Loading...
1995-09-05 CC Packet City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 1, 1995 L TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting September 5, 1995 1. Agenda Item No. 5A. B.B. Gun Shooting Range Permit. As noted in the memo from Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety, the permit request is governed by City Ordinance No. 527, a copy of which is included in your packet FYI. The Cub Scouts have been granted permits in previous years, and the events have been staged without incident at both Camp Burnett and Johnson Elementary School. This request is considered routine and is recommended for approval by staff. tor 2. Agenda Item No. 5B. Interlocal Agreement for the Colleyville-Grapevine-Southlake (CGS) Teen Court, between the cities of Colleyville, Grapevine, and Southlake and the Grapevine-Colleyville and Southlake Carroll Independent School Districts, will be a renewal of the previous contract which technically expired on August 31. The CGS Teen Court program has been highly successful, and is looked upon as a model by other communities. The only major change in the agreement is in Sections 5 and 9, which provides that the Teen Court Coordinator shall be employed by the City of Southlake as an exempt (for FLSA purposes) employee. In previous years, with the City of Southlake Teen Court program and last year's CGS Teen Court Program, the Teen Court Coordinator was hired by the City of Southlake as a contract employee. The change is being made this year in the FLSA coverage status of the Teen Court Coordinator in order to give employee benefits to the position. Establishing the position as a regular employee (rather than contract) will provide stability with the position. It will also give greater control over the activities of the Coordinator given the legal requirements necessary to maintain status as a contract employee. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and other Items of Interest September 1, 1995 Page 2 The decision was made by the Teen Court Budget Advisory Committee to have the Coordinator be our employee given our experience with the program. The contract provides $6,500 from each of the five participating jurisdictions, which will cover the salary and benefits of the position plus a small operations budget. This is an increase of $500 from last year in the contract amount. Since the incumbent in this position will be an employee of the City of Southlake, we will be following our employment procedures--which means we have posted the position internally prior to advertising outside. We had several qualified applicants express interest, and two have actually applied. According to the contract, the selection of the Teen Court Coordinator is subject to the majority approval of the Budget Advisory Committee (the City Managers and the School Superintendents) and the Municipal Court (10 Judges. The contract on your agenda has been approved by the City of Grapevine and the Carroll and Colleyville-Grapevine Independent School Districts. The contract is also on the City of Colleyville City Council consent agenda Tuesday, September 5. 3. Agenda Item No. C. Award of Bid for the Construction of Sanitary Sewer to North Davis Business Park. The memo from Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works, succinctly explains the item. If approved by City Council, this sewer line will help relieve an existing ground water problem in the area. Funds are budgeted in the Utility Fund. 4. Agenda Item No. 7A. Ordinance No. 642, 2nd Reading. Establishing Speed Zones and School Cross Zones. The format of the ordinance has changed somewhat since the first reading of the ordinance, but there has been no substantive change. The ordinance in your CIF packet sets the speed limits on F.M. 1938 at 45 mph as requested by TxDOT, and on N. White Chapel from F.M. 1709 to the northern end at 40 mph. By not addressing the remainder of White Chapel, the ordinance effectively reduces the speed limit on S. White Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and other Items of Interest September 1, 1995 Page 3 Chapel from F.M. 1709 to Continental to 30 mph. The ordinance also sets the school crossing zone speed limits. 5. Agenda Item No. 78. Ordinance No. 647. 2nd Reading. Setting the Municipal Tax Rate for FY95-96. As the memo in your packet from Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance, points out, the Tax Rate Ordinance if approved by City Council will set the tax rate at $0.42200, with $0.26285 dedicated for M&O and $0.15915 for debt. 6. Agenda Item No. 7C. Ordinance No. 468. 2nd Reading. adopting the FY1995-96 Annual budget. We are working on the final details of the budget summary sheets; the changes as approved by City Council will be incorporated and handed out at the meeting. Please bring your budget documents to the meeting Tuesday night. We will go over the highlights of the budget, including the changes suggested by City Council, in our presentation prior to the Public Hearing. 7. Agenda Item No. 7D. Resolution No. 95-35. Revision to Fee Schedule. The resolution lists all fees charged which have not been otherwise established by ordinance. The fees which have been recommended to increase, or which have otherwise been added, have been highlighted. 8. Agenda Item No. 7E. Ordinance No. 649. 2nd Reading. establishing Administrative Departments. My thoughts on this item are the same as those that have been set out in the memo from Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager. There is no need for me to add to her points. I will, however, point out here what I have included in the packet under agenda Item No. 10F as the cover memo: one of the top priorities listed in the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan is the establishment of a parks and recreation department directly under the supervision of the City Manager. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and other Items of Interest September 1, 1995 L. Page 4 9. Agenda Item No. 8A. Ordinance No. 480-179 (ZA 95-73). Zone change. Solana Residential PUD. The original submittal by Maguire Thomas Partners (MTP) included two components, this residential PUD and a non-residential PUD which was tabled and is currently being considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The overall proposal is to rezone the one large commercial PUD into the two components noted. As you are aware, the residential PUD is limited in number of single family units to 2.18 units per gross acre (199 acres) for a maximum of 434 total units. The proposal does include approximately 36 acres of"alternative living" units, generically called multifamily. The density of the apartments is limited to 12 units per acre, with no more than 50% of the units to have an area less than 850 square feet. The multifamily is located at the north end of the project, adjacent to Corps of Engineer land, Kirkwood Branch and the existing IBM complex in the Solana development. Ancillary uses (uses other than the principle use) are allowed within a PUD, not to exceed 10% of the gross land area. They are proposing ancillary uses in a limited area at the northeast corner of Kirkwood and Dove. There was some sensitivity on behalf of adjacent residents to the ancillary uses, however these seemed to be mitigated at P&Z with the limited uses and the location as now proposed. One important aspect of this proposal is that there is no road or drive access intended to White Chapel anywhere along this development. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 6-0-1. The issues related to this proposal are complex. I encourage you to call or meet with Greg Last or Karen Gandy prior to the meeting if you have questions concerning the issues related to this proposal if you can find the time. We have received several inquiries/comments concerning the multifamily, particularly related to the article in the Southlake Journal. However, there has been relative quiet in 1„ comparison with major rezoning in the past i.e., Coventry, Timarron, etc. Be aware that the City Council discussions on this development will be used by some to establish the fact on record of the City's official position on apartments, including low and moderate income Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and other Items of Interest September 1, 1995 L Page 5 housing. Caution is urged in what you say on the record. I am not concerned with MTP, but others who are paying attention. (See my comments in memo Item No. 28 below.) 10. Agenda Item No. 8B. ZA 95-76 Preliminary Plat. Village Center (Kroger). There have been some concerns raised by residents of Woodland Heights subdivision concerning this plat. The original submittal by the developer proposed that the public street crossing the development (Village Center Drive) be aligned with Westwood Drive and include a signalized intersection. Staff had discussed the positive and negative aspects of such an alignment with the developer before their submittal. It seemed plausible that the signalized intersection would benefit the residents of Woodland Heights due to the expected traffic in the future and the difficulty that they would have entering and exiting onto FM 1709 without a signal light. According to feedback received by staff, the residents clearly do Lre not want Village Center Drive to align with Westwood. The developer presented P&Z with an alternative plat providing for an offset alignment and the P&Z recommended approval of this plan (the one before you) by a vote of 5-2. The other issue raised at P&Z concerned pad sites along FM 1709. This issue has many facets. The principle negative impact of many pad sites along 1709 is the traffic congestion and turning movements into and out of the pad sites. An alternative you might want to consider would be limiting their full access driveways to only internal access off their loop road. (Note: This is not a plat issue. Drive access would be appropriately discussed at the Concept Plan review stage.) Greg Last points out that one positive aspect of pad sites, if done correctly, is that they would break up the monotony of the "sea of parking lot" that we are concerned about. It is somewhat a philosophical discussion about which is the lesser of two evils. Greg Last, Bob Whitehead and Ron Harper met with TxDOT last week to discuss a variety of issues relating to signalization along FM 1709 and driveways. Staff will discuss some of these points at the work session prior to the meeting next week, particularly the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and other Items of Interest September 1, 1995 L Page 6 State's comments concerning the 430' offset. TxDOT told staff that the offset as approved by P&Z is undesirable, and also that if there is a signal at the offset road out of Village Center, there will never be a signal at Westwood. FYI, Kroger has said it will meet the requirements of the Corridor Study. It is readily apparent, however, that Kroger is legally exempted from the Corridor Study requirements under the provisions of Section 481.143 of the Government Code. Therefore, do not ask the question unless you want the attorney to respond on the record. 11. Agenda Item No. 8C. ZA 95-80. Preliminary Plat. Cambridge Place. This is the Farrar tract which the City rezoned to SF-20 a few years ago. An important aspect of this proposal which was not forwarded from P&Z (due to the case-limit resolution) is a portion of proposed rezoning from I-1 to SF-20 at the north end of Greenlee Business Park. This portion, if approved, would provide an east access point for the residential subdivision to South Kimball. This portion should be before City Council at the meeting on September 19. The concept plan for this connection is attached to the memo from Karen Gandy for your reference. There are no significant issues with the remainder of this plat proposal. There are some staff review comments concerning the length of cul-de-sacs although the extent of the noncompliance is not large. One issue to consider is the need for a street connection to Continental at the south. Applicant does not want to provide the connection due to the unsightliness of the industrial user along Continental. Staff is recommending a connection from either Continental, or westerly from the southernmost cul-de-sac, to provide for an adequate road connection for public safety. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0. Late this afternoon, we received a letter signed by Douglas Tatum with Napa Valley, hand delivered by Art Clayton, which expresses opposition to the Cambridge Place Addition Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and other Items of Interest September 1, 1995 L Page 7 item before you. Staff has not had time to review the letter. We will have comments by Tuesday night. The letter is attached hereto for your review. 12. Agenda Item No. 8D. ZA 95-81. Plat Revision. Myers Meadow. There are no unresolved issues with this plat revision. The developer, Fred Joyce, has found that he needs to add area to a lot in order to have an adequate buildable area. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval 7-0. 13. Agenda Item No. 8E. ZA95-70. Plat Showing. Lots 1.2.3. W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition. Located on north side of F.M. 1709 approximately 350' east of Randol Mill Ave. This proposal includes three pad sites. It is our understanding that John Drews has Schlotzky's sandwich store interested in the easternmost lot. This proposal is a good example of the difficulty we may have with pad sites along the corridor. Drews property does not have western access across Mrs. Brown's property to Randol Mill Avenue. I believe her daughter owns the property that Mr. Drews is purchasing. The plat itself is basically clean with regard to staff comments. The driveway ordinance could impact the plat depending on how the access drives will work out. Staff has made the applicant aware of these potential concerns via comments on the review summary. Driveways are not an item to discuss on a plat other than the impact they might have on common access easements (CAE). It has been staff's position to only require CAE's where a lot may not otherwise be permitted drive access to the street due to the driveway ordinance limitations. Any other internal access the developer desires would be handled privately through the use of reciprocal easement agreements (REA). The concept plan for the development has been submitted for review by P&Z on 9/5/95. A copy of the concept plan is attached to the memo from Karen Gandy for your reference. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the plat 6-0. This item was previously tabled at the 8/15/95 City Council meeting at the request of John Drews. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and other Items of Interest September 1, 1995 Page 8 14. Agenda Item No. 9A. Resolution No. 95-35. clarifying the Southlake Parks. Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan. This action is requested of City Council by staff in order to satisfy requirements of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department in the priority ranking of our grant application. As background, recall that we submitted a grant application with TPWD in January, 1995, to receive funds to purchase the remainder of West Beach. At the end of February, we received notification from TPWD that our Master Plan had several items "which do not appear to meet the program guidelines." Kim McAdams, Park Project Manager, immediately contacted TPWD and asked for a clarification. At the end of March, we received a master plan review that suggests how to receive priority points in the application process. We provided information to TPWD, but were told that grant application for land purchase only would not receive the highest priority. We were still hopeful that we would receive consideration for the Spring 1995 funding cycle (to be awarded in August), and began preparation for the next cycle (to be awarded in January, 1996). We received notification Monday, August 28, that TPWD staff recommended no funding to the Parks and Wildlife Commission, which met yesterday. We have worked through the process with the Parks and Recreation Board to address the concerns regarding our Master Plan. We are hoping to address the requirement for official City Council action with the resolution, since the amendment/update of the Master Plan will be an extended, major process. Meantime, we are exploring other ways to strengthen our application resubmittal, which must be done by the end of September. 15. Agenda Item No. 9C. Resolution No. 95-36, appointing members to a committee to study the feasibility of splitting the Planning and Zoning Commission, is as directed by City Council during the budget work session last Tuesday. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and other Items of Interest September 1, 1995 Page 9 16. Agenda Item No. 10A. Developers Agreement for La Paloma Estates. This agreement is relatively straight-forward. The developer is paying the required park dedication fees and perimeter road fees as well as the pro-rata contribution for the off-site culvert. There are no off-site or sewer pro-rata requirements. Note the language in Section IC reference the escrow of funds, as suggested by City Council. We are experiencing continuing difficulty with this provision with another developer, which we will discuss in executive session. Note the language in Section IIC and F regarding the private streets and gates. FYI, in a related matter. reportedly, this morning we had a C.I.S.D. bus with children on board locked in behind a gate, unable to get out after gaining entry in the gated portion of Monticello Phase III. Needless to say C.I.S.D. has requested a meeting to express concerns. I hope to have more details to report Tuesday night. 17. Agenda Item No. 10B. Special Commercial Developer Agreement for McDonald's Corporation at S.H. 114 and Kimball Ave. As pointed out in the memo from Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works, the additional consideration requested by the developer concerning the driveway and buffer yards appear appropriate to their situation and the intent of our requirements. 18. Agenda Item No. 10C. Request for Sign Variance. Bank United. 1460 W. Southlake Blvd. The information included in your packet should provide City Council information necessary to consider the request. 19. Agenda Item No. 10D. Bids for Dove Creek Drainage Channel Improvements in Summerplace Addition. The memo from Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works, points out that the bids received were almost twice the estimated cost. There are a number Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and other Items of Interest September 1, 1995 Page 10 of factors cited, but basically Eddie Cheatham, our consulting engineer, is stating that because the project is so small it was not conducive to aggressive competitive bids. Staff has recommended that City Council reject the bids and re-bid the project next winter for a summer 1996 construction. Note, however, that the item is listed on the agenda so that you can accept or reject. Eddie Cheatham, in his analysis of the bids (pg. 10D-3) points out that the cost after rebid is likely to be $120-130,000. Given the delays that have been involved with this project (most outside the City's ability to control), City Council may want to consider moving forward with the project. There is no guarantee that the rebid will be any less. We do not have any major drainage projects to package with this one during 1996; thus, the economy of scale will not be available. r This project has been discussed with City Council since 1990. 20. Agenda Item No. 10E. City of Southlake petition to appear before TxDOT Commission concerning the reconstruction of S.H.114. Note the attached memos from Michael Weaver, our highway consultant on the S.H. 114 project. Weaver will be here for our Council meeting Tuesday night. Whether we go forward on the 28th of September or not, it is imperative that we join with the City of Fort Worth and others in a Tarrant and Johnson coalition to pursue S.H. 114 funding. This project can be discussed in executive session prior to the open public discussion. 21. Agenda Item No. 10F. Appointment of Director of Parks and Recreation. As pointed out in my memo to you in the packet, and hereinabove, the establishment of_a Park and Recreation Department with a Director has been part of an organization plan we have been working toward since the adoption of our Park Master Plan. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and other Items of Interest September 1, 1995 Page 11 Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager, has worked more closely with Kim McAdams than I have, and Shana recommends Kim for the position. I trust and value Shana's opinion. Based on what I have observed, based on feedback I have received from people in the community who have spoken to me regarding Kim, and based on her background, I believe Kim will make an excellent Park and Recreation Director. When we recruited for the Park Project Manager, we had a number of Park Directors other than Kim apply for the position because they were aware of the potential growth in Southlake for Parks and Recreation. Obviously we felt Kim was most qualified at the time. We still do. I have included behind this memo Shana's memo to me regarding Kim's promotion, a copy of Kim's resume brief, and a copy of the proposed job description. Should you agree with my appointment of Kim McAdams as Director of Park and Recreation, it is sufficient to record your approval with the vote reflected in the minutes. 22. Agenda Item No. 11A. Planning and Zoning Commission. relief from case-limiting resolution. The Planning and Zoning Commission would like for the City Council to consider removing the P&Z from the limitations of the recently passed resolution concerning limiting cases. It is their preference to proceed through all cases as submitted, regardless of the time of discussion. Should the City Council be receptive to this request, staff will bring forward another resolution for your consideration. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST L 23. Speaking of Parks...The Southlake Parks and Recreation Board has developed goals/objectives and action plans for the upcoming budget year, which are attached to this • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and other Items of Interest September 1, 1995 L Page 12 memo for your information. The Park Board has worked diligently to plan for the upcoming year, and has developed a "liaison" program (which essentially assigns Park Board members to specific areas of responsibility) to strengthen the staff/board member partnership for meeting these goals. I am confident that the elements of this action plan will be accomplished during the coming year. 24. SPIN Update. The SPIN Standing Committee recently began the goal-setting process for the coming year. The Committee will be working to finalize goals and objectives during September and hope to present their plan to you during a joint meeting scheduled for October 26, 1995. 25. Recycle Bin Cover Distribution. Keep Southlake Beautiful has proceeded with purchasing the hard recycle bin covers, as discussed previously with City Council. Volunteers will be distributing the covers on September 5 and September 8. KSB has invited the City Council to a kick-off of the distribution of the lids on Tuesday, September 5, 7:00 a.m., at the Albertson's at F.M. 1709 and Davis. Volunteers have been lined up to deliver the lids. Residents on the east of White Chapel will get their lids on Friday, those on the west on Tuesday. 26. Southlake Association of Volunteers (SAV) Update. Attached you will find a resignation letter from Vicki J. Johnson, who has served as Director of SAV since its inception. As noted during the budget process, staff proposes to fill this position by assigning the responsibility to the Administrative Assistant included in the Park budget. FYI, Ms. Johnson has developed much of the preliminary work needed to get the program running. The City is appreciative of all of her hard work! ,,. 27. Special newsletter. Work has begun to prepare another special edition newsletter, estimated delivery in late October. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and other Items of Interest September 1, 1995 L Page 13 In addition to the items we normally include, we would like to include brief statements from councilmembers. We suggest that each member of the City Council write short statements discussing your individual views for the coming fiscal year. Shana Yelverton will be coordinating this effort, and will be contacting you soon for your input. 28. Earlier this week I received a telephone call from Mark Leach with the Business Section of the Downtown Edition of the Star-Telegram concerning a report commissioned by the Tarrant County Home Builders' Association regarding impact fees accessed developers by cities in Northeast Tarrant County. According to Leach, the upshot of the report is that cities are using impact fees to artificially inflate housing costs and thereby reduce the likelihood that lower priced housing (including low income housing) will be constructed. Again according to Leach, the survey indicates that Southlake has the second highest Cry developer fees in Tarrant County (only Keller is higher). The Home Builders' Association has been challenging the developer fees in Northeast Tarrant County for several years. They have apparently started their campaign to lobby the next regular legislative session. I believe that Leach will have an article in the paper either this weekend or next week. He asked me for comments, and I asked for the opportunity to review the study before commenting. The Home Builders' Association refused to release the study to me for review at this time. It is evident that part of their strategy will include the exclusionary nature of our development. It is also noteworthy that in the last six months (and as recently as last month) that I have received a number of telephone calls from unidentified callers wanting to know what our policy is on low-cost housing. I have reported this to you before. My standard response is that the market drives housing developments in Southlake. This is why I am concerned ( ,, with any comments regarding low-cost or subsidized housing. Each phone call that I have received from residents concerned with the Solana residential development has centered on the fear of low-cost housing including Section 8 housing. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and other Items of Interest September 1, 1995 L Page 14 29. Upcoming Events: - Public Safety Auction to be conducted at City Hall, September 9, 1995, 10:00 a.m. - I will be leaving late Friday, September 15 to attend an ICMA conference in Colorado. I will return early afternoon on Tuesday, September 19. - Construction of the Adventure Alley playground begins September 19. Upon my return from the ICMA conference, I will be working from can-to-can't until the project is completed. Other staff have volunteered some of their time. If you can volunteer to help, please contact the Adventure Alley hotline at 595-6554. tiw Irt0CE C:\W P51\CEH&CC\95-09-05.MTG L 09/01/1995 15:10 2143859808 PAGE 01 09/01/1995 14:56 917-424-0664 CLAYTON COMPANY R E PAGE 01 4hre RECEIVED SEP - 1 1995 CITY SECRETARY September 1 , 1995 City Council Members City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: ZA 95-80 Cambridge Place Addition ZA 95-78 Greenlee Business Park ZA 95-79 Zoning & Concept Plan Southlake, Texas Dear Council Members: • I am opposed to development of Cambridge Place Addition and am filing this letter of opposition. I believe my opposition will require a super majority vote for approval of the development of this land. To date no Developer, Engineer, Planner , or City Official has called or written me concerning the above referenced cases . My concern and opposition are for the following reasons: 1.. The impact on the Drainage and Critical Drainage Structure @ (hoe Carrol and Continental, 2. The necessity of Road Repair for Carlisle Road, 3. Sewer Extension along Continential , 4. Spot Zoning along South Kimball Avenue, end 5. Poor circulation of traffic in this Addition . As you can see, my concerns are far reaching. It is my belief that this one tract of land embodies all of the issues that were the focal point of the past election. I ask that you study the issues relating to this Development prior to any approval or turn this plan down. My representative Arthur R. Clayton will attend the meeting and expand on my concerns. Sincerely, OUGLAS 1154 NAPA VALLEY attachment L __-—---- - - -, —01%----- II ,,,.% I 1 ett. ...,:,1„.:.,:,.,.ii.,;,.,-,,,,,,,,,„ Du thlak , .1, OF F -,,.,,,„,,,..,,,,, . 4'112.'..:0'1.L,I V.l'y3ilm•.'IV.4-,•,;.: II S 0 UT HLAKE • , -__ _ ..,. 11 LAND USE PLAN tt :11 2.— •::':...1 ai:;..iltivIlliiii,, , ,.,1'ff;11..,',,,,,„,I,,.i.:,, :,r., „r.,,:......,q ..P../. •/,` I I 11 . A' 1994 41.) '., r:,::.:,,:1•,:,;i;..,1,'.,0,:. '-1'. '460BUDBY N TT COUNCIL t 15 . ' ,.I'-:-l'lj.,'-1il,;,;•.:1:,,,I,.,';t'-i•,l'i1'i'..''.'".,.I,tl'.,,i.•.,.i'.. , .0. el 4. ,• ;,- ''f•,,J.,,,--" • 1, ,,,i-1..... •,,o, k k -, f '1. I! If 4.0..4 1J.--.........r... --C. ' II‘i'‘1'11t';I::II;'3'.Ii:,-IItrf427. _41i1V., 14''; 4. .i1w1 1 tpe p • t 1i 41,2 Cgk.bi.'".'".4,15-ttIJ .1 , \s' ".." :".....ika.I.rj.':..' liimmt.i- . \. 'I 140 d4,4. •,',•-•,' II. ' '‘l • ''i'lli.,., ;)-/I .'' '` 1 '.------ ,..•Itc-‘...' .. .1'.i,'11 ...r.„‘ .....' .‘• • J...:,11 ''. .1 I • \ '-''''''f^. .';•!•?,it.:1'40'.:1It '..1.1`.;.. • ; 'I•I )-''"---' '-.:. .id '-' ' L - 14 •II- • i -' ltViit;:11'li It-.:.:i S. !.1 ,,, ., , ..6m : 4, ,....,. e ,.--,i ILMID j — - 7-7-- 71 \A' 111. ''. 141', .1,.. . ••,. , , vi-,--,,:!,- 4311,k... ,,;..:,-. ,,, , 41 i 4,-, . ..,k ;...`-'-'`........,/ il .. ` •••..-Iti.I:: . i I ••••••••• bOUTHLAKE CITY UNIT '---11 '1. jr1 \'7•-'1F•le". iiirilgAt.' ". 4, ''' ‘.‘:..;•:,::-Mr' .\,.=._...-.... .ii ;.'. .' ' 41.'''' .M.Octwoui.1‘...' I• r—I 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN 1, '"`.. ...:.0.,;•,,,i;a:th ,k, •.. ,.../ r.,774 CORP OF ENGINE.ERS BOUNDARY ____„..„..i..i..-.. sil ,irmirt:vasc.r1, war., • ' it k ',. t• 11 - I • '• c. I. ",,. S tt '. ' • I I III puBur PARKS / OPEN SPACE , '1 ," iill ;WI 1....'1'1,411 'L,,,,,y1,4:,_,,..j.,,,,,u, ' '' . 1,1•Ff Li_ : _. . I i. , . _....... .v \‘ •-•I NI I 1 ti.4-4 PuBuc / SLIII-PUBUC I IIN A 1 ....'• i!,:.-4*. • i .. 1. •ts- - ----."'" • ' 117 • -- r_. , j.i...!, I i I ---- LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL :r-•--r •o.,'.•--0( 1 i' 1 'It I 1 ,11. ,tt'i,-,IA4a, , .. „ , . f . r, 'gm V V ( • --J - - '%„' -........... • • r. ': SA*. C.' .....:,..:.. .....:.......` 1 I 1 f .. L. '. l '0 1 .1 F-771 MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL :' i.:(---‘'':>-A .:.i'II: '-''''IL I;41121.--!;-11.1j7-4, 'lit,. • 111 MIXED USE , I . .1:, d',11'13}%1• '"."i-r.'''V1"'•' ••.•,;.'r . .... . '1 • I J i i :.•',1.: , :i N ' 1111'-•,„ '''- 1' ,1.;,44'00*.'1, 2..9::i'l • , • • .•;-I'\JI , i ',p-4(1( • ••f' ,.f'. 't,ik." `4.." ...,1•••%.....ii , ,111ti..., I INDI'SERIAL = ''''rt ".',' Ill .t..W..12VILI-1..” FItt.V.0....,1 .'.. ..• A) i '4k, ' „ ,, •-‘ ,.''e x. ti - 7 II I..Ii It. / • A • ' ;TIM; ~41--Ilf-rtPa,),tei,M-)3"ii..,I• ' _, L/1 ' .11•-4) II ;'' • '...--./ I • ,_._,..J , _•'IIIill• . '1 I I ,;•thif!,-1 ........--,..f,qiirdri ii-,'ItI:,', ..--,,i.. : 141014a40• 1,,,t.."i:,.,, c I ,. • 6. ,,til**14.,i-,L IL • •u-. 4 ' li •ic,' /1)11 i I ... sx,,,,,, .1. ‘,,,. (..z. ; -.., .., ,- - -81 c-c--1 . I,..c,...,... .. • 314 re if— ' I -1,,,•,,,.--.•,. .... 4--------1 , 4-----,' _._, 1;;-,;••;;•;•.,;•.- :10,, . .,-:::'.!..1,„,44. - „. ,-;....4,,;..,.,..:_g4,..4.• ,,,,•:,.....:!.:, - ... .; .... . : .---.-.,1 ,• • ,,,.. 1! .k••• :•;•;•,.-. ;,.1,,..;';;;;':;•'• ",' ;. '. .. , t.' -'.' . ‘.. , ' '.....;.;...• ...--;.:,.. . ,..... ..,.,.,...\/,‘,... , •,,. .. Fr,,,,,-.• 1,:. , C_...i, • ., 4 1 1 '•••' ... ..' '•; .i.• .,I....::,• 'is,'"ei ,.....,.,:.;:: ...-„T-T--_, . -....„.,,,,,--,..,. -.;............I II — .,....:,...., ...1:-, 1.-_-_-_--'1 .;/-"6-;' i'--,--4••• -..... • '. 1 FO IP ,.,;'.:•,'•7,',; k..,,,t,,,... I• k.... . . .. r7y ill ... .1 \\. „....,.,.„,,. .„.. ._,..,.........: . .,., . t: .. .. ,...., _. , . . . .,.. .,.„:. r ,(L., 1, .1 , „ . .. .. , ..... .. . . .. , . __..... _ . -) . ' ' .:,.: ''t,- •-• -17- --'-•-• --.-' '* • ' ':.; • .... , ..; . .. ,.•:•.,;,L • —)1___-''' icuril"'":"...1—'.—.-.--1--__. .., .-c-=... • 1/"C4C. yp.„,.. i t-04 -,--t,-..--_.-- . _.s.......,.- :..,,,f1. ..13 . ... ...._ . . .. . 1 ), \, •4•"-. ' • i.i...•• , 1•,' • ': .,•: '•=--,.'. L"--I-....'.-, • : . I f 1 - - ''.'s • ',. • ...s4 ; ‘•• ;- II - '7"...--LI'L' III• • :I II ' . • s.' 1 - i (• --;r 1 ..•LI L .1 L .: '414416\ I.:' . / ' II / 7 I t i •—••'444"- -7\ . . ,. . • " - ,-.' .1 . ,, . . , .. • 1 . .. i...........,__ I-.] ., ( . ,.... ,.. 1, , . . . 1. ( .. ..,... . . .11 , ,. , .6 ft_ • • . • . .. . .. .."- •out . •,•••tl ; 4 , _ _— •• ...". 613 ;.. ••-,••• •;• • - • • 4 , , loth....!join, ; illay.1.. ii, .0- '•I I. ' 11 Ulf 1 I . ,IIIINIIIIII 3 .. •. ..,.. ... , .., . ... . • I. , . . . . , . ......... .. . . ..-In ....Li .0-.0. ... ' ... ,. , N : . . . I / . ,.R....I. . ' _ ) I ) h 'II - ___ / --...,, L ... ...._______ _____._._ _ . ....----- i "I c. .. i H _ f ili a F k P7 n Lz < illlilist]] to ill till lls . 1 F.v o e im pi .1 14 ill h sss� 41 its 1r •' 1 'iFstrt s1llI11i1 0 grFi 4 t 1 6 Np Z " oz :.'.1 •' ! A aq eIN o - ii ; il �di ! i 'iii l ail la z r< : z P° x oe U a ..- Ittl 1 ; =`k S 1 tto W . :off ">"` 7 ;111 ,-i. tu„ l-t,:-.. 1 i! . i I, M iiiii III rillti W-• —.\a i I j N aAV 11VSPHI)I HILIOS 1,---- i g I ---- _LZ'LZ► 3 .f2.L0.00 f a as � - Tim- 1 9.71{- 1 R �\ 7! IM W .. 2 1 h i. III t' ow i..)2 Iri) --Dg----__r, ;II 1 > ii gilt: i �o I y 4 -IC/tad 0 , .f �\ —��'off— —7 I / n o mdS 0c0 . ' y� I �� `, FyB �rl • 'gam t j"...1- 1 • a• y=2 7 10g? II g;"Z -;.1 -to ' I k mil ;11 J Jr. \ flML ) - ~ ; - ^ .:1xL6 s f/ y y ' 2_..- I 1 W " Oh o N n. , 41 , _ O 1 N n; I I III 1., "' f H ' c 1 1 1:Pit\-1'7.— — -7' j ' - t V biltSt A.....;.R = — — L ,,, ;m_ ( _ >n=_ , __T — .tE ZZ� A 00 N 1 s 3n rt{ . . p-va i LS L- 1 N L ti ....„--\ ,_ ., ..., -__4::------ ,,,i! , t \�_ -n A' , Off' Yt,W `�\ ' 4j '"��'......,.., .., W 5.. ....,.........-,.."-.....„..„.„ N.1 OW Z. IM �1 n.a = e 1 T OQ �l �-�< —"'-'"'-.E—i7 _ T__ N\ \_._1A.____-UI /'\ ate_ I From the desk of VICKI J. JOHNSON home address: 1208 Timber Court Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 488-6195 August 21, 1995 City Manager's Office 667 N. Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 ATTN: Shana Yelverton Dear Shana; It is with regret that I must tender my resignation as Director of Southlake Association of Volunteers, effective immediately. As you are aware, my life situation has undergone some drastic changes over the last few months. I have returned to the work force and thus am unable to dedicate the hours required to successfully operate the Association. I truly regret having to leave this position, as it has been extremely rewarding to take what was once merely a concept and begin the steps of actualization. Being involved has also afforded me the opportunity of working with some truly wonderfully gifted and dedicated people, yourself being at the top of the list! I have tried to leave everything as organized as possible, so that the next Director will be able to step in and assume control quickly and smoothly. I would like to offer a few suggestions that I feel would make the job much easier and certainly more efficient. ► In order to attract someone with the right qualifications and dedication to the job, the position must be salaried. Not only is the job extremely time- consuming, but it also requires a knowledge and expertise that few'volunteers' are able to offer (myself included). ► A computer and good data base is a defmite must. Speaking from experience, it is extremely difficult to manage all of the paperwork and data without one ( immediately at-hand. ► In order to become a viable part of the community, the Volunteer Association needs an operating budget. I would recommend beginning with $10,000 (in addition to salary). There are many more programs and services that could be offered if the Association had enough funds with which to operate: Kids Who Care (ages 7-12); Teen Club (ages 13-18); a more active Senior Program; more extensive advertising; mailings and publications, etc. The list could go on and on, but I think you have the general idea. I will be happy to meet with you to review what has been accomplished thus far, suggest other ideas, and to help begin the search for someone to fill the position. Once that person comes on-line, I will also make myself available to offer whatever help I might be able to provide. Please call me, either at home in the evenings, or at work (214) 261-0000, to set up a meeting at your convenience. Shana, I really hate to do this, but sometimes Life requires us to travel down a different road from the one we would choose. I have really enjoyed the work I've done with the Association and will truly miss it. I want to thank you, especially, for all of the help, guidance and patience you've shown over the past several months. I can only hope that you understand my position, and that my leaving will not create too much of a hardship on you and the others in the City Manager's office. Thank you for everything you've done. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Sincerely, aaj Vicki J. Johnson L ,o ' 08-28-1995 05:23PM FROM TO 18174886796 P.01 CONFIDENTIAL MEMO • • TO: Curtis Hawk • DATE: August 28, 1995 City of Southlake • FROM: Michael J.Weaver • Prime Strategies, Inc. • • As requested in our meeting last Thursday, I have attempted to summarize the myriad number of issues surrounding the timing and success of our request for SH 114 construction funding. r've limited this memorandum to three broad areas - TxDOT funding, Project Development Plan (PDP) approval and timing, and some type of western Metroplex area Coalition -which I can discuss with the City Council in more • detail on September 5th. PRIME TxDOT Funding STRATEGIES, INC. We continue to hear about TXDOT's limited funding and their ability to meet only 46% of their currently planned projects. Within this funding crisis,there are two other aspects 1712 Rio Grande St. which are affecting projects being completed. The first is available State gas tax dollars. Austin.Texas 78701 TxDOT has committed 100%state funds to several significant construction projects such as the North Central Expressway(over$1.0 billion). Second,when ISTEA was passed, voice 512.474.6246 several of the federal funding categories increased the local match requirement from fax 474_5458 (kW 10%to 20%or 30%. Compounding this State funding crunch,TxDOT policy has been to use only State funds for.right-of-way acquisition, not wanting to get involved with Federal rules and regulations. Right-of-way acquisition Is one factor slowing down the SH 114 improvements. The State's available right-of-way funding has been significantly reduced during the last several years. Right-of-way acquisition along SH 114,from Dove Road to BS 114-L is estimated at cost over$10.5 million. In the coming budget,that represents close to 8% of the entire State right-of-way budget. A shortage of right-of-way funds, limited construction dollars if TxDOT had the right-of-way,and higher priorities, are why SH 114 improvements have not progressed since the City went to the Commission in 1993. • Project Development Plan • The Commission is scheduled to adopt the PDP this Thursday,August 31, 1995. The t ww PDP fvltll a I tub Nivjei D ii i two 44tegorie e:the 9-year section containing projects with construction funding committed,and the 7-year section,with projects included for development(i.e.,feasibility,environmental,design,right-of-way acquisition). Right now it looks like the•Commission is only going to approve the 3-year construction program on Thursday. While there is controversy over the construction program because of funding, there are greater political issues surrounding the 7-year program, where projects have disappeared completely. SH 114 is not scheduled for any construction funding over the next 3 years, but is included in the 7:year section for further project development. We are continuing to work on getting at least one project with construction tunds in the 3-year program. I don't know whether this late political push can make a (kr difference. 08-28-1995 05:24PM FROM TO 18174886796 P.02 CONFIDENTIAL The-PDP construction selection criteria used by TxDOT staff never gave SH 114 a Lie chance. Based on existing traffic,when the project would be ready for construction,and the category of funds available to the project, SH 114 did not rank high enough to be included. The Citys offer could tip the scales and convince them to fund$10.0 million or so. This raises two issues. First, would the Commission, after adopting their program, change it several months later to fund $10.0- $20.0 million for the City of Southiake. Probably not, since they would have to drop another project. I think this Commission would commit to priority right-of-way acquisition and accept the City's offer to prepare the construction plans,but would not be able to commit construction funding until they review the PDP next summer. Second,the staff could probably find a way to move$10.0 million next year. I don't think they can fund $20.0 - $30.0 million which is what is really needed on SH 114. This means priorities,both locally and In Austin, must be set if we go to the Commission on September 28th, I would recommend the City limit its request and focus on your highest priority-the Kimball Road interchange. I've prepared a more detailed memorandum on the Kimball Road issues, schedule and budget for your use. Regional Coalition There is an effort underway to build a coalition of Cities and private sector interests in the western half of the Metroplex to counteract the Dallas Mobility Coalition. It has become obvious to a number of elected officials in Tarrant and Johnson Counties that a disproportionate amount of TxDOT dollars are going to Dallas. TxDOTs number one project in the Metroplex is SH 190. There is a commitment to complete that freeway because of the strong political effort by the Dallas Mobility Coalition. Cie Without a doubt, a western coalition would identify SH 114 from Grapevine to IH-35W as the highest priority in this area. The City should consider participating in such a group that would provide both political and financial leverage. I think the SH 114 request would be more favorably considered as a group request than an individual one. If the Coalition is established,there has been discussion about going to the Commission in Spring 1996 with this group's own version of the PDP. With regional priorities agreed upon, and a political effort behind it, the Commission would have to adopt part, if not all, of the Coalition's request. I'd like to discuss this in more detail with you and the Council on September 5th. If all of the factors are weighted, there are two options to present to the Council. They are: • Go forward on September 28th with a modified request,establishing Kimball Road as the highest priority; or • Delay the September 28th appearance and regroup with the Coalition for a Spring 1996 appearance. I look forward to meeting with you and the Council to determine the best course of action and alternative strategies with TxDOT. 114SOU'1 Ii1114I SSU E.MO1 L 08-28-1995 05:25PM FROM TO 18174886796 P.03 • • MEMO • • • TO: Curtis Hawk • DATE:August 28,1995 • City of Southlake FROM: Michael J.Weaver • Prime Strategies, Inc. • Should the City of Southlake choose to go forward with Its request to the.Texas Transportation Commission to establish SH 114 project priorities and provide local funds to TxDOT,I would recommend that the Kimball Road interchange be given the highest priority. The general request to TxDOT, replacing the existing 10% of right-of-way • commitment for all of SH 114 with a$1.0 million cash commitment,would be the same. However, as Indicated in the previous memorandum, because of limited construction dollars, the City's emphasis would be on relieving existing congestion and safety PRIME hazards by building the Kimball Road interchange. STRATEGIES, INC. The following is a schedule and estimated budget for this project, assuming TxDOT responded favorably to the City's request 1712 Rio Grande 51. • Austin,Texas 78701 • September 28, 1995 Texas Transportation . Commission (Ilsre • delegation appearance. voice 512.474.6246 fax 474.5458 • November 29/December 21, 1995 Commission issues tendered Minute Order, accepting City's proposal and . committing priority right-of-way funds and FY 97 construction dollars. . •• P • January 1996- December 1996 Right-of-way acquisition by TxDOT. There are 22 parcels to be acquired. Several involve relocation assistance and • at least half will end up in condemnation. We estimate the State's right-of-way costs to be$3.0 million. Urban parcels such as the ones around Kimball Road normally • take TxDOT 6-8 (six to eight) months to get to condemnation and then 4 (four) months with the Attorney General's Office to get through the Special Commissioners'Hearings. January 1996- February 1996 City goes through RFP process to select consultant for construction plans. We estimate an engineering fee of $600,000.00. • • 08-28-1995 05 25PM FROM• TO 18174886796 P.04 • February 1996 -September 1996 Construction plan preparation. We estimate the construction plans would take 7-8 (seven to eight) months to complete and submit the 95% complete plans to the Fort Worth District. • October 1996 District review of plans. • November 1996 Consultant corrects/modifies/completes plans. • December 1996-January 1997 District completes final review and submits to Austin Design Division for review and construction letting. • January 1997-April 1997 Austin Design Division review and construction letting. Construction bids accepted April 1997. • May 1997-July 1998 Construction, open to traffic Summer 1998. Construction detours and building this section to urban freeway under traffic conditions would take a minimum of 14 months to complete, at an estimated construction cost of$10.8 million. As you can sea from the schedule,the City would be expending over$600,000.00 in consultant engineering fees In 1996. One way to assure that the State could actually complete the right-of-way acquisition during 1996 would be for the City to help in that process. I know you don't want to get into condemnation cases with your local (re businesses, but the City could offer to help with the appraisal process (could save several months)by hiring the appraisers($1,600.00-$3,000.00 per parcel). Also,the City could help the Attorney General's office by hiring expert witnesses and providing outside counsel. If the City did all of these things, you might expend another $100,000.00 in 1996, which would leave $300,000.00± to use on other segments/projects on SH 114. The balance of your funds would probably be spent in 1997 and 1998 to accelerate Dove Road construction or other safety and capacity improvements identified by TxDOT. Should you have any questions or need additional information prior to the September 5th City Council meeting,please let me know. 1145 OUTIVKIMBAIL_M01 L TOTAL P.04 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 1, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Appointment of Director of Parks and Recreation As you know, the City Council's agenda includes the second reading of the ordinance to create a Department of Parks and Recreation. In conjunction with the ordinance change, I am recommending the promotion of Kim McAdams to the position of Director of Parks and Recreation. The City Charter requires that "The head of each department shall be a chief, director or superintendent who shall be appointed by the City Manager subject to the approval of the Council... " (Section 4.01) As previously described, Ms. McAdams' job responsibilities have steadily increased since coming to Southlake as the Park Project Manager. Compare her original job description (Exhibit A) with the "marked up" copy revising the position to a Director (Exhibit B). You will note that she is currently a) solely responsible for some of these added responsibilities, b) works closely with me on other responsibilities, or c) could easily perform the duties as described given her background (resume brief also attached as Exhibit C). Briefly stated, Kim McAdams has performed the essential functions of her job, as well as many other functions related to the efficient provision of parks and recreation services. During the year she has been employed by the City of Southlake, I have found Ms. McAdams to be an energetic and enthusiastic employee, who is knowledgeable of parks and recreation management practices. She has a strong reputation in the profession as a "park builder" who has a keen eye for building facilities with strong consideration for maintenance issues. She has demonstrated her ability to produce results, and she is tenacious in her pursuit of solutions to difficult problems. Ms. McAdams is a team player, who looks at the "big picture" rather than focusing exclusively on the park issues. In short, I believe Kim McAdams is highly qualified to serve as Director of Parks and Recreation. I will be happy to answer any specific questions you may have about her qualifications and/or performance as Park Project Manager. SKY L (lbw' Exhibit A PROJECT MANAGER Department : City Manager' s Office June 1994 Division: Park & Recreation Job Category: Administrative/Professional FLSA Designation: Exempt Reports To : City Manager/Assistant City Manager Basic Function: To oversee and track projects under development and construction in the Park and Recreation Division. Essential Job Functions (hoe- Work with planning consultants, architects, and engineers in the planning phase of projects . - Prepare or work with consultants to prepare specifications and cost estimates for projects . - Procure bids for projects and products . - Work closely with City Manager to implement park and recreation project plans . - Prepare and maintain appropriate records and reports . - Attend and participate in public functions and meetings . - Meet with Park and Recreation Board and Southlake Parks Development Corporation as needed. - Prepare and oversee all state and federal grant applications for the Park and Recreation Division. (16.' Other Job Functions Complete other duties as assigned. Performance Oualifications Knowledge/Skills/Abilities - Reading and interpreting architectural and engineering plans and specifications . - Recognizing acceptable construction practices in a variety of trades and crafts . - Recognizing quality of products and materials to ensure compliance with project plans and specifications . - Knowledge of principles and practices of public recreation and park construction. - Knowledge of sports, recreation facility concepts and designs . Cr- Knowledge and familiarity with grant process . Ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with City officials, co-workers, agencies, contractors, architects and engineers . - Ability to operate surveyor' s level and instrument . - Ability to visually inspect projects under construction throughout the City. - General PC skills and familiarity with WordPerfect, spreadsheet applications, and various project management software . Education/Experience/Training - Bachelor' s degree in related area and three to five years related experience required. - Graduate work in project management, planning, and/or management preferred. Conditions of Employment 75% indoors - Light (occasional lifting and carrying of objects up to 10 lbs . ; sitting most of the time) - Non-hazardous work - Frequent contact with the public, City Councilmembers, other City Departments, Park and Recreation Board, and Southlake Parks Development Corporation. - Broad assignments; little supervision required in following established procedures . Additional supervision required when completing tasks out of the ordinary. (kw Exhibit B DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION Department: City Manager's Office Parks & Recreation August 28, 1995 Division: Park& Rccrcation Job Category: Administrative/Professional FLSA Designation: Exempt Reports To: City Manager/Assistant City Manager Basic Function: Parks and Recreation Di_ ision Under broad general direction,responsible for planning, organizing, and management of parks and recreation services for the City including parks operations, development and maintenance, recreational planning and programming. Represents all aspects of the City's park and recreation activities to City Boards and Commissions, City Council, and various civic organizations and associates as well as outside agencies. Essential Job Functions - Hire, train and supervise department personnel and supervises various consultants and/or capital improvement projects of the Department.* - Oversees and directs preparation of fiscal budget(s) for the Parks and Recreation Department. Make presentations to City Council to justify planned expenses. Administer budget.* Set Department goals and objectives; establish priorities, deadlines and standards; measure accomplishments toward goals and objectives; determine corrective course of action when needed.** - Plan,promote and administer a comprehensive park, recreation and open space program for the City. Anticipate long-term community needs and communicates these needs to various Boards and Commissions, City Council and other groups as required. Develop long-range plans to address community needs.** Coordinates directly with and advises park and recreation related boards and citizen groups on programs, facilities,maintenance and development. * Function now being performed by Project Manager due to administrative changes in Division. ** Function performed by Project Manager in conjunction with Assistant City Manager L - Work with planning consultants, architects, and engineers in the planning phase of park development projects. Prepare or work with consultants to prepare specifications and cost estimates for projects. Procure bids for projects and products. Work closely with city administration to implement park and recreation project plans. Prepare and maintain appropriate records and reports. - Meet-tvit-h-Park—attel-Reereatieri-Berard and Southlakc Parks Dcvclopmcnt Prepare and oversee all state and federal grant applications for the Park and Recreation Department. Coordinates activities between local Independent School Districts, surrounding communities, and local civic organizations regarding joint utilization of school and community facilities and area-wide events.* - Plans and develops policies and procedures for the affective and efficie nt operation and maintenance of the various departmental facilities including parks, recreation centers, athletic facilities, playgrounds, and park buildings. Other Job Functions - Complete other job-related duties as assigned. Performance Qualifications Knowledge/Skills/Abilities - Comprehensive knowledge of modern concepts and techniques related to the field of park services,recreational programming, grant programs, budget preparation, and administration. - Working knowledge of federal, state, local laws, codes and ordinances pertaining * Function now being performed by Project Manager due to administrative changes in Division. ** Function performed by Project Manager in conjunction with Assistant City Manager Lto parks and recreation services. Possess skills in managing multiple projects. - Demonstrated ability to take organization vision and carry out action plan. - Possess outstanding communication, and group facilitation skills. - Reading and interpreting architectural and engineering plans and specifications. Recognizing acceptable construction practices in a variety of trades and crafts. Recognizing quality of products and materials to ensure compliance with project plans and specifications. - Knowledge of principles and practices of public recreation and park construction. - Knowledge of sports, recreation facility concepts and designs. - Ability to establish and maintain effective working relations with City officials, co-workers, agencies, contractors, architects and engineers. - Ability operatcsurvcyor's lcvcl and instrumcnt. - Ability to visually inspect projects under construction throughout the City. - General PC skills and familiarity with WordPerfect, spreadsheet applications, and various project management software. Education/Experience/Training - Bachelor's degree in related area and thrcc to five seven years related experience required.,with at least five years in a management capacity. - Graduate work in project management, planning, and/or management preferred. Conditions of Employment - 75% indoors - Light (occasional lifting and carrying of objects up to 10 lbs.; sitting most of the Le * Function now being performed by Project Manager due to administrative changes in Division. ** Function performed by Project Manager in conjunction with Assistant City Manager Non-hazardous work Frequent contact with the public, City Council members, other City Departments, Park and Recreation Board, Joint Utilization Committee, Keep Southlake Beautiful, SPIN and Southlake Parks Development Corporation. Broad assignments; little supervision required in following established procedures. Additional supervision required when completing tasks out of the ordinary. C:\WPFILES\PARK\DIRECTOR.JOB L * Function now being performed by Project Manager due to administrative changes in Division. ** Function performed by Project Manager in conjunction with Assistant City Manager Lir Kim McAdams Exhibit C 1005 Texas Trail Roanoke, Texas 76262 EMPLOYMENT • In 15 years of park management and construction, I have acquired over $12 million in grants and donations, creating 14 new and expanded public parks in Texas. Park Project Manager, P & R Division, City of Southlake, August 1994 to present Director, Parks & Recreation Department, City of Keller, Texas, April 1992 - July 1994 Director, Southtown Urban Main Street Program, San Antonio, Texas, 1992 Director, Brazoria County Parks Commission, Angleton, Texas, 1982-1990 Director, Parks and Recreation Department, City of Bay City, Texas, 1980-1982 Community Program/Marketing Director, NW YMCA, San Antonio, Texas 1978-79 EDUCATION • Candidate for Master of Business Administration, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, 21 hours, 1979 • Bachelor of Science, Parks, Recreation, and Tourism, Cum Laude Graduate, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 1978 • International Leisure Studies, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom, 1977 Lei HONORS • Texas Recreation and Parks Society, Board of Directors, At-Large Director, 1994 • Texas Municipal League Parks& Recreation Association, Secretary/Treasurer, 1994 • National Gold Medal Merit Award for Excellence in Park Management, 1981, 1985 • The Texas Historical Commission, Citation for Distinguished Service, 1988 • Outstanding Young Professional, Texas Recreation & Parks Society, 1986 • Outstanding Young Professional, SW Region, National Recreation and Parks Association, 86 • American Red Cross Board of Directors, 1989-90 • United Way Board of Directors, Vice President of Planning, 1986-87 • Silver Chaparral Award for Most Outstanding Graduate, Texas A&M University, 1978 • Texas Garden Club Scholarship, 1977 AFFILIATIONS & MEMBERSHIPS • Texas Recreation and Parks Society, Registered Professional #487, 1977 to present • National Recreation and Parks Association, Certified Leisure Professional, 1977 to present • The Texas Historical Commission • The National Wildflower Institute • Keep Texas Beautiful, Inc • North Texas Trails Network • Members of the First United Methodist Church of Keller L MEMORANDUK Cie TO: Curtis Hawk City Manager er PROM: Analeslie Muncy DATE: June 29, 1992 RE: City Regulation of Satellite Dish Antennas The federal regulations for satellite dish antennas are different from those concerning amateur radio antennas. A copy of the relevant regulation is included in the Legal Comment attached to this memo. Generally, the regulation preempts any local ordinance that differentiates between satellite dishes and other types of antennas, unless (1) the city can clearly define a health, safety or aesthetic objective and (2) the ordinance does not impose unreasonable limitations on reception or impose excessive costs on the user. Since satellite dish antennas rarely pose health or safety problems, a city might be enticed to impose restrictions based solely on aesthetics. To avoid being arbitrary, there should be other regulatory activity aimed at promoting aesthetic objectives, such as historic preservation or scenic waterfront. If there are no other regulations to promote a common aesthetic purpose, it will be difficult to defend the ordinance as not arbitrary. The (re other alternative is to develop regulations that will treat all receiving antennas the same. This will not be an easy task because of the protections given the amateur radio antennas by federal regulations and the first amendment protection afforded all receiving antennas. Let us know if you want us to attempt to draft an ordinance on this subject. TEL No . Sep 1 ,95 16 :21 No .021 P .03 (its LeaI " ZPOIi. �.. New FCC Regulations on Satellite Dishes 'he legal comment in the June 1985 issue of THE The FCC has not provided a soecrftc process for the JisitCleAEITY discussed local regulation ot television entorcement of this new rule,indicating its expectation ellite dishes and reported that the Federal Commu- mat cites will conform present ordinances to these ations Commission(FCC) had initiated a process to standards and that FCC involvement in disputes be- act rules which would preempt such state and local tween municipalities and dish owners will not be neces- :ulatton. This rule-making process has since been sarv. It is expected that local ordinances which are 'eluded, with the FCC adopting a rule which is in- aueged to be in conflict with the FCC rule will be ided to limit the authority of cities and villages to challenged through the courts.rather than through any ;uiate the size, location and placement of satellite FCC administrative process. th stations. This rule, which took effect march 14, Any local ordinance which singles out satellite dish .eiatively short, providing that: antennas by name or on the basis of their unique 'State and local zoning or other regulations that characteristics (such as restrictions applicable only to iffe►entiate between satellite receive-only anten- spherical antennas")may be subject to challenge and las and other types of antenna facilities are pre- could be struck down if round not to meet the stan- dards established by the FCC for such differentiating unless such regulations: ordinances. "(a) have a reasonable and clearly defined iealth, safety or aesthetic objective: and First, the ordinance must have a reasonable and•ciear- Iv defined health, safety or aesthetic objective. Thus, "(b) do not operate to impose unreasonable local ordinances addressing satellite dish placement imitations on, ot prevent, reception of satellite only should contain legislative findings that the regu- selivered signals by receive-only antennas or to lation would achieve objectives related to health,safe- se costs on the users or such antennas that nor aesthetics. tcessive in light of the purchase and instal- n Costs of the equipment. Secondly, a local ordinance which differentiates could not unreasonably interfere with or prevent the "Regulation of satellite transmitting antennas is receipt of satellite delivered signals. This primarily re- )reempted in the same manner except that state lates to screening or placement requirements which ind local health and safety regulation is not pre- would result in obscuring reception. !mpted." A third condition on local requirements which dif- tese new rules clearly do not apply to local regula- ferentiate is that such differentiation cannot impose s which do not single out satellite dishes for costs on satellite dish owners which are excessive in mate treatment, but which treat satellite dishes in relation to the purchase and installation cost of the same manner as other signal receiving antennas. equipment. This would preclude establishment of high ,y municipalities will be able to adjust local or- application fees and hearing requirements as well as inces regulating satellite dishes to meet this FCC costly screening and installation requirements. ig quite easily by simply expanding the purview of Many municipalities have already taken steps to regu- "dish"ordinance to cover all types of signal receiv- late television satellite dishes. Such ordinances should antennas. While this may impose new limitations be reviewed and modified to either: iomeowners desiring to put up the traditional type (1)broaden the purview of these ordinances so that V antenna, new installation of such signal receiv- they do not"differentiate"between satellite dishes and devices is on the decline, with the satellite earth 'other types of signal receiving antenna; and/or on being utilized more often. In addition, a vari- a procedure could be utilized to permit the tradi- (2)where is is desired to maintain such differentia- 31 TV antenna,as well as appropriate satellite dishes, lion, provide clear indications of health, safety or aes- r•erected in a manner which may not fully comply thetic objectives which such differentiating regulations otherwise applicable local limitations. Currently achieve and assure that such limitations are not un- ing antennas would be grandrathered in and could reasonable or impose excessive costs on the owner of inue as nonconforming uses. the equipment. cie THE MUNICIPALITY • April 1986 103 t 1 — i (we ,t , Vil 0 " . kltaii‘ II 470 "0- "11t'. E a •�_ c r '� r3 iv. t' sdi.v r4 r�/, 61. �; w 1 All") Oil .1) t'itir w ` "Vf 9, —"` iii,„_, ittielio ..66 ,..1„,.....4.0 tlik*,44111c1 I 1 ( L,,,,, * ,J. ::: ♦ VD � �6r �, ...., -,4*..r.> - . (44 1VYr./``iii��rVVViii i .--I. J YA ,': 5 t SOUTHLAKE PARKS & RECREATION BOARD 1995-96 Goals & Objectives July 1995 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY Mission Statement: Respond to the articulated needs of Southlake citizens through efficient, harmonious • programs,facilities and open spaces which optimize neighborhood and community life. ...r .:; ro-i' ;•.:<� .7;^•.;^:.l :y,. ^^;.. '.may, t` ,cry {r.+J�4 a;yk +K< �},w .Kf,, .{ k r.t ;S F T. �`\�. «�Yi��F 4A,:7 oi'.3� } y §c htE t+�} 01 `t�73•}`. 49 3•'. '-73•E C4 B•} Es; d B `t: } 3 �E 5,5 E4 9f�f��' A� r ........r'v:>��,.,;,,�/ „� ..�'£�:f::. n... ,.:: .t;.�,�:.^c• C�f•, �" `. .. ':�:'�•"'.Sy+:�;:'•v„�F c�„��/5,`rsxe���4: �: ��� 5 ?.:.. Objectives Activities Target Date Comments 1) Have a well-informed 1)Develop quality, general park Oct. 1995 Discussing park issues with constituency with regard to presentation covering major issues Southlake's residents is critical in key Parks&Recreation and develop "speakers bureau." understanding'the wants/needs of issues. the community. By making 2) Disseminate information to local Oct. 1995 citizens aware of key issues, and clubs, organizations, and SPIN discussing these issues with the groups re: availability of speakers. public, staff and Board members will be better equipped to make 3)Hold "focus group" meetings as As Needed decisions for the Division. appropriate to disseminate information on key, timely issues to citizens. 4)Work closely with regional and Ongoing local press to ensure coverage of key events/issues. 2) Identify methods and 1)Using results from citizen Sept. 1995 Monitoring community needs establish well-defined system satisfaction survey, develop involves spending time with for monitoring community appropriate follow up survey for citizens who participate in needs and opinions. capturing more specific information programs, holding appropriate about citizen needs and opinions re: focus group meetings(perhaps park programs and facilities. with SPIN groups)to discuss issues, and using scientific surveys 2) Develop evaluation process for August 1995 to get meaningful information recreation programs and special from citizens. events to monitor citizen satisfaction. 3)Hold "focus group" meetings as As Needed appropriate to disseminate information on key, timely issues to citizens, and to receive input from citizens. 3) Network with community 1)Set up time to visit with key Begin Oct. 1995 Community organizations, _ organizations in order to community organizations about the particularly SPIN groups, are an obtain information for Parks efforts of P&R and needs of the invaluable resource to P&R. and Recreation Division. organization. 2) Develop close working Ongoing relationship w/SPIN & neighborhoods re: parks. 2 '" SOUTHLAKE PARKS & RECREATION BOARD 1995-96 Goals & Objectives July 1995 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY L Mission Statement: .Respond to the articulated needs of Southlake citizens through efficient, harmonious programs,facilities and open spaces which optimize neighborhood and community life. f;:Tz ^++`^�, , .:; .?.°? :..ta:4 �+r�u ';�;g ,i;�:v:2 ::,+.:%:r :++,•. t F`t`€ F '. ., F �v i :r;F jr all F ' "aY z,"€ e ti p/*,:r T,, : . F7 :,;;. . .,,-'� •v,?}gam.. •.: .z:s7 P., b a•)!y . ,•r � , t a-,c.tE? 0.3 8 E E : :.F f�F� Lvc.�7.,i.— E 7 i 7 W .'va v. .nvr.xYOXYs�; � 5t'• ..F2�+:����.�'�. .. .� x �'�.(�.f.4s�cw !vc.•ti�: X�"++' r. ::x .:.::.' '.rv: 4,•y}n: •k f.{.,:;.}+:•ii v ' i�+ ,v) ..:..... ...,t �'.•�r'��":?• n` ». Xt v k `�ar;va , . ..,�. ..:F... :p .:: :`'n?:;: ; K.:•t' �2\ :: .:� ::x ��'fi+ r ' �< r%S7 fil: ,v' .:� '; ::/:;:�<<:.. ..yr.;:, .t; :+ ''.. `�h nhY:, v:!�. .:. A:?`,rr "f:f x :# . . . �. zzf ..ft<.. t` f if'+. �::.;�:.`�a:�•+ ..v,. �:f ,. .,,ray,.,..�:;+: ... �G rs,�� $;. $} ",'C,'c.�'ia:� r 7£:\ v r.::::: :. �x., r. ..tiv.r..�,�r + ...:�§%��,�a:r+a>�r:Y• , .�..• .. ;:,.. .:: Jfrr ...... l ��'� :,; c , a. : .:..:':4 � ;:v•. .�• ;>, rrrr�.•%l2>.i<:�+� • •P S.i:�}?%>•{{y j{y e\}:i'ri:'�<r•y...}r.w. S.r ...... � ..�. ..... ..:.. .. f ' , a•:�:v. �' ...: Objectives Activities Target Date Comments 4) Create areas of 1) Expand liaison efforts to clearly Immediately The "Board Liaison" concept has • concentration and expertise identify Board members for really just been introduced, and on the Board. particular speaking engagements or efforts need to be made to focus groups. strengthen the involvement of Board members in these areas. By 2)Create networking opportunities Begin Oct..1995 having Board members agree to with other Park Boards. participate in speaking engagements and/or focus group 3)Hold periodic "issue sessions" As Needed sessions, the concept may become with specific Board liaisons to ensure stronger. By working with other active involvement and clear Park Boards, the Southlake Board understanding important issues. may develop new ideas or c approaches to overseeing park activities. Finally, issues sessions with individuals or the group may provide an opportunity to "dig in" to particular issues, thereby creating additional expertise and knowledge. 5) Translate needs and 1) Finalize Trail System Master Aug/Sept 1995 Using citizen input is critical. information into plans. Plan. Development and updates of Southlake park plans requires 2) Update Southlake Parks, Fall/Winter 1995 significant citizen input, and every Recreation& Open Space Master effort should be made to use Plan. information gleaned,not only for an overall master plan,but for 3) Develop "master plans" for all As Needed development of individual parks new facilities as they are identified. and for development of recreation programs and special events. 4) Develop an annual Recreation& January 1996 Special Events Guide, using information obtained from evaluation process. - 5) Hold annual planning session for April 1996 Park Board and staff for brainstorming purposes. C 3 SOUTHLAKE PARKS & RECREATION BOARD 1995-96 Goals & Objectives July 1995 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY , c Mission Statement: Respond to the articulated needs of Southlake citizens through efficient, harmonious programs,facilities and open spaces which optimize neighborhood and community life. .Y.rr.�.:. �}�: i::Y:.�y.�;�.. ��•: y rt• x+ .,��'': ' ,,�}ti, . ap . '' {'' ;{• ,r i% ... . . a�,i.M1;$ �s.: Y . 6:i .1 �r42 .. ;i+'fCifY.re {.z w•a ,8Y f { 3 . C9 .: tit. 44,4 i eS3 9 .... ° t o•9Y r3 �', r 3tA ,,I, ,5 �' ' ..--,,,,,-:,,,..,....--,..,,,,,,,,„,,, ,,...4,,•..4' {•Y).t:.• :SL':.it aY, .S:y:;:; ♦ .�:� {.:i:... 1 ..1, � i i .C 3 3 i 3 3 t ,is5 G A t:�rr:r %ac.�::<��- i3 i J4 iH:�, f5 .,.�.:vr. ,{ �i: }}:{\G{ •.r?4'Fir:C>:4^:p;:::.,;:t'v^i:!..{C".'�p�. v.. `i :i5{F.:� >.v,:..]s;+'X•.' ,.. �'�x���� `•�,�5� ;•� �`tk'��.�.4 '' {�4n? "'�.... f:,,;r�.{ J f } 0} �.>:F•iY Objectives Activities Target Date Comments 1) Prepare and deliver 1) Develop quality, general park Oct. 1995 Many community groups look for— presentations to community presentation covering major issues speakers on a regular basis. Staff groups. and develop "speakers bureau." and Board members should develop a high quality, multi- 2) Disseminate information to local . Oct. 1995 media, interesting presentation for clubs, organizations, and SPIN use upon request by community groups re: availability of speakers. groups. The Park"speakers bureau" should be marketed to 3) Develop quality, specific park As Needed these groups. Finally, when presentations covering current park specific issues emerge(i.e., Trails issues and utilize "speakers bureau" Plan), members of the Board and for presentations. staff should work together to ( develop a high quality, specific presentation to address the issue. 2) Utilize public relations 1) Develop public relations August 1995 There are many methods that can techniques to communicate subcommittee, consisting of Park be used to "market" Southlake's Park Board successes. Board members, staff. Parks&Recreation Division and the Board. The key is to 2)Compile public relations plan for November 1995 determine the specifics that need FY 1995-96. to be accomplished. A careful, well developed and implemented 3) Implement plan under guidance of Throughout plan will ensure that PR goals are. Public Relations Subcommittee and 1995-96 achieved as effectively and the Park Board. efficiently as possible. , 3) Utilize existing city 1) Prepare regular articles, items of Monthly The City of Southlake is fairly I communication tools to interest for Southlake In Review. progressive in communicating with convey P&R information. its citizenry. P&R can take 2) Utilize utility bills as a means to At least advantage of this by continuing to communicate short messages. quarterly utilize the newsletter, utility bills, and SPIN to communicate P&R 3) Work through SPIN to directly As Needed issues. communicate to the neighborhoods. — Ce SOUTHLAKE PARKS & RECREATION BOARD 1995-96 Goals & Objectives July 1995 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY L Mission Statement: Respond to the articulated needs of Southlake citizens through efficient, harmonious • programs,facilities and open spaces which optimize neighborhood and community life. •i:Jn ''f i�'v ::y;> ..�'I :.{v {{ ":r .C.a :,o-�f:�fi�,c.•Ya: 2-.• 2.w:, .f:v`a:• ••+.aF ,.,},,. , ,.{.:;av- E : y� f Q35iefN:if aj t�f1 E rb Pf a t? 3�3El k EE f ? `Y t£dvEi Pik A i 3 "¢f ` f, c ffrt7 *:Tt �f ':`PiBt z ; "�F' .a. �•'�rop"�c:•+.,,.•�•o. ..'�.�.,M.K.v..��w +,� ..;,�., ,r:7;X:;.-..v.,,. ,. »„k:..,,ta�,.. ..r;�.� r �>.r:s+:o ,,,x:roc�:{•:;:;�r, �.,.::�:::•:::::.v v:,•..\�::.: .:. (..v,v.:...:::.::^.,..... ^i. .Q}.'NX .:}.:.>;:.:ai'::i{.i S.�v ./....'., vtG:i:•{:b. 1.�...... .........:::::.{.:{::•:,�.:{...:vU.;Pr• : .. a:.,.... .,.. .: ....: .�..:.�'-i::.:.,.. ,v:.,: x;:a: .�;''� `51;T3:. �..2�:iiti:�:?:a:{ai>:i�ii: .:;'v/ ..i{.�.:a.;{{r;.�:4�::{-.: .a.'>.'�6."'"Y""f.�J• �( :..45 �k ���2 .;^..J^'1+'�} ^f� -•.,.�{b:••-: ti;a:: ;;;;::: ! J Gy.,�,£✓. .?5`Ca`r' ,2,.{:' ' ,,"'e;V" .2,},..,� .::Y;•E+. ";;:: >sr •u� :;:.:+:•r+r::.: .i::�.:a::{>.;:: '�'•`{" ;.3:Lc.{.,ti{'„ F f Q l E� ? £ G f,?• ' E t >f t .,f 'b:`♦ M f E ! .� :-� �4: Cf.;,f ... ::., \,:>::.�:::,' ......, rs �7',.Y.., f ,,, S.ro. ,' � a. :.. �.{l:•:.;:, ..�, ,fM� ��n :i*>r� :�. f`!%''�'£'?'f';,'�.�t{:}: ty�r�'%r'``. G' �nox�''ti �"`t£;"�'"""�c '- �.'.'#'.: =+,N.c:...::.• •'- 'x '�uw..•..,..:`�'i^G`'. ,.,x.,•.�,/.:.:<,?:.�,• l�,G?;/.:.>;:,At,,,.:•a•: : Objectives Activities Target Date Comments 4) Continue to utilize media 1)Continue to submit press releases Weekly Currently staff prepares news _ to communicate information to local and regional newspapers to . releases on all major issues—rec about park projects. inform them of park activities. programs, special events, Park Board activities. This should be 2)Expand media list to include Aug. 1995 continued and expanded to include appropriate radio stations for other media. possible PSAs. 3)Look for opportunities to work As Needed with television media on special projects. Communicate about both 1)Hold"focus group" meetings as As Needed Continuous communication with gic plans and project appropriate to disseminate Southlake citizens regarding plans t ans. information on key, timely issues to is critical. As planning begins for citizens, and to receive input from . each project, careful attention must citizens. be given to how information will be communicated to residents, 2)Develop quality, specific park As Needed particularly those that are most presentations covering strategic plans affected. Formal and informal and project plans and utilize presentations and discussion need "speakers bureau" for presentations. to be programmed into the process of developing plans. 3)Work through SPIN to directly As Needed communicate to the neighborhoods. 4) Prepare articles for Southlake In As Needed Review to communicate information about plans. C 5 SOUTHLAKE PARKS & RECREATION BOARD 1995-96 Goals & Objectives July 1995 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY (we Mission Statement: Respond to the articulated needs of Southlake citizens through efficient, harmonious • programs,facilities and open spaces which optimize neighborhood and community life. �::::%:�::'.:tY:;j%.:`;L:4+vr iF:.'i'•'.:::i::•:A}:^;:;:A'F ..F n:i•• r:1.: rs l{x...:f+"v,:t�:: :h'r' 1. v+•' ♦;>:y:...::.,.,:...<;..: ..1.Y.:.; ..... . .. , r.+{ s _ fizi>,',�. '%;�^zvt":. •sG ..�: � .F M1:.;h:> +r�.�'r•' �'�.t+:�;{;/:•ti}�., •..Fl:< :. i 'y, y `�`:c s . #Xs t;. 'M,'•'j3('�i5 '�j•r.<:6:" .+v`k},`.z:i:;,n.;:�,c2:::?1k <,,.:: > <:«. a�= f s s :, E s a wig a" y.:; :. ...Sr:.,:,•:r•r..•.....•::..�.:-4 as�«z� �. 2 '; k�'. .•1A'c';44.�c�• 5��' "��^�'�.. ;tom,, �� .?,�;:.• �r/<. Objectives Activities Target Date Comments 1) Use gathered information 1)Prepare critical needs analysis January 1995 Gathering information from to update current programs& based upon information gathered as citizens is only the first step. _ facilities. part of Goal One. Using the information to determine the critical park and recreation 2)Identify "Year One Targets" for January 1996 needs for Southlake is the second, meeting the program, facility, and and most important aspect of open space needs. developing a responsive plan of action for the Parks &Recreation 3) Develop process for monitoring January 1996 Division. By analyzing articulated progress towards meeting targets. needs and using this analysis to develop specific, measurable 4)Adjust targets as necessary to January 1996 targets, the Park Board/staff team continually meet articulated needs of will develop a strong rapport with the community, even as they change the community-at-large and over time. enhance its credibility. 2) Use assessed information 1) Develop evaluation process for August 1995 Currently, no meaningful to update existing programs. recreation programs and special evaluation process exists for events to monitor citizen satisfaction determining how effective with them. programming is. By developing an evaluation process, staff and Board 2) Develop an annual Recreation& January 1996 members will be able to better Special Events Guide, using determine the types of programs to information obtained from evaluation be offered. This information can process. be compiled and used to develop guidelines for developing future programs. Institutional memory becomes more formal in this process. C 6 • SOUTHLAKE PARKS & RECREATION BOARD 1995-96 Goals & Objectives July 1995 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY L., Mission Statement: Respond to the articulated needs of Southlake citizens through efficient, harmonious . programs,facilities and open spaces which optimize neighborhood and community life. {�>. y',;;; {> {.er:{< .{ ' +;;'.{q' ..i,':,4 .. .i .r. •r.-:.. ... >}.:tE�q.' 1�,5%; .. . :r 'hh Y,'z..; l .: k : � � �rw�. t�r }y„+ p ,' r � 'rr� 'r�...::}' }ri�o*: :5{{ �F±.°` 3 ' f ":t 3.:e F IFy ? 9 '_i t9 4t a[;; ..";c{9 tl ..tl , t}:fii;,.,. .'. 9 t f {%..: • ." • r::rr���.. h%sb`:?'��f;5y:h5a}},...‹^''.�.:}:{1`�s'....: --�'r'Y� %-s-%.nV. W :Y:' ^/n}: b / rF ....: Objective Activities Target Date Comments 3) Create new programs and 1) See Goal One, Objective Two to Quarters 3&4 It is imperative that staff/Board facilities. understand the approach for 1995 members continually assess the determining community wants and type and quality of programming needs. that is offered. As the - population of Southlake grows, it a 2) Prepare program/facility Oct. 1995 will be necessary to adjust inventory to be used as a baseline programming and facility plans when planning for future needs. to accommodate the needs of the . . community-at-large. 3)Hold quarterly staff/Board Quarterly member team workshops and work through liaison concept for brainstorming new program and facility ideas. ( c 4) Hold focus group meetings as As Needed appropriate to obtain input from citizens. 5) Implement team ideas as feasible. As Needed 4) Determine areas of need 1) Survey training needs. Aug/Sept 1995 Staff/Board member for staff/Board development. development is a particular area 2) Develop staff training plans in Aug/Sept 1995 of interest this fiscal year. In conjunction with city policy. order to ensure adequate training for both staff and Board 3) Develop Board training plans for Aug/Sept 1995 members, a survey will be the fiscal year. conducted to determine needs/interests. Individual training plans will be formulated. 5) Maintain clean and safe 1) Develop comprehensive safety Dec. 1995 A safety program is in the initial facilities. policy and program for Park& stages of development, and Recreation Division. should be fully developed by the end of the year. This will 2) Encourage "Adopt-A-Park" Ongoing include weekly and annual program for all new facilities, such inspections. Although - as exists with Bicentennial Park, to cleanliness is an ongoing include citizens in clean up of park maintenance issue, involving grounds. citizens through the quarterly litter pick up program is another (IIIII.v method for ensuring clean facilities. 7 SOUTHLAKE PARKS & RECREATION BOARD 1995-96 Goals & Objectives July 1995 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY Mission Statement: Respond to the articulated needs of Southlake citizens through efficient, harmonious programs,facilities and open spaces which optimize neighborhood and community life.. t '�` y `y f ., : h l• cq, f fir.'Sv' : c < 7 E E 'n El <.i ,tris•-:Eo• 3 .d.• � �8 ....... .. v .. J `}..L+ 4.4 ... .v�i 4i i�A.'y � 1. f ..:'v5:`yv';{•� Objective Activities Target Date Comments �K a 6) Explore and seek 1)Apply.for TPWD grant for West Jan./June 1996 City funding is not the only supplemental funding Beach development. source of funds available to opportunities. P&R. Federal and state grants, 2)Apply for ISTEA grant to fund Dec. 1995 sponsorships, etc. could provide trails. an additional means of funding for park development or projects. 3)Explore opportunities for other As Available grants for trees, nature areas, etc. 4)Implement fully-developed April 1996 revenue generation policy, detailing attitude toward sponsorships, fees, etc. ( solicit ideas based on• 1)Explore other metroplex cities. December 1995 Observing other Park rams and facilities found Determine what types of facilities Departments and what they offer elsewhere. and programs they offer that may be could be of benefit to Southlake's of interest to Southlake citizens. Park Board and staff could be extremely useful in coming up 2) Develop a partnership with a December 1995 with new ideas or methods to sister Park Board(i.e., approach problems. Colleyville?), exchange ideas, work through issues. 8) Maintain an open posture 1)Continue to seek opportunities to As Available Although the West Beach toward acquiring land. work with local land owners for property will be the focus of the "temporary" facilities. City's park land acquisition efforts for FY 1995-96, the Park 2)Continue close relationship with Ongoing Board must continue to look to SPDC, providing formal input to the future, planning for future them re: Park Board "wish list." park facility needs. This can be accomplished by ensuring that 3)Work to ensure that city policies Winter 1995 the SPDC is fully aware of Park encourage maximum developer Board ideas and preferences. participation in land acquisition Additionally, the Park Board, in activities for the City(donations). conjunction with the Department of Community Development, should examine park land dedication requirements. C 8 SOUTHLAKE PARKS & RECREATION BOARD 1995-96 Goals & Objectives July 1995 ACTION PLAN SUMMARY Mission Statement: Respond to the articulated needs of Southlake citizens through efficient, harmonious programs,facilities and open spaces which optimize neighborhood and community life. ..\:., E r .,.�.�,.':.�,,�; ;.� it :<`s:'tiii $�;e v�`4`•;,�: fd w3 `l [ f 3 f ;,c e�q, ,''3 y :iyff o ny: ;+•; E 3•'9 ' E' tl :E t: EY 3 �,q •M,,.� ;,.5:;::` _,.v.�:rt?�'u� S:4'3�°�" •'its•• �%'��� "�.'v.�:i. �^S '�5: �'F • Objective Activities Target Date Comments 1) Review policies and 1)Review Parkland Dedication Fall 1995 A policy and procedures manual procedures. section of Subdivision Ordinance in has been compiled for staff use, conjunction with Department of but many of the policies need to Community Development. be examined tq ensure that they are still current. Additional 2) Develop revenue philosophy and April 1996 policies will need to be policy. developed during the course of the year to deal with current 3)Review existing policies to ensure January 1996 issues(i.e., revenue). that they are still current. 2) Analyze response to 1) Using evaluation process, monitor Ongoing Note Goal 3, Objective 2. current programs, customer citizen satisfaction with programs. Developing a formal evaluation satisfaction. mechanism will allow staff and Board members to more clearly ( c. understand the dynamics of recreational programming. 3) Establish&maintain 1) Familiarize Board and staff with Aug. 1995 The City of Southlake has policy of fiscal provisions of City fiscal policies. formally adopted fiscal policies accountability; conduct to ensure accountability. budget and capital 2) Develop budget reporting process. Aug. 1995 Additionally, reporting expenditure analysis. mechanisms are in place. Staff 3) Refine capital projects monitoring Aug. 1995 will work to specifically adapt process. these for Parks &Recreation uses. 4) Update reservation&fee schedule Aug 1995 4) Ensure that data used in All survey methodology will be As Needed Although many informal surveys monitoring programs and carefully documented so that the may be utilized by the staff services is valid and reliable. Park Board, staff, and public can during the course of the year, feel comfortable with the reliability only those which are statistically of the information. valid and reliable will be used to make assumptions about the Where possible, accepted principles opinions of Southlake citizens. of research will be applied to the project. _ C 9 City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 7. 1995 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers of City Hall TIME: 7:30 P.M. AGENDA: 1. Call to Order. 2. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of August 17, 1995. 3. Administrative Comments. 4. Consider ZA95-77, Rezoning and Site Plan for Stacy Furniture Warehouse,being 5.66 acres legally described as Block B, Lot 2, Commerce Business Park. Location: 280 Commerce Street. approximately 180' South of East Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "I-1" Light Industrial District;Requested Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District to allow "I-1" Light Industrial uses asset forth in Ordinance No. 480, Section 26 • and the retail sale of furniture. Owner/Applicant: James R. Stacy d/b/a Stacy Furniture Warehouse. Spin Neighborhood#7. Continue Public Hearing. 5. Consider: ZA95-79, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Greenlee Business Park, being 6.715 acres situated in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, legally described as the northern portion of Lot 7R and all of Lot 8,Block 1,Greenlee Business Park,Phase I and being revised to Lot 8R, Block 1, Greenlee Business Park, Phase I. Location: 1475' North of East Continental Blvd. on the west side of South Kimball Ave. Current Zoning: "I-1" Light Industrial District; Requested Zoning: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential District. Owners: David and Beverly Thorne and ELFM Corporation;Applicant: Terra Land Development Company. Spin Neighborhood #7. The development proposes thirteen (13) single family residential lots. Continue Public Hearing. 6. Consider: ZA95-83, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Meadow Ridge Estates, being 37.416 acres of land situated in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, Tracts 1, IA, 1C, 1D and 3A. Location: on the west side of S. Kimball Ave.. adjacent to and East of Woodland Heights Addition. and approximately 900 feet South of East Southlake Blvd. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural; Requested Zoning: "SF-20A" Single-Family City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA SEPTEMBER 7, 1995 PAGE 2 Residential District. Owners: Mike&Ginger Jacobs, Dwaine Petty,and E.R.O. Development Company; Applicant: Briscoe Clark Company. Spin Neighborhood#7. The development proposes sixty-two (62) single family residential lots. Public Hearing. 7. Consider: ZA95-85, Concept Plan for Southlake Retail Center, being 3.351 acres situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, Tract 2B and proposed Lots 1,2 & 3 W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition. Location: 1800' West of N. Peytonville Ave.. 350' East of Randol Mill Ave.. and on the North of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owners/Applicants: DKV(Sutton)Partners II,L.P.,Drews Realty Group,General Partners. SPIN Neighborhood#13. Public Hearing. 8. Consider: ZA95-86, Final Plat for Stonebury, being 23.1642 acres of land situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, Tract 3A and the Northern portion of Tract 3A-1. Location: Approximately 1200' South of W. Southlake Blvd. on the West side of S. Peytonville Ave. at 340 S. Peytonville Ave. Current Zoning: "SF-20A" Single-Family Residential District. Owner: Chateau Development Corp.; Applicant: Teague Nall and Perkins,Inc. Spin Neighborhood#14. The development proposes 33 residential lots. • 9. Consider: ZA95-74,Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana(Non-Residential),being 127.2 acres situated in the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, being portions of Tracts 1A1, 1C,2A,2A1,2A2,2A5,2A6,2A7,and the James B. Martin Survey,Abstract No. 1134,being portions of Tracts 1 and 1C. Location: Northeast of Northwest Parkway (S.H. 114). South of Kirkwood Boulevard and North of West Dove Road. Current Zoning: "C-3" General Commercial District, "CS" Community Service District, and "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District; Requested Zoning: "NR-P.U.D."Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District", "C-3" General Commercial District, "0-2" Office District, "HC" Hotel District, and "CS" Community Service District. Owner: MTP-IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture; Applicant: Maguire Thomas Partners. SPIN Neighborhood#2. 10. Consider: Revisions to Zoning Ordinance No.480-Q establishing special regulations for development adjacent to residential areas. Continue Public Hearing. City of Southlake,Texas threREGULAR PLANNING AND ZONING AGENDA SEPTEMBER 7, 1995 PAGE 3 11. Discussion: Revisions to Subdivision Ordinance 483-C. 12. Discussion: Administrative Procedures regarding Resolution No. 95-24. • 13. Meeting Adjourned. CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards at City Hall, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake,Texas,on Friday, September 1, 1995 at 5:00 p.m.,pursuant to the Texas Government Code, Chapter 551. tzpilAK4 See C. Sandra L. LeGrand �. City Secretary ineatimensw- If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special needs,please advise the City Secretary 48 hours in advance at 481-5581 extension 704, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. G:\WPF\MTG\AGM09-07-95.WPD ihre CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 1, 1995 MINUTES COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENTS: Mayor Gary Fickes; Mayor Pro Tern Andy Wambsganss; Deputy Mayor Pro Tern Pamela Muller. Members: Sally Hall, Michael Richarme, Ron Maness, and W. Ralph Evans. STAFF PRESENT: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager; Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager; Kevin Hugman, Assistant to the City Manager; Greg Last, Director of Community Development; Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works; Ron Harper, City Engineer; Karen Gandy, Zoning Administrator; Analeslie Muncy, City Attorney; and, Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary. INVOCATION: Councilmember W. Ralph Evans. WORK SESSION: The work session was held where agenda items for tonight's meeting were discussed by Council and staff. c, The Regular City Council meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor Gary Fickes. Agenda Item #2-A, Executive Session Mayor Fickes advised the audience that Council would be going into executive session pursuant to Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.074, 551.076 of the Open Meetings Act, to seek the advice of the City Attorney with respect to pending and contemplated litigations, to discuss the purchase, exchange, lease or sale of real property and to consider the appointment and evaluation of public officials, and regarding the deployment of specific occasions for implementation of security personnel or devises. Council adjourned into executive session at 7:05 p.m. Council returned to open session at 8:05 p.m. Agenda Item #2-B. Action Necessary/Executive Session Motion was made to authorize the City staff to hire a MYI appraiser for the water tower site in the southern portion of the city that has been discussed. Motion: Richarme Second: Wambsganss Ayes: Richarme, Wambsganss, Hall, Evans, Maness, Muller LNays: None Regular City Council Meeting Minutes August 1, 1995 Page 2 Abstention: Fickes Approved: 6-0-1 Agenda Item #3. Approval of the Minutes of the July 18, 1995 City Council Meeting (Continued on July 25, 1995) Motion was made to approve the Minutes of the City Council meeting held on July 18, 1995 and continued July 25, 1995. Motion: Muller Second: Richarme Ayes: Muller, Richarme, Wambsganss, Hall, Maness, Fickes Nays: None Abstention: Evans Approved: 6-0-1 Agenda Item #4-A. Mayor's Report Mayor Fickes announced that Fiscal Year 1995-96 Annual Budget Work Sessions will be held on August 8, August 16, and August 17, 1995 at City Hall. The public is invited to attend. Mayor Fickes announced the City Manager filed the proposed budget with the City Secretary on August 1, 1995, as provided for in the City Charter. Agenda Item #4-B, City Manager's Report No comments were made during this item. Agenda Item #4-C, SPIN Report No comments1were made during this item. Agenda Item #5, Consent Agenda Mayor Fickes announced the Consent Agenda would consist of the following items: 5-A. Interlocal Agreement with Westlake for sewer services. 5-B. Interlocal Agreement with Town of Trophy Club for the road extension onto T.W. King. Motion was made to approve the Consent Agenda consisting of items #5-A, and #5-B. (..„ Motion: Richarme Second: Muller • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 31, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Request for Cub Scout BB Gun Shooting Range On September 30, 1995 and October 1, 1995, Cub Scout Pack 507 of Johnson Elementary School wishes to conduct their annual "Turkey Shoot" at Camp Burnett of Southlake. Mr. David W. Callahan, BSA trained BB Gun Range Instructor for the Pack, is requesting a permit to operate a Cub Scout BB Gun Shooting Range. A permit can be issued by the City Council under Ordinance #527, which regulates the discharge of any "weapon" designed to discharge a projectile in excess of three hundred (300) feet per second. Section 4 specifies that the ordinance "shall not prohibit the discharge of a weapon at a range or other similar location specifically designed and operated by...a responsible organization existing for the purpose of operating and maintaining the range, provided that [the organization] shall have first obtained a permit from the City Council to do so." Attached is Mr. Callahan's request, along with a diagram of the shooting range and range rules and regulations to be adhered to by the Cub Scouts. A copy of the applicable Ordinance No. 527 is also attached. Since BB guns are not firearms by definition, I anticipate no conflict or issues regarding the request for a permit. Additionally, the use of the permit process affords the opportunity to place any necessary limitations on the range use and duration. Also, we have issued several permits at this location in recent years without incident. I am available to assist in any manner or address any questions or comments you have on this matter. BC/bl` Attachments (be 5A-1 August 28 , 1995 (60, David W. Callahan Pack 507, BSA 2411 Taylor Southlake, TX 76092 RECE T_ AUG 2 8 1995 Mr. Curtis Hawk Southlake City Manager CITY SECRETARY 667 N. Carroll �° Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Mr. Hawk, I live in Emerald Estates and belong to Cub Scout Pack 507 of Johnson Elementary School . I am the Pack' s BSA trained, BB Gun Range Instructor. It is time once again to request a permit, under Ordinance No. 527, section 4. We would like to operate a Cub Scout BB Gun Shooting Range. On September 30th and October 1st, 1995 we wish to conduct our annual "Turkey Shoot" at Camp Burnett of Southlake. I will erect my range on the open parade ground facing north. It will be arranged as to allow participants an entry and an exit from the south. I am enclosing a diagram and literature pertaining to location, construction and operation of a Cub Scout BB Gun Range. I am trained and experienced. I have the mindset that if an activity cannot be done safely and well , that I will pack up and go home. I wish to offer our scouts a fun activity and responsible training. In conclusion, Mr. Hawk, I thank you and the Council ' s kind consideration in this matter. If you wish me to be present at your next work session please call me at 488-4646 . Due to work I may not be available for the September council meeting. Si cerely yours, all,DA) ( a74: ' David W. Callahan Enclosures (Ibmir -- J �� . - , `")6 .. P LCM '3'N (N 1 (;Z 6 L V1 C4 4 _ ll _ : I.3.7C: C-31-1: to :::. _., > P 4, A, , .._, ' --- -0-__ - - ..‹. 1:3 O 44-7 Lp ,,, c'i 1 t "--7) ... ,--,-------,N _ , 0 .. /.„ ,<, - P tb rj L 0' U3 ." Z. r-r-i ....i 'It?. .....1 L A V -S 1"1"›f0 ,5;9-3 RANGE OFFICER DOS AND DON'TS 1. ALWAYS PUT THE SAFETY OF YOUR STUDENTS AHEAD OF EVERYTHING ELSE. 2. NEVER SHOOT AT ANYTHING OTHER THAN PAPER TARGETS. Remember that B B's ricochet! 3. WORK AT THE AGE LEVEL OF YOUR STUDENTS. DON'T TALK AT AN ADULT LEVEL TO 9 YEAR OLDS. 4. GIVE ADULTS WITH YOUR STUDENTS A CONSTRUCTIVE JOB TO DO TO HELP. 6.21 5 '14) 5. NEVER TRY TO RUN A RANGE BY YOURSELF, ALWAYS HAVE AT LEAST TWO OTHER LINE OFFICERS WITH YOU. 6. DON'T ALLOW OTHER ADULTS TO INTIMIDATE YOU. YOU ARE IN CHARGE. 7. MAKE EYE CONTACT WITH THE STUDENTS YOU ARE TEACHING. 8. DO NOT ALLOW HORSEPLAY BY ANYONE ON THE RANGE. 9. IF ANYONE CAN NOT FOLLOW THE RULES THEY ARE TO LEAVE THE RANGE IMMEDIATELY. This includes adults. 10. IF STUDENTS HAVE IDEAS THAT YOU DON'T CONSIDER SAFE, GENTLY BUT FIRMLY POINT OUT THAT SAFETY COMES FIRST, LAST AND ALWAYS. L CODE OF THE DAISY cc RiFLEMAN • Treat every gun as if it were loaded and ready to (lime shoot. • Never carry a gun into your home, camp or public place loaded or cocked. • Always be sure your gun barrel is clean and not plugged. • Carry your gun so you can control the direction of the muzzle, even if you stumble. • Be sure of your target before you pull the trigger. • Never point a gun at anything you do not want to shoot. • Guns not being used should always be unloaded. • Never climb a tree or fence or jump a ditch with a loaded gun. • Never shoot at a flat, hard surface or the surface of water. • Respect other people's property. (6m." �5i9�5— .._-. c I •1 .: . . . ORDINANCE NO. 527 AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE DISCHARGE OF ANY�.. GUN, PISTOL OR ANY OTHER WEAPONS DESIGNED AS AIR PROJECTILES; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Southlaka deems it necessary for the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Southlake to adopt this ordinance regulating and prohibiting the discharge of guns, pistols, firearms and other similar weapons as provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY c OF SOUTHLARE, TEXAS: SECTION 1 It shall be unlawful for any person to discharge any gun, pistol, rifle, firearm, crossbow, or any other weapon designed as an air projectile, or an air rifle or air pistol of any description by whatever name known, that by means of compressed air, compressed gas, springs, or any other means is capable of discharging shots, pellets, or any solid object at a velocity in excess of three hundred (300) feet per second, within or across the city limits of Southlake. SECTION 2 This ordinance shall not prohibit the discharge of a firearm by a police officer in the discharge of his official duties. (II.1/7 slake\ord.31(1291) -1-/ fit ' J • ti •• 1• SECTION 3 This ordinance shall not prevent the reasonable discharge of tf: • a weapon for the necessary and lawful protection of one's person, a premises or property, unless such discharge be done in a reckless or negligent manner. SECTION 4 This ordinance shall not prohibit the discharge of a weapon at a range or other similar location specifically designed and operated by a governmental entity, a branch of the armed services or a responsible organization existing for the purpose of operating and maintaining the range, provided that such governmental entity, branch of the armed services or responsible organization shall have first obtained a permit from the City Council to do so. (111IY SECTION 5 This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas , except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 6 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect -any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and (1111,' sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been _enacted stake\ord.31(1291) -2- 5,4 7 . ! *7.;w 1•1 r / ' YL Iv • by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 7 Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500. 00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8 All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of any ordinances regulating the discharge of any gun, pistol, rifle, firearm, crossbow, or any other weapons regulated hereunder which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by. this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the cimposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally stake\ord.31(1291) -3-, t i/ publi-sh this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time ItC,„. within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3 . 13 of the Charter of the City of Southiake. SECTION 10 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING THIS c2. DAY OF } : a-MAYOR 1.J. ATTEST: .* •�` j ' . /jjr/ %// �C_i '''rrrrrrNiN11�N�,```` /_ ��,.' � / ,..•L.4:-t�%„{_-- C'3TY SECRETARY 00(7 PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING THIS / DAY OF - %i1-X�i.'-•i 1 11 lL_. rl C \'`‘...:\1 li L Al •,,,,, 1:::4-.4 �` . ATTEST: \ •. - -.r _ IT r:..... i;'; \-\ C') ' . 'Iv'elft• /..4 1,z u4aitil =, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO ''ILCRM,;,AIlD` LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: irtillY _ slake\ord_31(1291) -4- c5//Q —� City of Southlake,Texas A PERMIT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF (1kbe SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, GRANTING APPROVAL FOR AN ARCHERY AND BB GUN SHOOTING RANGE; SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS LISTED HEREIN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I . In accordance with Ordinance No. 527, Section 4, the City Council finds that the applicant represents a responsible organization and that the request for a permit is reasonable and is in the best interest of the public. II . A Permit is hereby granted for the Archery and BB Gun Shooting Range at Johnson Elementary School, subject to the following specific requirements and special conditions: 1 . The applicant shall receive permission from the Carroll Independent School District. 2 . The applicant shall comply with any down-range safety requirements established by the Director of Public Safety for the City of Southlake. 3 . This permit shall be for October 30, 1993, or the rain day of November 6, 1993, or another rain day if both the October 30 or November 6 days are rained out, provided however, that this permit will be valid for one (1) day only, and in any event shall expire within sixty (60) days of the effective date of this permit . 4 . 5 . III . This permit shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council . PASSED AND APPROVED THIS THE DAY OF , 1993 . CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Mayor Gary Fickes ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary b.PERMI7.BB/ORD/RES/kb City of Southlake,Texas A PERMIT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS, GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A BB GUN SHOOTING RANGE; SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS LISTED HEREIN; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. I. In accordance with Ordinance No. 527, Section 4,the City Council finds that the applicant represents a responsible organization and that the request for a permit is reasonable and is in the best interest of the public. II. A Permit is hereby granted for the Cub Scout BB Gun Shooting Range"Turkey Shoot" at Camp Burnett of Southlake, subject to the following specific requirements and special conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with any range safety and down-range safety requirements established by the Director of Public Safety for the City of Southlake. 2. This permit shall be for September 30 and October 1, 1995, or for two rain days if the September 30 and October 1, 1995 days are rained out, provided however,that this permit will be valid for two (2) days only, and in any event shall expire within sixty (60) days of the effective date of this permit. III. This permit shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council. Passed and approved this the day of , 1995. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BY: Mayor Gary Fickes ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary C:U3RD-RES.AGR�PERMITBBAd) c5 ' // City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 31, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Award of Bid for the Construction of a Sanitary Sewer to North Davis Business Park Background North Davis Business Park(Park)has been in need of sanitary sewer service for a long time. The Park is in the S-2 drainage basin and until the S-2 sewer was completed, the end of 1994, sewer service to the Park was not available. With the completion of the S-2 Sewer, the property owners have been working with City staff to extend the sewer to the Park. Initially the owners contacted Alan Plummer Associates to do a preliminary study and provide cost estimates. As there are approximately 20 lots and various owners involved and cost participation in the study became an issue, the City contracted with Alan Plummer to do the planning study. Since Alan Plummer Associates were initially engaged by the property owners, City staff has continued to use them on this project. Our cost was $1,800. The results of that study were presented to the property owners at a meeting on April 6, 1995. April 18, 1995 City Council authorized the Mayor to enter into a contract with Alan Plummer Associates, Inc. to provide engineering for surveying and design of the sanitary sewer. The contract was for a lump sum of$16,400. Then a June 20, 1995 City Council authorized staff to proceed to receive bids based upon the final plans. On August 16, 1995 eight bids were received. [See attached bid tabulation and letter from Alan Plummer Associates, Inc.] The low bid was from Wright Construction in the amount of$139,677.80 compared to the Engineer's estimate of $133,000. Funding Staff has approached this project as a combination of a typical developer's request where the City picks up the cost of oversizing the sewer and a sewer assessment where the City provides the - engineering. The final plans also called for a sewer to be extended along Davis Blvd. to north of Greenbriar Drive which would serve property owners other than North Davis Business Park. This sewer extension is optional but staff would recommend the construction, so that, Greenbriar L LCurtis E. Hawk, City Manager North Davis Business Park August 31, 1995 Page 2. Drive would not be torn up at a future date and the sewer would be available for additional properties. Therefore, based upon the bids received, the project would be funded by: City: Preliminary plan $ 1,800 Final plan 16,400 Subtotal engineering $18,200 Construction share: Oversizing $ 4,017 Sewer extension 18.222 Subtotal $22.239 Total City costs $40.439 (we Property Owners: 20 owners $117,438.80 (or $5,871.94/lot) Add City construction share 22.239.00 Total construction costs $139.677.80 At a meeting with the property owners on August 29, 1995 owners or representatives of 12 of the 20 lots agreed to pay the above per lot cost to the City. The property owners shares would be due prior to completion of the project. Public Works staff is presently collecting letters of commitment from each property owner. Recommendation Staff recommends that City Council approve the bid of Wright Construction in the amount of $139,677.80 for the construction of the N. Davis Business Park Sanitary Sewer and authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract for the construction. L �� —c Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager North Davis Business Park August 31, 1995 Page 3. Please place this item on the September 5, 1995 Council agenda for consideration. BW/sm Attachments: Allen Plummer bid summary Map showing project location L S-d-3 ic.,- ALAN PLUMMIER ASSOCIATES, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS•DESIGNERS•SCIENTISTS JAMES L ALTSTAETTE R.P.E. PEGGY W.GLASS.PhD. 572-0200/2 DAVID A GUDAL P.E. A LEE HEAD,III,P.E. ' August 29, 1995 BETTY L JORDAN.P.E. Robert O.O'BRIEN.P.E. Mr. Robert R. Whitehead, P.E. MARK A PERKINS,P.E Director of Public Works ALAN H.PLUMMER.JR, P.E. 667 North Carroll Avenue RICHARD H.SMITH.P.E. Southiake, Texas 76092 P.JONATHAN YOUNG,Ph.D.,P.E Re: North Davis Business Park Sanitary Sewer Service Extension Recommendation of Award Dear Mr. Whitehead: On August 16, 1995, eight bids were received for construction of the above-referenced project. Pending negotiation of a satisfactory payment agreement with the affected property owners, we recommend award of a construction contract for this project to Wright Construction Company, Inc. of Grapevine, Texas in the amount of$139,677.80. (hare We feel that the low bid amount is reasonably close to the $133,000 we had projected for this project. Of the total bid amount, we estimate that approximately 1913 if of pipe has been "oversized" beyond the immediate needs of the North Davis Business Park property owners. This oversizing from 6 inches to 8 inches accounts for approximately $4,017 of the total construction cost. We have also estimated that approximately $18,222 is attributable to extension of the line along Davis Boulevard north of Greenbriar Drive. This extension is useful in the City's ultimate plan for sewer service to this area, but it is not needed for connection of the North Davis Business Park properties. We understand that the City may wish to consider these items in its assessment of fees to the individual property owners in • and adjacent to the North Davis Business Park. A bid tabulation is attached for your information. We trust that this information will be helpful to the City. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, . ALAN PLUM I ASSOCIATES, INC. ,, if AV A. 'erkins, P.E. MAP:vlw 7524 VIEW COURT SUIT • FORT WORTH.TEXAS 76118-71 10 Enclosure PHONE 817-284-2724 METRO 817-589-2226 5720200\whitehead.l3 FAX METRO 817-589-0072 ✓ A_i/ (WI/ y g8888888888 $ 8888188188888 8 FO 423 N H I N W t- Q N 8 O >¢ $ m m.w 46 888(8pp888888888 �i ; 8_888'18_888888 t `r NNWNNNi g 4 O NOO8INN68N§2. ZZW �-0 M1 NJ ¢ ;8 > LL C m 6 88888888888 8 y 88888888888 8 w 88888888888 8 $ 11N1 M O $ ;ma asp . s O Na MNNNmM (m,M M W. N Z d N z O. SQ _0 N Z I y 8 � 8Q88 8888 888888 88 k 8 88 8818 8 8 8 8 8 8 tu ,' O INNNNN J ONNNNNNMN N . 3 HpNyoN►popMMN N H 7O m M Z N N al N ' Mi 0 W• O m ¢kw! pppp pppppppppppp p pp ppp �p p y w�N8 88.8888 P,, y 88N$?888$88. Or a .N-n/�.�CD.np..-h88W*8o gQ Yf 1q O 5� g1lf�^ M c� Z N,..N.,m. M 8 °1!4.1 ffiy tpo§y40A2 8 U aI♦kkkiiiS 4�p0 33 w� ` N _♦♦ O H Z O ^MNNN MMN N NNNNM » � vS MMMN�X�N - lig O Y`O ~ N OF 0Q wy• w[ ¢QLL p p pp p p >. > ppp pppppp pp ppypppp >' �y p p� (�Jp Q5 gg 6 IIV Vy GON(N$$88(p$$ ¢y O 88288OO�Of8V.88 �~z 1gm gmzM WN h V 8F NHNNNN MNNs OO F MWNR2NO�NM� >. z8 NNNM; «.1 NNNtl► Z z (� N M m o R M M tit N D Q >O Oi!yLo- p pppppppppppppppppp C pppp ppppGp' 2 Qm ppCC pp Gpp ('<V y 8888p888888 8 y 8888 888888 n m a 8888!8888$8 N O 8 EP: Co W O Z M YV►► O Nl7NN MMN M z $ N �1 `g NgN NM OD O O ~'1155' NM MM N us IAr► m 2 ; p p p p p p p p p p O W] p p p p p p p p p p 0 4. A J O p p p p p p p d� N 88888888888o RRm. tl1 8888Np8p888p88p, O FF- 88$8N888 88 z mrdp �yuipNM Z Q e��y8NO NNM -E'= FZ wwgdowp -.I - 8 NHNNMNa�O M *O V �jjNMf ONN� �o Z. NMN- Nl7NN Z N Z N N tit 30 N> > r C u 0 J 2 m c m�m W W W Q Z W W wow mjjm Q Z W W m.w' JQ ? w Z_Z_ > mzz > J z z LL- > ^s ¢JJ Qt (�eJ ¢JJ Q� �-t� ¢JJ Q W¢¢ N W Z W Q W W N W V z W> W W 'POW 111 °y&¢50 w owd¢d9 oNLLnag - mw <`K2zw € rnm Q wgzw . € rnm Q� Szw z 5 <Z9:o.z S z <ow-5m ` oowadO S5 4.OW�� z OiH mOw��,, awz ¢ Qm dw- V r.„> zoc..„OZOD w q, zo,.. 2"b. o; k ightnin (11bW' 00 r N Z LLLLLL LLLLWLLLLLLM Z LLLLLL4LLLL4LLLLLLy Z LLLLLL6LLLL6LL.4.4w 7 J J J J Jpp J p Jp p Jp J 7 J J J W J Jpp W J J J J P} J J J J J J J J ^nwN7-(O'ON V- F 'NNN�l7'-V��.- 1- fN W 8-417- NN < N l� VV N N O Z m > > o Q� 0 .-NM OO �NMYNwhwO/0� �NM Yhwt�w W O� 0 'Uwhw010.- 0. m W m w //_� m mtLuf ,-- t Vt.,/41/•f.I.1 III/ I4I.04 rAA CuI f-FaCStitald.4 A 1-1,11111IPR l< t,III . __ _ 41 OU Z _ i 1 1 i I it i t 4 UM X W I I 0 L gr n ce N vi ix a. -cc F..W 74-t 1 I 0 i %........ iz ,- -• 1 •• 0 an ...'.... f ........... ti 0 4 %. P.-In V I 1 ..s 4 m 0 • ...-in .. z E 1 i 1 : <= -I-Ilk 1\ ., , • ox e, v I .t. • i • i 1 : V)0 8S- 1 I 'C. I II 1 I ---- • : a.La • VI : g : . . , , • , 1 , —F II )--:icty n,s reit E 3 : _ ____, $ 01 1 tigE : • (N.' . i !, ---,„-: :1 1 :111 I 1 ill . 1 . 1 i i 1 , ____ . L ilill i ---. ..... ia—' h " —— _ , 1, 1 i 1 1 • i 1 I ei EV-5 ', I 1 / , 'sq•:.., .,...- _ - --.- , X 1.----1-- w . . . . of • 1 • \ i t ____, z of, t__------- - 1- ci --—.---- ..1_, hi i 1 I I IL 1 1 bp I I 1 1 • 1 1 ...1- ." . 11 - - , .--. 1 4--,1 I • I - I 1 I I 1 ....: - .. ', 1 , , • , . i 1 . I • , . . . • : --- , --I i • IlLeLLSWIrsz LIS as ra=.2.• uvulas-L.us,LP.0J 1.1mw.ti ULLada•Sim•JAL•41-0.•10"1.______________ _____.-_--_-_--7 wajamic3...--__-__—.-_---ir.______ ja , 1 240 i i i lir _ _ —_ 1 1 I .....„4„.-1 . I 111 , L 4 1, 1 i i 1 i 1 .., ....) • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 31, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Billy Campbell, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 642, 2nd Reading, Establishing the Speed Zone on a Portion of F.M. 1938 and South White Chapel Blvd., Repealing Ordinance No. 216 The State is requesting that the speed limit on F.M. 1938 (Davis Blvd.) south of F.M. 1709 to the Southlake city limits be changed from 55 mph to 45 mph. Currently this section is signed at 55 mph. Attached are survey results from the Texas Department of Transportation. There has also been a second request to extend the 30 mph speed limit on S. White Chapel Blvd. from Continental Blvd. to F.M. 1709. Before the area became as populous as it currently is, the City reduced the speed limit from Continental Blvd. to the bridge on S. White Chapel Blvd. to conform to the 30 mph speed zone as you enter Colleyville city limits. At that time it was generally felt that the current posted limit would be sufficient from Continental Blvd. to F.M. 1709. With the increase in traffic in recent years, and because driveway and entryways onto S. White Chapel Blvd. have been erected, hazards have been created which cause us to request the new speed limit of 30 mph. These requests are included in the attached ordinance that has been reworded to replace Ordinance No. 118 and all of its amendments. This will allow the City to adopt stand-alone ordinances when creating, changing, or nullifying school zones, speed zones, etc. Currently the City must amend Ordinance No. 118 per each request, which creates a possibility of error. Under the submitted ordinance, in the future we will adopt a stand-alone ordinance directly related to the specific situation at hand. •The ordinance also requires the Director of Public Works to authorize engineering and traffic investigations for each proposal, and if and when the City Council adopts said measure, the Director of Public Works will erect and maintain the appropriate signalization and file a written inventory with the City Secretary. This ordinance is similar to the ordinance that the City passed approximately two years ago cleaning up the array of ordinances that were on the books concerning other traffic devices, signage and other markings (i.e. stop sign, yield sign, etc.). There is a typographical on page 3 of this ordinance agenda item page 7A-7. The ordinance reads N. Whites Chapel from 1709 to Dove Rd. and when corrected will read N. Whites Chapel from 1709 to the north end of N. Whites Chapel. This aligns the ordinance with the current posted limit. The Department of Public Safety recommends that the City adopt Ordinance No. 642. BC/bls 74 1 • ,/ COPY • Air Texas Department of Transportation (re P.O. BOX 6868•FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76115-0868•(817) 370-6500 June 27, 1995 RECEIVED Subject: Speed Zone in Southlake CITY SECRETAR Control : 1978-01 Highway: FM 1938 County : Tarrant Mrs. Sandra Legrand City Secretary City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mrs . Legrand: The original strip map for the above mentioned highway has been redrawn to reflect the speed zones that have changed. kfter reviewing the strip map, if the City Council concurs with our 1kw,,recommendation, we would appreciate them passing an ordinance establishing the proposed speed zone . We are enclosing two copies of a typical speed zone ordinance for their consideration. Please send a copy of the ordinance to this office . You may retain the strip map for your file and use . If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Jay Holcomb at (817) 370-6813 . Sincerely, ed A. Abukar, P.E. District Traffic Engineer j dh Attachment L An Equal Opoortunity Employ or • (.0 ,, N 00N- O In 2 am- 45 ZONED AT 55 BY KELLER <E °C 44 i�J 52 V 1(47 m 1±1 '11-] 0125 Z S 1' 32'E �' v J 45 ti4; 55 I25 45 45 ZONED AT 55 BY KELLER 892 120' - 42' ON 20' SINGLE ASPH. ON 8'X40' FLEX BASE- 8" TWO CST►LDRS - 2ML DENTIAL/LIGHT BUSINESS . _ 85th PERCENTILE SPEED TOP SPEED MEASURED NUMBER OF CARS CHECKED FATAL ACCIDENTSSPEED z0NE, PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT LOPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENT INDICATES SECTION ZONED BY COMMISSION MINUTE '7�a - 2 • Ns44N4''i, VELOPMENT S ScSTANCE W LL < OR ADVISORY SPEED 0 — RVES VER 2° 00 O ADES OVER 3% O. RFACE WIDTH AND TYPE 0 >.W. AND RDBD. WIDTH a.. �, CIDENTS Cr) NE LENGTHS MILE NE SPEEDS MPH _ 45 -li SOUT TOWARDS 48 II FM 1709 ...1 56 POP. 125 S 0" I8'E TOWARDS 47 Fo. KELLER 56 125 NIT. II NE SPEEDS MPH -•. 45 NE LENGTHS . MILE CIDENTS -� ).W. AND RDBD. WIDTH I 20' USUAL IRFACE WIDTH AND TYPE _ 89x I o" ACP ON 6" FLEX BASE, CURBS„ 5 ML 26X FADES OVER 3% 'RYES OVER 2° .LL BANK OR ADVISORY SPEED :S SIGHT DISTANCE VELOPMENT • 3. NAME' FT WORTH COUNTY' TARRANT MINUTE NO DATE 33HWAY' FM 1938 CITY' SOUTHLAKE REPLACES NONE DATE REPLACED DATE ►TE OF SURVEY' JUN 95 SCALE' 10=I MILE CANCELED BY DATE LIMITS OF ZONE ;,TON ONE SECTION TWO STA OR MP CONT & SECT PROJECT STA OR MP CONT & SECT PROJECT N L.{1,,o, BEGINS STA OR MP CONT & SECT PROJECT STA OR MP CONT & SECT PROJECT )S ENDS I 7-%— / ORDINANCE NO. 6'1'4 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SPEED LIMITS ON STREETS AND ROADWAYS WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE; DIRECTING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO POST APPROPRIATE SIGNS; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO.216 AND REPEALING SECTION XXV OF ORDINANCE NO. 118, AS AMENDED; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 169 of Article 6701d,Vernon's Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.,the LCity of Southlake,Texas has the authority to establish prima facie maximum reasonable and prudent speeds within its corporate boundaries for vehicles on streets and highways; and WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Southlake recognizes that it is necessary to regulate traffic near schools so as to promote the safety of children going to or from school; and WHEREAS, the city council of the City of Southlake deems it necessary to provide for a period of time during the day when the reduced speed limit applies that is of sufficient length to protect children going to and from school; and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Safety has conducted an engineering and traffic - investigation and study to determine a prima facie maximum speed limit which is reasonable L f:\files\slake\ordinanc\speed.002(08-31-95) • and safe on all roadways within the city limits of Southlake including school crossing zones; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the engineering and traffic investigation and study, the city council desires to adopt this ordinance setting prima facie maximum speed limits on all roadways within the City of Southlake, including school crossing zones. WHEREAS, the prima facie maximum reasonable speed limits adopted herein are not in conflict with any order of the Texas Transportation Commission declaring speed limits along any roadways within the city limits of Southlake. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if copied in their entirety. SECTION 2. It shall be unlawful for any person to drive or operate a vehicle on a street or highway within the City of Southlake at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the circumstances then existing. SECTION 3. Any speed in excess of the prima facie maximum reasonable and prudent speed limit established by ordinance for the location shall be prima facie evidence that the speed is not reasonable and prudent and that it is unlawful. (pr F\files\slake\ordinanc\speed.002(08-31-95) 2 SECTION 4. The prima facie maximum reasonable and prudent speed for travel upon any street or highway within the City of Southlake shall be thirty (30) miles per hour, except: (1) upon S.H. 114 and F.M. 1709; (2) upon streets and highways with a speed limit otherwise established by the State of Texas; (3) upon streets and highways with a speed limit otherwise established by ordinance; (4) where a slower speed is required by paragraphs (b) and (c) of Section 166 of article 6701d,Tex.Rev. Civ.Stat.Ann.because of a special hazard or other condition set forth in said paragraphs. A speed limit of thirty (30) miles per hour shall be effective immediately upon any street or highway not presently posted with appropriate signs and shall be effective upon any street or highway otherwise posted with a different speed limit upon such presently existing speed limit sign being removed and a new speed limit sign reflecting a posted speed of thirty (30 ) miles per hour being erected. SECTION 5. The prima facie maximum reasonable and prudent speed for travel on the portions of the streets or highways designated below shall be the speed in miles per hour (mph) designated below, provided that an appropriate sign giving notice thereof is erected: STREET SPEED LIMIT (mph) North White Chapel Blvd. from F.M. 1709 to Dove Road 40 F.M. 1938 (Davis Blvd.) from mile point 0.000 South 0.892 45 - miles to mile point 0.0892 L f:\files\slake\ordinanc\speed.002(08-31-95) 3 7A- 7 (are SECTION 6. The prima facie maximum reasonable and prudent speed on the portion of the streets or highways designated below shall be the speed in miles per hour designated below, between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., both inclusive, and 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m., both inclusive, Monday through Friday, when school is in session, provided that an appropriate sign giving notice thereof is erected. The reduced speed limits established herein shall only be enforced between the signs which are erected designating the beginning and end of each school crossing zone. It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge of exceeding said prima facie maximum speed established below that the day in question was a day when there were no classes in session at the nearest school. LieSCHOOL CROSSING ZONE STREET SPEED LIMIT CARROLL INTERMEDIATE 1000 Block N. Carroll Avenue 20 through 1500 Block N. Carroll Avenue JOHNSON ELEMENTARY 1000 Block N. Carroll Avenue 20 through 1500 Block of N. Carroll Avenue CARROLL MIDDLE SCHOOL 2100 Block N. Carroll Avenue 20 through 2600 Block N. Carroll Avenue 800 Block E. Dove through 1300 20 Block E. Dove CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL 100 Block S. Peytonville through 20 300 Block S. Peytonville L f:\files\slake\ocdinanc\speed.002(08-31-95) 4 CARROLL ELEMENTARY 900 Block S. Peytonville to 20 (ire Continental Blvd. 1300 Block W. Continental 20 through 2200 Block W. Continental FLORENCE ELEMENTARY 3000 Block Johnson Road 20 through 3200 Block Johnson Road DURHAM ELEMENTARY 500 Block Shady Oaks Drive 20 through 1100 Block Shady Oaks Drive 3000 Block Johnson Road 20 through 3200 Block Johnson Road CLAREDON SCHOOL 1000 Block N. White Chapel 20 Blvd. through 1400 Block N. White Chapel Blvd. MONTESSORI SCHOOL 1000 Block E. Highland to • 20 Intersection with S.H. 114 SECTION 7. The speed limits, as established herein, may be revised from time to time by ordinance adopted by the city council. The Director of Public Works is hereby authorized to conduct engineering and traffic investigations and studies to determine prima facie maximum speed limits which are reasonable and safe on roadways within the city limits of Southlake and to make recommendations to the city council concerning speed regulations and traffic control devices. (ow f:\files\slake\ordinanc\speed.002(08-31-95) 5 SECTION 8. The Director of Public of Public Works is hereby directed to ensure that appropriate signs are erected and maintained giving notice of adopted speed limits, and the times and location in which a reduced speed limit within a school crossing zone is in effect. The Director of Public Works shall file a written inventory with the City Secretary of all locations in the City at which signs have been erected indicating a speed limit other than thirty (30) miles per hour. Hereafter, whenever speed limits are revised by the city council and the Director of Public Works erects and installs any sign indicating a new speed limit at any location in this City, he shall file an updated inventory with the City Secretary. The City Secretary shall file and maintain such inventory among the official papers of the office of the City Secretary. Cie SECTION 9. The abbreviations used herein include the following: "E" means "East" "W' means "West" "N" means "North" "S" means "South" "F.M." means "Texas Farm to Market Road" "S.H." means 'Texas State Highway" Block numbers are inclusive as to the portion of the street covered by both block numbers and all areas between said block numbers, including intersections. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with L f:\files\slake\ordinanc\speed.002(08-31-95) 6 7/-/O the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. Section XXV of Ordinance No. 118, as amended, is hereby repealed. Ordinance No. 216 is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION 11. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction,such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, (160, paragraph or section. SECTION 12. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 13. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 118, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting prima facie speed limits on roadways within the city limits which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all • f:\files\slake\ordinanc\speed.002(08-31-95) 7 7—!/ pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 14. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. (re SECTION 15. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY (ye f:\files\slake\ordinanc\speed.002(08-31-95) 8 7/41/c9? PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney L e f:\files\slake\ordinanc\speed.002(08-31-95) 9 7/Q /3 • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 1, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Ordinance 647 - Adopting the Tax Rate for FY1995-96 On July 25, the Tarrant Appraisal District certified appraised values to the City of Southlake. Total taxable value in the City is $1,041,743,161. This establishes the value of properties in Southlake as of January 1, 1995. These appraised values net of exemptions are assessed a tax rate effective October 1, 1995. Truth in Taxation laws require the City to calculate and publish an effective tax rate, notice-and hearing limit, and rollback tax rate. The effective tax rate is generally equal to the prior year's taxes divided by the current taxable value of properties that were also on the tax roll in the prior year. This shows the relation between the prior year's revenue and the current year's values. The effective tax rate notice for Southlake reflects $.41031 as the effective tax rate, $.42262 as the notice and hearing limit, and $.42844 as the rollback rate. The City of Southlake's effective tax rate notice (1995 Property Tax Rates in the City of Southlake) was published August 16, 1995 in the Fort Worth Star Telegram. A copy of the notice is attached for your review. The FY1995-96 budget presented to the City Council proposes a tax rate of$.42262 per $100 of assessed valuation. During the work sessions on the budget, it was suggested that the rate be $.422 per $100, dropping the last two numbers for simplification. The proposed tax rate is comprised of two parts: the operating, or maintenance and operations, rate, and the debt rate. Ordinance 647 proposes the following tax rate for the FY1995-96 year: maintenance and operations rate $.26285 debt rate $.15915 total rate $.42200 ,> This rate is a decrease of $.027 per $100 from the FY1994-95 rate of $.449. The Council approved Ordinance 647 at their August 15 meeting. Please place this ordinance on the agenda for second reading at the September 5 meeting. LAH Wednesday,August 16,1995/NORTHEAST,Fort Worth Star-Telegram/ Section A,Page 23:' 1 — •1995 Property Tax Rates in•the City of Southlake •• 14%be This notice concerns 1995 property tax rates for the City of Southlake.It presents information about three tax rates.Last -year's tax rate is the actual rate the taxing unit used to determine property taxes last year.This year's effective tax rate Y would impose the same total taxes as last year if you compare properties taxed in both years.This year's rollback tax rate {» is the highest tax rate the taxing unit can set before taxpayers can start tax rollback procedures.In each case these rates •, are found by dividing the total amount of taxes by the tax base(the total value of taxable property)with adjustments as required by state law.The rates are given per$100 of property value. • Last year's tax rate: Last year's operating taxes $2,250,058. 9 Last year's debt taxes $1,452,622. - Last year's total taxes $3,702,680. x, Last year's tax base • $824,650,349. Last year's total tax rate $.44900/$100 ', • Last year's effective tax rate: i�' Last year's adjusted taxes $3,681,870. (after subtracting taxes on lost property) + This year's adjusted tax base $897,334,072. (after subtracting taxes on lost property) - = This year's effective tax rate $.41031/$100 x 1.03=maximum rate unless unit ; publishes notices and holds hearing $.42262/$100 This year's rollback tax rate: Last year's adjusted operating taxes $2,237,413. . . (after subtracting taxes on lost property and adjusting for transferred function) ' +This year's adjusted tax base $897,334,072. =This year's effective operating rate $i4934/$100 • x 1.08 cents=this year's maximum operating rate $.26929/$100 +This year's debt rate $.15915/$100 =This year's rollback rate $.42844/$100 (re Schedule A Unencumbered Fund Balances . The following estimated balances will probably be left in the unit's property tax accounts at the end of the fiscal year.These balances are not encumbered by a corresponding debt obligation. Type of Property Tax Fund Balance :v'T General Fund S1,017,474. General Obligation Debt Service Fund $356,099. Schedule B 1995 Debt Service The unit plans to pay the following amounts for long-term debts that are secured by property taxes. These amounts will be paid from property tax revenues. Principal or Interest to be Contract Payment Paid from to be Paid from Property Total: Description Q(12ght Przraliluss Tans Pint • 1984 eries G.O.Bonds $45,000. $4,500. $49,500. •1990eries G.O.Refunding Bonds • S115,000. , $27,682. $142,682. . i 1990 Public Property Contractual Obligations $45,000. $1,603. $46,603. 1990 TRA-Denton Creek Revenue Bonds $45,000. $93,328. $138,328. } 1990 TRA-Southlake Sewer System Contract Revenue Bonds $35,000 $77,875 . $112,875 . 1991 Combination Tax and Revenue Certificates of Obligation $45,000 $1,350 $46,350 • 1992 Series Tax/WW and Sewer System Revenue Certificates $40,000 $78,925 ' $118,925 1992 Series General Obligation Bonds $45,000 $88,617 $133,617 1993 Series Certificates of Obligation $65,000 $8,410 $73,410 1993 Series Public Property Finance Contract Obligations $125,000 $18,920 $143,920 — . 1993 General Obligation Refunding and Improvement Bonds • $175,000 $274,700 •$449,700 1994 Note Payable $156,500 $45,570 S202,070 ' ' $936,500 $721,480 $1,657,980 Total required for 1995 debt service S1,657,980. - Amount(if any)paid from funds listed in Schedule A $.0. (ilirw • - Excess collectionslast year $0 = Total to be paid from taxes in 1995 $1,657,980. + Amount added in anticipation that the City will collect ' only 100%of its taxes in 1995 $0 1 = Total Debt Levy $1,657,980. This notice contains a summary of actual effective and rollback tax rat.v^"rculations.You can inspect a copy of the full calculations at Southlake City Hall,667 N.Carroll Avenue c 76092. Name of person preparing this notice:Lou Ann Heath.T 70-a ance,City of Southlake,Texas 76092. • ORDINANCE NO. 647 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, FIXING AND LEVYING MUNICIPAL AD VALOREM TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1995 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND FOR EACH YEAR THEREAFTER UNTIL OTHERWISE PROVIDED, AT THE RATE OF $0.422 PER ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) ASSESSED VALUE ON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AS OF JANUARY 1, 1995, TO PROVIDE REVENUES FOR THE PAYMENT OF CURRENT EXPENSES AND TO PROVIDE AN INTEREST AND SINKING FUND ON ALL OUTSTANDING DEBTS OF THE CITY; DIRECTING THE ASSESSMENT THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR DUE AND DELINQUENT DATES TOGETHER WITH PENALTIES AND INTEREST THEREON; PROVIDING FOR PLACE OF PAYMENT; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF THE TAX ROLLS PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "City") hereby fords that the tax for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1995, and ending September 30, 1996, hereinafter levied for current expenses of the City and the general improvements of the City and its property must be levied to provide the revenue requirements of the budget for the ensuing year; and WHEREAS, the City Council has approved, by a separate ordinance adopted on the 5th day of September, 1995, the budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1995, and ending September 30, 1996; and WHEREAS, all statutory and constitutional requirements concerning the levying and assessing of ad valorem taxes have been complied with. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. That there is hereby levied and ordered to be assessed and collected for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1995, and ending September 30, 1996, and for each fiscal year thereafter until it be otherwise provided by and ordained on all taxable property, real, personal and mixed, situated within the corporate limits of the City of Southlake, Texas, and not exempt 7% - 3 • Ordinance No. 647 Page 2 L from taxation by the Constitution of the State and valid State laws, an ad valorem tax rate of $0.422 for the general operations of the City on each One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) assessed value of taxable property, and shall be apportioned and distributed as follows: a. For the purpose of defraying the current expenses of the municipal government of the City, a tax of$0.26285 on each One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) assessed value of all taxable property. b. For the purpose of creating a sinking fund to pay the interest and principal on all outstanding debt of the City, not otherwise provided for, a tax of$0.15915 on each one Hundred Dollars ($100.00) assessed value of all taxable property, within the City which shall be applied to the payment of such interest and maturities of all outstanding debt. Section 3. That all ad valorem taxes shall become due and payable on December 31, 1995, and all ad valorem taxes for the year shall become delinquent after January 31, 1996. There shall be no discount for payment of taxes prior to said January 31, 1996. A delinquent tax shall incur all penalty and interest authorized by State law Section 33.01 of the Property Tax Code, to-wit: a penalty of six percent (6%) of the amount of the tax for the first calendar month it is delinquent plus one percent (1%) for each additional month or portion of a month the tax Niiir remains unpaid prior to July 1st of the year in which it becomes delinquent. Provided, however, a tax delinquent by July 1st incurs a total penalty of twelve percent (12%) of the amount of the delinquent tax without regard to the number of months the tax has been delinquent. A delinquent tax shall also accrue interest at a rate of one percent (1%) for each month or portion of a month the tax remains unpaid. Taxes that remain delinquent on July 1, 1996, incur an additional penalty of fifteen percent (15%) of the amount of taxes, penalty and interest due; such additional penalty is to defray costs of collection due to contract with the City's attorney pursuant to Section 6.30 of the Property Tax Code. Section 4. Taxes are payable at the office of Tarrant County Tax Collector. The City shall have available all rights and remedies provided by law for the enforcement of the collection of taxes levied under this ordinance. Section 5. That the tax rolls, as presented to the City Council, together with any supplement thereto, be, and the same are hereby approved. Section 6. That any and all ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations, policies or provisions inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby expressly repealed and rescinded to the extent of the inconsistency or conflict. Section 7. If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Ordinance, or application thereto any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such Ordinance No. 647 Page 3 L remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall • remain in full force and effect. Section 8. That the necessity of fixing and levying municipal ad valorem taxes of the City for the next fiscal year as required by the laws of the State of Texas, requires that this Ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on first reading this day of 1995. Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand (hme, City Secretary PASSED AND APPROVED on first reading this day of 1995. Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Date: Adopted: Effective: C:\ORD-RES.AGR\ORD-647.TAXAb � 4 7/6 ///� ..fJ / x3 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 1, 1995 • TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Ordinance 648- FY1995-96 Proposed Annual Budget and Revised FY1994-95 Budget. Public Hearing. Over the past several months, City staff has prepared budget requests for the fiscal year that begins October 1, 1995. Staff has also prepared estimates of the remaining expenditures for the current fiscal year. Reviews of these requests with the city manager's office resulted in a proposed FY1995-96 budget which was filed with the City Secretary's office as required by City Charter on August 1. Council work sessions on August 8, 10, 16, 17 and 29 have been held to discuss the proposed budget for FY1995-96 and the revised budget for FY1994-95. Ordinance 648, adopting the budget on first reading was approved August 15. Second reading on the budget is set for September 5. Changes to the budget as discussed in the August 29 work session will be incorporated into the budget summary work sheets, along with supporting narrative, for both the operating budget and the capital projects budget. These changes and summary work sheets will be distributed at the Council meeting Tuesday night. Please place Ordinance 648 on the Council's agenda for September 5. LAH (kw' 7e-i /j� / NI ORDINANCE NO 648 ,-. / ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF L //` SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPROVING REVISED BUDGET '' FIGURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-95; APPROVING AND /� ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR > 1" �- BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1995, AND TERMINATING /( r SEPTEMBER 30, 1996,AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR EACH DEPARTMENT, PROJECT AND ACCOUNT; REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING ) SAVINGS AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND DECL G AN EFFECTIVE DATE. , WHEREAS, the ity Tanager has prepared a revision of certain figures in the 1994-95 _ budget and submitted same to the City Council; and, -w , WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Southlake, Texas(hereinafter referred to as 7 e "City") has caused to be filed with the City Secretary a budget to cover all proposed expenditures of the government of the City for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1995, and ending September 30, 1996, (hereinafter referred to as the "Budget");ffijal or - WHEREAS, the Budget, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein for all purposes, shows as definitely as possible each of the various projects t ape for which appropriations are set up in the Budget, and the estimated amount of money carried in the Budget for each of such projects; and` WHEREAS, the Budget has been filed with the City Secretary for at least thirty (30) days and available for inspection by any taxpayer; and -- • HEREAS, public notice of public hearings on the proposed annual budget, stating the dates, times, places and subject matter of said public hearings, was given as required by the Charter of the City of Southlake and the laws of the State of Texas; and - ,I EREAS, such public hearings were held on August 15, 1995 and September 5, 1995, pri:' .pproval of such dates being hereby ratified and confirmed by the City Council, and all those wishing to speak on the Budget were heard; and EREAS, the Oity Council has studied the Budget and listened to the comments of the taxpayers at the public hearings held therefor and has determined that the Budget attached hereto is in the best interest of the City. - OW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHL' ' EXAS: - ection 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are (..,, incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. .-cti•n 2. That the revised figures, prepared and submitted by the City Manager for the 1994-95 budget, be, and the s ani are hereby, in all things,,approved and appropriated, and Ordinance No. 648 Page 2 • any necessary transfers between accounts and departments are hereby authorized, approved, and appropriated. Section 3. That the Budget attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein for all purposes is adopted for the Fiscal Year beginning October 1, 1995, and ending September 30, 1996; and there is hereby appropriated from the funds indicated such projects, operations, activities, purchases and other expenditures as proposed in the Budget. Section 4. That the City Manager shall file or cause to be filed a true and correct copy of the approved Budget, along with this ordinance, with the City Secretary and in the office of the County Clerks of Denton and Tarrant County, Texas, as required by State law. Section 5. That any and all ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations, policies or provisions in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed and rescinded to the extent of conflict herewith. Section 6. If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Ordinance, or application thereto any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. Section 7. That the necessity of adopting and approving a proposed budget for the next fiscal year as required by the laws of the State of Texas requires that this Ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage, and it is accordingly so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on first reading this day of 1995. Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary PASSED AND APPROVED ON second reading this day of 1995. le -3 Ordinance No. 648 Page 3 (re Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Date: Adopted: Effective: C:\ORD•RES.AGR\ORDN/.BGL/kb (We City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 1, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Resolution 95-34, Schedule of Fees Resolution 95-34 is presented for consideration in connection with the adoption of the FY95-96 - budget. Each year during the budget process Department Heads review the schedule of fees that pertain to their activities. Recommendations are made at the staff level for changes to the fees. These changes may be the result of state requirements, a new service to be provided, in-house review of the cost of providing the service, or adjustments due to comparisons with area cities. The fee changes have been incorporated into the proposed FY95-96 budget. Changes are recommended in several sections of the schedule of fees. Section I deals with Administrative Activities. The State has notified the City that effective September 1 they will require $2 be collected and remitted to them for each birth certificate issued by the City. The fee (#11) is proposed to increase from $11 to $13 per copy. Section II, (#26), Community Development Activities, has recommended an addition to the fee schedule. Cheatham& Associates will provide a digitized map of the City on tape. This will be a download of the City's current file. We are proposing to offer this to developers and engineers as requested for $140 each. Section III, Public Works Activities, lists as a new fee the Sewer Participation fee (#10) set by the Council for cost participation in the neighborhood sewer program. This fee will be charged to each lot/house in the program. Another activity added is listed as Exhibit "B", Critical Drainage Structure Fees. Exhibit "B" lists by critical drainage structure the per acre fee as established in the Drainage Study and Analysis at Critical Drainage Structures report dated June 1995 by Cheatham & Associates. Section IV, Park Activities, includes several changes. These changes were approved by the Park Board at their August meeting. LAH 7b—/ • RESOLUTION NO. 95-34 (s.• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 94-46; PROVIDING THAT THIS RESOLUTION SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 94-46, NO. 94-61, and NO. 95-05; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 592 providing for the adoption of fees and revisions thereto from time to time by resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council with Resolution No. 94-46 set a schedule of fees for certain services; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the perimeter street fees and has determined that said fees should be included in the fee schedule. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Schedule of Fees, Section I, Administrative Activities, Section II, Community Development Activities, Section III, Public Works Activities, and Section IV, Park Activities is amended per the attached. Section 2. That this resolution shall be cumulative of all provisions of Resolution No. 94-46 of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this resolution are in direct conflict with provisions of such resolution, in which event the conflicting provisions of such resolution are hereby repealed. Section 3. That the fee established herein shall be effective upon passage of this Resolution and shall take precedence over any fees previously adopted which are in conflict herewith. PASSED AND APPROVED this the day of , 1995. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ATTEST: Gary Fickes, Mayor , Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary B:95-34res.fee/ORD&RES/kb 713--a? SCHEDULE OF FEES L ACTIVITY FEE, SECTION I. Administrative Activities 1. NSF Check Return Charge $20.00 2. Copy Charges $.10/page 3. Water Service Customer Listing $1.00/computer page 4. Water Customer Mailing Labels $35.00 5. Offense/Accident Report Copies $4.00 ea. 6. Burning Permits $0.00 7. Ambulance Fees: Transport-Baylor, Grapevine (w/o oxygen) $150.00 Transport-Baylor, Grapevine (with oxygen) $160.00 Transport-Other Hospitals (w/o oxygen) $300.00 Transport-Other Hospitals (with oxygen) $310.00 8. House Moving Permit $10.00 + $1,000 Surety Bond + 1.5 x hourly rate of 2 police officers utilized in the move 9. Solicitation/Vendor Permit $35.00 (Co. license) +$10.00/Agent + $1,000 Surety Bond 10. Seasonal Permits $25.00 11. Vital Statistics: Certificate of Death $9.00/ 1st copy 3.00 each add'l copy at time of initial request .................. Certificate of Birth $11 / copy L b:ISCH995.FEEIORD&RES/kb(9/95) /�7D'S ACTIVITY FEE • 12. Wrecker Permit Fee: (Amended Res.x94-61) Permit fee per wrecker vehicle $24.00 per year (waived for contract agency) Permit Fee per authorized driver $12.00 per year (waived for contract agency) SECTION II. Community Development Activities 1. Board of Adjustment requests $200.00/request 2. Amendment to Zoning Ordinance $200.00/request 3. Zoning Only $200.00 + $10/Acre 4. Concept Plan Only $200.00 + $10/Acre 5. Zoning & Concept Plan $300.00 + $10/Acre 6. Zoning and Site Plan $300.00 + $10/Acre 7. Zoning/Concept & Site Plan $500.00 + $10/Acre 8. Specific Use Permit $200.00 + $10/Acre 9. Site Plans $300.00 + $10/Acre 10. Amended Plat s 4 lots $200.00 + $20/Lot/Res $200.00 + $20/Ac-Comm 11. Amended Plat > 4 lots $300.00 + $20/Lot-Res $300.00 + $20/Ac-Comm 12. Plat Showing (1 lot) $200.00 + $20/Lot-Res $200.00 + $20/Ac-Comm 13. Plat Showing (multiple lots) $300.00 + $20/Lot-Res $300.00 + $20/Ac/Comm 14. Preliminary Plat (Non-P.U.D.) $300.00 + $20/Lot-Res $300.00 + $20/Ac-Comm b.•ISCH995.FEEIORD&RES/kb(9/95) 7D.-41 ACTIVITY FEE Cr' 15. Preliminary Plat (P.U.D.) $300.00 + $30/Lot-Res $300.00 + $30/Ac-Comm 16. Final Plat (Non-P.U.D.) $300.00 + $20/Lot-Res $300.00 + $20/Ac-Comm 17. Final Plat (P.U.D.) $300.00 + $30/Lot-Res $300.00 + $30/Ac-Comm 18. Plat Revision $300.00 + $20/Lot-Res $300.00 + $20/Ac-Comm 19. Plat Vacation $200.00 Flat Fee 20. Rush Plat Filing $300.00 Flat Fee 21. Two-County Filing $50.00 Flat Fee 22. Extra Plat Page Filing $20.00 Flat Fee 23. Mapping (1:1000) -Blueprint $20.00 per map PP g P -Color $30.00 per map 24. Mapping (1:2000) -Black/White $5.00 per map -Color $10.00 per map 25. Mapping 11"x 17" plat reduction copies $2.00 per map 26. Mappingi`.:,:. motor) $140M0 ' p 26ai Street Name Change $100.00 per street 2-7.20. Temporary Batch Plant Permit $.00 per Permit 2 . Tree Removal Permit $.00 per Permit 29 Q. Park land Dedication- Raw acreage cost $25,000.00 per acre L b:ISCH995.FEEIORD&RES/kb(9/95) 7 D_5- ACTIVITY FEE L SECTION III. Public Works Activities • 1. Administrative Processing Fee 2% Actual Construction Cost 2. Computer Drainage Study: HEC I: $400.00 + $10/Linear Foot HEC II: $400.00 + $10/Linear Foot 3. Construction Inspection 3% Actual Construction Cost 4. Street Cut Permit $15.00 per Street 5. Easement Abandonments $150.00 Flat Fee 6. R.O.W. Abandonments $150.00 Flat Fee 7. Easement/R.O.W. Dedications $100.00 per Easement 8. Water Tap Fee 1" Meter $360.00 2" Meter $600.00 4" Meter $1,900.00 6" Meter $2,777.00 8" Meter $4,054.00 9. Sewer Tap Fee $75.00 10. sooktittioNdoiroo sumo E0 . Water Administrative Service Charge $15.00 -H . Water Deposits: Residential Accounts $50.00 Commercial Accounts Reviewed by Utility Billing Supervisor ±21 . Fire Plug Meter Deposit (City Meter) $650.00 Fire Plug Meter Deposit (Own Meter) $100.00 (to' b:ISCH995.FEEIORD&RES/kb(9/95) ACTIVITY FEE L 11 Water Reconnect Fees for Non-Payment, Business Days Only: 8 a.m.-5 p.m.: lst/2nd/3rd & subsequent $20/$40/$60 After 5 p.m.: lst/2nd/3rd & subsequent $40/$60/$80 Weekends, anytime $40/$60/$80 Se. Water Meter Re-installation Fee $50.00 6. Water Meter Reread Fee $5.00 141. Damaged or Broken Lock $25.00 11#. Late Utility Payment Fee 5% of Outstanding Balance -WO. Street Light Costs Developer pays installation + 2-year operation cost 1920. Building Permit Fees Per the currently adopted U.B.C. (Administrative Code) 2e21 Water Well Permit $42.00 210. Tent Permit $15.00 220. Sign Permit, Permanent Type (1 - 50 sq ft) $50.00 minimum Sign Permit, Permanent Type (> 50 sq ft) $1.00 / sq ft Sign Permit, Temporary Type $25.00 Illuminated Sign, Electrical Permit $35.00 (in addition to above) 244. Request for Variance to Sign Ordinance $100.00/request 203 Culvert and/or Approach Permit $42.00 2526. Building Contractor's Registration Fee $75.00 2627. Perimeter Street Fees(Amended Res.#95-05) See Exhibit "A" CñticalDig s000mitim b:ISCH995.FEEIORD&RES/kb(9/95) 7D-7 ACTIVITY FFF, (ire SECTION IV. Park Activities 1. - .............................................................................................. .�...�.x..................j.`.�..p..�....................j.!.�..�...................................... rr Fee A..-......a...............s r....io............................. ..................... Regular;M ."ngs $25.00 '': yr Security Deposit $50.00 (refundable) WtOkid. ><r $1i:00/ ' Lodge in the Park $10.00/Hr Community Building/room $15.00/nmr/ hr (3-lir min) 2. . Special Events Fee: Lodge in the Park $10.00/Hi Community Building/room $15.00/rm/hr (3 hr min) (or Community Building/entire building $75.00/hr (3 hr nun) ................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................. i il�ing>kese; :.::::_i _ $POOlal tActivities 010.11400tC040111;ViOiRiti. om u .;:,> gigOrf bu ing $ / 3 Note: Moved under Item #7 €3. Organized Athletic Programs $1,000,000 General Liability Insurance Policy ...................................................................... ..................................................................... 5:4. TV/VCR Rental Fee $5 00/use c r 675. Tennis Racket ikiaillfRental Fee $1.50/hr/personTr Makibigi ass i3ir RootmottogcottPark` a `t Security$0§Orgetiagia $ re ale) ProcTOotkiiieNiiii cei ter l'<P ill hr b:ISCH995.FEEIORD&RES/kb(9/95) 7D-8 ACTIVITY FEECie 4. 7. R :S ' h ? .t . a (No Lights) $7.50/1.5 hr/field Nti all l "(With Lights) $15.00/1.5 hr .:`? `er iek]s $2`S0/ S hr field . :::.:::................. Field Preparation Fees: Weekday Games $25.00/field Weekend Games $37.50/field {:%.::i::`.'::K:i:::........:'.:::::i::::i::::i':::}j'...}.:.:i:i::::".:ii::::ii:::n.::i::::i:'::i::i::':i::}`.'..': .............................— ...............ii::........................ zwoot C C b:ISCH995.FEEIORD&RES/kb(9/95) 7b-9 Exhibit "A" /1/f i�� January 25, 1995 LE'ER-LINEAR-FOOT COST ESTIMATES -IN 1994 DOLLARS ' Roadway Cost Cost Classification Per Linear Foot Per Linear Foot w/o Drainage w/Drainage Arterial-Interim 24' Section . No Curb&Gutter-4" HMAC $ 55.00 $95.00 Arterial-Interim 48' Section No Curb&Gutter-4" HMAC $95.00 $ 185.0Q Arterial-Ultimate A4D Boulevard Section-With Curb&Gutter $ 150.00 $200.00 Arterial-Ultimate A4D Boulevard Section- With Curb&Gutter-6" PCC $ 175.00 $230.00 ce Arterial-Ultimate A5U Undivided Section With Curb & Gutter-7" HMAC $ 175.00 $235.00 Arterial-Ultimate A5U Undivided Section With Curb&Gutter-6" PCC $ 210.00 $280.00 Arterial-Ultimate A4U Undivided Section- With Curb &Gutter-7" HMAC $ 135.00 $ 180.00 Arterial-Ultimate A4U Undivided Section-With Curb &Gutter-6" PCC $ 160.00 $215.00 Collector- Interim 24' Section No Curb &Gutter-4" HMAC $ 55.00 $95.00 Collector- Interim 48' Section No Curb & Gutter-4" HMAC $ 95.00 $ 185.00 Collector-Ultimate C2U Section With Curb & Gutter-7" HMAC $ 110.00 $ 145.00 (. (vw. 7j) ,'v t • Roadway Cost Cost • (rap:lassification. Per Linear Foot Per Linear Foot w/o Drainage w/Drainage Collector-Ultimate C2U Section With Curb &Gutter-6" PCC $ 125.00 $ 165.00 Residential Street-R20 Residential Street or Cul De Sac-31' Section With Curb&Gutter-6" HMAC $ 80.00 $ 105.00 Residential Street-R2U Residential Street or Cul De Sac-31' Section With Curb&Gutter-5" PCC $ 100.00 $ 135.00 HMAC=Hot Mix Asphaltic Concrete PCC=Portland Cement Concrete PLF=Per Linear Foot • W SOUT a.AncosTEsT2 • • • 7)—// i-: • - 1, '. (ire gatia(41. iiiifinii r, • .(.t &•. 1.;....-: ,.-i ,L:-.• ..,„n„is...-..:...-v. e.""-.14.1t1.;_:;-•;14----"itiralyii............... i.....!$tru::: eta: rei:::s1„.: ,,:,.:V rt13tritte,.Lrart: ff;itelavirittilitinC:MA ,. 1•' 1,-. :, ,o,: 4t. ::gi.:iii.i.;:i.:i;i".--" blidathatiEge:IatcPilt0 Li -..--------'—"" . :PiiiitiiilViEfi v b147144' 111Niiiiiiii.6. TW •------"uig Ref*/* itiiiiii $tologit WO4PM:::.::::-:-"•::::„ :ct.hiiaa614540 &'. .::: 1: 14-504xiima4iL ---- $4.....5.„2....4...4....: at PPMIAIM4 . *-mott :* v.. :x-:miii-WEISpii,::::::*,:::::,...:::INgiwhitokmmi......,..,......„.., ..:. ti::::: StgliVVIVigMFfk -----,---- ----- ti -4: ifi:fvil.lAktiitikli .......................„:„.:.:,::::,,::::Kni:K4 944.M : ..:::i.iwiiiwi..9sitiielvdIi::!at $141.111111 :3::''' kiiiiiwitiqssesANIgcgmFRA.....x.r.....:.:.:..„.....,....... $1.611:6 :Al -" marcf.,,„r:':'10titinittw. . :: ...:.:....11.. ......,.... .......... ...,.::::„:,.„ pit---viti-r: giiiukiktgretitirwi ,.,:-::::i etmettni,m::::i-m-riltrosgeviriiiprwitrs:; - -------- w ii,A,.... ...kx. ii : i :: ,,,iiiii $lingiti ''.. Oitie: gf::8titznyteinvilleiimv;t;i .......„,,......, ..,..--,-- :,:ko,::::vbve:Streetimprf 51:: giiiiettfte0t0s4si'ItL:i' ::..:.,. :: - -- --- $1.514:g :: '' ;1neti•f.::::xtroiggiiidr441.004110 ...,.. ,........:„.. gigigligt ii,.,...::::::4.*::4: ',.1, t.e, ses E . :.-:-:ove gi:i.::EifirokitieetEM:c Lw $-MxttggiMM : tito-kigiiioii-Braixtt $28tLigi.:: 7."''':: str.%:ititiewiai8vPlahtatiowgigakiii--:::..........,: .................,.. iii-iii. §-rildttitzilleioiies9'44411tAilifj....0..111*i.f.i.ivitox...!.itmooti Dave Street votom §9.A,...,m:. ::...::::.: : f :r. gifir:41tirwn0% -oil ge4§7004:Efil.....fe. a.::.::.Tro.:i.......:i...:...u::L:VO, ::;... „,..... .„—........ $„..z...„7„..s.„...1114.....: north4StiettigiivArit4 ....i .......,...........:. 10 s.:.,..tta.qtur4"o6i*::w.z..:...3..Ko.::...ppo,.......ct....::::::::tapp:tp:.....:,,*::...:...:..:,, $0429. 44:114T:ii$1*--#11P#Y#11Ptjai40 ,,i4rypgiiiiiiiii: ,.1....11,..;i ittilkior.k....:0:::i2i416....i..$0...filfird.o.:::.,....,:i11.....:1741....: ..,......... ......., Highland Street $46E41 0(0'4.k§pp........::.:::.ig..:=....i..:.:.....:.:„..i.i..:.:.ises Fast:::Higrtgerekiiitok tz: structomig;: ..,!.. : :.: son:61. rA.iit'-'em1:-::6itINNicoitaAvgg:s.::i.,.;;,..--,:ilii::- . : . wniiippitifip: +.„...:.„.:„.: wigeNditWNttaPARAY.g, •, F.,--- - 13 SitilailIMPMiiiiim. $321.1•10 ,...:.:,: Highway:: . .„,.,1: tepla24,. %AokitortivmAP..:{..... ... . ..._.... Structure crosses'14:i S.:;.400.rg;:Aggq4...:..............:.::.;,.....:.. ..... ....... ..._ $221140 ........... *i...„....::cltgl.. ...1P:1:: O!....pliti.i...i..:i....i.i.i.:....flsilitlatiiY4ici....1...1.iiii4,.:.:.:..„61....01014600....iii.. ..f.:....0::-....).c....:-....::.i.; ligi StrugtumgM.F4, . .: ,.i:,., *MAIO .......:'' ifirf State Highway le, ktitt...:...i:i.et,lithi.b.6*4...„.1r.:.:41p;Jip...: 4:11:".4prvx., $361101.i. ... ........... .....—..: 0013t11;1146:t:''iiitg4. .,:-RdiriMH1itiEF::„---:.:.:::::::,„, 4.„.--- .,. : i:),......iiii,4611::Ittr....sr votto t itl::: atragtwo::0-410r.4.:,..i.9 . . :::4--- $:40Iiii:........., P4.6.61:: °if btititOor141)Akn,„,„,.,.:.:„.....„„...:„.:.,,. ig::. "rt.x.,.,:.4.4,.......4.47..;:t.,,,):::1:ig"Es-..:..:.-0::...:0.i"0..-.10.-....-::::::..0...:::„ tot40.,:::::W40 $242VOt • . ,.....,.i.:,:).:::::..:,:::::::::::•: : %.60,Iiii:::*::::::::::e:::::sli11.0.,.:f".m....:....4...1.9.,..3.....8....:..!.1.. L 4tApprox,::,....:.....:.....:.:.:.:.:.,...... ..... -4'3 Cie SdhaiiiieWaa MitagaiDarii. tigOgg.gMomiltomjlatOiwg:109$ Drainage $4 Mt §-ww: dooptamatmando totibettitrOpooti ORM gifs tw$speita:** 4gig 0 ASNitegW.:,..:MWM:41.0010444 . 11ueta ilit0104,47.001101Gr--- "" NOM ccig .4M114%**1-0:SYMoltuvata1 atigUladjacom 000-#00114., mg 0. . !01 $6740106A0Miiiiitave. adjacent mita i241 Bg Bar Creei not developed 27 $400**P001410110100tiONNOP.Mg ti#901WitRiggiatit*Oliii sgzo* putmatmt niai:4p444.4:•! • Co. 71)-/-5 City of Southlake,Texas ilispe MEMORANDUM September 1, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Establishment of a Parks and Recreation Department The ordinance establishing administrative departments has been updated to include a Department of Parks and Recreation. As approved by the City Council on first reading, the ordinance is attached for action by the Council on second reading. In response to questions raised by Council during deliberations on first reading, I submit the following: Historical Overview of the Division: As noted in the attached table, numerous changes in the Division have occurred during the last several years. The table clearly documents the growth in the division, specifically noting changes in staffing, land/facilities, citizen participation, construction activity, budget responsibility, and funding sources. Clearly, parks and recreation have become a higher priority for this City. This is appropriate given citizen demand for facilities and services, the adoption of the Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan in January 1992, and the overwhelming passage of the half-cent sales tax initiative in November 1993. One issue which has not been discussed, however, is how the management of the Division has been accomplished during this time. When I was hired in June 1993 as Assistant to the City Manager, I was given the task of managing the Division. There were two employees at the time. Management of the Division primarily consisted of overseeing staff and their responsibilities, working closely with the Parks and Recreation Board, staffing related boards (JUC and subsequent to the election, the SPDC), and working with Community Development/Public Works staff to handle planning or capital projects that came up. This kept me busy, but it was manageable. Of course, there were many things we hoped to accomplish, such as expansion of recreation programs, improving the quality of park maintenance, better staff/Board planning, etc., but lack of funds and manpower prohibited this for the most part. The passage of the half-cent sales tax changed the scope of services offered irrevocably, however. With the passage of the new funding source, we were looking at managing approximately $3 million in capital expansion projects, land acquisition, and several master planning projects (Trail System, West Beach, updating Southlake Parks & Recreation Open Space Master Plan). Additionally, we received more and more pressure to provide practice fields for the sports associations, increased assistance to Keep Southlake Beautiful for their projects, and we began to see waiting lists for recreational programs. Fortunately, we were able to add the position of Park Project Manager to assist with management of the capital projects. Additionally, staff was anxious to enhance communication and coordination with the Park Board and other organizations, apply for grant funding, and get more involved in city issues affecting parks and recreation (i.e., park dedications and fees, etc.). Parks and recreation responsibilities were growing rapidly, and required a significant amount of attention. 7E—/ (ibily Simultaneously, my involvement in other areas of the City was becoming more time consuming. Programs and projects such as SPIN, the impact fee update, personnel issues (job description audit, development of a training plan, coordination of the performance appraisal system and others), and my involvement with community enhancement projects such as Sister Cities and Adventure Alley also require considerable attention. As such, I approached Kim McAdams about the possibility of overseeing day-to-day activities at the park. She did not hesitate to take on the additional responsibility. Since we have made this change, Kim and I have jointly managed the activity associated with Parks and Recreation, although I believe that you and the City Council ultimately hold me responsible for its management. As a result, Kim has provided me with some relief, but I still spend approximately 40% of my time working on park issues. Why Should P&R Be a Department? Obviously, things have changed considerably in the two years since I have been in Southlake. As such, there are three arguments that can be made for upgrading the status of the Division to a Department: ► The current responsibilities and visibility of the Division warrant high quality management and accountability. The time has come to charge a Park& Recreation professional with the administrative oversight of the Division. Note: If you count total budgetary responsibility, Parks & Recreation ranks third among city departments,just behind Public Works and Public Safety. . (me ► The future of Parks & Recreation in Southlake includes a number of significant projects, such as the development of the property at West Beach, implementation of the Trail System Master Plan, and numerous joint utilization projects just to name a few. Again, there needs to be one person charged with oversight and accountability. As the city grows,improving the quality of life through parks and recreation for all residents can be accomplished, given proper attention. ► Strengthened accountability can occur with minimal cost increases. Staffing, capital improvements, and land acquisition will continue, regardless of the status of the department. However, by upgrading the position of Park Project Manager to Director (cost increase of approximately $15, 000), the City Manager's Office can focus day-to-day attention to other management issues, while providing broad management oversight to Parks & Recreation as it does with other departments. The description of the additional job duties which will be undertaken by the Park Project Manager (should this change occur) warrants the upgrading of the position to Director level. In short, the changes which we have seen during the last two years have greatly expanded the scope of services provided through the Parks and Recreation Division; these changes, coupled with the direction the city is heading, warrant a change in the status of the Division to Department level. In my opinion, strengthened accountability and a more efficient use of staff resources will result from this change. Please place this item on the agenda for second reading. I will be happy to answer any questions you may have about this issue. KY 71 City of Southlake,Texas ORDINANCE NO. 649 AN ORDINANCE OF COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, ESTABLISHING ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 521 AND 531; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. Ordinance Nos. 521 and 531 of the City of Southlake are hereby repealed, and as provided by Section 4.01 of the Charter of the City of Southlake, the City Council hereby establishes the following administrative departments: Department of General Government, to be headed by the City Manager; Department of Public Safety, to be headed by the Director of Public Safety; Department of Public Works, to be headed by the Director of Public Works; Department of Finance, to be headed by the Director of Finance; Department of Community Development, to be headed by the Director of Community Development; and, Department of Parks and Recreation, to be headed by the Director of Parks and Recreation. Section 2. The Administrative Departments, and the Divisions thereof shall be reflected in the Annual Operating Budget of the City of Southlake. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval by the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1995. Eihoe Gary Fickes, Mayor 7E-3 City of Southlake,Texas Ordinance No. 649 Page 2 ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1995. • ATTEST: Gary Fickes, Mayor Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary C:\ORD-RES.AGR\619.ORD/kb L (11., Growth of Southlake Parks & Recreation Division Comparison: 1990 to 1995 September 1, 1995 ITEM 1990 1995 Division Staffmg 1 Maintenance Worker 3.5 Park Maintenance Workers 0 Recreation Staff 1.75 Rec Staff, 50 Contract 0 Park Project Manager 1 Park Project Manager Land/Facilities 14.3 acres of park land 138.23 acres* 2 ballfields 11 ballfields 0 baseball practice fields 4 baseball practice fields 0 soccer fields 10 soccer fields 0 joint use fields 14 joint fields 1 meeting room 5 meeting rooms 2 public restrooms 4 public restrooms Citizen Participation No recreation programs offered 32,850 class/program participants and Lodge available-no statistics renting facilities 9 Park Board Members 9 Park Board Members (lige Youth Sports Associations (No formal 5 Joint Utilization Committee Mbrs. agreement w/City) 7 SPDC Members 5 Youth Sports Associations Keep Southlake Beautiful (Wildscape and Litter Pick Up programs) Construction Activity Small Playground- $3,229 $2.7 million(Bicentennial expansion Oak Hills Fund Improvements -$58,000 and CMS Gym/Rec Center) General Fund Budget FY 1989-90: $52,177 FY 1995-96: $477,067 (Proposed) Other Funding Issues Park Dedication Fees: $30,796** Park Dedication Fees: $100,000** ' Cent Sales Tax: $0** 'h Cent Sales Tax: $400,000** JUC Projects: $0 JUC Projects: $933,237*** *Facility Inventory: Bicentennial Park(41.56 acres), Lonesome Dove Neighborhood Park(7.97 acres), Country Walk Neighborhood Park(5.7 acres), Current West Beach Holdings (approx. 83 acres). **Actual/Projected Collections ***Total Value of Capital Outlay for Joint Use Projects Since Beginning of JUC L 7Fv , City of Southiake,Texas MEMORANDUM 1I September 1, 1995 aC5 V Q 7VAlc- (J • . . TO: Curtis E. Hawk, CityManager ff i FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator I SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-179,First Reading D / ZA 95-73 Rezoning and Concept Plan/Solana (Residential) REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana(Residential), 199.2 acres situated in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015,being portions of Tracts 1A1, 2A2, 2A3, 2A5, 2A7,the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, being all of Tracts 1, 1B, 1C, 1C1, 1D, 1D1, 1E, 1E1, 1F, 1F1, 1G, 1H, 1J1, 3A, 3A1, 3A1A, 3A1A1, 3A1A2, 3A2, 3A3, 3A3A,3A3A1,3A4,3A4A,3A4B,3C,4A,4A1,4B,4B1,4B2,and the James 1\16 B. Martin Survey,Abstract No. 113,4,being a portion of Tract 1, and includes all of Lot 4, Block A, MTP-IBM Addition No.1 as recorded in Volume 388- 211, Page 68, P.R.T.C.T. and Cabinet G, Slide 208, P.R.D.C.T. This development proposes separate phases of single family detached \ v I residential (Product Type "A") with one phase having the flexibility of t\1 alternative living products (Product Types "B," "C," and "D"), either smaller lot single family detached,two family dwellings, or multi-family dwellings. LOCATION: Northeast of Northwest Parkway (S.H. 114), East of East T.W. King Road, North of West Dove St., and West of North White Chapel Blvd. OWNER: MTP-IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture APPLICANT: Maguire Thomas Partners CURRENT ZONING: "C-3" General Commercial District, "CS" Community Service District, and "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District REQUESTED ZONING: "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use/Flood Plain NO.NOTICES SENT: Twenty-four(24) Bc- ► 1 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E.HAWK Lz")RDINANCE NO.480-179,FIRST READING A95-73,ZONING REQUEST SEPTEMBER 1, 1995 PAGE 2 RESPONSES: Four(4)written responses received within the 200' notification area: • W. P. Fletcher, 116 Sweet St., Southlake, Texas 76092 1st notice: opposed to the apartments which will bring more children for Carroll schools and less taxes, also more traffic on White Chapel than the road was built for. 2nd notice (courtesy letter): in favor of single dwellings, but opposed to multiple dwellings. • Bonnie B. Hays, 2735 N. White Chapel Blvd., Southlake, Texas 76092, undecided, "Okay if as proposed." • J.W. Riemenschneider, P.O. Box 254, China Spring, Texas 76633-0245 1st notice: opposed, "I oppose the type C and type D. The single family would be okay. I think the type C and D would create a burden on the school." 2nd notice(courtesy letter): in favor of single dwellings,however,opposed to multi-family(apartments)because of the lack of taxes paid to the Carroll School. (letter received 08-18-95) • Martin W. Schelling, 601 W. Wall St., Grapevine, Texas 76051-5205, in favor, "It appears to be the best use for this portion of their property. Additionally, I am not opposed to the alternative living products." One(1)written response received outside the 200' notification area: • Harold D. Kruckenberg, 1730 Hunter's Creep Southlake, Texas 76092, opposed, "will lower property values while resulting in the other residents carrying an unfair school tax load" P &Z ACTION: August 3, 1995;Approved to Table (4-1-1)ZA95-73, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana(Residential) until the August 17, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting per the Applicant's request and continue the public hearing. August 17, 1995;Approved(6-0-1)ZA95-73,Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana(Residential)subject to the Plan Review Letter dated August 11, 1995 deleting item#2 to allow Product Type B lot coverage as follows: not more than twenty-five (25%) of the lots shall have a maximum lot coverage not (hure exceeding fifty percent(50%)of the lot area and seventy-five percent(75%) or more of the lots shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding forty percent(40%) of the lot area and adding the following requirements: 8a-2 MEMORANDUM CURTIS E.HAWK ORDINANCE NO.480-179,FIRST READING N60,,ZA95-73,ZONING REQUEST SEPTEMBER 1, 1995 PAGE 3 1) Multi-Family Units: no more than 50% of the units will be developed under the 850 square feet requirement with a minimum requirement of 650 square feet. 2) Southeast Portion of the Property: no more than 10 acres in that portion will be for ancillary uses having a boundary starting at the northwest portion of the City property, heading northwest to the intersection of the proposed Kirkwood Boulevard. 3) "C-3" General Commercial District: exclude the permitted uses for ice and roller skating rinks; gasoline service stations;tires,batteries, and auto accessory sales from the district. 4) Bufferyards: delete the bufferyard requirement shown on the Concept Plan;but establish bufferyard requirement at the Site Plan stage. 5) Product Type B Side Yard Adjacent to a Street: have a side yard L adjacent to a street of not less than ten(10) feet. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the review comments of the second Plan Review Summary dated August 11, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the third Plan Review Summary dated September 1, 1995. kigtk, KPG/ls G:\WPFIMEMO\CASES95\95-73ZC.ICC L ��-3 vv. ..i..... �..0 � .vu .nn �1 •a.iv o!.!U 11ft( Iltsz L1UJAJ rAKIAtAl lit002 Nme Village Care Suite 500 Wait/aka Wait/aka TX 76262 817 430-0303 L August 31, 1995 VIA FAX Mr. Greg Last CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 667 N.Carroll Southlake, Texas 76262 Re: Solana Zoning Request Residential Request Dear Greg: At its meeting on the evening of August 17, 1995, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to recommend approval of our request for the rezoning of 199 acres of our Southlake land into a Residential P.U.D. The vote was taken pursuant to a motion which stipulated certain conditions, some of which had been agreed to in writing by us prior to the meeting, and some of Coe which were agreed to by us during the meeting itself. This is to advise you that we agree with the conditions incorporated by the Planning and Zoning Commission into the motion which was voted on that night. Please call should you have any questions. Sincerely, f Tom • en WTA/th cc: Tony Canonaco _ Bob Goodwin • Richard Kuhlman Ode Vest AUG 3 11995 LVLI I L -- $1k -4 / u .. Y/ ` +.n'r ✓ __.�llJ� _- -'H.VTHROO g REIS O. PTI: • 1 •- �- (kW I (_-) .• 1 iIT' •r,, \ �-;- I' • RE13 PRICE jih_.. __._ . .._....--..-.--,--)\-\ _-_, ------,2 .'7.:, 1 W. MILLS . it....it+••• t t ::-: ..,: C........ ,1 r o.,r - ^. OAVID OOUTHIT • C:0-i F.... \"'.......-....." 1 ..- . .-.. .-•-:'- J. HEPIRT ,W. WILLS I TARRANT ,r r ` -I - �� r_ -:ate._ _ ..- ' - - '. // - .W iiE0L1Y1 oAvro.000THI,..' 1. w r•_�1. . ,4 • 1 ° � TIP' PAgA , �ApOHMI' I - I --'1'� -••� 'i9r.`• •�/ -`. lw-_ 1``�/fJ� -� 1 , . Af,ifs Np I •' -- Quo ios .• .. - I 4 )` I �`, iii CIO _ .7.., •.- '' REI i0.• meCA ; ;- C ML�THROOP i 5T to .1,, ..,.. 4 : i._,_ . :. , . . ,. •.. : : .., i . . ,..... 1 . ...mi.._ - .'1;:1 ........ : : ' e' \ .I. I ' .-..) --IT f c; ..447--4 fi t.r, -' friii��ii `. : Lit'' . i .... '^ •i 3.,E1 '- ifs .... • • w r-':.. .. �� U 1 mV ES • I� • -fST iii I• _ . MI I I i IPj I IN (spet;.-i.---.-- •- C� �` o''I go {fs ' IN �o`lm0,CISI'1 e b` - • ifit I *04 C. DART ^ S Y_� RIEEDY J.WYE37:, . / �� ,..s PN �� L•"-r •,`•- 1.,viii •••••,••-•••• .. nig= t,thhit . ,,,,, o, ., sairtstaffisuf, . .. , 0 .... A 1 IiS1:a_.._ , EHl9it Iuyx-u�f K. I ram:•.;;:.3.ir . •.f . .. © °g i{1i3'x:;rr.,.•.,� y ff. ...0•`V.� ASSAL01A H. �7�Z1f'kI07. -..— — :q — — — — — — — I . I o0...... .err. r 7 _ -'':iii Cle• --i.. - GEgngaK(A_ c _.. .. ... . —0- -_.CS ifr,�t R — -w: ��_RKIW N. CHIVERS I -• ate: rBait ilill *" : i _��i Es ii�l — , '� :. h awe" orr taw I' :. '. _ E �a �.. ayt o Sao CM.... - . -. ' •- I. 'I. Fallifi � •. HM CHICCRESS : !� Eli `U �� i-A +tq� r w.. • Lr .... ci Grit mil R � � ' r THO • M O i! pp,,,o,i.• .. .c-. ti� ME O" - a : •. . ..� . LS -cR ' — Ii ... ... . . ' iwIN - ._ I...1.1C ER "7-:.1 4 k•le.1: -- 0 •=. 50 'Ein.aij . „. _ ..., „11. ,,,, :: me:-:::;i --'1.-: , --i.--• ... .•• :stl--- -i-:. E:11 Mi; *men ,1 'Ili • " ' •1-.-• . : •• ...."--• ' - =CM= aril .I Hall! -. iiiiiiiirm-.-. , Ili BV��-..,,��i °. B o4,. ' 1" � "' HALL W.W—� j . ©L c I• 1 0 it • 1 �':- ' • • ("-- V i•. ram-y ,��I i''� 'f`�. -.t f rws t • • * TRACT MAP - jff, `T d pt101 �. ' t I M~ S I TI !� "� / L v�c 7 I� ) TA E�- ADJACENT OWNERS (.., • V.3.. H M t'L-,1 \% UL' V\J'' U U l • i- U U • • ' ' ~ � ' i 111 1 1 I 1 1 $ SURREY A-16070 2 4 iii'ii i ii? Rp • ..\ APPr1 .:1 1�r — — - L. 1 0 . ., ., DENTON_ 1 / I•---• 'i ii.0 i.i..t h 11.1.11-.y, — fn�G��l IA �Mn . HOL�[�3 118 IrlI is II lIlI ; TARRANT A-742 SURVEY A-1086 1 I ._I-. -:� iY . o EN :-c.:�.a- • -- • r 24 I 3 3A° _ ---_ — I— �� 2 . M DLIN n 2A ( Spin#2 Representative SURVEY A-1958 I Martin Schelling ylA Al t c '• • A3 l r 1 :7511,A I pDN• 1 ... �./ r Njl C.1 . "48• , c. K; + NriN VICO tlt =i- —A 15):. FT 461 4A1 �j US!) MART UV }A, �3A r - . i1- SURVEY A-1015 IJ I }( � . 5 2A1 3AI AIL 3 SURVEY A2 �O'� A �3� 410r3A111 A3 6 3_�Q' 3A3A13A3A I i\ 1 OIEN,A.F. I 1.t• _•I . 2 US CORPS OF ENGINEERS 3 US CORPS OF ENGINEERS 3A2 C \®:,• 10 fir- 4 PARK CITIES LIONS CLUB — 5 CALL!,MICHAEL&DOROTHY 9 6 SORG,KENNETH j11 7 RIEMENSCHNEIDER,J.W. • 7 FLETCHER,W.P. 2 12 1.8_ 8 THACKER,KEVIN&KIMBERLY 8 HARRIS,BARBARA ELLEN B. y J A M E S p . ]Q l T O�] 1E1.9 L 13 • 9 HAYS,BONNIE B. B1A IBIAI Si' I 10 SPARKS,PANSY O.CARPENTER SURVEY A-1134 ' 1 AG 7k 11 SCHELLING,MARTIN W. P 1 . pi L 14 12 SCHELLING,MARTIN W. I'I 13 TUCKER,MARILYN S. let is 15 14 McGREGOR,THOMAS&JUDITH 181D � 15 TATE,J.R.&KATHERINE '� ; 161 tel 16 TATE,ROBERT&BEVERLY :r A7A 17 TATE,JOHN&SUE ANN " I 17 3 t78 18 McPHERSON,ROBERT LEE i I�_ gin 19 DOVE CHAPEL JOINT VENTURE tB — ., ".1 TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION t .I A 7 STANFORD,MELVIN E. t + :�t a 1 18 8 g STANFORD,CONSTANCE I 18 3 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE IB2 1G �- _� _ 24 BRAZOS ELECTRIC \ 23 I r2c tF I 1 19I IA IA 1 i i --,(it I !.ic i-� \ I20 0-(0 City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No:ZA 95-73 Review No:Three Date of Review:9/01/95 Project Name: Concept Plan-Solana(Residential P.U.D.) 199.2 acres situated in the W.Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207. and the James B. Martin Survey.Abstract No. 1134. and includes all of Lot 4,Block A.MTP- IBM Addition No.! as recorded in Volume 388-211. Page 68, P.R.T.C.T. and Cabinet G. Slide 208, P.RD.C.T. APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Maguire Thomas Partners Bury&Pittman D.F.W..Inc. Nine Village Circle. Suite 500 5310 Harvest Hill Drive. Suite 100 Westlake. Texas 76262 Dallas. Texas 75230 Phone: (817)430-0303 Phone: (214) 991-0011 Fax : (817)430-8750 Fax : (214) 991-0278 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BOOKLET RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/21/95 AND THE PROJECT CONCEPT PLAN RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/28/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT. 787. Correct the acreages shown in the Residential Site Data Summary. The acreages shown total 200.2 acres. Correct any other calculations which might be affected. 2. Product Type 'B' calls for a maximum lot coverage of 50% on not more than 25%of the lots and a maximum lot coverage of 40% on not more than 75% of the lots. Ordinance 480-0, Section 30.5, pertaining to residential PUD's, requires that all buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding 30%of the lot area. 3. Show right of way dedication for the future re-alignment of Dove Street. Consult with the City Engineering Staff for alignment. 4. Clarify, in the development regulations,whether the intent is to comply with the regulations of the underlying zoning district as currently amended in Zoning Ordinance 480-0 dated September 19, 1989 or as the Zoning Ordinance may be amended at the time of development of each phase. 5. Move the ancillary uses in Section VIII "Development Standards" to a paragraph preceding Product- Type "A". Please note that it has been the understanding of City Staff that skating rink and gasoline service station uses were to be excluded. to-7 City of Southlake,Texas * The_applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by 9/11/95. All revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9", and include 11" x 17" revised reductions. All changes to be made should be incorporated into the bound documentation if re- submittal in this format is anticipated. • * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Maguire Thomas Partners Bury&Pittman D.F.W.,Inc. The SWA Group, 2211 N. Lamar, Suite 400,Dallas,Texas 75202, Phone: (214) 954-0016 G:\W PF\REV\95\95-073CP.W PD OPc-8 CONCEPT PLAN SOLANA RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AUGUST. 1995 1 !ir 0. �, ~ r•` Ir -"°`- % R•itIN_ITAMESOSMTY UNE / -5 s• r.-r`. , - - PROPOSED SOLANA NESOFMULL PAID. '.,.. •..ts.jO ;- I so, ,_...: A!°f° 1 I r(slaf RLN.IWA IAI.t X. • - ....- • .r cONNDN OPEN S►.EE(NIX) - 21.1 Ac. 1 .-"'^- - ... -- :.•..•......••• I i wmorr ICI.Au Its X. .:N.!.:.-..-: * �w.,.�`• [:.. -:i.A... ,.� -:-..... icK:'ti i I I R.O.W.TO RE 0[otATEO • t6.0 X. ••. f �� RESIDENTIAL ' I GROSS MFA 7!i�! �\ -..-;,•V... •• -1-t /, •• ..,,,,,_rye neeeii (•AHAAS �AaaEI tM2 X. tsus w \.p.`. i. �� T.7 - .;.5 I I t COLINITATION OF PROPOSED NUMBER i .Rr.A..', .w t • • NNntNAN...oN..w t. NIr.a _ t I A.Fa OF ONE2LOIG ANTS N � f� ! �a��;° roof alas.Au ttN.:.c �? * /� •d ?°' -• ••� PAo►osN COOTS -2 u D.U./X. _.�. c '±d-- •• .; Y.;:.,,.v-__-ir PROPOSED M.a 01.03AIGS. 43. li-'!�' .o- ....� .,' A. �.J, „/ . _ d.. . . •''°<a" � . \ T' - . z. No maremas \ $- fr /• •� • • �� ~ A.' ' .. , . :Ay ' s ••:;,.., -).), . / tt 9\ 1; ® • N ` \\\ ! ` • • • 'vili ®•• • -� ! v, �..w•���~�-i: • \ - �"- PROPOSED RESCIENTIAL •; PROPOSED SOLANA NON-RE7CENTW. • 11 - .UD.ND._ • • ® • TEsocr m.MG . .:t.s AC ; 1 4tifil Ewsnu Zmaac!ca c ‘ . .;- A,c a TO IC X30ATED - 3.6 X. <%,fir•�' +Y-. • a ."Cb.. EXISTING LUD. - M)CED •• o • \-�t N. 00 PROPOSED L.UD. • TAXED USE . Toll aims AKA - 1272 Ae. jP--r• �'3" - (r• WAS AAE APPADA.IaO 0.,,,,..„‘„i4g.r .\ • `. �- I a '� .°' We!. j RESIDENTIAL \ ;•;w ✓y I _ TYI ....--•�P.i....a.-Now.rNS• ` ti >R \ ' �, ltpb '#yam' f\�i >1. 1 ,-w .,(. 3r V -� 7 / LEGEND to•.\,\ r•- � .y\ i ,9'`,• , .......).0. comp%OPEN SPACE TO SE DEDIGTED .\ \ P-• NON-RESI\Dt7EE�l9AI' �--�°'`°¢ • ;_�� TO nit CITY OF SOITHIANE •.OT • COMMON OPEN SPACE (O SE UAINTNNED ~.0•. \ , 480-�_ 6 • •� BY N.O.A.OR P.MAt \ 't `\ `\\ .w -.... , •`•o FL000 PLAIN ;T ... t`.\�.E ;� �I r7..'.°u� :Y ,a ` 7 L ILO. .ANo USE DESIGNATION v "• 13• ;=a,• • N.D.R. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIOENTI: f) .. - LO.R. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL �' / .• I m NATa•- - C.O.E. CORPS OF ENGINEERS BND+. `} \ �` .-.•-.-a+;,�- - AG ZONING -AGRICULTURAL 5. 1• �.•. ? �..': t t G1 ZONING -CO.MIXMY SERVICE J ..° , �`_y �� i ,o....^^ :� CS 77'P G • GENERAL COMMERCuI ! I . RESIDENTIAL IUD T.ING - PLANNED UN.T DEVELOPMENT • \ \ 4-1 ! twA no. row.roc• - — PIt SFI 20NING - SINGLE FAMLY RES.•1ENTuL .l\ f < I.:-e < - - POTENTIAL AREAS LP PERMITTED ANCIUARI \ 1.'�s�'" t 'F.e :�.H ;� .l SIG NON-RESIOENTIAA f.-3&C-S NOT �X1N 0 " SS.n 'I' TO EXCEED A TOT.•. •7.9 ACRES IN T..E •. .� 5 _ -. ENTIRE RESIOENTNL ..U. '� f J a .`„'. I r w...aa.744.N.s.s.n.."e... rpE 1 a-+I 1 nrp w -YVEST..� �.3� .. ••.• .w ., ..N.t.. ..cw.�. ' • • a.a•o•o..c + - A.R.<NNW.Y•r.. r0•V040Roa. AUG 3 11995 •qWW11 NON 4 M M 1.(. .tl°O�.iN� 11010.0440 AN V�� `t''� y7 V V ..hi1t..titi .no wwr N.+.. 0 FIGURE 7 • IER UTP-eN POW PHASE I I •PO VENTURE APPLICANT. wa :r.. THOMAS PARTNERS I DN - •nR BURY a PITTMAN Of.N. NC. LAND PLANNER= THE SWA GROUP Not WA AGE CIRCLE NINE VILLAGE CIRCLE S310 HARVEST HEL DRIVE 2211 It u►uR SLAT! SO, SUITE SOO SLATE T00 SLATE 400 WWESTI Xr TEXAS 76262 WESTLAKE.TEXAS 76262 t OAU_AS• TEXAS 75230 DALLAS. TEXAS 75202 .YIT7Ny1 OS 161TA20-030J �� '7l I2141991-001 1714195A--0019 (sr CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-179 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITYry OF SOUTHLAKE, tTEXAS BEING k,(-k € r 1 rr°�4 I S .J 1�! r'C6 \!\�.iRf6�C 1..E, E.7,L'�`� ),E"y�r•,.V!'f `��. l:Df'Dj E Sl.�' -$:E '-7714�� A DArki v�"c\ 5ti7( c?•t" a ``L E-�C,T t.�.i��a�M[ E ,mm} \ ' �6,� d.=Z.K 'L: ! E i;"._f: Pt:it' f C.. i `ul� gt.i mil.1 ��{.l.i} C, ; CS ! ( l 6L li€1l1 lLt, I I ` `ICE ( .. _ q ' i el -.�.A4 \_�„ \ C r'� \( i (' Es c �€ I, ,: ,E Pr 'Tr' c\ dE�} a6[1 r` E``S1i tf �`.` C} i ll P� °C`�j2L:C1 E( C�E{JCpC eEC 3 @` OT 1i E C-eP+\S.FF., `{Pp El�PF. t om:.:r L 11) .,`t iy;F: .'2 5pg�+A RV �.I1; D LGl.� C ii11 AND MORE FULLY ANDt COMPLETELY T "A" °DESCRIBED IN EXHIBILie '`c t�, , - EE ((f" s �. 't��c ED. � e�a� ,E>� •EifE I' 'L C 1ml t),€ r SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code;.and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of G:\ORD\CASES\480-179.I RD Page 1 �a- 10 buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as } Y e es gt�tia C A psi e�eayyrt ry C� ^�}� �1 L'. C : r� :io c �c i 5 €g o gt icy tiLlix4 under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage,.schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- • crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, (kw WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, has determined that there is G:\ORD\CASES\480-179.iRD Page 2 1h_ 1I • a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a 54 `acre tract of land situated in the V7a 61 -A ,ii,,;o, ,. siroi0L ", s ail •U ' :' ;i ,`a9rrl i e e z� * t•.. I ®10rs(ow) s 'C .1 - .. \... F? e R, , f , k . 2A � .01`i,° 'i C} rkeere Eft vi'iff� ,e)')er s �Rl'a), a G '/ n i$c ! 1 qq¢,Yc c• ;f 3 l fl ter. 1CI1<'1rii ' as, Ili , III 1, f t`. 'IMF 1. 11c R, ij, t„ s3 4.1, = :\a & \t A t s rA itnil,: 34��R.. ; `:>j 4 +A,L , :1 •\-kE C \ j \:! o poi E. t`'''' l ert (le James8 :k; is 0 0.'61ir ,/x f c), ei^Yc e Ne1 E l;)'t e ia0 L,to re(All,el 1 i'l 1, 16izt Is1/Zt(4-6. all OfLO ) a,„ aPr . , �p oa a © obi o ii 1, 4e e.®i 111, s Io�2 . . ;e, •68 P ' . 11, ci ( o : )1 . � id : 1+i= k � . Jr, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from ' , Agncul ' '- 'e 1' ern l'1 A as .: � `=ej tit-, . . ,.,a „� . approved Gon,. e ere a, Vic. ®® . .:em :. . �" i� Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences,words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development G:\ORD\CASES\480-179.1 RD Page 3 8A-12 of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any (yeand all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR Cr' G:\ORD\CAS ES\480-179.I RD Page 4 8a -(3 (ire ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: (we G:\ORD\CAS ES\480-179.1 RD Page 5 bA-itf EXHIBIT "A" BEING a 199.2 acre tract situated in the J. B. Martin Survey, Abstract 1134, the R. D. Pric e Survey, Abstract 1207, and the U. P. Martin Survey, Abstract 1015, all located in Northern Tarrant County, Texas, and the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract 1588, located in Southern Denton County, Texas. This tract of land embraces all of those tracts described in deeds to International Business Machines Corporation, hereinafter referred to as I.B.M., and recorded in Volume 9846, Page 2023, Volume 9109, Page 620, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas and a portion of that tract of land deeded to MTP-IBM Phase II and HI Joint Venture, a partnership, as described in Volume 8995, Page 1260, said Tarrant County Deed Records, and all of Lot 4, Block A of MTP-IBM ADDITION NO. I, an Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant and Denton Counties, Texas according to the plats thereof recorded in Volume 388-211, Page 68, Plat Records, Tan-ant County, Texas, and Cabinet G, slide 208, Plat Records, Denton County, Texas, as amended by Certificate of Correction of Error filed March 15, 1988, recorded in Volume 2340, Page 486, Deed Records, Denton County, Texas; SAVE AND EXCEPT those facilities described in Partial Release filed February 27, 1989, recorded in Volume 2537, Page 513, Deed Records, Denton County, Texas, said tract being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 2 inch iron pipe found at the intersection of the South line of that certain tract of land conveyed to C. R. Revels as recorded in Volume 86, Page 557, said Deed Records, with the Westerly Right-of-Way of White'Chapel Road (50 feet wide); THENCE along the Westerly and Southwesterly Right-of-Way of White Chapel Road the following (me courses and distances: South 02 degrees 11 minutes 25 seconds East, 107.81 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found; South 26 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds East, 140.56 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "Carter& Burgess" found; South 38 degrees 45 minutes 03 seconds East, 192.24 feet to a railroad tie fence corner found; South 41 degrees 21 minutes 36 seconds East, 321.22 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod found, at the beginning of a curve to the right; Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 381.77 feet, through a central angle of 10 degrees 49 minutes 51 seconds, having a radius of 2019.60 feet and a long chord of South 39 degrees 59 minutes 04 seconds East, 381.20 feet to a 1/2-inch iron rod found; South 34 degrees 36 minutes 31 seconds East, 1648.69 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with yellow cap stamped "Carter& Burgess" found; Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 155.99 feet through a central angle of 99 degrees 18 minutes 20 seconds, a radius of 90.00 feet, and a long chord that bears North 13 degrees 36 co, minutes 16 seconds East, 137.18 feet to a point in the South Right-of-Way of Kirkwood Boulevard (131 feet wide); G:\ORD\CASES\480-179.I RD Page 6 -1 • EXHIBIT"A" THENCE along said Right-of-Way line as follows: North 63 degrees 15 minutes 24 seconds East, 32.25 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 602.55 feet through a central angle of 24 degrees 19 minutes 16 seconds, a radius of 1419.50 feet, and a long chord that bears North 75 degrees 25 minutes 02 seconds East, 598.04 feet; North 87 degrees 34 minutes 40 seconds East, 137.89 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod found; THENCE North 00 degrees 09 minutes 22 seconds West, 32.25 feet to a point; THENCE leaving the South Right-of-Way line of Kirkwood Boulevard and across the said MTP- IBM tract as follows: • North 89 degrees 50 minutes 38 seconds East, 338.73 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; • Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 479.85 feet through a central angle of 72 degrees 43 minutes 59 seconds, a radius of 378.00 feet, and a long chord that bears South 36 degrees 31 (my' minutes 21 seconds East, 608.76 feet to a point of reverse curvature; Along said curve to the left an arc distance of 1482.69 feet through a central angle of 83 degrees 07 minutes 24 seconds, a radius of 1022.00 feet, and a long chord that bears South 24 degrees 27 minutes 03 seconds East, 1356.04 feet to a point of reverse curvature; Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 1097.97 feet through a central angle of 44 degrees 42 minutes 41 seconds, a radius of 1407.00 feet, and a long chord that bears South 43 degrees 39 minutes 24 seconds East, 1070.32 feet to a point of reverse curvature; Along said curve to the left an arc distance of 467.10 feet through a central angle of 12 degrees 47 minutes 12 seconds, a radius of 2093.00 feet, and a long chord that bears South 27 degrees 41 minutes 40 seconds East, 466.13 feet; South 34 degrees 05 minutes 16 seconds East, 374.83 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right; Along said curve to the right an arc distance of 1,071.11 feet through a central angle of 34 degrees 30 minutes 58 seconds, a radius of 1778.00 feet, and a long chord that bears South 16 degrees 49 minutes 47 seconds East, 1054.98 feet; (11.- G:\ORD\CASES\480-179.1 RD Page 7 • EXHIBIT "A" Cof South 00 degrees 25 minutes 42 seconds West, 269.27 feet to the North Right-of-Way line of Dove Road; THENCE North 89 degrees 39 minutes 47 seconds West, along said North Right-of-Way of Dove Road, 980.02 feet to a standard Texas Highway Department concrete monument found; THENCE along the aforementioned Northeasterly Right-of-Way of State Highway No. 114 the following courses and distances: North 54 degrees 27 minutes 11 seconds West, 122.86 feet to a standard Texas Highway Department concrete monument found; North 19 degrees 26 minutes 08 seconds West, 859.84 feet to a standard Texas Highway Department concrete monument found at the beginning of a curve to the left; Along said curve to the left, an arc distance of 717.03 feet, through a central angle of 17 degrees 06 minutes 17 seconds, having a radius of 2401.83 feet and a long chord of North 27 degrees 59 minutes 17 seconds West, 714.37 feet, to a standard Texas Highway Department concrete monument found; (1., North 36 degrees 32 minutes 25 seconds West, 1383.96 feet to a 5/8-inch iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Carter&Burgess" found in the East line of aforementioned R. P. Estes Subdivision; THENCE leaving said Northeasterly Right-of-Way, North 00 degrees 15 minutes 24 seconds West, along the East line of said R. P. Estes Subdivision, 51.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 127.2 acres, more or less. G:\ORD\CASES\480-179.1 RD Page 8 'A-Al CONCEPT PLAN SOLANA RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT • - . SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS ,4. AUGUST, 1995 EXHIBIT "B" I:J•• ...• m i1.r „.P • w";,:oar"ro.. r • /, � _ ^ y APPROXIMATE COUNTY LINE • -:ham• °� , a e 511 f PROPOSED SOLANA RESDOITIAL P.UD. '•122.6 t 1•a. ..P.P''• %' J%F I IRSOCI , 'RCA - 161.1 AC. ;,i. :�'•' ..... " • CW SPACErON OPEN (115) - 21.1 AC . _:'••:. .. c- •,., •••._, ...... -."•• -N• I ! St1Cf0TN.NET AREA . 181.2 AC. !i( �1''"h•„ E "'" - - - .:iiYy y s y ( I . R.o.N.TO 9E o(D TArEo 16.o AC. 1`'� /? "4. E t`n` J RESIDENTIAL r 2 'till' \ 4f��� 1 SST ,e .YL r.11ar-r•muCl fw0 .� .•.•r..:.°•, I I ror.l GROSS AREA 190.2 AC. 73f' • « 1 -® a.5 td pu YEAS rq YVRox.xrE) i'- `..s 1. ,a.N ' " ��:: :ram-:{: I .f COLA UTATION OF PROPOSED NUMBER r r.�l�l,,�.pr° • r wlerlw roues WO u•as , . 1 ?.;c OF DWELLING UNITS ' \ t°2-�J� •*„.,....a.s4t^-('''• `• ti #A..J IOTA CROSS MICA IM.2.C. \ —.i, ` l: vet Pawl I PROPOSED OENSITt \ __ J+ ,+'_ `®® r B ® •��.'; :v�!'1•-�••m tt PROPOSED NO.Or OPEl1MG5_ 434 .A•Lt 01. - e` :.•ixky:!::fir% . .P iiiiii r • .• s� ®: jr �::r.- l� ? • . \ �� C. - e !rAdi .t ae e T Cj S'•.�R • • \ l;ram• ®® --•" , .e. ® • W 0 tit :� �t9°s. '�^p,r.,.... \ [` PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL �•‘ 1.-V — •-+• SOLANA!IDN-RESDENTiAL ♦ 9 3)D. N0. _ 0,,.., o 1,Y�0 of lilig MDEMvt MCA 121.0•C. ` -r• _ Phi s''`' 'G .. O.1.00 ' ISO ,a \ Al."'• TO!r.xaaAlE:. - s.P AC. ??1•..•/� R•I POSTING ZL7(MIC•�C3,CS f ° FF�' - t a'Aj!-:' Ems LUD. NIXED •,Ns. -7� `� `-N' PROPOSED LUD. . NIXED USE B rol•Lf210ss•e. - 1272C y- :.., . /. . (r' MY/5 YE M.RO°RN7() .1 • 1 O — si • O S•lra e eD? ,RESIDENTIAL • . ."' 1?), \ T® -.1_-_. -..mK.T..•4• 6`--�":'.,a w•°'. S .1\ ) All ..,. `ice o LEGEND °:. .\ \ ( i \��.\ v ! , �. o COMMON OPEN SPACE TO BE DEDICATED i \ P NON-RESDOIUAL .!` S} - ;__.=_, ti ti• 70 THE CRY OF SOUTItlAKE �.f.. ` NO. _ 'P' ` .'' Ft COMMON OPEN SPACE PO BE MARNTUNEC {�, \, • SOLANA y . ^` _ f.�+'' . VA BY H.O.A. OR P.MA.lt _ �`\ 480- /r �\ .�_\ ., ✓. ._.`' V//� FL000 PLAIN t T"i ry... ♦ o.A _.v - .�..y `- a C. LU.D. LINO USE DESIGNATION 1_., ' •;: r 0*S r,°..a� M.D.R. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIA: �' I Eo •' LD.R. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL •°�,, / I =•k;.r - C.O.E. CORPS OF ENGINEERS KNOT. '`' �L `^ T. ,o,,,si AG ZONING - AGRICULTURAL 4.d¢° t-•:'1•�- M • - ;7 Cs ZONING - COMMUNITY SERVICE fi' . -a` of 4. � "•'• ( C3 1,VIG GENERAL COMMERCIAL 3 ° • RESIDENTIAL` POD '•'%LNG - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT \I �{ /'-/ . I WN A MAY-r.lmucT*•.°. On ZpwIG • SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 1 • T 6,+'�. POtENTIAI AREAS(IS PERMITTED ANCIIIAR: \ .4 1 ' Pn•. "'^• I, :� NON-RESIDENTIAL • C-3&C-S NOT t " 3 ' ;,_ .e.c .._ .,j:` TO EXCEED A TOT.. '2.9 ACRES IN T..E 4+a t •c� \'' •- ENTIRE RESIDENTIAL .u. 4k .. oxq� \�.. •.',.. • 1,,,, E ' —7 AZµ. _�t� ` l M P1..•C.••MN•ar.q AG0..P11°m.•°N..1s ..1. aren • �.t' •�INEST�� ..�DOVE.'\ .,. S i�•-t`T--:L1:..,0 ,KR,t.CAMb•...wad. rms.... AUG 3 11995 •KR*Sr. N M.r:.RSPo r..°w •OP MI..R.°.P N N1••WV/WWI•., T1 - 1 I �7{ J. .�f C. ` A ..q.. _ ._.1. l - 1 ,.r FIGURE 7 Wh SE NE ,j O ,os PHA E{. jam.•VENTURE APPLICANT, NAO.,.. THOMAS PAUPERS RFjaZ,Cl AGE CIRCLE. NNE VLLACE CIRCLE Z5 -�� SURE t PI LL TMAN Of.W- ND NC. LA PLANER: THE SWA GROUP S310 HARVEST H DRIVE 22R N.LAMAR SUITI 50, SUIT SOO /vV°L` SUITE 100 SATE 400 WEST.J TEXAS 76262 WESTLAKE, TEXAS 76262 DALLAS. TEXAS 75230 DALLAS. TEXAS 75202 :Ar7141, il3 1601430-0303 171A1Go1_r1111, .......... ..•... • in o E d EJm OA 91 ha CC� o X ,t X X a 14 0 0 V G U M M.N..N con Z M M 7 +a, Q E o a _ g �' 0 0Ct o m m m a Ig C vi== a E a E a E a E a E a E a E :a 203 alio ow ow ow ow ow low NP) NP) an NP) rim NM N) 7 JJ iv c IS a Ww E V a a M O C _ o n ON 0_,O O pY:9H U N )0 AIRS N NN N C) NN.,a U u C: v aON} Yu No- N N NN S NV 'ram va vEU w O C e12 s M E O A oo Q CO d c= a a re � Eui m9w ma oi a y )a') aO N N NN ,C N N el G N 4.1 C •C O = CC t O ° C og EE Ex 0p E al Mbw NMA, MLL} in M C— M2 N1.0 a ° ... t CL C C O = o. a mJ a r 1 m C.a 5V EV o E g �� 7a Pn�� a o � En m.NrE'a' L. 3 ua o),..ua a 7 Cr J a) a n a c Et w IZI N �V) OJJ OJJ ' W co < z z z P.: G -e -F -J C O J +r 0 & _ c v .J0 a ^ a^ C a a a a w C N 0 0 0 .09.10 Qp O O 0 p ^ p N O OWO M'_�OC O O O O ".� Op a �;o J J J N� Nov .N-�vC)�I N Ve.N.e aU -C) O N C Vo to w w a e C A Io a 0P. M 000 CA m e £ E @ E .' ?.+ o u w u o E u o 41 o d CI �' ' ON coo �e0- 00 b N p M C N C.- e-N N O d V 0 d CO f, 00 Q CI `1. CO el el co Q Z CO N A - u) 4t VI «•J O ,► co co N ri co N N 0) Cl) •O.. Z « 0 W 0 5 3 o w 0 0 V vs m L W E 0 0 d 0 CC O V v J o C 0 Yl tL D > 0 0 O O a c v) 0 0 2 2 Cl) $Pt-lq • I m - « `E ita TT TT L KJ > °° �C X13 O T /y Tit at at TT T at 2 0 M o f,01 10n ber C. 0 . E w Uc m m 7( m a 1� o`xx• m x7� W K-d M W 10 « a W O a f e. r0 A . 10 _C • 40 C= aE a a la' E a a aE 2 m bb bb bb bi0 NIO I0O N b10 bH N 17 N 1', N!7 N a, N a.h E N N el N M CO E e' 1' a' s +d a� s JH a I a a a I a O O O O o o N O N N N N N V A O OS re} N N N N b N el .0 'C Al AI Al Al d 13 R N 0 b a y a a: N Q: V. C E W_a 7 d10 7 W .N..S fo `N..+ N Q a 0• l a O' lap O. L. i0- 2SN i0 SN 10 SN W to- W NC Wv JO7 C. a) C"r' W A co }< o } N N b b b b 10 0 1`on. .2 at .a.T in to To C °T' .�T �} N^VI N.VI H�VI N.VI .�- N C 0. a 2 d N to e- � E « .pp��J (ise0. iO 6 G ^iO 1q 10 O. § TAT- it°QT' TaPT TRT T T o� oo 0 eo lit �.-E 0,ea,� .vN- n00 a- „,...100 v a • O Q' x -J N a a a Q ::: 0 a o ;!: ems' 0. A • 0 J -I• N a a a c cr a 0 tea.' a a. t'-'1' -0 a c d a • a a m Ra) O W aOa > > m _O •W T o. C > .a ooW :B 2.2 22 02 : bO0Q ONZr ZE. aW 0a 0a COOS Z. .- 1: Wn- N 0 C �. u u u u u E u l l^ 1^ l^ l^ A W la 0 0 7 2 7 C 7� 7 C 7 ? 7 L at o OO N N_ N_ N_ OO 7 cc wt -as C �N el N{OV NH NN CI V e- 0 0 to m N N O m E E E E 1. � v U' a ui n•. 1.-. I . n-. ' O Q � w � a � m � m ma 03 w J a Or- o I0.0 I- O N A R R I CD a. 0 = IF le a C. d a W E .5 m m C 0 C.) T 0 I. x n CD c o u St0) I- V N 2 = C C C '30 "'i y d a. ‘itarryI § 0 § m 4 F� § £§ , ,c_ — `2 ) 0 00 /. 02c 0 vasAa0 k 7. EE1 ■ ■73 0 41 - | 0 — « =4 $ 2 § )m l q0 aE - s al E -- "- - - RIL« 0 k 0- li ) �� 11. V. _� } �� \» k IC cr Cr k I—e) t. 11, co of < \� }. / ea _ on o } % .. - /k 0 0 $ 0 ) k - — — L\T. / §� ;j 0 —■ae ■ $#kB 2 f J -' � . 2 0 dru) 2 < < < a « ! ■ Z Z Z -I a k . N f .. _ la ri , ; fi 7 z [2 Ili < °Cl) . § § ) ) g I' 2 rs / c 0| . , k 2 ,$ (0 | | ! | . & . , . £ #!ƒ § 2 2 I ) | , |t# o 0 ■ | |i| < $ 66 | a | ! •�: ! | _ a ! zf| 2] E § ,.E o 2 . } a } it| !IS ......'Z # !g� !s ° ° 2 |a �| § � � �«� co•o. .o 10 e �, sr# II �k� °" &w in ii e �� �£L, E,= ©=—o - �$ ■§`' o0 22277 � aE§ #!'! § 1 m�■ALE }• Ag • %-Pf-)A City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 1, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-80 Preliminary Plat/Cambridge Place Addition REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for Cambridge Place Addition,being 89.744 acres situated in the J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803, Tract 2, and the John A. Freeman Survey,Abstract No. 529, Tracts 6A, 6A1, 6B, and 6B1 The plat indicates 146 residential lots. LOCATION: North of East Continental Blvd. and West of S. Kimball Ave. OWNERS: Clifford Wayne Hood and Glenda Sue Hood,Nolan Lemons and Malacha A. Lemons,Billie Farrar Trustee, Southlake Joint Venture .PPLICANT: Terra Land Development Company CURRENT ZONING: "SF-20A" Single Family Residential LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Twenty-five(25) RESPONSES: Two (2)written responses received within the 200' notification area: • Sondra Kay Davis, 7902 Bryn Mawr Dr., Dallas, Texas 75225, in favor, "Does not affect my property at 1974 E. Continental." • Donald M. Ramsour, 703 S. Kimball Ave., Southlake, Texas 76092, in favor, however, the present drainage on existing property needs to be maintained, the roads are taking up several of the 89.744 acres, and the number of houses should be reduced. (letter received 08-17-95) Three(3)verbal responses received outside the 200' notification area: • Jim Lunsford (South Kimball Avenue Joint Venture), P.O. Box 1685, Dallas, Texas 75221, in favor. • Sue Hill (Van Zandt Realty), 1300 S. Bowen Road, Arlington, Texas 75221, in favor. -" l MEMORANDUM CURTIS E. HAWK (har;A95-80, PRELIMINARY PLAT EPTEMBER 1, 1995 PAGE 2 • Peter Sporrer(SPIN Representative #7), 1214 Woodsey Court, Southlake, Texas 76092,opposed to entrance on Continental; requested signal lights. P &Z ACTION: August 17, 1995;Approved ZA95-80, Preliminary Plat for Cambridge Place Addition subject to Plat Review Summary dated August 11, 1995 with the following amendments: item#5 (permit the cul-de-sac length as shown; add to the comment that the right-of-way width of the cul-de-sacs on Westminster Way and Windsor Drive be increased to 60 feet and the street pavement width be 37 feet;and forgive the Manchester Court discrepancy of the maximum of 20 lots for single points of access) and delete item #7 (the street stub to the west into the Nelson tract). STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the review comments of the first Plat Review Summary dated August 11, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the second Plat Review Summary dated September 1, 1995. (lbr Note that this development proposes including a portion of Greenlee Business Park to the East and a connection to South Kimball Avenue through this area. Currently the rezoning request for the Greenlee acreage is under review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Included with this packet is a copy of the concept plan accompanying the Greenlee rezoning request which shows the proposed connection to South Kimball Avenue. /e A,. AP6 KPG/ls G:\W PFIMEMO\CASES95\95-80PP.1 CC Lig/ $C-Z allik I :. 0 MP,ti --T , .. - in._- " ----- uwecamo^.'Co' .,' opze ,• .M,■ ;_ _a p •YF ppDN - C�o 4"_I — Y�`_ . • s,b.7::7 — GPI - G �w. �NK•0 ,.. V.7. •_i' " i�!!t iK, "\. YAK .1 yip :-�" (46.0, PJcE ® �� ikPY iV Ij•� MI 111111111 'A'..1 "'R —'"ut-.-... -'', „,,,,4 ' —i -'4 ti'iilaii•mismikesitii....«. IW•0491 -,,. i , assALosl H. cHIVERs "` st15:4z.t: 10. 1105... -o� Ai . te, '.:;%_ ::: ., 1 ,,d w N. . ,. c:r -'.. Ifruri': LARKINHCHIVERS . �- .. r *'ill ,��.� i,, ... • - Fd P.QOP.N • ,:::': , •6:E‘ ,--Lles1'1:,-. EM 'er ":-'6--- Oillg ti MiL. ,22.,...) ad Nig I. ler fGl �GAOI. nNr„,. .n aa a+cSr ER' u �I S? • 0° � r, -. � �i deAea: a1i a.a. . BI°�RI IpN -F. g `N -." ti _-ES� o• � E —RI mil y���'�. p P. [3 Oa EI •.v1llian ' v 1 �`Nti�► t WP • C�.i .w .n yu CI= Vicr, p 1 . .err ' W.W. HALL .- D VN_ ---2.f2eiz; t /. HALL ,i0ER c 1 � '1ae9;►�� ? 1 r RICH RD EADS raa�� • .14 v 51'.147' VI ;t at'•rq o I THOMAS Mi.HAH 'w S�', .EagirwC� , ; ii. + i e." _ s ©ilfifiYi7 '� !L , f p J e I-AC g HALL e ligur II- I,w tg EpjyO LAKE �� _ �gE �. A OA E II •E51A -- 0(?E6- D�. �p0r • r."� - NORTHWEST POW'COST { 14A 686 E' , -.I t_-. ,. '11 NM -- -- PIELO - �i, I IAZk--i .D01°`" --, : cs-r - m '. Ili 4446 apDa ;1 t. .yl E MAC �9.l •- '■Y�r II Ai : r m _ =J. .fir '.- ' •� �7 {E i -- ---; - � , --i .. ' . • 1 _. t ,1 ... SRO . it 1 h� 5DJ( �,,f .�..Ra " '.05 ;� 'f- .°�. . �5'� w. lI ,. .. — Oc m . ... pD 2 - . _ . ��- - s. f.. 451111 Iiiiiiiiii 2.- -- ___:" ' I , ./t. 0..,,\ ... * m,: ' ,- . v.-Nir' ' 1111 B J• A��RE :.r, �1 OSEDI-H W( NIGHT Y I g 5i t-o •IMEt Cnali Ho s W L--! .- 1 2... r orfs ,►V■. PARK I�C• All , rx.nr'«.r an cr� 5. t• -mmonamon y y�" OM 43AR • 11 - : OM ,•.SEE p W .. WE Y • ' r ` '� - 1 K M ° IN tRtRi �.. •°° 1N � 'sue G - I op HO v1,„$ ... . . L$7�. pAeDOiYA D 1 s ` ��' �.I f�Ey GRN K` _ ,,. * � .�; 1 '�\` 1 R ) fJ� 4 • S . ,* •1� ✓ OI •. .pR .mod FINA((IpN I� IT In. ..'. .HALL MEDLIPEI • J - «•• .., _ i' ... I HOLLINGSWORTH Y I .�1 "' "" --- .—•- �E s'" r�� •=:'' I ®A ' ETT I• �` 1 K .�I HARRISON,DE•ICIER ". N° g0C,ARPt° 00 ��, b L E., I ., '1 .. to�� gt L E A. THOM 3EPd ''�y��1a, ^A �_ �Dy Eg M�tANo BE` t `/-J� ,I�l' , C TRACT MAP i a R cREollk � E HO I EN P� tfe.M. DAVENPORT 1 ..... EC ^3.,. ,.� 5�"°°` ('HEATHAM & ASSOCIA _ ' _.' ,w , I j oE�INE CONSULTING ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - PLANNI • 1c 1- � 12.09Ac (kr O - - �� W T . - - - - 10 - •• - - - - - - - - 1 • - _ — l � I - - i - F. 3A11A nn MM��rr Spin #8 Representative NJ�WU�. Qo ( GCE= Ml1 Vacant SURVEY A-52• - -I- - '-. I r i -{G 5 `1 1 `� D. Minder 30 T. Ragan F alley' ,� - - - J. Petty / - - - - 38 Wiilliaml L. Parker 3 ,� D.Alter {.-1 C 1 • .. 6A ^ D. Ramsour 6G 4A1 Memo Industrial 6H 4A4 • W. Lee 61C 1 �' " '3 T. Ragan 1 Pumco \r‘ � 1 '" CSURE1'8‘1§0 6Ai✓ 6 T. ELFM IA2A 2A 2B 2C1 C 1 A'B ,--) \\ G. Foster E l� 1 1A2C t ��" 6. }AcGti�c,a-� - - - 1A2 o s / 683 68 IA o '� 2C 0551 co C. Nelso \ 6 \1 C 60 I 1 9T C. Lamon v; 13.4 Ac I Memo Industrial Li' 10Ac 100c C..> - - - - - < IJ ij L > CO. S _ Tract 164J1: R. Blythe fx o ° Tract 164J: B. Adams < a (.6o Tract 1 B4K3: G. Johnson U o Tract 1 B4K: G. Johnson 0 2A2 w Tract 1 B10D: Burger& Eakins ce IB4Jt 11340 • 1A 2A1 Q A� - 2F1 � lA 184J INK Q 1 1A !!!`""' 1B4C 184K1 1810E 6.3 Ac 1B4P IB4K2� 18KW mumt86Ct L INA C. Emery t810G . mix IB6C2 -- 15.6 Ac ImoImo 1E112 6 1B15 C 1B6F 1 101)e -,; Adjacent Owners r 1D ,0., C 1B6H 181 1 1 �i �5 �,/ ��-t I86J o ( HART Q[< t, ! �C-4 . ,:�t MI• C 1860 . • ,.,,,,,i...:,.•.: Rm.. .„..„.. r .... , ,,,,,,,...• _ , --- L _._.__ 51 i,,r, • .. • GoR9 ..'; • F-.17,-_,- ,..-_:-.r31--.1:.-,.. 0 .. mil ...'_',':7-•'-'"---:-='-----:.:-.; ° ----‘-',-; • p'"'".. ,- !'ilf.e:11 0-1P11:11.1rnitiliiiilii!. .--2-7i,r--'-;14-•;,,..--,-I) • ,:'';-::::47.:-f-. ,,-. -- wt4410,1:1•p;liliii,1011,4111;Iviv tit:. .•-•-:,,-- -.--z.'-. - „:-..- •',:ii:',,ti. •"'"f",:r-,4%-,....1::',!`:=:% i:•-•-•?.• ' ME ii,„Vilfif-Aii11111:1!1:1,1 :(1:::::: t.q,-,:... =, t••••:2,.•:;..,. -,'-,••-_-,7,-, ,,,,,,,-t,-,:,-.'z 1,m14. c),.., 0 1 1..-.;:.411:•;:,,,: •-:.;•',,...2::::::::',..i, ;,-..,..,,y,'-t.':.; III) r:r.n71;-j!ri:i!i!ii'iiiiiiiii.iifiliir.-! t,:::: . ._`,;::-..:;4 1..12:1• .-: tii.r:?.,,.• C2 ,,...---.----- . 4..T.TS•r,,ii ....isi iii.yi!iilii!iiir,.. i. ,,!i!,!iii ex.,1, .••••.•:.:1*!!:.iii., .-.-.••:-_,...- ,-,i, L.,,.,,!..,••0,i--.•...;• 1:::..,•—,- ••'''"f,.,,, i::;!:i':;•;:i4.i:.:::1 -7- ---7.77-.irTlf.3) .-7-1 SP2 rr'. ;,,-13.V.±1 '..1.''.1-':,i 11'.ii:'.,"t:.:.:i',,11 :::--2.:'.'i:i.::;1:!ii!i!:i:: 1 L----'--- • ,,,.,....::::,,:l.,.:.•..... .•''..:'''''''''. (160e v rzfrod 480-7•67 j:,.1!:-,--,.. .,;, ''''•'''''' ,. i 1.1 .,.''. 1 111111111LI%:1111!i!IiiiliNIIilliiiiMigiiiirililililil:" . I V ,*'0 / Pl.4/41/400,r. ' Agir:4Aw,011,411rACArg:rAlyliniirAirrinfirAry • p . ‘ ... r.4_ -----r 4 flr-4•• -.07;09-'-7-ra-frOr ":" # '4 I 1° 1/ S r 1. ,,t,',,'..,11'',,,,,''',!,.1,iiiig:„„!„lilii.l!ligilliili:W11,:iP,„iii,lic:,,P:.!:77,,.. ipport),;>//040,;0$, .:,:„:... ::,:,:„..„::.„,„,..,:,:,..„..::.:„.:.::.:..:....,:..„„,..:....... 1 _41.0),.41...cn,„..,,,ori,40-w......4e i ._._1_ •1 7 1?;:„;z1:4.,;1.iiiiiii:r;.!;„,i7puiliais . _ lirillirilliirill.iiilri!,.iiwi:i?.;;:!,;,4=_.,:, 6.400000,-- oe v/-r e -#44;r7)3;oreAr.0.7„ripir if" 04 4.:-, 8 -- --- - ° SPAI Or .41'',11 Ato..9res 0•04r-f 4'" 40,4 • A • 40 , .--d--- ,--- 1; _._._.__.-. iiiviiiiiiiilfiiiiiiPililiqiillilli;!iiiiliiiliipiii,Alillim, 020,07,s ,e4iioli, -44,4v z0oriA , iv 4/;.4 0 to 1°, f-,<.0 : E7 M Aim li .- IIVIIIIIIIIINNiiiiiihillgi,ARgitingliDi,.,,,'-' C-• VIP' t,'4,',.. ve&.71Kj„,-T,,,t,,,,..41,4;,,,i1:0.:1;..',...„Aitat•45Aft,1,,,o - - ._._i_._. /0 __ __.-- --- 4; '" F,141,,,,,Ose '.. r" •v.'"-DpwiteehriorOrir"......-.Z,HT". ...c.A... '' ; re",.4..,se to A0e) izzide_ .... .. .i , .,0 . . . i • Q - - - - • . . . • - 015 FI:011111PiligIlitiOittiliPilinE.ii!.A.'- .1,,iii,iiiiiiiiiiiilliulliiiii.illiiiiii*Miig• .',iii..41i;',!;.'-':, •Iiiiiililiiiin:M:iiiiriiiiili!ai;iiqi4:.11ilq!I ;.!!!!!iii-•::.,:,;,..- illiigilAliniiiiiiiililiiiiiiii•giii;iw,01;00.-........ _ -N-p.• .,7,......,....„..„,..,..:,:j„„„: ....._ .:•,:,...,...,,,,:,,::::,,,,,„,:,, ) • • - • ....:..- ..... ..... .: AAA . . .. .. .:..... . - . -- - -- , - - ,.:--,-.,--------,-,-----,,,,,,•::,..,:-,-,--,,-,-.,•,,,...,---- ---..,„, .. .,.-----,,...,..,..„-•,....*._-,,,,,,,,,,--,--,,,,,--,.--,----.. ,-,,,,:---,..„,'----Z----,-.,-,---z--.,,,--,,_--,.:,,,*----.i.:---,,--.„-It,,,,------ -,,,,,,,---.-.--- .1s._•-•,.-- ,,..,----..- •-- . • . . . . -- • .' . - . • - - ---,,,----,------ -,, ..,-----, ,.•,_,_---, ..,„_,,,,__,:.„........›...,...,„ _ „,-,...,-„,,--*,,,,-, •,..„.-....„-„, . ••••::. • -: . , --,, ,,,,----_---,...„.-----,...„,,,,,,,,,,, . . . . ----,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,- ,•,=.- -:: . • . ......,•••••••••::„,„„,,s,,,;:,,,,,„:„.,.,,,, . . ..: . - :... --. . - u . ..-------- -----------,--,- -.:-,,.. „,_•-•-,„. „;,:.,;•-7..;,-,;:,,,...r.:...,:.!:..,.:-,--.:-.-,-:::::.:.,,,,....,,:i,l,.,,i-,:.,;,:;, .i ,,_,_.....,77,",,-,,,,,-,,,,,,:.-1-,-,,,•,.- ,,,,..„,....::,,,-,,;,,..,:,,: „...q,,,,,..,..,•••,,.,::::•„,,,,,,,•,„.?„,..,,, si n sURVE FE114 - ... : : .:* .- -'-' .,_--,-,,,---- , ---''`'--,„ •'---C-C---,• ' -'--'* i ly H 11.0, - - -. . -•-: : . .. .,.- ,,,,, ,-,-„,,,,--,----_--t.- ._,.. ,.,4:,---_, ; . s .. .. 1:.t .;-•;•-•-:,-.-;:, :,:i':;:,,,;:.isi r,f,'::::.:';.:- .-.----:-.:::,:-:,:.;.:::,:i::::.,';:i::::;:,:ii . . •.-s.," •1•1 i'.. .:.. ":":.. -<=.•-,-' :'- ,-,--.,-,,•- --' ,,r'---!,•,,';•,--,,„:I 0--...1.--',•„.'"•-.,,,.'-'' ,,.-,,,'-=- • , ..,.... 7-%:•,-,,,,,,,.--"*:-:--,,:,,j.'"," -Zi:W,--'''' .. .'-' !:.!;;,.:;:;;;:,,1:!];;:i';!'•!.'(,:-•;;';':'..."'''.." :.!i;::?j,l1.''1:!:•!!i:',!".1 k —8 8 &._ I, .2 2--. :.-.;":. :::;.-1--:•:•.:- . - -. :-....,„------------'''''''"-.Z111- --•-•,..„- ',..=',>_., i.::,..::',i.,:i.'.:..!**'.:]..:...:!.':..;:•-•.:.::i•]:;:i';';:.::•....::.:---,:::!1!-,..,....4 s .-"---- =-:•,---„,,.•-,-.---,------.4..„--nk.••%•-_---ft.,_ i:•...:„.,,. :-:..i::.-: ::,::-.-;a:.,2:7.::-!.;:.,..-, .:',-:-..::-.:,. • ... ... . -:a gip --•••‹-z--,,,, ,...-,•,,..::-......-....,-- - •,.._,,,,I. •N,..4 0•.,. ....,,,,,,-.......--1„..„--...„-:,.......--R 4r... .. .. .......... .."----z_.-----,:z-- .. . ... . ..... . .. .. :... ..... .........: ...... 5..,...0 ,..„..•••....,-..-,, ,--- •-•„,„ - ...,-,,,,:•!-•:.:-1.,:=1-,,i,:.-1--•...::-...-..,,!..-.,.....,::: -:i:,!'i,'::.'i'i .M11 • . ":IT:i.: k:•......:-.-........ ---.-• •. ,r,- t.:.,-m.,_,_----,,,,,--,,,,,-.,.,---- - -::,, --..--i•,,,,•.„-,,--:,, „--k---.=--,,:1,,I-R.I.,...._.,-* . . . ..:: --- :-,:.......:::.,.:....,:,., i:;..:';-'.:'.:.,':-:::;•'.::::,-. ..i'i,4?..;ii:)...,',1'..",'..':,..i - :-.:'-'''''',t•:,,,\'' -.'.. ..,,.'z-' -'n St.', %.-.."'.1"'"'''' ' --".- -1-..„ 4,'.. ‘.‘::._.:,..i,',.•. i.ft._ c'---,,,- P.'3---,--'',=---!. %.t..,.•="•<-•.--„. ,e.' „,..,.,--„,„.., • :4111.....,.. •1!...,•: .:.:.:..i• up ,„.,..,,,,,,,..„...,,,.„, I, .' .- , ,. .:..:g.::i: z.:,.;: li:i!:::::: :::I.,:' -- .. ........ 4-,--iiv. .:,,,,,_,_ --------,-- -4-,:,----,_--<--- ..„.... , .. ... .., ..:„ ----:::i.-.:',,•.',,,..'-':-,';:;.1,-,-.'.,:,i 1 i....'.::::.:;i.:::::-:::, p -i-,,,-.--,14,::„.„,..,:„...,„._...,,„ • .. •• •• •. . .: ..: .....: . - 11 ''q m7 "''' _: g'-7:-',---- --------,,,,;---z%, ---- -,i -------,---z- ,-',:;'':1 Ns__ ,_ -,.....---,*----------'---- ii'i•:-------- -=1.-,_'.- ='z'-,,--,<--._--' ,:-.1.21, IMF ,'--,,,,•,!-... s•--•,,:r...;.:.:-:':.,,.,:,'..?:: :;!.i.-:: •-,..,....'-:::ii:-.?;:...„,,i.11.!:•*1- . . . . .. . :. . m,..._-------_-- ,--------,„-,-,--•:,,,,.-----,„-- ,...4.,_•-•,,,,,..;.;:„.-s.,-,•.1-,„-,-,„,,z.„. -,.,:-.i--,:-.:.::.,... ,-:,.-,---.-,:,, ;:,..,-,..•,.,,,.•::-..,; ;-:.•,i,.!:....,1-.:•:,a--.t .: . • .- ..: - . -4.--•,----..---,,,,,--- ,, ,N, -,.V--4-L,_ -‘--,- ,'N.Ikz,-- _,-',- - __,,,.... p.i•,:.:,•.--,-.-...,. . ::-:-::!•.:--:!,,..,•,..,;!--i.-filH -,,i;:.:...,i,:;,.H:i..,••,,,.mit:, .-.- . . 0 - - - .: -•:. . .: - NN:----„,_ ''--_- ..--,,>,--4.-_,,_ M..,_--,--4-*_,,,,==i1 .1:k------- -.---.,. -'-:._: •:-: -, .i :-f,f4::::'.-.:;. ;,-.--,- ,•••••:!.:-.::!p••,tlit.,r,,.!tir..i:•!,::!!; .).!•,.;..4!io:,- . • - %,--,,.''----- -- -','.---T,----..',-.1,.'-..-----•,'---!.- ---.-- z-;---- .t---Z-- --,: ,,---:•-g,--..--;;:,-.'::::-)-.!:'-rsi.-.......;:i:i i-i'.i,!.c,i .?•:;,:!:.•:,..',.;,.;:•.::,:...,I:1- !, , ....__,..: :...: .. ,,,,...,:,:••:,:: .: ,1,.::.?,-, -::::. :--::,,..:-.-.41-f1;,.:::::.:-::!:';...:-,i '..%1 : . --\->i..-..• : :.: . ---------_--,:,-- -,,,,,,,,-,--5-,---,..-----,---„i.z„,---------,,,---„..4.. ..:,----,.„--, :i.,:•::::.;, a i::::;.,,,::: .. .:...,:,.: ...::. ::,,:: ::,::,:,..: _ii.::::.:;•,:4:.•;:::irli!:,:-.a.5-:, :. .. . .: .-,- - ::..;:z.i: -. . .. •---:-.•:..!.:..::-.:.it,-:.:i.!, ,..i:0., - -•' .;:!.!.•-. :!::..: b,--, zz.._>:.,_----,----,---,_„--.,_:„., -,,-,„T---::A...„••••L" ..k.,2z1•-, -;•,--'-‘i.-..,--'-'.:4'''':-_ -': '''::::.:::;-!--...::::::!•- • :::''''" :..;- ••••::•:::: -,--:•;:::,-.-!;:',!' •:i::!:''::3';'!.!-:•:!:!•::.!::: : - :. . : - ..-- - -1;4A''-'-- •-•-'-i'-':,---••=7:-=--- - .‘=-- .-ik----:Zaft=-:',.--=.„-:-Zz,. .,.ft:;:'-'.=a---•<1--Z-,..--:„.-:,--_ ''.::•.:::''-:-i':',..;: --•,:: ':z•::'•'''=''.•: '::•'-:.;.*:•. •!.-::1;;Ii'.:::.:'i,!:;:;:'::.•:;•:::;:s.!::::',..!;1::::!:::•41::i ; : . L:- z-t3-:•:zik:-=1....._-:-.. -1.:::::-I-:-!Z-- ---•=:-4i;-,! ..,!-- -,w.i-_,,,--,.s.,.__,,,•- ,=------..,,,s•-„:„1., '`'...'.'-•':r.':-::::',:..--:.z!-.,- :::'!;:i,j-.•,:-::.;,::::.:::::!:::'-'- ',Lii':•..:i:::: :', ':'-i:::',:!•,!:-.2''.-in::11, • . . . ..: .-- -...- . ,.:.•3 7 k,L.,:..-,•,,,•-::.:.--...„,.,...,,.--:-.,-::.-:..-._•,',.--..,,,,,,- ::-..:-..::•:-.,,.,-..-".2.Z.-Z‘'..„...,,,,....-..s. ..4...3M,... .,...,•,••...: .;':,‘...:''': '-,i I.'':''.!. .b.',::::::'3.:;.'!",.;:-. ',.'2.1r:.:-.':'':'',.....:'.i..;:-.:.:-,.. ':;':'';'::!':''':!.',';'•;:,- 1 ' - ' ' ..'::::i:::: .: :;:i.::----'.:.--'::.: ...::„.,.:‘,...T, _,..,,,,,..A.,11Z.. ..:::'-'..----""'",z7.71-t,. .„7'..-,„..=-.2.4 ....;,,..::'::.:...;::::::.:::::::::,*:.:: :.::: ::;:.ii:::::,..7: ,,,,:',:,>;;:.1;t? '.. . ..„....,. .1.zz; 11:...1.-:',-,Si•Z4....i: =.--'2.„:":..„,,,,,s_.,,,'''''''''',..,..--:',;.....: 4''..'..1. ..1*-*.. ...:00::.:.:00:.:00,........,.:y.:,:,:q.t.::.:0",..,,,-...:.;•.::':..'.1:.• ..1..:-....;:..'. AG, :.:.:,! . ,,,•:.,.:, -0.,::,.,-,.,,;.].,;,.,.,,,--„,:,.:::,„.ii,.,.;,::,:,:,,‘,.,,,,,,,,,,,.„.,,-:,,,,,,, t•i-,,,z.--N,..,_.,...,,.> Z.-,,.,„_•:4-;*:' •''.--.:'.::::--'----,i:7'1:•:11....-:::::::::•,,,-,'•,:i.•-,,i,,IT-,i 1 ;;;;.:.:•::::::,,....:•:;;;;;,,„:,,:::;,:,:,;.:,.,..:,,,,,,,.. :'',!;! 111111 i •::,c3.-•‘-:! 1::::i,.-:: .:;.::!-..i•ii:::,,.i::ii;,:::-::ii,:i1,;4:1!,:,!.:.:.‘:.':1.! :i:,•:::i...,:!;.:;:!::: i ,,,,..,---:::-. ,...----,,,,,,,, , •-----, :ilt.j... --ii....;•-.:,i-:.:,::::::•:-,iii:e -:-::!1!:!.•'''!..:::;::, ::::::::::•;;;•:.:,:::..!•••:•••••,..... :, ,,: - •. :,-.i ,.0:1i,i:i .::t:1!:,1.•,:::,i.-,:.•-•,•:.:,...,,;!,!..,,,,,;,..::;.:i.:••••::::,...;i.,.,,,i:1,/ ...„...::,.„,.,,,........,,,,,,,,,,-,,,m.11, ,-,-.•,?:?-::,,r'•:i.iiii;",...,i4,i!:..11'-:.1::...114;i1•;`,',i;i:;::L.; •,,,,,,„,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,;:•;;;;;•,;;;;.:.;:,:.:•• : ...:.iii ,;:‘r,,-•-r.:.i•::::...1i:i 1 0.1,,,,:i!,Li.,,,i,,,,,„i,,,,:4::;,i,,:::•;.:r:i,!.::,,...i.;....i;:•!!..:!,i:,!:,,,:!..!:.•,:::,..!:•.•,••,:::, r-,,m...:.- --=.-- -A'zit'v.k..iz-'-i. !;1..i,!•:'.-:•!-1,•;:;::•-•;:,:iAi.t,--.::,.,:-.......,,4 i;:•!:.!:::!:!;p 1 :;::::::%::::::::';:i:::::::::,::,:::::::::::::•:!,.; •!•:;;:i! r::.:1.,::-.::::ii'?.1:.':t i'•;;::1:.:!::!,;!.•!:.! :;'•::::!:':!!.!'::: :::'•.:.:::•:*.:;!•.,;•:•:•:. :i::::::•:':-::::.: .:.:.;',:.''.!;:; t a:.. ----§•,.--..--.=.-.--,,-.4..!.,w1v.-:,,,,: t'.:,::.:1 1.-::.'..ei.i. :-..i :, !i:.,...•:',.:;u].:.:i'....,,'];.,! ii:!!i::! ..! .::::'....::::;;;:,,,,,,.;;: -.....:, ,!..i2-. ..;!.;: %.1,--.:1,,,,,N.4,, ,,,-- --4‘-.• ;:'.,!' '••1.-.--.•:;•-..-L. •-, i '•':,!:.;:::i,,ili,:;•:,.,;,I,: s,',.,..;:„.;:-,.;,:-,.0.:p!.;,1!;;, ::::,.;i:;!c:...,•:;.;.1.,1 ,?•,4,,,,:,- ,:,-s:.,?31,.....• ••.--,. ''''''.'c'''''''''' ''''' !..1.3 :::::::•4•1;-'.,%:4:-,-.:!;.:-':-.,.i i:::.::::::::::!::::::::::::::,:,:,:,:,!,,.,.,.:•,...... '.:•.•:.i- -,--...-.'..•z''..''.: ,:,:;'.:3....,.., I'0.:N.r.,,,!.:,':!.:1...:,,:i.:,•!,'!,.,..:!:.:'' %. ' ',i 15::'..1 1 01-'1i,,d1,M{-t,t,, ,,;,,,,,.,,... : ;r.a.'''':i'lf.:-::-:r'; 1 -": ..::.'--.li'"i'lli•I:S:ri ::::•::::,::::::;:iiii:i*i:!;y:::iii:::::igi,k:• • ,• .. .;;.•:,• ;.;:,:, :!:1.:;;!:1,-:i.:•:: ::::::!,...1'!::!•::::::,‘•.:!-,-:!.,::::::.::::,.!!•.::.: :•::::::::.:c - =•••...-•,'•1'4,M4'*-111.-,.. :;igi'.0-7.-•-i•:':'!•,.,„ 0:;.!"-..`:•;:;•::::::•::ii i'1, ti.;:i;:::.:11:I 1:,.e.,:::::,:i::::,:it';:i:•!:', :ini:;i:!':!,i:: ""1 ' ••'''-'.•-•- '';;:::-: 1:''','it:::::.i'..1?:!:`::::Iii!-..1k.!!:.:::::::•:;•:•'j:•::: ::,:!:::i•1....i:.'.::::::::1: :.-...!::;...,•:i ri.,1•04 4,,,,a-,i-,.:;•:.1:44:,•1 l''''''1;!:1;-;ti,t;T:,.;,,,.,.,..,.,;?t,;,:,.i!t:.Q.';',: ',.1.:',11t1;, :::iiii;iiii:.* ...i.ii::i•. i,::i:i;.,:!i:i:..:. !. •,..',:._.•.;..:•..•f :!.,.:: r!..',,.,!.•: ,i.i....:7,:.i-;.:.i,f.:,;%:.,.::''.-:•!.:'...:::,.'-..'-..'-',:.-'-:.... .--..k.I., : n ?,, z:,.I. . . ... ... • . • . •. • . •.• .„ .. ..... ,•,,.•,•:. :.„..•, ,,b v.,: ill.:E,. ,.:.:i.:.,:,...:.,:.:.....:,....,..,..,!;:_:,::.. _., lam ,eft..., ,1-4•LE".. ,•':-.:,',,....,,,..,:-:!1:::::ni ir.-:.:::.,,,::;,:,;iili iQiil,ii,:;:,1. t:.!..!••••:',:::::.....„:.,!.:. 2.. ':''1*.•'..:::'-'!:-.i i:J.::!!1:1:::t!!::;r::•!...!! I I , :•:•:.:;•!•I' '• 1-:. '. •: , ::.•:::: ,..:..•::::.: `!:::::::'::::!::::i:'......::•.:!::'!•::::. *.::.:i:.•..:.::,,,,::•:::'.:;:::i:!::: --::!:::':'-'":-.-k .a.H1.-,:i-..,,,..,,,,.,,o.:.,-.,-,t.,,,Iii opitunt 1 ii::;:.:::::::1;:.•::::•!::':';:%.;'••••••••••• ""':-''':-.." ""'''!"''''111:Y,'.*:!`•t44.'"--.:ZI :::.;i....:.:.:': !,.. ,....:,•::',:-: - :',-.:. ;:::ci...',-,:i,i ;1!,'••..!;:::.:1-,i r,.....,.-.,,,,,,--::::::;-.• ::::•:::.-:...:.,-,,...n...!i;,,t i ,,,.......,.‘,...... .:"..::::::::::::.::::::::;•!:!;.:. .:,;,...:::::•• I :......:•:•:•;•::;....,....,;,:,:.:.•.:;,..!.:,:.•.. ', .:.. --''. -:-:'..:1.:i :;,.I i.:,,:it,•-•!ii,!1:‘;:i'iJ 1,,,!!;Hi;•; -:-, :':',.•.i,'- .;-.1-.-::1:,1:i”,,..;1,y,...i:.- -;,...:1;-,..1:it • i.::I;• ;'.! i.;•':...,,i..;.:-.1.1..;ii! :1;gi'•Ai:::KI:It:;!;'::1,•:,1,!'.ii !,.::.,.,;.:',:li:.-,;,.;-=4,-----. :.;;.;....:.::::.;•:.;.:•.::::::•:,:•;..;,..,;.:••. :::.:,:::!t;.;,;.:,!;:.::...;•:. . ,-..,..: _.. ....;..:::,:;i:i:':ii:::.;::•.::.i.•. .::'..:. ;':,. '::;:.'.:.-::-..-:',..':-.-•.: -:.'yi.i,iii.:-,;::...:1: i':.!,:::.1;:i.i1:;.Nil:ii ,...:,!,:::::•••••4:.::-.:t•,•... -,•.,,,,I,.,-.-,:-...,,,.t.i,..,:,i,.-ir,mi.•!•-•qimill A DEC K(41) ...11::: 1:,::.,:::, ,::;.::;,.:!:•,:i::•-1::.1:til,•ii,1:,:i.i:,.i '•:,,iii,,,iiiii!T,,i1.:', • .,,',.t• 411k:::•4,....Y,•:.,,',i':;1;1%il,i:i.i!,!-.,•ipti,,,,ii,:iii3iiiiiiiil Y A-4.38 • ...., . . ,.... . . ,. . .. ..1111111T-67710r4 ''!1'':IF::;)"i;:'1;flil;IYIEliTiT.IITI16:1411iTt4iiiitilliaglaY1 h. ',.,!lint,t41.4ig;;;,(f.,ttt.74,,,,0: Arlhirtl, Z01 N1NG MAP\ 8c-5 !I 1.4,-;,,x,i,,:$6:-...t.!r,.;$4171p.itsfiiii!tlitqq!lt:f4;41; ,Ifiviit#.11::41i-,...1:.:140;.'S.4 1., V31'1,1,001 liti i:,. • • II. ten gi, ...........tR i .1. � 4A.LH ` ;�in lit pi fI4L ae IS at C .'�; if*J to�� ii' 'I' o a A -')" g. ,. 2 X t 1 J i e� fp G r' O s i ,i i L' t'ftfp jjli e1 P4a"' >.ig o5 a ,. • jiiig;.V. m/IVt. 3t. aLiPI SI 2 I~pa ] pz ug ^0 YY jjEE "i+k�a(t / 4[,r i i 1 )�t! t14 Tait]1;1 111,4rj.ir3 i l l s i i O J O< m K M f r 8 0° x 1 o i Olt Jt i g3 9 i t C<«Z` `a: i�i I .11, .11 i.`1 _ ei - \ — —it—-—•NAV 11VflNIIX H].ROS - -—-—-—--\-—-— ? 61 --- .LL•LLr i!__ _ I_ W ilr �1 I I 1.I ( I .. - . k oit1II ) _ r IA 11 ----7E-Wi— - . 1 :I ,...,, 4e 0 "tea 1 — 1 I'-'' .I s g-�71 I s1 �� : 3 411s`a ^ -- s I I --�I -rr. /: , 6" o t as i .t 4 11 IJ II 17I I ,3 • • •c.75---11 Oh _ u___ 1 .` T _ . y�0. I 11 ',I a , V I IlI1�- R ir ! I I "' x - ' v >� r i 1 L- EY 1 1 I r hith —T__LELL_T-172,1 --:: fi El ,., —�\ .-...� ._, —— r� W.bZ oo N— I1 t� ,ems ` �. k. ' � ,.. 1 N 1� ' ., ‘,., 0,. R� 1 7 �S' J ---"-'---fib ' �a i �i � ' ( tlai.ie� • City of Southlake,Texas PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY 2,ase No: ZA 95-80 Review No: Two Date of Review: 9/01/95 Project Name:Preliminary Plat-Cambridge Place Addition.89.744 Acres in the J.W.Hale Survey Abst. #803. and the John A. Freeman Survey Abst.#529 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Terra Land Development Company Goodwin& Marshall.Inc. 920 S. Peytonville Avenue 6001 Bridge Street. Suite 100. Southlake.Texas 76092 Fort Worth.Texas 76112 Phone: (817) 620-5373 Phone: (817) 429-4373 Fax : Fax : (817)446-3116 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/21/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. The following changes are needed with regard to rights of way: A. The cul-de-sac length of Westminster Way and Manchester Court are in excess of 1000' and Westminster Way,Windsor Drive and Monfort contain more than the maximum of 20 lots for single points of access. B. Staff recommends that Windsor Way connect to East Continental Boulevard to allow another point of access should the connection of Bristol Place to South Kimball not be approved, and to eliminate the cul-de-sac which exceeds the maximum 1000' and the 20 lot maximum for single point of entry. C. Delete the street stub of Windsor Drive into the north line of the Nelson tract and provide a street stub into the west line of the project tract common with the east line of the Nelson tract. D. The north line of South Hollow and the Foster tract common with the south line of Rainbow Street is shown 5' further south than it actually is. Rainbow should have only a 45' right of way common to this line, and should have a 50' right of way along the north line of Lot 3, Block 3. The northwest corner of Lot 3, Block 3, should be 5' offset to the south of the northeast corner of the Foster tract. 2. Delete "Tract 1,Block 1" from Lot 4,Block 1, Common Area No. 1. 3. Additional storm water detention area may be required. 4. An existing water line and fire hydrant is located north of the extension of Rainbow Street which will require relocation into the right of way or a 15' utility easement, whichever is the most appropriate. 8'C- 7 City of Southiake,Texas 5. The.following changes are needed with regard to street names: A. Change the name of"Bristol Place" to a name not similar to any existing street name. B. Change the name of"Leed's Court" to a name not similar to any existing street name. 6. Label the intended phase of Lots 7-24,Block 1. * The lots located along the east portion of the property may require reconfiguration depending on the outcome of the Zoning Case#ZA 95-79 * There is no street connection to a currently constructed roadway. * Although there are a few lot lines which are not perpendicular or radial,they appear to meet the intent of this requirement. * A 35' building setback line is required on both street frontages for a corner lot. The applicant has requested the normal 5' reduction (30' B.L.) for "Reverse Frontage Lots", and has requested a reduction to the standard side yard requirement of 15' (15'B.L.)for "Back to Back Lots" . * Staff recommends that the applicant check the buildable area of Lot 16, Block 1. C * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Terra Land Development Company Goodwin&Marshall, Inc. G G:\WPF\REV\95\95-080PP.WPD ln.Q,/�' 8 w Z ,-., ' ,. (,...., _RAY 11Va!L! _' .j : s o € : • , ‘4,. 1 0 1 El I I 6 r _ _ HAY 1lvaxix 7- . —7-—-- znos ' :„ , . .e „.... . T. Id ''1P , I O 1 — it -- — ---� — €L s ` . ' "�:2 ;: :j Z ail i e ° s ! _ o : i ;11011 z 0 .,..I,§41,.- - ..- : 07 A, i ..,,„ II �� Il' , 4i ''... ! 41 111"1 w'''' ' tij I! -,. 2 '—4 •••:,!'6„,rialtIVitilltWIF - "- ' ——T-1 I Fill. J ! Qo ......., 1 i giI`� 1 « HM^Z ~TI i ��4" �J�\�� , ,-. t 3I}NhYi/710119101 OM (...., r 7 tk i :* ?.)! " ;Ad III a ft k Ai c... , 1-1 at, ,...42,-....,,,,r , . . ,,...:\1., .,..... ,, _.,„_,„,_11_0,10 __ i_ _... , „„,,, .4..„.„,.;...,,,, i k 1 -P4 li*V7 • til 1 114i011,. , — L . 11 . 1_7_ / _711/10 ft):olehmk. .10 \"ilik• Ill . ._•_1111-,.-4-,-,-1 ...... Ami y",,, . Mf !ij $ r� - } e ^ . ti __ _ ! 1:.:. , 1 lki: .h... 11_,r, Ntlo • -.:_ir .-..lb. __,,..2 roa.--_-____ _ fil .., L.,___ to v... 04o vt A 1 — . :it, 4 a pi t r. p C i 4 Sy , �" .Ti: � a jli f ,_,,,,,,a , .4,4,, -*.4 .. , 47 i'I i a ..0 ' ': 11 .1 4 2 1 # „..,•,•14. 1 __ r 4 ..,4 vitt . ....4 se '<•4111111111151.1ti ... • • i• ••1+ 1 t!—__-, • iiirpir. • C7t e ,s 4 fI o , ! �,.h bl 1—:-___I 1____! r ' - ' ' i. ' a-i, re, 'I. 0-..,, 111 -� r- « — f e i p, .] • Irft-).tp 0 it • c. ; flii:J o�l� �11!# 1J1" C __ ic- 9 • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 1, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-81 Plat Revision REQUESTED ACTION: Plat Revision of Lots 6R and 7R, Block 5, Myers Meadow, Phase I, being a revision of Lots 6 and 7, Block 5, Myers Meadow, Phase I as shown on the Plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1328,P.R.T.C.T and 0.064 acres of Tract 1B situated in the B.J. Foster Survey,Abstract No. 519 for a total of 0.833 acres LOCATION: 302 and 304 Quail Court,Northwest of the intersection of Redwing Drive and North Peytonville Avenue OWNERS: The Estate of Audrey L Stone, deceased; the Estate of A.C. Stone, deceased; Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc.; William Byrne and Monica Waite APPLICANT: Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "R-P.U.D" Residential Planned Unit Development LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Three (3) RESPONSES: No written responses received. P & Z ACTION: August 17, 1995;Approved(7-0)ZA95-81,Plat Revision of Lots 6R and 7R, Block 5, Myers Meadow, Phase I subject to Plat Review Summary dated August 11, 1995, deleting item#8 (radial lot line requirement on common lot line). STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has met all the review comments of the first Plat Review Summary dated August 11, 1995 with the exception of the items addressed in the second Plat Review Summary dated September 1, 1995. The purpose of the plat revision is to provide more buildable area for Lot 7R. KPG/lms - G:\WPFNMEMO\CASES95\95-8IPR.ICC SSD- I K I I I I ��� za � � ,_; ADP .- INCII2 )� 1 1 "5g YI; 2A 1 .- ���-- 1 1- E 11- ___ --- I • - �� ' " � 6A2A IA tA2 ; f 1_T_f—.... `fit '!11 , 'r. ` -�, V� 1 L . ., . . ", , , . . ii.„-,,,, _ \,.... ,-r , t.,-- I ��i i i 1, , i ' , _ I AIRILY A-16a I. , 1 , ; 1 1 , - , 1 ..A ,, ' , p�( 5 1 l 1 11 I -` I --1---: ` , ,-'' 1 'i ,'1/4 2C t'r Ea „I 6At ; lAl At / 1 - 1 ` '_-- -1 , , , ' 1 1 1 I , , ', ",T JJ ([([]]] fAtA ___ r -�-T l-7- ®il®�' . .I r95 I , 20,A 2B Ejw.1.- r- ` ,AI __ -� �-�.�T-' .tA�tAt t21A tA�IA IA�tA tAlA2A a .�<- i / `` 2340 -- - 1- ___, i 1 1 1 t- B r - l_. 2e,E 1 1 1 1 1 ras 1112 ! 1 I 1 I :14 F-1-l-7-. tAlA2G ••1 • i i, ` ' ► • / ' 2C9 29 ' ' 2Ct ' I 1 i I I riMMgI II I11m r11Rf '-._. - Ti : I --IA1A3 _� _ J / J _ i �� Mill r_. J KELLER CITRIM O -- + _ i, `•- a•/'' -J•--Aw1 hLA: F�IEE M ' 1 a � 38110 :. --- ; 3 1111 _._._.., ,,,ogp • g . lr��� c _I.�F./ i i -, / --Zia `'>4�'•,1 ' i ':V AAPIE/' A-Sr0 ,B'' =t i `y III .98tto1A ` •` ' ` x i < ,�� 1 i i 1 ' -r1�,'�T��.L�� ...: . r• , 1 ,- I 11 '''III 1 ,,,,I ha 102 '• . 1 1 1 1 I I ^. �I .ra 3 _• 103 10 __ R _.i-ila 9C1 iet fi ! ''', '4- 'kJ is. .‘'tv.,elt--/.1' ' 'i .‘ r 4k-I-4,'I-,.,_1J\ .. `y'1. / .,HER 6 -r— . � , '` l � � , Al -----../ 2 irtitik 1 - •IU. , ` CJ :e tom. 1_ e " 1 tg Ac 3.5 Ac • •••iiiiiiii - Y 1799 II - , I 1 1 -JJ- •� I I 1 D 3E - 1A2 -` I I I I I I I I ' y 17.5 w 3 ... nrli IA lAir _ -cos I.-rO �,d+` 20 Ac 3C2A HIGH SCHOOL T; r v OM p°- :III --T E 'fP1p - --- o ` 2A3 2A2 •Rp • - OA'."' '� `i1'- . CN :3 . ..j,,' - '-s-�, -.--1_-_ 9.3 Ac J pvp, n , K _ IS G:�V Vr� IA —` ,. _A<I ....„.oufg,, jailik � it � • 6Ac JC S' '. .__ _-.I 2A1A 7AI 3A1 _ • ' ' '?� 1 • 3 2A1 u 2A6 ,.,1�K .{ D < - • c --T - 5A2A .... 5A 6 - GK R' �`�lya`��1 ]8 ��aa sAlN 1 2 yA 5 : B ._ --ICKE '-• 2A4 ✓"� -' ---- 6 At ,Y- , u( RR9cr A_re � �--- R � to {��, --�.�6OFtNE-- S Ac 12.2.Ac t,.S Ac F- A' ----• 10 Ac 30 Ac ._.58 _ J. THORNH i 51,1 __`__ _ : 1M < IM IG 1 AAv.£r A-r505 T Ac 1i2� I5L .1 k API). ,,,A r----- SAc l 1 I 1T 1A3, 1A PARK , , , - , 1 1 TRACT MAPS t - =y=r= 1 6A 6A1 60 602 6 ' L_ i 1 I 1 1 1 I -4, -r -r I -- l--I _ IE IC1A r 6 Ac Ac 5 Ac 7 Ac I40 ' I�1 , 1 I 1 1 -"'f I I 1 l 1 1 -' _ 11- 6C/ 1 6C2 16Cti I 9.65 Ac ,V •-- L 11Mt . . I II --im / I / ,. . LIT.' ; 1 • 4 Spin #13 Representative (46.•:9 Rex Potter � • � - 2 \ . GLE \ CO E I . z • I \ „RE„ \ ao \ 2A1 A \ N Frei Joyce- Mary Meyers Ent. I j (iiir "P.U.D." ;• z \ . ,, r "P.U.D." . — . U . — . _I/ Di ING DEk I__ . _ . _ Centennial Homes Inc. , I Perry Homes —j • U L. n • "P.U.D." —.. �/ . . k _ ,. • - \ \7- ' - • --- • . ..--, \._ • - • \ , , , „______, ADJACENT OWNERS �� . • OcJ AND ZONING j j I City of Southlake,Texas PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 95-81 Review No: Two, Date of Review: 9/01/95 Project Name: Plat Revision-Lots 6R& 7R,Block 5.Myers Meadow.Phase One. a Revision of Lots 6& 7.Block 5,Myers Meadow.Phase One, Cabinet A,Slide 1328,P.R.T.C.T. and 0.064 Acres in the B.J. Foster Survey Abst. #519,being a total of 0.833 Acres APPLICANT: SURVEYOR: Fred Joyce -Mary Myers Enterprises.Inc. Goodwin& Marshall. Inc. 1017 William D. Tate Avenue 6001 Bridge Street. Suite 100. Grapevine. Texas 76051 Fort Worth. Texas 76112 Phone: (817)481-3516 Phone: (817)429-4373 Fax : Fax : (817)446-3116 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/21/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Use the City of Southlake standard corporate format for the notary's acknowledgement of Fred Joyce - Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. (See Appendix 2 of the Subdivision Ordinance). 2. Clearly distinguish the easement to be abandoned with a different line type or shading. 3. Provide the standard"Easement Abandonment" statement on the plat and a signature block for each utility company which provides services within Southlake. Approval from each utility company must be acquired prior to this plat being filed. (See Appendix 4 of the Subdivision Ordinance) 4. The common lot line of Lots 6R and 7R does not meet the intent of the requirement of radial side lot lines. * Please submit a revised blueline "check print" prior to submitting blackline mylars with original signatures. * Original signatures and seals will be required on each blackline mylar prior to filing the plat. Also required are two sets of owner's dedications and notaries (8.5" x 11" or 14" paper) with original signatures and seals on each. Mylars will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. Goodwin&Marshall, Inc. G:\WPF\REV\95\95-081 PR.W PD ... Le i "iikk 1,-; / . . . . . mismoinnimmii 0 25 So mo 0:"i -,i•SCALE:r-50" (.-)14-1.0Y - vlitt•ITI Mat i 7, POINT OF - i o•Kt ----7-:''i .......BEGINNING-- jer* i. * • * .4' -::'' /I / .• ..• e::1 .• .:.41:"7.4' .• i 1 , /0 + ').pt.:". ,.. \ • , 44,K. .C I 4443. • ,.......4....... I . . 4 LOT Si . i I ,P I • •,, D. 0.424 A*. " .,. PI I 7P.,,,,,..., .1 ..,.,t, • 4 - r..• di . i• ..... I et t •Ns••• id . 1 at•12`5834' a- L-Mg 4 • , - ..... ..- oo 1 • 1 d.,..:,,,' f. . 4...:1., •..o. •1137F-,74" , 0 ! ., .. .?.. ...64.&E. O.. • 7057 ..,..- CP' .144 I at,OE••••42.0, 4< / r4 / , 00$ 14.1;1‘,1 V ID A t Our; .6,74 e,„sosieg 0 0 : 64-rgii •- / 5*k , I ..r i ..... ] .00 rl, I V. Illa I ....?‘--s.6.' 444/ 1:-Vi 1.• • „1:•41." LOT 71. IP ' '24 ' ,i 74. (....„, ,., , ...,,, 17411 sr I pa I ct 0 : 0.409 Ac. pi 0 ; 2 --- ; ----&-kr.....___ ....] ! A , I, P. I . . 'give ze .-.1i:,, D I • :).-....,..*::1 ..4..44;145.00.PP AO:. 1 — — 4 I -.. 01 I ........_____ ! KED wnio DR Tvz ---.......„, _.....,. J I -----. .... (Sc' 11.C.v.'.-: pc Z I t !Az 0 1 7. ...., ... ,,:. • (.4 • DI! ' A ,4 it . t eq ed . •••-:-..u•,.....f.r- , u].... i...c!".21:;..,. .... 1 lie- ..-, . C•I!5:: '4:r*-4 .;..' it.•PS..i.- 0'`. 0 i . , X f PLAT REVISION of LOTS 6R & 7R. BLOCK 5 MYERS MEADOW, PHASE ONE MI ADDMON TO TEl CITY OF 0017TELAXS. TAI.RAET COVETS.TEXAS WO A =SUNOS OP LOTS 6*2 7. SLOCX S MUMS MEADOW.PEASE ONE CADDIE?A.SLEDS MS P.X.T.C.T. AND 0.064 ACRES Of 1NN 16.1. POSTER SURVEY. (... ABSTRACT No. $19 '. IllIMIVID NI - THE CITY OP SOUTHLAXE. (11...0 TARRANT COUNTY. TEXAS 2 LOTS CM ACRES JOLT NM CASE Es. LA „,,..a Sb-5 ' • ' City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 30, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kim McAdams, Park Project Manager SUBJECT: Consider Resolution to Amend the Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD), rewrote the rules for grant applications this' year. The park master plan is now a major component of the grant application. We submitted the Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan with the grant application in January. TPWD wrote us a letter on February 16, that our master plan did not qualify for the "priority points? The Parks and Recreation Board has reviewed the issues and have recommended the following resolution to amend the Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan to meet the TPWD criteria for this next grant round. If you have any questions, please call me at 481-5581 ext 757. Please place this item on the September 5 City Council agenda so that the Council may consider the resolution clarifying the Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan. KM L Q�/ �►Er 41:t FEB 2 21995 ' (11.0° ............ TEXAS OFFICE OFCITY fciitf t.,G_R COMMISSIONERS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT ANDREWS/WSOM • YGNACIO D.GARZA 4200 Smith School Road • Austin,Texas 78744 • 512-389-4800 Executive Director Chairman,Brownsville 4a7WALTER UMPHREYY�ce Chairman /a Beaumont �� .I' �17 eee February 16, 1995 LEE M.BASS Ft.Worth MICKEYBURLESON Mr. Curtis E. Hawk Temple City Manager RAYCLYMER 667 North Carroll Ave. Wichita Falls Southl ake, TX 76092 TERESE TARLTON HERSHEY Houston Re: Master Plan Review GEORGE C.'TIM"NIXON San Antonio WILLIAM P.HOBBY Dear Mr. Hawk: Houston JOHN WILSON KELSEY Our review of your parks and recreation master plan has been Houston completed: Upon review, it appears that all of the standard requirements, as identified in the Texas Recreation & Parks Account Program Procedural Guide, have not been met. The enclosed "Master PERRYR.BASS Plan Review Checklist" identifies items which do not appear to meet Chairman-Emeritus the program Ft.Worth p g guidelines. TRPA grant applications will not receive priority points unless the master plan is revised to include items highlighted on the enclosed checklist. For the current review (Spring 1995), however, you will not be eligible for priority points since the plan is not approved at this time. Please be assured that our review of your plan is not in any way intended to pass judgement on the quality or results of your planning efforts. The only purpose of this review is to determine if your plan will allow you to qualify for priority points under criteria two of the "TRPA Project Priority Scoring System", if a grant application is considered by the Department. Please call me at 512/912-7119 if you have any questions. Sincerely, JP49 i A Stephen A. Bosak, CLP GIA Project Section Head SAB:RAM:Ib Enclosure L �� 9, q Cie MASTER PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST TEXAS RECREATION & PARKS ACCOUNT PROGRAM (TRPA) SPONSOR: Sod4l.ico) - PLAN DATE: 114Z. TRPA LOCAL MASTER PLAN STANDARD REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED BELOW. ITEMS WHICH ARE HIGHLIGHTED DO NOT MEET MINIMUM STANDARDS WHICH ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE TRPA PROCEDURAL GUIDE "PROJECT PRIORITY SCORING SYSTEM" . APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED FOR GRANT CONSIDERATION WILL NOT RECEIVE PRIORITY POINTS UNLESS THE MASTER PLAN IS REVISED TO INCLUDE THE HIGHLIGHTED ITEMS IDENTIFIED BELOW. ✓ PROOF OF ADOPTION (Plans must be formally adopted by the applicable governing body of the sponsor) JURISDICTION-WIDE PLAN (Plans must cover the entire juridiction area of the sponsor/applicant) PLAN DURATION (Plans must cover a minimum of five years) A)O' S1'14 e71 Summary of plan accomplishments needed (for plans more than two years old). //,4,a, cJi w P'a.rr," S/4)a, 'o h .J ,�,w.r/ ,.) /9"Z. (1116re PLAN CONTENTS Introduction ▪ Stated goals and objectives VPlan development process ▪ Area/Facility concepts and standards Area/Facility Inventory / Needs assessment and identification yOVK N6 s 6Ae'/cd bo' 6L 6d ex/ 's04-+4, Netts oL yo✓v. ,✓afA 7a ° n/ S NEG£5S gpu i/ Prioritization of needs GJ4 A.c.s- tlov.c, /O./O.c. N&issr > is Implementation plan '/r/�c JL yo✓X Y l#itiV 41;44 P-at /A41✓4^ .✓ it !/ Illustrations, charts, maps, etc. MISCELANEOUS COMMENTS / 1E�:(.(t& JJr D 5 � lfa%1it.CdV� Qk((�Q /.tait.t J TEPfli See-1,.., PA.( �., to U ales/Fs Reviewed Bye 0 Date 9A5 :iF:;%\ rid i I . MAR 2 71995 1 ' OFFICE OF CITY L ................... TEXAS fYr;,Ni,GER COMMISSIONERS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT` .ANDREWSANSOM YGNACIO D.GARZA 4200 Smith School Road • Austin,Texas 78744 • 512-389-4800 Executive Director Chairman,Brownsville WALTER UMPHREY I Vice-ChairmanO d � l i4 Beaumont March 23, 1995 1.N, I MAR 2 71995 ` LEE M.BASS • Ft.Worth Temple Mr. Curtis E. Hawk _._.__v. MICKEY BURLESON ____ RAY CLYMER City Manager Wichita Fans 667 N. Carroll Avenue ep72ef ,f1e&t STERESETARLTONHERSHEY Southlake, TX. 76092 Houston • -r V/_ GEORGEC.'TIM'NIXON Re: Master Plan Review - City of Southlake C=�J� San Antonio `,( WIWAM P.HOBBY / G/ v/ )f Houston Dear Mr. Hawk: «< JOHN WILSON KELSEY . Houston In an effort to assist you with the Master Plan process regarding the Texas Recreation and Parks Account program we have developed a list of suggestions that should help you in this process. Please note that a master plan is not PERRY hrmRan-EEmeritus required to participate in the grant program. If you are making plan revisions, LFt.Worth however, the enclosed suggestions may be of interest to you. Please contact me at 512/912-7119 if you have any Questions. Your efforts in this process are greatly appreciated, and we look forward to working with you. . Sincerely, TWLA ., Stephan A. Bosak, CLP Project Section Head Grants-In-Aid Program Enclosure L. T.7.4 9,4— (re PREPARATION SUGGESTIONS FOR LOCAL PARK, RECREATION & OPEN SPACE MASTER PLANS TEXAS RECREATION & PARKS ACCOUNT LOCAL PARK GRANT PROGRAM The following suggestions have been developed to assist local governments in the preparation of local master plans pursuant to requirements of the Texas Recreation & Parks Account Local Park Grant Program. Priority points can be received through the "TRPA Project Priority Scoring System" for projects which propose to meet priority needs identified in Department-approved, locally-endorsed parks, recreation and open space master plans. The suggestions are intended to assist you with this process, and they are not all-inclusive. Please note that a master plan is not required to participate in the grant program. Please contact Grants-In-Aid (GIA) at 512/912-7124 if you have any questions. Plans may be submitted for GIA review in advance of your application for funding assistance, or at the time your grant application is submitted. • If the plan is submitted with your application and it is not approved, however, it will not be eligible for project priority points during that particular review Cr, cycle, even if revisions are made. Plans must either be pre- approved, or in an acceptable form at the time of grant submission to receive priority points. PROOF OF ADOPTION Once plans are complete, the applicable governing body (city council, county commissioner's court, district or authority board) must pass a formal resolution (or ordinance) approving the plan and adopting a local listing of priority needs. Include the resolution (or ordinance) in the master plan when it is submitted for GIA review. JURISDICTION-WIDE PLAN Plans must be comprehensive and address the entire jurisdiction area of the sponsor. If you are a city, the plan should cover the entire city. County plans must include the entire county. Plans may be broken into planning areas, regions, districts or precincts, as needed for larger communities or for counties. All planning areas/regions/districts/precincts must be included in the plan, however, and piece-meal plans will not be accepted. (r, Area/Facility standards should be determined locally. Local standards are influenced by available economic and natural resources. A good source of information on this topic can be found in the National Recreation & Park Association's Recreation, Park & Open Space • Standards & Guidelines publication. The standards and guidelines identified in this document may, or may not be applicable to your community or county, as stated. Adjustments to those standards may need to be made to reflect your needs and available resources. V. INVENTORY OF AREAS & FACILITIES Assess what parks, recreation and open space areas and facilities are currently within your system. You may also want to address other areas and facilities which are available to the public which may be private or controlled by local school districts. This inventory information is important when you conduct the needs assessment. ' VI. NEEDS ASSESSMENT & IDENTIFICATION (titiar The following three approaches may be employed in determining parks and recreation needs; (1) demand-based, (2) standard-based, and . (3) resource-based. • The demand-based approach relies on information gathered from participation rates, surveys, and other information that indicates how much of the population wants certain types of facilities. The standard-based approach uses established standards to determine the amounts of facilities and park areas needed to meet the needs of a given population size. The standards may be based on studies of demand, or the professional judgement of parks and recreation planners and designers. The resource-based approach examines the assets and resources of the area for open space, parks and recreation facilities, and defines how these resources can be utilized. For example - the availability of a lake or river within a community/county is a resource Lye which can be utilized in developing a park system. City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. 95-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, CLARIFYING THE SOUTHLAKE PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN FOR THE TEXAS RECREATION AND PARKS ACCOUNT PROGRAM BY INCLUDING EXHIBIT "A"; PROVIDING THAT THIS RESOLUTION SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SOUTHLAKE PARKS,RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake heretofore adopted the Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan in January, 1992; and WHEREAS,the City Council has been notified by Texas Parks and Wildlife Department that this plan did not qualify for"Priority Points" for the Texas Recreation and Parks Account; and WHEREAS, the Southlake Parks and Recreation Board has reviewed and recommended action by the City Council to clarify the Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan to address items required by TPWD in order to receive priority points in the grant scoring process. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: Section 1. That Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein be added to the Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan. Section 2. That this resolution shall be cumulative of all provisions of the Southlake Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan. Section 3. That Exhibit"A"herein shall be effective upon passage of this Resolution and shall take effect immediately. Passed and approved this the day of , 1995. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS BY: ATTEST: Mayor Gary Fickes (hrie Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary C:\ORD-RES.ACR195-35-PKR£S EXHIBIT A (hor SOUTHLAKE PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN Proposed Amendments, June 7, 1995 Duration: Adopted in January, 1992 Plan is for 20 years, the city will review and update the plan every four Ye a r s . Accomplishments: Nov 1993 Citizens approved a 1/2 sales tax increase dedicated to park development Jan 1994 Citizens group formed to build a Leather's Community Playground Jun 1994 City acquired 24 acres of land to expand Bicentennial Park (City Park) July 1994 Developer donated and constructed 7 acre public neighborhood park, Lonesome Dove (playground, picnicking) Oct 1994 City let construction contract for $800,000 for recreation center/gym __ joint-use facility with CISD. Oct 1994 City let construction contract for $1.8 million expansion of Bicentennial Park (Multisports Complex) Oct 1994 City hires consultants to assist in developing a Trail System Master Plan Nov 1994 Developer donated 5 acres for a public neighborhood park - Country Walk (Baseball Fields). Dec 1994 City acquired 80 acres of future park land next to the COE park on Lake Grapevine (Trails, Nature Areas, Playground, Picnicking, Outdoor Swimming, Multisports Complex, Equestrian Sites) Feb 1995 Developer opens a public/private golf course on Big Bear Creek in Southlake Needs Assessment and Identification: The citizen survey that was conducted in 1991, which was used to determine local needs for the Southlake community ( page C-13). Prioritization of needs: The citizen survey of 1991 was used to determine recreational facility priorities. Top facilities in priority order are: #1 Hike & Bike Trails #2 Nature areas & trails #3 Playgrounds #4 Golf Course #5 Picnicking Sites #6 Exercise/Fitness Trails #7 Recreation Center #8 Outdoor Swimming #9 Multisports Complex . #10 Baseball Fields #11 Equestrian Sites #12 Indoor Pool 9�-8 Implementation Plan: 1992, Establish additional revenue sources to develop plan 1993, Set up a three year construction plan with 1/2 cent sales tax 1994, Expand Bicentennial Park as a Multisports Complex 1995, Open a joint-use recreation center / gym with CISD 1996, Acquire land near Lake Grapevine for the largest city park which would incorporate leased land from the Corps of Engineers 1996, Update Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan to determine the next five years of park facilities to be developed L City of Southlake,Texas RESOLUTION NO. 95-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, APPOINTING MEMBERS TO A COMMITTEE TO STUDY THE FEASIBILITY OF SPLITTING THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas under the provisions of its Charter, Chapter XI, Section 11.03, has established a Planning and Zoning Commission to act as an advisory board to the Council relating to all nature of zoning, public improvements, civic improvements, city planning, opening, widening and changing of streets, routing of public utilities, controlling and regulating traffic upon the public streets and ways of the City and such other matters relating to City improvements as the Commission and the Council may deem beneficial to the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council may by ordinance, at such time as deemed in the best interest of the citizens of Southlake, create a separate Commission to perform the duties of Planning; and, WHEREAS, the City Council believes it may be more beneficial to the citizens to split the duties of the Planning and Zoning Commission into two separate commissions, a Planning Commission and a Zoning Commission; and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to appoint members to a committee to study the feasibility of splitting the Planning and Zoning Commission; now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this resolution as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. The City Council desires to appoint the following members to serve on the Committee: 1. 04>e6 2. 3. p '' 4. 5. fflte(,ti) 6 7. (tis.„, Section 3. This resolution shall become effective after its passage and adoption by the City Council. QL' Resolution No. 95-36 Page 2 (se Passed and approved this the day of , 1995. • CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ATTEST: BY: Mayor Gary Fickes Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary C:\ORD-RES.AGR\95-36.RES/kb (kW 9e-a City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 31, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Lakes of La Paloma Developer Agreement The draft developer agreement for Lakes of La Paloma is attached. This agreement contains the usual requirements for performance and payment bonds, letters of credit, and cash escrow. This agreement is standard with a few changes and these changes are as follows: • Pages 1 and 2 contain a redlined sentence, which is a new requirement requested by Council to be written in all future developer agreements at our August 15, 1995 meeting. The City Attorney provided the language. This sentence clarifies the handling of cash escrow and requires the developer to obtain lien releases from subcontractors and suppliers. • Page 2, paragraph D. and F. contains strikeouts and a redline. The Addition is planned for private streets and these changes delete the requirements for a street maintenance bond and City acceptance. • Pages 4 and 5, STREETS: Section 1 refers to the private streets. The streets will be maintained by the Developer or homeowners association. Section 2 refers to the Developer having the responsibility for maintenance and operating costs of street lights and street signs. The City will retain the right to inspect and regulate street signs. • Page 6, AMENITIES: The Developer may incorporate a number of unique amenities (411 .1 within the Addition and agrees to accept responsibility for construction and maintenance of all amenities. Also, contained in this paragraph is the providing of authorized lock systems per the City of Southlake Fire Code. • Page 7, item number 6, requires the developer or contractor to furnish to the City a list of all subcontractors and suppliers, which provide labor or supplies greater than $1,000 value to the addition. • Page 9, OTHER ISSUES: OFF-SITE AND/Oi) SEWEn PRO DATA : Because there is no off-site and/or sewer pro-rata in this addition this item is struckout. (or /C,4—/ Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager Lakes of La Paloma August 31, 1995 Page 2. • Page 9, paragraph A. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE: The developer agrees to pay $3,105.74 toward culvert expense located in East Continental. • Paragraph C. is struckout because there is no off-site water to be constructed for this addition. • Page 10, paragraph B. PARK FEES: The Developer agrees to pay park fees in the amount of$8,5000 (17 lots X $500/lot). • Paragraph C. PERIMETER STREET ORDINANCE: The addition abuts South Carroll by 457.63 feet and at $47.50 per linear foot, the total cost is $21,737.43. Please place this on the September 5, 1995 Council agenda for their consideration. L BW/sm Attachments: Developer Agreement Map and plat L (ime, LAKES OF LA PALOMA ADDITION DEVELOPER AGREEMENT An Agreement between the City of Southlake,Texas,hereinafter referred to as the "City," and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," of the Addition, to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas,hereinafter referred to as the"Addition," for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to the III lots contained within the = `, Addition and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the Addition. I. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this Agreement. B. Since the Developer is prepared to develop the Addition as rapidly as possible and is desirous of selling lots to builders and having residential building activity begin (..., as quickly as possible and the City is desirous of having the subdivision completed as rapidly as possible,the City agrees to release 10%of the lots after installation of the water and sewer mains. Framing shall not commence until water quality is approved by the City and all appropriate Fire Code requirements are satisfied,and street signs(temporary or permanent)with street names are in place. The remaining building permits shall be released as soon as the streets are complete. The Developer recognizes that Certificates of Occupancy for residential dwellings will not be issued until the supporting public works infrastructure within the Addition has been accepted by the City,and this will serve as an incentive to the Developer to see that all remaining items are completed so that final acceptance can be obtained. C. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, letters of credit, performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all of the facilities to be constructed by the Developer,and providing for payment to the City of such amounts,up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the Addition if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2)years of the signing of this Agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds shall be issued by a Best-rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements - for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. The value of the performance bond,letters of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a (.." rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. ;: a (w, , .. Performance and payment bond, letters of credit or cash escrow from the prime contractor(s)or other entity reasonably acceptable to City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor,will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. D. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20%of the cost of construction of underground utilities. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two(2)years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the subdivision. The maintenance bonds,letters of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. E. Until the performance and payment bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow required in Paragraph C has been furnished as required, no approval of work on or in the Addition shall be given by City and no work shall be initiated on or in said Addition by Developer, save and except as provided above. F. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, title tom facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove shall be vested in the City and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title,or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities shall occur at such time that City,through its City Manager or his duly authorized representative,provides Developer with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete,have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. G. On all public facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his own construction contract,Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. Developer agrees to pay the following: a. Inspection fees equal to three percent(3%) of the cost of the water, street,drainage and sanitary sewer facilities,on all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract,to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; b. Administrative Processing Fee equal to two percent(2%)of the cost of water,street,drainage and sanitary sewer facilities,on all facilities (k.„.„ -2- /DA- / . • • . included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; c. Trench testing(95% Standard); d. The additional charge for inspections during Saturday, Sunday, holidays, and after normal working hours; e. Any charges for retesting as a result of failed tests; f. All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization. 2. The City agrees to bear the expense of: a. All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade(95% Standard); b. Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; and c. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and accepted by the City. H. The Developer and any third party, independent entity engaged in the construction of houses,hereinafter referred to as Builder will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen(15)days written notice, should the Developer or Builder fail in this responsibility,the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer or Builder for reasonable costs. Should such cost remain unpaid for 120 days after notice,the City can file a lien on such property so maintained. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the instrument. Approval by the City shall not be — unreasonably withheld or delayed. -3- . • • . • J. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas,provided that the City,through the City Manager,shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. II. FACILITIES: A. ON SITE WATER: The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and reviewed by the City. Further,the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs,materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City requirements,the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction,testing and irrigation purposes only, to individual lots during the construction of homes, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the homes. B. DRAINAGE: Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the Addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers,reviewd by the City Engineer, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council. The Developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. The Developer hereby agrees to comply with all provisions of the Texas Water Code. C. LAW COMPLIANCE: Developer hereby agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws that are applicable to development of this Addition. C. STREETS: 1. r 11 1V1T, The street -4- • construction in the Addition shall conform to the requirements in Ordinance No. 217 Streets will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and reviewed by the City Engineer. 2. The Developer will be responsible for: a)Installation and two-year-operation cost of street lights, b) Installation .. of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision, said signs to be of a type, size, color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in accordance with City ordinances: c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and as directed by the Director of Public Works. It is understood that Developer may put in signage having unique architectural features. Hieweverr -z� 3. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying (kw' with the requirements contained elsewhere in this Agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities. It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer hereby agrees to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. D. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES: The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and reviewed by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to -5- /Q/°:- . • complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. E. EROSION CONTROL: During construction of the Addition and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc.,to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this subdivision. When, in the opinion of the Director of Public Works,there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer,the Developer will have seventy-two (72)hours to clear the soil from the streets or affected areas. If the Developer does not remove the soil from the street within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the Addition at the Developer's expense. All expenses must be paid to the City prior to acceptance of the Addition. F. AMENITIES: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Addition may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes, unique landscaping, walls, and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities.The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty items such as walls, vegetation, signage, landscaping, street furniture,pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. " `. . f .'�. . : G. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way,such as landscaping,irrigation, lighting, etc., for the enhancement of the Addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer and his successors and assigns understand that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard -6- /��- 8 . . 4 • to these improvements and the Developer shall,at his own cost and expense,defend and protect City against all such claims and demands. H. START OF CONSTRUCTION: Before the construction of the streets,and the water, sewer,or drainage facilities can begin,the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds must be submitted to the City in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work. 2. At least six (6) sets of construction plans stamped "Released for Construction" by the City Engineer must be submitted. 3. All fees required to be paid to the City. 4. Developer's Agreement executed. 5. The Developer, or Contractor shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance,naming the City as co-insured,prior to commencement of any work. (heir? 6. A pre-construction meeting between Developer and City is required. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Developer covenants and agrees to and does hereby fully indemnify,hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever,whether real or asserted,brought for or on account of any injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from or in any way connected with the agreement or the construction of the improvements or facilities described herein;which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities; and in addition, the Developer covenants to indemnify,hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents,servants and employees,from and against any and all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever,brought for or on account of injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intentional or otherwise, neglect or misconduct of the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, agents, servants or /D/9— . . . employees, which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. C. Approval by the City Engineer or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers,agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection,the Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death,to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings brought against the City, its officers,agents, servants or employees, or any of them,on account thereof,to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgement which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection herewith. D. This agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein,shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract,the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who • is approved by the City,and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. F. Work performed under the agreement shall be completed within two(2)years from — the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period,the City may, at its election,draw on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's -8- /Q,9-/U . . . expense;provided,however,that if the construction under this agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may agree to renew the agreement with such renewed agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. G. The City is an exempt organization under Section 151,309, Tax Code, and the facilities constructed under this Agreement will be dedicated to public use and accepted by the City upon acknowledgement by the City of completion under Paragraph I.F. 1. The purchase of tangible personal property, other than machinery or equipment and its accessories, repair, and replacement parts, for use in the performance of this Agreement is, therefore, exempt from taxation under Chapter 151,Tax code,if the tangible property is: a. necessary and essential for the performance of the Agreement;and b. completely consumed at the job site. 2. The purchase of a taxable service for use in the performance of this Agreement is exempt if the service is performed at the job site and if: a. this Agreement expressly requires the specific service to be provided or purchased by the person performing the Agreement; or b. the service is integral to the performance of the Agreement. IV. OTHER ISSUES: A. OFF-SITE AND/OR SEWER PRO RATA: A. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE: The Developer understands that the Drainage Ordinance, Section 6.06-B, requires that each development contribute on a pro-rata basis towards the cost of replacing critical drainage structures downstream from the development. This development is within the basin served by the box culvert in The Developer agrees to pay $' of the culvert expense prior to the beginning of construction. C. OFF-SITE WATER: ---Watet-faeilities-will-be-installeci-in-aeeerelaftee-with-plaftsiml-sreeifieations-terbe t ,,� -9- (100/ . . . . . . eve-t aL a ra te_liift _ _ to be ed b ^^ the B. PARK FEES: The Developer agrees to pay park fees in conformance with Ordinance No. 483 (Subdivision Ord.),Article VII,Park and Recreation Dedication Requirements. The Addition consists of lots for a total required park fee of • . C. PERIMETER STREET ORDINANCE: The Developer agrees to pay the Perimeter Street Fee of$47.50 per linear foot. Approximately feet of the development abuts on` .$,; which will require a Perimeter Street Fee of D. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree preservation Ordinance 585. C SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: By: Title: Address Date: -10- 7,9 ld CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS By: Gary Fickes,Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: C -11- /D.9-/,3 • " C REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1. The Letter of Credit(L of C)must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The L of C may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding$10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3. The L of C must be issued by an FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The L of C must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six(6%)percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6. Partial drawings against L of C must be permitted. 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8. The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining L of C. 9. Expiring letter of credit must be replaced by substitute letters of credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the L of C held by the City. -12- /D,4/$/ M w NN INS ...... « jA 34 4 44i ,, z I 1 • 1 _ r. N.N h I ' ' I rQA rl. • •• •A - :.'•. HALL M14NER N�.!!!/ HALL A,:, • II •.,� 11 RICH RD FADS '� —� .I) I 0 :• '''. r.-"1 -.'-; " '1'. ill nit -:'."-":".- ;E9 . e42,... . ' / I YHORAS HAN.� �L� a '. In, , j •A s i 1 1ppp CHAU y xi / t .). .. T ! ! S. B11 61 G ��t. .. 7 -1 4 / woeTMs: �8 86 '.•,........., ., -., Xse p .. AV"- Y_ �� irti_. '� RJR •rir 4.R 3..',*w-..sa. -�� -- --•--n-�- ' •'� ' ----W� f O Qw1 er..r[ OM .. Naa"-• •----�• •�- ----- ram-'---�-----'.'". .-• � ' 7 >i Jfl ___ I w5 K 1rnt .,,..,, _.mar A. illi ... illtriN �` OIED1=H W. ,Y •f JOHW A. FREE•'dPs=.....-- . XI 43 illiaOrr , il III X ..71."1—7.. /ea---'.''..., Ile PI 04 N ' -� Ap° IIL I'a j /� 1, ----- - I "/ .. 0 ' ' i • -1 - J.W. HALfJ - - 1ge •l• • , ,tt • • NI��i �W�,• }• A r 10I IOC el / • '� �jN 1•. � . • I , • 1-W 4. I-- — ,• {I�j'/,, YU r __M y t �` '�♦I•,~�. �r� Y1KiVNa a.C, ,-• Ai a so .t • P ib•foc.i..- al 0, i ,,, 1 .-t rilw -- c ifs• ,-- ... % _ r © .w Y►rw a.� W_ 7 , si `_w • ! ; — ; .i . . ..__. . ■ M ( : r N r 4r; .Y al, r-fp.. -�_1P 4 m OM i Noe- 1 I .... ,-...-vi.•, 4 ..7! P ' Ik2 ii *ac ,-1 4 C• i • • • ii , .....-- • .•• ' -I. t.. ' I ` ? i BAR 8 ; "r H}.ric " C ILA y«r HALL INdEDLIP! �` �~ 'I NY [ ....-_ " _ _I i- ' ► ~L'w sue... SOW, •-Ant I . .,. uM G[• • U .• ,1N 4 �ate, jnrr' I MJ1. HOLLIPSGSIRYH IaZI us — s■a .1 " C•. IfdA�S', AVY ---- "--• ._ la _,I-----'--x- ..--_ I HARRISON DEGECEU'S s 'O&M. TRACT MAP t «TIP` • $• u7ViF"IfRW .yfA �1.. I 1 `�t .(ul/"' ( tAN1A 1 i,f iA��ntiuN •; enj , N �. �' t i� 1 I W.t I _ DIY 1•I 1 ,. • ` • \ 1 ,,, O.' : \ \1 r % I : n1 Kf�' \\. 1 f!• . I . i t<MI'1 1.. e I.HAY/D•4-4� _ 0 r. p� Ile <:13 yia �: Z 1111 lifi:f?4-1` 4 i o a z1 i{1 rig . • ...... S < u c r ~ 11 h E i FI 4 I . / . I _ I i 1! I _ I . I . 5 . I, / at 11 _ 1 _-__1 I} III- —_� ....--_ 1 ji Ii . I it. . .. y _ M'Wyf ( I - a 1 I` y 1 Ye _ 1 i 11 - - e It! q 11 Ii I ill 1, 6 Iii {, 4, Ii. .; nil Ii ii i . 1(..., ...„ ....... . _ iii i, ..=.. I iii hi is' ;- �i .I "*, ,, I a ;� ' �g ,f 1t,1 IV ill.;I i. 411 `iss'j li 0 II - r , I1 ;EL tali ill Lain k#it!! gYilf ' ". r, 11 Y ' , \ V liii% 's ssi. g -I 4 \ - --- I SS t it a cn C. ,.. ..4 C g I, 6 _I 0 /7,4—/6 City of Southlake,Texas • MEMORANDUM September 1, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Special Commercial Developer Agreement for McDonald's Corporation at the Southeast Corner of S.H. 114 and Kimball Ave. McDonald's Corporation is in the process of obtaining a building permit on the southeast corner of S.H. 114 and N. Kimball Ave. The site is across Kimball Ave. from Wal-Mart (See attached site plan). As this site has all of the "public" infrastructure in place, a majority of the paragraphs in the Developer Agreement can be struck out. However, in Article IV OTHER ISSUES: besides agreeing to pay the appropriate fees the developer is asking for two additional considerations. These are: E. DRIVEWAY: Because of the configuration of Kimball Avenue and the future realignment of S.H. 114, developer is requesting a temporary concrete driveway on the north side of the site to align with the N. Kimball center median cut. [See exhibit-titled Current Drive Configuration] When Tx-DoT acquires the needed right-of-way for S.H. 114 and upon the beginning of construction of the same, McDonald's would construct a new driveway at a location 221 feet south of the temporary drive. [See exhibit-titled Future Drive Configuration] This future driveway would be a right-in, right-out only driveway because it does not align with a median cut in Kimball. The future driveway location does meet the recently adopted Driveway Ordinance. F. BUFFERYARD: Tx-Dot will be acquiring all of the property between the McDonald's site and existing S.H. 114. The request for variance to the north bufferyard is unique to this site because of the adjacency of the tract to the future right-of-way of S.H. 114. The required bufferyard based on the corridor overlay zone is 25 feet in width. The problem that has arisen is that Chevron owns property between the McDonald's property and the existing S.H. 114 right-of-way and when Tx-DoT acquires the Chevron property there will be an offset along the McDonald's frontage. The offset abut into the north line of McDonald's and although they are providing the required 25 foot bufferyard along the majority of their frontage, the offset of the future right-of-way into their lot does not allow them to provide the full 25 foot width for this portion. Staff recommends approval of their request due to the fact that visually it will still look like a full width bufferyard due to the /Q l (toyCurtis E. Hawk, City Manager McDonald's Special Developer Agreement September 1, 1995 Page 2. parkway provided by Tx-DoT along S.H. 114. [See attached site plan-Exhibit C, the offset area is crosshatched and on the north east corner of the site.] Please place this on the September 5, 1995 City Council Agenda. BW/sm Attachments: Special Developer Agreement Letter from McDonald's Four Exhibits L �Q�-2� MCDONALD'S CORPORATION SPECIAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPER AGREEMENT An agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas, hereinafter referred to as the City, and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the Developer, o to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is understood by and between the parties that this Agreement is applicable to A (a commercial development) and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the subdivision. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: B. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow, Letter of Credit, Develeper-and-aeeePteel-brthe-Gietr-Performance-ftnd-PaYment-bendr letter-of • • • 1. To pay to the City three (3%) percent of the construction cost for • 2. To pay to the City two (2%) percent of the construction cost for It is agreed by both the City and the Developer that the City will pay the • a) All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgradc (95% Developer; b) All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or lime stabilization; c) Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; d) Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. Charges for retesting as a result of failed tests will be paid by the Develeper=Fees-are-payable-prier-te-eenstruetion-ef-eaelt-phaser based The Developer will be responsible to pay for all inspection fees when 3. To delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains 2 • C. The Developer will be responsible for mowing all g • • fr-suretrier-enrwerk-ander-this-eritnrether-DevelePeris-Agreement-withift-the A. The Developer agrees to fully comply with the terms and conditions of all other applicable development regulations and ordinances of the City of Southlake. B. The Developer agrees that the completed project will be constructed in conformance with the Development Site Plan, Construction Plans and other permits or regulatory authorizations granted by the City during the development review process. H. FACILITIES: A. ON SITE WATER: on thc final plat of thc to thc City of Southlakc. No=1-70-and-Aall-be-responsible-fer-all-eonstruetion-eestsr materials-and { 176-I 3 to-previde-tenverary-water-serviee-at-Developeris-request-ancl-expenser for A. DRAINAGE: Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers, approved by the City Engineer, the City, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council. The developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. C. STREETS: (If applicable) 1. If applicable, the street construction in the . . 2. The Developer will be responsible for: a) Installation and one year • • lQ46" 4 • Le, pre-planned-faeilitiesT • It is understood that in every construction projcct a decision later may be stabilitr D. ON SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES: service lots as shown on thc final plat of to the • • engineering B. EROSION CONTROL: During construction of the been-instaRed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc., to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this • subdivision. When in the opinion of the Director of Public Works there is sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer, the Developer will have seventy-two (72) hours to clear the soil from the affected areas. If the Developer does not remove the soil within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the subdivision at the contractor's expense. All fees owed to the City will be collected prior to acceptance of the g � subdivision. F. AMENITIES: It understood by and between thc City and Developer that thc , /&6'/ 5 C. USE OF PUBLIC RICIJT-OF-WAY: • C. START OF CONSTRUCTION: , 2. At least five (5) sets of construction plans stamped "Approved for 3. All fccs required by thc City to be paid to thc City. 4. The Developer, or Contractor shall furnish to thc City a policy of III. GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Developer covenants and agrees to and does hereby fully indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from - all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, whether real or asserted, brought for or on account of any injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from or in any way connected with this agreement or the construction of the improvements or facilities described herein; which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities; and in addition, the Developer covenants to indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and 6 employees, from and against any and all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever, brought for or on account of injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intentional or otherwise, neglect or misconduct of the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, agents, servants or employees, which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in Fort Worth, Tarrant County, • Texas. C. Approval by the City Engineer or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers,agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection, the (00, Developer shall for a period of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage, liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to any and all persons which may arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other proceedings bought against the City, its officers, agents, servants or employees,or any of them, on account thereof, to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgements which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection with herewith. D. This agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein, shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. (10. /04-1 7 • • . . • insmanee. > , IV. OTHER ISSUES: B. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE: C. OFF-SITE WATER: C. PARK FEES: The Developer agrees to pay the Park Fee of$500 per acre, in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 7.0. There are approximately acres in which would bring the total cost of Park Fee to D. PERIMETER STREET FEE: The Developer agrees to pay the Perimeter Street Fee of ' in accordance with Ordinance �^�There are approximately feet of frontage on _ ` which would require a Perimeter Street Fee of >° l' 6-ip 8 �E_ its SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: By: Title: Date: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: - Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: -6``( 9 McDonald's Corporation i 511 East Carpenter Freeway Suite 375 co: YIcDonald's Irving,Texas 75062 214/869-1888 Fax:214/869-5380 August 23, 1995 Mr.Robert Whitehead,P.E. Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake,Texas 76092 Re: New McDonald's Development 114&Kimball Southlake,Texas Dear Mr.Whitehead: Please accept this letter as a formal notification to your office that we have submitted an application and plans for a construction permit. (be In addition to the plans and application I would like to address the following items in an effort to clarify questions that may arise upon your review of the above mentioned documents. 1.) We are aware that the Texas Department of Transportation is anticipating future changes to Highway 114. Those changes will effect the current north-approach to our development. In an effort to be pro-active and in anticipation of this highway expansion,we have developed, designed and engineered a plan to close the north-approach at the request time,and relocate that same approach to the south along Kimball Avenue. Mr.Gregg Last can confirm and verify this issue. Please see attached 8.5 x 14 drawing entitled,FUTURE DRIVE CONFIGURATION,reflecting the new approach to the south. And the,CURRENT DRIVE CONFIGURATION,reflecting the existing plan for construction. 2.) In addition and for your quick reference,please also find attached and reduced plan of the Development Concept from the office of Dick LeBlanc,who will be involved in the additional developments. 3.) Based on several conversations with the TxDoT they have informed us and the office of Gregg Last,that the area of condemnation will be excessive,leaving more than 25'between our property line and the state right-of-way. As a result we are therefore requesting approval of the Buffer-Yard configuration as submitted, due to the fact that the immediate requirement would only create an irregular Buffer-Yard. co, • 1 LP' In closing,it is my understanding that these issues must addressed by the City Council via a Commercial Developer's Agreement. We therefore respectfully request that this issue be placed upon your next available City Council Agenda. Thanking You in Advance for anticipated assistance and help in this matter I am Sincerelx, Anthony Thompson, Construction Project Manager. AAT/aat ENCLOSURES: 4 From : D.E.LARSEN+ASSC.RRCHITECTS,INC PHONE No. : Aug.25 1995 9:05AM PO2 \ 1 N p��022dE �4.sv er THICK CONCRETE APPROACH IN ACCORDANCE WRH - STANDARDS. (We \ r Exhibit A S 87'40'15"E 155.57 • f 1 r OC sof> •::•, 20.0' unu1Y 'V i••�• EASEMENT ' ..1 • • /..—CO • \ N• e ,c. .7. \ * g o ASOD 11 SET SC0 w4, itil _ ' - - j` -`t°ROp N. \ , ,i �1• 8.. p V 2r_ N, \ �bI& of \N p ;, 141 \ w 2+.pp \� 1 .1,� , (11.10". \ \,,.. . , .,,/,- \ \III- V ',\ 1" 7177 4 j , \ \ _ \\ (A ` \ CURRENT PARKING COWIOURATION / • \ (FUTURE PARKING CONFIGURATIONA, / 01 AND DRNE APPROACH ARE DENOTED O. . \ W/DASHED AND LIGHT UNES.) \' / \\\\(1 - \ 1 \, \ 1p) V-zi \\ . SET bIRON p \* \ .4 0 10 20' \ 5OD ,•••°m o . CURRENT DRIVE. =ET a , ' 3•0 4,10 w (14,__ONFIGURA TION. ROD 01 Gu�C�DOn a Im. :: DAVID E.._ __ LARSEN + ASSOCIATES 17MBALL AVENUE AT S.N...t414 AR(:lii'1'P:CT3, INC. SOUT'ILAKE, TEXAS 8204 =DROOL DM'. SUITE 243 • DA US, =CAR 76247-4013 (2144008-$200 McDONALDS L/C: 42/137O AUCUST 25, 1995 LARSEN + ASSOC.: 195160 From : D.E.LARSEN+ASSC.ARCH!TECTS,INC PHONE No. : Aug.23 1995 5:21PM P02 N• N81'Ot E� ----- \ 1� ROOOIN�oOpCRREEIE 1` _ TO BE DEYOUTIONED.DRIVE PRWFlLL r MEW CURB/GUTTER t LAND— SCAPING. Exhibit B S 87'40'15"E 155.57 • N.I \ s °c \\ iii's's 2D.0 unurr ‘ . wTAik \ co • ::... EASEmINT ,41 r `, - _5 15 I,' ^Oh \ / 11 0 0 , \\ �i < IX\ •. \ i''''' \\.. j . 1. C?'''''‘I.V\% RODTIII�• ^` N. j'';;lt PROA, e• 0‘ Or �' \ \-i NEW PARKING CONFIGURATION \ • V I1D_A OTED CONFIGURATIOND1, $� ` AHD LIGHT UNES. 1 At , O °`� It ti. " XICO1 % ! fttairk • CI i• ..., e (1....„ `. ..,t •00040 1111 I . 0 I� .. . 0. fli v41. 0 : , \ `1 . ti...4 ti....4 ? '1 Iliw - \ NEW fr THICK CONCRETE 20'R \ APPROACH IN ACCORDANCE ' •�, WITH CRY STANDARDS. • © \ 11;;II' 1 \ .1.....5....., , , _.,. 1 .....4.-1 03 C ir-zi (,.1 1 • \ ,1 1 IRON ..‘.. WO ‘0011111.1 r — 1. SET pr 'IRON 6ROO • FUTURE DRIVE . S g•4 4�4�,.w SET ,E 30 YFIGURA TION : -- , /e g Ar. ... wukVL u uUC�ILIOtt. ; :: DAVID E. LARSEN + ASSOCIATES KIMBALL AVENUE AT S.N. 1Y4 ARCmTECTS, INC. SOUTHLA ', TEXAS I 0204 ELYSROOx Dawn SUITS 243 • DALLAS, TIUAS 76247-4013 (e11wo6-3ooe I L. Exhibit C g , - = 00000000 k € a. lli6 5 p,Ig iii 111:1191141 ;I:VI &lig ill1F J a iiiiii,.. IA .• I Pi, . ... a f• t ? rrs Pi 11 1$ illi --- c''‘ ' °I 9 illqiiii 8 116; :20 .. OBIWIT01[11 T °I 4 ------- iT 9 1 111 4 1 r , , ti A a Lail mgl! - - iZ '. il 0 r 1 III_ .:: ; I . • P• p •t,,, 1,1. •,., ,, . „„...,. h, 1 1 i a �,, ._,...,,,,,. . ' I_ ra Am: „. ) __ nl� 1 x ii ill g - s104 it i t ` 7 P W5k • . 1111 ,.. ::,;: /sue' „E " „n • 'aogooVrig ������` „ I per' n '.?". .•. ....' *4 • W'ow Alik; • ' --=---r- lo V 1 4 t 7 '..•::,‘ .1(,1 -:-..• ""--411 4 wrp...,,, 0. 0.. . .. .irl;: g t ,010 •01,' . ;11:01..\I'll, t IV •p7 ,..-?rji..*1- 416 ill"- 2 f s •� .: tjN-JR•6• m 71AV • n I: / o IL' y7 M r, errs! (� w• o _ 41 �• K ¢e El ''a :s .. •STAIR.�, : �- . I -- :E Ilia �� .- . , h I V . nRSH OVER COHC.MILE d warm 1 _ '�� �� v , Qi ., KR IICOOIIMOS SPEC.ROI•SOr/S. , ISrt•J O�' LLaa lr •JO»' ' 4' I 1090 20I6' IMF 12 I 1 •HAIOR'u AoeEsswY Wawa IIIRARE VAN" \�\��'���.�fit:."• $ • !p •VM1 Aa'�'dC PAWLS WWI POI[VAN \\ �\ \.\'.'4 r I •G INIF AXIMOIAi VAC(An A01 as Rat•.. '�'i■■ _� r 111 O il leg, rB; ... MAi I•L 1 J• A''�, 4 0 eil a4l! a 1_ ■ P [ ,M , "" suet OOICRCIt PARAPIZOIC RAM AIM � (, ` ••• �i [ PM 7 .o AN warm SIIR7AeE Rat WIT.•SOP/S '_. li. , =: l ...\:: 11 B R 0010113 WW MOO RAIL VRM POSTS EACH {y'� •I� I ' l ig MOIL I 1rd trio[eoHERaE PAo To K tr l ,�l`p' ,Jai.0 ll 4l ;9\ to } ri $ 1IRar.mamma KR IOU wORf_ , /Il.oawm ) _� i�L ; uo ,,,21CO oat•'AL(TO MAK EIIOOW MIN C' _ �_.' I1, tj }`.y - ARO SCA1ART RR Y.O•S ACC.Rat MET -,� - �� Oj\ •..aA wm n �••�S�IIv[Ror µiOtrtc[RA1R'PER tt.00ItAID'L / •Lw IPal. ''. PI �• .�1• ••!1, m I ~1Z lSvdir SIMAIZ iM r . IIOR. �11`\\�i� , I ` , 'Roa Aoemuooaw waT As tP�-4 0 (volr IOGI. ./H.00HAI•s PRO...•IL)I ; ��� k'N1e 'TRA91 DIC OSYRC.R1H MISIH TO MATCH r£ '�Y IllaI y II MOOT AS PCI Y.DOIWO'S[HORImI , Y. OR APPROV0 row,. RC.MIT WI I Y. WM r,1,R IL/POS&OOICR[lt PA0. 1� {e O O O O O O O Q <OOHnACTOR m carom I was. 1'I'. I•• S OZy1�9'� .0 ■■■ - ' t t ! VRM Iota WOOS•Y.00RNI S) Y t •~ 41 1€ ! a i Se moo - 2530`-^: o o o 11 M. m� ..'t{� i t;IIIUI 14i fl(IP li I I i S $g 11 til j§� - i. H I i r _t Ott ` F R . li FI : ti t� �! '! i In Ss €. KIMBALL / 1709 ADD TION.A 1E : 0 € w Exhibit D Ivevrroa LLJS - I l p . , I.-'j� I i��ii��i� MIM• :_____ i�Jl_-'1k... •/ Fp 1 '''.. r' 4' i t, 1()__N:\.... .0.: .___i= --__z_____. I • ll I 'Tl li I I i i *kg - - - -bi- NW 1 16:"17-11 "I - - - il 111 • /!/ _ . 1 1 i MIR / LZ ' 1 - a) m n r 0 -1 1 _iZ c m rN - m v r D Z , (16., /Qd-fi 13 l i; 1 / RICHMOND GROUP HANOVER PROP. "' 01 A WTI.1•..., IA R..IO. I 'MOOR TX THM 'ems City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 1, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Request for Sign Variance for Bank United at 1460 W. Southlake Blvd. Bank United located at 1460 W. Southlake Blvd., which is across the street from Carroll High School, is requesting a variance to the Sign Ordinance to allow a second attached sign. Section 16, A, 4 of the Sign Ordinance limits such signs to one attached sign per street frontage. The Bank only has street frontage on W. Southlake Blvd. Bank United has stated in their application that the literal enforcement of this section will cause unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty to the Bank. Therefore, "Bank United requests an additional set of channel letters on the west elevation facing a new proposed shopping center, thereby increasing their exposure to a greater audience, than the one (1) set allowed under the current ordinance." The following information is attached: • Exhibit A - Sign Variance Application. This exhibit includes Chandler Sign Company's "demonstration" of their need for a variance. • Exhibit B - Chandler Sign's elevation drawings. This exhibit shows the proposed sign in B elevation (west side). • Exhibit C - Final plat of Southridge Lakes Block 6. This exhibit shows the relationship at the bank site (lot 5) to the "future shopping center" on Lot 4. • Exhibit D - Section 16 A, Attached Sign from the Sign Ordinance Please place this item on the September 5, 1995 City Council agenda. BW/sm Attachments: Exhibits A,B,C,D C . �� ,b, � CITY OF SOUTHLAKE February 6, 1995 SIGN VARIANCE APPLICATION (NY' APPLICANT OWNER (if different) NAME: Chandler Sign Company ADDRESS: 3201 Manor Way Dallas, TX 75235,5909 PHONE: (214)902-2000 - FAX: (214)902-2044 The following information pertains to the location for which the variance is being requested: NAME OF BUSINESS OR OPERATION: Bank United PHYSICAL ADDRESS: 1460 W. Southlake Blvd. - Southlake, TX LEGAL DESCRIPTION : Lot Block Subdivision I hereby certify that this application is complete as per the requirements of Sign Ordinance No. 506 as summarized below. I further understand that it is necessary to have a presentative at t Council meeting who is authorized to discuss this request, ress any unres. ved is-ues, and - •1.rove hanges, if any. Applicant's Signatur>. ' / Avg:., Date: 1 < O ****************** **** ****** **** ************************************************** For City Use Only: I hereby acknowledge receipt of the sign variance application and the appliction fee in the amount of $ on this the day of , 199_. Signed: Title: ****************************************************************************************** The following checklist is a summary of requirements for sign variance requests as required by the City of Southlake. The applicant should further refer to the Sign Ordinance No. 50f and amendments, and other ordinances maps, and codes available at the City Hall that may pertain to this sign variance request. X Completed sign variance request application. X Completed demonstration of conditions applicable to the requested variance (see attached.) X Site plan showing the location of the sign variance request and any other _ signs that conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. The site plan shall also indicate the building, landscaped areas, parking & approaches and adjoining street R.O.W. (110, X Scaled and dimensioned elevations of the signs for which the variance is requested. For attached signs, the elevations shall show bui.adi7[Ig; the sign for which the variance is requested, and any,o igas ha`'t i!conform to or are exempt from the sign ordinance. 1 • /De-a7 Am 1 11995 Demonstration jase demonstra that he following conditions are applicable to the ested sign variance: 1. That a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant . Allowed only one (1) set of channel letters per street frontage. Bank United requests an additional sef of channel letters on the West Elevation facing a new proposed shopping center, thereby increasing their exposure to a greater audience, than the one (1) set allowed under the current ordinance. 2 . That the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self imposed. The difficulty is unique because both properties are bounded by a common property line on the West side. (hoe 3 . That the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties . The addition of one (1) extra set of channel letters will not injure anyone. 1 4. That the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance. The variance will be in harmony. The signage will be in good taste and will more adequately identify the building. (hoe G:\WPF\FORMS\APPS\SIGN VAR.WPD /D e-3 R woRK ORDER NUMBER DESIGEEN R 95-1897 NUMB 4 SHEET 1 Of 1 L . (^^7p, Exhibit B I"1 \ CUEM BANK UNITED • ADDRESS \\ CRY/STATE tn----- (41==4-1:== r soUTHLAKE,TEXAS a ' SALES S J.HAGLE T 1D1 E -95 ARTIST SDM APPROVED BY DATE to ART DEPT. m SALES m y z Wo 1.11 ESTIMATING ¢W w z .0 z 0 ¢ ENGINEERING rs — F �i= OzN CUEM::!:::' � Q J.0 2; WLANDLORDWWJW Mr. xWO J O �¢ WJJ Z ) Chandler !_i =O m=W ?O N O S LL < .91. 1 �Y ������ i �o ¢m3 moo ,_ � �<• , ,m d Signs i om =o�w w fw m !II 4Q= etc r-4 C O t) = C t� m ~ 3201 Manor�wl. 214-902-2000 p� �� � n u<. f ¢�' c rj xWx 0 OaAat DC 73233 RUC 214-902-2044 �W0+1 FFQq 4y W ¢g, uz'OO LU 3201 Ridge _ 5 I0,6 P 3`g t e id 11 iii�m V l i Q) San AI DC 74230 FAX 210J449��724 ^.- 0W ¢G HS ClIANING I NE NICONItYOF CN*ACt8t <GW 2 ZW WM NC.AND ALL RIGNIS ID IS UM FOR y W & g W= l NC. ARE RESBN®MCN4g8t _ O J z¢ AZNS,N • oz.. j N- < R <,Q+'�r • REVISIONS N N Na . ^a3 O _ I - c II O 11 •- eo Lir -, 1 . N / 1 14 6. oa / BULof MATERIALS Q W / ( III (111 ri CC - i ., o Ium • \\".3 , I I I N - LAI �Q - Z — ` 3.. 0 111111 , b 11E1 a L - W ...111.1111 la !WI ....I....IW DISTRIBURON Of PRINTS .1 MIASTER 0 FILE 0 CAD CI Lu1' 8 W BECIRK1L❑KEE 0 CAM 0 .4G . - SERVICE ❑PMNT 0 NFAI IRANS❑ .�000G0G , CO CUSSOM ❑VNYL D AWN.ASSY. ❑ E , NIMRAM 0 NEON 0 MALL CI .oe CNNL uR. 0 SCREEN ❑ ❑ •/ /D j9 AMINO' 0 AWNNG 0 CI!// `/- TOTAL Exhibit C L N. . .. ,........_ ..... -_-1 I I . .i I i • SOUTHRIOGE LAKES . . uT r I • LIT s. 'I ur s. I PHASE I I I I [M. .RIK 213 ur s ur ly I Lr:� SOU 7HRIDGE LAKES -- miNT or 6E31NN1M il �Ef KR L,mR .. 1 - PHASE t CALA.RIK 2/3 1.a { flO. WI I. I rr.Iw1w1K a N O0.31.3s' 2/ 1 Ile.an•1.11 I I ITIUTY Gf0001 TZO.3••LOT. \1 1 N 00.00.1T V 2I3.01• ill �1V UTILITY CASOaT • 1' T.....I.PC.la I \ • SAO' ' -1%..11 .42 \ pli FAG,r t io,_ •••VTILITY CANDOR 1. MOO. T •SRN .4.1/• LOT 4 ;! lq:N 03.311•I 113M.T32!O R. F 7 nolcs N'- d. >: I �raa wear cO�/ t `r its'`` e n LIT I • i) W r .Sr. I 0 a I 1, 13•KIIITT(A700•f .1. ain J yG 1 p0 ,//p r --- 'z y M• _ I I.•VT IL ITT TATOOIT g L n ifea `1• • ..r II '3cT 1 I.L■ arst:oo-( 3/..K _ I.I.O.• 200,00•us - - Q. maw !CT I/YI.L M 11•>,2• •. N 60.32.00-C ICY I N 00'00•IT'• I 00. , 1si.00• • • Ur275.00• I .1R'L.. • 3 1/• 1/I'1.14 _ AMU I N 00.26•1 . Y LOT 6 • 8 132,00• .a: i IO.O01 so.rT. LOT 3 I 8 �a 2= 0.01a Amu •• •• 3..0T3 lO.fT. w�A O.m Aala L .O•KIWI.1 ILK_ r L Ii f TI/.N•L T/•UTILITY WNW ....... ,00• 1a.gip• ;0O.0O _- rM.3/I'I.L 1• an 1/a•1.L 30•..0•COMM 1/I.1.14 ACCESS WI.L 3 20.32.00'11/ . .—•••••••••• T4 714.10• A.A.MOWS 3u.VCY•AIOT.I0.S22 SOUTH-NM oOUL.EVARD MIL I ' L3.r ow aunct. T i i- II30•LLI.I ----1 I if �- -_ __ S.T111-g1131TY �30.OTILITT CAW!OLLCTa1C CAY'T. I CON NER LAM — NI...aI.241.r00 LOT I• BLOCK I AD CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL OITION 1 CAL..RIK I..O k Coe ARTICLE IV - GENERAL SIGN PROVISIONS SEC. 15 WIND PRESSURE AND DEAD LOAD REOUIREMENTS All signs shall be designed and constructed to withstand a wind pressure of not less than thirty (30) pounds per square foot of area and shall be constructed to receive dead loads as required by the Uniform Building Code. The sign permit application must include a statement signed by the applicant which states compliance with this requirement. SEC. 16 PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS A. ATTACHED SIGN 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all attached signs which are allowed under this ordinance. Signs may not be attached to light fixtures, poles, curbs, sidewalks, gutters, streets, utility poles, public buildings, fences, railings, public telephone poles, or trees. The direct painting of signs on buildings shall be prohibited except for signs less than a three (3) square feet area used for building identification. 2. MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT: The maximum height allowed for letters or logos shall be based on the following criteria: Distance From R.O.W. Maximum Letter/Logo Height Less than 50 ft. 24 inches 51 - 100 ft. 30 inches 101 - 150 ft. 36 inches (me 151 - 200 ft. 42 inches 201 - 250 ft. 48 inches 251 - 300 ft. 54 inches 301 and greater 60 inches 3. MAXIMUM AREA: 1.5 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed 400 square feet - see Appendix 'A' for further clarification. 4. NUMBER OF SIGNS: Only one attached sign per street frontage shall be allowed on any site, unless otherwise specifically provided in this ordinance. 5. SIGN WIDTH: Attached signs shall be.limited in width to the middle seventy five percent (75%) of the width of any building or lease space (see Appendix 'B' for further clarification) . 6. ROOF LINE LIMITATIONS: In no case shall an attached sign project above the roof line of any building, except those attached to parapet walls and the sign may not extend above the parapet wall. 7. ILLUMINATION: Attached signs may only be illuminated utilizing internal lighting. Letters with exposed neon lighting are allowed. 8. PROTRUSIONS: Attached signs may not protrude farther than eighteen inches (18") from the building, excluding signs attached to - canopies. . 9. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: Attached signs shall not be allowed on any facade other than the main front of the building which faces property zoned for single-family residential uses if the sign is within one hundred fifty feet (150') of the property line of said Coe residential property. G:\ORD\SIGNS\F07_3-21.WPD 8 /ee'6 � LA I•�ST LAJI 1 13•.} ' 10 2 - « 1 0 2 0_ K ^ „ .-_ Er, Qs _-n N 1 1 o 13aa yc — Q to 3 = w •co C - • q I• . i kisio, ��__ ; a I • z 3 E-+ p s o 91 t 111 1 !1 �` x b I 13f.7 '' 1 e .. to ,¢ ° I J 145 : . - 4 • It 4 141.f I W ° 5 o w -+ 1 0 • • . C; 5 1 1 Z i I 143.. 1 V 0 i� 6 = 1 1 2I 6 . T 1 2 , W I 143.E I. 9 3 ' BILLY G. J 03 7 1 U GARV/N 3 •T_ ( 7 i `I sh I I p Isa_f I 1° p 0• I I j (1/4o/.3703 p.64/) S88"02'E 3/3.0 I 14s o e of 01 •1 A• f -mu--,`-�---1Sf-3is w;`w EAST' I oi \f r 14 « 13 « 12 «a 1 I a�'e'er,,,, :* EAST ' • ` ,; EJ• I/ImI. L/7= M::0 � P.P.. -- + 4,q »I t1 J SI .81 cize.:4. iip w.i 1 �my , a I I . ti'�l 3 II 1 4. I- .M E6+r'' 4 1 ' of' - t ,,,,, . ' ' ''' ..:,.:!',..- • 1 1 ,P' S f 0 • it >,I!f,'4 \ ►, J * :911i . 0 E O ,, I /► ` r�J... 10 ::::4: �',4s1I i• w, yi JN 13 w� • 7 t .p .;• 13 • l't • .1 2 - tiiii 1 1.;,,' N p'JtE 11 l'u I 1' 5 : 1 I , 9 .1,,' .,.. 1.7.5 °,+ N!9'37... 1 • 8 ,,. 14 ° s •I I **U.S. ..,I 11�I I1: //,'U.9. 'q I LLE. }�1- -- 2Cu___,F . -`--2i 3_. --- 50 _1S'L-l�. __ S 89'52' 674.6 1 G F. FUOUA TED IA. AKIN (Vol. 4977 p. 332 ) i (Vol.3677 A.355) SUMMERPLACE ADDITION _.. !TATE to TEXAS l)y 031.1911107 WNW ) 1..,w•..M.r Ms rab.ma.mil/atl r TO THE CITY OF W.,1•1.a limo e.o.,boom I, •.�.� IMMO r.•}..�•r P. of iA�. JI€CII4 Nat C#TOW d t.••C .Im.o,•+mow•limo.1.OW t10YMY Of TAMAN9 I.41 16 iv. S a u,t ,Ct,leis, 1 1or}....,Y OW r�mmm■r fa kb itr 01114 Om Mow.r••If mmmr li elM 1r.,.1 R..,ID�.. Af1. 7 TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS MAC 1b Fen AP/'AIDVfn � COMITY NUM.mw �:Q_�yr'� _ CITY COUNCIL WI/ISM W Noll S,,o.y.As•/.ecf No. 697 v 'iWI/ISM .CMiT 11A or •THLAKE, TEXAS WOW 051111T.Tau. ‘ r/AQL /frje, mayor • 6. .;_ , � , • /0b:5�' . , . 4...., o0000000000 O 0000000000 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H to V►to 69.69 V i 69 69 el 69 69 O U. U 0 9- I- C3 W ui w F al = OX � Da (n awQ 00000000000 0 09 � � N un o 0o000000000 0 Z 01 .r. „ oo F rioui000 �ri .ri000 00 0 vi O O to O n et ul M CD � tO vi O 0 .r- <O- M � .7OMOo aD N 'a r' U r- vn m ' . 0 n W 0:1 •J:"I to M W co ...) XNN c` V NViN NNul v! (D 69 OD < ',','�i F. - - bq 69 69 del 69 fA 69 a F, x0000 \' Ca = • aLQ zz OW 2 HU o r ' o o C3c:, 0XF Z2 Nv i 0�0iiiiiiiiiiiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII v �; U? 0000 U 41'. Qcz:N ►. O rii • F� 30x � z• e � � � • o 0 0 0 0 00 00000r � o� o - sr000 II 1 HHp Fo <c �c - - oia000c. t0Oo N h N Nn � Oto ao (o OU rniN ���� w kh r: !L!! !!!!L !Nt CD el CID CD 0 CD CD CV CD m H 04 XF Zy Q2 aCI I OA NI N ON O F- 0 } Q >: } V) 06 y LL: u: ti Q u,Cn Z fA WUUJJJJ6 V) w Z Q H W W ? a JO W ¢ 0- m � * -iz2 > (A A oo > g w2 CC ¢ ¢ w W of ti zo o1Eg m i- 0- ~ m n W � � o 0- Q aO z Z I- of w wQ F F W O A - U rc V m -I 0 "H ' u - ww = - >0 °° �XXW <co3: pcc62 .3w Y I W W W O � .. 0it65o Qco W I- o > f `� OwU a W/ Q >. 0Z N v CC Z UZV_rncn =_Oa �� 0 W U LLi O F02 °O00a6W 0B0 0B W 0 ti F p iO U U tL U U u_ OC tL u. u_ > w F Z ti 0 m co C) N M v ui fO lZ o O Our 9 0 F Z `©v—% City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 31, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Accept or Reject Bids with Permission to Re-advertise for Summerplace Channel Improvements GENERAL INFORMATION Advertisements were published on February 6 and February 13. Bids were publicly opened and read aloud on August 7, 1995 at 10:00 A.M. BID TABULATION (we See attached bid tabulations prepared by Cheatham and Associates. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS The bids were higher than consulting engineers Cheatham and Associates had anticipated. The original estimate two years ago was $65,000, which was budgeted. After the 1995 June retreat, Council authorized that the "Segmented Retaining Wall" design be used at an estimated cost of $74,625. The low bid was $148,677.70. The reasons for the higher bids, as per Cheatham and Associates analysis, are due to increase of material costs (15%-20%), and the contractors have plenty of work causing them to not bid aggressively. FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT Funding for the Summerplace drainage project is planned to come from the Infrastructure Reserve Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council reject the bid and re-bid the project next winter for a - summer 1996 construction. L /O)-/ Curtis E. Hawk, City Manger Summerplace Channel Improvements Page 2. August 31, 1995 Please place this item on the Council's September 5, 1995 agenda for their consideration. BW Attachments: Bid Tabulation Sheets Map of Summerplace wp60\wpdoc\wthead.mem\summer.plc L L Aov-A • R C 1VL D CHEATHAM f AND AUG (me ASSOCIATES DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS • August 30, 1995 Mr. Bob Whitehead, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Bids for Sum nerplace Channel Improvements Project No. 001-224 Dear Mr. Whitehead: Enclosed herewith is the bid tabulation for the Summerplace Channel Improvements. The bids were opened August 7, 1995 at 10:00 A.M. As you are aware, we did not have a very good response from bidders on this project. Several Lecontractors which we have contacted indicated that they are extremely busy at this time, and did not bid on this project. In addition, most contractors are concerned about the wet working conditions in the bottom of the channel, and the work may not be complete prior to the Fall rainy season. The bids were considerably higher than our preliminary estimate. There are several reasons for the higher prices. Material costs have increased 15-20 percent recently, contractors are busy and do not need work, and the bidders who bid the project were not aggressive with their bids. Therefore, we recommend rejecting the bids and re-bidding the project next Spring. This will allow the contractor the full summer to complete the work, and hopefully we will get more bidders, and better bids, at that time. We also recommend that additional funds be budgeted for this project. The actual cost after re-bidding will most likely be $120-130,000. If you have any questions or comments regarding this project, please give us a call. Respectfully, G • Eddie Cheatham, P.E. f:\word\southlak\224\reject.bid Enclosure ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design, Inc. 1601 E. Lamar Blvd. • Suite 200 • Arlington, Texas 7601 i 817/548-0696 • Metro 265-8836 •Fax 817/265-8532 /D )-3 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 1, 1995 . TO: Mayor and Council Members FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Appointment of Director of Parks and Recreation Agenda Item 7E,Ordinance 649,if approved by City Council,will establish the Department of Parks - and Recreation as an administrative department within the municipal organization. The Southlake Parks, Recreation & Open Space Master Plan, approved January 1992, lists a series of planning recommendations in Section 6 of the report to be accomplished between 1991 and 1996. We have successfully completed a number of recommendations listed in the Plan. In the Administrative Actions section of the recommendations(Page 41 of the report) ,the first recommendation listed is to"...establish a parks and recreation department with a director who is under the direct supervision of the City Manager." With the approval of the administrative department, we have taken anothe step in the implementation of the recommendations. Section 401 of the Charter provides that department head• ;_. .ointed by the City Manager, subject to the approval by City Council. I will appoint M►ifry1 o the position upon the approval of City Council, effective October 1, 1995. 1111111111111111111.1111111 CEH/lc Attachments C:\W PFILES\PARK\P&RDIR.MEM (iimw, /OC. City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 30, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Planning and Zoning Commission request for relief from Resolution 95-24 The Planning and Zoning Commission would like for the Council to consider removing the Commission from the limitations of the recently passed resolution concerning limiting cases. It is ,` their preference to proceed through all cases as submitted, regardless of the time of discussion. Please place this on the next available Council agenda as a discussion item. GL/ls CAWPF\MEMO\STAFF\CEH\PZ-CASE.WPD //4 -/ City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM August 31, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Satellite Dishes Earlier this month, we discussed the issue of satellite dishes, specifically as the ordinance requirements impact a code enforcement case currently under review. It is my understanding that the dish in question is located atop a service station on property zoned "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. The Zoning Ordinance provides in Section 34 that roof-mounted nonresidential satellite dishes accessory to the principal permitted use shall be placed on the "rear of the roof not visible from the public R.O.W. in front of the principal structure." The ordinance further provides that these dishes shall not exceed ten feet(10') in diameter nor exceed thirty-five feet(35') in height. As you may recall, these provisions were adopted with ordinance amendment 480-J on May 4, 1993. This amendment was initiated to eliminate the public hearing process in place at that time and to provide specific guidelines that staff could utilize when reviewing such applications prior to permitting. To my knowledge, the technology for the smaller ighteen-inch (18") "direct satellite service" ("dss") and three-foot (3') "Primestar-type" systems were at readily available in 1993, nor considered in our discussions on the ordinance amendment. The issue has been raised that the satellite dish in question (as well as others throughout the city) is actually essential to their business operations today and therefore, should be considered as an extension of the permitted use, rather than accessory to it. Currently, the Planning and Zoning Commission in their review of the Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance have indicated that the dss-type system would not require any screening, whether roof-mounted or ground-mounted, because they feel that this type system is not as obtrusive as the "large-dish-type" systems; however, it should be noted that this provision would conflict with the screening requirements in the recently approved Corridor Study. Although I do not disagree with the logic that satellite dishes are important to the credit operations of service stations, I still fmd that the zoning ordinance is silent to this line of reasoning, especially with the provision in Section 7.2 which states: "All uses permitted in a particular zoning district are specifically listed in each district. Any use not expressly authorized and permitted is expressly prohibited." In my opinion, an ordinance amendment would be required in order to designate satellite dishes as permitted uses within certain nonresidential districts. My concern is that once permitted, the ordinance cannot limit the permissible ones to the dss-type and Primestar-type systems without being charged with violating the rights of the other "large-dish-type" systems. 'hould you have questions regarding the above, please call me at extension 743. If it is the desire of the ;ity Council to amend the zoning ordinance, I will be happy to begin preparing such an amendment at the earliest opportunity or as directed. City of Southlake,Texas REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING, SEPTEMBER 5, 1995 L LOCATION: 667 N. Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas City Council Chambers THIS MEETING TO BE CONTINUED WORK SESSION: 6:30 P.M. 9-/A-75e 7, ,p 1. Discussion of all items on tonight's meeting agenda. REGULAR SESSION: 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to order. Invocation. 2. A. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Pursuant to the Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the . Texas Government Code, Sections 551.071, 551.072, 551.074, 551.076. Refer to posted list attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. RECONVENE: Action necessary on items discussed in executive session. 3. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held on August 1, 1995 and Ap oved the Minutes of the Regular City Council meeting held on August 15 and continued to 6- -1 vote August 22, 1995 and the Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting held on August 28, 1995. 4. Reports: A. Mayor's Report. B. City Manager's Report. C. SPIN Report CONSENT AGENDA All items listed below are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items unless a Council member or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered in its normal sequence. 5. Consider: A. Permit renewal request for Cub Scout Pack #507 to operate a BB Gun Shooting Range. Consent Agenda approved 7-0 vote City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda September 5, 1995 Page 2 B. Authorizing the Mayor to enter into an Interlocal Agreement for the Teen Court Program with City of Grapevine, City of Colleyville, City of Southlake, Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District, and the Carroll Independent School District. C. Award of bid for construction of a sanitary sewer line to N. Davis Business Park. REGULAR AGENDA 6. Public Forum. 7. Ordinances, second readings, public hearings, and related items. A. Ordinance No. 642, 2nd reading, an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 216 and a portion of Ordinance No. 118, relating to the establishment of speed limits on certain streets and roadways within the City of Southlake by revising the speed limits on a portion of F.M. 1938 (Davis Blvd.) and South White Chapel Blvd. , and establishing school crossing zones and specifying time when reduced speed limit applies to school crossing zones. Public Hearing. Approved 7-0 vote B. Ordinance No. 647, 2nd reading, Fixing and Levying Municipal Ad Valorem Taxes for FY1995-96. Public Hearing. Approved 7-0 vote C. Ordinance No. 648, 2nd reading, adopting Fiscal Year 1995-96 Annual Budget and revising Fiscal Year 1994-95 Annual Budget. Public Hearing. Approved 7-0 vote D. Resolution No. 95-34, Revision to fee schedule. Approved 7-0 vote E. Ordinance No. 649, 2nd reading, establishing Administrative Departments. Public Hearing. Approved 7-0 vote 8. Ordinances, first readings, and related items. A. Ordinance No. 480-179 (ZA 95-73), 1st Reading, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Solana(Residential), being 199.2 acres situated in the W. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 1958, the U.P. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1015, being portions of Tracts 1A1, 2A2, 2A3, 2A5, 2A7, the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, being all of Tracts 1, 1B, 1C, 1C1, 1D, 1D1, 1E, 1E1, 1F, 1F1, 1G, 1H,. 1J1, 3A, 3A1, 3A1A, 3A1A1, 3A1A2, 3A2, 3A3, 3A3A, 3A3A1, 3A4, 3A4A, 3A4B, 3C, 4A, 4A1, 4B, 4B1, 4B2, and the James B. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, being a portion of Tract 1, and includes all of Lot 4, Block A, MTP-IBM Addition No. 1 as recorded in Volume 388-211, Page 68, P.R.T.C.T. and Cabinet G, Slide 208, City of Southlake,Texas Regular City Council Meeting Agenda September 5, 1995 Page 3 P.R.D.C.T. Location: Northeast of Northwest Parkway (SH 114). East of East T.W. King Road. North of West Dove St.. and West of North White Chapel Blvd. Current Zoning: C-3" General Commercial District, "CS" Community Service District, and "P.U.D." Planned Unit Development District; Requested Zoning: "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. Owner: MTP-IBM Phase II & III Joint Venture; Applicant: Maguire Thomas Partners. SPIN Neighborhood #2. Tabled at request of applicant 7-0 vote 11 ; ZA 95-76, Preliminary Plat for Village Center, Lots 1-6, Block 1, and Lots 1-7, ,. I Block 2, being 44.328 acres situated in the T. Mahan Survey, Abstract No. 1049 / and being a portion of Tract 6 and also being Lot 3, Block 1 of the previously approved Preliminary Plat of Farrar Addition and all of Lot 1, Block 1 of the Farrar Addition as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1539, P.R.T.C.T. Location: South and adjacent to East Northwest Parkway (SH 114) and North and adjacent to East Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709). approximately 1000' West of Kimball Ave. Current Zoning: "C-3" Commercial District. Owner: James Farrar, et. al.; Applicant: The Midland Development Group. SPIN Neighborhood #4. To be continued on September 12 , 1995 at 7 : 30 p.m. • C. ZA 95-80, Preliminary Plat for Cambridge Place Addition • 89.744 acres situated in the J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. , ract 2, and the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, A, 6A1, 6B, and 6B1. Location: prth of East Continental B nd West of S. Kimball Ave. Current Zoning: "SF-20A" Single F. • 'esidential. Owners: Clifford Wayne Hood and Glenda Sue Hood • an Lemons and Malacha A. Lemons, Billie Farrar Trustee, S• . take Joint Venture; Applicant: Terra Land Development. SPIN Neighborhood#8. To be continued on September 12 , 1995 at 7 : 30 p .m. D. ZA 95-81, Plat Revision of Lots 6R nc1 2R, $lock 5, Myers Meadow, Phase I, being a revision of Lots 6 din 7, Block 5, Myers Meadow, Phase I as shown on the Plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1328, P.R.T.C.T. and 0.064 acres of Tract 1B situated in the B.J. Foster Survey, Abstract No. 519 for a total of 0.833 acres. Location: 302 and 304 Quail Court Northwest of the intersection of Redwing Drive and North Peytonville Ave. Current Zoning: "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development. Owners: The estate of Audrey L. Stone, deceased; the Estate of A.C. Stone, deceased; Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc., William Byrne and Monica Waite; Applicant: Fred Joyce-Mary Myers Enterprises, Inc. SPIN Neighborhood #13. To be continued on September 12 , 1995 at 7 : 30 p.m. ' il i I . Plat Showing, ZA 95-70, for Lots 1, 2, and 3, W.R. Eaves No. 500 Addition, 1 being 3.351 acres situated in the W.R. Eaves Survey, Abstract No. 500, Tract 2B. Location: 1800' west of N. Peytonville Ave.. 350' east of Randol Mill Ave.. and on the north side of W. Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709). Current Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Owner/Applicant: DKV (Sutton) Partners II L.P., Drews Realty Group, General Partners. SPIN Neighborhood #13. To be continued on September 12 , 1995 at 7 : 30 p .m. r City ofS• . - - -xas —. Regular City Council Meeti. • genda September 5, 1995 es Page 4 ,r r�� it A ,,„ ,:lt 0 4 , 1 , 01W 9. Resolutions: N � .. I' . 44,44/ , ,4 A. Resolution : 95-35 - •. .- Space. - _: . . . e P ecreation and Open P l Master Plan for the Texas Recreation a ar Account Program of the Texas / Parks and Wild • epartment. To be co in ed on ptem r 12 , 1995 at 7 : 30 p .m. ki B. Resolut' n No. 9 - , App • ents to a Committee.to study the feasibility of splitting the P1 • g oning Commission. To be in d on September 12 , 1995 at 7 : 30 p.m. 11471/410. Other Ite for onsideration: I , � A Developers Agreement for Lakesstates i/ /� inued on September 95 at 7 : 30 p .m. B. Special Co per Agreement for McDonald's Corporation at the east corner of SH 114 and Kimball Ave. To be continued on September 12 , 1995 at 7 : 30 p .m. TO Request for sign variance for B • ed at 1460 lake Blvd. 4/ �. To b ntinued eptembe , 1995 at 7 : 30 p .m. r/ i ► A pt or • s with Permission to re- Ise - Summerplace Drainage e cETpprovemen TE e ember 12 , 1995 at 7 : 30 p .m. E. City of a petition with TxDOT 114 reconstruction project. ter I( on 1 1995 at 7 : 30 F. Appointment of Director of Parks and Recreation To be continued on September 12 , 1995 at 7 : 30 p .m. 11. Other Items for Discussion. A. Planning and Zoning Commission request for relief from Resolution No. 95-24 relating to limiting cases. . To be continued on September 12 , 1995 at 7 : 30 p .m. B. Zoning Ordinance provision pertaining to small-type Satellite Dishes To be continued on September 12 , 1995 at 7 : 30 p .m. 12. Meeting Adjourned. I - "-'• �• -��" .�.c . 4L4J0J7ot o PASE 01 09/11/1995 18:11 817.424-0884 CLAYTON COMPANY R E PAGE 91 September .t l , 1995 r Se p ' City Council Members. ' SEP 111995 City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue L.OL■I 1 I. Southiake , Texas 76092 RE; 7A_ 95-80 Cambridge Place Addition Southlake, Texas Dear Council Members: I am opposed to development of Cambridge Place Addition and am filing this letter of opposition. My concern and opposition are for the following reasons : 1 . The necessity of road repair and or the replacement of. Carlisle Road, and 2 . Poor circulation of traffic in this Addition. The Off-Site Traffic Impact generated by this new development will be substantial . The traffic impact from this development obligates the City of Southiake to either improve Carlisle Road or request that the developer of Cambridge Place make the needed improvements. If the City or the Developer would agree to make the necessary improvements to Carlisle Road I. would not be opposed to this development„ I ask that you study the issues relating to this Development prior to any approval . Sincerely, DOUGLAS TATUM NAPA VALLEY attachment City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 8, 1995 TO: Bob Whitehead, P. E., Director of Public Works FROM: Charles Bloomberg, Plans Examiner SUBJECT Amendment to sign appeal for Bank United 1460 W. Southlake Blvd. Southridge Lakes C-1, Lot 5, Block 6 Chandler Sign Co. has applied for a permit to construct an attached sign consisting of a logo and the words Bank United on the west side of the subject building. Section 16, A, 4 of the Sign Ordinance limits such signs to street frontages only. The applicant wants this additional sign to face the proposed shopping center. Mr. Jim Hagle of Chandler Sign Co. called today and said he also needs a variance to the setback requirement for the Monument Sign. The proposed location is adjacent to the west-- property line. Section 16-B of the Sign Ordinance requires 15 feet from any property line. This situation was called to the attention of the Architect on July 10 with my initial plan review. Their response letter received August 7 indicated they had reviewed this with the sign company. Due to a 30 feet wide common access easement on the adjacent lot that is the nearest another sign could be. This serves the same purpose as the setback requirement of the ordinance. This appeal is on the City Council Agenda for Tuesday September 12, 1995. I will be present if you or the council have any questions. attachments: plans sign drawings CB L WORK ORDER NUMBER pESIG 95-1898 NuMBER SHEET 1 OF 1 us m , BANK UNITED o Es) > ADDRESS Z CITY/STATE W SOUTHLAICE.TEXAS SALESF J.HAGLE DATE ARTIST SDM 7-11-95 - APPROVED BY DATE ART DE ESII G OF F> ENGIN ERING W a wp Lu a O IANDlORO F Q D- Y O LL } W 0. ¢� o �aW o00 � co ¢ C� Chandler w 3O¢ OW> a- o a • o _� Signs mb m0 J m H Z Q❑a 0 0 N Z Z Lu a WwW V ]tot Mono'Woy 2t�-902.2000 W? Q Q X a W a Y W ~ W Z Oohs,tX 75235 FAX 2t 4A024O44 j Y J O. >m w >--wJ¢a D Z 0 CO W O 3201 CMay oC C301 2t6349.3 O4 Z O a a F =a ip i= 320AIoIYgDC30230 FAX2ta349-p2A ZQ �S FO, Ow Zm x F 4o jm Q O U O H¢W g 2 v Z 1N6 OR0Waq 611E saosEpnos CHM4CU1 7(15 J x Z< J F o x�,0 p V C x *a4ss.ANO At1 a1GN6 t0RISE FOR a Q F.E. a W a W 3 v a¢ z d o R@ROOIkpCNAREaEsfllwntNctwrolel Fo h02 Nd¢ O0 x O p¢ srr4nc. O Z O N O O O al ao p ¢ W ^wF mn`�rn cF °tea REVISIONS 0 1 I .may ix• ,�,a•a✓ • ! III s, 0.....e,,, , TV ii zi, 1 . . . BILL OF OF MATERIALS :: i IE i J i ^Fif I I g1:1:1) �� O mw...,.».,uo..a xwYo,,., ,../.»,a,..,..a.%..u.,a:. ..,..e.�,.a..-,�» ,.n, F1 a W• .SL .4Z i[ " - ILI 4 DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTS G MAXIM ❑al ❑CAD ❑ ' flECT ICAL❑MEC ❑GM ❑ I I Q 3ERwCE 0 rA CT ❑NFATIRAx 0 'E 9 •ZL cI4ToM ❑Vim ❑ANTI ASK ❑ NLi AJM ❑NEON ❑R/SWL ❑ ant UR. ❑seaefll ❑ ❑ AS5AMKT 0 AWNING 0 ❑ --- TOTAL iV Ia. • I ', I O N:)), Q I- 'I- _~/ CCU a.ca 111111: I I I I • I I h _ _ I I I I -�! W Cr O U i I I I I "' W . cn J J J J iI J � --- : = W 3 Ii 1r3 \Lt., . 3:DOD Q I i: .! 1-Ln NI O •r CV+I I _ T _1--L — _{. — m W W I I >a I } I I - � _ _ o T . w�r W , ° } I I I .�__�W W ii _r UJO '. Z Q • U. .' �\ j co- — Q .; 0 ]I i Z ; J J inp Er) O W V O V N '. J — ; o; — ,. ci .45 J 2 —0 — , I! t- 3 i ' J4\\ H io s r3 _ m n •li — ` Qii YQ U 1411111V . _ X F— I^i D tri I II 1 1 , _ II i 1 I ‘ a 1-3 i ;, • Ni\rH -I- —v W 1. I N1 1— —l- i CC ' 1 I m i 1 ra¢ 1 ,-,1 H I li _I I N .` - 4 F•X U W W • i Q J .-z. p . NI' cr,in I W �' cc I` OD / VI _' j \if I Fa ui4 :j 7,� < w ao r w I r v I<, i.; I o`er z i _13 - C Wo, Iz I-i- W J - .40 U = �6� of !N' • ZUl 1; U W ors, vi / a.7. CD1J, - I I ZO IW T 4 — WO'- xIU oa Inla O . o 1 , �.. " City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM September 5, 1995 • TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: FY95-96 Proposed Budget and FY94-95 Revised Budget Over the course of several work sessions, changes have been recommended by the Council to the proposed FY95-96 budget, revised FY94-95 budget, and the Capital Projects budget. Attached are the various summary sheets for the Operating Budget and the Capital Projects that reflect the discussed changes. In the following paragraphs, I will explain each difference so that comparisons can be made to the original documents provided. Proposed Budget 1995-96 All Funds Summary. The Operating Budget is presented in summary P° pu form, by individual fund, and by expenditure category for FY93-94 actual, FY94-95 adopted budget, FY94-95 revised budget, and FY95-96 proposed budget. The top portion of the first page details projected revenues and expenditures for FY95-96. Revenues remain as previously presented. Expenditures in the Utility Fund are reduced by $957,047, the amount designated for capital projects. This same amount is reflected as a transfer out of the Utility Fund to the Waterworks Improvement Fund, a Capital Projects Fund, where the specific projects will be listed. Therefore, ending fund balance in the Utility Fund remains the same at $1,045,850. The FY94-95 Revised Budget reflects a net change of +$600 due to adjustments in the General Fund's Parks/Recreation Division.• Revenues from recreation classes are increased $8,500, and payments for recreation contractors are increased $15,400. Professional service expenditures of $7,500 in the Division are reduced to zero, as these expenditures are associated with and properly accounted for in the SPDC project fund. The beginning fund balance as originally presented for the SPDC operating funds was understated by $5,000 due to an adjustment in the FY94-95 sales tax revenues. Originally, the fund balance estimate for all funds was $3,605,483. The ending fund balance for all funds is $3,611,083, reflecting the changes discussed above ($3,605,483 + $5,000 + $600). 1 Curtis E. Hawk FY95-96 Proposed Budget and FY94-95 Revised Budget September 5, 1995 page 2 Capital Projects Proposed 1995-96 Budg-,t. The Capital Projects budget summary reflects the same revenues for FY95-96, $1,805,500. The Waterworks Improvements Fund previously listed zero expenditures. As discussed on the previous page, $957,047 is transferred from the Utility Fund to the Waterworks Improvements Fund and identified for specific water and sewer capital projects. Accounting for these projects in a capital projects fund via transfer from an operating fund will enable year by year comparisons to be made. The Sewer Assessment Fund second year neighborhood assessment program was deleted, reducing expenditures by $1.49 million. Bond proceeds for this second year program were, in turn, reduced by $990,000. It is anticipated that the second year of the program will be implemented in FY96-97. In the 1994 Street Bond Projects, certain road sections are proposed to be delayed until FY96-97, reducing the FY95-96 amount originally presented by $648,081. The Infrastructure Reserve Fund budget reflects expenditures of $1,967,850, a reduction of $1,953,800 from the original proposal. Remaining funds in the Perimeter Road Fund, $124,793, are reflected as a transfer from the Perimeter Road Fund to the Infrastructure Reserve Fund. This amount will be used for construction of the Randol Mill project from FM1709 to Kingswood. These two changes reduces by $2,107,000 the anticipated bond proceeds required to fund the projects from $3,950,000 to $1,843,000. LAH L PROPOSED BUDGET 1995-96 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY 41115, Special Revenue General Debt Service Utility Parks/ Fund Fund Fund Recreation SPDC Total Projected Revenues-FY95-96 $7,148,925 $1,703,065 $5,566,000 $106,000 $709,500 $15,233,490 Less: Projected Expenditures $7,869,598 $1,464,333 $5,402,072 $138,000 $416,680 $15,290,683 Total-Expenditures-FY95-96 $7,869,598 $1,464,333 $5,402,072 $138,000 $416,680 $15,290,683 C.O. Proceeds 330,000 0 0 0 0 330,000 Net Transfers In(Out) 556.600 (195.647) (1.201.324) 0 0 (840,371) Net Revenues $165,927 $43.085 ($1,03Z396) ($32400) $292,820 ($567,564) Estimated Fund Balance/ Working Capital 9/30/95 $1,018,074 $356,099 $2,083,246 $68,502 $652,726 $4,178,647 Estimated Fund Balance/ Working Capital 9/30/96 $1,184,001 $399,184 $1,045,850 $36,502 $945,546 $3,611,083 1994-95 1994-95 1995-96 $Increase/ 1993-94 Adopted Revised Adopted (Decrease) %Increase/ Expenditures Actual Budget Budget Budget Adopted -Decrease General Fund Personnel $3,173,470 $4,111,936 $4,083,863 $4,825,826 $713,890 17.4% Operations 1,560,042 2,063,354 2,121,036 2,455,842 392,488 19.0% Capital Outlay 1.041.155 655.908 883.530 587.930 (67.978) -10.4% Total Expenditures $5,774,667 $6,831,198 $7,088,429 $7,869,598 $1,038,400 15.2% Debt Service Fund Debt Service $1.048.735 $1,342,923 $1,228.170 $1.464.333 $121.410 9.0% Total Expenditures $1,048,735 $1,342,923 $1,228,170 $1,464,333 $121,410 9.0% Utility Fund Personnel $434,167 $451,405 $461,530 $603,708 $152,303 33.7% Operations 2,547,672 3,067,858 3,576,326 4,013,522 945,664 30.8% Capital Outlay 291,608 519,375 689,375 587,080 67,705 13.0% Debt Service 81,900 78,525 193,278 197,762 119,237 151.8% Other 19.713 0 0 0 0 0.0% Total Expenses $3,375,060 $4,117,163 $4,920,509 $5,402,072 $1,284,909 31.2% Special Revenue-Parks/Recreation Operations $109,566 $20,000 $81,000 $30,000 $10,000 50.0% Capital Outlay 516.782 63.350 121.258 108.000 44.650 70.5% Total Expenditures $626,348 $83,350 $202,258 $138,000 $54,650 65.6% SPDC Personnel $7,971 $47,680 $47,680 $47,680 $0 0.0% Operations 875 0 4,800 4,800 4,800 100.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Debt Service 0 252.310 252.310 364.200 111.890 44.3% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $8,846 $299,990 $304,790 $416,680 $116,690 38.9% L. TOTAL EXPENDITURES 810.833.656 112.674.624 $13.744.156 $15.290.683 $2.616.059 20.6% ALL FUNDS SUMMARY 03:15PM REVISED 1994-95 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET o905A5 96su114.wk4 $.449/$100 1994-95 1995-96 Adopted $449/j100 > $Increase/ 1994-95 $.422/$100 $Increase/ 1995-96 1993-94 1994-95 1994 95 (Decrease) %Increase/ 1995 96 (Decrease) %Increase/ REVENUES Actual Budget RRVISed Adopted -Decrease P(OjpDSeif Adopted -Decrease ........................ Ad Valorem Taxes $3,253,743 $3,784,980 $3'849,030 $64,050 1.7% $4561665 $776,685 20.5% Sales Tax 1,050,731 1,849,500 1,530,000 (319,500) -17.3% 2011,500 162,000 8.8% Franchise Fees 400,036 418,040 478,209 60,169 14.4% >516,715 98,675 23.6% Fines 238,030 242,400 243,600 1,200 0.5% 260,400 18,000 7.4% Charges for Services 53,786 80,000 100,743 20,743 25.9% . •. 94,800 14,800 18.5% Permits/Fees 1,879,961 2,041,350 1,969,210 (72,140) -3.5% 1953,335 Miscellaneous 148,908 93,350 147,793 54,443 58.3% :::159,275 65,925 70.6% Water Sales-residential 2,608,334 2,970,000: 3,044,700. 74,700 2.5% 3355175 385,175 13.0% Water Sales-commercial 468,664 612,000: 537 300 (74,700) -12.2% 68T,000 75,000 12.3% Wastewater Sales 371,706 432,000 500,000 68,000 15.7% 61000.0 178,000 41.2% Sanitation Sales 344,140 432,000 390,000 (42,000) -9.7% :420,000 (12,000) -2.8% Other Utility Charges 373,733 391,000 300250 (90,750) -23.2% .318625. (72,375) r18.5% Interest Income 215.662 222.650 2 34.912 15.7% 285 000 62.350 28.0% Total Revenues $11.407.434 $13,569.27Q ,$13 348.397 (622Q,873J -1.6X 515 233:490 $1.664.220 12.3541 EXPENDITURES City Secretary $212,832 $194,598 •$214,111 $19,513 10.0% $210,893 $16,295 8.4% ......................... ............................. City Manager 200,295 314,533 360,197 45,664 14.5% :.353,712 39,179 12.5% Economic Development 0 117,245 117,245 0 0.0% .426,813 9,568 100.0% Support Services 615.511 642.785' 714.274 71.489 11.1% 815.850 173.065 26.9% ......................... ....... ............................................... ...................................................... General Gov Total 61,028.638 $1.269.161 $1.405.82Z 6136.666 10.8°/` 51507,268 $238.107 18.8°/s ......................... ...................................................... Finance 263,764 265,640! 261.974 (3,666) -1.4% 295;906 30,266 11.4% Municipal Court 158.71,1 203.990 211.383 7.393 3.6% 242.475 38.485 18.9% Finance Total 6422.557 6469.630 4473.357 $3.727 0.8% 5538.381 668.751 14.6% • Fire 728,480 784,663 810,736 26,073 3.3% '900,166 115,503 14.7% Police 1,055,234 1,249,070 1,330,994 81,924 6.6% 1447,567 198,497 15.9% Public Safety Support 434.779 690.080 611988 (78.092) -11.3% ;$43124 153.044 22.2% Public Safety Total $2.218.493 $2.723.813 42753.718 429.905 1.1% S3190857 S467.044 17.1% . ........... ........... Building Inspections 261,663 375,155` 339,048 (36,107)' -9.6% >385;i69 10,014 2.7% Streets/Drainage 1,225,241 997,072 1033,062 35,990 3.6% 939197 (57,875) -5.8% Public Works Admin 137,192 360,495 336,283 (24,212) -6.7% 443,327 82,832 23.0% Water 2,268,794 2,748,041 •......2976,910 228,869 8.3% 3368;103 620,062 22.6% . ................. ............................ ......................... ............................. Wastewater 700,168 901,797 1399,321 497,524 55.2% 1458,207 556,410 61.7% Sanitation 304.485 388.800 351.000 (37.800) -9.7% 378.000 (10.800) -2.8% Public Works Total 64.897.543 65.771.360 $6.435.624 6664.264 11.5% 46972,003 61.200.643 20.8% ........................ ....................... ... ............................. ............................. Parks and Recreation 834.875 395.190': b23:433 228.243 57.8% >664.547 269.357 58.2% Community Dev.Total 6281.202 6371.712 4NS37,8,439 56.727 1.8% 4391.332 519.620 5.3% ............................. Other 19,713 0! >a 0 0.0% : 0 0 0.0% Debt Service 1.130.635 1.673.758 1.673.758 0 0.0% 2.026.295 352.537 21.1% Total Expenditures 610.833.656 $12.674.624 513.744,156 $1.069.532 0.4.% 615290,683 2,616,059 20.6% Net Revenues S573.778 $894.64Q (6395.759, (61.290.4051 1657:1931 Proceeds from C.O.Sale $1,293,741 $414,180d $445,500. $31,320 $330000 ($84,180) Transfers to $424,613 $916,150'i $1,167,733 $251,583 $1'.,343,235 $427,085 Transfers out ($643.292) 42.623.0051 (51.675.979) $947.026 ($2.183.606) $439.399 Total Other sources(uses) $1.075.062 (51.292.675) 2.7461 $1.229.929 ($510i371) $782.304 Beginning Fund Balance $3,215,164 $4,637,152�I $4,637,152 $4178,647 Reserved Fund Balance ($226,852; $0 $0 ?$0 Encino Fund Balance $4.637.152 $4.239.123 $4.178 647 $3.611.083 411. GENERAL FUND 03:15 PM REVISED 1994-95 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET 09g5/95 .......................... 96sud4.wk4 $.44941000.1Mig.g:i]!1.1gTii!:! 1994-95 1995-96 Adopted $4491$100 $Increase/ 1994-95 $.422f$100 $Increase/ 1995-96 1993-94 1994-95 495 199 (Decrease) %Increase/ 1995$8.... (Decrease) %Increase/ REVENUES Actual Budget RevisedAdopted -Decrease Proposed Adopted -Decrease Ad Valorem Taxes $2,189,927 $2,325,950 $2385000 $59,050 2.5% $2888600 $562,650 24.2% Sales Tax 877,615 1,233,000 1020,000 (213,000) -17.3% 1;341,000 108,000 8.8% Franchise Fees 400,036 418,040 478,209 60,169 14.4% 516,715 98,675 23.6% •Fines 238,030 242,400 243000 1,200 0.5% 260;400 18,000 7.4% Charges for Services . 53,786 80,000 100;743.. 20,743 25.9% 94,800 14,800 18.5% Permits/Fees 1,680,919 1,941,350 1857;710 (83,640) -4.3% 1,853;335. (88,015) -4.5% Miscellaneous 40,350 41,750 55,300. 13,550 32.5% 74,075 32,325 77.4% Interest Income 106.660 WAIN 105.000 15.000 16.7% 120.000 3Q. 33.3% Total Revenues $5,587,323 $6,372,490 $6;245;562 ($126,9281 -2.0% $7,148,925 $776,435 12.2% EXPENDITURES City Secretary $212,832 $194,598 $214'111 $19,513 10.0% $210,893 $16,295 8.4% City Manager 200,295 314,533 360,197 45,664 14.5% ::::353,712 39,179 12.5% Economic Development 0 117,245 1'17,245 0 0.0% 126,813 9,568 8.2% Support Services • 615.511 642.785 714 27d 71.489 11.1% A(1 173.065 26.9% General Gov Total S1.028,638 S1.269.161 11.405 127 $136.666 10.8% 81;507268 $238.107 16.811 Finance 263,764 265,640 261,974 (3,666J -1.4% ,.295,906 30,266 11.4% Municipal Court 158.793 203.990 211.383 7.393 3.6% 242.475 38.485 18.9% Finance Total S422.557 $469.630 $473,357 S3.727 4,$!i $538.381 S68.751 14 f6% Fire 728,480 784,663 810,736 26,073 3.3% :900.166 115,503 14.7% Police 1,055,234 1,249,070 1,330,994 81,924 6.6% 1447,567 198,497 15.9% Public Safety Support 434.779 690.080 611.95 (78.092 -11.3% 543124 153.044 22.2% Public Safety Total S2.218.493 S2.723.813 $2 753 718 S29.905 1.1% 13;190 857 S467.044 17.1% Building Inspections 261,663 375,155 339,048. (36,107) -9.6% 385,169 10,014 2.7% Streets/Drainage 1,225,241 997,072 1033,062 35,990 3.6% 939,197. (57,875) -5.8% Public Works Admin 137.192 360.495 ;336.283 (24.212) -6.7% :443.327 82.832 23.0% ......................... Public Works Total $1.624.096 11.222222 $1 708393 (S24.3291 -1.4% 51.767.693 $34.971 2.4% Parks and Recreation 199.681 264.160 368 695 104.535 39.6% '474.067 209.907 79.5% ......................... .............. ............ ......................... .......................... Community Dev.Total $281.202 $371.712 ;1378 439 $6.727 1.8% <$391,332 S19.620 5.3% Total Expenditures $5,774,667 $6,831,198 $7,068,429 $257,231 3.8% $7869,598 $1,038,400 15.2% Net Revenues (9187.344( 15458.7081 <:($842.8673, (1384.159( f1720.6731 4261.9651 Proceeds from C.O.Sale $720,826 $414,180 $445,500 $330,000 ........... . ............... Transfers In 159,446 496,360 496,360 ':556,600 .......................... ................... ......... ........ . ................ Transfers Out ($155.0001 ($820.0261 (S623.000j $0 Total Other Sources(uses) S725.272 S90.514 $318.860 ;ram Beginning Fund Balance $1,405,310 $1,542,081 $1542081 $1',018,074 Reserved Fund Balance ($401,157) $0 $0 $0 En3 Fund ng Fd Balance 11.542.081 51.173.887 $1 018074 $1 184.001 Fund balance percentage-CM 26.70% 17.18% 14.36% 15.05% • * During FY1994-95,the City utilized Fund Balance to construct the Kimball Road extension from FM1709 to SH114. It was anticipated that revenues generated from sales tax in subsequent years could be used to restore the Fund Balance to the minimum 15%. The FY1995-96 budget proposal achieves this minimum. DEBT SERVICE FUND 03:15 PM REVISED 1994-95 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET 0905/95 96su 14.wk1 $.449/$100 1994-95 1995-96 Adopted $.4491$100 : $Increase/ 1994-95 $42:1G$100 $Increase/ 1995-96 1993-94 1994-95 1994-95 (Decrease) %Increase/ 1995 96 (Decrease) %Increase/ REVENUES Actual Budget Revised Adopted -Decrease P OPOSed Adopted -Decrease Ad Valorem Taxes $1,063,816 $1,459,030 $1,464 030 $5,000 0.3% $1( 065 $214,035 14.7% Interest Income 21.963 25.000 25 000 Q 0.0% : .30,000 5.04 20.0% Total Revenues $1,085,779 $1,484,030 $1,489 030 $5,000 0.3% $1703065, $219,035 14.8% EXPENDITURES Principal $470,000 $700,000 065000 ($35,000) -5.0% 5891.500 $191,500 27.4% Interest 575,737 640,923 561• ,17d (79,753) -12.4% :i:570833 (70,090) -10.9% Admin.Expenses � 2.91 2.44Q 2.4QQ Q me Q 0.0% Total Expenditures $1,048,735 $1,342,923 $1,228,170 ($114,753, -8.5% $1,464,333 $121,410 9.0% Not Revenues $37,044 $141.107 5260 860 $119.753 ;$238.732 $97.625 Transfers In 265,167 168,480 53 725 55,556 • Transfer Out (218,679) (251,585) (251585) (251,203) Begimkng Fund Balance $209,567 $293,099 $293,099 $356,099 Erviing Fund Balance $293.099 $351.101 $356.099 $399.184 k 41kir UTILITY FUND 03:15 PM REVISED 1994-95 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET 3:1 PM 5/9509 96su 14.wk4 1994-95 1995-96 Adopted $Increase/ 1994-95 ' $Increase/ 1995-96 1993-94 1994-95 :1994-95 (Decrease) %Increase/ 1995 96 (Decrease) %Increase/ • REVENUES Actual Budget ,Reli(Sed...; Adopted -Decrease PropOSed...;:: Adopted -Decrease Miscellaneous $108,558 551,600 84.:,* $33,000 64.0% $85a00 $33,600 65.1% Interest Income 74,859 75,000 94000 19,000 25.3% 904000 15,000 20.0% Water Sales-residential 2,608,334 2,970,000 3044700 74,700 2.5% 3;355.175 385,175 13.0% Water Sales-commercial 468,664 612,000 537300 (74,700' -12.2% 3687000 75,000 12.3% Sewer Sales 371,706 432,000 500000 68,000 15.7% 610,000 178,000 41.2% Sanitation Sales 344,140 432,000. 390000 (42,000 -9.7% 42099i (12,000) -2.8% Other utility charges 373.733 391.000 s300 250 (90.750) -23.2% 318 625 (72375) -18.5% Total Revenues $4,349,994 $4,963,600 $4,850,850 ($12,7501 -0.3% $5566000 $602,400 12.1% EXPENSES o $19,713 30 $0 0.0% $p $0 0.090 Debt Service-Revenue Bonds 81,900 78,525 193,276 114,753 146.1% '197762 119,237 151.8% Water 2,268,794 2,748,041 2;876910 228,869 8.3% 3368.103 620,062 22.6% Sewer 700,168 901,797 1399321 497,524 55.2% 1458207 556,410 61.7% Sanitation 304.485 388.800 51.000 (37.8001 -9.7% 378000 (10.8001 -2.89(1 Total Expenses $3.375.060 $4.117.16$ 14 920 509 $803,346 19.5%MM$5.40Z.072 $1,284,909 31.2% Net Revenues $974.934 $846.437 ; 0 3 3341 15816.096 _....;: $163.92$ (S682.5091 Transfers In - $0 $0 $366 338 :$3367.879 Transfers out (269.613) (1.300.0841� (550 084) (1569.203' Total Sources(Uses) (269,613) (1,300,084) (183 74.6 (1 201,324) Net change In w/c components 9174.305 $Q i 1.2 Beginning fund balance $1,357,025 $2,236,651 $2,23.6 651 ...$2083;246 Ending find balance $2.236.651 51.783 004 - 3.: 3 2 51:045.Sso No.of days worldng capital 242 158 155 71: kw SPECIAL REVENUE FUND Parks/Recreation 03:15 PM • REVISED 1994-95 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET o945/95 ...... ................... 96su 14.vec4 1994-95 1995-96 Adopted $Increase! 1994-95 $Increase/ 1995-96 1993-94 1994-95 1994-95 (Decrease) %Increase/ 1995 96 (Decrease) %Increase/ REVENUES Actual Budget d Revise .., Adopted -Decrease Proposed Adopted -Decrease .......................... Permits/Fees $199,042 $100,000 $111500 $11,500 11.5% $100;000 $0 0.0% Miscellaneous 0 0 r 893 7,893 0.0% 0 0 0.0% Interest Z 7s1 7.650 1Q Q o.o% • $.QQ• Q (1.6501 21.6% Total Revenues $206,803 $107,650 $12r 043 $19,393 18.0•/. $106,000 $0 0.0% EXPENDITURES Professional Services $98,515 $20,000 $81,000 $61,000 0.0% $30,000 $10,000 100.0% Parks and Recreation 0 22,000 37,912 15,912 72.3% '8,000 (14,000) -63.6% Park Improvements 65,218 41,350 :02,246 10,896 26.4% >' 75,000 33,650 81.4% Land 462.615 Q • 31.100 31.100 100.0% 25.000 25.000 100.0% Total Expenditures $626,348 $83,350 $202,258 $118,908 142.7% $138,0110 $54,650 65.6% .......................... ...................................................... ...................................................... ................ .................................... ............................. ......................... ............................. .......................... ............................. ......................... ............. ............... .......................... ..... ....... ............. . ......................... .................. .......... .......................... ............. ............... ............................. Net Revenues ($419,545' $24,300 ( 75,21:51 ($99,515' ($32,000' ($56,300: Proceeds from C.O.Sale $320,000 $0 $0 $0 Beaming Fund Balance $243,262 $143,717 $1.43,717 $68,502 .......................... ..... ...................... Encing Fund Balance 5143.717 $168.017 1 ... .. ...........•. . .... • .......................... ....... .. .............. • L ,. SPDC - OPERATING FUND Parks/Recreation 03:15 PM REVISED 1994-95 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET 05s5 .......................... 96surnl4.wk4 1994-95 1995-96 Adopted $Increase/ 1994-95 $Increase/ 1995-96 1993-94 1994-95 1994«95 > (Decrease) %Increase/ 1995 96 (Decrease) %Increase/ REVENUES Actual Budget Revised: Adopted -Decrease PropOSed Adopted -Decrease ...............-,...... Sales Tax $173,116 $616,500 $510 000 ($106,500) -17.3% $670,500 $54,000 8.8% Interest 1.181 12...04 13 412 212 7.3% 2. W 68.,QQ¢ $S0% Total Revenues $174,297 $629,000•ME$523,412 ($105,5881 -16.8% $691,500 $54,000 8.6% EXPENDITURES Personnel $7,971 $47,680 $47 680 $0 0.0% $47,680 $0 0.0% Operations 875 0 4,800 4,800 100.0% 4,800 4,800 0.0% Capital Q Q 0 4 0.0% 0 Q 4.1% Total Expenditures $8,846 $47,680 $52,480 $4,800 10.1% $52,480 $4,800 10.1% Net Revenues $165,451 $581,320 $470,932 ($110,388' $639,020 $57,700 Transfers Out 0 (251,310) .. (251,310) (363,200J Proceeds from C.O.Sale Q Q 0 0 Tow Other Sources(Uses) 0 (251,310) (251,310) (363,200) Beginning Fund Balance $0 $165,451 $165,451 $385,073 En6rg Furs Balance $165.451 ;495.461 $385.073 51/60.893 Lr SPDC - DEBT SERVICE FUND Parks/Recreation 03:15 PM REVISED 1994-95 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET 09IO5e95 96sunl4.vwk4 1994-95 1995-96 Adopted $Increase/ 1994-95 $Increase/ 1995-96 1993-94 1994-95 1994�95 (Decrease) %Increase/ 6 1995 9 (Decrease) %Increase/ REVENUES Actual Budget Revised Adopted -Decrease Proposed Adopted -Decrease Interest Income $3.238 S12.500 ,$12:500 $4 100.0% $18.00Q S5.500 44.011 • Total Revenues $3,238 S12,500 $..12,500 $0 100.0% $18,000 $5,500 44.0% EXPENDITURES Principal $0 $50,000 S50 000 $0 100.0% $i95 000 $45,000 90.0% Interest 0 201,310 201,310 0 100.0% 268,200 66,890 33.2% Admin.Expenses 4 1.444 ].,00 4 100.0% 1 4 0.0% Total Expenditures $0 $252,310 $252,310 S0 100.0% $364,200 $111,890 44.3% Net Revenues $3,238 ($239,810, (3239,810j S0 1$346,200; ($106,390' Proceeds from bond sate $252,915 $0 30 $0 Transfers In $Q S251.310 ,$251 310 �$363 200 Total Other sources(Uses) $252,915 $251,310 $251 310 • $363,200 • Beginning Fund Balance S0 $256,153 $256153 $267,653 Ending Fund Balance $256.153 $267.653 $267 654 $284.653 L Lir CONSOLIDATED GENERAL FUND AND DEBT SERVICE FUND 03:15 PM REVISED 1994-95 BUDGET and PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET o9,o5e9s .......................... 96sunl4.wk4 $.4494100 1994-95 1995-96 Adopted $.449/$.100 $Increase/ 1994-95 $4221$100 $Increase/ 1995-96 1993-94 1994-95 1994-95 (Decrease) %Increase/ 1995 96 (Decrease) %Increase/ REVENUES Actual Budget Revised Adopted -Decrease P"oposed : Adopted -Decrease Ad Valorem Taxes $3,253,743 $3,784,980: $3,849 030 $64,050 1.7% $4,561,666 $776,685 20.5% Sales Tax 877,615 1,233,000: 1;0211;000 (213,000) -17.3% 1;341,000 108,000 8.8% Franchise Fees 400,036 418,040 478,209. 60,169 14.4%: :516;716 98,675 23.6% Fines 238,030 242,400> 243 600 1,200 0.5% 260,400 18,000 7.4% Charges for Services 53,786 80,000 100,743 20,743 25.9% 93,300 13,300 16.6% Permits/Fees 1,680,919 1,941,350 1,857,710 (83,640) -4.3% 1853,335 (88,015) -4.5% Miscellaneous 40,350 41,750 55,300 13,550 32.5%' 74,075. 32,325 77.4% Interest Income 128.623 115.000 is 15.000 13.0%! 150.000 35.000 30.4% ........................ Total Revenues $6,673,102 $7,856,520: $7;734;6.92 ($121,9281 -1.6% $8850490 $993,970 12.7% ... ................. EXPENDITURES City Secretary $212,832 $194,598: $214,111 $19,513 ' 10.0% $210,893 $16,295 8.4% City Manager 200,295 314,533 360,197 45,664 14.5% .353;712 39,179 12.5% Economic Development 0 117,245 .117,245 0 0.0% 125,813 9,568 8.2% Support Services 615.511 642.785;: 314.274 71.489 11.1%-: ' 815 850 173.065 26.9% General Gov Total S1.028.638 S1.269.161 1:3 405.827 6138.666 10.6% 51507,268 6238.10Z 16.6% Finance 263,764 265,640 261974 (3,666) -1.4% 295;906 30,266 11.4% Municipal Court 158.793 203.990 311.383 7.393 3.6% 242,475 38.485 18.9% Finance Total S422.657 S469.630; 5473 357 53.727 lei! $538,38 S68.751 14.6% Fire 728,480 784,663 0 73 816 26,073 3.3% 900,166 115,503 14.7% ................. ....... Police 1,055,234 1,249,070 1330994 81,924 6.6% 1,447567 198,497 15.9% Public Safety Support 434.779 690.080 $11988 (78,092) 11.3% $43124 153.044 22.2% Public Safety Total S2.218.493 S2.723.813 ...,..$24,, ;$ S29.905 1.1%`...... 53.190.857 5497 Q44 17.1'/ Building Inspections 261,663 375,155 339048 (36,107) -9.6% 385,169 10,014 2.7% Streets/Drainage 1,225,241 997,072 1,F133;062 35,990 3.6% 939197.: (57,875) -5.8% Public Works Admin 137.192 360.495 336.283 (24,212J -6.7%' 443.327 82.832 23.0% Public Works Total $1.624.096 $1,732.722 $1708,393 (624.329 -1.4% 51767,693 $34.971 2.4% Parks and Recreation 199.681 264.160 366.695 104.535 39.6% 474.067 209.907 79.5% Community Dev.Total $281.202 $371.712 M !!!$378..4.19 $6.727 1.8X 5391.332 S19.620 5.3% Debt Service G.D.Bonds 1.048.735 1.342.923 ; 1 228170 (114.753) -8.5% 1464.333 121.410 9.0132 Total Expenditures 56,823,402 $8,174,121> : $t3 315899 $142,478 1.7% $9,333,931 $1,159,810 14.2% .......................... .......... ........................................... .......................... ........... .......................................... .......... ..... ..................................... Net Revenues (5150.3001 (5317.601,4 (55820071 (S264.4061 :.(5483.4411 ($165.840 Transfers to $424,613 $664,840. $550 085 ($114,755) $612,156 ($52,684) Transfers Out ($373,679) ($1,071,611): ($874585) $197,026 ($251203) $820,408 Proceeds from C.o.Sale $720,826 $414,180 $445,500 $31,320 $330,000 ($84,180) Total Other Sources(Uses) $621.460 (5310.1921 ($461.0073 (5150.815) $207:512 5517.704 . Begirfng Fund Balance $1,614,877 $1,614,877 > $1614,877 $1153,870 Reserve Fund Balance ($401,157) $0 `>' $(f $0 Enang Find Balance 51.835.18Q $1.304.685 $1.153.87Q $1.361.382 PROPOSED BUDGET 1995-96 ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY DIVISION/CATEGORY 1994-95 1994-95 1995-96 $ Increase/ % Increase/ 1993-94 Adopted Revised Proposed (Decrease) -Decrease FUND Actual Budget Budget Budget Adopted Adopted General Fund Personnel 3,173,470 4,111,936 4,083,863 4,825,826 713,890 17.4% Operations 1,560,042 2,063,354 2,121,036 2,455,842 392,488 19.0% Capital Outlay 1.041.155 655.908 883 530 587.930 (67.978) -10.4% Total 5,774,667 6,831,198 7,088,429 7,869,598 1,038,400 15.2% Debt Service Fund Debt Service 1.048.735 1.342.923 1.228,170 1.464.333 121.410 9.0% Total 1,048,735 1,342,923 1,228,170 1,464,333 121,410 9.0% Utility Fund Personnel 434,167 451,405 461,530 603,708 152,303 33.7% Operations 2,547,672 3,067,858 3,576,326 4,013,522 945,664 30.8% Capital Outlay 291,608 519,375 689,375 587,080 67,705 13.0% Debt Service 81,900 78,525 193,278 197,762 119,237 151.8% Other(Capital) 19.713 0 0 0 0 0.0% Total 3,375,060 4,117,163 4,920,509 5,402,072 1,284,909 31.2% Special Revenue • - Parks/Recreation Fund Operations 109,566 20,000 81,000 30,000 10,000 50.0% Capital Outlay 516.782 63.350 121.258 108.000 44,650 70.5% Total 626,348 83,350 202,258 138,000 54,650 65.6% SPDC Fund Personnel 7,971 47,680 47,680 47,680 0 0.0% Operations 875 0 4,800 4,800 4,800 100.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Debt Service 0 252.310 252.310 364,200 111 890 44.3% Total 8,846 299,990 304,790 416,680 116,690 38.9% GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 10,833,656 12,674,624 13,744,156 15,290,683 2,616,059 20.6% EXPENDITURE CATEGORY Personnel 3,615,608 4,611,021 4,593,073 5,477,214 866,193 18.8% Operations 4,218,155 5,151,212 5,783,162 6,504,164 1,352,952 26.3% Capital Outlay 1,869,258 1,238,633 1,694,163 1,283,010 44,377 3.6% Debt Service 1.130.635 1.673.758 1.673.758 2,026,295 352,537 21.1% GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 10,833,656 12,674,624 13,744,156 15,290,683 2,616,059 20.6% L PROPOSED BUDGET 1995-96 • ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY DIVISION/CATEGORY 1994-95 1994-95 1995-96 $ Increase/ % Increase/ 1993-94 Adopted Revised Proposed (Decrease) -Decrease GENERAL FUND Actual Budget Budget Budget Adopted Adopted City Secretary/Mayor/Council Personnel 94,839 69,150 70,490 77,102 7,952 11.5% Operations 96,231 115,060 128,050 127,273 12,213 10.6% Capital Outlay 21 762 10 388 15 571 6,518 (3.870) -37.3% Total 212,832 194,598 214,111 210,893 16,295 8.4% City Manager's Office Personnel 162,544 261,522 285,274 283,032 21,510 8.2% Operations 35,330 43,106 49,216 70,680 27,574 64.0% Capital Outlay 2 421 9.905 25.707 0 (9.905) -100.0% Total 200,295 314,533 360,197 353,712 39,179 12.5% Economic Development Personnel 0 57,626 57,626 63,433 5,807 10.1% Operations 0 59,619 59,619 63,380 3,761 6.3% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Total 0 117,245 117,245 126,813 9,568 8.2% Support Services Personnel 23,290 24,755 23,855 26,665 1,910 7.7% Operations 543,904 576,955 648,505 694,295 117,340 20.3% Capital Outlay 48.317 41.075 41914 94.890 53.815 131.0% Total 615,511 642,785 714,274 815,850 173,065 26.9% IIIIIr Finance Personnel 167,551 178,135 175,185 193,831 15,696 8.8% Operations 89,032 87,505 85,505 102,075 14,570 16.7% Capital Outlay 7.181 0 1,284 0 0 0.0% Total 263,764 265,640 261,974 295,906 30,266 11.4% Municipal Court Personnel 93,546 115,865 108,505 118,155 2,290 2.0% Operations 64,824 86,225 99,178 119,920 33,695 39.1% Capital Outlay 423 1 900 3 700 4 400 2 500 131.6% Total 158,793 203,990 211,383 242,475 38,485 18.9% Fire Services Personnel 557,753 594,373 621,746 668,656 74,283 12.5% Operations 69,779 78,565 77,265 85,360 6,795 8.6% Capital Outlay 100 948 111.725 111.725 146.150 34.425 30.8% Total 728,480 784,663 810,736 900,166 115,503 14.7% Police Services Personnel 870,057 994,903 1,001,996 1,190,194 195,291 19.6% Operations 104,689 132,767 137,224 162,908 30,141 22.7% Capital Outlay 80.488 121,400 191.774 94.465 (26.935) -22.2% Total 1,055,234 1,249,070 1,330,994 1,447,567 198,497 15.9% L PROPOSED BUDGET 1995-96 _ ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY DIVISION/CATEGORY 1994-95 1994-95 1995-96 $ Increase/ % Increase/ 1993-94 Adopted Revised Proposed (Decrease) -Decrease GENERAL FUND Actual Budget Budget Budget Adopted Adopted Public Safety Support Personnel 340,116 557,360 486,313 664,779 107,419 19.3% Operations 65,722 78,040 70,370 148,245 70,205 90.0% Capital Outlay 28 941 54 680 55,305 30.100 (24.580) -45.0% Total 434,779 690,080 611,988 843,124 153,044 22.2% Building Inspection Personnel 198,315 263,313 246,287 295,516 32,203 12.2% Operations 23,361 88,442 62,961 80,003 (8,439) -9.5% Capital Outlay 39.987 23,400 29.800 9 650 (13.750) -58.8% Total 261,663 375,155 339,048 385,169 10,014 2.7% Streets/Drainage Personnel 308,820 446,022 437,502 465,216 19,194 4.3% Operations 291,233 323,350 350,200 372,881 49,531 15.3% Capital Outlay 625.188 227 700 245.360 101.100 (126.600) -55.6% Total 1,225,241 997,072 1,033,062 939,197 (57,875) -5.8% Parks and Recreation Personnel 69,339 120,705 117,510 211,773 91,068 75.4% Operations 73,107 127,560 141,185 167,167 39,607 31.0% Capital Outlay 57 235 15.895 110 000 95.127 79.232 498.5% IF Total 199,681 264,160 368,695 474,067 209,907 79.5% Public Works Administration Personnel 111,743 190,845 219,108 266,852 76,007 39.8% Operations 14,639 150,550 82,825 176,475 25,925 17.2% Capital Outlay 10.810 19,100 34.350 0 (19.100) -100.0% Total 137,192 360,495 336,283 443,327 82,832 23.0% Community Development Personnel 175,557 237,362 232,466 300,622 63,260 26.7% Operations 88,191 115,610 128,933 85,180 (30,430) -26.3% Capital Outlay 17 454 18.740 17.040 5.530 (13.210) -70.5% Total 281,202 371,712 378,439 391,332 19,620 5.3% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 5,774,667 6,831,198 7,088,429 7,869,598 1,038,400 15.2% DEBT SERVICE FUND Debt Service 1,048,735 1,342,923 1,228,170 1,464,333 121,410 9.0% Total 1,048,735 1,342,923 1,228,170 1,464,333 121,410 9.0% TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,048,735 1,342,923 1,228,170 1,464,333 121,410 9.0% L PROPOSED BUDGET 1995-96 _ ALL FUNDS SUMMARY EXPENDITURES BY DIVISION/CATEGORY 1994-95 1994-95 1995-96 $ Increase/ % Increase/ 1993-94 Adopted Revised Proposed (Decrease) -Decrease UTILITY FUND Actual Budget Budget Budget Adopted Adopted Water Utilities Personnel 383,319 347,018 356,817 495,225 148,207 42.7% Operations 1,622,190 1,966,148 2,030,218 2,316,712 350,564 17.8% Capital Outlay 263.285 434.875 589 875 556.166 121.291 27.9% Total 2,268,794 2,748,041 2,976,910 3,368,103 620,062 22.6% Wastewater Utilities Personnel 50,848 104,387 104,713 108,483 4,096 3.9% Operations 620,997 712,910 1,195,108 1,318,810 605,900 85.0% Capital Outlay 28.323 84.500 99,500 30.914 (53.586) -63.4% Total 700,168 901,797 1,399,321 1,458,207 556,410 61.7% Sanitation Personnel 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Operations 304,485 388,800 351,000 378,000 (10,800) -2.8% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Total 304,485 388,800 351,000 378,000 (10,800) -2.8% Non-Departmentalized Other 19,713 0 0 0 0 0.0% Debt Service 81.900 78,525 193.278 197.762 119.237 151.8% Total 101,613 78,525 193,278 197,762 119,237 151.8% TOTAL UTILITY FUND 3,375,060 4,117,163 4,920,509 5,402,072 1,284,909 31.2% SPECIAL REVENUE- PARKS/RECREATION FUND Operations 109,566 20,000 81,000 30,000 10,000 50.0% Capital Outlay 516.782 63 350 121,258 108.000 44.650 70.5% Total 626,348 83,350 202,258 138,000 54,650 65.6% SPDC FUND Personnel 7,971 47,680 47,680 47,680 0 0.0% Operations&Maintenance 875 0 4,800 4,800 4,800 100.0% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% Debt Service 0 252.310 252.310 364.200 111.890 44.3% Total 8,846 299,990 304,790 416,680 116,690 100.0% GRAND TOTAL 10,833,656 12,674,624 13,744,156 15,290,683 2,616,059 20.6% M iiw CAPITAL PROJECTS 09/05l95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd965.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed ALL FUNDS Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Interest Income 121,287 268,192 361,250 403,000 340,500 Fees 587,977 1,000,899 1,041,000 895,000 1,365,0b0 Assessment Income 11,228 6,101 1,060 5,000 70,000 Developer Participation 250,175 79,825 0 0 0 Carroll ISD Participation 0 0 30,000 0 30,000 City of Keller Participation 0 52.402 40.353 0 0 Total Revenue 970,667 1,407,419 1,473,663 1,303,000 1,805,500 Expenditures Water/Sewer Projects 1993 Water Bond Projects($1.3 million) 241,698 1,073,555 142,456 152,065 0 Water Impact Fee Fund 17,835 126,856 207,220 180,000 279,800 Sewer Impact Fee Fund 177,134 414,010 1,307,500 560,000 400,000 Waterworks Improvements Fund 0 240,599 993,740 0 957,047 1995 Water Bond Projects($2.5 million) 0 0 596,000 50,000 1,725,000 Sewer Assessment Fund 0 0 1.300.000 125.000 764.840 Subtotal-Water/Sewer Projects 436 667 1.855.020 4.546.916 1.067.065 4.126,687 Streets/Drainage Projects 1993 Street Bond Projects($1.5 million) 308,614 697,878 1,023,791 500,891 0 1994 Street Bond Projects($3 million) 0 104,712 2,468,000 394,020 1,853,357 Perimeter Road Fee Fund 0 0 0 55,395 0 Infrastructure Reserve Fund 0 0 840,526 1,748,000 1,967,850 Offsite Drainage Fund 0 0 0 0 0 Street Impact Fee Fund 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal-Streets/Drainage Projects 308.614 802.590 4.332.317 2.698.306 3.821.207 Parks Projects SPDC Revenue Bond Projects 0 258.651 2.635.963 2.563.329 141.207 Total Expenditures 745,281 2916,261 11,515.196 6,328,700 8,089,101 Net Revenue 225,386 (1,508,842) (10,041,533) (5,025,700) (6,283,601) Bond Proceeds 2,800,000 5,603,772 5,300,000 5,665,995 1,843,000 Transfers in 0 0 1,570,026 918,375 1,081,840 Transfer out 0 (152.000) (114.755) (410.130) (241.469) Total Other Sources(Uses) 2,800,000 5,451,772 6,755,271 6,174,240 2,683,371 Beginning Fund Balance 724,772 3,750,158 7,693,088 7,693,088 8,841,628 Ending Fund Balance 3,750.158 7,693,088 4,406,826 8,841,628 5,241,398 CAPITAL PROJECTS 095 bndb PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET d965.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 757-$1.3 MILLION FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed 1993 WATER BOND PROJECTS Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Interest income 39,699 25,217 5,000 5,000 0 Developer Participation(Oakwood Estates) 35,000 10,000 0 0 `0 Keller Participation-Beach Str 0 52.402 40.353 0 0 Total Revenue/Other Sources 74,699 87,619 45,353 5,000 0 Expenditures Engineering contract 75,151 46,588 0 0 0 Water line-FM1709 west(Bal. of contract) 6,291 0 0 0 0 Water line-N. White Chapel(Oakwood) 160,256 0 0 0 0 Pearson Lane Pumps 0 19,274 0 0 0 12"High-Pressure 0 470,881 0 0 0 8"Peytonville(Cont-FM1709)12"Cont./TWKing 0 271,171 0 0 0 Shady Lane water line improvements 0 0 142,456 127,667 0 Beach Street Pumps/Upgrade-Keller pump station 0 265.641 0 24.398 0 Total Expenditures 241,698 1,073,555 142,456 152,065 0 Net Revenue (166,999) (985,936) (97,103) (147,065) 0 Bond Proceeds(11/92) 1,300,000 0 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfer Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 1,300,000 0 0 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 1,133,001 147,065 147,065 0 Ending Fund Balance 1,133.001 147,065 49.962 0 4 CAPITAL PROJECTS 09/05/95 bndb PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET d965.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 751 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed WATER IMPACT FEES Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Impact fee receipts 243,000 371,940 390,000 300,000 317,520 CISD participation-Shady Oaks 12"water line 0 0 30,000 0 30,000 Interest Income 12.362 20.848 35.000 30,000 30.000 Total Revenue 255,362 392,788 455,000 330,000 377,500 Expenditures Impact fee update 17,835 0 0 10,000 5,000 Construction/Engineering-Kimball water line 0 126,856 77,220 25,000 0 N. Kimball 12"water main 0 0 0 0 125,800 S.White Chapel 12"water main 0 0 0 0 149,000 Shady Oaks 12"water line(CISD) 0 0 130.000 145.000 0 Total Expenditures 17,835 126,856 207,220 180,000 279,800 Net Revenue 237,527 265,932 247,780 150,000 97,700 Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Out(1) 0 (152.000) (114.755) (114.755) (116.676) Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 (152,000) (114,755) (114,755) (116,676) Beginning Fund Balance 230,247 467,774 581,706 581,706 616,951 Ending Fund Balance 467.774 581,706 714.731 616.951 597,975 (1)Transfer to Utility Fund for debt service on 1993 series certificates of obligation issued for impact fee eligible projects. These projects are listed in Fund 757, $1.3M Water Bond Projects. CAPITAL PROJECTS09/05/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd965.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 752 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed SEWER IMPACT FEES Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue/Other Sources Impact fee receipts 315,112 541,143 575,000 460,000 492,500 Interest Income 17,362 29,917 37,500 30,000 36,d00 Developer contributions 215,175 69 825 0 0 0 Total Revenue/Other Sources 547,649 640,885 612,500 490,000 528,500 Expenditures S-2 Sewer line easements 18,950 0 0 0 0 Engineering-S-2 Sewer line(BearCreek/FM1709) 15,220 4,356 0 0 0 Construction-S-2 Sewer line(BearCreek/FM1709) 142,964 337,265 0 0 0 S2A Sewer line(FM1709/Florence) 0 0 454,500 30,000 400,000 N-5 Sewer line 0 0 350,000 10,000 0 N-4 Sewer line 0 72,389 503.000 520.000 0 Total Expenditures 177,134 414,010 1,307,500 560,000 400,000 Net Revenue 370,515 226,875 (695,000) (70,000) 128,500 Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 0 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 250,122 620,637 847,512 847,512 777,512 Ending Fund Balance 620,637 847,512 152,512 777,512 906,012 L CAPITAL PROJECTS o 9/05/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd965.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 750 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed WATERWORKS IMPROVEMENTS FUND Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue/Other Sources Interest Income 4.964 11.018 35.000 0 0 Total Revenue/Other Sources 4,964 11,018 35,000 0 0 Expenditures: Marshall Creek Sewer Line participation (1) 0 240,599 243,740 0 0 Water/Sewer system improvements 0 0 670,000 0 0 Land-elevated water storage site 0 0 80,000 0 0 6"water main-Ridgecrest,Brian, Hilltop 0 0 0 0 103,200 Engineering-pump station&storage tank 0 0 0 0 170,000 Water lines-Rolling Hills,Greenbough,Raintree,Brookwood 0 0 0 0 228,247 Water line-W. Continental 0 0 0 0 25,000 8"water line-Lonesome Dove to Emerald 0 0 0 0 37,000 Land-ground storage/pumping, N. of MTP 0 0 0 0 80,000 Land-Public Works facility(down payment) 0 0 0 0 100,000 Land-overhead storage/FM1709 0 0 0 0 40,000 Land-ROW Sutton S-2A 0 0 0 0 18,600 Dove Estates-sewer collection system 0 0 0 0 155.000 Total Expenditures 0 240,599 993,740 0 957,047 Net Revenue 4,964 (229,581) (958,740) 0 (957,047) Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers In (2) 0 0 750,000 0 957,047 Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 750,000 0 957,047 Beginning Fund Balance 224,617 229,581 (0) (0) (0) Ending Fund Balance 229,581 (0) (208.740) (0) (0) (1)The Marshall Creek Sewer line participation was a one time payment of$240,599 which was made at the end of fiscal year 1994 after the budget for 1995 had been adopted, allocating the funds in the 1994-95 year instead. (2) In FY94-95, $750,000 was allocated as a transfer from the Utility Fund to provide seed money for the sewer assessment program. Instead$1.3 million in bonds were issued for the entire first year of the program. Funds were not transferred from the Utility Fund. The City reallocated a portion of these funds($450,000)in the Utility Fund for payment of debt service on the Denton Creek pressure line initiated during the year. In FY95-96, capital improvement projects are funded through a transfer from the Utility Fund. L Cor CAPITAL PROJECTS 09/05/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd965.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 758 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed 1995 WATER BOND PROJECTS Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Interest Income 0 0 47.000 47 000 90 000 Total Revenue/Other Sources 0 0 47,000 47,000 90,000 Expenditures Engineering 0 0 196,000 50,000 25,000 Land 0 0 0 0 200,000 Ground Storage Tank-5 million gallons 0 0 400.000 0 1.500.000 Total Expenditures 0 0 596,000 50,000 1,725,000 Net Revenue 0 0 (549,000) (3,000) (1,635,000) Bond Proceeds 0 0 2,500,000 2,500,000 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 2,500,000 2,500,000 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 2,497,000 Ending Fund Balance 4 4 1,951,000 2,497,000 862,000 This project will construct a ground storage tank on the west side of Southlake, and will take approximately 18 months to build. The remainder of the project will be built in FY96-97. L kw CAPITAL PROJECTS 09/05/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd965.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 755 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed SEWER ASSESSMENT FUND Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Assessment Income 11,228 6,101 1,060 5,000 70,000 Interest Income 1.068 1.576 37.500 37.500 60.000 Total Revenue 12,296 7,677 38,560 42,500 130,0'00 Expenditures Engineering 0 0 0 125,000 35,000 Year 1 sewer assessment program(1) 0 0 1,300,000 0 0 Vista Trails 0 0 0 0 247,000 Cimarron Estates 0 0 0 0 48,500 Emerald Estates 0 0 0 0 142,340 Whispering Dell Estates 0 0 0 0 165,000 Highland Estates 0 0 0 0 127.000 Total Expenditures 0 0 1,300,000 125,000 764,840 Net Revenue 12,296 7,677 (1,261,440) (82,500) (634,840) Bond Proceeds 0 0 1,300,000 1,317,050 0 I. Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 r Transfer Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 1,300,000 1,317,050 0 Beginning Fund Balance 19,786 32,082 39,759 39,759 1,274,309 Ending Fund Balance 32,082 39.759 78.319 1,274,309 639.469 (1)Year 1 =Vista Trails, Cimarron Estates, Emerald Estates, Whispering Dell Estates, Highland Estates Year 2 subdivisions identified for FY96-97=Huntwick, Diamond Circle, Mission Hills, Rainforest/Shady Lane vicinity, with$1.49M estimate. L CAPITAL PROJECTS 09/05/95 bndb PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET d965.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 703-$1.5 MILLION FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed 1993 STREET BOND PROJECTS Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Interest income 45.265 43.548 25.000 18,000 44 500 Total Revenue 45,265 43,548 25,000 18,000 4,500 Expenditures Engineering contract 135,339 51,985 10,000 0 0 Administrative expenses(bond issuance) 24,437 0 0 0 0 N. Carroll-Dove/Burney 148,838 351,535 0 0 0 N. Carroll-SH114/Dove 0 86,158 463,661 195,175 0 N. Carroll-FM1709/Continental 0 0 392,763 0 0 S.White Chapel-Big Bear Creek/FM1709 0 0 0 211,295 0 S. Peytonville Road-FM1709/Continental Blvd. 0 208.200 157.367 94 421 0 Total Expenditures 308,614 697,878 1,023,791 500,891 0 Net Revenue (263,349) (654,330) (998,791) (482,891) 4,500 Bond Proceeds(11/92) 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 0 Vibe Total Other Sources(Uses) 1,500,000 0 0 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 1,236,651 582,321 582,321 99,430 Ending Fund Balance 1.236.651 582.321 (416.470) 99,430 103.930 Remaining funds to be used to construct projects identified in Fund 700, 1994 Street Bond Projects on the following page. L • ii, CAPITAL PROJECTS 09/05/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd965.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 700-$3.0 MILLION FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed 1994 STREET BOND PROJECTS Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Interest Income 0 102.067 75.000 108.000 77.000 Total Revenue 0 102,067 75,000 108,000 77,0b0 Expenditures Engineering contract 0 104,712 93,000 60,000 0 Brumlow-Continental/SH26(2) 0 0 270,000 0 0 N. Carroll-FM1709/SH114(1) 0 0 0 0 0 S. Carroll-FM1709/Continental Blvd. (1) 0 0 325,000 0 0 W. Continental-White Chapel/Davis 0 0 0 0 555,750 E. Dove-White Chapel/Kimball(3) 0 0 900,000 0 859,000 W. Dove-Creek/Peytonville 0 0 0 0 28,607 W. Dove-Peytonville/Shady Oaks 0 0 0 0 142,100 E. Highland-Carroll/Kimball (3) 0 0 0 0 0 W. Highland-Shady Oaks/White Chapel 0 0 0 0 121,900 N. Kimball-Highland/Dove(ROW only-intersection)(3) 0 0 0 0 25,000 N. Kimball-SH114/Highland(3) 0 0 0 0 0 N.White Chapel-SH114/Dove 0 0 0 0 121,000 if N.White Chapel-FM1709/SH114 0 0 555,000 334,020 0 „► S. White Chapel-Big Bear Creek/FM1709 0 0 325.000 0 0 Total Expenditures 0 104,712 2,468,000 394,020 1,853,357 Net Revenue 0 (2,645) (2,393,000) (286,020) (1,776,357) Bond Proceeds(11/93) 0 3,001,137 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 3,001,137 0 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 2,998,492 2,998,492 2,712,472 Ending Fund Balance O. 2.998.492 605.492 2.712.472 936.115 (1)Road section design and construction on hold due to anticipated adjacent development, interim road sections vs. ultimate design/width, ROW considerations with alignment. (N. Carroll-$293,721; S. Carroll-$326,580) (2)Brumlow identified by Task Force, but not included as recommended project. The FY94-95 budget assumed funding would be available after all recommended projects were completed. Updated cost estimates for remaining projects indicate that no funding will be available for Brumlow. (3)Projects to be constructed in FY96-97. (E. Highland-$172,960; N. Kimball-SH114/Dove-$250,140; N. Kimball-Highland/Dove remainder-$160,430) Funds remaining from Fund 703, 1993 Street Bond Projects, will also be used. Priorities for FY95-96: 1. E. Dove-White Chapel/Kimball 2. N. White Chapel-SH114/Dove 3. W. Continental-White Chapel/Davis 4.W. Highland-Shady Oaks/White Chapel L. 5. N. Kimball-Highland/Dove(widening intersection only) 6. W. Dove-Shady Oaks/Creek CAPITAL PROJECTS 09/05/95 bndb PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET d965.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 502 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed PERIMETER ROAD FEE FUND Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue/Other Sources Perimeter Road Fees 29,865 48,875 76,000 90,000 0 Interest income 567 2.881 5,000 5 000 3 d00 Total Revenue/Other Sources 30,432 51,756 81,000 95,000 3,000 Expenditures E. Continental(Timarron/Dominion participation) 0 0 0 55395 0 Total Expenditures 0 0 0 55,395 0 Net Revenue 30,432 51,756 81,000 39,605 3,000 Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 (124.793) Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 0 0 (124,793) Beginning Fund Balance 0 30,432 82,188 82,188 121,793 Ending Fund Balance 30.432 82,188 163,188 121, 93 Q ,r Remainder of funds transferred to Fund 501, Infrastructure Reserve, for construction of Randol Mill-FM1709/Kingswood. With adoption of Street Impact Fee in latter part of 1995, perimeter road fees will no longer be collected. L CAPITAL PROJECTS 09/05/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd965.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND 501 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed INFRASTRUCTURE RESERVE FUND Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue/Other Sources Interest Income 0 0 20.500 20.500 1.500 Total Revenue/Other Sources 0 0 20,500 20,500 1,5b0 Expenditures Kimball Road-FM1709/SH114 0 0 400,000 500,000 0 Randol Mill-FM1709 to Kingswood 0 0 103,100 15,000 319,770 West Beach Land Acquisition 0 0 0 1,168,000 0 Summer Place drainage improvements 0 0 60,000 65,000 0 Vista Trails(contractor) 0 0 163,000 0 0 Engineering-Continental/SH26 RR Crossing 0 0 20,500 0 0 Land acquisition(Municipal Facility) 0 0 0 0 850,000 Street improvements-year 1 sewer assm program(1) 0 0 0 0 440,000 Ridgecrest 0 0 93,926 0 0 Brock 0 0 0 0 58,080 Hilltop/Briar/Hillside/CrescentNVoodland 0 0 0 0 250,000 Seal-Coat(Cross Timbers addition) 0 0 0 0 50.000 Total Expenditures 0 0 840,526 1,748,000 1,967,850 Net Revenue 0 0 (820,026) (1,727,500) (1,966,350) Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 872,625 1,843,000 Transfers In (2) 0 0 820,026 918,375 124,793 Transfers Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 820,026 1,791,000 1,967,793 Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 63,500 Ending Fund Balance 0 0 0 63,500 64,943 (1)Funding for reconstruction of Vista Trails Subdivision streets only. Street repairs for the remaining Year 1 neighborhoods(Cimarron,Highland Estates, Whispering Dell Estates, Emerald)are included in the estimate of sewer installation in the Sewer Assessment Fund. (Assumes Rone Engineering street design). (2)FY95-96 transfer in from Perimeter Road Fund 502 for construction of Randol Mill-FM1709/Kingswood. Other projects identified, to be considered in FY96-97=$1,953,800: Year 2 sewer assessment neighborhoods-street improvements-$709,445 Ridgecrest-$214,500 Love Henry-$58,080 Bumey to cul-de-sac-$49,500 Lake Drive-$80,800 Burney Road-$112,475 Johnson Road-$475,000 Pine/Lilac-$204,000 Culvert @ S. Carroll/Continental-$50,000 L Iby CAPITAL PROJECTS 09/O5/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd965.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed STREET IMPACT FEE FUND Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Impact fee receipts 0 0 0 0 525,000 Interest Income 0 0 0 0 6.000 Total Revenue 0 0 0 0 531,d00 Total Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 Net Revenue 0 0 0 0 531,000 Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfer Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 0 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 0 Ending Fund Balance 0 Q 0 0 531,000 Street impact fees are anticipated to be adopted in the last quarter of 1995. L CAPITAL PROJECTS o 9/05/95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd965.wk5 FY94-95 FY95-96 FUND FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed DRAINAGE-OFFSITE Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue Drainage Fees 0 38,941 0 45,000 30,000 Interest Income 0 795 0 2 000 2.500 Total Revenue 0 39,736 0 47,000 32,5'00 Total Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 Net Revenue 0 39,736 0 47,000 32,500 Bond Proceeds 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfer Out 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 0 0 0 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 39,736 39,736 86,736 Ending Fund Balance Q 39.736 39.706 86, ,36 119,236 Revenues collected from developers for specific critical drainage structures are identified as such on subsidiary accounting records. CAPITAL PROJECTS 09/O5f95 PROPOSED 1995-96 BUDGET bndbd965.wk4 FY94-95 FY95-96 Fund 302 FY92-93 FY93-94 FY94-95 Actual Proposed SPDC REVENUE BOND PROJECTS Actual Actual Adopted Estimated Budget Revenue/Other Sources Interest income 0 30.325 38.750 100.000 30.000 Total Revenue/Other Sources 0 30,325 38,750 100,000 30,0b0 Expenditures Joint Use Improvements-Gymnasium 0 0 0 719,690 44,207 Bicentennial Park-Phase I 0 0 1,635,963 1,843,639 97,000 Land Acquisition 0 258.651 1.000.000 0 0 Total Expenditures 0 258,651 2,635,963 2,563,329 141,207 Net Revenue 0 (228,326) (2,597,213) (2,463,329) (111,207) Bond Proceeds 0 2,602,635 1,500,000 976,320 0 Transfers In 0 0 0 0 0 Transfers Out(down payment-W. Beach) 0 0 0 (295.375) 0 Total Other Sources(Uses) 0 2,602,635 1,500,000 680,945 0 Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 2,374,309 2,374,309 591,925 Ending Fund Balance Q 2,374.309 1,277.096 591,925 480,718 Remainder of funds to be used to purchase land for park use at Bicentennial and the north side park, with possible use of funds as grant match upon award of grant. L CD 0 CD un QN ((Di o Lo ~OO CC) 00o 2 F-V N co 69 69 Ea Ea W CV- aZZ o 0 0 0 QZ o 0 0 0 rw o 0 0 0 Fw-w L 0 to ZOHa U, Tv; Z O a o�z 1=OJ o 0 0 0 }WJ0 o 0 08 d%-a< C, co co Co) ?Z=V ca fa 69 VI U,J 0 z Z N- M W p w j aoo CO CO0 CO o ¢ m a.O0 re O dL ix co zc)t� o t t to u. p ICO)- Ea 69 69 EA w O W 0 W F— J o a p Z V) Q Z w g U U ( z H W V� w - - Lu Er I j 'Z g 2 2 cn 0 OZ <-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 OJ U U Z U o FE Q V) Q lir.F- O O o ~ J J E2 co O O o 2 J w • O Qc/)O EA a' CO V 2 J = Q >_ O -J O U w U g 1 F'F' w 0 F pQ�~ o 0 0 0 I Z < Ln p=-u. r. N Q Q CO LLI = u. 0o X 0 N- O w a IJOu- o- CDc0 CO o J Q w v co co co co O 2 w O 5 cc m w w >- o 0 0 0 I- I- -- awcn 0 N N 0 Ct G.Z O ui Cr; ao co � O nJV co o) CD _ U N Lu Q O Q Z ZcQ 1-Lo in to o w 0 • a o <Oir! rn N r- of JUv 0) VP QI- o 6,3 ea ea 69 F- * Co w 5 I— Q m 0 0 w 1- cJ) 0 5 r 7 A. PO,J rD Np ..,r, �� rlr-I ,�- uN, .xm.,[ ARP x.. .�]�\� I "-?T ,�TI i"r► -c"oe _J I - - ``%, ` T 1 �''� ter, _ ...,. L..I PL CE ,. x. 7n L�rt pYA}' r' c`,I Il, ri \\r J 1 R r_. .1 6 -9 ass . Vale 1 'V21.1/111A i ARSAL0W H. CH1VER3 ��Y , to — c.Ed �' p rifittAlf. ' r r.-1 C RQIN w. GHIYERS .... ...'.. © NERt)A5 • 22 OZ s IC) ,�I , - . o (r_i © I _ FoT ROOF °,,© bilper,«•j f _.> YELLI Iii 14,7;11.44k n. ty.Y ELEVEN .A.Mp '•NIY- . .p BILL "fsr .. ,V1)yER,S, acrfort.xr Hp-,.. >. _ t;iEl Aft'� ogIG R0pRI0N. - )g i'E RK 8 1H0° .ES 1 E`', >� 11.1 .,a ,..,, .,, N�iL V-1 ��?• ' A„ H , I ' _ - / -1 E�pppp_ �i 7�:5�{FIEMLyp pE Or i te�,RR c P�.:•' �. :ENV i i I, intaiii EEO I,...MAC \,1,_ . 1---- ..y I ". �.1tr�Q t1d'31� HALL moo I.V.W. HALL .f A _ L� x''''''.. ' ©r c"'.r -704viii v pp'"/1,a r 6w RD sA11114P r I, - i} f 1 ,—, SIM ° . G I,. tin. r ;I 4 �1}F'1 ��. MOp yW? . . '11 1 ,' TX0 n3- ,wax '' li weE , 1 A'''' }• 1 f 5 -;ROOD � 5 -- S1 I u 1 y N. ';. - N' -- '�' yy� ©©�©�© ,R s_ _ r9 M Y 1 65 E { A E II I' - 5'fi" ,, 'i;�� 7 J�. -'i E '- y +liID10�©ii� 1?' _ . — �� r .I 1 i I 4L A6REy ,T..... i gG_ Wf LL -.� ff, : � ` • 1 i NCR TMwiST PgwY 'Sr r 4.3 r rxI I r t: • n.a• P E �r �-J ,.,. I E51 E 61M / £� !di v, x.'1 . w- 1 i— --'t-- ,,I, �~ Opt,,, y_. }')E _:� LA,, .. n"\__ y J `II fY' ITV, S` I �{r{ I ."op ,. .. .C>,- 011 _ ".'\ ,I x,.` ,�.I rOn 1 ti\T-1 „ar" SONf �KK .af<` - � ,�,, c am.P. —;-� '� Hoc, _ Pt 1 0 �,- '1 1MIR ,L1 g _ APR-51 .--� a , of, , .,. • O i I ml I n .1� 1 9R z .'i_; ' xu x- aY i, l —'VI . •'',. r n` II7II7 r. 1 K., 1 1x.+. x., __ , ,�yp1E•PIE1E � I� 8 1 - >:- r. �� • Y- .� 1, ---M--�M .¢I' MO A3- '- TER 13A'V -t"'- AG, I- ..I1 M M I,_ _ T Hif r ii 0I3EDIAF9 'i?.\gvit6 8- ..� I OXtd _ , --- �4 0p/(S , ��--'J - (, • W J A. F 4�i ��yy • v— ApD" I'- •� '_' '� —ci " .I I � -' .PAR - ,i gt - 0' .., ll -,, 91. XAL , GRAPE+wE ,r, ',or � _ 1- } II �"iel ')s I 1 NLE I. I ttf oRy Alli '.�'r '', ''' ,1 1 .{�I O .. I UgINES -- f .G.q E`—o I �,r .i G .. I11 t,''.. .F .. II g-� •` NEA, N .�. �U51RwL rr ._.---- ( 1`... - - ?i2eb0R9AL0 AGE 1 c •, ( O �i.f :1-,-' N 2 • ti iNALLRAEDLIM I tro i ii, • ,, . ., ,_,_ _. II .•, 6 v©`'`�' Ap01.110$ i ll✓� '�nj ••- H0LLIR9CaSYO0RYw I >.:.i ••, 4��1:414� — � +1� ' ` '" ._ T i i' ll ram, 1) I83A TT 1 nI �' XRRI ... r, ---- - -J ;� j1 1 ,o= g :!' b \ O • /� ' Mp51pUM OC" Sp�APT tI If �' l.�`- G SypD U Ai . ' ,•� \ -- —� I _ JOH GI®S•� I 'M p.',pl? Y K5. 'LAp9¢ I . A. THO_p Atli . �} c_r r I ,. I P �'t IC 5NA E N�Sy 10 • REd'} L „,-0014 N' y 5 1111 I, + °LL I ' R A jO NIL ' I E A \ • a I P,j.tnA -f { .sue V 11 .N 10.9.H. DAY.ER9G'0RT -r ' JN°ot w �. 5 CI-IE_1rI,I-IA NI & ASSOCI_A VI ' ,AO ri t� I P J1` "IYIY �i E,f•,;:ECONSULTING ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS - NLYS` r �j i� J 1601 E.. I.\!tRR IRLVU. SUITE ^_(10 \RI.I\GTO\, TE\ 1 (0171 710-0606 METRO • ACCESS MANHOLE (WITH VENT PAINTERS VENT MANHOLE PAINTER'S (36" DI A.) /RAIL OVE ACCESS MAN I ELE — CONICAL - 7-WEIR BOX = -....-`12" 36"DUL OVERFLOW ACCESS — w TUBE� ¢o (DRY WELL) ,S w SEE DETAIL A' ACCESS LADDERS/= (INSIDE a • OUTSIDE ACCESS = CONICAL TUBE)WITH ACCESS SAF-T-CLIMB = MANHOLE RAILS Lei 1S r r •', LADDER - •'•N' ••INTER'S RAIL .L _WEATHERPROOF ACCESS LOUVER WITH INSECT. _ _Tri °,' SCREEN (' k LADDER TOP LANDING • W/1 9a"g TrD. - REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE HANDRAIL PEDESTAL • 1: 16"SS - ••r SUPPLY • I c: I2" SS r- r-. OVERFLOW • • • LADDER WITH SAF-T-CLIMB RAI L E: -- REINFORCED CONCRETE REINFORCED CONCRETE • FLOOR SLABS COLUMNS • • SECOND FLOOR(STORAGE) /FF ELEV..698.67 1 I FINISHED GROUND AT TANK"683.00 • a • I"TAP n SLOPE AWAY FROM TANKir :E FLEX CONNECTION > --,\--71) • >CKFILL WITH SELECT BORROW ;1' •4.''.':'••• REINFORCED CONCRETE FOUNDATIONS 21.-0" SECTION NOT TO SCALE • N Cpl R T H 0 25 50 100 200 SCALE: V = 100' 3L OCK 3 � \, 1 _ � � I r 1, SPA VALL.E� , E S IT A TE,5 L TD _ Vol 11916. is . 0737- D.T..R.TT. w 18 7 �--------, i 5 13 ' 4' 7 I . N PA VALLE<, L S z) C':-- Sllde �6 � �� � �� w� � P. one S{- -� 0.� BL f 10-F 1F' i 12-P, \14 11� 1 12 1 r� _ POINT OF \ \ --- EEOINNI,N \, ;, 112 "fRF A T WETS �t i FA i/ 15' (i TiL FSW F \ N �e tJ4� E5C1. -OF 24' OAK`�-� T133' 148' Z44 i �� , 35b =%' - - /I i 'WL7 $ U.E. 8 \9 ;; CCll� 19 .� 5 I � A PPRO V D F11\14L PL 4 T NA PA VA L L E Y ES TA rE S• 5 Ccb. A. 54de 2396 _ _ _ `r" Lj \ 4 �J . C. /� `1 o - 202 _ canea Sr - -20,4 20 ; I � � OCK 21,2 155 / 22 � 1 - - 15.L- 5p I06, I �-- B! 0fK 1 l� - I� ,Pi- v'E! ICtI; 4 L PI- T 10 75 UT KILL CYO I �7ned �) - A I /2 L. U D. - e s ty PCg1Gen�r3l 123 Normcn J Br' _- and Vi<"><f e. --- __NQrma J. Brown Vol 3034. _329 r� T c, '__1 -�-- L1�arrc Carl �- aster .R.T.CT r i CLIFFORD WAYNE and wife, GLENDA SUE HOOD --- 1820 Rainbow Street »vF Southlake, Texas 76092-9264 I ^ - - I� I 7 t NOLAN LEMONS and wife, MALACHA A. LEMONS 12206 Brisbane Avenue _ L Dallas, Texas 75234-6528 BILLIE FARRAR, Trustee Joe L. Wrijht Vol,7982. Pa. 1825 600 W. Park Row Drive Arlington, Texas 76010-4104 D.R.C.``r SOUTHLAKE JOINT VENTURE ' ( 15851 Dallas Parkway, Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75248-3330 DEVELOPERO- TERRA LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 920 S. Peytonville Avenue Southlake, Texas I I I 14 J i / Z' C�oQL AND hE/GH T r T / % Phn I .C. T f / j on>✓d SF- i' EXISTING PROPOSED No. DWELLING GROSS RES. GROSS LAND USE L.U.D. ZONING UN/ rS DFNsl T Y A CRFA r.F TE NING - 'SF-20A ONING --SF-20A ' NOTE. - THOSE AREAS DENOTED AS 'COMMON AREA' and/or 'PAR ' ARE TO BE PRIVATE AND NOT FOR HABITATION. PHASE 1 t CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN 12/95 PHA SE 2 CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN 12198 gook Sounders Petty Vol. 6364. P 431 D.R. T r. 2 onedd .4 C7 FND RAkROAD CROSS TLF s UE 224' ___- • �na�oT/sour and 're, Heler, L. Ramsour Zj Vol. 2J50. P 307 i DR, ir C.� c o 78 �/p I Zonedd AG ! Memo Industrial Plonnin,q . Inc. -7-9 Vo,! 11463. P . 14:56 D.R. T C.T. 135" Zor Eedd A v _ m ! Metroplex Development CCIRSUltants, Inc. 8 80 I? L. � moo. Gr c rr I � bI f: . L - , to U.E. 220- 239' 3694 ` la {L,jgs 125' O �6 \ f1tu PLIMFCO, ANC. _ Vol. 82i 8. P .1G 66 PRTC.i- Zoned 1-1 O :T 8F, BL OCK 1 Lam , AM .N�:7 '� PAT C) '- owl E� L D �. r�RE. EiVI _ EE B(1S!`VESS PA RAC, Pti_ 1 . UC �� Ice -�- --PR. ,. - 116 ;--15 U. E . o \ zCr u SOUTf PROJECT LOCATIO /Moog -4 Cal I �J \ j 48 11,1110 i 1 _--___--- �` --� 35- ,� L�e I I = _ - __ Gn E� IVIL AU0 ill S1_)Bl�lVl,. (?/ B R I I I I------- T EX/S t s' U.E. �, '_ 2 m 9I z ,�2' ,� 47 1, 1 VL. �.>�>8 9, f 45 �, 113 i n6 !�� 42 I 43 IA . 4 I_G'T 7k'-1. BLO(�,K I •,;_ FFrR T �,. 174 � b line J '" K a"� / I 4I '. �:53' 1 , (Yl `� 1 DED PL_ 4 f `%r` �18 (� 10 U. %118-7 ' ; : 2grl E� JAL_ E�w 1� {NES`> 4 f?K. PN i one c� I i t 1 31 i _11. 115- 1� `tfIf m - 116 - ns, t - 115' 7115' J 115. - � \ ., /fob. Slltle m o a K d 01 I �. r T 10 R. l . v . 174' 50 113" 15" D. dUE. 117 0 ,� ��, 4 0 ;� 9^ 3 8 ; �' 3 7 3 6 3 5 \`�� 3 4 r FND AXLE _ - 114' - _ - I I _ Q� Bldg. s ...._bored 1- 8gv 26 9 W Ca 40' Bldg-53' 366.72' v1 3S Line L�?e l 5 IL�1 � 1 I 115' 115' 5>_ l r 129' P / 50' ! r -- ---,- �-- - o - Y ®R K L 0 4. LOCK 1 � 7 __ - - _-� - - - --- �� �� I _ -� GREE.-NL. EE BUSINE `� S t�'A RK. Ph. 1 15' D d U.E. 5 125' 15 1 ' 715 115 r 725 46' 32 _. _ _� a� -\,� Cab. A S11de 7930 � � � o --• 35" B . Line me , 2 N _�_� � ,- 10 fva Lamor+s etd9 I P� T. I ;ITI blakirha IA. L era•�ns l 7 /� f `J� Zone d l -1 2 J` � I I VrJ 43 8. Pa 47 �J 0 - 2 6 2 DR .c r - 31 i 28 29 0 7.�UE. Al 201" IL 13 3/4 -IR - S 69 28 22 W 663 36 RF I 4- Char.!es F. Nelson. I 2 le 1 and Wife, aura . Nelson F11' 8 - 2 .4.- °` GREENL_ EE BUSINESS PARK. Pry � John J Coffins. Trustee Vr_V 774 Pq 442 It ' \ °' ' D.R. T.C.. 1. i w� _ 212' o _ �� Cob. A. Slide 19 30 D.R. TIC T (oned SP-20A / � �` � � � � 2 `3 � ►� �. T!"'. l . '� ` I � � i R,zl C T l o g 3 0 ----!( ► Forted(-1 o I ' 2,2 �Qj LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0 159_ O o Q BEING a 89.744 acre tract of land situated in the John A. Freeman Survey. Abstract No. 529 and THENCE S 00025 03 E. alongg the east line of said Lemons tract and the west line of said Davis Z m I l the J.W. Hale Survey. Abstract No. 803. City of Southlake. Tarrant County, Texas and being all tract. 971.60 feet (Deed 906 67 feet - Adjoiner Deed 971.60 feet) to a railroads eke set in as hal �. of a tract of land as described in deed to Southlake Joint Venture. recorded in Volume 9232. pavement in the cente- of Continental Boulevard (Variable Width R.O.W-) at the southeast corner P -_- - Page 0708 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas (DRTCT), all of a tract of land as of said Lemons tract and the southwest corner of said Davis tract: L2 1 described in deed to Nolan Lemons and wife. Malacho A. Lemons. recorded in Volume 4348. ,1 15' DRv. ESMT. t i l Page 47.(DRTCT). being the remainder portion of a tract of land as described :n deed to Billie / I City O 1 g g p THENCE S 89°33'O1" W, along the center of said Continentd Boulevard. at 107.30 feet (Deed v° '/ 0 1 Farrar. ---.�- Trustee. recorded n Volume 5370. Page 284.(DRTCT) and all of a tract of land as 110.56 feet) passing the southwest corner of said Lemons tract, same tieing the southeas, corner Q % 1 m c- described in deed to Clifford Wayne Hood and wife. Glenda Sue Hood. recorded in Volume of said Farrar Remainder tract. at approximately 370.0 feet passing the northeast corner of a tract sj� w '�7 I to a '0-) 5152. Page 136. DRTCT and being more articular) described as follows _ �, �, g 9 particularly of land as described in deed to William D Tate. Trustee, recorded in Volume 6820. Page 511. / 237` _ � L� DRTCT, continuinga total distance of 51912 feet (Deed 522.94 feet) a railroad spike set in / u �- �I W �' `'� I BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron rod found at the west face of a 24" Oak tree at an angle point in the asphalt pavement at the southwest corner of said Farrar Remainder tract. same beog the southeast I 0 2l0 ' �� Cr �, r p ' '`I }�- ki Q north line of said Southlake Joint Venture tract. said point being the southwest corner of corner of a tract of land as described in deed to Charles F. Nelson and wife. Laura A. Nelson. I 12 ,'�- Woodland Heights Addition. on addition to the City of Fort Worth. Tarrant county. Texas as recorded in Volume 7747, Page 442. DRTCT: - I / �' 1 _ U a y <J Lr Ct T recorded in Volume 388-161. Page 55. of the Plat Records of Tarrant Count Texas (PRTCT). o -+-*� In Co v C l-- i\l some being the easterl most so uheast corner of a tract of (and as described m deed to N.V. ° �= (Remarnder Troctl rz �� O Q t' y THENCE N OC 09'27" W. departing the center of said Continental Boulevard and the north line I C �1 O c� Z Estates. Ltd.. recorded in Volume 11916, Page 0737. DRTCT: F ar Trustee T o 5 9 of said Tate tract. along the east Gne of said Nelson tract, at 18.0 feet passing a 5/8' iron rod g' rj ►ti. found. continuin a total distance of 1283.98 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found at the northwest corner I Vd. 5370, Pgg. 2$�t m g O O C� try q THENCE N 89021'Ol" E. alon the north line of said Southlake Joint Venture tract and the south g DR T.C.T.*- g of said Farrar remainder tract and the northeast corner of said Nelson tract, said point lying in � 9 � to 47 Q � p c �• line of said Woodland Heights Addition. at a called distance of 1309.8 feet passing the southeast the south line of said Southlake Joint Venture tract: corner of said oodition, some being the southwest corner of a tract of land as described in deed to Jack Saunders Pett . recorded m Volume 6364. Pa e 431. DRTCT. continuin a total distance yy gg g THENCE S 89°26'19" W. along south line of said Southlake Joint Venture tract and the north � of 1542.76 feet (Southloke Joint Venture Deed 1534.04 - Previous Deed Vol.1015. Pg. 514. line of said Nelson tract, 366.72 feet (Deed 366.40 feet) to an axle found at the northwest corner 2 %j \ DRTCT 1543.80 feet) to a railroad crosstie found at the northeast corner of said Southlake Joint of said Charles tract and the southerlymost southwest corner of said Southlake Joint Venture I L� Venture tract. some being the northwest corner of a tract of land as described in deed to Donald tract. said Point lyin in the east line of a tract of land as described in deed to Grady L. Foster + 8 - M. Ramsour and wife. Helen L. Ramsour. recorded in Volume 2350. Page 307. DRTCT: and wife. Diona Gail'roster. recorded in Volume 4080. Page 30, DRTCT: THENCE S 00020'40" E (Reference Bearing). alone the east line of said Southlake Joint Venture THENCE N 00°46'21" W. along a west line said Southlake Joint Venture tract and the east line Q 14 tract. at a called distance of 1188 feet passing the southwest corner of said Ramsour tract. some of said Foster tract. 387.82 feet (Deed 387.80 feet) to a 1/2" iron rod found at the northeast `� being the northwest corner of a tract oflandas described in deed to Memo Industrial Planning. corner of said Foster tract. same being the southwest corner of said Hood tract. ' 176. I /ter; Inc.. recorded in Volume 11463. Page 1486. DRTCT, at a called distance of 237.4 feet passing- the southwest corner of said Memo industrial Fanning. Inc. tract. some being the northwesTHENCE S 89021'07" W. along a south lire of said Southlake Joint Venture tract. at 553.21 feet au - 50 7 �I TAC �` /{ f f I d d 1, d n d ed to Metro lox Develo ment Consultants Inc at a f F ESufT \ �A LEGEND. APPROXIMATE TREE LINE corner o a tract o an as esm e i e p p (Deed 553.35 feet) passing a 3/8 iron rod found at the northwest corner o said osier tract. said - v called distance of 279.41 feet ppassing iron rod found at the southwest corner of said Metroplex point being 0.97 feet to the right of line, same being the northeast corner of a tract of land as I n IPRELIMINARY PLAT Development tract. same being the northwest corner of a tract of land as described in deed to described in deed to Joe L. Wright, recorded in Volume 79$2. Page 1825, DRTCT, at a called Pumpco. Inc.. recorded in Volume 8278. Pa e -66. DRTCT, at 771.38 feet passing a 112- iron distance of 813.65 feet passin the northwest corner of said Wright tract. same bein the 7 I / I g g 99 8 FOR rod found at the southwest corner of said Pumpco. Inc. tract. some being the northwest corner northeast corner of a tract of land as described in deed to Norman L. Brown and wife. Norma /� �` / �' ' f r IBusiness Park Phase I an addit�on to the City of Southlake. - feet I I I / ill -� \ 1 f th Am rded Plat of G een ee J B d d V { 3C 34 P 329 DRTCT nt n total distance of 873 54B L Tarrant County. Texas as recorded in Cabinet Slide PRTCT. at 1397.20 feet prising being rown, recur e m oume . a e co inw a s (Deed 897.40 feet) to a 1/2' iron rod- found at the a 1/2" iron pipe found at the southeast corner of said Southlake Joint Venture tract. some westerlymost southwest corner of said Southlake Joint Venture tract, some being the southerlym- the northeast corner of said Lemons tract, at 1414.41 feet passing a 1/2- iron rod set at the ost southeast corner of said N.V. Estates. Ltd. troct: southwest corner of said Amended Plat of Greenlee Business Park. Phase 1. some being the northwest corner of Lot 4R. Block 1 of Greenlee Business Park. Phase I. on addition to the City THENCE N 00024'59" W. departing the north line of said Brown tract, along the west line of of Southloke. Tarrant County. Texas as recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 1930. PRTCT. continuing said Southlake Joint Venture tract and a east line of said N.V. Estates. Ltd tract. 993.95 feet a totol distance of 17'0.96 feet to a 112" iron rod pipe found at the southeast corner of said (Deed 993.60 feet - Ad joiner Deed 993.96) to a 112' iron rod found at the northwest corner of Lemons tract. some bung the northeast corner of a tract of land (Tract 1) as described in deed said Southlake Joint Venture tract: to Memo Industrial Pkmning. Inc.. recorded in Volume 8553. Page 1963. DRTCT, from which a 1/2" iron rod found at the northwest corner of Lot 5. Block 1 of Greenlee Business Park as THENCE N 88°30'24" E. along the north line of said Southloke Joint Venture tact and a south recorded in Volume 388-10. Page 9. PRTCT. bears S 00*20 40" E. 2.91 feet: line of said N.V. Estates. Ltd. tract. 883.58 feet (Subject Deed 885.45 feet - Ad omer Deed feet) to the POINT of BEGINNING and containing 3.909.243 feet or 89.74� acres of THENCE S 89028'22- W. along the south line of said Lemons tract. at 394.21 feet (Deed 394.56 land. feet) possing a 3/8" iron rod found at the northwest corner of said Memo Industrial Planningg. Inc. land described deed Diana Nidio tract. same being the northeast corner of a tract of as in to Moussa and Tamara Sonia Moussa. recorded in Volume 10970. Page 1872. DRTCT. at 528.90 feet (Deed 529,06 feet) passing a 3/8' iron rod found at the northwest corner of said Moussa tract. some being the northeast corner of a tract of land as described in deed to Sondra Kay Davis, recorded r^ Volume 7158. Page 1748, DRTCT. continuing a total distance of 663.36 feet (Subject Deed 660.00 feet - AdJJomer Deeds 663.60 feet) to a 3/4" iron rod found at an inner ell corner of said Lemons tract and the northwest corner of said Davis tract: SET RAIL- EAST SPIKE//, 1 Wllllant D. Tate Vol 6820, Pq. 511 D.l? T. C 7 Zoned' l-1 ' 3 16 � 298' St T,%RAILROAD SPRF 1 �Y T H IN V`� E 1 `V� TYA B-, V o 1 ROPOSED 84 R/GH - �F- WA Yi ' PREPARED BY: GOODWRN Richord Emmet Blythe I ,. � I I AkRSHAkLL 03 I d6o I (Jeer4599, e L, Johnson I Burger & Eakins I Bid So/as vnd Vol. �371 Custom Builders. In{- I C� 0L� CN®OKGERS - PLANNERS - 8110RVLY( RS Gwendo/ n 6'. Blythe D. T.. Cl.TVol. 7? I ° . 457 VO,l. 1�5 `J�. D� 0��8 6001 Bridge Street, Suits 100, Fort `Warta Texas 7602 �.R. T. C. . -R. T. C. T. Zoned l-1 Zone d i-1 Metro 1817> 42e-4373 Zoned AG' cL1��a"a1L.1y %Xz ZL��in �LP IL)) aA®n BEING 89.744 9 . 7 4 4 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED IN THE J.W. HALE SURVEY, ABSTRACT No. 8 O 3 AND THE J . FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT No. 5 2 9 SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 146 RESIDENTIAL LOTS D n 2 OPEN SPACE LOTS AUG 211995 CASE No. ZA 95-80 95561PREL IVIPPL A T y dy SCALE : 1' - 50' q0� 5\9 P tyo • ,�t0 °yjt3 SL,OE n, 8�41�EQ R� G 01 C P OOK N o� t Z � FLORENCE RD P=OJILCT LOCATION JOHNSON RD SOUTHLAKE B YO 0 w J d VICINITY HAP la' ME POINT OF B]EGINNHNG 4 z"E Ste ��- p� Lp S vkr r LOT 6R'�` 1 18,479 SF `Sso �4 �.O 0.424 AC. S 0 4�00. e 15. 0' in - 12*58*54' R - 50.00' \ / L - 98.60' ^ OOVI PL¢� & I ol PR°JGD�� p� t5 D 6 U.E N az) CAB A $ME 1328 �a'� 76. P.R T C.T. (TO BE ABANDONED ®r, BY THIS PLAT) 0 o J rib too- ;7 � Oi; a O 441% o0 "*' LOT 7R 17,811 SF so 0.409 Ac. 2 R '__ S"S.O0. _ � Vi. � Q 14026L • 145.00' NOTES: 'THE CITY OF SOUTHLA<E RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REQUIRE MINIMUM FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS ON ANY LOT CONTAINED WITHIN THIS ADDITION. THE MINIMUM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIMF THE PLAT IS FILED AND MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. ADDITIONAL LOTS. OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN. MAY ALSO BE SUBJECT TO MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR CRITERIA.' `THE OWNERS OF ALL CORNER LOTS SHALL MAINTAIN SIGHT TRIANGLES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY SUBDIVIcIION ORDINANCE.' This is to certify that I. E;ob Henderson. Jr- a Registered Professional Land Surveyor of the State of Texas. have platted the above subdivision from an actual on the grand survey and that all lot corners. or yje points. and points of the curve shall be properly marked on the ground and tftot this plot correctly represents that survey made by me or under my direction and supervision. Bob son. Jr. Registered Professional Lo nd Surveyor No. 2502 Goodwin & Morshat Inc. 6001 Bridge Street. Suite 100 Fort Work Texas 7612 metro (817) 429-4373 5.0 , O { i IW l\ � O 0 f 25.00. 2 32.00' -1- 32.00' a, V) in e oz z � U � a Q � im 4 r 'r � J 4 z W 4n oLL LL LL -; 1 4. REDWING DRIVE (5 0' R.0.W.) f 0 4 sE 1 Qp,' { �p8 P . 6 OWNED BY: /1 I a z �4 t� z 0� >4 (14 { W 19 0 z THE ESTATE OF AUDREY L. STONE, DECEASED KIPPY LEE MYERS - SUCCESSOR EXECUTOR THE ESTATE Of A.C. STONE, DECEASED MARY STONE MYERS - INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX 1017 W.D. TATE AVENUE GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 (817) 481-3516 and FRED JOYCE - MARY MYERS ENTERPRISES, INC. 1017 W.D. TATE AVENUE GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 (817) 461-3516 and WILLIAM BYRNE, and WIFE, MONICA WAITE 1017 W.D. TATE AVENUE GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 (817) 481-3516 FRED JOYCE-MARY MYERS ENTERPRISES. INC. BY: Fred Joyce. President BY: _ Mary Stone Myers. Vice President STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME. the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Fred Joyce and Mar Stone Myers. President and Vice President. respectively of FRED JOYCE-MARY MYERS ENYERPRISES. INC.. a corporation, on behalf of said corporation. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this day of 1995. Notary Pu ic. State of Texas My commission expires William Byrne v - Monica Waite STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE CIE. the undersigned authority. on this day personally appeared William Byrne and wife. Monica Waite. known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the foregoing instrument. and acknowledged to me that they executed the some for the purposes and consideration {herein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this day of _. 1995, Notary Public. State of Texas My commission expires APPROVED BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION DATE-- ------------ - --- ----- CHAIRMAN: -- — --_ __-- P&Z SECRETARY: APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL DA TE: -- — --- -------- MAYOR: —` CITY SECRETARY: _. 0- city Of DEVELOPED BY: FRED JOYCE - MARY MYERS ENTERPRISES, INC. 1017 W.D. TATE AVENUE GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 (817) 481-3516 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT WHEREAS THE ESTATE OF AUDREY L. STONE. DECEASED. - KIPPY LEE, MYERS, SUCCESSOR EXECUTOR, THE ESTATE OF A.C. STONE, DECEASED, - MARY STONE MYERS. INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX, FRED JOYCE - MARY MYERS ENTERPRISES, INC.. and WILLIAM BYRNE AND WIFE. MONICA WAITE are the owners of a 0.833 acre tract of land in the B.J. Foster Survey. Abstract No. 519 situated in the City of Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas. being all of Lot 6. Block 5 of Myers Meadow. Phase One, as described in deed. recorded in Volume 11822. Page 1564 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and all of Lot 7. Block 5 of Myers Meadow, Phase One, according to the lot recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 1328 of the Plat Records of Tarrant Countyy Texas and a 0.S64 ocre portion of a tract of land as described in deed. recorded in Volume 4153. Pope 557 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2' iron pin found, said pin being the most Northerly Northwest corner of Lot 6. Block 5, Myers Meadow, Phase One. an addition to the City of Southloke. Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 1328 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County. Texas: r THENCE S 55036'24- E. 166.61 feet to a 1/2' iron in found. said pin beinthe Point of Curvature of a non-tongqent circular curve to the left having a radius of 5&00 feet, a central angle of 112°58'54'. a chord Tength of 83.38 feet and a chord bearing of S 22'05'51' E: THENCE along said curve to the left. 98.60 feet to a 1/2' iron pin found: THENCE S 00007'31' E. 163.50 feet to a 1/2- iron pin found. said pin beingg the Point of Curvature of a non -ton ent circular curve to the right having a ra ius of 575.00 feet. a central angle of 14'26'56 a cord length of 144.62 feet and a chord bearing of N 76°04'52- W. THENCE along said curve to the right. 145.00 feet to a 1/2' iron pin set: THENCE N 19`C9'01' E. 142.15 feet to a 1/2' iron pin set: THENCE N 55°36'24' W. 168.35 feet to a 1/2' iron pin found: THENCE N 41*54*21' E. 95.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 36.290 square feet or 0.833 acres of land. NOW. THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. THAT THE ESTATE OF AUDREY L. STONE. DECEASED. - KIPPY LEE MYERS. SUCCESSOR EXECUTOR. THE ESTATE OF A.C. STONE. DECEASED. - MARY STONE MYERS. INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX. FRED JOYCE - MARY MYERS ENTERPRISES. INC.. AND WILLIAM BYRNE AND WIFE. MONICA WAITE acting by and through the undersigned. do hereby adopt this plot designating the herein above described real Property as LOT 6R &7R. BLOCK 5. MYERS MEADOW - PHASE ONE. an addition to the City of Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas and do hereby dedicate to the public's use forever the streets and easements shown thereon. WITNESS our hands this the -_day of . 1995 Mary Stone Myers. Attorney -in -Fact for Kipp Lee Myers. Successor Executor of the Estate of Audrey L. Stone. Deceosedy STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME. the undersigned authority. on this day personally appeared Mary Stone Myers. Agent and Attorney -in -fact for Kippy Lee Myers. Successor Executor of the Estate of Audrey L. Stone. Deceased. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument. and acknowledged to me that she executed the some for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this day of . 1995. Notary Public. State of Texas My commission expires Mary Stone Myers. Independent Executrix of The Estate of A.C. Stone. Deceased STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME. the undersigned authority. on this day personally appeared Mary Stone Myers. Independent Executrix of the Estate of A.C. Stone. Deceased. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument. and acknowledged to me that she executed the some for the purposes and consideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this day of . 1995 Notary Public. State of Texas My commission expires-- - NOTES: THIS PLAT IS AMENDED TO PROVIDE A MORE USEFUL DEVELOPABLE AREA FOR LOT 7R. THIS PLAT DOES NOT ALTER OR REMOVE EXISTING DEED RESTRICTIONS OR COVENANTS. IF ANY. ON THIS PROPERTY. PREPARED BY: GOODWM i TARS HIAL L z Cn m ENO =" - puma" - s:tJRVEYOR6 9001 Bridge Street, Stilts 100. Fort Worth Texas 78t12 Metro (817) 429-4373 PLAT REVISION f OF(�� (� LOTS 6R� � /ICE9 1ODL Ifs 5 MYYlERRS MEADOW, PHASE ONE AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAHE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING A REVISION OF LOTS 6 A 7, BLOCK 5 MYERS MEADOW. PHASE ONE CABINET A. SLIDE 1328 P.R.T.C.T. AND 0.064 ACRES IN THE B.J. FOSTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT No. 519 SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 2 LOTS 0.833 ACRES JULY 1995 CASE No. ZA 95-81 THIS PLAT FILED IN CABINET--.SLIDE-.DATE-.1995 61iJ