Item 6GS0UTHLA1<..,E
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
STAFF REPORT
September 14, 2021
CASE NO: ZA19-0069
PROJECT: Site Plan for River Oaks, Lot 9
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY:
DETAILS
Blake Architects on behalf of Vikram Capital, is requesting approval of a Site Plan
for River Oaks office building on property described as Lot 9, Block 1, River Oaks
Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and located
at 124 River Oaks Drive, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized
Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #11.
The project is located on the northwest side of River Oaks Drive, approximately
1,000 feet north of W. Southlake Blvd. The site is accessed from existing River
Oaks Drive.
The purpose of this item is to receive approval of a Site Plan to allow construction
of a 5,100 square foot single -story office building on 1.147 acres. The building
will be constructed of brick and stucco with a composition shingled roof.
IWW.
Approved Concept Plan
proposed Site Plan
17Anc
-091
Zoning/Proposed Zoning
"S-P-2" with "0-1" uses
"S-P-2" with "0-1" uses
Gross Site Acreage
1.147 acres
1.147 acres
Number of Proposed
1
1
Buildings
Proposed Building Area
5,100 sf
5,100 sf
Area of Impervious
12,495 sf
10,178 sf
Coverage
Percentage of Impervious
Space Allowed (0-1) /
65% max /25%
65% max /22%
Provided
Max Building Height (0-1)
2.5 story/35 feet (allowed)
1 story/31.1 feet
(Roof peak)
Required Parking
26 spaces
26 spaces
(1 space per 193 sf for the
entire site per S-P-2
(incl. 10 spaces on Lot 8)
(incl. 10 spaces on Lot 8)
Provided Parking
16 spaces on Lot 9
17 spaces on Lot 9
(10 spaces on Lot 8)
(10 spaces on Lot 8)
The proposed building is a single -story structure clad in brick and stucco. The
Case No.
ZA19-0069 Page 1
proposed architectural style for Lots 6-10 (minus lot 8) are a more contemporary
style of architecture approved under a zoning change and site plan under
Planning Case ZA16-026 (Lot 7, Block 1 River Oaks Addition located at 125 River
Oaks) through the revised the S-P-2 regulations. The applicant proposes a
building of similar scale with Lot 7 and includes the off-street parking shown on
the Concept Plan. Parking is proposed as a combination of off-street and on -
street spaces in a configuration similar to what was approved with the Concept
Plan (ZA05-091). Overall parking adjacent to the site meets the 26 spaces shown
on the Concept Plan.
Regulations approved with Lot 7 with the River Oaks (Stonebridge Park Plan)
(ZA16-026) are as follows:
Permitted Uses
This property shall be limited to the permitted uses as found in the "0-1" Office
District as described in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as
amended.
Approved Development Regulations
This property shall be subject to the development regulations for the " O-1" Office,
and all other applicable regulations with the following exceptions:
• An overall parking ratio of 1 space per 193 square feet of building area
shall be used in calculating required parking for the entire site, including
on -street parking on lots 6 through 10. Parking shall be considered as a
whole instead of based on individual spaces for each lot in order to
provide a consistent feel and architectural standard for the overall
development. All Tenants and/or Buyers for the development will sign a
shared parking clause/easement in their respective lease/sale
agreements as mutually approved by us and the City Attorney.
• On -street parking for lots 6 through 10.
• Fencing and screening along the northern and western property lines will
be 6' wrought iron.
• Bufferyards along interior lot lines not be required for this development.
• No frontage on a public road for Lot 10.
The Planning and Zoning Commission included the following conditions in their
motion for approval of the item on September 9, 2021.
P&Z Commission Conditions
of Approval
Applicant's Response
Staff has determined that the previously approved Zoning
Evaluate the addition of
Change and Concept Plan for River Oaks only required 16
additional parking spaces or
spaces on Lot 9. The applicant is revising the Site Plan to
options.
provide one additional parking space by removing the
parking island that was previously shown. 17 spaces are to
be shown on Lot 9.
Clarify and evaluate the removal
No information provided at the time the meeting packet
of one of the handicap spots.
was prepared.
Case No.
ZA19-0069 Page 2
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing
2) Consider approval of a Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated September 14, 2021
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Link to Narrative
Link to Building Material Reference
Link to Plans
STAFF CONTACT:
Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Patty Moos (817) 748-8269
Case No.
ZA19-0069 Page 3
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Vikram Capital, Ltd.
APPLICANT: Blake Architects
PROPERTY SITUATION: 124 River Oaks Drive
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 9, Block 1, River Oaks Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Low -Density Residential and Flood Plain
CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with "0-1" uses
HISTORY: The property was annexed into the Town of Southlake in 1956 as "AG"
(Ord. No. 041).
February 7, 2006; City Council approved a Zoning Change and
Concept Plan for Stonebridge Park at Southlake Phase II from "AG" to
"S-P-2" with " O-1 " and "C-2" uses (ZA05-091) (Ord. No. 480-474).
August 15, 2006; City Council approved a Site Plan for Lots 1 & 4 of River
Oaks, consisting of 4 buildings totaling approximately 15,000 square feet.
(ZA06-075)
August 17, 2006; Planning and Zoning Commission approved a Final Plat
of River Oaks, Lots 1-10 on consent. (ZA06-077)
August 6, 2013; City Council approved a Site Plan for Lot 8 of River Oaks,
consisting of 2 buildings totaling approximately 6,000 square feet. One
building at 120 River Oaks was constructed in 2013/2014.( ZA13-062)
February 7, 2017: City Council approved a Zoning Change and Site Plan
for Lot 7, River Oaks to allow a change in the zoning ordinance to include
revised architectural renderings as an acceptable building type for all lots
in the zoning district and to approve the Site Plan for Lot 7 under
Ordinance No. 480-474a. (ZA16-026)
SOUTHLAKE 2035 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2035 future land use designation for the site is Low -Density
Residential and Flood Plain
These Future Uses are defined in the Southlake 2035 plan as follows:
FLOODPLAIN Purpose and Definition: The Floodplain category
Case No. Attachment A
ZA19-0069 Page 1
illustrates areas designated by the August 1995 Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) maps as being in the 100-year
floodplain. The "floodplain" is an expanse of natural vegetation and
wildlife, and should t
be preserved as
natural open area.
Within the floodplain i
is "floodway" that JOHN SON RE)
must be kept free of
encroachment in F pus
order that the 100- t
year flood may be
carried without
harmful increases in
the height of flood
waters. Although it =
is not to be
encouraged, the L
portion of the {
floodplain not in the f
floodway may be
reclaimed for development under certain circumstances if in
accordance with FEMA regulations. The designated land use for
areas of reclaimed floodplain is that of the immediately adjacent land
use category. This designation may also include environmentally
sensitive areas, habitats, or wetlands that may not be in FEMA
identified floodplains.
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Purpose: The purpose of the Low
Density Residential land use category is to provide for and to protect
low intensity detached single-family residential development that
promotes the openness and rural character of Southlake.
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Definition: (this definition was
updated by passage of Ordinance No. 1186 on February 20,
2018): The Low Density Residential category is for detached single-
family residential development at a net density of one or fewer
dwelling units per acre. Net density is the number of dwelling units
per net acre, which excludes acreage in all rights -of -way, easement,
and lots designated for public or private streets. Other suitable
activities are those permitted in the Public Parks / Open Space and
Public / Semi -Public categories. The Low Density Residential
category encourages the openness and rural character of the City of
Southlake.
The Concept Plan for Stonebridge Park (known as River Oaks) was
approved in 2006 with no change to the Low -Density Residential and
Flood Plain Future Land Use. A site specific recommendation was made
in the 2004 Davis/F.M. 1938 Corridor Plan (a component of the Southlake
2025 Plan) which encouraged lower intensity office and/or residential
uses on the site.
Sidewalks
Case No. Attachment A
ZA19-0069 Page 2
The proposed site plan shows the required 5 ft. sidewalk along River Oaks
Drive. The proposed two east handicap spaces will need to align with the
existing handicap ramp located at the southeast corner of the intersection
near Lot 7 for a crosswalk.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The site has direct access to River Oaks Drive, a non-residential collector
with 40-50' right of way.
* Based on the 2017 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact
development.
Analysis (TIA) was not required/prepared for this
General Office (710) 5,100 1 17 3 1
* Vehicle Trips Per Day
* AM -In, AM -Out, PM -In and PM -Out are peak hour generators on a weekday
* Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7" Edition
TREE PRESERVATION: The proposed Tree Conservation Plan complies with the Existing Tree
Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance.
There is 43% of existing tree cover on the property and a minimum of
50% of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved. A maximum
of 68% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved.
UTILITIES: Water
There is an existing 8" water line along River Oaks Drive that will serve
this property.
Sewer
There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer line along River Oaks Drive that will
serve this property.
DRAINAGE: Drainage from this site will flow to the area east of the property and into
the adjacent creek.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was not held for this request.
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: September 9, 2021; Approved (7-0) subject to the revised staff report
dated September 8, 2021 and Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated
September 8, 2021 noting the applicant's willingness to evaluate the
addition of additional parking spaces or options and clarifying and
evaluating the removal of one of the handicap spots.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA19-0069 Page 3
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated September
14, 2021.
Case No.
ZA19-0069
Attachment A
Page 4
Vicinity Map
14 River Oaks Drive
U4 w
In
I�
N
Y,
'+
ms
7bagVD
ail
a
a
2Ta6
�y6
, a
2WI 2901 C
2419 9
2fi21
19-0069
H
Site Plan
S
0 90180 360
+=
v Feet
Case No. Attachment B
ZA19-0069 Page 1
REVISED SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA19-0069 Review No.: Five Date of Review: 9/14/21
Project Name: Site Plan — River Oaks Lot 9
APPLICANT: Blake Architects OWNER: Vikram Capital, Ltd.
Roger Blake
1202 S. White Chapel Blvd. 914 Lipscomb
Southlake, TX 79062 Fort Worth, TX
Phone: 817-488-9397 Phone: 972-849-8216
Email: blakearchaverizon. net Email:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 8/23/2021 AND WE OFFER THE
FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS
SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE
CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER.
Planning Review
Patty Moos
Planner
Phone: (817) 748-8269
Email: pmoos(a)ci.south lake.tx.us
The approved concept plan for Lot 9 shows one 12' wide landscaped parking island. To address
the P&Z motion recommending approval, the applicant is revising the Site Plan to provide one
additional parking space by removing the parking island that was previously shown. 17 spaces
are to be shown on Lot 9.
2. Realign the east handicap spaces further east to align with handicap ramp southeast of the
intersection near Lot 7 for a crosswalk.
3. Provide colored renderings of the tree conservation plan.
Note: All building signage will require sign permits. Signs shown on the building are
representative only.
Note: The articulation requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 43,
Residential Adjacency Standards, Section 43.13.a.4 is not being met on the north elevation. A
variance to the to the articulation requirements would typically be required but is exempted by HB
2439 of 86th Legislature of the State of Texas.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
E-mail: kmartin(a ci.southlake.tx.us
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
Case No. Attachment C
ZA19-0069 Page 1
Submit a color rendition of the Tree Conservation Plan.
2. A preliminary Plat for the property was approved prior to the effective date of the Tree
Preservation Ordinance 585-E. In accordance with Section 20.0, of Ord. 585-E, the development
of the property is regulated by the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. The applicant has the
option to request that the development of the property be regulated by the current Tree
Preservation Ordinance 585-E.
Under the regulations of Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B the allowed removal of protected
trees is as follows;
Non-residential Development: In a non-residential development, all protected trees that the
Landscape Administrator determines must be altered in order to install utility lines within public
R.O.W. or public utility or drainage easements as shown on an approved Final Plat, or to install
fire lanes, required parking areas and building pad sites as shown on an approved Site Plan,
shall be exempt from the tree protection and tree replacement requirements listed in Sections 7
and 8 of this Ordinance. Any protected trees within these areas that the Landscape Administrator
determines do not have to be altered shall be subject to the tree protection requirements listed
in Section 8 of this Ordinance, but not to the tree replacement requirements listed in Section 7
of this Ordinance. All other areas of the development shall be subject to both the tree
replacement and the tree protection requirements, and all other provisions of this Ordinance.
The proposed Tree Conservation Plan complies with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation
Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. There is 43% of existing tree cover on the
property and a minimum of 50% of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved. A
maximum of 68% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved.
Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the
zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do
not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
The ground cover and seasonal color plant material calculations in the Interior Landscape
Summary Chart are slightly incorrect. The correct minimum of amount of ground cover is 382
square feet, and seasonal color is 51 square feet.
2. The parking landscape island in front of the building seems to be 11' wide instead of the required
minimum of 12' wide. Parking lot islands shall have a minimum width of 12' from back -of -curb
to back -of -curb if curbed, or 13' edge -to -edge if no curb is intended and shall be equal to the
length of the parking stall.
3. On the Landscape Plan remove the bufferyards labeling along the east and south property lines.
Per previous approved zoning, bufferyards are not required to be provided along interior lot lines,
and no bufferyard is required adjacent to the right-of-way of River Oaks Drive. The only required
bufferyards are along the north and west property lines.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA19-0069 Page 2
Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Development Engineering Review
Sandy Endy, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy(aD-ci.south lake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of Building
Plans.
2. Submit grading and drainage plan with Building Permit application prepared by a registered
professional engineer in the State of Texas. Plan shall include 2' contours and drainage arrows.
Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. Runoff from the dwelling must be shown to
discharge into a drainage easement or right of way.
3. Submit Civil Plans and building plans directly to the Building Department for permitting, no
separate submittal through Public Works will be needed.
4. Floodplain will need to be depicted utilizing site survey contours and FEMA Flood Insurance
Study (FIS) to determine floodplain boundary. Encroachment in the floodplain, including
proposed landscaping, will require a floodplain development permit, a drainage study, and
possible a LOMR.
Water
Water Meters shall not be located within a parking stall or parking lot. Move the water meter
outside of the paved area.
The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers
allowed before the meter on the public side. A 1" inch meter must have a 1" tap, etc.
Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000.
The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The
Environmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the
review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in:
https://www.citvofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S.
SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared
by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the
Building Inspections Department prior to construction.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA19-0069 Page 3
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical
report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements(a)-ci.south lake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
No comments based on submitted information.
General Informational Comments
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21,
Building Color Standards for Non -Residential Buildings.
* Through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water
connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact
fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The
applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact
Fees Guide to determine the fee amount.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit the following may be
required: a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan and building plans must be
submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited
to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees,
and related Permit Fees.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment C
ZA19-0069 Page 4
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP
SPO #
1.
Owner
YATES, LINDA
Zoning
SF1-A
Physical Address
135 JELLICO CIR
Acreage
1.01
Response
NR
2.
QUINONES, MICHAEL C
SF1-A
115 JELLICO CIR
2.27
O
3.
AISHWARYA PROPERTIES LLC
SP2
124 RIVER OAKS DR
1.16
NR
4.
JOJO REED LLC
SP2
113 RIVER OAKS DR
0.07
NR
5'
CNNTEXAS HOLDINGS
SOUTHLAKE ILL
SP2
109 RIVER OAKS DR
0.08
NR
6.
PES MANAGEMENT LLC
SP2
105 RIVER OAKS DR # 105
0.08
NR
7.
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
SP2
105 RIVER OAKS DR
1.91
NR
8.
LEONHARD, TIMOTHY
SF1-A
226 TIMBER LINE LN
3.46
NR
9.
THOENNES, MARY GRACE
SF1-A
119 JELLICO CIR
1.94
NR
10.
KMARR PROPERTIES LLC (Kevin
Schmuhl)
SP2
120 RIVER OAKS DR
0.64
O
11.
POWELL, CHARLES
SF1-A
127 JELLICO CIR
7.01
NR
12.
LINEHAN, THOMAS S
SF1-A
220 TIMBER LINE LN
1.39
NR
13.
KENDZIOR, RUSSELL
SF1-A
139 JELLICO CIR
4.17
NR
14.
FIRST CARLYLE CAPITAL FUNDING
SP1
170 STONEBRIDGE LN
4.31
NR
15.
AISHWARYA PROPERTIES LLC
SP2
125 RIVER OAKS DR
1.10
NR
16.
CRISIS RESPONSE COMPANY LLC
SP2
121 RIVER OAKS DR
2.17
NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA19-0069 Page 1
17.
AISHWARYA PROPERTIES LLC
SP2
116 RIVER OAKS DR
0.61
NR
18.
Superintendent of Carroll ISD
NR
19'
Superintendent of Grapevine
Colleyville ISD
NR
20.
Superintendent of Northwest ISD
NR
21.
Superintendent of Keller ISD
NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Nineteen (19)
Responses Received: In Favor: 0 Opposed: 2 Undecided: 0 No Response: 17
Case No. Attachment D
ZA19-0069 Page 2
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS RESPONSES
SS II�THLIE
TF_XAS
Public ConmmnL ..
Your pardcipatian in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can
electronically s ubmit th is Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item.
Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information.
("'All comments must be submitted by 5:01) p-m_ on the meeting date and will be provided far the
COVID-IB PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL
Citizens have the Option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable
channel rather than in person due to carnoetns related to the spread of COVIO-19_ Citizens wishing to
address the City may submit comments on any top o or agerda item a ect•cnically by utilizing this Public
Comment Form below.
Public Meeting Date MrMll
Board Meeting" Plamng and Zoning Corwisskm
* FI wo Laq Nahne
Keuin Schrrujhl
* Idchcs
120 Risher Oaks drive
Fhx
B17B747113
EaII
schrnuHQtftmh.net
wish tD share my views on an .Agenda Item:
Ag&ndla Item MG.*
Q
iLt. IN
* 1 will speak in SUPPORT of this item
• I vAl speak in OPPOSMN 1a this item
I do not wish to- speak_ but please record rrryr
Comments:
Tht tan oppolbmty t:Mmlt ccmffNJft m r'tl"c"t t DW L&eMled 'or a ph k he Mnp or an ltem Tat Is nei on the aX4,M.
I appose the project as al" drown cn the site plan because not enough parking spaces are prauided_
This wculd ^egatively impact my a4mern property. The site plan currently shows 16 parking spaces for a
5100 square =oat buldng_ Seetinn 35.WdXd) requires 22 spaces for this building.
pm aheracer "-.
Signature:*
6:+r �5+�aavk
Case No. Attachment D
ZA19-0069 Page 3
Kevin W. Sch:muht
120 River Oaks Drive • Southlake, TX 76092
Phone (817) 337-3786
September 14, 2021
Re: Rives' Oaks Office Park
Development of Lots 2, 6, & 9
Southlake, Texas 76092
To All Applicable Parties:
I am the owner of two buildings within the River Oaks Office Complex, located at 120 and 122
River Oaks Drive. 1 am the principle of KWS Structural Consultants, and operate my engineering
company out of the 120 River Oaks Drive building, and have done so for the last seven years.
As you are likely aware, the current land owner of the remaining six undeveloped lots in the
Diver Oaks Office Complex is presently looking to develop Lots 2, 6, and 9.
My concerns regarding the proposed site plans and building elevations are as follows:
Lot 9 -- My primary concern with regards to Lot 9 is the lack of adequate parking for this 24 2-I - 00 6
proposed 5,100 square foot building. My buildings are located directly to the South of Lot 9, and
if there is a shortage of parking for Lot 9, my parking spaces are at risk of being impacted.
Parking for my two buildings will become fully occupied next month with the arrival of my
newest tenant.
Lot 2 - Concerns surrounding the site plan and elevations for this lot are as follows: 2A 2 ! _ 007 3
a) The elevations are very plain, and do not appear to meet the City of Southlake's
architectural standards for building articulation and plateline changes. Due to its street
front location, it serves as a focal point for the entirety of the complex. Because of
this, I feel that it is of the utmost importance that it be more aesthetically impressive
than the current proposed plan.
b) As both a business owner, and landlord, I remain committed to providing the best
possible working conditions for my employees and tenants. There is concern that
noise from the playground, and the ability to conduct business in a proper manner, is
at risk of being compromised. My work requires a great deal of numerical intricacy,
and allows little room for error. One of my tenants runs a mental health operation,
while another is a CPA, and the constant chaos from the playground noise could be
detrimental to each of us. If the daycare project is to move forward, I respectfully
request that there be some type of sound mitigation measure regarding the screening
walls around the playground.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA19-0069 Page 4
Kevin W. Schmuht
120 River Oaks Drive • Southlake, TX 76092
Plione (817) 337-3786 •
c) There is only one exit into and out of this office park. This poses a safety and fire
hazard to all employees, customers, clients, and visitors.
The original concept plan had three exits total — one south to 1709 and two exits to
the east. My concern is that the exits to the east will never be constructed.
The exit eastbound out of the office park is very difficult in the mornings and
evenings currently, with only about 20,000 square feet of buildings being occupied
and traffic on 1709 being reduced due to Covid. Once traffic and office occupancies
rise back up to pre-Covid levels, and the office park is built out to 60,000 square feet,
I am concerned about the safety of exiting the office park in the evenings.
I am recommending requiring the developer / owner of these six undeveloped lots to
install the east bridge and drive lane to the Cantex Carlysle Nursing Home, so that
there is an alternate route out of this office park.
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions and/or concerns regarding
this matter.
Thanks for your consideration,
Case No. Attachment D
ZA19-0069 Page 5
Notification Response Form
Site Plan for Lot 9, River Oaks Drive
Meeting Dame` September 9, 2021 at 6:30 PM
Flit out:
owner: d,
jj /
Address: Jj "/
City, State, Z I p Code: •+'
Wool
,.• `-
PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HA NO DELIVERY
BEF-0HE THE START OF THE SCHF-OULED PUBLIC HEARING.
uei 7c the owners) of thurmp so noted above, are hereby
in favor of LLe�rline
undecided about
one)
the proposed Site Plan referenced above.
Space for comments regarding your position:
Signature,
Adoldional Slgnatum:
Printsd Narne s),
Date, 09 /#-7 1,P I
Must be property owner{s). Oiherwive onnUwA the planning Dspardnaht. OtA ken Pet l3h!Wty-
Philpe Number (Optional):
Case No. Attachment D
ZA19-0069 Page 6