Item 8Case No.
ZA21-0007
S T A F F R E P O R T
February 12, 2021
CASE NO: ZA21-0007
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Site Plan for Mustang Business Park
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: On behalf of Wright Mustang Business Park, LLC, Kimley Horn is requesting
approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan for Mustang Business Park on
property described as Tract 1B3, Harrison Decker Survey, Abstract No. 438, City
of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and located at 1800 S.H. 26, Southlake,
Texas. Current Zoning: “I-1” Light Industrial District. Requested Zoning: “S-P-1”
Detailed Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #8.
DETAILS: The project is generally located northwest of the intersection of Southwestern St.
and Mustang Ct. “MH” zoned properties on Woodsey Ct. and Timberline Ct. are
to the north.
The purpose of this request is to seek approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan
from “I-1” Light Industrial District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District for three
distribution warehouse buildings totaling approximately 340,180 square feet on
approximately 26.24 acres.
Site Data Summary
Existing Zoning “I-1”
Proposed Zoning “S-P-1”
Gross/Net Acreage 26.24 ac.
Open Space Area 8.10 ac.
Open Space % 30.87%
Imp. Coverage Area 18.14 ac.
Imp. Coverage % 69.13%
Building 1 Area 174,600 sf
Building 2 Area 78,100 sf
Building 3 Area 87,480 sf
Total Bldg. Area 340,180 sf
Parking Required 460
Parking Provided 462
The proposed “S-P-1” Generalized Site Plan District zoning will follow the “I-1”
Light Industrial District uses and regulations with the following exceptions:
Case No.
ZA21-0007
Development
Regulation Proposed “S-P-1” Requirement “I-1” Light Industrial District
Building Height
Any building lying more than one
hundred (100) feet from any area
zoned in a residential classification
shall not exceed forty-five (45) feet
in height.
Any building lying more than one
hundred (100) feet from any area
zoned in a residential classification
shall not exceed two and one-half (2
½) stories or thirty-five (35) feet in
height.
VARIANCES
REQUESTED: 1) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, Section 5.2.d requires a minimum stacking
depth of 150’. A variance is requested to allow a stacking depth of 0’ measured
from the property line. The functional stacking depth provided is approximately
60’.
2) Zoning Ord. No. 480, as amended, Section 33.19 and Subdivision Ord. No.
483, as amended, Section 5.06 require a 5’ sidewalk along Southwestern St. A
variance to this requirement is requested.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated February 12, 2021
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map & Responses
Half Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
Presentation
“S-P-1” Regulations and Variance Request Letter
Plans
Traffic Impact Analysis (pdf only)
Lighting Specifications (pdf only)
2035 Corridor Planning Committee Report
Spin Meeting Report
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No. Attachment A
ZA21-0007 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Wright Mustang Business Park, LLC
APPLICANT: Kimley-Horn
PROPERTY SITUATION: 1800 SH 26, generally located northwest of the intersection of
Southwestern St. and Mustang Ct.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 1B3, Harrison Decker Survey, Abstract No. 438
LAND USE CATEGORY: Industrial and 100-Year Floodplain
CURRENT ZONING: “I-1” Light Industrial District
PROPOSED ZONING: “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
HISTORY: - The property was annexed into the City in 1987.
- A zoning change (ZA02-025) from “AG” Agricultural District and “I-2”
Heavy Industrial District to “I-1” Light Industrial District was approved by
City Council on April 16, 2002.
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2035 future land use designation for the site is Industrial and 100-
Year Floodplain.
Industrial Land Use Designation
Purpose and Definition: Industrial and business service development
that is relatively free of unwanted side effects, such as unsightliness,
noise, odor, glare, vibrations, etc., is permitted in the Industrial category.
If meeting the qualification of relatively free of unwanted side effects,
suitable types of development in the Industrial category can be
characterized by the manufacturing, processing, packaging, assembly,
storage, warehousing and/or distribution of products. Ancillary
commercial and retail activities associated with these uses are permitted.
Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi-Public activities as
described above may be permitted if surrounding industrial uses do not
pose hazards and are sufficiently buffered.
100-Year Floodplain Designation
Purpose and Definition: The Floodplain category illustrates areas
designated by the August 1995 Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) maps as being in the 100-year floodplain. The “floodplain” is an
expanse of natural vegetation and wildlife, and should be preserved as
natural open area. Within the floodplain is “floodway” that must be kept
free of encroachment in order that the 100-year flood may be carried
without harmful increases in the height of flood waters. Although it is not
to be encouraged, the portion of the floodplain not in the floodway may
be reclaimed for development under certain circumstances if in
accordance with FEMA regulations. The designated land use for areas of
reclaimed floodplain is that of the immediately adjacent land use category.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA21-0007 Page 2
This designation may also include environmentally sensitive areas,
habitats, or wetlands that may not be in FEMA identified floodplains.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Pathways Master Plan does not show a sidewalk or trail along
Southwestern St. adjacent to the site, so a minimum 5’ sidewalk is
required per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.19. A variance is
requested to allow no sidewalk to be provided. A sidewalk exists on the
southeast side of Southwestern St. and the southwest side of Mustang
Ct. An 8’ multi-use trail exists along the north side of SH 26 west of the
intersection with Mustang Ct.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The property is at the end of Mustang Ct., which is a local commercial
street with 64’ of right of way. Southwestern St. is a local commercial
street with 60’ of right of way.
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has been submitted (see pdf only attached
separately). The Site Plan shows a 60’ private street easement with a 37’
back of curb to back of curb pavement extending from the end of Mustang
Ct. into the development. Access to the three proposed buildings is from
driveways off the private street. An emergency only access driveway is
provided to Woodsey Ct. to the north.
TREE PRESERVATION: There is 22.3% of existing tree cover on the property and a minimum of
60% would be required to be preserved if the request was for a straight
zoning district. The submitted Tree Conservation Plan shows that 21.6%
of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved but the applicant is
requesting in the “S-P-1” regulations that a minimum of 15% existing tree
cover be preserved. A review comment has been added to change the
percentage in the S-P-1 regulations to match the percentage shown to be
preserved on the plan.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a
planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-
2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development,
or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the
application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application.
The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds
that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
Case No. Attachment A
ZA21-0007 Page 3
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets,
and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of
environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas
indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the
potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and
visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a
natural or man-made drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural
roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the
Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement
procedures pursuant to this Ordinance.
UTILITIES: The property is served by existing 12” and 8” water lines along the east
and north property boundaries and an existing 12” sewer line along the
west property boundary.
DRAINAGE: Existing drainage is from a high point at the north and center of the site
generally sheet flow to the east, west and south across the property. The
100-Year Floodplain runs north and south along the west portion of the
property.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held on January 26, 2021. Please see the report
attached separately.
A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on January 25,
2021. Please see the report attached separately.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated February 12, 2021.
Variance Approval Criteria for Sidewalk Requirement in Ord. No.
480, as amended, Section 33.19:
The City Council may grant a variance to this regulation where
compliance would present extraordinary difficulties:
i. in the use of the property or;
ii. to construct due to characteristics of the development or
surrounding properties.
Variance Approval Criteria for Driveway Ordinance No. 634:
The City Council shall have the authority to grant a variance to this
ordinance. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that
a literal enforcement of the regulations herein will create an unnecessary
hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing
unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected
property and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will
be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent
properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with
Case No. Attachment A
ZA21-0007 Page 4
the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The decision of the City Council
shall be final.
General
Development
Standards
Applies? Comments
Overlay Regulations No The property is not in any of the overlay districts.
Building Articulation No
Masonry Standards Yes South and east facades of Building 3 are subject to Masonry
Ord. 557-A and both facades comply.
Impervious Coverage Yes Complies
Bufferyards Yes Complies subject to review comments being addressed
Interior Landscape Yes Complies subject to review comments being addressed
Tree Preservation Yes Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E applies. A Tree
Conservation Plan is approved with “S-P-1” zoning.
Sidewalks Yes A 5’ sidewalk is required along Mustang Dr. A variance to this
requirement is requested.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA21-0007 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0007 Page 1
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA21-0007 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 02/12/21
Project Name: Site Plan – Mustang Business Park
APPLICANT: Patrick Hogan, P.E. OWNER: Kendal Kreamer
Kimley-Horn Wright Mustang Business Park, LLC
13455 Noel Dr., Two Galleria Office Tower, Ste. 700 601 W. Wall St.
Dallas, TX 75240 Grapevine, TX 76051
Phone: (972) 770-1312 Phone:
E-mail: patrick.hogan@kimley-horn.com E-mail: kkreamer@wrightconst.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
02/01/21 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE
HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,
PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
Planning Review
1. The Site Plan must conform to the underlying zoning district.
2. An appropriate plat must be processed, approved and recorded with the County prior to the
issuance of building permits and, if the buildings are to be placed on separate lots, prior to the
conveyance of any of the lots.
3. Place the City case number “ZA21-0007" in the lower right corner for ease of reference.
4. The survey and legal description shows the area to be 26.2352 acres. Please change the
acreage in the “S-P-1” letter and in the Site Data Summary Chart on the Site Plan to 26.24 ac.
5. Please make the following changes to the Site Plan. The review comments are based on three
buildings on one lot as shown.
a. Change the land use designation on the property to the south at 1700 Mustang Dr. and
to the north at 1236 Woodsey Ct. to LUD = “Industrial and 100-Year Flood Plain”.
b. Show, label and dimension the width of any easements on or adjacent to the site, if
any. Please see the plat for Lot 1, Block 2, Mustang Business Park.
c. Show the distance from the southeast corners of Buildings 1 and 3 perpendicular to the
property lines.
d. Show and label the width and type of bufferyards along each boundary in accordance
with Zoning Ord. No. 480, Section 42. Show the bufferyard with cross-hatch instead of
the building setbacks.
e. Provide the bufferyard and interior landscape calculation chart on plan (see attached
example in the Landscape Administrator’s comments below).
f. Staff recommends relocating or eliminating the row of parking spaces that faces the “MH”
Manufactured Housing zoned properties to the north.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0007 Page 2
6. All driveways/points of ingress/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as
amended). The only connection to a public street is the proposed private street connection to
Mustang Ct. The stacking distance from the right of way/property line to the first turning
movement does not meet the minimum 150’ required in Driveway Ord. No. 634, Section 5.2.d.
No stacking depth is provided. Please revise the variance request letter to request a 0’ stacking
depth. You can note that a functional stacking depth of ±60’ is provided.
7. Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 26.5.a regarding building height in the “I-1”
Light Industrial Zoning District states that no building or structure which lies within one hundred
(100) feet of any area zoned in a residential classification shall exceed one (1) story or twenty
(20) feet in height. Any building lying more than one hundred (100) feet from any area zoned in
a residential classification shall not exceed two and one-half (2 ½) stories or thirty-five (35) feet
in height. The 100’ building line along the north property line is shown on the Site Plan. An S-P-
1 regulation has been added to allow a maximum building height of 45’.
8. Sidewalks and/or trails in compliance with the Zoning Ord. No. 480, as amended, Section 33.19,
Subdivision Ord. No. 483, as amended, Section 5.06 and the Master Pathways Plan are
required. An 8’ multi-use trail exists along S.H. 26 and a 5’ sidewalk exists along the street
frontages of Lot, Block 2, Mustang Business Park to the southeast addressed as 1750 Mustang
Ct. A variance to the sidewalk requirement is requested.
33.19 For all new development or existing development which increases the existing floor area
of building(s) or the number of parking spaces by twenty (20) percent or more and require a
City Council approved site plan, a five (5)-foot wide concrete sidewalk shall be provided along
all adjacent public streets unless identified in the city’s Pathways Plan, in which case the
Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 5.06 shall apply. In addition, all non-
residential development shall provide pedestrian access to the City’s existing or future trail
system as identified in any City Council adopted plan.
The City Council may grant a variance to this regulation where compliance would present
extraordinary difficulties:
i. in the use of the property or;
ii. to construct due to characteristics of the development or surrounding properties.
9. The elevations must comply with Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 33.21,
Building Color Standards for Non-Residential Buildings. Please submit a physical material
sample board in addition to the images.
* An 8’ solid wood fence is shown along the north boundary per the requirements of Ordinance
480, Section 39.6.a below since the boundary abuts residential properties.
39.6.a Where a non-residential use abuts a residentially zoned lot or tract or lot having an
occupied residential dwelling, a solid fence meeting the material standards of Section 39.2(b)
shall be erected along the side and rear property lines abutting said residential lot or dwelling to
a height of eight (8) feet. A variance to this section may be approved by the City Council during
its review of any concept plan, development plan, or site plan requiring review by the Planning
and Zoning Commission and approval by the City Council, or by the Board of Adjustment for all
other concept plans, development plans, or site plans. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-
UUU.)
* The property must comply with Masonry Ordinance 557-A. Sections 1.b and 1.d. of the
ordinance are below. The applicant has verified that Building 3 complies with both sections
below and an exhibit has been provided.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0007 Page 3
1.b. Buildings requiring masonry along street frontage only: All buildings constructed on property
zoned I-1 or 1-2 under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance shall be constructed of
masonry materials, wood, glass, or decorative metal (non-galvanized finish); provided, however,
any exterior wall fronting on any street shall be constructed of masonry materials or glass,
covering at least eighty percent (80%) of said wall, exclusive of all doors.
1.d. State highways and F.M. roads: With the exception of barns and storage buildings in the
"AG" zoning district, all nonresidential buildings located within 500 feet of the R.O.W. line along
State Highway No. 114 and within 300 feet of the R.O.W. line along State Highway No. 26,
Farm-to-Market Road 1709 and Farm-to-Market Road 1938 shall have at least eighty percent
(80%) of all exterior walls, excluding doors, constructed of masonry materials or glass.
* Minimum building setback lines in the “I-1” Light Industrial zoning district are as follows. A 30’
front yard setback is required on the property boundaries abutting a public right of way. The rear
lot line is the north property line since is opposite and most distant from the front street line.
There shall be a rear yard of not less than ten (10) feet except where the lot abuts property
zoned as single-family residential there shall be a rear yard of not less than twenty-five (25) feet.
All other property lines will have a side yard setback. There shall be a side yard of not less than
fifteen (15) feet except where the lot abuts property zoned as single-family residential there shall
be a side yard of not less than twenty-five (25) feet. The Site Plan shows 30’ front building lines
along the south, southeast and east boundaries and 25’ rear building lines along the west and
north boundaries, which exceed the minimum required setbacks.
* The property does not lie within any of the overlay zones in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as
amended, Section 43-Overlay Zones.
* Per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 26.5.i, outdoor storage of trash
receptacles shall be at the side or rear of the site and shall be totally encircled or screened by
fence, planting or other suitable visual barrier. Per Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 39.6.c,
outside storage of trash/recycling receptacles or any garbage, refuse and trash/recycling
collection and storage areas shall be at the side or rear of the building, shall be totally encircled
or screened by fence, planting or other suitable visual barrier six feet (6') in height and shall
have a metal door which shall remain closed at all times. These areas or receptacles shall not
encroach into any required bufferyard. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-HH.)
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. If the proposed development were submitted as traditional zoning it would not comply the
Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E.
There is 22.3% of existing tree cover on the property and a minimum of 60% would be required
to be preserved. The submitted Tree Conservation Plan shows that 21.6% of the existing tree
cover is proposed to be preserved but the Applicant is requesting in the Development
Regulations that a minimum of 15% existing tree cover be preserved. Please revise the
percentage in the S-P-1 regulations to match the percentage shown to be preserved on the plan.
* The applicant is proposing to plant 98 canopy trees and 202 accent trees towards mitigating the
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0007 Page 4
removal of protected trees. We normally require that any trees planted toward tree removal
mitigation be canopy tree species or an equivalent species as listed within the Landscape
Ordinance 544-B.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree
Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing
tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the
property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing
tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum
existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall
consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning
Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council
regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council
finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so
as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including
mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential
areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to
this Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0007 Page 5
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the
zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do
not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS
1. On the Site Plan, please show and label all required bufferyards.
2. All of the proposed trees are proposed to be 4” caliper. Nursery stock standards for
accent/understory/ornamental trees such as Crape Myrtles, Vitex, Rusty Blackhaw Viburnum,
and Yaupon Holly are generally provided as container size, height, and width, and do not come
in a caliper size unless they are sold as standard single trunk.
3. In the “Provided” sections of the Interior Landscape and Bufferyards Summary Charts show the
exact quantity of plant material being provided towards the interior landscape and bufferyards
landscaping.
* The applicant is proposing to take existing trees credits for preserving existing trees with the
north, west, and east bufferyards. The west is located within an existing floodplain in which no
construction is proposed.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Sandy Endy, P.E.
Development Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of the
civil construction plans.
WATER COMMENTS:
1. Verify that the fire hydrant spacing meets the maximum required separation of 300 linear feet or
600 linear feet if sprinklered.
2. Public Works does not allow 3” water meters. Please revise proposed water meter sizes.
SEWER COMMENTS:
1. Provide a sewer stub up to the northern property line at the end of Woodsey Court to allow for
future sewer connections to the southern lots along Woodsey Court.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. All detention/retention basins are required to be within a dedicated easement.
* If detention is not being proposed for the full increase in runoff, then documentation supporting
and certifying the reduction in detention will be required prior to approval of construction plans.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0007 Page 6
Memorandum shall be signed and sealed by a registered PE. Please ensure that the drainage
models and memo are submitted with the Civil Construction Plans.
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
* Submittal to FEMA will be required. FEMA approval of a CLOMR shall be required prior to
construction plan approval, and LOMR approval shall be required prior to obtaining CO. If
submitting only a LOMR is the preferred method, then proof of submittal to FEMA shall be
required prior to construction plan approval.
* A Base Flood Elevation shall be determined.
* Calculations will be required to verify capacity of proposed curb inlets.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard
details and general notes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000.
The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The
Environmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the
review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in:
https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP
shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical
report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comments that will need to be addressed on the first submittal of the Civil
Construction Plans.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler systems can be located
on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length
of the pipe. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0007 Page 7
a vault. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is located in a vault, or a
minimum of 6’X6’ if it is located on the riser. (Label riser room locations to determine termination
point of riser piping, and indicate size of the riser rooms, no room sizes indicated)
The Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system must be within 100 feet of a fire
hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes on the property. (The FDC for Building
3 is not within 50 feet of fire lane access)
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
Fire apparatus access needs to be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, 24 feet wide
and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (Minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW)
Provide a secondary egress point on the north side of the property for emergency vehicle
access.
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Fire hydrants are required at a maximum spacing of 500 feet for commercial locations with
completely sprinkled buildings. (Fire hydrants located on the property do not meet the spacing
requirements) (Add fire hydrants as required).
Case No. Attachment C
ZA21-0007 Page 8
General Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting was held on January 26, 2021 and a 2035 Corridor Planning Committee
meeting was held on January 25, 2021.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be
paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee,
Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale
water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to
pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based
on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to
review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine
the fee amount.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA21-0007 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1. PENEDO, AIDA DEL C MH 1232 TIMBERLINE CT 0.43 NR
2. KYLE, KRAIG MH 1232 WOODSEY CT 0.51 NR
3. PEARSON, CAREY O MH 1234 TIMBERLINE CT 0.50 NR
4. DE ANDA, VICTORIA MH 1234 WOODSEY CT 0.48 NR
5. GUILER PROPERTIES LLC MH 1236 TIMBERLINE CT 0.48 O
6. AULD, LYNN V MH 1236 WOODSEY CT 0.46 NR
7. NUSTAR LOGISTICS LP I2 1700 MUSTANG DR 27.09 NR
8. PS LPT PROPERTIES INVESTORS I1 1750 MUSTANG CT 3.03 NR
9. PETROLEUM CO OF TEXAS ETAL I1 1800 STATE HWY 26 0.19 NR
10. WRIGHT, JOE L I1 2400 SH 26 0.06 NR
11. WRIGHT, BELLA AG 1719 E CONTINENTAL BLVD 31.81 NR
12. MAGELLAN PIPELINE TERMINALS LP I2 2110 MUSTANG CT 0.70 NR
13. MAGELLAN PIPELINE TERMINALS LP I2 2110 MUSTANG CT 1.25 NR
14. MAGELLAN PIPELINE TERMINALS LP I2 2100 MUSTANG CT 14.16 NR
15. OSTUNI, REXANA E MH 1233 TIMBERLINE CT 0.42 NR
16. OSTUNI, REXANA E MH 1233 TIMBERLINE CT 0.08 NR
17. MARTINEZ, MAURO MH 1235 TIMBERLINE CT 0.39 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA21-0007 Page 2
18. MARTINEZ, MAURO MH 1235 TIMBERLINE CT 0.08 NR
19. JTK DYER GROUP LLC MH 1237 TIMBERLINE CT 0.40 NR
20. WRIGHT, BALLA C I1 1800 SH 26 26.42 NR
21. JTK DYER GROUP LLC MH 1237 TIMBERLINE CT 0.09 NR
22. AMERICORP LLC MH 1233 WOODSEY CT 0.52 NR
23. WOROBIEC, KAMIL MH 1235 WOODSEY CT 0.43 NR
24. XU, H M MH 1237 WOODSEY CT 0.47 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Twenty (20)
Responses Received: One (1) – Attached
Case No. Attachment D
ZA21-0007 Page 3