Loading...
Item 6GS0UTHLA1<..,E PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT September 14, 2021 CASE NO: ZA19-0069 PROJECT: Site Plan for River Oaks, Lot 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: DETAILS Blake Architects on behalf of Vikram Capital, is requesting approval of a Site Plan for River Oaks office building on property described as Lot 9, Block 1, River Oaks Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and located at 124 River Oaks Drive, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #11. The project is located on the northwest side of River Oaks Drive, approximately 1,000 feet north of W. Southlake Blvd. The site is accessed from existing River Oaks Drive. The purpose of this item is to receive approval of a Site Plan to allow construction of a 5,100 square foot single -story office building on 1.147 acres. The building will be constructed of brick and stucco with a composition shingled roof. IWW. Approved Concept Plan proposed Site Plan 17Anc -091 Zoning/Proposed Zoning "S-P-2" with "0-1" uses "S-P-2" with "0-1" uses Gross Site Acreage 1.147 acres 1.147 acres Number of Proposed 1 1 Buildings Proposed Building Area 5,100 sf 5,100 sf Area of Impervious 12,495 sf 10,178 sf Coverage Percentage of Impervious Space Allowed (0-1) / 65% max /25% 65% max /22% Provided Max Building Height (0-1) 2.5 story/35 feet (allowed) 1 story/31.1 feet (Roof peak) Required Parking 26 spaces 26 spaces (1 space per 193 sf for the entire site per S-P-2 (incl. 10 spaces on Lot 8) (incl. 10 spaces on Lot 8) Provided Parking 16 spaces on Lot 9 17 spaces on Lot 9 (10 spaces on Lot 8) (10 spaces on Lot 8) The proposed building is a single -story structure clad in brick and stucco. The Case No. ZA19-0069 Page 1 proposed architectural style for Lots 6-10 (minus lot 8) are a more contemporary style of architecture approved under a zoning change and site plan under Planning Case ZA16-026 (Lot 7, Block 1 River Oaks Addition located at 125 River Oaks) through the revised the S-P-2 regulations. The applicant proposes a building of similar scale with Lot 7 and includes the off-street parking shown on the Concept Plan. Parking is proposed as a combination of off-street and on - street spaces in a configuration similar to what was approved with the Concept Plan (ZA05-091). Overall parking adjacent to the site meets the 26 spaces shown on the Concept Plan. Regulations approved with Lot 7 with the River Oaks (Stonebridge Park Plan) (ZA16-026) are as follows: Permitted Uses This property shall be limited to the permitted uses as found in the "0-1" Office District as described in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. Approved Development Regulations This property shall be subject to the development regulations for the " O-1" Office, and all other applicable regulations with the following exceptions: • An overall parking ratio of 1 space per 193 square feet of building area shall be used in calculating required parking for the entire site, including on -street parking on lots 6 through 10. Parking shall be considered as a whole instead of based on individual spaces for each lot in order to provide a consistent feel and architectural standard for the overall development. All Tenants and/or Buyers for the development will sign a shared parking clause/easement in their respective lease/sale agreements as mutually approved by us and the City Attorney. • On -street parking for lots 6 through 10. • Fencing and screening along the northern and western property lines will be 6' wrought iron. • Bufferyards along interior lot lines not be required for this development. • No frontage on a public road for Lot 10. The Planning and Zoning Commission included the following conditions in their motion for approval of the item on September 9, 2021. P&Z Commission Conditions of Approval Applicant's Response Staff has determined that the previously approved Zoning Evaluate the addition of Change and Concept Plan for River Oaks only required 16 additional parking spaces or spaces on Lot 9. The applicant is revising the Site Plan to options. provide one additional parking space by removing the parking island that was previously shown. 17 spaces are to be shown on Lot 9. Clarify and evaluate the removal No information provided at the time the meeting packet of one of the handicap spots. was prepared. Case No. ZA19-0069 Page 2 ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider approval of a Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated September 14, 2021 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only) Link to PowerPoint Presentation Link to Narrative Link to Building Material Reference Link to Plans STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072 Patty Moos (817) 748-8269 Case No. ZA19-0069 Page 3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Vikram Capital, Ltd. APPLICANT: Blake Architects PROPERTY SITUATION: 124 River Oaks Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 9, Block 1, River Oaks Addition LAND USE CATEGORY: Low -Density Residential and Flood Plain CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" uses HISTORY: The property was annexed into the Town of Southlake in 1956 as "AG" (Ord. No. 041). February 7, 2006; City Council approved a Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Stonebridge Park at Southlake Phase II from "AG" to "S-P-2" with " O-1 " and "C-2" uses (ZA05-091) (Ord. No. 480-474). August 15, 2006; City Council approved a Site Plan for Lots 1 & 4 of River Oaks, consisting of 4 buildings totaling approximately 15,000 square feet. (ZA06-075) August 17, 2006; Planning and Zoning Commission approved a Final Plat of River Oaks, Lots 1-10 on consent. (ZA06-077) August 6, 2013; City Council approved a Site Plan for Lot 8 of River Oaks, consisting of 2 buildings totaling approximately 6,000 square feet. One building at 120 River Oaks was constructed in 2013/2014.( ZA13-062) February 7, 2017: City Council approved a Zoning Change and Site Plan for Lot 7, River Oaks to allow a change in the zoning ordinance to include revised architectural renderings as an acceptable building type for all lots in the zoning district and to approve the Site Plan for Lot 7 under Ordinance No. 480-474a. (ZA16-026) SOUTHLAKE 2035 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The 2035 future land use designation for the site is Low -Density Residential and Flood Plain These Future Uses are defined in the Southlake 2035 plan as follows: FLOODPLAIN Purpose and Definition: The Floodplain category Case No. Attachment A ZA19-0069 Page 1 illustrates areas designated by the August 1995 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps as being in the 100-year floodplain. The "floodplain" is an expanse of natural vegetation and wildlife, and should t be preserved as natural open area. Within the floodplain i is "floodway" that JOHN SON RE) must be kept free of encroachment in F pus order that the 100- t year flood may be carried without harmful increases in the height of flood waters. Although it = is not to be encouraged, the L portion of the { floodplain not in the f floodway may be reclaimed for development under certain circumstances if in accordance with FEMA regulations. The designated land use for areas of reclaimed floodplain is that of the immediately adjacent land use category. This designation may also include environmentally sensitive areas, habitats, or wetlands that may not be in FEMA identified floodplains. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Purpose: The purpose of the Low Density Residential land use category is to provide for and to protect low intensity detached single-family residential development that promotes the openness and rural character of Southlake. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Definition: (this definition was updated by passage of Ordinance No. 1186 on February 20, 2018): The Low Density Residential category is for detached single- family residential development at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. Net density is the number of dwelling units per net acre, which excludes acreage in all rights -of -way, easement, and lots designated for public or private streets. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi -Public categories. The Low Density Residential category encourages the openness and rural character of the City of Southlake. The Concept Plan for Stonebridge Park (known as River Oaks) was approved in 2006 with no change to the Low -Density Residential and Flood Plain Future Land Use. A site specific recommendation was made in the 2004 Davis/F.M. 1938 Corridor Plan (a component of the Southlake 2025 Plan) which encouraged lower intensity office and/or residential uses on the site. Sidewalks Case No. Attachment A ZA19-0069 Page 2 The proposed site plan shows the required 5 ft. sidewalk along River Oaks Drive. The proposed two east handicap spaces will need to align with the existing handicap ramp located at the southeast corner of the intersection near Lot 7 for a crosswalk. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions The site has direct access to River Oaks Drive, a non-residential collector with 40-50' right of way. * Based on the 2017 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report Traffic Impact A Traffic Impact development. Analysis (TIA) was not required/prepared for this General Office (710) 5,100 1 17 3 1 * Vehicle Trips Per Day * AM -In, AM -Out, PM -In and PM -Out are peak hour generators on a weekday * Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7" Edition TREE PRESERVATION: The proposed Tree Conservation Plan complies with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. There is 43% of existing tree cover on the property and a minimum of 50% of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved. A maximum of 68% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved. UTILITIES: Water There is an existing 8" water line along River Oaks Drive that will serve this property. Sewer There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer line along River Oaks Drive that will serve this property. DRAINAGE: Drainage from this site will flow to the area east of the property and into the adjacent creek. CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was not held for this request. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: September 9, 2021; Approved (7-0) subject to the revised staff report dated September 8, 2021 and Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated September 8, 2021 noting the applicant's willingness to evaluate the addition of additional parking spaces or options and clarifying and evaluating the removal of one of the handicap spots. Case No. Attachment A ZA19-0069 Page 3 STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated September 14, 2021. Case No. ZA19-0069 Attachment A Page 4 Vicinity Map 14 River Oaks Drive U4 w In I� N Y, '+ ms 7bagVD ail a a 2Ta6 �y6 , a 2WI 2901 C 2419 9 2fi21 19-0069 H Site Plan S 0 90180 360 += v Feet Case No. Attachment B ZA19-0069 Page 1 REVISED SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA19-0069 Review No.: Five Date of Review: 9/14/21 Project Name: Site Plan — River Oaks Lot 9 APPLICANT: Blake Architects OWNER: Vikram Capital, Ltd. Roger Blake 1202 S. White Chapel Blvd. 914 Lipscomb Southlake, TX 79062 Fort Worth, TX Phone: 817-488-9397 Phone: 972-849-8216 Email: blakearchaverizon. net Email: CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/23/2021 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER. Planning Review Patty Moos Planner Phone: (817) 748-8269 Email: pmoos(a)ci.south lake.tx.us The approved concept plan for Lot 9 shows one 12' wide landscaped parking island. To address the P&Z motion recommending approval, the applicant is revising the Site Plan to provide one additional parking space by removing the parking island that was previously shown. 17 spaces are to be shown on Lot 9. 2. Realign the east handicap spaces further east to align with handicap ramp southeast of the intersection near Lot 7 for a crosswalk. 3. Provide colored renderings of the tree conservation plan. Note: All building signage will require sign permits. Signs shown on the building are representative only. Note: The articulation requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 43, Residential Adjacency Standards, Section 43.13.a.4 is not being met on the north elevation. A variance to the to the articulation requirements would typically be required but is exempted by HB 2439 of 86th Legislature of the State of Texas. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 E-mail: kmartin(a ci.southlake.tx.us TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: Case No. Attachment C ZA19-0069 Page 1 Submit a color rendition of the Tree Conservation Plan. 2. A preliminary Plat for the property was approved prior to the effective date of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E. In accordance with Section 20.0, of Ord. 585-E, the development of the property is regulated by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. The applicant has the option to request that the development of the property be regulated by the current Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E. Under the regulations of Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B the allowed removal of protected trees is as follows; Non-residential Development: In a non-residential development, all protected trees that the Landscape Administrator determines must be altered in order to install utility lines within public R.O.W. or public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, or to install fire lanes, required parking areas and building pad sites as shown on an approved Site Plan, shall be exempt from the tree protection and tree replacement requirements listed in Sections 7 and 8 of this Ordinance. Any protected trees within these areas that the Landscape Administrator determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements listed in Section 8 of this Ordinance, but not to the tree replacement requirements listed in Section 7 of this Ordinance. All other areas of the development shall be subject to both the tree replacement and the tree protection requirements, and all other provisions of this Ordinance. The proposed Tree Conservation Plan complies with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. There is 43% of existing tree cover on the property and a minimum of 50% of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved. A maximum of 68% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved. Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: The ground cover and seasonal color plant material calculations in the Interior Landscape Summary Chart are slightly incorrect. The correct minimum of amount of ground cover is 382 square feet, and seasonal color is 51 square feet. 2. The parking landscape island in front of the building seems to be 11' wide instead of the required minimum of 12' wide. Parking lot islands shall have a minimum width of 12' from back -of -curb to back -of -curb if curbed, or 13' edge -to -edge if no curb is intended and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall. 3. On the Landscape Plan remove the bufferyards labeling along the east and south property lines. Per previous approved zoning, bufferyards are not required to be provided along interior lot lines, and no bufferyard is required adjacent to the right-of-way of River Oaks Drive. The only required bufferyards are along the north and west property lines. Case No. Attachment C ZA19-0069 Page 2 Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Development Engineering Review Sandy Endy, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8033 E-mail: sendy(aD-ci.south lake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of Building Plans. 2. Submit grading and drainage plan with Building Permit application prepared by a registered professional engineer in the State of Texas. Plan shall include 2' contours and drainage arrows. Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. Runoff from the dwelling must be shown to discharge into a drainage easement or right of way. 3. Submit Civil Plans and building plans directly to the Building Department for permitting, no separate submittal through Public Works will be needed. 4. Floodplain will need to be depicted utilizing site survey contours and FEMA Flood Insurance Study (FIS) to determine floodplain boundary. Encroachment in the floodplain, including proposed landscaping, will require a floodplain development permit, a drainage study, and possible a LOMR. Water Water Meters shall not be located within a parking stall or parking lot. Move the water meter outside of the paved area. The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A 1" inch meter must have a 1" tap, etc. Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The Environmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in: https://www.citvofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. Case No. Attachment C ZA19-0069 Page 3 * A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. *=Denotes informational comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 E-mail: kclements(a)-ci.south lake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: No comments based on submitted information. General Informational Comments * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21, Building Color Standards for Non -Residential Buildings. * Through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit the following may be required: a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan and building plans must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment C ZA19-0069 Page 4 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP SPO # 1. Owner YATES, LINDA Zoning SF1-A Physical Address 135 JELLICO CIR Acreage 1.01 Response NR 2. QUINONES, MICHAEL C SF1-A 115 JELLICO CIR 2.27 O 3. AISHWARYA PROPERTIES LLC SP2 124 RIVER OAKS DR 1.16 NR 4. JOJO REED LLC SP2 113 RIVER OAKS DR 0.07 NR 5' CNNTEXAS HOLDINGS SOUTHLAKE ILL SP2 109 RIVER OAKS DR 0.08 NR 6. PES MANAGEMENT LLC SP2 105 RIVER OAKS DR # 105 0.08 NR 7. WELLS FARGO BANK NA SP2 105 RIVER OAKS DR 1.91 NR 8. LEONHARD, TIMOTHY SF1-A 226 TIMBER LINE LN 3.46 NR 9. THOENNES, MARY GRACE SF1-A 119 JELLICO CIR 1.94 NR 10. KMARR PROPERTIES LLC (Kevin Schmuhl) SP2 120 RIVER OAKS DR 0.64 O 11. POWELL, CHARLES SF1-A 127 JELLICO CIR 7.01 NR 12. LINEHAN, THOMAS S SF1-A 220 TIMBER LINE LN 1.39 NR 13. KENDZIOR, RUSSELL SF1-A 139 JELLICO CIR 4.17 NR 14. FIRST CARLYLE CAPITAL FUNDING SP1 170 STONEBRIDGE LN 4.31 NR 15. AISHWARYA PROPERTIES LLC SP2 125 RIVER OAKS DR 1.10 NR 16. CRISIS RESPONSE COMPANY LLC SP2 121 RIVER OAKS DR 2.17 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA19-0069 Page 1 17. AISHWARYA PROPERTIES LLC SP2 116 RIVER OAKS DR 0.61 NR 18. Superintendent of Carroll ISD NR 19' Superintendent of Grapevine Colleyville ISD NR 20. Superintendent of Northwest ISD NR 21. Superintendent of Keller ISD NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Nineteen (19) Responses Received: In Favor: 0 Opposed: 2 Undecided: 0 No Response: 17 Case No. Attachment D ZA19-0069 Page 2 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS RESPONSES SS II�THLIE TF_XAS Public ConmmnL .. Your pardcipatian in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically s ubmit th is Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. ("'All comments must be submitted by 5:01) p-m_ on the meeting date and will be provided far the COVID-IB PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the Option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to carnoetns related to the spread of COVIO-19_ Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any top o or agerda item a ect•cnically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date MrMll Board Meeting" Plamng and Zoning Corwisskm * FI wo Laq Nahne Keuin Schrrujhl * Idchcs 120 Risher Oaks drive Fhx B17B747113 EaII schrnuHQtftmh.net wish tD share my views on an .Agenda Item: Ag&ndla Item MG.* Q iLt. IN * 1 will speak in SUPPORT of this item • I vAl speak in OPPOSMN 1a this item I do not wish to- speak_ but please record rrryr Comments: Tht tan oppolbmty t:Mmlt ccmffNJft m r'tl"c"t t DW L&eMled 'or a ph k he Mnp or an ltem Tat Is nei on the aX4,M. I appose the project as al" drown cn the site plan because not enough parking spaces are prauided_ This wculd ^egatively impact my a4mern property. The site plan currently shows 16 parking spaces for a 5100 square =oat buldng_ Seetinn 35.WdXd) requires 22 spaces for this building. pm aheracer "-. Signature:* 6:+r �5+�aavk Case No. Attachment D ZA19-0069 Page 3 Kevin W. Sch:muht 120 River Oaks Drive • Southlake, TX 76092 Phone (817) 337-3786 September 14, 2021 Re: Rives' Oaks Office Park Development of Lots 2, 6, & 9 Southlake, Texas 76092 To All Applicable Parties: I am the owner of two buildings within the River Oaks Office Complex, located at 120 and 122 River Oaks Drive. 1 am the principle of KWS Structural Consultants, and operate my engineering company out of the 120 River Oaks Drive building, and have done so for the last seven years. As you are likely aware, the current land owner of the remaining six undeveloped lots in the Diver Oaks Office Complex is presently looking to develop Lots 2, 6, and 9. My concerns regarding the proposed site plans and building elevations are as follows: Lot 9 -- My primary concern with regards to Lot 9 is the lack of adequate parking for this 24 2-I - 00 6 proposed 5,100 square foot building. My buildings are located directly to the South of Lot 9, and if there is a shortage of parking for Lot 9, my parking spaces are at risk of being impacted. Parking for my two buildings will become fully occupied next month with the arrival of my newest tenant. Lot 2 - Concerns surrounding the site plan and elevations for this lot are as follows: 2A 2 ! _ 007 3 a) The elevations are very plain, and do not appear to meet the City of Southlake's architectural standards for building articulation and plateline changes. Due to its street front location, it serves as a focal point for the entirety of the complex. Because of this, I feel that it is of the utmost importance that it be more aesthetically impressive than the current proposed plan. b) As both a business owner, and landlord, I remain committed to providing the best possible working conditions for my employees and tenants. There is concern that noise from the playground, and the ability to conduct business in a proper manner, is at risk of being compromised. My work requires a great deal of numerical intricacy, and allows little room for error. One of my tenants runs a mental health operation, while another is a CPA, and the constant chaos from the playground noise could be detrimental to each of us. If the daycare project is to move forward, I respectfully request that there be some type of sound mitigation measure regarding the screening walls around the playground. Case No. Attachment D ZA19-0069 Page 4 Kevin W. Schmuht 120 River Oaks Drive • Southlake, TX 76092 Plione (817) 337-3786 • c) There is only one exit into and out of this office park. This poses a safety and fire hazard to all employees, customers, clients, and visitors. The original concept plan had three exits total — one south to 1709 and two exits to the east. My concern is that the exits to the east will never be constructed. The exit eastbound out of the office park is very difficult in the mornings and evenings currently, with only about 20,000 square feet of buildings being occupied and traffic on 1709 being reduced due to Covid. Once traffic and office occupancies rise back up to pre-Covid levels, and the office park is built out to 60,000 square feet, I am concerned about the safety of exiting the office park in the evenings. I am recommending requiring the developer / owner of these six undeveloped lots to install the east bridge and drive lane to the Cantex Carlysle Nursing Home, so that there is an alternate route out of this office park. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions and/or concerns regarding this matter. Thanks for your consideration, Case No. Attachment D ZA19-0069 Page 5 Notification Response Form Site Plan for Lot 9, River Oaks Drive Meeting Dame` September 9, 2021 at 6:30 PM Flit out: owner: d, jj / Address: Jj "/ City, State, Z I p Code: •+' Wool ,.• `- PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HA NO DELIVERY BEF-0HE THE START OF THE SCHF-OULED PUBLIC HEARING. uei 7c the owners) of thurmp so noted above, are hereby in favor of LLe�rline undecided about one) the proposed Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature, Adoldional Slgnatum: Printsd Narne s), Date, 09 /#-7 1,P I Must be property owner{s). Oiherwive onnUwA the planning Dspardnaht. OtA ken Pet l3h!Wty- Philpe Number (Optional): Case No. Attachment D ZA19-0069 Page 6