Item 8Case No.
ZA18-006
S T A F F R E P O R T
October 30, 2020
CASE NO: ZA18-006
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Creekside Point (formerly
Southwest Meadows)
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: On behalf of Wilks Southlake Development , LLC, Brown Company Partners, LLC
is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Creekside
Point (formerly known as Southwest Meadows) on property described as Lot
1R1R2, Block 1, Sabre Group Campus Addition, an addition to the City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1901 W. Kirkwood Blvd.,
Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: “NR-PUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit
Development District. Proposed Zoning: "S -P-2" Generalized Site Plan
District. SPIN Neighborhood #1.
DETAILS: This project is located at the southeast corner of W. State Hwy. 114 and W
Kirkwood Blvd.
This development was last presented to City Council at 1st reading on June 19,
2018, at which time the item was tabled. After the case was subsequently tabled
several additional times, the item was finally tabled indefinitely at the January 15,
2019 City Council meeting. The development now has a different developer. Since
significant changes have been made to the plans, the developer requested that the
item be remanded back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration
prior to moving forward to City Council. On October 6, 2020, City Council
remanded the item back to the Planning and Zoning Commission to be heard at
their October 22, 2020 meeting.
The original submittal for Southwest Meadows was a request for approval of a
Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District to
develop a five-story, full service hotel with 134 rooms (Concept and Site Plan) and
three outparcel lots with a total of approximately 15,000 square feet of retail,
restaurant, office, bank and/or health and well -being uses (Concept Plan) on
approximately 6 acres. The previous proposal also included a parking garage.
The current request for Creekside Point is for approval of a Zoning Change and
Concept/Site Plan to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District to develop a six-story,
full service hotel with 145 rooms (Concept and Site Plan) and two outparcel lots
with a total of approximately 14,500 square feet of retail, restaurant, non-medical
office, bank and/or health and well-being uses (Concept Plan) on approximately 6
acres. The full-service hotel, which is proposed as Phase 1 of the development on
approximately 2.86 acres, includes a restaurant and lounge, approximately 3,000
square feet of meeting space and an approximately 600 square foot fitness center.
Department of Planning & Development Services
Case No.
ZA18-006
Future development of the two outparcel lots will require approval of a Site Plan by
City Council following a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
The applicant is proposing off-site parking for employees during peak demand
times through a shared parking agreement with a nearby office building.
The Site Data Summary chart below from the proposed Concept Plan includes the
data for the hotel site in the Lot 1 column and also the data for the two outparcel
lots in the columns for Lots 2-3.
VARIANCES
REQUESTED: 1) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.1 requires a minimum
stacking depth of 100’. The applicant is prop osing a stacking depth of
approximately 30’ on the S.H. 114 driveway and approximately 4 9’ on the
Kirkwood Blvd. driveway .
Case No.
ZA18-006
2) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.4 requires a deceleration
lane for any driveway located on an arterial street if the rig ht turn ingress
volume exceeds 50 vehicles in the design hour. If the street facility exceeds 40
MPH, a deceleration lane may be required if 40 turn ingress vehicles occur in
the design hour. The applicant is requesting a variance to not construct a right
turn lane into the property driveway on Kirkwood Blvd.
3) A variance Landscape Ordinance No. 544, as amended, is requested to allow
the interior and parking lot landscaping as shown on the plans.
On October 22, 2020, The Planning and Zoni ng Commission tabled the item to the
November 5, 2020 meeting. The applicant is revising the plans and exhibits to
address issues and concerns that were raised by the Planning and Zoning
Commission at the meeting. The revised plans and exhibits and an updated staff
report will be sent to the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to the meeting on
November 5, 2020. The issues and concerns that were discussed at the meeting
are summarized in the chart below.
P&Z Commission Issues/Concerns Applicant’s Response
Consider reducing the density (one less floor on
hotel, reduce number or area(s) of pad sites,
reduce parking) to preserve more trees and
topography and to create a pedestrian linked
environment with more usable green space.
Revised plans and exhibits will be provided
prior to the P&Z Commission on November 5,
2020 meeting. An updated staff report and
review summary will be prepared and
distributed.
Buffer the view of parking from SH 114 with trees,
landscaping, berms, naturally covered parking, etc. ”
Provide more and better renderings of the site. ”
Provide at least two options. ”
Limit pad site uses to sit-down restaurants only. ”
Provide green space adjacent to outdoor dining
areas. ”
Consider corner entry sign design. ”
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Concept/Site Plan Review Summary No. 10, dated October 16, 2020
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses – Notice for
Southwest Meadows sent March 23, 2018
(E) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses – Notice for Creekside
Point sent October 8, 2020
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
PowerPoint Presentation
Comprehensive Plan Analysis
“S-P-2” Regulations
Plans
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)
Parking Analysis
Case No.
ZA18-006
Letter for Shared Parking Agreement
SPIN meeting Report dated December 12, 2017
SPIN meeting Report dated April 28, 2020
2035 Corridor Planning Committee Report dated October 4, 2017
2035 Corridor Planning Committee Report dated August 2, 2018
2035 Corridor Planning Committee Report dated January 29, 2020
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-006 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Wilks Southlake Development, LLC
APPLICANT: Brown Company Partners, LLC
PROPERTY SITUATION: 1901 W. Kirkwood Blvd., generally located at the southeast corner of W.
State Hwy. 114 and W Kirkwood Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1R1R2, Block 1, Sabre Group Campus Add ition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING: “NR-PUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District.
PROPOSED ZONING: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District.
HISTORY: November 19, 1985 - The site was zoned "H"- Heavy Commercial with
the annexation the property under Ordinance No. 319.
August 4, 1987 - Approximately 342 acres, bounded by T.W. King Road,
W. S.H. 114, W. Dove Road and N. White Chapel Blvd. was zoned from
"H" Heavy Commercial to "PUD" Planned Unit Development allowing "R-1"
and "R-2" Retail, "O-1" and "O-2" office and "CS" Community Service
district development under case ZA87 -015 (Ordinance 334-012).
September 19, 1989 - The above described 342 acres was given "PUD"
Planned Unit Development zoning allowing "C -3" General Commercial,
"CS" Community Service development with the adoption of the Zoning
Ordinance No. 480 and the official zoning map.
October 17, 1995 - A Zoning Change and Concept Plan for NR-PUD
allowing "C-3" General Commercial, "O -2" Office, "HC" Hotel and "CS"
Community Service development under Case ZA95-074 (Ordinance 480-
180) was approved for an approximately 127 acre portion of the previously
described 342 acres, west of the alignment of the approximate alignment of
Kirkwood Boulevard; "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development
allowing detached single family residential development was approved
under Case ZA95-073 (Ordinance 480-179) for approximately 199 acre
portion of the previously described 342 acres, east of the approximate
alignment of Kirkwood Boulevard.
July 20, 1999 - A Zoning Change and Concept Plan for NR-PUD allowing
a variety of non-residential uses and development to include "High -Tech"
uses, "O-2 Office", "Parking Structures", "Hotel", "Restaurant" was
approved for approximately 155 acre under Case ZA99-056 (Ordinance
480-313). The area included portions of the above described "NR -PUD"
west of the alignment of Kirkwood Boulevard and a northern portion of the
"R-PUD" area east of the alignment of Kirkwood Boulevard.
October 19, 1999 - A Preliminary Plat for Lots 1-4, Block 1, Sabre Group
Campus was approved under Case ZA99 -080.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-006 Page 2
November 18, 1999 - A Final Plat for Lots 1 -4, Block 1, Sabre Group
Campus was approved under case ZA99 -096.
January 18, 2000 - A Development Plan for Sabre Group Campus was
approved under Case ZA99-090.
March 20, 2007 - A Plat Revision for Lots 1R1, 1R2, 2R, 4R1, 4R2 and
4R3, Block 1, Sabre Group Campus was approved under case ZA07 -025.
September 15, 2015 - A Plat Revision for Lots 1R1R1 and 1R1R2, Block 1,
Sabre Group Campus was approved under case ZA15-085.
SOUTHLAKE 2030/2035
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: A detailed Comprehensive Plan Analysis has been prepared for this
development. See the Comprehensive Plan Analysis attached separately.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
Access to the project will be provided by one access driveways onto W.
Kirkwood Blvd., which is a four-lane divided arterial with 100’ of right of
way. One access driveway is proposed onto a future SH 114 frontage road.
The timing of the SH 114 frontage road construction is unknown at this
time.
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) and a Parking Analysis were prepared for
this development. Please see the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), Parking
Analysis and Letter for Shared Parking Agreement attached separately.
TREE PRESERVATION: The site is subject to the City’s Tree Preservation Ordi nance No. 585-D
because the request is for a Zoning Change and Site Plan.
There is approximately 41.5% existing tree cover on the site, of which
approximately 7.6% is proposed to be preserved. A standard zoning district
requires that a minimum 50% of existing tree cover be preserved. The
applicant is proposing that the tree removal be allowed as shown on the
plan.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a
planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2
Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or
Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the
application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application.
The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds
that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets,
and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-006 Page 3
environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas
indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the
potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and
visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a
natural or man-made drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural
roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the
Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement
procedures pursuant to this Ordinance.
CITIZEN INPUT: The following meetings were held to discuss the development:
SPIN meeting this project were held on December 12, 2017 and April 28,
2020. Please see the meeting reports attached separately.
2035 Corridor Planning Committee meetings were held on October 4,
2017, August 2, 2018 and January 29, 2020. Please see the meeting
reports attached separately.
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: April 5, 2018; Approved (7-0) to table until the next scheduled Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting (April 19, 2018).
April 19, 2018; Approved (5 -0) to table to the May 17, 2018 meeting.
May 17, 2018; Approved (6-0) to table to the June 7, 2018 meeting.
June 7, 2018; Approved (5-1) subject to the staff report dated June 7, 2018
to develop a five-story full-service hotel with 134 rooms and three outparcel
lots with a total of approximately 15,000 square feet on approximately
6.004 acres and approving the variance requests:
1) Proposing a stacking depth of approximately 75’ on the S.H. 114
driveway and approximately 47’ on the two Kirkwood Blvd.
driveways,
2) Proposing a centerline spacing of approximately 231’ between the
two proposed driveways on Kirkwood Blvd.,
3) Requesting to not construct deceleration lanes on the two Kirkwood
Blvd. driveways.
Vice-Chairman Kubiak voted against approval of the item based on the
following issues:
1) The three restaurants are too much and the development is too
dense. Consider losing one of the restaurants.
2) The hotel and the restaurants need to be tied together on the site
better.
3) The revised elevations are a step in the right direction, but not
enough.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-006 Page 4
4) The Land Use Plan calls for a full service hotel. The hotel
presented does not appear to meet the criteria for a fu ll service
hotel and it is not consistent with the City’s desire for the site.
Provide a direct comparison with the Cambria hotel and other full
service hotels.
October 22, 2020 ; Approved (5-0) to table to the November 5, 2020
meeting.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: June 19, 2018; A motion to table the item at 1st Reading was approved (6-
0), noting Council is remanding this item back to the Corridor Planning
Committee for consideration; also noting this item is tabled to the
September 4, 2018 City Council meeting.
September 4, 2018; Tabled at 1st Reading on consent to the October 2,
2018 meeting.
October 2, 2018; Tabled at 1st Reading on consent to the November 6,
2018 meeting.
November 6, 2018; Tabled at 1st Reading on consent to the January 15,
2019 meeting.
January 15, 2019; Tabled indefinitely.
October 6, 2020; The item was remanded back to the Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting to be considered at their October 22, 2020 meeting.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept/Site Plan Review Summary No. 10, dated October 16,
2020.
The criteria for granting variances to Driveway Ordinance No. 634 and
Landscape Ordinance No. 544, as amended, are below:
In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal
enforcement of the regulations herein will create and unnecessary hardship
or practical difficulty on the app licant, that the situation causing
unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected
property and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be
wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent
properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the
spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The decision of the City Council shall
be final.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA18-006 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-006 Page 1
CONCEPT/SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA18-006 Review No.: Ten Date of Review: 10/16/20
Project Name: Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan – Creekside Point
APPLICANT: David Karr Owner: Julieta Wilks
Brown Company Partners Wilks Southlake Development LLC
P.O. Box 1530 10235 I-20 W
Midlothian, TX 75065 Eastland, TX 76448
Phone: (972) 533-8702 Phone: (817) 821-0221
E-mail: david@browndfw.com E-mail: juwilks@wilksdevelopment.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT R ECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
09/21/20 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE H EREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE
CONTACT RIC HARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
1. The applicant is seeking Zoning Change and Site Plan approval for the hotel lot and Zoning
Change and Concept Plan approval of the uses on proposed Lots 2 and 3. The case is being
processed as a “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan.
Future Site Plan approval for the restaurant/commercial uses on Lots 2 and 3 (subject to
compliance with the underlying “S-P-2” Zoning and Concept/Site Plan) will require City Council
approval of a Site Plan (or plans) following a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning
Commission prior to issuance of any building permits for those lots. Any future submittal(s) for
Lots 2 and 3 that do not comply with the underlying “S-P-2” Zoning and Concept/Site Plan will
require approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan in addition to a Site Plan by City
Council following a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The “S-P-2” zoning
is a site-specific zoning district. Any changes to the plans, regulations, design guidelines or any
deviations from example renderings or materials approve d with the zoning will require approval of
a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan by City Council following a recommendation by the
Planning and Zoning Commiss ion.
2. A Plat Revision that conforms to the underlying zoning district must be processed , approved and
recorded with the County prior to the conveyance of any lots or the issuance of any building
permits. Provide a copy of an executed cross access, reciprocal parking and property
maintenance agreement – required prior to the issuance of any building permits.
* Driveway Ord. No. 634 requires a right turn deceleration lane if right turn ingress volumes exceed
50 vehicles in the design hour. The DeShazo TIA shows 71 right turn ingress vehicles in the a.m.
peak hour and 78 right turn ingress vehicles in the p.m. peak hour. The DeShazo TIA proposes
that the existing rightmost eastbound travel lane be designated as a right turn only in lieu of
providing a deceleration lane. A variance has been requested.
* Ensure that all electrical transformers and mechanical equipment are sufficiently screened for
visibility from the right-of-way.
* The following informational comments pertain to the elevations and renderings:
* The east and west elevations (front and rear) do not meet the minimum required vertical
articulation. The minimum offset is 15% of the predominant wall height (71’ 8”), or
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-006 Page 2
approximately 10.75’). An S-P-2 regulation to allow the articulation as shown has been
added.
* The stucco proposed must be applied using the 3-step process as stated in Zoning
Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 43.9.c.1.a. A note has been added to the
elevations stating that the stucco will meet the masonry requirements in the Corridor
Overlay District and the Masonry Ordinan ce.
* No PTAC or VTAC vents are shown on the elevations. The applicant has noted in the S-P-
2 regulations that the HVAC will use rooftop units.
* Staff recommends providing a material sample board of each material shown on the
elevations. Also provide samples or exhibits of retaining wall materials.
* No more than 50% of any façade may be reflective glass, which is defined as glass having
a reflectance of greater than 10%.
* An 8’ multi-use trail is required along SH114 and a 5’ sidewalk is required along Kirkwood. The
required trail and sidewalk are shown on the plans.
Tree Conservation/Landscape R eview
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
* Five (5) of the existing trees shown to be preserved are not located on the property proposed to
be developed. Trees 304, 30 5, 306, 562, 566.
* The applicant is proposing that the tree removal be as shown on the plan.
If the development were proposed as straight zoning it would not comply with the Existi ng Tree
Cover Regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. There is approximately 41.5% of existing
tree cover on the site and a minimum of 50% of the tree cover would be required to be preserved.
7.6% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preser ved.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will prese rve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage require ments established by Table 2.0. If the property has
previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at
the time the first such permit was issue d shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree
cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-006 Page 3
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council sha ll consider
the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding
development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commis sion
shall review the application and make a recommendation to the C ity Council regarding the
application. The City Council shall approve the Pla n or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan
or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as
to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including m ature
tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Pro tection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential
areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a na tural or man-made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology de signation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tr ee replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning
as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structu re proposed to be constructed do not
conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE AND BUFFERYARDS COMMENTS:
1. The north and east bufferyards on the Landscape Plan L1.1, and Landscape Concept Plan LCP.1
are incorrectly labeled 10’ – J. Please ensure that the labeling of the correct required bufferyards
is consistent on all plans.
* The applicant is proposing that the Lot 1 east bufferyard and the Lot 3 sout h buffeyard vary in
width and are as shown on the plans.
* The applicant is proposing that parking be allowed within the bufferyards along the western edge
of Lot 2 and Lot 3, and the eastern edge of Lot 1.
USE OF BUFFERYARDS – A bufferyard may be used for passive recreation, such as pedestrian,
bike or equestrian trails, provided that: (a) no plant material is eliminated; (b) the total width of the
bufferyard is maintained; and (c) all other regulations of this ordinance are met. In no event shall
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-006 Page 4
the following uses be permitted in a bufferyard: playfiel ds, stables, swimming pools, tennis courts
or similar facilities, accessory buildings, parking facilities, or trash dumpsters.
* The applicant is requesting a variance to the Landscape Ordinance 544 -B to allow for the interior
and parking lot landscaping to be shown as on the plan. Some of the proposed parking lot islands
are less than 12 ’ width and do not contain the full amount of require d plant material.
Parking lot islands shall have a minimum width o f 12’ back-to-back if curbed or 13’ edge -to-
edge if no curb is intended, and sh all be equal to the length of the parking stall.
All parking planter islands in parking areas shall contain a minimum of one (1) canopy tree with
the remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses or seasonal color. Planter islands
which have light poles for lighting the parking areas may substitute two (2) understory/accent
trees for the required canopy tree.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Sandy Endy, P.E.
Development Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of the civil
construction plans.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. If detention is not being proposed for the increase in runoff, then documentation supporting and
certifying that detention is not necessary will be required prior to approval of construction plans.
Memorandum shall be signed and sealed by a registered PE.
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on do wnstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard
details and general no tes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Pla n (SWPPP) per TXR150000.
The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The Environmental
Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the review of the
SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in:
https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater -Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP
shall be submitted by second review of t he civil construction plans.
* A geotechnical report will be required for all pr ivate and public roadways. The geotechnical
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-006 Page 5
report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this deve lopment and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing th e Developer’s
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
*=Denotes informational comments that will need to be addressed on the first submittal of the Civil
Construction Plans.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Deputy Fire Ch ief/Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
No comments based on submitted information.
Transportation Manager Review
Stephanie Taylor, P.E., PTOE
Transportation Manager
Phone: (817) 748-8216
E-mail: staylor@ci.southlake.tx.us
No comments.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-006 Page 6
General Informational Comments
* SPIN meetings for project were held on December 12, 2017 and April 28, 2020.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
* A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut on S.H. 114.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* It appears that a portion of this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay
Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible
Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479.
* Development must comply with a ll requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Sec tion 43,
Overlay Zones.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit , a fully corrected site
plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans must be submitted for approval and all
required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee,
Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related P ermit Fees.
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, pleas e be aware that through the wholesale water
customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the
City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final
plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City
of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-006 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
1st NOTICE SENT MARCH 23, 2018
Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1. U S A AG 3295 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 5.47 NR
2. NGUYEN, HIEU VAN RPUD 557 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.88 NR
3. CANTELE, JOHN W RPUD 565 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.60 NR
4. XU, LIYU RPUD 560 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.69 NR
5. MILHIZER, ERIC RPUD 569 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.49 NR
6. ROTHENBACH, THOMAS A RPUD 570 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.67 NR
7. DUCANES, A CHRISTOPHER RPUD 573 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.51 NR
8. FRAGA, MARK RPUD 526 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.62 NR
9. ALTIMONT, DAVID RPUD 520 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.56 NR
10. ZEALLOS, JUAN RPUD 516 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.73 NR
11. CURTISS, THOMAS L RPUD 509 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.61 NR
12. DICKSTEIN, MICHAEL RPUD 505 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.57 NR
13. SALESKI, MARK RPUD 2816 TYLER ST 0.56 NR
14. FISCHER, DIRK T RPUD 2815 TYLER ST 0.68 NR
15. KIRKWOOD HOLLOW HO ASSOC RPUD 2819 TYLER ST 1.17 NR
16. PARKER, THANE D RPUD 2813 TYLER ST 0.65 NR
17. SABRE HEADQUARTERS LLC NRPUD 3150 SABRE DR 25.45 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-006 Page 2
18. KIRKWOOD HOLLOW HO ASSOC RPUD 2818 TYLER ST 0.10 NR
19. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 1001 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 11.26 NR
20. DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W STATE HWY 114 19.99 NR
21. DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W STATE HWY 114 0.24 NR
22. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 3410 T W KING RD 0.41 NR
23. THOMPSON, KENNETH L RPUD 3521 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.48 NR
24. BENNETT, MICHAEL RPUD 3517 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.47 NR
25. BRAZOS ELECTRIC POWER CORP NRPUD 3411 T W KING RD 3.71 NR
26. U S A AG 3050 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 94.78 NR
27. HALL, PATRICK S RPUD 617 RANCHO LAREDO TRL 0.46 NR
28. JONI L WOMACK LIVING TRUST RPUD 613 RANCHO LAREDO TRL 0.44 NR
29. ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO LLC NRPUD 3401 T W KING RD 2.23 NR
30. MCCRAY, KENNETH RPUD 3520 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.46 O
31. PAULSEN, DEREK J RPUD 3500 SUNRISE RANCH RD 0.48 NR
32. U S A AG 3600 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 19.84 NR
33. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF RPUD 3728 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 10.39 NR
34. TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TX SP1 3200 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.27 NR
35. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF RPUD 3000 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 5.10 NR
36. BROWN, MICHAEL RPUD 561 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.94 NR
37. ALLAM, SRIDHAR RPUD 577 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.61 NR
38. DELEMOS, JAMES A RPUD 581 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.87 O
39. BAKSHI, UTPAL RPUD 524 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.60 NR
40. ROOP, THOMAS RPUD 512 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.70 NR
41. DANG, VI RPUD 508 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.62 NR
42. BARDEN, VIC RPUD 3513 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.66 NR
43. BEN-MEIR, NAPHTALI RPUD 3505 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.47 NR
44. SHUTE, SCOTT RPUD 3509 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.48 NR
45. HENDERSON, JOSEPH WILLIAM RPUD 3501 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.47 NR
46. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 1400 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 13.77 NR
47. DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W STATE HWY 114 4.38 NR
48. DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W SH 114 0.08 NR
49. SOUTHLAKE CITY NRPUD 1050 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 4.39 NR
50. SINNOTT, ROBERT A RPUD 504 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.69 NR
51. BADYLAK, JOHN RPUD 500 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.58 NR
52. TD AMERITRADE SERVICES
COMPANY NRPUD 1051 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 78.39 NR
53. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 1901 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 5.98 NR
54. U S A AG 3400 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 16.97 NR
55. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 3415 T W KING RD 4.29 NR
56. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 1750 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 2.95 NR
57. SABRE HEADQUARTERS LLC NRPUD 1600 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 9.15 NR
58. REDUS TEXAS LAND LLC NRPUD 3400 E T W KING RD 2.31 NR
59. BRE SOLANA LLC NRPUD 1900 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 19.99 NR
60. MAGUIRE PTNRS-SOLANA LTD RPUD 812 W SH 114 0.05 NR
61. MAGUIRE PTNRS-SOLANA LTD RPUD 812 W STATE HWY 114 1.32 NR
62. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2509 AMELIA ISLAND PATH 0.48 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Forty-seven (47)
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-006 Page 3
Responses Received within 200’: Two (2) – Attached
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-006 Page 4
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-006 Page 5
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-006 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
2nd NOTICE SENT OCTOBER 8, 2020
Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1. U S A AG 3295 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 5.47 NR
2. NGUYEN, HIEU VAN RPUD 557 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.88 NR
3. TORRES, MIRIAM RPUD 565 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.60 NR
4. XU, LIYU RPUD 560 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.68 NR
5. MILHIZER, ERIC RPUD 569 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.49 NR
6. ROTHENBACH, THOMAS A RPUD 570 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.67 NR
7. DUCANES, A CHRISTOPHER RPUD 573 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.51 NR
8. FRAGA, MARK RPUD 526 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.62 NR
9. ALTIMONT, DAVID RPUD 520 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.56 NR
10. ZEALLOS, JUAN RPUD 516 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.73 O
11. ROBERTSON, ROBERT RPUD 509 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.61 NR
12. BARRETT, JOSEPH RPUD 505 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.57 NR
13. SALESKI, MARK RPUD 2816 TYLER ST 0.56 O
14. POGUE, BILLINGSLEY GARNER RPUD 2815 TYLER ST 0.68 NR
15. KIRKWOOD HOLLOW HO ASSOC RPUD 2819 TYLER ST 1.17 NR
16. PARKER, THANE D RPUD 2813 TYLER ST 0.65 NR
17. SABRE HEADQUARTERS LLC NRPUD 3150 SABRE DR 25.45 NR
18. KIRKWOOD HOLLOW HO ASSOC RPUD 2818 TYLER ST 0.10 NR
19. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT L NRPUD 1001 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 11.26 F
20. DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W STATE HWY 114 19.99 NR
21. DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W STATE HWY 114 0.24 NR
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-006 Page 2
22. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT L NRPUD 3410 T W KING RD 0.41 F
23. KOLLAR, GEORGE RPUD 3521 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.48 O
24. MITCHELL BUILDERS INC RPUD 3517 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.47 NR
25. BRAZOS ELECTRIC POWER CORP NRPUD 3411 T W KING RD 3.71 NR
26. HALL, PATRICK S RPUD 617 RANCHO LAREDO TRL 0.46 NR
27. WOODS, GLENN RPUD 613 RANCHO LAREDO TRL 0.44 NR
28. ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO LLC NRPUD 3401 T W KING RD 2.23 NR
29. MCCRAY, KENNETH RPUD 3520 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.46 O
30. PAULSEN, DEREK J RPUD 3500 SUNRISE RANCH RD 0.48 NR
31. U S A AG 3600 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 19.84 NR
32. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF RPUD 3728 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 10.39 NR
33. TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TX SP1 3200 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.27 NR
34. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF RPUD 3000 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 5.10 NR
35. BROWN, MICHAEL RPUD 561 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.94 NR
36. ALLAM, SRIDHAR RPUD 577 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.61 NR
37. DELEMOS, JAMES A RPUD 581 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.87 NR
38. BAKSHI FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING RPUD 524 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.60 NR
39. 512 LEGACY LIVING TRUST RPUD 512 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.69 NR
40. DANG, VI RPUD 508 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.62 NR
41. BARDEN, VIC RPUD 3513 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.66 NR
42. BEN-MEIR, NAPHTALI RPUD 3505 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.47 NR
43. SHUTE, SCOTT RPUD 3509 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.48 NR
44. HENDERSON, JOSEPH WILLIAM RPUD 3501 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.47 NR
45. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT L NRPUD 1400 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 13.77 F
46. DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W STATE HWY 114 4.39 NR
47. DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W SH 114 0.08 NR
48. SOUTHLAKE CITY NRPUD 1050 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 4.39 NR
49. NAIR, RAJEEV RPUD 504 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.69 NR
50. BADYLAK, JOHN RPUD 500 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.58 NR
51. TD AMERITRADE SERVICES COMPANY NRPUD 1051 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 78.39 NR
52. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT L NRPUD 1901 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 5.98 F
53. U S A AG 3400 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 16.97 NR
54. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT L NRPUD 3415 T W KING RD 4.29 F
55. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT L NRPUD 1750 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 2.95 F
56. SABRE HEADQUARTERS LLC NRPUD 1600 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 9.15 NR
57. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT L NRPUD 3400 E T W KING RD 2.31 F
58. VARIDESK LLC NRPUD 1900 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 19.99 NR
59. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2509 AMELIA ISLAND PATH 0.48 NR
60. U S A AG 3050 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 94.61 NR
61. MAGUIRE PTNRS-SOLANA LTD RPUD 910 JAMESTOWN LN 2.09 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Forty-seven (44)
Responses Received within 200’: Five (5) – Attached
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-006 Page 3
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-006 Page 4
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-006 Page 5
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-006 Page 6
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-006 Page 7