Loading...
1995-04-04 CC Packet City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 30, 1995 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilpersons Planning.and Zoning Commissioners Corridor Advisory Committee Members FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Schedules of Permitted Uses and District Regulations • Attached are copies of the Schedule of Permitted Uses and the Schedule of District Regulations for your use as a quick reference. These schedules have been prepared respectively by Chris Carpenter, Administrative Intern, and Liz Lea, Zoning Clerk. Although these documents have been reviewed several times, there may be some errors. If so, please call me at (817) 481-5581, extension 743. KPG g\TAKemo\ se schd.cc Y Y Y Y Y a > aA0A 7 'O p4 fy E. CAN A ' ° Cl) Cl) Cl) 4 C. A A 5. A- a y• N• g . 0 0 0 0 o a. 5. 6. 6 s D ,_, • o N a 5' o .ti a ... r. cm E. Cr Cr Cr CA a c °°o a, a a ii a s n'd vn a q vQ CD 5 0 afro a ( o x o g aro trEo. E• E. y"yyy. p•d CDi �. n CD N Q. N• A b N N N F/ P. 'o N 0 N f/l Cl) (0 0 b CD AI F„ r'"3 0CD 0_ • 0 Cr CD b O A A o Co ^ C� . 0 0-,• `< h Cl) N g. C • 0 0 et) Q.gH N 5 B ' c a C 5A ' 1U cm Na. N a ��yC dp iQ CD l� N g • N A '� rG . g b CD CD v A CD 0 0 O I C/1 CCD CD (CD CD y CCDD t. cn a g '0 �. A) '-• CD .a a 0 CD E Y to a Q.. 0 N rn Y g o -• CD CA CD W C) h7 trf Y a? vi 5 Q 0 c- 0 CD to trn > ,, o rn > on N CD O o CD b7 a y 0 C/) ,+ rA. a CD 0 CI Y �71 z 0. Oot) n o CD to > -4 — tri 0 G cD rn ^' Z "0 0 0 a CD o• o r* a-0 -I:, 'CI b Y ° O p .--n o � 0 e � an •b b b b a 4 CDO ;� c, CD C) at o a Cl) y Pa 111 'd "d CA ', 'Ti 'C 2 ---, N I-• N •ti ►d V) an C/) a S. c '� b 0 w x ',y 'v 'b "IV ''CI ►d a `J. 7� a o 0-4 C/)'d 0 .ti b b b b 'v a N It. o N Cl) a om r 0L . 5 a — _ CD a a . Cl) gt a '-Cl) C ul la. Cl) Ns' v' o 6• UQ ed CO CO RI CO w to CO wo CO to w o� a, dy CO CO > > > a > > H 5. 5. 0 n• (4 o w w ' n ... �j' a a a a E. g Pv 'si `t cr co o 0 E. E y 5 .coy ... r� o 'd �y' .e N '+ �• c�o• 'd ° �' o (....., N 00 N . W ci• 6 El g• N Qp7� aro N 'O �p.+� p �. N co �• b L2 rn pt p• . „ N 9 .N-r A '� r' ►at y �pi� _ C) ci H ,mow.' v- OQ .. 'L7 w iJ� il O g O o y R CO N-. co W w 'Lf ro < W v dQ ti y C 'X � g 1• 0 •• ar N co' Cr fir) "Y CD CD 0.w,. OQ C� N �• W. CO G. rn �y 5 CO 5. V ,''}` co 0 a N pt w e O. N W N .... W v ', Vi CD" CA a v N VI N v n CO a a cn > a cn g Y cn aIP Y cn oo Fil Y cn o4 N N Y cn y O C r , a - N Z a cn - ►-, a cn N z b b Q 0 ►d b 2 V V 2 C7 'U 'd 'U 'd 'd 'd 'd 'd 2 — ►d .d b ►d ►d ►d .d C' c 'v ►d .d b ro m rb 'v ►d 'd ro V n 'd 'v ►d ►d ►d ►d ►d ►d V N H x n i (61.... . ` CO N b I () o n o C) C) n C) _n C) n c) C) c) pnt p)� ' C) C ai W tg ig g 0 0 Op O N N 4 fig- -. C-i. "'T B 'C 7 „^f, N Q. N ' v�i v�i Q5 E. C _]r.- N 0 r: ': gyp• °' O g N B. E. E. (a: ►t ti O.N g a w 0 Q. �t o 2,, co. &' A. e' N 7 w o O 0 0 I. w co as o c�. 0 g `9 0 r ado R. w 4 co iv o aro a w Po. •, o �, v O 0 0 ,� a oo 0 pi " N O R. O N N ,�., w pr p N .y "+ pj N O tJ N 0n co my' il cC 0. Nrt ' o N wn,r• is.) N • V Cis"CS N v y 1 0~ �M�ryy.•. A K (IQ E. H T3 0 �"1 0 0 y '� p M y as N O .. r. ,1 fts tJ Nn �..i _ I) v' ,•d Cl) N a r N .d a "d y?1 r N .-0o N C TJ Nri O o�' - tz. z -x 1-4 ,� .d N z 'd 'd 'd 'd 'd 4 0 b b b 'd 'v 4 iv 'd - t7 'd 'd 'V 'V 'V 'V 'V - - 'V 2 - .0 .0 -0 .0 .0 .0 'd b - -3 'd 'd .d b 'd 'd b7 'd V ►d 'd 'd V b 'Si b 'd 'd r 0 'd 'd ,. 'd V oo 'd 'd .d 'd 'd 'd 'v N 1-3 x ►d o (Iiire 'Cl ro 'd 'Vr b N 'd N h0 d d d d d 0 d d d d C7 P Q 2 c) P P r ca g P 9 c� C C 0 N CD CD pl % w CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '� 't7 Cy `G `< a H CD {�� t�7 a b Co 0o uo S. y w 0C ne� 0 g . g Pt p� r22 7„. 'U 'O 'c, B nr.' 0 W F �t g U5Q. E CD H W n n R .A^.. a a 0 CCD Q• y v�0i . Q' v�i v�i ~ coo i a' i-. Cy co y is) 5' , 5 -, y n CD 0 O C b �/ pl pi y R v' e) N 0 0 A C r70 0 00 _ (D CD NAr. r.( CO 0 CO �o H .• 0. m F.D. g », s...., CO ff: a o. o t.,) ft• a N ' v % GAn fn RIaR p N CD V1�' D 18 ? t tJA 1,4 • tJ p H' , nt• v H 0Q C y ao N 0 in CA 0a to g �y trl a to CD'�9 ...VJ to o N N(, O to a1" LN to �;y� N Z '0 '0 ►o '0 '0 P v) A d '0 '•0 'TJ 'TJ '0 iv J 'd '0 'O 10 '0 V 'd 2 .-- 'd 'b .,d 'd 'd '0 'd 'd 'd '0 2 ' 3 .b ►0 'd '0 .0 '0 `0 'i .0 V — IJ .0 '0 'TJ .6 .0 "d '0 0 .0 "0 '0 '0 '0 ''0 '0 'V '0 1'0 .r. -3 x A E L ... fA r f, V) N . 0 0 G) G) ►T1 tia � '.1 'ri 'rf '7 tin trf to trl [11 CZ to CZ 0 �, V g c o p o 5' S' c 0 .2. c aro 8 cfD, 0 4 DI p p ( g LJ1jLi 'jJ81I. t IIi ' IlI ! I cr Q. IV a ~' R. �.- v, o o = p. 0 m c�'"i• < cp'i w b �-�, N N dQ G3unO J & y �+ ffli .Ni N ►+ •-• 1i o N C Q. 8 v is.) A ch 00 t,n a\ -. .Ni n H ro > 0 .0 Y g H 00 a"y ...Vf 00m'�1 ro �� N N H O ro a � 1,...., i., ro 0� .0 _4 — ro ro ro ro P 0 •0 ro ro ro 2 ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro 2 — .0 .0 -0 ►0 2 tn ro ro ro ro 2 '-3 .b ro ro ro ro tl.. pc) m .� •d .0 .0N .0 ro ro ro ro `0 ro ro n ro ro ro ro ro IV ro En ro ro ro ro ro N x n E . L ... u, N..: o c, x x xa. x x x x x x x x 9 C, GC c 0 p+• r 5 = a CD CD O 0 O 05 O c�a•• =°. w C w o 2 P� cn -, P1 y '� y 0 R 0 N b 'L3 CD H w rc-' (I(0.0.) g. 5. " 6' 5' i... g Q CD cn , n =g I. El. O O 0 H 0 " — 8 e A pi i7 N b • O 0,3 M N r O fg. M OQ W y v• H = �. � ��'• (D G. CD tJ her. OR U) H c ( aF = y y o a ° N oo �. tic °C cr go 0 N OQ x u°�Q v "d C� A• E. rX 0 •-• 1 A N • N rr. 0 (D 0o rn H tJ yy O �' 00 Q. H lJ 0000 a i N W 3 VJ a+ 5. N ^ rn 0DCD `� E. < N Cn A H V. v Oy H N ''Cl '17 C b y a En a Cn En 0 b a Cl) a M a En a >ri a Cl) a 5 a Cn a or, N Y a >' 0 Li, a En a to 4 z a Cl) a - > Cl) a N?1 z ►v v) CA 2 Cn .0 4 C7 b u, 'v ►v 2 'b 'b Cl) No 'b b 'v °V En b 2 VI `►o ►d En 00 b 'v •v 'v Cl) b 2 1-3 ►1 Cl) O0 b (,) ci) N 'b "d 00 00 `0 'TJ N 00 Cl) CA is "0 Cl) b n L . En Cn 8 .-b H Cl) . 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 r r r r r r r r a• c c C• 5. — co CD - E LT,�• g g a s m sE. g g ar c C8--• Et n f9 ,O N ~ N .7 N 00 O N N R' w r. Q. co N• chi O 'CrN � :9 w OO v, co IV E GCD A CD y .Ni w to 's7. N CCi, 0 `''' 0 p p N ..r• sn A O ^ N ' 5 CD N 0 p .0 s _ * Nis) CD N 'U w_ rr V1 .� g .• N 'y O rA' St- Ca Cto .r N H N g y W ..' n O ►� N col N co W .Ni ? 00 OQ .5' Ni .i Cl) 9 a a o a a M a a >ri a a 'VA a a ogi N a a aW o c, N a a m,, z a a _ 11 a N Z 'd '/ ►d P 0 ►o 'u .d 2 ci) 9 0 cn v 'o V 'd V N I-+ cn 'Z7 'o 'b cn b 2 VI b 'd b 'd V) 'v 2 ' .b Cn N .� 'd 'TJ 'c! 'd 'Cf 'd 'C! 'd 'TJ V 'U N o (...; -; N N;b I o O O O 'O V. 'd a O O O C Z Z z 4 4 4 4 O o O o 8' N p N co atO .0 C 'n) 0 r-. `y� cr. w L Ft 8 w o o ee. C• M rn �, H p O A' g El OQ CD I p CD G CD p% .r. .NP 05Q O N C 5. b N 0 w b VAi p E N rn 0 rn `� t�.l p ^ O y g• n n n :f ..i " N - 7 �p, N b�j LA is.) y 7 N v, E CD a r. Cam! b N a S EC v • O ..... N cD N K. GQQ• a CD — 0 y y y v Q7Q W 0 00 CD •? tJ "d y "C `d 000 to . (n a;� W 5 y;9' o4 N "y O >71 AS in Z o� (II.1 . P ray 'v N z V a b 'b Q 0 b a ►o b 2 .-0 A ej .-0 .0 .-0 b ' N H cn b b b b b 2 ci b b b b b b b a a b b ro b `° cn Y b N II Cl) .b .d ►d a V `b 'b N 1-3 x A L . b 6 'e 8 r he in N b 'o 'ti b 'aL7. 'C 'o 'o 'd 'o V 'o V "v V V 'C °V to W ti P 't 0 0 0 i3• ',3' a- CD N co 0 0 5 0 CY 0 a'. p: CD C 2, a wr w 0' tp\t A' rytp _ o• 0 a a C C w N y N 4 on g. cp co y �• W P g. n C 'O p a„, o co O y eH' �Hf coLi �' a g Q' p; O v N C L'' H R O O O Ia p Vn is) C% 01 C �� w cyo fo CIO Uo v A _ CD �A.. CD rD E. w 0 5. O r-, H coN H w A B 5 A W Oa y p' v `G CD ifl: Oy ? w cp cy w ? P.T. _ w g C H E3 < y a v w cam° CD 43 0a. fA/l W ci g N CD U :... N• CD Ni Cav a .A. N v Cl) tri Cl) y Cn a a rn rn > a a a g Cl) a a a >. Cn a > a Cn a a o� N cm a a >r, 0 > a w z Cn a a I I . VI a a N?f z Cn 'o V Cn Cl) b 'o 9 0 Cl) 'o 'o rn v) iv 'o P Cl) rn CA 2 0 CA V 'd rn Cl) 'o 'o 'o Cn N — Cl) Cn En "o 'o 'o "0 Cn 2 C4 CA rn to 'o V "0 V Cn 2 1-3 En 'd 'o "0 to Cn 'o 'o O° p:1 Cn '•o to Cn 'o Cn N .--, Cn 'o 'd Cn CA 'o 'o 'o "d 'o Cn 0 Cn V V ^v V Cn En 'o '0 V 'U Cn "0 Cn ,;, ''3 Cn rn En Cxi CA a a x Cn rn tn 8 Cl) Cn Cn .-7 Cl) Cn Cn �.,ro pv, H N ' ••-t E. o o N ^ P. (70 o `n NA . O. c H p, cowocu CD wvmy o `< < S '6,1 n (IQ RC a, <' <' _' U' A 5' NN H p p .d gi v wv .d .d gNc p cA. pp0 b A. -i p. k Crr Cr Z O p . My w g CD A A ~•5. ,..0 o v v v' kWp! A ry A A I' v, gj. g G bJ 2. V a 0 CD p 'i v N v 00 .�-r 0 2 O 00 nI N `y CO _ a _ 53 H v N A W .Ni A A v N Or .-. C t.►, A H 00 N 0 y A A w v ��i v Cl) "t7 "C y cn Cl) b Cl)rocn > cn b cn rn b M cn 00 cn cn ►d -y cn cn b cn cn ►d oo ri Cl) IT) C/3 b o N cn '.v Cl) Cl) ►u y Ec, 0 cn V cn cn ►v 'Or, Z Cl) b cn cn b -6 1 .1 Cl) b VI Ci) b N4 z > cn C/3 b b b Cl) b 9 0 y cn cn b b b cn b 2 tv cn en 9 d b Y cn b ,v b cn N .v ,,y Y Cl) '0 Cl) 2 cn b b a en b VI 2 -3 a b a En b b `° ►d Cl) •d Cl) Cl) N ~► cn > cn a cn b b b _ n a a En b ,0 b b b N -3 Cl) b A cn cn E L, .0 ,.„ c„, 8 En En �; tn Cl) VI tJ.b cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn cn g g g g o s w 5' aro' c 0 `D b o o < fin' ��' .t F,' °' o O cn o-w, .-. cm G N N ^. Fq �• '�' a. `'� vim, N 0 81 0. = r..t'' co 'a -. g a Qv v O O E ' .n 0Q " o .b o g. pw R. E ° 9n 9n uo as Po 6, C y' w * p° m w O Rfa. C. CO aa P. o _ CO ' a ft. g c' . ,. g CD a, a 5 O O w co w H a ,.. a r)• a ,o ,n c g G G o q 5. o.d G CD a in n' �' f) IV G O O O CO (. �. rn CD O W s3 A a. .ti CA G Win �./ N0 CD N 0 tL A CO b til 0> b to h7 b to >71 rn W r ►o to o N •d a 4.3 O C .0 . . . ' " b -- N Z a b b a 9 O . b b a 2 a b Y b b b N — b b > 'v 2 Cn b b a b C/3 2 -3 b a b b b b > If p a b °° N b b b b b C/3 (A b a T._ C] a b 00 b b b b b b b b 'V a N 1-3 x A 6 L' ft, CO ^ro CO N.•,, • H H H H --! H H H H H H H H H H � v) cn � � Cl) w 0 = q co co co co co co CD w pal E. 0 0 0 0 u C '� `< N N N = g a s N N N 7G' o a: coo co �. =i o 0 G co C �'' o 'iv �o AO °H CNv .uu 'o' G OQ N. va. 5. to N C N '� N QQ co' ' �' °' c�i �� °:; {off C5' w a °g s N Iv r� N - 0 & �0 0 vdi N O O' N 0 b to p' y P.` < ,0 C y 'a_ ° W CD P E. o1' N 0 0 N W � c n ►= N' Ts ��„' 'V A 0 c w �r n H N 2- :i 00 N `� b N 0 ,41 0' 0 <D &y a� .p W O� 00 N N CCF CD N N .--. Ja ►11 V ? N R 0 �- v 0 U � a CCD ; a N �-. v p co N a. 0 a H N a rn cn ra V1 n N til Cl) t=i Cl) 0 Crf En Ell En tcl 'i til En tri En Ell y r tri Cl) tri cn tri m-Nn tni Cl) tTi Cl) rn o'NC N (..., t�i Cl) rn v) rn >n 0 Cri v) `Crf v) rn o z t=i Cl) rn v) -4 1-4 to Ill En N z b try v) til Cl) b 9 0 ►d M Cl) trl Cl) ►d P a tri Cl) rn En Cl)b2 'b ►o a rn i) til cn b ..d 2 ---- ►o ►d a tri En rn Cl) b b w CA b b a to Cl) tri Cl) ►d V 2 y b a rn Cl) P1 v) 'd 'b w 7:1 N V a rn Cl) ra Cl) b ►d ►d () b ro b b a rn En tif Cn b b b b b N ►3 a tri En to Cl) P1 Cl) tri Cl) (lone. a tri v) to cn tri Cn tri cn -b a a tr., En t=i En N b U p. as. °g. ci• • O „9 o o o coo co (kare -I 0 c4. 2 0 — q — -0 ta. C O 'b ff y R. y co ce H 0 DI 0 vli N H 'p 8. N .0 N a N' 0 w b fil N fA a o .Ni a. N N e• CD O iist, C 5 °` w tn D.c-14y CAO.to 2. cL o ta olo I-. Tl y 'C > M a;� y r.H 5,1 N o A/y O a"" ¼.., N cn O . N z b o 0 b 2 n d b iv . — b b 2 En ,v ,v 2 ►-3 b 2 7ci .d v) P-o .d _ () "v "d Cn "v "v •d ''v b N H x 0 L ' ro 8 r v (A N;9 • px0q1Mc7OW >4+—e• * * O , , I . , a , . , . . . , • '-: oriOSP, vnwtowcnnzP 0 0 0 0 0 N 4., 0 aoLi !ilI O to p0 0 . .- -, - .- w .4 5 p H 4 4 w cn cn C C 7d a t. o o c, c) c) .n pR 0 5' S' 5' 5' 5' y ao N Zn 5 0 N N N N ..1 `- N 0 p; r* 0 Oo 00 do UO Qo 0 CD 0 CD CD 0.• o A G .ar a r5E. 0 0 0 0 0 0'0 ) p g hf TJ '71 '1 ''71 5, C n 0) 005. 5. 5. 5. 5. c `yf a a - , .< '< '< '.< ..< ,, .. o "+ 2. CA (p �Gyy.�+, 2. — - per+, CQ, CO. a. 0 tJ' i x `� m 7d 7d 7y 7d 7d F. x a v. 5' P �+ S+ 5'b a ig'"` 0 O. f0A N N N Co 0 .1 Ln O vy py oyro uy ey 0 0, Fn' S. p 0 CD CD 0 CD 00 -� CD• 00 to to P, P, 0 cn ,,� '` a —F W A,' o, w w a s 0 a: 0 00 a0 00 00 00 N da 5' 5 { { XN k k X X a O r, ti 5a' 5 O A• a D N 0o + .• .-. .-. .. . . — N N .-. g ›. 1.21 ,- �p co co co �-, a ."�' 0.. N V, v. to Oo V. O O vA _ - o ,�. 5 0 0. 0. aaa � 5' o cn a a a a a a a a CCD o IN 0 r. — 0, - •- v, 0ao << CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e~" 1. 9t • v,' a `< D0000 i gff y a KMm cac ` 50 C C/O A N N . .. O O AN O '' C+a a to :- . C G is.) * a 0 m.-. co rt., O O O CD.- NI a 0% 00 00 to . O O O O y 1c 'cFa-c':p)- .^ .poi 'O .. .=.. ra. 00. N •P 'J' . l .o--o 0' < ao ON 0 0 0 0 W W r 1 vt'', y -fie r 11 c : 0 O O O o O a, to 0 0 `.`.. 0 .O•► S. y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r cm w 0 HH 0 ~d. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r. Q o - ►� .-. • r6'''idl y o O O O o O O O .. ,.. •* p fD e0 0 ►-+• A CD N c�.1, 1--1 eD ►�I 'e w v, •. G 7 5 CD 1^�1 '. tin tit tit tti. tvi. VI vvi. O 0 :�.., .O. a * //yyC��D Di a' V Y — O.. te `fi b..) CA .4. tN lJ to A A A A +, 0 e g, OOotl v. O O O O ms• , v O e ,. — 0 a .. • 0 m 1-+ zi LA 0 0 �, n 0 0 0 v. vN, r .4 a• a a .a - O 5 .... 8. !► ►,.1 r�y <D .--. co . C C . . . . . !'. DI !~D ,,,,,,^. o v, N O x DC O O O O O • 9 0 a a O 0. -e • a a a 00 _ 0 y w N 7 b..) N N.) N N Kt NI N.) 0 x E. td Le. A. in v. IA In v, IA i.n ,. M QQ ei K C• O y a a - Q° 0 El 01 x v, v, to th u, to u, u. v, v Q- Q a. K IX a' ."E . L el 0 ,...., ,..., ta IQ ts.) ts.) I.../ ._, ",, .4 0 t0 00 o0 w0 0 O g 0 m v to .. K 0q 0 io co &) CA x 7• W bd r) () C) 9 O O 2 '� z O CD CD T1 '�d C7 N '• N 1,.. w N N "d '- W N •• 'U CCD C C G d H d O 5. E. E. in w �' P' 0 0 o c0 r' o d • oo o CzD O O no o c p, a cor'l <o 'b p O• C O O W Co � S .C1 n 0 O N S 0 mq G (R• CD• A.. 0.. a. En 0 4 E'.. coo w 0 0 4 a b C (02 o S .7 �.. M C � O --O Ci WM N D . D p„ � MM (a -1 .i < ,o c . ggo 4. ' = q O a v' 'n• -+ CD CD .• p..• CD CD O ; P-.. � m 4 .-• N V, ,••• n "11 C n N O Vs U O O O A Atit 0 S co CD CA co p CD C N W (7 �• 4. W W W N N N N W W w, O O O O O O O O O y cnezi~_ . a a a a a a a a a .•..y �j' O. �• F O 0- Q• O O O O O O O O O co r P Q. M O CD CA C t... U O O A y (/] to o 1' • `a o . o o ,� ;-, N a 0 O 00 -i CDa 0 0 , .. CD Qa Ye .< <e Co fy - --•- _. `J M p a a. co y ` I cm ,.... ,'' o 0 0 o w w w w w w w Qq A y C 4 N eN-l- z t" o 3 o 0 0 0 0 0 o c yi •" -+ p p' o rn CD .. O CD N (") CD M O 0 .Z N y G OD F� O ,�� t./1 LA U Am X X X X A.A to U �V, A p . ..., A z1 V`t co p a o ��...+ •Q ' tn' G. •-• y .0 O 00 N 5• 0 p c ►-+ 1v O co (1- O w v1 co ► ' 0 ...• co CA• gA O ,,, ►cz4 p 0 O a o -. H a. .r p ,� CD p CAo Ca N .� tzi H O, — ,--. r-. — ON W N N Q\ N N O O p 2 r0•. r�' b7 6. "0 C O O O C C C i,� in O i�, in a, p. �.�; a E. 'O vi "3 CM v t"'tro a O CoA '< n .so QQ w ... c ....• a CO x CT E w S ,.� x `. oc C) co o 0 o O 0 o vwi vwi cwi, o vwi cwii = v k • r C) A O '*. to H .= O O u, u, cr. U u,� o� , u, V, co e < r..,a, o 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 .°�.. a 0 CD aLu- CD w 0 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 1995 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting April 4, 1995 1. Agenda Item No. 5A. Authorizing the City Manager to enter into a lease agreement with Dallas/Fort Worth Airport for a Noise Monitoring site. As you will note in the attached memo from Kevin Hugman, Assistant to the City Manager, we are ready to proceed with a lease agreement with D/FW Airport for a permanent noise monitoring station in Southlake. Kevin's memo explains the details and the benefits of entering into this agreement. 2. Agenda Items 5B, SC. 5D and 5E. Authorizing the Mayor to enter into agreements • relative to the Impact Fee Study. As we have previously discussed, funds to conduct an impact fee study have been included in the budget. We.are planning to update current water and sewer impact fees and develop roadway impact fees, as provided for under Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code. The items for consideration are the contracts/letters of agreement for each of the consultants that will be participating in the study. Note particularly the scope of services to be provided by each and the schedule which delineates the time frame under which the study will be conducted. The study will be completed in time to integrate the new fees into next year's budget. FYI--note the attached Work Task Schedule following this memo. 3. Agenda Item No. 5F. Award of bid for Paving and Drainage Improvements Phase IL South White Chapel Blvd. from Big Bear Creek to F.M. 1709. You will recall requesting staff to rebid the portion of White Chapel from Big Bear Creek to FM 1709. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City Council Meeting April 4, 1995 L Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 31, 1995 Page 2 As you will note in the memo from Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works, the project was rebid and the low, bidder was Sunmount Corporation with a bid of $211,295.00. FYI -- the previous low bid by Reynolds Asphalt and Construction was $223,438.50. Sunmount's previous bid (notwithstanding failure to adequately respond to the bid specifications) was $207,875.00. Note that Reynolds did not rebid the project. 4. Agenda Item No. 6B. Presentation of a Proclamation. Scott Martin will be honored Tuesday evening as Southiake's Volunteer of the Year for 1994. Mr. Martin serves as the Standing Committee representative for SPIN Neighborhood #4, a member of the Board of.Directors for Keep Southlake Beautiful, is active with GRACE, and is generally involved in many volunteer efforts for the City of Southlake. He is a committed and enthusiastic participant/leader in this community and highly deserving of this honor. 5. Agenda Item No. 7A. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 480-167 (ZA 95-18), rezoning for 1.45 acres, from AG to 0-1. There have been no changes since City Council approval (5-0) of the 1st reading on March 21, 1995. 6. Agenda Item No. 7B. 2nd Reading, Ordinance No. 480-168 (ZA 95-19), rezoning for 6.0 acres, from AG to SF-1A. There have been no changes since City Council approval (5-0) of the 1st reading on March 21, 1995. 7. Agenda Item No. 8A. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 480-143 (ZA 94-85), rezoning and development plan for Versailles, from SF-20B to R-P-U-D. In your packet is the ninth (9th) submittal for this development. The developer met with C.I.S.D. last week and C.I.S.D. apparently expressed interest in acquiring a portion of this property for a middle school. The plan shows a 21± acre lot intended for a school/public park site. It is our Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City Council Meeting April 4, 1995 L Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 31, 1995 Page 3 understanding that the school will acquire 17± acres and the public park will be the remainder (approximately 4 acres). Section 30.10 of the Zoning Ordinance addresses the fact that school sites do qualify as open space, however, the area should be calculated "excluding the area devoted to buildings." This exclusion has been noted in their land use summary but is not included in their open space calculations. Given all the other issues with this development, the reduction in open space due to buildings is fairly insignificant and does not impact the "required" open space calculation because their approximate 25% open space calculation is far above the required 10%. FYI--Curtis and Bill Branum discussed drainage issues at the proposed school site. ,,• C.I.S.D. is evaluating the situation. Another significant issue with this plan is the alignment of the proposed S. Hollow Drive and existing Carlisle Drive with the "new" Carroll Drive. Staff is currently discussing alternatives with Art Clayton, representative for South Hollow. He has told staff he is receptive to relocating his entry drive further north on Carroll, but is concerned about who will pay for improvements to Carlisle and "new" Carroll from his entry south to Continental. Note that the developers have provided a 10' landscape easement along lots backing to "new" Carroll Drive. It is our understanding that they intend to have offsets in the fencing to eliminate the tunnel effect. Landscaping would also be provided. We need to clarify their commitment to this at the meeting. The opposition issues for this case are difficult to articulate given the number of changes with the plans. Several parties have been opposed or in favor based on a variety of plans received. We researched the staging of various responses and concluded that it is Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City Council Meeting April 4, 1995 Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 31, 1995 Page 4 impossible to determine what position the surrounding owners hold regarding this latest plan. Staff has mailed out courtesy notices with the latest plan to the adjacent property owners. We have also asked the developer to obtain letters stating any withdrawal of opposition based on this latest plan. A final issue which is fairly minor is the location of the street stub to the north. The staff review summary recommends relocating this stub easterly to align with Street E. This will allow more flexibility in developing the McKenzie tract and provide the stub at more of a midpoint. 8. Agenda Item No. 8B. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 480-164 (ZA 95-02), rezoning for 16.63 acres, from AG to SF-lA (Denton Tract). The first reading of this request was previously tabled at Council on 3/7/95 until this meeting. The developer has submitted a preliminary plat for P&Z review on 4/6/95 which conforms to the sketch provided in the packet. The plat should catch up with the zoning request at second reading. The P&Z Commission approved the zoning request 6-0. 9. Agenda Item No. 8C. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 636, changing a street name for a portion of McCrae Trail to Parker Court, in Lonesome Dove Estates Addition. The developer has requested this name change on behalf of the Parkers who were the original owners of the property. They would like to have a street address with their name on it. Staff does not have a problem with this request. 10. Agenda Item No, 8D. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 638, abandonment of a portion of South Kimball Avenue right-of-way. The attached memo from Bob Whitehead clearly describes the history of the portion of South Kimball right-of-way recommended for abandonment. Please let Bob know if you have any questions. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City Council Meeting April 4, 1995 Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 31, 1995 Page 5 11. Agenda Item No. 10A. Developer Agreement for Stone Lakes, Phase IV. As noted in the memo from Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works, there are a few conditions of the agreement which are unique, including the park dedication fees. The Park Board unanimously approved Mr. Jobe's request for 100% credit for the park dedication fees. The developer will donate a strip of land which will provide pedestrian access between Stone Lakes and Chimney Hills and is willing to provide improvements including the walkway, fencing, landscaping and irrigation. Further, the developer has agreed to allow staff to review the planting plan for the site to ensure that the plants selected are hardy and low maintenance. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 12. The Corridor Advisory Committee will meet on Monday, April 3, to review a zoning ordinance amendment which incorporates the Corridor Overlay District (SH 114, FM 1709, and FM 1938) proposed regulations. This amendment includes the input received at the last joint City Council/Commission meeting. Staff intends to modify the amendment based on suggestions by the CAC, prior to the April 6 review by the Planning & Zoning Commission. Please call Greg Last if you have any questions. 13. The Neighborhood Preservation Zoning Ordinance Amendment is also scheduled for P&Z review on April 6. We have included a copy of the draft in your packet in case you receive any telephone calls. The second draft does not include a map of eligible neighborhoods which was in the first draft. This map was eliminated so as not to focus attention on specific neighborhoods, but rather on the general philosophy and format of the amendment. I anticipate considerable discussion before the Commission sends it forward to City Council. Feel free to call Greg Last if you have any questions. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City Council Meeting April 4, 1995 Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 31, 1995 Page 6 14. Construction on the Shady Oaks school site has generated some complaints concerning workers' trucks parked along the side of the street, restricting traffic flow. We have discussed the situation with Warren Anderson of Total Project Management (TPM), the school district's project manager, and police have warned the workers twice that they were creating a safety hazard. After the last warning, the contractor said he would construct a pad site for parking. .We have had no further complaints. 15. A City Council and School Board Candidates' Forum is being sponsored by SPIN Neighborhoods #12 and #13, and the Cross Timber Hills Homeowners Association on Monday, April 17 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. According to organizers, each candidate will be given approximately five minutes to speak and then the floor will be opened to questions. A notice will be mailed to residents of these neighborhoods. The forum is open to all Southlake residents. 16. SPIN Update: The Spin Standing Committee met on Thursday, March 30. Following a presentation by Southlake Sister Cities and a park issues update, the Committee considered adoption of a Code of Conduct and election of a chair and vice-chair. Although SPIN representatives are subject to the same Code of Ethics and Conduct as other Council appointees, there are circumstances unique to SPIN that the Standing Committee felt it necessary to address. The importance of maintaining open and candid communication between the neighborhoods and the City requires a commitment to impartiality and objectivity. The SPIN Code of Conduct will address these matters. Since some of our SPIN representatives are running for City Council, including the previous chair and vice-chair, new leaders have been elected. The new chair is Rex Potter, SPIN#13 representative, and Karen Reynolds, SPIN#5 representative, will serve as the new vice-chair. June Haney, SPIN #15, remains as the Standing Committee secretary. The new chair and vice chair will serve out the unexpired terms of the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City Council Meeting April 4, 1995 L Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 31, 1995 Page 7 previous chair and vice-chair. As you will remember too, half of the appointments to the Standing Committee will expire in June. If you have any further questions, please call me. 17. Park Construction Update: Bicentennial Park Expansion, Phase I -- Rain delays have put the project nearly three months behind, which will make it difficult to plant Bermuda this summer and allow the turf to become well established by Spring of 1996. Roadway work continues with concrete work on the road, plaza and ballfields to begin soon. The pump for the irrigation system has been installed and the system will soon be converted over from city water to well water. All underground utilities and the irrigation line from the pumphouse to the expansion site have been installed. Carroll Middle School Gymnasium/Recreation Center -- After the change in foundation design from piers to footings, some soil had to be excavated and select fill material brought in. The design change resulted in a cost savings of about $1,000. Approximately 25% of the footings have been poured. Rain delays have pushed the completion date from June to August 1995. 18. The SYAC Trip to Austin on Wednesday, March 22 was a great success. The students met with Governor Bush for approximately 45 minutes in the morning, followed by a tour of the Capitol and recognition in the State Senate by Senator Jane Nelson. Later in the afternoon, the youth met with Senator Nelson and presented her with a position paper expressing their opposition to a county-wide teen curfew. She thanked them for their input and stated that she agreed with their position. 19. The Great Texas Trash-Off is scheduled for Saturday, April 1 from 8:00 a.m. to noon. A "Trash Bash" with free hot dogs, drinks, and entertainment, will be held at Bicentennial Park at 11:00 a.m. for all participants. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City Council Meeting April 4, 1995 L Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 31, 1995 Page 8 20. General Election Schedule: Thursday, April 6 -- Last day to register to vote in the May 6, 1995 General Election. Monday, April 17 -- Early voting begins at City Hall. Tuesday, May 2 -- Early voting by personal appearance ends. Saturday, May 6 -- Election Day. 21. Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance, was recently elected President-elect of the Government Finance Officers of Texas. She will begin her term as President in 1996. This is yet another example of the quality of our Directors. I hope you will join me in congratulating Lou Ann. 22. FYI, late this afternoon, Stephen Apple withdrew as a candidate for Councilmember Place 4. Stephen expressed his regret, but his work schedule would not allow him the time needed to serve. 22. Note: • City Hall will be closed April 14 for Good Friday. Happy Easter April 16. • Daylight savings begins Sunday, April 2. Remember to set your clocks forward one hour. • Curtis will be back in the office on Monday. Hooray! SKY/kb L City of Southlake 1995 IMPACT FEE STUDY WORK TASK SCHEDULE March 29, 1995 DATE/LOCATION ACTION By March 31 Negotiate Consulting Contracts April 4th City Council Approval of Consulting Contracts April 5th, 9:00 a.m. Study Team (staff) Orientation/Growth Rate Meeting CC Chambers April 11th, 7:00 p.m. Advisory Committee Orientation CC Chambers April 12 - 26 Preparation of Land Use Assumptions (LUA) for water, sewer, roadways April 25th, 7:00 p.m. Advisory Committee Meeting CC Chambers • LUA Growth Rate Briefing April 26th, 9:00 a.m. Study Team Meeting CC Chambers • LUA • Basic Data Requirement Submitted April 27th Revise LUA (if necessary) Send to Advisory Committee May 9th, 7:00 p.m. Advisory Committee Meeting CC Chambers • LUA Comments May 26th LUA available to public June 1st Preliminary water, wastewater, roadway facilities CIPs and fees to study team. June 1-16 Study Team review preliminary of CIPS (over) *June 13th, 7:00 p.m. Study Team Meeting - . CC Chambers (if needed) June 30th, 9:00 a.m. Study Team Meeting i CC Chambers • Presentation of final CIPs and max fees • Draft ordinance discussion CIP Methodology to Advisory Committee I Finance Consultant prepares bond, Fee Calculation Report and Double Taxation Analysis 1 July 5th or July 6th, 7:00 p.m. Advisory Committee Meeting Community Center © CIP Bicentennial Park • Discussion of fee policies Final draft of ordinance prepared July 12th, 7:00 p.m. Advisory Committee Meeting CC Chambers Consideration of CIP l July 18th, 7:00 p.m. City Council Meeting CC Chambers Review CIP/written comments of Advisory Committe 1 • Fee discussion • Set consolidated Public Hearing date July 24th Public Notices prepared for Public Hearing on LUA, CIP; sent to newspaper and anyone who has requested. 1 i August 6 First of three (3) notices appears in newspaper (between 60- 30 days) before the hearing date, LUA/CIP available to public. August 14 - 28 City Council holds public workshops on proposed fees (optional) i August 15 First reading of Impact Fee Ordinance September 5 Consolidated Public Hearing on LUA, CIPs and Ordinance/CC approves CIP (within 30 days) j 1 October 4 Adoption of Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee ordinances within 30 days of Public Hearing. c:lwpflesl impactfel impactee.sch 1 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 30, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kevin Hugman, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: Lease Agreement with DFW Airport DFW Airport has requested a lease agreement with the City to place a noise monitoring station on Exchange Boulevard in the Commerce Business Park. The monitor would be located on the property line between 726 Commerce Street and 2875 Exchange Boulevard, in the right of way on the south side of the street. The attorneys have reviewed the proposed agreement and are satisfied with it. I have also spoken with the owners of the two lots in question, Mr. David McMahan and Mr. Randy Pack, and they have no objection to placement of the monitor at this location. The monitor, a drawing of which is attached, is 20' tall. DFW Airport has embarked on a project to install a permanent noise monitoring system in cities surrounding the airport. The system is composed of approximately 35 microphone sites, radar flight tracking equipment, a central computer processing center, and geographic analysis equipment. Two monitoring sites proposed for Southlake will monitor the northwest runway. The Commerce Business Park area is well suited because the ambient noise level is relatively low, it is situated on the centerline of the northwest approach and within the 75 LDN contour, and electric power and telephone lines are nearby. Placement of the noise monitor in Southlake will ultimately benefit the citizens of Southlake. The system will be used for a variety of purposes: noise contours included in the Environmental Impact Study (EIS)can be verified and modified if actual noise data warrants, which could result in smaller avigation easements; citizen complaints of excessive noise can be investigated and localized to individual aircraft; and the system will provide tools to DFW airport authorities which could lead to improved noise abatement procedures. Please place the proposed lease agreement on the next City Council agenda for consideration. If you have any further questions, please let me know. KH Attachments L W.; ti B 27 '95 11:07 DFW AIRPORT-P'E (214)574-8709 • C DFW AGe4T LEASE AGREEMENT The State of Texas $ • • County of Dallas $ THIS AGREEMENT IS MADE THIS day of_ , 1994 by and between . hereinafter referred to as "Owner", and the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Board, hereinafter referred to as "Board'. • J.tECITALS WHEREAS, Board desires to place noise monitoring equipment consisting.of some or all of the following: a three foot by three foot concrete base, 20 foot above ground tilt pole, • microphone, windscreen, bird spike, lightning arrestor. noise level analyzer, weather station, • spread-spectrum radio, electrical meter and associated enclosure cases, hereinafter referred to as "Equipment", on Owner's property located at Property. line between Lot 1 .and Lot 2 or Block D, "Commerce business Park. . hereinafter referred to as 'Premises": and WHEREAS, Owner agrees to the placement of said Equipment on Owner's property; NOW. TORE, this Lease Agreement is this day made between the Board and Owner. 1. Terms of this Lease Agreement: Rental A $1.00 (one time payment within 14 days of execution) Effective Date: • Termination Date: December 31, 2015 2. Owner grants to Board a lease to construct, use, maintain,operate, alter, add to,repair, replace. reconstruct, Inspect, access and remove the Equipment on Owner's property at any time. 3. Owner may not terminate this Lease Agreement in the initial five(S)years of the term. After the initial five (5)years, this Lease Agreement may be terminated by either party • • • p - FEB 27 '95 11:08 DFW AIRPORT-P,E (214)574-8709 P.2 with three hundred sixty(360)days advance written notice to the other party. 4. Owner shall not at any time alter, remove, attach to, disturb, disrupt, demolish or any way interfere with the Equipment or its intended use or knowingly allow anyone else to tamper with the Equipment. 5. Owner shall notify any successor or assign of the terms of this Lease Agreement and shall notify Board of the transfer. 6. Board agrees upon expiration of this agreement to remove all equipment and restore the property to its previous condition. reasonable wear and tear excepted. 7. This Lease Agreement embodies the complete agreement of the parties, superseding all oral or written previous and contemporary agreements between the parties and relating to matters in this Lease Agreement. and except as otherwise provided in this Lease Agreement cannot'be modified without written agreement of Board and Owner to be attached to and made a part of this Lease Agreement. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this agreement on the.day and year first above written. DALLAS-FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL APPROVED AS TO FORM: AIRPORT BOARD By Executive Director • Legal Counsel for the Board Date • OWNER • Date C . . 7 e. C, 1 t ...f. axone O ROD I . .........""p r I, 86 K RA010 MODRM Xi d f it w • r....% 1 .X' I •avo?OIRECTION 7 M I yf . a+p I a f Obw. WNVD06 ABLA SFa190R loll. ,� WIND Often •�� M SENSOR g (lei iti I i ..47 i •••••••.,•••••••••o. (� mEm rINSTRUMENT CABINET 43 Ali .. . 4 Ill. ■ MAX POWER•000YAM 110 VOLTS 16 AMPCIRCUIr j .Yt. 0 GRi11RE �� �-t' OlbtXib 6fiil�P i . tv% MOOOPPOI rh—TB, We MOD OOwurr � goal 6s w ti NEE Ali : :Y a nax+DROD N E ORAVANO MoA.e+6 OTAL • : ::L9iGR0MilPOIOIU0N D - t1' � ' =° r. yyt m. % .i seaclv4oavOooNotra M.71_ POwlgtlMLfF101E " .1I ! I1 i 1 1, 3 1 1 v P 1 i 1,---„,--,,.., ..,..*:....:::::::::::::„.„.---.........„,.......,, .,.....,,...„—...„,„....:,_,_______....„-„„:3::::...:...:.......::::..,....:...:,,,,,,,± I C • fs-1 FM ��I /r1 I>fl-4TH M-1[T F.A:t t C.. J7 WI V ''•PWllg•llmlm.lg•N•V•WMNIMIIIIIIIIIIIII•••FI.gIIIIIIII..•IemIjtm•.p.. .........r 1IN C a • 1.....__________________. t...... . , -•:....:.:.:_:...;.:.:.: if:*i::•:-::i:i:i:i:.::i .:::•:::•:.:::::.:.:•: i I . • Fle V m 9 i 1 r........ 1 ft I. .ik W 7 . Pt 1, i _ a ..._____,___............. ; 1 1 II .:„..„,„:„,:„....„..,....,..:,.....„:„.. .,,.,_ _,......,......„:„...„......____,=.:„..„, .. ..,„,......„:„. ,s.÷....„.„....„....„,•,,...„...„,...„,..... „..........,.....„..„ , ,.::.,.,....„.„.....,_,_,..::..„....._..,,..„ . .„...,„,..„..:. ... /tiA ti, ,F i. ...-:•:::-.:•:-... t •::...i:-::....::.:"..........;...:.:-....::::1-:::::.:e....-7.:::.....":::: ..;:i•: •:-...*::::*f_:-.'..- :'. / % 1 -...047-:::-: ,:: ::7::::: .:i*::-::i •::-:::::::was witg 1.4. 1str—rominii---iminc— . 1 g 1 AI of') 4 ••:•:.:-:-:•.•• C i L -.,,,,,-''',"4--°•;.=.:.•7-7-777-,-:;7-:.--,--4,.^''''''''::.7.-"................, .., ' . ••••••••"*.'"'".....'''''''''''*•?..". ••,,-"".:::`.", ,,V: r r-r.zr''''..---', ...;.Z.:.... ' ' - ----•,,-,•••-•'•r7'.,"::':".....,;;-,--;.•,r•,''`-`7. & % ii i t4,.... ..11''.''• ..-.»,-;.,-.:::::::::::' ,..,..-,...,...--,3=,.„„ 10 rro 1 , .................... 1 .0 • "S •M t I p2 g 0 0 tel lt • ii X la §:3.1 8 7 11 - a • .gi IS 4 irc OC) III II 1 1> 1 gill • i • 0 . I 0 35 i 4 1 • z 1 al r.- zl I II 1 II I I I I I I tito ; g ...:.:.:.:.:•:•:•: . 1 le 3 1 p Z 2 24 •:::::•::::.:i*i:: g ii. •:•:.:.:.:.:•:.-..-.• b. _ a I • 11 •••••••:-:.:•:•:•:•:. _.. ._ El 6 t C I *k.---1 IN / 2 1 — .:•:-:•:•:.:•:•:•:: .:•:•:•:•:,....:.:, !.. T ••••••..-... :•:•:•:•:•."•:-.•:. ••.• 1••• 1100 0 i i\ 3 a.1 .:.:•:.:„....:.:.:: ..:.:: 1 . i 1 1 . . . , ..:•:„.:.:.:., ................ :.:::::::::::::::. • . , c•A - ' . APIJ.R-5/9-5 -1A14>4TH 114(7 Ril:IT f ).? Fr4 4 • • .. .___.........______ .•._ r-- • .. • • �� Y—eat�e.V�e.s At W NANKIN yWISR71011 Cr T of • 71C-OOt11Ri D,D•. W�''~�-fib p76111:Al w.�.Ns*i balm taw 7124. 40W w�i9•L r - .„wf4 r.N 00.f W Deal Resod.d Tweet t+rV.7err. PI42.104 a. Tn-N r u ' TMy 1 4- 111 wr4e-a-evK3' s SIC _• Yltll�i1 MSC ITS DOVMUT.MG' LOIIL RAI CAS COMPASS SAIf10MS n.�ii �IeupIsuita �tq sm� A r.G �i]a�e'�-- or711' • RATE C iMl�C.f• Dai1r rY�3_I�f91• _J �WVJ� Ddr COIIMii 71wY meet& .m tell. r I. MSC A 44 Y ifN.""'«'..' r. . Volume my _ Aeee• AM tO t'• • - .. Seeley& 1( • ¢ Y Street I E I matY t 1 'Aly1 244.00 I it YI aI A te`Ate n 1a� I3 .A1 Q THENCE 1 let S97.00 €g I II.�1t i, id r Norther •; I Iy I FJ le:- THEWS Mtn /Y S11A1N.•tli ----- '--_ !a' �0• _ i�1 7HE0.7 = i; trra al a-:Ie roe Nat I-r—_ -�.a'vi va'a.�eTa ie.wT _-__=J ...ot eSt I tad I P3 \ ‘ \ In-- comer Le the 1 — 1 1 71 r_______________..—KAESCLIA2P— VIDI 3 ! Ii NM 1 r_ ______ ii . . 1 i E . ......... e.0 et MU a I , 1 1 7L 1 I I S I ° I I I. i I Ym^ S[1110 I , I i i sin ; I L I , I • I 5 1 II to- r I _ __ _ _ �l I 1 1 1j, STATE MOS 7 1 1 tat.. I- I = I �I I -}- -3.11'16( wet.. IS I 1. ` St I par�i Ier.i i' I iI Ig CIVET 11 0 Nl 144.35t t.r. (A/aRAOE SIC7LOID k . 1� w l -1 it Ii f I / I �I I i �i- . I aN M I J l 1 2:--Elf 14 ��jj,S�If I t r I Ike 2, is ...... �,4 __�S?�HI-_. sr I I -I 1: STATE Yis o �i + f SAI Ni sat al aOwmES IOf 41 r: S I 1 1 a q10° > aC• 3 NUN ': 1.I S7<y. k ({S.43t LI. m11 an IOf 5�10 I I cartel Teem �, - $ r S4„ 1 1 MOf. l t I Ii -1 14 1 1 ee4A e IN C I I �,,y 2°e.15 ylf lII 2S7.00 'K1 I i'r 1 1 Ayn—o `r ..... 1 10 I - I• S W/N'OS S 1171Y S°N SI'tr• a; fn s..f I' I I 1 1�7\o..7{CD rut 1 I I - ,I, Cd1 I , , MO _1 Tt R above I I log I y 1 1 1 •01�I IV" M : 1 tAe 0 vitioes rI I I 1 ":��,(, `11'1 Id I I I LOcAi tot I 11 I G r• 114 I 8 Id f I i A 7 11 I— I 1 1 e11Ir 1 P I 1 I D.u.. I _J I ^I LfL -.— I 1 I i III- r.o.c. I I H le I lo;1 ,eA L—_—._._F�SHiNS �R�C :ram .__J i it 1 ream OW i ' t I I �- l 1 I O••• I O¢ I I ® I I • I 1 1 I is f I a . I 0 1 2 1 t 11 I f 1 1 1 1 Sten I ii I I I I k' I I 1 1 _ 4 1 gg Jp A Ot j10L aw- K fC.YI ---I I Er --O°i kV-aM-a1J on ee..N r _ - HE I • HERITAGE INDUSTRIAL PARK I I I CIVEP VOL. see-217. PC. Is I I • SR.. ^ / I 1 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Request for Authorization to Enter Into Contractual Agreement with J.T. Dunkin and Associates for Impact Fee Study The consulting firm of J.T. Dunkin and Associates has agreed to work with the City of Southlake as the planning consultant for the City's impact fee study. This study is being conducted to a) update water and wastewater fees, and b) to implement roadway impact fees. They have submitted the attached professional services retainer agreement for consideration. As you will note in the scope of services, J.T. Dunkin will serve as the general coordinating agent between the City and the Impact Fee Consulting Team, to be comprised of the planning consultant, transportation engineers, water and sewer engineers, the attorneys and staff. They will also work closely with the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee. The fees and direct expenses for their portion of the entire project shall not exceed $20,000. Staff requests authorization to enter into a contract with J.T. Dunkin for the provision of these services. Please note that Wayne Olson is currently reviewing the attached document and will work with staff to finalize the agreement. Please let me or Greg Last, Director of Community Development know if you have any questions about the agreement or the scope of services. i4f SKY L V13—1 MEMORANDUM J. T. DUNKIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. L To: Shana K Yelverton, Assistant City Manager From: Dan Sefko, AICP /j/ • Subject: Impact Fee Contract and Scope Date: March 29, 1995 Please find attached our proposed contract for updating the City's impact fee program. We anticipate that each consultant would contract separately with the City. I have Included Barton- Aschman's proposed scope of service for your review. If it is acceptable, I will get them to submit a contract to you as soon as possible. Let me know if everything is in order and we can messenger originals to you. C L 513 -a PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RETAINER AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into between the City of Southiake,Texas and the firm of J.T.Dunkin&Associates, Inc.,Urban Planning Consultants, Dallas,Texas. The City of Southiake shall hereafter be referred to as the 'City"and J. T. Dunkin &Associates will be referred to as the Planning Consultant.' z WITNESSETH WHEREAS,the City desires to update its impact fee program in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS,the Consultant possesses experience, knowledge, and skill in the preparation of land use assumptions for Impact fees as prescribed by State law; and WHEREAS, the Consultant has recommended a role and procedure to provide the desired assistance and consultation; and WHEREAS, the City staff has agreed to undertake certain tasks to assist in the formulation of impact fees; NOW THEREFORE,for and in consideration of the premises and the agreements contained herein, City and Consultant hereby agree as follows: 1. Retention of Consultant. City hereby retains Consultant to provide professional services and Consultant shall provide those services in accordance with this Agreement. More specifically, but without limitation, Consultant shall report to and be directed by the Project Manager which will be designated by the City at the time of the execution of this Agreement. The Consultant shall perform in accordance with the following scope of service: SCOPE OF SERVICE TASK 1. PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT The Planning Consultant will act as the general coordinating agent between the City of Southiake and the Impact Fee Consulting Team. The Consulting Team shall consist of J.T. Dunkin & Associates, Inc. (Planning Consultant), Barton Aschman Associates, Inc. (Transportation Engineers),and Cheatham&Associates(Water&Sanitary Sewer Engineers). Fielding, Barrett and Taylor (Attorneys and Counselors) shall provide legal counsel to the team. Lewis McLain,Financial Consultant,shall coordinate the water and wastewater impact fees and the Planning Consultant shall coordinate the roadway impact fees. All meetings, requests for informatkm, and similar tasks will be processed through the Planning and Financial Consultants. It is the intent the Planning Consultant shall control the involvement and time of the roadway consulting team members and the Finance Consultant shall control the water and sewer consultant according to the scope of services of each team member and provided for by separate contracts with the City. 1 The Planning Consultant shall: 1.1 Meet with each Consultant Team Member and corresponding City Department Head and assist in identifying work tasks to be completed by the various Consultants and those to be completed by City Staff. 1.2 Organize a Study Team consisting of the Consulting Team and the respective Department Directors or their designees within the City. 1.3 Develop a time schedule and arrange meetings to accomplish each phase of the impact fee ordinance development. 1.4 Assist other consultants as may be required and provide planning input through the capital improvement plan phase. 1.5 Attend each Study Team meeting according to the schedule (8 estimated). 1.6 Attend all public hearings and workshops with the Advisory Committee and/or City Council, as necessary (10 estimated). 1.7 Provide input to the City Attorney, as necessary. 1.8 Coordinate printing of the final report. TASK II. DEVELOPMENT OF LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS The Planning Consultant shall: 2.1 Assist the traffic engineers in preparing the proposed service zones for inclusion in the Land Use Assumptions (LUA). 2.2 Draw Service Zone Map(s) suitable for reproduction and Inclusion in the WA report. 2.3 Revise the land use assumptions,meeting the requirements of Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code. This includes meeting with the engineering consultants to ensure that the format and contents are in a form suitable for use in the preparation of the Capital Improvement Plans. The WA will be initially prepared in draft format for review by the study team and Advisory Committee. After a consensus is reached regarding the projections contained in the LUA,the report will be prepared for public distribution and public hearing. 2.4 Prepare public hearing notices and recommend a format and procedure for receiving input. City Responsibilities The City shall perform the following tasks: A. Coordinate meeting times and places including notifying each study team member. 2 B. Review and comment on consultant recommendations. C. Publish all public hearing notices including all notices required in the newspaper. D. Provide to the Consultant all existing population, employment, base maps, and . other data which may be relevant to the impact fee program. E. Make all requests to the North Central Texas Council of Governments for data and/or assistance as may be appropriate and relevant to the impact fee program. F. Provide data as requested by separate letter. G. The City's attorney shall prepare the impact fee ordinance. 2. Fees and Expenses. The following is an estimate of the hours required to complete the tasks In Task I above: Task 1.1 - 4 hours Task 1.2 - 2 hours Task 1.3 - 4 hours Task 1.4 - 30 hours Task 1.5 - 40 hours Task 1.6 - 50 hours Task 1.7 - 8 hours Task 1.8 - 8 hours 146 total estimated hours The Consultant shall invoice the City on a monthly basis for the hours expended on each of the items identified in Task I of the Scope of Services. The billing rate shall be as follows: J.T. Dunkin - $95.00 per hour Dan Sefko - $75.00 per hour Staff Planner- $50.00 per hour Computer Operator- $45.00 per hour Drafting/Graphics- $35.00 per hour ' Typing and Clerical - $25.00 per hour The fee for preparing the land use assumptions according to Task II above is$8,000.00- The Consultant shall invoice the City for the total amount in Task II when the final land use assumption report has been submitted to the City. Direct expenses shall include printing, delivery, long distance telephone, and similar costs and shall be invoiced to the City at the Consultant's actual cost. Fees and direct expenses shall not exceed $12,000 for the completion of the Scope of Services as outlined in Task I above. The City shall be responsible only for those services actually • performed for the City by the Planning Consultant in Task I. The total amount for Task i and II shall not exceed $20,000. C 3 3. Billing. The Consultant may bill monthly for the hours expended for Task I. Direct expenses shall be submitted with receipts with the invoice for the Consultant's fees. All invoices shall be due within thirty (30) days after receipt. The Consultant shall invoice the amount for Task II when the LUA are completed. 4. Records. The Consultant shall maintain time sheets of all work done on behalf of the City and shall maintain expense statements. The time sheets and expense statements shall be made available to the City promptly upon request and summarized on each invoice. 5. Termination. The City may terminate this Agreement at any time,at will,upon'thirty(30) days written notice to the Consultant. 6. Ownership of Materials. All materials in the possession of the Consultant, created on behalf of the City for his tasks,shall remain the exclusive property of the City. The Consultant shall retain,whenever possible, custody or rights of access to all materials,whether preliminary or final, used in the preparation of their work for the City, including, by way of example, printer negatives, photography materials, and similar materials. 7. Notices. Any notice required or desired to be given to either party hereto shall be deemed to be delivered: (i)on the date of delivery, if hand delivered; (ii) one(1)day after sending, if sent by overnight courier,or(ill)three(3)days after the same is posted in a U.S.mall receptacle, postage prepaid, to the address of the applicable party set out below, such party's signature hereinbelow, if sent by mail. Either party hereto may change such patty's address for notice, but until written notice of such change is actually received by the other party, the last address of such party designated for notice shall remain such party's address for notice. 8. No Assignment. Neither party shall have the right to assign that party's interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. 9. Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement is held to be illegal, invalid, unenforceable, the legality, validity, or enforceability of the remaining terms or provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and in lieu of each such illegal, invalid, or unenforceable term or provision,there shall be added automatically to this Agreement a legal,valid,or enforceable term or provision as similar as possible to the term or provision declared illegal, invalid, or unenforceable. 10. Waiver. Either party shall have the right to waive any requirement contained in this Agreement, which is intended for the waiving party's benefit, but, except as otherwise provided herein,such waiver shall be effective only if in writing executed by the party for whose benefit such requirement is intended. 11. Governing Law. This Agreement and all of the transactions contemplated herein shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. The venue for any suit shall be in Dallas County, Texas. 12. Paragraph Headinas. The paragraph headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall in no way enlarge or limit the scope or meaning of the various and several paragraphs hereof. C 4 S.6 6 13. Binding Effect. Except as limited herein, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, devisees, personal and legal representatives, successors, and assigns. 14. Counterparts. This Agreement has been executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which shall .constitute but one and the same instrument. • 15. Relationship of Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed by the parties hereto or by any third party to create the relationship of principal and agent or of partnership or of joint venture or of any association whatsoever between the parties it being expressly understood and agreed that no provision contained in this Agreement nor any act or acts of the parties hereto shall be deemed to create any relationship between the parties other than the relationship of a purchaser and an Independent contractor. EXECUTED this day of , 1995. CITY: CONSULTANT: CiTY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS J. T. DUNKIN &ASSOCIATES, INC. By: By: Title: City Manager Title: President, J. T. Dunkin &Associates, Inc. City of Southlake,Texas Attest: City Secretary Attest: Approved as to form • • ADDRESS FOR NOTICE: CITY CONSULTANT City Manager J.T. Dunkin &Associates, Inc. City of Southlake 9876 Plano Road 667 North Carroll Avenue Dallas,Texas 75238 Southlake,Texas 76092 • LZ3-7 03/28/95 15:37 e214 490 9261 BARTON ASCHMAN 1003/008 ATTACHMENT 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES TASK 1.0: PROJECT INITIATION MEETINGS Two project initiation meetings will be held under this task. We will meet with the Study Team (Consultant team and City staff) to discuss the study methodology and approach, coordination between the consultant team and city staff, schedule,data needs,and proposed growth rates. We will then meet and present the proposed methodology and approach to the Advisory Committee. Task Products: 1. Study Team meeting(scheduled for April 5th,9:00 a.m.) 2. Advisory Committee meeting(scheduled for April 11, 7:00 p.m.) TASK 2.0 COMPILE DATA We will assemble available roadway inventory and traffic count data available from the city. This data will be reviewed and a list or additional data needs that are relevant to the study will be prepared Cand submitted to the City. For purposes of our fee estimate, we have assumed that the City will collect all additional data. Following completion of the data collection effort,we will compile the data into an impact fee database for use in subsequent analysis. Task Products: 1. List of additional data needs. 2. Existing Conditions database for subsequent analysis. TASK 3.0 DEVELOP SERVICE AREAS We will meet with the study team to develop the service area structure for the City. The service area boundaries will be developed based on the review of the following information: ■ Existing NCTCOG traffic survey zones(TSZ). • ■ Projected growth patterns ■ Potential roadway projects ■ Existing geographic features. ■ Existing thoroughfare system . ■ Existing Legislation limitations Task Products: 1. Study Area Boundary Map. ,__57,3-S 03/28/95 15:38 $214 490 9281 BARTON ASCHMAN Q 004/008 TASK 4.0 PREPARE INVENTORY OF EXISTING ROADWAYS Based on the data assembled and collected in Task 2.0, and the service area boundaries developed in Task 3.0,we will prepare an inventory of existing roadways in the City. The existing inventory will contain the following information,by service area: ■ Roadway segment name ■ Roadway segment limits ■ Length(in miles) ■ Number of lanes ■ Type(divided,undivided,minor arterial,major arterial,etc) ■ Existing traffic volume(by direction during the peak hour) ■ Capacity supplied ■ Existing deficiencies(in any) Task Products: 1. Existing roadway inventory by service area. TASK 5.0 DETERMINE NEW ROADWAY DEMAND We will work closely with the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) to determine the number of new trips that will be generated within each service area over the next ten years. The new trips will be multiplied by the average trip length to determine the new vehicle miles of demand that will be generated by new development. For purposes of our fee estimate,we have assumed that any fee charged by NCTCOG for providing services to this study will be paid under a separate agreement between the City of Southlake and the NCTCOG. NOTE: The ability for Barton-Aschman to comply with the schedule of this study is dependent on the delivery of new trip information from the NCTCOG. We will work closely with NCTCOG to facilitate the development of this information in a timely fashion. However,any delays that may occur that are beyond the control of Barton- Aschman will necessitate a revision to the study schedule Task Products: 1. ' New vehicle miles of demand generated by new development over the next ten years. TASK 6.0 PREPARE ROADWAY PROJECTS DATABASE We will meet with City Staff to review and discuss the proposed Capital Improvements Program developed by the City. This review will include proposed project limits, cost estimates, and design Ccharacteristics. We will utilize the information contained in the Capital Improvement Program to develop a roadway projects database. This database will include for each service area the following s�_y 01/28/95 15:39 '&214 490 9261 BARTON ASCHMA,\ 0005/008 information: ■ Roadway segment name • Roadway segment limits ■ Number of Lanes ■ Length ■ Type ■ Cost • Number of vehicle miles of capacity supplied Task Products: 1. Proposed roadway projects by service area. TASK 7.0 CALCULATE MAXIMUM FEE PER SERVICE AREA Based on the information develop in previous tasks,we will calculate the maximum cost per service unit(vehicle mile of travel) in each service area. Task Products: 1. Table containing the maximum fee per service unit for each service area. TASK 8.0 DEVELOP LAND USE EQUIVALENCY TABLE We will prepare a listing of specific land use type(based on ITE land use categories)and develop a recommended service unit generation rate for each land use. The service unit generation rate will be based on the number of primary trips generated by the land use during the peak hour, and the average trip length of each trip. Task Products: 1. Land use Equivalency Table. TASK 9.0 • DOCUMENTATION We will prepare a draft report that documents the methodology, findings,and recommendations of the study. We will submit ten(10) copies of the report to the City for review. Based on written comments received within two weeks from the date of submittal,we will prepare and submit ten (10)copies of the final report. We will also submit a computer disk containing the final report(in . WordPerfect version 6.0 for Windows format)and the database(Dbase 4 format)to the City. • ,S,a—iC ' 03/28/95 15:40 $214 490 9261 BARTON ASCHMAN Q1006/008 Task Products: 1. Draft Final report(10 copies) 2. Final report(10 Copies) 3. Computer files containing final report and impact fee database. TASK 10 MEETINGS In addition to the meetings identified above(2 -Task 1.0, 1 -Task 3.0, 1 -Task 6.0) we have assumed our attendance at the following meetings: • Advisory Committee Meeting-April 25, 1995, 7:00 p.m. • Study Team Meeting-April 26, 1995,9:00 a.m. • Advisory Committee Meeting-May 9, 1995,7:00 p.m. • Study Team Meeting-June 30, 1995, 9:00 aan. • Advisory Committee Meeting-July 5, 1995,7:00 p.m. • Advisory Committee Meeting-July 12, 1995, 7:00 p.m. • City Council Meeting-July 18, 1995, 7:00 p.m. • Public Hearing- September 5, 1995,TBA Additional meeting would be beyond the scope of this agreement and considered additional services. We are certainly available to attend any additional meetings deemed necessary. However,additional meetings are not part of the agreement and will be billed separately,based on time and expenses incurred. C L563// . 03/28/95 15:40 $214 490 9281 BARTON ASCHMAN Q 007/008 (110, ATTACHMENT la INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED BY CITY OF SOUTHLAKE • The following data will be required for the development of transportation impact fees for the City of Southlake: • Ease Map of City-Base map should be current,to scale and in reproducible form. • City Thoroughfare Plan Map- Current Thoroughfare Plan map to scale. • Existing Roadway Inventory-Inventory of all existing thoroughfares(arterial and collector streets)within the city limits. Specific information required for the inventory includes the following: Roadway name ▪ Roadway segment limits(From x To y) -Typically roadway segments are defined between two crossing thoroughfares. Roadway segment length(in miles) - Existing number of lanes Roadway type(divided, undivided, arterial, collector,etc) ■ Peak Hour Directional Traffic Volumes - Existing traffic volumes are used to determine existing demand and deficiencies.Desirably,this data is available for each roadway segment identified in the existing inventory. Traffic volume data should be as current as possible (corresponding to base year land use assumptions). ■ - jmpact Fee Roadway Improvement Plan (CIP) - Information needed as part of the CIP includes the following: • Roadway name Roadway segment limits • Number of planned lanes • Roadway segment length(in miles) - Roadway type Costs-The total roadway cost is typically broken down into engineering, right-of- • way, construction,lighting and signalization, and financing components. Amount of any previous monies collected for this particular roadway improvement. ■ Future traffic volume forecasts and traffic generation statistics by traffic survey zone -Based • on approved land use assumptions and other long range forecasts. 09/.28/95 15:41 '&214 490 9281 BARTON ASCHMAN Q 008/008 ATTACHMENT 2 FEE ESTIMATE Our fee for completing the Scope of Services outlined above will be based on our hourly rates, current at the time of performance,for staff services rendered. Based on our experience in studies of this type,the fee for the study will be$35,500.00. We will not exceed the total budget without receiving your prior authorization. If the need for additional services should arise,we will seek your authorization and,before proceeding and if requested,we will supply you with our best estimate of the fee to be incurred. L$3-/.3 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager — SUBJECT: Request for Authorization to Enter Into Agreements with Consultants for Impact Fee Study Several firms have agreed to work with the City of Southlake as consultants for the City's impact fee study. This study is being conducted to: a) update water and wastewater fees, and b) implement roadway impact fees. As you will note in the scope of services in the attached draft agreements, each consultant will be involved with a portion of the study, working with staff and other consultants participating on the Impact.Fee Study Team. They will also work closely with the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee. The proposed fees are identified in each letter of agreement. Staff requests authorization to negotiate the final details of the letters of agreement and proceed with utilization of each consultant. Please note that Wayne Olson is currently reviewing the attached documents and will work with staff to finalize the agreements. Please let me or any staff member of the study team (Bob Whitehead, Lou Ann Heath, Greg g Last, Ron Harper, Tom Elgin)know if you have any questions about the agreement or the scope of services. SK L c- CHEATHAM AND DRAFT c, ASSOCIATES March 31, 1995 Ms. Shana Yelverton — Assistant City Manager City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Proposal for Engineering Services for Assistance in the Development of Street Impact Fees, and Updating Water & Sewer Impact Fees Dear Shana: We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal for engineering services. It is our understanding that your request is for us to assist in the development of a street impact fee program, and updating of water and sewer impact fees. The specific role of our firm which will be provided pursuant to this proposal will include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. The review of numbers, assumptions, and reports prepared in cooperation with city staff, consultants, and the city attorney. 2. Attendance at meetings of the impact fee study team, the capital improvements advisory committee, the city council, and other necessary meetings with the city staff, consultants, and city attorney in order to coordinate the update of the water/wastewater impact fees and the adoption of roadway impact fees. 3. Providing water and wastewater demand characteristics for the City of Southlake for incorporation into the computer model, including average water and wastewater demand per capita, peak hour and peak day. The output will be total demand data as well as water and wastewater flow data. 4. Work with planning consultant to develop roadway service zones for the City where impact fees will be applied. 5. Performing calculations of the construction costs for various street sections based upon the thoroughfare plan, in conjunction with the traffic engineering consultant. Estimated construction costs will be based upon current unit prices for construction. Providing data with regard to the capacity and the capital plan from third party suppliers such as Trinity River Authority and the City of Fort Worth, providing cost estimates and capacity allocation for the City of Southlake for incorporation into the computer model. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design,Inc. 1601 E. Lamar Blvd. • Suite 200•Arlington,Texas 76011 817/548-0696•Metro 265-8836•Fax 817/265-8532 DRAFT Ms. Shana Yelverton March 31, 1995 City of Southlake Page 2 6. Revising as necessary and providing an updated water/wastewater and roadway capital improvements plan with specific written descriptions of cost estimates. The usage capacity will be matched to the growth and demand estimates with time segregation of the next ten years. 7. Making necessary professional decisions in cooperation with city staff in order to analyze and recommend updates to the water/wastewater impact fees. Making necessary professional decisions in cooperation with city staff in order to analyze and recommend adoption of roadway impact fees. 8. Preparing and providing maps and charts for display or handout at meetings and public hearings and for publication with notices in the newspaper. Our fee for the above services will be a lump sum of$5,750.00. Hopefully, this proposal will be acceptable to you. If so, please sign at the bottom and return a copy to our office. Respectfully, • Eddie Cheatham, P.E. W:\PROPOSALISOUTHLAK\W&SIM P.FEE Authorization to Proceed with scope of services outlined above: Accepted Dated C a-3 City of Southlake,Texas s MEMORANDUM March 31, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Request for Authorization to Enter Into Agreements with Consultants for Impact Fee Study Several firms have agreed to work with the City of Southlake as consultants for the City's impact fee study. This study is being conducted to: a) update water and wastewater fees, and b) implement roadway impact fees. As you will note in the scope of services in the attached draft agreements, each consultant will be involved with a portion of the study, working with staff and other consultants participating on the Impact Fee Study Team. They will also work closely with the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee. The proposed fees are identified in each letter of agreement. Staff requests authorization to negotiate the final details of the letters of agreement and proceed with utilization of each consultant. Please note that Wayne Olson is currently reviewing the attached documents and will work with staff to finalize the agreements. Please let me or any staff member of the study team (Bob Whitehead, Lou Ann Heath, Greg Last, Ron Harper, Tom Elgin)know if you have any questions about the agreement or the scope of services. favi 56_ , DRAFT � City,, _ Southlake of oUthlQk' March 30, 1995 Gary Fidces Mr. Lewis F. McLain, Jr. Mayor Pro Tern: Fiscal PlanningConsultant Jerry Farrier McLain and Associates Councilmembers: 2515 Nature Blvd. Micha Ftichanne WRalph Evans Carrollton, Texas 75006 Stephen W.Apple Sr. Jon Michael Franks Re: Performance of Independent Fiscal Planning L.wam,bsganss p Consultant Services Related to Update of Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvement City Curtis E. Plan and Impact Fees Assistant City Manager. Dear Lewis: Shana K.Yelverton City Secretary: This letter sets forth the condition and provisions of Independent Fiscal Planning Sandra L.LeGrand P Consultant services to be provided by your firm to the City of Southlake in connection of the City's Impact Fee Ordinance pursuant to Chapter 395 of the C Local Government Code. ' Once the City has authorized consultants to proceed with coordination of the update, you will be notified to begin your services pursuant to this agreement. In order to accomplish the update of water and sewer fees and the development of roadway impact fees under Chapter 395, the City will utilize an Impact Fee Study Team which will consist of a planning consultant (serving as project coordinator), the City Attorney, a traffic consultant, a project engineer, city staff, and you, as the independent fiscal planning consultant. The planning consultant will coordinate the overall analysis, review and update/development of the impact fees as necessary, with cooperation of the project engineer, traffic consultants, City Attorney, staff and you. The consultant will necessarily rely on data and factual information from the aforementioned parties. It is expected that you will provide necessary back-up information and data in response to the consultant's or staff's request for information. Such backup data should be provided within a reasonable period of time from the date of the request or as agreed at the time of the request. The specific role of your firm which will be provided pursuant to this letter of agreement will include, but not limited to, the following: (..., 5 o-z 667 North Carroll Avenue• Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 • FAX (817) 488-6796 or Metro (817) 481-0036 'AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER' 7 DRAFT C 1. Attend project initiation meetings to discuss the study methodology and approach, coordination, schedule, data needs, and proposed growth rates. Attend and participate in an orientation meeting for the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee. 2. Assist the study team in the evaluation of costs eligible for recovery, accounting and bonding procedures and discussion of double taxation issues (water/wastewater and roadway). 3. Work with finance director in the preparation of an amortization schedule for various debt issues for ten years versus bond year payoff or expected life of the project (water/wastewater and roadway). 4. Work with planning consultant and engineering consultant to develop the computer model with land use assumptions and capital project list, including the time period designation in which the projects will be needed. Assist with the development of variables built into the model, including calculation of maximum impact fee, calculation of adopted impact fee and percentage recovery, calculation of impact fee/utility rate sensitivity table, and estimate of impact fee revenues and impact fee expenditures by year. Develop debt related assumptions along with other financial results (water/wastewater and roadway). 5. Write portions of the impact fee report related to the financing and accounting issues (water/wastewater and roadway). 6. Assist in reconciliation of the water/wastewater impact fees collection since the adoption of water/wastewater impact fees. 7. Attend meetings identified in the project schedule dated March 29, 1995. In consideration of the performance of the services hereunder, the City of Southlake agrees to reimburse you on an hourly rate. On or about the first of each month, you will submit an invoice to the City for services performed by you during the previous month. The total cost of the services pursuant to this agreement shall not exceed $17,340.00. No fees in excess of this amount shall be paid by the City without prior written consent of the City. C _50-3 DRAFT C If the terms of this agreement are acceptable to you, please sign below and return the original letter to me. Very truly yours, Curtis E. Hawk City Manager CEH/SKY/lc AGREED TO AN ACCEPTED BY: Lewis F. McLain, Jr. Date McLain and Associates c:I xpfeles l impadfee 1 McLain.llr C 5b — Lt- City of Southlake,Texas r. MEMORANDUM March 31, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Shana K. Yelverton, Assistant City Manager — SUBJECT: Request for Authorization to Enter Into Agreements with Consultants for Impact Fee Study Several firms have agreed to work with the City of Southlake as consultants for the City's impact fee study. This study is being conducted to: a) update water and wastewater fees, and b) implement roadway impact fees. As you will note in the scope of services in the attached draft agreements, each consultant will be involved with a portion of the study, working with staff and other consultants participating on the Impact Fee Study Team. They will also work closely with the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee. The proposed fees are identified in each letter of agreement. L' I Staff requests authorization to negotiate the final details of the letters of agreement and proceed with utilization of each consultant. Please note that Wayne Olson is currently reviewing the attached documents and will work with staff to finalize the agreements. Please let me or any staff member of the study team (Bob Whitehead, Lou Ann Heath, Greg 4 Last, Ron Harper, Tom Elgin)know if you have any questions about the agreement or the scope of services. if L 5t - i 7 , ' DRAFT (. j1az__ Cityof Southlake D u t H a k' March 30, 1995 Gary Rdces Mr. Gary Jost Mayor ProTem: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Jerry Farrier 5485 Belt Line Road Councilmembers: Suite 199 MiW. ael REvans Dallas, Texas 75240 W.Ralph Evans Stephen W.Apple Sr. Jon Michael Franks Re: Performance of Traffic Consultant Services Related to Update of Andrew L.Wambsganss Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvement Plan and Impact Fees City Manager. Curtis E.Hawk Dear Mr. Jost: Assistant City Manager. Shane K.Yelverton • This letter sets forth the condition and provisions of traffic consultant services City Secretary: to be provided by your firm to the City of Southlake in connection of the City's sands L.LeGrand Impact Fee Ordinance pursuant to Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code. (00, Once the City has authorized consultants to proceed with coordination of the update, you will be notified to begin your services pursuant to this agreement. Wi In order to accomplish the update of water and sewer fees and the development of roadway impact fees under Chapter 395, the City will utilize an Impact Fee Study Team which will consist of a planning consultant (serving as project coordinator), an independent fiscal planning consultant, the City Attorney, a project engineer, city staff, and you, as the traffic consultant. The planning consultant will coordinate the overall analysis, review and update/development of the impact fees as necessary, with cooperation of the financial and traffic consultants, City Attorney, staff and you. The consultant will necessarily rely on data and factual information from the aforementioned - parties. It is expected that you will provide necessary back-up information and data in response to the consultant's or staff request for information. Such backup data should be provided within a reasonable period of time from the date of the request or as agreed at the time of the request. The specific role of your firm which will be provided pursuant to this letter of agreement will include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Attend project initiation meetings to discuss the study (mei methodology and approach, coordination, schedule, data needs, Jf E_Z. 667 North Carroll Avenue• Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481-5581 • FAX (817) 488-6796 or Metro (817) 481-0036 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER' DRAFT and proposed growth rates. Attend and participate in an orientation meeting for the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee. 2. Assemble available roadway inventory and traffic count data available from the City. Compile data into an impact fee database for use in subsequent analysis. 3. Develop, in conjunction with study team, roadway service area structure for the City. The service area boundaries will be developed based on the review of existing NCTCOG traffic survey zones (TSZ), projected growth patterns, potential roadway projects, existing geographic features, existing thoroughfare system, and existing legislative limitations. 4. Prepare an inventory of existing roadways in the City containing • information by service area which will include roadway segment name, roadway segment limits, length(in miles), number of lanes, type (divided, undivided, minor arterial, major arterial, etc.), existing traffic volume (by direction during peak hour), capacity supplied, existing deficiencies (if any). 0 5. Work with the North Central Council of Governments (NCTCOG) to determine new vehicle miles of demand generated by new development over the next ten years. 6. Review the proposed Capital Improvements Program, including proposed project limits, cost estimates, and design characteristics. This information will be utilized to develop a roadway projects database. This database will include for each service area the following information: roadway segment name, roadway segment limits, number of lanes, length, type, cost, number of vehicle miles of capacity supplied, to be provided by the City. 7. Calculate the maximum cost per service unit (vehicle mile of travel) in each service area. 8. Prepare listing of specific land use type and develop a recommended service unit generation rate for each land use. The service unit generation rate will be based on the number of primary trips generated by the land use during the peak hour, and the average trip length of each trip. C 5E -3 ) 4 • DRAFT 9. Prepare a draft report that documents the methodology, fmdings, and recommendations of the study. Submit ten copies of preliminary report and ten copies of the final report. Provide computer disk containing final report and the database. 10. Attend meetings identified in the project schedule dates March 29, 1995. In consideration of the performance of the services hereunder, the City of Southlake agrees to reimburse you on an hourly rate. On or about the first of each month, you will submit an invoice to the City for services performed by you during the previous month. The total cost of the services pursuant to this agreement shall not exceed $35,500.00. No fees in excess of this amount shall be paid by the City without prior written consent of the City. If the terms of this agreement are acceptable to you, please sign below and • return the original letter to me. Very truly yours, C, Curtis E. Hawk City Manager CEH/SKY/lc AGREED TO AN ACCEPTED BY: Gary Jost • Date Barton-Aschman, Inc. c:I wpfrlesl impactfeel Barton hr C 5 .-�- r City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM CITY MANAG R March 30, 1995 — Q TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, P.E., Director of Public Works Department SUBJECT: Award of Bids for Paving and Drainage Improvements Phase II, South White Chapel Blvd. From Big Bear Creek to F.M. 1709 GENERAL INFORMATION City Council rejected the bid of White Chapel Paving at their March 7, 1995 meeting. Staff was requested to rebid the project. Advertisements were published on March 12 and March 19. Bids were publicly opened and read aloud on March 24 at 10:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers. BID TABULATION The engineer's estimate for this project was $221,185. See attached bid tabulations prepared by Dunaway Associates. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS The Base bid consists of pavement repair and a 2-inch asphalt overlay. This will result in a total pavement thickness in this area of 4-inches. FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT Funds for these projects will be provided by the $3 million bond sale. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the City Council award the following bid to low bidder Sunmount Corporation in the amount of$211,295. Sunmount Corporation has performed for the City in the past, and has done satisfactory work. Please place this on the April 4, 1995 agenda for Council consideration. BW Attachments: Bid Tabulation Map of Project c:lwpfileslmenwslwtchp.bid • 5F-I • ,; w , L - . 1 ...,.:E.:: ¢ "�> - . O b 0 J O, o A W N r p b00JO, V. zo6 _AQ Z, a, [ f• I h CF - P xaHH g = 0 - i ;-, 'i- v if 0.-:,:,.-,::„: iii,,,i,„:,.. , _ - _ - t E. g. m 8, . 9 2,0 0 t ht A I d L E. g s 7 I �. ; 'r 8 n - ;3 a. 6 t4.1 n. ' $ 3 c Fa R .6. 3 e`� w T a0 In In >ro Cpz V. _ r v O1.1 r N A . 0, N y. 8 J8 Q >^ A O0 88p o _ Ola,-) V V. K V. V. K V 4, H H H bf H H H H H H H H H Hi H H h H H 0 .: y 1n : V� g N W : V. p $ :$ 4 7 S S O O O 8 8 8 8 8 8 8: 8 8 8 8 8 $ b Hd w:.• y 4/ H H H H H H H H H 4! H. H H 41 H H H H H N H(0. '' i. 7 � ^ J O6, w N A:: N .� o 00 as :88Q pQp to O� pp� R " J Q ..O S �O pp.: �; C O O O 8 O. C : � O O O; �n �: O �� C O b H 0o VJ. J A gig 8 8 gag 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 . 8 8 : $ 8 8 ,.8 Ii H H 41 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H z O. 10 O 8 J J N .NO V, O O V. L., 8 O �1 'U �••� A W N i 8 it', 8 8 VJ, oN 8 8 vp, 8 8 o a 8 g 8 000o .. 8 8 8 0 r H 4/ H H H H H H H H H 1V2. H 4) H H- 44 H H H H H �r V• O b O. pWp�� In yp, O, p0p0 N 7yO, ppN. yN, .y+, O8, 00 .J.. V. if r� r '0 T O 8 VJ, - O 8 . O V. . O. O O O N 8 O J 8 8. o g 8 g 8 8 8 8 S 8 g 8 0 8 8 g 8 $ 8 8 8 8 4, H H- H 41 H H H H 4Y H H' :!.....--a H'; H H H '..N ,: H 4y H N {.p1 Q� pp�� N ,pp,�, . ff b �. f7 `.' -. O, O S yy�.6 O:! - O 00 O -N W V. pN :•� ,! H `. H H'. H H H H` H ::H H H H 41 H H H H H 4► 41 H H: 'N N O V. V. ,N..• u, :-.'-':41.':'''''':-... A 00 •(.J w , b A y .r J a bE. br O .. rr � H 0 8: ' 0 1J+, ;8 � 25 25 0 � $ £� 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 H H H 4f H H H H H H H H H H H H H N H H H z 8 IC: W N ... J to N t8o q O1 O O 8 N O O INI, J W 8 UAO In. A 8 O E G . 8 8 0'0 8 o e 8 8 8 8 8 8 Ao t 1 8 = 0 8 8 8 �Rio H H 41 41 41 4f 41 H H 41 H H H H H H H 41 H V! 4/ H 4 N r Opps > e W L .. A V, u J C, V, in V, }J N �1 b N .—.. ONO O. to W O R 8 8 $ . 8 N 8 8 � 8 . � a o p c o gig , 8 z n Z 8 8 $ 8 8 8 •8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 s o 8 8 8 8 y 5F-0Z City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-167, Second Reading, ZA 95-18 Rezoning Request REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for 1.45 acres situated in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, Tract 2C LOCATION: 2111 E. Southlake Blvd. OWNER/APPLICANT: Frank A. Ritz CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "0-1" Office District LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use NO.NOTICES SENT: Seven(7) RESPONSES: One written response received from within the 200'notification area: * William Craig Willan/Omega Engr., 175 Westwood, in favor. P&Z ACTION: March 9, 1995; Approved(7-0)ZA 95-18 Rezoning Request COUNCIL ACTION: March 21, 1995; Approved (5-0) First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-167 STAFF COMMENTS: This property is within the 65 'LDN' Noise Contour and requires an Avigation Easement to be filed of record. Attached is a copy of a letter Mr. Ritz sent to George Barclay and other residents in Woodland Heights Addition. (.., KPG/bls G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES95\95-18Z.WPD 1.1(4-1 fr ' \/ 3�Ln •I to r._.,_... 3AIJI ' 1AI ii&A . xla__� U t x u 20 a (, �/11P `, �O � ififigingttt t***4 4.4,#$ �T- — t f x 1►AIIIIIInikt ri:Cti1ul���' SCEOOL ' 2 , w 101 1 102A --I.1 '«" I ycx ruf"' •'a ' ti �: 7 r \_ Fr ; t. I.tAI I �.51114 a. IRICH IUD FADS '" R ' r tt lit do THO6MiAS R -.HAN A ll!lial I111:11ll—7.,,,Iiii ~ >r ;,, '14111 3 '• Cee`-A �, ,{ram• j 'ailw lu w'F`.' ' ,� n .IMI IT iell ,c : ,...hii—ow • . MOWN Mai 3A �, III >m aeu SA NORTHWEST P Wy a-ST x • m>t x d ' ` ` �C rogi S i 9B • ,� wA } , 262 VI IA w UtA ylA IAN \I.i . i ��� xA 1 II 6 I I.7t 1 I IX 1 i 1 ' 'i I 2 1 lopOtH . I JOHN A. M•: - r' 1.11 .# 1 9)111114 I(3I I 3. "Ir 1 7 ' M 4iii1 ! 4 ex en A ix" stow tla J i , ti y -- --T r y i,1 illa TRACT MAP t'j i, IA IC GAO ©�I r ' 7A-4 lc4 1\� OW in al ii 1 I I , , , cc: City of Southlake Attn: Karen P. Gandy Zoning Administrator 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 cc: Mr. John G. Taylor 209 Eastwood Drive Southlake, Texas 76092 cc: Mr. Dennis E. Minder 223 Eastwood Drive Southlake, Texas 76092 cc: Mr. David E. Morgan 210 Westwood Drive Southlake, Texas 76092 cc: Mr. & Mrs. George& Corrine Tuttle 219 Eastwood Drive Southlake, Texas 76092 Cim•• cc: Mrs. Donna Schroctke 211 Eastwood Drive Southlake, Texas . cc: Mrs. Donna L. Slechta 218 Eastwood Drive Southlake, Texas cc: Mr. Don W. Light 200 Westwood Drive Southlake, Texas 76092 i)pbt-1 L 4i N 4 N -t ••tll , • (V tLl •U m cn cc I ^o) I--- Q O 4114044 ® T a `� L to -E cc 2 CD z `` 1 me, v cu v N v• a.-. = czA ��� a ) \ ~</ u) _ U.< 2 = \\D <IL. O o ;\ ..Ne LI Q N it Q\ p F r` y, N Q L t', N COd..,i. ': ¢p G Cl) L•• U mJ •�~' . N W N L1. ¢°CO°. i N . • \ . \\ Z0 coibow. (4 , a) I c U _ �/ t '� a 0. Ul O V 'n § N O P m r- ., , in 0 Z y I- O Q N �o N N I a'I " Li Z N ►- • N 0 V) IS. W 0 CO GO I - —c, 0 (, Z N I IH Q E a. Q �r\ a I I r,p I I 1 al •92 OSL c U) a U I $ ¢ n a) I InN %-I c °° NOUIW Q �—ar z2 CO I� U z U Q "J I `t Q m N --- - , WE' � o a cc.. � in iI •• aat • COQ _ Z Q < f)h.-S \ N N to p CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-167 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, w AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF / THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING` / CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING 1.45 ACRES SITUATED IN THE JOHN A. FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 529, TRACT 2C, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO "0-1" OFFICE DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL) OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETE . G THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND G RAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; 4(.• PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; DING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southl e, ex is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety,morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the G:\O R D\ZON I NG\480.167 Page 1 N / -- facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the.City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bough!or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,changed. and amended as shown and described below: G:\ORD\ZONI NG\480.167 Page 2 Being a 1.45 acre tract of land situated in the John A. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 529, Tract 2C, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural to "0-1" Office District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable ki•-• consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. • • Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court G:\ORD\ZONING\480.167 Page 3 _ r\A- or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this-Ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: L CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY L G:\ORD\ZONING\480.167 Page 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L L G:\O R D\ZO N I NG\480.167 Page 5 1l A-l0 (we EXHIBIT"A" BEING a 1.45 acre tract of land out of the JOHN A. FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 529, situated in Tarrant County, Texas, and being a portion of-that certain 80.0 acre tract of land as conveyed to M.J. HOLLIS, by Deed as recorded in Volume 361, Page 375 Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said 1.45 acres of land being more fully described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGSURVEY and sametbeingt820.0 feet West andeSouthh00rdegreese40Fminuutes West 20.0 feet from the Northeast corner of the referenced HOLLIS 80 acre tract; THENCE East and at all times being 20.0 feet South of and parallel to the North line of said Survey line, 111.22 feet to an iron rod for corner; • TIJENCE South 00 degrees 40 minutes East, a distance of 567.5 feet to a 1 1/2 inch iron pipe found for corner; THENCE West, 111.22 feet to a 3/4 inch iron rod found for corner; THENCE North 00 degrees 40 minutes West, a distance of 567.5 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and containing 1.45 acres of land, more or lees, and being the same land as conveyed by LUKE THRASHER and wife, LELA THRASHER, to LESTER H. THRASHER and wife, OPHELIA THRASHER, by deed recorded in VoluExcept:e 2All,thate ortion Deed of abovedproppertynasCdescribedxin. save and Agreed Judgment in favor of the State of Texas in Condemnation Suit #17-129535-90 described as follows: BEING 0.041 of an acre of land, more or less, situated in the County y of Tarrantiltito, Abstract No.State29, an of dabeinggdpartnofoattracthe ofJlandN AconveyE conveyed OPHELIA THRASHER THRASHER to WAYNE E. HOWELL and wife, LENA MAE HOWELL by deed dated October 10, 1984 and recorded in Volume 7976, Page 70 of the Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, which 0.041 of an acre of land, more or less, is more particularly described as follows: • BEGINNING at the point of intersection of the proposed Southerly right-of-way line of F,M, Highway 1709 with the East line of said HOWELL tract, said point being 65.00 feet Southerly of and at right angles to centerline survey station 408+73.54, and also being North 01 degrees 02 minutes 46 seconds West a distance of 553.09 feet and from the Southeast corner of said HOWELL tract; 1) THENCE North 89 degrees 53 minutes 01 seconds West along the proposed Southerly right-of-way line of said F.M. Highway 1709. a distance of 111.30' feet; 2 THENCE North 01 degrees 04 minutes 06 seconds West along the West line of said HOWELL tract a distance of 14.55 feet to a point in the existing Southerly right-of-way line of said F.M. Highway 1709; 3) THENCE South 89 degrees 53 minutes 32 seconds East along the existing Southerly right-of-way line of said F.M. Highway 1709 a distance of 111.30 feet; 4 THENCE South 01 degrees 02 minutes 46 seconds East along the Eaet line of said HOWELL tract a distance of 14.56 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. (re G:\ORD\ZONING14110.l67 Page 6 f)A— ll t i City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 1995 TO: Curtis E.Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-168, Second Reading ZA 95-19 Rezoning Request REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for 6.0 acres situated in the Christopher Dart Survey, Abstract No. 2003, Tract 1D LOCATION: West side of N. Peytonville Ave., 300' South of Brittany Ct. and approximately 475'North of Plantation Dr. OWNER: Joan Crowe APPLICANT: Graham Associates, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: . "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single-Family Residential District • LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential/100-Year Flood Plain NO.NOTICES SENT: Seven(7) RESPONSES: One written response received from within the 200' notification area: * David A. Wirtala, 1852 N. Peytonville Ave.,undecided; concerned that the drainage ditch may be altered and more water run-off will come onto his property; also concerned that the buildings will alter the drainage as has happened from the Plantation Drive houses. * Note that Michael J. Costello, 1862 N. Peytonville Ave., has withdrawn his opposition. P &Z ACTION: March 9, 1995; Approved(7-0)ZA 95-19 Rezoning Request COUNCIL ACTION: March 21, 1995; Approved(5-0)First Reading, Ordinance No. 480-168 r,to KPG/bls G:\WPFIMEMO\CASES95\95-19Z.WPD 98-' '--------- - --t J ( At� u+ \ ' 3A18 '1, 3AlA • �.\ O ,jj Al ©.Un�. 7GgGt0OP �ti - SURVEY A-1310 % (� I .0 .- t !A tC 21.76 Ac ,-� • , •).- . l 7AI L. 8 i 1� � . l M 1 . M� 1 A � � i� M itlit Ti(�I SURICY A-IIJI \`_`. �--- ---1/ 7A5 1E12 SIAevEY A-1107 151C • 1` 4A1 ,a IB2 1181 15.t9 Ac 3 �, /�' 20011 Ac ;- 7 :troy��; I EgTES ,3.77 A< 84.22 Ac / 2A2 2.126 Ac �/ 7A1A ,810 "'� 8.182A -- v�1 5 t8 ;t (ROANOME DOA RD No.3M0) 1N • 7A i I1B2A1 c 181 , 7.36 Ac SA op., REST OCK S1R:E1 - t .. ..- .-. -.-_ I 9 gIA • Rq '� ``t a^. --- S11151.0,4: JSAc ORG 1 ' 1 IA1 -I----4/- r; 1 oVE �GR __ _ •11 tplD G��rrt� IP M 1I I , . I ", 'c \III\ - 1`I1 A,� , I /1 I , 1 1 382 , i , 1A2 ç7r Tirw t, , 1 L Q�t 6 DART I ,A I,At .. 14. AMIf --- - •- t vEr A-72 tbfr SURKr A VEY A-IOOJ 17 Ac P , ;�N 1M 10.15 Ac 3 S1- ,O . <� 5 Ac IS Ac a E 2A2A ' rir, x x x 2C1 else P 1 I 'D' 10 A< _l 53%212 „ 3 , 2A2 C 2C 4. . `r� _ .1�1 Lr 16;.�r.O 'O� Ip Ac -- _ �r s ,c> L f� ) TO �1 ! 7 2e 3A ` ('11N' rS!! 1'�a-'2 - , 1 � t t 1 13 Ac i ` ` ljf i 1 . -\ U BAKE 611 -COMPti t t 1 , r --J 1 ' 1A 1_ 2J t ', ,1 ``u _ A D 1 ,r - �19'fp I r 1r 1. 1 �? I � v Iv' i P� _A_ _ ' V ' OObIb C4�NId�G°3Cg5 _, . 30 3E f sok. AIr73J. - 1 t E wW' ,�y�AL�.{Iz 7= R 00.3. , 1 , t 1 26 Ac t 7 Ac 0 3B2 L 4G;IOO �1 — N®��• S53 Ac 118 EA . 8A EAIt 8'%I 11: 1• �� 'i 1�''�,wit'' _ 1 G.l� A t nC I tlE A 1 '•, II t t t 1 /'*i — ��'1 r' 1 1 w TRACT MAP 8AI 8.615 98 1 ' -- -- 1 - ,, ,' I, — .., UA' -- r-- `�--t i 1 Jl I ttp r p, , —'I r- ' -�28,8 2 281 t _I a'9,� - MA �AY',_G_ 4 ' IA B 5 l�� 1 - I'k 1A2 BRI - Spin #12 Representative 1 A 1 Al / David Baltimore i _ r) "SF-1 A" ((�. - VEY A -2003 1 17 A c J. Horn; I J. Hornick "SF-1A 2R I "AG" M. Costello Y. Meyer "SF-1A" �,. / \ : r1 i\ N D. Wirtala "AG" 1"AG„ I I L. Farenbrook ` ., "AG" i I I I I 14. F\- " 1 I I1 N 1 I J I I - ? S P ' iri A i PLANTATION DR AI \ I I I /. I � � i I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I - - - I I - - - I I - - - 3B Bi ' ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING I / I I 1?)-3 I I a ' liY • �9 ` W c h H W .0.1i, rc1 R wy;q;i!ii liiii J R ., �mLn. os« IV:i el ® 1 . i u m _--- - _-= —ems- ------ - - • e • r '4 '/ ','/ ,/ 6e:: I/ � /' r%' .3 6 i - ""� f' S ✓, \ N: f I-•. ?S'r',1 \ s c I s; 7/ \ \ m l fi - l/ n-' I q .�- /' <` ! 1 I }.%// � I �b / z / m ••9} I / I I pp � all: a 1 j d ;l+ S , 'g I N. F1 ! x . i l .I I 121Idi i, , aI 1 , i, 6 • / ' 1 '', �r it io ':/..://, i'`, 11 i f 1 III I i a •• e' I i iii II C 'g= ay -,/ -� �li 9 i ; ill fit .Ell III / r 6 !� 9 is kx ii3 -I �j ilt RI 11 1 1�! 1'91 11 '* ' -�� _ E kill li 51 Ili 1i1 JI /g i� i • I. • 1 - - — ---- la—y %�- CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ,7 Lir, / ORDINANCE NO. 480-168 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS // AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING, 7 CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LANIi_ WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING 6.0 ACRES SITUATED IN THE CHRISTOPHER DART SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 2003, TRACT 1D, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "AG" AGRICULTURAL TO"SF-1A"SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL I WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND I AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; ' PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFF WSPAPER; AND ` PROVIDING AN EFFEC I " DATE. / „' EREAS, the City of uthlake, Texas is a home rule City actin: der its Charter adopted b the electorate p t to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Tex oca ernment Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial,residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety,morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG" Agricultural , under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and r— WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,at a public hearing called by ,fir the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these G:\ORD\ZONI NG\480.168 Page 1 13—S changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate.neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, • WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly 'requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population,and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation,water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City (61, of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, G:\ORD\ZON I NG\480.168 Page 2 lb—CP c...., c is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being a 6.0 acre tract of land situated in the Christopher Dart Survey, Abstract No. 2003, Tract 1D, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AG" Agricultural to "SF-1A" Single..-Family Residential District. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs,sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future;to Aar' lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water,parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full arid complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. JP Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a ki..„ violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. G:\O RD\ZON I NG\480.l68 Page 3 diV Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This Qrdinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. • ii� }f MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: 'Lye CITY SECRETARY G:\O R D\ZO N I NG\480.168 Page 4 _ EXHIBIT "A" BEING a 6.000 acre tract of land conveyed to Joan Crowe, as recorded in Volume 11810, Page 2171, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Said tract being out of the Christopher Dart Survey, Abstract No. 2003, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a set 1/2" iron rod in the southeast corner of said Crowe tract, said point also being in the north line of Lamp Estates, as recorded in Volume 388-142, Page 92, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE South 89°47'16" West, a distance of 721.30 feet along north line of said Lamp Estates to a found 5/8" iron rod; THENCE North 45°00'00" West, a distance of 125.00 feet to a found 5/8" iron rod; THENCE North, a distance of 237.96 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod, said point being the • northwest corner of said Crowe tract, said point also being in the north line of said Lamp Estates; THENCE North 89°39'00" East, a distance of 832.56 feet along the north line of said Crowe tract to a set 1/2" iron rod, said point also being the east line of Peytonville Avenue (a variable width R.O.W.); THENCE South 00°02'14" East, a distance of 328.62 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and CONTAINING 261,336 square feet, 6.000 acres of land, more or less. G:1ORD\ZONINGU80.168 Page 6 1 1pq 4 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy,Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-143,First Reading ZA 94-85 Rezoning and Development Plan/Versailles REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Development Plan of Versailles, being a 78.046 acre tract of land situated in the J.W. Hale Survey,Abstract No. 803,Tracts .lA and 1A3 This development proposes 102±residential lots with a density of 1.31 / j du/acre. [LOCATION East Side of South Carroll Ave.,North Side of East Continental Blvd. OWNER: 4 i ercho Kochweop Partnership APPLICANT: ersailles, Ltd.,John Dickerson, Agent CURRENT ZONING: "SF-20B" Single-Family Residential District REQUESTED ZONING: "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO.NOTICES SENT: Eighteen(18) RESPONSES: Two written responses received within the 200' notification area (based on the previous plan showing no realignment of South Carroll with Brumlow Avenue): * Paul L. Schell, 620 S. Carroll Ave., opposed; concerns are the devaluation of property, increased taxes, increased crime potential, and this will lower the quality of life. * Steve and Brenda Ryan, 1000 S. Carroll Road, in favor if certain guidelines are followed; move the entrance into the development so that it is not directly across from their property, widen the roads to allow for the increased traffic, and place landscape around the development such as a brick wall with shrubs. Also, attached letter received 3/9/95 with additional comments. LIL____________-_ One written response received from outside the 200' notification area: ® Charles J. Fechtel, 1216 Southlake Blvd., concerned that if the thoroughfare plan is not adhered to there will be no continuous north/south roads without T intersections. The City should not let a single development supersede the future best interests of the City. 0 - 1 City of Southlake,Texas P &Z ACTION: August 4, 1994; Approved (6-0-1) to table ZA 94-85 at Applicant's request to the September 8, 1994 Planning and Zoning Meeting and continue the Public Hearing. September 8, 1994; Approved (6-0) Applicant's request to table ZA 94-85 via letter received from John F. Dickerson on August 23, 1994 to the September 22, 1994 Planning and Zoning Meeting and continue the Public Hearing. September 22, 1994; Approved (4-0-1) Applicant's request to table ZA 94-85 to the October 20, 1994 Planning and Zoning Meeting and continue the Public Hearing. October 20, 1994; Approved (7-0) Applicant's request to table ZA 94-85 to the December 8, 1994 Planning and Zoning Meeting and continue the Public Hearing. December 8, 1994; Approved (7-0) Applicant's request to table ZA 94-85 to the January 5, 1994 Planning and Zoning Meeting and continue the Public Hearing. , January 5, 1995; Approved (4-0-1) ZA 94-85, Rezoning and Development Plan for Versailles,subject to the Plan Review Summary li, % dated December 30, 1994, and including the following additional stipulations to the Development Regulations: a) side yards adjacent to W\ street shall not be less than 20' (changed from 15'); b) average lot size s 15,000 sq. ft. and it should be noted that 85 lots shall be 13,000- 14,000 sq. ft., 15 lots shall be 14,000-15,000 sq. ft., 28 lots shall be 15,000-20,000 sq. ft., and 16 lots shall be over 20,000 sq. ft. If this total number of lots for the development cannot be obtained, then the numbers should follow this proportion as closely as possible; c) minimum floor area shall be 2,200 sq. ft. (increased from 1,800); d) PUD zoning to be approved subject to a density not to exceed " dwelling units per acre; e) number of lots shall not exceed 135 total lots; f) developer will provide a street stub roughly halfway on the midpoint of the north property line; g) #6 on development plan be clarified such that it is clear that new Carroll will be built concurrently with Phase 2 of the development; h) agreement to work with Staff to resolve the street alignment situation pertaining to the Ryan property on the west. March 9, 1995; Approved to Deny (6-0-1) ZA 94-85 Rezoning and Development Plan for Versailles. Li, COUNCIL ACTION: January 17, 1995; Approved (7-0) to table ZA 94-85 to the February 7, 1995 City Council Meeting. February 7, 1995; Approved(6-0)to table ZA 94-85 to the YA_ z February 21, 1995 City Council Meeting. City of Southlake,Texas • February 2i, 1995;Approved(4-2)to return ZA 94-85 to the Planning and Zoning Meeting on March 9, 1995. March 21, 1995;Approved(5-0)to table ZA 94-85 to the City Council Meeting on April 4, 1995. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the ninth Plan Review Summary dated March 31, 1995. Note that five of the property owners within the 200' notification area(William E.Minor,Juanita Peters,Harvey Miller,Theron Sr. & Dorthy Ragan and Sylvia Smith Norris) who were formerly opposed to this request have withdrawn their original opposition and indicated that they were in favor of the plan showing no realignment of South Carroll with Brumlow Avenue. To insure that the surrounding property owners are aware of the latest submittal showing the South Carroll/Brumlow connection, Staff has again sent courtesy letters to all property owners within 200' and have requested that-they submit any comments based on the current plan. Also be aware that Timarron has submitted a development plan and preliminary plat for the property south of the intersection of Carroll Avenue and Continental Boulevard. A copy of the development plan is included in this packet material. It is Staffs understanding that legal counsel feels that the Council may proceed with a vote on this item (without another recommendation from P&Z)because the current plan includes the realignment of South Carroll.and essentially meets the recommendations of the Commission. KPG/bls itg G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES\94-85-ZD.W PD L 3-9-95 TO: City of Southlake Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Steve and Brenda Ryan 1000 S. Carroll Southlake, TX 76092 RE: ZA 94-85, Rezoning and Development Plan of Versailles We would like to begin this letter by reminding the Planning and Zoning Commission and city officials of the difficulty our schools are having keeping up with the rapid growth being experienced in Southlake. From our understanding, there are at least four new developments (including Versailles) either taking place or trying to take place in the same general area (south of FM 1709 , north of Continental Boulevard, east of Carroll Avenue) (approximately 331 dwellings) . Timarron itself is growing by leaps and bounds. It appears that keeping up with this growth is going to get even more difficult since the CISD has not even purchased land for the next proposed school site in the southeast quadrant of Southlake. We also would like to emphasize once again our concern regarding the streets and how the city is going to handle increased traffic in this part of Southlake if the subject development is approved. Are plans underway to reconstruct Carroll Avenue, Brumlow Avenue, and Continental Boulevard so that they can adequately handle increased traffic in due time? We are appreciative to the developer of Versailles for relocating the South Carroll entrance into the development so that it is not located directly across from our residence. We are also appreciative to the developer for agreeing to place the construction entrance along Continental Boulevard. We are also very much in favor of the public park planned for the development. L L However , we are still not in favor of the type of screen fencing planned for the outer perimeters of the development. We would like to stress that when we chose Southlake as our home, we chose it for its rural atmosphere and one-acre minimum lot size. We have enjoyed our view of open country and horse pasture for 14 years now. It does not sound appealing to have that view changed to a screening fence and the back sides of what will probably be two-story dwellings . But, if that is what has to be, we suggest the use of 100% masonry in combination with green landscaping in lieu of the planned fencing illustrated in the current drawing. The °developer is not in favor of this . Other options which might be considered to solve this are : a. Locate the planned public park directly across from our residence instead of a screening fence . b. Divide those lots along Carroll Avenue so that the size of each is more comparable to the size of those lots located along the west side of Carroll Avenue (1 acre minimum) . At the same time, position those lots located along Carroll Avenue so that the dwellings to be built on those lots face the west (our residence) instead of east . Suggest the developer look into the new housing development currently under construction on the east side of far North Carroll Avenue where those dwellings are being built to face west with no screening fence. As we all know, Southlake is quickly losing its rural appeal . We would like to encourage the Planning and Zoning Commission and city officials to do everything possible to make developers heed strict requirements to slow this loss of rural appeal while at the same time consider how our roads and schools are going to handle this growth. Sincerely, Steve and Brenda Ryan 1000 S. Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 (817) 488-0351 L -5 ( � - SA I -WY-II S r —11; nl DI z M1 ?AI • ti _\.. lizA _it ri 111 :".... il • f0 (r u, "nq fAf. K w+1.0n14 Ao OVA 1 K n IA T Flo' , — ._." XI Pi T; teU WIs 9 500 1St le 1 tE lAti — IC — 7 �, Y . •,0 Tom, I \ c'•_ j10 CiI$— 4 la— _. f.A414Y A._.. 6 A •r• 14 _ 3 to c + ------ -----� �C W N 1 1 1 IIt J ea 040 _4 IC I — .� J.W. HAL, 1 I a.AfIC A-4103 Mt I 4 I I' . IA tT. 1 I I i I1t ' 111 l tAt l x'&_\ r,� II\II,x � w 47.....441 F IKo x 1 : tom` ` I , t Al K I . 1 ;� ( 1 1 l � • '� ' -- -- -- -----� I s 3 I lir IA ; Nr IA 4rA Y 1F1I to w eit-IOW rn NIA -Or 1 I 1 ">.' I. ■ - W. I 1 N I• '� -MI III I St ` ... 7i iin �.A nn nn MM ��,�// I I i1'•PW *ad IN A oat ,.oc'-.. I f1®IL LL'UVGStIY/O'•TH 1 S411 —~034/ 1 1111 !BARNi I ,� '� NN I . A-7117 I n,\ �, �,` Z7AI HARRISON DECKER •4. t 1 _ 1 V' MRKY A-� / 7 VI r ]Y zF I Nit L., �� r 30 l g 1 1G ai, 4. IFF 31. 10 N TRACT MAP Q S E . S�1TN 1 38920I --1 • A . — — — — — — — I SPIN#8 REPRESENTATIVE: MULLER I (16000„, 2 "SF-20B" I TR 1 E.A.Smith 8.91 AC C.Prade "SF-20A" v 8 1 O O) \\,. T.Ragan CI L TR fA �,LY P.Schell- 35.0 AC - I S P, �—r1'Ti:A - r 1 Rucker,L.P.4 J.Peters A' - \___. • I 1A3 TRR31A2. .W.Minor c 35. AC I o T.&R.Bamett a'. y A2 v--T D" 1 139 r Loo,xl g H.Miller I , N.Pond r !1 S . \ „a_.. O Carroll Road Baptist I. Np�Y • �J .Ua� 3 TR 1A N.Brown ,,80 os Z "AG" A w I S.Ryan t . m - _ 4 r I TR 1A U 4 01 AC "SF-20A" o - 6 I o I Tc _ 2 J 4 t t IYftL m l 1 F lI w I ,« c I t " mom limarron Land Corp. Th"Ii-U.D." J I TR it 181 cA E .* 182 ADJACENT OWNERS TR IA M 1.0 AC )�0MANO 1.0`5' AND ZONING gA.� _,tQ5 AC TR 18 I d a s h. 1 .a .ri• d I .),i 41. @� # ;y xi, o J v Lam' ,- � U „ g E,{ j 'bit I • n Pro. ......, gilt! I 1 -, a S .1.0.4Ai c e , f I , A • • _ _ ••---..__41 A CI_ s ii 16 (04 _ v I �: — - I al • N I 11 , ..� • d t F ' \zoo-x:30m 11. T ij� I 1 z• / 1. \ • II ` A i i18 11 C" 1 ' 1 • a — I H .._.. I I ,x I $ I 11 '' m I 1 ‘ Ja a •d a • '' E Y ��e 1 ..— 1 IP gt i11• Li' ! H.---- -' 1 0.1 1 = ,. P a / 1 1: I I I .._..at . I I WI I y I I I I ~y'�L�a 3 1-°_—,--,� .J -. ' L_° r 1 situ n.szzz oos •I'1 I ~3'�.SS 1 t pp) ,�+,;h V! —.I./ . ' .:.t to r w.... RI I_ ra CI: "1 m Ir1Il• '� I r • _ I �� —� + d- LLB ,„,:, ,2t7iir -FYI i 11 • I.-14.-- k II • 1� ���1C4 so iaA a uoa ^a a : 'o ny ` 1 I h 1 "'-'11 .^,-li R.r •a ,I I Ili i +., •i' I ..ii 1 tozz9 - I �Z J JON - -\ 1 I: 1 y 'e� Niys,:N. �j � � I . sh • % , 1 i z I is N I ? € E E E E E �` >< 3 E - �j E f€ 7 21a i LgE ; u Y $R 1 �'''4 `tti44r 'Oa '1EM Er `h iYF E+ Y tlE ! ` 5,e% I C$ .1- : -` e e 3 3 3 iaa I 4.4 I 'q 1 I a l g g ft I ~ ? i l I I i i 1111111 ! s1 sJ 8 A Ill L101 HI ! ! II !!! iti II ii P� 1 0 ti ti ti li5 � Pi y1, j� S- et. €-t S aL 8i 8g €€a 84 € I c<ly7E11 i- AL Aa JfII k 1 1 g As �I' SA C4 • :11.1 1 1 6 1:1 7.1.7 1 1 1 1 1 1 a - 9 li , . a Ili .s:1s:-:•.s:l:7l l !! i4i _ �f g5 g • u . 1 1 i . . :.: , g gi 1 41 1 :S $; a is _e7Zo a�•' L 9a-Z """;ry ,,1 +]:F 4 (,Q.Lg 3; :_Ft' g.0-1111 � ! E k iW -YA- I. } a ,z!1g ''it a111a . = F 3. 3: `r t ! ! II a 1!! ! !! I a � „ . h lj q ; t 1 i liitililillifi I 'r E are w • • ~ I1 '3li 1111 ;Ilk:: , • try `k O J , . z Q{!!1 !! i illl J 19 ' - i 10..x.05 CONTINE-Alitki-- 4 '5"-/ )1;4° ! I § :'4....).7-41 -- ', ALA 11 '1;1 .2 ca it W '� , 44piii e , Too •��''��� tt .n�• !1��, � 000o C rirk 111 Pb... l C a. r .` & __ •---•---•- -- .ice ... . • (I W i �r� 4 M�: .far, a -- a „.., D ial i.,.„,,,, , ..q ^ �_ O� ._1 .54 10 . M ..e_, _ . ,Fun----- ",-_, f •c ,i , ipt. g , .1=111 . I OW iqirig . 1:., ' bow- '2"!' ' - ; . 111U= (I) „,it ."'It ') ...WNW f O. ik 1 ----ep, .� - ..:::V j i_ :•::•:ti•:::::::,::•:,- -siiti A • - * - ` 1.: ; yip �;a :•:: ::•. . L .Mat ," r -"`r'"PW, . A u . g i s�.:.•y f ! 'Y , � - 3 i� �e 0 iI i; Ill .. .....:0-,-- ,...,.-.- ir 5,3 1 .11.::, g .. : g, . ... _ ,:„.._._.0.1, ...,1,,:▪ -... 4„ .....6 _.r,"-- s A0 . . I i : r. II= r \ bp (� AIIIIIIWI: -W 1 - --- ---•--- --- --- --- --- - fr\ _,d4 93-1 um, at ,:.:, . _ , 1 ••4 - JC O a iftØ 0. 41100' 4 ita Y •-�onus K s A \ 7 I, END d 0 `,`.. . gip . ) if2 5 i7 Y - V4 •o 0 0 c 11' I"r 4 0 .1* alltea i to ..., /1: (7) P Ilk:r- .11 ..„ „,r,4 //6/0/ne 6 0 •0 ---\ .. .. • --so- 010.4 ' ierf 4 j„---..--.,---, i5,1-1i4.‘,4 ,), , • \ f / a a leas - 6 ric=7 \I W..�� a- i i O% 0a. i . _ i . . __ . _ : . __ .. ca +._ /I uc�wa v+ ‘. , • --,..: 01-. . — re,F.,,hil J.,_,.,„,, .., .„,_, ON cope (\ \‘• . f'-'ili-i og / .._ , _.-1 . -0 C% itilliI. 1iiiiiiii, 1;it9ill ; iIr P' I ' I1;1;ir�111 ,jf �jjif��rfijf°t ,I� ; (jif1t1! Id1 ,,1r 1j( 1 {,f f � r11111 Ir !I; x 11 tldiiI1111 11ifj'r11 ;11I1 1' 1111111 914• It !lit 41 ,t1 ; 11 § II: Ill ;tr, 1114 fil ;; lE' si t x a = �.lii ii;:l ft t OM Mi •• .1111f 1;i H tfii I •s°` It11;l it .1 g N = z 0-L.' i i i;;111. !ill 11t1111, Iil lit j11 d`11il itI0++ e 'r • •1+� Iiiilj! jt ll t _ " � ,��nj1` '� j tl` i 1 j s •� 1it1r' 1r Z a na illf i 1jlit llewiY 1 t11 ill 11111 sit! 11/111 1 !rl W =� < € ¢ x! t ,. i1 11 srl , .1, 3 W S Q „� el Q Y g wM:141 11fir f• I,f'i f i le fry} net II: i fr ei. 1 -tt2{}{ yy q4 1 '�j l !Iiia•i (` vi a {i • lO 211 E'lliMegt1 ij +t it i 1 ,11 °ji ` 11 !yt ,� 1 I N =<VI <^ .3 did it ii �ijr3i�g 1 .irr .11' .; 11 111 § `�s :: ` ID11s1h:1111I111 i� 111 ;i 1111i 1►1111i 1;t 1t 111N/1114111111!!! ' 6 Wm �� W u �m m p i t1tt It j !ill li f f Y ill :::;3 ! i 0 1t1 i; j till if i 1 I 1. f l 1 t y I 1 g ` 1. • ` �'11 1i ` 1'; i4110ii r t11 ijA 'j mi If � r aia� 11 i h1n II it ii i1 `gci.,l . F lid! IY6 JQ S Y � `-_ a; l dRi a a-° .g a '. fi - - _te _� ` • ';1 '1 ' 1 -1 -1 1!:iii MI 0 4ORIIMONI ,IP 11.1 .>f, I .. ! 1, (i!I 1, 1 a.: e , cp .a. • alum L !I�Q!1 - �► •01 � Willi ;1 i 3 \gillilliffit 471 Pliant? fly Y 14 1 n I 4 i !I qi i . . ri_ _ . lid I sill aemit . .101:t.,. 0 ifil ao rte i ,I f19, I�j all Ail / �'at --�� o ° i"" rx z l isgr..4 04071 time r ,l r=i- i ,:.. .. . -ec • — Y •'-/1. .. !;! j ia 1Ih ! —S119EY i :Yk /"1/ i! G• 1 + \;a'1:Exr0 %-411 Y! g10 i9 13 r 1i [11IT 4111 1111 a--. t �j hr j I I I I -1 �y th 3 r-1--i 7-T , -- 44S.�.i4$!i I I r__ —1 jk, )If I �--�g. , —r-1 I--- - . .. • aa i , 1 1 0 1[11 I 1 'ITT 11. 1'1 FA,. ., 1 1 , 1 II , 1.,) , il „Imp Al L.,. ..., ,,, , g filo 4.1,0 ill! y I r jE 111, 010 I li f r •11 --a-- ' I 111 1 t Il11i111 ! II it lr .11 i I•1.-..- = City of Southlake,Texas PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 94-85 Review No: Nine Date of Review: 3/31/95 Project Name: Development Plan for"R-P.U.D." Rezoning Request for Versailles. being 78.046 Acres OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER/PLANNER/ARCHITECT: Kercho Kochweop Partnership Carter& Burgess. Inc. 3825 Lake Austin Blvd.. Suite 504 7950 Elmbrook. Suite 250 Austin. Texas 75225 Dallas. Texas 75247 Phone: Phone: (214) 638-0145 Fax: Fax: (214) 638-0447 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 3/29/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT KAREN GANDY AT(817)481-5581,EXT.744,OR DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581 EXT. 787. 1. Label the bearing and distance for the east boundary line adjacent to the Hart,Minor,and Miller tracts. 2. Dimension the interior street rights of way within the project tract. 3. Correct the "Proposed South Hollow" R.O.W. dedication for proposed South Carroll/Carlisle. 4. Label the Land Use Designation for the Timarron Land Corp. tract located south of the Barnet tract and north of the Carroll Rd. Baptist Church tract and the Pond tract. 5. Show and label the width and type of bufferyards on the graphic. 6. Provide the following required bufferyard table.Please note that a type'B'bufferyard is required along north and east lines of the Joe L. Wright tract, adjacent to the southwest corner of the project tract. REQUIRED BUFFERYARDS Canopy Accent Clockwise Required Provided Trees Trees Shrubs North-1398' None None 0 0 0 East -2021' None None 0 0 0 South-1378' 10'-Et 10'-Et 14 28 110 East -169' 10'-B 10'-B 3 5 17 North-175' 10'-B 10'-B 4 5 18 West-2057' None None 0 0 0 Requires 3' tall berm or hedge of shrubs over 75%of frontage. 7. Designate and label the areas for the school, park, and any other areas to be designated as public or private open space on the graphic. Label the approximate acreage of each area on the graphic. City of South lake,Texas 8. Show and label the location, type, and height of walls, fences, and screening devices. 9. Provide anticipated schedule of development for Phase 1 &Phase 2. 10. Verify the acreages shown for"Total Perimeter/Thoroughfare R.O.W.", "Residential", "School ", and "Public Park" in the Proposed Land Use Summary for Phase 2. The acreages shown should add up to to equal the Gross Acreage for Phase 2 of 49.9 Ac..The acreages currently shown add up to equal 50.3 acres. 11. Change the side yard building setback lines, adjacent to the side street, from 20' to 25' on the following "reverse frontage" corner lots: A. Lots adjacent to the east and west lines of Street'D' B. Lot adjacent to the southwest corner of Street'C' and Street'E' C. Lot adjacent to the northwest corner of Street'H' and Street'B' D. Lot adjacent to the northeast corner of Street'H' and Street'B' 12. Staff recommends that Street'D',the street stub into the north boundary line, be aligned with Street 'E' or be located at the center point of the north boundary line. .* The applicant should be aware that landscape and irrigation plans must be submitted with construction plans for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water and Sewer Impact Fee, and related permit fees. * Art Clayton, the spokesperson for the South Hollow project located to the east of this project, has indicated that based upon conditions of the Developer's Agreement for the South Hollow project, he would not be opposed to relocating South Hollow Drive further north to avoid conflict with the proposed South Carroll/Carlisle connection. * Denotes an informational comment. cc: Kercho Kochweop Partnership Carter and Burgess Versailles, Ltd., 8333 Douglas Ave., Suite 1300, Dallas, Tx. 75225 G:\W PP\RE V\94\94-85_DP.W PD Sin - i� ) L..-... 3' , - -' 1 j - ,ev-/- d" .....-' -beLcri.L3 '7 PROPOSED LAND USE SUMMARY Phase 1 Phase 2 TOTAL TOTAL ACREAGE (GROSS) 28.2 49.9 7a046 ACRES * DUSTING 0.6 1.8 2.3 ACRES r PERIMETER/THOROUGHFARE R.O.W. BY PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHTS PROPOSED ADDITIONAL 0.2 4.3 4.5 ACRES t PERIMETER/THOROUGHFARE R.O.W. DEDICATION TOTAL .7 6.1 6.8 ACRES t PERIMETER/THOROUGHFARE R.O.W. NET ACREAGE (LESS 27.6 43.6 71.3 ACRES t PERIMETER/THOROUGHFARE R.O.W.) RESIDENTIAL 27.0 23.2 50.2 ACRES t AMENITY CENTER 0.5 0 0.5 ACRES t SCHOOL 0 16.0 16.0 ACRES r PUBUC PARK 0 5.0 5.0 ACRES t L- OPEN SPACE 0.5 21.0 21.5 ACRES t PUBUC 0 21.0 21.5 ACRES t PRIVATE 0.5 0 0.5 ACRES t NUMBER OF LOTS 51 51 102t DENSITY (AS SHOWN) 1.81 1.02 1.31 D.U./ GROSS/ ACRES t PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE (NET 1.8 48.0 30.2 %+ OF PERIMETER/THOROUGHFARE R.O.W.) TYPICAL LOT DIMENSIONS 105t X 145r (15,225t S.F.) NOTE; OPEN SPACE AND PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR BUILDINGS ON SCHOOL SITE. MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE ON SCHOOL SITE SHALL NOT EXCEED 626,000t SQUARE FEET SO THAT MINIMUM 10% OPEN SPACE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT CAN BE PRESERVED. 93330601.D06 $14- H4 if! CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-143 , 1t' ;AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, (AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND o- - WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE , TEXAS BEIN �3�3 3�T ; fit SL g��aif L 3�&F? IIt y ,,..�. .� MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM � . ,. �TO r . M. , .. SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND } AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; (kr"' PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREO , PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING '•R 'UBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPE , AND PR. I' i G AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS,the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as" - gi ; (,, 01 s` +tnunder the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these G:\ORD\ZON1NG\480.143 Page 1 _ Y R -I_ 4 changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood;location,lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their (how..." original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,changed Lir and amended as shown and described below: G:\ORD\ZONING\480.143 Page 2 _1 1 Being a 78.04.6 acre tract of land situated in the J.W.H .e S rvey,,Abstract No.$03, Li" Tracts.:Tr4:401W,40:41M1and more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from ems= to ' t ' v r � % appr v p , Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake,Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences, words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances (644., affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to G:\ORD\ZONING\480.143 Page 3 i4 -17 such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: L CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY Lire‘ G:\ORD\ZONING\480.143 Page 4 QQ OBI—jt Lei APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: E1—bCTIVE: L G:\ORD\ZONING\480.143 Page5 EXHIBIT "A" L." BEING A 78.05 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE J. W. HALE SURVEY. ABSTRACT NUMBER 803,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS,AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO MARVIN KERCHO, AND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 3241, PAGE 415. DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. BEARING BASIS IS PLAT FILED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 1707, TIMARRON ADDITION,WINDSOR CREEK. PHASE 1, PLAT RECORDS,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS,AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING at a 3/4-iron rod found at the northeast corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to Sarah Reynolds as described in deed recorded in Volume 2414, Page 583, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 89°39'21' W. along the north line of said Reynolds tract, at 189.05 feet, passing a 3/4' iron rod found, a total distance of 210.00 feet to a 5/8' iron rod with plastic cap stamped 'Carter & Burgess' set in Carroll Road for corner, said point also being in the east line of that certain 4.81 acre tract of land conveyed to Timarron Land Corporation. described in deed recorded in Volume 10533, Page 235, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 00°04'05' W. along the approximate centerline of Carroll Road and along the east line of said 4.81 acre Timarron Land Corporation tract, and also along the east line of those tracts of land recorded in Deed Records, Tarrant County. Texas, as follows: S. Ryan, Volume 7158, Page 644; Trustees of the Carroll Road Baptist Church,Volume 4929, Page 356; N. Pond, Volume 7134, Page 944; T. Barnett, Volume 9657, Page 2320; Rucker Family Limited Partnership, Volume 10432, Page 1162; P. Schell, Volume 2851, Page 198; and C. Prade, Volume 2835, Page 358, a distance of 2056.61 feet to a 5/8' iron rod with plastic cap stamped 'Carter & Burgess' set for the northwest corner of herein described tract, said point also being Le"..1 in the south line of LOT 2, BLOCK I, of the E. A. SMITH SUBDIVISION, that certain 27.625 acre tract of land conveyed to E. A. Smith, described in plat record Volume 388-154, Page 91, Plat Records. Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 89°55'55' E, leaving the east line of said tracts and the said approximate centerline of Carroll Road. along the south line of said E. A. SMITH-SUBDIVISION, 1397.48 feet to a 5/8' iron rod with plastic cap stamped 'Carter & Burgess' set in the west line of that certain tract of land conveyed to THE BRANAN ENTERPRISES, described in deed recorded in Volume 6377, Page 99, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S 01°16'56" W, leaving the south line of said E. A. SMITH SUBDIVISION, along the west line of said BRANAN ENTERPRISES tract, 621.41 feet to a 1/2' iron rod found at the southwest corner of said BRANAN ENTERPRISES tract: THENCE S 89°46'40' E. along the south line of said BRANAN ENTERPRISES tract, 19.52 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found at the northwest corner of that certain 2.52 acre tract of land conveyed to Charles Hart, described in deed recorded in Volume 3193. Page 361. Deed Records. Tarrant County. Texas; THENCE S 01°23'55" E. leaving the south line of said BRANAN ENTERPRISES, along the west line of said Charles Hart tract, and also along the west line of those tracts of land recorded in Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, as follows: William Minor, Volume 6506. Page 266, and Harvey Miller. Volume 9165, Page 2165, a distance of 484.26 feet to a 1:2"iron rod with plastic cap stamped ' Vogt Engineering" found at the southwest corner of said Harvey Miller tract; G:\ORD'ZON1NG 480.143 Page 6 EXHIBIT "A" THENCE S 86°38'45' E. along the south line of said Harvey Miller tract, at 187.94 feet, passing a 1/2'iron rod with plastic cap stamped'Vogt Engineering'found,a total distance of 208.19 feet to a 5/8' iron rod with plastic cap stamped 'Carter & Burgess' set in Carlisle Lane. said point also being in the west line of that tract of land conveyed to N. Brown, described in deed recorded in Volume 6444, Page 569, Deed Records, Tarrant County. Texas: THENCE S 00°04'56" W. along the approximate centerline of said Carlisle Lane and the west line of said N. Brown tract. 1171.77 feet to a 5/8' iron rod with plastic cap stamped 'Carter & Burgess' set in the north line of that certain 17.0 acre tract of land conveyed to Timarron Land Corporation, described in deed recorded in Volume 10533. Page 235. Deed Records, Tarrant County. Texas: THENCE N 89°14'05'W. leaving the west line of said N.Brown tract, along the north line of said Timarron Land Corporation tract, and also along the north line of those tracts of land recorded in Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas as follows: Bear Creek Communities, Volume 10351, Page 2377, and that certain 2.86 acre tract conveyed to Timarron Land Corporation, described in deed recorded in Volume 10533, Page 235. a distance of 1413.05 feet to a 5/8' iron rod with plastic cap stamped 'Carter& Burgess' set at the southeast corner of the aforementioned Sarah Reynolds tract: THENCE N 01°09'53' E, leaving the north line of said 2.86 acre Timarron Land Corporation tract, along the east line of said Sarah Reynolds tract, at 24.70 feet, passing a 3/4" iron rod found, a total distance of 211.03 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 78.046 acres (3,399,664 square feet) of land with 0.55 acres contained in Carlisle Lane, 0.71 acres contained in Continental Boulevard. and 1.00 acre contained in Carroll Road,leaving a total of 75.786 acres of land more or less. G 1ORD\ZON tNG\480.143 Page 7 EXHIBIT 'B' ���11 I1 111 1.Il11111! Pi( t' Ili II ! G, li pill! 1 it !1 c` 1 • It a I t,t ;•Si lr 1 10t !� '( '1 Ill t! Ii `! c. - $ !eel I 1 sl 1111111i • (' ° . I i1 it 1111 111t11 i 1 11 I: is 1. ;! �4, ,111 . 1[11t $ ; _ § 1 Si a ; 11 .11 It 1 t.. . 1 , 111.1I I . 11 •i 11 c i?i�ii j 1111 i I li( 5! 11 tll'tl 1111 � = = o a3 ,1.IF_ Illh , .!�•� lii itl 11I •; It l IlIlli � wH 3 ? "�o '^�^11 t . I ta s2 J t=i. ;.11 i! ;1• ;II 1; 11111 s J 61i ! ` $4" N 0!'i{{e1013 !II ]1( !] 1111 W N :t . . a ;n: Ye 1 ee = t t I s w'as Q m � $� Y<kn! it bil i l I d $ o cn :ig' N oaf t<"- t� +1 1lli.". ,,t, • .11 ., . ft Y1[! Oi g i .i.ta tg . $ 4 !till 5 I ! :I :I lp Mt !1 I • i]i 1 h ill,' tl DaM 1iii• .Ii .11 II' .1 i'} !111 11 llitlii11l 1111) Ili Ills III it s 1 lia1l 11111111(1l11 ' 1 o �a a 0 - 1 . ` Ilia I '811 H M 1 = • 1 5 i..2K 111 ! t i llle 1 t 81 111 : 1 41_<1 ° ill;! 1 81 11 1111 e I !1(I6 is 5 I / _ It31t :e le ;3j 31 1 ill ] : f t i Ii.� 'a gYi I i _r iL___i�"' 4- I • P- hil• .2 2 11 111p1N, 11- I _ -_ `_ `� I JT I I t �€t�`I � !.; 161111 a a 11 11 a Ill 1 Y 6i i3� i�f ';; I e -i !=�i� ��t{ , '�IS�r y lit'/► kimie°' - �t, CIE I= - -�� '��� ]• #ft owe i g ckp s Q 't- e $ t 1, t t i ,a• xa. I Q J lr► =L_ 5 tir t, i nil 1 I t"x - ,I L! , ha i 1liii i ! 1 !F a$7.: iif z � :s h ;� -Ili t: :± ��eli�� Y �t'ti t 1` s t1! lii is 1 •�� 0 _ ;i '1 21 . __ fill , ,f tI , lif i 1 11 i, It 11 -••-1 ,��1 raw �' ' i is 10 } j iI ID S !![ Ili 1 if 11 ! i1f li t[ ij '. j ii`L�" �i �i� 111 n S I'_ ii! 1 1t, II 1 i! li jiAS I '. 1102 ICI ` lil 1III 1 'il „.a: i S s ! ° i k g v ' I 1• 1 w \ Yi =.Y sxY js 1�. t ! siY'JP 121 t3ky,M rF "it .: ! k \` I I. 1 I I k j N,.. Y --Li_L _i_L .� Lei i x J ,,,,I,I,i,i 1 �•.f — { - -- -IT- !y r 1 + [--1 I I 1 --• z/-- ,1i �� ! itinwek-T e : • • —1!-1 i == ( 1, - ! 3 _ 1, q•--!I!lil!I!,il!;i 1 t Ordinance No. 480-143 . qja_ 2-23 Page 8 '' • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-164, First Reading ZA 95-02 Rezoning Request REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for 16.63 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, Tract 2C LOCATION: North of Quail Creek Estates Addition and adjacent and West of Harbor Oaks Addition OWNER: Peggy H. Denton APPLICANT: H. Creek Development CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single-Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Seventeen(17) RESPONSES: Six written responses received from within the 200' notification area. * Christopher Packard, 875 Harbor Ct., opposed; one acre sites are not compatible with adjacent Harbor Oaks Subdivision; and, in previous Planning and Zoning meetings there was discussion of one acre sites not being sufficient for septic fields and the runoff flowing into Lake Grapevine. * John D. Stewart, 2920 Burney Ln., opposed; possible drainage difficulties, increased demand on utilities and emergency services, loss of equestrian access to Corp of Engineer property on Lake Grapevine, concerns about smaller lots, and decrease of property value. * William R. Bacus, 902 Quail Creek Ct., opposed; concerned that there is no plat of the planned development and that another development like Lonesome Dove Estates will occur; he might consider withdrawing his opposition if the planned development is compatible to present home sites. City of Southlake,Texas * Raymond L. and Dinah Chancellor, 890 Harbor Ct., opposed;this area has poor drainage, limited access, and the residents of Harbor Oaks will continue to need equestrian access to the Corp of Engineers property. * John Wilson, 2930 Burney Lane, opposed; there is already too much residential development in Southlake. There is inadequate infrastructure along Carroll and in Harbor Oaks. * Betty J. Foreman, for J.D. Jones, 2652 Oakdale St.; this now belongs to someone else. One written response received from outside the 200' notification area: * Billy Cook, 895 Harbor Ct.,undecided;would like to see a plan of the area. His concerns are number of lots, lot size, square feet of homes, street location, sewer provisions,preservation of trees, and restrictions on residents. P &Z ACTION: February 9, 1995;Approved(7-0)to table ZA 95-02 Rezoning Request at Applicant's request to the February 23, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting and continue the Public Hearing. February 23, 1995; Approved(6-0)ZA 95-02 Rezoning Request. COUNCIL ACTION: March 7, 1995; Approved(6-0)Applicant's request to table ZA 95-02 to the April 4, 1995 City Council Meeting. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has submitted a preliminary plat for P&Z consideration on April 6, 1995. The plat essentially mirrors the sketch provided in this packet information. Assuming no delays at the Commission,the second reading of this ordinance and the preliminary plat should appear on the April 18 Council 16py KPG/bls L G:\W PF\MEMO\CASES95\95-02Z.W PD Sib ? y = a L - 1- J.D. JOPCfc.� 11— IY= • �. NA _k- I SCOW, . I 1 n r«..W4f441----------1 I I <2,-.;_r('--4.:'.' yl.::; I I' ',,',.•,•.',"•,22,y, ,,,',:,;•,"•,:•,':'•,;',,',;,, - _7 DENTON 11 I i� -_ .- _ ' , — -- "''= =- '=• , -� wl wal z " nl©©IL� (ff • r ,," • • IyiIIII TARRANT i }I. __! JI • — — _ , { 3.yi 4 /�' 1, ` � it......1 n' I�►a.. n. ;,"1 ._. . • 71� r \ ,"\ ,r - ak� a' te,,♦,, .F.L'H at DA!/ID . . J '°� '-- r-— -- _ - 1 7Ye tor sl. I' E ( —s.Kr -- K ItoQ? ,Q 1 �, 1 }JOb� 4 p16:�ciE8= .a:� . Y p "'J#4-u 1 • a ! KIpOa. ,ppa1 • � e1.11 Pe ' .ti Y OR I. J.J. 11' RIEI D. i.,I:,,1 --- A. ear "�-- r- - •g't '' �� YY u 1•» , •-I1u �tE I 0.-:.' 9 gl1's r r-;_;-l -- i tin• w• NnX 5t0NEN0R E' ---- I 1 _Y --—--—- - -- ,• 1 wEStAt 1 �+-�a i N I. • m m• 1»k r tc \\,k• I i I ;.i�1 --- ltlk __ 1 IL • iiim 41k 1 lOr . • • ._ • • . . . .3:.•,..,,,,, 4t4 w 11nk ___ _�,1. -.<"',•', ;�4tAtEse _'-J-- ' = ro ANEW' SNk ' _.I Ian • f-5- ' 14 aNtk 321 •1•1'2IIfIN1 IL 1.. 12 stR �Y� -' • '---1-- -- ' KVelKa 1k pRp I ,� »r y , ; : r' l YID II rIAL' K A_ W C ea•, 1 : JA':1 E $• I . CHIMERS t 'I, 1 • .1E.: ".1,^„'':,0� '" P 313" a 1.:�- -4 . A..Y r ,,., 11k 11 LE06bARD' L a KI tE - - I - ..I.1r . 1 ,-,.ns -_ N.I. --- --- ;' laud.l I.YI. IV k r U k11' of k s 5 I MEN -- ».f1 k N4 I >e ` g Y Y �� "a SaA p.IME I E { I k s "I I r �• MIMI �HD°I uHn+c • —_ — —1 —' T'Ar^.•ftAd rr atk 1 t<'0 r -—--—- '� 1 D »7 YY .I>r 41.4 r fj.t7 {III 77 Y ! •.' N• �-�1 Y Q 43 A, :•N , au W S 4 o IN.. I 4n 4 1 ltl 4 t 1 j j 14 »4 • t »• P we Y 7O aNK `lk Ilk J. WEST I' '" w'�, vies K 1 7 1 304W l».. X t •• • 7 -.E,i p L •.K. _w, Y :�p..SN It Q X•' ¢ -- ilk H�' coE lY 0 1 to_XI 7a e�'_ • I•••• _ Nl' • I. Dk V • ( QQ pp�a, H. /� 1�1� to we. s®®� ER AI�JAI.OIRN H. CP11NE�S 1 Yk yt / "»k �.'- 1 -- ' '�.. 3 >A I. I MA k ri I q k!V `• L1Q • 5tY- to,icER n• R o : :: �AI@CbIIrYI P9. 51911l�IRS i .' JAb 1„� �ERs-r I .1 .-1Y At P C R• 171 k • FoT '_OOda r 1J - Y' l •' 4 I:k ..I.r ._a.•5y.i1NE-- ' •,?.._ ~ 'w.rF y h, " - '---Y Cjt�l 1�_ ala 5VN .C --- nu k P � I R5 ,•• '/*� y O�el „ I »»k 1. ALL E YK I.GR y u RA .4 PL • I GHI�E N. • , fly an k I op p 1 Y»! A Yq7. LAG / Y I. P. ST P kV k ' Z�l^ t k LACK D. '" �p' 1 a k ® _ VW k k K7. q K rY IOHNSON -_ w01 .1111. ' �C k£S I ERS ELEMENTARY SIG ® r• :,�: Crr a K 1'E t[» 112 IK NtPILL l f k if k •41 k 4 k e'l 5• --- NY 'ma NU i � _a1G ..•N 1 I _:.if.5 � MRDp �C,i.tE?. � AIL I / ---, I Kt hour t j 511 G I \ - Y a.In 111 k ppW e e Kt I�'1 IttO' •• ( j A Q7 1 YNk 1 �'�`'"�' ' - TRACT MAP y N NN WI 11•• eu7 e M�' '-1' / " '--IIf�•.aaw fw11 ®©- - eYY/ �?wt • " li' t tT N 1(t • e Oil r CC OH y1 M'Yq __,�,aft� •5 ` 5� y` "M •'N k I II I \\ A - IJ•' 1 K I / ._.. I \ a1»q'11 \ / — r\ . - - - AG I-1� Coe AG I \ f � D.Vaughn \ • J.D.Jones 7 6 2B 2 B 1 vr J.Wilson - -0 6 • J. S rt I U.S.Army Corps of Engineers V — — — SF-1A 5 I AGI 4 CO ' . f B.B.Kin Z / C- Vir 'K.Land j \ SF-1A 1 \ 2 Ac 9.8 Ac I I R. an cell_r G� \ B.Cook Spin Representative Joseph Mast I - 3 \ 2R A.Byrd I k , I C.Packard \ 1 II:-} I A xande �� I s 1 SF-1 A I I N o �; 4'W—Bacu' I R.Sc®tt 1 m I i 1.3 1— \ -- 1 _ i N — 1525 I, . I N I 1 16 � I 1C 19 • SF-1A 1 C9, Jrr — I jp M_Snow I. , I I1 1 - , 1 i I`� 1 1C1 1 .r 11 . L, cf,, c20:, N 1 I- - - - - - ! I i/ 1 \- 1 1 ADJACENT OWNERS 1 1 AND ZONING \; 3- 1 \ ‘q 89'27'50"E 322.70' CL f ?flflr7r {T% � I _` \\ 1) 1 (so, coo ��s� i \ N l \ \ \ Original Scale': tip 91 1 10 \ f 1..V - 1N ' O \ \ \ Graphic Scale M /M r g 1 i 3r 1 I , , \\ \ \ • 1- \ \`` ` , \ ` 1 1 \ 4: \ \ 1 1 a ji \ 1 as. I. N :22'01"E '4�9.73' .. / i D I ,�, g / , , .•, .. • / i :)\ 5 I I7 •• . • •.63ac. T- •CY Nl ' • ' CE SURVEY, ABS' -AC 1207 • ii-... , , . ; I 1 •+I THLAKEI TARRANT C C. T\Y, TEXAS -- — ——. .` ^��N 1 _ do\ ` ` 6IS I N . \ 11 11 \. I \ 1 \ 1 / `• \ 5 f 3 / 1A«. 1 I I I 1 \. / - I j,<fr , s.. , I � 1A es. 1 — T� ' ; Ii 0 it I // � . \ ,.1w 1. \ .. \ 1 1 \` 3 1 \\ 2 �� `` \ \ \ \ ‘ \ \� —5 rex—a—Kid-0 3 19.is-- 1/46- rel, Ce,kto 451 (SI-cop-iviakz, P/a41-#144n1 4-2v-pt Ce3144A,vt..(±6_‘_, fie. wate,g...5. ' 4--D s4,(trai_}. +Le ele,t,„_ti.x . (4,..• IA•stree ‘...e.v.....teL.4--Ler:1._ 0_6 ce.A.0-d_crryLz,vd- cx,,c, L ''''t-A -c-49 1"--: .r - w &-"1 • , cri,t.em j .aftt,.., --14,Lee...„),(...t.„,..,1 to 00..• .itort,.._c_bw-t,t • et . OoL - . The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake P1 'Q and Zo In Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092. v Acto,c,ou 2/23/ys REFERENCE NO.: ZA 95-02 r I am (in nfavor of) (opposed to (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: , siu-v cc.re 1 ac. mac.. f 1t:•, tc2 o-c-e.tt5 "-lf U`d %,1-1.,1� . C.re a Fa.'I.s h o caA i e c i „art V e�a e.�I v La.Su/ c)Qa ere-SS is tc --�$q t _�' a^ St lr►'�t.� �hnn P_ SP✓�i�S.p�a�� I� act of-au�r rP.a.,► nre�� res - f aAl/'t� r p r ua.( OT M� 4-r5..e,$ cu-c.d a.-itc-r -fib pso eT -f' l Q.rQ.v --'- �a�-.- w:-fl- , Ai& 44 .rbor Oa,.YG 5, JJwbJrv`�'Inn >n-ininr -►K C re�r,,�aR -h-G.c'ic, w\ 43Gueluz...) Le.-•mot, I, j e- '^.5 -rk.c.+L.:( . ve k...e.�.e3 K c SIGNATURE: 7<--..-..�� L� J G £&- be -,..Q C''' -� (Please Print Name) I1-2.hne-4H. +-6 l or'vd._ (_0.4,, ADDRESS: aq.o© tuuty 2,,,„La.4.e 1 % ?(o 01 D -1'?t(-77 L LAND. KENNETH ETUX GLORIA 2900 BURNEY LN SOUTHLAKE TX 760921 M-10 Lor MEMORANDUM TO: HARBOR OAKS HOMEOWNERS FROM: TOM MATTHEWS, H. CREEK DEVELOPMENT CO. 11 DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1995 SUBJECT: PROPOSED ZONING OF 16.67 ACRES Kosse Maykus, Bob Kresler and I appreciate you inviting us to speak with you last evening to review our plans for the zoning and platting of Mrs. Peggy Denton's 16.67 acre property located to the immediate west of the Harbor Oaks subdivision. We felt our meeting was very productive and look forward to now moving forward with you toward developing lots which we feel will be a complimentary neighbor to Harbor Oaks. • In closing our meeting last night it was suggested that I send a letter to all of the homeowners to review the issues which we presented and to memorialize the commitments we made which will be incorporated into the deed restrictions of our development. First of all, for those not in attendance at last night's meeting, we presented a much "softer" land plan than that plan originally presented at the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing on Thursday, February 9. In the original plan,the entry road entered the property at the end of Harbor Court,travelled west then took a 90 degree turn to the north and meandered to the back of the property crossing the low area behind several existing Harbor Oaks homes. This original plan provided for fourteen(14) lots. The revised land plan presented last night calls for the new lots to be served by two short cul-de- sacs coming off the current end of Harbor Court. We have created one large lot on the north end of the property which has eliminated the need for a public road along the back of the existing Harbor Oaks homes. A bridal path,accessible to the Harbor Oaks homeowners, will be dedicated and constructed along the east side of the subject property from Harbor Court to the north end of the property at which point it will follow the property line to the west to tie into the Corps property. This new plan has also reduced the overall number of lots from fourteen(14)to a total of twelve(12) lots. I have enclosed for your review a copy of this revised land plan. It is this land plan which will become the basis for the plat of this property. This land plan may, in the future, be adjusted but only for topographical considerations and for the preservations of trees. It will not though,contain more lots than we have now agreed to develop. J. (tia., In addition to reducing the number of lots,as we discussed last night, the following development/building restrictions will be incorporated into the building deed restrictions. These restrictions will be enforced by a mandatory homeowners association which will be established • LHarbor Oaks Memo 2-17-95 page two for the additional purposes of maintaining the unobstructed use of the bridal path and for the maintenance and payment of common landscaping, including landscape lighting,proposed to be built into the landscape islands located at the cul-de-sacs and at the intersection of the two cul- de-sacs. Deed Restrictions: Minimum, 3200 square feet of living area in each house Minimum, 10 X 12 roof pitch Minimum, 300 pound composition roof No solid fences along any property line (This is done in order to maintain the open environment and the continued visual enjoyment of property.) A split rail or pipe fence will be constructed along the back of the new lots to delineate the bridal path • All building plans will be approved by an Architectural Control Committee established by the developer to ipsure the construction of quality homes compatible with the property and the adjacent homes within the subdivision Again,I appreciate the forthright approach the homeowners of Harbor Oaks have taken in working with this new development. If anyone has any questions about our plan for the development of this property,please feel free to call me at 214/350-7732. A special thanks to Diane and Chris Packard for opening their house for our meeting last night. cc: City of Southlake J. L CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-164 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF' SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEINGS 16 l.zz�-,. ,. N . AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM l'eSt AG L U• R x. TO " F-I S LE-FAMILY`V ' SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL.WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; (tir' PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. AS, the City of Southlake,,T- as is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate p icle XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as `A �gfidittu under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the G:\ORD\ZONING\480.I64 Page 1 pact facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: G:\ORD\ZONI NG\480.I64 Page 2 LBeing a '41 acre tract of land situated in the I ' _c am l "- `and more fully completely and com letel described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto �. and incorporated herein, from -"S. .4. tt1 to 'SF-1A` 4 '® t ieiV Residents iiiiid Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any Land all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to G:\ORD\ZONI NG\480.164 Page 3 ii)t—11 Le such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR (kr ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY G:\ORD\ZONING\480.I64 Page 4 qB—la (thw APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: (kiwi • • (W. G:\ORD\ZON I NG\480.164 Page 5 EXHIBIT "A" Being a 16 . 63 acre tract of land located in the R.D. Price Survey 1207, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being the tract of land in the name of Peggy H. Denton, as recorded in Volume 10366, Page 2208, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, (D.R.T.Co. ,Tx. ) , and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8" iron pin set at the southwest corner of Lot 4, Block 1, Harbor Oaks, an addition to the city of Southlake, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-135, Page 11, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, (P.R.T.Co.Tx. ) , and also being in the north line of Lot 16, Block A, Quail Creek Estates, an addition to the city of Southlake, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-118, Page 92, P.R.T.Co. ,Tx. Said 5/8" iron pin is the .most easterly southeast . corner of said Price Survey, the most westerly southwest corner of the John Childress Survey 254, and in the north line of the J.L. Chivers Survey 348, all in Tarrant County, Texas. THENCE South 89 degrees 10 minutes 58 seconds with the south line of said Denton tract, departing with the north line of Quail Creek Estates, 620.77 feet to a Corps of Engineers concrete monument with brass plate (all monuments hereafter are so marked) stamped C231-5, being the most easterly southeast corner of a tract of land conveyed by deed to the United States of America, recorded in (hoe Volume 2378, Page 567, D.R.T.Co. ,Tx. , THENCE along the easterly line of said United States of America Tract (Lake Grapevine) , and the westerly line of said Denton Tract the following courses and distances: N 00 degrees 39 minutes 49 seconds W, at 4 .05 feet past the north line of Quail Creek Estates and continuing in all 939 .77 feet to Mon. No. C231-4, N 89 degrees 22 minutes 01 seconds E, 499 .73 feet to Mon. No. C213-3, N 18 degrees 13 minutes 56 seconds W, 673 . 70 feet to Mon. No. C213-2 (monument broken) for the northwest corner of said Denton Tract, THENCE N 89 degrees 27 minutes 50 seconds E, 322 . 70 feet to a 3/8" iron pin found for the northeast corner of said Denton tract and in the west line of said John Childress Survey and said Harbor Oaks, THENCE S 00 degrees 43 minutes 30 seconds E with the west line of said John Childress Survey and said Harbor Oaks 1579 .40 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing some 16.63 acres or 724, 354.73 square feet. L G:\ORD\ZONING\480.I64 Page 6 $R-ly City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 31, 1995 TO: Curtis E . Hawk, City Manager FROM: Tom Elgin, Planner SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 636, Street Name Change Please find attached a letter dated March 13, 1995, from Tom Mathews, Hat Creek Ltd.,requesting a street name change for a portion of a street in Lonesome Dove Estates, Phase I. The request is to change the name of McCrae Trail between Parker Court and Milk River Trail to Parker Court. As addressed in his letter, the purpose of this request is to allow the two existing Parker family residences to be addressed on Parker Court. Staff has reviewed this request and have no problems with the street name change. Street name changes require passage of an ordinance. Attached is a copy of Ordinance No. 636 including a graphic of the portion of the street for which the name change is being requested. Upon adoption of the street name change ordinance,the Building Secretary will readdress the lots on the street and forward changes to the appropriate departments within the City and other public agencies (U.S. Post Office, Tarrant Appraisal District, etc.) TE att: Letter from Tom Mathews dated 3/13/95 Ordinance No. 636 Graphic Exhibit (kr' G:I WPFIMEMOISTAFFIST NM CK WPD HAT CREEK, LTD. P.O. BOX 92988 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 214/ 350-7732 March 13 , 1995 Mr. Gregory D. Last Community Development Director City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Street Name Change in Lonesome Dove Estates Dear Greg: Please accept this letter as formal request that we change the name of the McCrae Trail west of the point where it intersects Milk River Crossing at the Lonesome Dove Park. We request that the name of that section of road be change to Parker Court. The current Parker Court would remain unchanged. The purpose of this change, as I have discussed with your staff, is to provide the two existing houses which are owned by members of the Parker family, to be addressed on Parker Court. From the point east of the intersection of Milk River Crossing and McCrae Trail would remain McCrae Trail. Thank you for your help and cooperation in this matter. I appreciate your willingness to pursue this change and know the Parker's do as well. Sincerely, ---74#7re.czLiepos Tom M. Matthews, Jr. L , L CITY OF SOUTHLAKE ,'`,\ ORDINANCE NO. 449 AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE NAME OF A PORTION '-------------.7 OF THE STREET LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY PRESENTLY KNOWN AS "McCRAE TRAIL" (IN THE LONESOME DOVE ESTATES, PHASE I ADDITION)TO "PARKER COURT" FURTHER DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR THE AL OF INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES. WHEREAS, a change in the name of the street located within the City of Southlake, Texas(the "City"),presently known as "McCrae Trail" (in the Lonesome Dove Estates, Phase I Addition)to "Parker Court" has been requested by the City of Southiake; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to hereby officially change the name of such street as requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE: (Ilire Section 1. That all of the above premises are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Section 2. That the name of the portion of street located within the City presently known as "McCrae Trail" as described in Exhibit "A", is hereby officially changed to "Parker Court". Section 3. If any section, article, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this ordinance, or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of the ordinance despite such invalidity,which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are hereby expressly repealed to the extent of the inconsistency or conflict. G:\ORD\STREE1\NAME-CHG.W PD iC- 3 PASSED AND APPRO VED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY JAMES L.GIVERS SURVEY 7j QUAIL CREEK ESTATES A-348 • C(1 e, WC ►a In.PII.T.C.T. moo< E N BLOCK R C..TN Sr-IA E � tY P i Pig VA-lOr it 1C9Cf71 rN. E Y' T.';', 0. w t p g> 7l V a'2 _L_ _ _. .......r.r-2 7"L''''. _.._ _ 4._.._ ._ ._.5.•!-_:. ._ 1:/._.4. _.._.._.._.._`4._.•1.,_-. _. -4_. _ ....1`"'".!TT Et'. _.._;.1 F N „2 _J_ _f-z,_--2(10.,RT -�_ I_-- Ilk' ....wa - __- �_-__-1-- - t -- c---h1URT1� �lHI�dLj-1! hl IQ�SSd' -- -_-f-==,'«7 I x-x- x-< • •I 93'6. I' f. 1 '� - Ja- D-x••••• ••= Noe -x-*--JS-x-x teo.o3 x-�. ?7rr--,•-x- -x-d-R-x-x-x-- 1 .... I6..11• 1 IEI.O I/a°U� IN°I °t.M' Ea]°'w A »°.0� I!a°O' I!a°OT I.°. -- ieoo �pytl 1, ,.. ,eaoo filjr- I a L., LCK 1 a it 6uI E I c • tl.4 I :� © LOCK 7 e c $� •c r. I T S _fir. _^ ,ea«L I I M 0OIXI' E I 1419 b °Ia.ar , 5 mx__.__Ia4er __ _1ua¢-FE 'F__,...if--_ IQ9.o__ ]eaot -�- 1"q�or----' __,-_.110 4.4 1 v 1� I «s°7aI f I ' 'Ia0s . 7T).!I «rr7YOs•a I 1 - .„ _TOLe .1 10a°7 - Poe more' IODOd IOaod ,00N N 700.07 5 •t IJ 0Ar __R- I it E Q E @ ( 1,... p it • S i' [ 4 I. 1. V ! s It S°' 1.t 3IF' 1/1 L 1 1. 1 to iI 1S i Aii l& 47: C 1w ,r¢-0` 1 war .k 1 I.._ 2._. _e._. _.�LL .__ C__ _ .;.. {.. 5 t s1 .. G s aisee • �' 4177 Harr woe' ropes Haas IOeOV 1alOr um' ~ '?,. r c•11 . .m •ARKER CT. i,_U g X i., �;i ---.-POWDER-i'-RIVER: r IMIL-----_ _. 1 ti ( i -•• Pa tite. 'F 1 ,3.00r :VI! I44r waif wee eat Had Dear 7a»' , 4 _.- cam , e,.Ir.> r.' ._� _.._ _ I �.$ •3. • _- ot.1 1 I N s f I �4y c I I I p •V Se.. 4 it. g4 K g. 4 t.. R ag a 4 g., h ^I f«•ac7rour t I c ' 1 9y h e C I r• BLOCK 3 �i F e I t R ;� I , «eov Ir a I 1; ; �� �c O I .Iaaed I • saes - - « woo' nod I 0 1 . c e, 7+ �. � FiF� ••r r• - - - - r-mi..'- -Tarr.- 11 ■1 ti".'•'.;'I S 70770'a0•. ",- s S x r !. :1 t I w a. ! p-3 10 Y1 I. . IR •' _ IM.rJ _x-R-)A •F it �o I. C 1 � C (� y r>1 C 4-j C K♦•a C r1 ' vp�L. 11 -r I I I C, IF Y� i- :.,;•. I YSW 1p �rN s • +,�w i" +. ;vn e...__. E J `•I I F I, / ^ ' r .,... \ 3aEraN . t •i •.aa . .la.r our_ uaar ` I I C:i o li ' I I Sl n N•- V•II o 1\.a ' Ig,' I u I b a F ";-".ac----Im"9 cr."- ;r r T iIS--- I�' g ` c , n Z I i �� 1 °°.°I X IF C I c \ t 1� FI oc0.. Sin' MOW law , _1 im. 9 S� -le-lif► Ir`' * ry, $6. I v .4 g6. >p 4 t tr It Q r��0 s•�U 9alr'n...f�-WU.. -..__. "I f I v. v l �`� t. 11 ,yot t •, t,y fife \' & 4.0'' '---;:-1, �•t' `U k ig 11 1�I& & ! A a N ---4 --Io IJNJ • 1 V 'C a c • \ I N d C-- ^ c 18 -I a "ig �I a (^� atr �t -; / Sass\ '0' )`S li .ia ` ell I,f I �apR IG U• \ • X t*�p 4+ ,f t+F V. C •I.•,P' _two _Imar__I_ I LIbU3.Y l Ltr....j, I 1• _^ ;.P`�'s /.Y V y� 9 f IP °� : �L 275.03 team'(rn� A r I I . I Ism p S .f;O U.a r� r�� y ,� `` oI c I I I. �' g>< u5 •\ i10 _iv �¢�.'b \:vat C '91. rt . f I q .., 1,,,:,, :: ...,_6.._.-- .,.. . \ ,... ,, . �i.f/M. 1 17 I I €� 11 11 E» O \2, • 1 � '.14eroral +_�A �#+Os °�\` a\�� :i- 'aa� �u sty , ._ - _ __ _-_ 5% , II i xr { o ;s. .. o , \ \ I. •C ,�tl� c;IIi=ES+.ti11l1U1;ie A I L.. .. ,,. .c . ..; pg.: tl , SSR1=s55i��ISS�iSli e , Iyni 9 I • DATCI.' ' 0 r+ • �' ... _..I "a �SU kU 551i5555i((11 V I I Le SaA I is I k " g Yr�t i 1 g - /,4 c11 t hi1131T• � 11 .11 ..0, •\\I 11f11 allelll rll I1 !al Il;�i (Ilg!ft lirrlls g! J I_-_.--- _- t 1F '1 't ill ��TI !is It 11 is is It It is l; if It l� 1� i e 1 if_ il[ 11 ffla6fi ,i[!a•1 "'_�_' .' s ! bar • • rr • ra • I ' re 1 r1 Str!rriq Ili �I `I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 111 :! ilI hall' 111 11 1.1=a, 2a9.fw' ! Ili t .1ltt � , ' 111r t. S 00'26 29• E r ante • g E If ' try f r ��fI ylI^ ^ "i 11 f ' f11111111 i /III rl I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 ff ill !111111 1 l`.14 'i r � a: z E P ; • �r �•Ir a!° 1 1 t iI iIle!° tt1�I 11��1a1 II ® e !Ili /19411 ill �l l 1 1 l l l 1 l 1 l l 1 j 1 ►0 , ,l 14 1 !g:!•�rl a 2 .rPA } € I - 1 i+ ri t t i i i i i i i i I t .i „1 t pi 1f171 e �i 1�atr i t , l r [ II ! j tE r.. ,,,, ga s" .@ `!r� t1` i,a i i 3 < < j �� j� �l I����; ,l:6r�I 2 A".'g i 1 i 7 ? t htla tit III 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 l f lr lieraf lar1:. Ii 15 1 Y Z • I l R p N n B 8 1__ - „ _ ,-�1 _ a City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 30, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Ordinance 638-First Reading to Abandon a Portion of South Kimball Right- of-Way Ordinance 638 and a quitclaim deed for the Mayor's signature are attached. Ordinance 638 authorizes the Mayor to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all claims to title, ownership, or control of the right-of-way (R.O.W.) on the City's behalf. Last summer South Kimball was reconstructed. The north section of South Kimball was realigned to join the new North Kimball, which is between F.M. 1709 and S.H. 114 (see attached map). The curve at this section of South Kimball was permanently closed and will not be used for R.O.W. All of the utility companies Toyed existing lines from the former R.O.W. to the present R.O.W. along the realignment. The utility companies have signed releases expressing no objection to the abandonment. The portion of the tract to be abandoned is specially shown on Exhibit A and described on • Exhibit B, which is part of the quitclaim deed. The City has no interest in this property and believes that the public would be better served and benefitted by,vacating and abandoning this property. The owners of the property have previously given the City R.O.W. for widening South Kimball in exchange for this section of South Kimball when it is abandoned. In addition, the City Attorney's staff researched the initial dedication of the R.O.W. and determined that it was acquired from the property to which the quitclaim deed is written. Staff recommends that the City of Southlake abandon this northern portion of South Kimball. Please place this on the April 4, 1995 Council agenda for First Reading. BW Attachments: Ordinance 638 Quitclaim Deed, Exhibits A & B Kimball Realignment Map 9D-/ ORDINANCE NO. 638 AN ORDINANCE VACATING AND ABANDONING CERTAIN PORTIONS OF SOUTH KIMBALL IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, DECLARING THAT SUCH PROPERTY IS UNNECESSARY FOR USE BY THE PUBLIC; AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE QUIT CLAIM DEEDS RELEASING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP INTEREST AND CONTROL OF THESE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS;PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, after careful study and consideration, has determined that certain portions of South Kimball in the City of Southlake, are not being a public charge without a corresponding public benefit, and the public would be vacation and ' better served and benefitted by theirabandonment; and WHEREAS, in order to remove any question as to the continued interest or ownership of the public in said right-of-way, the city desires to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all title, ownership and control in said right-of-way, the city desires to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all title, ownership and control in said right-of-way to the owner or owners of the abutting property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The following right-of-way in the City of Southlake is hereby vacated and abandoned as public property: a portion of South Kimball as a dedicated public street, more specifically described in Exhibit A and shown on Exhibit B. Exhibits A and B are attached hereto and gb-2 incorporated herein for all purposes. The right-of-way is not being used by, nor useful or convenient to the public in general. It constitutes a public charge without a corresponding benefit, and the public would be better served and benefitted by its vacation and abandonment. The right-of-way so vacated and abandoned shall revert in fee simple to the owners of the abutting properties. SECTION 2. The Mayor of the City of Southlake, Texas, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute a quitclaim deed releasing all claims to title, ownership, or control of the right-of-way, on behalf of the City of Southlake, Texas. SECTION 3. A copy of said quitclaim deed shall be presented for filing with the County Clerk of Tarrant County, Texas by the office of the City Secretary. SECTION 4. • It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgement or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF 1995. MAYOR L ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney wp51\Files\ord finance.sk L QUITCLAIM DEED STATE OF TEXAS § KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TARRANT § For and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the City of Southlake (Grantor), does hereby bargain, sell, release, vacate, abandon and forever quitclaim unto: Southlake Kimball Venture, LTD., Texas Limited Partnership and any and all of its heirs, legal representatives or assigns, all of Grantor's right, title, and interest in and to the property described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD all of Grantor's right, title and interest in and to the above Ldescribed property unto the said Grantee, its heirs and assigns forever, so that neither Grantor nor its heirs, legal representatives or assigns shall have,,claim or demand any right or title to the aforesaid property, premises or appurtenances or any part thereof. EXECUTED this day of , 1995. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, GRANTOR By: Mayor L gb-5 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of 1995, by Notary Public in and for the State of Texas Type or Print Notary's Name My Commission Expires: L gb-10 • EXHIBIT 'A' L PROPERTY DESCRIBED 4,888.20 SQ. FT 0.1122 ACRES Sp --\ v ............... et. V�. -�I\--\-- (p.\ M1 _\ p9) �I ; - " '5"E TRACT 6A \ P.O.B.. . , C.8. 46' I I MARWN C. DARBY ,\—— R .4 1844.88'4. /T 21.94' •1 VOL. J806, P.65 '' I. 43.88'I I / �14•is ::rr �?::•:•: j: }:i•.' el . , 4 �::.. `�� g'��..::;::' ev` �d f,0 c,�Na L . I. y P 9l S I --- /� § ........... �45 --- I 1 5�p �o. � pe/ r9- N W E S • 1"=50' 001218L0.DWG I certify that this is a iw_ CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES true and accurate �.'.�\STrR' + representation of this ;•y� fo'•.9 1801 E. LAMAR BLVD. SUITE 200 survey as made on the ,� '"17 `n ARLLINGTON, TEXAS 78011 • •• METRO (817) 285-8836 ground. EDDIE L. CHEATHAM (817) 548-0896 ..Y .4 2346 'it SUR`, DATE : \\"Z' ""?4, gb-q EXHIBIT 'B' KIMBALL AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY Field Notes Being a 0.112 acre tract of land situated in Tarrant County, Texas and being a part of the S. Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525 and the G.W. Main Survey, Abstract No. 1098 and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the southerly right-of-way of Southlake Boulevard(F.M. Highway No. 1709)and the easterly line of a tract of land conveyed by W.R. Nail to Marvin G. Darby and wife, Mary Darby by deed dated May 16, 1963 and recorded in Volume 3806, Page 65 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County,Texas(DRTCT), said point being 65.00 feet southerly and radial to centerline survey station 430+79.21 and being North 54° 14' 37" East a distance • of 155.11 feet from the Southeast corner of said Darby tract and also being the beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 1844.86 feet, a chord bearing of South 71°46'35" East and a chord length of 43.88 feet; THENCE along the southerly right-of-way line of Southlake Boulevard and along said curve to the right through a central angle of 01°21'46" and an arc length of 43.88 feet to a point in the westerly line of a tract of land as described in a deed to Grover G. Fickes etux recorded in Volume 8309, Page 1579(DRTCT); THENCE along the westerly line of said Fickes tract, South 53°59'29" West a distance of 162.19 feet to a point for corner; THENCE departing the westerly line of said Fickes tract, NORTH a distance of 44.62 feet to a point for corner in the easterly line of said Darby tract; L, THENCE along the easterly line of said Darby tract, North 54°14'37" East a distance of 110.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; containing within these metes and bounds 0.112 acres or 4,888 square feet of land, more or less. L • Lie STATE HIQHwAY 114 _ - - - �R.O.W. HWY 114 I 1 WSW 1 , I .:• FUTURE R.O.W. HWY 114 I- - ---- - II \ , �� JIMP i "::-1 I ; ��i , , 9 p I , , r am \'' / /i',\ ;tt , .%1 _.__ 40....I•,.,..6‘ :"°., ` /' ' 1" S: V I = 200' � - 1(11W iA , ___- -- :____________1__:____________:_____:____________1_________-- :' i T T T -- - .....A '..4. I 1 I or,:e ".•••••, 1 I \ I I „.„,,• ..., I I I m► 1 I ,/ 1 L- I ---! •gr I I \ , , >. ti. ror.,- I1 c i AN`a I w. . . mi lI I ,, I ��5ti y ' 9 LI . _ _Ji , II ( 1 , • City of Southiake,Texas T_Y3rig\lisk_GlafiR MEMORANDUMMarch 29, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Stone Lakes Phase IV Developer Agreement The draft Developer Agreement to Stone Lakes Phase IV is attached. The Agreement contains the standard requirements for the provisions of water, sewer, streets, and drainage. Usual requirements relating to performance and payment bonds, maintenance bonds, and inspection fees are included in the Agreement. A few conditions are distinctive to this phase, which resulted in revisions to our standard agreement. These items are discussed below. • Page 9, Section A, OFF-SITE DRAINAGE: Developer is required to participate in the cost of the W. Continental Blvd. (Critical Drainage Structure No. 20). The cost for this ,phase is $5,280 (see attached drainage calculations). • Page 9, Section C, PARK FEES: Developer has requested a 100% credit toward Park Fees. In lieu of Park Fees the Developer has agreed to dedicate and landscape a small strip of land to connect Stone Lakes with Chimney Hills. This land will be landscaped at Developer expense and donated as a public park. At their February meeting, the Park Board considered the Developer's request for 100% credit and recommends the entire credit be granted. A memo from Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager, is attached. • Page 10, PERIMETER STREET ORDINANCE: This section is struckout because there is no perimeter street that will abut Stone Lakes Phase IV. Please place this on the April 4, 1994 agenda for Council consideration. i BW/sm Attachments: Developer Agreement Drainage Pro-rata Calculation Memo from Shana Yelverton Maps (1••• wp51\wpfiles\wthead.mem\stnelks.da /60,44-/ • STONE LAKES ADDITION,PHASE IV DEVELOPER AGREEMENT An Agreement between the City of Southlake, Texas,hereinafter referred to as the "City," and the undersigned Developer, hereinafter referred to as the "Developer," of the ct" : , to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas,hereinafter referred to as the"Addition," for the installation of certain community facilities located therein, and to provide city services thereto. It is underst000d by and between the parities that this Agreement is applicable to the{`._ro. lots contained withing the ` r a and to the off-site improvements necessary to support the Addition. I. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: . A. It is agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Developer shall employ a civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas for the design and preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of all facilities covered by this Agreement. B. Since the Developer is prepared to develop the Addition as rapidly as possible and is desirous of selling lots to builders and having residential building activity begin as quickly as possible and the City is desirous of having the subdivision completed as rapidly as possible,the City agrees to release 10%of the lots after installation of the water and sewer mains. Framing shall not commence until water quality is approved by the City and all appropriate Fire Code requirements are satisfied, and street signs(temporary or permanent)with street names are in place. The remaining building permits shall be released as soon as the streets are complete. The Developer recognizes that Certificates of Occupancy for residential dwellings will not be issued until the supporting public works infrastructure within the Addition has been accepted by the City,and this will serve as an incentive to the Developer to see that all remaining items are completed so that final acceptance can be.obtained. C. The Developer will present to the City either a cash escrow; letters of credit, performance bond or payment bond acceptable to the City guaranteeing and agreeing to pay an amount equal to 100% of the value of the construction cost of all of the facilities to be constructed by the Developer, and providing for payment to the City of such amounts,up to the total remaining amounts required for the completion of the Addition if the Developer fails to complete the work within two (2)years of the signing of this Agreement between the City and Developer. All bonds shall be issued by a Best-rated bonding company. All letters of credit must meet the Requirements for Irrevocable Letter of Credit attached hereto and incorporated herein. The value of the performance bond,letters of credit or cash escrow will reduce at a C,, rate consistent with the amount of work that has been completed by the Developer and accepted by the City. Performance and payment bond, letters of credit or cash /D19 a escrow from the prime contractor(s) or other entity reasonably acceptable to City, hereinafter referred to as Contractor, will be acceptable in lieu of Developer's obligations specified above. D. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City maintenance bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow amounting to 20%of the cost of construction of underground utilities and 50% of the construction cost for paving. These maintenance bonds, letter of credit or cash escrow will be for a period of two(2)years and will be issued prior to the final City acceptance of the subdivision. The maintenance bonds,letters of credit or cash escrow will be supplied to the City by the contractors performing the work, and the City will be named as the beneficiary if the contractors fail to perform any required maintenance. E. Until the performance and payment bonds, letters of credit or cash escrow required in Paragraph C has been furnished as required, no approval of work on or in the Addition shall be given by City and no work shall be initiated on or in said Addition by Developer, save and except as provided above. F. It is further agreed and understood by the parties hereto that upon acceptance by City, title to all facilities and improvements mentioned hereinabove shall be vested in the City and Developer hereby relinquishes any right, title, or interest in and to said facilities or any part thereof. It is further understood and agreed that until the City accepts such improvements, City shall have no liability or responsibility in connection with any such facilities. Acceptance of the facilities shall occur at such time that City, through its City Manager or his duly authorized representative, provides Developer with a written acknowledgement that all facilities are complete, have been inspected and approved and are being accepted by the City. G. On all public facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his own construction contract,Developer agrees to the following procedure: 1. Developer agrees to pay the following: a. Inspection fees equal to three percent(3%) of the cost of the water, street,drainage and sanitary sewer facilities,on all facilities included in this agreement for which Developer awards his or her own construction contract,to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; b. Administrative Processing Fee equal to two percent(2%) of the cost of water,street,drainage and sanitary sewer facilities,on all facilities included in this Agreement for which Developer awards his or her C, -2- /O 3 own construction contract, to be paid prior to construction of each phase and based on actual bid construction cost; c. Trench testing(95% Standar ); d. The additional charge for nspections during Saturday, Sunday, holidays, and after normal working hours; e. Any charges for retesting as a result of failed tests; f. All gradation tests required to insure proper cement and/or time stabilization. 2. The City agrees to bear the expense of: a. All nuclear density tests on the roadway subgrade(95% Standard); b. Technicians time for preparing concrete cylinders; and c. Concrete cylinder tests and concrete coring samples. The City can delay connection of buildings to service lines or water mains constructed under this Agreement until said water mains and service lines have been completed to the satisfaction of and accepted by the City. H. The Developer and any third party, independent entity engaged in the construction of houses,hereinafter referred to as Builder will be responsible for mowing all grass and weeds and otherwise reasonably maintaining the aesthetics of all land and lots in said subdivision which have not been sold to third parties. After fifteen(15) days written notice, should the Developer or Builder fail in this responsibility, the City may contract for this service and bill the Developer or Builder for reasonable costs. Should such cost remain unpaid for 120 days after notice,the City can file a lien on such property so maintained. Any guarantee of payment instrument (Performance Bond, Letter of Credit, etc.) submitted by the Developer or Contractor on a form other than the one which has been previously approved by the City as "acceptable" shall be submitted to the City Attorney for the City and this Agreement shall not be considered in effect until such City Attorney has approved the -instrument. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. J. Any surety company through which a bond is written shall be a surety company duly authorized to do business in the State of Texas,provided that the City,through the -3- /0/9-' City Manager,shall retain the right to reject any surety company as a surety for any work under this or any other Developer's Agreement within the City of Southlake regardless of such company's authorization to do business in Texas. Approval by the City shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. II. FACILITIES: A. ON SITE WATER: The Developer hereby agrees to install water facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and reviewed by the City. Further,the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with Ordinance No. 170 and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City requirements,the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost greater than the cost of an 8" line. Additionally, the City agrees to provide temporary water service at Developer's request and expense, for construction, testing and irrigation • purposes only,to individual lots during the construction of homes, even though sanitary sewer service may not be available to the homes. B. DRAINAGE: Developer hereby agrees to construct the necessary drainage facilities within the Addition. These facilities shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by Developer's engineers,reviewd by the City Engineer, and made part of the final plat as approved by the City Council. The Developer hereby agrees to fully comply with all EPA requirements relating to the planning, permitting and management of storm water which may be in force at the time that development proposals are being presented for approval by the City. C. STREETS: 1. The street construction in the Addition shall conform to the requirements in Ordinance No. 217. Streets will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and reviewed by the City Engineer. 2. The Developer will be responsible for: a)Installation and two year operation cost of streetlights,which is payable to the City prior to final acceptance of the Addition;b) Installation of all street signs designating the names of the streets inside the subdivision,said signs to be of a type,size,color and design standard generally employed by the Developer and approved by the City in • -4- /o,41-s f . accordance with City ordinances: c) Installation of all regulatory signs recommended by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices and as directed by the Director of Public Works.It is understood that Developer may put in signage having unique architectural features,however,should the signs be moved or destroyed by any means the City is only responsible for replacement of standard signage. 3. All street improvements will be subject to inspection and approval by the City. No work will begin on any street included herein prior to complying with the requirements contained elsewhere in this Agreement. All water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage utilities which are anticipated to be installed within the street or within the street right-of-way will be completed - prior to the commencement of street construction on the specific section of street in which the utility improvements have been placed or for which they are programmed. It is understood by and between the Developer and the City that this requirement is aimed at substantial compliance with the majority of the pre-planned facilities. • It is understood that in every construction project a decision later may be made to realign a line or service which may occur after construction has commenced. The Developer hereby agrees to advise the City Director of Public Works as quickly as possible when such a need has been identified and to work cooperatively with the City to make such utility change in a manner that will be least disruptive to street construction or stability. D. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES: The Developer hereby agrees to install sanitary sewerage collection facilities to service lots as shown on the final plat of the Addition. Sanitary sewer facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and reviewed by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in compliance with all applicable city ordinances, regulations and codes and shall be responsible for all construction costs, materials and engineering. E. EROSION CONTROL: During construction of the Addition and after the streets have been installed, the Developer agrees to keep the streets free from soil build-up. The Developer agrees to use soil control measures such as hay bales, silt screening, hydromulch, etc.,to prevent soil erosion. It will be the Developer's responsibility to present to the Director of Public Works a soil control development plan that will be implemented for this subdivision. When, in the opinion of the Director of Public Works,there is -5- /6iq- sufficient soil build-up on the streets or other drainage areas and notification has been given to the Developer,the Developer will have seventy-two(72)hours to clear the soil from the streets or affected areas. If the Developer does not remove the soil from the street within 72 hours, the City may cause the soil to be removed either by contract or City forces and place the soil within the Addition at the Developer's expense. All expenses must be paid to the City prior to acceptance of the Addition. F. AMENITIES: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Addition may incorporate a number of unique amenities and aesthetic improvements such as ponds, aesthetic lakes,unique landscaping,walls,and may incorporate specialty signage and accessory facilities. The Developer agrees to accept responsibility for the construction and maintenance of all such aesthetic or specialty item such as walls, vegetation, signage,landscaping,street furniture,pond and lake improvements until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. G. USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY: It is understood by and between the City and Developer that the Developer may provide unique amenities within public right-of-way, such as landscaping,irrigation, coi lighting, etc., for the enhancement of the Addition. The Developer agrees to maintain these amenities until such responsibility is turned over to a homeowners association. The Developer and his successors and assigns understand that the City shall not be responsible for the replacement.•of these amenities under any circumstances and further agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all damages, loss or liability of any kind whatsoever by reason of injury to property or third person occasioned by its use of the public right-of-way with regard to these improvements and the Developer shall,at his own cost and expense, defend and protect City against all such claims and demands. H. START OF CONSTRUCTION: Before the construction of the streets,and the water, sewer,or drainage facilities can begin, the following must take place: 1. Approved payment and performance bonds must be submitted to the City in the name of the City prior to the commencement of any work. 2. At least six (6) sets of construction plans stamped "Released for Construction" by the City Engineer must be submitted. 3. All fees required to be paid to the City. -6- l©A 7 • 4. Developer's Agreement executed. 5. The Developer, or Contractor shall furnish to the City a policy of general liability insurance,naming the City as co-insured,prior to commencement of any work. 6. A pre-construction meeting between Developer and City is required. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Developer covenants and agrees to and does hereby fully indemnify,hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever,whether real or asserted, brought for or on account of any injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from or in any way connected with the agreement or the construction of the improvements or facilities described herein; which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities; and in addition, the Developer covenants to indemnify,hold harmless and defend the City, its officers, agents,servants and employees,from and against any and all claims, suits or causes of action of any nature whatsoever,brought for or on account of injuries or damages to persons or property, including death, resulting from any failure to properly safeguard the work, or on account of any act, intentional or otherwise, neglect or misconduct of the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, agents, servants or employees;which indemnity, shall terminate upon acceptance by the City of such improvements or facilities. B. Venue of any action brought hereunder shall be in.Fort.Worth, Tarrant County, Texas. C. Approval by the City Engineer or other City employee of any plans, designs or specifications submitted by the Developer pursuant to this agreement shall not constitute or be deemed to be a release of the responsibility and liability of the Developer, his engineer, employees, officers or agents for the accuracy and • competency of their design and specifications. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility and liability by the City for any defect in the design and specifications prepared by the consulting engineer, his officers, agents, servants or employees, it being the intent of the parties that approval by the City Engineer signifies the City's approval on only the general design concept of the improvements to be constructed. In this connection,the Developer shall for a period. of two (2) years after the acceptance by the City of Southlake of the completed construction project, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, servants and employees, from any loss, damage,liability or expense on account of damage to property and injuries, including death,to any and all persons which may -7- /D.9-8 (impe arise out of any defect, deficiency or negligence of the engineer's designs and specifications incorporated into any improvements constructed in accordance therewith, and the Developer shall defend at his own expense any suits or other • proceedings brought against the City,its officers,agents, servants or employees,or any of them,on account thereof,to pay all expenses and satisfy all judgement which may be incurred by or rendered against them or any of them in connection herewith. D. This agreement or any part thereof or any interest herein,shall not be assigned by the Developer without the express written consent of the City Manager,which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. E. On all facilities included in this agreement for which the Developer awards his own construction contract,the Developer agrees to employ a construction contractor who is approved by the City, and whose approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, said contractor to meet City and statutory requirements for being insured, licensed and bonded to do work in public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public streets and to be qualified in all respects to bid on public projects of a similar nature. F. Work performed under the agreement shall be completed within two (2)years from the date thereof. In the event the work is not completed within the two (2) year period,the City may, at its election, draw on the performance bond, letter of credit or other security provided by Developer and complete such work at Developer's expense;provided,however,that if the construction under this agreement shall have started within the two (2) year period, the City may.agree to renew the agreement with such renewed agreement to be in compliance with the City policies in effect at that time. G. The City is an exempt organization under Section 151,309, Tax Code, and the facilities constructed under this Agreement will be dedicated to public use and accepted by the City upon acknowledgement by the City of completion under Paragraph I.F. 1. The purchase of tangible personal property, other than machinery or equipment and its accessories, repair, and replacement parts, for use in the performance of this Agreement is, therefore, exempt from taxation under Chapter 151, Tax code, if the tangible property is: a. necessary and essential for the performance of the Agreement; and b. completely consumed at the job site. -8- 42 9 2. The purchase of a taxable service for use in the performance of this Agreement is exempt if the service is performed at the job site and if: a. this Agreement expressly requires the specific service to be provided or purchased by the person performing the Agreement; or b. the service is integral to the performance of the Agreement. N. OTHER ISSUES: A. OFF-SITE DRAINAGE: The Developer understands that the Drainage Ordinance, Section 6.06-B, requires that each development contribute on a.pro-rata basis towards the cost of replacing critical drainage structures downstream from the development. This development is within the basin served by the box culvert in ' c} F . The Developer agrees to pay € f the culvert expense prior to the beginning of construction. B. OFF-SITE WATER: Water facilities will be installed in accordance with plans and specifications to be prepared by the Developer's engineer and reviewed by the City. Further, the Developer agrees to complete this installation in accordance with currents ordinances and shall be responsible for all construction costs,materials and engineering. In the event that certain water lines are to be oversized because of City requirements,the City will reimburse the Developer for the oversize cost C. PARK FEES: , . Addition consists of_lots for a total rcquircd park fcc of$ . u9 t� �e ( cps r air Y � -9- /DA-A0 . . E. PERIMETER STREET ORDINANCE: fcct of the development abuts on , which will require a Perimeter Street Fcc of D. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE: All construction activities shall meet the requirements of the Tree preservation Ordinance 585. SIGNED AND EFFECTIVE on the date last set forth below. DEVELOPER: By: Title: Date: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,TEXAS By: Gary Fickes, Mayor ATTEST: Sandra LeGrand, City Secretary Date: -10- • (0, REQUIREMENTS FOR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT 1. The Letter of Credit(L of C)must have a duration of at least one year. 2. The L of C may be substituted for utility security deposits exceeding$10,000.00. The City reserves the right to specify the face amount of the letter of credit. 3. The L of C must be issued by an FDIC insured bank in a form acceptable to the City of Southlake. The City reserves the right to approve/disapprove the bank issuing the Letter of Credit. 4. The L of C must be issued by a bank that has a minimum capital ratio of six(6%)percent, and has been profitable for each of the last two consecutive years. 5. The customer must provide the City with supporting financial information on the bank to allow the City to ascertain requirements are met. Suitable financial information would be the previous two (2) years December 31 Call Reports submitted to the FDIC and audited financial statements. 6. Partial drawings against L of C must be permitted. 7. The City must be able to draft on sight with proof of amount owed. 8. The customer pays any and all fees associated with obtaining L of C. 9. Expiring letter of credit must be replaced by substitute letters of credit at least 30 days prior to the expiration date on the L of C held by the City. c:1 wpfrlesldevagreeformat -11- /DA-ice CITY OF SOUTHLAKE PROJECT COST ESTIMATE CRITICAL STRUCTURE NO. 20 1,337 ACRE WATERSHED ESTIMATE ITEM DESCRIPTION ' COST 1. MAIN "PRE-CAST BOX CULVERT = 80 L.F. @ $2,610.00 $ 208,800.00 2. 2-TEX-D.O.T TYPE WING WALLS (PARALLEL TYPE)(L.S.) 16,000.00 3. 320 L.F.-METAL GUARD RAIL I@ $28.75/L.F. 9,200.00 4. 6" THICK CONCRETE RIP-RAP @ CULV. ENDS 3000 S.F. @ $4.85/S.F 14,550.00 • 5. HYDRO MULCHING AND EROSION CONTROL 2,500.00 6. REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE 2.000.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 253,050.00 ENGINEERING COSTS 25,300.00 SURVEYING COSTS 3,150.00 PROJECT INSPECTION COSTS 5,000.00 GRAND TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 286,500.00 COST PER ACRE (BASED ON 1,337 ACRES) COST/AC. = $286,500.00/1 337 = $214.29/ACRE jfr je 6 4 I /let 1.04;..al 014 - 64/ - 6Qew)J 5agn. io CS20 - 3 t • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM February 24, 1995 TO: Robert Whitehead, Director of Public Works FROM: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Park Dedication Fee Credits -- Stone Lakes Phase IV Attached you will find an application from Phil Jobe, Developer of Stone Lakes Phase IV, for park dedication fee credits, which was presented to the Park Board at its February meeting. The request is somewhat unusual, with several points worth noting. First, the developer is offering to dedicate a small strip of land (approximately 20' width) to connect Stone Lakes with Chimney Hills. This would be the only pedestrian connection between the two subdivisions since the Council did not require the 'street continuation between the two. This is a critical piece of the forthcoming trail system master plan. Greg Last, Director of Community Development, has been working with Mr. Jobe to secure the connection. The piece of land to be dedicated is not large enough to suffice for the park dedication required by the City's subdivision ordinance, so the developer would be required to pay fees in addition to dedicating the land. Another point worth mentioning is the location of the property. This piece of land (and the subsequent "trail") is located between houses in the middle of the subdivision. At first glance it might appear that the developer is merely proposing a walkway and landscaping, but given the property's location, some screening of the trail is desirable. Obviously the City would not want to landscape (in this way) the miles of trail we will eventually build, but the location in question may warrant the enhanced landscaping. Staff would like the opportunity to review the actual plant selections to insure the plants are hardy and low maintenance. Finally, the developer has asked for 100% credit on the fees ($21,000). The subdivision ordinance clearly states that "private park, recreation or open space amenities may never satisfy more than 50% of the total park and open space dedication requirement." Since this will become a public park, and given that the developer is proposing some improvements, the Park Board unanimously approved a recommendation to grant the developer 100% credit. You will recall that the Oak Hill developer received 100% credit because of improvements he made to Bicentennial Park. I hope this provides some clarification on the request and the Park Board's recommendation. P1-ase let me know if you have questions. 1 /O ""/� r ' • THE NELSON CORPORATION 5999 Summerside Drive,Suite 202 Dallas,Texas 75252 TEL: (214)380-2605 FAX: (214) 380-2609 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST PROJECT: Stonelakes — Phase IV JOB NUMBER 90062.04 CLIENT: Beachwood Company DATE: 02/02/95 ADDRESS: Two Turtle Creek Village,Ste. 1000 Dallas,Texas 75219 ITEM._DESCRIPTION .f <, 'f,.�< '.... :.;.QUANTITY .UNIT. .COSTNNIT '; TOTALCOST :. 1 Wood Fence (7'— Cedar Double—Sided with Steel Post @ 6' o.c) 255 LF. 33.25 8,478.75 2 Wrought Iron Fence 40 LF. 30.00 1,200.00 3 I Concrete Walk 1,210 S.F. 2.00 2,420.00 4 Low Column (Stone) 4 EA. 475.00 1,900.03 5 Tall Column (Stone) 2 EA. 750.00 1,500.00 6 Shade Trees (6"Cal. lave Oak) 6 EA. 550.00 3,300.00 7 Ornamental Trees (10' Ht.) 11 EA. 165.00 1,815.00 8 Shrubs 2 Gal. 60 EA. 13.00 780.00 9 Ground Cover 2,220 EA. 0.90 1,998.03 10 Common Bermuda (Hydro Mulch) 2,150 S.F. 0.10 215.00 11 Steel Edging 75 LF. 2.00 150.00 ( 12 Bed Prep 2" 885 S.F. 0.40 354.00 13 Mulch 1' 885 S.F. 0.15 132.75 14 Cast Stone Insets 2 EA. 150.00 r 300.00 15 Irrigation 1 LS. 3,500.00 3,500.00 16 Professional Fees 1 LS. 1,750.00 1,750.00 SUB—TOTAL: $29,793.50 5% CONTINGENCY: $1,489.68 GRAND TOTAL $31,283.18 NOTES: These prices are for estimation purposes only. Actual prices will vary. F:W006204ULand.WK9 • /D�/S • --s -1 RPM ,. sn+rt car ow T •• s II • ' ' , rum an. timer b>s [1. - �_ ' .I®P9N7 61r�ILD4�( S S -- s ., R�` s x as a1 is y i 01 ,.,.k. ,ti...- -!-x NE 5 QQ 4:, 4Nre x, _eV? ,o. � s . �R055: JA �REE�i �1oN r 11 , G- — C , , '• .. A 1 x „k ,4 C 11/ ' • ` - �M, y; �•,,...•'y c`�R �I J4 J Yaao�As- . Ho+II"1 ji IW' a rw 11� . T , � L`-- -Gp F-� . • a,..1� ff71a •'�..F` F l L. W. IALILER :E�. • • . ! _ 11 ...2 r.e le Y C. 18 •- iee 181 ilia. -- p -..--tc: ,. -,-: i: --1_ KLLILR OM twitT - -. ♦.....•'� • _ +- 2 ' • . •.�I•.,t- nsi MOV iff s ' • 1 .• WDRD`S CO > f- — 1 } ,_ •`�; _ _ ; .03� - _• D� 1 5 // �. I �X; ANY r E 11 ,�ERt s III- o �}., /a kk { ,a.' Yr .K '• ..♦ r • AIM gal O r,` 't -1<-.' ti'w Ei' p: 9,. . ...„-..,. . . . .. ....,:...„. -;,.., .., \-_-... . . ,.. .. , :.-„,_,.. „t! >w {-� . ..i'-, -ALL j___C oixig—.-1•—•—• •3 r.1•3 6 . . - : -1::. :••.• i'.'......• •!... ,f• Di • • "..-r. rr ••-c 4.0., : 1:i: i...;,•:-..,... ,,r•i. v.........__ ,,,„6-e-g::II 0., 66._ MB 1 ,0%• e 2 In = \ -- 5. ., . . : : -;4..... .—.' .,,)-:-: -1`... . :-.;-. ) :--! -c\-I(- pi Num 30 E . ! , ...„ . _ , -- . .. • I CI ci r 1 pDD��� W r19s ! 1 -: 1 '- ~ Np5�1 � arK � �'� •( i !� _G 1------_-- ---,,, - . --- �--�-- ---- ----_-- -- ---- - 1- , �o ,. , . . ,bl�. ( - :Ni,<- ; ,,QEll r`., �, i� ram... ., , -.,-- Stp1E' :� p of.,3,2. cARRou ems\^ t x o t - •�� 1 6" i' yr:. 70•` HIGH SCHOOL a i.• f �� Y�f v�C Sq_ t1-�tptESr3 . w rr •r �✓ r :y"K• '•1 \ i • 'Y �;.' j I �' I ra G 471,1° i I , '. 1 ,,,�{o� IN 1 . ,a 1{ 1L,. 1 • -1112 j,..J __G'RD 5`f 1 • '••"Y` i• 1 1- 4, , - ir\„'v.,- i I : . MINI MIT IMMI40 .1E• r. j o r s r 0 � F91RARfl GRAi$� NER K .s p. GDR . r., w r w 1• Alf?' YH iNilaltit jr11$111iir#14f Qr FAR N1- . - I 3.1 1 WO r. 6I{rca L � IC � Of T '£{D 1.V YHORiAS _ OPd- N r .�.. - +, -FR1 ..-': •, V ;- -y ND tN: ,Y.I. .,:y t r... . :466/ � -1rT• ©® JHVD� ! `_:-1 C_ i-----. .7-;-.r.,., _,_ • Hy .. tp ES L 1MS ; 11�y1�• ' I<T PpRK. -' • 4 lorI.WIA ",1 I I• MY "11"" ,,. ! I). r, .r 1-, - •- ••- .! •a o. T •./.,... : T IjIVAM ,:::....: . hi 11! "'I` III:11 y1YARY CARROIL I i . '� •. y. LL -• .1C -• i 11� 1p;T I. i� /jy SCIRXIL k ,:I•. =-� ..y `{ r.6•• ,,.D IC 1:. • .04 �/ — • 4A1'I,a'11 1 nr - n. 1 ^ • '• I �.AL _ -MO •- q p'S' „ .. ,' • 4.[t1MU L 1; f .� %t?' •_•,�� ,'.. TRACT MAP ` i': .. =a.. . ,, ,t.:... ,ot4 1.• ( ...,‘,..pmue 1 7 MI ( -7 I 1 -..... „ C )) 1 [ \ r` / • QD i ` ems' 40P k a 1 ' ! ' / -J 8% sju t / 1,.. - a (-L., \, y �'r�� of 3 S. ,,���. t 3 ipr ' ....... I; :si Y �$j• ,tp ? X I b g4 _ - !a in -.It i 3� ii i toglg U n F� :F a - _z st4 v;-A . \.......i: a c% ha S --,a_ , i Mr p CC '�• r•f•_ -'O ! i 2 \SI•.�= 17Ni17O A o�..Ot ��_ ! E w M tM e n ;I:2-:;1 i 1 !II k •nN iSIS ; ✓• S 1r- _ :S ,a I � S. ! - _, S 1.‘! S S I• Ole :S 1I taw I y ta�mwa Y Milimits • I. t i 0IN •V isELY .. 1 SG il_ �:a _..p i . i I. =?z Yt: I. `l`-1 0.41 1 ! ;:� =E' :y; I Ssi'J E3 is : I z4E pi :4i iii i rte:s iv ' t it V zi ztl s=i =i•- 31 tt, 1%F t ", ;t S Quit t:: x:- 3:1 f.4 i •t xl i . Ki ta:-- 11:: I: 11 i 1 NJost i 1 III _i . 1•-12 ! x.t 3 x: n. 1,, :-1 1IT .ire-:t ,as x :t li! 4; .:t•; is t 2• ; l 1 21 ...._ .._..... } l.. rimwoua+ xuaa ._Ys!tji ii: it Tl:-j iJt/S :] If t.ss tt -hey', f'--= tt_ �tise I:1 II •Il i gg 'II! s= -I,y S 1•`. i Ii t- �;5! 'i3 - i z 1B( i si : iyl �"'z tti: _i� ii ! i Ty ((i.„. o ,i-IQ,.��$_ s ( i1 ! 51 !E( # :at i.lt g: it.gaI ,IS t1 n if N:i:: 1gc I '-tt _ ,,... iv iv ,Yi:: •z'p- .: :tjsyss:i s :) _ :i a NJa SLY W: d3i1 Q_•` P �(�" i:1 Sv- a c` 1,12 eiir gm x�t 's::i r_Tc :g tis1 ;:3:1 Yi E:xi I-IS 03NOZ M •-•• SVX31 .SY11Y0 • NOILYHOdUO3 NOS13 N 3H1 -•"'•` y /0/9 /7 20' Gjv — 1 ;� 3 s 1 5 , co In S6S 03 .0 Ps50.se o 1 15' D.E �4`38 7 21 F �. OQ• 6 1 ^ is. o `° . 41. 3 BLOCK 8 •F. w - ci. . • w V 142.54' 143 58 �� S89'55'05'W S89'5 V 23.00' a 50' ;n o- `� u, m v -Irn N89'56.49" n ;° m 62 o 2 147.60' o in o .. to m Z BLOCK 8 W N89'55'05'E N89' • ., o - o ., 160.00' 16 .+ o -J O i W 15' O. mu; 57 m 6ti10 _ LI v in - 0 15- D.E. to EN cn N. • N• v i5' D.E. Z Yr 63 N o ��._ N89'56'49"E/-- �. .." 30' B �' 147.60' VI o 10.00'-/� - f' i5 160.00' 16 • or in o z 370.13' DA1 / .9` \ N89'55 Sp .t ' 56 co / 3, 42 00 125.00' 124.25 cc; •// 3 .36' _ • N c; i4' `t` S 9� ' Q 16.56' • /9, ,.5c) m v v o •• `� '/ �°� cu •o 5 53 ` /' 55 0 to 20.00'Ihille 83 N47.45'56'E D.E. & U.E. .. I i5'���37.00' 47 09 SEE NOTE 6 5• F- 454.93' 167.78' \`� 54,82 ---125.00'__ 124.25 S89 °52 ' 42"W 802 . 53 ' 5' U.E. 5' U.E. E 7.5' U.E.---11 f1:144 LOT 13 CHIMNEY HILL g BLOCK 4 PHASE II LOT 8 , /— CAB, A. SLIDE 808 LOT 16 ' BLOCK 6 �-.1-4 i • P.R.T.C.T. ►J �___�\ LOT 14 LOT 15 �7.5' U.E. ~, .E. / I�7.5' U.E. LOT MEADOW LANE + �" 1-5• U.E. Cx4 LOT 7 3T 12 Ii 5' U.E.-01 +I— ‘ f7.- LOT 7 BLOCK 5 7.5' U.E I LOT 8 LOT 9 I V L /��a • • (OW' CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS COMMUNICATION OF INTERNAL CONTROL STRUCTURE RELATED MATTERS NOTED IN THE AUDIT YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1994 coif //, • WEAVER AN!)TIDWELL AFFILIATIONS CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FORT WORTH OFFICE MMIT INTERNATIONAL A REGISTERED LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 1500 COMMERCE BUILDING ASSOCIATES,INC. THREE FOREST PLAZA,19TH FLOOR 307 WEST SEVENTH STREET ASSOCIATED REGIONAL 12221 MERIT DRIVE FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76102 ACCOUNTING FIRMS DALLAS,TEXAS 75251-2216 (917)332-7905 (214)490-1970 FACSIMILE(214)702-8321 January 20, 1995 Members of the City Council and City Manager City of Southlake, Texas In planning and performing our audit of the general purpose financial statements of the City of Southlake, Texas for the year ended September 30, 1994, we considered its internal control structure in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control structure. Reportable conditions involve matters coming to our attention relating to significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal control structure, that in our judgement, could adversely affect the City's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data consistent with the assertions of management in the financial statements. A material weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control elements does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Our consideration of the internal control structure would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal control structure that might be reportable conditions and accordingly, would not disclose all reportable conditions that would be considered to be material weaknesses as defined above. However, our audit disclosed no condition believed to be a material weakness. We noted other matters that we have communicated to management in a separate letter dated January 20, 1995. (we L CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS January 20, 1995 Page Two This report is intended solely for the information and use of the City Council and management and should not be used for any other purpose. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service and wish to express our appreciation to the City staff for their cooperation and assistance during the audit. We would be pleased to discuss these observations further with you and to assist you in implementing any of the recommendations. Very truly yours, WEAVER AND TIDWELL, L.L.P. (kw Je L. Gaither Partner JLG:cck L //3 WEAVER AND TIDWELL AFFILIATIONS CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FORT WORTH OFFICE IMMIT INTERNATIONAL A REGISTERED LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 1500 COMMERCE BUILDING ASSOCIATES,INC. 307 WEST SEVENTH STREET THREE FOREST PLAZA,19TH FLOOR ASSOCIATED REGIONAL 12221 MERIT DRIVE FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76102 ACCOUNTING FIRMS DALLAS,TEXAS 75251-2216 (617)332-7905 (214)490-1970 FACSIMILE(214)702-8321 January 20, 1995 Members of City Council and City Manager CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS In planning and performing our audit of the general purpose financial statements of the City of Southlake, Texas for the year ended September 30, 1994, we considered its internal control structure in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control structure. As a result of our audit, we have prepared recommendations and comments regarding the accounting policies and procedures and other observations. Our consideration of the internal control structure, described above, should not be considered as being all-inclusive of the areas where improvements might be achieved. FUEL INVENTORY During the current year fuel inventory was not appropriately charged for all vehicles to user departments. This resulted in fuel inventory at year end being overstated by approximately $15,000. We recommend the City institute procedures to ensure fuel usage is appropriately recorded and fuel inventory is measured and periodically reconciled to the general ledger. WATER AND SEWER RECEIVABLES At year end the water and sewer receivable subsidiary ledger was not in agreement with the general ledger balance by approximately $8,000. We recommend the City reconcile the water and sewer receivable ledger to the general ledger balances periodically. L /I / J17/ L Members of City Council and City Manager CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS January 20, 1995 Page Two CONCLUDING REMARKS If we may be of assistance in the further discussion of the above comments, please call upon us. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service and wish to express our appreciation to management and employees of the City for their cooperation and assistance during the audit. Very truly yours, WEAVER AND TIDWELL, L.L.P. (be 11634— AJ L. Gaither Partner JLG:cck L /// City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 16, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Lou Ann Heath, Director of Finance SUBJECT: Management's Response to Auditor's Recommendations - Fiscal Year 1994 In their review of the City's fiscal year 1993-94 financial statements, auditors Weaver and Tidwell made two recommendations and comments regarding the accounting policies and procedures of the City. This is a response to those recommendations and explanation of the circumstances surrounding the items. Fuel Inventory. The City utilizes a computerized card fueling system whereby each City vehicle is assigned a fuel card. The City Manager's Office assumed responsibility for assigning cards and personal identification numbers (PIN). Employees are required to access the fuel tanks via the card plus a PIN. A personal computer located in the Police Dispatch area accumulates the raw data generated by this system. At the end of the month, this raw data is accessed and assembled into a report reflecting gallons of gas used by type, vehicles, and PIN's. Monthly reporting is available by department, by vehicle card, or by PIN. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 1994, the Dispatch office provided Finance with a computer generated departmental report of the fuel usage, which was then joumaled to the general ledger. Year end analysis of the fuel inventory by the Finance Department revealed that the general ledger balance was more than the actual inventory amounts. This was because some vehicle cards had not been assigned to a department, therefore usage for these cards was not reflected in the reports received by Finance. However, the system was tracking all usage of all types of fuel. The Finance Department has assumed responsibility for the fuel reporting and assigning fuel cards and personal identification numbers. This will ensure that all cards will be assigned to the proper department, and that all fuel used for the month will be allocated. The 1994-95 budget authorized a Project Accountant position which started January 1995. This new position will allow for periodic reconcilation of this account plus other general ledger accounts. ///9- LCurtis E. Hawk Management's Response to Auditor's Recommendations - Fiscal Year 1994 March 16, 1995 page 2 • Water and Sewer Receivables. The City bills utility accounts monthly. At the end of each billing cycle, inactive accounts delinquent longer than 90 days are purged from the utility accounts receivable. These account amounts are deleted from the utility billing (subsidiary) register, however the amounts are not deleted from the general ledger utility accounts receivable balance. This causes the utility billing register accounts receivable to not agree with the general ledger balance. The Finance Department has reconciled this account as of February 28, 1995 and will continue reconciling monthly the general ledger balance to the utility billing register. • b:wditrrs.wpd • ///1 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION r 0 IGHLAN STREET In ]C o PROJECT >_ LOCATION o . /y a (n SOUTHLAKE BLVD FM 1709 SPUR 382 TPe� � J � a m a v Y CON NENTAL BLVD BEAR > C RffK o of Q 0 JOHN �M.CAIN Z a N a COLLEIYVILLE GRAPEVINE _ N In LOCATION' MAP N.T S. DALLAS/FT. WORTH REGIONAL AIRPORT NOTES: 1. EXISTING ZONING: SF-20B 2. EXISTING L.U.D.: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 3. STREET LIGHTING WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF SOUTHLAKE REGULATIONS. C. A. PRADE JR. 4. INTERIOR STREETS WILL TYPICALLY BE 31' B-B CONCRETE IN 50' R.O.W. EX. ZONING: AG UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE PLAN. L.U.D. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 35 5. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE: SPRING 1995. R.O.W. ' DEDICAMON 6. THE AREA SHOWN AS PUBLIC PARK SHALL BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF 70' FUTURE SOUTHLAKE AT THE TIME OF FINAL PLATTING. 7. A PRIVATE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (H.O.A.) SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PAUL L. SCHELL FOR THE PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREAS, BUFFER YARDS, EX. ZONING: AG LANDSCAPING, SCREENING, NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER AND OTHER PRIVATELY L.U.D. MEDIUM DENSITY OWNED ASSOCIATION AMENITIES. THE H.O.A. SHALL BE ESTABLISHED IN RESIDENTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AT THE TIME OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS. COMMON AREA 8. NO KNOWN EASEMENTS ARE CURRENTLY ON OR ADJACENT TO THIS (0.07 AC.± ) PROPERTY. RUCKER FAMILY LTD PARTNERSHIP 9. SCREENING FENCES SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN SIGHT TRIANGLES OR EX. ZONING: AG VISIBILITY EASEMENTS AT PUBLIC INTERSECTIONS. •L.U.D. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BRICK b'-G" COMMON AREA (0.1 AC±) PROPOSED LAND USE SUMMARY Phase I Phase 2 TOTAL TOTAL ACREAGE (GROSS) 42.3 35.8 78.046 ACRES : EXISTING 1.7 0.6 2.3 ACRES t PERIMETER/THOROUGHFARE R.O.W. BY PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHTS PROPOSED ADDITIONAL PER R.O.W. DEDICATION NET ACREAGE (LESS PERIMETER/THOROUGHFARE R.O.W.) OPEN SPACE PUBLIC PRIVATE NUMBER OF LOTS DENSITY PERCENT OF OPEN SPACE (NET OF -EXISTING PERIMETER R.O.W.) TYPICAL LOT DIMENSIONS E. A. SMITH SUBDIVISION BLOCK 1, LOT 2 V 388-1 54, P 91 P.RTCT HILLMAN 0. McKENZIE EST. EXISTING ZONING: SE 20B L.U.D. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL N 89055'55"E - 1397.48' 0.7 0.3 1.0 ACRES t 39.9 34.9 74.8 7.4 0.2 7.6 ACRES t 4.1 0 4.1 ACRES t 3.3 0.2 3.5 ACRES t 53 64 117t 1.25 1.79 1.50 D.U./ GROSS ACRES : 18.2 0.6 1Q.0 %+ 120' X 150' (18,000 S.F.) I I 10 ' U.E. I•� I DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS All City of Southlake development regulations, rules, and standards that are applicable to SF-20B single family residential districts shall also apply to the Versailles Planned Unit Development, except where said regulations, rules, and standards are in conflict with the following: Front Yard: There shall be a front yard of not less than thirty (30) feet. Side Yard: There shall be a side yard of not less than fifteen (15) feet unless the side yard is adjacent to a street. Side yards adjacent to a street shall not be less than twenty (20) feet. Reverse frontage corner lots (key lots) shall have a designated side yard of not less than twenty-five (25) feet. A lot shall not be considered to be adjacent to a street if separated from the street by a common area with a width of at least five (5) feet. Rear Yard: There shall be a rear yard of not less than thirty (30) feet. Maximum Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding twenty- five (25) percent of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings which shall not exceed six hundred (600) square feet. (As amended by ordinance No. 480- C). Lot Area: The minimum area of a lot shall be eighteen thousand (18,000) square feet. Lot Dimensions: Each lot shall have a minimum width of one hundred (100) feet and a minimum depth of one hundred twenty-five (125) feet. Floor Area: The main residence shall contain a minimum of two thousand two hundred (2,200) square feet of floor area. Maximum Residential Density The maximum number of dwelling units per gross acre shall be 1.50. Drive Access: ^riveww• access to SoL4h Carroll Avenue, East ''ontinental B-)ulevard, and Carlirle Lane shall not be allowed. REQUIRED BUFFERYARDS REQUIRED PROVIDED CANOPY TREES ACCENT TREES SHRUBS North None None East None None - - - SOUTH - 975 10'-B 10'-B 20 30 98 West None None - - - / ml — lm E. 5U. o o I 1 cVl H IN `V 30 B.L. — — — — �— STREE 'K' \ 5 THERON A. RAGAN EXISTING ZONING: SF 20A z I L.U.D. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 25 B.L. 30 B.L. z \ ►"' 4 I I APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT I IcD I I I 11 II w o J i I 3---- NAPA VALLEY ESTATES Co W 110 1 -o Tw KD 3 W to Cr L 30' B.L. - _¢y w to cn P b 2 1 STREET M, Flo o F- L I m —� S 89046'40"E - 19.52 `L J 2c l � � ��li 30B.L. P s� 15' DE.a U.E.EXIST. RAINBOW ST. z W CHARLES & EDNA HA T W EX. ZONING. SF 208 W W m J O0�/ / I L U D MED. DENSITY Q- Z - J RESIDENTIAL N LL O • QD - I WILLIAM & JANICE MINOR TUMMY G. BARNETT N Al !�N',I EX. ZCNNG SF 20B EX. ZONING: AG I I 0�(vv w. �1 L U RESIDENTIANSITY L.U.D. MEDIUM DIENSITY 30*-B. ___L RESIDENTIAL I TIMARRON LAND CORP (D W HARVEY MILLER � I S TREET EX ZONING: SF 20B ' S 860 38145° E, 208.191 EXISTING ZONING L) zI ' .50 LUD MED. DENSITY 0 PUD 480 - 018 W ( RESIDENTIAL I DENSITY RESIDENTIAL o al 30'gL a 3QgL. — --r — —, N O A H B. POND JR . J .::»>:::::.;:.;::.;:.::.;:.:<::;::.::.;:.;:.;:.;:.;::.;:;J / / PROPOSED SOUTH HOLLOW — — EX ZONING: AG 3 L.U.O. MEDIUM u-i X (� I _ --- NORMAN J BROWN z EXhSTlN6 ZONING: SF 20A DENSITY RESIDENTIAL-0 N L.U.D. M(�DIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TIMARRON ADDITION L-- 0 c�i 0 30' B m �� �o 1 WYNDSOR CREEK W — 20"B I I CARROL ROAD o� C. I N cn�i CABINET A, SLIDE 1707 — BAPTIST CHURCH z o \ I I EX. ZONING: CS I U) Z STREET C' 1 L.U.D. PUBLIC & I Iw 25'R.O.W. L-- SEMI-PUBLIC I X I �. B DEDTCATION 3 STEVE RYAN N o m I FUTURE 50 I EX. ZONING: Cd I o 2 I R.O.W. DEDICATION w PRIVATE �' w APPROXIMATE O --- LOCATION OF L UDE SITbIUM �' NEIGHBORHOOD ,� W I _ f3LK 2 RESID NJIAL Cr EXISTING JJ h— __J HOUSE I (n CENTER a 30 B L 25' BL (f-) COMMON AREA 60' R.O.W. (0.1 AC.±) STREET 'E cD COMMON ARQA /TIMARRON LAND CORP. (37 B B) o (0.07 AC ± ) EXISTING ZONING: STREET F ' 0 4- -� I P.U.D. 480-01B EXISTING TREE 30 BL J � I cn U.D. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL a1 I COMMON AREA COVER (TYP.) I m 5 Q 35' R.O.W. DEDICATION PUBLIC PARK I� I J 70' FUTURE R.O.W. (4.2 AC.±) 30' B.L. z —'7 PO•B• F STREET A 0 1 0 X I- vv) JOE L. N N 89039'2111 W - 2 10.00 z Q ExW zoNi G: RIGHT N 01 009, 53"E 30' B.L. Y = SF 20B 3 3 L.U.D. MEDIUM COMMON AREA DENSITY RESIDEN. (0. 1 AC A ) VKMVI VKLJ rV1K IKCC LIM J/ LNI147. TYPICAL 5C12EENING rENCE ELEVATION COMM N A A (0.2 AC. J. W. HALE EAST CONTINENTAL BLVID ` ON JOHN N. GiBS61\. SURVEY — ABST 591 N 89014 05 W - 1413.05 _ TYPICAL BUFFERYARD B BILLY JENNINGS 81SCREENING{SEE EX. ZONING: SF IA o� UJ L42' R.O.W. DEDICATION DETAIL 8L.U.D. MED. DENSITY z UJ - d z F84' FUTURE R.O. W. TABLE) o RESIDENTIAL P Iw Cn w J Q W w U w o UI-z �P a Q o 11MARRON LAND CORP. Cr zz � J)m EXISTING ZONING: x �U_wc 0wo P.U.Q. 480-01B ``' o .. o z J L.U.D. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Q O 0 w JOE L. WRIGHT I,z � o EX. ZONING: SF R-P.U.D. M w TI ARRON LAND CORP. ry EXISTING ZONING: L.U.D. MED DENSITY x � P.U.D. 480-01B RESIDENTIAL w L.U.D. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL BEING A 78.05 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE J. W. HALE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 803, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO MARVIN KERCHO, AND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 3241, PAGE 415, DEED RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEARING BASIS IS PLAT FILED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 1707, TIMARRON ADDITION, WINDSOR CREEK, PHASE 1, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING at a 3/4" iron rod found at the northeast corner of that certain tract of land conveyed to Sarah Reynolds as described in deed recorded in Volume 2414, Page 583, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 89039'21" W, along the north line of said Reynolds tract, at 189.05 feet, passing a 3/4" iron rod found, a total distance of 210.00 feet to a 5/8" iron rod with plastic cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" set in Carroll Road for corner, said point also being in the east line of that certain 4.81 acre tract of land conveyed to Timarron Land Corporation, described in deed recorded in Volume 10533, Page 235, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 00004'05" W, along the approximate centerline of Carroll Road and along the east line of said 4.81 acre Timarron Land Corporation tract, and also along the east line of those tracts of land recorded in Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, as follows: S. Ryan, Volume 7158, Page 644; Trustees of the Carroll Road Baptist Church, Volume 4929, Page 356; N. Pond, Volume 7134, Page 944; T. Barnett, Volume 9657, Page 2320; Rucker Family Limited Partnership, Volume 10432, Page 1162; P. Schell, Volume 2851, Page 198; and C. Prade, Volume 2835, Page 358, a distance of 2056.61 feet to a 5/8" iron rod with plastic cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" set for the northwest corner of herein described tract, said point also being in the south line of LOT 2, BLOCK I, of the E. A. SMITH SUBDIVISION, that certain 27.625 acre tract of land conveyed to E. A. Smith, described in plat record Volume 388-154, Page 91, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 89055'55" E, leaving the east line of said tracts and the said approximate centerline of Carroll Road, along the south line of said E. A. SMITH SUBDIVISION, 1397.48 feet to a 5/8" iron rod with plastic cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" set in the west line of that certain tract of land conveyed to THE BRANAN ENTERPRISES, described in deed recorded in Volume 6377, Page 99, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE 9 01-16'56" W, leaving the south line of said E. A. SMITH SUBDIVISION, along the west line of said BRANAN ENTERPRISES tract, 621.41 feet to a 1 /2" iron rod found at the southwest corner of said BRANAN ENTERPRISES tract; THENCE S 89046'40" E, along the south line of said BRANAN ENTERPRISES tract, 19.52 feet to a 5/8" iron rod found at the northwest corner of that certain 2.52 acre tract of land conveyed to Charles Hart, described in deed recorded in Volume 3193, Page 361, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S 01023'55" E, leaving the south line of said BRANAN ENTERPRISES, along the west line of said Charles Hart tract, and also along the west line of those tracts of land recorded in Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, as follows: William Minor, Volume 6506, Page 266, and Harvey Miller, Volume 9165, Page 2165, a distance of 484.2� feet to a 1 /2" iron rod with plastic cap stamped " Vogt Engineering" found at the southwest corner of said Harvey Miller tract; THENCE S 86038'45" E, along the south line of said Harvey Miller tract, at 187.94 feet, passing a 1 /2" iron rod with plastic cap stamped "Vogt Engineering" found, a total distance of 208.19 feet to a 5/8" iron rod with plastic cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" set in Carlisle Lane, said point also being in the west line of that tract of land conveyed to N. Brown, described in deed recorded in Volume 6444, Page 569, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S 00004*56" W, along the approximate centerline of said Carlisle Lane and the west line of said N. Brown tract, 1171.77 feet to a 5/8" iron rod with plastic cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" set in the north line of that certain 17.0 acre tract of land conveyed to Timarron Land Corporation, described in deed recorded in Volume 10533, Page 235, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 89014'05" W, leaving the west line of said N. Brown tract, along the north line of said Timarron Land Corporation tract, and also along the north line of those tracts of land recorded in Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas as follows: Bear Creek Communities, Volume 10351, Page 2377, and that certain 2.86 acre tract conveyed to Timarron Land Corporation, described in deed recorded in Volume 10533, Page 235, a distance of 1413.05 feet to a 5/8" iron rod with plastic cap stamped "Carter & Burgess" set at the southeast corner of the aforementioned Sarah Reynolds tract; THENCE N 01009'53" E, leaving the north line of said 2.86 acre Timarron Land Corporation tract, along the east line of said Sarah Reynolds tract, at 24.70 feet, passing a 3/4" iron rod found, a total distance of 211.03 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, and containing 78.046 acres (3,399,664 square feet) of land with 0.55 acres contained in Carlisle Lane, 0.71 acres contained in Continental Boulevard, and 1.00 acre contained in Carroll Road, leaving a total of 75.786 acres of land more or less. DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR R-P.U.D. REZONING REQUEST OF VERSAILLES 78.046 ACRES OUT OF THE J.W. HALE SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 803 IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS SF-20B TO R—P.U.D. OWNER: KERCHO KOCHWEOP PARTNERSHIP 3825 LAKE AUSTIN BLVD., SUITE 504 AUSTIN, TX. 78703 DEVELOPER: VERSAILLES, LTD. 8333 DOUGLAS AVENUE, SUITE 1300 DALLAS, TEXAS 75225 (214) 691-5300 ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: Carter:: Burgess Consultants in Engineering, Architecture, Planning and the Environment CARTER & BURGESS, INC. n 7950 ELMBROOK DRIVE, SUITE 250 DALLAS, TX 75247-4961 DECEMBER, 1994 MAR 131995 REVISED FEBURARY 27, 1995 C n LL-------------------------� -------------- ---- --- - - - ---- 7 7 - V J I ' (-, -- - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - �- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - L J { IQIF=kS Tr) =1�1.lTt=hlt'1) Tn TT- P!r'�I A r—�C✓�DEfAtt��,G'A5 III I _.e J Wt~L (co) PLncShMoo I . �Y>✓� 1. �A I �Jl.t�[✓ c� �7iGi--1 W� X 20 rt,,x �xol^c!� X Z, o„ � r 3 1 1- ,I I II II Ci 4Pi ter 14 st Omt> -r ! AAn I� m EXCAVATION -&-UTIU7- 1ES, INC-.-, .i I a IMt ---TA JII " Jill II' P- 0- ctf�4I I I I I 1 ri. - c �5 4 owl MAR 131995 3 r 11) 1994 ELE\Z"Ti��� v 17EG.1�1g��. SHEET A2 4 } r Ll - --- --- METAL ROOF i o--.--_---_---- ---- _ ___� STUCCO O`,/ER MET.%L SIDING BEYOND 1 f WASW BAY OPEN METAL !GOOF f ] L 6WT I STUCCO OVER METAL SIDING ---- ' -- I 3'-0' X 3'-O' WINDOW WITH WIRE GLASS 3'-C' x T-0' METAL DOOR WIN WIRE GLASS 0 s :r} �, n. NA �.F 1 k. r s: r. 'S ,� N. d' J f :fir,, R-. ak, �; ti• - .� :a.�at � .,,�- �.,'; z ,�,'1h 1h ��: +� ;; �� ��i y,, e � rr••• i ° V S;h t; .+ y 0'f ti., PG- 51) 1 BLK. E OAK KNOLLS LAKEVIEW ADDN' IVOL.388W, �_- Noo vaR� SOv \7 09 1► AS�i F.M. •M•- �vQR1Pe�E POINT OF �A=01°OF'07" BEGINNING R=889.93' L=1712°0CH=N754'201f�d•r"cif 17.12' d/ In Cvi9c. ` Fad Awy f- N%mamCr/F 5sn ca ° 0 N.1705407"W N 25.44' )i I� u�51de \ t 001 ) ._ , nQ . � 0 _\ I Q LOT 4R-2R- I w 1 BLOCK A LOT 2 0.8369 ACRE: 1 25' C�,�rnc« • 00 LOT 4 R - I R access Es�nf J I BLOCK A N 11 (CD�,A� S/14'e/o0%' , , SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACE 0-17° 26 59 1 (D 1 E 4 (CAB.A)SLIDE 1001) R=721.90 00 L=219.86' - I— — — S,iI U' G`'''c' \`� '-OT 5 BLOCK A CH= N.08°38'08"W. I G 11 I' o \�� 3OUTHLAKE BANK PLACE 219.01 I I .' N F eye (VOL. 388- 176, PG. 9 ) .X 0 0 � CP— ° DZ EAST - 111.45' LOT 3 Fn d I � 2 5� Dro/ aye � mf 0 � � S, • c�s�, qI, I2 o o LOT 4R-2R-2 BLOCK A S 1.3036 ACRES i IEQ51/ oo 1 8� a4 �+� 25 � Cornrnar� Access 14� '/5/ csrnt LOT 4 O Cr W O U n J W m Z r1 Ld UQ w m (D 0WT m a OD trr--- —J v / m J D LOT 5 C) Y� Z Q 00 I , LOT 6 2 5 25 LOT 7 —1—ice—I 2042 I i�•— 25 P�ivofe Access Esrnf. - ---•- �' sco% / "= 561' LOT 4R -2R -3 BLOCK A 9.6527 ACRES SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION THIS Is to certify that I, Roland Foerster, a Registered Professional Land Surveyor of the State of Texas, having platted the above subdivision from a actual survey on the ground; and that all lot corners, and angle points, and points of curve shall be properly marked on the ground, and that this plat correctly represents that survey made by me under my direction and supervision Roland Foerster, RPLS # 3233 0000- F d' l� � Z CERTIFICATE OF DEDICATION STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT WHEREAS, I, GARY HOUDEK , am the sole owner of a 11 7932 acre tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey. Abstract No 474, in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the deed recorded in Volume 9696, Page 886, Deed Records, Tarrant County Texas. and being all of Lot 4R-2R. Block A, SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACE. an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the Amended Plat recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1001 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County. Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows. BEGINNING at a Texas Highway Department Monument in the south nght-of-way line of East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) at the intersection of the east nght-of-way line of Bank Street (a 50-foot wide right-of-way); said Point of Beginning also being the most northerly northwest comer of said Lot 4R-2R. THENCE, along the north boundary line of said Lot 4R-2R and south nght-of-way line of said East Southlake Boulevard,as follows: 1. N.750 0716"E., 111 70-feet to a "Y" cut in concrete at the beginning of a curve to the right: 2. Northeasterly 17.12-feet along said curve to the right, having a radius of 889 93 feet, a central angle of 010 0607", and a chord bearing N.750 40'20"E., 17.12 feet to an "x" cut in the centerline of a concrete driveway at the northwest comer of said Lot 4R-2R; THENCE, along the common boundary line between said Lot 4R-2R and Lot 4R-1 R of said Block A, as follows: 1 SOUTH, 165.50 feet along the centerline of said concrete driveway to an "x" cut in concrete: 2. S. 140 02'10"E., 103.08-feet to a 1/2" iron rod. 3. EAST. 111.45 feet to a 1/2" iron rod; 4. N.460 32'41"E., 73.56 feet to a 1/2" iron rod at the most easterly southeast comer of said Lot 4R- 1 R. and lyingin the south boundary line of Lot 5, Block A, of said SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACE, THENCE, along the north boundary line of said Lot 4R-2R and the south boundary line of said Lot 5, as follows 1. S.43027'19"E., 172.53 feet to a 1/2" iron rod; 2. N.56048.10"E , 219.83 feet to a 1/2" iron rod at the most easterly comer of said Lot 5. and the most easterlynortheast comer of said Lot 4R-2R, and lying in the southwest right-of-way of State Highway No. 114; THENCE, along the northeast boundary line of said Lot 4R-2R and the southwest right-of-way line of said State Highway No. 114, S.3311 0824"E., 549.42 feet to a concrete Texas Highway Department Right -of way Monument at the most easterly southeast comer of said Lot 4R-2R, same being the northerly comer of Lot 6, Block A. of said SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACE; THENCE, along the common boundary line between said Lot 4R-2R and Lot 6, as follows: 1. S.560 49'43"W., 179.58 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found for comer; 2. S.000 1605"E., 140.28 feet to a 1/2" iron rod found for the most southerly southeast comer of said Lot 4R-2R, same being in the north line of Industrial Boulevard (a 60-foot right-of-way) and the north line of GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK, an addition to the City of Grapevine according to plat recorded in Volume 388-111, Page 2, of the Tarrant County Plat records, THENCE, along the south boundary line of said Lot 4R-2R, as follows: 1. S.89°29'08W., 133.43 feet along the north boundary line of said GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK.. to a 5/8" iron rod; 2 S.890 44'40W., 432.89 feet along the said north boundary line of GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK \ to a 1"iron rod at the northwest comer of said GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK, same being the 2 northeast comer of Lot 3, Block A, of said SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACE; \ O 3. S.890 58'51"W., 161.70 feet along the north boundary line of said Lot 3, to a 5/8" iron rod at the southwest comer of said Lot 4R-2R, same being the northwest comer of said Lot 3, and lying in \ the east right-of-way line of aforesaid Bank Street; THENCE, along the west boundary line of said Lot 4R-2R and the east nght-of-way line of Bank Street, as \ y follows: 1. N.000 05'22"E., 647.90 feet to a 3/4" iron rod at the beginning of a curve to the left; \ 2. Northwesterly, 219.86 feet along said curve to the left having a radius of 721.90 feet. a central angle .n of 17026'59", and a chord bearing N 080 38'08"W., 219.01 feet to a 1/2" iron rod at the end of said curve, 3. N.170 54'07"W., 25.44 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, and containing 513,712 square feet or 11 7932 acres of land. 9 NOTE; 1. OWNERS OF CORNER LOTS SHALL MAINTAIN SIGHT TRIANGLES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE. 2. THIS PLAT DOES NOT INCREASE THE NUMBER OF LOTS OR REMOVE EXISTING DEED RESTRICT- ONS OR COVENANTS, IF ANY, ON THE PROPERTY. 3. BEARINGS ARE REFERENCED TO SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACE, RECORDED IN CABINET A, SLIDE 1001, P.R.T.C.T. r- 31 �1 � � \ \ 0 0 0 ::ji "q� \ fob \ ti,,'o Epp W LOT 6 BLOCK A �- SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACEOD L 0 C\J (VOL.388 -176, PG. 9) N O � :0 o- o 3o�P�o!g. L 117e _ 0 0 /5 _T. P.L. Co. Fsrn �Xv/. 7Z6B,/gS4,� � r rr" _. Fnd.l'i2 •/D'l1� EsrylLIlv� 388-17G, Pq• 4) � .• �Frr> �Q'%Q •. Fes.% :? ----S.89° 58 5I W.=161.70' S. 89° 44' 40" W - 43 2.89' S.89°29108''W.-133.43' !U f rd388-17G , LOT 3, BLOCK A s r�� I 4a aaii elf,%E-­.nf LOT 8, BLOCK 1 r _ SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACE �cn I P9.02) GRAPEVINE INDUSTRIAL PARK INDUSTRIAL (VOL.388- 176, PG. 9) ( (VOL.388-III , PG. 2) I 3o This property lies within the noise contours established by the 1974 final environmental impact statement for DFW International Airport at the north end of runway 13 right - 31 left. This property is within the City of Southlake airport overlay zone established by Ordinance No. 479 and is subject to an avigation easement and right-of-way filed in the county deed records. NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT, 1, GARY HOUDEK, being the sole owner do hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinabove described property as LOTS 4R-2R-1, 4R-2R-2, and 4R-211-3, BLOCK A, SOUTHI AKE BANK PLACE, an addition to the City of Southlake. Tarrant County, Texas. and I do hereby dedicate to the public's use the streets and easements shown thereon WITNESS, my hand at Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana this the day of 1995 GARY HOUDEK STATE OF INDIANA COUNTY OF MARION BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Gary Houdek. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the above and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this the_ --,__day of , 1995 SEAL APPROVED BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Date: Chairman: Secretary: Notary Public My Commission Expires: APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Date: Mayor: City Secretary: L.UUA I I U N MAH THIS PLAT FILED IN CABINET SLIDE NO. DATE FILED: .1995. CASE NO. ZA 95 - 25 PLAT REVISION LOTS 4R-2R-1, 4R-2R-2, & 4R-2R-3; BLOCK A SOUTHLAKE BANK PLACE AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 11.7932 ACRES OUT OF THE THOMAS EASTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 474 Being A Revision Of Lot 4R-2R, Block A, Of Southlake Bank Place As Recorded In Cab.A, Slide 1001, PRTCT FEBR O 131995 VARY, 1995 / 3 LOTS �, MAR G` Of �Y��%114rc e �� fJ, of G2i�Aec,iii�e . OWNER: _ GARY HOUDEK 5727 NORTH o INDIANAPOL S, I DIANA 4 B LV D. AL ` 60' R.O.`N. 46220 (317) 255-7119 SURVEYOR: ROLAND FOERSTER CIVIL ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 260411 PLANO, TEXAS 75026-0411 (214) 881-0725 ? > rill f z OL pf, > PiF 4 —tL—LQQ�P (UNPAVED) (5 6' R. 0. W.) 6 I au 5 28' . ..... ...... 85d �!9i;1111 600 .46 > 7 co co Ln 1 k.D 2RI C:) CD 289,917 S. F. (FORMERLY LOTS 2R & 3R) 1­117- C. > co 28' 11/Z' .I.R. 298.75 .1 /2" F.I.R. 297.00 1 IZ' F S 89d 46' 05" W N 89d 51' 13" W 0 cc -1 V, . ......... 30, 31.11: ......... ......... ............... ..... .. ... .... EXCHANGE BLVD. (CONC. PAVEMENT) (56' R.O.W.) . . .......... ..................... ........... C — -- 4 PAE, 388-5'14 F-G. (-0) I'IERIT --- -- - ---- - Ar-."- INDI. STRI-AL P RX V('J.!-.,. '1388-2-'17, P/G. 1"i M Cn U O li 4 rA) 71 5 1 Ii 6 :Z) tic' D- R Al < U.L.VOL. Vr- 60 388 Zl-i f 0, 1: STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT WHEREAS, Muller & Holdgate Construction Services, being the sole owner of a tract of land situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract No. 474, County of Tarrant, according to the deed recorded in Volume 11758, Page 0436, DRTCT, and more particularly described as follows: BEING A TRACT OF LAND situated in the Thomas Easter Survey, Abstract 474, Tarrant County, Texas, and being part of a tract of land conveyed to Muller & Holdgate Construction Services, as recorded in Volume 11758, Page 0436 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas, and being all of lots 2R and 3R of the Plat Revision for Commerce Business Park, a subdivision in the City of Southlake recorded in CABINET A, Page 1932 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County. NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT, Muller & Holdgate Construction Services, being the sole owner, does hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinabove described property as Lot 2R1 of Commerce Business Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and I do hereby dedicate to the public's use the streets and easements shown thereon. This plat does not increase the number of lots or alter or remove existing deed restrictions or covenants, if any, on this property. WITNESS my hand at Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas this the ----- day of ------- 1995. ------------------------------- Brian Holdgate, Partner Muller & Holdgate Construction Services STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Brian Holdgate, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the above and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and consideration expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this the ----- day of -------- 1995 --------------------- Notary Public ***Seal*** Commission Expires:______ SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION THIS is to certify that I, Michael J. Eberle, a Registered Public Surveyor of the State of Texas, having platted the above subdivision from an actual survey on the ground; and that all lot corners, and angle points, and points of curve shall be properly marked on the ground, and that this plat correctly represents that survey made by me or under my direction and supervision. Or nal ***Seal*** Approved By: PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Date ----------- Chairman --------------------------- Name: Texas Registration No -- — — — — — — — — — Approved By: CITY COUNCIL -------------------------- Date -------------------- Mayor ---------------------------- ---------------------------- Secretary City Secretary NOTE: THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN THE NOISE CONTOURS ESTABLISHED BY THE 1974 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR DFW INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AT THE NORTH END OF RUNWAY 13 RIGHT — 31 LEFT. THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE OVERLAY ZONE ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 479 AND IS SUBJECT TO AN AVIGATION EASEMENT AND RIGHT—OF—WAY FILED IN THE COUNTY DEED RECORDS. 0 50 100 200 300 GRAPHIC SCALE (FEET) 1# = 100' THIS PLAT FILED IN CABINET viL;mi-tr jLAr No Wl= - SLIDE # — — — — — — - DATE: — — — — — — — — PLAT REVISION LOT 2R1, BLOCK C COMMERCE BUSINESS PARK AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 6.6556 ACRES OUT OF THE THOMAS EASTER SURVEY, ABST. 474 BEING A REVISION OF LOTS 2R & 3R, BLOCK C OF PLAT REVISION AS RECORDED IN CABINET.L—E-G.- 1932 FEBRUARY 1995 / 1 LOT fBAR 13195 OWNER SURVEYOR MULLER & HOLDGATE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES EBERLE SURVEYING P.O. BOX 1773 104 HIDDEN LANE GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 RED OAK, TEXAS 75154 817-481-2886 214-617-3969 CASE NO. ZA 95-241 VICINITY MAP ) A, f r` ULT. 100 YEAR FLOODPLAI N A - VARIABLE WIDTH D.U. E. LOT 5 I (100 YEAR FLOODWAY) I � \ I LOT 41 Off' 15' 0v U.E. I I LOT 6 \ I I LOT 7 \ I I 1d D.U.E. FND. Ih�' I.R. SET 1/2"I.R. �- Q) POND LOT 2 - R r` M N VAR. WIDTH D.U. E. �~ (100 YEAR z FLOODWAY) I FND. 5V/8" I.R. RS ULTIMATE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN FND 5/8"I WAKEFIELD COURT w LOT I 10' R.O.W. I DEDICATION OG 7 7' R.O.W. LOT I v LU C 2 1 1 � N89039'00"E I I -- — 10.0 0' 70' R.O.W. 10' U.E. POINT OF BEGINNING N89°3900'E832.56 _ SET I/2_I.R. SET 1/2' 8 22. 56 15 ' D. E. 10' R.O.W. I � � S 00002 ' 14" E ♦C���� DEDICATION 100.00' EXISTING \ \� N89°39'0Q"E I NI 1 (-0 BUILDINGS BUILDINGS TO BE _382 • 15CID GY PP REMOVED ��', 100 ml RQW LOT I r BUILDING O -- / OVERHEAD r� PP \ I 1 W i ; C) 0� y N Q (/ ILDING ` INin� 1 ' AREA TREE CO R PP GY LOT 1747 225 SQ. FTC 4[000 ACRES FENCE LINE ON C 339.85'7' — - - S 89° 4 16" W LOT 3 10' U.E. O N' o ' I S 00002' 14" E �l I �\ \ '0i ;3 LLJ 228. 62' LOT 2 --1 \ CULVERT 87, 1 1 1 SQ. FT. \ I ; EX. 2.000 ACRES Ia4 � I 'z I}, O 371.45' - _ FND. FENCE CORN R 7 21 ' �1 io) .1 SITE DATA f EXISTING ZONING - AG PROPOSED ZONING - SF - IA TOTAL AREA - 6. 000 Ac. TOTAL LOTS - 2 DENSITY - 0.33 LOTS/Ac. AVE. LOT AREA - 87, 120 S.F. SET V2 L Lj i. R. (L Q� ob OWNER/DEVELOPER JOAN CROWE 1502 PLANTATION DRIVE SOUTHLAKE , TEXAS 76092 (817) 329-6848 , METES AND BOUNDS BEING a 6.000 acre tract of land conveyed to Joan Crowe, as recorded in Volume 11810, Page 2171, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas. Said tract being out of the Christopher Dart Survey, Abstract No. 2003, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a set 1 /2" iron rod in the north line of said Crowe tract, said point also being the most southeasterly corner of Wakefield Addition, as recorded in Cabinet —, Slide No. , Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and also being in the west line of Peytonville Road (a variable width right-of-way); THENCE North 89°39'00" East, a distance of 10 feet to a set 1 /2" iron rod, said point being in the west line of said Peytonville Road. and being the most northeasterly corner of said Crowe tract; THENCE along said west line of Peytonville Road, South 00°02' 14" East, a distance of 328.62 feet to a set 1 /2" iron rod; THENCE South 89°47' 16" West, a distance of 721.30 feet to a found 5/8" iron rod, said point being the most southwesterly corner of said Crowe tract, and being in the north line of Lamp Estates, as recorded in Volume 388-142, Page 92, Deed Records Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North 45°00'00" West, a distance of 125.00 feet to a found 5/8" iron rod; THENCE North, a distance of 237.96 feet to a set 1 /2" iron rod, said point being the northwest corner of said Crowe tract, said point also being in the north line of said Lamp Estates; THENCE North 89039'00" East, a distance of 822.56 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and CONTAINING 261,336 square feet, 6.000 acres of land, more or less. ri CI ~ b� 0 50 100 200 C SCALE:I"=100' PRELIMINARY PLAT OLYMPIA ADDITION BEING A 6.000 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONTAINING TWO LOTS OUT OF THE ENGINEER /SURVEYOR CHR I STOPHER DART SURVEY ABSTRACT NO. 2003 GRAHAM ASSOCIATES INC. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 616 SIX FLAGS DRIVE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS CENTREPORT TWO, SUITE 400 ARLI NGTON ,TEXAS 76011 alee (817) 640 - 8 535 Graham ASSOCIatesAnc, FEB., 1995 CCISULTING ENGINEERS & PLANNERS 616 SIX FLAGS DRIVE, SUITE 400 File ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011 (8I7) 640-8535 9886- 1001 Drawn By: G.A.I. Sheet 1 Of 1 f 0 D CASE NO. Z A 95 - 20 0 10 20 30 40 60 80 120 160 SCALE 1" = 40' 613 H Z L ~ � o Q LLI A I q a LL_ A in J W ' 0 = Q w Lj Z 3 a_ W a a o � N J =a U ZONED: AG L,U,D,: MED, RES, DENSITY �2 H.F. GEOR6E VOL, 502�QG. 662 b~� ° rL r, S 89.01'40'E 65.00' 619 MARTIN W, PRINZ VOL. 10628, PG. 2178 j VCE 6 ,3 A OR VING (y U 2 24' 30 24' J z Z 30' , i l7 �< ¢Q } z# I W �� w �� c�q wo �O V b Li LiQ ¢N Z ow l7 0 C 3 ❑ �1 U 0 W W� U ❑ N W Z LAJ o 3� N w 4t w i } ❑; 0 ❑� 3 \ ¢ W 5 w Z U C4 A W a I 10;z r'' ack�� 3 z ¢ _j o X l7 sa 3¢ d y W , 20 J J ❑ LOf w ? o N Z O U -1 gn Lo a_ � w �` 0 Q' Z p N 627,3 WW. W Ib J �- \ J a W d J Z w \ / .--� _ = a..� c a M W Q ❑ tY � J Z Q M c� l \ 20' 2 f i N o 623.3 N 6, Cr • \ W O `� _ Q o q �\ cn p w o 2 Ely I �D s 628.3 I 0. �4_1 p r,LC i 2 30, 24' 6?0 - \ dCO2� 05 #` 624 o IR _ 6r. ` \ p 62 v eo co y \ BENCHMARK = 625.91 (SOUTHLAKE BM#29) WPA MONUMENT ON HEADWALL OF CULVERT AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF KIMBALL & DOVE, �ZS .ol 32' 22' A W Z LL_ LL. olo UIU :_:-Y OF Q_RAr- W Z, I J LLJ CLJ N �D ANNIE HAMM w ao t I vwi 0 cl � �,, I • . ❑a a a, M > wi o _ o CD 3 Q I m ❑❑� �, m i �D I Z 32,— QI Y , W I U A N •I I -0 U Li Z LAURIE HOVEY 22' I d l I 1 VOL. 10168, PC 1874 2 d o ♦5 28.5 I ASPHA T OR I roI NCRETE PAVING I VP AR DU PSTERLOCATAR 1N 2 \ 5 \624.3 `�, 4 BU E PHASE IOIN 9'x18' TYPICAL L S GN ILO ATION AND ORIENTATION, NF 2 Q RYAPD PARKIN! SPACE S ZE, HEIGHT, AND TYPE PER ORDINANCE, 8�F\"4d W 4 F cu `ERy FNC 2L j 6\ � N66. 161c' eNct n �b 8% 4 t , ca ri ��� 35' �Q, 9 N64.0\ ljF�IC \ \ w \ 56 Oo \ TIDN \ v 1 F O goo o ZONED: C1 MABEL LATE �� \ L,U.D.: MIXED USE VOL. 9501, PG. -001 ekISTjN\ \ a� ^ i R, McPHERSON F��INe NGUYEN DINH VOL, 9501, PG. 950 PAMELA LONG VOL. 8713, Pi, 620 NSF BUFFERYARD TABLE LOCATION REQUIRED PROVIDED CANOPY TREES ACCENT TREES SHRUBS NORTH-360' 10'-F1 ** 10'-F1 11 22 29 EAST-357' 10'-C 10'-C 11 14 43 SOUTH-161' 10'-8 10'-B 3 5 16 EAST-106' 10'-B 10'-6 2 3 11 SOUTH-205' 10'-E* 10'-E 2 4 16 WEST-335' 10'-F1 ** 10'-F1 10 20 27 * 6' WOOD FENCE IN LIEU OF 3' Bf-RM ** 6' WOOD FENCE REQ'D PLUS PLANTINGS. NOTE: BOUNDARY AND TOPO BY WARD :SURVEYING I I \ I. ZONED: C1 L.U.D.: MIXED USE \� DONNIE WARD ETUX VOL. 8735, PG. 1350 0 LO ' F.H. 190'x i OWNER: RICK McPHERSON P.O. BOX 1792 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 (817) 488-4163 (817) 481-3281 FAX 488-0790 »a AL:ITIDN C LOCATION MAP SITE DATA SUMMARY CHART ITEM TOTAL PHASE I PHASE II GROSS AREA 137,634 S.F. 49,369 S.F. 88,625 S.F. NET AREA 130,624 S.F. 46,021 S.F. 84,604 S.F. PROPOSED BLDG. AREA * 30,045 S.F. 11,720 S.F. 18,325 S.F. DERCENTAGE OF BLDG. COVERAGE 23% 25% 22% AREA OF OPEN SPACE 100,579 S.F. 34,301 S.F. 66,279 S.F. PERCENTAGE OF OPEN SPACE 77% 75% 78% ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT BEGIN APR. 95 APR. 97 COMPLETION NOV. 95 NOV. 97 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 10 6 4 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED 10 2 8 LOADING SPACES REQUIRED 0 0 0 LOADING SPACES PROVIDED O O 0 OUTSIDE STORAGE 0% 0% 0% EXISTING ZONING S—P-2 REMOVAL OF EXISTING MOBILE HOMES 2 YEARS * ALL BLDG. AREA SHALL BE WAREHOUSE STORAGE EXCEPT FOR 100 S.F. OF OFFICE SPACE CONSTRUCTED IN PHASE ONE. GENERAL NOTES: 1. PROPOSED USE: COMMERCIAL/RETAIL — MINI WAREHOUSE 2. NUMBER OF STORIES: ONE 3. MAXIMUM HEIGHT = 12 FEET 4. FRONT BUILDING SETBACK = 30' 5. REAR YARD SETBACK = 10 FEET 6. SIDE YARD SETBACK = 15 FEET 7. BUFFER YARDS AS SHOWN. 8. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: MASONRY 9. TRASH ENCLOSURES SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ORDINANCE NO. 480, SECTION 39.4—C. 10. NO OUTSIDE STORAGE 11. ALL SIGNAGE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ORDINANCE NO. 350. 12. BUILDING DIMENSIONS TO EXTERIOR WALL. 13. EXIST. ZONING S—P-2 14. EXIST. USE — NON CONFORMING MOBILE HOMES 15. L.U.D. — MIXED USE 16. ALL PAVING SHALL BE ASPHALT OR CONCRETE A. NO OUTSIDE STORAGE WILL BE ALLOWED, B. NO STORAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES WILL BE ALLOWED, C. APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS THAT IF SEPTIC PROBLEMS ARISE FER THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL CENTER, A NEW AND SEPARATE SEPTIC SYSTEM MUST BE INSTALLED FOR LOT 1, FIELD NOTES Being a tract of land in the Francis Throop Survey, Abstract No, 1511, situated in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a portion of the tracts described in a deed of record in Volume 8340, Page 439, Deed Records Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows, Beginning at the southwesterly corner of said McPherson tract in the northerly right-of-way line of East Dove Street, said point being South 57 degrees 01 minutes 37 seconds East 78,12 feet from an iron rod found at the southeast corner of the F, Throop No. 1511 Addition to the City of Southlake as shown on a plat of record in Cabinet A, Slide 1064, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, said point being in the easterly line of an unimproved road known as Torian Lane; Thence North no degrees 02 minutes 31 seconds West 356.16 feet along the west tine of said McPherson tract to a 1/2' iron rod in same for corner, said point being the southwest corner of a tract described in a deed to H,F, George of record in Volume 5027, Page 662, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; Thence South 89 degrees 01 minutes 40 seconds East, at 182,5 feet passing a pipe at the southeast corner of said George tract, continuing along the south line of a tract described in a deed to Martin W, Prinz etux of record in Volume 10628, Page 2178, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, in all 365.0 feet to a 1/2' iron rod found at the southeast corner of same in the west line of North Kimball Avenue; Thence South no degrees 02 minutes 31 seconds East 386,24 feet along said west line to a 5/8' iron rod found in same for corner; Thence North 66 degrees 28 minutes 07 seconds West 174,77 feet to a 1/2' iron rod for corner; Thence South 11 degrees 19 minutes 49 seconds West 123,55 feet to a 5/8' iron rod in the south line of said McPherson tract in the northerly line of East Dove Street; Thence North 64 degrees 06 minutes no seconds West 200,60 feet along said northerly line to the Point of Beginning and containing 3,160 acres (137,634 square feet) of land, NOTES: 1, PHASE ONE SHALL BE BUILDINGS 1, 2 AND 3, 2, EXISTING TRAILERS SHALL REMAIN UNTIL CONSTRUCTION FOR PHASE TWO IS STARTED. 3, SIZE OF BUILDINGS TO BE 20' OR 30' WIDTH AS DEMAND REQUIRES, 4, REQUEST VARIANCE ON BUFFER YARD ON LANDSCAPE PLAN BECAUSE OF EXISTING TREES, 5, SEE ATTACHED ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR L❑CATIONS OF ENTRANCES AND EXITS FOR EACH BUILDING, AND FOR TYPICAL ELEVATIONS OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES, 6, SEE ATTACHED ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR L❑CATION, TYPE, AND HEIGHT OF INTENDED LIGHTING (SEE ELEVATIONS), 7, A SEPARATE SIGN PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED SIGN, AT SUCH TIME PERMIT IS APPLIED FOR, RENDERINGS SH❑WING PARTICULAR SIGN TYPE, FACINGS, MATERIAL COMPOSITIONS, COLORS, HEIGHT, AND SIZE SHALL BE PROVIDED, 8, THERE ARE NO ON -SITE FACILITIES FOR LIQUID AND SOLID WASTE TEMPORARY STORAGE PENDING DISPOSAL, LOCATION OF EXISTING SEPTIC FIELDS IS UNKNOWN, 9, THERE ARE NO PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTS AS REQUIRED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, 10, PRELIMINARY WATER, SEWER, AND DRAINAGE PLANS HAVE BEEN WAIVED BY RON HARPER, CITY ENGINEER, ON MARCH 6, 19951 FOR PHASE ONE, 11, PORTIONS OF THE WOOD FENCE ALONG N, KIMBALL MAY BE REPLACED AT A FUTURE TIME WITH AN ORNAMENTAL FENCE, SITE PLAN YATES CORNER STORAGE LOT 1, BL❑"K 1, YATES CORNER ADDITION CITY OF S❑UTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 2,999 ACRES IN THE FRANCIS THROOP SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1511 0 'W �pt>� : e ��.,; r ! Ul. 8. J JD lid 77643 3�,�9 �D n MAR 13 1995 '( L5 r_ P. I ZONED S-P-2 ERNEST HEDGCOTH CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. 5701—C MIDWAY ROAD FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76117 PRINT DATE, MARCH 10, 1995 CASE NO, ZA 95-21 (817) 831-7711 ptib5 N AA Trot t A: 1 c _ -,A, + ' �i i /0 ' U.E. s D.E. r nCounty,i ¢Q �0 �� \' L - J - - — - - - - - I om ip g�,`)i Being a tract or parcel of land out of the J.W. Hale Srtb03urvey, Ab.;tract , situated /n Tar a t Texas I P' cooQ� ��Q\ 1 ► I I I a Ot` and more particvlary that some tract OF land as recorded in Volume 1502, page 445, Deed Records, I 0� �\, o��QQ I } I I �(-0 0\ Q �0\ Tarrant County, Texas and described by metes and bounds as follows: J I I C\J�o 0a r bt o r°� i i i i 1 2� I v3'(� 6)0���j'Y BEGINNING at an iron pin in the North line of County Road 3099. sold Iron pin is West 797.3 Feet and North _ _ I I 1 _ �o J 20.0 feet from the Southeast corner of sold S� urvey; �o THENCE West, alongthe North line of said Road 239.5 feet to a-i iron pin For corner in the East line or a 40.0 Foot i QtO c,l I I i 35'evlldrny Lrnel " P V I �, v l I 1 I Road; THENGE North, along the East line of said Road 1648.15 Feet to ,an iron pin for corner /n the South line of Gravel ----- Road; I t0 I I I r------ - in I I I---- ----------- THENCE East, along the South Ilse of said Road 235.9 feet to a7 Iron pin for corner; 1-45' U.E. t D.E_ - - _ m L _ J / i I - _ - - - - - - - , _ - - 5' k1.d:W . 72-0-&Z'o - - - - THENGE South, along a fence 1650.5 Poet to the point of beginning and containing 41.00 Acres of Land, of which nd is in the Road Area on the West and North 2,747 square Feet, or 0.063 Acres, falls outside of fence a5 64d lo' lo" W 406.40' r — N 64d 5400' W ASO' � I ' � 1 163 5' U.i- sides of this tract. 10 ' av X I i i Ir ll n 12 m i Trot t B= ��,�a0t0 2077 _ _ _ _ 20141 - 1255 The following described tract or parcel of land situated in the J.A. Hale Survey, A-803, Tarrant County, Texas, I ' and being the some tract as recorded on page 4e9 of Volume 6609 in the Tarrant County Deed Records and JQ' ¢ I i i �44 ��� `' l5/ 1 being more porticulary described as Pollows: ' BEGINNING 0by at on old iron rod in the North line of County Road No. 39q and being deed N 8qd le' 30" W 5 a �a I i ��'On ��,a : � I ' U.E. distance of 536.75 feet and North a distance of 20.0 Peet Frori the Southeast corner of said J.W. Hale Survey; 0(' �oQOQ\ I I to I THENGE West along the North line of County Road No. 3099 a distance of 260.3 Feet to an iron rod at the �`�\P%' �� t�Ot`� I I I " 00 3 Southeast corner of a 6.99 acre tract as recorded on page N54 of Volume 6444 in the Tarrant County Deed �`�Imo' c=66 64 2 70i i Records; I �' L GK THENCE North along the East Ilno of sold 8.99 acre tract a d/stance of 1650.g4 feet to an iron rod and being in JQ I i I \g'� 35' Bvlidlny Li / I I the South line of a gravel road; I �I I THENCE East along the South line of said gravel road a distance of 260.3 feet to an old iron rod at the Northeast t 0\,�a 1 i i -2e 20610 corner of Bald tract as recorded on page 489 of Volume 6601 in the Tarrant County Deed Records; \\\0 �0 0� I I I - _ _ _ _5' U.E. -4 THENCE South genorolly along a Pence a distance of 1650.g4 Feet to o place of beginning, containing q.e6b acres \Q,'l- �� p I i 1 _�cb,' P 0801 424,740 square Feetof land. 2100 % n i Beinga tract or parcel of land out of the J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract #803, situated in Tarrant County, Texas, I '4 i I I 20 7 more porticulory a part of the certain tract out of the J.W. Hole and J.A. Freeman Surveys, as recorded in Volume i I DUI J - R375' i _ 5' U.E. 1356, page 43, rood Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and this Dart is described as follows: I I 23 l26 I BEGINNING at a 5/8" iron pin in the common line betwoon said :;urvoys, North 20.0 Feet From the Southeast corner I iI n a ; 5' U.E. p v ' b� n �o Rainbow Street IS of said Hale Survey, said iron pin in the North line of Govnty Read 3099; - - 20' ROW THENCE N89d 22' 19' W along the North lire of said Road 536.'11 Feet to a 1/2" Iron pin For corner in the West line of / S R.Oi'11 I I i I 160 00 " l74 v Y, - _ _ _ Diamond sold tract as recorded /n Volume 1356, page 43, same being the Southest corner of a certain 9.86 Acre Tract in 7a.5 /34 j prsdJCQtIOn I 1 2 � � I 5 `0 i BL OG /?� sold survey, as recorded /n Volume 2920, page 298; b THENGE North along the West fence Ilne of Bald tract recorded in Volume 1356, page 43 and a/on the East line of / v 2,0039 20542 _ 2 40 8 said 4.86 Acre Tract, 1144.44 feet to a 3/8" iron pin for corner, said iron pin is the -Sovthwost corner of that certain / I Isj 6.503 Acre Tract, as recorded In Volume 4080, po e 30; 20/46 r 2 233 - I 242gb THENCE 587d 26' 32" E along o Fence and the Sovt� IJne of sold 6.503 Acre Tract 553.07 feet to 0 3/8" Iron pin for - I I a - I 1 - common Ilse between said Svrve s; - - J ` I I I i � �� l33 130 40 � q3 �' - - - - 35 8urldlncj ILM+s 1 � the Southeast corner of sold 6.503 Acre Tract, In the co y -- 1 THENCE 500d 48'll" W along a Fence and the East line of said Hale 5urvoy, same being the west line of said Freeman i I I I --------- c`44 - innin and containing 14.256 Acres of land. 1 I I I 17o.s Waverly Drive - l7 /34 I ti Survey, 1130.76 Feet to the point of beginning, g 9 s1 -----, /r--------t-JI I II l'J0 I 100 51 c:4q c=66 1 I I I ---------------- 1 I l I I I Ir 20020 -- c 1 I I 171 V- -- - -- - I I 1 1 li I II m ; 13 I 20000INJ 201g9 lO -- ' 5' U20037 .E. Masonry Wall -see De I Be low I L - - - - - - - - - e� I ' -- - -- - R3 I 0 pavers r canopy rses I I I II I I 20115 ; S A,� Accent Tr s I I d II I r r ND Al/lExisting Structu�esll II 1 I >�- 4 on s 51t� to ne Removeld I 20100 - F 100 5' u43 - 2010 16 m �► .E. 57 II I --.--- momI I I II 5 r / I6 o o O 2057.2 1 2 20628 I\Q I� I I 172 201 0 I 008 0Gr ' 1$ y5' U.E. Q� �21 1 L 35' Bvl - - - Line l I 175 r'1' Waverly Court c=44 35, Bulldln9 Line qj ` 125' 16 r I I • I 8i4 21215 �Ob BLOCK 3 I' Gtrroll Avsnus East 5outhlake Blvd. Q TH15 51TE � Ralnfaow �g G( a G Y East Gontlnentol Avenve �O Q�h Pia Vic init y Map 0 C mpMc SmA 300 ►ment with OJ �� rock Gor� p. �wJ � P�0 �t\�g >�b���,a V 1_-_ 20 b5 ' \� +�7 2O' ROW Easement with ' I I Diamond shamrock Corp. rYYY1 I I -- 620 14 i 1 20iQa Ir I I I � + I� ��-V- r�- -fib- - - a� 1 I I 20103 11550-_ — _4„ R50' 103 I Ib0.5 I I �\2 2014T. 5\aGlenwood (Courtbe\ 7 Cz110 G _ Isa 2o1�'1s7 IIInlII _ 2083 7 l75 jf� 17q I I _ _ _ _ _ _ Q- 1 Got JQP Q- I llv 1 I I 20065 35' Building Lin !q `' I 5' U.E. m I 12 20095 _ I --- i 5'---- 174 - - -11 -J I I 0 �- — I I 1 II 1 I62 125 r77 5' U.E. 113 178 I B1LO�K 4 ' CLj Carlisle Lane 1 I I I ' r ; 20000 17 I� I I I 22600 2 181 00 2 68 1 � � ', � I I Mosonr Wal( R150' v , I 701,Proposed ROW I1 IS y 4 R150' m r=177 , _ 35' Bv!! ing Line -' o� 20297 ^ c �� -- - Q------- -- ----- ---- 15 /�' R.OlhV DIShccptiOln I II I 5' U.E. lO I I l II 1 I 134 = s � � I Entrance Sign Elevotion _ _ _ _ _ _ I �' 2oog I '� I II m I I I �. � -Way .b Rsc 'Z' I .2 _ J c= 2 123 - 125 51 c=4B a -\ ,y `� I IJj 23300 ---------- --- --------------------------- �• I I - --- 10 Development I Plan for \�� /� i i \�a 2 3q0 n 4 5 " b 7'" • / I , m ^ 200 20100 02 I - 0 81 20 /0 - - - VERSAILLE� T� I i L i 1 /aa, Pu /nt Landsc e jG�i il `\ 214361 I�I Rezoning Request 1 I a' I r s' U.E. sorry Wan F cc w/ Columns \ 15 Drain e ` - 4 63 - 5' U.E 125 nds here - 125_ 146 Se Detail l28 \ 124�asem�nf - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- L� -- ----- •-� . i I I ROM Nba1d2� Iq'�W --- -------- - - - - -- N 2� 14 W N Ovid 22' M' W minty Roca 3ola P•�•�• East continental Boulevard 22�1 22, 6/8 620 0 � 620 Ms /O' Public Landscape Easement to be maintained by the Homeowners Association 12' ROW Dedlcotlon P.O.B. 20' from iron pin ® North line bra Notes: Owners of all corner lots shall maintain sight triangles in accordance with City of 5outhlake Subdivision Ordinance All fences and walls to be out of sight triangles Required Svffe� r?�°Q GGGc� 30uth-1036' 10'-B l0'-3 21 31 104 DAcst-1646' None None 8 8 50 North-10447' None None None None None East-1632 None None None None None D Beyond Required Bufferyard Requirements: apex. 300' Site Data Existing Zoning..............................SF20 A Proposed Zoning ........................SF20 A Total Area......................................33.12 Acres TotalLots.......................................57 Lot Density......................................1.7 Lots to Acre Average Lot Arco....................20,643 sf Minimum Lot Area ........................20,000 sf Land Use Designotion......... Mod. Den. Res. Hoffpavir Plaming Design Landscape Architects -- Land Planners 2201 Windsor Rood East Austin, Texas 7e703 State of Texas Registration No. 465 (512) 474-rM0 Concept Plan OF SOUTH HOL L OA an addition to the City of 5outhlake Tarrant County, Texas 33.12 Acres J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 603 57 Totol Lots Revised 2113195 Owners: Troct A: Tract B Tract G Norman J. Brown Joe Wrlght Dorthi M. Rockenbaugh and 601 W. Wall Street Igol W c- a -roil Norma J. Brown Grapevine, Texos 5outhlake, Texas 3404 Heritage Oak Gt. (617) 461-2544 (617) 461-3752 Golleyville, Texas (617) 46l -W26 Developer: youth Hollow Ltd. 3124 Loke Dries South Lake, Texas 76042 (617) 324-lo42 (617) 424-06e4 Fax - ' SI'►eet / Of FEB 2 71995 T? .. U Gore No. ZA q� tD NO SCALE I. I I `., 3. (TO BE INST D rc W/MARKET LO P 250' TO BLDG E- _ W � O 7 d Lo I a I • I Lo I �D H • O I E- W co Lo E.H. (TO BE INSTAL W/MARKET L00 235' TO BLDG.) I� I I" NOTE: THE CITY'S BENCHMARK LISTED IN THE RECORD DRAWINGS OF "COMMERCE BUSINESS PARR', PREPARED BY TEAGUE, NALL & PERKINS, DATED JULY 1986, WAS NOT LOCATED. N.W. CORNER OF THE 10' INLET ON THE EAST SIDE OF COMMERCE BLVD.) AT THE INTERSECTION OF COMMERCE BLVD. & EXCHANGE BLVD. ELEV.: 674.56 R=20' = 20' =20. E= z w d a U z 0 2=20' R=20' R=20' REQUIRED BUFFERYARDS CANOPY ACCENT REQUIRED PROVIDED TREES TREES SHRUBS NORTH - 600' 5' - A NONE 6 12 48 EAST - 173' (STREET) NONE NONE - - - SOUTH - 596' 5' - A NONE 6 12 48 WEST - 263' NONE NONE - - - REQUIRED INTERIOR LANDSCAPE CANOPY ACCENT GROUND TREES TREES SHRUBS COVER AREA REQ'D.: 3,010 S.F.** 5 10 50 301 S.F. ** - 900 S.F. OF THE 3,010 S.F. IS REQUIRED IN PARKING LOT PLANTER ISLANDS. M//m%//////// GRAPHIC SCALE (FEET) 1" = 40' RANDY PACK, Owner EX. F.H. • (145' TO BLDG.) PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE: 1. NORTH OFFICE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS. 2. FACILITIES EXPANSION TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN PHASES AS NEEDED FOR BUSINESS OPERATIONS. I SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. PROPOSED 4,800 -S.F. AND 9,000 S.F. OFFICES ARE FOR CONSTRUCTION TRADE PURPOSES. I 2. PROPOSED 5,600 S.F. AND 7,500 S.F. BUILDINGS ARE FOR WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE OF OWNERS' EQUIPMENT. A 1,400 S.F. WASH JAY IS ATTACHED TO EACH WAREHOUSE. 3. OFFICE BUILDINGS ARE SINGLE STORY CONCRETE TILT -WALL STRUCTURES. HEIGHT IS 14'-0" ABOVE FIN. FLOOR. MASONRY PERGSNTAGE IS 88.5%. 4. TOTAL LOT AREA = 289,917 S.F. TOTAL FLOOI AREA OF ALL BUILDINGS IS 30,100 S.F. (10.4% OF TOTAL). • 5- PARKING REQUIRED: 13.800 S.F. OFFICE (® 1300) = 46 SPACES; 11,200 S.F. WAREHOUSE I (O 1:1000) = 12 SPACES, 3,200 S.F. STORAGE SHED (01:1000) = 4 SPACES. PARKING REQUIRED: 62 SPACES, PLUS 4 HANIICAP SPACES. PARKING PROVIDED: 86 SPACES, PLUS 4 HANDICAP SPACES STD. PARKING SPACES: 9' x 18, ; HANDICAP PARKING SPACES: ADA STANDARDS I 6. THE OFFICES, WAREHOUSES AND STORAGE SHED WILL HAVE 500 WATT QUARTZ MERCURY VAPOR WALL PACKS ON EACH SIDE OF STRUCTUTRE. YARD LIGHTING WILL MOUNTED ON 40' POLES WITH 4-HPS COBRA HEADS PER POLE. YARD LIGHTING WILL BE DIRECTED TOWARD OWNER'S FACILITIES. POLE LOCATIONS MAY VARY WITH FINAL DESIGN. I 7. EXISTING ZONING FOR THE SITE IS S-P-1. ND CHANGE IN ZONING IS BEING REQUESTED. (L.U.D. = INDUSTRIAL) I APPROX. SITE COVERAGE : SITE COVERAGE: (GROSS AREA = 289,917 S.°.) PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 TOTAL BUILDINGS 11,866 SF. 8.7% 3,200 S.F. 5.8% 16,756 S.F. 17.2% 31,822 S.F. 11.0% CONCRETE PAVING/SIDEWALKS 42,728 SF. 31.1% 9,836 S.F. 17.8% 37,374 S.F. 38.4% 89,938 S.F. 31.0% OUTSIDE STORAGE AREA 45,598 SF. 33.3% 26,926 S.F. 48.5% 12,788 S.F. 13.1% 85,312 S.F. 29.4% LANDSCAPING/GRASS AREAS 36,910 SF. 26.9% 15,446 S.F. 27.9% 30,489 S.F. 31.3% 82,845 S.F. 28.6% TOTAL 137,102 SF. 100.0% 55,408 S.F. 100.0% 97,407 S.F. 100.0% 289,917 S.F. 100.0% I I NOTE: THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN THE NOISE CONTOURS • ESTABLISHED BY THE 1974 FITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT I FOR DFW INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AT THE NORTH END OF RUNWAY 13 RIGHT - 31 LEFT. THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AIRPORT OVERLAY ZONE ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. I 479 AND IS SUBJECT TO AN AVIGATION EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY ' FILED IN THE COUNTY DEED FECORDS. I I]-* EX. F.H. (145' TO BLDG.) I .I RANDYs ^, r Y � F D ... .A A.� IaC' ; ............ OWNER: MULLER & HOLDGATE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES P.O. BOX 1773 GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 1� � h%q 3 199 CASE NO. ZA 95-23 NOTE: ALL LOTS SURROUNDING LOT 2R1 ARE ZONED I-1 (L.U.D. = COMMERCIAL). Troc t A: Being a tract or parcel OF land out of the J.W. Hale -5vr\1ey, Abstract #e03, situated in Tarrant County, Texas and more particulary that some tract of land as recorded in Volume 1502, page 445, Deed Records, Tarrant Govnty, Texas and described by metes and bouncs as Follows: BEGINNING at or iron pIr In the North line of County Roac' #30gq, sold iron pin is West 7g7.3 feet and North 20.0 feet from the Southeaster cornof said Survey; THENCE West, along the North lire of said Road 23q.5 Feet to an iron pin For corner in the East line or a 40.0 Foot Road; THENCE North, along the East line of sold Road 1648.15 feet to an iron pin For corner in the South line of Gravel Road; THENCE East, along the South line of said Road 235.4T feat to an iron pin for corner; THENCE south, along a Fence 1650.5 feet to the point of beginning and containing 6T.00 Acres of Land, of which 2,747 square Feet, or 0.063 Acres, Falls outside of Fen,:e and is /n the Road Area on the West and North Ides of this tract. Troc t 0: The following described tract or parcel of land situates in the J.W. Hale Survey, A-803, Tarrant County, Texas, and being the some tract as recorded on page 4861 of Volume 6601; in the Tarrant County Deed Records and being more particulary described as follows: BEGINNING at an old iron rod in the North line of County Road No. 30179 and being by deed N eqd le' 30" W a distance of 536.75 Feet and North a distance of 20.0 F<:et from the Southeast corner of said J.W. Hale 5urve y; THENCE West along the North line of County Road No. 3Ugq a distance of 260.3 Feet to an iron rod at the Southeast corner OF a e.q4 acre tract as recorded on vage 56q of Volume 6444 in the Tarrant Gourty Deed Records; THENCE North along the East line of said e.414 acre tract a distance of 1650.g4 Feet to an iron rod and being in the South line of a gravel road; THENCE East along the South line OF said gravel road a distance OF 260.3 Feet to an old iron rod at the Northeast corner of said tract as recorded on page 48(:T of Volume 660g in the Tarrant County Deed Records; THENCE South generally along a Force a distance of 16 ;o.q4 feet to a place of beginning, containing df.e66 acres 42g,740 square FeetoF land. Trac t G : el of land out of the J.W. Hale 5.1rvey, Abstract #503, situated in Tarrant County, Texas, Being a tract or parc more particulary a part of the certain tract out of the J.W. Hale and J.A. Freeman Surveys, as recoraed in Volume 1356, page 43, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and this part is described as Follows: BE61NN1N6 at a 5/45" iron pin in the common line betweE-n said surveys, North 20.0 feet From the Southeast corner OF said Hale Survey, sold iron pin in the North line of 0,5)unty Road #301-Tq; THENCE N6gd 22' Iq' W along the North line OF said Road 536.71 Feet to a 1/2" iron pin For corner in the West line of said tract as recorded in Volume 1356, page 43, som<: being the 5outhest corner of a certain -4.66 Acre Tract in said survey, as recorded in Vo ume 2,120, page 2118; THENCE North along the West Fence line of said tract recorded in Volume 1356, page 43 and along the East line of said q.86 Acre Tract, 114g.44 Feet to a 3/5" iron pin For corner, said iron pin is the Southwest corner of that certain 6.503 Acre Tract, as recorded in Volume 4050, page 30; THENCE 587d 26' 32' E along a fence and the South lire Of said 6.503 Acre Tract 553.07 Feet to a 3/e" iron pin For the Southeast corner OF said 6.503 Acre Tract, in the common line between said surveys; THENCE SOOd 48,71" W along a Fence and the East line OF said Hale Survey, same being the West lire OF said Freeman Survey, 1130.76 feet to the point OF beginning and contaaining 14.256 Acres of land. —77 I N bad 54 00' W /4 I 1 1 I I I I I + + I I 1 n I I { I -r lot 0�&� 0 p�ti 0�gti`� l 1 �- { { Q-g V + I I ILLI I � I GL Carlfsle Lane � —01 70' Proposed ROW ; 15 Fig 1 �d°g °61 poll,i 0& C� �a � Carroll Avenue o 11 r I 0 �� G°� �O Q��� ( Eaet 5outhlake Blvd Q THl5 5/TE d �1 V Rainbow Q G( 14 1 r n L - - - - - - I L Y East Continentol Avenue ------ -- Rainbow Street i /2 �+ ra r ' /4► 1 21233 1 I 1 i Vicinity Map 4 e R50, I Q P L L � / 0 6 21701 I ONO gg O�0 � j �. I Q ' LOCK 2� o> a 0 O NORTH ,� I 00q $ I 40 P V ry`0 o s w o Q6o P 5 U.E. u�° I _ , a 20801 1 < h xd 1 stir -AFja �� 160 00 30o m ¢ 1 201607 i r V J D� --723-- --T25- 1 I 20 ROW Easement with Diamond Shamrock Gorp. 26 � 7a.5 . 7 f3L OG I I lo' u.e. ��� �p� �,�ti�. V ,�0 ^ 0 0 �� Fj �'' 20542 2041e 8 q 1 + I ��� �6 -,6 �_35'$ullding /ne ______------ I?0/46 ?4? ------------___ ems, � ,6 � ?I?J9 1 fi) °,�¢ G =a3„q� ,yo - , , �y 133 /30 40 Fj % g J9 p0 - , 9 <- - - - -- - 35 Bvildln9 Ling ¢Fi �' G =44 - I I PJ9 •raiaa• a• a•m � _ 1'7 I �Q �/ 1 I c=80 '� 2 125 125 51 c = 4S " ^ ry cs ?9�`Q ------- - ------------- --------------------------" 35' Building Line 63 463 r 20281 I 20610 M 2— {L{ Easem nt BLOCK I(SI I io 125 125 46 8?01 l2 I I ROW l�' —— — — — — — — -- - - - - - - — — — — — — — — � — _- — N ??' l,' W OWN N &W ??' 14' W N 8qd 22 ' 14 W --�------------------�-------------------------------------------�-�----------------------__EasE Gon-inon�a7Sov�evarc�----- - .,- -------------n _ _ _ _ �.V :. -------------- --- -- ---- Sveyey Quadrant Line Notes: Owners of al/ corner lots shall maintain sight triangles in accordance with city of 50uthloke Subdivision Ordinance All Fences and walls to be out of sight triangies Q -Indicates Street Name Change GtL� f�w�w Existing Zoning_ ...... ..................... 5F,20 A Proposed Zoning ........................5F20 A Total Area......................................33.12 Acre: TOtal Lots.......................................57 Lot Density......................................1.7 Lots to Acre Average Lot Arco ....... .............. 0,541 sF Minimum Lot Area ........................20,000 sF Land Use Designation ......... MOO. Den. Res Hoffpmir P/GIII'r 0 j Posign Landscape Architects -- Land Planners 220/ Windsor Rood East Avstin, Texas 78703 state of Texas Registration No 485 1512) 474-7s60 Preliminary Plat SOUTH HOLLOW !O Public Landscape Easement an addition to the City of 50vthiake to be mointaired by the Tarrant county, Texas Homeowners Association 33.12 Acres J.W. Hale Survey, Abstract No. 803 1?• ROW Dvdlaotlon 57 Total Lots Revised 2/13/a5 Travoied Roadway OWI1ers: -OUnKj Road ,3Q firac t A: Troc t B Trac t C - - - - Norman J. Brawn Joe Wright Dorthy hf. Rockenbough and bo1 W. W011 Street 14701 N. Carroll • Norma J. Brown Grapevine, Texas 5ovthiake, Texas 20' From iror pin (9 North line 34011 Heritage Oak Ct. (8/7) 461-2544 (ell) 481-3752 I of count Road 30gq Colleyville, Texas y (8l7) 48l-5826 Developer: r��a0 South Hollow Ltd. 3129 Lake Drive (v� 5outh Lake, Texas 760g2 (e/7) 32q-loK2 (e17) 424-08434 Fax Case No. ZA a5-04 LA