The URL can be used to link to this page

Item 6D - Responses Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 CHITWOOD, JOHN Southlake, TX 76092 1070 HARBOR HAVEN ST Phone: (817)748-8621 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed t undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: [� L& 0,- . P I M )_s Wit. 'Zv, . Signature:--__. ' j Date: 'u Additional - ignature: Un^ f Date: ' Printed Name(s): �. k )C } �2� i r 0y)61 Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One farm per property. Phone Number (optional): ( �j_ �' q 73 Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of 5outhlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 JOHNSON, GRAHAM Southlake, TX 76092 2940 BURNEY LN Phone: (817)748-8621 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of 19E3> undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): 6ya ('Dms or �' Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): • � o �'>— September 29, 2020 Zoning Change and Development Plan Thank you for allowing me to voice my opinion. As an owner of an adjacent house, I am strongly opposed to this zoning change and development plan for the following reasons. Public Safety: Currently there are approximately 75 homes in this neighborhood that all rely on one stretch of road as the sole access point for emergency vehicle entrance. Adding additional houses to an already strained design is dangerous for the current residents. Wildlife Protection/Tree Conservation: Maintaining the current wildlife habitat, natural corridor, and native Post Oak trees in this unique area of Southlake is a priority. For more information see Ray Chancellor's "Southlake Conservation" document written to Mayor Laura Hill, City Council Members, City Manager Yelverton, Parks and Recreation Board, and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Lack of Compatibility: The proposed development is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood in lot size, lot width, road width, curb and gutter, as well as creating an HOA. Protecting my Neighbor: Creating a public road through an existing lot changes the structure of the surrounding lots. One lot would be transformed into a "corner lots" which may not be desirable to established owner, another lot would now have headlights shine directly into her front door and master bedroom. The developer is proposing this street as an "easement" through a current Harbor Oaks lot to avoid mandatory re-platting. The Harbor Oaks Deed Restrictions requires approval from the neighborhood to subdivide/re-plat an existing lot. Thank you, Graham and Katherine Johnson L 2940 Burney Lane Southlake TX, 76092 Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 WILSON THELMA B SURVIVOR'S TRU Southlake, TIC 76092 2930 BURNEY LN Phone: (817)748-8621 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Fax: (817)748$077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of {, opposed toy undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position -- crj ,t�arzdrZ� ZGs �c� it} G �cc c a Signature Date: 0 Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): 1� S✓��Z•' Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): �( 7- -"/a/ -, s?/ 7q Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 BRAYTON, LARRY Southlake, TX 76092 3020 BURNEY LN P ne;-j8-1_Z) -8621 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Pax; (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING, Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of (: opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: r 1 Signature: � ae: r= Additional Signature: Date: Printed Names :%��i/"ri Must be property owner(s) whose name(s)are printed at top, 16therwise ca tact the Planninfi Department one form per property. Phone Number (optional): t Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services Notification Response WALSH, DENNIS M 7400 Main St; Ste 310 Southlake, TX 76092 1115 HARBOR HAVEN ST Phone: (817}748-8fi21 S©UTHLAKE, TX 76092 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the pro erty so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: �) L, �q- t-k k.,o6--iJ vvL,-L-VL - b - t) CJC Signature: e: 'z�► zl Additional Signature: -, Date. Printed Names : �-B� Y\ItS CL- )�e Must be property owner(s)whose name(s) are printed at op. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): c)- I (-( oc>C z 13 r70 Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 BARBARA AUYANG REVOCABLE TRUST Southlake, TX 76092 PO BOX 92086 Phone: (817)748-8621 SOUTHLAKE, TX 7609 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: -� Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PNI Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 CURTIS, MARY KATHRYN Southlake, TX 76092 3580 BURNEY LN Phone: (817)748-8621 SOUTH(LAKE, TX 76092 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Date: Signature: /Q Additional Signature: Date: to- -2- - Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s)whose na (s)are printed aftop. Otherwi contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional):& 'qS Cathy & Steve Curtis 3580 Burney Ln.,5outhlake,TX. 76092 817-481-6298 hetzer@p,et.net Planning&Zoning Commission To whom it may concern, We live 152 ft. from the Houseman's property where the proposed road enters and exits. We have lived in 5outhlake, on Burney Lane,for 38 years. And we love our city and our neighborhood. I worked for the city and the Stebbon's Group as an independent contractor for 13 yrs. As for the neighborhood, it is our ideal location with open fences,horses and an abundant of trees- As for the people who live here, for years we get together once every two months with our loving and congenial group, called, Love Thy Neighbor. These are good people. These are good citizens. There is, however, one glitch,and it's an unsafe one. Metaphorically speaking,we have one front door. There is only one way in, and, one way out, where Carroll meets Burney Road. If you go to a theatre, you will find exits. If you build a 900 sq.ft. building,you have to add to it,for a back door. I am sure many homes have one,two, or three backdoors and it's all good and simply, for safety precautions& standards. Capacity speaking, at present, we are now up to 75 homes and 6 cul du sacs...a grossly insufficient travel route before funneling into an arterial street, which is 2 lane Carroll Rd. 42 yrs.ago, a fire started at the knoll, after you turn onto Burney, that swept all the way to the cul du sac at the end of Burney where The McIntire's currently live, 3530 Burney Lane. The fireman burst in their home without knocking and told Mrs. McIntire to get their children and get out NOW. She got her kids, her husband, her Mother and 2 dogs in the car and upon leaving, Mr. McIntire ran off Burney Lane because the smoke was that thick and intense. (They are happy to tell of this harrowing event.) Fires happen. It can be as innocent as a Gender Reveal Party(if you have seen the news of late.) Under God, family and home is priority in life...where freedom and security go together. Now...to compound this safety hazard issue,there is a proposed eight added houses with 2 to 3 cars each,with other added congestion such as lawn people,Amazon/Fed Ex trucks, UPS, food deliveries,the forever ongoing onslaught of lake lookers for an access to the lake,and so on. This proposed development,also has, one way in and one way out, which augments and hinders our safety capacity issue. It worsens it. One entrance/exit is due to a half century ago,this land became landlocked where it should have been resolved back then, but that does not constitute the descending of those problems upon this well established neighborhood, where 90 percent of us are in the autumn of our years. Too, there is property that is abutted up to the flood plain, and with aerobic systems, there could possibly be flooding,that our neighbor,Jack, could expand on. In brief,this situation is elemental,once you have heard us all. We have been reduced again, 2006 and now,to deflect this impractical flawed design,while not being compatible to Harbor Oaks, which suppresses us all. We now must labor through sacrificing our time to "reveal"this counter productive proposal. Our fervent hope, is that this will be delved into with due diligence, so that our tranquility will not be altered, which diminishes our peace.....for as long as we live here! We hope you, too,will be considerate of our needs. Thank you for your time. Kindest Regards, i Cathy Cur Notification Response Form ZA20-0049 FDirectquestions and mail responses to: Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Southlake ng $ Development Services oification Response HOUSMANS, ERROL V 1400 Main St; Ste 310 2970 BURNEY LN Southlake, TX 76092 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Phone: (817)748-8621 Fax: (817)748-8A77 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL FAX BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HAND DELIVERY FARING. Being the owners) of the property so noted above, are he reby in favor of opposed to undecided about the proposed Zoning Chanrcee or and Development one) g Plan referenced above_ Space for comments regarding your position: r12 Q'•` bignat rs.a 'Additional Signature: Date. Date: Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s) whose names are printed at top. the contact the Planni ng Department, One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Notification Response Form }ttestions nd n1aill re ponr� es to.o ZA20-0049 t Oil o #e Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM F atlnin.g ,&Devetgpftent Seiivtee�.. h, iet�ctcepei �e � Q ern� �, MILES, MARYLYN E uthtl ; 76092 1120 50UTHLAKE DR ,,hone: (817)74-8621 3 DESOTO, TX 75115 x 4 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: ;�Wao" . j & 0 r f lyyWh lo7y Signature: pate: Additional Signature: Date: Printed Narne(s): __M n Am Must be property owner(s) whose narne(s} are rnte at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. r Phone Number (Optional): __ �0 1 aTZL66 oct . 05. 2020 03 : 32 PM 'PERRY / JUDY SAUDER 8174429568 PAGE . 1/ 1 Notification Response Form ZA20-00a9 Mooting Dato: Octobor 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM 5AUDER, TERRY L 1090 HARBOR HAVEN ST SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of <2opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s) whose name(a)are printed at top. Otherwiao contact the Planning Department. One form per prop". Phone Number (optional): L - / Z, 11 DRChancellor 817-488-8281 p.1 Notification Response Form alliaxt aw=a tW ZA20-0049 Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM , # CHANCELLOR, RAYMOND L 890 HARBOR CT SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date:/ Additional Signature: Date: / _z� -� Printed Names) �,� P, yU A 0,1 c& /+�) Must be properly owner(s) whose na (s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department One form per property Phone Number (optional): CIF1 _ _�, / -- �_ 3533 Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 GEORGE, DAVID Southlake, TX 76092 2980 BURNEY LN Phone: (817)748-8621 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to� undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: � ;�, -c-< < � — Date: L b� � Additional Signature: Date: 3D-L�-o Printed Name(s): MALL Must be property owner(s) whose name(s) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (Optional): Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 LAND, KENNETH w Southlake, TX 76092 2900 BURNEY LN Phone: (817)748-8621 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed D undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: ��-- Date: Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): '� Must be property owner(s)whose names) are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 MOLLY GEORGE BROWN TRUST Southlake, TX 76092 2908 BURNEY LN Phone: (817)748$621 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: Additional Signature: Date:�i0 Printed Name(s): L&L-LY J- 31-*WPJ Must be property owner(s) whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 ZIELKE, RODNEY Southlake, TX 76092 1090 BURNEY LN Phone: (817)748-8621 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Fax. (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Si nafure: Date. . 9��z Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): Wtvcl -7/1 . Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): --Z-t6( .mod Z 7 o: 8177488077 From: (469713a194) 10/07/20 07:4G RH Page I of I Notification response Form ZA20-0049 Meeting Date* October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM BOYER, LISA VU 2900 HARBOR REFUGE ST SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of (op osed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: r Z_L Sd cc % r�?,:�,✓ /'P C e �Ps7% r� ?~/-7 e s' a r P zs;: e Z a� : ! Y`ts nor � � Date ZI?6J*n �'' 1gnature: te:.__, Printed Name(s): L-IN �- ��. Must De property owner(s) whose names)are printed at top. oinermse contact the llan oe nt.b ne 1 per Rrope Phone Number (optional): t/ t o ne r 0 yyl e _�b Opt-Out: Not Defined CITY OFSOUTHLAKE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ��O��v � 1400 Main St.;Suite 310 Southlake,TX 76092 Phone: (817)748-8621 Planning and Zoning Fax: (817)748-8077 g g Commission www,cityofsouthlake.com Thursday, October 8, 2020 6:30 PM -� Town Hall Council Chambers t JA1 JI 6-L Iti�G � �� 1400 Main Street C 4(_'S utl lake, Texas SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Or Virtual Town Hall Meeting 0 V(0, (�( �J r'u f:f y { 5 C)u I L(A_) 17 0 AJ i�i `i-i C.!I !-) V IC t "V r • Zoning Change and Development Plan for The Conservation on property described as Lot 10, Block 2, Harbor Oaks Subdivision, and Tract 5, Rees D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, Southlake, Texas and addressed as 2970 Burney Lane and 3185 Southlake Park Dr., Southlake, Texas. SPIN Neighborhood#2. • Current Zoning: "AG"Agricultural District and "SF-IA"Single Family Residential District. • Proposed Zoning: "R-PUD"Residential Planned Unit Development District. • The purpose of this item is to seek approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan to develop 8 residential lots on approximately 13.1 acres. Dear Property Owner, Your property has been identified as being within 200 feet and/or within the same platted subdivision as the above referenced property that is being considered for a Zoning Change and Development Plan. Because your property meets one or both of these criterion, state and local laws grant you special privileges when the City considers such requests. They are as follows: 1) You are entitled to receive written notice from the City of Southlake about the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan and its associated public hearing held by the Planning and Zoning Commission if your property is within 200 feet or within the same previously platted subdivision as the subject property. Written notice is sent to the listed property owner(s) shown on the last approved City of Southlake tax roll; 2) If your property is within 200 feet of the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan, and if you are opposed to the requested action, you are entitled to file a formal Protest Petition with the City which can ultimately affect the voting procedure of the City Council when they consider the proposed action. If the owners of 20 percent of the area of the lots or land within 200 feet of the subject property file a Pretest Petition with the City, then an affirmative vote of three-fourths of the City Council is required to approve the Zoning Change and Development Plan. All protests must be written, signed, and acknowledged by the property owner as required by Section 46.3 of the City`s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, in order for the protest to be valid. If you wish to register your opposition or support to this action, you may complete, sign and return the enclosed Notification Response Form to the Planning & Development Services Department. You are encouraged to follow the request through final action because changes are often made during the review process. Please note that if local health conditions warrant, this meeting and future meetings may be held virtually. Please check with the City of Southlake website, cityofsouthlake.com, for updates. Please note that this letter and its attachments constitute written notice about the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan. Please contact the Planning and Development Services Department if you have any questions; Project Contact: Jerod Potts, Phone: (817) 748-8195 1 Dept. Phone: (817) 748-8621 a) x 0 0 '0 0 .— I C) > 0 0 is o 00 Z ul m 0 IT cu cu _J. 7Tj Ln 0 ro U) 7 1 r�{{.� :1 i' i __�:t {t$ �ji�,Y• t fir - -'_'"_ 1 CIA ca r Lf fu 4—j C (D < cl C, L) rl4 013 2.10 LL 4t oj A"i , LU Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services K`a n► e l C A r,,�4)I N6' Notification Response 7� i L E/�9G1)O1.JC-t-� '1400 Main St; Ste 310 �4 c Southlake, TIC 76092 ia6a_n.Wtfa 0 At4.�J ter, Phone: (817)74$-8C21 -'` SOUTHL.AKE, TX 76092 Fax: (81.7)748-8077 . 5 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING, Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of posed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: e-q-sC see &AleQ/d-� 61 � Signature: t Date: y Additional Signature: 'o Date: / U Y Printed Names : � e_ _r { ' 2 ,. ' 6L /plc Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): �r 1-( 3 - 3 4"Jeeh rrahi pe 4- Vicinity Map J�a,&+e.l M&bzweil `s The Conservation ' 10e r y J� 1020 1040 CT `C,30 1900 Sri 1 r 3E20 352 1570 --- 0 1 Oo5 � co c+i 3000 cs � M ac' CY y 4+" �p F �S 1020 n 1060 1070 AR logy c� 1075 1Ct65 .y c4 ry' ZA 20 00 49 1-� .,.y .L13 A -7+- Zoning Change and Development Plan Feet To: City of Southlake, Planning & Development Services Attention: Ken Baker, Jerod Potts, Madeline Oujesky, Daniel Cortez, Frances Scharli, Gina Phalen, Daniel Kubiak, Michael Forman, Chad Patton, Shawn McCaskill, and John Huffman From: Kathleen Carrabine & Daniel McDowell, 961 Thousand Oaks Court Re: Public Hearing Notice ZA20-0049 We are opposed to the proposed zoning change and development plan referenced above. The Harbor Oaks area is unlike any other in Southlake. It has an equestrian country estate feel that has an understated and quiet presence. It is truly a sanctuary amidst a highly condensed residential and retail area. The concern lies in that the developer stated that they know what Southlake wants regarding types of homes. They said that they know what they are doing because they've developed streets all over the area. But we all know that new developments all over the area are all similar to each other. You see the same formula in Grapevine, Colleyville, and Keller. These are compact, homogenous groups of houses with a fountain in the middle and a lighted sign. These types of homes work well for transient families looking for a good school close to DFW until their children go off to college. But Harbor Oaks is not populated with transient families. It is populated with people who have a stake in the quality of Southlake long term. It's where people can enjoy a permanent lifestyle filled with nature and respect instead of the bustling cement developments. With preservation in mind — even existing residents will let their neighbors know if they are putting something up for sale. They try to be careful who they are selling to because we share the same environmental values. There is a high demand for this unique lifestyle. I alone know of at least 6 families that waited until a Harbor Oaks home was available until they moved. These families are from Timarron and Stone Lakes. I've personally received 3 letters over the years from strangers asking me to contact them if we ever decide to sell. And I'm sure I'm not alone in this experience. Here's an example of one letter. "My family and I are currently looking to buy a different home within Southlake. We currently live in the Timarron Golf Community of Southlake. We have scoured every inch of the city to find an interesting home. Your home is one of about 10 that meets our interests and requirements. Should you decide to sell in the future, could you please keep me in mind?" The comments of our friends and family that visit all have the same theme: I can't believe this exists. Are we still in Southlake? I can't believe how quiet it is. Please let me know if something comes up for sale. How come it hasn't been overdeveloped with McMansions? I respond to that last question by saying the homeowners have fought for their sanctuary over the years and will continue to do so. They thrive without the need of an HOA for homeowners to respect each other, their animals, their property, local wildlife and the environment. My family has been in the Carroll ISD for over 14 years. I've also started my 5th year working for the high school administration. This has enabled me to connect with literally thousands of Southlake parents and students. And it's given me a fantastic perspective on the spectrum of Southlake residents. One demographic can't define us all just like one developer can't define land use. Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 HARRYMAN, SCOTT Southlake, TX 76092 1105 HARBOR RETREAT Phone: (817)748-8621 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Be in -the.-owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby Cin favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: Date: /6 a1 � Additional Signaturw Date: Printed dame(s): Must be property owner(s)whose names are prin d at topj Otherwise contact the Planning Depart t. One rm per property. Phone dumber (optional): Residential Planned Unit Development District- Land Use and Development Regulations, Variance Request and Open Space Management Plan for the 13.09 acre development located at 2970 Burney Lane known as The Conservation Southlake, Texas 7 October 2020 Case # ZA20-0049 Sage Group, Inc. This Residential Planned Unit Development shall abide by the all conditions of the City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as it pertains to the “SF-1A” Single-Family Residential zoning district; and the City of Southlake Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended: The following regulations shall apply to all lots, except as noted: Minimum House Size: All new houses constructed shall be a minimum of 4,000 s.f. in floor area. Street: A 25’ B-B pavement section with standard 6” curb, in a 40’ Access Easement shall be provided along the frontage of the residential lots. The cul-de-sac shall have a 100’ B-B outside diameter of paving, in a one hundred ten (110’) foot diameter easement. Residential Lots shall not be required to front on a public street. (Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Article VIII Miscellaneous Requirements, Section 8.01 Lotting Requirements, A.) Sidewalks: In keeping with the nearby neighborhood conventions, no sidewalks shall be required. Side and rear lot lines shall be configured as shown on the Development Plan. All newly constructed homes shall be required to be protected by a fire-suppression sprinkler system. No separate common open space lot shall be required, consistent with the normal requirements of SF-1A zoning, which this development is patterned after. In the Open Space, Pedestrian Access and Wildlife Easement, no construction or living tree removal shall be allowed. City sewer is and will not be available at this site, so this development requests a waiver to the normal requirement, listed in Chapter 19, Article III, Division 2, Section 19-88 of the Southlake Code or Ordinances, to install a sewage collection system that extends to the development’s borders and throughout the development. Open Space Management Plan: The “Access Easement,” and the “Open Space, Pedestrian Access and Wildlife Easement” areas in the project, and common facilities such as the access road, shall be maintained by a Homeowners Association (HOA), to be established for the development. All other areas shall be the responsibility of the individual property owners, including the front yards and required streetscape trees of the residential lots. All property owners shall be required to be a member of the HOA. Dues assessments, required for the maintenance of the landscape easement areas and other HOA activities, shall be mandatory. The HOA, through a resident Board of Directors, shall be responsible for the maintenance and operation of the protected open space within the development, either directly or through a third-party management company. No full-time employees are contemplated to be necessary. The expenses required to maintain the roadway and easement areas at a quality level shall be estimated annually by the HOA Board, and dues shall be determined and assessed on each property owner in an equitable fashion at such a rate as necessary to maintain such a level of quality. The annual expenses for such open space maintenance are initially estimated to be $8,000, or approximately $1,000 for each of the HOA homeowners. Authority to enforce these requirements, and to place a lien on the property if such dues are not paid, shall be in the form of written Deed Restrictions and Covenants, agreed to by all property owners in the HOA at purchase, and shall run with the land. Provisions shall be made, in the HOA Bylaws and Deed Restrictions, that in the unlikely event the HOA fails to maintain all or a portion of the protected open space in reasonable order and condition, the City of Southlake may, but is not required to, assume responsibility for its maintenance and take corrective action, including the provision of extended maintenance. The costs of such maintenance may be charged to the HOA or individual property owners that make up the HOA, and may include administrative costs and penalties which shall become a lien on all property in the development. Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning &. Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 ADAMS, BILL M Southlake, TX 76092 880 HARBOR CT Phone: (817)748-8621 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of t so noted above, are hereby in favor of _ opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: �� i'�Df�cn.� f/�,,/) �r�� y�`'/.�� Chi/'f 4,�r�� l� � �� G��C� �i'✓.�T 6 Ile, -(�i ie e CW r~✓ff df- rf�C� ' Signature: Date: �-; - Additional Signature: - Date:. Printed Name(s): Z-�,& - C�;g 5 Must be property owner(s) whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 HULTIN, ALLAN C Southlake, TX 76092 1075 HARBOR HAVEN ST Phone: (817)748-8621 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: ( acw-L- C U 1� Date: 1-0 n� J Additional Signature: ,�',, ,.-- �,�� Date: Printed Name(s): L Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): 9V1_ �N-�� - S )-\-A'A October 7, 2020 To Planning and Zoning Board, We are in support of project Sage Development Group in Burney Lane Southlake. We signed and sent back our form in support building of new homes in our neighborhood. To begin with, the neighborhood is in a period of transition and it needs to be. Many of the homes are not being properly maintained or kept up to date. Since we don't have an HOA, which we are ok with, it presents wide variation of what is perceived as well maintained. With that said, we would like to outline some facts about some of the comments from the last Zoning Meeting, addressing both those who spoke and the written statements. 1. There have been several tear downs of existing homes or complete remodels. There are a few more that will occur in 2021. 2. There have been 3 net new homes to the neighborhood that everyone neglected to mention. 3. Many in opposition don't have their facts straight related to taxes thinking new homes will increase. Tarrant County Appraisals are measured on factors, new homes will not impact that. Our taxes have gone up 10% per year last 2 years regardless of our neighborhood. 4. Two neighbors who opposed with the comments that the new homes are not in keeping with the neighborhood is complete hypocrisy. One recently bulldozed 3400 sq. ft. home and built 20,000 sq ft. home. The other lives next door in a 15,000 square ft home. Neither home is in line in keeping with current development. 5. One neighbor who spoke on the zoning call that was vehemently opposed tried to sell off a portion of her property. It was in the back 'here current property which would essentially need an easement and create a flag lot, also not in keeping with the neighborhood. More importantly, trying to profit by dividing her property when it would be not even consistent with what is being proposed. Adds to the hypocrisy. 6. Concern over traffic; Mr. Zielke believes the 7 new homes will create a huge traffic impact stating each home will have 4 cars driving up and down. These will be single family homes probably selling to those moving within the district or to get into the district with families. 2 cars on average per household or 14 more cars. 7. Mr. Zielke keeps the worst yard in the neighborhood, and it is an eyesore for anyone driving by. His wife is constantly complaining and stirring the pot with neighbors. 8. Many of those opposed have been here for 20 plus years and are not concerned about property values long into the future but only for the next few years. Not sure this will impact decisions, but felt it was important for visibility to the truth. Respectfully, Those who support project. Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 LEEDY, ERETT Southlake, TX 76092 2920 HARBOR REFUGE ST Phone: (817)748-8621 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of C ed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: 1 f f Gt h � D A l rp '� A/'/ k-- 4 k-, e- k6 V- Signature. Date: /0-2 -Z L) Additional Signature: Date:0 - �aq Printed Name(s)- Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Elepartment. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): - l-Z -- `'i M04� 0J50 )oyl 1k WA tl+ The cdQeoC PIWS Ina 2 P-eop)e, -t-haf oil Noiw &j �,i�,P�✓� eve � � � � die Q/� I,an �e�rM� n n k horhov�C t dm t f vv-A P1 Can G�6C � ubi �� Vi) Ad Un a Pvc%c.le 164, Gino( thlv� V-g( 614YA ri ce A k6i 4w I G,tiv �js � s,'ol�v✓.�.Pk� � G lei( own �DR we dunk kA Vt V\i l4w+ wry) Dire Vl� f G0yOn ,vi like hvr IGiol batk� mn � nFvv� . -(�u I'l/0 nolk helkW- -1h is ok v he- os kj 0. Plrf(Zv64 k)v � � Y-\4,r�Q\,na kmt NA,30e, n b5k6( had _ W A d no-t c pn ve mot- . Notification Response Form Direct questions and mail responses to: ZA20-0049 City of Southlake Meeting Date: October 8, 2020 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services Notification Response 1400 Main St; Ste 310 STAPLES, RANDY G Southlake, TX 76092 1080 HARBOR HAVEN ST Phone: (817)748-8621 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Fax: (817)748-8077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the propert so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: 01"n 111(tAM L-) are &� (((,&d Signature: Date: Additional Signature: _ >��'�` Date:�� 3v zz. Printed Name(s):. L �'� , Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are pri to at top. Otherwise contact t e Planning Dep rtment. One form per property. Phone Number (optional): �r , `y - (4, L Attachment to Notification Response Farm for Randy & Mary Staples, 1080 Harbor Haven Street, Southla e We have lived in the Harbor Oaks neighborhood for more than 35 years and strongly oppose this zoning change and development plan because it is not at all "compatible" with our country estate neighborhood. Some of you on this Committee may not be familiar with our charming quiet neighborhood on the city's North side which is adjacent to the Core of Engineer property and Lake Grapevine. We have oversized lots, the majority 2-10 acres, and we do not have curbs, gutters, or bright street lights. There is an abundance of wildlife. While the developer thinks his plan is acceptable because it slightly exceeds the city's minimum one-acre lot size, and his plans include curbs, gutters and bright lights to the development, that is not a compatible development to our neighborhood. Compatible means it must be similar to the adjacent neighborhood. The fact is that all of the adjacent lots closest to the proposed development and the lot directly across from the proposed entrance are much larger, more than two-plus acres each. This proposed project fails the compatibility test. Regarding "property rights," the developer does not own the property, and thus he cannot stake a claim to any property rights. Let's be clear. No one is denying anyone of their property rights. The two landowners entertaining the sale of their properties to this developer have property rights, but both knew when they acquired their property that the Harbor Oaks lot is zoned SF-IA single family and the other I I t acres is zoned agricultural. Now these two people want to change the rules and that is wrong. These two property owners have no greater rights than the property rights as all the rest of us whom have invested our lifesavings in this country estate neighborhood and plan to continue living here. By rejecting this rezoning project, you are not taking away anyone's rights, but if you approve it, you are taking away the property rights from all the homeowners in our neighborhood. Approving this proposal granting an easement allowing a private road on a lot currently zoned SF-lA Single Family Resident District in our Harbor Oaks neighborhood will open the floodgates for more developers seeking subdividing and replotting of our neighborhood. We know of at least three property owners that are watching these proceedings with a special interest. One neighbor admitted that they already have been approached by a developer to do a similar project on their multi-acre lot. We have lived in this neighborhood for more than 35 years. Don't allow these developers to ruin our SF-IA single-family country estate neighborhood. For all the reasons stated above, we strongly urge the Planning and Zoning Committee to reject this proposed zoning change and development plan. 10/7/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAG5%2BZGgTPxJLhDBFswTS%2Bzc%3D 1/6 Fwd: Development on Burney Ln Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us> Sat 10/3/2020 3:19 PM To: Dennis Killough <dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> Get Outlook for iOS From: Kay Johnson Sent: Saturday, October 3, 2020 2:51:36 PM To: Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Daniel Kubiak <Daniel.Kubiak@ci.southlake.tx.us>; ; Lepp, Amy <Amy.Lepp@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Gina Phalen <Gina.Phalen@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Michael Springer <Michael.Springer@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Sco 10/7/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAG5%2BZGgTPxJLhDBFswTS%2Bzc%3D 2/6 and despite being asked by many realtors about selling our house, we are never planning to leave. The developer will continue to say that this development is compatible with the City of Southlake. I agree with that statement. But more importantly, it is NOT compatible with this neighborhood, which many consider a hidden gem of Southlake. The developer has had meetings with the neighborhood to discuss his plans, but not offer any compromises.The public entrance to the Corps he has added to the north end of the property is NOT desired by the majority of the neighborhood. He uses this as a selling point; however, we already have access to this area (off Harbor Court) and added traffic/street parking on a curved road is not safe nor desired. He did not ask the neighborhood's opinion on sidewalks, street lights or signs as suggested by the Corridor Committee. He is currently planning to re-zone a platted lot in our subdivision, place a private road and an entrance sign in the front of that platted lot, and make that platted lot part of the new subdivision without ever re-platting? I do strongly believe that he is purposefully avoiding re-platting as he knows he does not have the neighborhood support, especially of adjacent lots. In my opinion, it will not be financially beneficial for this developer or any future developer to repurpose this area for residential use in a way that will be compatible with the neighborhood. I do feel that the city has an opportunity here to preserve this precious piece of land and preserve this unique neighborhood with all its wildlife and trees by purchasing it for the city. The profound opposition of the neighborhood to keep it as it is has made it an even more inspiring place for us to live. The remainder of my issues in opposition are summarized in the petition signed by the neighborhood. Please enjoy the photos and I would be happy to walk the neighborhood with anyone interested. It is beautiful here. Respectfully, Kay Johnson 2940 Burney Ln 918 289 3009 10/7/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAG5%2BZGgTPxJLhDBFswTS%2Bzc%3D 3/6 10/7/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAG5%2BZGgTPxJLhDBFswTS%2Bzc%3D 4/6 10/7/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAG5%2BZGgTPxJLhDBFswTS%2Bzc%3D 5/6 10/7/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAG5%2BZGgTPxJLhDBFswTS%2Bzc%3D 6/6 10/7/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQABoTHcCprGZMh7shCTb3Fls%3D 1/2 Woodbridge Development/Harbor Oaks Mary Van Sant Mon 10/5/2020 11:18 AM To: Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mr. Potts, My name is Mary Van Sant OConnor, I have resided at 2965 Burney Lane, Southlake for 27 years. I strongly oppose the proposed development by Woodbridge Development aka Jody Boyd on the grounds that it goes against every stated objective of the 2035 plan. This plan was developed after surveying the residents of Southlake. What is overwhelmingly apparent inthe 2035 plan is preservation of the few remaining open natural spaces and quality development that maintains and enhances established neighborhoods. This proposal does the exact OPPOSITE. Here are some other not insignificant objections. 1. By allowing Mr Houseman’s property to be incorporated into this PUD you are violating our deeds and restriction. Deeds andRestrictions Mr Houseman agreed to when he signed them on purchase of his home. The city of Southlake along with the developer of Huse Homeplace landlocked Mrs Myles, Harbor Oaks residents did not!!!!!If this goes through, do we as larger holders of property in Harbor Oaks have the right to make our properties into a PUD? Right now I can’t even put a toilet in my barn because of building restrictions. 2. The road itself is too close to Mr Fredricks property and puts roads on almost all 3 sides of his home. The road empties directly into the front of my home, is too close to both my drive and the Fredricks to make this a safe access onto Burney. 3. Nothing about the proposed development reflects the current nature of the surrounding community. The streets are not compatible with our neighborhood. The lot sizes are not compatible, the proposed street lights are not compatible, the aerobic septic systems are notcompatible. 4. Probably the biggest problem with this development is the topography of the land and the harm this development will do to one of thelast open natural spaces left in Southlake and this wildlife corridor. I urge you to read carefully Ray Chancellor’s letter to you regarding the treasure that Southlake has in the property in question. Because the land will need major landfill and huge culverts to divert water that flows at tremendous speed and volume through the back of the Fredricks property the development costs are huge. Consequently the developer says he can not reduce the number of homes orchange the road to be compatible with Harbor Oaks. Because the lots are small and the land very rocky aerobic septic systems are required. I know Mr Boyd has stated that because thesepeople will have so much money that they will have all the resources needed to prevent any pollution. This is just not true! These systems can easily spew untreated waste when the system is not working properly. I ask you to just google “problems with aerobic systems” andyou will see how tricky they can be to maintain. The erosion when a huge home is place against the Corp property can be witness on the trail that backs up to the development off ofRidgecrest. I ride and hike back there frequently and that one house has created major erosion. I can only imagine what 7 homes that have 10/7/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQABoTHcCprGZMh7shCTb3Fls%3D 2/2 changed the topography will do to the Corp property to the west of this development. This is just not a suitable piece of property to try and develop. Mr Boyd also touts how many trees he will save but if you look at his plan and what he allows the homeowners for buildable space, several lots could eliminate all the trees. His tree preservation plan only encompasses the road and lot development. Once in, the homeownerscan wipe out a large portion of the trees with tennis courts and swimming pools etc. 5. The safety issue of putting more large homes in a neighborhood with one way in and one way out. We are already overbuilt back here.My water pressure continues to decline since the 2 large homes have been built near me. What will 8 mega mansions do? 6. This is a personal note, I purchased my home specifically because further development In this neighborhood seemed impossible. Wewere an established platted community, it was quiet and rural in nature. To think now a road will empty directly into my property and street signage and lights will be the new norm is upsetting. I have been paying over $23,000.00 a year in taxes to live here because of the amenities and features I enjoy in Harbor Oaks. I’m retired and living on my retirement so this is no small expense but it has been worth it for me to have this type of community. Placing this road and development in its current form will harm my property value and the quality of my life not to mention the sensitive environment this property holds. I would also like you to consider the construction that will be taking place over the next several years. From Road grading and construction to 8 multi million dollar homes being built with the only access dumping directly in my front yard and down the side of the Fredricks. Notto mention the staging of all the equipment. Recently 2 multi million dollar homes have been built off Burney. I had trucks and heavy equipment staged in front of my house for 2 years. It is not a pleasant thing. This was only 2 large homes. I can’t imagine heavy roadconstruction and 8 mega mansions. I’m 66, this isn’t how I want to spend my later years here after paying huge taxes for the peace and tranquillity I once enjoyed. 7. I understand the city settled with Ms Myles in 2006 for over a million dollars regarding her landlocked property by Bob Jones. Why can’t you settle with her on this property?8. I would also like to ask what kind of bond Woodbridge is required to have to ensure they have adequate financing to complete the project. Looking at the Dun and Bradstreet report, Woodbridge Development made roughly only a $167,000.00 Does he have additional backing and if so, who? 9. I strongly urge you to deny this proposal. This land should be preserved, not raped by another money hungry developer. Let them gowhere the environmental and community impact won’t be so very great. Respectfully, Mary Van Sant OConnorSent from my iPad Sent from my iPad 1 My Objections to the Zone Change/Proposed Development Adjacent to Harbor Oaks Subdivision – Oct 4, 2020 Submitted by: Thelma Bea Wilson, 2930 Burney Ln Proposed Roadway (ROW) using Housmans lot • Housmans’ lot is Lot 10, Block 2 in Harbor Oaks Subdivision • Deed restrictions say: “no lot shall be used for other than single family • Deed restrictions say: “no owner shall be permitted to re-subdivide any lot in the Addition” • Deed restrictions say: “no building or structure of any other character is permitted to use existing easements” • Propose development shows a roadway (ROW) on Lot 10, Block 2, that is in direct violation of Harbor Oaks Deed Restrictions. It is proposed to be next to Fredricks lots with severe impact to his property value. • Signage – The proposed sign for the proposed development is in direct conflict with the Harbor Oaks Deed Restrictions. We would not be allowed to add anything but “for sale” or “for rent” signs, per Deed Restrictions. • Will the request to City for R-PUD for proposed development be allowed since ALL of Harbor Oaks is SF-1. If SF-1 was applied to development request, it would first require ALL of Harbor Oaks residents approval . • Corridor Committee minutes #23 asked applicant need to ensure there are no existing Deed Restrictions that would preclude the proposed ANNEXATION of a lot (Lot 10, Blk 2) from the Harbor Oaks subdivision. • Compatibility: All adjacent lots are all 2 acres (without including easement (adjacent ROW area). The proposed lot sizes are down to 1.1 to 1.6 acres ALL OF WHICH INCLUDE THE EASEMENTS (ROW AREA). By comparison, if you added easement size to existing HO lots it would be a plus of 7000 ft. • Lot widths of development vs established HO lots are drastically different. Adjacent HO lots are at least 215 ft in width while the proposed show narrow lots of 130’ in width. ALL HO lots are minimum width of 190’. Proposed ROW width = 40’ while existing HO roadway is 60’. • Proposal shows street lighting, and signage. Existing area of HO has neither. 2 My Objections to the Zone Change/Proposed Development Adjacent to Harbor Oaks Subdivision – Oct 4, 2020 (continued) • Signage: Developer is proposing a “lighted” sign for the project. Harbor Oaks = no sign. Carmel Bay = modest sign w/o lights Huse Homeplace= very small sign w/o lights. • Lot size of proposal vs Harbor Oaks: Proposed lots are 1.1 – 1.6 ac includes easement in the calculations. Harbor Oaks adjacent lot sizes are 2.2 ac and higher, not including easements in calculations. • Impact to environment: City 2035 plan specifically says the city’s mission is to “preserve the rural setting and high slopes” etc in the area. This proposal does not meet with the City 2035 promises nor is good for the fragile eco system attached to Harbor Oaks. Gaylord Texan, City of Grapevine, Trophy Club and Colleyville are currently trying to “preserve/protect” the wildlife habitat and have asked for Ray Cancellor’s consult on the matter. Southlake could join the effort and “preserve/protect” the wildlife habitat that we already have. Why not ask City to purchase this fragile portion of land. It is adjoined to the Bob Jones Wildlife Center area. Summary: It is my request that P&Z realize what we have in the North part of town and see that this proposal does not in any way show compatibility with the rural setting in Harbor Oaks. This proposal violates many of Harbor Oaks Deed Restrictions. This proposal will drastically, if approved, impact our fragile ecological treasure adjacent to Harbor Oaks. I am opposed to the proposed development for the above reasons. I hope you will consider all of the above and help preserve what Southlake has – a treasure! Thanks for your consideration, Thelma (Bea) Wilson 2930 Burney Lane Resident since 1990 (30 years) BURNEY ESATES OPPOSITION NARRITATIVE 9/22/20 Introduction: Burney Lane provides the only/single point of access to the Harbor Oaks Subdivision and some smaller subdivisions adjacent to Harbor Oaks we’ll call the Harbor Oaks Neighborhood (HON). This area is located at the end of Carroll Road on the very north side of Southlake and is bordered on three sides by Lake Grapevine/COE property and is adjacent to the Quail Creek Subdivision to the south. Harbor Oaks was developed some 40 years ago and today is an exemplary environmentally friendly estate development of near “historic age” where deer and a variety of many other fauna are regularly seen along the streets and adjacent lots. It typifies the earlier developments in Southlake north of SH 114 when rural/estate and equestrian style living were the norm and is very different from more recent and conventional Southlake development where sanitary sewer service became available such as many areas south of SH 114. The HON consists of approximately 160+/- acres and some 70 to 80 homes. Some of the things that make this area so desirable and successful as a community relate to its open, rural and equestrian friendly atmosphere. This is accomplished in part by: 1) Wide, rural estate roadway sections with minimum 60 foot Right-of-way, grassed/treed parkways, non-curb and gutter pavement, no sidewalks, and no street lights. This not only enhances the open atmosphere but also encourages use by a variety of flora and fauna as well as equestrian and other residential uses as simple as walking the dog. This is enhanced by close proximity to the abundance of COE land nearby and adjacent. 2) Lot Size and wide lot dimensions. Harbor Oaks lots average well over 2 acres not including adjacent road ROW areas. 3) Abundance of both protected and new growth trees in dedicated street ROW and on platted lots. Harbor Oaks is aging beautifully and is a very successful community demonstrated not only by the large number of residents that have lived there 25 + years but also by the desirability by younger people and families to relocate from more conventional developments if properties become available. Reasons for Opposition: A) Lack of Neighborhood Compatibility 1) Adjacent Lot Size: Adjacent Harbor Oaks lots are all 2 acres or larger not including the adjacent road ROW area. The proposed adjacent lots are much smaller and include their adjacent road area due to the road in an “easement” as opposed to a dedicated ROW. Add about 7000 square feet to each Harbor Oaks platted lot acreage to compare to the proposed lots. To be compatible the proposed adjacent lots should be at least as large as the adjacent Harbor Oaks lots. 2) Adjacent lot width: Lot width helps spread houses out and help a more open appearace. Adjacent Harbor oaks lots are at least 215 feet in width while the proposed shows lots as narrow as 130 feet in width. All harbor Oaks lots are minimum width of 190’ +/- 3) Average Lot Size: Harbor Oaks average lot size is 2.5+ acres as opposed to the proposed average is only 1.6 acres. 4) 40 foot Private Road (easement): The proposed is for a 40 foot wide private road easement, curb and gutter pavement, street lights, sidewalk, potential for future private gated entrance, and entry monument …. All of which not only do not exist currently in Harbor Oaks, are not desired by HO residents, and are contrary to the character of the neighborhood. Also by putting the roadway in an easement it effectively adds the roadway area to the lot acreage making the lots appear larger when compared to a ROW dedication lot as is the case in Harbor Oaks. B) Access The proposed roadway which will generate about 80 vehicle trips a day once traffic dies down to normal volumes after construction etc. is proposed to go through a Platted lot that is part of the Harbor Oaks Platted subdivision. THIS IS JUST WRONG! No one would want this to happen to them in their subdivision especially after 40 years of successful, desirable existence. Add street lights, monument sign, potential future gate …. All wrong for this area and residents. C) Total Lot Count and Neighborhood Service: Harbor Oaks is also unusual in that it only has a single point of access for travel and utilities that serves the existing 70 to 80 homes. This does not allow for an alternative emergency vehicle service access route if this point of access is blocked, alternative water service if the one water line that serves through this location is down, and the same for gas and other utilities. Normal planning practice does not allow more than about 15 homes on a single access. Minimizing the number of additional houses using this single point of access is very important to consider. Each new house just adds more traffic and utility usage to an already undesirable situation. Seven new lots would increase traffic and utility usage by about 10% ….. which straw will break the Camel’s back? . 1267f«e 52VOL REAL PROFERH RECORDS 9.00 W 406/16.2000 5 1 1 5 5 5 DEDICATION AND RESTRICTIONS HARBOR OAKS 43080 An Addition to the City of Soutﬁlake, Tarrant County, Texas NOW, THEREFORE, know all men by these presents, that the undersigned, JAMES B, STAHALA, Trustee, hereinafter called "undersigned”, being the fee simple owner of atract of land containing 134. 731 acres, more or less, situated in the John Childress Survey, Abstract No. 254, Tarrant County, Texas, has caused said property to be platted and subdivided into an addition known as HARBOR OAKS, an Addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, as shown on the Plat of said Addition recorded in Volume 388-135, Page. 11, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, which Plat is incorporated by reference for all applicable purposes herein. For the purposes of assuring the orderly and uniform development of the above-described property, and in order to carry out ageneral plan of development for the beneﬁt of each and every purchaser of alot in said Addition, the following restrictions upon the use of said property are hereby established; and each and every lot shown on the Plat of the Addition is held and shall be conveyed subject to the reservations, restrictions, and c o v e n a n t s h e r e i n a f t e r s e t f o r t h . 1. Use of Land: Only one (1) overground or underground single-family residence and incidental suitable out-buildings shall be con¬ structed or permitted to remain on any lot. No lot shall ever be used for other than asingle-family residence or purposes incidental thereto. No garage or out-building on any lot shall be used as aresidence for living quarters, temporary or otherwise, except by servants engaged on the premises, or by abona ﬁde relative who makes his home with the owner of the residential lot. 2' Size of Living Area: A n y r e s i d e n c e e r e c t e d , e i t h e r o n e - s t o r y or two-story, shall'have aminimum ﬂoor area of not less than that square foot minimum speciﬁed for the lot on which the residence is erected as follows: (a) 1, 800 square foot minimum ﬂoor area: Lots 1through 4, Block 1; Lots 1through 5, Block 2; Lots 1through 6, Block 3; and Lots 1through 8, Block 4; V (b) 2, 000 square foot minimum ﬂoor area: Lots 6through 10, Block 2; Lot 7and Lots 10 through 12, Block 3; and Lot 9, Block 4; 2, 500 square foot minimum ﬂoor area: Lots 8and 9, Block 3; and Lots 19 through 23, Block 4; (d) 3, 000 square foot minimum ﬂoor area: Lots 10 through 18, Block 4. (c) By "ﬂoor area” as that term is used above, is meant to be ﬂoor area of the residence only, "Residence" as that term is used in this para- 'graph, does not include the ﬂoor area of the out-buildings, servant quarters garages, and similar buildings attached to the main dwelling, nor does it include the ﬂoor area of porches, basements, or attics. Dedication and Restrictions -Page One VOL opv/0 i 1267p*ge 5 <1 VOL 3, Building Materials: (a) Masonry: All overground residential dwellings shall have a minimum exterior wall area for the ground ﬂoor of 5C% brick, stone or stucco plaster. The visible exterior wall area of underground homes shall be at least 50% brick, stone or stucco plaster. The remaining walls of under¬ ground homes shall be constructed of any suitable building material. (b) Rooﬁng Material: The rooﬁng material utilized on the roof of any overground residential dwelling shall be composition rooﬁng material or better. Any composition materials must weigh not less than 300 lbs, per 100 sq. feet of roof area. Rooﬁng material for underground homes shall be any suitable rooﬁng material for said type of home, (c) Other Construction Materials: Only new construction materials (except for used brick or stone) sliall be used in constructing any structures situated on any lot. 4, Building Lines: Building lines as shown on the recorded plat of the Addition shall be observed. In the event building lines are not speciﬁed on said recorded plat, no residential dwelling or out-building shall be erected or permitted to remain nearer than ﬁfteen (15) feet from any side line, nor nearer than tvmnty-ﬁve (25) feet from any front line, 5. Garages: Every overground residential dwelling shall have at least atwo (2) car garage which shall be attached to the residence or to a breezeway or covered porch which is attached to the residence. Underground homes may contain overground garages which are not attached to the under¬ ground home, but which shall be of sufﬁcient size to contain at least two (2) cars. For both overground and underground homes, no garage doors may face any street. 6. No Re-Subdivision of Lots: No owner shall be permitted to re-subdivide any lot of the Addition, 7. Pets and Livestock: Subject to all applicable city, county, state and/or federal laws, rules or regulations, the owners or other occupants of residential dwellings in the Addition shall be allowed to keep and maintain domestic pets and livestock, with the exception that no swine whatsoever shall be permitted to remain on any lot in the Addition, No lot shall be utilized for any commercial purposes with reference to the pets or livestock referred to above. No more than two (2) head of livestock per acre shall be permitted. Easements Reserved: The undersigned reserves aperpetual easement in, on and under the lots of tne width and extent as shown on the recorded Plat of the Addition for the purpose of laying or permitting the laying, placing and maintaining of utilities, and such other purposes as may be shown on the recorded Plat; and the undersigned further reserves aperpetual easement in, on and under the streets as shown on the recorded Plat, for the purpose of laying, or permitting the laying, placing and main¬ taining of utilities with the right to go upon such lots and streets, and to place or permit the placing, erecting, repairing, and maintenance of utility instal¬ lations without interference. Fences, walls, and hedges, but no building or structure of any other character, may be erected or maintained on the ease¬ ments shown on the recorded Plat of the addition, provided (1) that such fences, walls, and hedges do not interfere in any way with the use of such easement 8. Dedication and Restrictions -Page Two VOL 6347i'age 3G5 1267me 54VOL by public utilities then utilizing or hereafter wishing to utilize the same, (2) that the rights of the owners of such fences, walls, and hedges shall be subordinate to the rights of such public utilities, and (3) that such public utilities may, at any time without liability to the owner, remove such fence, wall, or hedge where the removal of same is incidental to the performance of public utility service operations; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, no fence, wall, hedge, or any other obstruction whatsoever shall be erected or permitted to remain on any portion of the twenty (20) foot jogging, bridle and utility easement shown on the recorded Plat of the Addition, The undersigned reserves the right to construct afence along both sides of said jogging, bridle and utility easement. Lot owners, may, at their discretion, place fences contiguous to any fence constructed by the undersigned so long as no fence shall encroach on said twenty (20) foot jogging, bridle and utility easement. For purposes of identiﬁcation, the undesignated easement shown traversing aportion of Lot 18 and traversing Lots 19 and 20 in Block 4of the Addition is hereby designated as atwenty (20) foot drainage easement. 9, Use and Maintenance of Jogging, Bridle and Utility Easement: The twenty (20) foot jogging, bridle and utility easement shown on the recorded Plat of the Addition shall be utilized as follows; (a) 2, 5feet along each side of said easement is for the purpose of installation and maintenance of utility lines and poles; (b) The interior ﬁfteen (15) feet of said easement is ajogging and bridle path easement for the private use of any and all lot owners of the Addition, and their respective families and invited guests. Alot owner shall be responsible for the periodic inspection and reasonable maintenance of that portion of the jogging and bridle easement and fence situated on or within the boundaries of his respective lot. Alot owner shall be responsible for seeing that the portion of the jogging and bridle path easement lying within his respective lot is maintained free and clear of any and all obstructions at all times. Bicycles may be operated but never parked on said path. No auto¬ mobiles, trucks, motorbikes or motorcycles, nor any other form of motorized vehicle of any type shall be permitted to be operated or parked upon said path, with the sole exception of vehicles operated on atemporary basis for main¬ tenance purposes only. 10.Erection of Antennas: No television, radio, or other similar antenna, mast or receiver or sending apparatus shall be erected on any lot exceeding aheight of 30 feet from the roof of any structure on any lot, whether or not said antenna, mast or other sending or receiving apparatus has its base on the ground or on the structure itself. No use shall be made of any lot or structure thereon for any type of commercial radio or tele¬ vision or similar broadcasting system. Vehicles: Trucks with tonnage in excess of 3/4 ton shall not be permitted to park on the streets, driveways or lots over night, and no vehicle of any size which normally transports inﬂammatory or explosive cargo may be kept in the subdivision at any tinie. No trailer, camper or boat shall be parked, stored or maintained on any lot in such away as to be visible from the fronting street, nor shall any garbage cans or racks be stored or maintained on any lot in such away as to be visible from the fronting street. 11. Signs: No sign shall be erected or maintained on any lot except "For Sale ,For Rent" signs or signs supporting political candidates or propositions which are placed on alot no more than 30 days prior to or ﬁve days following apolitical election. 12. Dedication and Restrictions -Page Three VO! G'J4'7ime nCG r’ mirn 55VOL 13.D u r a t i o n : A l l o f t h e r e s t r i c t i o n s a n d c o v e n a n t s h e r e i n s e t forth shall continue and be binding upon the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns, and all parties claiming through, or under them, for a period of twenty-ﬁve (25) years from the date this instrument is ﬁled for record in the ofﬁce of the County Clerk of Tarrant County, Texas, and shall automatically be extended thereafter for successive period of ten (10) years each, provided, however, that at any time within one (1) year prior to the expiration of any 10-year period thereafter, the owners of the fee simple title to more than 50% of the lots in the addition may provide for the release or modiﬁcation of any or all of the restrictions or covenants contained herein. Any such instrument of release or modiﬁcation shall not be effective until it has been properly signed, acknowledged and recorded in the deed records of Tarrant County, Texas. 14.Enforcement: The restrictions herein set forth are imposed upon each residential lot for the beneﬁt of each and every residential lot and shall constitute covenants running with the land, and shall inure to the beneﬁt of and be binding upon the undersigned, their successors, heirs, and assigns, and upon each and every purchaser acquiring any interest in any lot, and upon their respective heirs, successors and assigns, All persons acquiring any of the land covered by these restrictions shall be taken to agree and covenant t o c o n f o r m t o o b s e r v e a l l s u c h r e s t r i c t i o n s a s t o t h e u s e o f s a i d l a n d . N o restrictions or covenants herein set forth shall be binding upon any corporation, person or persons except in respect to breaches committed during the time such corporation or person owns or had an interest in said land or part thereof. The undersigned, their heirs, successors and assigns, and the owner omowners of any part of such land or any interest therein acting jointly or separately, shall have the right to sue for and obtain an injunction preventing the breach of, or to enforce the observance of, the restrictions and covenants above set forth in addition to the ordinary legal action for damages; and the failure of any one oi: all of such persons to enforce any of the restrictions or covenants herein set forth at the time of its violation shall in no event be deemed to be awaiver of the right to do so at any time thereafter; nor shall the failure to enforce such restrictions as to any one or more residential lots, or as to any one or more owners thereof, be deemed awaiver of the right to enforce them as to any and all other residential lots and owners; nor shall the failure of the undersigned to enforce any such covenants, conditions, or restrictions give rise to any cause of action against the undersigned by any other person. Invalidation of any one or more of these covenants by judgment or court order shall in no wise affect any of the other provisions, which shall remain in full force and effect. DATED the 4th day of June, 1980. sB. Stahalia,rustee S T A T E O F T E X A S COUNTY OF BEXAR BEFORE ME, the undersigned, aNotary Public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared JAMES B. STAHALA, Trustee, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purposes and con¬ sideration therein expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN under my hand and seal of ofﬁce this the ;,.VF980. day of i/t -IN Notary^^^^lic in and for Bexar CountyT Texas 'T > - - to C: G'VS Dedication ancl'R’dstf'iSﬁS'hd -Page Four 'DM111●'' . ;VOL '7 NCE CM Or" PUBUC of Eta DMI,OTI ENT L is Isis p b P I AS 11 mac - 1' h Swhk�X 7ET2 W Planning mnd Zoning GornAssion x 8 17 4 F.-8 C 7 Thursday. MEW 0, 2026 2-A TQ� C'L f,-,f "_,I L i S FaEnSUCKS, MCK 1105 PAY Stroel: 296(ii SOUTH LA,01E., 711',�;C.VJ12 Tovuin Zc(o�ir?aq and Vavekprueml Ran %,Ior Thc-, Ccinservadcw cy 10, Sawk 2, Aedwr 0�f,,s, Sijbdivk-ion.. aid As= I Rees Z). W.AwkC Tom,,, ayW: aiddfre iscid as 2110 himmay We ;no VA ArAVYk-, D,�, ,F'OZ,dhLiik,e SPt',1 NEdgi7berhoo,1�V2. mad Lnk Zavw, 20nog (Tragp 31n or 0yv"VMV phr W nra,,),pnj))L'-jrr'Fd'illy 13.,,'! acres. Dear Pnoevty Chwar, `lowl I- hss Ann ideMe as bVing AM M bet arcAr Whin ..i i s ta Ff"'O'Ve Avg onazewd OF a Kling Wng* 0. 0 G .S� : Quaisa '10L'11 FJIIC aana or GA, W lose MUM, sot ano laml [a` s got 16 n t h El City (ionsickrs sucl. mquests. They ais an Wws: r,"'Iec to vritten ncirtice fron- i ha City of Wat K;T in v a impo sad Mming Mage no "Pla'n r-nd is M&Ydwed putt h0vog on. npvmg ard i".' 'Nliu'-J!�p ir sl te last approvac. ".'f tax loil; L.' "';Jhki 2i'-)i,'j 1`,_,AQM pmposad ZcnW _T snd I i'he i..:'JcA yaL we MAO io 0, on! nuh te Amy KaA Ma vaAg pooKure o, Aw Ny �.xwn �nv .: �2, mq:,oc wiAx. L Aa mwar; of 20 paoem N the pma A "a �wi �; q v a�v, Ab RA of a tjie CiC,, then an Wknolp Yze WhookwAS A Ue City is Ceqijwec A 2pprcva te Wiing CHErge tmc' _: is ry,UgI Do n to� Ied. :M SWvjSdf�0"j 'Jl rdmwma W On as aDnv! W :W W w If YCLA XV15 to inc 10 zoswm C qTlvt a ON avAn, you qW,, encloses NoMMor FWqxse Fami to Gm Rannin—' 1, ;1zc:' eu-iicrlva'T' � " nww"h Ent x1on heaRn W f. A, C� reAp"i Wwass noW TP! j UsA heat candtans YnTmnt, tF W rveGg an! f1i v i ATs Y i k Awa!Q. Please new no� � 1 C �' Sf 5SUAW UMMA ckyofsoutdakacom, 0- w . !�— --i- wn vA W wW and A alavmnn:�_ Sitter pmpmed hmkj 7va vi An. plz-aa a"i'li:,', , Se Was -! Depaqmmnt 1 you hqs t nov n�n � qecvt Cor"k�(: J!'.'-o I -"H's F"Icna: 417174801 DE Apt Phrne, MR) ............... -fill"11#n" F&A ,--7 t. II qq� A 2 FUT 011 i w lots J-i ff pp f r. E t{ eeookig Date:; 2020 at BOG PM a d ART,, r T laical; rt; t3OUINUA& u,_, i 0t. .. - i f i . , op yy � �f� .}P�fdu .m�v.i�..�fl. _f.,•r .4 by sl If�..,at lP'"31:� tend 4 � �3` :; r` 1 vq t F i i ..... ...... — — } l Add i t ------ Must be Cilltle..s d., Oa":llw"! S;Isl„t:rf eo)am pG(lNC.c.a Q. t_l.atis. .. ...'s_< ., to 14f r ON Af, Q W,5P .... ............... as R, V ------------- ----------- i na me Ji c k Frec ricks,i long wit[ my Wife, Rc SEl FrEldnicks and C L 11 family,WEI hav EI IiVEIC in CIL r property a1 :ISICICI Bu rncl Ln fori cver 115 yea rs. WEI arEl opposed is 1[EI plrapased Clc nlElrvationl DElvelopr7 Elrll. We 11 nar8ly aplplasEl the de\EIICIpmElrlt L a1Elc an the implact 1[at it will h aVE1 on aL Its EII\EI1 arc our neighbors.TN EI proposed c Elveloplrr EIr1t does real fit, and is real in I<ElElpling with au r neighborhood. 11 is not camplatik IEI with Harbor Oak s which is a rlurli I, ec U Elstrian cesig nE1C r Elil hL ar[c'c d. It Wili 1121VEl eca system impact onl 1hEl natunal lark scaplel and Wildlife in the allEla. In addition, it creates accilional irifnastruCi L IlEl risk for ou ri c Elveloplmarlt. TNEI planned ncad will cneate a sLmiclLrlcinig ClfthrElEl sites Of my pinapleniy. Ilie rciad errlenl creates trafilic, r1Clisel arlc light pollution at rlig[1 fram Elvery vehicle that trlaVElls thEl rand, on 1ha 5,ide cf r1:o1� propeert} arlc the rear of my plrclplernly.Ac rass 1 het strEI91, lv cry Var Marti with the r'clad ENit= 21 irarr the de\Ellapmerlt c irectly amass from her horria,will have till[1 pOIIL 1 ion and significant rlaise impli c'1 in8 in a neClativ a"lay the front cif[E111 [Clme. After the issue witil the noad, compal ibility Cif t[El riaig[L CIO ooc is a siglrlificant acincern aS�VC Ili.ThEI tat SIzE1s irl Our rleiOVtouhaac Clnl managa are 0\911 t acnes.T[El proposed C EIVEIIOplrl',E r;t is n',,flich ias,s thlarl this.The pluaplasal to m} N rlcl"Ilec ge c aes plot inICIL c EI a pllar1r1Elc public naac, rati"IE4 an 'easeni;erit ci art e)istirlg Ic11 to "ilonCEI fit" a rl a plpinclacH to ga in aaeess la thE1 pnoplert5. As far the SLIIIICILrICirlg arEla irl questicirl, I am conlCerrlElc a1LaL1 tHE signilicarlt dar"a twiI do tc "i[E natu rat en\ironri aric EICIO system.1111'EIIIEI is IimitEIC open lark in 9outhW e �Ath nat L rat ra'. 5 c rIC wilt lice, as sauetakens of our general ion and the r1E1xt, "EI all need ici tEl as thougl ifei Us ,sic ss 1)1E 'tc protest 1[e lank arlc all of us 1[at live Within it. This davclaplment Will significarllIy chanEIE'tllEl topograi y C11I 1[EI anea to @let 1 he raac in and Name plat sitEls establishEIC . \A EI as a floutN lal,E corr mL rlil y Sh al.IC minimize iniCttOSLCheaa systems Wilh WEIIIpllalrlrlEIC tHOU Ell'I AL,ICEN61apment,'di is de\Ellapmerlt is r1al such a C Elvelclplment. F alIII:aii Claks Elxisl irlg lots a lie rial fL I I y de\EIIOpEIC.1h EI sl rElElt infra '1 ru cture irll a the d&v elci� l-;eat 1-a s One"ay in aIrIC Or1E1 Was Out.111ha plrCIpICISEIC de\EIIClpmerlt la my knowledge Aas rai par, oft1i1 1-1EiiLall Oaks, Carmel Bay or Huse Home pllaee ceveloprrlElnis.Ihis de\EllopmErlt, with a signi'4icar-1 incrE1236 in horrles not anigirlally planlrled, will add addil iclra I pinessL rEl art the water system in 11'El c ENeiaplmenit.1h is not arlly ac c s preslL lle 1 Cl c ally watElr aarlsu mpli Karl, L L 1 in casE1 of a fire all c11[Elr C mC]ngElr c/ (sprinkler systems in H Cirli etc) it CIIElates gneatElr risk to 1 I-EI r1eigl[L ar[sac watElr system. 1 h aVEi ncit SEIE n any studies showing tH El irr pact of this de\Ellapmelrlt art tap of the pllarined c ElveloplmElmt of Hatilbar C aks. My ne)t oonaElrirl is allowing this application I pass,will slart a �lip sic p irn aL 11 if this de\ElICIpmerlt plallEls,1[E1116 is rial[in€I to stOpl C11[EI11 to de\EIICIpJrl t all Elal ern ents 11Jitll X. Existivj'ai lots. Wil[ tH is plrElQeC EIrICe, CItI1 Elr property CIWrlEIrs can rEICIU EISt ea sE meats anc" f 'uilc ac dit urlial "ovne,. C f 1CIU rse,they CCIU Id La cerIiEIC, L Lt with a pIIIEICEIC EIrICIEI, irl rr y viEl"I t[Eiy "ill be rO`CE:c.T`"1iS V,i1:1l card inue to add nisk to OL 11 C Elveloplmerlt aric s[arlge it f11CIm "I[at it is toc av, a tuna) c c-valo-irnffi1, irlla n'IorE1 of a SUtL III:anl aplpinaaa[. AlIElase date, I am r1al opposed is c Elvelaplmerlt, L L11 sic t(IrCEI it tl1 is devEIIOpni arlc fLILlle aharlgles into Harbor OaNs shanginlg ii fiiam "hat it is today, to 3climeEhing ii was not irltElrlC EIC to be, is my ob.jElation. It has bE E r my Er F ElliE rice it lice and t L siness tH ai if tH Ei right fourldi tiorlal F rincliK IEis are riot in rla(la, tH E in-r act of cH angle czirl bEl Sig r iificarit.lire c evElloper has afilerEIC smE II chE r E a! to try E rlc woI k wil l au r rrneighborhood as long as the load arid 1 h e lots cart clh arlge.As I tolc Mr. 9ayd arl tH Ei first c ay, I rTIEll H im, I issue is lha iiciad arid i HEi lots. I contirlLE la H elieve tH ase issues 1 avEl not been addressed acagLately. It is not the iiElh Ilia L rcatiar of a plan to%A ark%A ith! I Simi 1y can riot L ncarslarid haw tH is wau ld LEI ag g navEIC givE r tH E ar I raa clH thi t is taken and l h E inl i 1 I"a 1 it will h aVE Oil aL I H C ME and C L r nE igH bars H amEIS,i nd aL I rleiE h t arh CICIc. Cluttir E a r Ela'EImE rlt ar to ar e�istirg lai, night r EXt to C L H whicl" wi s rIEVEIr pE rt of the deu E IOpmElrlt F la r, simg ly is ioncing a c evelc F ME-r t thal is riot logical On ag F nC F niatE it my aK it ion. FIIeaSE1 dE r y 1 His arlrllicatiarl. IVank Irc u fc r yc-ur carisideral ion of this rrl Ell tEn. RespectfL Hy Jack 91 Flase I ricks 219EO 9L nriEly Lni 5outhlakEl,TX. EICIS121 C a a� 0 4 � N b v p 0 bio -:� ..G a C O 4- C o a � ° v b v s,. O eE O o z La 2 H ►►►��III fLLLL�) u a4 o- U' -d - -b ° E lu O ,.� 21 O z ' { Q O v F v rJ !� . P--i 4 v v � Z a4 d .2 ) � _ § � � G § 5 . k / 0 \ © 0 2 O, 0 . .m 2 . q . � S � — / o . \ u § Q u _ w qj � ^ § / _ 41 0 x . § ) , u q 2 ƒ . R 4k= r m ( C ` � � o \ . � Pkj . p u i \ § 3 * ~2 2 5 Q � ) � / � § k � # / ¥ � n ❑ q R d 0 v w w 0 0 o 4-4 ❑ 4-J c� 0 -41 V U .ry `0 r� v bA '� 4-1 �O P, aO v C �D P-� V Qj 41 44 a n � o ii� � o , u ro 6. L �} ro o w aA •v •a o M oA O a' w a � � a p C P H ° `r' ti �oQj 'd 71 V 4 v O C'd M 4-3 �" �� •� OOP � -si o o ti o 4,1 , -b a CIS © ~ � z � Q � 0 �a a 0 0 o 7, 0 cl o �i -ti � •° � c C: [ 1 o h v V o [� 4.1 4.1 o v -� v w o .. C E � �1 O t4l ° ' p6-4 IN v o ..� L4 d 0 v s a- v a t 6. bA `' Q ~ � U v w � o a o E o h Cd U u H a ° c" -ill � L v � , u � � `� o 4 td 4, o r 0 - ry o o o M o o 11 1-4- J . p 1 _ v J a� u a i `d 4.1 �i d o v b O O O v m O [ u vll� a4 N° v o O Kn x "°PL4 v , -� x o '`"s ~ Cam' 4.1 ^ H Q o Z C G � � O Q b rJA O o cV) O o �. 0� c V) d 0 a) ro ur 0 0 z o v o U O v7 N a�i o O b -Cd R to p ` O u 1-4 ti 4L v u p ° 0-4 \y 4 , O o 6 z P-4 c a V) v ro 0 4- 1-4 Z v Q w bA N Q) a o o 4 1 _ t a v a �, - 0 G (� c El, u V) b '4. Q u O bA 0 Z v v � o v � w ULI v can Q [ U Q �, � .� ° v, v 0 On o o r cd I-jy O V, � � G o O o 41 Q 4 •R -° o N � 7 C O Q) cn 4. td b O h O bA `" bA Q v o N 4a o .y •N y rjj 44i L [� S� �. zVt aS V5 a� 3 ZdGL� ❑ A � 0 L. b 4 4-1 bA '� � w a bA .'� •� 0 q oV4C 3 4. O v 0 x cad L. �a b w N 0 NO 0 � d aA flo ri U �t •N V Q O qj cr3 •� � b�0 •� N O � w ® �^� (4W. z 3 o U © 0 L4 o { X n C U 5 -d 0 b (0 � 0 o bA O 11 �I u Q A 4.•J cry O N v o H C U 142 4.1 o 0 C [ O Q ' �! � cad o v u cia � a v w ro b a� 4-. O 4 bbi) O 4-1 Q (U G d L O v Cd U V v ti A Qj p d w 'b u cn 44Ja o o 3 O un a o C6 [ > 64 e ro ~ d G C) C O u"a w O 41 O N c w � O c J •w v 0 rj3 `r� � ` Ln C� 4 o u v G cd 6. o u _F. y L Cd s o �a bA �" v cd bA e j d v O. bA o 0 : o N C'd Va N v .� _2 emu. 0 t � � 0 z -d -d V) .� G � o p 3•��' C: N 4-1 .b p " cd � C O V) vV) v w ° N � m O N G z ° bb ° v o 4 cn � � L O •� (U 4-1 o `5 `0 IZI a Q 4.141 b O o b v a a 3 -°db � p � xd (U O .y 4 M cad V bA �" z O 71cl ° O bo Q cl U U '�- .� 4.1 o El E G 4" o c° b v r CJ CU C � � o _ a4 � e 3 c`d ti O {n � C6 b O cd O L4 4J 7Wi 4 lul o � O o J E b O O O +v 'b v u 4.1 -5 O U 1 V O o lu P�ll .� 4 0 ° N o U zd � G cis 0 V v 0 �s 0 a� 61 ca a N u 4-6 O o U o +1 IJ cd v 44 b o #_ y CJ� .4c-, b t•i va 'n O o Z o � U ti a 45cd .� Ul �i ) � � . . � E � G § - � B ` § ¥ / & V ./ f ] 1 g E q '§ a ƒ r., © a � \ © k ® \ \ 0 ° \ 2 § ® �k Ocd 13 / � G R G 0 V) i b O t�S O bly i. 1� t'n y u U a N �a V� L° 4.1 0 v o Cd w Z En 1 o 3 � � 4.1 > O r-L4 OR v �. o U .3 o U -d cd � Q � LI ❑ v� � G O y u V) 1. fb b QJ �41 V] Q id 0 aUcd o o o w 4 a� bA �A L © Y El s �s v v u � 0 0 i 0 L,., to cd t 0 L o N Cd .. O Cw' 4-J N � bn O po .N .U ° 40 `r' l � y c a4��s � � v c —d � •� � O bh O m O C z CL O N O � C y r-4 1-4 V) FTj • - e3 © 0 V u ai d o aj z < P. Q 11 V) cad b O t cd O 4., 4+ dJ bA O v w U ° 4 bl) G y u U C w k o a � ,. © 0 N CA CA b O cd O 6. CA Q O .z as (U 4 � Ul) u ` C) f_= O 4—J c%rA y F b Ei O O l � uV _ � v E v +� o oCd � ,� • O L b :. O . 4 C�4 H - ti cl 4-1 `. C C: m o v Qj v o �. qIN, b o~ i V) 4�1 lu cad � 4. o _ � O ~ d au U O � L4 b a `d ' V) �' c44 o o m (4. z . ,.� y o v 4 4.1 0 s a a� 0 cl 4.a 4.1 �L •v � ® O v w v 0 LP •� 1 f� 0 y vU .w o E b L v cd O v V3 O +� b Ln � u O 0 d b Q vQj n 4 oQj En I � -°a rn � L(U.i 7:1cd c 0 a� ai w 0 w bi 0 c ° z v o bA p v A Q zi 44 u v 0 131, bA S d a o G ,j ; Qj C Q b Of c1T>• U Public Comment Form TEXAS AI<E TEXAS Your participation in all public web rigs is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specifywhere you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. ("'All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record"') COVIDA9 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL 0 0 o ea s ao a oad ofCw DD- Citizens wishing to address the City maysubmit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by ubliang this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 102012020 Board Meeting* City Council • rustem law N.re Kathleen Canabine ' ndo-ese 961 Thousand Oaks Court Rene 214 923-3369 real I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 7D -1 0 (Le,iw * O 1 vnll speak m SUPPORT of this Rem O 1 vdll speak in OPPOSITION to this item RD O I not vish to speak, but please record my: y1 t` OPPOSRION Signature:* -" PnA.ta4Ltt CITY OF Public Comment FormTHLAESOU Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19. Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 10/20/2020 Board Meeting* City Council First and Last Narre Kathleen Carrabine Address 961 Thousand Oaks Court Fhone 214-923-3369 mil kamcarrabine@hotmail.com I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No. 7D i.e., 1A) r I will speak in SUPPORT of this item r I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item F I do not wish to speak, but please record my: Signature:* OPPOSITION 1w un, eanAabrtc Public Comment Form Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. (***All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19. Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date Board Meeting * * * I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* * Signature:* 10/20/2020 City Council First and Last Name JAMES GALIS Address 885 HARBOR COURT Phone 8179927408 Email JIM.GALIS@GMAIL.COM 0049 (i.e., 1A) I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my: OPPOSITION Public Comment Form Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. (***All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19. Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date Board Meeting * * * I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* * Signature:* 10/20/2020 Planning and Zoning Commission First and Last Name Daniel R McDowell Address 961 THOUSAND OAKS CT Phone 2148932348 Email DAN1310@HOTMAIL.COM 7D (i.e., 1A) I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my: OPPOSITION Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: M ( c, e !e_ YV t e `1 Date: I ).20 i iv Address: 45 o it7 U f y' r' Phone: 21P '`t f a" (10 y5- Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# -]D I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: 177,4.4.1.670,-i Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. r•) ! , a Name: Date: 4.2„) Address: Phone:7 -3Y3---&04/(0 Include City and State) EdI wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: 10\v 1eC Date: (0- ?.b - Address: 1065 arb r }lowe.0 Pa. Soh ke, Tx ''O4., Phone: Include City and State) XI wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# L(vO 7 )3 -meq D_ pbr.(q I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item XI do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT X OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: EfXYA S7-0 Date: 1 L.01 2 D 2 0 Address: } A r -IiNein 5f . IA-in Phone: 2 j, -B214 t 715 Include City and State) A,c 7:1, 3/ 4TX I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item # 7 2-0 ^cogici -IA-) I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please r ord my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be h rd,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be re&I into the record unlessit is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: 1 30oC ? O P u` Date: J —, a r' J Address: 1 0 1J&ibov l- 'F' '5\/ h 61 Phone: (oZh 617 g `K.f Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# _ted 7'73 ZA`2.4-QQ 1L -417 I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but pleasejecord my SUPPORT A OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form dPlease print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: ..// /t i''R" Date: /CJ/Zf9 Address: ?Fr 1/A r Phone: 1`' Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# 773 2 I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: i 5 \-0 Date: 1. ,J ;t)"*"7 1 4bei Address: 10(.r ,:.,/ o r l a v ten- sle.,Q . . Phone: (o,2 b _ e 11 3 Fe Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Agenda Item# - J ID -004g I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item 7-I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT C OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature:tr. Required: Cards will noaera into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: c3 e l/D,. Date: 471- 094.2 oa D Address: eq 0 C2, to,A-f"Phone: 8)2- A/ - ,3.51? Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# /7 ,) I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT i/OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will n t be read into the record unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: b r Date: /O" 0 c)..e) Address: J.' 6L&( \42-e'\La'ti'‘,Q, Sam" l Q .Phone:7174U 0-a Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# 4 7 7 3 Z 4 o o 4/-5 I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item X I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: 61 G. Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: ,, , /-7 /7:y1)15 Date: //o,Z2e) Address: gr3:0 .#4.-ii-List-611 Phone: /‘•L, d,-0' Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# Xf- ./Isei-t1/9 ai7 / 77 /d j 1 I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item X I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT X OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to s • - 'ard,please ' 't yo ' comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: ards will not be tea, ' to e record unless it is signed ‘ Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. PeVer5f Date: V "" V "Name: 12)4\rraii\y Address: 35 By( -ey L.y Phone: R14-1 --7c7 -54 Include City and State) 1 I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item#7D I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please r9e6id my SUPPORT t OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow every: 'e an o iportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature:111 Required: Cards wi not be read into the re ord unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: 5 T F:,• , 4 e T r s Date: (Oh 0(2. 49 Address: 3 s u ¢u z N Ey L Phone: 2 l' • Y 2't-G- 3 2 l Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# '14S 0 - 7 7 3 Z A 2.0 t 71.1 I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item V I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT V OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. r;t..Signature: Required: Catelf will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: Z.— &' \44 \c j t.- Date: \O Address: 11 itoey kAc of Phone: `'' ,1kI(Cf"gler?? Include City and State) n I I I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item#1 E) I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to..ke heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: J 0 4A/ InAl-U!4 y Date: /Opp J 6 Address: .) (t 0 /-41449)/ Ld. 4TT 77: Phone:3/7 41-G S.417 Include City and State) I I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# ' 7', I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature:j 1,. , /1 Al . Required: Cards will of be read into the record unless it is signtd Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. 1 Date: /0' e2 — 19Name: l j^l Address: 30 IJV r"rr E. Phone:g17-308P-aa Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item#7 10 I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT X OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow ev e an opportunity to be heard, lease limit your comments to 3 minutes. r • Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into third unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular sessio . Name: ( vSS 9C\ O (Th Date: to tt. t© Address: on 1 6 Ui'VI it./ 4,\ Phone: ?J I 10 "7 772-z. Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# D I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item do not wish to speak, but please refd my SUPPORT j/ OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow every anojnity to b hear ,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: ON. Required: Cards will not be read into e record unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name:h 0 C X511 . . cat Date: it) 16 - Address: A`fin 4'7(1 C?r (4 6cs kkor„-A )Phone:a) ' °r I Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I) (,gym cp t r Pa I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: l Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed 11form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. 1Name: 6ri Date: lo f \ tO Address:Y ICA\a5r 1\,ven S\- , Phone: 2iii'5i3-C1? Include City and State) dI wish to share my viewson an Agenda Item:g Agenda Item# 7-9 I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT L'MPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed formm to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: ACA Q l(z t' Date: I LO / 4 Address: 1 \2Q c 4 o' \-?cv e y& Phone:( 1 1 3 "e?S4j Include City and State) so t CLIC 1°)i. I wish to share my view on an Agenda Item: 7 (907 2.-- Agenda Item # - I will speak in SUPPORT of this item will speak in OPPOSITION to this item v'I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT li3OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone\ 14) an oppo nity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: I "^) Required: Cards will not lire read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: J \A- - 0`(k-' Date:_1012.1_4 . 2.6 Address: \ 110 T1 U G. ,/ S4. Phone: 1 7 Include City and State) c 0101/4,44A ( a 1,. 1 leg LI (t ci I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# 7ED I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please reco my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature:4 (: Required: Cards wiil_notbe red into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: 1t)i)c Fr viCks Date: 10 j 20 24;72.-0 Address: Z" 9 ( V EtAx r'e9 ( Phone: % -7 4 4(4 L\DO Include City and State) VII wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT XOPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note:To allow everyone an opportunity to,bi leheard, please e liimmittyyour comments to 3 minutes. r/ Signature: y'G'V Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Mid( print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: I V tic (GN t 1,0(16160 Date: 18/10/2-6 Address: '2 7t RbY V1&f L toe / uriti v4k.e f TY Phone: D,3 2 - L03- ZS Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# -7 D I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an o portun' to be heard,please limityour comments to 3 minutes. Signature: `--- i--- Required: Cards will not be re in the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: Z.c2 r e J pC'`• v Date: / ('ie" Ay) 3 t.-,) -1 ' !0 V.,!,001 1 Phone: /y—6 23 ? %Address: Include City and State) yI wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# 7 L I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item f do not wish to speak, but please reco d my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard, 'lease limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: ( Required: Cards will not be ead Eo the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: Date: 10,2 0 -2 O Address: Phone,3)7—L ( - 777 Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# j I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: e Required: Cards will not be read into'lhe record's it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: L c-,k Y Dater _7 Q — Address: t 7g t t t 0,,V If` ‘: . Phone: 817 — tO—() Tr- Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# -j r- I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,p4 ase limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not e read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form lease print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: eWt/ Date:41_242,0DD Address: Di , v \-. 41( lC Gitt Phone: q 1 7—rro 3 Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# D XI will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyon n oppo ity to heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the recor nless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: h IhLc, Date: / Z_I 1_026 Address: Z1'a C 314 t re L., 14.0 Q 15 4144. ot Phone: 5111' Vca-/Ci Y Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I I will speak in SUPPORT of this item will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyon n v ortu ,,to /ard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be rea' into i a record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting 0 Public Comment Form lease print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: 11 e Date: /) —20 - —2 0 Za Address: .33 l kA) 1 1 .1,v\0_5A-, 7(OO? 2_ Phone:C g 17 850 "O Include City and State) Ig' I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# V V5 5d2.1/%' 6-' 2''/C— V I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not o tonight's agenda Topic: Y5_ -520-,,J-11,b, Note: To allow eve o , oppo ' nity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. ve Signature: Required: Car, will n i be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: ciPok.\ C k Date: /0 -7Q ZC7 Address: 3`i "`] 14 i 4 l K2 Phone:C$( 7) 7 Include City and State) VI wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# x I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION RI wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: 3 ) (S SCONtlAO\c 2 )Jk IP 7__D Note: To allow everyone an o's ortuniry to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards w, ` be into the record unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: S h c. ( I.- .k (to., Date: ( / ho Address: it ZD cl JO t/ J 4 - Phone: '6 (7 411(' ---Cd777IncludeCityandState) II wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please reco my SUPPORT iOPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: 6 ,kA i //W 91,,,yo-ic,Date: 10 17'4'1 Address: /---Sq f3t bt Phone: 110-, A(, -Q03 Include City and State)J X I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# 947 I will speak in SUPPORT of this item 4 I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note:To allow ev ne an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. l Signature: et) Required: Cards not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: S('O \ L Date: I d 29 Address: Pa// S tAff l4t,,1)C Phone: iipr2 Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I will speak in SUPPORT of this item TT I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an o' i rtunity I, . e, %,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Itt Required: Card will ead int,4., e r• d unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: J44L- 4G 9 Date: P.? 2C1.-C) Address:Z`7‘;70 tA7 14/ Phone: 4 ) 7' /6"" (iod Include City and State) LJ wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# .7) will speak in SUPPORT of this item V I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Not w everyo n opportunity to be heard,please limityour comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards 'll not be read into the record unles Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: G uy M O l\er0 a loN Date: )0/2012-1) Address: 1 v O gu r ri Phone: n y 55O77tr Include City and State) L"J I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item#70/ I will speak in SUPPORT of this item VTwill speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit 'ur comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is s ed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Date:Name: 2 `5S a 6 I /' © / Z,d L a Address:?06n g79/03b 12 , '7 9 € Z4 Phone: W/ ' Include City and State) 49'3 I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item:4' Agenda Item#_____q--6 I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone- . i to bias ase limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cardscifl not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: WI A, \ t,(t(, Date:________ Address: 4;9 D d AN) 1- 93C Phone: T-`i-11 Vr )ti Include City and State) XI wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# ID XI will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. g LoAyr--Required: Si nature: Cards wi not be read into the runless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: ClYitkilili Jt)h I tS114N Date: 10/7-0) 24) Address: IA LtQ r`'' S1 Lk....e Phone: ig- 2819 _ Include City and State) 1> a DO I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item#17E) I will speak in SUPPORT of this item f)(' I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity too/be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: 6.12.40,40' .4146- Date: 20 Address: z-9 3t J. n L Phone: g !t IO f t= Include City and State) 21 I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# - 4-L670 — 77 7 Zo - 610 -9 I will speak in SUPPORT of this item X I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: S5 Date: OC, old c Address: J c-- 177 i ' _ Phone(J/7 c2 Include City and State) MI wish to share my views on an Agenda Ite ': Agenda Item#SQ - % %2 O — O O y y 7 p I will speak in SUPPORT of this item V I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not,be read into the record unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. 6 , Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. oName: / V O 0'Date: - +..-' Vito 17 { LJ\1 A 4 ' Phone: t 6 - : eta l "Address: Include City and State) N.T.)e,- I wish to sharear my views on an Agenda Item: AgendaiItem# 1 17 I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportuni to be heard,please 'mit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: i!/%j 7 Required: Cards will not be read into t e record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: v( eJ l2 / F 2/ eir't=Date: E') z a Pc" Address: i £ 7 0 13 R be/ 4---Phone:e/ Include City and State)a s--7 "7.›...._ I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item#1 I will speak in SUPPORT of this item will speak in OPPOSITION to this item do not wish to speak, but plea e record y SUPPORT PPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone,an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: ) Q Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: 4 Date: Address: c1101 4 r c'R s( '"" Phone: 1st-12,33 3002, Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will ni'!be Lead into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: S\C\ih 0O bAbb Date: ) D 2b Address: \ IDS Vpirlpor \ Jtv• cot44,A6kei Phone:S*7 f Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: EX Agenda Item# --"/.. I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item XI do not wish to speak, but please r cord my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone n opportunity to be ard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature:S140 Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed t Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: 10i 4,, r ' f Date: cfry Address: ?ii j ''' {f/' I-, I Phone: If ?1' ogw ,.-- 1n lchideCityandState) f/' 1 I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item # I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone pportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature:li, ; Required: Cards wi not be readlinto the record unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form 1- Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of rlegul session. Name: Date: 0 l) Address: '., guy- Phone: J'F '1/ ) Include City and State) 14tet keel S/4.014 I wish to share my i ws on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT )( OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed 1 c'T" of SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Farm TEXAS Your partclpation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to a)press their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specifywhere youwoudd like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. (*"*All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided forlhe record***) CCVIQ-i9 PUBLIC MEETHG PROTOCOL 0 0 D Citizens Wshing to acEdress the C€iy may subrrMt comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Farm below. Pudic Meeting Date 10120/2020 Board Meeting` CityCouncii * First and Last N�rra Mary Van Sent * AdIress 2965 Burney Lane Rom 817.600-0949 mil - wish to stare my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No_* (tep Cte.,iR) A II C I will speak in SUPPORT of this item x w C I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item l l C, I do not wish to speak,but please record my: l Comments: Tiffs is an oppcctunily to submt comrents on any topic that is not scheduled far a pubic hearing or an item that is not on the agenda Please come and look at the corner of The Fredricks property in person.None of us are against development but 7 lots are way too many. Septic issues and health and safety support fetiver lots.If you €game and see for yourselves in person,i think you Wil be able to make a well Informed decision. (3W character kMt) Signature: City Of Public Comment Form SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Your participation in a pub is meetings is va ued and citizens wishing to express their views can e ectronica y submit this Pub is Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. P ease specify where you wou d ike your comments to appear be ow and enter to required information. (***A comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the meeting date and 4 be provided for the record') COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Counci or PZ Commission meetings onine oron the cab echanne father than in person due to concerns reated to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on anytopic or agenda item e ectronica y by uti izing this Pub is Comment Form be ow. Public Meeting Date 1018/2020 Board Meeting P a nn ng and Zon ng Comm ss on Rrst and Last fJanT:5 Kath een Garrab ne Adches 961 Thousand Oaks Court Ruflp 214-923-3369 el-Ed I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No. 6 (is 1A) I w speak n SUPPORT of th s tem 1 w speak n OPPOSITION to th s tern do not wsh to speak, but p ease record my: Comments: This is an opporLanily to subfficonT(Ents an arty k*ffElis not scheduled for a public hearing or an 63rnthat is nat©n the awrda South ake's 2035 p an s of sound management wth accountab e objectves.As any common ty earn ng from the past, these have been f ne-tuned over decades of nput from our counc s and res dents. Rem 46, the proposed Conservat on Deve opment, s c ear y ncompat b e w th 2035 p an. (30D character lima) Signature: 10/19/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAKaJBR%2BuiEnDkH8xePKJey…1/1 The Conservation Development - lot drainage and aerobic systems Valerie Adams Mon 10/19/2020 12:52 PM To: Mayor <Mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 1 <Place1@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 2 <Place2@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 3 <Place3@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 4 <Place4@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 5 <Place5@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 6 <Place6@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Ken Baker <kbaker@ci southlake.tx.us>; Dennis Killough <dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> Good morning, We are Bill and Valerie Adams and we live at 880 Harbor Court and we are both registered voters in Southlake. We were present at the planning and zoning mee 10/19/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQANVQ5EUERsBOvh5Wt2wLMp…1/1 [Possible Scam Fraud]Proposed Development. The Conservation Barbara A Mon 10/19/2020 12:00 PM To: Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> WARNING: Your email security system has determined the message below may be a potential threat. The sender may trick victims into passing bad checks on their behalf. f you do not know the sender or cannot verify the integrity of the message, please do not respond orclick on links in the message. Depending on the security settings, clickable URLs may have been modified to provide additional security. Mr Potts, My name is Barbara Auyang. I live at 1065 Harbor Haven St, Southlake, TX 76092 and I am a registered voter in Southlake. I am opposed to the proposed development, The Conservation, for the reasons listed below and the detailed reasons outlined in the 2020 petition, submitted by Harbor Oaks: compatibility with the existing neighborhood public safety issues ecological concerns aerobic septic systems drainage issues Harbor Oaks deed restrictions violations I believe all property owners have the right to develop their property, within the guidelines of any restrictions attached to the said land. However, I do not believe Mr. and Mrs. Housman can arbitrarily rezone and remove their platted lot from the Harbor Oaks Subdivision without violating the Harbor Oaks deed restrictions. I do not feel that the current proposed plan by the applicant has solved any of the previous and still existing challenges to the development of this land. Then Councilwoman Hill and her fellow Councilmen unanimously denied this development proposal in 2006 and 2008. Please continue to uphold the prior decision to deny this almost identical proposal in 2020, as nothing has changed. Thank you for volunteering your time and energy for the benefit of our community. I appreciate all you do for Southlake. Sincerely, Barbara Auyang 10/19/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQADuGx2DuXMdCsFJlklbPmCI%…1/1 Harbor Oaks Lisa Vu Boyer Mon 10/19/2020 9:15 AM To: Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mayor Hill, Councilmen, and Directors of Planning and Development, My name is Lisa Boyer. I live at 2900 Harbor Refuge and I am a registered voter in Southlake. I am opposed to the proposed development, The Conservation, for the reasons listed below and the detailed reasons outlined in the 2020 petition, submitted by Harbor Oaks: compatibility with the existing neighborhood public safety issues ecological concerns aerobic septic systems drainage issues Harbor Oaks deed restrictions violations I believe all property owners have the right to develop their property, within the guidelines of any restrictions attached to the said land. However, I do not believe Mr. and Mrs. Housman can arbitrarily rezone and remove their platted lot from the Harbor Oaks Subdivision without violating the Harbor Oaks deed restrictions. I do not feel that the current proposed plan by the applicant has solved any of the previous and still existing challenges to the development of this land. Then Councilwoman Hill and her fellow Councilmen unanimously denied this development proposal in 2006 and 2008. Please continue to uphold the prior decision to deny this almost identical proposal in 2020, as nothing has changed. Thank you for volunteering your time and energy for the benefit of our community. I appreciate all you do for Southlake. Sincerely, Lisa Boyer 2900 Harbor Refuge Street Southlake Texas 76092 Sent from my iPhone From: Wty 8 n Subjectr. Pr0p�aD8VebpmrrM Sale: QTaber19,2S20a1W1A To: Sliavni armor - Mayor Hill, Councilmen, and Directors of Planning and Development, Our names are_SHAWN & MOLLY BROWN. We live at 2980 Burney Lu_, Southlake, TX 76092_and I am a registered voter in Southlake. I am opposed to the proposed development, The Conservation, for the reasons listed below and the detailed reasons outlined in the 2020 petition, submitted by Harbor Oaks: • compatibility with the existing neighborhood • public safety issues • ecological concerns • aerobic septic systems • drainage issues • Harbor Oaks deed restrictions violations I believe all property owners have the right to develop their property, within the guidelines of any restrictions attached to the said land. However, I do not believe Mc and Mrs. Housman can arbitrarily rezone and remove their platted lot from the Harbor Oaks Subdivision without violating the Harbor Oaks deed restrictions. I do not feel that the current proposed plan by the applicant has solved any of the previous and still existing challenges to the development of this land. Then Councilwoman Hill and her fellow Councilmen unanimously denied this development proposal in 2006 and 2008. Please continue to uphold the prior decision to deny this almost identical proposal in 2020, as nothing has changed. Thank you for volunteering your time and energy for the benefit of our community. 1 appreciate all you do for Southlake. Sincerely, �tiw� l�'Law� 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAF1%2FyBeG0jxKhFdpSrb8sM…1/2 [Possible Scam Fraud]Opposition to the proposed development, The Conservation Kathleen Carrabine Mon 10/19/2020 8:52 PM To: Mayor <Mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 1 <Place1@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 2 <Place2@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 3 <Place3@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 4 <Place4@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 5 <Place5@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 6 <Place6@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Ken Baker <kbaker@ci southlake.tx.us>; Dennis Killough <dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> WARNING: Your email security system has determined the message below may be a potential threat.The sender may trick victims into passing bad checks on their behalf. If you do not know the sender or cannot verify the integrity of the message, please do not respond orclick on links in the message. Depending on the security settings, clickable URLs may have been modified to provide additional security. Hello my name is Kathleen Carrabine. I live at 961 Thousand Oaks Court and I am a registered voter in Southlake. Up front, I want to thank you for taking the 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAF1%2FyBeG0jxKhFdpSrb8sM…2/2 3.3: to use pathways to connect shopping, schools, work and residen 10/19/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAETSMAsObEVCk9B%2Bz5ib3…1/1 Harbour Oaks Michael Cope Mon 10/19/2020 4:01 PM To: Mayor <Mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 1 <Place1@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 2 <Place2@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 3 <Place3@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 4 <Place4@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 5 <Place5@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 6 <Place6@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Ken Baker <kbaker@ci southlake.tx.us>; Dennis Killough <dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mayor Hill, Councilmen, and Directors of Planning and Development, My name is_Michael Cope. I live at _3550 Carmel Ct and I am a registered voter in Southlake. I join many of my neighbors in being opposed to the proposed development, The Conservation, for the reasons listed below and the detailed reasons outlined in the 2020 petition, submitted by Harbor Oaks: *compatibility with the existing neighborhood Added Traffic by virtually doubling the number of houses served by a section of road. other public safety issues ecological concerns aerobic septic systems drainage issues Harbor Oaks deed restrictions violations I believe all property owners have the right to develop their property, within the guidelines of any restrictions attached to the said land. However, I do not believe Mr. and Mrs. Housman can arbitrarily rezone and remove their platted lot from the Harbor Oaks Subdivision without violating the Harbor Oaks deed restrictions. I do not feel that the current proposed plan by the applicant has solved any of the previous and still existing challenges to the development of this land. Then Councilwoman Hill and her fellow Councilmen unanimously denied this development proposal in 2006 and 2008. Please continue to uphold the prior decision to deny this almost identical proposal in 2020, as nothing has changed. Thank you for volunteering your time and energy for the benefit of our community. I appreciate all you do for Southlake. > > Sincerely, > Michael Cope 10/19/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQACxyEZ5XwNRFvL34E4G%2B…1/2 [Possible Scam Fraud]The Conservation Development Jamie Galis Mon 10/19/2020 11:55 AM To: Mayor <Mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 1 <Place1@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 2 <Place2@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 3 <Place3@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 4 <Place4@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 5 <Place5@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 6 <Place6@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Ken Baker <kbaker@ci southlake.tx.us>; Dennis Killough <dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> WARNING: Your email security system has determined the message below may be a potential threat. The sender may trick victims into passing bad checks on their behalf. If you do not know the sender or cannot verify the integrity of the message, please do not respond orclick on links in the message. Depending on the security settings, clickable URLs may have been modified to provide additional security. Mayor Hill, Councilmen and Directors of Planning and Development. My name is Jame Galis and I live at 885 Harbor Court in Harbor Oaks Subdivision. I am a registeredvoter in Southlake. I am strongly opposed to the proposed development, The Conservation, for the pertinent and notable reasons listed below and detailed in the 2020 petitions submitted by Harbor Oaks which I have signed:A) COMPATIBILITY WITH THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD B) PUBLIC SAFETY ISSUES DUE TO SINGLE INGRESS AND EGRESS INTO THE HARBOR OAKSSUBDIVISION C) ECOLOGICAL CONCERNS REGARDING THE SENSITIVE ECO-CLIMATED) THE SUSCEPTIBILITY AND LIKELY FAILURE OF THE AEROBIC SEPTIC SYSTEMS LEADING TO SEWAGE CONTAMINATION OF THE SENSITIVE ECOLOGY OF THE AREA.E) DRAINAGE ISSUES And most importantly,F) HARBOR OAKS SUBDIVISION DEED RESTRICTION VIOLATIONS THAT WILL BE NECESSARY TO ALLOW THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO PROCEED. Certainly all property owners have a right to develop their property within the guidelines of anyrestrictions that are attached to the said land under development consideration. The right of a property owner to develop stops when it leads to violations of existing deed restrictions. Upon reviewof the Harbor Oaks Subdivision Deed Restrictions (which the Housman’s agreed to upon purchase of their property), it is my understanding and belief that the Housman’s can not arbitrarily REZONE ANDREMOVE their platted lot from the Harbor Oaks Subdivision without violating the Harbor Oaks deed restrictions. The proposed plan by the applicant has NOT SOLVED ANY of the previous and still existing challengesto development of the land identified in the proposed development. Previous attempts to gain development approval for this property in 2006 and 2008 were denied by the city council which 10/19/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQACxyEZ5XwNRFvL34E4G%2B…2/2 included Councilwoman Hill. Please continue to uphold the prior decisions to deny this proposed development since none of the basis for the previous two denials has changed in the current proposal. Thank you for your time and I appreciate all that you do to make and keep Southlake the desirablecommunity that it is today. Jamie L. Petty-Galis, M.S., P.E. 885 Harbor Court Southlake, Texas 76092 Mobile: 817-368-5525 10/19/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQANvgpFneLSdLqP6RdC%2Biq0…1/2 [Possible Scam Fraud]City Council meeting 10/20 Kay Johnson Mon 10/19/2020 4:16 PM To: Mayor <Mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 1 <Place1@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 2 <Place2@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 3 <Place3@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 4 <Place4@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 5 <Place5@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 6 <Place6@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Ken Baker <kbaker@ci southlake.tx.us>; Dennis Killough <dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> WARNING: Your email security system has determined the message below may be a potential threat. The sender may trick victims into passing bad checks on their behalf. If you do not know the sender or cannot verify the integrity of the message, please do not respond orclick on links in the message. Depending on the security settings, clickable URLs may have been modified to provide additional security. Mayor Hill, Councilmen and members of Planning and Zoning, My name is Kay Johnson and I live at 2940 Burney Ln in Southlake. I am directly behind Lot 6 of theproposed development, The Conservation. I submitted comments prior to the P&Z meeting on Oct 8th and I really appreciated the dialogue and feedback. I watched the P&Z meeting on the City Website and was disappointed it turned into a debate onproperty rights and family history. I was hoping to gain some clarification on the zoning ordinances and specifics within the proposed development from experts in the area. Since that didn't happen andI don't entirely trust the developer to be forthcoming on his motives, I am reaching out to you in an effort to gain clarity at tomorrow's meeting. It is unclear to me and many others why the applicant is requesting a zoning change for Lot 10 ofHarbor Oaks, currently zoned SF1-A. Initially when this was presented to the neighborhood the entire development was going to be zoned SF1A with a 50ft ROW through Lot 10. By the time it waspresented to the Corridor Committee, the zoning was changed to R-PUD for all the lots in the development, including Lot 10, now with a 40ft private access easement. At the corridor committeemeeting, it was stated Lot 10 would be part of the subdivision but not re-platted and would remain part of Harbor Oaks Estates. How can a lot be platted in Harbor Oaks and part of another subdivision?All the lots in Harbor Oaks are SF1A so how does one re-zone a platted lot to PUD without approval of the Subdivision? If people can do this, what is the point of a neighborhood at all? In the Corridor Committee meeting, Mr. Kubiak asked, "if this development wasn’t an R-PUD, wouldyou be able to get the same number of lots on the property?" The Applicant's response was "with straight zoning we could get more, but we thought 8 lots looks good on the property. So, it could bedone with more but that is why we went with R-PUD zoning (to get fewer lots)." A developer is choosing this zoning so he can "get fewer lots"?? That answer cannot suffice. To me and perhaps I am wrong, it seems that he is intentionally finding ways to not have to re-plat Lot 10 ashe knows he would never have the neighborhood's approval. 10/19/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQANvgpFneLSdLqP6RdC%2Biq0…2/2 As it states in the prepared document (page 797 of meeting packet) that will be signed by Mayor Hill ifthis is approved, one must "find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changesdo not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made." I think it is pretty clear that the majority of the public are NOT demanding this zoning change butvehemently opposing it. It does seem to invade the rights of the property owners immediately surrounding Lot 10 as now they will have an entrance road to a new subdivision next door instead of asingle family home as our platted Subdivision states. This fundamentally changes the property they purchased. I'm begging you to help us understand how this is acceptable. Thank you for your time. I will see you tomorrow night. Again, if anyone would like to walk the area, Iwelcome and encourage it. Best, Kay Johnson 10/18/2020 Mayor Hill, Councilmen, and Directors of Planning and Development, Hello, my name is Ken Land. I live at 2900 Burney Lane and I am a registered voter in Southlake. I do not feel that the current proposed plan by the applicant has solved any of the previous and still existing challenges, which include: • Compatibility with our current neighborhood • Public safety with once access point serving 80 + homes • Aerobic septic systems not having adequate size aeration field • Ecological impacts • Drainage issues • And impact on the boarding neighbors I am opposed to the proposed development for all the same reasons it was unanimously denied in 2006 and 2008, by you Mayor Hill and your fellow Councilmen at the time. I believe all property owners have the right to develop their property, within the guidelines of any restrictions attached to the land. However, I do not believe Mr. and Mrs. Housmans can arbitrarily rezone and remove their platted lot from the Harbor Oaks Subdivision without violating the Harbor Oaks deed restrictions. This proposal was denied in 2006 and 2008 with a unanimous vote by City Council. Nothing has changed with the challenges of developing this land. Please continue to uphold the prior decisions to deny this almost identical proposal in 2020. Thank you for your time and for serving our community in a volunteer elected position. I appreciate all you do for Southlake. Sincerely, Ken Land 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAOmiQGsSM1lInEJYqAuUNRA…1/1 [Possible Scam Fraud]Harbor Oaks Martin Newby Mon 10/19/2020 8:56 PM To: Mayor <Mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 1 <Place1@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 2 <Place2@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 3 <Place3@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 4 <Place4@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 5 <Place5@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 6 <Place6@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Ken Baker <kbaker@ci southlake.tx.us>; Dennis Killough <dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> WARNING: Your email security system has determined the message below may be a potential threat. The sender may trick victims into passing bad checks on their behalf. If you do not know the sender or cannot verify the integrity of the message, please do not respond orclick on links in the message. Depending on the security settings, clickable URLs may have been modified to provide additional security. Mayor Hill, Councilmen, and Directors of Planning and Development, My name is Martin Newby. I live at 2885 Burney Lane and I am a registered voter in Southlake. I am opposed to the proposed development, The Conservation, for the reasons listed below and the detailed reasons outlined in the 2020 petition, submitted by Harbor Oaks: compatibility with the existing neighborhood public safety issues ecological concerns aerobic septic systems drainage issues Harbor Oaks deed restrictions violations I believe all property owners have the right to develop their property, within the guidelines of any restrictions attached to the said land. However, I do not believe Mr. and Mrs. Housman can arbitrarily rezone and remove their platted lot from the Harbor Oaks Subdivision without violating the Harbor Oaks deed restrictions. I do not feel that the current proposed plan by the applicant has solved any of the previous and still existing challenges to the development of this land. Then Councilwoman Hill and her fellow Councilmen unanimously denied this development proposal in 2006 and 2008. Please continue to uphold the prior decision to deny this almost identical proposal in 2020, as nothing has changed. Thank you for volunteering your time and energy for the benefit of our community. I appreciate all you do for Southlake. Sincerely, Martin Newby 10/19/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAJ5VOU7WL1NNnMmp%2FhxT…1/1 [Possible Scam Fraud]Proposed Development, The Conservation Mon 10/19/2020 2:06 PM To: Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> WARNING: Your email security system has determined the message below may be a potential threat. The sender may trick victims into passing bad checks on their behalf. If you do not know the sender or cannot verify the integrity of the message, please do not respond orclick on links in the message. Depending on the security settings, clickable URLs may have been modified to provide additional security. Mr. Potts, My name is Arturo Soto. I live at 1065 Harbor Haven St, Southlake, TX 76092 and I am a registered voter in Southlake. I am opposed to the proposed development, The Conservation, for the reasons listed below and the detailed reasons outlined in the 2020 petition, submitted by Harbor Oaks: · compatibility with the existing neighborhood · public safety issues · ecological concerns · aerobic septic systems · drainage issues · Harbor Oaks deed restrictions violations I believe all property owners have the right to develop their property, within the guidelines of any restrictions attached to the said land. However, I do not believe Mr. and Mrs. Housman can arbitrarily rezone and remove their platted lot from the Harbor Oaks Subdivision without violating the Harbor Oaks deed restrictions. I do not feel that the current proposed plan by the applicant has solved any of the previous and still existing challenges to the development of this land. You and your fellow Councilmen unanimously denied this development proposal in 2006 and 2008. Please continue to uphold the prior decision to deny this almost identical proposal in 2020, as nothing has changed. Thank you for volunteering your time and energy for the benefit of our community. I appreciate all you do for Southlake. Sincerely, Arturo Soto 10/19/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAJ7QRGLnj%2BlAusfeGytBJZ4…1/1 [Possible Scam Fraud]Proposed Development, The Conservation Elena Soto Mon 10/19/2020 5:16 PM To: Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> WARNING: Your email security system has determined the message below may be a potential threat. The sender may trick victims into passing bad checks on their behalf. If you do not know the sender or cannot verify the integrity of the message, please do not respond orclick on links in the message. Depending on the security settings, clickable URLs may have been modified to provide additional security. Mr. Potts, My name is Elena Soto. I live at 1065 Harbor Haven St. Southlake, TX 76092 and I am a registered voter in Southlake. I am opposed to the proposed development, The Conservation, for the reasons listed below and the detailed reasons outlined in the 2020 petition, submitted by Harbor Oaks: compatibility with the existing neighborhood public safety issues ecological concerns aerobic septic systems drainage issues Harbor Oaks deed restrictions violations I believe all property owners have the right to develop their property, within the guidelines of any restrictions attached to the said land. However, I do not believe Mr. and Mrs. Housman can arbitrarily rezone and remove their platted lot from the Harbor Oaks Subdivision without violating the Harbor Oaks deed restrictions. I do not feel that the current proposed plan by the applicant has solved any of the previous and still existing challenges to the development of this land. Then Councilwoman Hill and her fellow Councilmen unanimously denied this development proposal in 2006 and 2008. Please continue to uphold the prior decision to deny this almost identical proposal in 2020, as nothing has changed. Thank you for volunteering your time and energy for the benefit of our community. I appreciate all you do for Southlake. Sincerely, Elena Soto 10/19/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAJD2X7DAZ6pAqTCXe%2FXX…1/1 FW: The Conservation - Proposed Development @ Harbor Oaks Subdivision Amy Shelley <ashelley@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon 10/19/2020 3:06 PM To: Mayor-Int <Mayor-Int@ci southlake.tx.us>; Laura Hill Cc: Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Bea Wilson Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 2:39 PM To: Mayor and City Council <MayorandCityCouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: The Conserva 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAA91L%2BTWzZ1Bubg7aWrM…1/2 [Possible Scam Fraud]Opposition to the proposed "The Conservation" Tue 10/20/2020 6:32 AM To: Mayor <Mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 1 <Place1@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 2 <Place2@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 3 <Place3@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 4 <Place4@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 5 <Place5@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 6 <Place6@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Ken Baker <kbaker@ci southlake.tx.us>; Dennis Killough <dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> WARNING: Your email security system has determined the message below may be a potential threat. The sender may trick victims into passing bad checks on their behalf. If you do not know the sender or cannot verify the integrity of the message, please do not respond orclick on links in the message. Depending on the security settings, clickable URLs may have been modified to provide additional security. Mayor Hill, Councilmen, and Directors of Planning and Development, My name is Ray Chancellor. I live at 890 Harbor Court of the Harbor Oaks subdivision and I am a registered voter in Southlake. I am opposed to the proposed development, The Conservation, as it is currently is presented, for the same reasons as many of my neighbor's reasons listed below and the detailed reasons outlined in the 2020 petition, submitted by Harbor Oaks, i.e.: compatibility with the existing neighborhood ecological concerns • aerobic Septic System • drainage issues public safety issues • Harbor Oaks deed restrictions violations I want to specifically address ecological concerns. This development is adjacent to the Kirkwood-Quail Creek environmental corridor and ecosystem. This corridor is one of the most sensitive ecological areas that still remain in Southlake. It includes land within Bob Jones Park as well as the corridor adjacent to the proposed land to be rezoned. It is one ecosystem, pure and simple. The City seems to be aware and to recognize this sensitivity in its planning documents but still has no environmental/ecological/ wildlife management/trail management plan for any of this area including adjacent land to this proposed rezoning development. The often-stated commitment to preserving and protecting Southlake’s natural heritage and ecosystems while having absolutely no plan to do so raises question as to the City’s own planning documents. It is for that reason; I am opposed to the development as it is currently proposed and ask that any rezoning be tabled until such time as the City has an ecological preservation and conservation plan for the Kirkwood-Quail Creek Corridor as recognized protection for the City's natural heritage. Without that, all that the City has stated to the citizens of its long range plan is nothing more than a rhetorical wish list with little apparent 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAA91L%2BTWzZ1Bubg7aWrM…2/2 commitment. Without that plan, any decisions related to this development could be detrimental to or will lack any relationship to any plan that the City might have present or future. After 20 plus years and after incrementally losing the majority of of the City’s natual heritage without any semblance of a plan, it would seem an appropriate action to first include a real plan for the preservation and protection of the little remaining natural heritage we have is in order before we rezone and develop such sensitive and unique adjacent lands. As a City Council and stewards of this natural heritage, if the question arises, “What is your ecological and conservation/protection plan for the sensitive Kirkwood-Quail Creek Ecosystem Corridor?”, what answer can you presently give? You have a standing invitation to walk any or all parts of this ecosystem or any of Southlake's remaining natural areas to better understand the sensitivity, what is being lost, and why a management plan is imperative. Respectfully Submitted, Ray L. Chancellor 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAN6Cw%2FuLOEa2o6zw%2FQ…1/2 The Conservation (ZA20-0049) Tue 10/20/2020 5:08 AM To: Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> Dear Sir, My name Jack Fredricks, along with my wife, Rose Fredricks and our family, we have lived in our property at 2960 Burney Ln for over 15 years and are registered voters in the City of Southlake. Today there is a significant request being brought forward to the City Council, the Conserva 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAN6Cw%2FuLOEa2o6zw%2FQ…2/2 issue is the road and the lots. I con 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAAnloL%2BrDStLoH4YIWoYXrA…1/2 FW: The Conservation Amy Shelley <ashelley@ci.southlake.tx.us> Tue 10/20/2020 3:01 PM To: Mayor-Int <Mayor-Int@ci southlake.tx.us>; Laura Hill Cc: Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Graham Johnson Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 2:51 PM To: Mayor <Mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 1 <Place1@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 2 <Place2@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 3 <Place3@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 4 <Place4@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 5 <Place5@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 6 <Place6@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: The Conserva 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAAnloL%2BrDStLoH4YIWoYXrA…2/2 access road and all dwelling units are equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2, or 903.3.1.3, access from two directionsshall not be required. 2) The number of dwelling units on a single fire apparatus access road shall not be increasedunless fire access roads will connect with future development, as determined by the fire code official. D107.2 Remoteness: Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one-half of the length of the maximum overall diagonaldimension of the property area to be served, measured in a straight line between access.” These provisions support the conclusion that a Traffic Impact Analysis and more thorough study into the emergency preparedness/response should be completed. Harbor Oaks has one (1) point of ingress and egress, with 79 homes. The a 10/18/2020 Mayor Hill, Councilmen, and Directors of Planning and Development, Hello, my name is Gloria Land. I live at 2900 Burney Lane and I am a registered voter in Southlake. I do not feel that the current proposed plan by the applicant has solved any of the previous and still existing challenges, which include: • Compatibility with our current neighborhood • Public safety with once access point serving 80 + homes • Aerobic septic systems not having adequate size aeration field • Ecological impacts • Drainage issues • And impact on the boarding neighbors I am opposed to the proposed development for all the same reasons it was unanimously denied in 2006 and 2008, by you Mayor Hill and your fellow Councilmen at the time. I believe all property owners have the right to develop their property, within the guidelines of any restrictions attached to the land. However, I do not believe Mr. and Mrs. Housmans can arbitrarily rezone and remove their platted lot from the Harbor Oaks Subdivision without violating the Harbor Oaks deed restrictions. This proposal was denied in 2006 and 2008 with a unanimous vote by City Council. Nothing has changed with the challenges of developing this land. Please continue to uphold the prior decisions to deny this almost identical proposal in 2020. Thank you for your time and for serving our community in a volunteer elected position. I appreciate all you do for Southlake. Sincerely, Gloria Land 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAFsM8mXE70qVjq%2FEmKpX…1/2 Proposed new subdivision in Harbor Oaks Brett Leedy Tue 10/20/2020 4:30 PM To: Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mr. Potts, my name is Bre 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAFsM8mXE70qVjq%2FEmKpX…2/2 Please do right by my awesome neighborhood & deny this proposal as it is currently constructed. Thank you for your service to our city. Respec 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAH%2Bymk%2F6ETVPkiuhiC3s…1/2 FW: [Possible Scam Fraud]Harbor Oaks Subdivision Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us> Tue 10/20/2020 9:16 AM To: Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Amy Shelley <ashelley@ci.southlake.tx.us> Kenneth M. Baker, AICP Senior Director of Planning and Development Services City of Southlake 1400 Main Street, Suite 310 817-748-8067 From: > Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 10:20 PM To: Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: [Possible Scam Fraud]Harbor Oaks Subdivision WARNING: Your email security system has determined the message below may be a potential threat. The sender may trick victims into passing bad checks on their behalf. If you do not know the sender or cannot verify the integrity of the message, please do not respond or click on links in the message. Depending on the security settings, clickable URLs may have beenmodified to provide additional security. Mayor Hill, Councilmen, and Directors of Planning and Development, My name is Mills Roberts. I live at 1110 Harbor Retreat St and I am a registered voter in Southlake. I am opposed to the proposed development, The Conservation, for the reasons listed below and the detailed reasons outlined in the 2020 petition, submitted by Harbor Oaks: compatibility with the existing neighborhood public safety issues ecological concerns aerobic septic systems drainage issues Harbor Oaks deed restrictions violations I believe all property owners have the right to develop their property, within the guidelines of any restrictions attached to the said land. However, I do not believe Mr. and Mrs. 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAH%2Bymk%2F6ETVPkiuhiC3s…2/2 Housman can arbitrarily rezone and remove their platted lot from the Harbor Oaks Subdivision without violating the Harbor Oaks deed restrictions. I do not feel that the current proposed plan by the applicant has solved any of the previous and still existing challenges to the development of this land. Then Councilwoman Hill and her fellow Councilmen unanimously denied this development proposal in 2006 and 2008. Please continue to uphold the prior decision to deny this almost identical proposal in 2020, as nothing has changed. Thank you for volunteering your time and energy for the benefit of our community. I appreciate all you do for Southlake. Sincerely, Mills Roberts, MD 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAFQfs4DigEQFuCvyixM3lF8%3D 1/2 [Possible Scam Fraud]opposition Shay Sabbatis Tue 10/20/2020 9:02 AM To: Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> WARNING: Your email security system has determined the message below may be a potential threat. The sender may trick victims into passing bad checks on their behalf. If you do not know the sender or cannot verify the integrity of the message, please do not respond orclick on links in the message. Depending on the security settings, clickable URLs may have been modified to provide additional security. October 20, 2020 Dear Mr. Potts, My name is Sharon Sabbatis. I live at 850 Harbor Court and I am a registered voter in Southlake. I am opposed to the proposed development, The Conservation, for the reasons listed below and the detailed reasons outlined in the 2020 petition, submitted by Harbor Oaks: compatibility with the existing neighborhood Harbor Oaks deed restriction violations ecological concerns aerobic septic systems drainage issues Public safety issues I believe all property owners have the right to develop their property, within the guidelines of any restrictions attached to the said land. However, I do not believe Mr. and Mrs. Housman can arbitrarily rezone and remove their platted lot from the Harbor Oaks Subdivision without violating the Harbor Oaks deed restrictions. I do not feel that the current proposed plan by the applicant has solved any of the previous and still existing challenges to the development of this land. Then Councilwoman Hill and her fellow Councilmen unanimously denied this development proposal in 2006 and 2008. Please continue to uphold the prior decision to deny this almost identical proposal in 2020, as nothing has changed. Thank you for volunteering your time and energy for the benefit of our community. I appreciate all you do for Southlake. Sincerely, Sharon Sabbatis 850 Harbor Ct, 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAFQfs4DigEQFuCvyixM3lF8%3D 2/2 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQAC8kYVjwKvhNvQ72T9vKqZ0…1/1 FW: Conservation development Amy Shelley <ashelley@ci.southlake.tx.us> Tue 10/20/2020 2:43 PM To: Mayor-Int <Mayor-Int@ci southlake.tx.us>; Laura Hill Cc: Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Terry Sauder Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 10:46 AM To: Mayor <Mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: Conserva 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQALJyTqS1MbBJkSeFkkC7yeI%3D 1/1 [Possible Scam Fraud]Opposition to "The Conservation" first reading tonight Oct 20th Hans Schroen Tue 10/20/2020 3:07 PM To: Mayor <Mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 1 <Place1@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 2 <Place2@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 3 <Place3@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 4 <Place4@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 5 <Place5@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 6 <Place6@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Ken Baker <kbaker@ci southlake.tx.us>; Dennis Killough <dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> WARNING: Your email security system has determined the message below may be a potential threat.The sender may trick victims into passing bad checks on their behalf. If you do not know the sender or cannot verify the integrity of the message, please do not respond orclick on links in the message. Depending on the security settings, clickable URLs may have been modified to provide additional security. Hello, My name is Hans Schroen. I live at 2895 Burney Lane where I have resided since 2005. I'm directly on the path to this proposed development as Harbor Oaks sub-division and those behind it to the North (Carmel Bay) are accessible only from Burney Lane. So, I think it is fair to say I will be directly impacted by any "collateral damage" this new sub-divison will bring with it. I do not feel that the current proposed plan by the applicant has solved any of the previous and s 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQABpNbYkd%2FHtMo064IMr5Q6…1/2 FW: Comments on Ordinance No. 480-773 (ZA20-0049) – (7.D) - strongly oppose butcannot attend meeting Amy Shelley <ashelley@ci.southlake.tx.us> Tue 10/20/2020 11:24 AM To: Mayor-Int <Mayor-Int@ci southlake.tx.us>; Laura Hill Cc: Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Mary Staples Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 8:54 PM To: Mayor and City Council <MayorandCityCouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Amy Shelley <ashelley@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Veronica Lomas <vlomas@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Selena Serrano <sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us> Subject: Comments on Ordinance No. 480-773 (ZA20-0049) – (7.D) - strongly oppose but cannot a 10/20/2020 Mail - Jerod Potts - Outlook https://outlook.office.com/mail/inbox/id/AAQkADNhOGM4NzA5LWUxODgtNGI2ZS1iN2QzLTA1N2I0ODMzN2UzZgAQABpNbYkd%2FHtMo064IMr5Q6…2/2 Thank you. Respectfully, Randy & Mary Staples 817-488-1094 1020I2020 Mail-Jared Polls-Outlook Ordinace No. 480-773 (ZA20-0049) Rod Zielke- Tue 10/20/2020 12:02 PM To: Mayor <Mayor@ci.southlake.h.us>; Place 1 <Placel@ci.southlake.txus>; Place 2 <Place2@ci.southlake.N.us>; Place 3 <Place3@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 4 <Place4@ci.southlake.N.us>; Place 5 <Place5@ci.southlake.tx.us>; Place 6 <Place6@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc Jared Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.N.us> 0 1 attachments(937 KB) HSW report 10-20-20.pdf; Honorable Mayor and Council Members, I regret I will not be able to participate in the Council Meeting this evening. Although I wholeheartedly support the inherent rights of the subject property to develop, I am currently in opposition to the PUD currently presented. I would appreciate it if you would take the time to consider the brief narrative attached describing one of my concerns for our neighborhood before making your decision on this case. Thank you for your service and feel free to contact me for any further discussion. Rod Zielke 1090 Burney Lane Southlake, TX hips//aullaok office_mMmaiViinboxld/MQMDNhOGM4N 5LWUxODgINGI2 SliN2QzLTA1 N2180DMzN2UZ gAQAD48n8OgkVEg2 ,2ByTH12_ 1/1 10/19/20 Burney Lane Development (Conservation?) HON Health, Safety, Welfare Narrative The roughly 200 acre Harbor Oaks Neighborhood/Area(HON) is served by a single point of access and water main originating at N. Carroll Ave. and Burney lane. This single point of access/water main serves approximately 79 existing lots, 10,400 liner feet of existing dead end roadway/waterline with a single existing long run dead end of 4,600 liner feet and an overall diagonal straight line distance of 1,750+/-. Proposed development would add 7 lots and a 650+/- linear foot of dead end road/waterline. Section 5.01, C of the Southlake Ordinance – Street and ROW Requirements - “Adequate Emergency Access: To insure adequate access to each subdivision, there should be at least two(2) planned points of ingress and egress, except that Cul-de-sacs shall be permitted in conformity with section 5.03-I. The Council may require more than two access points be considered if the configuration, number of lots, or other consideration creates the need for the additional access points.” Section 5.03-I “Cul-de-sacs: Generally, a maximum number of 20 dwelling units should be permitted on a cul-de-sac street permanently designed as such. Additionally, the length of the cul-de-sac should not exceed 1,000 feet or be less than 150 feet in length. However, density of development, topography, lot sizes and other significant factors will be weighed in determining the length pf the cul-de-sac street. ….” 2018 International Fire Code Appendix D, D107.1: “One or two-family dwelling residential development: Developments of one or two family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. EXCEPTIONS: 1) Where there are more than 30 dwelling units on a single public or private fire apparatus access road and all dwelling units are equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2, or 903.3.1.3, access from two directions shall not be required. 2) The number of dwelling units on a single fire apparatus access road shall not be increased unless fire access roads will connect with future development, as determined by the fire code official. D107.2 Remoteness: Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one-half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the property area to be served, measured in a straight line between access.” COMMENT: The City/Fire Marshall have currently made the interpretation under Exception 1) that “all dwelling units are equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system …” only applies to new development in a single access/single water line area, thus as long as new development is spriklered they can be added to an area without considering the impacts of a single access/waterline and the need for a second access/water loop. In the HON instance the vast majority of the existing 70+ homes served by the single access/water are older and are not sprinklered. Although sprinklers may help protect the new development it would only serve to exacerbate an already bad situation for the existing homes already depending on one access and one waterline. This interpretation would “theoretically” allow additional development at the expense of the safety of the existing homes. Therefore we respectfully submit that this current interpretation does not make sense and be reconsidered. NOTE: Although the Fire Code addresses exceptions to two points of access with total sprinkler coverage (see above) this does not address other EMERGENCY VEHICLE response times associated with potential blockage of one point of access/water (ie Ambulance, Police, etc.) A Traffic Impact Analysis or other Emergency Vehicle Response Time evaluation study should be considered to determine the number of units that can be safely added to this existing single point of access. Fire department water availability tests only test pressure at the delivery point both static and with load and adds a safety factor. This type of limited evaluation does not model/account for or recognize the total system dynamic effects of one supply line with over 10,000 linear feet of dead end water lines and 79 existing homes plus the contribution of possible additional. Because this is not a “typical” code application, this should be studied to determine the effects of adding additional units to the system before the amount of additional units that can be safely added is determined. Harbor Oaks Service Area Point A Single point of access starts at Carroll Ave/ Burney Lane Intersection Ponit C - Intersection of Harbor Haven and Burney Lane Point D- Dead end at Thousand Oaks Court. Point A to Point C—summary Shortest Roadway - 2,420 If Total Existing Roadway - 7,020 If Total existing lots - 50 Point C to Point D—summary Roadway to dead end 2,173 If Total Existing Roadway - 3,423 If Total existing Lots 29 TOTAL HARBOR OAKS AREA , Point A to Point C Roadway to dead end - 4,593 If Total Existing Roadway - 10,443 If Total existing lots - 79 Note: r of the maximum diagonal distance of service area from Point A = Y x 3,500 If= 1,750 If Separation required for two points of access is 1,750 If, E3E3 E 0 T r .I 40779+-22 � 06040810 � , f 06040845 08840713 06040891 .. �taAo a 11 J 06040926 41 81534 03792$70 '^ 06332153 1IIL1•1.I ,.I• IIII D4475763 14c I �s rl• f �t• I sou rslFh,ap revision pend ill g I 03792812 � - 41481569 �1 03792838 062 43t9 06523811 40778686 - 01175254 - - 06523838-- - --- 011 686 �� y• 01175165 f 1t74$78 PYo7G�tt 01175173 04089278 01175181 01175211 OilF74851 �wj t a1175149 01 74843 `� artlA.k•: 01175130 01174967 01 4835 } F4:.f•.lj,•F¢,.e:h.,*.I y.4 I L.t-dl 01175122 I'l 00 6082 01174940 f 00716090 011741127 0073606 0073605 069055 4 737229 01/74932 01175092 01174819 01175106 0073602 735981 38859 01174924 - 007 5584 r •� tF 01174500 01175088 °,ut 06905528 � �0 174916 �01�175041 - t . 069"501 00731825 P rll'.kPt:.P_'IDIII •I! 01174797 r� 045380,3 01174789 1 01174908 00735663� - lu 06905471 �A � 0652281 r IME, ,k-F^ '1 55 00735655 00r35531 06905463 94051811 — 08739865 0892ga4a 08905455 04851$03=1111rwE4.r• n:,Frr-. -IAA^r�Irr��! �06739857 Frl Ra•,..ppl Trl - 7 067�97 - 0692308;I 0226 877 Fy 02288966nit ' — 02299059 06739989 r '!' K 06923070 NU II ar^.r. F —_ 02288885 06739970 1 - 02289040 02288974 � - 06923046 3DOft 06739962 j 02289008 I n�aaalaa� --06740030 \ _ ��=tsrt Worth,Ciy a Jthlake.Tarlarst Gtaunly Cullet�g,Town of Flawcr Ma`u^n.. Tt, CI f Y Of Public Conymnt Form SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Your participation in a pub is meetings is va ued and citizens wishing to express their views can e ectronica y submit this Pub is Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. P ease specify where you wou d ike your comments to appear be ow and enter the required information. (***A comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the meeting date and 4 be provided for the record') COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Counci or PZ Commission meebngs onine oron the cab echanne rather than in person due to concerns reated to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item e ectronica y by ufi izing this Pub is Comment Form be ow. Public Meeting Date 1018/2020 Board Meeting* P a nn ng and Zon ng Comm ss on Rrst and Last t,,Ian-B JmGa s Address 885 Harbor Court a-Fofle 8179927408 En-ail I wish to share my mews on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No. 6 joe ]A) I w speak n SUPPORT of th s tem r I w speak n OPPOSITION to th s tern (-' i do not wsh to speak, but p ease record my: OPPOSITION Signature: CI f Y Of Public Conymnt Form SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Your participation in a pub is meetings is va ued and citizens wishing to express their views can e ectronica y submit this Pub is Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. P ease specify where you wou d ike your comments to appear be ow and enter the required information. (***A comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the meeting date and 4 be provided for the record') COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Counci or PZ Commission meebngs onine oron the cab echanne rather than in person due to concerns reated to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item e ectronica y by ufi izing this Pub is Comment Form be ow. Public Meeting Date 10/2012020 Board Meeting C ty Counc Srst and List t+bn-E JAMES GALIS Addiebs 885 HARBOR COURT R-FonF, 8179927408 Email I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 0049 ]A) r 1 w speak n SUPPORT of th s tern I w speak n OPPOSITION to th s tern I do not wsh to speak, but p ease record my: OPPOSITION Signature: City Of Public Comment Form SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Your participation in a pub is meetings is va ued and citizens wishing to express their views can e ectronica y submit this Pub is Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. P ease specify where you wou d ike your comments to appear be ow and enter to required information. (***A comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the meeting date and 4 be provided for the record') COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Counci or PZ Commission meetings onine oron the cab echanne father than in person due to concerns reated to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on anytopic or agenda item e ectronica y by uti izing this Pub is Comment Form be ow. Public Meeting Date 1018/2020 Board Meeting P a nn ng and Zon ng Comm ss on First and Last NanT:5 Dan McDove Addfes 961 THOUSAND OAKS CT Fl-one 2148932348 En-ail I wish to share my mewson an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No. 6 (is 1A) I w speak n SUPPORT of th s tem 1 w speak n OPPOSITION to th s tern do not wsh to speak, but p ease record my: Comments: This is an opportunity tosubrrit corm entson any topic ffolis not schEdded f0f a PUbk,hearing or an iternthat is not on the aWwJ@ I oppose the proposed zon ng change and deve opment p an. Th s deve oprnent s not compat b e wth th s un que ne ghborhood. I searched every ne ghborhood n South ake for 3 years before mov ng here. The reason I moved here s the country fee ng and atmosphere. Pease don't et t become homogen zed (30D ctoracter limit) Signature:* CI f Y Of Public Conymnt Form SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Your participation in a pub is meetings is va ued and citizens wishing to express their views can e ectronica y submit this Pub is Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. P ease specify where you wou d ike your comments to appear be ow and enter the required information. (***A comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the meeting date and 4 be provided for the record') COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Counci or PZ Commission meebngs onine oron the cab echanne rather than in person due to concerns reated to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item e ectronica y by ufi izing this Pub is Comment Form be ow. Public Meeting Date 10/2012020 Board Meeting P a nn ng and Zon ng Comm ss on First and Last Nan-B Dane R McDowe Address 961 THOUSAND OAKS CT R-rine 2148932348 En-ail I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No. 7D [oe ]A) I w speak n SUPPORT of th s tem r I w speak n OPPOSff ION to th s tern (-' I do not wsh to speak, but p ease record my: OPPOSITION Signature: ��WIUI?12vw/ Citizens of Soulhiake Carmel Bay Harbor Oaks Huse Humeptace September 29, 2020 Planning and Zoning Commissioners City of SouthlaRe 1400 Main Street Suite 310 Soullhlake, TX 76092 Commissioners: Please let us take this opportunity to eWess four points regarding the proposed Sage Group development, "The Conservation,'targeting the issues of ccmpatibilrty with our rural neighborhood, wildlife conservation, public safety, and drainage- As citizens of this neighborhood, we oppose the proposed development for the foltowing reasons, First, a simple drive through the existing community would clearly reveal our rural, equestrian neighborhood with 2 acre lots and open nature. This is very different from many areas of South lake. Southlake 2035. Objective 1,3 "encourage[s]appropriately-scaled neighborhood des?jn that compliments existing de velopm ent patterns while creating unique places, recognizing that quality residential neighborhoods are the cornerstone ofour community,"The proposed"The Conservation'plan of 1.16-1,8 acre lots cllustefed around a narrow boutevaf>l is not ransistent.w0h this wmmunity- Lots directly adjacent to the development are over 2 acres in size and some much larger in the Harbor Oaks subdivision. Lot width Of adjacent lOtS are a minimum of 215 ft compared to narrow lots of 1 3M of the development. Unlike the current lots of Harbor Oaks, the proposed I ots include the private road in determination of lot size and thereby the proposed Jots are even smaller than statc-d- A 40ft private road/easement with curb and gutter pavement does not match the 60ft ROW currently present in Harbor Oafs. We also)question the developer's plan to place an entrance road Wdh a lighled entry monument in a platted lot within Harbor Oaks subdivision (Lot 10). The proposed roadway will generate about 80 vehicle trips per day with headlights and traffic drastically affecting previously isolated adjacent lots. Sireetfights, sidewalks, entry signs and curb and gutter roads are all features not consistent with Harbor Oaks. The developer states -The Conservation"is compatible with the City of Southlake: however, its lack of comp at i b i I Ry to this neighborhood is obvious, especially the adjacent lots, Second, the pTopo5ed development plat, a 1013+ year old undisturbed wooded acreage,consthutes a major land piece in the 'Southlake Cove'ecosystem and also serves as the major wildlife corridor on the eastern side of the"Cove.- CrAiral to this property is its adjacency to the Corps property that forms park of the most dynamic and important natural habitat epicenter of the Southlake stewardship--as part of the Kirkwood-Quail creek corridor. This area offers ample native food supply, sufficient habitat acreage. a dynamic and balanced food chain, and ample denning capabilities. South,lake 2035 Objective 1.4 asks that developers"emphasize creativity and ensure environrnental stewardship in the design of all development and public intrastructure, maximizing the pre.serwqtian of desirable natural features such as trees, topography, strearrs, wildlife corridors and habitat" Development of this property wMout critical overview will alter this natural ecosystern forever- If efforts are not made to minimize development of this property as much as possible,the result will be the total ttimination of a vital part of the remaining natural ecosystem that currently exists_ Third, Harbor Oaks is unusual in that there is one single point of access for travel and utilities that serves the existing 70-N homes. There 7s no alternative ernergency vehicle service access mijis if this point of across is blocked, alternative water service if the one water line or gas 11ne serving the location is impaired- Adding additional houses to this already strained dcsign- is dangerous to the safety of the current ard future residents. Fourth, the density of the current "The Conservation' proposal generates another issue, the implementation Of sewage treatment systems. We have several owners of aerobic systems in the area and can offer the following experience- A 4,500 square foot house requires an aeration field of approximately %of an acre. It is hard for us to understand how a pad for a 5,000 to 7,000 square foot house, a swimming pool, and some yard is going to leave space for an appropriate aeration field. Aerobic sewage treatment system failures should also be a cause of concern. Experts in this area will tell you that 'surge demand" can cause system failures. 'Surge demand" can be caused by something as normal as a house full of Christmas guests. Further, any deterioration of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause massive system failure. Bacteria deterioration can be caused by something as simple as the accidental disposal of a household cleaner down the sink, an act that would seem'normal" in a home connected to the City sewer system, or even a more forgiving traditional septic system with an underground drainage field. Finally, it is apparent that several of the current lots will be spraying effluent in the flood plain- In the event of system failures, the possibility of pollution to the Lake Grapevine drainage certainly exists. From experience,we n-an tell you that the solution for any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped out. This c-an take two or three days to schedule. All the while the system continues to aerate partially treated water and the property smells like raw sewage. In conclusion, as a neighborhood we are in opposition of the proposed development in its current state. The reasons for opposition are abundant amongst the neighbors-. however, forthe sake of brevity, allow this letter to surnmarize the issues of utmost concern. Respectfully, The Citizens of Carmel Bay, Harbor Oaks and Huse Horneplace Name, Addrcss; bate- Harbor Oaks (HOI., Carmel_Bay (CB), & Huse Homeplace (HH Sage Group Development Petition Sutra Name Addr s Signature —— 110 Chadd,Jewel& 1Cristy 1029 Burney Lane HU Cox,Mark&Caro 1039 Hurney Lane HO Hill,Saris &Barbara 1095 13umey Lane 110 7ielke,Rod& Marge 1090 Burney Lane. 1:10 Sanders-,l-rud& Pracy 1095 Burmv Lane 110 5;tanytr,Joseph&Natalie 11 Oc113urrzcy l.an€° 110 Lonergan,Scott&Michelle 2875 Burney Lane r 140 Newsy,Mail in&Amy 2885 Burney Lane; — 1 110Selircan, 2895 13unncv Lune r — tiq 110 Land,Ken&Gloria 2900 Burney Lane HO Wood,Martha 2900 Bunicy lane HO Monrtcl,John&Barbara 2905 Burney Lane � I io 1 lakerl,Amy - 2410 Burney Lane 110 Wambsganss,Andy& 1xigh 2915 Burney Lwe Wambs gangs,beck 110 Stewart,Jahn& Lynda 292013umey Lane L P&_iYo n 9C 110 Peuer,-on,Matt&13ethmy 2925 l3ttmr:y lane HO Wilson,Ilea 2930 I3urney Lane Hal Johnson,(irahain&Kay 2940 Burncy Lane: 110 'Minn,Dariit&MichelleNII 2950 Berney Lane 110 King,Ellyn 2950 I3uramey lane c HO Fredricks,lack&hose 2960 Burney Lane r; 110 Van Sant,Mary 2965 llumey Lazne HO Houmans,Errol&Leslie 2970 Burney Lane HO Brown,Shawn&Molly 298013urney Lane � 1-10 George,'l-inki 29I30 I3umey Lane - ,� _ HO Galanti,Livio& Paula 3000 Burney Lane - 110 IL:1 Valle,Thomas& Patricia 301013umey Lane - 110 Brayton,Joe&Patti 3020 13runey°I.anc: x � Sage Group DcccloprfleAt M2-0 pc6fioji names list-doex ! Jf2712o io-25:oo A ;uln Name --: Address Sq alone ]IC3 Patturso 1,Dean&Tina 3520 literacy Lane 110 McIntire, Leon 3530 13mmicy Lane � 110 MtiIIcr,l?ric.&Alice 3540 13umne'y lane e -NC 1V c t f � 110 Van Til,John cat Melissa 3550 Durney I,anc 110 1 L"nar%Jay(owucr) 35 Lane � HO Atilt,Calon a 3570 Burney lane 110 Curtis,Sreve& Cathy 3580 Burney Lane � 1111 1lern aa,Oreg& Wendy 0855 [larbor Court l l>:I; Sabbatls,I+t+like&Shay 0850 harbor Court H 1 13artholornae,Shawn& 0860 I[arbor C our[ Angela Ilia Curmingham,Andy&Ashlcy 0365 1]arbor Court - 141-1 ;Smith,Jett`&Sasmi 0870 1[arbor Court 1Il l Adams,Bill&Valevic 0880 I[arbor Court �['{ r � 'e 110 Litt le Fie Id,Ilayden& Tina 0875 1[arbor Court 110 GaIis,Jim&Ja[nie 0885 Harbor CourtPA� 110 Chancellor,Ray&Dinah 0890 1larbor Court 1-10 Cook,Bill&Jimmie bell 0895 1 lartxrr Court s -110 Warren, Mike Lynn 09001]arbor Court r 110 F�irlwt,Judge Mike [060 1]arbor I laven IiC) Auyang .13ar ra&Soto, 1065 1 Urtxtr I lavers Art tint I I.G chi(wcod Steve&Jttul a 1070 1 larbor I lavQji ' � ty iC HO I lultin,Al& Cilia 1075 l]arbor I laven HO Staples Randy&Mary 1080 harbor haver?[ v � 110 Sauder,Terry&Judy 10901 lartxar 1laven � { 110 Masser[,Mon-is& Ally 1095 1 larbw I laven 110 Itenda,Vicki 1100,1 larbor 11aven 110 Choo, Mia � .,t,K 7 1105 1]arbor Ilaven dL_ t tCOT0ynxL� G Y!P'�U4 .' 110 Smith,Adam& Rebecca 1110 Harbor Haven 110 Walsh,1knnis&Janet 1115 Harbor I laven Y /7L Sage[Troup 17c' rap col fi 2 tau names fiat darx I' 2 9/2742U [0:25:00 tit Sab Name Addren Si kar+e 110 l lakemy,SattTe= 1120 I]arbor I farm 110 1 lakemy,Shair& Nina 1120 I]arbor I liven 04 110 C-appw Jr„ Iluddy& Debi 2H90 1Iarlx7r Rcfugc r 110 Boyer.Add k Lisa 29W I lartxtr Rcluge 110 Ali, F3arkat 2�IU5 N yr Rcfug now a: Undeveloped list 615 C'larldL-n Ranch Rd 110 Burchen, Larry&Cyndi 2910 1]artx)r refuge 110 IA%*,Brett& IIcidi 2920 Ilartxar Refuge 110 Mitchell,Mike& Kathy 2925 ITarhor Refuge 1ID I'ctL oil-Jerry&Carly 1064 11artxrr Retreat _ _ 110 Kolh.Mike&Jennifer 1095 1IaTWT RctrCat � 11() 11001[arbor Retreat 110 1lanyman,`icntt&Laura Ill05 1larbor Rcireat 110 Rnherts,M11h;Vic.Starr 1110 I lartmr Rrire at � � � 1 O Claxton,Mark&1.€,1ie l 1 15 1lartx)r Rctrcat CB Eastwood, hill& Kill is 3530 Cannel Court CB I lartman,Jay(rc, idLn c:) 3540Carmel Court Parxl Mary 1 k th f Ja 's sister CB Snook,]on&Anette 3545 Carmel Court Cif Cope,Michael&.`gun 3550 Carmel Cowl CB As umm I Iumber to&Erika 3560 Carmel Court � C; (0 CH Burtch,Carl&Kelsey 3570 Carmel Court 03 McDowell,Dare& lathy 0961 `I°hous:ind Oates Ct. CB 1=rieclrnan, Richard 1020 1how-and Oaks 0. now at: Und"eMp5d to 330 Slate Rack Rd Ennis,TX 75119 C;13 Knudson,Greg&DeNvah 1040`Thousand Oaks 0 �. O 20 'flan Til,Bob&Bonnie 1060'lhowsand Oaks Ct bk - Sage Cn-oup Icvr1trpn=12020 pxtition namcs]ist,dmx 3 0127,70 10.25.00 f'yM ff Number Description 79 Lots in Harbsar C)aks, Huse HomepIace,Carmel Bay 2 Undeveloped lots - 77 Number of passible household signatures to collect 59 dumber of household signatures cailected 7TA Percentage of households in OPPOSITION **signatures from the same household were o0y counted as ONE signature Citizons of Southlake Cernie3l Bay Harbor Oaks Huse Hameplace Sept-amber 29, 2020 Planning and Honing Commissioners City of Southlake 1400 Blain Street Suite 31U Southlake, TX 76092 Commissioners; Please let us take this opportunity to express four paints regarding the proposed Sage Group development. "The Conservation,"targeting the issues of compatibility with our rural neighborhood, wildlife conservation, public safety, and drainage, As citizens of this neighborhood, we oppose the proposed development for the following reascns- First, a simple drive through the existing community would clearly reveal our rural, equestrian neighborhood with 2 acre lots and open nature_ This is very different from many areas of Southiake, Southlake 2035, Objective 1.3 'encourage[s]appropriately-scaled neighborhood design that compliments existing development patterns while creating unique,places, recognizing that quality residential neighborhoods are the cornerstone of cur community."The proposed "The Censerva#ion" plan of 1_116-1 A acre lets clustered around a narrow boufevard is not consistent with this community. Lots directly adjacent to the development are over 2 acres in size and some much larger in the Harbor Oaks subdivision. Lot width of adjacent lots are a minimum of 215 ft compared to narrow lots of 130ft of the development. Unlike the current lots of Harbor Oaks, the proposed fats include the primate road in determination of lot size and therehy the proposed lots are even smaller than stated. A 40ft private road/easement with curb and gutter pavement does not match the 60ft ROW currently present in Harbor Oaks_ We also question the developer's plan to place an entrance road with a lighted entry monument in a platted lot within Harbor Oaks subdivision (Lot 10), The proposed roadway will generate about 80 vehicle trips per day with headlights and traffic drastically affecting previously isolated adjacent lots. Streetlights, sidewalks, entry signs and curb and gutter roads are all features not consistent with Harbor Oaks. The developer states"The Conservation" is compatible with the City of Southlake; however, its lack of compatibility to this neighborhood is obvious, especially the adjacent lots. Second, the proposed development plat, a 100+ year old undisturbed wooded acreage, constitutes a major land piece in the "Southlake Cove" ecosystem and a sc serves as the major wildlife corridor on the eastern side of the "Cove." Critical to this property is its adjacency to the Corps property that ferM5 part of the most dynamic and important natural habitat epicenter of the Southlake stewardship—as part of the Kirkwood-Quail creek corridor. This area offers ample naive food supply, sufficient habitat acreage, a dynamic and balanced food !chain, and ample denning capabilities. Southlake 2035 Objective 1.4 asks that developers 'emphasize creativity and ensure environmental stewardship in the design of all develoapmertt and public infrasrructure, maximizing the preservation of desirable natural features such as frees, topography, strearns, wildlife corridors and habitat," Development of this property without critical overview will alter this natural ecosystern forever. If efforts are not made to minimize development of this property as much as passible,the result will be the total elimination of a vital part of the remaining natural ecosystem that currently exists. Third, Harbor Oaks is unusual in that there is one single point of access for travel and utilities that serves the existing 70-80 harries, There is no alternative emergency vehicle service access route if this paint of access is blocked, alternative water service if the one water line or gas line serving the IcK-ation is impaired- Adding additional houses to this already strained design is dangerous to the safety of the current and future residents. Fourth, the density of the current 'The Conservation' proposal generates anc)fher issue, the implementation of sewage treatment systems. We have several owners of aerobic systems in the area and can offer the following experience. A 4.500 square foot house requires an aeration field of approximately 1/, of an acre. It is hard for us to understand how a pad for a 5,000 to 7,000 square foot house, a swimming pool, and some yard is going to leave space for an appropriate aeration held. Aerobic sewage treatment system faHures should also be a cause of concem. Experts in this area will tell you that "surge demand" can cause systern failures. "Surge demand" n be caused by something as normal as a house full of Christmas guests. Fuilher, any deterioration of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause M.2SSiVe SySt8M failure. Bacteria deterioration can be caused by something as simple as the accidental disposal of a household cleaner down the sink an act that would seem 'normal' in a home connected to the City sewer system, or even a more forgiving traditional septic system Wth an underground drainage field. Finally, it is apparent that several of the current lots will be spraying effluent in the Pond plain- In the event of system failures, the possibility of pollution to the Lake Grapevine drainage certainly exists_ Fromexperience, we can tell you that the solution for any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped out. This can take two or three days to schedue. All the while the system continues to aerate partially treated water and the property smells like raw sewage_ Inconclusion, as a neighborhood we are in opposition of the proposed development in its current state. The reasons for opposition are abundant amongst the neighbors: however. for the sake of brevity, allow this letter to summarize the issues of utmost concern. Respectfully, The Citizens of Carmel Bay, Harbor Oaks and Huse Homeplace Signature, Narne, Address: 'kr)_Q Date: C., .CC*N4 Ck1L#sd,en-.wb-trpW iM"+'C e"qnq apL.:n.-W¢ ors WA--Q"6X_-E*-. npuw ---C iw9 miefy or ft CJa rant And 5l".urn rwrdontn Pv-"..W Cana'iy 0:r-0Cwra#'Tra CmaaYs3or'';yam parwr.iaa.xYher r.an Rre how—ran—=r—..pe rra 1-1 a�W.m—sews.i 0.,Wl of.wart 1,110T*n In arse -nd tan agar lM fDk-,'G arpirfarrca A 4.5rlp Sg.Wrf itai moue.r6q-n MI 4W&DC l AWd mp{foa..'nll*fi od an are.I It hard rd u b 6fe]dga"rKm a pffid ror a 5.000 W],DW squersipal Ix»a..kw':fCrfl4j pool,and iPl"r.yard la qg%,ears spa[*iv OP sWopnais dwgW-aafd A*NOC 14w4,a Csal7hs'iI",VfL,Iiih oft arro,i araa be a OkW 9?or"Ca Fxp-m n'n.also wm Ad you rW's go d,.r'r.1rY tan oau.i MyA=I"—'&lpa d WWxr Can b*C*road by 10nl9+rtQ a. aorrnsr+�s a houm sue or Cha Wnii gr.nsfa FIa1hY.any daSMrW.W)n pi Mrs 6jKWW Q3�..i molds 11W tr-" l W Da CV,C'a4W'I'.F14N+V S�'�IXll ladlye.9emoa mw"BDM am ha8kraaa bylomagr:'rq as wnpbm as"&=40rd.Ob i 0a hr h3ld rlw darn lr».mmk M pa 6W M s.ern'norr,r in a rdma r vrr,aeted w L-w Cry,erar t rswn,Cr rdw a rceaa bv"lg Caditl4n61 H-.PW wumn we,an 6rvWOFw/3 9ra+ra M tem F,LW-m Aapperwi Mai ae.aari'.I m'ra rdl t* anarrm."'OW rxaM In Me ew,bn of aymwr5 fat--.C'n pmvha[y 4 pYAM.1.ne Lab..CSrnp—drm m",5r'risi yy&.ice Flom etYpdme ws tan rA you moo rime oo rom Iv any Iakma is w tmw the':ma,_flank pun'yad art.T hL'f can yaks Wro�w tt+ae data to adwitoo AM M o brfule the symbw,.os hr rs.ho raral8[>r y Ira&W xh'.M e:7 C.propu'ry mnxsas ska r—arrrrape. In OCIKIualnn,sa a r..ghhorhooe tiro afn,n.9pnRW'.7r Ir.pr]pGaad On+anprn 1 M,ae our.rn=m The rararyru W cp"bm are.n.,.x.W,.mmogs[tm rogb m,howftw,ka fl*sake hro-rrtr.ab. Ira kftm m aran--Ixu en irs.+eM vI vtn, pxK t-. Th*CFtztn.of Carnes BIY,kWV 0"�Fr'4{}HUM Foff PODS° Atltrwt: 7tr� OVrJV.pkrW1 �:r1f? �'��} j fGJ` tbca: 10— r 1 I I 4 - • - - I A A � 4 access is blocked, alternative water service if the one water line or gas line serving the location is impaired. Adding additional houses to this already strained design is dangerous to the safety of the current and future residents. Fourth, the density of the current 'The Conservation" proposal generates another issue, the implementation of sewage treatment systems. We have several owners of aerobic systems in the area and can offer the following experience. A 4,500 square foot house requires an aeration field of approximately 1/4 of an acre_ It is hard for us to, understand hove a pad for a 5,000 to 7,00C square foot house, a swimming pool, and some yard is going to leave space for an appropriate aeration field. Aerobic sewage treatment system failures should also be a cause of concern_ Experts in this area will tell you that'surge demand" can cause system:failures, "Surge demand" can be caused by something as normal as a house full of Christmas guests_ Further, any deterioration of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause massive system failure. Bacteria deterioration can be caused by something as sample as the accidental disposal of a household cleaner down the sink, an act that would seem"normal" in a home connected to the City sewer system, or even a more forgiving traditional septic system with an underground drainage field. Finally, it is apparent that several of the current lots will be spraying effluent in the flood plain. In the event of system failures, the possibility of pollution to the Lake Grapevine drainage certainly exists. From experience, we can tell you that the solution for any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped out. This can take two or three days to schedule. All the while the system continues to aerate partially treated water and the property.smells like raw sewage. In conclusion, as a neighborhood we are in [apposition of the proposed development in its current state. The reasons for opposition are abundant amongst the neighbors-, however, for the sake of brevity, allow this letter to summarize the issues of utrnost concern_ Respectfully, The Citizens of Carmel Bay, Harbor Oaks and Huse Horneplace Signature:) Name: V1- Address: L .4 Date: access is blocked. alternative water service it the one water line Of gas line serving the location is impaired. Adding additional hauses to this already strained design is-dangerous to the safety of the current and future residents- Fourth, the density of the current'The Conservation" proposal generates another issue, the implementation of sewage treatment systems. We have several owners of aerobic systems in the area and can offer the following experience. A 4.500 square foot house requires an aeration field of approximately 1/4 of an acre, 11 is hard for Lis to understand how a pad for a 5,000 to 7,000 square foot house, a swimming wol, and some yard is going to leave space for an appropriate aeration field. Aerobic sewage treatment system failures Should also be a cause of concem, Experts in this area will tell you that'-surge demand" can cause system failures- "Surge demand" ran be caused by something 25 normal as a house full of Christmas guests. Further, any deterioration of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause massive syslern failure. Bacteria deterioration can be caused bar something as simple as the accidental disposal of a household cleaner down the sink, an act that would seem "normal' in a home connected to the City sewer system, or even a more forgiving traditional septic system with an underground.drainage field. Finally, it is apparent that several of the current `ots vdill be spraying effluent in the flood plain- In the event of system failures, the possibility of pollution to the Lake Grapevine drainage certainly exists- Frornexperience, we can tell you that the solution for any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped Out. This can take two or three days to schedule. All the while the system continues to aerate partially treated water and the property smells like raw sewage- In conclusion, as a neighborhood we are in opposilion of the proposed deve!oprnent in its current state. The reasons for opposition are abundant amongst the neighbors.: however. for the sake of brevity, allow this letter to summafiZe the issues Of uEmo,91 Concern. Respectfully, The Citizens of Carmel Pay, Harter Oaks and Huse Hemeplace signature- Name: Address: /7 Date: ktitv LU OneDrive n of I 4A Tra sr.lya Ya4 rx�'e!cis r:ref i e/M t♦�9h11 af�n rrrVar ti v1�[rYrf i reWe25.dn er,e rt.�pyi,w.sV Va ra yr�e -k—,r• g M R1q. _lef Y. d'�'rf!+� f1.4f W�C'faalr!ii9 ti R14M d ti''cad:vs'an Nf'�r-aY. Tf.,CM—PQ-W&W,LPGp~4HkP .� ��c_t. t(cr ff [y+r� fiCN L hLlfy�Iar�I4lEee i1V!/6Mti]k f'Pw.Fd hiW 611 P'G1f klf lrl�YP�fP Lam°.W A+klrfl if�tll rxsaw n Cr d.,�riW:ae yid,k b�ff1rY H n f+r�f w+6 Afira . 6mrU:_t'ib a'�?'rf R+f SLlrlilt Tr.:iwwHLvi pgr�r 9ff`Mffu aclRr NJ.ti �Y c!r.t.�cnfrr rr.r�..wf fy.a.nrr wnwf of rr�eyk`prn f9 1'r�M Y 10•...., Fr uw-kfre.A s.r0.giw►fxx ..p. an refrM.5r.7a ,��Wlo'f k: a-Acre.-R,9fItl Fn-.q ti iho.i PkE#x�S 0.90 q 7,0(Q q,P!hr yrM r Q fk1�.�...•,q�w kN`n w4—ip +'++•+:--r�r5.L•i�.a�rr'esf�n•"'....avcw ake.Ga a ta.4�cafnm.Esmt�b n tP ffri+9r Blau taf's�nys riaa oyrrr,4+ax^S..ryr uy,�.,!sarr c.cr+y hx■nfnPwq iW a Uf+a�r prrx F F.sfr a.rnmrwri dr.at+�a ma-E reuse ma TW_.y U oY r cif Rrrw.., ,o PYea elver anf.em im can tr "E}w�r^M,:'P s+'�y r rtr dw—[Y a rt6 P-Ad elerYr-M ffN_an rH rrl'�lad farts 4s1nd`F. feC11L—_ d#tl1e Cky�qrr Im—a—a—6agerap►ram rPkran Wih r7 yryy die wp�fys, Fwiy.0 r.rppwwy NI----w NYr—.4 b..a w P M*v fOL_re P*Rk r plrn N iw r.ra Of rfr 6&muk s P+OILY a PdL a p Fr Lair Grip � oy Ws ML .'°#il�'e W9 7oW!W tlee frd.rof b ar1 fyi e bd—r t hnr Wr fwee.frf WrBa M odl 7Wa un aka V P P v'enwRity 2rry b fa y as h f.FM the ^C9f0'aJ1 b rsrrlr prrylyl Mww".raffr.d rnf W Y er.e.eqs �44 �■ �1Pi P!k10{pOCdil it 0"fl pOPOfe} yi py�[+rAii Pre. �LR�fF Kr F'T I�illdP�PICit}}I nR�TPK:]Pf,.KwwR.iR/116 YfYki 4�afeeF f w4 r41{!fMVIP$r its IYfrJY dp 4rbM G}%},= mmm - J of 3 , htIps:IJone drive.live.earnj'7auIh key 7%21AFYaWiyAOjjDE00&Citl=...FF7223B%211426&Paf1d=09593677CFF72238%211d2&0 OneUp 1013120, 1:21 PM Page 1 of 1 yf fe //f f f A access is Mocked, alternative water service if the one water line or gas line serving the location is Impaired. Adding additional houses to this already strained design is dangerous to the safety of the current and future residents. Fourth, the density of the current 'The Conservation" proposal generates another issue, the implementation of sewage treatment systems. We have several owners of aerobic systems in the area and can offer the following experience- A 4,500 square foot house requires an aeration field of approximately 'l4 of an acre. It is hard for us to understand how a pad for a 5,DOG to 7,0M square foot house, a swimming pool. and some yard is going to leave space for an appropriate aeration fiield. Aerobic sewage treatment system failures should also be a cause of concern- Experts in this area will tell you that "surge demand" can cause system failures. "Surge demand" can be caused by something as normal as a house full of Christmas guests, Further, any deterioration of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause massive system failure. Bacteria deterioration can be caused by something as simple as the accidental disposal of a household cleaner down the sink, an act that would seem "normal" in a home connected to the City sewer system, or even a more forgiving traditional septic system with an underground drainage field. Finally, it is apparent that several of the current hots will be spraying effluent in the food plain. In the event of system failures, the possibility of pollution to the Lake Grapevine drainage certainly exists. From experience, we can tell you that the solution for any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped out. This can take two or three days to schedLle. All the while the system continues to aerate partially treated water and the property smells like raw sewage, [n conclusion, as a neighborhood we are in opposition of the proposed development in its current state. The reasons for opposition are abundant amongst the neighbors; however, for the sake of brevity. allow this letter to summarize the issues of utmost concern- Respectfully, The Citizens of Carmel flay, Harbor Oaks and Huse Horneplace jSignature'. �! access is blocked, alternative water service if the one Waller line cr gas lima wving the location is impaired. Adding additional houses to this already strained des€gn is dangerous to the safety of the current and future residents- Fourth, the density 01 the Current 'the Conservation' proposal generates another issue, the implementation of sew aga t rest rnent systems. We nave several owners of aeroble systems in the,area and can offer the folIowing experience. A 4.50D square foot house requires an aeration field of approximately %of an acfe It is hard for us to understand haw a pad for a 5.000 to 7,0€0 square foot house. a swimming pool, and some yard is Cuing to leave space tar an appro;xiate aeration fie d Aerobic-sewage treatment system failures should also be a cause cf canCem Experts in this areas will tell you that "surge demand' can cause system faslums "Surge demand" can be caused try something as normal as a house full of Christmas guests. Fw1hei-, any detencratien of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause Massive system failure: 'bacteria detenorattoon can t�e cau-&,,W by something as simple as the accidental dispo Sal of a household cleaner down the sink, an wl that would seem "normal" in a some connected to the City sewer system or even a more forgiving traditional septic system with an underground drainage lield. Finally, rt is apparent that several of the current lots will be spraying effluent in the flood plasn. In the event of system failures, the pos!ibility of pollution to the Lake Grapevine drainage certainly exists From experience, we can tell you that the solution for any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped out This Can take two or three days to henlule. All the while the system continues to aerate partially treated water and the property smells like raw sewage. In concIusion. as a n eiigh bo r hood we are sr:opposition of tha proposed development in its current state The reasyons for opposition are abundant amongst the neighbors: however, tar tree sake of brevity, a,lltaw this letter to surnmarize the issues of utmost concern. Respectfully, The Citizens of Carmel Bay, Harbor-Oaks and muse Homeplasce r Signature; Address: ��^-tom L L. . Da T�r access is blocked, alternative water service if the one water line or gas line serving the location is impaired. Adding additional houses to this already strained design is dangerous to the safety of the current and future residents. Fourth, the density of the current`The Conservation`proposal generates another issue, the implementation of sewage treatment systems. We have several owners of aerobic systems in the area and can offer the following experience. A 4.40 square foot house requires an aeration held of approximately I/. of an acre. It is hard for us to understand haw a pad for a 5,0-oo to 7,000 square foot house, a swimming pool, and some yard is going to leave space fear an appropriate aeration field. Aerobic sewage treatment system failures should also be a cause of concern. Experts in this area will tell you that'surge demand` can cause system failures. 'Surge demand'can be caused by something as normal as a house full of Chnstmas guests_ Further. any deterioration of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause massive system failure. Bacteria deterioration can be caused by something as simple as the accidental disposal of a household cleaner down the sink, an act that would seem`normal' in a home connected to the City sewer system, or even a more forgiving traditional septic system with an underground drainage field. Finally. it is apparent that several of the current lots will be spraying effluent in the flood plain, In the event of system failures, the possibility of pollution to the Lake Grapevine drainage certainly exists. Fronn experience, we can tell you that the solution for any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped out- This can take two or three days to schedule. All the while the system continues to aerate partially treated water and the property smells like raw sewage. In conclusion, as a neighborhood we are in opposition of the proposed development in its current state. The reasons for opposition are abundant amongst the neighbors; however, for the sake of brevity, allow this letter to summarize the issues of utmost concern. Respectfully, The Citizens of G el gay arbor Oaks and Huse Homeplace Signature: Name:. Address: Date: access is blocked, alternative water service if the one water line or gas line serving the k" On is impaired. Adding additional houses to this already strained design is dangerous to te safety of the current and future residents. Fourth, the density of the current 'The Conservation' proposal generates another issue, the implementation of %ewage treatment systems. We have several owners of aerot�c systems in the area and can offer the following experience-A 4,bOO square loot house requires an aeration field of approximately 114 of an acre. It is hard for us to understand how a pad for a 5.000 to 7.000 square foot house,a swimrining pool,and some yard Is going to leave space for an appropriate aeration fietd. Aerobic sewage treatment system failures should also be a cause of concern- Experts in this area will tell you that"surge demand'can cause system failures 'Surge demand'can be caused by something as normal as a In ou se full of Christmas guests, Further, any deterioration of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause massive system failure. Bacteria deterioration can be caused by something as simpte as the accidental disposal of a household cleaner down the sink, an act that would seem"normal" in a home Gonnected to the City sewer system, or even a more forgiving traditional septif,system with an underground drainage field. Finally, it is apparent that several of the current lots will be spraying effluent in the Mod plain. In the event of system failures, the possibility of pollution to the Lake Grapevine drainage certainly exists. Fromexperience, we can tell you that the solution for any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped out. This can take two or three days to schedule. All t h e while the system continues to aerate partially treated water and the property smells like raw sewage. In conclusion,as a neighborhood we are in opposition of the proposed development in its current state. The rea.&ons for opposl6on are abundant amongst the neighbors:however,for the sake of brevity, allow this letter to surnmarize the iussijes of utrnost concern, Respectfully, The Citizens of Carmel Bay, Harbor Oaks and Huse Horneplace Signature. Name: �A nl Q Mdress: 07 0 Mz'—�-ES 0 �4 Date: access is blocked, alternative water:service if the one water lane or gas line serving the Ip tioon is impaired. Adding additional houses to this already Strained design is daNeirous to the safely 41 the current and future residents. Fourth, the density of the current"The Conservabon"proposal generates another issue.the implementation of sewage treatment systems. We have several owner;of aerobic systems in the area arid can offer the following experience. A 4,SW square lool house requires an aeration field of approximately 1,1 of an acre. It is heard for us to understand ttow a pad for a 5.DW to 7..000 Square foot house. a swimming pool. and some yard is going to leave space for an appropriate aera,ti�ora field Aerobic sewage treatment system failures should also to a cause of conQern. Experts in this area will tell you Chat"surge demand"can cause system failures..'Surge demand'can tle caused by sornettrang a normal as a house full of Christmas guests. Further, any detenoration of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks n cause massive system failure- Bacteria deterioration can be caused by something as simple as the accidental disposal of a household cleaner down the sink, an act that would seem"normal`an a home co'nnectad to the City sewer system,or even a more forgiving tradaiunal septic system with an underground drainage field. Finally,it is apparent that several of the current lots will be spraying effluent in the flood plains. In the event of system failures,the possibility of pollution to the Lake Grapevine dreireage certainty exists. From experience, we can tell you that the solution for any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped out.This can take two or three days to schedule.All the while the system continues to aerate partially treated water and the property smells like raw sewage. In conclusion, as a neighborhaod we are in opposition of the proposed development in its current state. The-reasons for opposition are abundant.amongst the neighbors:however,for the sake of brevity, allow this letter to summarize the issues of utmost concern. Respectfully, The Citizens of Carmel Bay, Harbor Oaks and Buse Flomeplace Signature-. Name. V _ f 7 vi 0_ l access is blocked, alternative water service if the one water line or gas line serving the lotion is impaired. Adding additional houses to this already strained design is dangerous to the safety of the current and future residents. Fourth, the density of the current"The Conservation" proposal generates.another issue, the implementation of sewage treatment systems. We have several owners of aerobic systems in the area and can offer the following experience. A 4,500 square foot house requires an aeration field of approximately 'f. of an acre. It is hard for us to understand how a pad for a 5,000 to 7,000 square foot house, a swimming pool and soma yard is going to leave space for an appropriate aeration field. Aerobic sewage treatment system failures should also be a cause of concern. Experts in this area will tell you that"surge demand" can cause system failures. "Surge demand" can be caused by something as normal.as a house full of Christmas guests, Further, any deterioration of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause massive system failure. Bacteria deterioration can be caused by something as simple as the accidental disposal of a household cleaner down the sink, an act that would seem''normal"in a home connected to the DIty serer system, or even a more forgiving traditional septic system with an underground drainage field. Finally, it is apparent that several of the current lots will be spraying effluent in the flood plain, In the event of system failures, the possibility of pollution to the Lake Grapevine drainage certainly exists. From experience, we cart tell you that the solution for any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped out. This can take two or three days to schedule.All the while the system continues to aerate partially treated water and the property smells like raw sewage. In conclusion, as a neighborhood we are in opposition of the proposed development in its current state_ The reasons for opposition are abundant amongst the neighbors; however, for the sake of brevity, allow this letter to summarize the issues of utmost concern, Respectfully, The Citizens of Carmel Bay, Harbor Oaks and Huse Honieplace Signature: ,Address, 9 %.k C �51-1 -e Date, ( FJ `2 2-0 access is blocked, alternative water service if the one water line or gas line serving the location is impaired. Adding additional houses to this already strained design is dangerous to the safety of the current and future residents. Fourth, the density of the current"The Conservation" proposal generates another issue, the implementation of sewage treatment systems. We have several owners of aerobic systems in the area and can offer the following experience. A 4,500 square foot house requires an aeration field of approximately 1/4 of an acre. It is hard for us to understand how a pad for a 5,000 to 7,000 square foot house, a swimming pool, and some yard is going to leave space for an appropriate aeration field. Aerobic sewage treatment system failures should also be a cause of concern. Experts in this area will tell you that"surge demand" can cause system failures. "Surge demand" can be caused by something as normal as a house full of Christmas guests_ Further, any deterioration of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause massive system failure. Bacteria deterioration can he caused by something as simple as the accidental disposal of a household cleaner down the sink, an act that would seem �'norrnal" in a home connected to the City sewer system, or even a more forgiving traditional septic system with an underground drainage field. FinaGy, it is apparent that several of the current lots will be spraying effluent in the flood plain- In the event of system failures, the possibility of pollution to the Lake Grapevine drainage certainly exists. From experience, we can tell you that the sclution for any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped out. This can take two or three days to schedule. All the while the system continues to aerate partially treated water and the property smells like raw sewage. In conclusion, as a neighborhood we are in opposition of the proposed development in its current state. The reasons for opposition are abundant amongst the neighbors; however, for the sake of brevity, allow this letter to summarize the issues of utmost concern_ Respectfully, The Citizens of Carmel Say, Harbor Oaks and Huse Homeplace Signature: -- Dame: Address: Cate. access is bk>cked, alternative water serviced the one water line or gas line serving the txothn is impaired. Adding additional houses to this already strained design Is dangerous to the safety of the current and future residents. Fourth, the density of the current"The Conservation' proposal generates another issue, the implementation of sewage treatment systems. We have several owners of aerobsc systems in ft area and can offer the following experience- A 4,500 square foot house requires an aeration field of approximately 1/4 of an acre- It is hard for us to understand how a pad for a 5,000 to 7,000 square foot house, a swimming pool, and some yard Is going to leave space for an appropriate aeration field. Aerobic sewage treatment system failures should also by a cause of concern. Experts in this area will tell you that"surge demand' can cause system failures. "Surge demand" can be caused by something as normal as a house full of Christmas guests- Further, any deterioration of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause massive system failure_ Bacteria deterioration can be caused by something as simple as the accidental disposal of a household cleaner down the sink, an act that would seem'ncrrnai' in a home connected to the City sewer system, or even a more forgiving traditional septic systern with an underground drainage field. Finally, it is .apparent that several of the current lots will be spraying effluent in the flood plain. In the event of system failures, the possibility of pullu6on to the take Grapevine drainage certainly exists. From experience, we can tell you that the solution for any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped out- This can take two or three days to schedule. All the while the system continues to aerate partially treated water and the property smells like raw sewage, In conclusion, as a neighborhood we are in opposition of the proposed development in its current state- The reasons for opposition are abundant amongst the neighbors; however, for the sake of brevity, allow this letter to summarize the issues of utmost concern_ Respectfully, The Citizens of Carmel Bay, Harbor Oaks and Huse Homeplace Signature: Address:_ I d U12", lcC T - b c) Date:- Firefox dbout6lank Recess is blocked,alternative water service it the one crater line or gas line serving the iocation is irrrpaired. Adding addilional houses to this already strained design is dangerous to the safety cl the current and future residents. Fourth,the density of the current-The Conservation'proposal generates another issue, the implementation of sewage treatment systems.We have several owners of aeroh�ic systems in the area and can offer the following experience. A 4.500 square foot house requires an aeration field of approximately'f.of an acre. It is bard for us to understand how a pad For a 5,000 to 7,UUiU square foot house,a swimming pool,and some yard is going to leave space for an appropriate aeration field. Aerobic sewage treatment system failures should also be a cause of concern. Experts in this area wwill tell you that'surge demand'can cause systern Failures.-Surge domand'can be causW by somethirig as normal as a house full of Christmas guests, Further,any deterioration of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause massive system failure. Bacteria deterioration can he caused by something as simple as the accidental disposal of a household cleaner down the sink,an act that would seam"normal'in a home connected to the City sewer system.err even a more Forgiving traditional septic system vein,an underground drainage geld. Finally.it is apparent that several of the current lets will be spraying effluent in the flood plain. In the event of system failures,the possibility of pollution to the Lake Grapevine drainage certainly exists. From experience,we can tell you that the solution lot any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped out.This can take two or three days to schedule.All the while the system continues to aerate partially treated waiter ancf the property smells like raw sewage. In conclusion,a5 a neighborhood we are in upp05itiun of the proposed development in its current state. The reasons for opposition are abundant amongst the neighbors:however,for the safe of brevity,a'low this letter to summarize the issues of utmost concem. Respectfully, The Citizens of Carmel Bay, Harbor Oaks and Muse Horneplaca f Signature: — Name: _ lf{ f t i �-. 1r1 ff,�1 z Address: D U �. 1 �1 i��`1 'i #- '- t Date: r J 2 of 9/301?020, 5 3 4 PM access is blocked, afternative water service if the one water line or gas line serving the location is impaired_ Adding additional houses to this already strained design is dangerous to the safety of the current and future residents. Fourth,the density of the current "The Conservation" proposal generates another issue,the irnplernentaVon of sewage treatment systems. We have several owners of aerobic Systems in the area and can offer the following experience. A 4,500 square foot Ficuse requires an aeration freld of approximately 1/4 of an acre. It is hard for Lj5 to understand how a pad for a 5,000 to 7,00 square foot house, a swimming pool, and some yard lis going to leave space for an appropriate aeration field. Aerobic sewage treatment system failures should also be a cause of conGem. Experts in Ilh is area will tell you that 'surge demand' can cause system failures. "Surge demand can be caused by something as normal as a house full of Christmas guests. Further, any deterioration of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause massive system failure. Bacteria deterioration can be caused by something as simple as the accidental disposal of a household cleaner down the sink, an act that would seem'normal' in a home connected to the City sewer system, or even a more forgiving traditional septic system with an underground drainage field. Finally, it is apparent that several of the current lots will be spraying effluent in the flood plain. In the event of system failures,the possibility of PO]JUtiorn to the Lake Grapevine drainage certainly exists. From experience, we can tell you that the solution for any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped out. This can take two or three days to schedule- All the while the system continues to aerate partially treated water and the property swells like raw sewage, In conclusion. as a neighborhood we are in opposdfon of the proposed development In its current state. The reasons for opposition are abundant amongst the neighbors„ however,for the sake of brevity, allow this letter to su rnrnafize the issues of utmost concern. Respectfully, The Citizens of Carmel Bay, Harbor Oaks and, Huse Horneplace Signature: N a m 0,11 r"hfbrr Address: I t - [late: o Chi access is blocked,alternalive water service 11 the one water line or gas line-serving the location is impaired. Adding additional houses to this already strained design is dangefous to the safety of the current and iuture residents, Fourth,the density of the current'The Conservation'proposal generates another issue,the implementation of sewage treatment systems. We have several owners of aerobic systems in the area and can offer the following experience.A 4.500 square foot house requires an aeration field of approximately 114 of an acre- 11 is hard for us to understand how a pad for a 5,"to 7,000 square loot house, a swimming pool.and same yard is going to leave space for an appropriate aeration field. Aerobic sewage treatment system failures should also be a cause of ccricem- IlExperts,in this area will tell you that"Surge demand'can cause system failures-'Surge demand'can he caused by something as normal as a house full of Christmas guests. Further,any deterioration of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause massive system failure. Bacteria deterioration can be caused by something as simple as the accidental disposal of a household cleaner down the sink,an act that would seern"normal"in a home connected to the City sewer system,or even a More 1DrgljViR9 traditional septic system with an underground drainage field. Finally, it is apparent that several of the current lots will be spraying effluent in the good plain. In the event of system failures,the possibility of pollution to the Lake Grapevine drainage certainly exists. From experience,we can fell you That the solution for any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped out. This can take two or three days to schedule.All the while the system continues to aerate pallially Treated water and the property smalls like raw sewage. In conclusion,as a neighborhood we are in opposition of the proposed development in its Current state. Thereasons for opposition are abundant among the neighbors-.however,for the sake of brevity, allow this letter to summarize the issues of utmost conceit. Respectfully. The Citizens of Carmel Bay, Harbor Oaks acid Huse Hanneplace Signature: Name: --�Eka R.Antunes Humberto C.Antunes Address: 3560 Carmel Ct. Southlake TX 76092 Vale. October 1, 2020 access is blocked, alternative water service if the one water line of gas Me serving the location is impaired. Adding additional houses to this already strained design is dangerous to the safety of the current and future residents. Fourth, the density of the current'The Conservation" proposal generates another issue, the implementation of sewage treatment systems. We have several owners of aerobic systems in the area and can offer the following experience.A 4,500 square foot house requires an aeration field of approximately 1/4 of an acre. It is hard for us W understand how a pad for a 5,000 to 7,000 square foot house, a swimming pool, and some yard is going to leave space for an appropriate aeration field. Aerobic;sewage treatment system failures should also be a cause of concern. Experts in this area will tell you that 'surge demand'can cause system failures- "Surge demand" can be caused by something as normal as a house full of Christmas guests. Further, any detelinfalion 1)1 11)e bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause Tpassive system failure. Bacteria deterioration Can be caused by something as simple as the accidental disposal of a Musehold cleaner down the sink, an act that would seem"normal' in a home connected to the City sewer System, or even a more forgiving traditional septic system with an underground drainage field. Finally, it is apparent that several of the current lots will be ,praying effluent in the flood plain. In the event of system failures,the possibility of pollution to the Lake Grapevine drainage certainly exists. From experience,we can tell you that the solution for any laihAre is to have the treatment tanks Pumped out. This ran take two or three days to schedule. All the while the system continues to aerate partially treated water and the property smells like raw sewage. In conclusion, as a neighborhood we are in opposition of the proposed development in its current state. The reasons for opposition are abundant amongst the neighbors; however, for the sake of brevity, allow this letter to s u rnm a rize the issues of utmost concern. Respectfully, The Citizens of Carmel Bay, Harbor Oaks and Huse Horneplace Sig 11 aty re" Name: Address: Date: access is blocked, alternative water service if the one water line or gas line serving the location is impaired. Adding additional houses to this already strained design is dangerous to the safety of the current arid future residents. Fourth, the density of the current"The Conservation" proposal generates.another issue, the implementation of sewage treatment systems. We have several owners of aerobic systems in the area and can offer the following experience.A 4,500 square foot house requires an aeration field of approximately'f4 of an acre. It is hard for us to understand how a part for a 5,009 to 7,000 square foot house, a swimming pool, and some yard is going to leave space for an appropriate aeration field. Aerobic sewage treatment system failures should also be a cause of concern. Experts in this area will tell you that "surge demand"can cause systern failures. "Surge dernand" can be caused by something as normal as a house full of Christmas guests. Further, any deterioration of the bacteria count inside the treatment tanks can cause massive system failure. Bacteria deterioration can be caused by something as simple as the accidental disposal of a household cleaner down the sink, an act that would seem'nnrn'yar in a home connected to the City sewer system„ or even a more forgiving traditional septic system with an underground drainage field. Finally. it is apparent that several of the current lots will be spraying effluent in the flood plain. Ire the event of system failures, the passibility of pollution to the Lake Grapevine drainage certainly exists_ From experience,we can tell you that the solution for any failure is to have the treatment tanks pumped out. This can to ke two or three days to schedule. All the while the system continues to aerate partially treated water and the property smells like raw sewage. In conclusion, as a neighborhood we are in oppos0ion of the proposed development in its current state,. The reasons for opposition are abundant amongst the neighbors: however, for the sake of brevity, .allow this letter to summarize the issues of utmost concern. Respectfully. The Citizen: of Carmel Bay, Harbor Oaks and Huse Horneplace i(irrature: Name ti i' .ti1 Address: td r - r` f �- - 76 0 -72— date: CI f Y Of Public Conymnt Form SOUTHLAKE TEXAS Your participation in a pub is meetings is va ued and citizens wishing to express their views can e ectronica y submit this Pub is Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. P ease specify where you wou d ike your comments to appear be ow and enter the required information. (***A comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the meeting date and 4 be proMed for the record') COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Counci or PZ Commission meetings onine oron the cab echanne rather than in person due to concerns reated to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item e ectronica y by ufi izing this Pub is Comment Form be ow. Public Meeting Date 1018/2020 Board Meeting* P a nn ng and Zon ng Comm ss on First and Last NNm Le gh Warnbsganss Address 2915 Burney Lane Phone. 8174560066 Emil I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6 joe ]A) I w speak n SUPPORT of th s tem r I w speak n OPPOSITION to th s tern r- I do not wsh to speak, but p ease record my: SUPPORT Signature: 6E The Conservation (ZA20-0049) November 17, 2020 Dear Mayor and Council Members, My name Jack Fredricks, along with my wife, Rose Fredricks and our family, we have lived in our property at 2960 Burney Ln for over 15 years and are registered voters in the City of Southlake. Today there is a significant request being brought forward to the City Council, the Conservation Development, which we are opposed to. I believe all property owners have the right to develop their property, within the guidelines of any restrictions attached to the land. However, I do not believe the Housmans’, or any other owner within Harbor Oaks, can arbitrarily rezone their platted lot within the Harbor Oaks Subdivision without violating the Harbor Oaks deed restrictions. Please note, I am not opposed to development, however I view this as a force fit this a non- neighborhood compliant development as proposed into Harbor Oaks negatively impacting from what it is today, to something it was not intended to be, is my objection. I have and will continue to request that a development with level of impact to our neighborhood be thoughtful in its approach and make sense for ourselves as taxpayers of Southlake, the delicate balance of this precious land around Lake Grapevine without negative impact to our lives and property values. The impact on my home and property is multiple. The biggest being the loss of value if this proposal is approved with a road that would surround my home and property on three sides. I am the single resident that has such an impact. We have our home here, not just a lot. No existing home would have such an impact. I believe that this should be a significant consideration of this proposed development. Based on the first reading, many issues were raised by myself and neighbors, reference my October letter; Two clear areas of concern were highlighted by you as members and ourselves as a community. Those being the access to the property and the density of the development. Given I was not fortunate enough to have most of you out at the site for a walk around, I wanted to supply photos to provide you, I hope, a better sense of the impact. These along with photos that are already on record I believe give you a better sense of the impact on our home and our opposition to the development. This first photo is from my back deck behind our pool, shooting towards the Northwest rear corner which is the critical entry point to the lower half of the development with sixty feet between my property line and the core of engineering property. As I mentioned in the previous meeting, the basin is significant. It is estimated that culvert placement will be fourteen to sixteen feet lower from a reference point of the Northeast corner of my property. I hope this provides you the scale of this critical water entry point into the dry creek that runs to Lake Grapevine. I requested details from Mr. Boyd on the build of the road at this point, which I have not received as of this writing. In reviewing the submission package, at least at the plot view, I highlight that the existing vegetation and trees will be completely removed not only at the street but also along the property line. This is a critical pressure point of the project for the following reasons: noise and traffic abutting to my property, significant erosion zone created by complete elimination of vegetation and trees, consolidation point of water during heavy rains creating high risk point of failure, and placement of mail services where each day owners will be stopping and starting for mail. As you will see in the photo taken from our back deck, I will have continuous traffic and noise with no natural blockage / screening from the cars. Some may say, just put up a wall, this gets back to our development and the natural approach that was taken to reduce walls and fences, fence only where necessary and open or low fencing approach leaving as much open space and approach as possible with low wild life impact. We have had the space to do this and it is the feel and design of Harbor Oaks. This second picture is to provide you a sense of traffic. I drove our mid-size SUV to the Northeast corner of the property to provide a visual of the corner and the basin slope and what our new view will be to demonstrate the impact. Of course, once the road is cut in through the basin, all of the area will be without vegetation, thus the impact will be much greater than shown. Also, I remind you that these cars will also be traveling the side of our property in close proximity to our home, (reference previous presentations for impact), I have been told, “no one will even notice that the development is back there”. I hope that this visual provides an understanding that it will be very noticeable. While, I have focused on specifics issues, I hope this information will provide context to the issues raised of access and density. The more density equals more traffic and impact on my homestead and household. The negative access proposed with a road surrounding our property on three sides will lower the value of our property. I thank you for your time and energy placed on this important project. I appreciate and thank you for the service to our community. In closing, I ask that you deny this proposal as submitted. Please consider, which I know you will, if this was your home of over fifteen years, in a unique neighborhood in Southlake. Is this the best approach and development that can be completed? I say no and ask you to vote no. Respectfully Jack & Rose Fredricks 2960 Burney Ln Southlake, TX. 76092 13 Cif Y "` SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* Planning and Zoning Commission First and Last Name Michelle Lonergan Address 2875 Burney Lane Fhone Emil I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6 i.e.,1A) r I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature:* SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record"*') COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVD-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* Planning and Zoning Commission First and Last f\tirre Scott Lonergan Address 2875 Burney Lane Phone 8587351692 Emil I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6 i.e.,1A) r I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature:* SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COV®-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council First and Last llarre Jay hartman Address 3540 Carmel ct F hone 817.239.4958 Erred 1110.111.111.1.11111* I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e 1A) f I will speak in SUPPORT of this item f I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item f•I do not wish to speak, but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature:* SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form13TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council Rrst and Last to Shinsoo Choo Address 1105 harbor haven st Southlake Rione 7148012466 Erred I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e.,1A) r I will speak in SUPPORT of this item 1 will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my: Comments: This is an opportunity to subrrit convents on any topic that is not scheduled for a public hearing or an item that is not on the agenda. 300 character knit) Signature:* SOUTHLAKE Public Comment FormelTEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council Rrst and Last tarre Mia choo Address 1105 harbor haven st southlake tx Rhone 7149446270 Email I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E Le.,1A) C I will speak in SUPPORT of this item F I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item C I do not wish to speak, but please record my: Comments: This is an opportunity to submit comrents on any topic that is not scheduled for a public hearing or an itemthat is not on the agenda. 300 character knit) Signature:* 13 Cil Y (7i SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council Frst and Last tine Kathleen Carrabine Address 961 Thousand Oaks Court Rhone 2149233369 Erred 11111.1111101110101.111.106 I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6e i.e.,1A) r I will speak in SUPPORT of this item C I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item r I do not wish to speak, but please record my: Comments: This is an opportunity to submit corments an any topic that is not scheduled for a public hearing or an item that is not on the agenda. 300 character knit) Signature:* 4466t L°° fhG SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVD-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council Rrst and Last Nbrre Hans Schroen Address 2895 Burney Lane Phone 2142807992 Erred I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e,1A) f I will speak in SUPPORT of this item C I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature: SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVD-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council First and Last t brre Brett Leedy Address 2920 Harbor Refuge Rion 8173129184 Email 41111.11111111111. I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e,1A) C I will speak in SUPPORT of this item r I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item r I do not wish to speak, but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature:* SOUTHLAKE Public Comment FormalTEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVD-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council First and Last tarre Julia Stantic Address 2895 Burney Lane Phone 9709469903 Erred 1011111111.11.111111110 I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i_e,1A) f I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature:* Cg) SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form13TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record') COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVD-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council Rrst and Last Nbrre Adrian Boyer Address 2900 Harbor Refuge Street Southlake Texas 76092 Fhone 8178257334 I I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e,1A) r I will speak in SUPPORT of this item f I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item r I do not wish to speak,but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature: lifru,. 4D.42yera Oar. SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form113TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVD-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council Rrst and Last Nkarre Heidi Leedy Address 2920 Harbor Refuge St,Southlake Fhone Bi I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e,1A) C I will speak in SUPPORT of this item fI will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature: ktiiik914 15,_ ,, : , ,,SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVD-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council Rrst and Last Narre Lisa Boyer Address 2900 Harbor Refuge Street Southlake Texas 76092 Frons 8179394060 Brad 4111111.11111111111111111111111111 I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e.,1A) C I will speak in SUPPORT of this item C I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item f•I do not wish to speak,but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature: e-` 74 SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council Hrst and Last Ntarre Xavier Soto Address 1065 Harbor Haven St. Southlake TX 76092 Rhone ErraiI I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e.,1A) r I will speak in SUPPORT of this item f I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item F I do not wish to speak,but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature:* X,avis sora SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record') COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council Rrst and Last tame Elena Soto Address 1065 Harbor Haven St.Southlake TX 76092 Rhone I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e.1A) f I will speak in SUPPORT of this item f I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature:* SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form131TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council First and Last Nkarre Arturo Soto Address 1065 Harbor Haven St.Southlake TX 76092 Ifione Email I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e.,1A) r I will speak in SUPPORT of this item C I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item ITI do not wish to speak, but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature:* A>ro51 la( , I , , ,. SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record') COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVD-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council Rrst and Last Narre Barbara Auyang Address 1065 Harbor Haven St. Rhone Erred I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e.,1A) C I will speak in SUPPORT of this item f I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item C:I do not wish to speak,but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature: SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form13TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council Frst and Last Ntarre Ken and Gloria Land Address 2900 Burney Ln Rione 8176803352 Email 401111111 I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e,1A) r I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature:* ar 'e'ot iz S `54UTHLAKE Public Comment Form TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* Planning and Zoning Commission Rrst and Last Narre Allan Hultin Address 1075 Harbor Haven Fione 817 488 8244 Ereil I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e,1A) C I will speak in SUPPORT of this item C I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item f•I do not wish to speak,but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature:* SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form13TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council First and Last Niarre Gregory Herman Address 855 Harbor Court Rlone 5038190498 Iii 11111/111/1//11 I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E Le.,1A) C I will speak in SUPPORT of this item C I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item C: I do not wish to speak,but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature:* t Oty sir SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form13TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council First and Last N rre Carlotta Petersen Address 1064 Harbor Retreat(corner of Burney) Fhone Errsil I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E 1A) r I will speak in SUPPORT of this item r I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item Or I do not wish to speak, but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature:* 44"41/1" SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council First and Last rhrre Dan McDowell Address 961 Thousand Oaks Ct Krone 2148932348 Ereil iniMERIMMINIM I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e,1A) C I will speak in SUPPORT of this item C I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature: SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form13TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record***) COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council Rrst and Last Narre Kollis Eastwood Address 3530 Carmel Ct Rhone 817-319- 1014 Email I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e.,1A) C I will speak in SUPPORT of this item f I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak,but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature:* as crux SOUTHLAKE Public Comment Form13TEXAS Your participation in all public meetings is valued and citizens wishing to express their views can electronically submit this Public Comment Form for any topic or agenda item. Please specify where you would like your comments to appear below and enter the required information. All comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m.on the meeting date and will be provided for the record*'') COVID-19 PUBLIC MEETING PROTOCOL Citizens have the option to watch the City Council or PZ Commission meetings online or on the cable channel rather than in person due to concerns related to the spread of COVID-19.Citizens wishing to address the City may submit comments on any topic or agenda item electronically by utilizing this Public Comment Form below. Public Meeting Date 11/17/2020 Board Meeting* City Council Rrst and Last Narre Martin Newby Address 2885 Burney Lane Fhone 941-400-1068 Erred I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item No.* 6E i.e,1A) r I will speak in SUPPORT of this item f I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item f•I do not wish to speak, but please record my: OPPOSITION Signature: 41 Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name:To,- ,5 r r s Date: it/ 7/ L Address: 3 v e 0 augN c Y 4.1v Phone: 2.ty_ 12 `t - 6 3 2 1 Include City and State) I I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# g 0 - 7 7 3 Z Q 2 O - 0 0 y y I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT V OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Canis-will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name:CEJ rt*.e NI Date: t 4'- 707 0 Address: `l . f 4'6.kg I1\- ' .," . %.“,01,4410 2(14 - .12 ` 1Phone. Include City and State) L I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item#-LA- 2 (] -ac,' (41 I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please r cord my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I1 I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone ' ,op rtuni i be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. i A 1 it 4 Signature: ,. 1 1 ,. .Required: duds-will not be read into e . i rd unless it is signed J Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. OName:f Date:r 41 t Address: 2 444 F " ` „ , 'd °` Phone: Y I" ''t94*- Include City and State) I I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item Y I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: /' i r F; Date: 1 l I 1'1 I. 4 Address:Phone: Include City and State) 1 I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limityour comments to 3 minutes. Signature: ,f Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: [..__ ,,";I p. ; ton, Date: / r 11 Address: (1. tef75 1..1 ; Phone: *Ill'< '414.X71.5 Include City and State) 1 .1 I wish to share my view pn an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I / I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed. Southla.ke City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: .. ._ ` U Date: Address: Phone: Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# (. (-4'4) I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature:_ Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: 1--f7s`[.... 4-eafril,1 Date: Li 67 /20 Address: '' 't t s 1. Phone: f Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: R r Agenda Item # Q(' `' I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: -C ?(,mDate: Address: r Phone:5-49794 Include City and State) I wish to share my vipws on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item # I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I i will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: er Required: Cards will not be read info the record unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: k 1 t tl .. Date: Address: /L go Ft,/1?W- Phone: ,4/ Include City and State) 4r I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item # (1 ) 4-- I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION II wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: 11 ri, • ""' Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name:l ' cAt. : Date: 1 117 /71Q2 €' 64. Address: Phone: Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item # L-f -:fr.) — I will speak in SUPPORT of this item will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an off"" rtunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: i 1 Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: 2.,4277 ?dk 7'S Date: //-•/7-1;70,440 Address: 65 3ksV / / "Phone:7 5IFf GiC Include City and State) '`'' I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# 7 Jr J 01/42j I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT >i< OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: 1 /`"/D! / 2 Date: I) -)7 212/20 r Address: £g 7 lsr721/ 2-11 'orf/d. C Phone:(2/v)876--/73k Include City and State) j I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# = 3 15 411ke_ D., I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION aI wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic &% t\ ;f\, A Niv0 kki i\or 6\ u /c-CCS Note: To allow everyone 'nil)?to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 mines. l,/Signature: Required: Cards ead into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting` Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: 1 Date: 6/. / Address:0 ti o /..)( v Phone:,_./c6" 5.- 5-1-9 79(7InclecilyandState) t c0 I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# " (£,F-, f' 1 will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: i Required: Cards,will notbe read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: ,-a uDate: I I 17 —2L'2() a... , i Address: .3 ‘Al )4%%n \ -4) S Phone: (3/7 k' .. i a Include City and State) I wish to share my views o_n an Agenda Item: Agenda Item # rr' is_` " 6 5 .$ t A`' a I will speak in SUPPORT of this item 1 W L fiO sP0- I will speak in OPPOSITION to this itemoIdonotwishtospeak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an o ortun' to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: t Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed 11111111111.1111.111r" Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: e' 1; .,,,, Date: 1 1 I Pr I 7--.0, 5 • r Address: 1 L 1), (E,) Vr-e ,-.s4 40 le: 0 % A —et i , ''.:4.-. ,issi, Phone: 3. „i l''' 7A di Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: --— „) /-,..— — —IL il Required: ,Cards well not be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. riReturn completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: /i 72.-D, .e."/70 AL Date: ,/7. f Address: kr-46 i&Phone: Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT I7. OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: C" Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed. A Nt. 3..u+ iiv.w.t wsb.w. : n, w,1;,* Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name:`, 1111, 44. k 44,e 1 Date: 0 ,Q Address: '4'`` Phone: ` '17 45 s$. Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: , Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: ` O._ti, vin 0 Vn. Date: 1 t Address: 0 S ;i. _- Phone: `5 ?:"1:,' Include City and State) VI wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone a portun' to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: r Required: Cards will:not be d into 1 •'record unlessit is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: /1 -9-1t "" C.Z5 Date: 1( it' Address: a :' r.. ' '/1, :. Phone:ci i 7—'// Include City and State)s RI wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# _- I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow veryone an opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. Signature: \ Required: Cards will,hot be read into the record unless it is signed Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Re completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: /"_ Date: \ ri Address: "" 14 74 7' ; 1 _ 1..Phone: Include City and State) i I" I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item # . ' I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyo a an op diunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. 11 Signature: r 1 1 Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed. Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: Date: 4' 411 ' o 6\P 46' -. 600 - Address: y Phone: y • Include City and State) 41 I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyonefan opportunity to be heard,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. r` dCr w Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed" Southlake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: 3 t A)t: Date:l Phone: aAddress: Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# 6/ I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: N:: a : lk1To everyone an ppo nity to be hear ,please limit your comments to 3 minutes. P Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed. Southiake City Council meeting Public Comment Form Please print. Return completed form to City Secretary prior to start of regular session. Name: , 1 i . Date: Address: -A Phone: ` ,, Include City and State) I wish to share my views on an Agenda Item: Agenda Item# I will speak in SUPPORT of this item I will speak in OPPOSITION to this item I do not wish to speak, but please record my SUPPORT OPPOSITION I wish to speak during Public Forum on an item not on tonight's agenda Topic: Note: To allow everyone an opportunity to be heard,please limityour comments to 3 minutes. Signature: Required: Cards will not be read into the record unless it is signed.