Loading...
Item 7A - 2035 Corridor Committee Meeting ReportCITY OF SOUTHLAKE 0 Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Meeting Report Meeting 32 — June 2, 2021 MEETING LOCATION: 1400 Main St., Southlake, Texas 76092 City Council Chambers IN ATTENDANCE: • City Council Members: Chad Patton, Shawn McCaskill, Amy Torres-Lepp, Kathy Talley, Randy Robbins • Planning & Zoning Commission Members: Daniel Kubiak, Gina Phalen, Michael Springer • Park Board Member: Frances Scharli • City Staff: Ken Baker, Dennis Killough, Madeline Oujesky AGENDA ITEMS: 1. Call to Order. 2. Administrative Comments. 3. Review, discuss and make recommendations on the Ferguson Place development proposing 2 single family residential lots on approximately 1 acre located at 2589 and 2593 Lonesome Dove Avenue. 4. Review, discuss and make recommendations on Ridgecrest Addition proposing 9 single family residential lots on approximately 9.87 acres located at 2645, 2725, 2735 and 2745 Ridgecrest Drive. 5. Review, discuss and make recommendations on 603 N. Kimball Avenue development proposing 6 single family residential lots on approximately 3.75 acres located at 603 N. Kimball Avenue. 6. Review, discuss and make recommendations on the proposed Greenway- Kimball Crossing development of two (2) flex office buildings on approximately 8 acres located at 2175 and 2185 E. Southlake Boulevard, generally located south of E. Southlake Boulevard, west of S. Kimball Avenue and north of S. Village Center Drive. 7. Review, discuss and make recommendations on the proposed development of residential single family townhomes on the Shivers -Utley tract being approximately 22 acres located at 1835 Shady Oaks Drive, generally located along the west side of W. State Highway 114, 1200 feet south of W. Dove Road. 8. Adjournment. MEETING OVERVIEW On June 2, 2021 the Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee held their thirty-second meeting. The Committee was sent a packet of materials prior to the meeting that were to be discussed during the session. A meeting agenda was posted, and the meeting time was advertised on the City's website. The following meeting report focuses on discussion points made during the meeting by members of the Committee, public and City staff. This report is neither verbatim nor does it represent official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by the Committee, City staff, and any attendees of the meeting. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow development cases through the process. Please visit CityofSouthlake.com/Planning for more information. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 0 ITEM #3 DISCUSSION — Review, discuss and make recommendations on the Ferguson Place development proposing 2 single family residential lots on approximately 1 acre located at 2589 and 2593 Lonesome Dove Avenue. Staff presentation: Ken Baker • Proposed rezoning of two tracts from "AG" Agriculture District to Residential Planned Unit Development "RPUD" for the creation of two residential lots that would become part of a 30-lot subdivision in the City of Grapevine called "Ferguson Place". • The two tracts total 45,301 square feet • Future Land Use: Low Density Residential • The applicant will be requesting a zoning change with the City of Grapevine to R- 7.5 zoning (7,500 s.f. lots) for the 15 acres located in the Grapevine City limits • The neighborhood is proposed for 30 lots with 28 lots in Grapevine and two lots located in Southlake • The City of Southlake zoning request to achieve this lot configuration will be to rezone the property (2 tracts) from "AG" Agriculture District to Residential Planned Unit Development "RPUD" and request a variance to the 10% open space requirement Questions for staff by the Committee: N/A Applicant presentation: Kosse Maykus • 8 different tracts assembled over 10 years - 2 outliers in Southlake • Zoned AG • Request RPUD - understand it requires 10% open space o Dedicating open -space park as part of concept - 100 acres of corps easement land • Roadway easement - built to Southlake standards • 2 lots in Southlake by full-size Southlake dedicated roadway • Placing approx. 38% of development in open space Questions for applicant by the Committee: Kathy Talley: Where is there access to the road next to the proposed development? Applicant: 30ft gravel road — private. Kathy Talley: So, the residents have access it? Applicant: Yes, the same access as they have today. 15ft of the access on these lots. The fence will be placed on the edge of the easement. Big efforts to secure easement. Chad Patton: Asking for RPUD? Variance for open space? Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Meeting #32 — June 2, 2021 Item #3 — Ferguson Place Page 3 Applicant: Yes. Gina Phalen: Who's responsibility is it to maintain access easement? Applicant: People on the property who own it. No municipal responsibility. Amy Torres-Lepp: Portion owned by City of Southlake then extends to City of Grapevine? Applicant: Portion under Southlake ownership, the other portion is picked up in Grapevine/Colleyville. Kathy Talley: These two houses at the front, are they designated for Carroll schools? Applicant: All the houses will be Carroll Schools and some Grapevine. Gina Phalen: Green space - is it flood way or flood plain? Applicant: Neither it's Corps easement. Difference between the three. Daniel Kubiak: Describe what it will look like from Lonesome Dove? Hopefully no large masonry wall along that property line. Applicant: No, we will create a 50ft landscape area. Very subtle, no masonry wall. Daniel Kubiak: Material will be wrought iron? Applicant: No final design yet, but it will not be masonry wall. Potentially a combination of masonry and wrought iron, maybe. We still don't know which direction the 1st house would face. Daniel Kubiak: Probably angle the 1st house inside rather than outside. Applicant: We do want a sense of an entry feature. No castle -like structures. I assume you would rather not have a masonry structure. Daniel Kubiak: Correct, we are trying to encourage an older open feel - the less masonry the better. Daniel Kubiak: Initial feedback from City of Grapevine? Applicant: We have met with the City of Grapevine numerous times, we are inclined with what the neighbors want, and we are complying with comprehensive plans. Amy Torres-Lepp: Fine with zoning change — good job beautifying the neighborhood. Good to keep lots bigger. I agree with Dan, less masonry along the corridor the better. Also agree to have first house face inward instead of outward. Any drainage issues? Applicant: We want water to reach the park and fill pond feature. 2 or 3 curb inlets in development. Drains fast, great soil that's sandy. Do not foresee any drainage issues. Michael Springer: Regarding the park, there is no area designated for parking. Understand this park might be for neighborhood use only, but also assume this park will be open to the public. Will there be parking? Applicant: Not trying to develop something for people to drive to. Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Meeting #32 — June 2, 2021 Item #3 — Ferguson Place Page 4 Chad Patton: I know this is Grapevine property, but for the folks living along the gravel road, will they have access to the park? Applicant: Yes. We are hoping to have a sidewalk by the open -space feature. Hope to not fence this park at all. Randy Robbins: We mentioned the land -swap deal, I'm trying to figure out why this doesn't feel like an option, because it does feel like an option to take 22 and 21 and switch them around so you have a closed in neighborhood on the Grapevine side. Then 1-acre lot on Lonesome Dove, which would be more in line with intentions to do. Ken Baker: There could be a swap of the properties to the south, if that is something City Council is interested in. It is an option, but we must ensure we get 100ft frontage to meet our zoning regulations along the street. That could be a consideration. Randy Robbins: I do not like that the entirety of the street is taken up by Southlake land. This eats up as much of the two Southlake lots as possible. I know we are fighting to keep lots sizes as big as possible in town, especially on that side of SH 114. 1 assume there are issues splitting a road between Grapevine and Southlake? Applicant: We investigated the land -swap deal, and it took a long time. It is a very difficult process that involves every taxing jurisdiction and franchise utility entity. That is why we came up with this idea, it is a simplistic solution. Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #3 — Ferguson Place Meeting #32 — June 2, 2021 Page 5 STAFF PRESENTATION SHOWN TO COMMITTEE: CITY OF , SOUTHLAKE Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Meeting #32 — June 2, 2021 Item #3 — Ferguson Place Page 6 Ilk City of Grapevine 'CL Fr .�`. fiL 1 '- City of 5outhiake Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #3 — Ferguson Place Meeting #32 — June 2, 2021 Page 7 Future Land Use tjnd VS* D—gnanm; grrvee cemme rc ial i I r Future Land Use �i + ' 100-Year Flood Morn Corps of Engmeers Property - Property IIIII♦ Puhlla Perk)Open Space Publicl8emi-Public ❑ensily Rewdeotlal lartium Density Resrdenlral a� -.rfice Commercial I - Rota It commemmi Mixed use - - - Town Center f. Regional Retail � - Indusuwl 1 a vs Aso �500 rear z J - r A Current Zoning Cumnt Zoningi "AG' Agricultural Dialack Zoning Districw AG C2 E SFI•� - . Property IIII ^ .v EI 11 r-_ ¢ EI ccRxdM MFl SPI ' ......�■ i!s r ■=--=02 =_ I■Ili H /,..f�� ■ r .�.; Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Meeting #32 — June 2, 2021 Item #3 — Ferguson Place Page 8 �;1.,,r�--��.,�.� _ -•.� i : , _fig:-.. '�N-:s. . - _ � • Google - View of property from Lonesome dove Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #3 — Ferguson Place Meeting #32 — June 2, 2021 Page 10 -1 7— Cate Ira C', Al F. Cate Tract -j J L Cate Traci A q 61 -A - 7T ­ :�tj-47— t] Cate Tract 140? Current City Limit Line City of Southlake Provides Water Trash Collection t. It No Sanitary Sewer Ida- 2 701 Lonesome Dove Ave 1556 N. Gravel Cir- Southlake, Texas 76092 Southlake, Texas 76092 Cate Owner — Jason Glen Cate Owner — Bobby Wayne Cate Tracts + 037 Acre in Southlake + 0.37 Acre in Southlake + 051 Acre in Grapevine ± 051 Acre in Grapevine + -gAc. Current City Limit Li cAyOC,-w—_Oj "T Jason Cates Bobby Wayne Cates Southlake to Provide Grapevine to Provide Water ater Trash Collection Trash Collection Grapevine to Provide. 1 Sanitary Sewer Sanitary Sewer 2701 Lonesome Dove Rd- 1556 N. Gravel Cir- Southlake, Texas 76092 Southlake, Texas 76092 Cate Owner — Jason Glen Cate Owner — Bobby Wayne Cate Tracts + 0.88 Acre in Southlake + 0.88 Acre in Grapevine Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #3 — Ferguson Place Meeting #32 — June 2, 2021 Page 11 1' Cox T---+s ..�, C +e• ra - Norman Tract tL l c�, r,•a-•s I 'r If � rl - .tee, .� Li d6p " Norman fy�y�Tract �r w' ,�,Pa- �k low oryr,rcrme.ne -- -- it City Limit Line City of Southlake Provides Water Trash Collection a#A_ Sanitary Sewer Not Connected 2311 Lonesome Dove Ave. l f ! f Southlake; Texas 76092 Il lJ J fI Norman — Robert L. Norman } `} j +J Tract ± 1 Acre in Southlake ± 1 Acre in Grapevine F"' — - — Cu itrk lone Each City to Provide Water _ Trash Collection Sanitary Sew to 2311 Lonesome Dove Ave. Southlake; Texas 76092Norman Owner - Robert L. Norman ,,,' 1, Tract ± 1 Acre in Southlake ± 1 Acre in Grapevine Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #3 — Ferguson Place Meeting #32 — June 2, 2021 Page 12