Loading...
Item 8Case No. ZA20-0029 S T A F F R E P O R T October 15, 2021 CASE NO: ZA20-0029 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Development Plan for Carillon Parc EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Carillon Parc Development Partners and Hunter Chase Development Partners are requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Carillon Parc (Plaza District) on property described as Tracts 1, 1D, 1E, 1F, 1G, 3A, 3A01, 3A03, 3A04, 3A04A, 3A05, and 3A01B, Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1775, 1781 and 1801 N. White Chapel Blvd., 1840 Riviera Ln ., 201 E. Kirkwood Blvd., 1700 N. Carroll Ave. (addressed as 1900 N. Carroll Ave. by Tarrant Appraisal District) and 100 through 300 E. State Hwy. 114, generally located east of N. White Chapel Blvd., south of E. Kirkwood Blvd., west of Riviera Ln., and no rth of E. State Hwy. 114. Current Zoning: “ECZ” Employment Center Zoning District. Proposed Zoning: “ECZ” Employment Center Zoning District. SPIN Neighborhood #3. DETAILS: The purpose of this item is to seek approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for the Plaza District portion (approximately 42.51 acres) of the Carillon Development for the purposes of amending the existing district regulations and approved development plan for this portion of Carillon. This application represents a Development Plan. If this Zoning Change and Development Plan is approved by City Council, approval of Site Plan(s) by City Council following a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission will be required for all residential lofts and non-residential buildings (excluding kiosks) prior to issuance of building permits. Please see the Carillon Zoning Booklet and Development Plan attached separately. The Development Plan Site Data Summary Table is below: Department of Planning & Development Services Case No. ZA20-0029 VARIANCE REQUESTED: The street connections to E. SH 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd. are functionally like commercial driveways. Per the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, the minimum stacking depth from the SH114 & N. White Chapel would be 150’. Approximately 40 feet and 110’ are provided respectively. Case No. ZA20-0029 ACTION NEEDED: Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Development Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated October 15, 2021 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses Carillon Zoning Booklet Development Plan TIA Vol. 1 TIA Vol. 2 Consultant’s Review of TIA SPIN Meeting Report Comprehensive Plan Review STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072 Case No. Attachment A ZA20-0029 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Carillon Parc Development Partners APPLICANT: Hunter Chase Development Partners PROPERTY SITUATION: Generally located east of N. White Chapel Blvd., south of E. Kirkwood Blvd., west of Riviera Ln., and north of E. State HWY 114. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 1, 1D, 1E, 1F, 1G, 3A, 3A01, 3A03, 3A04, 3A04A, 3A05, and 3A01B, Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300 LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CURRENT ZONING: “ECZ” Employment Center Zoning District HISTORY: May 20, 1997; City Council approved a zoning change and concept plan to “NR-PUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit Development. December 18, 2001; City Council approved a zoning change and concept plan requiring a 300 ft. setback on N. Carroll Avenue, subject to City Council discretion. The purpose of the zoning change and concept plan was to incorporate newly acquired tracts of land into the existing “NR - PUD”, revise parcel boundaries and permitted uses within the district. On November 18, 2008 the City Council approved a Zoning Change and Development Plan from ‘NR-PUD’ Non-Residential Planned Unit Development and ‘C-2’ Local Retail Commercial District to ‘ECZ’ Employment Center Zoning District for Carillon under Planning Case ZA08- 031 (Ordinance No. 480-564). September 4, 2012; City Council approved the request to amend miscellaneous development regulations in the Carillon Zoning Booklet under Planning Case ZA12-066 (Ordinance No. 480-564a). November 6, 2014; Jacobs Engineeri ng, Inc. on behalf of Hines Interest, LP requested at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting on November 6, 2014 to table indefinitely two applications: a Site Plan application for One Carillon Court (ZA18-085) and a Zoning Change and Development Plan application for the Carillon Corporate District (ZA14 -102). April 21, 2015; City Council voted to deny a 1st Reading request for a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Carillon under Planning Case ZA15-002 (Ordinance No. 564b). The purpose of this request was to amend the current Carillon Zoning Book to add a roofing material permitted in the EC Neighborhood - Chateaux District. The proposal intended to add language that would have allowed metal as a permitted roof material to Chateaux District. April 18, 2017; Jacobs Engineering, Inc. on behalf of Hines Interest, LP requested to withdrawal the following Planning Cases at the April 18, 2017 City Council meeting: • ZA16-029 (Ordinance. No. 480-564B) – Zoning Change and Case No. Attachment A ZA20-0029 Page 2 Development Plan for Carillon Corporate District • ZA16-030 – Site Plan for Hotel Indigo Carillon • ZA16-031 – Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Carillon – Hotel Indigo • Also at the April 18, 2017 City Council meeting, The City of Southlake withdrew Planning Case ZA17-071 (Ordinance No. 480- 564C), which was a proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan for Carillon Plaza District. The following Planning Cases related to the Carillon Plaza District were withdrawn by staff due to inactivity; the applicant d id not ever make a formal submittal: • ZA16-081 – Site Plan for Carillon Salons of Volterra • ZA16-082 – Site Plan for Carillon Wellness Center and Spa • ZA16-083 – Preliminary Plat for the Carillon Plaza District On June 19, 2018, the City Council approved a Zoning Change and Development Plan (ZA18-0006) for the Plaza District portion (approximately 42.51 acres) of the Carillon Development for the purposes of amending the existing district regulations and approved development plan for this portion of Carillon. SOUTHLAKE 2030/2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: A detailed Comprehensive Plan Review has been prepared for this development. (Attached separately) TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Traffic Impact A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared for the previous Carillon Parc submittal in 2018. Please see the TIA and Consultant’s Review of TIA attached separately. CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN Town Hall Forum was held for this project on September 28, 2021. Please see the SPIN meeting report attached separately. A Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held . The meeting report will be distributed to the Planning and Zoning Commission members prior to the meeting on October 21, 2021. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated October 15, 2021 Case No. Attachment B ZA20-0029 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA20-0029 Page 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA20-0029 Review No.: Four Date of Review: 10/15/21 Project Name: Zoning Change and Development Plan – Carillon Parc APPLICANT: OWNER: Carillon Parc Development Partners Hunter Chase Development Partners John Terrell John Terrell 161 Summit Ave., Suite 200, Southlake, Texas 161 Summit Ave., Suite 200, Southlake, Texas Phone: (817) 253-8355 Phone: (817) 253-8355 Email: JTerrell@HCDevelopmentPartners.com Email: JTerrell@HCDevelopmentPartners.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 10/04/21 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072. General Comments 1. If possible, please provide a redline/strike -out illustrating changes from the currently adopted ordinance for Carillon Parc, as formerly done. 2. In the site data summary replace the minimum % of open space and maximum impervious area with the actual approximated percentages based on the plan. Provide the maximum number of residential loft units. 3. On the Pathways Plan, page 11, include sidewalks for the Village District single family residential in in accordance with the City’s Master Pathways Plan and the Village District regulations. Show and/or note on the Development Plan as well. 4. Label street and alley segments with a numbe r or letter for number for ease of reference. 5. Revise and/or consider the following on the development plan/ zoning booklet: a. Update Appendix ‘A’ and ‘B’ to conform with the currently proposed plan and zoning booklet. b. Ensure that all the proposed single family lots conform with the regulations for the intended Village District – Villa ‘A’ product. The Typical Villa ‘A’ product includes a knee wall and gate along the street frontage. If the intent is to only include this along the Riviera frontage, please note such on the development plan and in the booklet. You may also consider ‘’B’ or ‘C’ products. c. Consider adding Brew Pub and Craft Brewery as a permitted use. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 Case No. Attachment C ZA20-0029 Page 2 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: * A Tree Conservation Analysis was submitted as part of the Zoning Document. If the proposed development was straight zoning, the proposed existing tree canopy cover preservation would not comply with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. There is 38.4% (16.3 acres) of existing tree cover on the site and a minimum of 60% (9.78 acres) of the existing tree cover would be required to be preserved. A Total of 33% (5.4 acres) of existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved. * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% – 20% 70% 20.1 – 40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Pla nning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man -made drainage creek; v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other Case No. Attachment C ZA20-0029 Page 3 streets as identified and prioritize d in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be pr eserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. Within the Zoning Document Section 2.0 – Streetscape Standards, The minimum size of the tree wells does not comply with the Zoning Ordinance Section 49.8 Stree tscape Standards of tree wells to be a minimum of 6’ x 6’, and planting strips a minimum of 6 feet – 8 feet. 2. Within the Zoning Document Section 6.0 – Site Design Standards, the proposed parking lot islands width does not comply with the Landscape Ordin ance 544B required width a 12’. Parking lot islands shall have a minimum width of 12’ back -to-back if curbed or 13’ edge -to- edge if no curb is intended and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Sandra Endy , P.E. Development Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8033 E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of the civil construction plans. 2. The driveway off White Chapel is not shown on the color exhibits. Please update the color exhibits to reflect the access off White Chapel. 3. The White Chapel roadway improvements will be required to be approved and constructed concurrent with the onsite civil construction plans. Per direction from the Public Works Director, the full roadway section for White Chapel shall be constructed. If right -of-way cannot be obtained along the west side of White Chapel, the roadway section shall be shifted to the e ast to allow for the full right-of-way dedication. 4. Please update the TIA to reflect the site layout changes, and to assess the proposed access points. Will only having two access points for the commercial development be adequate? Please Case No. Attachment C ZA20-0029 Page 4 also ensure the TIA reflects the projection of how traffic volumes will increase based on routes people will take. 5. The street connections to E. SH 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd. are functionally like commercial driveways. Per the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, the minimum stacking depth from the SH114 & N. White Chapel would be 150’. Approximately 40 feet and 110’ are provided respectively. 6. Preliminary utility plan, grading plan, and existing and proposed drainage area maps can be deferred to the Site Plan submittal. Please be aware that any increase in sewer flow to each sewer basin will require the existing sewer analysis, provided to the City in 2018, to be updated. Also, drainage calculations shall follow the 7. It was mentioned that there will be a retaining wall along the drive just south of the residential. Please be aware that a safety rail will be required to be placed at the top of the retaining wall. Also, retaining walls taller than 4’, measured from the bottom of footing to the top of the wall, will require a separate building permit. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us 1. Fire lanes must be a minimum of 26 feet wide, for access to the high -rise building, and 24 feet wide for all others, with a 6-inch red striping that contains 4-inch white lettering that states "FIRE LANE NO PARKING" every 25 feet. Also, a minimum clearance height of 14 feet is required. (Using the scale indicated on the plans, the fire lanes do not measure to be 26 feet wide on the plans in the area depicted as a 26 wide fire lane) 2. Ensure that the fire lanes intersect with and provide access to White Chapel Boulevard and State Highway 114. (Plans do not indicate a connection to either of these roadways) 3. One or more of the required aerial apparatus access routes, fire lanes, shall be located not less than 15 feet and not greater than 30 feet from the buildings, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. (Adjust fire lanes to meet this requirement) 4. Depending on the exact square footage of t he chapel, anything in excess of 6,000 square feet must be equipped with a fire suppression system. If it is equipped with a fire suppression system, then the hose lay distance is allowed at 250 feet, which can be obtained with the current fire lane layout indicated on the plans. If the structure is not equipped with a fire suppression system, then only 150 of hose lay distance is allowed, and the current fire lane configuration will not be sufficient to meet the requirements. General Informational Comments * The Ordinance Number for this request is 480-564e. Through this request (ZA20-0029), the applicant is proposing an amendment to the currently approved ordinance for Carillon Parc, which is 480-564d. Please reference Ord. No. 480-564e when referring to the proposed amendment to Carillon Parc. Ord. No. 564a will stay in place, apart from the changes within approved Ord. No. 564d or those proposed in Ord. No. 564e, if approved. If approved, Ord. No. 480-564e would completely replace Ord. No. 564d. Case No. Attachment C ZA20-0029 Page 5 * The residential Villas will be served by a private alley – the developer / applicant should contact Republic Waste Services to determine the needs for garbage / recycling access. The number for customer service is (817) 317-2424. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * It appears that a portion of this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * Masonry materials shall be as approved and defined in the Carillon Zoning Booklet. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21, Building Color Standards for Non -Residential Buildings, unless otherwise approved under the ECZ district of this property. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a n approved fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for appr oval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Plats are only accepted for processing in accordance with the Plat Submittal Schedule - https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/302/Applications -Fees-Submittal-Schedules , and only after appropriate zoning approvals for the proposed subdivision. * All driveways/points of ingress/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended). * The subject property lies within the City’s SH 114 Land Use Corridor and falls within the Employment Center Optional Land Use in the Future Land Use Pl an. The site has Employment Center Zoning (ECZ) and thus must comply with Section 49 of the Zoning Ordinance and the specific regulations approved under this zoning district . * All development must comply with the underlying zoning district regulations. * With Site Plan and/or Plat submittal an open space management plan may be required. * Consider adding a note that states all square footage, building heights, stories, etc. illustrated on the plan are representative only. * In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final Case No. Attachment C ZA20-0029 Page 6 plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount. * The Development Plan and any future Site Plans must comply with the underlying zoning regulations of the Carillon Parc zoning booklet, as approved. * Ensure that all trails comply with the Pathways Master Plan. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA20-0029 Page 1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Carillon Parc – Plaza District Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1. KHAN, ASHRUF ALI AG 1975 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.18 NR 2. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 250 E SH 114 3.62 NR 3. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF ECZ 100 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 0.63 NR 4. KHAN, ASHRUF ALI AG 1965 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.86 NR 5. LEE, CHARLES ECZ 100 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.39 NR 6. DAVENPORT, DANIEL F ECZ 104 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36 NR 7. MCGOWEN, MILTON ECZ 105 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.37 NR 8. GOLLA, HEMANTHA ECZ 101 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.37 NR 9. SATANI, DHAVAL D ECZ 209 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36 NR 10. WALKER, ANDREW T ECZ 213 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36 NR 11. MARINELLI, RODNEY ECZ 301 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36 NR 12. CRANE, MARY E ECZ 305 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36 NR 13. HUSAIN, ASIF ECZ 1801 RIVIERA LN 0.14 NR 14. ATWOOD, TODD ECZ 1845 RIVIERA LN 0.14 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA20-0029 Page 2 15. LARDIS, KRISTOPHER ECZ 1841 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 16. KHALIL, ISHAQUE K ECZ 1837 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 17. GUTHRIE, JACQUELINE ECZ 1833 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 18. PATTERSON, BRIAN ECZ 1829 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 19. BRYCE, DANIEL L ECZ 1825 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 20. LEE, ERVING ECZ 1821 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 21. FRANDSEN, CHRISTOPHER ECZ 1817 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 22. BENOIT, ROBERT ECZ 1813 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 23. FLURY, JANE ECZ 1809 RIVIERA LN 0.13 NR 24. CLARK, JAMES C ECZ 1805 RIVIERA LN 0.13 NR 25. MICHELSEN FAMILY LIVING TRUST, ECZ 1800 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.20 NR 26. MANDARA, FRANCESCO ECZ 1804 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.20 NR 27. SHAW, DEREK DURAND ECZ 1808 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.18 NR 28. ALFORD, CARL S ECZ 1812 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.18 NR 29. JACK, HAYDEN ECZ 1816 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.18 NR 30. PARK, JEFFREY ECZ 1820 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.26 NR 31. ORF, TONY ECZ 405 MONTE CARLO DR 0.18 NR 32. EAMSHERANGKOON, KRIDDANAT ECZ 401 MONTE CARLO DR 0.19 NR 33. MILLER, JAMES ECZ 1713 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 34. ELVING, CARL ECZ 1709 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 35. CLARK, ROBERT K ECZ 1701 RIVIERA LN 0.17 NR 36. MISRA, NILAMBEN R ECZ 1705 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 37. ORTIZ, LOUIS M ECZ 400 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.15 NR 38. MOCHULSKY, RICHARD ECZ 402 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.13 NR 39. LASSITER, TODD ECZ 404 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.13 NR 40. DEVINENI, NAGA ECZ 403 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.13 NR 41. WEBB, GREG ECZ 405 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.13 NR 42. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 1750 LE MANS LN 0.48 NR 43. BURCH, MIKE J ECZ 1633 RIVIERA LN 0.16 NR 44. COUCH JOHN AND PEGGY REVOCABLE ECZ 1629 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 45. DUNCAN, BRIAN ECZ 1625 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 46. BIEKER, RON ECZ 1621 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 47. MCCAW, NEIL ECZ 1617 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 48. RUCCI, COREY ECZ 1613 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 49. BATOOL, FATIMA ECZ 1609 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 50. DANCE, DAVID ECZ 1601 RIVIERA LN 0.21 NR 51. SMITH, MICHAEL ECZ 1605 RIVIERA LN 0.12 NR 52. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF ECZ 400 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 4.91 NR 53. VISSERS EMILY A REVOCABLE FAMI ECZ 310 MONTPELIER DR 0.17 NR 54. PERRY, RICHARD B ECZ 308 MONTPELIER DR 0.13 NR 55. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 1700 N CARROLL AVE 8.01 NR 56. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 300 E SH 114 3.94 NR 57. MARCIANO, PAUL ECZ 1717 RIVIERA LN 0.15 NR 58. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 1840 RIVIERA LN 2.33 NR 59. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 201 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 1.69 NR 60. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 1801 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 10.50 NR 61. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 1781 N WHITE CHAPEL 3.07 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA20-0029 Page 3 BLVD 62. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 1775 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.32 NR 63. BROWN, CHRISTOPHER ECZ 300 ORLEANS DR 0.48 NR 64. MEISNER, JEFFREY ECZ 401 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.16 NR 65. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 1650 LE MANS LN 0.36 NR 66. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 300 CARILLON CT 0.15 NR 67. MCKELLAR TRUST ECZ 300 MONTPELIER DR 0.24 NR 68. LANIER LIVING TRUST ECZ 304 MONTPELIER DR 0.15 NR 69. SHARON R. BELL LIVING TRUST ECZ 306 MONTPELIER DR 0.13 NR 70. ILINENI, VISHNU ECZ 400 MONTPELIER DR 0.36 NR 71. CARILLON PARC CORPORATE DISTRI ECZ 360 E SH 114 9.02 NR 72. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 350 ORLEANS DR 0.83 NR 73. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 401 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 0.67 NR 74. WATERS, TIMOTHY ECZ 301 MONTPELIER DR 0.19 NR 75. BARNES, BRITTON ECZ 303 MONTPELIER DR 0.15 NR 76. IRWIN, PATTI J ECZ 305 MONTPELIER DR 0.16 NR 77. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 100 E SH 114 4.60 NR 78. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 190 E SH 114 1.29 NR 79. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 200 E SH 114 1.05 NR 80. CARILLON PARC DEVELOPMENT PART ECZ 240 E SH 114 0.76 NR 81. ZVONECEK, BRIAN SP1 1700 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.51 NR 82. SHIVERS, FRANCES BIRD EST AG 1800 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.20 NR 83. HOPKINS DALLAS PROPERTIES LTD C2 140 W SH 114 0.85 NR 84. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES SP2 1451 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 10.05 NR 85. METHODIST HOSPITALS OF DALLAS SP2 335 E SH 114 15.09 NR 86. CHAPEL OWNER LP SP2 245 W SH 114 4.52 NR 87. CHAPEL CROSSING MEDICAL LTD SP2 275 W SH 114 1.73 NR 88. SHIVERS FAMILY PTNRSHIP LTD AG 1900 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 39.08 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Seventy-four (74) Responses Received : None (0)