Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1995-03-07 CC Packet
City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 3, 1995 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest for City Council Meeting March 7, 1995 1. Agenda Item No. 4A & 4B. During the Mayor's Report or City Manager's Report, we will report on the Austin trip on Thursday, March 2, pertaining to S.H. 114. 2. Agenda Item No. 5A. Authorizing the immediate demolition of a portion of the building located at Lot 18, Block 1, of West Beach. Addition. On Monday, February 27, 1995, the Building Board of Appeals ordered the demolition of five (5) substandard buildings, including this structure. (See Item No. 24 below). The ordinance allows the Board to order the demolition within 30 days, with provisions which could give an extension of up to 90 days. The ordinance (No. 615) also has a provision that allows the City Council, if the structure is determined by City Council to likely immediately endanger persons or property, to order the immediate demolition of the structure or dangerous part of the structure. (See excerpt from Ordinance No. 615 attached hereto.) As pointed out in the memo from Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works and Paul Ward, Building Official, the Board, in its motion ordering the demolition of the building at Lot 18, Block 1, West Beach, requested the City Council to consider the immediate demolition of the chimney due to the immediate endangerment to the public. Staff shares the concerns of the Board, and recommends City Council order the immediate demolition of the chimney. As set out in Section XII(2)(b) of the ordinance, if so ordered by the City Council, the building chimney would be demolished by the City at our expense and we would in turn assess the expense on the property, to be eventually recovered. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 3, 1995 Page 2 The remainder of the structure will be demolished within 30 days as set out in the Order of the Board. 3. Agenda Item No. 5B. Authorizing agreement with a consultant for Economic Development Strategic Plan. Kate Barlow, Economic Development Coordinator, and the Economic Development Advisory Committee (Councilmember Michael Richarme, Betty Springer, and Rick Wilhelm) reviewed the proposals submitted in response to the RFP. The Advisory Committee recommends the proposal submitted by PHH Fantus Consulting. Staff recommends the Mayor be authorized to execute the agreement. 4. Agenda Item No. SC. Authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with Cheatham and Associates for design of S-7, Phase I, Sewer Line. The memo from Bob Whithead, Director of Public Works, points out the underlying reason to proceed at this time with the engineering for Section 1 of the S-7 sewer line. If the sewer line is constructed with developer participation, it would open up a significant area of the City to development. Should the engineering be completed and the proposed developments not occur as anticipated at this time, the project would still be "on the drawing board" for construction at a future date; the engineering plans once completed can be utilized at any time. To recap, we are recommending authorization to proceed with the engineering of the sewer line at this time due to the potential development of the area. Eddie Cheatham is the design engineer for our other sewer projects, and we recommend he continue in order to provide continuity. 5. Agenda Item No. 5D. Renewal Agreement between the City and Fort Worth Star- Telegram for City's official legal publications. The Charter in Section 12.05 provides �i• that the "...Council may designate by resolution a newspaper of general circulation in the City as the official newspaper of the City..." to publish legal notices. In order to take Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 3, 1995 Page 3 advantage of the special rates offered by the Telegram, a contract is required. The City Council approved Resolution No. 89-32, which authorized the City Manager to execute the agreement. The original agreement provided for the amendment or modifcation at any time upon the written approval of both the City and the Publisher. We have exercised this option each year since 1989 because of the lower rates and satisfactory service offered by the Telegram. • As pointed out in the memo from Sandy LeGrand, City Secretary, the rates of the Telegram have increased but are still considerably lower than the Dallas Morning News. With the new rates in effect, the following comparison resulted in staff's recommendation to renew the contract with the Star-Telegram: Fort Worth Star-Telegram w/contract w/o contract Dallas Morning News* Legals • Daily agate line per day $ 0.55 $ 4.24 $ 6.36 • Sunday agate line per day $ 0.90 $ 4.24 $ 7.08 Employment • line per day $ 4.75 $ 9.80 $12.96 * The Dallas Morning News does not offer special contract rates. 6. Agenda Items 5E and 5F. Recommended bid awards for the paving of White Chapel in two phases: Phase I from F.M. 1709 to S.H; 114; Phase II from Big Bear Creek to F.M. 1709. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 3, 1995 Page 4 The low bidder for Phase I is Sunmount. They have satisfactorily performed work in Southlake previously. The low bidder for Phase II is Reynolds Asphalt and Construction. (Sunmount would have been the low bidder for Phase II but for failure to fully respond to the specifications.) Note that the Phase II project will not realign the two curves in the northern portion of ' the project. The Phase I project provides for the realignment of Highland at White Chapel and the lowering of the hill at this intersection. Although we have not yet received City Council direction to proceed with the realignment, the decision will not change the low bidder. We are recommending both paving projects be awarded in order to proceed with the projects. We will be back to City Council shortly with the Highland/White Chapel alignment for direction. 7. Agenda Item No. 5G. Approval of Change Order #2 for Bicentennial Park Expansion, Phase I. With a project of this magnitude, change orders are to be expected. The memo from Kim McAdams and the letters from the consultant succinctly point out the need for the change order. Please call Kim McAdams, Shana Yelverton or me if you have any questions prior to the meeting. 8. Agenda Item No. 8A. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 480-160, ZA 95-01, Rezoning for 9.494 acres, from AG to SF-1A. There are no significant issues with the zoning portion of this request. The applicant had originally told staff that both proposed lots would be less than 5 acres, which led them to submit the SF-1 request rather than an RE request. Upon review of the Preliminary Plat (95-13), we found that the rear lot is 5.199 acres. Their request is still for SF-1 on both lots. Adjacent owners are in favor if the property is developed into two lots as proposed on the plat. P&Z approved 5-0-1. FYI, apparently Pat Summerall will build a residence on the rear lot. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Iiem Comments and Other Items of Interest March 3, 1995 Page 5 9. Agenda Item No. 8B. ZA 95-13, Preliminary Plat for Burns/Grubbs Addition. The only significant issue with this plat is the unusual lot line configuration between the two lots. Comment No. 1 on the review letter notes that the lot width (40') of the panhandle portion of the rear lot does appear to meet the intent of the lot width requirement. Note however, that the lot width of 100' at the front building line actually does meet the technical requirement for lot width in the zoning ordinance. P&Z Commission recommended approval (5-0-1) with the deletion of the 100' lot width comment due to the following mitigating circumstances proposed by the applicant: (1) providing a drive to the front lot and the rear lot which the Fire Services Division feels is adequate to access both homes with fire vehicles; (2) providing an "emergency access easement" loop across the front of both lots; (3) providing knox-box fire access gates at both drive connections to White Chapel and at the connection point between the two lots; (4) providing a rear lot turn-around sufficient for emergency vehicles. Staff has always held the position that the ordinance prohibited "panhandle" lots of insufficient width, but the applicant in this case has taken extra steps to address the City's concerns, and the proposed improvements seem to meet the need for adequate emergency access to the site. 10. Agenda Item No. 8C. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 480-164, ZA 95-02, Rezoning for 16.63 acres, from AG to SF-1A. Note that the developer has requested this item be tabled to April 4. There is some opposition to this request from the adjacent homeowners in Harbor Oaks, mainly that the subdivision would have lots which are too small and do not match those in Harbor Oaks. Tom Mathews has met with the homeowners and is alleviating some of their concerns with his offer for deed restrictions. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 3, 1995 Page 6 He has also shown them a sketch (in packet) which proposes 12 lots on two cul-de-sacs. He is also proposing a "bridle path" along the east line of his property which will allow Harbor Oaks residents access to the Corp property. Also note in the packet a summary of deed restrictions which he proposes. P&Z recommended approval of the zoning 6-0. Two other ancillary issues may come • up in the discussion. First, Mathews may propose a "country lane" type road with no bar ditches. Staff has made them aware that an a bar ditch cross-section is allowed but must be provided within a 60' R.O.W. rather than the normal 50' R.O.W. Second, Greg Last made the applicants aware that it was staff's intent to require a public access easement or strip of parkland west from their southern cul-de-sac in order to provide a critical trail system connection to the Corp property. Some of the residents do not want the public access through this property. By tabling this item until April 4, the plat will be through P&Z and track with the second reading of the ordinance. 11. Agenda Item No. 8D. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 480-165, ZA 95-09. Rezoning and Concept Plan for Ridgewood I, from AG to SF-20A. There are no significant issues with this request. Staff has recommended a 20' park dedication for a trail system connection from this addition to Sutton Place to the north. The applicant proposes that it would be better to provide a trail from Florence Road, through the City water tower site and eventually to Johnson Road. Staff is currently reviewing the pros and cons of this option. P&Z recommended approval 6-0 to include the deletion of the 20' wide trail system connection to the north. 12. Agenda Item No. 8E. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 480-166, ZA 95-10, Rezoning and Concept Plan for Ridgewood II, from AG to SF-20A. There is considerable opposition to this request as proposed, although currently less than the 20% figure. P&Z recommended denial of the request as submitted by a 6-0 vote. The L.U.P. recommends Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 3, 1995 r Page 7 6. low density residential and several of the P&Z Commission were uncomfortable with the conflict with the L.U.P. The applicant has requested to table until 3/21/95 so he can evaluate his options. We have heard that on 3/21/95 he may request that Council remand his request back to P&Z to allow them to reconsider a different proposal of some kind, with hopes of approving the request and eliminating the required 3/4 Council vote due to P&Z denial. 13. Agenda Item No. 8F. ZA 95-11, Revised Development Plan for Timarron Addition, Golf Villas A and B. There are no significant issues with this request. They had previously received approval for 33 lots with 6,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size with a 7,200 sq. ft..average and utilizing a zero lot-line concept. The current submittal also proposes 6,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size with a 7,200 sq. ft. average, zero lot line with 10' separation between units. The zero lot-line concept has some distinct advantages in this size lot, mainly the creation of liveable yard areas rather than an unusable area between a house and a fence on the property line. The only issue raised during review has been the number of lots from one point of entry (105 lots). Applicant has worked with the Fire Services staff to provide for an "emergency access easement" crossing common green "G." This effectively reduces the single access total to 33 lots on the southern-most cul-de-sac. P&Z recommended approval 5-0-1. 14. Agenda Item No. 8G. ZA 95-12, Revised Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition, Golf Villas A and B. The issues for this request are the same as the Development Plan. P&Z recommended approval 5-0-1. 15. Agenda Item No. 8H. 1st Reading, Ordinance No. 506-A, amending the present Sign Ordinance No. 506. Greg Last, Director of Community Development, has included in the packet the redline/strikeout version#6 of the sign ordinance which uses as a base the ordinance as recommended by P&Z. All revisions in the redline/strikeout are those Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 3, 1995 Page 8 recommended by Council or something that staff has discovered as a problem due to questions Council has raised. This draft also includes the comments from the City Attorney. 16. Agenda Item No. 8I. Ordinance No. 635. 1st Reading. Code of Ethics and Conduct. This item will be handed out at work session. We have not yet put the fmishing touches • on the ordinance. We have scheduled this item for 1st reading, rather than discussion, since we have had drafts before City Council on several previous occasions. 17. Agenda Item No. 11A. Discussion of Request to amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow a Full Service Car Wash. The memo from Karen Gandy describes staff's recommendation for including a full service car wash in the zoning ordinance as a permitted use in C-3 with a SUP, if this is something City Council wishes to consider. We need Council direction as to whether you want us to proceed with an ordinance amendment. OTHER ITEMS OF INTEREST 18. FYI. SF building permit activity was up considerably in February--46. This compares with 34 in February '94, 31 in February '93, and 30 in February '92. It compares with 43 in January of this year. The point underscores what I have mentioned previously to you: my belief that the decline in building activity is directly related to the abnormal rainfall we have experienced this year. Whatever the reason, it is unlikely that building permit activity will meet our projections for the year. Coe 19. FYI, City of Southlake employees pledged $97 per capita to the United Way during its 1994 campaign, the highest employee per capita pledge among cities in Tarrant County. City staff recently received the results, which showed that Southlake ranked far ahead Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 3, 1995 �r Page 9 of the second ranking city (Kennedale at $77.44 per employee), and third ranking city(North Richland Hills at $60.88 per employee). Approximately 65% of the work force made contributions with a total gift of$10,671.42 from 71 donors with an average contribution of $150.30 20. SPIN Report - During the joint meeting with City Council on February 23, 1995, several SPIN leaders expressed concern about the apparent apathy of their neighbors. Many of the SPIN representatives have concerns that a great deal of time and energy goes into planning neighborhood meetings, with few residents attending. This has led a few of the SPIN leaders to question the effectiveness of the program. Cer It appears that considerable work needs to be done to mitigate this concern. A few points for you to ponder: First, SPIN was established as a communication tool. Its purpose is to facilitate communication between the neighborhoods and City officials. I do not believe that Council or staff has ever expected SPIN leaders to plan monthly meetings for all of the residents of their neighborhood to attend! I do believe that we wanted SPIN leaders to create programs in their neighborhoods to effectively "get the word out" and to let us know what issues are of interest to the residents. Second, SPIN is an ongoing program, not a finite project. The difference between the two is enormous in my opinion. There are no measurable goals that have been established by Council (i.e., each neighborhood must have 50% of its residents in attendance at neighborhood meetings). As such, there are not really any tangible payoff points (i.e., successfully getting 50% of residents to a SPIN meeting). This being the case, the frustration expressed may be due to the fact that SPIN representatives cannot tell when they are making significant achievements. Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 3, 1995 Page 10 We believe that there have been significant achievements in this program. A few examples follow: -Dick Johnston has had several meetings in which he hosted City staff as speakers. These have generally been well attended, with the last meeting having 34 attendees. -Thirty residents of SPIN #1 & #2 attended a meeting to hear plans for West Beach, -Other groups have hosted a large number of residents at neighborhood meetings to discuss issues of interest, -Several SPIN reps now produce newsletters or other types of communiques to inform neighbors of items of interest, -The SPIN Standing Committee meets regularly and has initiated a number of projects which will have a positive impact on the City (see attached newsletter page), -City Council agendas and zoning change notifications are regularly sent to SPIN leaders, as well as copies of press releases and other items of interest. These are just a few of the more tangible accomplishments--we can't even quantify how many problems we have solved just by being accessible. For the most part, we are in uncharted territory and solutions to problems are not readily available. I wanted to bring this issue to your attention because I am convinced that this is one of the most important things we are doing. Shana and I have in the last few months begun to meet over lunch with the individual SPIN representatives to discuss Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 3, 1995 Page 11 specific issues in the neighborhoods, general concerns, and other topics. After lunch, we drive through their SPIN neighborhood. This personal attention has helped. We as a staff will continue to work for SPIN's success. It is very important for us to have your full support and that we let our SPIN leaders know they are meeting our expectations and are doing a good job. 21. West Beach Property Acquisition - We currently have contracts working with four property owners. More information will be provided to you during Executive Session on Tuesday. 22. 9-1-1 Issue As you will note in the memorandum from John Knight, Deputy Director of Support Services, there have been complaints regarding the 9-1-1 system. Specifically, one of our SPIN leaders alerted us to the fact that some of her neighbors had hadvertently discovered that their addresses were incorrectly listed in the 9-1-1 system. Similarly, we received a complaint Thursday from a gentleman who dialed 9-1-1 and was not connected with Southlake DPS for approximately 10 minutes. I Mr. Knight is working with Tarrant County 9-1-1 on this issue and has suggested that, until the problem can be fully corrected, new residents and SPIN representatives be made aware that they need to "test" the system. We will keep you informed of our progress on this issue. 23. Outdoor Burning Update - You will recall that in last meeting's memo I raised this as an issue for consideration. My memo read: The State Prohibition on Outdoor Burning has put us in a very difficult situation concerning brush and limb disposal. Because of the numerous large-acre tracts in Southlake, many of our citizens have been piling up brush and limb cuttings from their trees, creating a need to find some way to dispose of it. • Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 3, 1995 Page 12 We have received an opinion letter from the attorneys, which I have attached. WKO clearly states the restrictions--and the opportunities--for the City if we wish to contemplate reviewing our practices on outdoor burning. A copy of WKO's memo went to Director of Public Safety Billy Campbell. SDPS will work on the draft of an amendment to our regulatory controls that would provide for outdoor burning under certain controlled situations on large tracts of land. 24. The Building Board of Appeals met on Monday, February 27 to consider five substandard buildings (see attached BBA agenda). BBA Case #004 is the agenda item discussed hereinabove. In all of the cases, BBA issued a 30 day order to demolish/remove the substandard structure. BBA Case #001 - The owner has a permit and is currently demolishing the structure. BBA Case #002 - The owner is willing to demolish the structure and has been given an application for a permit. BBA Case #003 There have been discussions with the family of the property owner but it is likely they will wait until the 30 days have passed and allow the City to demolish the structure and assess the costs against the property. BBA Case #005 - Since children have been seen playing in the structure and it appears in danger of collapsing, we are taking immediate steps to board the house to prevent entry. Paul Ward, Building Official, and Roger Stewart, Fire Marshal, are in the process of assessing the next group of structures for fire danger and substandard construction. 25. Director Campbell, Deputy Director Williams and I will meet on March 7 with the Texas Railroad Commission and Lone Star Gas to discuss the danger of above-ground gas Lregulators. The February 14 accident on Shady Oaks has again pointed out the safety risk inherent with this design. Some of you may recall that we raised this issue with the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Agenda Item Comments and Other Items of Interest March 3, 1995 Page 13 RRC and Lone Star Gas in September 1992 because of the potential danger. (FYI, a copy of the RRC special investigation report is attached.) • At the time, Lone Star Gas agreed to strengthen the safety bollards and consider moving the stations in the future. As seen from the Shady Oaks accident though, the bollards do little to prevent a vehicle from striking the regulator and causing a gas leak. I will brief • you on the results of our meeting Tuesday night. 26. Upcoming Meetings: SPDC Meeting - Tuesday, March 7, 5:00 p.m. (just before the Council work session.) Joint CC/P&Z Corridor Meeting - Wednesday, March 22, 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. fiar SPIN #13 - Wednesday, March 8, 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers. SPIN #3 - Thursday, March 9, 7:00 p.m. in the DPS Training Room. SPIN#16- Wednesday, March 15, 7:30 p.m. at the Lodge in Bicentennial Park. SPIN #7 - Saturday, March 18, 6:00 p.m. at the home of Peter Sporrer. • 27. The Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance should be ready to go to P&Z on March 23. 28. Update on Recycle Bin Covers - At Council's request, Dick Johnston has distributed recycle bin covers to approximately 60 households. He sent out a questionnaire this week to the participating households. The responses will help us better assess the usefulness of the caps. C / SECTION XII. ..► ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO SECURE CERTAIN SUBSTANDARD BUILDINGS PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARING AND SECURE, DEMOLISH, REPAIR OR REMOVE CERTAIN DANGEROUS BUILDINGS (1) Securing of Unoccupied, Substandard Building. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Ordinance the City may secure a building if the building official determines: (a) That the building violates the minimum standards set forth in Section IV above; and (b) That the building is unoccupied or is occupied only by persons who do not have the right of possession to the building. (2) If Building Creates Immediate Danger. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Ordinance, if the City Council finds that a building is likely to immediately endanger persons or property the City Council may: (a) Order the owner of the building, the owner's agent, or the owner or occupant of the property on which the structure is located to repair, remove, or demolish the structure, or the dangerous part of the structure, within a specified time; or (b) Repair, remove, or demolish the structure, or the dangerous part of the structure, at the expense of the municipality, on behalf of the owner of the structure or the owner of the property on which the structure is located, and assess the repair, removal, or demolition expenses on the property on which the structure was located. (3) Before the eleventh (11th) day after the date the building is secured pursuant to Subsection XII(1) above, or action is ordered pursuant to Subsection XII(2)(a) above, or the building is repaired, removed or demolished pursuant to Subsection XII(2)(b) above, the building official shall give notice to the owner by: (a) Personally serving the owner with written notice; or (b) Depositing the notice in the United States mail addressed to the owner at the owner's post office address; or (c) Publishing the notice at least twice within a ten (10) day period in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the building is located, if personal service cannot be obtained and the owner's post office address is unknown; or fAfiles\muni\slake\ordinanc\danger03(08-11-94) 14 (or '—`- 09:-.1 --1---- STANDING COMMITTEE MEMBERS TAKING ON A VARIETY OF PROJECTS During. SPIN's first few months, SPIN Code of Conduct - SPIN Standing Standing Committee members have spent Committee members realize that the public considerable time working to get their must have a good perception of SPIN and Neighborhood Councils organized, and to are seeking to develop a code of conduct to establish the Standing Committee. There identify and encourage the highest standards Clin have been, however, a number of projects of professional conduct by Standing 111%1 initiated by Standing Committee members. Committee members. . Villillitiok Ak The following are just a few of the projects which have either been initiated or will be Project Input - Standing Committee implemented with strong Standing members have had formal input into several Committee participation: projects, including the Trail Master Plan and •1�1 the citizen survey. Directory of City Services - The Standing Committee has requested that the City Education - SPIN Standing Committee develop a single source of information about members are working to ensure that they who to contact in the City to answer and their neighborhoods become familiar common questions or report problems. with the City, its programs and processes. For example, several neighborhoods have Brush & Limb Chipping Program - What invited staff and elected officials to come should a homeowner do with all of the brush talk with them about various issues. Iand tree limb clippings now that burning is • not an option? Standing Committee member Leadership - A number of SPIN Standing AO Dick Johnston is working with staff to Committee members have also become CID develop some alternatives. involved in other city activities, including serving on the Charter Review Committee, Public Access Television-Can the City take Keep Southlake Beautiful, the Adventure advantage of its public access channel to Alley Committee, and the Southlake Dispute make citizens more aware of what is Resolution program. happening in Southlake? Communication - Standing Committee All America City Award Application-Many members receive certified notices of of SPIN's activities may enhance the City's impending zoning cases in their ability to receive an All America City neighborhoods; Council and P&Z packets Award. Standing Committee members will are distributed to the Standing Committee; be working with staff to develop this year's press releases are sent to Standing application. Committee members to ensure that they can answer questions about current city events. ® Adopt a Road - Some neighborhoods are 0 adopting streets and neighborhoods for litter Through SPIN, Standing Committee al O� IR pick up. volunteers have made significant strides in y making City Hall accessible to Southlake 444 Voter Registration - Some Standing neighborhoods, and are working to take on Committee members are working to educate projects that will benefit the community in their neighbors about how to become a other ways. registered voter. City of South lake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 2, 1995 TO: Billy Campbell,Director of Public Safety FROM: John Knight, Deputy Director of Support Services RE: Problems with 9-1-1 calls In the last two weeks it has been brought to my attention that several of the new residents have not had their phones programmed to fall to the correct 9-1-1 answering point. I have spoken with Mr. Bill Munn,Executive Director of Tarrant County 9-1-1, who informed me that the commission has received numerous complaints regarding the GTE data base. Apparently GTE has an ongoing problem with data entry in their 9-1-1 data being either entered in a timely manner or incorrectly. He has assured me that he will contact GTE regarding our concerns. In an attempt to take steps for notification of the citizens regarding this GTE problem,I have outlined two separate approaches. First, I have directed Coordinator Jackson to compile a packet of information for citizens to be presented with when they come to city hall to begin their water service. This information would include 9-1-1 paraphernalia along with a written explanation for the citizen to test the 9-1-1 system when their phones are installed in their residences. If the system has not been updated then Support Services could complete the proper paper work and submit it to Tarrant County 9-1-1 for corrections. Secondly, I have spoken with Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager, about utilizing the "SPIN" groups throughout the city to notify the citizens that have relocated in our within the last few months. Ms. Yelverton requested that I forward a copy of this memorandum to her office. She wants to duplicate it into the council packets in order to inform them of the problem in the event they are receiving citizen complaints. JK/jk cc: Shana Yelverton, Assistant City Manager L • • • FIELDING, BARRETT & TAYLOR, L.L.P. ATTORNEYS •A 3400 BANK ONE TOWER 500 THROCKMORTON STREET U FORT WORTH,TEXAS 76102-3821 FEBTELEPHONE(817)332-2580 FCD 2 4paE6 (800)318-3400 FAX(817)3324740 OFFICE OF CITY h1ANAGER �I r v WAYNE K.OLSON c.,— February 23, 1995 Mr. Curtis Hawk City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Outdoor burning Dear Curtis: Cir As a follow-up to our telephone conversation earlier this week, I have reviewed the regulations of the Texas Air Control Board (now the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission) that apply to outdoor burning. I read these regulations to permit eight (8) specific types of outdoor burning. One type of outdoor burning which is specifically permitted is "rural area on-site burning of trees, brush, grass and other dried plant growth when no practical alternative to burning exists for right-of-way maintenance, land clearing operations and for... forest, crop and range management purposes...." (30 T.A.C. §111.103(b)(5)). Burning which is conducted under this provision must occur outside the corporate limits of the city except when it is necessary to eliminate a naturally occurring fire hazard as determined by the local fire department. It is my opinion that deadfall could be classified as a naturally occurring fire hazard. If burning occurs under this provision, it must be conducted under certain guidelines set forth in section 111.105 of the regulations. These guidelines include a 300 foot distance restriction from adjacent properties, limited hours of burning between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., and a wind speed no greater than twenty-three miles per hour and blowing in a direction away from areas which might be affected by the smoke. f:\files\muni\slake\letters\hawL008 • Mr. Curtis Hawk L. February 23, 1995 Page 2 The TNRCC regulations are adopted pursuant to Chapter 382 of the Texas Health and Safety Code (the Texas Clean Air Act). Section 382.018 of the Act provides that the board,by rule,may control and prohibit outdoor burning of waste and combustible material. Section 382.113 authorizes a municipality to enact and enforce an ordinance to control and abate air pollution as long as the ordinance is consistent with Chapter 382 and the board's rules and orders. A municipality may not make unlawful a condition or act approved or authorized under Chapter 382 or the board's rules or orders. Finally, any person who violates the TNRCC's rules or orders as described above would be subject to all kinds of terrible penalties, including civil penalties up to $25,000.00, administrative penalties and criminal penalties. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please let me know. Very truly yours, /J4 Wayne K. Olson WKO/wrt f:\tiles\muni\slake\letters\hawk.008 City of Southlake,Texas BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING FEBRUARY 27. 1995 LOCATION: 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas Council Chambers of City Hall TIME: 7:00 P.M., Monday AGENDA: • 1. Call to Order. • 2. Approval of Minutes of the January 23, 1995 Building Board of Appeals Meeting. 3. Administrative Comments. 4. Consider: BBA CASE#001, Substandard Building, being Lot 5-B, W. E. Mayfield Subdivision. Location: South side of State Hwy. 114 in the 2700 block just West of Austin Place. Owner: Conner Lam. PUBLIC HEARING. 5. Consider: BBA CASE #002, Substandard Building, being Tract 3E, Abstract 695 out of the W.W. Hall Survey and further known as; 710 E. Southlake Blvd. Location: North side of E. Southlake Blvd. (F.M.1709)just East of Diamond Blvd. Owner: Homei Liao. PUBLIC HEARING.. 6. Consider: BBA CASE #003, Substandard Building, being Tract 6D, Abstract 706 out of the T. M. Hood Survey and further known as: 1310 North White Chapel Blvd. Location: West side of N. White Chapel Blvd. between State Hwy. 114 and W. Highland St. Owner: Mrs. E. J. Bryant. PULIC HEARING. 7. Consider: BBA CASE #004, Substandard Building, being Lot 18, Block 1, West Beach Addition and further known as; Bass Drive. Location: East on Bass Drive. last house on North side. Owner: Katherine Redmon. PUBLIC HEARING. 8. Consider: BBA CASE #005, Substandard Building, being Lot 23, Block 2, West Beach Addition and further known as; Bass Drive. Location: East on Bass Drive. last house on South side. Owner: Louise Watts. PUBLIC HEARING. 9. Adjournment. -', "-V" , 1 ee . n-giozi ... A ; 0 FFI E n F .�_w. -rd , o - z - - _r _ — - L T •. n. � : .1.�..,�r irw, .•rE..may u'i<.,}�•r ... .. r, / .,,, i: ,,,,--,.‘,.sc. . ,-, , v. t. s-;s, f y {/[J�/j,(�'+ I ter.. < - 'Ai: i� ..i. .4. i IERRY L MARTIN ' /, LENA GUERRERO.C4irmae y Director 1 TAMES E.(IIM)NUGENT.Commissioner (ye)463'7W • � .,i/! I ROBERT KRUECER.Commissioner TRANSPORTATION/GAS UTILITIES DIVISION FAX(grr).163-7'S3 �', G fro N.CONGRESS CAPITOL STATION—P.O.BOX ugh .,4dif ••7 J E U E I V E /..4fp1)) October 28, 1992ii Mr. James W. Hinds NW - 1992 I Vice President, Distribution Operations Lone Star Gas Company OFFICE OF CITY 301 S. Harwood Street MANAGER Dallas, Texas 75201 RE: Special Investigation 93-SA-009 Dear Mr. Hinds: At the request of the City of Southlake, Ms. J.M. Kerl, of the Dallas Pipeline Safety office met with Mssrs. Curtis Hawk, Mike Barnes, Greg Last; City of Southlake and Johnny James and Jeff Hooper; Lone Star Gas Company, to discuss the City' s concerns regarding the location of several regulator stations. As discussed during the meeting, several barricades were inadequate and a sign on a newly painted station was missing. These areas of noncompliance were brought to the attention of all attendees, and repairs were made promptly. The City of Southlake is,-very concerned about the potential danger the locations pose along these heavily travelled roads and has stated that there have been a number of incidents in these areas. Attached for your information is a copy of our final investigation report. Thank you for your cooperation during our investigation. Sincerely, Ma L. Mc aniel, P.E. Ma ager, Pipeline Safety cc : City of Southlake C An Ewa,:C)ppurnmirr•I:ngdns.r INVESTIGATION REPORT *Special/Accident Investigation No. 93-SA-009 I Incident/Accident C Complaint/Inquiry V Written/Verbal Date of Incident: Material Transportation: X Natural Gas Hazardous Liquid (product) Type Pipeline: X Distribution Transmission Master Meter _Other (Specify) OPERATOR DATA Company Name: Lone Star Gas Company Phone Number: 817/336-8381 Co. Representative: Johnny James & Jeff Hooper Address: 100 W. Morningside, Ft. Worth, Texas OTHER PARTY/COMPLAINANT DATA Name: City of Southlake Phone Number: 817/481-5581 Address: 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas Location of Incident: Southlake, Texas County: Tarrant (so ****************************************************************************** Investigation Report 41.1, Page 2 NATURE OF INVESTIGATION: The City of Southlake is concerned about the location of several regulator stations owned and operated by LSG. The regulator stations are located on the corners of heavily travelled intersections. According to the City of Southlake, there have been several accidents involving overturned 18-wheelers and concrete - trucks. The City of Southlake wants the stations moved because of the potential danger. ACTION TAKEN: At the request of the City of Southlake, Ms. J. M. Kerl, of the Dallas Transportation/Gas Utilities Division's Pipeline Safety (1. office met with Messrs. Curtis Hawk, Mike Barnes, Greg Last; City of Southlake and Johnny James and Jeff Hooper; Lone Star Gas Company, to discuss the City's concerns about the location of several regulator stations. The stations in question were viewed. Unfortunately, the stations are not unlike others across the state. The barricades were inadequate and would not prevent any single incident from completely eliminating the stations. Also, a sign on a newly painted station was missing. This was brought to the attention of the operator. As I stated to all the attendees, the Railroad Commission cannot make an operator move the station but we are going to document the fact that the City of Southlake has brought this concern to the attention of the operator. C • Investigation Report tie Page 3 CONCLUDING STATUS: Lone Star Gas stated that the barricades will be re-worked and that they will consider moving the two stations in Question. The City of Southlake feels that they have a state statute that they may be able to use to get the stations moved. They are very concerned about the potential danger the locations pose along these heavily travelled roads and has stated that there have been a number of incidents in these areas. This has now been brought to attention of the operator and is noted and documented by the Commission. It is our understanding from the meeting, that Lone Star Gas Company representatives stated that every effort will be given to correcting and working with the City of Southlake on these (Ow concerns. SYNOPSIS: At the request of the City of Southlake, a special investigation was Conducted of the location of several regulator stations owned and operated by LSG. The City wants the stations moved because of the potential danger they pose to the public. These stations are not unlike others across the state and are located in heavily populated areas. The barricades were inadequate and a sign was needed. This was brought to the attention of the operator and the City. Both entities state that they will try to work together to eliminate problems. C Investigation Report Cre Page 4 ALLEGED VIOLATION CITED (Please give code numbers only. ) None ***************************************************************** Date Received: 9/16/92 Date Completed: 9/18/92 4Region: 6 Investigator: J. M. Kerl Regional Engineer/Supervisor: J. M. Kerl Approved By:' M. L. McDaniel, P.E. Manager, Pipeline Safety ***************************************************************** INVESTIGATION TIME: Travel 1 Field 3 Report 3 * SI or AI numbers only required when field time is recorded. RRC, Transportation/Gas Utilities Pipeline Safety Section Form PS-55, February, 1989 C City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, P. E. Director Public Works Paul Ward, Building Offical SUBJECT: SUBSTANDARD / DANGEROUS BUILDINGS BASS DRIVE WEST BEACH ADDITION Southlake Building Board of Appeals has ordered the building located at Lot 18, Block 1, Bass Drive to be removed or demolished within 30 days. The motion was made requesting the condition of the building be considered by City Council. If the City Council finds that the building is likely to immediately endanger persons in the area, they may order the dangerous part of the structure removed within a specified time less than the 30 days. It should be noted that this structure has a brick fireplace that has tilted away from the building and children have been seen playing in the area. City Staff recommends that the Council authorize the removal of the dangerous part of the structure (chimney) at the expense of the city, on behalf of the owner and assess the removal expenses on the property on which the structure is located, as requested by the Board. Please schedule this item for the March 7, 1995 City Council Meeting. BW/PW:dc Attachments: Order for Case #004 Substandard Building Inspection Report Case #004 City of Southlake,Texas L . S►BIER OF THE SOUTHLAKE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS CASE NO. 004 TO: Katherine Redmon DATE: February 27, 1995 WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on February 27, 1995 before-the Southlake Building Board of Appeals ("Board") regarding structures present on Lot 18, Block 1, West Beach Addition, located on Bass Drive in Southlake, Texas; and WHEREAS, the records of the office of the county clerk indicate that Katherine Redmon is the record owner of the buildings; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing was mailed to the property owner more than ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Board fords that the defects or conditions set forth on the Substandard Building Inspection Report, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein for all purposes, are present in the buildings; and WHEREAS, the Board further fords that the buildings are infeasible of repair. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS HEREBY ORDERS THAT the structures described as one (1) house and one (1) shed located on Lot 18, Block 1, West Beach Addition, located on Bass Drive in Southlake, Texas be demolished and the debris removed form the property within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. The owner may demolish or remove the structure at his option. If the ordered action is not taken within the allotted time, the city will remove or demolish the building and charge the cost to the property. If the city is not promptly reimbursed for its expenses, the city will place a lien on the property for the amount owned. irman, o ake Building Board of Appeals (.1 ,spa r EXHIBIT "A" SUBSTANDARD -BJILDINGS • INSPECTION REPORT CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 - 667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE (817) 481-5581 - FAX (817) 488-5097 PROPERTY ADDRESS Bass Dr. ABST TRACT out of SURVEY L - 18 B - 1 SUB DIVISION West Beach PROPERTY OWNER Katherine Redmon PROPERTY OCCUPANT ORDINANCE NO. 615 CASE NO. 004 DATED 12/13/94 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS APPLICABLEFOR DANGEROUS AND SUBSTANDARD BUILDINGS; PROVIDING THE REPAIR, DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, SECURING, AND VACATION OF DANGEROUS AND SUBSTANDARD BUILDINGS; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR FORVIOLATIONS U PUBLICATION PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING IN Tin., OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. SECTION IV. SUBSTANDARD BUILDINGS DECLARED For the purposes of this Ordinance, any building, regardless of the date of its construction, which has any or all of the conditions or defects hereinafter described shall be deemed to be a substandard building: X (1) Any building that is dilapidated, substandard, or unfit for human habitation and a hazard to the public health, safety and welfare. X (2) Any building that, regardless of its structural condition, is unoccupied by its owners, lessees or other invitees and is unsecured from unauthorized entry to the extent that 1 ,-59-3 it could be entered or used by vagrants or other uninvited persons as a place of harborage or could be entered or used by children. (3) Any building that is boarded up, fenced or otherwise secured in any manner if: (a) The building constitutes a danger to the public even though secured from entry; or (b) The means used to secure the building are inadequate to prevent unauthorized entry or use of the building in the manner described by Section 1V(2) above. (4) Whenever any door, aisle, passageway, stairway or other means of exit is not of sufficient width or size or is not so arranged as to provide safe and adequate means of exit in case of fire or panic. )( (5) Whenever the walking surface of any aisle, passageway, stairway or other means of exit is so warped, worn, loose, torn or otherwise unsafe as to not provide safe and adequate means of exit in case of fire or panic. (6) Whenever the stress in any materials, or members or portion thereof, due to all dead and live loads, is more than one and one half times the working stress or stresses allowed in the Building Code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location. (7) Whenever any portion thereof has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind flood or by any other cause, to such an extent that the structural strength or stability thereof is materially less than it was before such catastrophe and is less than the minimum requirements of the Building Code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location. X - (8) Whenever any portion or member or appurtenance thereof is likely to fail, or to become detached or dislodged, or to collapse and thereby injure persons or damage property. X (9) Whenever any portion of a building, or any member, appurtenance or ornamentation on the exterior thereof is not of sufficient strength or stability, or is not so anchored, attached or fastened in place so as to be capable of resisting a wind pressure of one half of that specified in the Building Code for new buildings of similar structure, purpose or location without exceeding the working stresses permitted in the Building Code for such buildings. c (10) Whenever any portion thereof has wracked, warped, buckled or settled to such an extent that walls or other structural portions have materially less resistance to winds or earthquakes than is required in the case of similar new construction. ( (11) Whenever the building, or any portion thereof, because of(a) dilapidation, deterioration or decay; (b) faulty construction; (c) the removal, movement or instability of (..„ 2 /2_4L r ' • Cany portion of the ground necessary for the purpose of supporting such building; (d) the. . •deterioration, decay or inadequacy of its foundation; or (e) any other cause, is likely to partially or completely collapse. (12) Whenever, for any reason, the building, or any portion thereof, is manifestly unsafe for the purpose for which it is being used. (13) Whenever the exterior walls or other vertical structural members list, lean or buckle to such an extent that a plumb line passing through the center of gravity does not fall inside the middle one third of the base. X (14) Whenever the building, exclusive of the foundation, shows 33 percent or more damage or deterioration of its supporting member or members, or 50 or more percent damage or deterioration of its non-supporting members, enclosing or outside walls or coverings. '(15) Whenever the building has been so damaged by fire, wind, earthquake, flood or other causes, or has become so dilapidated or deteriorated as to become (a) an attractive nuisance to children; or, (b) a harbor for vagrants, criminals or immoral persons. (16) Whenever any building has been constructed, exists or is maintained in violation of any specific requirement or prohibition applicable to such building provided by dr the building regulations of this jurisdiction, as specified in the Building Code, or of any law or ordinance of this state or jurisdiction relating to the condition, location or structure of buildings. (17) Whenever any building which, whether or not erected in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances, has in any non-supporting part, member or portion less than 50 percent, or in any supporting part, member or portion less than 66 percent of the (a) strength, (b) fire-resisting qualities or characteristics, or (c) weather-resisting qualities or characteristics required by law in the case of a newly constructed building of like area, height and occupancy in the same location. (18) Whenever a building, used or intended to be used for dwelling purposes, because of inadequate maintenance, dilapidation, decay, damage, faulty construction or arrangement, inadequate light, air or sanitation facilities, or otherwise, is determined by the building official to be unsanitary, unfit for human habitation or in such a condition that is likely to cause sickness or disease for reasons including, but not limited to, the following: (a) Lack of, or improper water closet, lavatory, bathtub or shower in a dwelling unit or lodging house. (b) Lack of, or improper water closets, lavatories and bathtubs or showers per number of guests in a hotel. 3 (c) Lack of, or improper kitchen sink in a dwelling unit. (d) Lack of hot and cold running water to plumbing fixtures in a hotel. (e) Lack of hot and cold running water to plumbing fixtures in a dwelling unit or lodging house. (f) Lack of adequate heating facilities. (g) Lack of, or improper operation of, required ventilating equipment. (h) Lack of minimum amounts of natural light and ventilation required by this code. - (i) Room and space dimensions less than required by this code the building code. (j) Lack of required electrical lighting. (k) Dampness of habitable rooms. (1) Infestation of insects, vermin or rodents. (m) General dilapidation or improper maintenance. (n) Lack of connection to required sewage disposal system. (o) Lack of adequate garbage and rubbish storage and removal facilities. X (19) Whenever any building, because of obsolescence, dilapidated condition, deterioration, damage, inadequate exits, lack of sufficient fire-resistive construction, faulty electric wiring, gas connections or heating apparatus, or other cause, is determined by the fire marshal to be a fire hazard. (20) Whenever any building is in such a condition as to make a public nuisance known to the common law or in equity jurisprudence. (21) Whenever any portion of a building remains on a site after the demolition or destruction of the building. (22) Whenever any building is abandoned so as to constitute such building or portion thereof an attractive nuisance or hazard to the public. (23) Any building constructed and is still existing in violation of any provision of the Building Code or Uniform Fire Code of the City of Southlake. 4 .5/9- 6 •(100/ f.66'""" r{,y .6i�Yr ,, r} } Ec; :"Y, f j„.f . f Y ay$,. t.,"0. !: '.tf-.a, fir . s` : •i .k.. /.�;,,,:Y ^�59'• s<''N }3,}. r'?:. f • _r'r �'D ��yr°f {f c�jfy: F' o �jai{•:•1 5� t✓ i f:1f 6.'la ::;;;'":> w.•:N ,�`t o �r ,.,, t„�j�f 4 ` f }$� ATE :}A.._ :� �` 'ti4'd �r .F�t' +A'�Y } L F � � �, �� f ,� i �:+t4� rip ..P e °4 rb @ Lr' t�'' e 4 : :r } ',rr 'o 9 a�•. +i ''{{ ,t.' r• krfasyti: >°t t -0: }i`-f.•••":"Z, o t 9r +.ki.. 1}� } T a g '915.,!iNl '^""^ T'L j'�}' t •f a,.% 3 1,11 ::C.. ..;fig. Frt $ t f ? ri 4,1 /,, r'.. . n.},,, S r �- t"C ° ':...c.::::.:,.?.. ..,:G...i...w.:�'.y; r r. 3 .'i?Y r Y'.2Y+Y.A. ? i. rd' w ,c.t g{, A . . ro ::,, GF w ° :..?S a &'a',C .r, P ,�'4 �`i ?,�i,� e v y;°k.'' a R f� fit,:{,'} ?. '. ,r,,:: i : • . .. ' � ,:r.•>:r s ::-,,.•:,,.{� , • ,:,o,,.. , Y. • ?V� { _ Vg*i6 } 'r r r• 7 s � Y• :+� fi }. . �_ r �4,C : k f fi:1 6L w �< a} t : , � . oo` ' T gay. „a > F d� r % g .'k° .c, } ur" •• fa° at . .: .c, ;b, '' '^ Y.yn� ' o++ q r:i. }f :: :a.: h . t '.',.i §. x :-.} :` : fkh a: 3?.. .. ..• '•., •'+:,,;a „: ,,; a n ,.:} s ▪ • :$:90:,,.,.*::a: "} w r$:.:..%`:::,. 'ail .. :,, �{ } ,c r :, ? 'T{'oc . . ;. b w h ..... x ',...>.f.:. ;•,�:. DATE � �f n v..::.LtiK;b}:.}.::$ ::. •:T}':`:s:*::.;•-ij:• .:%'• 's h'• :;:{..yii:}:w.,..:i:..r-.y.:..A r . il' v W .• ''•Y �1f , • • • �Ji•:'a�T'F f >x ; • • �• f$ ' w '4 .:r}.+4:. 'X n .•f} .`: Yb Av -.1.1 f{:;:i:iir : x:�.%i::< :a... #J$-tiu� sF'1 •:} : ,.. x.T •T• f •::., : .. :.:y 9 •„. f�vw�c f-.: • 5v pY+•.Y+., A'C ., : :. �.: {}t .. } 5 . . f:Vles\muni\slakebrdinanc\danger03(08-11-94) City of Southlake Duthlak' Mayor: Gary Fickes MayorProTem: DATE: February 28, 1995 Jerry Farrier Councilmembers: TO: Curtis Hawk, City Manager, City of Southlake Michael Richarme W.Ralph Evans Stephen W.Apple Sr. FROM: Kate Barlow, Economic Development Coordinator Jon Michael Franks Andrew L.Wambsganss SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION TO SELECT CONSULTANT FOR CityHay,* Curtistis E. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN E.Haw H Assis taK.City Manager.Shan K.Rice EconomicP The Office of Development Advisors and I have reviewed the three Sham proposals submitted in response to the RFP mailed mid-December 1994. Based on City Secretary: Sandra L.LeGrand our review and discussion, we are recommending the selection of PHH Fantus Consulting as the professional consulting firm providing assistance with the Lie preparation of the City of Southlake Economic Development Strategic Plan (EDSP). Attached is the authorization and acceptance form submitted by PHH Fantus Consulting to be completed in order to initiate work on the EDSP. I will gladly furnish copies of their proposal and any other additional information which may prove useful to City Council members before final authorization is awarded on this project. cc: Michael Richarme, OED Advisor Betty Springer, OED Advisor Richard Wilhelm, OED Advisor (16.• 667 North Cerro. ithlake, Texas 76092 (817) 481 5,g—/ 317) 329-7497 AN E EMPLOYER' r , I . c ICONFIDENTIAL COPY Response to Request for Proposal for: AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN I (11.1 Prepared for: I . SOOTHLAKE,TEXAS I January 13, 1995 1 i This proposal or quotation includes data that shall not be disclosed outside of the City of Southlake and shall not be duplicated,used ' or disclosed in whole or in part for any purposes other than to evaluate this proposal or quotation. Each shed in this proposal is subject to this restriction. C 1 r January 13,1995 City of Southlake Page 2 Background and Statement of Qualifications PHH Fantus is the nation's oldest and largest consulting firm specializing in facilities planning, corporate location assignments, and economic development services. Since 1919,PHH Fantus has helped companies find locations for more than 8,000 offices, manufacturing facilities, distribution centers, and research labs. { Our consulting assignments also involve, on a regular basis, detailed evaluations of the location advantages and disadvantages of various communities, regions, and states. PHH Fantus has been retained by hundreds of public sector organizations to evaluate the competitiveness of their respective jurisdictions, and to recommend resources and strategies that will enable them to capitalize on their strengths and overcome their weaknesses. Since 1950, we have performed economic development assistance for nearly 1,000 communities, cities, regions and states throughout the world. PHH Fantus Consulting is uniquely qualified to provide Southlake with sound economic development strategic consulting assistance. Our firm is founded upon, and practices, corporate locational problem solving and creative economic development. Other key company strengths include: • Extensive experience providing economic development assistance to community, utility, state, and regional economic development organizations. • In-depth knowledge of Texas and the Southwest, its communities, and its business climate. • Unparalleled experience in resolving location-related issues for corporate clients. • Massive database of community economic and demographic information. I • Ability to prioritize development strategies based on their impact on facilities location decision making. • Design of successful development and marketing plans for numerous development organizations. • Ability to coordinate diverse development resources into a cohesive, effective effort. • Highly qualified staff. • Satisfied clients. 1 . January 13,1995 City of Southlake Page 3 PHH Fantus Consulting entered the field of economic development services during the 1950s. Our trademark has been pragmatic solutions to difficult economic development problems. Over the years we have provided strategic issue resolution, marketing programs, growth strategies, site planning, and counsel in numerous other disciplines for over one thousand • public and private development clients. • PHH Fantus Consulting has been particularly active in economic development strategic planning and strategic issue resolution for large and prominent development organizations. Strategic handling of development concerns has evolved into a critical process necessary to the economic well being of communities, states, and other geographic jurisdictions. Over the years, our consulting work has allowed us to build a tremendous database of community and state related information. The database is continually updated inasmuch as we revisit hundreds of cities annually during the course of client projects. We maintain data files on demographics, economic factors, markets, infrastructure, quality of life features, and development and growth trends. Moreover, we have established a working relationship with development officials and community leaders throughout the country. Perhaps most important, our staff works only on economic development assignments for the public sector and location-related projects for the private sector. This focus assures you that C. the staff assigned to your project will be specialists rather than available staff normally assigned to other types of work. Our staff is recruited on the basis of economic development background and technical skills needed to complement the company's expertise in facility location issues. f� We are extremely familiar with Texas. Our corporate location practice has analyzed Texas ( locations more than 100 times since 1980. Some of our Texas corporate locations have included: • Paccar, Inc. • Allergan, Inc. • Frito-Lay, Inc. • J. C. Penney Co., Inc. • Citizens Utilities(the Southlake area was extensively analyzed for this project) We have also worked for more than 40 Texas communities since 1980. Examples include: • Alliance Airport • Round Rock Amarillo t>.: enton ,.. • Cleburne • San Antonio i j�flrt'�U'�rth <.. �.;. Austin..Cham er>o Commerce • Lubbock • Waco 1 �,Q-' F January 13.1995 1 C City of Southlake Page 4 PHH Fantus Consulting is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PHH Corporation of Hunt Valley, Maryland. PHH is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and is 53rd on the Fortune list of general service corporations. Our intention in designing the following project methodology is to take full advantage of any work and research that has already been performed, and to add our expertise gained from working with hundreds of other communities and regions, as well as corporate clients. 1 The remainder of this proposal contains a complete description of our project methodology, and our schedule and fees. r• Methodology and Scope of Work 1 In order to effectively address the issues facing Southlake, PHH Fantus Consulting has designed the following scope of work. i PHH Fantus Consulting believes in an interactive process which will combine your internal knowledge and insights, and our unique perspective on business issues and strategy implementation. To that end, we will work with a steering committee that will be established 1 C for the duration of the project. The steering committee should combine representatives of the strategic planning committee, the local elected leadership, other local business leaders, the school district and other key residents of the community. �' PHH Fantus Consulting will work with and through the steering committee. Key functions of the committee will be to represent the area's perspective and to act as a sounding board for recommendations throughout the project. We will plan for progress reviews with the steering committee at appropriate points in the f engagement. All sessions will be fully interactive, will encourage local input into the strategic is process, and will permit us to surface critical issues with you. { In addition, the strategic planning committee will be designate a permanent liaison for this engagement. This person will act as contact point for PHH Fantus Consulting and will expedite the setting up of interviews, delivery of pertinent data, and otherwise facilitate 1 interaction during the assignment. Our approach will analyze the competitive issues facing the Southlake area. The project will j begin with a brainstorming session with the steering committee and will address the following issues and questions: 1 c 1 January 13,1995 City of Southlake Page 5 • What has been the background and trends/climate for economic development in Southlake? { - Competitors - Critical Success Factors and/or obstacles to success • What are current development goals and objectives? • What are the major issues of concern for existing local businesses? • How does the area currently perceive its competitive position — nationally, internationally, and within the region? • What areas are either politically or structurally sacred? • What specific development efforts are currently underway? - Marketing and promotion - Industry targeting (...., - Business climate and infrastructure initiatives - Business assistance and incentives • What are the top business segments/"customers" that the community wants to . attract? The following three Worksteps address categories A. through H. as listed on page 7 of the - RFP. While not specifically following the outline provided under VII. of the RFP, our format represents our historic and successful approach to the community economic development strategic planning process. Workstep One and An Analysis of the Economic Base and Key Deliverables: Labor Force of the Sonthiake Area PHH Fantus Consulting will approach this phase of the project much in the same manner as . we would when evaluating a regional economy for one of our corporate clients. We will utilize the following techniques: • Take advantage of existing data and information resources provided by the City (..../ • Analyze the basic sectors of the local economy and identify trends that will affect the growth and/or decline of each sector. These analyses will take into account r January 13,1995 IC City of Southlake Page 6 1 technology changes, market changes, and product changes that will affect growth in investment and jobs on a national and international basis, with a particular emphasis on the impact of NAFTA on the Dallas/Fort Worth regional economy • Undertake the research and analysis necessaryto fullyunderstand the labor market • Y dynamics of the Southlake area. Key objectives are: - To investigate and document the demographics of the area labor force, • I - To determine the availability of a quality work force to support various hiring needs, I . - To investigate local wage, benefits, and recruiting experiences ( - To investigate labor quality and labor relations. 1 Our analysis will include the following steps: 1 • Meet with the Southlake strategic planningcommittee to fullyunderstand project � needs and expectations along with obtaining any specific labor market information 1 (iwi that is pertinent to the project. This will include interviewing key community leaders and officials as well as taking an community tour. r-. I • Interview 15 local employers to obtain information about local hiring practices and experience, projected changes in labor force requirements, and demographic I profile of the employee base. Current data will be assembled in these interviews on the availability of people by skill category, wage rates, shift differentials, benefit programs, turnover, absenteeism, union activity, and other information that will profile the labor force. Key deliverables will include a Progress Review briefing one month after the project kickoff 1 which will include a foreshadowing of preliminary strengths/weaknesses and 11 opportunities/threats for development that have surfaced in our field work analysis and lead us into Workstep Two. This part of our report will address Item#2 under A. Project Description fof the RFP. 1 i. C 1 i January 13,1995 (1110V City of Southlake Page 7 Workstep Two and A Review of Critical Baseline Strengths and Key Deliverables: Weaknesses for Economic Development Building upon our evaluation of the local economic base and labor force,we will perform an objective analysis of Southlake's strengths/weaknesses and opportunities/threats for development. This analysis will be performed using a variety of approaches and resources, including: • Extensive field interviews in the area with key business decision makers, employers, economic development officials, public officials, education spokespersons, infrastructure representatives and others; • Use of proprietary PHH Fantus Consulting models, such as the target area cost (TAC)model used in our corporate site selection assignments, as well as proprietary databases; • PHH Fantus Consulting'business judgment based on 75 years of experience, more (re' than 8,000 facilities location studies, and nearly 1,000 economic development assignments. During this portion of the study we plan to: �._ • Identify and rank keybusiness climate competitiveness factors for business �Y Pe location, retention, and entrepreneurial development • Analyze Southlake's business climate strengths and weaknesses within the context of these factors. Some of the categories of factors to be analyzed include: • Labor Market Conditions - General labor availability - Skilled labor availability - Labor availability of managerial, professional, technical and supervisory personnel - Secondary labor sources (military retirees, spousal labor, etc.) - Labor costs (wages, fringe benefits) January 13.1995 City of Southlake Page 8 • Labor/Management Relations - Labor legislation - Types and impact of labor management activity • Property - Availability and qualify of sites and buildings - Industrial and office-related costs • Transportation - Air service - Rail service - Trucking and distribution management services • Utilities - Electric power service and cost - Fuel service and cost - Water and effluent disposal service and costs at site areas • Environment - Air and water quality at site areas - Environmental regulations and restrictions at site areas • Technical Education Facilities and Training - Engineering and technical training - Industrial trades training - On-the-job training • Taxation - Corporate income and other business taxes - Property taxes - Personal taxes i q-- January 13,1995 City of Southlake Page 9 . (6_, • Living Conditions - Availability and cost of housing - Education - Recreation and culture - Health care • Determine barriers which might affect development efforts. • Develop a preliminary end-game vision for making the strategic plan happen and define the preliminary needs for success Key deliverables will include an analysis of Southlake's business location factors and an overall competitive profile. At this time, we will surface Southlake's Critical Success Factors (CSFs)for economic development. The results will be presented at a one-half day retreat of steering committee members and will begin to form the preliminary basis of the vision, goals, and objectives of the strategic plan. This Workstep will provide a foreshadowing of recommendations to address Items#1,3,4,5 under A. Project Description of the RFP. We will also provide recommendations pertinent to Item B. Regulation Evaluation and Analysis under the scope of services identified on page 7 of the RFP. (6 Workstep Three and Strategic Master Plan Development Key Deliverables: Building on Worksteps One and Two, PHH Fantus Consulting will analyze the key economic development issues facing Southlake and potential strategies designed to address these issues. We plan to outline several alternative scenarios that the community might undertake to improve its development prospects. We will refine these proposals through an interactive process between PHH Fantus Consulting and the steering committee, during which we will review and evaluate alternative goals, -objectives, strategic thrusts, and specific strategies. These sessions will help set priorities, build consensus, and create a common vision. As part of this Workstep, a strategy framework will emerge based on the following tasks: • Identify and link key drivers and defined critical success factors for this effort. • Consider existing programs, development efforts, and growth strategies. ( • • Determine priorities based on where the most valuable opportunities appear to reside. • Determine cost/benefit trade-offs. (• • Propose roles and responsibilities for implementation. ce 5,Q-/D I , January 13,1995 City of Southlake Page 10 At the completion of this Workstep, PHH Fantus Consulting will prepare a strategy framework document, incorporating the major remedial strategies and program changes needed to enable Southlake to succeed in attracting, retaining, and fostering new job growth. Specific recommendations are possible in a number of areas and can include but are not limited to: • Marketing efforts • Prospect handling/management • Incentives • Business taxes • Database development • Education and training programs • Image development • Industry retention efforts • Public relations • Permitting • Sites and buildings • Financial assistance programs • Labor market analysis • Promotional materials • Infrastructure improvements • Following additional consensus building, we will finalize the strategic plan and develop a program to implement the process. To accomplish this,PHH Fantus Consulting will: • Develop the detailed strategy and define the programmatic and operational initiatives: - Identify the resources that are required. I ` • - Define the priority and timing of each initiative and the investment required for successful implementation. • Build a "blueprint" to guide the implementation efforts. • • Develop the supporting recommendation detail in a working document, fundamental for further implementation initiatives: - Synopsis of all key findings. - Working analysis of criterion development and ranking methodology/best demonstrated practices. - Completed strategy and "blueprint" for program implementation .5"6i/ January 13,1995. City of Southiake Page 11 This Workstep will address Items#1,3,4,5 under A. Project Description of the RFP. We will also satisfy the requirements under Items A., C., D., E., F. and G. as listed in the summary of required services on page 7 of the RFP. ` Schedule,Summary of Deliverables sad tests We can complete the strategic process in 16 weeks. Our timetable follows: . WORKSTEPS ONE and TWO Economic Base Analysis 30 Days SWOT Analysis mulm7 60 Days WORKSTEP THREE Preliminary Strategy Development 90 Days Final Strategy Construction aaaaaa,pp. 120 Days (6., Our deliverables will include three Progress Review reports and a final strategy document. We are prepared to begin immediately. Overall project direction will be provided by Robert P P gm Y Farley, Partner of our Global Public Sector Practice. Carlton Schwab, Manager, will provide day-to-day leadership. He will be assisted by Deborah Ramsey of our Chicago office. Their resumes are attached. Our fees for this project are$24,750. . In addition, we request reimbursement for out-of-pocket travel expenses, our cost of computer usage, communication services, package delivery, graphic costs, and reproduction costs. These various expenses are billed without mark-up and will not exceed 10 percent of project costs. We request a 30 percent payment at the time of the contract authorization, and will bill for expenses and progress payments on a monthly basis thereafter. PHH Fantus Consulting will devote its best efforts to the work which is to be performed under this assignment. Our findings, conclusions, and recommendations, and any written C 1 material that we provide, will represent our best professional judgment based on the information available to us. J.-" /a? January 13,1995 LeCity of Southlake Page 12 Authorization You can authorize this report by signing one copy of this proposal and returning it to us. . Alternatively, you may wish to issue a purchase order or send a letter of authorization referring to this document. We are very happy to have the opportunity to propose our services for this project and are • prepared to begin work immediately upon authorization. Thank you for the confidence you have show in PHH Fantus Consulting. Sincerely, AUTHORIZED AND ACCEPTED BY: PHH FANTUS CONSULTING (Name) (Title) Carlton Schwab Manager (Company) (Date) • �',6-/3 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 2, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: Proposal for Professional Engineering Services for the Design of Sewer Line S-7, Section I City Hall Staff, Community Development, and Public Works have recently received numerous calls regarding development in the S-7 drainage basin. One small new development (South Hollow) is planning a plat within this basin, a petroleum depot along S.H. 26 has requested sewer service, and developers are considering a large tract of land north of Continental Avenue (see map). None of the above entities are large enough to finance the engineering with no assurance of ability to finance the total development. The S-2 sewer was similarly approached, i.e., the City doing the engineering and the total project being financed by a three way split. Staff would recommend this same concept be used in the S-7 basin. The attached "Proposal for Providing Professional Services in Connection With the Design of Sewer Line S-7, Section I" by Cheatham and Associates is recommended. Mr. Cheatham's proposal is based upon the Texas Society of Professional Engineer's standard compensation curve based upon construction costs (see attached). The S-7 is in the Sewer Impact Fee Study. Staff would propose that the sewer impact fees fund the engineering. Please place this on the March 7, 1995 agenda for Council consent. BW L se-i , . , 1 ., i) 1-1 gi‘F L I ---4 ,--. ,- k :-.7 •--- f>/ I ...\ii 3 At j°I i '..---- 7' - ').--..- 2 `'-'• (•-•-'‘"1 1(11,41 1.14EZ L.- .'''. 3rt 170.0 2A2 4G- CA-S-SOu , ... ... .1 : 3A1I 3C 3431 ' •'4 14 \ 4C 40 /A , 1 t. • .2 7/t 182' le to 381 GorzBarl AA/ !il • k L is • (---7 . 0 8 1 i SO 1 Ac 156 Ac 1 -‘5.,c l- i` te Li; gal i:t.), • .10.6 At ',5 -- 0 ---\'--11_On I Bi • i 2es__5..L,E , , MI 4 18t is irl 2A 1 AC.....-' ..i - : 2A• ...._.- .. 2 1_ . . - 401 4 - - 12.09 At - O . _ ‘ -_ f JOHN &. FREE MAN : • : •-litn 20 Ac 5 :G c, i r.rs vt,00 ,. ... 05100.!...____ / E . _ ._ - 50./1 Ac *"••-• :1 1 ---2..) / 4, r.A. •_____,..,___., ..-. 1.4:„.. e___„,„ ,. 1- ,S. ! I •••-......__,/ 614 4Ar . 1 . LI . GIV.... 61C1 • . ( 4c 1A3 . XV I. - ' .... ----f, F-1 383 3 , I ) C 4A SIA9K"'s A- J •••.v 1 6. .1'T T-,,•%, 11.1 2C1 1 i V IA2A 1 11A1A •. CI inf 0 t , 4 r 141.2C .44 1.- 5 4 i it -_,~ [ . /I. , , SeliZ5%° s•‘.. --.. . ..0 60. 1A2 s•mmmm4w 123...1210. WI. - .1 ‘I , 1,... __. I.. ..,......z•4 , 6m.. itIN ,i IA fi , al If. -,,, t" -4-- -•,:t - t 2 kOlikC...,/ 682 0••••••••riMMEMP 6C 6D 6E 13171 ---2' - 5'..), C. . ii+'' :. &I 6C i 4 C.:.;) '--1701 • 's 1 til 7,8.,•ir .4 43.01 AC 41 S s t H-f--r--• \ ‘, 1 6r IA,18 , bse. N \\ k . _ , . . • • .L.J.i.i.L.Li.- k 1 [ t 1 c, iCONMENTM. IN-Nt(,) I ___1_,..../ ....... moo--- -- ______, .7.- --- -___..." vs .,so. p I 10 1 IA 2C .Y 2f1: IA -4‘, I 8 2 Va.• MS 0 tem WC win 199X \ • s - 4 ' Ggii "A' '-' Wie24 Cr "A •MCI 1840 mix ...mc - i5.6 Ac _ay A.f 'sea%ilaNIC ea t o •Y, 0 -,- 02• 1---- . i -- -- - - t 1 my •-1 E--"ThE : WI...V 41M 10 ir 181 • - _ .-...---4" • .pg t • -.INS 1.:11.1•MGIND V: I FINArrION 2 141.,I. Laell"MIC. ,„,111I4 -4. • , xi, 2 ., 640 AicsA. `4 • s \ 44.66 4.4 ,...._;:1644.6 on bill" ADD . ,....,,.• , • . • • ..--. , I 1534 Ac K4 31.6s Ac Mc WIC 5.31 At H(t LLING5WORTII . . , .. .Y 1 „ 2(6 ,- .•.4'!1A$V4'*"1,S1,I7I 4,III,,1I0.,-.4o01II,1,41VI1 1".,1"1'4,,0 k4I.0#.P.0..*Oc#,*4°d.. ;*.k04o94- 1r-0*0, 1.• Ifx r24i 0 ', - - 6 1 1 /1 2G HA RIs0 ..,5i1 M ILTAIUS I#.1 A.-4- II1-4M-G-- OP 1, ** 461,1AA ) JOH rA 2J N GEM 0 N 4, , •1.1"'- _______07.3.-- . 10. y OP- 1 to 3 StNevrt A-59I to i I \ 4'.0 SHAP sfg I 1716 Ac t 1AL / k ........‘ .1- 26.00 4.4 ,, : L'a s4.. II1i. i•m-iiif , , E20 t‘c-. - 0411,11 0 iz..v l.PtC.0 V1 d -.- YI16-: sc• W.N. DAVNPORT s H1o1 l- • A 9C HFtoo SAI f CONS . . - / CHEATHAM AND ASSOCIATES February 28, 1995 Mr. Bob Whitehead Director of Public Works City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, TX 76092 Re: Proposal for Providing Professional Services in Connection with the Design of Sewer Line S-7 - Section I CONSULTANT'S UNDERSTANDING Property within the lower S-7 drainage area is currently in the planning stages of development. Southlake basically would like to be able to provide sanitary sewer service to this area. In that regard, Southlake has directed Cheatham&Associates to prepare construction plans and associated documents to facilitate the construction of a sanitary sewer line (S-7) to serve the C lower S-7 area, Section I. SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.0 Surveying 1.1 Our firm will furnish all necessary surveying field and office work necessary to perform the engineering design and to prepare construction plans. 1.2 We will also furnish all construction staking. 1.3 Surveying for easement preparation, if required, will also be furnished. (See Item 3.2) • 2.0 Engineering 2.1 Our firm will furnish all necessary technical expertise required to accomplish the engineering design of the sewer line. The design will be in accordance with applicable state and local regulations. 2.2 Our firm will then prepare construction plans, specifications and contract documents based on the engineering design. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS A Subsidiary Firm of Southwest Planning and Design,Inc. 1601 E. Lamar Blvd. •Suite 200•Arlington,Texas 76011 817/548-0696• Metro 265-8836•Fax 817/265-8532 Se.-3 Mr. Bob Whitehead February 28, 1995 City of Southlake Page 2 - - 2.3 We will assist in the advertising for and taking of construction bids. We will issue any required addendums. Our firm will assist in the processing of contract documents after contract award and will issue notice-to-proceed. 2.4 Periodic on-site visits by an engineer will take place during construction. We will issue and process any required change orders. 2.5 We will provide assistance in conducting the final inspection and issuance of certificate of completion. 3.0 Easements 3.1 Our firm will conduct the search for deeds and conduct other research at the Tarrant County Courthouse necessary for the preparation of the required easements. 3.2 We will then prepare the legal (metes & bounds) descriptions of the easements with computer plotting. This work element also includes the surveying work necessary to prepare easements and to tie easements to the base line(s). 3.3 This element includes preparation of the final written easement document and of the accompanying drawing. 3.4. This proposal does not contemplate our firm providing assistance in acquiring . property owner's signatures, nor participating in any condemnation proceedings without additional compensation. 4.0 Inspection 4.1 We will not furnish full-time on-site construction inspection, but will make periodic visits to the site, and will be available for plan interpretations. FEES We will provide all the services and products described in the scope of services including all services necessary for engineering surveying, engineering, preparation of construction plans and specifications, preparation of construction cost estimates, contract administration, construction staking and periodic visits during construction, and as-built plans. [See Engineer's Estimate and Excerpts from the TSPE General Engineering Services Manual on the last three pages.] C 5 -1 Mr. Bob Whitehead February 28, 1995 City of Southlake Page 3 -- - *Engineering Fee [Based on TSPE Curve A, 8.75% of Engineer's Estimate of Construction Cost] $38,000.00 Surveying Fees [Flat fees based on estimate of time required times hourly rate for field party] Design Survey • $14,500.00 Construction Staking 7,500.00 Easement Preparation(if required) [Flat Fees based on estimate of time required times hourly rates for technicians] ci Research 3,500.00 Documents/drawings/field work 6.500.00 * Total Professional Fees $ 70,000.00 * These fees to be computed for final billing based upon actual construction costs of the project. Please note that all direct expenses, such as travel and printing, are included in the above fees. The fees cover only that work specified in the proposal. It does not include; - Soils testing - Other testing involving outside laboratory services - Revisions to material prepared beyond that specified in proposal The above listing of services or others not included in the basic fees may be added to our agreement at your request and approval of estimated costs or rates. C 52-5- Mr. Bob Whitehead February 28, 1995 City of Southlake Page 4 __ - FEE SCHEDULE 1/01/92 Professional fees for studies and reports are calculated using hourly rates which include all wages, benefits, overhead and profit. The fees include all incidental costs and expenses (except where specifically noted), including all travel, out-of-pocket expenses, drafting, telephone, typing, etc., plus direct expenses times a handling multiplier. The fees proposed for this project are based on the hours estimated for each phase of the project times hourly rates. The following is the current rate schedule used to calculate job fees Principal Engineer $90.00 Registered Engineer $75.00 Staff Engineer $70.00 Land Planner $65.00 Certified City Planner (AICP) $67.50 Registered Landscape Architect $65.00 Licensed Irrigator $60.00 Technician $55.00 Construction Inspector $45.00 Drafter $45.00 Technical Typist $40.00 4 Man Survey Crew $85.00 3 Man Survey Crew $75.00 TERMS AND CONDITIONS Monthly billing will be on a basis of percentage of completion. Invoices are normally mailed by the 5th of each month and payment is expected within ten working days. GUARANTEE Cheatham&Associates guarantee to maintain the fees presented herein for 90 days from the date of this proposal unchanged. The above fees include all incidental costs and expenses ci (except where specifically noted), including all travel, out-of-pocket expenses, drafting, telephone, typing, etc. • LMr. Bob Whitehead February 28, 1995 i City of Southlake Page 5 If the above meets with your approval, this proposal can also serve as our agreement, which you may indicate by signing in the space provided below. Please do not hesitate to call should you have any questions or requested modifications of the proposal. The opportunity to be of service to you and the City of Southlake is greatly appreciated. Respectfully, Eddie Cheatham, P.E. WIASOUTHLAKTROPOSAMSER.I C AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED: Accepted this day of , 1995 By: • Title: C ��— 7 Curve A is intended to apply to assignments of which the following are (...., typical examples: Water, sewage and industrial waste treatment plants Low cost, or complicated, waterfront and marine terminal facilities ._ Complicated dams and hydro-power installations Small bridges and bridges which are complicated by involved geo- metrics and unsymmetrical features, or which require location and/or alternate design studies Grade crossing eliminations Urban streets and freeways, including related drainage facilities Water distribution lines under 16-inch diameter Sanitary sewage collection lines under 24-inch diameter t..11v Pumping stations Air pressure tunnels Swimming pools Foundations Curve B is intended to apply to less complicated assignments of which the following are examples: Large intercepting and relief sewers Storm sewers and drains Sanitary sewage collection lines 24-inch diameter and over Water distribution lines 16-inch diameter and over Le Simple bridges and other structures of straightforward or conven- tional design Dams of average complexity .0 Airport paving and grading Irrigation works, except pumping plants Railways Levees and flood walls, conventional Sewer and water tunnels(free air) Earthwork and dredging • Highways and rural roads, except low-cost rural roads High-cost wharf facilities of conventional design Retaining walls and bulkheads, conventional • Curves of Median Compensation CURVES A AND B (lb/ E >, a) C coti o U .0 W cn 7 0 U >•y a� 7 y L C V•> • O OD In C_ U Q C 0 • a) en 0. .O C 7 V 7 d -0 ° C� Na�i.0 a) 0 0 'c N + C•C N O •3 0 In LID U X E .0 3 U N < m 4 O '0 to.. c N al c0 C C a) 7 w d o C '6 U ". 0 all to O ♦"' d - 0.U) CO E - •o a) W co U) J `0 cat m d_ Wn cn c 0 ; N 3 >cox 2cr N .a Co 7 .0InW UW J CO ca U l m O o R •0 0 >.• � u_ J 0 T »C v U > C .c Q � UI 3 � OWCL O E O O L C •Z t = / 44 U .. U ca ` 0 ai c 0 L., c x cn ¢ J a) 4) al 0 Ea d; 0 �� ca g cu ai o C To . ./ , ELa) co oao i .co "�.0 a) = In In E -0 COO 7 w+ C J�4P, — O E 4- c m a. > Q' tu co c° o .r E •� GJ 413 v C L - <v Dii U p 0 0 7- n 0 1° n u a) c 1- cn ac E , — ° 0 u* L.0t d 7 0fg 3 v cv 0 h 0 m caa) '5 do .. Z ta a 0c "c n 7 +r a ° E — a � ` U 0 "' Q c a, c 0 N yy, C N W CC ° C.X C C 'ba L. N In 0 .0 L. V O C O.•i O Z 0 0 .. 3 CAW d a o O 7 CO " -, U C 't'' CO Q 7 U TAaci 0 :) .` ivr 0 c 0. . a) cn > C u .c OE U.Ccoo 'w1- 7 U 4 d m an c d C N L- d .a in0 _ '~ C N 4, C a) ° 0 > NV a) .Cy-' 3 4f ..-.0 O o o n' ..- c .. ca ca cm c ao 0 .. � .. ' .0 v= N N U v d O V 0) CVO at a) t. is 0 •t O .i .y w 1 i N33 3d-3921VH3 31SV8 O z Lire CHEATHAM&ASSOCIATES 1601 E. LAMAR BLVD., SUITE#200 ARLINGTON,TEXAS 76011 817/548-0696 - METRO 817/265-8836 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE SEWER OUTFALL S-7,PHASE I BIG BEAR CREEEK TO CONTINENTAL BLVD. DATE: February 21, 1995 SHEET 1 OF 1 ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PLAN UNIT TOTAL NO. QTY. PRICE COST 1. 18"PVC SEWER LINE(18'-20') L.F. 300 52.00 15600.00 2. 18"PVC SEWER LINE(16'-18') L.F. 300 50.00 15000.00 3. 15"PVC SEWER LINE(18'-20') L.F. 1380 42.00 57960.00 4. 15"PVC SEWER LINE(16'-18') L.F. 1380 40.00 55200.00 5. 12"PVC SEWER LINE(18'-20') L.F. 1955 32.00 62560.00 6. 12"PVC SEWER LINE(16'-18') L.F. 1955 30.00 58650.00 7. STD.4'MANHOLE EA. 20 1250.00 25000.00 8. EXTRA DEPTH MANHOLES V.F. 275 55.00 15125.00 9. BORE FOR 18"W/CASING L.F. 100 250.00 25000.00 LW' 10. BORE FOR 15"W/CASING L.F. 100 225.00 22500.00 11. BORE FOR 12"W/CASING L.F. 150 200.00 30000.00 12. CREEK CROSSING L.S. 1 7500.00 7500.00 13. PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT L.F. 60 15.00 900.00 14. CONCRETE ENCASEMENT L.F. 200 25.00 5000.00 15. TRENCH SAFETY L.F. 7300 2.00 14600.00 16. 4"SERVICES EA. 20 500.00 10000.00 17. CRUSHED STONE EMBEDMENT C.Y. 800 18.00 14400.00 434995.00 SUBTOTAL CONST.COST $434,995.00 OWNER: CITY OF SOUTHLAKE CONST.CONTINGENCY $45,005.00 ENGINEERING/SURVEYING $60,000.00 EASEMENT DOCUMENTS $10,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $550,000.00 sos-7 (Pe Ce -,o ' 0.60% / 6o.6 % (O /• ' 1 _A I ,... � 4u 6, _ 6' m 6.6s•,.-y. : \ .4 !' .e 0.40• o's.- 0' 3 R' I O - ,*.(bol ' "sue aveti . • m e.60% 1 11.'1 i 0"c0 0.55°/ j i T::; ? -.)/‘......,- I I r� ,T. 0. /o .... .1 6" e.50%-, I . ` L • • t m A1411 le '\5 . - ' Of 4D.0.26% I fir 14 (.5` f\ - --tf'f.' -i j � f • Irvii. ..), ...., ..,. .. .., :. __ - _____ :.. • lik' 0 �. i •..� e fieo 7- ,.:. _ N I 6"a)C 1 'T b : 4)Iaa ' A ,fir++r , * t. • •• • �. t sue • se r N• .• l 8"—(D a 40%�.v zi r .1/ EE �' . 1:. . J O , tEE�E' Y 1 I • G ' • -x ......„ jel) m C IL t "ol - 4.I: \ /" .%i ,, a,,410i .4 f.is T i� a slid ...la:. fa_• ...... ,•( Ir:•�' s. µ , � ti l iv i z s © —,—,wL f18'� a ..e•° rt .. c ierifitit 4: I . t ��,. I 'cD0.40` : .\.v: a 1'..,kao t\- r E Lt-- 4 IV ill. ,z. "VS : SUR Y 43J,. '. a - r.e .4� zc �.•. i 1 1 • P i y / . Aa � 15"�0.46�o .1_. : 12"m 0.48°/• 'r � S i )0 lilt I • - Su vl• ♦ lie: • 59• 1- r T . \ .1 �t0 U T' Ilh Wi�gg�.. i 1 ice_ ��IL NINO -' i 1 I144! , ,„Lki 1 . a. • °II • f �/,. i •.e•. • E ! .N �0 a S• _. IG !' ,! i �r� " j dl 1 az zn A.1(�/ •.1 1 18"m 0.213% . \ e4` r ' t'a.' c O 1. City of Southlake,Texas CITY T ATIAGER MEMORANDUM March 3 , 1995 TO Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM Sandra L. LeGrand, City Secretary SUBJECT Renewal Contract with Fort Worth Star-Telegram for Legal Publication. The current contract for the city's legal publication has expired. The City has designated the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as the legal publication as it is one of the newspapers in the area that meets the requirement of the City of Southlake Home Rule Charter and State Statutes. The Dallas Morning News also qualifies as a legal publication, however, they are considerably higher in costs. I received the attached letter from Jerry Scott, Classified Advertising Manager, informing me of the amended rates. Comparing the new rates to the current rates: Current Rates: Both morning and evening editions of the full circulation are $.46 per agate line per day. This compares to the regular rate of $4. 04 per line per day for legal notices. Legals published on Saturday or Sunday are $.75 per agate line per day. Display ads and recruitment are currently $3 .37 per agate line per day. New Rates: Legal notices will be published in both the morning and evening editions of the full circulation Star-Telegram at the rate of $.55 per agate line per day. This compares to the regular rate of $4.24 per line per day for legal notices. Legals to be published on Saturday or Sunday will be $.90 per agate line per day. Employment and other display ads in the classified section of Star- Telegram will be $4.75 per agate line per day, compared to the regular rate of $9.80 per line for Sunday employment ads. This special rate applies only if the Star-Telegram is chosen to publish legals for the City of Southlake. Ads are to be set in agate type unless requested otherwise. The rates have increased slightly, but are still considerably lower than other area newspapers. If ou have questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. sl memo\cc\iegal\p lication\sl LHE NEWS You WANT WHEN YOU WANT IT Fort WorthStar-Telegram MORNING EVENING SUNDAY Jerry Scott Classified Advertising Manager February 21, 1995 RECET/D Sandra L. LeGrand CITY SECRETAR City Secretary City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, TX 76092 (Fax# 481-0036) Dear Ms. LeGrand: On behalf of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, I submit herein our bid to publish legal notices for the City of Southlake for the period of March 1, 1995 through February 28, 1996 . Legal notices will be published in the daily or Saturday edition of the full circulation Star-Telegram at the rate of $.55 per agate line, per day. Legal th 'otices to be published on Sunday will be $.90 per agate line, per day. This lif ampares to the regular rate of $4. 24 per line, per day for legal notices. on-legal ads, or legal notices not published in the classified section will be charged at the normal published rates. We will publish employment and other display ads in the classified section of the Star-Telegram at a rate of $4.75 per agate line per day. This compares to the regular rate of $9.80 per line for Sunday employment ads. This special rate applies only if the Star-Telegram is chosen to publish legals for the City of Southlake. If necessary, a maximum of two affidavits of publication will be furnished to the City of Southlake upon request, at no additional charge. Additional affidavits are available for $15.00 each. Ads are to be set in agate type unless requested otherwise. We are pleased to offer you the large circulation of the Fort Worth Star- Telegram at this low bid. We look forward to continuing to serve you in the coming year. Sincerely, Jerry Scott cc: Betty Williams, Fort Worth Star-Telegram Janice Gregory, Fort Worth Str - "^m 400 WEST SEVENTH STREET / FORT V '6102 / AREA CODE 817/390-7519 5v-a • City of Southlake,Texas (7 CONTRACT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS STATE OF TEXAS * COUNTIES OF TARRANT AND DENTON * This Contract, dated as of March 1, 1995, is made and entered into by and between the City of Southlake, Texas, (the "City") and the Fort Worth Star Telegram (the "Publisher") . WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 12.05 of the City's Charter, the City Council, as approved on March 1, 1995, has designated the Fort Worth Star Telegram (the "Newspaper") to be the official newspaper of the City. Such newspaper being of general circulation in the City. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises the agreements herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the City and the Publisher do hereby agree as follows: I. That the City will cause to be published in the Newspaper any ordinances, notices, and other matters which are required to be published by the City's Charter, the ordinances of the City, or the Constitution or laws of the State of Texas. II. That the City and the Publisher hereby agree that the rates to be paid by the City for the City's official publications are as follows: Legal notices will be published in the daily or Saturday edition of the Full circulation Star-Telegram at the rate of $.55 per agate line, per day. Legal notices to be published on Sunday will be $.90 per agate line, per day. This compares to the regular, rate of $4.24 per line, per day for legal notices. Non-legal ads, or legal notices not published in the classified section will be charged at the normal published rates. The Star-Telegram will publish employment and other display ads in the classified section of the Star-Telegram at a rate of $4.75 per agate line per day. This compares to the regular rate of $9.80 per line for Sunday employment ads. This special rate applies only if the Star- Telegram is chosen to publish legals for the City of Southlake. A (we maximum of two affidavits of publication will be furnished to the City of Southlake upon request, at no additional charge. p • Contract for Official Publications Lei Fort Worth Star Telegram page two Additional affidavits are available for $15.00 each. Ads are to be set in agate type unless requested otherwise. III. This Contract may be modified or amended at any time upon the written approval by both the City and the Publisher. Any such amendment or modification shall be attached to and incorporated into this Contract. IV. This Contract shall be in full force and effect until the 28th day of February, 1996, or its earlier termination or cancellation by either the City or the Publisher upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. Written notice shall be deemed given upon a party hereto three (3) days following the deposit of such notice in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed to such party as follows: (we TO THE CITY: City Manager City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 TO THE PUBLISHER: Director of Advertising Fort Worth Star-Telegram 400 West Seventh Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102 Iv. That the persons affixing their signatures hereto on behalf of the City and the Publisher are duly authorized and empowered to execute this contract. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 4:100/ Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager ��- n • Contract for Official Publications Fort Worth Star Telegram page three ATTEST: Sandra L. LeGrand City Secretary FORT WORTH STAR-TELEGRAM Jerry Scott Classified Advertising Manager contracdiegal publication\star-tole\sl C EXHIBIT -A" • CHANGE ORDER #2 BICENTENNIAL PARK EXPANSION - PHASE I March 2, 1995 Contract changes are as follows: • REDUCTIONS: Incorporation of three inches (31 of masonry sand into the outfields of fields 4, 6, 6& 7 $ 14,600 Acceptance of Alternate #14- Rainbird equipment in lieu of base bid equipment 2,190 Restroom signs 50 Total Reductions $ 1 u,74u ADDITIONS: Cement treated base in lieu of Lime treated base 18;857 incorporation of three inches (31 of organic material Into the grassed infield areas of fields 4, 6, 6& 7 17,400 mash and place solid sod bermuda grass in the i 2 o CP CJ grassed Infield areas of fields 4, 5, 6&7 12,060 Drill seeding and fertilization of common bermuda grass in the outfield areas of fields 4,5, 6& 7. _2.500 Total Addition 50.817 • NET INCREASE_ it 22101'7i SPDC 5 rico hAw\e,c .0 3/7/q5 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM CITY !APll,AGER bpi March 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works Department Ron Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: Contract Award for White Chapel Paving, Phase I From F.M. 1709 to S.H. 114 GENERAL INFORMATION City Council approved the bidding of White Chapel Paving at their November 1, 1994 meeting. Advertisements were published on February 5 and February 12, 1995. Bids were publicly opened and read aloud on February 15, 1995 at 10:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers. BID TABULATION thre The engineer's estimate for this project was $355,370. See attached bid tabulations prepared by Dunaway Associates. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS The Base Bid consists of pavement repair and a 2-inch asphalt overlay. This will result in a total pavement thickness in this area of 4-inches. (Option 1 consisted of milling and grinding the existing pavement and constructing a 2-inch pavement over a 6-inch stabilized base.) In reviewing the geotechnical report, the existing pavement condition, and the relative small area of repair needed, we are recommending that the repair and overlay bid be accepted. We feel that a longer lasting, better riding pavement will result. Alternate A is the realignment of Highland at White Chapel. Discussions are still proceeding with the homeowner from whom right-of-way will be required. The Base Bid includes the lowering of the hill at this intersection to improve the sight distance. While we still feel that the realignment of this intersection will improve safety, it is possible to accomplish this project without the realignment. We are recommending that it be included in the contract award in case we choose to construct this realignment. Sunmount Corporation would be low bidder regardless of whether we choose the realignment or not. FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT Funds for this project will be provided by the $3 million street bond funds. 5E—/ Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager (11160,- Contract Award for White Chapel Paving From F.M. 1709 to S.H. 114 March 3, 1995 Page 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the City Council award White Chapel Paving Base Bid and Alternate A in the amount of $334,020 to Sunmount Corporation, which is the low bidder. Sunmount Corporation has performed for the City in the past, and has done satisfactory work. Please place this on the March 7, 1995 agenda for Council review and approval. (Ihrw B /sm RH Attachments: Bid Tabulation L L gINR 8 G Ci �rnn O11, I w4 4.4 ry w rrr cs 49 sA to r �-` I cs1 in, odd v lei o en E i i 1 t. .0,,, Er g 5 re $ 1 47 fA IA i/7 e/9 h 4'1 6R e �Q t` I V1 en ' N ry ..y �P 4.1i. l�'1 %O Ci, d� L Tz. Z t' N t+ .•: O� lV �{ Q1 1� O •-� •� OD [- 4,4 e. i cc, 1 1 b N i? r►9 v. rr4 H y 1 xi 1 r g c-kr, .... $ a O �-+ o 4-1d d Iu0 ON W 144 .45 it A fA N GA GA fA GA aK 1III a y C.) 021 8 4 M 3 . 4 IA t 4.al ? Aiii /I V .4 44 03 ' A. li g t 5 i- - Ill ... City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM CITY MANAGER March 3, 1995 3-3-�qs J-- i TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Works Department Ron Harper, City Engineer SUBJECT: Contract Award for White Chapel Paving, Phase II From Bear Creek to F.M. 1709 GENERAL INFORMATION City Council approved the bidding of White Chapel Paving at their November 1, 1994 meeting. Advertisements were published on February 5 and February 12, 1995. Bids were publicly opened and read aloud on February 15, 1995 at 10:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers. BID TABULATION The engineer's estimate for this project was $221,185. See attached bid tabulations prepared by Dunaway Associates. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS The Base Bid consists of pavement repair and a 2-inch asphalt overlay. This will result in a total pavement thickness in this area of 4-inches. (Option 1 consisted of milling and grinding the existing pavement and constructing a 2-inch pavement over a 6-inch stabilized base.) In reviewing the geotechnical report, the existing pavement condition, and the relative small area of repair needed, we are recommending that the repair and overlay bid be accepted. We feel that a longer lasting, better riding pavement will result. Alternates A-1 and A-2 involved the realignment of two curves in the northern portion of the project. In reviewing the bid prices we did not feel that the cost to realign was worth the perceived benefit for this interim street project. We recognize that if and when this street is constructed to the ultimate section we will need to realign several areas. FUNDING/FISCAL IMPACT Funds for this project will be provided by the $3 million street bond fund. L ,5-F-/ Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager (itime Contract Award for White Chapel Paving From Bear Creek to S.H. 114 March 3, 1995 Page 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends that the City Council award White Chapel Paving from Big Bear Creek to F.M. 1709 to Reynolds Asphalt and Construction in the amount of$223,438.50. Please place this on the March 7, 1995 agenda for Council review and approval. BW/sm Le, Attachments: Bid Tabulation L - 7 8 8 n 8 i 1 elM 'D O J �i F G � if � A60Q .. S � o� nnNsF 'P "t e+! r� ! f 65, - t-... . ,,, , g, Ri l iii eh WO irsI NN N..w O Q N {V L`1 1 2 LP/ o � ,IlS_I p � _ Op�-1a n '.1—',;a 8. �a v r. $—. I n 1 y fi 2 1 ta ' 1 1 i' 1 1 x Hin H iR 4/9 b! W 4r9 fA rlt 1I l ) IS 1 riz 8 A City of Southiake,Texas CITY MANAGER MEMORANDUM -3 93A March 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Kim McAdams, Park Project Manager SUBJECT: Consider Approval of Change Order #2 Bicentennial Park Expansion - Phase I Attached are letters from JT Dunkin and Associates concerning the change order requested. The major item on the change order is the need to use cement treated base (CTB) versus lime stabilization for the parking lots, which requires an additional $18,857. The other addition is the turf treatment of the ballfields. Turf was not a part of the original bid due to unknown factors of soil condition after grading and time of year that the turf could be established. The substantial completion date of the contract is currently September 18, 1995, and if the weather remains as uncooperative as it has been through the Spring rains, the contractor may need another weather extension. We feel certain that the park will not be completed for the opening day of Fall Baseball. What we are trying to do at this point is to concentrate on having a quality turf for Spring 1996 Baseball. We are recommending that the contractor mulch the entire grass infield and that solid sod be laid. We have the option of going with Tiffway 419 or common bermuda. The outfields will be drill seeded with bermuda in May and we will rely on rain water for germination and growth. Irrigation and sod are the last things that will happen on the job, which could be as late as September. By putting in solid turf infields, the fields will be playable for Spring 1996 Baseball. We set aside a $50,000 contingency for this project in October. Change order number one was $10,080 and change order number two is $34,077, leaving us a balance of$5,843. SPDC and City Council need to consider Change Order Number Two at their next meeting. If you have any questions please feel free to call me. 5J8 - 1 J. T. Dunkin & Associates, Inc. Urban Planning and Landscape Architecture (kir February 27, 1995 Kim McAdams, Park Project Manager Parks & Recreation Department City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Avenue Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: Subgrade treatment at vehicular pavement Dear Kim: A change in the method of treatment of the subgrade under all vehicular paving (parking lot, roadway, and service drive) within Bicentennial Park is required. Cement treated base (CTB) is required In lieu of the lime stabilized base specified in the plans. The reason and timing of this required change Is complex but generally occurred as follows: Rone Engineers prepared geotechnical studies on three sites (Bicentennial Park and Way, Kimball Road,and Summerplace Lane) as part of one contract with the City of Southlake. The geotechnlcal report was issued in July, 1994. Unbeknown to the members of the design team working on Bicentennial Park and Way, the original report contained only subgrade stabilization recommenda- tions for Summerplace Lane. The recommendations for Bicentennial Way and Kimball Road were contained in a Rone Engineers' addendum dated August 10, 1994. Further obscuring the need to reference a separate addendum for subgrade recommendations on Bicentennial Way was the mislabeling of a key section of the original soils report by Rone Engineers. This section (5.5.2) dealt with subgrade stabilization and was titled "Subgrade Stabilization and Pavement Thickness Determinations for Bicentennial Way" when it should have read "Subgrade Stabilization and Pavement Thickness Determinations for Summerplace Lane." The mislabeling of this section lead the design team to specify lime treatment for the Bicentennial Park vehicular pavement subgrade as this was the stabilization method outlined In section 5.5.2. Lie" 9876 Plano Road Dallas, Texas 75238 214-553-5778 • Page 2 L The discrepancy of lime treatment versus cement treated base (CTB) became apparent to the -. - design professionals earlier this year. At that time it was determined that retesting for the optimum stabilization method would be prudent due to the large amount of earthwork and subsequent relocation of soils which had occurred on the site since the original soils report(s) were performed. The results of the retesting arrived last week and indicated that CTB remained the optimum subgrade stabilization under vehicular pavement based on the soils currently existing at those locations. Marty Halpem with Dean Construction forwarded the cost difference for cement treated base(CTB) in lieu of the specified lime treated subgrade to our office on Friday, February 24, 1995. Following is a reiteration of that information: Cement Treatment @ 30 lb./Sq. Yd. - $3.43/Sq. Yd. Total Area (vehicular pavement) - 20,425 Sq. Yd. Cement Treatment Cost $ 70,057 Bid Amount - Lime Treatment 51.200 Net Increase $ 18,857 The unit price of $3.43/Sq. Yd. compares favorably to the cost when cement treated base is specified and bid. While it is unfortunate that the cement treated base will have to be added with a change order reflected as an increase of$18,857, the cost associated with the cement treated base would have been similar if it had been specified prior to bid opening. Another benefit of using CTB versus lime with the soils existing at the pavement locations is that CTB will make the soils more stabile and should result in lower pavement maintenance costs and longer pavement life. Please contact me regarding your thoughts on this matter and scheduling the change order for optimum sequencing. Sincerely, gjl"i/ Bob Stoffels, AS xc: Eddie Cheatham Chula B. Ellepola, E.I.T., Rone Engineers Marty Halpern L 5)1-3 s J. T. Dunkin & Associates, Inc. Urban Planning and Landscape Architecture (kr' February 27, 1995 Marty Halpern Dean Construction & Electrical, Inc. P.O. Box 70 Argyle, Texas 76226 Re: Modification of baseball field soil and turf installation Dear Marty: Bicentennial Park expansion plans currently call for Dean Construction to place and rototill 3" of sand into the outfields of Fields 4, 5, 6 and 7. The cost for incorporation of the sand is listed as $14,500 in the schedule of values submitted by Dean Construction. As discussed previously,the existing soil,as well as the soils placed in the outfield during earthwork operations are good friable soils. Therefore, the Incorporation of 3" of sand would not serve any benefit and could in fact be detrimental by decreasing the soils ability to hold water. Therefore, to reallocate the $14,500 to a more beneficial use with Bicentennial Park, the following is proposed. Dean Construction shall place and rototill three inches of peat moss or approval • compost into the grassed areas within the limits of the infield drainage system areas of fields 4, 5, 6 and 7 as indicated on sheets SD-2 and SD-3. In addition,Dean Construction shall place solid sod common bermuda grass in the grassed portions within the infield drainage system areas of fields 4, 5, 6 and 7. The outfield portions of the fields shall be hydromulched with common bermuda grass with soil preparation and application of grass seed in compliance with Specification Section 02805. Realizing that the$14,500 associated with placement of outfield sand will not cover the scope of the work outlined above, it is requested that you present a cost for completion of the work outlined for consideration by the City of Southlake. L 9876 Plano Road Dallas, Texas 75238 214-553-5778 A Page 2 if you would like to discuss this matter or make further suggestions for consideration, please call. Sincerely, Bob Stoffels, xc: Kim McAdams, Park Project Manager • L A J. I. Dunkin & Associates, Inc. Urban Pfanntng and Landscape Arc;i acture (Ire March 2, 1995 Kim McAdams, Park Project Manager Parka& Recreation Department City of Southiake 687 North Carroll Avenue Southiake, Texas 76092 Dear Kim: Attached for your use and records is an unsigned copy of change order#2 for Bicentennial Park construction. Five copies or change order #2 have been forwarded to Marty Halpern of Dean Construction Company for his signature and forwarding to you for final signing and execution. Change order #2 covers the use of cement stabilized base In lieu of lime treatment as subgrade law stabiiization under vehicular pavement as outlined in my letter to you dated February 27, 1995. Change order #2 also covers work adjustments and additional work within fields 4, 5, a and 7 as outlined In my letter to Marty Halpern, Dean Construction Company also dated February 27, 1995, with one exception. That exception being that outfield areas will be drill seeded in May or Jim, 1995 rather than hydromuiched. This method was selected because the irrigation system will not be operational and work on the baseball fields will not be completed until later this summer thereby reducing,fi not negating,the possibility of hydromuiching Bermuda grass this growing season. But by drill seeding at a cost of 20% to 25% of that of hydromulching, the planting can be timed to correspond with the spring rains allowing the grass to establish roots prior to the summer heat. Therefore,at a small cost and risk,the City could effectively regain at least a portion of this growing season and with optimum weather have a good stand of grass. If you would like to discuss any aspect of change order#2, please call. Sincerely, Bob Stoffeis, pc: Marty Halpern L 9876 Reno woad fiaifas, Texas 7$238 214-553-5778 5�- c� • CHANGE OWNER ❑ oa aeiEn ARCHITECT 0 CONTRACTOR 0 MA DOCUMENT G701 FIELDp OTHER 0 (tPi(] CT Bicentennial Park 8 ansion Phase I : Two 1S Expansion, CHANGE ORDER g1UI�flBHR. (name,address) 450 W. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, Texas 76092 DATE: March 2, 1995 TO CONI'RACs'OR:Dean Construction Company ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO: (name, addre s) F.C. Box 70 Argyle, Texas 76226 CONTRACT DATE: October 17, 1994 CONTRACT FOR: Site Development Construction Bicentennial Park Expansion, Phase I The Contract is changed as follows: See attached Exhibit "AY • • • Not va:M wit alinad by the Owner,Arc iIect end Collimator. The original(Contract suss)( was. i>; 1,843,000 Net change by previously authorized Change orders ... : 10,080 The(Contract Sum)fPWRITLOAXIOBJEilititil4 prior to this Change order was s 1,8 53,080 The(Contract Sum)(dailifidiREMBEENIMitej will be(Increased)glitioaw by this Change Order in the amount at # 34,077 The new(Contract Sum)( Including this Change Order will be # 1,887,157 The Contract Time will be (unchanged)by ( )d7Y$. The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is September 18, 1995 NOTE: ma wmmary does not refeect donors in the Corium Sum,Coruna lime or Guaranteed Maximum Price which have been authorized by Cm-4=d=Chin Directive. J. T. Dunkin & Associates, Inc. Dean Construction Company City of Southlake ARCHITECT cam RAGTOR OWNER 9876 Plano Road P.O. Box 70 667 North Carroll Avenue AdAmm Adamm Aditcm pall„, T,. APr 75741 i Argyle, Texas 76226 Southlake, Texas 76092 /fa. 8Y BY •BY /fry 3, 995' DATE DATE AIA OOCIAIENT t1781 • CHANGE. ORDFR • 1997 EDITION • A1A. • 019117 • The Ai:1ER:C N INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AEI, iti.'W., WASHri ANON, D.C. 70oc6 C,7r t7 i—1 V Arre NG:Urti;wreiid pQ o ouapyiriQ vialiip u.S.oopyriq:lt ii*6 Mid ir.iteibieire idr iaaa pwoNtvdon. EXHIBIT 'A" CHANGE ORDER #2 BICENTENNIAL PARK EXPANSION - PHASE i March 2, 1995 Contract changes are as follows: REDUCTIONS: Incorporation of three inches (3') of masonry sand Into the outfields of fields 4, 5, 6& 7 $ 14,500 Acceptance of Alternate *14- Rainbird equipment in lieu of base bid equipment 2,180 Restroom signs _44 Total Reductions $ 10,740 ADDITIONS: (be Cement treated rase in lieu of Lime treated base 18,857 incorporation of three inches (3') of organic material into the grassed infield areas of fields 4, 5, 6 & 7 17,400 Furnish and place solid sod bermuda grass In the grassed infield areas of fields 4, 5, 6& 7 12,060 Drill seeding and fertilization of common bermuda grass in the outfield areas of fields 4,5, 6& 7. 2.500 Total Addition 50.817 • NET INCREASE $34,077 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-160,First Reading ZA 95-01 Rezoning Request REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning-for 9.494 acres situated in the H. Granberry Survey,Abstract No. 581, Tract 1H LOCATION: West side of S. White Chapel Blvd., midway between W. Southlake Blvd. and W. Continental Blvd., South of Lake Crest Addition and North of Princeton Park Addition OWNER: William Casner APPLICANTS: Linda Martin and Tim Piatt CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single-Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential/100-Year Flood Plain NO.NOTICES SENT: Ten(10) RESPONSES: No written responses received P &Z ACTION: February 9, 1995; Approved (6-0-1) to table ZA 95-01 Rezoning Request to the February 23, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting and continue the Public Hearing. February 23, 1995; Approved(5-0-1) ZA 95-01 Rezoning Request. KPG/bls L G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES95\95-01Z.WPD -t ` pr ril" ........-. .....-..--..= i*, i x 7.1 pG-G✓ ----I r R7rL� gR1G" DDRION BDV ARt k) A ,� .. � i.: if - cS#'• � - _�'- --7�' 1171. 14 NN N Nil N4 NNI NI7 1 -1 •' - 1 I7 _ u ' I 2 w MN 190 HEM I,60 r GE I S b S5 — " O w . ,,,� p55 r '' 'P N 7< w MIS N NW , LII, -N , ;(iiw. ,,,l, 11 NI 10 10 I'•...., • I n I 71.11 4 ,r 1-1�'h r- `� " HALL NWT A-AIIS -r t, ..13 ,. I' , ' . ' p r. 4 • YN: 'I., s:;1 -.1_ •;;,,,, , ,, ; ' — ••-•••rd.-- ril ----- 2 \ i ottil !. ' ..-; ; ; I,;,:s, ''(I i � 2111.i ALL 001ENNI K • ) ti ft CO ® o- MALL -- - 1p.r r-- ,'-'--1, • ' • • --S 0 •: r© © Ea. ADP��p Y`; ; • ES• tA E' n7 XT ON_ w� Q�1 ■ '� Ks.-.arrww --, s __ r-,... �iir+c=.• . __—'---- ---__- ,r x n WI >u x N w x J gingssuirill ;� xr r r a „l,`{�-,4 l , r{- } ;C I �' PELjS ■k ,ri,..wr DIIGE At ei ;� 442 < x �„ HOD PLAG o. r x . .� / c, .„.. ,. . Ar-`''- ..•.! '14,,, • ..--r+ - ' .! 15 4 1 . ,A3 2 IIT__________„.--1' -,� ^:.J.1 i - -+ .IE , e E .a k r�1�Y iiiiiiii �° !( ,` 4 9 R,...� i - r 1E. PS ^JrIi/ rk ,�Nr 1.�,.. ,ft'k, ifie �x 5-1A kl i!I ! 7u. 7.xfOFEDIAO� �R9• - ate,.. . II xin k , . '.‹: i _ 41, ,..,1 ri ,,1,11M____loll mi 1 x lifiktO 1%4t r J1/ P L .../ -(41, •� .,..�� a.. U x '_ - �-TTiT'f I TT T- - NOW I r-'.,11, 1 "-If. -- I _ .11:1 F^.J. POVD� a�� l %in. .0011 • THE C..1.-gge-N ,0-9, 4 Ali� ) -_," ._ , ri. ,, . r p�( p •ci„ 1 'a r qp. „,.lil ® _ / 1111 I _ ` r -1 C. u, 1. i ADD'-lir a�r /' 11 -1 '>tl -T- _-_ •< ,�•,�'' 1_ �...3• r �;_I ,'__• ��r� - ---}' i_ x ! ALVPLIN t. i N. ' r »s.• HOLLIPAG� OIV ,IL ' 0 AO °N ., TRACT MAP I �YY LL.4are C-> ; •..-< -- -,___,- 1 , <- .1,Ico. I 1 AN\ 1 . I — IC .C' r 4 {l- '1` gEpif r I 1. l ,I ��„ -i - ! I '}- „' �7 co( Tarr I I. \c N A( Z \ , , R rK���N LF HILL 1 �\ U Q U /1 Q m Q LL1\\ (-0CDU cN L d: .,---... ):\I\t:)- UT Le' .,--- - W d- C V ——U c Eca( I � o o -i -i u( Y 'F ccaNI Ja Quo a) C1 nnn o •CA1E 1cVHO ±IHM 1HIf1OS 0_ LL \1 U t; 1 1 w Q N 0 I a CC eli • 10 a I 0) Lij \.4.__ I%: h ' . _„) , , ..„ o z , ,_, , 0 \----A - - t - - Z " ! ! W 0 V Z C e Li p� ICC\ 0 N 'I rj . I I Q --- — T i I i I r -I / � � � Y , t -ao w _ / p T —7 Icn o >, \ a / n, I/ CL a - Q - � � • a, —m > / ojilr i'� /- — — - I Y\ (-V cscji • thr CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-160 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,¢ TEXAS BEING79 • -_ 6 6 J [ ' �i�' `� 1 t14. ,c$ • ' MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A"f' t FROM !PA.(' [J' TO C3 � �t CG1, .i •eb _ 9�3t.y�i h : D � J SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; (limme PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as ' under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these G:1OR01ZONING1160.160 Page I changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas,has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, G:\ORD\ZONING\480.160 Page 2 is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being .£ acre tract of land situated in the �fxal „ 58 d more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from ' ;'a to Res�ntt i p Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water,parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and 'complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a (taw, violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. GAORD\ZONING4g0.160 p�_� Page 3 JVC (Ire Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not,under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. (ire MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY G:ORDIZONINGU80.160 ��- Page 4 L APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L (kw G:\ORD\ZONING\480.160 A -a, Page 5 V EXHIBIT "A" L BEING a tract of land in the H. Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, situated in the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being that same tract of land as described in deed to William A. Casner and wife, Susan B. Casner, recorded in Vol. 7263, Pg. 1943 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 3/4" iron pin found at the Northwest corner of said Casner tract, same being the Southwest corner of Lot 5 of the H. Granberry No. 581 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1976, of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, said point lying in the East line of Timber Lake, Section I, an addition to the City of Southlake,Tarrant County,Texas, according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 485, of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE S 89°13'00" E, along the south line of said Lot 5, 390.00 feet to a 1/2" iron pin set; THENCE S 88°55'09" E, continuing along the south line of said Lot 5, at 886.14 feet passing a 1/2" iron pin set at the dedicated southeast corner of said Lot 5, continuing a total distance of 928.53 feet to a "PK" nail set in asphalt pavement at the northeast corner of said Casner tract, said point lying in the centerline of South White Chapel Boulevard (County Road No. 3016, ROW Varies); THENCE S 00°29'28" W, along the centerline of said South White Chapel Boulevard, 311.58 feet to a "PK" nail set in asphalt pavement at the southeast corner of said Casner tract; ,, THENCE N 89°07'15" W, departing the centerline of said South White Chapel Boulevard, at 42.00 feet passing a 1/2" iron pin set at the dedicated Northeast corner of the Amended Plat of Lot 2R of the H. Granberry No. 581 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 1326, of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas, continuing along the North line of said Lot 2R a total distance of 1319.01 feet to a 1/2" iron pin set at the corner common to the Southwest corner of said Casner tract and the Northwest corner of said Lot 2R,said point lying in the Fast line of tract of land as described in deed to Southlake Joint Venture, recorded in Volume 9719, Page 599, of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE N 00°35'02" E, along the East line of said Southlake Joint Venture tract and the East line of the aforementioned Timber Lake, Section I, 314.19 feet to the POINT of BEGINNING and containing 413,552 square feet or 9.494 acres of land. L O:\ORDIZONING14110.160 Page 6 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-13 Preliminary Plat/Burns/Grubbs Addition REQUESTED ACTION: Preliminary Plat for Burns/Grubbs Addition, being 9.494 acres situated in the H. Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581, Tract 1H LOCATION: West side of S. White Chapel Blvd., midway between W. Southlake Blvd. and W. Continental Blvd., South of Lake Crest Addition and North of Princeton Park Addition OWNER: William Casner APPLICANTS: Linda Martin and Timothy Piatt CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" Single-Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential/100-Year Flood Plain NO.NOTICES SENT: Ten(10) RESPONSES: Three written responses received from within the 200'notification area: * William E. LaFavers, 620 S. White Chapel Blvd., has no problem with the positions of the houses. He does have a problem with the shed which ruins the view from his living room-the shed was not approved when built. * Mark Struhs, 700 S. White Chapel Blvd.,in favor;Applicant's have reviewed plans for the property with Mr. Struhs and he finds them to be consistent with the surrounding residential estate look, however,if the plans should be changed,further consideration by all affected parties should be given before the request is approved. * Ken and Gloria Land, 2900 Burney Lane, in favor; see attached letter. P&Z ACTION: February 23, 1995; Approved (5-0-1) ZA 95-13 Preliminary Plat subject to the Plat Review Summary dated February 17, 1995,deleting item#6 regarding the 100' lot width minimum. City of Southlake,Texas STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the first Plat Review Summary dated February 17, 1995 with the exception of those items addressed in the attached second Plat Review Summary dated March 3, 1995. KPG/bls Lie G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES95\95-13PP.WPD pv- __ alt-- r 4 p`'' 1 e • a' A°°((I�' t --,I PAR ?A at ,\ - ER �, : QbC�GAA3�G1- HO A ��1 �'► ,..11 ICI � O �,�� \�� _ i R `�#'_ - .." - I•.-. --C� S.?7 4 11► NA .\ N NII NN N Mlle N17 1 !.Nr- ®�� ► L iK 1* �6, A I Na S./ A 7 lel IVER R'. "`—i � �,.�� U.54iy°sHEM LY . cE I MtL� TTA �' • , 1 . Nt SLY 15 p '° A 5�F "' WIN72O "4 Y, - . 'I it W YR N►N N10 '.-� r r r NI N 1!A7 r IICi IICi a I/Ilf . r r r - I I MI 4 « R ENS°• °, ` 1 pllq- • HALL I ER W.W. HALL M aw lT .-.n it-. ,,-.::.-:-4_,„':,:,,.::::, IF ' ~ 7 na• .o,r ram °A; :: 7 . + 1 ,412...;..._,...,,,:.,,,::,: , ni,i ,,,:, : .:. 7 ._::__,. !::11:?:1140_iii<::: • .7N(''''' ;i' 'moo/.,f� a, rr,.w ...r £th- z • 1r:{'•�-` ' �, �' ri ,•. '4�1LL iENµ�L ' , I , .(�,Q`�, • . ; . ■MIA . B p�R1C _ _ . SA JA r DER o- ALL ; ''y i 7 s G 68 '•� : I _i .Iii , , i6 1 iii El m- Di:l- oos:, . 111 -- -- ' - al so I A . . . 4. YI, it MN_ I' T `, w I. 1 1 :,�F0I x x' T z a AI at x Si w x J ' ...':L.:. 11 `l 1, r[- �- Al © w0,N,POpIy a4 /A• w wr °It(,� �4 a,/ nr r 1fS{r � : ,11Tk , a . '\ I - i `;k + 1 iis GN. O a: ' i �/ rNK •o © i NIL •` A :" i ..'"-%_ _ i� II— Are•p v WM !1 4 SI f „ICC , r-N 1 , .: ` i ; i iiiiiIIIMVA7ill lif OMEDIAN W. 1-:RIICHY iA 4' ‘ " -t-Y1. , :.,_ , , ..._ _...: ..iimjarii _ '4, , MIT 04 QtPaH s Pre � :*„..,i _ N C A ir -� — �I>m *eli 7 p Ai C p 'II ' .,,„,, •_ ,- I • L — . ,_ _4_ _ , .iii..i.41H gL,. ...I - r- YN M 4 A w r: Inp : C.-A C T T T T� • T •'. J. HCDE k 'cl ' .' . , l�i.p ��; • J THE *'''r4� _. . . . �.. .�.. + rt1+ , l,. ,! �_ ��� ARI ';,;, - GLORY Of� I,• �' -T� ,' � -`;K�. Y1 1A � � - 6/, • A d� .;•... datioln-o^' .-11.. i El .111 ��..1. .� _ ..aa�.,1.,aL,' 111, : --t" ...,i ''''....,'. ' f,, Or:r.• ,„_,.., A?)0,, lit.,,e. if., ii . . -I 1 CO PA(? ' '',j , • • • - I il3 4 ask HALL. MEDLIN _-_ 11}4 HOLLING3iOf' °" TRACT MAP d►5 ° A°► ( I13A EYY ��LL n J 0 � i ! TY . ` �� ________i nr4L [ ,l \/) IA I•itARK; ! a� I K ` • ,,r a f NtLLi< tTA G i ,': , „ R •.,1{I a{ m NcN 0 , w w NN r '-i 8 i • - i- c 45 rff--- 70- 1 n__. 0. -i -i LJ I Y o CC U NI p .0A18 13dVH3 �1IHM 1HIf�OS z_ cY I I w C.) N 0 Q z D as -- T - — -o .___ .. : - - -� T i l\ t_��J - — ■ 6 /^ zc� - - Nt� � a � — - _ (14 zN W CI U. 5\!1 V Z cn _ _ �� ` te a i i CI r ,__ . 1 - a --- \\ I I I I l I 1 / I l l Y oL '9 :M \ Y U .o o T \ N/ I a.O rf- /t 2 A I / �-- ...,,/ -m — --. > / ""--- 0 -r(P.,.... (L____2) .N. -1-T; ,,, , ,,,i -,..._ __r,, , i ( ,,,, -f, -< ,,, , \ ,. .4 .___. ,401"1"4600,-/ \—(.-'17i1 11 Q. cam, / -0 1 2 cam,/ _ i:\0c( :_(\-r.- p-\. \M• 'a. N ^ / y8N -7 — f- fc - ( ).L cam\ y �. p • City of Southlake,Texas PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 95-13 Review No: Two Date of Review: 3/03/95 Project Name: Preliminary Plat-Burns/Grubbs Addition.9.494 Ac..H. Granberry Survey Abst.#581 OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: Linda Martin/Timothy Piatt Goodwin and Marshall.Inc. 9 Durango Drive Trophy Club. Texas 76262 6001 Bridge Street. Suite 100 Fort Worth. Texas 76112 Phone: (817)430-8443 Phone: (817) 429-4373 ax: Fax: (817)446-3116 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 2/27/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. The configuration of Lot 2, Block 1, does not appear to meet the intended purpose of the 100' minimum lot width requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Label the width of the "Emergency Access Easement" portion located in Lot 1, Block 1. cc: Linda Martin/Timothy Piatt Goodwin and Marshall,Inc. William Casner, 1381 Lakeview Drive, Southlake,Texas 76092 G:\WPF\REV\95\95-013PP.WPD (we BB-S • I 0 g 1 I LLim z i i.,, siii i � � 1, 1 v F �� .144V _1e g re :4 I. eel 9 i 2 r,114,11ifi ti Pi: ill lii i : rtipid,,P . v 1p - . Ill r.; . rN . l a a i a a aiii o ' � 1 0 ill i PI ikitilig of a �t 4 I st ? k w g g ip t,it,44% 21 1 la . . li -La .12 os- k�.i t -k wr--2!"'�*w' 1 . 11 Bg 1 i if w 1d �7 øF x 4 III 1 i aa11 a � _ all : ' 1 it l ‘4.14 C V, tk - 1 iisx ; 1 _ y j 3lip � 0 1 a. -i4- � \ ',�'i ° V v '‘ IP . Lir' 1 ! City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-164, First Reading ZA 95-02 Rezoning Request The Applicant has requested that ZA 95-02 Rezoning Request be tabled to the April 4, 1995 City Council Meeting per the attached letter received March 2, 1995 from Tom M. Matth- s, r., President, H.Creek Development, Inc. 7P4 KPG/bls L L SC- . .._. .... _. ,,,.J. .. ...,. .. ..... .. ...,.. . . . ..... . .. lJUUZ/UUZ II. CREEK DEVELOPMENT, INC_ P.O.(kirme BOX 92988 ,� SUUTHLAK E, 'TEXAS 76092 2141 350-7732 1n fax: 2141904-9930 ; ,i y, _ r� %, ICJ 7„, .i/ March 1, 1995 Ms. Karen Gandy VIA FAX: 817/488-5097 Zoning Administrator City of 5outhlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 Re: ZA 95-02 , Rezoning for 16.63 acres Dear Ms. Gandy: Please accept this letter as formal notification that we wish to table our zoning application currently scheduled to be heard by the (kw' City Council next Tuesday, March 7, 1995. Please table this application for two meetings. Therefore, we will plan to have our application heard on April 4, 1995. With this additional timing, city staff will have time to review our preliminary plat and give their thoughts to the city council, to us and to the neighboring homeowners. Thank you for your help in this matter. Please call me if you need additional information regarding the tabling of this application. Sincerely, Tom M. Matthews, Jr. President, H. Creek Development, Inc. (kiwi City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-164,First Reading ZA 95-02 Rezoning Request REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning for 16.63 acres situated in the R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, Tract 2C LOCATION: North of Quail Creek Estates Addition and adjacent and West of Harbor Oaks Addition OWNER: Peggy H. Denton APPLICANT: H. Creek Development CURRENT ZONING:REQUESTED ZONING: LAND USE CATEGORY: "AG" Agricultural "SF-lA" Single-Family Residential District Low Density Residential NO.NOTICES SENT: Seventeen(17) RESPONSES: Five written responses received from within the 200' notification area. * Christopher Packard, 875 Harbor Ct., opposed; one acre sites are not compatible with adjacent Harbor Oaks Subdivision; and, in previous Planning and Zoning meetings there was disscussion of one acre sites not being sufficient for septic fields and the runoff flowing into Lake Grapevine. * John D. Stewart, 2920 Burney Ln., opposed; possible drainage difficulties, increased demand on utilities and emergency services, loss of equestrian access to Corp of Engineer property on Lake Grapevine, concerns about smaller lots, and decrease of property value. * William R. Bacus, 902 Quail Creek Ct., opposed; concerned that there is no plat of the planned development and that another development like Lonesome Dove Estates will occur; he might consider withdrawing his opposition if the planned development is compatible to present home sites. $C-3 City of Southlake,Texas * Raymond L. and Dinah Chancellor, 890 Harbor Ct., opposed; this area has poor drainage, limited access, and the residents of Harbor Oaks will continue to need equestrian access to the Corp of Engineers property. * John Wilson, 2930 Burney Lane, opposed; there is already too much residential development in Southlake. There is inadequate infrastructure along Carroll and in Harbor Oaks. One written response received from outside the 200' notification area: * Billy Cook, 895 Harbor Ct.,undecided; would like to see a plan of the area. His concerns are number of lots, lot size, square feet of homes,street location, sewer provisions,preservation of trees, and restrictions on residents. P &Z ACTION: February 9, 1995;Approved(7-0)to table ZA 95-02 Rezoning Request at Applicant's request to the February 23, 1995 Planning and Zoning Meeting and continue the Public Hearing. February 23, 1995; Approved(6-0)ZA 95-02 Rezoning Request. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has submitted a sketch of the proposed lotting. Please be aware that this attached sketch is not a concept plan. KPG/bls L G:\WPF\MEMO\CA SES95\95-02Z.W PD �c-4 - - J.D. JONES :::11:.- - --11:.: 4-- '' ' REI3.4). PRICEL EE 7 I 1 ,Hiii+ nr.wuaN+1----------I I .. 1-- J i J. WIZIR/ELL ' e-----------fi� ' , SLIMY •-!., i � _ :,�1.1,1JLL,AA l y.,J i r; Yi,; ;,, Tel fl tf=% = / - � ! — —. __ - ,f' " DENTON 1 • • O— ' ' �•"' � '--4-scci�,, err wa>uui y� J n ©��� ,-! %' ;,•,-„ • TARRANT M i - - - -- _; �;• 4. a DAVID '+ I .;J - e.„,. i-�� r-�L � �_�.'_ I sari al. :w` l: ♦ • - w`•,n- tE5 '^ ' %. ...,,. i C JL.• J ' � `�. r a Y f', Kip .1aI. . • ._ ... pA t 7/4 • a am REIS D.: 4 U4 1 lAY IIJTM 510NE pR ' --- I a «�------- • t w N • m m, aM4 M µA 1A1E I -.+-..�.� x 4 1 ^K wq ,_ - aM 4 i A '� 11 41 K , r , ,- I ',-T---1 1 21, —T• 14 � i . ...1; 41 -fp . — ,, ' ZIVAW • 1111 le 0 , ��-� a.•• 1N4 224 a734 — -_�,,.. _ 'E 1• �1g5 a-f-- ' i a 'tf•- CID '� 1�I , •, ' _' -_ ---•I .4 not4 m VOW w IK w ile M4 e. a4 �--- - s «K� .4 i TIC .- c-- -�3i1! 1p oA „ • I,`,1A6E Ic K,. J k.,,i1$- I . COVERS = ••• • ON a >a P A31"n-m• .1.�-:-{ !l, 41w ! • r',.a-k,, ,•)..'•c'nya.J Z! 1i ` X 4 ti, LEOPIAiiD I 7 A L. t 170 4 Ce 1A1 r Cr. i14 4 I H x ;' jj 1Xi1 ® aM4 a u4� 214 a •(A `� I•.E - -- M174 n • -f N 7.O/s, SCHOOL , ARC P. a■ -p:7 I *421 uY >•- 'Al G r . Se rS s .. 5 4► �� 1• \ y 1. aN4 (� 1,. 4 O Ap R ' t0 4 w s 4 •i an 4 an 4 f aM 4 7 ''j IFN ,p- In 4 q, . �� a i• i, Mx � k- I rs P GE lu. a O sa :x•IC lee Oa 1 1.4 I N _ as4 40 401 - 00_,- J. WEST :r `a W 1c I 2 i Io'k IN as 4 a `�' • R ti -� • O Ma 4 I 1N)q %SIXO' �,�• •, ,` 4- ye - IV 2 ri ASSAL0r, H. CHIVERS I wi Pe nM4 ��� iTti mwi w oD,n n ._”. �—K-.-u � n 4K c K.'" y 7 w _ Y us I na0 4 r i • -ot,10 ,— -a, , 1H J >q� HER 1 E5 7 7 LARKIH H. CHIVERS 1 a' 17,4 E? M 0 .A MKS s•. } t+© g'r• sAK FCT 'OOP ' ..).- t. _ ai 7-4"t 17 k 74soitir_..__ w NO 1 >w,n aN E P .N U I HERS 7 }�V Ai sit s as 4 a bEL� •" ( AGO ' ' �, AO its" �, Its 4 I 0 l 4 y Y K. K 4 KA.QA 0 I sr 1.74 •• ZL s.M V ` M pkwY I JACK O. tr., as t® J` MAN 4 'Q• 'a K �1 I JOHNSON y f( ��{ he, )4 1.4 f•1 K .4 l �{NO ELEMENTARY N-- ® /"p I n�.c o Ns c n 14C4.j ><• ,iY " _n161- 81LL.,.N 1 I 1 (0 :nif-55 �i Rope '(E? KAu! yla w._ A�H — ea Apt `MISKK E5 Sax 1I34 pd7IC a 0 � tN�' MN 4 I e 'a A .W MU TRACT MAP J Rim 1 K. M raw•aW e M 1 _ ,A.1 nol/n .•q1 _— • NK 1 ✓ oi /;:-.4-., N,I. - ,u ;mom. ,„. YH , 1121A Y0 Y. _ _ \ 107 q7A I _ ) II . .I 1 I UM r,aMu II 1, •IV/.fir,,r. Isar•II tI `� ,,1,u� 11 I ! • , , \ / , -- - - - \r\ \ AG 7 H f (16.\ AG I ' D J,D.Jones D.Vaughn 7 6 2 B 2 B 1 1 ,irj J.Wilson f� 1 6 J.Stewart5 — — I U.S.Army Corps of Engineers 0 — ' SF-1A 5 I AG ' � 4/ f.- lir 3 2 , K Land \ SF-1A 1 \. 2 L .6 Ac 9.8 Ac 1I. \ I I \ R.R.Chancellor_ C..s i \ B.Cook Spin Representative Joseph Mast 4 \------ D.Alexander 3 \ 2R.IA.ByrdIC.Packard \12 I N I .`6c I SF-IA I \ 1 131 18 I W.Bacus 1 I IR_Scott I m 1 1 - , I �5 1/ Ir r I I 17 I 16� 1 1C 19 , SF-1A‘ I ( r IM_Snow I I I 1 1 Cl _ _ I 1 1 1 < I p � r Il ii,L.... x , / , Lvi - 1 1 ADJACENT OWNERS 1 1 AND ZONING i- 21 / I �f C- 4 , 22 1 \ XI 322.70' , 0 1.117nn r t \ \ 1 \ N 1 k. FED 2 3 995 1 \ \� p L, LaL VL ` �' \ Orlglnal Scale:• kl" % 1 10 -'\ \ 4 1-3 • 1 6 \ \ \ Graphic Scale In I \ 1 '1[1 I \ \ i Ye; \ \ \' N. \ \ i.,` \ I \ \\ I \\ Ii , \ ‘\\ I ;r. i \ ; 1 tt I i \ 1 Et. / / -t -_ 1 i Vi .r- r-- / �— ----- 1 / • / i' /. ,- I / I / N,'22'01'E--� 9.73' ,t /.``‘N. ---' I/ E /t / 1.7.. —/ I // . — — I / it ;i /� 9 . - I /� ..L., ,I,k A , IA... L/ agq •j 1\ \ / 1.2 K . • . , ; + F 1 ; 1.0 b. I / 6 2 I 17 • ..63 ac. C'f • CE SURVEY, ABS ' C 1207 ii` I 1 .%I THLAKE' TARRANT CO �1f, TEXAS —— _. 1. \.;. 1 1 /� . — b. \ 1 1 s •, % 1 z I , N r 1 t 1A.. \' /.1.. I N :I,. ti \ I I \ 1 \ \ I • / . \• \ - 5 \ 1 1 / k I I 1 • / j,--":"/ • _ / 4 / II L 1 1, I . 1 / 1 . -. \ 1.0.. \ 1 I' - 1.O w I . \ 2 I \ 3 1 \ \ \� \ \ \ ` Lre,t)►emu`'°`' c 3 !9ci. C.A.ca., c, (S-',,,,Q-uojL,_, /2/„,„.,,n. 4-2,4_,:v.. ,) c_4„..th&.„ a.-L.c.. w `/-tom 1P-t ` -e CP-4 -e 0-6 Ceek-d-errd- c,....-0 re„.m_op cLftz,_, ---i„.„..,,4„...„) co ..k. .A.,) • Oa . The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Southlake Pla ui i and Zo m Commission, 667 North Carroll Avenue, Southlake, Texas 76092. / , tea(/ 2/13iys REFERENCE NO.: ZA 95-02 I am (in nfavor op (opposed to (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: n�e.� ae .�' 4e, 1,.;; tcQ a-aa-ts5 �r -C,.,ti Ve k�el,¢6 V�t $ J Olrc�-6S is ►tof- a - 1:. }a,,�g4- .%14eeti-S ' af-et..rre.�vF- a��C AAA,' r� k!ic� C.HtoOa,( of +r.tS w-�.c.1 a.Li-cr. 4 e • —� c fo.+h,t.L 14,ri n a tl i t i n 4-ha r bo r Oa*c 5,9 'o o/�l Q re u�. l &e3 lv‘ere n v A +e-0,41e. w% f u.✓ Le-ae. bye.e 5.4-ru-cA-je,-.•. ve.K..e.r SIGNATURE: �� •c� LA..JJ G £� upsdo, -r -� ( (Please Print Name) ILe,v\-rrA'l. +-G l or u L-0-4A,ct ADDRESS: agto© ) Lo e. 1 "Po 01 3 -`"7-7 L. LAND. KENNETH ETUX GLORIA 2900 BURNEY LN SOUTHLAKE TX 760921 U�' O (lire MEMORANDUM TO: HARBOR OAKS HOMEOWNERS FROM: TOM MATTHEWS, H. CREEK DEVELOPMENT CO. DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1995 SUBJECT: PROPOSED ZONING OF 16.67 ACRES Kosse Maykus, Bob Kresler and I appreciate you inviting us to speak with you last evening to review our plans for the zoning and platting of Mrs. Peggy Denton's 16.67 acre property located to the immediate west of the Harbor Oaks subdivision. We felt our meeting was very productive and look forward to now moving forward with you toward developing lots which we feel will be a complimentary neighbor to Harbor Oaks. In closing our meeting last night it was suggested that I send a letter to all of the homeowners to review the issues which we presented and to memorialize the commitments we made which will (1..., be incorporated into the deed restrictions of our development. First of all, for those not in attendance at last night's meeting, we presented a much"softer" land plan than that plan originally presented at the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing on Thursday, February 9. In the original plan,the entry road entered the property at the end of . Harbor Court,travelled west then took a 90 degree turn to the north and meandered to the back of the property crossing the low area behind several existing Harbor Oaks homes. This original plan provided for fourteen(14) lots. The revised land plan presented last night calls for the new lots to be served by two short cul-de- sacs coming off the current end of Harbor Court. We have created one large lot on the north end of the property which has eliminated the need for a public road along the back of the existing Harbor Oaks homes. A bridal path,accessible to the Harbor Oaks homeowners, will be dedicated and constructed along the east side of the subject property from Harbor Court to the north end of the property at which point it will follow the property line to the west to tie into the Corps property. This new plan has also reduced the overall number of lots from fourteen(14)to a total of twelve (12) lots. I have enclosed for your review a copy of this revised land plan. It is this land plan which will become the basis for the plat of this property. This land plan may, in the future, be adjusted but only for topographical considerations and for the preservations of J. trees. It will not though, contain more lots than we have now agreed to develop. (....., In addition to reducing the number of lots, as we discussed last night, the following development/building restrictions will be incorporated into the building deed restrictions. These restrictions will be enforced by a mandatory homeowners association which will be established Harbor Oaks Memo Ley, 2-17-95 page two for the additional purposes of maintaining the unobstructed use of the bridal path and for the maintenance and payment of common landscaping, including landscape lighting, proposed to be built into the landscape islands located at the cul-de-sacs and at the intersection of the two cul- de-sacs. Deed Restrictions: Minimum, 3200 square feet of living area in each house Minimum, 10 X 12 roof pitch Minimum, 300 pound composition roof No solid fences along any property line (This is done in order to maintain the open environment and the continued visual enjoyment of property.) (hoe A split rail or pipe fence will be constructed along the back of the new lots to delineate the bridal path All building plans will be approved by an Architectural Control Committee established by the developer to insure the construction of quality homes compatible with the property and the adjacent homes within • the subdivision Again,I appreciate the forthright approach the homeowners of Harbor Oaks have taken in working with this new development. If anyone has any questions about our plan for the development of this property, please feel free to call me at 214/350-7732. A special thanks to Diane and Chris Packard for opening their house for our meeting last night. cc: City of Southlake j L • (re CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-164 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING 1 N ,r MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "'` TO " @ 4L SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; (16.` PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "AG",aA4 & ='x under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these Cie changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the G:\O R D\ZONING\480.164 Page 1 WC—tl (se facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets,helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No.480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: G:\ORD\ZONING\480.164 Page 2 (or Being a 16 63,..acre tract of land situated in the D Price SurY' ' Abstraet NoA207, Tract4 and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from "AGG"- Ag icult r l to "SFt0A'`€aS°ingle amily Residential District: Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development (or' of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to G:\ORD\ZONING\480.164 Page 3 .c-13 cof such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY L G:\ORD\ZONING\480.164 Page 4 CSC-1 y— (we APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: (re co, G:\O RD\ZON I N G\480.164 Page 5 ete ' J EXHIBIT "A" (re Being a 16.63 acre tract of land located in the R.D. Price Survey 1207, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being the tract of land in the name of Peggy H. Denton, as recorded in Volume 10366, Page 2208, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, (D.R.T.Co. ,Tx. ) , and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 5/8" iron pin set at the southwest corner of Lot 4, Block 1, Harbor Oaks, an addition to the city of Southlake, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-135, Page 11, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, (P.R.T.Co.Tx. ) , and also being in the north line of Lot 16, Block A, Quail Creek Estates, an addition to the city of Southlake, Texas, as recorded in Volume 388-118, Page 92, P.R.T.Co. ,Tx. Said 5/8" iron pin is the most easterly southeast corner of said Price Survey, the most westerly southwest corner of the John Childress Survey 254, and in the north line of the J.L. Chivers Survey 348, all in Tarrant County, Texas. THENCE South 89 degrees 10 minutes 58 seconds with the south line of said Denton tract, departing with the north line of Quail Creek Estates, 620.77 feet to a Corps of Engineers concrete monument with brass plate (all monuments hereafter are so marked) stamped C231-5, being the most easterly southeast corner of a tract of land conveyed by deed to the United States of America, recorded in Volume 2378, Page 567, D.R.T.Co. ,Tx. , THENCE along the easterly line of said United States of America Tract (Lake Grapevine) , and the westerly line of said Denton Tract the following courses and distances: N 00 degrees 39 minutes 49 seconds W, at 4 . 05 feet past the north line of Quail Creek Estates and continuing in all 939 .77 feet to Mon. No. C231-4, N 89 degrees 22 minutes 01 seconds E, 499 .73 feet to Mon. No. C213-3, N 18 degrees 13 minutes 56 seconds W, 673.70 feet to Mon. No. C213-2 (monument broken) for the northwest corner of said Denton Tract, THENCE N 89 degrees 27 minutes 50 seconds E, 322 . 70 feet to a 3/8" iron pin found for the northeast corner of said Denton tract and in the west line of said John Childress Survey and said Harbor Oaks, THENCE S 00 degrees 43 minutes 30 seconds E with the west line of said John Childress Survey and said Harbor Oaks 1579 .40 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing some 16.63 acres or 724, 354.73 square feet. L G:\ORD\ZONING\480.164 Page 6 $C. (to City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-165,First Reading ZA 95-09 Rezoning and Concept Plan/Ridgewood I REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan for Ridgewood I, being 18.03 acres situated in the J.J. Freshour Survey,Abstract No. 521,Tract 7C. The development proposes 30 residential lots. LOCATION: North side of Johnson Road, adjacent and East of Vista Trails Addition, approximately 1500 feet East of Pearson Lane OWNER: Royal E. Smith, Jr. APPLICANT: PIMA Properties,Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-20A" Single-Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential NO.NOTICES SENT: Twenty-two (22) RESPONSES: Eight written responses received from within the 200'notification area: * Daphine Johnson, 2840 Johnson Rd., in favor; road improvement and sewer system. * Royal and Marilyn Smith (Owners), 300 Timber Trail, in favor; upscale residential development would be more preferable than commercial or less desirable uses. * Mary Ausley, 2895 Johnson Rd., opposed; will destroy rural atmosphere, will cause drainage problems on their property, will decrease the value of their property. * Ladis Pokluda,628 Overland Trail, in favor;with the condition that the new homes are in excess of 2700 sq. ft. of living area. * Robert A. Jordan,712 Overland Tr., undecided; would like to see a copy of building restrictions; he is not in favor of front entry garages. City of Southlake,Texas * Carl R. Wilson, 604 Overland Trail, undecided; does not want commercial development and does not want a four lane road next to his house. If the development causes this,he is not in favor. * Robert Edmondson, 600 Overland Trail, in favor. * Marc and Becky Summey, 612 Overland Tr., in favor. One written response received from outside the 200' notification area: * Alleane N. Johnston, 139 Jellico Circle, opposed; Lot size is too small and the development has only one entrance/exit. P & Z ACTION: February 23, 1995; Approved(6-0)ZA 95-09 Rezoning and Concept Plan for Ridgewood I subject to the Plan Review Summary dated February 17, 1995, amending item #6 providing stub out of middle cul-de-sac Yorkshire Ct.,and deleting item#8 regarding 20' wide park dedication. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the first Plan Review Summary dated February 17, 1995 with the exception of those items addressed in the attached second Plan Review Summary dated March 3, 1995. KPG/bls L G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES95\95-09ZC.WPD i ti-- II I L- 607P 609,, 2AI 1 6A7A ' IA[1A7 -l T1-i—\---7 f 6A7 , pL �LL 6A ' D I 1RA SUR1i r A-r604 I ' E rs,b ' - - ' I I I . I I 6A1 ' IAIAI 1 'I--A ;_4.A 'pit - - - ,--- -' - , , 6812 66 - ---' �--1- 15UR.t rL,t�1.., ` c. -- -l- T-I-f l-7-. I IA:A 3 I - -C c61? - - _T-'I __ I , , i 687A B 6B1AI 681 -__ t . --VIE D_--�-1. ,---t+ T,�I-,L y' 7 MA IAIA 1A1A IAIA'MIA IA1A7A r 3A . -.RAG'. t 1 •_y I - 686, � 6B2 r 7e x 7 7D x - 6A1 } ;-F- -y- IAlA7F V I r ,^ , 1 f 1A1A3 ' I KELLER CIT LIMIT 1 pa - - - I Y3 Y10'—' �3D1 30,3A 3 X XIA - t - A o_d. ,{ OQF 'v 9 9 3 9 99A7 9AtA — , D� , Y6 Ylc 0 D , D 0 I ' ARK?' A-. -4 R R �I Y5 3Yn8 _ _ 7A 3Ct 6 1 i 2 ,13 9A' 9A1 SyJORD IOU �1 \ 1 Y9 Y1N 01 ER ��- ~ -- 7D \ r 1 Y ' YJY13 g'` 2:--, E`�ER�� I` O .I-.:..,:1. Y,1t p Iq ICI 7N2 JCt I Y ,- L t.i�l,. 981. Jr Y' Yt[ ' 1i_tp, 0 GN -- pi YI Y,Csn 3c � xt ST xl UqFZ Y' -Y6 YU r tD1 60 At P AGE x .'R - - Y7 YIC 1 ,___I . 41.1 , �,,.,.,,,r r•T ,07 P r - - Y10 !If I Io3 ID N 11 YIN x5A.d I 78 1 IA /N Icl -.:.•.�.,�•-- 7 78 7A 6A]r 8A78 �A.�NER_ 33 54 e , J. (Ff I H UIrry1 2 V' 7 ,, 4A1 a .- . RIAI U. - SUR1[r A-A)1 AC AC -- 7.6 At jQE 2 a i-._-� � 7 , - ? 2 481 _ -'!-' - - 19 Ac 1,1 6 9.5 Ac I - e 6 p - --{-- 6 6 e 6A78 6Ax 1 �'4�1i A 1,f 4i1 RIB eA! 7 7AI �! S9 OP e089 II[Ti-- 6 . ■ IIOAD 2 . - ' le IS , I tct tc 1 If x5 2C7 7c1 XI _I - •Ham- 1 1 oRSo0 I - 7C3 7p xIC 7clt'X!7 tea I, J 7 7 �- u 181* 1 \ cc - 17s 111 A. PI_ . . FLORENCE 6 3 - - - - - _- - - -'RA}( I. 1. w�1A1 m 1et ' ELEM. 128 Al NI_ t, -(E ' —I,,. 6.3 As 1C, - 181 SCHOOL , . .-r B,�:�-r , - :5TA '�� 7e " 18I I ; `.). _ O - ). 1►M �IES7 ` 2 ao - 1 EcJ I r I(7 7A! 7A7 ,i L4� , �. 70 -- � It (� 1e 3 G _ x ,/ I o:L:00i I ; r=1A' _ - - ; - _ 93 Ac G. ALL J iA7AT + gr4 _ - - 7r p .A , .Y11 Rp551 1 R la t G AG� 1 20 Ac _ - _ I ... - - - _ 701 I III 7A5 - , r _ _ ��� 7A1A 1 -- x77x167AILII "-- 1 ' - r lA 7A6 � ' ws1 uI K7 x76 - - � G ' Q —-- `//AHA 465 1{A.,IA _ ► [ma y D(7�{'_ /.� II 2^ V • (1 A KI. __ .--fAI-.- _ to i 3(r �' u A /A3 4A1 41 '— sCI Ep 1-----ic-- r� :�. '"' ---- r' GORN f� I 177 A( 145 Ac 6t'1 iU ® IA10 IA17 .— 11(1 NI \\, . U 5 As 5 . coil K2' —_1____. to At W « 5A1 5A7 _-1 I IAI ,A. R ;tl IAlI IA Y St) `oN ,', TRACT MAP �.� I ,A - 5 At ; 6C �NVAvvRi ' r,1 `Ir1-90Ktllaa3 J. IG4Ob ,_ 7 .• « ee ,' ] "61)-3 A‘l I 111 VA 1�`' 1"► f_- UP. _._I_ ,... • ... j NV. I .. I I I, I I / "AG" 4_,-( 3F2 3F1G • a \ O R. Jordan � S. Shelley J. Martin I cnn c _ . (ftir � . — . — . — . _ „MH„ „NH, "CS" o D. Settles 1 Z. _ G. Hopper R. Pierce 1 U --i - — f . - — „MH„ „MH„I N.Thieleman i I1-- J. McCarthy (1vl L. Pokluda — �0 , ► I' C 1.;�,.W. Edwards; "SF-20B" J o _ R VE Y A - W. Moore' SU _-)0 _ • _ D. Johnson 7 J. Jarvies L-1-- I Q "AG" M. Summey Lii I R. Aldinger - C. Wilson I I Edmondson 1 R. Smith "AG" JOHN `. cr R. Smith 1 1 E 2 C 5 "AG" 2 C 7 2 C 17 2 "AG" „AG„ !/_ 2 2 c a „AG„ cm L. Spin #16 Representative Dick Johnston 0 ' C C J „AG„ I i / 6 8 ADJACENT OWNERS FLO ,ENC AND ZONING City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 95-09 Review No: Two Date of Review: 3/03/95 Project Name: Concept Plan-Ridgewood I, 18.03 Acres,J.J. Freshour Survey Abst. #521 OWNER/APPLICANT: PIMA Properties, Inc. J.E. Levitt Engineers. Inc. - 5215 North O'Connor. Suite 200 726 Commerce Street. Suite 104 Irving.Texas 75035 Southlake. Texas 76092 Phone: (214) 868-9168 Phone: (817)488-3313 Fax: Fax: (817) 488-3315 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 2/27/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Provide a graphic and written scale in close proximity to the north arrow. 2. Add "Proposed" to the label for Ridgewood II, the project located to the south. co, 3. Show the R.O.W. easement for Sutton Lane located to the north of the project site. 4. Provide owner's name and corresponding deed volume and page for the ingress/egress easement located in lot 23, Block 1. If this is a proposed ingress/egress easement staff recommends that it be labeled as a"Common Access Easement" and extended into the cul-de-sac of Bristol Glen. 5. Johnson Road is indicated as a 70' R.O.W. per the Thorou'hfare Plan, which requires a minimum R.O.W. dedication of 35' from the centerline of the apparent existing R.O.W.. If the opposite side has already dedicated R.O.W. per the Thoroughfare Plan, this project should show a R.O.W. dedication which provides for the ultimate required 70' R.O.W.. 6. Provide 35'building setback lines along Johnson Road for Lot 1,Block 1, along Yorkshire for Lot 5, Block 1,and Lot 1,Block 2,and along Warrington for Lot 24, Block 2. For corner lots that do not align back-to-back,Zoning Ordinance No.480 requires building setbacks lines equal to the required front setback for each of the yards adjacent to R.O.W. . Typically a 5' reduction in the required building setback line has been allowed for these types of lots. 7. Staff recommends that the applicant provide a 20' wide park dedication between Lots 7 and 8 Block 2, extending from Knight Court to the north boundary line of the project tract, to allow for continuation of the City Hike&Bike Trail System. 8. Provide a 20'utility easement within the park dedication for water and sewer extensions. C $D-S City of Southlake,Texas * Any water,sewer,and/or drainage easements required should be a minimum of 15'in width and offset into one lot. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: PIMA Properties, Inc. (0.° J.E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. Royal E. Smith, 300 Timber Trails, Southlake,Texas 76092 C:\WPF\REV\95\95-009CP.WPD I • ars••a••• r•. 1 1 1 ..v.............. .....„........ .....„...„• r.zsra- • [i ' • MPI I — — I •MLR. ,.. OSI Yr• ® w- I ■ Y.• YI• LOOMIS.NIP- -- WI / SI 01. II* N. Y•• • KNIGHT CT. •• _ • 0•1•141M•IV•••M.•I • .ITII•=1:dr'......"H Ill ILL •Y4..••Y YY YR\.W�yY•�Y••WY Y��..•1 Yf• I VYY•Y 11..•R—.............Y .ay MY MII IR4 I a. r••I r y body l.•1 w••�iN+ MAN•r .11.M•.• rMR a•1•V Y\•4••R tri• •••=lr.r ti ■■■444 I M• •Rr�•••w•••YiN••�•\~w�YiYIYr I 4� q �4 *I wR\•• •wr1.": \Iu.tt.. _ t vw IR4 I 1 YII ` .LL I I — — — v 4 I YORKSNIRE — YOBE.RNIBE ! L • I !t3 . ( ir:, R• I z I A ON OM MU. II oI I sat XL • y Y•/• li nyps•' IN• OTTIM Olmr IMMO lot rr4 I It SI. Y•4 L 11•11 aaM Y••M la L •M was•d beNA••Y TYii•}i W~il•�1�••l 1 1r. BRLRTOL GLEN I IN •r M•T 1 i I •R. iY1 M. — . i LT5 �� i `IR WOE001Y ` il I I I SILL-- •;'� vP.O.H — _ _ IMP r — — — — — JOHNSON ROAD — — — — '� ` - rfirekul cvII�T PUP ter ' -^ Mt , .f.m RIDGEWOOD I IR I seWri•w� urAooR1011TOTaatra a. SOt TBLIRE TUOYIIT OVUM TEM iifig. la It.14.TOOmW N O OTOT.A-IOl i M•L.YRT MIER ROOM Y INNOMMIalSanpI�•rR II M'M a. Two®mimlol�-aoi aw•TA•. Marrs. ••M•A RIOMMrrMIM•MM. ��� I ~p� LOA-KID.OM TM. i. srr14• Mr•w••.•larM WI••-i1ti r•••i Iou•a.• M N%MO NM w M•Mt a\41 an•r TOOT ACMWWI.Nw. S.tOTO 141111.1 IT IQ01OT 10011 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-165 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEINGS V \ ��a €�. k ' s €1 e s ". 3 s 4<" r tat €F D MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM \'° ' TO ° ; 2 )4€ € t; 4,, `f4 . SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; (6.." PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial,residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these G:\ORD\ZONING\480.165 Page 1 (11••• CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-165 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OFF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING `',1 Tay tip ffi CTj? AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EX0AHIBIT "A" FROM ' ' 1 ICT, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST,MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; • ► PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ' AS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a horn- e City acting under its Charter adopted by the e : torate pursuant to Article XI of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Gove i . ••e; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as , under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlak.e, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these G:\ORD\ZONING\480.l65 Page 1 g ) l (to, changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those L, who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed,are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, L G:\ORD\ZONING\480.165 SLIM 0 Page 2 is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being �� acre tract of land situated in the *, @� -, a#�'�� Ab d more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from to . depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B." Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas,to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs, sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby,but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. G:\ORD\ZONING\480.165 Page 3 $D-lt Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10)days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY G:\OR D\ZONING\480.165 Page 4 SD-It • (bre APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: L L G:\ORD\ZON I NG\480.165 Page 5 FJ—i3 EXHIBIT "A" L A tract in the J . J . Freshour Survey Abstract No. 521, located in Tarrant County, and embracing a portion of the (called) 19 acre tract described in the deed to Royal E. Smith, Jr. recorded as Tract 1 in Vol . 4077, Pg. 427 of the Tarrant County Deed Records and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the north right-of-way line of Johnson Road, said point being 3167. 5 feet West of and 15 feet North of the Southeast Corner of the said Freshour Survey; THENCE West along the north right-of-way line of Johnson road, 490.9 feet to an ' X ' set in concrete; THENCE North leaving said right-of-way, 168.39 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pin set for corner; THENCE East 163 . 7 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pin set in the west line of said Smith tract and also being in the east line of Vista Trails Addition recorded in Vol . 388-95, Pg. 3, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North along the east line of said Vista Trails Addition, 1069.41 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pin found at the Northwest corner of said Smith tract; THENCE North 89 degrees 14 minutes 21 seconds. East along the north line of Smith tract 655 feet to a 1/2 inch iron pin found for corner; THENCE South 00 degree 00 minute 56 seconds West along the east line of said Smith tract, passing a 1 inch iron pin found at 1, 220 feet, in all 1, 246 . 50 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 18.03 acres. L G:\OR D\ZO N I NG\480.165 Page 6 • EXHIBIT "B" 1/ • NW..IYI r-w I==r (fter • imii I �... .R1.r. AAA LL 1' le al YI. O IY 1T• YIN IR. Iwr LW • .Er ...Me ••..1... I+Y-w Nur Y•Nr ®id )���irlr kK�.+.��+�.Y fY II.Ed 11��tiWl y�.�Y Taw on•A Am tt LLLL �w_M_�N w•�.iilN Y�wriMir�� 1 YfN ,I .. 1 L I MYw.MYY11�.i1 y•~....• Y�IY�I • YIN YIN I , - • II • IR• d YORKSIDRE — YORKsHIRE r.L I — — �19 411110e II YIN YIN iF IR• uIN N I O I IAIm DATA T AL dl IP Sit MI ur♦ 1N6 DOTE IT.� N w... M.R. uI. WV IS • 0$' WV s DOY.LJIEZEL ru O L w..w DI W.MAO•w.•DAL u1■ / \ L WM IAA...YN, • I L IS W�NY.W�4/4 b••...�nolo.r rY Y HRC3TDL GLEN Asir We*We,Abrams Awl r \ — — ..Iru w.NL1 1 i WV VI �» - 1 • %�v.p i•• I % I IR 1 ME ORY _— I .0 :. _ �P.o.a �Np ya y u.11 - " D— - - - - - - r' '"= — - - �l - JOHN80N ROAD re• IM ��`� RI I--- VIf ..NE� I:r DG.EWOODh. • AN AMMON TD TEN CUT Of IR' 8OUTHLAHE • TMlbINT WUNTT.Tau Plenam. I.IAA t3.TN®o=N MIR•A-611 AL N...ay.*T TQ®IT TOWIU.u I— p�/.�.I — - rainy SONs.MO. PROPOSEDsalmw v—�oL werwL a.earns ww Ew a,MO. fpT LLD.-ESL DIAL=IL NI a•rw. NNW.WEEK wN� IIEVV.-=iti wrww.,kW I.IN VW I.M.Ya1 s r.s war wI.w U.OD ACM SO URI IT T®DDANT I1196 w w aM Ordinance No. 480-165 Page 7 gat'1S- City of Southlake,Texas MEM • RANDUM March 3, 1995 J/ TO: �.�1� Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager ft FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJE i , Ordinance No. 480-166, First Reading ZA 95-10 Rezoning and Concept Plan/Ridgewood II The Applicant has requested that ZA 95-10 Rezoning and Concept Plan for Ridgewood II be tabled to the March 21, 1995 City Council Meeting per the attached letter received February 28, 1995 from David C. McMahan, Executive Vice President of PIMA Properties Inc. KPG/bls L III PIMA d �I PROPERTIES Inc. FEB 2 8 1995 , February 27, 1995 Ms. Karen Gandy Zoning Administrator City of Southlake 667 N. Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 RE: Request to Table ZA 95-10 Dear Ms. Gandy; Please consider this our formal request for the City Council to table the captioned action for a period of two weeks until March tiV 2t, 1995. In as much as we were unanimously denied a recommendation by Planning and Zoning we would like an opportunity -to re-design our plan and to work with the opposition in coming up with a satisfactory plan. Moreover, we suspect that at the March Lei 23rd meeting we will request that the Council remand the action back to P & Z as I'm sure we will have a completely different concept plan to present. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, • David. C. McMahan Executive Vice President L 5655 Lindero Canyon Road Suite 321 Westlake Village. California 91362 818/889-0440 800/633-3458 5215 N. O'Connor Suite 200 Irving. Texas 75039 214/444-8322 817/329-6996 SE-2 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 480-166,First Reading ZA 95-10 Rezoning and Concept Plan/Ridgewood II REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning and Concept Plan for Ridgewood II, being 13.15 acres situated in the J.G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, Tract 1 This development proposes 20 residential lots. LOCATION: South side of Johnson Road,adjacent and East of Florence Elementary School, approximately 1425 feet East of Pearson Lane OWNER: Royal E. Smith, Jr. APPLICANT: PIMA Properties, Inc. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-20A" Single-Family Residential District LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential NO. NOTICES SENT: Fourteen (14) RESPONSES: Eight written responses received from within the 200'notification area: * Stoney and Julie Stubbs, 158 Jellico Circle,opposed;Master Plan of allows one acre lots, smaller lots will decrease the property value. * George L. Ausley, 2895 Johnson Rd., opposed. * Paul Miller, 152 Jellico Circle, opposed; Lots that border Ridgewood II are in excess of two acres each. Smaller lots will destroy the spaciousness of the area. * William and Lesley Froeba, 156 W. Jellico,opposed; small lot sizes do not fit in with surrounding neighborhood and will reduce property values. Request does not correspond to the Master Plan. * Johnnie Brumbalow, 3002 W. Southlake Blvd., in favor. * Alfred Wilson, 201 Harrell Dr., opposed; does not want the street (kir extended from the cul-de-sac on Royal Lane west to the school property line and he does not want Royal Lane extended between Lots#9 and#11. $E-3 City of Southlake,Texas * Mary Pierce, 10 Heritage Court, Trophy Club, in favor; this development will be advantageous to keeping the property value. * Robert Edmondson, 600 Overland Tr., in favor. Three written responses received from outside the 200' notification area: * Carry and Bonny Ramsey, 3001 Johnson Rd. in favor. * Alleane N. Johnston, 139 Jellico Circle, opposed; lot size is too small and there is only one entrance/exit into the development. * Walter Brumbalow, 2901 W. Southlake Blvd., did not indicate his preference on his return notice. P&Z ACTION: February 23, 1995;Approved to DENY(6-0)ZA 95-10 Rezoning and Concept Plan for Ridgewood II subject to the Plan Review Summary dated February 17, 1995. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached please find the first Plan Review Summary dated February 17, 1995. Opposition to this request is approaching 20%and may require a super majority Council vote. Note that the request does not conform with the Land Use Plan. KPG/bls L G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES95\95-10ZC.WPD KELLLA C'IY LpuI] _. '�' „ �_.- nI R.q��p R.R(� ' •-. - -r J�U)u YIIV �PYOIS�LLScI t hew L---w, --— --r 60 ----a 11 - , IIc l 1 I � zt°��-�• JANE�S .� �6BIR - A 2.A910��TMp' > m9., a. It ..]. �pi1$E - 1 Le, I 6A]u ,:(, t4p°L MILL 1N1LL55--' GP- -i-`- _1.lat I IRA � ; � � 15 ' J. WALKEGN 6 E5 JYr I Nll� ,Of swK,-.1rx9' - ,-I r,-I- IA, mw e l A tl R - I - 6B],9 681A NI 55 ,_A ]B 1L k 114 ;yJl DJQ __;-I 5_ I] J IxA,i A9A 5 .,.,.]A— GR --1( ❑E , 1 ' 6 u, gUtj({r F S� I _ i}I F f ,A,Ax _ 5 I -- , ti E5—A1��' � . i «' '6B9 _ tot I '.�r 1.,A3 _ vrJO `N ii6A - P1,E _, -. ,/ `A - ,- KELLER CIT 6L�IMIT 1 .-- g)a-y�'1'' ADD .0 , 1 SS Sw�—D 30 3A 3 x XI; )0 9 9 ~-3 9 9'N] M,A nn Iv..�VW Y,I�W _x,C, CI , 1 5 r' TIM i i D U 3MKr ._s,. • 1, �— ---,MA 3A1 6 ' fA 9A, ' *OR e ' x N1 ,M . e•U x m • T a`EW �ER1p'I 9e I---f, 5 0 " n air x ,, p1. N 99 KI 7 _ - , 11A 5 I .\ IC '-rr• . ON r, sn x 31I x, .. x, r PVlj`GE I II x ' n sx >n NIL� I D0 / '- : 1 > P _.Sw SY w3 w '-__ 1,:_1,.,fir'-.{_I 'N --Sn Sw ��eArt ) IA e �- --_ -� { l• .1 AA M Ya._ _ : -- x , IS ,A 6A SO SAX NER `j .D®NH J. Ir�rRESrNO 13 a ,e4 DE ' 29 Y' ] Vt• }lt SI ' 1 1 Mi_�1 �� _ _I ' _. 4 ?k 6 4 954 4 _�____ 4I '^ I - -�'l_ 5 w e.3 ] mr1Y.G R. / ROAo ApD �?=le ; -2 I ? y © s_ w �PNAS i U el- --xlx p X36 ,]d77de ]c3 2C1 XX x37C.3] ' ---- .1 IO2 itti. 0 _ CC - I - FLORENCE I -- 81�'Kv I A =,11J x 6 IA ul_ w tel . '- ELEM. - -'7--- �,fE I x, ,A• au,,�� a3 4 SCHOOL 1 ----0 T---51 x] CARPOLL -- ,elb, A S ' _ -r_c'- 11M51p!1E5rj 3 I w m A` 3°" RICH SCHOOL - q - E o m :A] Rp m t_ p I 7. e, 4 I ,! - _ 1 4, • _ _ '� Ap�� ( >an llf N1A sV4. Ed IE2. G�.d P a ..,...:.q R-QgN c -- --- -I ---! ------ LI r cl -Snrf yp1y5 1 I s.�r, ,R Aa.AA.ef0 _ ' _ 1 � �/ VOA 2A1 1AI I 1 t x I .., I xr,x3 I KE� I ,. ] �i 1 .AA, IA,14 �, 5"�"„'"i 1 gR GK 1cER 1 E 1F Tll. 6.4 33 ? s IA a1 'R� — ,G. /+�,_L,Er` 3 -- PAR---- I-- i--- -'-u�o rs I ----IL-,—,- su r .-rs Li -- p __-1 I, A '"1 W �\ SCI -- GARNER I ,C I 1i]4 ,N.s 4 --A1R -.I 10 K }�p.6 (g�B R.q'n I1I0 K IN J. Ihi y Mlr Y <, 1, rJ _ 54 - - -- J. 0 Pl®WI]V fl Nalyl IM 104 M ., Y 5A1 yv SwKr -ryro ]_, ilI ma I .J 41. 66 4 • 4 a]A•) u.4 ` l- PIA. - I I , _ ,I" - I ,.I NV n ., pR . Y 51LN,....0 + 3d ]A] I " 54 ] ? I GIN�E0 i -1' 1 AO� , ; IO) TI�®MAS J T n n:�T®P� 1L•I�p f 'q° sc I 6A 61i1 6B 6B] f Y 1 wR r A-1302 - -- " 0 6 1.6 I M x 6 4]4 5 4 1 4 ,.�,.�'.'! I I I . ... 242 ) I - \-� .4 r, t ma. ..�.: jA1E5 c1 102, 9.65 4 Mkt 4 M.,.. 6A1A BC I ' 69] 1It1 I EE: - 965 4 ':. -(, _ {.IA,I6e,e 3. ynjs l y� 11 4 1 _ L ] ( JF af14 K I ,�- S___ �I GNI�` S { --.3 At N1:1- P 11 R p F S SIIQ b IN IS4` H 5 0 9L l , AAe 6A, X 1604 A,4 I® _ N =1 1" I Y - ---- - - -- — — --�-_ ;___-- ..�_'_l L_ I_-_ x, .A {, "- S 3• DN KELLER CITY LIMIT ] .a 5A S �I _ E51A15 0 1N 11214 CARROLL f' L y 11 ELEMENTARY x = B, 1151 yam" - SCHOOL '.,\ ,,.. , �.°w. CLAY AP N xi I .R]rr -,.. 00''T 11A se'"1_ 19 4 ]5 4 n. I U 14 4 00 Az 'I,OAG�'AIISJ[�L. b. rtIOI A P O ) I1 6f ,1 AKr •- nw Ix,. �. _IRO lE1A1f 5 U, w] i M �' TRACT MAP • '1a 1�. _ , ,mi m .1(tf?' (t ) _/ I II I 1 1 I IAA.V. tI: J. HIMI�l.45 5 T i . I — Spin #16 Representative Dick Johnston i "SF-2 B" C. Wilson j — — — — 1 IR. Edmondson I "AG"; M. Pierc ' 7 C 1, R. Smith! J' cr 1C . 1E 2C5 2C7 21 ► J 2 2 .1 C C Q 68 FLORNCE _,:LE M. "AG" (6-' SCHOOL 1 "SF-1A" . • Keller I. S. D. I EN R. Tillerson l „CS„ 1 1 EDN "SF-1A"j 1 P. Miller l "AG" 1 Ev W. Froeba "SF-1A" W. Brumbalow LL I A. Wilson , "AG" S. Stubbs "SF-1A" , B. Brumbalow "SF-1A" --Li—) ADJACENT OWNERS - _ - _ AND ZONING _ City of Southlake,Texas CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 95-10 Review No: One Date of Review: 2/17/95 Project Name: Concept Plan-Ridgewood II, 13.15 Acres,J.G. Allen Survey Abst. #18 OWNER/APPLICANT: PIMA Properties, Inc. J.E. Levitt Engineers.Inc. 5215 North O'Connor, Suite 200 726 Commerce Street. Suite 104 Irving. Texas 75035 Southlake. Texas 76092 Phone: (214) 868-9168 Phone: (817)488-3313 Fax: Fax: (817)488-3315 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 1/30/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. Provide 35'building line's along Johnson Road for Lot 1,Block 1 and Lot 1,Block 2. For corner lots that do not align back-to-back,Zoning Ordinance No.480 requires setbacks equal to the required front setback for each of the yards adjacent to R.O.W. 2. Show the location of existing structures and utilities.Note whether they will remain or be removed. Provide a 10 'utility easement for any utility which is to remain. 3. Provide a minimum rear lot width of 125' for Lot 1, Block 2. 4. Johnson Road is indicated as a 70' R.O.W. per the Thoroughfare Plan, which requires a minimum R.O.W. dedication of 35' from the centerline of the apparent existing R.O.W.. If the opposite side has already dedicated R.O.W. per the Thoroughfare Plan, this project should show a R.O.W. dedication which provides for the ultimate required 70' R.O.W.. 5. Provide a letter of agreement from K.I.S.D. for continuation of the street stub of Royal Lane into the K.I.S.D. property (Florence Elementary School). 6. Show the proposed lotting of Ridgewood I within 200' of the project to the North. C • City of South lake,Texas * Should Royal Lane not be extended to the west for some reason, staff recommends providing a 20' park dedication to the west property line for a Trail System connection to the school. * Although not required by ordinance, staff would appreciate placing "Case No. 95-10" in the lower right corner for ease of reference. * The applicant should be aware that any revisions made prior to City Council must be received at the City by 2/27/95. All revised submittals must be folded 6" x 9" and include an 11"x 17"revised reduction. * Denotes Informational Comment cc: PIMA Properties, Inc. J.E. Levitt Engineers, Inc. Royal E. Smith, 300 Timber Trails, Southlake, Texas 76092 G:\WPF\REV\95\95-010CP.WPD 1GI1( • — -- - . -- —^ •• - . I • I • I I I i IJ , -i- •- - - - - -I tn.. �.r. lr• 'Y If(Itipof ilOrll -_ �- 600A710A W I i�iw�i.11'�li.a�i.•A�L-- --• JONNsoN ROAD—1--•—•—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—.—•---1—.—.J P.O.&� PP.10.4P --r-- �M"- --- MY. ,, \ r:;e I \ , kk 1 1 161 r rr r Y11.1 611/1.Peprr • IR! 1 14 .. Fr ti womb•pr.NY• =r j r 41i M P.6..1 r rs r.lrw rllrr r r• rr r-1 v• i i I .r�•r r rr Oa r.••r r..r1 `..6S.ri• Me mew.rP.r•r w an./POPP .Ioen Op/..rrrr 111•4111 .�....Irrr r r r IO I �rr.-.rr Wr1Y 1.pY�1II..1.RPep rIr.R wIY.• 1r.�rylr�rll rwlr�YM�b�r�.1Y On IRI 1 I 664,16 rr/•INV r�l41111.2. r��r••11r�r•1 PAP Pt I 1 •rr rr..1.16 e■rr wiyr rrw 1 wY f.r1.111,.y•4.rlalr rriY.r,rr I I I I1rr1�•wlrr..~.r.Vr�i.r�irM"' wr.rr .r..rr,r�ry1r rwrr . Peli R.C...r. / 1R• I IMP�-rR 1r� ..rrrr.r MK I / MY• Rae r.•rglP.6,�IrlrY�IW pp/1.r...rrli..rYr 9 / �. • I ` r / ' I O1 1 II I 1 1 1R 1 1 1 I Air' 4 AR1 V. 1,. 1 1 I 1 I i I .: o®ca I I 1 MT II I ; '✓1I r _ .r ..1 v. I 1 i',� I ..u�-ra.r 1 1 I �.1� —I I I EIAKAALJu1. I I I MV I• i hobYIo�1�og I.r�ISMS boars Wm S. O. M..11.1 war S..mold. 1 1 1 I S. r 1i—ilrw bowl r rr r 1 - I &11 - y1 , ' I 1 .,- 1 I 1 @ MP. I I _.-._.-.-.- bob or. ..... I; I I Qy ,9 _-ILL_ I I M N I ,S --_ o 1st • 1 MY �'-IR. 2 Ira i NMI II r 111 AI Ism Yar =NWT PLO OP. -1•... I I A lx Ww ���• RIDGEWOOD II I AK ADDITION N TVS OTT OT SOUTIILAIM • • LltltAMR 001111R.TIMM I Morn 111•4011e1MbINSo ISOM Is IAA TA,.ALMS MKT,A-le MINOR SOWN*AO wevwl,to.ewr.. ta.rw Iaww1 .,wq, .�lemima .w IIANONS LOS.-SOT MN.14 w1.�'ira MP'PM ~wl�lir vi PM 41111110M MI AO 1...'w.1111.1IMP rr r1 MIS AC Iw1)MO?OP p UNMET IS UNMETIN6 —.— —. _— wr aw CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-166 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING3 "4a • I . ,Y7' D MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM ° ` TO r r q, . SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; Ikhoe PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS,a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the G:\ORD\ZONING\480.166 Page 1 15Gr' facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population,and effect on transportation,water, sewerage, schools,parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings,and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments,and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their (limme original investment was made; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake,Texas,does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire,panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over- crowding of land,avoids undue concentration of population,and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 480,the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,Texas,passed on the 19th day of September, 1989,as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed Lipe and amended as shown and described below: G:\ORD\ZONING\480.166 Page 2 -III (ime Being,altii#5 acre tract of land situated in the J 3 Ai1.en Survey A°bstracN00, Tr`act4 and more fully and completely described in Exhibit"A" attached hereto and incorporated herein,from + :'to!F42f-3..�.gym... z ce�����r�hx' P.,r+.,_ , -:6a ✓/k `"�.: .x'^f Districtas depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B." Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. Section 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake,Texas. All existing sections, subsections,paragraphs,sentences,words,phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified,verified, and affirmed. Section 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed,with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets;to provide adequate light and air;to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population;and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, (be water, sewerage, drainage and surface water,parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Section 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. Section 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid,the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. Section 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates,disobeys,omits,neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Section 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances G:\ORD\ZONING\480.166 Page 3 %e-t 2— affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation,both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. Section 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten(10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty,fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions,then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten(10)days after passage of this ordinance,as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR (010., ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the day of , 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY L G:\OR D\ZONING\480.166 Page 4 8t-13 (hope APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: • (ire G:\ORD\ZON I NG\480.I66 Page 5 13r (4 EXHIBIT "A" L A tract of land in the J. G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, in Tarrant County, Texas and embracing a portion of the 40 acre tract described in the deed to Royal E. Smith Sr. , recorded in Volume 2858, Page 532, of the Tarrant County Deed Records and described as follows; BEGINNING in the north line of said Allen Survey and being (called) 1440.9 feet from its northwest corner, and in the north line of said Smith tract and in Johnson Road for the northeast corner of a 6 acres tract described in deed to Keller Independent School District recorded in Volume 5641, Page 499 of said Deed Records; THENCE East along said north line of Allen Survey and Smith tract in said road 433.42 feet to the northwest corner of the tract described in the deed to R. D. Taliaferro recorded in Volume 4194, Page 435 of said Deed Records and being for the northeast corner of Smith tract; THENCE South 00 degree 15 minutes 32 seconds East along the west line of said Taliaferro tract passing a 1/2 inch iron pin found at 9 .6 feet, in all 1, 316 . 62 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pin found at the southwest corner of said Taliferro tract and being for the southeast corner of said Smith tract; THENCE South 89 degrees 23 minutes 29 seconds West along the south line of said Smith tract 435.29 feet to a 1 inch iron pin found at the southeast corner of said Keller Independent School District (K. I .S.D. ) tract; THENCE North 00 degree 10 minutes 41 seconds West along the east line of said K.S. I .D. tract passing a 1 inch iron pin at 1, 298.77 feet in all 1, 321 .23 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 13. 15 acres. L G:\O R D\ZON I NG\480.166 Page 6 . ......---...----____:______ • EXHIBIT "B" - -- 1 1 Ii 11 i _l_ _ _..._ m,1,.., L , po .r.; r-ON MOM Will �• � I• YGllff.— _._ — 1.00AT1aM MOP I IrA 1w�i.r�.aL__ JONN90N ROAD—� —•wMM. _._._._._..__I P.O.B. -----r-----. - ILL- I ru II , \ I•YI v. I 1 , I•M v. I _-- \ ` I err•Ir Y.rn 1 ut. rr1•r Y•os Om.ya...I•Yr r.. 1 Irv. l�.I•••••••.mrr Yr r.M•r••(.•'Y rw v. 1 1 I I w"Mr•••••••••rLw•r. ...are • 1 a..1r Yr.r —.— I I I eon r rY..•s w.IWY w r r r ••r Y carry•rr.•s.rr Mrr.•r•rrr I•I• 1 IrK , i I• �t Y Y I..•r ■Y•••r rrrr 1 i I ••••r r I.•••r rr rw r r�r w.• SIMI r.•I OI•.1 Y•I•.�MIII W•`MAV�• • 1• .r Yti••..1 W YY.IIKi I.•I * M1 / M• I• •MfMII•i•.r.••I.�11r.Yrrlr•••rr•I- .�w.�• iilK I 1 ..•r Y. II.�..rr...Imst•rll......MY WWI • •.1•rtia•rYr 4 / •• 1 1 1 , 1 1 p I ' 1 _ _f- f I 1 I.., I I 1 a�IK 4, I.. I I I IAIm us mHL T TOTAL I I I Iwl �. 1 L ;[ armament�011f IYI I 1 I I, 1 Y Y.N V. , I I Pt! I MAIM.OnOtM 1 I.A] j �pyt1 r• I ej j I'r v. I i 2461"�a•-WM+..bet mu./. wi •iMy Ur-J.K �, I a 1 Mahn r,Y r w«M.•.t �I I A T..r 1i :•• I1/M•Y Y I I I II IYY i I 1 I i __ j I 4f 1 it,I M1 I-! 1I r a " 9 ---_---- -� I --rl \`-- l I 1 • YIYK ur.�' 0 �hl • Ir V. gli I Y • I I t„C.�r_ CONCr7 PEA he �- �°-•— 1 RIDGEWOOD II JAN ADDITION TO TEL CITT Of sounLAKE WEER COMM ETAS I I 17�III L 16.!A.MIEN SEMtLT.MU +.i I L M 7-r now SCENE AO IOlI i Nairn' WNW.M I'Am seem MD. MOM ►AOP�LOT mM1pA r.r WY .•.aY.'IN Y0N. r MD.-LOW Oaf,m orwonrw.—wr wIYYYs nay«wr MI6 ACMIII '�Ii rII 100 -W lA1IOAif EftLc ---• MI.iM.i • Ordinance No. 480-166 (6 Page 7 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-11 Revised Development Plan/Timarron Addition, Golf Villas A and B REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Development Plan for Timarron Addition, Golf Villas A and B, (formerly known as Phase III, Product Type D),being 10.4 acres of the previous Product D area and an additional 38 acres for a total proposed of 48.072 acres situated in the Hollingsworth & Barnett • Survey, Abstract No. 797 and the M.W. Davenport Survey, Abstract No.432. The Development includes 170 single-family residential lots. LOCATION: South of Byron Nelson Parkway and adjacent to Timarron Golf Course OWNER/APPLICANT: Timarron Land Corporation URRENT ZONING:LAND USE CATEGORY: NO.N•TICES SENT: RESPONSES: "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development Medium Density Residentia1/100-Year Flood Plain Three (3) No written responses received P &Z ACTION: February 23, 1995;Approved(5-0-1)ZA 95-11 Revised Development Plan subject to the Plan Review Summary dated February 17, 1995. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the first Plan Review Summary dated February 17, 1995 with the exception of those. items addressed in the attached second Plan Review Summary dated March 3, 1995. KPG/bls L GM/bra-MEMO\CASES95\95-11RDP.WPD MAR 0,2 1995 TIMARRON �...,� (kw. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS GOLF VILLAS REGULATION -4, PROPOSED CRITERIA Height J'ty ( foot maximum (up to of the lots); thirty ve (35) foot maximum (u to 75% of the lots); no building or structure shall exceed two and one-half (21/2) stories. Depth of Front Yard: Fifteen My) feet minimum Depth of Rear Yard: Twenty N0') feet minimum Width of Side Yard: Zero tot line allowed with 1a''minimum between units Width of Side Yard Adjacent toep Street: Ten (10') feet minimum , Lot Width: No more than 45% of the Mal lots shall have a minimum lot width of fifty feet (50'), with the remaining lots to have a minimum lot width of sixty feet (60') or greater. Lot Depth: One hundred (100') feet minimum Lot Size: Six thousand (6,000) S.F. minimum Seven thousand two hundred (7,200) S.F. average Maximum Lot Coverage: 50% (up to 25% of the lots); 40% (up to 75 % of the lots) Minimum Floor Area: 2,000 S.F Note: A private access and maintenance easement shall be provided adjacent to all lot lines intended as 'zeros lot lines. 95000007 • (we '�3hn;�Q I !! - d1 I ! I I N 11 el t0 N O m Is: ` C! 1 r I ( C7 a �'*' ;.t,.<: co 0) 4: f: of tri c) @ O 1 o 4 �� 6 r i J ti Y' r r r r r r r .Ci.:ij: .mot: ll - ki W% x: �; I i .IN I asin 'I::I gi ti. 1 4 ii::::,::"..a,:';,i • r zV I 1 I I I tit - I I I 1 I MC:I F: I - r I! I I I I r ':,..s,,��:: C J '�Q' .- c7 N C7 c9I 0 O o M 'tt c0 tI I 1 i E :•"'ph•X:� :: II . (limg„,,° L V I I /:-. : .: N 1 c3C: t°C){ (I!I 1 1 I I•ttl $sr > N I .- r CV NI r I • M rI -N N Ire -I p CI :t�1::.i4.�:< I I I I a El.,: ...._ . _.. `---,.. ' so . co `c�, . n co co n o in ono, N. . w i.o:.oAx 4 I r :,-t- N d M NI in `d CD ,7> tl ,%:k.,rk:s:YAF- .. • art 8 `S chi 2 8 1 2 c` ti a ' w Is I I I • eavGiSiir� _•� ,-,a > +o-t a.n,,i r N r N co Q C/) yx a .' H hW f. O O O O ce w uujj = Z - tu .� aks ,.: (1) C CO vi i 0 0 < a > = cc W U a a °O. a. C^ r ," N N WC W W W 0 Q U? w _D - _3 n M- U d x *. --- - - W a0 O' t9 U~? z m N O 0 _� CC:(klow" : : S m 0 co N P) _ I $F-3 7 NO 6 r_ LE; i 1-- _ _ Cz301 301t 3C o• N l s A< III b °0_ -J _- ES-CA,-E' ' — s Ac'ol a __ ill _ = sot --1 1 -7 y',.C:.: 1 ram_____ ' Y1` D,"303A` i 1 30{ 30 I so�(!A +70!) xi` xx, 5i Sc w SoJ SD2 ----------------- - ------ - - --/ x SA 7A1 x se 4C 40 2A'-T— E ik 391 x I w WH'1 pa- ,o A< a ks A<r': DI (� ��,k A< ix AC sa6A< /, 0 Olt P c Soi Ae3 G i5 �,.ES 2211 Ac xl �. G so sot x j 2AIC 2A1 r 10 ( 2A2 2A5 2A3 2 • {.2]Ac •AII 1 2AI8 20 401/\, .U% _ cwp4 0 3 STATE' PI .� ,�.. ,EEK 1 28 cam•. 2A ING �A RP 1 21 Ac 1E1 ° C A �✓ CjI a 281 2s 283A 21sx ,� wN�E ,k l o o ED8 AMKr�th cf. r�a(1HT J® IX ( A � 20 Ac tor* 1 50.71 Ac , Apt) 1A< a_ I. �CF A ' ' f IA3 6 Ac O 58 ._ _ w i (1 10 Ac .. - IT T-..i;;; n - , - c--r T T T'r•- " BAIA , O A2A 2A SRI 't- IN,.v. _• �� 1 1 _, TT9 11 -1 Y IA2C 2CI 1r(� ii. . r- - • . l�l , i r D r I IA I • • v��, D-- �; bl��I �..+..( 111r }} � I. �'ate I Is.01 Al: — _�' 11L1 .1 1l1111..1' IIAI ,•_'L J2A x xl • 3 -- - CASE CONTINENTAL MAID___—__ uu 1 A Sill 1 1 10 Ac 'r. ( a - 1 siptc,,,,iii 17 Ac iril' • *.i. • A ../ <:), i t r j I I 123.3 Ac 37.63 Ac LL MEDLI N •, 'C 51wvKr w_rp,A7 '14 , 44.66 Ac Id,, 1 1331 Ac tatEa 39 Ac ' LibG 3 141®1,94b 1 1 ` a1 A DTI —�2N1 a xi x r( - 11 Kra '>!7 XI 2 ,c �E r t .D®�0 7Jb7 G1f;t3d ' Bry ' � T I. 3 N r w-sfr i so' I / 3AI 1 _ sr �;ftEE I, it . umi 0\ .1 Ir1\K - lu - . ..,II I. • -- nR , I�I� i sr SVI �I I}� 11,` TRACT MAP aF- 4 91;t U• j \‘, z 0 a ta, k LYrv 1 . 1.4 N. N N N C.. N n ]` le 111 0 1� am , � N � � nw , I 5 0. 0 4WiMkEE-1 Lk ag- ; puksuir 4 5 15 AI J R.p .,co '0 I©1. — I • 1Yt I - >" I W s . pp�'�I/i�� �. CC > n2 JA iliell _IL A / 5 CI N33LtD NOI41707 ®©A©o I PI - r 1L W/ I . z VP irtirt 3„ z6 ,‘... ,. ____y .2 ... ti N / ' fD ®s 4o'[Ip11.a.,..d.,,,„....e 'I' II N F N/ .rent N im 1� li rem 000.a0���'' II i 1 ' 7ii II _I/_J.!.I Il. 1'/I i L1i I11it/H •Y'1... .. :::::;.;•� V .cc.M y'' (,1�� SZ N c119 NbNWd7` r _ - on -Nokokjiliat ‘111 . • -• til - ( 11 I MIPP1 LI .a .. �b 1� r—— 0 go orsitax. (..., 4•7 ...., ILE 2111r40,0111111111111011411-abi ib : : illicerdpir r C _ p 0O O R�' ®vo � A 1 �� �101140 . 4 II, , .,---- F r‘ \ : LIPA,44% 46 � �® ©0 a 0® a. * V'41t,41 7A I� !i _,R ® o®ma �oo® ®®®♦ o o I I11 ,A O �� / /�� N " N IOW � elk U •• r �� ® ' pi-tp t. `\ N \\ 11{kV- i-Ealui asitv• iiv d ___�� \\ • II irctit Alb+ 40 .-.....--- \ d © I �- 1 V �� ®O, I '� II L.,/ 7.========= .. _ - : \-,c-k _—St • - Timarron (Ilibee , -- r, ... • a I w d Timarron . ;���-.M R.-P.U.D. / yll g; g - R.-P.U.D. - :gal I .f ...4-0 `^ o f • rM Spin #9 Representative Bill Salazar i r, 4• 0 :,4 4107..4, k_,7�6 > tor " it% oF, It Ijit t. 1+�' i. iE e. • 7:,I e � 'F°,);;.,.rt -ate _. '�`` I �f"- Timarron 6444 siritiK I a" .1 R --Is» c;OW , ,,,„ 0114,k, Att,,AL : R. F Mkg: I it allt; A -11 lie�' if R.-P.U.D. Atii arron • ' =--' ' 77 -4 a ity .R I� 1 al: FEW� - 0a. I 6A 4F-Alr ` 1 R.-P.U.D. }t I ir$ - _ ' / (11AF:4.i Iiit. s .- a to t'. „8 7 sit 4* 41,4„,..A, to. Alb. ::.___A,„...,,,..,...-:Ns.,„.,...,„.;,.. : - itt f "ire. I O1k, ' 4-1q• 1 4--- ' ,:-_—:_;------,7=1-::___ ::, „..,.../.....-.)tr' s N _ , , ., ' A Z ' Ail6 „:,. ,, , ,,,,, 4, Y i . 4t:, 4----- i / 4 1., ."- 'Sri r ) .e. N .IP •' .fib :i �, st.° � ,,,,,,,„ ik • I e il , a. 'S1 8 o ;I' a.„ 'o, , 141 , I 0, ,., 11117•. 'ss: Av.; s.-."10,1* „., . r.N.........411 v �pp -- , _ ,, . tittot,,.. ..-...\,,,, .. ,i -,...1 City of Y f - s.., s ^ - ,-{f t at .p. kilible' � Colleyville �4 '. 0 �- _ "�� • ADJACENT OWNERS AND tsiz-(47 • City of Southlake,Texas DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No:ZA 95-11 Review No: Two Date of Review: 3/03/95 Project Name:Revised Development Plan-Timarron Addition Golf Villas A & B. 48.07 Acres, Hollingsworth & Barnett Survey Abst. #797.M.W.Davenport Survey. Abst. #432 OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Timarron Land Corporation Carter& Burgess,Inc. 300 E. Carpenter Freeway.Suite 1425 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250 Irving.Texas 75062 Dallas,Texas 75247 Phone: (214) 791-3333 Phone: (214) 638-0145 Fax: (214) 541-0800 ax: (214) 638-0447 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 2/27/95 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. The number of lots accessing from a single point of entry(105)from Street'D'exceeds the maximum number of 20 lots recommended by the Subdivision Ordinance(483-5.03 I). However,the applicant has provided a 20'wide Emergency Access Easement in Common Green 43 between Street "C" and Street "E" . City Fire Marshall requires that the Emergency Access Easement be increased to 24' in width. 2. Private streets, if any, should be labeled, assigned lot and block numbers, and designated as public drainage&utility easements and private access easement. * The approved preliminary plat of the golf course expired on 7/21/94. * If known, show the proposed residential lotting to the West which will be accessed by street "G." * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Timarron Land Corporation Carter&Burgess, Inc. G:\WPF\REV\95\95-011DP.WPD C NSF-ri - it . , . N‘ , LI ,Ajoihg g` g . L s, \\ . MO.1: I f --- ,., LI g 0. g. Le I li ., '.. \-_ 1 h , I irTi! e i . / fir `t 1 11 i „ ft.'71 .i\ . __ . .4 { o . 5 g J •4i 0 , it Lpyi9 a w g c_1 R C- w '=Sidg _ /'.•` 111af pG O ` � pQW P/Alk %\ I .4A w 4 r ,,...-. I . 2' x . PAL . S `.;,: . ,, . ,,,, . or-y-47' lle , p' J J S '•'. S�[Ci g. . t . 1'� ► i UU! / u.. ... 41 t ' i*' ir 11 I 111 o aiI E ,, y 1, . o r g 8 T 1 4 4 r< p i U •0 it..*,. , Y ....... . Al It 1 1 1 ' : h i 0 1/ n 14 . t il i Dill /AT?' . -141,,141 i ... 1. .- w 2 g ii Rd? ii, 9, 44%0:''- ',',.. V- -1111" //:./ ..3 i gtd i i 1, 1,0 i gi t A -' ,:iq, S •;• 0 41.---"'7,4- -4V1111.1"" //d i ii a i : 42g Yi 1 / S*\‘ ,,..,..-- b 14L71--. , , . i 4.1... .-0 j ,g NI ,, g 1 •'..4 407.'''r'''4' 9 N 1 1 . * 41/11 rf, I1 y � 3 1¢ P:0 / 11 ; .1.417irri :I,: i E.49M 11 18 iiii " ' 0 A it 1- k i 1 - M r� ,IM �3 j�'JI P I. , l ,10L4* >f .,E • +74,/, l' -- I r 4 •*7 I lei 1 • /; 1 tail r. i-‘. .i4e IVit' J ...... . ,ot,,V+ „/ 4- t ''',-. pill i if I I) it 1 i1S . •..- t► -47/4/46 6 i. . i 5 ...-•%% ::::. 1.1.1" "Erridkbhlticr. i gP . .5 4410imal cf4i. i I . qi i''' 1 ::::::::::::R:::::* 4' 7 4 16k 484 ' r 1 '•••••••:•. ;,..Z.... ; ,I ill t• 4:9' I"'• .••.;••V::;••••••:.:. \ P• !p 44 , 1 4....,.. ....*:`:::•::.. 't, •lb 0 A tat* e, 4% E..? I I lb j'�Qy� w qi W • V„'� y •,�I W ig tliO- 2 1t al , iii*** "1i. It p .•p 'erg d yM/,r 1 1 \\ '\\ 2 •*,•••.j. 0 ftr 1 i of°A'.'. '. 1�1 \1 City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 3, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Karen P. Gandy, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: ZA 95-12 Revised Preliminary Plat/Timarron Addition, Golf Villas A and B REQUESTED ACTION: Revised Preliminary Plat for Timarron Addition, Golf Villas A and B, (formerly known as Phase III,Product Type D),being 10.4 acres of the previous Product D area and an additional 38 acres for a total proposed of 48.072 acres situated in the Hollingsworth & Barnett Survey, Abstract No. 797 and the M.W. Davenport Survey,Abstract No. 432. LOCATION: South of Byron Nelson Parkway and adjacent to Timarron Golf Course OWNER/APPLICANT: Timarron Land Corporation CURRENT ZONING: "R-P.U.D." Residential Planned Unit Development LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential/100-Year Flood Plain NO.NOTICES SENT: Three (3) RESPONSES: No written responses received P &Z ACTION: February 23, 1995; Approved (5-0-1) subject to the Plat Review Summary dated February 17, 1995. STAFF COMMENTS: The Applicant has met all the review comments of the first Plat Review Summary dated February 17, 1995 with the exception of those items addressed in the attached second Plat Review Summary dated. March 3, 1995. KPG/bls G:\WPF\MEMO\CASES95\95-12RPP.WPD Fri? MAR 0.2 1995 i IMARIRON LJ L I V L L DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS GOLF VILLAS REGULATION PRQPOSED CRITERIA Height Forty (40) foot maximum (up to 25% of the lots); thirty-five (35) foot maximum (up to 75% of the lots); no building or structure shall exceed two and one-half (21/z) stories. Depth of Front Yard: Fifteen (15') feet minimum Depth of Rear Yard: Twenty (20') feet minimum Width of Side Yard: Zero lot line allowed with 10' minimum between units (be Width of Side Yard Adjacent to Ten (10') feet minimum Street: Lot Width: No more than 45% of the total lois shall have a minimum lot width of fifty feet (50'), with the remaining lots to have a minimum lot width of sixty feet (60') or greater. Lot Depth: One hundred (100') feet minimum Lot Size: Six thousand (6,000) S.F. minimum Seven thousand two hundred (7,200) S.F. average Maximum Lot Coverage: 50% (up to 25% of the lots); 40% (up to 75 % of the lots) Minimum Floor Area: 2,000 S.F Note: A private access and maintenance easement shall be provided adjacent to all lot lines intended as 'zero' lot lines. 950000e7.tdb r fir (my, "' II 1 ! I g .1 l I I 1 1 ! I !.• II N 1- fit N N C] m 1-: 1 C') of p C3 > ...... c., ,... 1 1 ,_....,)::. ii_i_J<: I I I 1 iiiiiig2'.‘iki:': I <.srF. ! :ti R.;9.?iY I i III�f a■■ :xy�;ti:wi: ..:: s.f co [�I N I N M N ti C, 1 :<. ... o. Sid t--- p Q t'? i [ CV O N. W r- cV I Cb r m *- .�: — — tg { : i I I I II 1 I 111 r in.I 1 ! 1 1 re . NI .� .-1 co NI co M a c) I co 3! ; 1 11.4.. a ., 1 I. r . I 1 I I 1 `' l>y I I I teliliti-giiTi1 cc 0 , co 2 Y— tO cu N 4 I �r v ' 1 . 1 i !: g!+ z I:g .i .: Nj - - �- N N - M r I N N I I I �e+. :1. _ _ d . .. .,, 0 IF, ,stit CD6 ao OD CD h 8 titiOtQlla�'o ai eo '~ ,gyp � t� C7 :O - - coo) N. Is. : r r rt Y. 'sex; Q ! ci:r...i :n:c,:r.: N COI r �' N � N d' CD �A NKr � r r I i'-.t......CI.S.• QY Srl I `1 IF: l 07 42 rif wi, :if;:t-, 1— 1— /— i— 0 111 <0 I --1 0 11: 0 CI II D CI US C}. R co11.1 co N to 0 0 III k . ,.., Q c > _ W U Z F. Q 1- at F- = - .d`.. Lii : •''._ w w w w 2 w _ co w ...3 � m t0j ti'' � .. 1 1 m N �' L ...... ... 4 f::,s.+.ft ;. I s I m! 3 A 1 ! cfl v § 8G— 3 7 .:1,1- '1.3p, _ _ __/ t • -1-1--}-, , I I , , CIa-, 3 Ac r. EAA g1 _ _ 3 Ac ,'JD2 t. '- ©n� '.y�,•c.�:�.�r �+. -- I -- t yt 3D7;mkt �� I -- — -- 1 JD(c,) nos) X 0 EA ,yX 3Ct SF SE 50 5DJ 502 —-- X JA 3At -JL 39 -—--�-- 40--—--—--—-- T- ' LT. � 7A wN p0.- G :.al tk Ac 156M, GORgI A yT ✓N 140" 10 Ac 6 Ac ]Ac 4.57 Ac DI GE k 30.E Ac O 30 . M Rc,N PlA 3Dl 15 AO 311 Gr.' 22.11 Ac 3A i E5 I d 30 302 ,lA 5N — x 2AIC 2AI2A1D 2A2 2A5 I - ' y 2A3 2 11 tt A Var ,,{ 2AI811) cOt 1� ' STATE orlE vo- EFK 2i c) AGI E�• �xl ACRES n Ac ,E, 1 C f`n .7 p 281 29✓ 283A 283C ( O o ®IAH W. (`�t��bT 1 JO /B HrE ,Ac 0A sF - SURWY .-899 20 Ac 13 Ac IC 2C3., 2C2A 50.71 Ac I I GNpYEL ( C_ 1 .ACN I 1 ADD.� I 4 I Ic Ac ♦Ac ^ -4__ J'�'� C I V -' - I IA3 1 Ac 1 6Ac 058 � . . . . _ .e I d.fd. - T T P __ r C'T T 1-T`f' -n Ac XI I , 6AIA Q` ` gA1 PIA 2A I IMg y{, _ u ,1- --, 1 IA2C 1 _�'��' - r IMP:* _- ` i 6A I 1A2 iiimpe _- 6A1 IA k �-- -ti 1- .L 1. 1 45 PU,GJ ill �l G b 1 A T -I T', ' .4 44 ' i-i ,. le' 4 I 1 43.01 AC -1 I /-� _ _ ' __—--—-- 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 c l 1 1..1' ems— I IAI EAST CONTINENTAL MAO -- i Ng°io ._L}A I. .1C ICI `]C.S ' _ T ' T r'..,�-:-.— 'II �A I L 1 1 II 1 r L ` F 1 { • ,Afl'Y 'T'� sts '1�. \:;AV. -1 - •- A A I W.,Ac N(' . -1 t . WEI i �) ' '2 a - , -f- ki /&LL PAE0IIG! �� I W.66A< I " Ix3.s AA 32.63 Ac 1 I TI `� ' UMW,' A-.O,n 1131 AG I e r.� : 1 LI GaOfr`�i'TH I i - ,1 .,, 66.3E Ac , I ii I r 1 B6 ,s. ur A-ssT li 3 �1 C. . l(� I,16 Ar ' (\, ` / EE1yA }t'��: 1, Ml' 11 t ({j� Ili f °IL fl R Iii♦ oft, I �4p�fra(�; 10 1 . 'I/ / '31 " j ; I TRACT MAP -4 ;�,s•u. j �, c ` I� I� I . . n . . n, • z . o a IL LI _.4 or. , m o-- I.y N . , • a N _ : aS n n�i+II` \ N N�� 1 n • I '���© � I N N N N N n i 11/4 a i♦ N 111 • W d 111 -1N n Q Q_--• Attbk k (.9.t 6 VI *' 0 0 V - lizEl 11266_ Iv. ; N °-• g - t HW £ S % 5 ,.„% n i _ _ I cu �, noo. Q � � IIv.. . „ r . • _ y a N33b9 NOW ©AWrzn 3 W tj, i z 1 mu � OQ�©� •, I 1611114CPratiP iitii ommysjjilaEsl 11 -\ , Frp- � .. 11 ‘1‘, \ . 9c riz,Norrylo L ^.-enma .„,,L.",,, irmillk‘ t tZkIIIMEH k igrA, IIIIIMPAKil A (Roe ./4 0 qg aponagalx,rooligligginEm li c ,„._ 6 4 , 0 -we r_ • wil 0,01)1/41,219 4441111111100B2 w ----ir A'":•. ,i .. .14 li tt 1 # .1 I I I 14 tirAi i ak,_ 1& 4 6 44 . crzy-CI itl _ °T, lagatirtir,N11 441t., AD i vt_45 dli Iio, �� : 9: 00 To[‘ • t ��- V. i 101,, i .... \\ 01°eit44 I 104b I ll iilik WI OIL NI 171.1W4V S 4‘11 PrIf. , 4 , ) II ,,Szardia 44 **Ilk t - • 1 d o9 4®O o -�`, \�\ OOe��;�44__ e1\\ ��1 01 ifp \\ ��•- �, B ► \�sin I ====,,,,... .-. IsilEa assik ,,44, e `e ?V 4411%7 tr ---T ,__________i N \ 4* 44 ++ \ ) ....„, 13 r �Q © ,� II -----A--..,/ \ e`Nk 0..L 0, n S //� 1 Q 11 \�� , • co N b m o c6$.v r5.. m g-v a. enf' = I .¢ f -=' Timarron ".:,. m ,�i - 0 0 7 q 4, e Timarron R.-P.U.D. R.-P.U.D. - :: : l' 4 Fat y Spin #9 Representative Bill Salazar / y, rs\ a= - =-47_Ii¢xiy' A i: -gr. g 3 's ,. • „..;, -40 1-...::...1 e --- -tipi._ -+'f Re, � � `x:• ;?�r ��:, �� i oil l . (a , it\i,./,,,, ' ,� ' '� ,=e; ;_``_ ; Timarron 47 `h. (144* Q Wi XX R 11 L_ `' kI i,'. ':. •, ° •` R.-P.U.D. .- , 7• iarron M vJ a i tff Yia• I�,� Yi • : ;"ill. R.-P.U.D. a21:1 • : �'rr r ;6- .- i,' Zffiliqr .XII V.,„,, Ai'r.--,._----, ..u-, Vilr-L.-_-_:,:f.-4 \ ( Mr, . . . Ne-e. ,::. iii ggl `‘,..) .wr— At_7141,":414,4" . 4414ki „ 1.1 ss,..,, . •:g2 . .'FlOrfff . VIP. ,„Alif '4,14447,40._.„4-- ----,1-„...,-:-;:;1_,%21_._.-- ,,f...---11'\\' ibk !fie,* Itlir ---v".."7-Z1---:,;,---:"- /<........ \ • Op -, :toll • , . .141bi. vi,„ i ,,,,,,,,, , ,_, _....._.."- ,,....., ,s *Rig !,11,41_, it. 1,.—t-) ,.$4 '''' .: i a. / .y .e sib. 1 tT — 4: 1 1 -*41441 40 4.. 4.011--, 7. -C' .. , t lir\.- ,,,,,,..4 .„,. vow, ¢ 44# - , i P R , , ,,, •...,-_-_-..zoott. , .,..a„...\ City of ,,.rii jai§z�• L ' Colleyville � ,� \N\ .,,-------1K . ADJACENT OWNERS AND ZONING City of Southlake,Texas PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No: ZA 95-12 Review No: Two Date of Review: 3/03/95 Project Name: Revised Preliminary Plat-Timarron Addition Golf Villas A & B. 48.07 Acres, Hollingsworth & Barnett Survey Abst.#797,M.W. Davenport Survey,Abst. #432 OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Timarron Land Corporation Carter& Burgess, Inc. 300 E. Carpenter Freeway.Suite 1425 7950 Elmbrook Drive, Suite 250 Irving.Texas 75062 Dallas,Texas 75247 Phone: (214) 791-3333 Phone: (214) 638-0145 Fax: (214) 541-0800 Fax: (214) 638-0447 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 2/27/95,AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT(817)481-5581,EXT.787. 1. The number of lots accessing from a single point of entry(105)from Street'D'exceeds the maximum number of 20 lots recommended by the Subdivision Ordinance(483-5.03 I). However,the applicant has provided a 20'wide Emergency Access Easement in Common Green 43 between Street "C" and Street "E" . City Fire Marshall requires that the Emergency Access Easement be increased to 24' in width. 2. Provide a"Private 10'Access&Maintenance Easement" adjacent to all side lot lines intended as the "Zero Lot Line". 3. Lot 9,Block 38, and Lot 1,Block 42 do not appear to meet the minimum area requirement of 6000 square feet per the Development Regulations. 4. Private streets, if any, should be labeled, assigned lot and block numbers, and designated as public drainage&utility easements and private access easement. * The approved preliminary plat of the golf course expired on 7/21/94. * If known, show the proposed residential lotting to the West which will be accessed by street "G." * Denotes Informational Comment cc: Timarron Land Corporation Carter&Burgess,Inc. Cot:\WPF\REV\95\95-012PP.WPD a 6 s b K g Y it D �I `�' k iag-„ 1 Olt • ; S- i a� r :5 1:^ 4;. i 4 .,: 1 4 !all .%. lig ! 0 (t"ll 'rill •+,• �J ' -- — - -- "� rs !co 'pdgs1 #. :, A , F11 1. � a e ¢ Ali g g ht i _� 1st.. ..a t r •. �"4711 ilg N E � �� p i 47 ne=_.-.Fir4 , k �_. i Tyr ii Ff I ;4t: 1 40 • ,� r lilliiiitl-rill L 4s a Yiigiiiiii..iyi t s . , ,, , siiiiiisiie•s•iiir - I 1iiE 20• ' J ..� e R`i i^r ?ice i: ;g&igi ,..4 , , ., 7 0,.. Irlik '.: ). . • ...244, - jig r'(-) ' 7*1‘ "A"*" ... 2 111111 Mk-- ) i.r ;-.1 _ 2f ,-�Yttlitt b ' R 'i 1Yr � \ .�� .t i! rs F�gplQlFpElFlr!!!E 1 r. *It jy. , ` ECE a rc li�i� i'iAiEiI�l�li Y R -WIN 1 8 �. r y llgill \ 1:01.- to , ,\„..,..,.._ ; • 03"S Airillair; *, ' ,i„I r 71irimilitintili r iiii fifii fiii• !'ts R'i �� r •� �; Bite1 i fi i(.or trilt, 431rike.....‘ ,,,..*......, ,..4.:. ,.. .,...• ...); f g . /, ., * ,)%to . t ;.,'. i 1::zur Siritt ilie .44.4e7:‘,;;,:,, 111t.-- '..41,-c- 41 .4--- • if ills _..... __, `,_./i. v ire At_ 4,4141444to f*,411/4.4:t4 pt--.7--, g!iii -i„,z,.,::, II, 5 II 41141+ 1r - et .1* .&-' 4111W' .( . ..• a wag: 3.9.1‘.... - el:1..:s31. .._ .02. 44N1-C \ti. ''' f At . .. . . .4 .... • , ....1,,- - . -.....', g TrigeMiLlitkir V I 1 ;I,?,,5,,,.-.: 4,441tR Alli.re of • • '' � ' . ..,. . . ;,,, . iii 1 , 1 ...,_ . mai ;:.:: t , ! N. 'r ; , ;„......v ,,1 il" *It s :RR`'\ f. - 4 44164 ‘,6„4.' 1 .., la\''l'i i; rI - 1 3 b li $ ' i __`ram •�'i :, //ii tF t i •' �i� .11 iii iir , 'N\ 1--1'Iv kitillit.%%III- siloptilit; --- i 4/ ti .. irl L 11 ' \iiiiittltitik' ;-1\'‘. ,_ 1111 (111 --- . pi .....,_ r, :-/ i 1 e e 1 -_._�_�.. a i ,,'t - _ 1�fM1 >- I w • • City of Southlake,Texas MEMORANDUM March 2, 1995 TO: Curtis E. Hawk, City Manager FROM: Greg Last, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 506-A, Amendments to Sign Ordinance No. 506 Draft No. 6 dated 3/7/95 Attached is redline/strikeout draft no. 6 of the amendments to the sign ordinance which uses as a base the recommendation from the planning and zoning commission rather than the original ordinance. The redline and strikeout changes shown are those recommendations from Council, the City Attorney, or changes that staff has noticed due to those recommendations. I think it will be the easiest to understand if we work from this draft. I will lead the discussion utilizing the redline/strikeout draft no. 5 which uses as a base the original ordinance. I will point out to the Council all changes made to the original ordinance. Any further recommendations that they have will be incorporated into the cleaner redline/strikeout version (based on P/Z recommendation) and this version will be used for future discussions by Council. I know this is confusing. I welcome any alternative approach. It is my assumption that the Council would like a great deal of detail on the recommended changes and I feel this approach will satisfy that need and provide us with a cleaner version to work from in future meetings. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. GL/gl C:\ORD\SIGNSIMEMOS\CEH-CC3 • 8 �1 -I (me ARTICLE I - IN GENERAL SEC. 1 DEFINITIONS A. GENERAL ALTER: To change the size, shape or outline, intcnt, or type of sign. BUILDING: A structure which has a roof supported by walls for the shelter, support, or enclosure of persons, animals, or chattel. BUILDING OFFICIAL: The Building Official of the City of Southlake, Texas, or his designee. COMMENCEMENT OF WORK: For construction of a sign shall be the point in time when the sign has been delivered to the site and attachment to a building has begun or holes are excavated for ground installation. DILAPIDATED OR DETERIORATED CONDITION: Any sign which in the opinion of the building official has =� 0i v4 the following characteristics: (a) Where elements of the surface or background can be seen, as viewed from the normal viewing distance, to have portions of the finished material or paint flaked, broken off, or missing, or otherwise not in harmony with the rest of the surface; or (b) Where the structural support or frame members are visibly bent, broken, dented, or torn; or (hre (c) Where the panel is visibly cracked, or in the case of wood and similar products, splintered in such a way as to constitute an un- sightly or harmful condition; or (d) Where the sign or its elements are twisted or leaning or at angles other than those at which it was originally erected (such as may result from being blown or the failure of a structural support) ; or (e) Where the message or wording can no longer be clearly read by a person with normal eyesight under normal viewing conditions; or (f) Where the sign or its elements are not in compliance with the requirements of the National Electric Code and/or the Uniform Building Code currently adopted by the City. DISTANCE : Distance of signs from R.O.W. shall mean the shortest horizontal distance from the f=k�s� =�, R.O.W. to a vertical line to the ground from the nearest element of e sign or the distance in a straight line between signs. ERECT: To build, construct, attach, hang, place, suspend or affix, and shall also include the painting of signs on the exterior surface of .a building or structure. FACADE: Any separate face of a building, including parapet walls and omitted wall lines, or any part of a building which encloses or covers usable space. Where separate faces are oriented in the same direction, or in the directions within 45 degrees of one another, they are to be considered as part of a single facade. GROSS SURFACE AREA OR AREA OF A SIGN: The area of the smallest rectangle which includes the extreme limits of the sign, excluding the supporting structure for the sign. Methods of area measurement shall be in accordance with Appendix 'A' . G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WPD 1 g 11 Z (We HEIGHT: As applied to a sign, height shall be measured as the vertical distance between the highest part of the sign or its supporting structure, whichever is higher, and natural grade at the center of the base of the sign (see Appendix 'A' for clarification) . ILLUMINATION: The enhancement of a sign utilizing electric lights, luminous tubes or other similar means. LEASE SPACE: An area of a building separated internally and intended for use by an individual tenant. LOGO: Any design or insignia of an organization, individual, company, or product which is commonly used in advertising to identify that organization, individual, company, or product. OBSOLETE: Any sign which no longer serves a bona fide use or purpose PAD SITE: A tract, lot, or land lease intended for the single use of a freestanding building typically adjacent to street R.O.W. and may also be a portion of a tract or lot. SETBACK: The distance from the closest portion, whether the support or edge of the sign, to the right-of-way. SIGHT TRIANGLE: There shall be two different sight triangles as depicted in the Subdivision Ordinance. One shall be for public and/or private street intersections and the other for the intersection of private non- single family driveways with public or private streets. (kwe SIGN: Every sign, name, number, identification, description, and announcement, declaration, demonstration, device, display, flag, banner, pennant, illustration, logo, balloon, streamer, • C t= beacon, light or insignia, and structure suppor ing any o e same, a ixed directly or indirectly to or upon any building or outdoor structure, or erected or maintained upon a piece of land, which directs attention to any object, project, service, place, activity, person, institution, organization, or business. ,SIGN. ATTACHED: Any sign attached to, applied on, or supported by any. part of a building (including canopy facia, walls and awnings) which encloses or covers usable space. SIGN. BANNER: A temporary flag, cloth, flexible plastic or canvas material with all cornero attached to a building to advertise temporarily. SIGN. BUSINESS: A permanent on-site sign that is used to identify a business, profession, organization, institution, service, product, activity or other nonresidential use conducted, sold or offered on the site where such sign is located. This sign may also identify the name of the site or development or may identify the occupants within the site or development. SIGN. CONSTRUCTION: A temporary on-site sign identifying the property owner, architect, contractor, engineer, landscape architect, decorator, or mortgagee engaged in the construction or improvement of the site on which the sign is located. ,SIGN. DIRECTIONAL: A permanent on-site sign intended to aid in vehicular movement on the site. It may contain a logo but no other advertising. (we SIGN. FREESTANDING: Any sign connected to the ground by legs, poles, or other supports and which is not an attached, portable, monument, or vehicular sign. G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WPD 2 _.� (we SIGN, GARAGE/YARD SAL : A temporary sign intended to advertise garage sales or yard sales. .nk ti� _� i�(.' n K ,j a." SIGN, GROUND: Any temporary sign erected on vertical framework and used primarily for real estate sales, political, and Subdivision Marketing signs. SIGN, MENUBOARD: A sign which displays a menu and pricing for food services and may include an audible speaker and microphone integral to the sign. SIGN. MODEL HOME: A. temporary real estate sign identifying a homebuilders model home open for inspection. SIGN, MONUMENT: Any sign which is connected to the ground and which has no clear space for the full width of the sign between the bottom of the sign and the surface of the ground. CICN. ODCOLETE: Any oign advcrtising a buoincsa that ha3 bccn cloacd for a period of Sixty (GO) days or more. SIGN. OFF-SITE: A sign which directs attention to a business, commodity, service, good, product, or entertainment not related to the site upon which such sign is located or to which it is affixed. SIGN, ON-SITE: Any sign, the content of which relates to the site on (We which it is located, referring exclusively to businesses, commodities, services, products, goods, or entertainment on the site , or the sale, lease, or construction of those sites . SIGN. POLITICAL: A type of off-site sign which refers only to the candidates or issues involved in a political election. Only those signs which address candidates and issues within the City of Southlake are permitted. SIGN, PORTABLE: Any sign which is not attached or affixed to the ground, a building, vehicle, or other fixed structure or object. Portable signs include those signs installed on wheels, trailers, skids, and similar mobile structures. SIGN, READERBOARD (electronic) : A sign that utilizes alternating electronic data control components showing time, temperature, and miscellaneous advertising and/or information. SIGN. READERBOARD (manual) : A sign comprised of non-permanent letters, numerals or symbols, which allows a change of sign copy by adding, removing or rearranging said letters, symbols or numerals. SIGN, REAL ESTATE: A `" °" sign intended to advertise real estate Fla SIGN. SPECIAL PURPOSE: A temporary sign ®„r e t "area:' "° ga + � , that is either on-site or o -site at prove es i en 1 Ica ion or information pertaining to a special event or occurrences excluding garage or yard ealc3, but under no circumstance ohal'l be a3aociatcd with real catatc advcrti3ing. (1110, SIGN. SUBDIVISION a. Development Sign: A temporary sign providing identification or information pertaining to a residential or commercial development. G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WP0 3 (me The sign shall be limited to the identification of the subdivision • only and not the builders. b. Directory Sign: A temporary on-site sign providing direction to or identifying the buildings in the subdivision. c. Entry Sign: Any permanent sign identifying a residential subdivision and located on-si e . SIGN. SUBDIVISION MARKETING: A temporary sign used to market or advertise residential subdivisions and builders and direct interested persons to the subdivision location. ,SIGN. TEMPORARY: Any sign, banner, pcnnant, valance of advcrtioing display constructed of cloth, canvas, light fabric, cardboard, wallboard, or other like materials, with or without frames, and any type sign not permanently attached to the ground, wall, or building, intended to be displayed for a short period of time only. SIGN. TRADESMAN: A temporary on-site sign identifying the contractor performing a construction trade on the site. SIGN. VEHICULAR.: Any sign which is affixed to a vehicle. SIGN. WINDOW: Any sign, banner, poster, or display located on the internal and/or external surface of the window, or is located within two feet (2') of the window, of any establishment which advertises services, products,- or sales available within said establishment or which announces the opening of said establishment. (We SITE: A lot, tract or pad site. ARTICLE II - ADMINISTRATION SEC. 2 RESPONSIBILITY FOR ENFORCEMENT It is the responsibility of the Building Official to interpret, administer and enforce the requirements of this ordinance. SEC. 3 SIGN PERMIT REOUIRED • • No person shall erect, '671 any sign nor shall any person allow the erectio sa or .isp ay of any sign upon property owned or controlled by im wi ou first obtaining a permit to do so from the City of Southlake, except as hereinafter provided. Ercction . a sign shall include any change in the chapc, aisc, or electrica . ig ing except for the replacement of lamps not brighter than the original or replacement of a surface panel. SEC. 4 APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT Application for a permit shall be made as required by this ordinance and the following information shall be submitted as separate documents: a. Application form shall be completed. b. General plan that illustrates: - Location of the building, structure, or tract to which or upon (kW which the sign is to be attached or erected. - Position of the sign in relation to right-of-ways, easements, buildings, structures, existing signs, a c. G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WPD 4 //- t (Nme c. Sign drawing that illustrates height, length, width, and all other dimensions associated with the sign. d. Letter from owner of the property stating that the applicant has permission to erect such signs. SEC. 5 FEES All fees for signs shall be in accordance with the current fee schedule adopted by e iy Council. SEC. 6 CONDITIONAL SIGN PERMIT A. GENERAL: Notwithstanding anything in this ordinance to the contrary, the erection of a sign or signs may be approved pursuant to this section under a conditional sign permit approved by the City Council. . The purpose of this section is to allow for-a specialized review of signs which may not be appropriate generally without certain restrictions, but which, if controlled as to the number, size, height, color, location, lighting, or relation to adjacent properties, would promote the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Conditional use permitting of signs shall not be based upon the content of the sign, but is intended to allow for the evaluation of the physical impact of the proposed sign on adjacent properties and to ensure adequate mitigation of potentially unfavorable factors, such as the number, size, height, color, location, lighting, and other potentially unfavorable impacts. • B. APPLICATION: An application for a conditional sign permit shall be submitted to the Building Official and shall include all documents as required by Section 3 of this ordinance. Additionally, the applicant (tre shall submit construction plans drawn . by a registered professional engineer or architect in the State of Texas and also provide renderings of the particular sign types, facades, materials, compositions, dimensions, lighting, and colors. C. FEES: Fees for conditional sign permits shall be determined in accordance with the adopted Uniform Administrative Code utilizing Table No. 3-A. SEC. t7 REVOCATION OF PERMITS The Building Official may suspend or revoke any permit issued under the provisions of this ordinance whenever it is determined that the permit is issued in error or on the basis of incorrect or false information supplied, or whenever such permit be gs issued in violation of .any of the provisions of this ordinance or any Other ordinance of this City or laws of this state or the federal government. Such suspension or revocation • shall be effective when -communicated in writing to- the person to whom the permit is issued, the owner of the sign, or the owner of the site upon which the sign is located. Upon such revocation, all construction related to the revoked permit shall cease. A person may appeal the revocation of the sign permit to the City Council by filing an appeal in accordance with this ordinance. The dcci3ion of the City Council shall be thcrcaftcr dccmcd ao approved, reversed, or modificd, and such decision shall be final. Upon final determination that the permit is properly revoked, any portion of the sign in place as a result of the permit shall be removed within 10 days by the owner of the sign or the owner of the site on which the sign is located. Failure to remove the sign shall be deemed a violation of (100' this ordinance. G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WPD 5 gH_ 1 Lior' SEC. 8 INSPECTION The Building Official shall periodically inspect each sign regulated by this ordinance for the purpose of ascertaining whether the same is obsolete and whether it is in need of removal or repair. SEC. 9 PERMIT VALID FOR ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY (180) DAYS If the work authorized by a permit issued under this ordinance has not been commenced within one hundred eighty (180) days after the date of issuance, the permit shall become null and void. SEC. 10 INVESTIGATION FEES: WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT A. INVESTIGATION. Whenever any work for which a permit is required by this ordinance has been commenced or completed without first obtaining a permit, a special investigation shall be made before a permit may be issued for such work. B. FEE. An investigation fee, in addition to the permit fee, shall be collected whether or not a permit is then subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of the permit fee required by this ordinance. SEC. 11 REMOVAL OF SIGNS A. OBSOLETE SIGNS. Any sign which the Building Official determines to be obsolete , shall be removed by the 'f i«k Z:f n G. aving c •cncicia use o" c an., :ui sings, or structure upon which ouch sign is located, within ten (10) days after re v written notification to do so from the Building Official. Upon fai ure o comply with such notice or to file an appeal of the decision in accordance with this ordinance, the Building Official is hereby authorized to cause the removal of such sign, and any expense incident thereto shall be paid by the 'r,7 5i f .! „„ r a-;; , `; owner of the land, building, or structure to whic suc sign is at ached or upon which it is erected. B. UNSAFE DILAPIDATED OR DETERIORATED SIGNS. If the Building Official determines that any sign is unsafe or insecure, or is dilapidated or deteriorated, he shall give written notice to remove or replace (in accordance with this ordinance) said sign to the person or persons responsible for such sign. If the permittee, owner, agent, or person having the beneficial use of the site fails to remove or repair the sign within ten (10) days after such notice or to file an appeal of the decision in accordance with this ordinance, the Building Official is hereby authorized to cause the removal of such sign. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit the immediate removal, without notice, of any sign which is determined by the Building Official to be an immediate threat or danger to the Public health, safety, or welfare. Any expense incident to the removal of a sign pursuant to this paragraph shall be paid by the owner of the land, building, or structure to which such sign is attached or upon which it is erected. C. SIGNS ON UTILITY POLES. It shall be prohibited to attach any sign to a utility pole located upon any public right-of-way or utility easement and any sign so placed may be removed by City personnel. The owner of such sign shall be charged a sign recovery fee in accordance with the city fee schedule to recover such sign from the City unless the owner satisfactorily establishes that such sign was not placed in the right-of- way by the owner of such sign or by any authorized agent, representative, (NW or employee of said owner. Any such sign removed by City personnel may be held for a period of seventy-two (72) hours and upon expiration of such time may be disposed of. The City is not required to notify the owner of G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WPD 6 Q /1_7 A . (kre the sign that it has been picked up or that disposal of the sign is imminent. D. SIGNS IN RIGHT-OF-WAY&. Any sign that is erected, constructed or otherwise located within or upon public right-of-way may be removed by City Personnel and the owner of such sign shall be charged a sign recovery fee in accordance with the city fee schedule to recover such sign from the City. No such fee shall be charged if the owner satisfactorily establishes that such sign was not placed in the right-of-way by the owner of such sign or by any authorized agent, representative or employee of said owner. Any such sign removed by City personnel may be held for a period of seventy-two (72) hours and upon expiration of such time may be disposed of. The City is not required to notify the owner of the sign that it has been picked up or that disposal of the sign is imminent. E. EXTENT OF SIGN REMOVAL: The Building Official shall determine to what extent the elements of the- sign must be removed to comply with this section. This may include any of the following, but is not limited to the following: a. SIGN COPY: Removal of the text or copy portion of the sign. b. SIGN BOX: Removal of the portion of the sign excluding the structural support of the sign. c. ENTIRE SIGN: Removal of all structural elements of the sign. SEC. 12 FILING OF LIENS AGAINST PROPERTY Failure to pay any expenses incurred by the City for removal of a sign (*me under Section 11 may result in the City filing a lien against the property to facilitate future recovery of these expenses. ARTICLE III - APPEALS AND VARIANCES SEC. 13 APPEALS Any decision rendered by the Building Official :; ,4 ®. may be appealed to the City Council by any person, agen , or representative affected by such decision. Such appeal must be received within ten (10) days after the receipt of a certified letter in the mail which states the written decision which has been rendered by the Building Official. Such appeal shall be filed in writing with the Building Official specifying the grounds on which the appeal is based. The Building Official shall forthwith transmit to the City Council all documents pertaining to the appealed action. The City Council shall hear the appeal at a City Council meeting as soon as practicable thereafter to determine whether the decision of the Building Official was in accordance with all ordinances and regulations. The decision of the City Council shall be final. SEC. 14 VARIANCES The City Council may authorize variances to any requirements regarding number of signs, area, height, setback, or any other aspect involved in the sign permitting process. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the sign regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed, (kw that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this sign ordinance. A person may request a variance from the Sign G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WPD 7 O -y (hoW Ordinance by filing said request with the Building Official. Any request for variance !fill be accompanied by a completed application and a non-refundable filing fee in the amount specified in the current fee schedule adopted by City Council. ARTICLE IV - GENERAL SIGN PROVISIONS SEC. 15 WIND PRESSURE AND DEAD LOAD REOUIREMENTS All signs shall be designed and constructed to withstand a wind pressure of not less than thirty (30) pounds per square foot of area and shall be constructed to receive dead loads as required by the Uniform Building Code. The sign permit application must include a statement signed by the applicant which states compliance with this requirement. SEC. 16 PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURES AND GENERAL REGULATIONS A. ATTACHED SIGN 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all attached signs which are allowed under this ordinance. Only one attached sign per street frontage shall be allowed on any site , unless otherwise specifically provided in this ordinance. Er- sw & F 2. MAXIMUM LETTER/LOGO HEIGHT: The maximum height allowed for letters or logos shall be based on the following criteria: (hire Distance From R.O.W. Maximum Letter/Logo Height Less than 50 ft. 24 inches 51 - 100 ft. 30 inches 101 - 150 ft. 36 inches 151 - 200 ft. 42 inches 201 - 250 ft. 48 inches 251 - 300 ft. 54 inches 301 and greater 60 inches 3. MAXIMUM AREA: 1.5 square feet for every one foot of width of building or lease space not to exceed 400 square feet - see Appendix 'A' for further clarification. 4. SIGN WIDTH: Attached signs shall be limited in width to the middle seventy five percent (75%) of the width of any building or lease space (see Appendix 'B' for further clarification) . 5. ROOF LINE LIMITATIONS: In no case shall an attached sign project above the roof line of any building, except those attached to parapet walls and the sign may not extend above the parapet wall. 6. ILLUMINATION: Attached signs may be illuminated only utilizing internal lighting. �4 ` ®4 '� a �r >a `"" 7. PROTRUSIONS: Attached signs may not protrude farther than eighteen inches (18") from the building excluding signs attached to canopies. 8. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: Attached signs shall not be allowed on any (hoe facade other than the main front of the building which faces property zoned for residential single-family uses and t the sign is within one hundred fifty feet 150 of he property line of said residential use G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WPD 8 g14 NOW B. MONUMENT SIGN 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulation set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all monume signs which are allowed under this ordinance. Only one monument sign per street frontage, excluding menuboard signs, shall be allowed on any site, unless otherwise specifically provided in this ordinance. 2. MAXIMUM HEIGHT Six (6) feet, including y`• " monument bas- , , "0,0 � .�1ti Rr ;e fk, F ..aa ,?' € ':'a ^.�>3 measure• rom groun• eve a e cen er o e ease =ems „ 3. MAXIMUM AREA: Onc hundred fifty (150) Mb t d'1 + , square/ feet per sign with a maximum area per sign face o eeveezyf�ve (7 ) {one square feet. The sign may have no more than tw • faces an ey must be constructed arallel to each more than cightccn m '. inches (3 " of separation between the faces of the sign � � {6"r i `� 4. MINIMUM SETBACK: Fifteen (15) feet from any property line. 5. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: All monument sign bases mutt be made 'hail be ^ h � of the same masonry material as the front buidi g faca•e on e same site or stone or brick. 6. ILLUMINATION: Monument signs may � be illuminated enly utilizing internal lighting, or a lighting source where the light itself and supporting structure is not visible from public R.O.W. Loor C. FREESTANDING SIGN 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all freestanding signs which are allowed under this ordinance. 2. LOCATIONS WHERE ALLOWED: Freestanding signs shall be located in accordance with the following limitations: a. State Highway 114 Frontage: Freestanding signs shall be allowed on sites having frontage on S.H. 114 or fronting on a grade separated intersecting street and within two hundred feet (200') of the ultimate R.O.W. for S.H. 11471 however, eai signe shall be located a minimum of wo un•re• ° eet (200') d apar . No freestanding sign sha- •e a owe• c�oser -n one hundred feet (100') to an intersecting R.O.W. and the allocation of said signs shall be on a first come, first serve basis. Sites meeting the criteria of section (b. ) below may have a freestanding sign even if the spacing limitation would otherwise disallow the sign. b. All Other Sites: A freestanding s' •. s be allowed on any site which is greater than seven el= in size, includes ten (10) or more contiguous bu -- •- . e lessees and is . developed as a comprehensive development. 3. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Maximum height for the sign shall be twenty (20) feet. id ae q '0, c.a —f w€ r`i' _e i`• e � • d!,�bl e ,i, _ .r �-. _ a-s, 5cg s- «�� s LW' 4. MAXIMUM AREA: Maximum area( for the sign shall be two hundred (200) square feet with a maximum of one hundred (100) square feet per face of sign. The sign may have only two faces and they must be G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WPD 9 S N_/o ,r constructed parallel to each other and no more than thirty—six inches (30") of separation between the faces of the sign. 5. 1,f16 SETBACK: The sign shall bc octback - -- m of Fifteen eet from any property line. 6. MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: The support structure for the sign shall be constructed or covered with materials which match the masonry portion of the principal building on the site or shall be stone or brick. 7. ILLUMINATION: Freestanding signs may c , be illuminated enly utilizg internal lighting. No lighting source external to the sign may be exposed. 1, - ; ,s �� ` � , _ q s 4 s_ Q ' `_fgw t 8. RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY: No freestanding sign shall be allowed within one hundred • • y residential uses. D. GROUND SIGN 1. GENERAL: Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this subsection shall be applicable to all ground signs. 4 . LOCATION LIMITATIONS: No signs shall be placed within public right- of-way. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Four feet (4' ) MAXIMUM AREA: Twelve (12) square feet with a maximum of six (6) square feet per sign face. SEC. 17 - • ' SIGNS A. GENERAL Any sign, or structure which could be interpreted as a sign, which is not specifically allowed a '� ,� , e is hereby prohibited. B. OBSCENE SIGNS No person shall erect or allow to be displayed upon site owned or controlled by him a sign in which the dominant theme of material taken as a whole appeals to a prurient interest in sex, or is patently offensive because it affronts community standards relating to the description or representation of sexual matters, and is utterly without redeeming social value. C. OBSTRUCTING DOORS, WINDOWS, OR FIRE ESCAPES No person shall erect or allow to bc displayed on "" „Poi site owncd or controllcd by said peroon a ;p; sign which prevents ree ingress to or egress from any door, window, or fire escape. D. OBSTRUCTING VISION/SIGHT TRIANGLE It shall be unlawful to crcct, relocetc, or maintain ==, I -)rv=1Irlrrl any sign in such a manner as o o•s ruc ree and c ear vision a any ocation, street, intersection, or driveway. All signs placed at any intersection shall prevent such problem by observing (hrie a sight triangle as provided for in Sec, .:- 1, "Definitions." G:AORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WPD 10 "_ \ rr► E. INTERFERENCE WITH TRAFFIC fi No person shall erect or allow to be displayed any sign which interferes with vehicular or pedestrian tra ' ic 'as a result of the position, size, shape, movement, color, fashion, manner, or intensity of illumination or any other characteristics causing such interference. Nor shall any person erect or allow to be displayed any sign in such a manner as to interfere with, obstruct the view of, or be confused with any authorized traffic sign, signal, or device, including, without limitation, signs making use of the words "stop, " "go, " "look, " "slow, " "danger, " or any other similar word, phrase, symbol or character, or employ any red, yellow, green, or other colored lamp or light in such a manner as to cause confusion or otherwise interfere with vehicular or pedestrian traffic. F. SIGNS ATTACHED TO OR SUSPENDED FROM POLES No person shall erect or display upon >-@: site owncd or controllcd by ouch peroon any items such as goods, wares, merchandise, or other advertising objects or material which are suspended from any light fixture, pole or structure, for the purpose of advertising such items, except as allowed pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance. G. PAINTING. MARKING. ETC. OF STREETS. SIDEWALKS. UTILITY POLES. ETC. No person shall attach any sign, paper, or other material, or paint, stencil, or write any name, number (except address numbers) or otherwise mark on any sidewalk, curb, gutter, street, utility pole, public building, fence, or structure except as otherwise allowed by this ordinance. H. ATTACHING ADVERTISING MATTER TO FENCES, UTILITY POLES, STREET SIGNS. ETC. (hoe No person shall place, stick, tack, nail, or otherwise place any advertisement, sign, handbill, placard, or printed or written matter or thing for political advertisement or other advertising purposes upon any fence, railing, sidewalk, public telephone pole, electric or other utility pole or any other public property, including trees thereon or to knowingly cause or to co..-__ same to be done for his bene"`fit. I. PORTABLE SIGNS No person shall erect or allow to be displayed any portable sign; except, however, that upon a majority vote. by the City Council, a conditional use permit may be issued to any non-profit organization . for an on-site portable sign. Permits shall be issued for one thirty (30) day period with at least ninety (90) days separation between permits. J. CERTAIN ILLUMINATED SIGNS 1. No sign shall be illuminated to such an intensity or in such a manner as to cause a glare e€ Op brightness to a degree that it constitutes a hazard or nuisance to traffic. Moving, flashing, intermittent lighted, changing color, revolving, or similarly constructed signs shall not be allowed. It is further provided that a sign which uses illumination to provide time of day and/or temperature only shall not constitute a flashing sign. 2. No lighted sign shall be erected or displayed within one-hundred fifty (150) feet of a as sass residentially zoned neghberbeed .tp. ; unless the ig ing is shielded from view of the resi•en ially zoned district and indirect light does not exceed 1/2 lumen measured prom any property line of the (kW residentially zoned district G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WPD 11 ¶ ��� r � ‘Ible K. SIGNS PROJECTING ON/OVER PUBLIC PROPERTY It shall be prohibited to erect or allow to be displayed any type of sign on or over public property, unless the same be erected by the City, • County, State or other authorized governmental agency, or with the permission of the City, for public purposes. L. ROOF SIGNS PROHIBITED Any sign erected on a vertical framework supported by and located immediately and entirely over the roof of a building is prohibited. The painting or otherwise affixing of signs on a roof is prohibited. ARTICLE V - SPECIFIC SIGN REGULATIONS SEC. 18 SPECIFIC REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ON-SITE SIGNS REOUIRING PERMIT Unless otherwise specifically provided, the regulations set forth in this article shall be applicable to all of the following signs. A. BUSINESS SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached, freestanding or monument 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: None B. READERBOARD SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Freestanding or monument (ire 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. GENERAL: Readerboard signs (manual or electronic) may only be approved as a conditional sign permit by the. City Council. b. MAXIMUM AREA: Cannot exceed two-thirds (2/3) of the gross surface area per face of the sign. c. Manual readerboard signs using alphabetical lettering must have a lockable covering ovcr the arca of ;; ' `t of easy access by vandals. d. c olli - - = . - •. 'c derboa - - all not •- a owed to utilize a scr. gar - . . MENUBOARD SIGN 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Freestanding, monument or attached 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Six feet (6') , from groun. € '^_ sign. b. MAXIMUM AREA: Twenty four (24) square feet. Only one face will be allowed per sign. C. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: No more than two (2) signs per site. d. LOCATION LIMITATIONS: All menuboard signs must be located at the side or rear of the principal building. DG. SUBDIVISION SIGNS 1. ENTRY SIGN c Kee' (If Z) a. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Monument,— OZ attached coe b. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: 1. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Six (6) feet for monument, attached sign may not project above top of wall G:\ORD\SIGNS\OR6_3-07.WPD 12 _ (3 2. MAXIMUM AREA: square ee €er monument, Thirty-two (32) square ee _ - 3. MINIMUM SETBACK: Fifteen (15) feet from right-of-way 4. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One (1) monument sign or two attached wall plaque signs (i.e. not a combination thereof) per street entrance CC 2. DIRECTORY SIGN c2A456. a. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Freestanding or monument l b. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: 1. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Twelve (12) feet for freestanding; six (6) feet for monument 2. MAXIMUM AREA: ." e1 .,. �' ' air -:� ? ��;" F 99` y • square fee 3. MINIMUM SETBACK: i eenh 15) feet from right-of-way 4. MAXIMUM"NUMBER OF SIGNS: One (1) sign per street entrance f��r! f (kWSEC. 19 TEMPORARY SIGNS REQUIRING PERMIT A. BANNERS, PENNANTS. AND STREAMERS 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM AREA: One hundred (100) square feet (no maximum for streamers) b. MINIMUM SETBACK: Fifteen (15) feet from right-of-way c. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: Two (2) total ; d. DURATION: Thirty (30) •ays ree times a calendar • year with a sixty (60) day separation between permits ' c ,.Y..-, /.: c4(99- •lL=. e • = k r.0 Rom,64.. B. BALLOONS AND OTHER FLOATING DEVICES 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Fifty (50) feet to end of tether line b. MINIMUM SETBACK: Fifteen (15) feet from right-of-way c. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One balloon or floating device having a capacity greater than three (3) cubic feet of air. No limit to number of smaller(kw' balloons d. DURATION: Maximum thirty (30) days/three times a calendar year with a minimum sixty (60) day separation between permits G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WP0 13 C. MODEL HOME SIGNS 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Monument, freestanding, gr713.5. 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Six (6) feet b. MAXIMUM AREA: . l y ' square ee r ar` .. _ ... c. MINIMUM SETBACK: ., "een (15) feet from any property line d. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One (1) sign per builder per subdivision Pxk at:m D. SPECIAL PURPOSE SIGNS 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached or freestanding 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM AREA: l y • square ee b. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: Four (4) total '4 .(61K s� c. PLACEMENT TIME: May be placed t it y • says •e ore the event or occasion commences but must be removed within three (3) days after termination thereof. No more than twice a year. E. SEARCH LIGHTS • 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Freestanding 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. • MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: Two (2) per site b. DURATION: Seven (7) days, twice a calendar year with a sixty (60) day separation between permits. F. CONSTRUCTION SIGNS 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Freestanding, monument, ground 1 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS:a. MAXIMUM NUMBERPfiG OF SIGNS: One (1) per site — b. DURATION: Sign may be installed at any time after the issuance of the building permit for a commercial development or approval of the (kW developers agreement for a residential subdivision. The sign must be removed upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a commercial development and upon the G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WPD 14 Y U.-(S issuance of a C.O. on ninety percent (90%) of the lots within the subdivision for a residential subdivision. G. DEVELOPMENT SIGNED 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Freestanding, monument, ground 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One (1) per site b. DURATION: Sign may be installed at any time after the issuance of the building permit for a commercial development or approval of the developers agreement for a residential subdivision. The sign must be removed upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy , for a commercial development and upon the issuance of a C.O. on ninety percent (90%) of the lots within the subdivision for a residential subdivision. n 1, 1k SEC. 20 TEMPORARY SIGNS EXEMPT FROM PERMIT A permit shall not be required for the following signs: ,1YNk A. SUBDIVISION MARKETING SIGNS \\ 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: round 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: A maximum of three signs advertising the same item per grouping of signs (see Appendix 'B' 50!• ss r b. LOCATION OF SIGNS: 'o sign may be placed closer than fifty feet (50') from an intersecting R.O.W. Signs advertising the same item may be no closer than ten feet (10' ) apart c. PLACEMENT TIME: 12:00 noon Friday to 12:00 noon Monday B. POLITICAL SIGNS 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: ground 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: unlimited b. I'LACEMENT TIME. may bc placed forty fivc (4S) daya bcforc klime an cicction, but °hall bc rcmovcd within three-(34 s after c - -- G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WPD 15 811-(/ • Loo,, C. TRADESMAN SIGNi 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: aground 2.. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGTIONS: a. DURATION: Signs may only be placed after issuance of a building permit and must be removed upon completion of the construction trade advertised. D. REAL ESTATE SIGNS 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: aground, freestanding, monument or attached 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS: a. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: six (6) feet for groun , elow roof line for attached b. MAXIMUM AREA: - fifty (50) square feet c. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: one (1) sign for every five (5) acres E. WINDOW SIGNS Window signs are permitted, provided such signage does not obscure more than fifty percent (50%) of the total window area and may not include exposed gas tubes within two feet (2') of window glass. F. GARAGE/YARD SALE SIGNS 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: aground 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS a. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: Four (4) per sale b. PLACEMENT TIME: 12:00 Noon Friday to 12:00 Noon Monday 05 C. COVERIRIENTAL CICNG • Covcrnmcntal aigna within public R.O.W. when placed by the appropriate transportation department of the Ctatc, County or City. SEC. 21 SPECIFIC REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO OFF-SITE SIGNS REOUIRING PERMIT A. OFF-SITE DEVELOPMENT SIGNS 1. PERMITTED SIGN STRUCTURE: Freestanding or monument 2. MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL REGULATIONS a. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Fifteen (15) feet for freestanding b. MAXIMUM AREA: One hundred (100) square feet with a • maximum of fifty (50) square feet per sign face c. MINIMUM SPACING: one-hundred (100) feet, measured radially from all other off-site development signs d. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SIGNS: One (1) per subdivision plus an additional sign for any subdivision with more than two hundred (200) platted lots. e. REQUIRED REMOVAL: All off-site subdivision signs must be removed upon permits being issued to build upon seventy-five (75%) of the lots being advertised. (We /1°1 G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WPD 16 s.' SEC. 22 EXEMPT SIGNS The following signs are exempted from the requirements of this ordinance: 1. Signs on vehicles unless the sign is used or intended to be used as an on-site ;.-, , - sign. It shall be prima facie evidence that a sign is use. as an on-site mod? �� sign if a vehicle is parked at the same location for a con inuous period exceeding seventy-two (72) hours. No person shall attach any sign to a trailer, skid, or similar mobile structure, where the primary use of such structure is to provide a base for such sign or to constitute the sign itself. This provision shall not be interpreted to prohibit identification signs on vehicles used for business purposes. 2. Warning, security, and directional signs for parking, etc. 3. Government signs,— t{ E�t '' s (..1460, c • ati j ra ®�& byPY%-4g41e Q q c,11 ags, insignia, legal no ices', e informa lona , •1rec lona ,- er ,7,tw traffic signs. 4. "No Dumping" and "No Trespassing" signs. 5. All signs not visible from off the site . 6. Signs placed in public parks by the City which are intended or aver ising to raise unds for recreation programs `•z- x<5 nap , L SEC. 23 NONCONFORMING EXISTING SIGNS All signs that are lawfully in existence on the date of adoption of this ordinance may exist in their present form, but no such signs shall be altered, or moved unless a permit be issued pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance. Permits granted prior to the passage of this ordinance shall be renewed only if the applicant complies with all provisions of this ordinance. Any legal, non-conforming sign which has been substantially destroyed or dismantled for any purpose other than maintenance shall be deemed as completely destroyed if the cost of repairing the sign is more than 60% of the cost of erecting a new sign of the same type at the same location. Under this provision, the sign shall be removed and a permit required to erect a new sign. SEC. 24 SIGN COPY Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, any sign authorized in this ordinance is allowed to contain non-commercial (ideological) copy in lieu of any other copy. CEC. 25 CUPMULATIVE CLAUCD This ordinance shall bc cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of thc Es fCeu Make e3as, e�ceep here ehe previsions of th _ _.nee arc in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances arc hcrcby repealed. Ordinance Nos. 350, 390, and 4-05 arc hereby repealed in their entirety. CEC. 2G CI3VDRADILITY CLAUCD It is hcrcby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the (4we phrase , elauses, see�enees, severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall bc declared unceastitutional by thc valid judgment or G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-O7.WPD 17 shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since thc came would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph er section. CEC. 27 VIOLATIONC Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects el refuses to comply with. or who resists thc enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall bc fined not more than rive Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each offcnsc. Each day that a violation is permittcd to exist shall constitute a separate offence. CEC. 20 CAVINCC CLAUCD All rights and remedies of the City of Couthlakc arc expressly saved as to any and all violations of thc provisions of any ordinances affecting the regulation of signs which havc accrutcd at thc time of the effective date of this ordinance, and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, came shall not bc affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until fin . CEC. 2 PUBLICATION IN P1114rIILET POflM The City Cccrctary of the City of &ottthlakc is hereby authorized to • publish this ordinance in book or pact form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in -all courts without further proof than the production thereof. £EC. 30 PUBLICATION IN OFFICIAL NEWCPAPER • the proposed ordinance or its setting out tie-time and place €era-public hearing-thereon at leas -test ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Cccrctary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after passage of this ordinance, as required by £ection 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Couthlakc. CEC. 31 EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. SEC. 322;5' APPENDICES It is anticipated that the following appendices will be changed periodically by the Building Official in response to changes in the administration of this ordinance. L G:\ORD\S1GNS\DR6_3-07.WP0 • 18 Rff-1 9 L PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 1995. MAYOR (bre ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY EFFECTIVE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney L G:\ORD\SIGNS\DR6_3-07.WPD 19 g - L! (kW Mill0111111 METHODS OF AREA 12° I 1 t`).-1'-. "' 1_--.4-4;r EXHIBIT A-1 ~fr do SIGN STRUCTURE: Freestanding - ...t =. HEIGHT: 20' R AREA OF SIGN: 96 s.f. (8' x 12') 11 H 1 NOTES: Supporting structure must be made of the same masonry material . as the principal building on the site. �— 1 t I EXHIBIT A-2 t1.445 -.. ' SIGN STRUCTURE: Freestanding rti.IONS (4we HEIGHT: 20' b. �Hi. F Co7, AREA OF SIGN: 96 s.f. (12" x 8') v'd T" co V114x- a @gk b NOTES: Supporting structure must be �.-4, „ -; 1 N made of the same masonry material as the principal building on the site. 6 _, Area by current ordinance = 57 s.f. L` io ri EXHIBIT A-3 EC SIGN STRUCTURE: Freestanding HEIGHT: 20' (at centerline) n +4a, ..'l`' i •AREA OF SIGN: 96 s.f. (12' x 8') �_� , .�Y 4.1k Q, NOTES: Supporting structure must be made c°'~'.', " . ..- � of the same masonry material as the principal 63 r° A=-''; i. building on the site. N n - Area by current ordinance = 72 s.f. N Height by current ordinance = 22' (not allowed) N s ''�ti*«.. a ■ g • la a (We ■I ■ • G:\ORD\SIGNS\FD53-10.WPO 19 $1f'1 o METHODS OF AREA IVRAME FMENT g 1'I 1•I g 11• 1 1• EXHIBIT A-4 eM3.:::.r_ 7-~- ' •-_ ,. -•v i SIGN STRUCTURE: Freestanding �� e w=� __ HEIGHT: 20' :'=•'f_K ,'-rr` " �-- AREA OF SIGN: 99 s.f. (11' x 9') i ��•�• y��~ i 4 11. xis""'_• rr•� . NOTES: Supporting structure must be made rv"e ^' `'.'=4 ` ci of the same masonry material as the principal 's °�` C building on the site. �:` .�'- . Current ordinance allows 30' for a multi- +°Wi�► i1 ', purpose sign. Current practice would calculate -- :- 1111111 area as 32.5 s.f. is I � INI MIN L EXHIBIT A-5 6 SIGN STRUCTURE: Ground I I ,t..., -I HEIGHT: 4' ` ' AREA OF SIGN: 6 s.f. •Y - a Mil lV L G:\0RD\SIGNS\FD5 2-10.VPD 20 SIf ;2 (111re AWYRROM# METHODS OF AREA MEASUREMENT • BXHIBIT A-6 SIGN STRUCTURE: Monument HEIGHT: 4' a .--._ AREA OF SIGN: 40 s.f. (4' x 10') :-:tray ati' NOTES: .,t,.2:4=..Gsks:..;:u.-.7 '. No lighting sources may """- be visible. EXHIBIT A-7 la SIGN STRUCTURE: Monument r 1r r HEIGHT: 6' — AREA OF SIGN: ea S.r 2 . (55• x 12•) ''-`� NOTES: The base of the sign must be "' a, constructed of the same masonry 'o as the principal building. imum erial height of the base shall be 18". ���i�""��'� Height by current ordinance = 6.75' • • EXHIBIT A-8 SIGN STRUCTURE: Monument 10' HEIGHT: 6' AREA OF SIGN: 45 a_f. (4.5• x 1O1 NOTES: The base of the sig n must be -� ,:teat constructed' of the same mason - = to as the principal building. �i material height of the base shall be 18". -P Height by current ordinance = 6.0' • (We G:\ORD\SiGNS\FDS 2-10.NPD 21 811-23 _ (we EFAREEMMOW METHODS OF AREA MEASVREMENT , 1r EXHIBIT A-9 I I s s SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached • N i_ ,I r HEIGHT: Letter Height • 24" 0.1 I 1 ., V' ° 1•. 1 Li'it I ' AREA OF SIGN: 12 s.f. (2' x 6') _r- sr'^ '. . . T NOTES: Sign area can be no wider than 75% of the building width le (.75 x 12' = 9') and must be within the middle 75% of the useable area. 1r EXHIBIT A-10 1•-6-1 9- 11.-6 SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached HEIGHT: 4' cl-- 121:7472777777 Le AREA OF SIGN: as =.f. (4' is Er) 74,r iv s—i Y NOTES: Note that 1.5' is the minimum side ___ distance based on the requirement that the sign be contained within the middle 75% of the width of the building ;o ' (.75 x 12 = 9' useable, (12'-9')/2 = 1.5' minimum on each side.) EXHIBIT A-11 1r , SIGN STRUCTURE: Attached 1•-6"'1 6*. I (-6 HEIGHT: 4' AREA OF SIGN: 36' s.f. (4' x 9') ;, e N NOTES: Sign area can be no wider _ - - _ than 75% of the building width (.75 x 12' = 9') and must be within the middle 75% of the useable area. Height by current ordinance = 2' Area by current ordinance = 8 s.f. (2'x4') • (Ire G:\ORD\SIGNS\fD5 2-10.WP0 2 2 APPENDIX 'B' (We SELECTED GRAPHIC CLARIFICATIONS Section , Area Limitations for Attached Signs Lassa I.ss. I , L.sse Ns Z. Le s*a Ws •S LO re• ae• LW 1131:011181.22 .. . S 1 G 1M tIlig- - (ii.. Section 20-A,B, Subdivision Marketing and Political Signs 0 I® D • -- -----i 1 ______V®O V®O vile O®A owe pee I 1 --- 1....-_ O L G:\ORD\SIGNS\FD5 2-10.WPD 2 3 • These appendices are not considered a part of this ordinance and may be revised-or updated as necessary by the City Staff. APPENDIX 9 (ttie Sight Triangles STREET «r 11111111r4 ...:: --.11*OPERTYITLO.W.USE :x e • IIM.B1140 LINE I ' I m a:or Mtn • t I Y p I I lSIGHT TRIANGLE CO" INTERSECTION OF TWO STREET R.O.W.'S snmer so' �• I10. w C•raORTY/RAM 1DR Q .....j4.•-• •• — _— K ADQglD E� N -----— M five of Dew WAN' o I LSIGHT TRIANGLE INTERSECTION OF A DRIVEWAY & A STREET R.O.W. 24 ORDINANCE NO. 635 CODE OF ETHICS AND CONDUCT 1 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ADOPTING A CODE OF ETHICS AND CONDUCT APPLICABLE TO OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND BOARD MEMBERS WITHIN THE CITY;PROVIDING STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR SUCH OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND BOARD MEMBERS; REQUIRING THE DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS; PROVIDING FOR THE RENDERING OF ADVISORY OPINIONS BY THE CITY ATTORNEY; PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN PAMPHLET FORM; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter car 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake deems it necessary and advisable to adopt a Code of Ethics and Conduct applicable to the conduct of officers, employees and board members while acting in their official capacities in representing the City of Southlake. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. DECLARATION OF POLICY It is hereby declared to be the policy of the City of Southlake that the proper operation of democratic government requires that public officials and employees be independent, impartial and responsible only to the people of the city; that governmental decisions and policy should be made in the proper channels of the governmental structure; that no officer, employee or member of any board, commission or committee should have any interest, financial or otherwise, direct Cor or indirect, or engage in any business, transaction or professional activity or incur any obligation of any nature which is in conflict with the proper discharge of his or her duties in the public interest; that public office and public employment are positions of public trust imposing the duty of a fiduciary upon all employees and officeholders, who are not to use their public position for personal gain, and that the public should have confidence in the integrity of its government. To implement such a policy, the City Council deems it advisable to enact this code of ethics and conduct for all officers, employees and advisory board members, whether elected or appointed, paid or unpaid, to serve not only as a guide for official conduct of the city's public servants, but also as a basis for discipline for those who refuse to abide by its terms. This code of ethics and conduct is cumulative of other ordinances, city charter provisions and state statutes defusing and prohibiting conflict of interest. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS For the purposes of the this code of ethics and conduct the following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them by this section. Advisory board shall mean a board, commission or committee of the city that functions only in an advisory or study capacity. Business entity shall mean a sole proprietorship, partnership, firm, corporation, association, holding company, jointstock company, receivership, trust, or any other entity recognized by law. Employee shall mean any person employed by the city, including those individuals on a c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 2 part-time basis, but such term shall not be extended to apply to any independent contractor. Knowingly. A person acts knowingly, or with knowledge, with respect to the nature of his or her conduct or to circumstances surrounding his or her conduct when he is aware of the nature of his or her conduct or that the circumstances exist. A person acts knowing, or with knowledge, with respect to a result of his or her conduct when he is aware that his or her conduct is reasonably certain to cause the result. Officer shall mean any member of the City Council, the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Board of Adjustment, and any member of a board, commission or committee established by ordinance, charter or state law that has final approval authority over any application, permit, license or other City approvals; provided, no member of an advisory board shall be deemed an officer of the city. Substantial interest. A. A person has a substantial interest in a business entity if: (1) The interest is ownership of ten (10) percent or more of the voting stock or shares of the business entity or ownership of either ten (10) percent or more or five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) or more of the fair market value of the business entity (see Section 171.002, Texas Local Government Code); or (2) Funds received by the person from the business entity exceed ten (10) percent of the person's gross income for the previous year (see Section 171.002, Texas Local Government Code); or (3) The person holds a position of member of the board of directors or other governing board of the business entity; or c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 3 (4) The person serves as an elected officer of the business entity; or (5) The person is an employee of the business entity; or (6) The person is a creditor, debtor or guarantor of the business entity in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) or more; or (7) Property of the person has been pledged to the business entity or is subject to a lien in favor of the business entity in the amount five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) or more. B. A person does not have a substantial interest in a business entity if: (1) The person holds a position as a member of the board of directors or other governing board of a business entity; and (2) The person has been designated by the City Council to serve on such board; and (3) The person receives no remuneration, either directly or indirectly, for his or her service on such board; and (4) The primary nature of the business entity is either charitable, nonprofit or governmental. • C. A person has a substantial interest in real property if the interest is an equitable or legal ownership interest with a fair market value of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500.00) or more (see Section 171.002, Texas Local Government Code). D. A person has a substantial interest under this ordinance if the person's spouse or a person related to the person in the first degree by consanguinity or affinity has a substantial interest under this ordinance (see Section 171.002, Texas Local c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 4 Government Code). A person is related in the first degree by consanguinity to his or her father, mother, brother, sister, son or daughter. A person is related in the first degree by affinity to his or her father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother's spouse, sister's spouse, son-in-law or daughter-in-law. SECTION 3. STANDARDS OF CONDUCT A. No city officer, employee or advisory board member, or their spouses, shall knowingly: (1) Accept or solicit any gift, favor, service or thing of value from any person, group or business entity that might reasonably tend to influence him in the discharge of his or her official duties. This prohibition shall not apply to: (a) An occasional non-pecuniary gift, insignificant in value; or (b) An award publicly presented in recognition of public service; or (c) Any gift which would have been offered or given to him if he were not a city officer, employee or advisory board member, or their spouses. (2) Grant in the discharge of his or her official duties any improper favor, service or thing of value to any person, group or business entity; (3) Accept or solicit any gift, favor, service or thing of value, including a promise of future employment, of sufficient economic value that it might reasonably tend to influence him, in the discharge of his or her official fire duties, from any person, group or business entity: c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 5 (a) Who is licensed or has a substantial interest in any business entity Cow that is licensed by any city department, agency, commission or board on which the city officer, employee or advisory board member serves; or (b) Who has a financial interest in any proposed ordinance or decision upon which the city officer, employee or advisory board member may or must act or make a recommendation; provided, however, that any city officer, employee or advisory board member and their spouses, may accept travel and related expenses to attend ceremonial functions,provided that such acceptance and attendance have been approved by the City Council prior to the occurrence of the ceremonial function. Coe (4) Knowingly disclose any confidential information gained by reason of the position of the officer, employee or advisory board member concerning the property, operations, policies or affairs of the city, or use such confidential information to advance any personal interest, financial or otherwise, of such officer, employee or advisory board member, or others. This subparagraph 4 shall not preclude disclosure of such confidential information in connection with any investigation or proceeding regarding whether there has been a violation of the standards of conduct set forth in this code. (5) Use one's position or office of employment or city facilities, personnel, equipment or supplies to secure special privileges or exemptions for himself or others or for the private gain of the city officer, employee, c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 6 advisory board member or his or her spouse. (6) Engage in anyexchange, purchase or sale of property, goods or services g with the city, except: (a) Rendering services to the city as an officer, employee or advisory board member; (b) Paying taxes, fines, utility service or filing fees; (c) Executing and performing any developer's agreement or plat in compliance with laws and regulations applicable to any person; provided, however, that if any city ordinance, rule or regulation allows any discretion by the appropriate officers or employees of the city in the interpretation or enforcement of such ordinance, rule or regulation, any such discretion shall be exercised in favor of the city in connection with any such developer's agreement or plat; (d) Advisory board members who are not otherwise officers or employees of the city, may engage in any exchange, purchase or sale of property, goods or services with the city, or enter into a contract with the city, provided that the board on which they are a member has no advisory function or cognizance, direct or indirect, present or prospective, with respect to the transaction in which such advisory board member engages or proposes to engage. (7) Hold himself out as representing the city in any capacity other than that for which he was appointed, elected or hired. c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 7 (8) Engage in or accept private employment or render a service when such employment or service is incompatible with the proper discharge of his or her official duties or would tend to impair his or her independent judgment in the performance of his or her official duties. (9) Make or permit the unauthorized use of city owned vehicles, equipment, materials or property. (10) Grant any special consideration, treatment or advantage to any citizen beyond that which is available to every other citizen. (11) After termination of service or employment with the city, appear before any board or commission of the city in relation to any case, proceeding or application in which he or she personally participated or which was under his or her active consideration, during the period of his or her service or employment. (12) Transact any business in his or her official capacity with the city with a business entity in which he has a substantial interest. (13) Engage in any dishonest or criminal act or any other conduct prejudicial to the government of the city or that reflects discredit upon the government of the city. (14) Knowingly perform or refuse to perform any act in order to deliberately thwart the execution of city ordinances, rules or regulations or the achievement of official city programs. B. No member of the City Council, salaried city officer or city employee shall knowingly represent, directly or indirectly, any person, group or business entity: (1) Before the City Council or any department, agency, board or commission c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 8 of the city; (2) In any action or proceeding against the interests of the city or in any litigation in which the city or any department, agency, board or commission thereof is a party; or (3) In any action or proceeding in the municipal courts of the city which was instituted by a city officer or employee in the course of his or her official duties, or a criminal proceeding in which any city officer or employee is a material witness for the prosecution. C. No member of a city board or commission shall knowingly represent, directly or indirectly, any person, group or business entity: (1) Before the City Council or the board or commission of which he or she is a member; (2) Before a board or commission which has appellate jurisdiction over the board or commission of which he or she is a member; (3) In any action or proceeding against the interests of the city or in any litigation in which the city or any department, agency, board or commission thereof is a party; or (4) In any action or proceeding in the municipal courts of the city which was instituted by a city officer or employee in the course of his or her official duties, or a criminal proceeding in which any city officer or employee is a material witness for the prosecution. D. The restrictions in this section do not prohibit the following: (1) A city employee or member of a city board or commission (other than City Council), or his or her spouse, appearing before the City Council or c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 9 a city department, agency, board or commission to represent himself or herself in a matter affecting his or her property; provided, however, that • no such person, or his or her spouse, shall appear before the board or commission of which he or she is a member; or (2) A city employee or officer of an employee organization appearing before the City Council or a city department, agency, board or commission to address employment matters. E. The restrictions in this section do not apply to business associates of officers, employees or advisory board members, but only personally to the officers, employees and advisory board members themselves. kor SECTION 4. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST A. If any city officer, employee or advisory board member has a substantial interest in a business entity or real property involved in any decision pending before such officer, employee, or advisory board member, or the body of which he or she is a member, such officer, employee, or advisory board member shall disclose such interest as provided in paragraph C below and shall not, except as provided in paragraph B below, discuss the substance of the matter at any time with any other member of the board of which he is a member or any other body which will vote on or otherwise participate in the consideration of the matter. B. If any of the following interests are involved in any decision pending before any city officer, employee, or advisory board member, or the body of which he is a c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 10 member, such officer, employee, or advisory board member must disclose such interest as provided in paragraph C below, but he shall be permitted to vote on and participate in the consideration of such matter: (1) A decision concerning a bank or other financial institution from which the officer, employee, or advisory board member has a home mortgage, automobile loan, or other installment loan, if the loan is not currently in default, was originally for a term of more than 2 years and cannot be accelerated except for failure to make payments according to the terms thereof; (2) A decision concerning a bank or other financial institution in which the officer, employee, or advisory board member holds a savings account, checking account or certificate of deposit and which is fully insured by the U.S. government or an agency thereof; (3) A decision concerning a business entity with which the officer, employee, or advisory board member has a retail or credit card account; (4) A decision concerning the approval of substitution of collateral by a city depository bank; (5) A decision concerning real property in which the officer, employee or advisory board member has a substantial interest if it is not reasonably foreseeable that such decision would have a special economic effect on the value of the property, distinguishable from the effect on the public (see Section 171.004, Texas Local Government Code). C. A city officer, employee or advisory board member shall disclose the existence firre of any substantial interest in a business entity or real property involved in any c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 1 1 decision pending before such officer, employee or advisory board member, or the Cnr body of which he is a member. To comply with this paragraph, a city officer or advisory board member shall, prior to any discussion or determination of the matter, either file and affidavit of disclosure as required by Section 171.004 of the Texas Local Government Code or, if not so required, shall publicly disclose in the official records of the body or of the city secretary the nature of the interest. To comply with this paragraph, a city employee shall notify his or her superior in writing of the nature of any substantial interest he may have in a business entity or real property which would be affected by an exercise of discretionary authority by the city employee and such superior shall assign the matter to another employee. SECTION 5. ENFORCEMENT A. The City Council shall have the primary responsibility for the enforcement of this code. The City Council may direct the city attorney to investigate or prosecute any apparent violation of the code or it may employ or appoint any qualified attorney to investigate or prosecute any violation or series of violations of this code by one or more persons. At the direction of the City Council, the city attorney shall have the power to investigate any complaint, to initiate any suit, and to prosecute any action on behalf of the city where such action is appropriate. B. Any person who believes that a violation of any portion of the code has occurred may file a complaint with the City Council who may then proceed as provided in paragraph A above. However, nothing in this code shall be construed to prevent c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 12 complainants from instituting direct legal action through the appropriate judicial authority. c c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 13 SECTION 6. ADVISORY OPINIONS A. Where any officer, employee or advisory board member has a doubt as to the applicability of any provision of this code to a particular situation, or as to the definition of terms used herein, he may apply to the city attorney for an advisory opinion. The officer, employee or advisory board member shall have the opportunity to present his or her interpretation of the facts at issue and of the applicability of provisions of the code before such advisory opinion is made. B. Until amended or revoked, any advisory opinion shall be binding on the city, the City Council, and the city attorney in any subsequent actions concerning the public officer, employee or advisory board member who sought the opinion and acted on it in good faith, unless material facts were omitted or misstated in the request for the advisory opinion. Such opinion shall not be binding in any action initiated by any private citizen. SECTION 7. PENALTIES; FORFEITED POSITION; EXEMPTIONS; INJUNCTIONS A. Except where otherwise provided by state law, it is not the intent of this code that violations thereof be subject to criminal penalties. B. Whenever the City Council has determined that any officer, employee or advisory board member has violated any provision of this code, such officer, employee or advisory board member shall be subject to discipline, including forfeiture of his or her office or position. Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to prohibit such officer, employee or advisory board member from being re-elected, c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 14 reappointed or otherwise rehired to any position forfeited under the provisions of this code. C. The City Council may exempt from the provisions of this code any conduct found to constitute a violation by an officer, employee or advisory board member if it finds that the enforcement of this code with respect to such conduct is not in the public interest. D. Any contract or transaction which was the subject of an official act or action of the city in which there is an interest prohibited by this code, or which involved the violation of a provision of this code, shall be voidable at the option of the City Council. E. At the discretion of the City Council, the city attorney shall have the power, where a violation of the provisions of this code is threatened or has occurred, to bring a civil action or proceeding, at law or in equity, for a judgment enjoining any violation of the provisions of this code or requiring the relinquishment of any prohibited interest or the voiding of any such contract or transaction, taking into account the interests of the city and any third persons who may be injured thereby. Where the City Council determines that the public interest may best be served by not voiding a contract or transaction entered into in violation of this code, such contract or transaction may be enforced and an action or proceeding may be brought against any officer, employee or advisory board member found in violation of provisions of this code for damages, not to exceed twice the damages suffered by the city or twice the profit or gain realized by the officer, employee or advisory board member, whichever is greater. L c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 15 SECTION 8. DISTRIBUTION OF CODE OF ETHICS AND CONDUCT The city clerk shall cause a copy of this code of ethics and conduct to be distributed to every officer, employee and advisory board member of the city within thirty (30) days after enactment of this code. Each officer, employee and advisory board member thereafter elected, hired or appointed shall be furnished a copy before entering upon the duties of his or her office or employment. SECTION 9. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. SECTION 10. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 16 SECTION 11. (kw The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. SECTION 12. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING ON THIS DAY OF , 199 . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED ON SECOND READING ON THIS DAY OF , 199 . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 17 tier APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: City Attorney Date: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: c:\wp51\ord&res\ethics.635/kb 18 z cL o 00 m cr Uu 0 v) U u o X a- Lz c� w Wm (2: Z Z 0 C) cr cr ct (1; ct� X a r-L 10 U U cr Ld W o cr 0 0 f_ cr cr a- CL F-- Lz Lz Li w II Ld -j m Ct cr a11 CE LZ co ID CK5 0 0 O C 0 C6 ID z z a- 0 0 z 0 V, 0 X m X CL CL 0, .0 Z _z CD CL CL z 2 J 1 Cn 00 0,0(p z 0z 00 ey cr m 0 V) ci U LU w o CL Lr Lz LI: L,j Z C, Ld L'i 0 cr. m 0 a_ APPROVED PRELIMINARYl_,� PRELIMINARY rI rj r TIMAR L ANQ_J CORPORA T40W (VOL. 9a,13, PG. 2375 L -,-Gp` COURSE ZONED P.U.. 4�80 qjB' ff V TIMARRON LAND�,! `A/TION VO t'PG. 1002 FUTURE RLIDENTIAL..__- APPROVED FINALPLAT ,�` f ZONED P.U.D. �80-0�B TIMARRON ADD114ON 3 LA ND unr� TIMARRON /A I J12A I I Ul'% GLENDOVER PHASL"2 VOL. 9813, PG. 2375 ZONED P.U.D. 480-016 APPROX. LIMITS z -_TIUT-U�Rt POINT 6F 100 YR FLOODIP AIN/FLOqp*AY <? � )INGRESS/EGR EtS z. L 1:, -0', A V541-'A? A C HALL JN0b*22'I9_'W• " %7K3 T cj VA W1 -J Q7 I/ C. E Ir- _j (0 LOCK 7 6- APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT I . I eo 10 Cb Uj 10 1 1 \,,e\n TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION 2 VOL. 9813, PG. 2375 LOCATION MAP rnt c, rAHOr-C' N.T.S. _0_ AC/ 82' 1.53 AC/ �s 4 ZONED P.U.D. 480-OIB Ln 61 71 3' 01 0- 5 �k 45 tn 5 -,b 4 ti- 44 50, 51, 46 5 G, 46 36 4 9 'APPROVED PRELIMINARY` PLAT 47 Af,::-o . Ln NO- 58' lo r8 Ili cli TIMARRON LAND CORR6RATION," I I Zo 12 Zn 13 �n 7 nl 14 42 � - L - VOL.. 9813, PG. 275 48 zn 15 Pw- /5 0 /**1 %J . A= 31*08'52- % \< 1 9 /16 , 1-1 1-1 GOLF COURSE 1-16 - R= 160.00' ss, 9 ZONED P.U.D.,180-010' 51, 54' 49' 1 T= 44.59' A= 18*54'54 110e, C.G.38 60, L 86.98, R= 440.00' 0.50 AC n 59' 84, 1- N 10 1 scp- N T= 73.30' A 19-37'4 40 18 � # S4 7 * 20'29OW L= 145.26 2.OQ' 01 R= 282.00 BOCK 33 N, 70.00' 'Ns, 39 Zo 1 19 0) 15 14 a 38 �n 37 �C2 0 D 9 36 It - L b. jj 11 12 C.G.37 .37 N42* 35 1je 39'31OW 16 20- N, 0.25 AC �S,88 5 7'21-E 70.00' 4n, 34 09, - -T 13 60.00' 21 17 60' N47'20'29'E 4�q 60 33 22 ".0 14 32 60.00, r C.G.40 Nk L 18 029 A 41 12 6 Q IX9 60, 117' 1V1 i'49,j P.O.B. 19 40 51BE 31 1 So, to*", Gx 17 /S,� 0 18 4 Sol 02'39 ON ADDITION % IN, N, TIMARfR J: 20 1 25 10 21 �n 0.09 AC 22 2 3 �,Vl 30 TIMARRON AND CORPORATION /00, 32.07' 1 16 10 0- 136 NDOVER _j C9 az 26 Fj M 1_ 29 .G.41 VOL.' .13, PG. 2375 /_67 28 �n 15 _j 85' 62' 0.06 AC,,, ZONED PiU-G- 480-OIB CO 9 VpoQ A= 44-09*39- co 195, �% 28 04 V, CAB.,, ,!,'SLIDE 1709 il _j Z. 33 19, 0 j R= 360.0 11.193 24 14 5 T= 146.03' 8 L �Ak, 30 L= 277.47' 'fo \rA! '0, 13 -0, 7 VARIABLE 4 WIDTH DE 100 25,_ p. 12 6 2-,7,-- 32 7 6CL- 15'33'470 0, &a 3 N64*17'045E ?A& 43 BLOCK 39 ry N. '41 31. All 'C.G.45 cot.s. R= 240.00' v 1.00 AC 38.41' SO, 5 LRIA 33 8 T= 32.80' -Z WIDTH DE 10 L 6 5.19' 0.08 AC G.4 G.4 2 q' U, t)z- 72' L ."I- �� A.' CD 70' 44' 64' 4 9! 70' 9 APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT 165_� - - �j �* O)OK 70' 70' 77' /AQ A\ 151 s TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION6 NOTES: �n% ti I. COMMON GREENS ARE DENOTED AS -C.G. 37, C.G. 38. ETC.'. COMMON GREENS ARE PRIVATE GOLF COURSE ;�, i. I VOL. 9813, PG. 2375 3 1 ut\25 10 OPEN SPACES DEDICATED TO AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. 33 0, Li 37 ZONED P.U.D. 480-OIB \j I 2 L 38 125' 36 35 34 2. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN THIS PLATTED AREA SHALL BE REMOVED. 2 L, 4K \V U, I 7 N� 6% %3.A HYDRAULIC STUDY HAS BEEN PREPARED BY CARTER & BURGESS, INC., FOR THE BIG BEAR V/- QI CREEK TRIBUTARY, AND SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE. FLOODPLAIN LIMITS AND It I - ♦ .11 .., 6 15'BL 3' 00'12'497; E 'c 1 3 VARIABLE (P RECLAMATION SHOWN ARE BASED ON THIS STUDY. WHICH UTILIZES ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT i36' 70' 7CF 0% WIDTH DE 70.00"�, APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT FLOWS FOR THE TRIBUTARY. -A 12 TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION C.G.43 4.MINIMUM FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS WILL BE ESTABLISHED FOR ALL LOTS ADJACENT TO 4 20'EMERGENCY FLOODPLAIN DRAINAGE CHANNELS BASED ON THE HYDRAULIC STUDY PREPARED FOR BIG BEAR VOL. 9813, PG. 2375 -0, % 5 ACCESS E 70' J 13 CREEK AND THE BB-6 TRIBUTARY. 70' o 5 _j c 70' GOLF COURSE -,77� - - - -OIB 5. ALL LOT DIMENSIONS AND BUILDING SETBACK LINES SHALL MEET THE DEVELOPMENT tZ 30 ro ZONED P.L.I.D. 480 C6 -cl 3 kN 5 0.52 AC 14 REGULATIONS AS APPROVED IN P.U.D. ORDINANCE 480-OIB,AND/OR AS A PART OF OF THE ib 1S1&z DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL. /N ` 7 18 Ln c� 15 6. THIS PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING PROPERTY ARE ZONED TO P.U.D. 480-0113. �n ?9 17 0 20 19 2 &1 01 rn 7. DRIVEWAY ACCESS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED ON STREET 'A'. A 00 Ld rc; 8 I TING- SANITARY ------ �N 28 0: %% DALLAS/FT.WORTH ,REGIONAL AIRPORT 3� 0 1010 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1"=IOO' 7,45 --- OT- -2W- 138' D� �,5j;- S�_ <§7 BLOCK 382'D&LIE �O LO --i 7 6 60 5 io < 4 o_n 3 2 cl 01 R I A B L E DTH DE 236, 8 1,.44 -r -5(TL §01j F -Sir -65' r-r% ;0j 3 1, 11 1 9 -T _2102� 78' BE ABANDONED _v 63 _7v LO APPROX. LIMITS . .... -SOI-11'0E 493.0 27 10 _,,,,-'I0O YR FLOODWAY U-MS'.TINC SANI%i- *FWER E T x PNI C. 100 YR FLOODPLAIN '_1 ASEMEN' 26 11 0. APPROX LIMITS 01 9955. PC. �m P'T ENT Yr, 12 995'-, 25 U.U.14 1 GOLF VILLAS N v, 13 0.60 AC METES AND BOUNDS A �*rj r, 24 BEING A 48.072 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE HOLLINGSWORTH & BARNETT -0 m 0-\ SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 797, AND THE M.W. DAVENPORT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 432, m v CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING OUT OF THAT CERTAIN 01 N APPROVED PRELIMINARY P T TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION AS RECORDED Ar, OF 14 f10N IN VOLUME 9813, PAGE 2375 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. TIMARRON LAND CORPORA 23 124' VOL. 9813, PG. 237$ SAID 48.072 ACRE TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND 77, _p BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: GOLF COURSE 5'UE--J .................. i ) `� BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF BYRON NELSON PARKWAY, SAID POINT BEING 22 4 A 15 ZONED P.U.D. 480-OIB S 88'57'21'W. A DISTANCE OF 181.25 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT I. BLOCK 20 GLENDOVER TODD U.JANSSEN"T �u ............ 1� ............. ADDITION. AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE AS SHOWN ON FINAL PLAT RECORDED IN CABINET A. THENCE N 29'34'25' W, A DISTANCE OF 260.00 FEET; APPROVED RELIMINARY PLAT (j SLIDE 1709, PLAT RECORDS TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS.• 0. 79416 :'q. 18 qw 21 16) �q I THENCE N 47'20'29' E, A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; TIMARRON AND CORPORATION 16 THENCE S 01*02'39' W. A DISTANCE OF 32.07 FEET; ST.. 20 &1 19 n 17 THENCE N 42*39'31-W.A DISTANCE OF 70.00 URAL V 13, PG.1)2375 A Uj L� FEET; co 10 i�, THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 360.00 FEET,A DELTA ANGLE OF 44 09'39"A COURSE �n LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S 21'02'10' E A DISTANCE OF 270.65 FEET. AN ARC DISTANCE OF 277.47 FEET; THENCE S 47'20'29' W, A DISTANCE OF 70.00 FEET; 7-OVED, •U.D. 480-OIB 114' 50' 2 THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 240.00 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE OF 15-33,47% A THENCE N 59'48'24' W. A DISTANCE OF 535.00 FEET; 151' I% LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S 35*20'06' E A DISTANCE OF 64.99 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 65.19 FEET; tOl-27'56mW 491.68' THENCE S 43*50'49' E. A DISTANCE OF 644.82 FEET; THENCE N 00*22'19' W. A DISTANCE OF 1034.89 FEET; THENCE N 55*54*42' E, A DISTANCE OF 198.58 FEET; i 1 i r THENCE S 24'33'13' E. A DISTANCE OF 266.26 FEET; , THENCE S 01'11'12' E. A DISTANCE OF 493.08 FEET; THENCE N 33*30'08' E. A DISTANCE OF 468.62 FEET; V THENCE S 12*38'28' W. A DISTANCE OF 235.04 FEET; THENCE N 24*05'18' E. A DISTANCE OF 190.79 FEET; THENCE N 11'49'30" E. A DISTANCE OF 102.18 FEET; ANTICIPATED NUMBER OF GROSS NUMBER OF COMMON PERCENT PHASE COMPLETION ZONING LAND USE RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY- COMMON AREA OPEN DATE LOTS AREAS ACREAGE SPACE (D.U./ACRE) GOLF VILLAS JAN 1996 PD 480-OIB RESIDENTIAL 170 48.07 3.53 10 4.92 10.2 RESIDENTIAL 978 502.28 62.60 CUMULATIVE CLUBHOUSE (PD-C3 USES) - - - 12.61 PROJECT -TO -DATE PD 480-OIB GOLF COURSE - - - 148.73 148.73 TOTAL 1 978 1 663.62 1 1.47 1 46 1 211.33 1 31.8 THENCE S 49 52 15 W. A DISTANCE OF 312.76 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 160.00 FEET. A DELTA ANGLE OF 31'08'541, A THENCE S 40'28'10' W. A DISTANCE OF 524.70 FEET; LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N 27*32'33' W A DISTANCE OF 85.92 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 86.98 FEET; CIRF CAPPED IRON ROD FOUND THENCE S 42'39'31' E. A DISTANCE OF 277.95 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 440.00 FEET, A DELTA ANGLE OF 18-54,54-, A CIRS CAPPED IRON ROD SET THENCE N 64'17'04' E. A DISTANCE OF 38.41 FEET; LONG CHORD THAT BEARS N 33*39'33' W A DISTANCE OF 144.60 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 145.26 FEET; # STREET CHANGE THENCE N 45'12'02' E. A DISTANCE OF 771.43 FEET; THENCE S 53'13*26' W. A DISTANCE OF 138.70 FEET; UE UTILITY EASEMENT THENCE S 86*32'46- E. A DISTANCE OF 232.44 FEET; THENCE N 17'38'51' W. A DISTANCE OF 184.93 FEET; DE DRAINAGE EASEMENT THENCE S 01'27'56- W. A DISTANCE OF 491.68FEET; THENCE N 20*40'29' E. A DISTANCE OF 155.00 FEET; C.G. COMMON GREEN THENCE S 68'13'37- W. A DISTANCE OF 741.42 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS LONG CHORD THAT BEARS S 79*08'29* E A DISTANCE OF OF 282.00 FEET. A DELTA ANGLE 96.14 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF OF 19,37,441. A 96.61 FEET; BL BUILDING LINE THENCE S 00'12'49' E A DISTANCE OF 70.00 FEET; *INCLUDES ALL PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLATTED PROPERTY WITHIN TIMARRON. THENCE S 88*57'21' E. A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AND CONTAINING THENCE N 59'36'08' W, A DISTANCE OF 190.00 FEET; 48.072 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS. REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT OF :j TIMARRON ADDITION GOLF VILLAS A AND B OUT OF THE HOLLINGSWORTH & BARNETT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 797, M.W.DAVENPORT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.432 IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS 48.07 ACRES/ 170 LOTS/ 10 COMMON GREENS THIS PLAN INCLUDES A REVISION OF THE 10.4 ACRES DESIGNATED AS PRODUCT TYPE ODO OF THE PREVIOUS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS APPROVED ON MAY 19,1992. OWNER/DEVELOPER: TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION 300 E CARPENTER FREEWAY, SUITE 1425 IRVING, TEXAS 75062 (214) 791-3333 ENGINEER /SURVEYOR: CARTER & BURGESS, INC, 7950 ELMBROOK DRIVE, SUITE 250 ��Tl DALLAS, TEXAS 75247 (214) 638-0145 2�'0 JANUARY, 1995 CASE NO. ZA 95-12 C&B JOB# 94318901D 3C -F�" P,-R QL �CZ LLI <1 13 Q M E- F1 3 J.J. FRESHOUR SUR 4-521 Jjx. ALLEN SUR 14-18 K.I.S.D. V. 5641 Pg. 499 ZONED: CS LU.D. — PUBLIC/SEMI—PUBLIC 2 29 GARY HOOPER. V. 10770, Pg. 1995 ZONED: MH L.U.D. — ME.D.UEN.RES. 20' B.L. LOT 1 LOT 2 Owner: 300 TIMBER TRAILS SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 RANDY PIERCE V. 8445. Pg. 57 ZONED: MH L.U.D. — MED.DEN.RES W tJ I JOHNSON RO 20' B.L. LOT 1 P. E. SMITH V. 6481 Pg. 15 ZONED: AG L_U.D. — LOW DEN.RES i 4yv.y P(e rFloper: T-D0R�o j� OW 0% CD DMI M A -7 0 M a DM=- 5215 NORTH O'CONNOR, SUITE 200 IRVING, TEXAS 75035 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE V. 9145, Pg 46 ZONED: CS L.U.D. — PUBLIC/SEMI—PUBLIC GEORGE L AUSHLEY V. 5431 Pg. 63 ZONED: AG L.U.D. — LOW DEN.RES. Planner: ENGINEERS - PLANNERS 726 COMMERCE STREET SUITE 104 SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS 76092 (817) 488-3313 a FLORENCE ROAD Q 0= H Q H fN 4i > > Q W JOHNSON ROAD U � Z W Z W W J =_j O 0 W a O W Q 0 4 Z FM 1709 W. SOUTHLAKE LOCATION MAP DESCRIPTION FOR A 18.03 AC. TRACT A tract in the J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, loacted in Tarrant County, and embracing a portion of the (called) 19 acre tract described in the deed to Royal E. Smith, Jr., recorded as Tract 1 in Vol. 4077, Pg. 427 of the Tarrant County Deed Records and described as follows: BEGINNING at a point In the north right—of—way line of Johnson Road, said point being 3167.5 feet West of and 15 feet North of the Southeast Comer of the said Freshour Survey, THENCE West along the north right—of—way line of Johnson road, 490.9 feet to an 'X' set in concrete; THENCE North leaving said north ringt—of—way, 168.39 feet to a 5/8 inch Iron pin set for corner; THENCE East 163.7 feet to a 5/8 iron pin set in the west line of sald Smith tract and also being in the east line of Vista Trails Addition recorded in Vol. 388-95, Pg. 3, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas; THENCE North along the east line of said Vista Trails Addition, 1069.41 feet to a 1 /2 iron pin found at the Northwest corner of said Smith tract; THENCE North 89' 14 minutes 21 seconds East along the north line of said Smith tract 655 feet to a 1 /2 inch iron pin found for comer; THENCE South 00' 00 minute 56 seconds West along the East line of said Smith tract, passing a 1 inch iron pin found at 1,220 feet, in all 1,246.50 feet to the Place of Beginning and containing 18.03 Acres of land. LAND USE DATA TOTAL NO. DWELL NET RES. GROSS UNITS DENSITY ACREAGE SINGLE 29 1.6 du/ac 18.0 FAMILY DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE START — JUNE. 1995 COMPLETION — AUGUST, 1995 GENERAL NOTES: 1. Minimum lot size = 20,000 square feet. 2. Front Building Line = 35 feet. 3. All utilities shall be underground. 4. No driveway access from rear/side of lots to Timber Trails and/or Johnson Road. J.J. FRESHOUR SUR A-521 J.Cs. ALLEN SUR. A-18 CONCEPT PLAN for RIDGEWOOD 11 AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS in the J.J. FRESHOUR SURVEY, A-521 PRESENT ZONING: AG PROPOSED ZONING: SF-20A L.U.D. — MED. DEN. RES. 18.03 ACRES 29 LOTS" 7.r'-., 27 FEBRUARY 1995 " FEB 2 71995 CASE NO. ZA 95-09 Z 0 a / Z 0 Ir F- N F- U w 0 CL CL LL LLI Z z 00 J a a N N U M O X J X Z C7 O Z a J a Z N C) N O M a / c O U n O N J N � M M f- O / / Z Z O O fr K Q Q N N f- f- U u LaJ L11 00 Q LY a a Li li Li LL 0a W 0 M N O t` M N p� V N N ~ N z z 0 0 Z J J a a CO00 M X I"1 X L N Z Z h (-) CD �31 p O ,- ? Q Q a J a a O V5i M M V N z Z Li. ooa_ m m a as ME m N J / / W vH U U 0 0 0 o a K m a a °0 r L� LL / m II li � J �a:a 0- co 0 O 0 0 o u lf1 M m � N H 16 n, O II II Ll cr a II Z J O a n T J M L c7 X W d . J a In M 00 Z Z 0 U O p 00 � p lb J a d m a ro / 11 M l� cl / M / O a, M M M M Q C, P n Z Z z 0 0 0 cr i a a a / n N H F- N F- f- � U N Lal W W O oo�i a cL a w Li Z O Lal Lac J ix ¢ 0 a APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION VOL. 9813, PG. 2375 GOLF COURSE -' ZONED P.U.D.480-OIB L.U.D.-MEDIUM DENSITY , RESIDENTIAL / F / G7} GOLF VILLA B APPROX. LIMITS 100 YR FLOODPLAIN/FLOODWAY APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION / yy VOL. 9813, PG. 2375 �yy GOLF COURSE W W y y TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION VOL. 9813, PG. 1082 FUTURE RESIDENTIAL ZONED P.U.D.480-OIB L.U.D.-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL /y .L y .1: y 1. .L Jr J: \ 2t'D&UE .L. .#. .I. .L, y,/ - y .I. .t. y \ h�� 15'BL .L. S ZONED P.U.D. 480-01B y y W W 4- y/ L..U.D.-MEDIUM DENSITY yq, 4, 4"s/' RESIDENTIAL y y y y I COMMON GREEN I y yyy y IJ .D% y _'t •� Jr L, y y J: / it I l;I 2$i i,. i APPROVED FINAL PLAT TIMARRON ADDITION TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION GLENDOVER -,P HASE 2 VOL. 9813, PG. 2375 ZONED P■U.D.480-OIB L.U.D.-MEDIUM DENSITY I 25•0& E APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT'° Im o� TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION " 0 a HIGHLAND STREET 41 J 0 0 Z w oL" a & o bq SOUTHLAKE BLVD FM 1709 SPUR 382 In J g a Y S m i CONTINENTAL B VD BEAp C < •,• •,• ReFk O J co JOHN McCAIN ROAD • DALLAS/FT.WORTH REGIONAL AIRPORT GRAPEVINE � (V PROJECT •''. a/L`O SITE LA ••.� a J COLL VILLE w Io \ .5 VOL. 9813, PG. 2375 LOCATION MAP GOLF COURSE \ F RSE \, / ZONED P.U.D.480-OIB N.T.S. PEDESTRIAN �' �Se4 L.U.D.-MEDIUM DENSITY ' I WALKWAY RESIDENTIAL COMMON GREEN - - - - -- - \ \ IN , 0 100 200 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET r=100, \ZA•9 W y y �55029•F /� A : 31'08'52. N`�•38"� yyyyyy yyyyyy�Wy ' POINT OF. INGRESS - / �s- / \ \ `' \ �• R 160.00' � \ T \ \'SB \ F\ T= 44.59 A= 18'54 54 P y /J■ J. Jr J. J: / �- -- \ \ �!� //�� \� \ \ ' L- 86.98' R= 730300, .v�, .t` \y y y y W y y y y y A = 19. 3744■ S47'20'29'W ,P� yy�y yy•yyy �' \ T e \ L- 145.26 /�■ y y W y y II /� a /\ Wyy yyyyyy y y Lyyyyy �. z__4Z�270 '. 70.00' � y y� y y y so ' \ \ \ ' • _ J l s \ \ V y y y y y y y y • I h II �. �5' DE \ \ / /S Dy \ \ \ \ \ • �OcJ"• \.� y y y y y �I, y y J: y L 96 61' `Y V \ y W may... / ■ J.I J. .l• .I. .L J: J. J. �Y .L / N42 39 N VI y 0� \ / \ l \ 70.00' yyyy�yyyWyWyyy '\`' -- ---- / \` ` \\ \ SS8'.0 , E y .L .Y J. J. .L J, ♦ ■ ` �" V M 60.00/ c� ' N47.20'29'E y m /y m y y h� \ .�, - \ �� \ \ \ \ ♦♦♦♦ y y y �. 9oUs,8• Q . POINT OF�GRESS ' y \ \ PEDESTRIAN \ \ \ ♦♦ y\y y� . �9, 60.00 B _ 11 WALKWAY \ \\ \ \ �o`V \ \��,♦ y y y y y y y y \ y\ N' 1' Iy k N \ y �. y y y o \ o ♦ 49 . COMMON GREEN -- C /yyyy / \'sL1--IJ'BL - \ \ `' ♦ , �NIINI u �02.1$0 E -� TIMARIR'OV ADDITION ' y / 'S� \ %04, \ \ ♦♦ g HIGH ` ,' B\ `' / �. \ 's� ♦ SCREEN FENCE s'y�G �- � S01'02'39'w _ TIMARRON LAAID CORPORATION O N 32.07' GLENDOVER g--- ___ t MF M - N „�u �� - VOL. 9$I; , PG. 2375 `� c,�' y y "/ \ \ \ \ ` \ � o � / se \ RFFT \ \ ♦♦� �MASONRYI y MST q NT�j�i v N �, g1• y \ \ J l� \ �� \ \ ♦♦ / y It FE q� M� m _. ZONED I P .D. 480-OIB \ ♦ / � y NC PEDESTRIAN P - �P y yyW �W /yyyy ,��h \ \ \ /� \ \ ♦♦/ yy so_ \ E y/ A_ ooh CA6.', ,SLIDE 1709 AllR= 360.00 y 1 \ \ ,o \ \ ♦�/ ,p , WALKWAY 44 09 39 N . z ��- L.U.D.-M IUM DENSITY m y yj I ENTIAL s _ . - ►n BLOCKS • (,�O J. .I: J: J. y , y y \ } \ \ O. 1r' .A. ,.... ., s T = 146.03 .., a ... "' I, y y y y PEDESTRIAN \ �,� �, \ I \ \�1.,..., �o/' �`Gt / / L- 277.47 ---s _ - R- P WALKWAYft `\ _ . �'� � � I .L y .L J. .10 60 v 'iA' \ \ o. / , / A= 15' 33'47' �e a N64.17'04'E s29 \ F� \ \ y y W s s / R= 240.00' y 41 38.41' •%- VARIABLE / T = 32.80' " I; h�O� y y y y y y \ F y y L- 65 I9' �' y y Ny y y w y y ' , APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT` , \'s- WIDTH DE - tl. yyyyyyyyyy tyyyyy y y TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION y y -�- - - - - - - - - VOL. 9813, PG. 2375 •� ' ' I 1 GOLF COURSE \�. 's \\ �yyy (bti \ \ ZONED P.U.D. 480-OIB \ yy�y �` o' \ `,a�i ``/`Q'� / / ((__aa• eye,. I yp�I 1 L.U.D.-MEDIUM DENSITY / \\ \s RESIDENTIAL ` , . yyy Isles �\ ��,'�;� COMMON GREEIVy �. I ` / �\ ------ -15'BL .� / / Oa{ S00'12'49'E \ \ \ ,s y�61yy / �-- - - s / h APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT 70.00 \ v // �� yWIDTWDE, y s � � / a TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION ' 9• 1 y y y y o PEDESTRIAN / i VOL. 9813, PG. 2375 a / 131. / \ s�/ ho y -�W / 1 \ \`•"., /his 20' EMERGENCY WALKWAY o GOLF COURSE � ;. y yyy0y y ACCESS - - - - - - - _ - �y'eL 1/ ZONED P.U.D. 480-OIB \ \ \\ \\4'v / L.U.D.-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL p / w - - _ 6626 DATE REVISION MADE CKD. APPD. 13 y y - w,,-- GOLF VILLA B 493.8$ - \ oyyyyyWyyyyy r\ Y�Ij / �:.._ f REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN �/� `= q7g IS T�f k,. SAI`,I TAR , / APPROX LIMITS t �� V • y J. y y W J. y y y y -J\ \ i .}k' 4i '.'� Y �."..%f r• N ; \ n c .Q JV „ 8 G. d. 100 YR FLOODPLAIN APPROX. LIMtT�\ �` y y s i L. 9� 55, = G. 3 100 YR FLOODWAY, TIMARRON ADDITION -41 $1=/-n"" ¢.�;;"".°:., \ `.; �\ yyy yy�.yy�y yyyy �- GOLF VILLAS A AND R -°�����%` ,'`` < y y y y y y \� ��y,'APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT COMMON GREEN + .L. 1-1 ' \t I .• \ \ y y y y 1.01 1 � im TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION OUT OF.THE \v 'ax \ .I. y .I. APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT \\ --- - TIMARRON SAND CORPORATION °9. MEMO VOL. 9813, PG. 2375 GOLF COURSE \ / ZONED, P.U.D. 480-OIBLn L.U.D.-MEDIUM DENSITY \, ✓ RESIDENTIAL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ /// t0l•27'56'w 491.68' - - - - cy Rlo�r,, 1 �COMMON GREEN66L F VI LEA A q f eh I u 1,: , I N ; VOL. 9813, PG. 2375 '11 NOTES: HOLLINGSWORTH & BARNETT SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 797, I N 5'UE� i I I GOLF COURSE ZONED P.U.D. 480-OIB �,\ I. EXISTING ZONING: RESIDENTIAL P.U.D. 480-OIB M.W. DAVENPORT SURVEY, ABSTRACT N0. 432 I I �� L.U.D.-MEDIUM DENSITY IN THE �, 1 Q + RESIDENTIAL 11\ 2. ALL BUILDING SETBACK LINES SHALL BE PER THE DEVELOPMENT CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS I I N I , REGULATIONS ATTACHED TO THIS SUBMITTAL. , I � I `, 3. DRIVEWAY ACCESS WILL NOT BE ALLOVWED ON STREET 'A'. 48.07 ACRES/ 170 LOTS/ 10 COMMON GREENS ,• ----------- '\ SUMMARY THIS PLAN INCLUDES A REVISION OF THE 10.4 ACRES DESIGNATED AS PRODUCT TYPE 'D' OF THE PREVIOUS PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT A, B-RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND ROADWAYS 89.77% 43.15 ACRES PLAN AS APPROVED ON MAY 19, 1992. C-COMMON GREEN 10.23% 4.92 ACRES I ' I I 1 I I I 1 I I r J°• ' ANTICIPATED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIALGROSS NUMBER OF COMMON PERCENT PHASE COMPLETION ZONING LAND USE RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE DENSITY COMMON AREA OPEN DATE LOTS (D.U./ACRE) AREAS ACREAGE SPACE GOLF VILLAS FALL 1995 PD 480-OIB RESIDENTIAL 170 48.07 3.53 10 4.92 10.2 RESIDENTIAL 978 502.28 62.60 CLUBHOUSE - - - 12.61 *CUMULATIVE PROJECT -TO -DATE PD 480-OIB (PD-C3 USES) GOLF COURSE - - - 148.73 148.73 TOTAL 978 663.62 1.47 46 211.33 31.8 *INCLUDES ALL PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLATTED PROPERTY WITHIN TIMARRON. TOTAL 100% 48.07 ACRES OWNER/DEVELOPER: TIMARRON LAND CORPORATION 300 E CARPENTER FREEWAY, SUITE 1425 THE MAXIMUM VILLAS A AND GROSS DENSITY OF RESIDENTIAL B. INCLUDING COMMON GREENS IS USES WITHIN 3.53 DU/AC. ��F ��• °•�fxo IRVING, TEXAS 75062 L.U.D. - LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM CITY MASTER PLAN �;::'•'-�'R* ................ TODD Y. (214) 791-3333 JAi&E� 7941g41b....t """ 't ENGINEER: CARTER & BURGESS ` 199 ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT / 7950 ELMBROOK DRIVE, SUITE 2 FEB 7 z OVAL - DALLAS, TEXAS 75247 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION END CONSTRUCTION GOLF VILLAS SPRING, 1995 FALL, 1995 (214) 638-0145 JANUARY, 1995 CASE NO. ZA 95-11 C&B JOB* 94318901D ED] 10. ao U I � 4 I a � C45I Q Q 99�� ON h as ti G!► 4 d � BLOCK 2 1 5 U.E. 5' U.E. �� �I I. w wl in i ,., .��� ,-YEAR ULTIMATE FLIOODWAY = ! EASEMENT DII !I I1N ,, �t5 ti0�e's� �ti P�6 S 9 v yo �P �� � ZONED: SF -IA A3STRACT 97 D.T. BAILY SURVEY P.J.HYDE SURVEY ABSTTRACT 667 SOUTHLAKE BOULEVARD PROJECT LOCATION PINE PINE CT ACRES LILAC J d Q S U w 3 CONTINENTAL BOULEVARD VICINITY MAP NTS �S titi1P 0) G� o1vOti SCALE : I' - 100' rD 0 1 1 I S U BEQINNINQ /4" IPF S 89'IPS 13'00' E 390.00' S 88°55'09' - I/ - - 211.62' ui ( IS' U.E. ZONING CURRENT: AG 5' UE - >4 PROPOSED: SF -IA F75' .E. ? ® �••'"' � � GA LOT 2 ! .3 / � `�- APPROX. LOCAN E 5.199 ACRES 1� titi sn �' OF TREE 1i '3• 't COMMON AREA No. I M x y COVER 226,480 SQ. FT. 45e' �Z6 G• DRAINAGE EASEMENT v v a a �Oy• 94� L \�`f i Z �9 S t F _ �yOG� � = PS � 55 Z O N E D : PUG Sig 1 53 F 1 20' G.E_ ®I m 56 ,tt GA 4 m a I ° - - 52 � V�oa !. 20 uE c„ 10' U.E. J I Z `. j E' ;� 57 0 51 I � 1 I 10' U.E. J S 8 POINT OF i� SUE __::: __ _� __ � �_ . N 89°07'15' W 4t'A� 1Ot" P�9X� e► o o get t�ti6 19$ �$44';� g� G� . 4• ZONED: AG 50-1 - 5' U.E. 4G BUILDING LINE �44� E _ 928.53' I I 5 U.E �L"��- ~^^--��J I/2' IPS 5' U.E. i 674.5- APPRox. 42.3 �� sr`T ZONED: AG `� LOCATION ROW DEDICATION g OC TEAR 0.302 Acres OR053 9.494 ACRES 13.149 S0. FT. k) IIn R.O.W. DEDICATION 0.302 ACRES ^ -� NET 9.192 ACRES ( M APPROX. LOCATION LOT I OF MEE 40-00, IN XPPROX. covER J 3.993 ACRES S 89°07'15- E I w o 13 ( $yOGy 4ti�'�y1 173,923 SQ. FT. A6`. APPROX. j �?�°V ti00 LOCATION �Rh�, 8 e I 1't4' ��� G' OF TREE OF TREE EMERGENCY O �� Oy• �• COVER S 89°07•6-, 1 COVER ACCESS ESMT. 4762f - a 'z .1 111 f v U) 277.01' 4 0 Y- — EMERGENCv l I j S UE. ACCESS ESMT ------5' _UE -- -- 1319AI I�2 � I i al I - �► tie► a C5 0 jto 4a. pq W ti 4•t aid L O 4 d I tk H ( ZONED: RE NAIL SET ZONED: RE ZONED: RE OWNED/DEVELOPED BY: WH LILHAM (CASi�II�IR 1381 LAIKEVI EW DRIVE SONTI�I[ILAK E, TEXAS 76092 (817) 481-2526 O v PREPARED BY: GOODWMI �jjlARSHALL'1 COVI C��l®0NEERS - Pt>,.t�WERS - SURVEYORS 6001 Bridge Street. Suite 100. Fort Worth Texas 76112 Metro (81 7) 429- 4373 STATE OF TEXAS: COUNTY OF TARRANT: BEING a tract of land m the H. Granberry Survey. Abstract No. 581. situated in the City of Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas and being that some tract of land as described in deed to William A. Cosner and wife. Susan B. Cosner. recorded in Vol. 7263. Pg. 1943 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County. Texas and being more particularly described as follows, BEGINNING at a 3/4- iron pin found at the Northwest corner of said Cosner tract. same being the Southwest corner of Lot 5 of the H. Granberry No. 581 Addition. an addition to the City of Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas. according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 1976. of the Plot Records of Tarrant County. Texas. said point lying in the East line of the Plat Revision of Timber Lake. Section 1. an addition to the City of Southlake . Tarrant County. Texas. according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 1215. of the Plat Records of Tarrant County. Texas: THENCE S 89013*00` E. along the south line of said Lot 5. 390.00 feet to a 1/2' iron pin set: THENCE S 88055*09- E. continuing along the south line of said Lot 5. at 886.14 feet passing a 1/2` iron pin set at the dedicated southeast corner of said Lot 5. continuing a total distance of "928.53 feet to a PK- nail set in asphalt pavement at the northeast corner of said Cosner tract. said point lying in the centerline of South White Chapel Boulevard (County Road No. 3016. R.O.W. Varies): THENCE S 00029'28" W. along the centerline of said South White Chapel Boulevard. 311.58 feet to a -PK- nail set in asphalt pavement at the southeast corner of said Cosner tract: THENCE N 8900-7'15- W. departing the centerline of said South White Chapel Boulevard. at 42.00 feet passing a 1/2- iron Pin set at the dedicated Northeast corner of the Amended Plat of Lot 2R. of the HGranberry No. 581 Addition. an addition to the City of Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas. according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 1326. of the Plot Records of Tarrant County. Texas. continuing along the North line of said Lot 2R a total distance of 1319.01 feet to a 1/2- iron pin set at the corner common to the Southwest corner of said Cosner tract and the Northwest corner of said Lot 2R. said point lying in the East line of Timber Lake, Phases 3 & 4. an addition to the City of Southlake. Tarrant County. Texas. according to the plat thereof recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 1787. of the Plat Records of Tarrant County. Texas: THENCE N 00035'02- E. along the East line of said Timber Lake. Phases 3 & 4 and the East line of the aforementioned Plat Revision of Timber Lake. Section 1. 314.19 feet to the POINT of BEGINNING and containing 413.552 square feet or 9.494 acres of land. APPROVED: . 1995 - Planning oning ommission BY: Chairman APPROVED: I995 City otmc M. Mayor BY: City Secretary PRELIMINARY PLAT LOT ¶ j� jj OF �j (� ¶ L® 11 I Cam+ LOT 29 BL®`LK 2 OF THE I UIRNS I OII)�TII BS AIIDIIDII'l HON AN ADDITION TO TIME C�= OF BOUT HIILAK E, TARRANT CO�JNT Y, TEXAS AND BEING 9.494 ACRES OF LAND IN THE H. GRANBERRY SURVEY, ABSTRACT No. 581 TARRANT COUNTY, 'TEXAS JANUARY 1995 � Z 71995 CASE No. ZA 95-13