Item 7Case No.
ZA21-0031
S T A F F R E P O R T
May 28, 2021
CASE NO: ZA21-0031
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for XO Marriage Center EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: On behalf of XO Marriage, Parkhill is requesting approval of a Zoning Change
and Concept/Site Plan for XO Marriage Center on property described as Lot 1,
Block 1 (shown as Lots 1A and 1B by Tarrant Appraisal District), Lot 1, Block 2,
Lot 2, Block 4 and Lot 1, Block 5, Gateway Church – 114 Campus, an addition to
the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1301 and 1351 E.
Kirkwood Blvd., 700 and 701 Blessed Way, and 1501 E. Highland St., Southlake,
Texas. Current Zoning: "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit Development
District. Proposed Zoning: "NR-PUD" Non-Residential Planned Unit
Development District. SPIN Neighborhood #4.
DETAILS: The project is generally located southeast of the intersection of E. Kirkwood Blvd.
and Grace Ln.
The purpose of this request is to seek approval of a Zoning Change and
Concept/Site Plan to modify the existing Gateway Church “NR-PUD" Non-
Residential Planned Unit Development District for Gateway Church. The Concept
Plan for the approximately 82 acre Parcel ‘B’ in the existing zoning shows a
prayer center at the northwest corner of the parcel. The applicant is proposing to
revise the Parcel ‘B’ Concept Plan to show a three-story, approximately 32,190
square foot building for XO Marriage with office, assembly and studio uses on an
approximately 4.998 acre lot where the prayer center is currently shown. The
“NR-PUD” zoning currently permits “O-1” and “O-2” Office District uses and
regulations. The zoning is proposed to be revised to allow the building to contain
a 150-seat film studio, a Podcast studio, and assembly and gathering areas. Site
Plan approval of the proposed XO Marriage site is also requested. The proposed
“NR-PUD” zoning regulations and permitted uses are below along with the Site
Data Summary Chart.
Case No.
ZA21-0031
Case No.
ZA21-0031
Site Data Summary
Current/Proposed Zoning NR-PUD
Land Use Designation Public/Semi-Public
Gross/Net Acreage 4.998 (217,702 sf)
Number of Lots 1
Total Building Floor Area (Gross)
Floor Area by Use:
Office
Assembly
Circulation, storage, mechanical, etc.
32,190 sf
19,780 sf
4,652 sf
7,758 sf
Max. Building Height/
Number of Stories
52’ 6”
3 stories
Open Space Area 134,182 sf
Open Space % 61.7%
Area of Impervious Coverage 83,520 sf
Impervious Coverage % 38.3%
Parking Spaces Required (Zoning Ord.) 139
Parking Spaces Provided (NR-PUD) 126
Case No.
ZA21-0031
VARIANCE
REQUESTED: Variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, Section 5.2.d, which requires a
minimum stacking depth of 75’ for the driveway on Grace Ln., to allow
approximately 59’ of stacking depth.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider approval of a Plat Revision
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Concept/Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated May 27, 2021
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map & Responses
Half Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
Presentation
“NR-PUD” Zoning Narrative and Variance Request
Plans
SPIN Report
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No. Attachment A
ZA21-0031 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: XO Marriage
APPLICANT: Parkhill
PROPERTY SITUATION: Generally located southeast of the intersection of E. Kirkwood Blvd. and
Grace Ln.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1 (shown as Lots 1A and 1B by Tarrant Appraisal District),
Lot 1, Block 2, Lot 2, Block 4 and Lot 1, Block 5, Gateway Church – 114
Campus
LAND USE CATEGORY: Public/Semi-Public with EC-R, Employment Center Residential; EC-1,
Employment Center 1; and EC-2, Employment Center 2 optional Land
Use Overlay Designations.
CURRENT ZONING: “NR-PUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District.
PROPOSED ZONING: “NR-PUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District.
HISTORY: - The property was annexed into the City in 1957.
- “NR-PUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District and a
Concept Plan were approved June 17, 1997.
- A Zoning Change and Concept Plan (ZA05-112) for Gateway Church to
allow religious institutions as a permitted use along with multi-level
parking garages as a permitted accessory use on a 90 acre parcel within
the NRPUD district labeled as Parcel ‘B’ and ‘E’ on the proposed concept
plan was approved August 21, 2007. A Preliminary Plat (ZA05-113) was
also approved.
- A Final Plat (Z07-115) was approved by P&Z May 5, 2008.
- A Site Plan (ZA08-022) for Gateway Church for a 206,246 square foot
church building and a 4,700 square foot physical plant on 81.82 acres
was approved June 3, 2008.
SOUTHLAKE 2035 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2035 future land use designation for the entire 82 acre Gateway
Church and proposed XO Marriage Center site is Public/Semi-Public with
EC-R, Employment Center Residential; EC-1, Employment Center 1; and
EC-2, Employment Center 2 optional Land Use Overlay Designations.
Public/Semi-Public
Purpose and Definition: Public/Semi-Public areas are suitable for a wide
range of public, civic, and religious uses, such as government offices and
facilities, public and private schools, churches and related facilities
(including parsonage and parochial schools), cemeteries, and Public
Parks/Open Space uses in conjunction with these developments. The
current “NR-PUD” zoning on the property allows “O-1” and “O-2” uses in
Case No. Attachment A
ZA21-0031 Page 2
Parcel ‘B’, so an amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan is not
required.
Employment Center 1 (EC-1)
Purpose and Definition: The EC-1
category is intended for the highest
intensity of commercial and
employment uses immediately
adjacent to S.H. 114. This land use
category should be applied to
properties that have significant
frontage along the highway, have
limited development constraints,
and are largely undeveloped or underdeveloped. For optimal
development opportunities, properties in the EC-1 land use category
should have a minimum contiguous frontage of 1,200 feet. The EC-1 land
use category shall be a maximum of 700 feet in depth (as measured from
the R-O-W of S.H. 114). The EC-1 land use category has to be applied in
conjunction with the EC-2 and EC-R land use categories to provide for
compatible transitions to adjoining neighborhoods. As a percentage of the
entire EC land use.
Employment Center 2 (EC-2)
Purpose and Definition: The Employment Center 2 (EC-2) is intended
for a medium intensity mix of uses that transition from EC-1 or S.H. 114
to EC-R or lower intensity residential neighborhoods. This land use
category would be applied to properties that may have significant frontage
along the highway, have limited development constraints, and are largely
undeveloped or underdeveloped.
Employment Residential (EC-R)
Purpose and Definition: The Employment Center Residential (EC-R)
designation is intended for low-intensity, predominantly residential
neighborhoods. This land use category should be applied to properties
that have significant development constraints such as wetlands, creeks,
floodplains, water bodies, steep grades, and woodlands and are largely
undeveloped or underdeveloped. This category is intended for properties
adjacent to existing neighborhoods, open space, or as buffers from
environmentally sensitive areas. Very limited non-residential uses (office,
retail, and civic) may be permitted at key street intersections and shall be
designed to an appropriate neighborhood scale.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA21-0031 Page 3
S.H 114 Corridor Plan
The following recommendations are
for the LU #7 Geographical Area in
the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan.
• Retain existing Mixed Use and
Public/Semi-Public Land Use
designations and add Multi-
Tenant Office Overlay on the
undeveloped portion along S.H.
114 as indicated on the Overlay
Map.
• Office development should
consist of moderately-scaled buildings with a high degree of design
quality with amenities at major corners and features such as
structured or underground parking. Buildings should lessen in height
closer to Kirkwood Blvd. corridor.
• Office development near Highland St. should be limited to building
size and scale which is compatible with adjacent single-family
residential and preserves the maximum amount of green space on the
site. Buffer should be established between existing and future
residential uses and any planned office uses.
• Future development should be approved in a manner that is sensitive
to potential impacts on adjacent residential areas, particularly as
related to noise, traffic, building heights, lighting and views.
• Area is also appropriate for medical development consistent with
overlay description, and educational facilities as recommended in the
Economic Development Master Plan.
• Future development on the Chesapeake site should incorporate
existing wetlands and creek. Evaluate the water intake from Town
Square and reduce impact on downstream flood plain.
• Any development should be walkable and pedestrian friendly and
should explore opportunities to interconnect adjacent properties
particularly to the north through a trail system.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Master Pathways Plan shows a future <8’ sidewalk along the south
side of E. Kirkwood Blvd. A 5’ wide sidewalk is required to be constructed
with the extension of the eastbound Kirkwood Blvd. lanes to the east
property line. A 5’ sidewalk is also required along the east side of Grace
Ln. The required sidewalks are shown on the Site Plan.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA21-0031 Page 4
Traffic Impact
One driveway is proposed on Grace Lane and one driveway is proposed
on E. Kirkwood Blvd. The existing eastbound lanes for E. Kirkwood Blvd.
do not extend to the proposed driveway location. The lanes are required
to be extended to the east property line before E. Kirkwood Blvd. reduces
back to two lanes.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The Master Thoroughfare Plan shows Grace Ln. and E. Kirkwood Blvd.
to be four-lane divided arterials with 100’ of right of way. Grace Ln. was
approved as an 80’ right of way with the previous “NR-PUD” zoning case.
Adequate right of way has been previously dedicated for both streets.
TREE PRESERVATION: The proposed preservation of the existing cover complies with the
Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation
Ordinance 585-E. There is 19% of existing trees cover on the site, and a
minimum of 70% of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved.
The applicant is proposing to preserve 73.7% of the existing tree cover.
UTILITIES: The property is served by an existing 8” water line in Grace Ln. and
sanitary sewer will be extended from an existing 8” sanitary sewer line to
the south in the Gateway Church lot to serve the property.
DRAINAGE: Drainage is generally west to east across the property to an existing
drainage/detention channel along the east property line.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held on April 27, 2021. Please see the SPIN Report
attached separately.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept/Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated May 27,
2021.
The criteria for approving a variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634 is
below:
In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal
enforcement of the regulations herein will create an unnecessary
hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing
the unnecessary hardship is unique to the affected property an is not self-
imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible
with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that
the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose
of this ordinance. The decision of the City Council shall be final.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA21-0031 Page 5
General
Development
Standards
Applies? Comments
Overlay Regulations Yes
The property is not in the Corridor Overlay District, but the
previous “NR-PUD” zoning requires all development to comply
with the requirements of the district.
Building Articulation Yes A “NR-PUD” regulation has been added to allow the vertical
and horizontal articulation as shown.
Masonry Standards Yes Complies
Impervious Coverage Yes Complies
Bufferyards Yes Complies subject to review comments being addressed
Interior Landscape Yes Complies subject to review comments being addressed
Tree Preservation Yes Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E applies. Complies
Sidewalks Yes A minimum 5’ sidewalk is required along Grace Ln. and E.
Kirkwood Blvd. and the sidewalk is shown on the plan.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA21-0031 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0031 Page 1
CONCEPT/SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA21-0031 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 05/27/21
Project Name: Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan – XO Marriage
APPLICANT: Shahnaz Talukder OWNER: Brent Evans
Parkhill XO Marriage
3000 Internet Blvd. Suite 550 115 Grand Ave. #213
Frisco, TX 75034 Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (972)987-1670 Phone:
E:mail: stalukder@parkhill.com E:mail: brent@xomarriage.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
05/17/21 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE
HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,
PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
1. An appropriate plat that conforms to the underlying zoning and to the approved Site Plan must
be processed, approved and recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. Please use the
boundary of the proposed lot as the base for all plans. The new lot number will be Lot 1R2 on
the plat. The lot containing Gateway Church will be Lot 1R1 on the plat.
1. The Trip Generation spreadsheet was provided; however, it lists the Land Use as “Church” and
per the narrative this building is to be used for General Office and Assembly. Please revise the
Trip Generation Rates to reflect the correct Land Use categories. Also, 126 spaces parking
spaces are shown on the plan for two driveways and 98 spaces are shown for Criteria #1.
Criteria #1 is for the average number of spaces per driveway.
2. Please make the following changes to the Site Plan:
a. Revise the description in the title block to Lot 1B, Block 1, Gateway Church-114 Campus,
being a portion of Lot 1, Block 1, Gateway Church-114 Campus.
b. Change the note by the asterisk under the parking summary to “10% REDUCTION PER
NR-PUD # 480-222B”.
c. In the Site Data Summary Chart, remove “#480-222A” from the existing and proposed
zoning and just put “NR-PUD” for both.
3. All driveways/points of ingress/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as
amended). The following comments are in regard to the proposed driveways:
a. The proposed driveway off Kirkwood is located past the existing pavement section.
Please extend the pavement section on the south side of Kirkwood to the eastern edge
of the property to allow for two east bound traffic lanes. At this location, the street section
can be taper back to the existing cross section.
b. Approximately 59’ of stacking depth is provided and a minimum stacking depth of 75’ is
required. A variance request has been added to the zoning narrative.
c. Dimension the driveway distance to the intersection for both driveways from the
centerline of the driveway to the right of way/property line. A minimum distance of 200’
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0031 Page 2
from the intersection is required. The distance from the centerline driveway on E.
Kirkwood Blvd. to the intersection appears to be approximately 220’ from the right of
way/property line. Both driveways appear to comply with the distance requirement.
4. One 10’ x 50’ loading space is required and one 10’ x 25’ space is provided. A regulation has
been added to the NR-PUD zoning narrative stating that one 10’ x 25’ loading space is required
for the site.
5. Provide sidewalks and/or trails in compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as
amended and the Master Pathways Plan. The Master Pathways Plan shows a <8’ sidewalk
along the south side of E. Kirkwood Blvd. A minimum 5’ sidewalk is required along Grace Ln.
and E. Kirkwood Blvd. A pedestrian access easement must be dedicated for portions of the
sidewalk that are on private property and not in the right of way.
* The monument sign requires separate approval. It is not approved as part of the Zoning
Change and Concept/Site Plan.
* The current NR-PUD zoning (Ord. No. 480-222A) states that buildings will comply with the
80% masonry requirement. The building as shown complies. A ‘NR-PUD” regulation has been
added to allow the horizontal and vertical articulation as shown. The property is not in the
Corridor Overlay District, but the existing zoning requires that development comply with the
requirements in that district.
* Per Subdivision Ord. No. 483, as amended, Section 8.05, Sections E and F:
E. Placement of Equipment: All electric, telephone, and cable, utilities shall be placed in the
rear easement unless otherwise approved by City Council as a part of platting process.
Mechanical equipment, transformers, and other visible installations will not be permitted
in the front yards of any lots. Occasional location in the front yard area may be permitted
for unusual conditions if said locations have been indicated on an approved preliminary
plat. All such equipment that is installed above ground will be low profile in nature and will
not exceed thirty (30) inches in height. Placement of such equipment shall be such that it
is located as near the rear property line as possible. Switch gear will be located such that
it maintains low visibility but may be placed convenient to and accessible from the street.
F. All above ground equipment shall be screened from public view, in such a manner that
the ground equipment cannot be seen from a public right-of-way. Said screening shall be
completed at the time of installation by the utility company and/or developer.
Please make sure that the electrical transformer and any other equipment is screened from
public rights of way with landscaping or by some other manner.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type
of lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0031 Page 3
1. The proposed preservation of the existing cover complies with the Existing Tree Cover
Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E. There is 19% of existing
trees cover on the site, and a minimum of 70% of the existing tree cover is required to be
preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve 73.7% of the existing tree cover.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree
Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing
tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the
property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing
tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum
existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall
consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning
Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council
regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council
finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so
as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including
mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential
areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to
this Ordinance.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0031 Page 4
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the
zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do
not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. In the Interior Landscape Summary Chart show the correct “Required” and “Provided” interior
landscape areas and the associated landscape plant material calculations. The minimum
required interior landscape area is based on 50% of the 10,674 square foot building footprint
area, 5,337 square feet. The provided interior landscape area is all landscape area except the
required bufferyards. Please use the format of the interior landscape chart in the example
landscape plan attached separately.
2. All parking planter islands in parking areas shall contain a minimum of one (1) canopy tree with
the remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses or seasonal color. Planter
islands which have light poles for lighting the parking areas may substitute two (2)
understory/accent trees for the required canopy tree. Turf grass may not be provided within
parking planter islands.
3. Existing tree credits are being taken for required bufferyard canopy trees. The north, east, and
south bufferyards do not contain any existing trees to take credits for. Please provide at least
the minimum required canopy trees for the north, east, and south bufferyards or add a regulation
to the NR-PUD amendment document to allow the bufferyards as shown.
Existing Plant Credits: Existing trees which are within fifty feet (50’) of the property line and have
a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the drip line within the bufferyard area shall be granted
credits toward reducing the required plantings as set forth in the Landscape Ordinance, as
amended.
4. The minimum required accent trees and shrubs are proposed to not be provided within the
bufferyards. Please provide at least the minimum required accent trees and shrubs for the
required bufferyards.
An excess amount of canopy trees, accent trees, and shrubs are proposed to be planted within
the interior landscape portion of the development. Because there is a vast amount of interior
landscape area the required bufferyards plant material does not need to be planted directly
within the bufferyards. Use some of the proposed provided interior plant material to count
towards the required bufferyards plant material. Provide a color Landscape Plan rendition.
Delineate which plant material is provided towards required interior landscaping, bufferyards,
and towards existing tree credits.
5. Provide a color-coded Landscape Plan. The plan should have the detail of sheet L-4 in the first
submittal, but each plant symbol in the plant schedule will be a different color that corresponds
to the same color symbol on the plan. Please provide this plan in addition to sheet L-5. See the
example landscape plan attached separately.
* Existing tree credits shall only be granted if the tree/s are in healthy condition and all
requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined at the time of
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0031 Page 5
inspection for a Permanent Certificate of Occupancy.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Sandra Endy, P.E.,
Development Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of the
civil construction plans.
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
2. The Trip Generation spreadsheet was provided; however, it lists the Land Use as “Church” and
per the narrative this building is to be used for General Office and Assembly. Please revise the
Trip Generation Rates to reflect the correct Land Use categories.
3. The proposed driveway off Kirkwood is located past the existing pavement section. Please
extend the pavement section on the south side of Kirkwood to the eastern edge of the property
to allow for two east bound traffic lanes. At this location, the street section can be taper back to
the existing cross section.
WATER COMMENTS:
4. The domestic waterline pipe size was updated to match the meter size, however, placing two
meters on the same domestic pipe line is not permitted. The domestic water service line should
have one meter. The City of Southlake allows a 1”, 2” or 4” water meter.
5. The 12” water line along Kirkwood should be extended to the eastern property boundary. There
is a potential for the City to participate in a cost sharing for the difference in cost between an 8”
pipe and a 12” pipe.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
6. The proposed detention channel is located outside of the existing drainage easement. The
detention channel shall be located within a drainage easement. The existing drainage easement
shall be modified to include the new detention channel.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard
details and general notes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000.
The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The
Environmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the
review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in:
https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP
shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0031 Page 6
* NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
* Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared
by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the
Building Inspections Department prior to construction.
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical
report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
*=Denotes informational comment that don’t need to be addressed until Civil Construction Submittals.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler systems can be located
on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length
of the pipe. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in
a vault. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is located in a vault, or a
minimum of 6’X6’ if it is located on the riser. (Label riser room location to determine termination
point of riser piping, and indicate size of the riser room).
General Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting was held on April 27, 2021.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will
require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use
Zoning Ordinance No. 479.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0031 Page 7
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be
paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee,
Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale
water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to
pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based
on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to
review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine
the fee amount.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA21-0031 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
‘
SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1. DEAN FAMILY TRUST DATED AUGUST SF1-A 1205 COSTA AZUL CT 1.00 NR
2. WOMACK, JUSTEN SF1-A 1201 COSTA AZUL CT 1.03 NR
3. KAUFMAN, JAMES C SF1-A 625 BRIARWOOD DR 1.35 NR
4. CARROLL, ISD AG 1375 E HIGHLAND ST 0.70 NR
5. GATEWAY CHURCH NRPUD 1301 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 0.23 NR
6. TOTAL E&P USA REAL ESTATE LLC AG 1680 E SH 114 3.09 NR
7. TOTAL E&P USA REAL ESTATE LLC AG 1730 E SH 114 8.08 NR
8. TOTAL E&P USA REAL ESTATE LLC AG 1700 E SH 114 1.11 NR
9. MOSS, ANGELIA J SF1-A 550 CHERRY LN 1.09 NR
10. BROWN, RONNI SF1-A 600 BRIARWOOD DR 1.27 NR
11. MILLER, CHARLES K NRPUD 1778 E SH 114 0.08 NR
12. TOTAL E&P USA REAL ESTATE LLC AG 1750 E SH 114 7.84 NR
13. WAGNER, STEVEN R SF1-A 550 BRIARWOOD DR 1.05 NR
14. BHAGAT, ALPA SF1-A 1350 E HIGHLAND ST 0.90 NR
15. TUBB, KEVIN L SF1-A 1200 ST EMILION CT 0.99 NR
16. MCDERMOTT-LANGE INV LLC SF1-A 1201 ASHMOORE CT 0.91 NR
17. MILLER, CHARLES K NRPUD 1774 E SH 114 0.25 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA21-0031 Page 2
18. FIRST FINANCIAL TRUST & ASSET MF1 675 CHERRY LN 0.98 NR
19. GATEWAY CHURCH NRPUD 701 BLESSED WAY 34.29 NR
20. COTY, ROB SF1-A 600 CHERRY LN 1.00 NR
21. CARROLL, ISD AG 1379 E HIGHLAND ST 0.77 NR
22. SOUTHLAKE FEE OWNER LLC SP1 1200 E SH 114 6.78 NR
23. CARROLL, ISD AG 1361 E HIGHLAND ST 1.04 NR
24. EARP, JOSHUA SF1-A 650 CHERRY CT 0.99 NR
25. SILVERADO SOUTHLAKE LLC NRPUD 1975 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 0.77 NR
26. 2011 EAST KIRKWOOD BOULEVARD L SP1 2011 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 0.83 NR
27. PLOWS, IAN SF1-A 1204 COSTA AZUL CT 1.07 O
28. LLOYD, WILLIAM E SF1-A 1201 ST EMILION CT 0.94 NR
29. SHAFI, SHAHID SF1-A 1200 COSTA AZUL CT 1.02 NR
30. SOUTHLAKE GLEN RESIDENTIAL COM TZD 850 GLEN LAKE DR 0.05 NR
31. NOORANI, IMRAN TZD 2009 LAKE VISTA CT 0.28 NR
32. WIDMER, ELIZABETH TZD 2005 LAKE VISTA CT 0.28 NR
33. MORE, JAMES TZD 2013 LAKE VISTA CT 0.41 NR
34. SOUTHLAKE GLEN RESIDENTIAL COM TZD 851 GLEN LAKE DR 0.04 NR
35. ROY, ARINDAM D TZD 2001 LAKE VISTA CT 0.28 NR
36. BARUAH, MRINAL TZD 900 GLEN LAKE DR 0.26 NR
37. MOTURI, JEEVANA TZD 912 GLEN LAKE DR 0.23 NR
38. ARSID, DEEPAK TZD 908 GLEN LAKE DR 0.23 NR
39. CITY OF SOUTHLAKE TZD 932 GLEN LAKE DR 9.62 NR
40. OBAID, SACHA SF1-A 1251 SUNSHINE LN 3.04 NR
41. D'SOUZA, ADAM SF1-A 1200 BLYTHE LN 0.92 NR
42. VILLAGE CHURCH CS 1282 E HIGHLAND ST 1.00 NR
43. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 1371 E HIGHLAND ST 0.04 NR
44. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 1371 E HIGHLAND ST 0.11 NR
45. CARROLL, ISD CS 1335 E HIGHLAND ST 3.82 NR
46. CARROLL, ISD AG 1349 E HIGHLAND ST 0.56 NR
47. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 1371 E HIGHLAND ST 0.07 NR
48. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 1371 E HIGHLAND ST 0.13 NR
49. GATEWAY CHURCH NRPUD 700 BLESSED WAY 76.90 NR
50. MARRIAGE TODAY NRPUD 1351 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 5.11 NR
51. SILVERADO SOUTHLAKE LLC SP1 2001 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 4.41 NR
52. SUNSHINE LANE LLC RPUD 1120 HIGH CT 1.00 NR
53. SUNSHINE LANE LLC RPUD 1116 HIGH CT 1.01 NR
54. GATEWAY CHURCH NRPUD 1501 E HIGHLAND ST 22.15 NR
55. SUNSHINE LANE LLC RPUD 1112 HIGH CT 1.01 NR
56. SUNSHINE LANE LLC RPUD 1108 HIGH CT 1.00 NR
57. SUNSHINE LANE LLC RPUD 1104 HIGH CT 1.10 NR
58. SUNSHINE LANE LLC RPUD 1100 HIGH CT 1.01 NR
59. CARROLL, ISD SP1 1800 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 24.39 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Fifty-nine (59)
Responses Received within the notification area: One (1) - attached
Responses Received outside the notification area: One (1) – attached
Case No. Attachment D
ZA21-0031 Page 3
Responses received within the notification area:
Case No. Attachment D
ZA21-0031 Page 1
Responses received outside the notification area