Item 7A •
•
• XM WEN
III 11 City of Southlake
outhlake Department of Planning
MEMORANDUM
April 12, 2002
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: ` Ken Baker, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 02-010 an amendment to The Master Thoroughfare Plan Text and Map to
indicate the general alignment and roadway classifications for the following: 1)Rucker Road
located south of FM 1709 that provides a connection between Byron Nelson Parkway(north
of Rockenbaugh Elementary School) and Central Avenue (Town Square); 2) Remington
Road that provides a connection between FM 1709 and Union Church Road,west of Davis
Boulevard and east of S. Pearson Lane; and 3) Randol Mill Avenue (FM 1938).
ACTION
REQUESTED: Amend the currently adopted Master Thoroughfare Plan(MTP) Map and Text to
indicate the following (See Attachment A).
1. Rucker Road - designate a C2U-60' collector between Byron Nelson Parkway
(north of Rockenbaugh Elementary School)and Central Avenue(Town Square).
Amend the MTP text to include the following:
Design features of Rucker Road include:
• Approximately 35' wide roadway with the possibility of parallel parking on
one or both sides along portions of the roadway.
• "Urban" cross section which includes curb, gutters, street trees and
sidewalks.
• Speed limit not to exceed 25 m.p.h.
• Design as a local slow movement roadway.
• Crossing at the Carroll Avenue intersection will ultimately be controlled
through traffic signalization or 4-way stop.
• Pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Carroll Avenue and Rucker Road
should be provided.
2. Remington Road (Owenwood Drive) - designate a C2U-60' collector with a
continuous left hand turn lane between FM 1709 and Union Church Road,west
of Davis Blvd. and east of S. Pearson Lane on the Remington Retirement
Community's and Keller Independent School District's properties.
L
Design features of Remington Road include:
• Approximately 37' wide roadway.
• "Urban" cross section which includes curb, gutters, street trees, sidewalk
and trail.
• Continuous left hand turn lane.
• Speed limit not to exceed 30 m.p.h.
3. FM 1938-Designate Randol Mill Avenue as 140' of right-of-way to reflect the
extension of the FM 1938 Texas Department of Transportation project north to
State Highway 114.
GENERAL
BACKGROUND: ROLE OF THE CURRENT MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN
The current Master Thoroughfare Plan (MTP) was adopted in March of 1997. The
MTP is the City's general plan for guiding thoroughfare system improvements,
including the widening and extensions of streets and highways. The plan primarily
consists of a map showing locations and ultimate cross sections of future road
improvements. The primary objective of the current MTP is to ensure the
reservation/dedication of adequate right-of-way on appropriate alignments to allow
for orderly and efficient expansion. Also,there are many other benefits that the MTP
provides which include:
• Minimizing the amount of land required for street and highway purposes;
• Identifying the functional role(i.e. collector, arterial)that each street should
be designed in order to promote and maintain the stability of traffic and land
use patterns;
• Informing citizens of future street plans so that private land use decisions can
anticipate which streets will become major facilities;
• Provide information on thoroughfare improvements needs which can be used
to determine priorities and schedules in the capital improvements program;
and
• Minimizing the negative impacts of street widening and construction on
neighborhood areas and the overall community,by recognizing where future
street improvements may be needed.
FUTURE ROLE OF THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN(MOBILITY PLAN)-
SOUTHLAKE 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The current MTP consists of a map which identifies arterials and collectors for future
improvements.The plan does not evaluate such critical transportation factors such as:
1)local road networks; 2)detailed road design; 3)streetscapes;4)alternative modes
of transportation (i.e. walking/bicycle/rail); 5) critical connections of sidewalks; 6)
-2 -
Resolution 02-008
4/12/02
unified access and circulation; 7) stub streets; 8)internal circulation;9)prioritization
of projects; and 10) financial planning.
The staff is planning to significantly broaden the scope of the MTP in conjunction
with the development of the Southlake 2025 Comprehensive Plan in order to
address many the transportation issues facing Southlake,including those listed above.
By addressing such issues in a planning document, it is believed that the MTP will
evolve into a true Mobility Plan for the City of Southlake.
The first step in the creation of the Mobility Plan is to update the current MTP map.
The MTP map will serve as the foundation and framework for the development of the
Mobility Plan. As such, staff recommended that the following roadways/areas be
considered as MTP map amendments.
• Durham Road Collector (Completed)
• Kirkwood Boulevard Extension (Completed)
• Remington Road (Under Review by City Council)
• Rucker Road (Under Review by City Council)
• FM 1938 (Under Review by City Council)
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS: LOCAL COLLECTORS-RUCKER AND REMINGTON ROADS
THE FOLLOWING IS BACKGROUND INFORMATION THAT PROVIDED THE BASIS FOR THE
STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE MTP MAP TO INCLUDE RUCKER
AND REMMINGTON ROADS.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
STATE HIGHWAY(SH) 114
Broadly defined, the SH 114 corridor is an approximately forty (40) mile stretch,
from its intersection with Interstate 35E in Dallas to Interstate 35W in Fort Worth.
Southlake's transportation planning efforts generally focus on that portion of SH 114
west of SH 121. The corridor includes some of the fastest growing communities in
Dallas-Fort Worth and links several of its major employment centers (Los Colinas,
DFW Airport and Alliance Airport). The corridor will also serve future employment
centers in Southlake and Westlake(Circle T Ranch). State Highway 114's function as
a link between DFW Airport and Alliance Airport deserves particular emphasis:
DFW is one of the nation's busiest airports, while Alliance is an increasingly
important multimodal distribution center. Together, they represent the key
transportation hub of the mid-continent United States and make the area extremely
attractive nationally and internationally as a location for business and industry. State
Highway 114 should be viewed as an economic development imperative, both to
accommodate a steadily increasing volume of motor vehicle traffic and to ensure that
41b,. -3 -
Resolution 02-008
4/12/02
traffic congestion does not jeopardize the ability of the corridor communities to
compete successfully for new business and capital investment(Source-Explosive Growth
Cor in the 114 Corridor,H. Gross,PhD.,B. Weinstein,PhD.And T. Clower,MS-University ofNorth Texas
Center for Economic Development and Research).
FM 1709
FM 1709, is a regional arterial that runs from SH 114 west to Interstate 35W. This
roadway is designed to serve regional and major traffic generators. Its primary
purpose is to carry what is considered through traffic.
ROLE OF SH 114 AND FM 1709
State Highway 114 and FM 1709 in Southlake are design to function as
thoroughfares that:
• Carry high volumes of traffic regionally and inter-regionally
• Carry traffic into Southlake (i.e. shopping/work)
• Conduct traffic out of Southlake (i.e. Dallas commute)
• Pass traffic through Southlake.
The SH-114 freeway and FM 1709 are not designed to carry local trips.
WHY IS TRAFFIC CONGESTION OCCURRING ON SH 114 AND FM 1709?
Cry
Much of the traffic on FM 1709 and SH 114 is non-Southlake residents traveling
to and from work and places of business in Dallas, DFW, Alliance Airport, Los
Colinas and other employment centers. In addition, most of the local Southlake
traffic is forced onto FM 1709 and SH 114 to access the area's shopping centers,
businesses, employment centers, etc. This results in the mixing of local trips and
regional trips on FM 1709 and SH 114. See Figure #1 (Next Page).
-4-
Resolution 02-008
4/12/02
s
•
a e•
4~}o
• •X
E a • • ■ i
ft * • ... . a
at 4
IL•••••.w \ X it . III 11 4
lk
it
kr
'ta z'4 ♦ •*s• ♦+ s s
•
4`--; N.,y + '°*s iss
i w • •
•
, „ s : s
C..,
Jr ill
c e
G
Figure#1-Typical Suburban Roadway Design Layout. Every vehicle trip from one use
to another makes use of an arterial.
WILL TRAFFIC VOLUMES CONTINUE TO INCREASE ON SH 114 AND FM 1709?
Yes, Southlake is expected to more than triple its daytime workforce to over 30,000
persons over the next twenty (20) years. Most of the non-residential development
constructed to accommodate this future workforce will occur on the SH 114 and FM
1709 corridors,which will substantially increase traffic volumes on these roadways.
In addition, traffic pressures along SH 114 and FM 1709 will escalate further as
development continues at Alliance Airport, Circle T Ranch, DFW Airport and
communities surrounding Southlake continue to grow.
WHAT CAN SOUTHLAKE Do TO IMPROVE TRAFFIC CONGESTION ON SH 114 AND FM
1709?
Realistically,until an alternative form of transportation(i.e.light rail)is provided for
the area, the traffic congestion levels along SH 114 and FM 1709 will continue to
worsen. The possibility of providing light rail in Southlake is at least 20 years into
the future. The widening of SH 114 and FM 1709 will only provide temporary relief
to Southlake's congestion issues and do not offer a long term solution.
However, Southlake can provide a local roadway network that allows its citizens and
work force the ability to access the City's commercial, office and shopping areas
without having to drive on SH 114 or FM 1709 (See Figure#2). Both the Durham
Road and Kirkwood Boulevard Extension MTP amendments function as connectors
L. that allow access to major trip generators without the utilization of FM 1709 and SH
-5 -
Resolution 02-008
4/12/02
114. The continuation of providing a local roadway network for Southlake's
residents is the basis for the Rucker and Remington Roads amendment requests.
Arteder
Ial
at
4 4-F'
1! ♦ '4.:
! 4
it 4
Ix : *
.0\`k 4,,,,,,447,.44 ,,,
a • . lc .47 • 4p ''. 1: —I: : 2:,:a za. ma LZ71 C.1.'
e\
r•• +, ;' •a a M * . at
t• r ti
•. AM' ♦ - _ :.•_ ••�.* ;♦ •. ***
•
• ♦ ♦ • a ■ ! . .r a • •-♦R •Ita• •• •
•
• • ••as • aaa •• •
•• * IRE airs
• • a a • if R
I • • • * • I a
Figure#2—Every trip from one use to another makes use of a local collector instead of the
major arterial.
RUCKER AND REMINGTON ROADS PROPOSED AMENDMENTS:
Car
1. RUCKER ROAD
The proposed Rucker Road (C2U-60') is located south of FM 1709 and would
provide a connection between Byron Nelson Parkway north of the Rockenbaugh
Elementary School and Central Avenue (Town Square). Staff developed four (4)
options (See Attachments B & C) for presentation to the Planning and Zoning
Commission. Alternative #1 shows the road beginning at Byron Nelson Parkway
(north of Rockenbaugh Elementary) and connecting into Carroll Avenue
approximately 900' south of FM 1709. Alternatives#2 and#3 are located further to
the south than Alternative #1. Both these alternatives also begin at Byron Nelson
Parkway and"T"into Carroll Avenue across from Westmont Drive. Alternative#4
provides a connection from Carroll Avenue (900' south of FM 1709) to Central
Place in Town Square. The City does not plan to fund construction of Rucker
Road. It is expected that the road would be constructed in conjunction with
future development of the area.
RUCKER ROAD DESIGN
Rucker Road is recommended to have the following design characteristics (See
Attachment D).
-6-
Resolution 02-008
4/12/02
• Approximately 35' wide roadway with the possibility of parallel parking on
one or both sides of the roadway.
• "Urban" cross section which includes curb, gutters, street trees and
sidewalks.
• Speed limit not to exceed 25 m.p.h.
• Design as a local slow movement roadway.
• Crossing at the Carroll Avenue intersection will ultimately be controlled
through traffic signalization or 4-way stop.
• Pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Carroll Avenue and Rucker Road
should be provided.
RUCKER ROAD-ROCKENBAUGH ELEMENTARY
The construction of Rucker Road would require that the north entrance to
Rockenbaugh Elementary be redesigned. The northern most entrance to
Rockenbaugh Elementary would be reconfigured as a right-in only for school bus
traffic. The median cut at this entrance would be closed.
Rucker Road would intersect at Byron Nelson approximately 200' north of the
school's existing entrance. A new median cut at this location would be constructed.
Rockenbaugh Elementary would have direct access to Rucker Road from the north
parking lot (See Attachment E).
CISD SCHOOL BOARD
On February 25, 2002,the Planning staff presented the Rucker Road alignment and
Rockenbaugh Elementary redesign to the Carroll Independent School District school
board.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION-RUCKER ROAD
Staff is recommending that the MTP map be amended to indicate alternative #2 and
alternative#4 as shown on attachments A &B. Alternative#2 would create a four
(4)—way intersection at Westmont Drive and Carroll Avenue (See Attachment A).
The location of this intersection ensures enough spacing from FM 1709 to prevent the
possibility of traffic backing up during peak times onto Carroll Avenue from left
turns off of Rucker Road. Also, the possibility of a future traffic signal at this
location being approved is likely. (Spacing of this intersection from the FM
1709/Carroll intersection (>1,000 ft.) meets the progressive movement warrant of
the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control). A traffic signal at the entrance of
Oak Tree Estates will allow the residents to enter onto a future four(4) lane Carroll
Avenue with a minimum of conflict between vehicles. The staff proposed alignment
also minimizes the number of intersections along Carroll Avenue. Alternative #4
will allow traffic to continue to the east into the South Carroll/1709 Ltd.Property and
eventually to Town Square.
-7-
Resolution 02-008
4/12/02
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION-RUCKER ROAD
On March 7,2002,the Planning Commission recommend approval of Rucker Road
with alternative 1 and alternative 4 to be indicated on the MTP map (See
Attachment B). The Planning Commission stated that it is likely that Rucker Road
would serve as a future boundary-line between residential and non-residential uses
and believed that alignments#2 and#3 were located at a distance too far south from
FM 1709.
SUMMARY OF ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE OPTIONS
Below is a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of the staffs proposed
roadway option and P&Z's proposed roadway option:
Alternatives #2 & #4—Staff Recommendation
Advantages , Disadvantages
Create a four(4)way intersection at Westmont Drive The general road alignment of Alternative
and Carroll Avenue,thereby reducing the number of #2 does not follow property boundaries as
intersections in the general area and possible points closely as Alternative#1 and transects some
of conflict. _parcels.
Ensures enough spacing from FM 1709 to prevent Possibly creates a demarcation line between
the possibility of back ups from left turns from residential and non-residential uses farther
Rucker Road onto Carroll Avenue. south than Alternative#1.
The possibility of a future traffic signal at this Some residents owning property west of
location being approved is likely. (Spacing of this Carroll prefer alternative#1.
intersection from the FM 1709/Carroll intersection
(>1,000 )1.) meets the progressive movement
warrant of the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control).
Alternatives #1 & #4—P&Z Recommendation
Creates a demarcation line between residential and The Rucker Road/Carroll Ave. intersection
non-residential uses farther north than Alternative location near FM 1709 may result in back
#1. ups from vehicles turning left onto Carroll
Avenue from Rucker Road.
Some residents owning property west of Carroll Future traffic signal at this location is
Avenue prefer alternative#2. unlikely due to separation from FM 1709.
Alternative#1 connects directly to Alternative#4. Crossing Carroll Avenue (4-lanes)from
Rucker Road will be difficult during peak
traffic times due to its close location to
FM 1709.
- 8 -
Resolution 02-008
4/12/02
POSSIBLE COMPRIMISE ALTERNATIVE ADDRESSING THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION'S AND STAFF'S CONCERNS.
Based on the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation, staff has
developed an additional alternative for City Council's consideration. This
alternative will have Rucker Road accessing onto Carroll Avenue approximately
900' south of the FM 1709 intersection. The road would be designed as a right-in/
right-out only. A second full access roadway would be located to the south across
from Westmont Drive. A future traffic signal or a four(4)-way stop would be
installed at the Carroll Avenue/Rucker Road/Westmont Drive to assist drivers
from the Oak Tree Estates subdivision and Rucker Road to access on to Carroll
Avenue (See Attachment F).
2. REMINGTON ROAD (OWENWOOD DRIVE)
The proposed Remington Road(C2U-60' with a continuous left hand turn lane)is a
minor collector between FM 1709 and Union Church Road located on the
Remington Retirement Community's and Keller Independent School District's
properties (See Attachment G).
Construction Plans for a 37' wide roadway with a continuous left hand turn lane
have been approved on the Remington Retirement Community property by the City.
Current plans are to construct this roadway from the intersection of FM 1709 to the
southwest corner of the site in conjunction with occurring development.
The Keller Independent School District (KISD) plans to construct either an
elementary school/middle school or a fine arts high school on its site to serve
approximately 600 students. The earliest that construction of a school will begin is in
the fall of 2004. It is expected that the road will be extended from the Remington site
once development occurs on the K.I.S.D site. The primary access to the school site
would likely be provided from Union Church Road;however,it is likely that much of
the bus traffic and parent drop-off traffic will utilize Remington Road. The City
does not plan to fund construction of Remington Road. It is expected that the
road would be constructed in conjunction with future development of the area.
REMINGTON ROAD DESIGN
Remington Road is recommended to have the following design characteristics
(See Attachment H).
• Approximately 37' wide roadway.
• "Urban" cross section which includes curb, gutters, street trees, sidewalk
and trail.
• Continuous left hand turn lane.
-9-
Resolution 02-008
4/12/02
•
• Speed limit not to exceed 30 m.p.h.
K.I.S.D. SCHOOL BOARD
The general roadway alignment was presented to the Keller Independent School
District (K.I.S.D.) school board by K.I.S.D. staff on January 29, 2002. The school
board requested that the general alignment be along the eastern property line.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION-RUCKER ROAD
Staff recommends the amendment of the MTP map to indicate the general
alignment as shown on attachment E. Also, the MTP text should be amended to
include the design characteristic discussed in this section.
Proposed
Amendment: 3. FM 1938
On Dec. 13,2001,the Texas Transportation Commission(TTC)approved a Minute
Order giving the proposed extension of FM 1938 along the Randol Mill right-of-way
Priority II funding status and Farm to Market designation. Both moves had been
requested and pursued by the Metroport Cities group in its presentation to the TIC
last September. This means that the proposed extension of FM 1938 is now officially
a TxDOT highway project,although it is not yet funded. Priority II funding status is
for projects that are approved by the TTC,but funding has yet to be identified. Staff
is recommending the MTP map be amended to identify Randol Mill north of FM
1709 as a future State road with140' of R.O.W. (Attachment I)
Citywide SPIN
Meeting: On February 20, 2002, the Planning Department held a Citywide SPIN meeting
on the Thoroughfare Plan Map Amendments.
Planning and
Zoning
Commission: Approved Resolution 02-010, Amendments to the Master Thoroughfare Plan to
include Rucker Road (specifically options 1 &4), Remington, and FM 1938.
City Council: On April 1, 2002, the City Council tabled this item until the April 16, 2002 City
Council meeting,
Attachment A-Resolution 02-010
Attachment B-General Alignment Alternatives Rucker Road
Attachment C-General Alignment Alternatives Rucker Road (Cont.)
Attachment D-Rucker Road Roadway Design
Attachment E-Rockenbaugh Elementary Design
Attachment F-Alternative Alignment based on P&Z's Action
- 10-
Resolution 02-008
4/12/02
Attachment G-General Alignment Remington Road
Attachment H-Remington Road Roadway Design
Attachment I-FM 1938 Alignment
KMB/kmb
L
- 11 -
Resolution 02-008
4/12/02
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. 02-010
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE ADOPTED MASTER
THOROUGHFARE PLAN MAP TO INDICATE THE GENERAL
ALIGNMENT DESIGNATING RUCKER ROAD AS A C2U-60' R.O.W.
COLLECTOR STREET LOCATED SOUTH OF FM 1709 BETWEEN
BYRON NELSON PARKWAY AND FM 1709/CENTRAL PLACE
INTERSECTION AND SPECIFYING THE DESIGN FEATURES FOR
RUCKER ROAD; DESIGNATING REMINGTON ROAD (OWENWOOD
DRIVE) AS A C2U-60' R.O.W. COLLECTOR STREET WITH A
CONTINUOUS LEFT TURN LANE BETWEEN FM 1709 AND UNION
CHURCH ROAD AND SPECIFYING DESIGN FEATURES FOR
REMINGTON ROAD; DESIGNATING RANDOL MILL AVENUE FROM
FM 1709 NORTH TO THE WESTLAKE CITY LIMITS AS 140' OF R.O.W.
TO REFLECT THE EXTENSION OF FM 1938 ALONG THE RANDOL
MILL R.O.W.; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
kir WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the
electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local
Government Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 11.06 of the Southlake City Charter provides for the adoption and updating of a
Comprehensive Master Plan and its components, including the Master Thoroughfare Plan; and
WHEREAS,the Planning and Zoning Commission has forwarded a recommendation that the Master
Thoroughfare Plan be amended as set forth herein below and the City Council having conducted a public
hearing on the proposed changes.
- 12-
Resolution 02-008
4/12/02
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1
Pursuant to Section 11.06 of the Southlake City Charter,the Comprehensive Master Plan,of which the
Master Thoroughfare Plan is a component, may be submitted in whole or in part from time to time to the
Council for their adoption,accompanied by a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission,and
shall contain a planning consideration for a period of at least ten(10)years. The proposed amendments to
the Master Thoroughfare Plan which designate the general alignment of Rucker Road and Remington Road
and approve the R.O.W. width of Randol Mill Avenue from FM 1709 north to the City limits are noted by
graphical depiction in Exhibit"A" and written description in Exhibit"B"attached hereto and incorporated
herein, is hereby approved.
SECTION 2
The different elements of the Comprehensive Master Plan, as adopted and amended by the City
Council from time to time, shall be kept on file in the office of the City Secretary of the City of Southlake,
along with a copy of the minute order of the Council so adopting or approving same.Any existing element of
the Comprehensive Master Plan which has been heretofore adopted by the City Council shall remain in full
force and effect until amended by the City Council as provided herein.
- 13 -
Resolution 02-008
4/12/02
1
SECTION 3
This resolution shall become effective on the date of approval by the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2002.
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE
By:
Rick Stacy, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kim Bush
Acting City Secretary
L. APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
City of Southlake, Texas
- 14-
Resolution 02-008
4/12/02
u
11W EXHIBIT A gtIa 3
` • / —um
om.) 3 03
°.5. ,s
►� cn 811111
1.
01, e s
_', ■ 8 !li 1 I€
8i:ri s•B Y O 26 b 3i 'b
Ill e) E idli
11111
:4:1i;�tt7YyY ! / r.1A11=
E:11' .r ,�
u U c a 1 j �� . . r
v 17ArIF -- v \ fa. �s i.�r ma/wmi N•.
\.J1-
IV Mmr- �L:.anl - •err.. 1t n 17 �.91 of`
/ vile 7 ` sI `1 n•! r a.I.•i
% I f' t pia=a e�z tia■in qY..r 'i11 1 rciigl..1 MIN Epri; �= S :S r,
% �S r.---„1,f�.11111i__��■- _ :ril�!1.3���IIE ii ��1 IE FI'll
�.i '".w I� ~
�C% \y G' �. • ■\s alltt � ��.N{.A�.�. a eR: N r, 5°J■haltlltal�':
G1 q I •. . tea■ a = .i s. 1• V [t ..
1 al. `'- 'lial-- I ,�E �.■ ."S A en t f o jay T
/,i ��. SIN 1e - ;, � Roma Millisr■ S •s' r$S3 J
111.
Q/ • SIB `` Willow
.i : Ip �, - „„„„.110y.iiitz ti . . .. AI :omit::VON 1 rA,•:,'Le 411g.-...:•,:ir;:=4 ri-W.t:,•,..,.,. '
/rlapf +'rl f ..,.4"4•t
!jj4.
�% 7iita4r'� 121 F.�1 .''S El till. L al ow- :-ct ::1 1,'+7 M �11!1�_ i.. s i Jn•.•"'` `•'r�''i
11i�1� latirifira ��. d% rNEM \ I. � +�I � iTo I •4 d 4// r.` Film![-� �'��-1111eArimia.me I \` y0'„ay`1 .. �- ±;al sl 1 m llWIII Ira `,`y,+'�,
it e
% ! 111..1?I11.•■ („�etz,Nb,• ..,...• Illl .: sem In s■ *.alp'n• _��' f 5
,` g =: .0. lioNLIA ii.•,. ..... ..,ti.;•,;iitir imi,el.,:i E......fi:if';!:•.:Aff::::77if.„;•,;:4'it r
I. i . • , . �Q '. .- rams. �-r"
: :': '' ."�• 'nta. �=,==1 w I ! ` I• = .,1,,r�Nl i � �_- y:: ,,p1f1i3i:U;•- •:,: ,�:„.. ..- .
SAM03
119. :;` to 'nib= - .. .-�T. aril'.
.1_ 1 ' , . 1 ■ (Qt �= nM■H :Tazz. all .i1� l, a 0a r1E or ea µ_
.;;;;74 r % -1111 Al i. .d ... .: , - .u:::
Ilea 1- na .■�' terra s. Lllfll•,;:' IP 11 III
114aTiiiiiihriAliFt7.4 al iz.:::".;;:c•.:r.r.zA 111.0;;;;t74,-,,;:.•,..4,1.,...,.4..1.:4 4
I ^aMOW. s
U -..:...... _ ■
mi?";4 timmm 1E (0 �Nuu+xxunn"Mira"112:.11111
��y m 411
14.ii !pi
�g-N-Xt06 -g8X-PX%12$$Sst ./, ,ilt9 Ig s%
ZQQiQQ66 k -fix= Xl
Z Z‹).%Z':Z:'Z .. l% xis %_
2 ;,r1` lit iZ] 11
Caw
EXHIBIT B
Design features of Rucker Road include:
• Approximately 35' wide roadway with the possibility of parallel parking on
one or both sides along portions of the roadway.
• "Urban" cross section which includes curb, gutters, street trees and
sidewalks.
• Speed limit not to exceed 25 m.p.h.
• Design as a local slow movement roadway.
• Crossing at the Carroll Avenue intersection will ultimately be controlled
through traffic signalization or 4-way stop.
• Pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Carroll Avenue and Rucker Road
should be provided.
Design features of Remington Road include:
• Approximately 37' wide roadway.
• "Urban"cross section which includes curb, gutters, street trees, sidewalk
and trail.
• Continuous left hand turn lane.
• Speed limit not to exceed 30 m.p.h.
- 16-
Resolution 02-008
4/12/02
ATTACHMENT B
...i 11 ,1 '
.,, ,_ • '''4,44.44 -t- ,
I:
• u - r "
•1 ,
4 is
141, 4,
, .. •
it -I f.:7 • C ., ,' 7:71 ir
. _
i
i•:.'
•
. . ; i• •'. C 2c I (IS
rji -) kcs._:( * 0)
, - •t f 10 st —
P I ; 44 ,,
---0- 44t-
1 1, CD
, . •
i ,•
•104.1 ii,-- - A cu
it en
•t 4 t I.. - ,I, , •, v sp...„ . a it \ 0
•11 41
t f 4 :-, ,4.1,4 ot • ',4 - . 4,4'. r ,,,,,4
. '.'.... i ."f `4 ' \C•4)
! „ :I --
' i .t- - • . ' t _
le
0- .
, # " 1 "' 1
. ,
al .•
-0
. ' 1. •' ••' • ,t.',. •
, .. .
/ •'6 .. "" ',.. co t_., '
• 4r.it 4 c 4_, \ .....
1 .0 . , .
. 14 •T
114 -i.'! -+ °
----- 4
\
1 i, / Af•
'/ .•
\ 1, 1
0 , g.. i • 1 .r--- CD * C i
, . •.,le , a .4
" •1 •— a
(13 4. - . 404 a) i— as t . ct . .-' - , • -- - . '-
. , , ,,.
4' CD
I, .4
i A , 1
pr • , I ! .- 444%- 4 1,. 1 2
• • it, ,• - ...,0-
•••• ., .1 4 •
...
• 6. i)
i 1 , al* -
: - 1. 4
• ••* ; ill 1•°•• . 5 IN
,
-la s ,s • " - O.
44 •,
4 4, , -IA 1 4 =
••II'. t
• , 4 , Jr* . iiiiik
•• , , . fi
„.
„oda 1
... ,
' 2 It
cr >, ! . •
0 t
, 0 • ci, t , . .... a): ...-. t.,„ , u
=
.,, L. • E I 0 eci
'" 0 .—2 . 6.0
. . .
1
—' w - 4
r
4 1 - 0: ' .N 2
_
t
..
g) .-
: e i:
ea . 5..=7-. '1
co
: Il
: w •
: .
a a
• 2
#4. t , , r'4 ..,
14. (1) i•'' Z
.. *.1'\ *' • • • a
1 1 I _ • .
> i 7; • e III a3
Aiti, '*. 411411 :
f 2
/ cc
i - ..-.‘.
i 1' a i
„. , 'i" 1,
4. 0
•
• CU
• 0
4:k
" • • . 1 ' . ' haidimenakti' CO It CI) Cr)
c) a)
...,., -• . •-...7. 1.7; -.= '--,, , ...
- ' FM 1709 icr) co cu ms 0 —c-; 71)
T1 ..1 I aX C C C C 0 2
' r
' U
=
43 43 a) a) -c co
-.=, =..• :...-_, ...= c.) ri
i'•
- -III fi
7.
0 . ,
1114
1 +I
I /P, 4' ' . '. 11 ' t tv• 4 ,, ' -14,,,,;' '''
. ATTACHMENT C
,t' I • li $ r . 1 . •r - , ,
I t ,
. . .
st1mw, ' Is,,, ' •i , ' --
4P •- t
• .• .- t '
/# ' -t'k • alkoc l .
,Iti • , -,.(. s , • 1, . ' . , 1
, I . 2 ..,t. 1 •
of 4 i .., ,1 ,.„„ ,„.... c ,, . t• -
'4.1•:#10:4-
, . ' • f 7 , Vt ' ,it ),
,{
)1 .f ''I t ii. . -s_•Vis•I'll, . it.' —.„.. •
• •
,, 1.4t r. - '', i ' •A• 4' 4 t•
4 -7-• „„ii,c„, _.
.1 •. t f ' ail •
• •••
I _ 1 s 1 ' ii•' ' fit. ' ' ' '' !`
1 .1 `, ' i 4‘0 -I. -,. .,
1 . C - --- . .
11 I,.
r - r - t
. is, „:.. i • ,ir- . , , . ,
• iht-4 1 • . ,• 1.., I 4 , ,
, ,I C • At
P • , , k if! ,,,.- ' '
,: it ' .. } . • 8 II 4,
L. .i.1•. 1•'.1 1:1•,41*-,.;,,'1,ir,e;;f''i,1,,'
11,1:-4:-1:.i:Av-i• :':
I
'I4
t
0j li .1'-i N,;,',V,,*,:'':..,.tLsi'.•':'•,,'s.k.i'•''.', -1.`I 4
•r
"b2:.8ClC7".111i:-2C9zP--1'4 1 >4'44...•1
i
i$ ..••;tI'- '-'t,-,1 0 . ".P14' i 4,,... . • f *Is a t - *P-
.
. • ,r A
i., —t.4001 4 oli 1
• , , _ .t'' . ..• ,,,, -i
,t 1
i ' ri, 111
' 1 1...., 1 1 . .i‘ ,. • ,
Ci
.„ 1 .•A •
f 't• 1 f
i . r • o 1
1 11 1 1 t, •• # I 111 401)
, ' •• i,
II'
i, .•.
II
'''ii I I 41 • ,.,. ,
1.,
t. • J
gill.
..
. -g i, I • *a , , , •' 4 (.
WI :I 1
, .
. . •
.
. rq. • . T.... Al, .
. • , ; • 0.••wct r'l
• -I: Irl i• .•c.„14 , 4, , / . .
' ,. ....-1- ... ..
..,- ,, , . r •., - -,..'. # 7 • • mg •
t . i''' •
_ -., --,. • ,
1 i i
;. • . I : '4 . . e#11F- -;
r
• . •• • - i 4t: .
. I
i Milk I
•
11 -,,.
- 0' i • '''' li r ' or , . ,..
4 • 6 ii .4.
A e. e ' r' ' -N k •
, .1 it 11 it4i i ,,,
.
, .. ..' ' 4 •
c•,1 i - • ii. ' "
- .. 1 •
,Ft' • - ' - '• - •_•-• ,
. . . .
,... 1 . 4 Ai*.; • .
- - .
, i I„• tit• 'clp r ••Ir. ,I,0 ..,,,,i, . _ . , .
--c-
--? '>4.Q•-. ,e-.-7 1•„••., I
`-• E•. .4 i, ;-L -:1 lit ''N• -. ' , ; : 1 1 '-'"' . --,-*".- e
- C, ir, i 1 • •iji . 44, 'i .,' 1 i .,
,
"IV i ikl
s ' Al- 4-kt
,. . t.
c • 0
• • A...., ..'„..
.s.- . i . 4; •*. ''l • •
1 4' M" al' • . . ' - •11‘ t
4 - sco ci)
a) C
1 I
, • ''', N4.,'. i •k
. .
•• ,: N„,, 1„4. .. • n* ,
t .0
- • e* "....r.',"--4..,......7: , 0 a)
• ik sc.' .
'tt t
•
,
% 'i• ' ' ' • - ,
iire A• II
11. ' 4
s 0 -
-$1 %
. .., k lii
-• ,.- . ' t 1 , 1 kii - . .4 1:3 4—
t i • ‘ 4 i I.4 tik : It ' f 0
(;) I
I.
t '4—• (\I CO •cr (.0
, .. it , ,..? t . . • z ,i - .t.,- ,,.
Aik
4
III • .i. I ‘ V. ,4 i :. ,‘ ,,5 0 * * * * 8 >,' - It 1 ,J4, ' ° - • ,- IL,_° '. ._
%
, ,- -2 r .i. It; - -
,
,,, ,„i .:•.,, .iti .. ,1:1 ilibil _
CC
. s_ s_ s._ s_ ....• I
• s • * • s .,.. '10 -111 , 1! cl: '5 c c c c ,„0 c__
- 4, -... . c_) ..c Q) Q) Q.) Q) -C ,•-,_,
' . •s ,.,• I ‘. s i* •,,NS. . '''••.. I s - n :,_, ..... -.- ..- _ 0 ,..-)
'•, i " (r, . 1 , Lt < ZC .;t- < U) 0
• It 1 j. k
'
• , ,..
11,, ,.1 iit, k ,A • N 1 ,
N ; . ,.. 4‘ t. t . p
$,,,.
M1
• t ... a Itr,
`,,... -.....
'-' 31IP
ATTACHMENT D
* :„ .',.. '14441.\\
•C Ilit,,,,
.'‘,:' hi -0
r �/`p
t � R+ ,. ,,,_ ''''s — . —
` \ 'fin
r
in
a 5Tu
CI Qa
"si J ScL x
L Q
a
NI5 Q
•
4n T ' ) ' "
, . :
--, _
.,
__--
.,_., _ ...,,,... ..__„
. . ,:i.,„:„. 5 ,
1 fl ('.
w Fk � •
L. .
itCle) ,..:•,.:'.''s ';•.:...1;.'. 44,,:il
am
tit
int
' - 0) W ^C^``
L W
U, ^ E
O• (Z U ,Y
0 i-
>
If) 0
Z O U(91 a)"
CD N E
-0 0- C C U to
i 4—
\// O ,
(n U
fib
CD
>, Cl) }, 0 (a
CDu •) (n (n -I—, U.)
" U " E -0
0_ N — CDy X O _c C -0 C co
1
O j U Ui Cn 0 O
ATTACHMENT E " 1 °
In
I '
: i 0
_o .
41"
o
;� CISo
U
_
• 11 :/
1
i =/
i >-,
iAllOtSi U
E
1 '4--.._ peo : , F
i ./i/ I i CD
i 0 a.)
a_ Li..J
1 - i tp:_ #.7 g
, , K
l
aD c
CD
' '''4. ..=••••'''--f /
.:11kk\ wig
U
co co • el q ' -— _Y
:6 Z-5 / ;ON 7) 0
2 2 .• \ I
#.
jj �:`� • t'+ � I ' R
; 4 �:_
7' • ' ATTACHMENT F
a •4 4.'--. • 1,, . frk.:40 , - . I itli,,,,, o .' • t. ' . . 714-klipirr .
i . ,..:1 ,- - ,
4 f <3 i r z � r+.� � 3 �.
�I,,t ::1,-i j t� W .- f • # • •,.
it '• .1- 2
lie
I./
C ..--. --1°:. .: .
! Via' ti Zj. u_ 4 - ° IN o
y� {1 it. ,d t _ i I -. 41 ., ...cm9otiiii .
i6f. 7
R ( o
•
il? 13. > ! . (0 1
♦•
'i �Iiiii, -
Ili •
•
f
- i" {• i' Z r •; .+
•
•
;
• •r
1�. •
itN , . ,_ 4
11
; • r. .114ii
t J
+ r r s 4�,...N. , i
• s rr
•n w U
,,-...'..1 ...,,I.-',,,,,,,,,4,.,-4:_,....-1:.,:.----- -',,.::: '' :. ,,, ' . ' '. ' .*"" I - ' '''''. - .I.- •
4 . it. ‘.. .....„.. .. 2 .., . z, , , ; ., ,
_ " /
tir4r, .,
• , . . MI I ' -I- ,
. , .
t• • - ,.,
L 1
• • -- '
_ - ••41 •' ..."‘,,,:. - • + ,y,,,,,
• :• ATTACHMENT G
11.—
.......
LAMEMEM
+4'16
'' - • L-0
Ir ,4"iri, ,is rf • '' '• .
il
I' " V
g., r_ .
0 -, -m.- ii• -,r ... • • 11
p 4, ill
-be - ''"'"'• if
. .
- - 1'7DAVISBLVD70.2%.iiii - • ---. ---
- ...„.•
1.... . 1 i ,,,."%i: - .), •
19 . • ' X
•
UOI o.,
— -.- .
. 1
i 2. itz4 .
la
0
. Z _ . 'IP • . .
, iiitli... : ..I"'14 7 •;rk ' ‘ I.
— ...„.. .....
.. ., ,,,.
• ... , _ 1 ,... ..,
n
''I
.4-
ii
C< ..
t.,
- ,
< '•l!01- ... i t .4A
"C " ..;-
, ••. .1,
• ''
'.4
. LI
C D
co 0 ;: z7 -. I
Z ---- -
o
. C4 C4 r--:-- ..„
... a
....--, , a it ... L 0
0 4
- •
__,
_,..
. • — (13 CO 0
.. ,
0 Z
Z . - - • . . . . ___,.._ ,,....., ora -0
ce •.....
2 . -0
0 -, c .... •• .... ._ •
. . "N.
4! N
IA
- '''''.
CD m D .-• >,
......,
L... :-....- ,
.. •
I.
......_ ., c
........ • •••
a.)
. . a),............ ..._ w o
--LT
.. ,
.,_ . ... .. .
999
—11111r
. _
,• -
- ,,,, - - •
cn
r".... .-. A. --14"a
LL.
I ---- - _--,L, -IF,---- , AB.'.1.q.' "•11 Jr '
• . $,, ._ ,
.' ''' •.' 7--,,,i" '• ..,. •
'2 _ ., _ ....:,_;„... , _,.,,,H.-,-.:-,:,;4‘ -,,,-....,... . .-w7 - wor...:7 :•:.......i„-- - 711111.-,to.- ---- "-
. 110.0--..- :,__. _ ! ..._
, I
•..-- .' ' -' . f.,,, '"'' -7 ': '1':,,,,,:imii , _ •
,, . .• '
- .1% 1,---, ' "
ATTACHMENT H
(1)
a;
ci
b U CV,
�•-� L a)
0 CD -I-, a)O L D N
N-11:tU _ CO 0
. Cr) +..
Ale4-
V 7+ Cf) -I , CD
N v) _0 -U — C
- O L C +=
Il
U U p E
z 2 > CZ
a.)
Q- Q U O Q
IU
b. (---- .
,, ,r ---- . i.
,,,,
4,,,,, .., ,0,14 C•41:"..=
ILL1?,p_i,\ , s # •". , ',- II , ....:,_,„4,1,1, .,, :', ; 11 -'-' •
Ir § _„
• OBI
zy, L? .;` , .- A't." N .','' .\•' +1.', '..' 7
C9 § 4 9
ti
CO 1
Y• kr. h
Coll "I _
h 1. f�,
• ATTACHMENT
,+ �.�"f• RIP
:::.14,,.:
.rJ_
I R...I
3 diec
l R e . I M. I ~-. sr g. Lc.
; 2 WS..
C yz -'ll,.
-
. >_ _ , .
.44 1
4 ,1 ' 44--„,. il ,,, ci .. , 4 i:
`�"` ,F ,
C 1
_ _
r ( ; ,ra h
w 4 .a ;4 a ':.i
5a ♦ i
...
��yy ma•yy,,__.
CI4.
c. `' i3a . W ,-- DTI
T.
r I tiG , I r. il. r 4 C
I
"'' L tlA '' g.may tl
.:AV l'L4:. ij1'� . .
c .AL ..i
,,,. _ _.- I J
ti.