The URL can be used to link to this page

1986-01-21 CC PacketAL :► *A*® 7101 WHITLEY ROAD * WATAUGA, TEXAS 76148 * (817) 281-8047 Januatcy 20, 1986 M-s . Sandy L eGtcand City o6 Svuthtake 667 N. Caty ott South.eake, Texas 76092 RE: Invitation- to Bid /4oA Mictco4itm System M,s . L eGtca nd : The City o6 Watauga tcezpect4utty zubmitz a bid 4otc the micto�i2m system o�6ened. It iz undekztood that the equipment to be included in thin 5y,6tem iz ass Uottowz: Be22 9 Howe22 Fite Maztetc Cametca, Beat 8 Howett Jacket Readetc-P,i. tvL, Bett 9 Howett Jacket PAintvL and Beat 9 Howett Ptcocezzon, Bid amount o66ened by the City o6 Watauga iz $950,00 which shatt be tcemitted to the City o� Southtake upon acceptance o4 thiz bid o44ek. Bid o64etc 6hatt be active 6otc a petc,iod o4 45 days /4tcom thin date. Sincetcety, W . B m "Bitt. Keating City Manag etc L SUM cc: DPS MOTIOROLA INC. Mr. Lloyd Latta, Mayor c/o City Hall 667 N. Carroll Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Mr. Latta: January 15, 1986 l G icy City `�.--Zsglaf y. With reference to my letter of January 13; we are very interested in resolving the issue on the Special Use Permit for the proposed Southlake cell site as soon as possible. We would appreciate the opportunity to reopen this issue with the council and have them reconsider our application. In return, we would propose one of the following payment alternatives: i) a one time fee of $10,000.00, or ii) 5 annual payments of $2,500.00 each, or iii) 10 annual payments of $1,500.00 each. Please advise us of when the meeting can be scheduled and whether you feel it is appropriate for a Motorola representative to participate. Your advice and guidance on this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, Joseph R. Ganzel Operations Manager Cellular Infrastructure Division (312)590-5402 cc: Bill Cade Bill Davies -Bernie.Smedley JRG:lr Cellular Group 1501 W. Shure Drive, Arlington Heights, IL 60004 • (312) 590-5000 January 1, 1986 City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Sir: Please accept this as a formal bid of $850.00 for the purchase of the following microfilm equipment: (1) One Bell & Howell Filemaster Camera, SR#r515-A (1) One Bell & Howell Jacket Reader/Filler, SRAV1610247 (1) One Bell & Howell Printer, SR#407466 • (1) One Bell & Howell Processor, SRiT465784 Equipment purchased on an as is basis with no warranty. Equipment will be paid for by company check or cashier's check as requested. Equipment will be paid for and picked up within three days after notification of successful bid acceptance. Sincerely yours, A ` qGorgeHardin General Manager Caleb Microfilm Company 19 GH/tr CALCD MICROFILM COMPANY ' (817) 332-2532 • ONES UMM IT AVE NUE,SUITE 205, FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 9 P.O. BOX 471018, FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76147 s 0 MCP7'0ROLA INC. January 13, 1985 2' x S U n us ..a ,,.E Mr. Lloyd Latta, Mayor :3h viiy c/o City Hall 667 N. Carroll Southlake, TX 76092 Dear Mr. Latta: As I believe you are aware, Motorola is in the process of implementing a Cellular Telephone System covering the greater Dallas --Fort Worth area for Metroplex Telecommunications Company. The system consists of over twenty cell -site locations, one of which was to be located in Southlake. We had begun the process of designing the sites, and submitted the _ information for zoning approval to your zoning board or committee during November 1985. Our people were told that the zoning committee had approved the zoning application, and that it had to be forwarded to the Southlake City Council for final approval. We were under the belief that since there were no issues raised by the zoning committee, and that there already was a similar cell site - approved for the Southwest Bell System less than one mile from our proposed site, that council approval was more of a formality. Then as you know, at the December 17 City Council meeting our application was tabled for consideration of possible tax revenue alternatives. Believing that council approval would be forthcoming, our field people were proceeding with the implementation of this site in order to meet our schedule commitments to Metroplex Telecommunications Company. Needless to say, we were both disappointed and embarrassed at the outcome of last Tuesday's council meeting. I want LAW to assure you it was never Motorola's intent to not comply with the legal issues or to upset the members of the city council. i Cellular Group 1501 W. Shure Drive, Arlington Heights, IL 60004 ® (312) 590-5000 I want to offer you and the members of the city council our formal apology on this issue. We appreciate your counsel and direction on what options or alternatives may be open to us to resolve this matter as soon as possible. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ose R. Ganzel Operations Manager Cellular Infrastructure Division JRG:jp cc: Mr. William Cade Mr. William Davies Mr. Bernard Smedley I `, e-- L(N1 G X 5 � 1`l �''e 5 �U Pam✓► ire ry') o s ��'� ✓� U US �.0 T� 7 v 11 cA-4 rz s y r `7) 14S �it> �j i� �► � G'i V �t� lCU/ o u v- Cc� rn r v,� �� CW7 v ► Cbn m en -1-A4-, pirppose-j /10 0 7421� p �'A) ry l� Aooeo Aw6p /#002e S- �� u --EIN) a e. I �GcJi41-� S S i�oFNSgC, iy I �bY�v�4 Svpy.��1 -2 � �W-7--\-111 x\NmI-\-�;'2� QvK-,,A4 Gi J P REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL After initial review of -the Land Use Plan and recommendations by the consultant Hensley, Farmer & Associates, the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following interim recommendations to the City of Southlake City Council. 1) Retain the consultant to revise the current zoning ordinance and.subdivision with common appendices for: Site Planning Requirements - Urban Design Standards to include: a) Set -back and Open Space Requirements. b) Avigation easements. 2) Retain the City Engineer to draft a stormwater and sanitary sewer easement and policy ordinance. This is to provide specific requirements for future water and sewer easements as well as restrictions on flood plane construction and encroachment. 3) Adopt COG standard specifications for all public works to ® eliminate miscellaneous city ordinances. 4) Provide for additional city staff, specifically a building official and a planner. 5) Provide for a 6-year capital improvements and budget plan. Also, require the city staff to prioritize the projects/ .programs and provide an estimated cost for future budget programming. 6) Request.the City Park Commission to draft a development_ and services projection for the next 10-years, based on available population estimates. To be utilized in the capital budgeting process. 7) The City Council should immediately review the ,fiscal .implications of restricting various types of business enterprises within the City of Southlake. Nuisance ordinances, special use permits and restrictive zoning may have asthetic appeal, however they may be a double- edged sword when evaluating potential tax revenues, and discourage services the city will require. The Planning and Zoning Commission adopted this report on November 25,1985 by a vote of 5 for and 0 against. The Planning and Zoning to meet with Council in tions. Commission would welcome the opportunity a worksession o disqu these recommenda- 1 William F: Stoner, Chairperson P & Z TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE FROM: MUNICIPAL COURT CLERK, JANIE BURNS SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL COURT ACTIVITY REPORT FOR December, 1985 DATE: January 9, 1986 MUNICIPAL COURT MONTHLY REPORT MONTH OF December 1985 CASES SET FOR TRAIL 47 CASES HEARD 30 CASES DISMISSED 08 WARRANTS ISSUED 88 WARRANTS SERVED 28 CASES APPEAL 07 CASES RESET 03 PAST DUE LETTERS 32 CASES REFERED TO DEFENSIVE DRIVING 03 CASH BONDS OR CASH ESCROWS 18 CITATIONS PAID 223 SOUI11LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1985 ANNUAL REPORT PERSONNEL: FY 84-85 FY 85-86 Sworn Personnel 11 13 Civilian Personnel 5 5 16 18 Reserve 4 4 PART ONE / POLICE ACTIVITIES ACTIVITY 1983 1984 1985 % of change TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE 10,130 10,935 17,695 + 61.8% TOTAL CITATIONS ISSUED 2,690 2,954 41,330 + 46.5% TOTAL ARRESTS 443 368 404 + 9.7% TOTAL ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATED 160 186 264 + 41.9% ARRESTS FELONY ARRESTS 1985 44 MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS 1935 349 JUVINILE ARRESTS 1985 11 TOTAL 404 ACCIDENTS NON -INJURY ACCIDENTS 176 INJURY ACCIDENTS 86 FATALITY ACCIDENTS 2 TOTAL 264 i PART TWO / CRIMINAL OFFENSES INDEX CRIMES 1983 1984 1985 % of Change MURDERS 0 0 1 + 100 % RAPES 3 2 0 - 200 % ROBBERIES 1 2 0 - 200 % AGGRAVATED ASSAULTS 2 4 11 + 175 % BURGLARIES 52 71 119 + 68 % THEFTS 50 70 63 - 10 % MOTOR VEHICLE THEFTS 7 11 17 + 73 % TOTAL CRIME INDEX 115 160 211 + 32 % ON VIEW OFFENSES 28 27 35 + 30 % OTHER REPORTED OFFENSES 39 51 50. - 2 % TOTAL REPORTED OFFENSES 182 238 296 + 24 % a PART THREE / CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS ACTIVITY 1983 1984 1985 TOTAL REPORTED OFFENSES 182 238 296 TOTal offenses cleared 62 93 92 CLEARANCE PERCENTAGE 34 % 39 % 31 % STOLEN PROPERTY $ 237,840 $ 25931352 $ 204,663 STOLEN PROPERTY RECOVERED $ 231,130 $ 1225,812 $ 23,512 TOTAL CASES FILED 43 42 57 Felony 17 10 18 Misdemeanor 22 31 29 Juvinile 4 1 10 CRIME PREVENTION PRESINTATIONS 9 17 9 0 SOUTHLAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT 1985 QUARTERLY REPORTS 1985 POLICE ACTIVITIES lst Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total RADIO CALLS 4206 4065 5074 4350 17,695 TOTAL OFFENSES 69 71 72 84 296 OFFENSES CLEARED 14 17 24 27 92 ACCIDENTS 65 73 66 60 264 ARRESTS 87 88 117 112 404 CITATIONS 968 1080 1346 936 4330 CRIME INDEX 54 55 44 58 211 MURDER RAPE ROBBERY AGGRAVATED ASSAULT BURGLARY THEFT MOTOR VEH. THEFT 1985 CRIME INDEX 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 30 29 26 17 18 12 5 4 5 TOTAL CRIME INDEX 54 55 44 4th Quarter Total 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 11 34 119 16 63 3 17 58 211 COMMISSION STATE DEPARTMENT OF H1GHNIA1'S ROBERT C. LANIER, CHAIRMAN AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION THOMAS M. DUNNING P. 0. Box 6868 RAY STOKER, JR. Fort Worth, Texas 76115 January 21, 1986 • I* SH 114 in Southlake, Texas Honorable Lloyd 0. Latta, Jr. Mayor, City of Southlake 667 North Carroll Ave. Southlake, Texas 76092 Dear Mayor Latta: i ENGINEER -DIRECTOR MARK G. GOODE IN REPLY REFER TO FILE NO. The Department appreciates the opportunity to have input at this stage in the development of SH 114. In the past, this District has constructed two- way frontage roads adjacent to four -lane divided facilities, as outlined in the third paragraph of your letter dated January 15, 1986. Each of these endeavors has proved to be difficult to operate, because it is difficult to inform the driver of the proper roadway he is to use. It is also difficult to signalize, even when the frontage roads operate as one-way. This difficulty of operation is brought about by the intersection of the frontage road and crossroad being entirely too close to the intersection of the highway and the crossroad. This type of facility also seems to contribute to an inordinately high accident rate, both at the intersection and on adjacent lengths of the main lanes. We are therefore removing these conditions from existing highways as quickly as possible and recommend that if the City acquires the dedication for these access roads, the construction of the access road be delayed until such time as the SH 114 facility becomes a full freeway, complete with ramps at the interchanges. The second scheme mentioned in your letter is a very desirable scheme from the standpoint of this Department. The set -back of the thoroughfare system of approximately one -quarter mile from SH 114 is a very desirable feature, in that it would give adequate room for left -turn lanes and storage and operation of the intersections between the ramps and the crossroad and the thoroughfare system and the crossroad. The type of development that you mentioned would therefore not need access to SH 114. The access from the adjacent development to SH 114 should therefore be denied in order to keep 1 gESUU� Honorable Lloyd 0. Latta, Jr. January 21, 1986 Page 2. future property owners from requesting access for driveways, or streets, onto the ramp or freeway lanes. The existing 220 feet of right-of-way will be- sufficient for this type of development, except at intersections, as pointed out in your letter. Additional right-of-way of approximately 500 feet in width will be required at these locations. The other requirement would be to eventually acquire the access rights of all existing properties on SH 114 in order to remove existing driveways. If the access rights of the adjacent properties are not purchased, i.e., if the development were too expensive for the Department to acquire and the most economical method of controlling access would be the construction of frontage roads, additional right-of-way for frontage roads would have to be acquired at that time. We therefore request that as your City considers the thoroughfare plan which we agree is highly desirable, you furnish the State with locations of existing facilities which will not be incorporated into these major developments and that will have to be dealt with at some time concerning access control. Again, we want to thank you for the opportunity to review the development along SH 114 with your City at this time. We look forward to working with you and your staff in this development. Yours very truly, `,1 / 4 4� X- R. Stone District Engineer BAH: dh