Loading...
Item 7B - 2035 Corridor Committee Meeting Report - Ridgecrest AdditionCITY OF SOUTHLAKE 0 Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Meeting Report Meeting 32 — June 2, 2021 MEETING LOCATION: 1400 Main St., Southlake, Texas 76092 City Council Chambers IN ATTENDANCE: • City Council Members: Chad Patton, Shawn McCaskill, Amy Torres-Lepp, Kathy Talley, Randy Robbins • Planning & Zoning Commission Members: Daniel Kubiak, Gina Phalen, Michael Springer • Park Board Member: Frances Scharli • City Staff: Ken Baker, Dennis Killough, Madeline Oujesky AGENDA ITEMS: 1. Call to Order. 2. Administrative Comments. 3. Review, discuss and make recommendations on the Ferguson Place development proposing 2 single family residential lots on approximately 1 acre located at 2589 and 2593 Lonesome Dove Avenue. 4. Review, discuss and make recommendations on Ridgecrest Addition proposing 9 single family residential lots on approximately 9.87 acres located at 2645, 2725, 2735 and 2745 Ridgecrest Drive. 5. Review, discuss and make recommendations on 603 N. Kimball Avenue development proposing 6 single family residential lots on approximately 3.75 acres located at 603 N. Kimball Avenue. 6. Review, discuss and make recommendations on the proposed Greenway- Kimball Crossing development of two (2) flex office buildings on approximately 8 acres located at 2175 and 2185 E. Southlake Boulevard, generally located south of E. Southlake Boulevard, west of S. Kimball Avenue and north of S. Village Center Drive. 7. Review, discuss and make recommendations on the proposed development of residential single family townhomes on the Shivers -Utley tract being approximately 22 acres located at 1835 Shady Oaks Drive, generally located along the west side of W. State Highway 114, 1200 feet south of W. Dove Road. 8. Adjournment. MEETING OVERVIEW On June 2, 2021 the Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee held their thirty-second meeting. The Committee was sent a packet of materials prior to the meeting that were to be discussed during the session. A meeting agenda was posted, and the meeting time was advertised on the City's website. The following meeting report focuses on discussion points made during the meeting by members of the Committee, public and City staff. This report is neither verbatim nor does it represent official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by the Committee, City staff, and any attendees of the meeting. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow development cases through the process. Please visit CityofSouthlake.com/Planning for more information. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE 0 ITEM #4 DISCUSSION — Review, discuss and make recommendations on Ridgecrest Addition proposing 9 single family residential lots on approximately 9.87 acres located at 2645, 2725, 2735 and 2745 Ridgecrest Drive. Staff presentation: Dennis Killough • Future Land Use: Low Density Residential • Zoning: AG • Proposed concept plan — 9 single-family residential lots on approx. 9.87 acres o Some lots will front on the cul-du-sac that will be constructed off Ridgecrest o Lot 8 will have side access off the privately maintained drive. o Lot 9 will have access off the privately maintained drive as well. • Along a private access drive — practically maintained. This has not been approved by city street standards nor is it accepted by the City. Questions for staff by the Committee: Frances Scharli: For Lot 2, where is the access to it? Dennis Killough: Lot 2 fronts off Ridgecrest, not the cul-du-sac. Gina Phalen: Privately maintained road? Dennis Killough: Yes, access off the privately maintained access Kathy Talley: Road would need to be adjusted; I see this as a huge issue. Barely over a one -lane road. Probably not built to City standards for Fire and safety. Does the City not maintain this? Dennis Killough: As the properties developed around it prior to the City having annexed it or regulated its subdivision, it was constructed to provide access to the lots or tracts that would divide the roadway. Applicant presentation: Kosse Maykus Requesting SF-1A zoning Development according to land use plan Questions for applicant by the Committee: Kathy Talley: Concerns about roadway in general. The City is not maintaining it. I see some challenges with it if its not brought up to standards. Applicant: I understand your concerns. There are already 5 other homes using it. Any costs or burdens should be shared with more than this neighborhood. Ken Baker: Lot 9 will have street frontage variance, and as part of that we will have public safety evaluate the access easement. Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Meeting #32 — June 2, 2021 Item #4 — Ridgecrest Addition Page 3 Chad Patton: So, that applicant is asking for straight SF-1A and it defaults the standards expect for Lot 9 (which will have a potential variance). Applicant: All the homes will be fire sprinkled (suppression). Kathy Talley: What is the net acreage per lot? No park space or open space required? Chad Patton: No, this is a SF-1A case that meets the standards. Not much to look at besides the variance and access for potential lots. Since this is not a zoning request, we cannot ask for open space. Amy Torres-Lepp: Isn't the existing zoning AG? Applicant: Yes. Amy Torres-Lepp: So, he is asking for a zoning change? Chad Patton: Yes, but it meets all the SF-1A requirements. Applicant: We consciously didn't come in with a proposal that didn't exactly meet all SF-1A requirements. It is 1-acre lots on AG property that identifies as low density residential. Randy Robbins: Do you lose a lot if you come in top or bottom and pull the cul-du-sac down so that you have nine lots as opposed to six lots in the neighborhood and three on the outskirts? Applicant: To categorize, this is not a neighborhood. This is blending into an existing neighborhood with many lots. There are already homes fronting the road up to the north. We have the cul-du-sac and lots 2 and 1 already exist right now. Randy Robbins: So, the house on lot 1 is remaining? Applicant: No, it will be torn down. Randy Robbins: If six houses front off the cul-du-sac and three that are not part of it, what are you losing if you move the road up and all nine lots are contiguous to the city road. By doing this you remove the variance and bring in the outliers. Applicant: I did not even contemplate it that way, because there are already five homes using this road. Shawn McCaskill: Council likes having options. Might include an R-PUD option that includes the comments heard tonight. Applicant: Under R-PUD, what would you like to see different? Shawn McCaskill: I've heard concerns about lot 9 with private access. Lot 8, 9, and 2 not being part of the neighborhood. Maybe buffers along Ridgecrest to make it self- contained. Applicant: So, right now we have 4 lots running along Ridgecrest. Is that problematic? Kathy Talley: If you take out one lot you could configure this better. Visually, I just can't see this. This is not entirely a neighborhood. Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #4 — Ridgecrest Addition Meeting #32 — June 2, 2021 Page 4 Daniel Kubiak: Fencing along Ridgecrest, preferably wrought iron and pushed back, for the lots that front the street. Applicant: So, you would rather not have fronting and place a wall of iron and isolate them? Daniel Kubiak: If they are fronting Ridgecrest. Allow some stacking, more of a logistical and aesthetic comment. Something to think about. STAFF PRESENTATION SHOWN TO COMMITTEE: USOUTHLAI<E I Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #4 — Ridgecrest Addition Meeting #32 — June 2, 2021 Page 5 Future Land Use Ridgecrest Property Lana Use Designation: Low Density R-idenual Future Land Use 100-Year Flood Plain Corps of Engineers Property Prilmc ParklOpen Spece ST f5 - Puhlicemi-Pul Low Density Resitlennal _ Medium Density Resideniisl Office Commercial - Retail Commercial L. Densih Resin U - Mixec: Use - Town center Regional Retail - Industrial o m seo sR Feet 1 — — j 1 f r L > Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #4 — Ridgecrest Addition Meeting #32 — June 2, 2021 Page 6 Current Zoning Rldgecrest Property Current Zoning: '•nc••agr,cwtl,ralDistrict Zoning Districts: AS i C, SPAC3 � _ �SF1g �C9 \ ®SFZ - NR-PUA SF30 � WC II ` 0 SF20A Q B, R�UW � 11 - MF1 � 12 ® MF2 Q SP, _ yt - MW Q SP2 ®CS 1711-�-, IOF j: ,;sue• _� . 19.87 AC I .+ --�.�,-,•ems j �g'� , I." � e �''�`'�, � �.� j If Ij R: � Pla��� swFaeouc.wc. ..,,� .� �•, r, �•� rP k-" �1 �a "�•i-! Boundary Ridgeerest PropertA Stinta e, Tarrant Courtly, Texas Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #4 — Ridgecrest Addition Meeting #32 —June 2, 2021 Page 7 L Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #4 — Ridgecrest Addition Meeting #32 — June 2, 2021 Page 8 View East at Ridgecrest Drive (North Property) View East from Ridgecrest Drive way ®, u Concept Plan Ridgeerest Property ut a Rant county, .— Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #4 — Ridgecrest Addition Meeting #32 — June 2, 2021 Page 10