Loading...
Item 6D - PresentationThe Conservation (FKA Burney Estates) Item 6D ZA20-0049 (Ord. No. 480-773) ZA20-0049 OWNER:Marylyn Miles and Errol &Leslie Housmans APPLICANT:Rockwater Developments REQUEST:Approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan to develop 8 residential lots on approximately 13.1 acres. The applicant is requesting to rezone one existing “SF-1A” lot and one tract zoned “AG”Agricultural District,totaling approximately 13.1 acres. LOCATION:2970 Burney Lane and 3185 Southlake Park Dr. Regional Aerial Proposed Development Plan –Option A Proposed Development Plan –Option B Future Land Use Corps of Engineers Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Floodplain Comprehensive Plan Zoning AG SF-1A SF-20B Environmental Legend for environmental map: •thin blue lines –2-foot contours (elevations labeled in yellow) •thick blue line –creek (Kirkwood Branch) •orange shaded areas represent 100-year flood plain areas •transparent light blue shaded areas represent 500-year flood plain areas Environmental Legend for environmental map: •light green shaded areas represent existing tree cover •opaque light blue shaded areas represent tree preservation areas •thick blue line –creek (Kirkwood Branch) USACE Property Tree Preservation Plan –Option A Tree Preservation Plan –Option B Thoroughfare Plan Site Existing and Future Pathways/Trails/Parks Map Site Existing and Future Pathways/Trails/Parks Map Site Lot 6 –Common Area (Loch Meadow Estates) Plat –Loch Meadow Estates Harbor Court Trailhead / Huse Homeplace Option A Comparison Plan since 1st Reading Gross + Net Acreage Calculations 1st Reading Revised Submittal -City Council 2nd Reading Revised Submittal Option "A" –City Council 2nd Reading Revised Submittal Option "B" –City Council Lot Ac -Net Roadway (Access Easement) / Area above 572 Ac -Net Roadway Easement Only Gross Ac Ac -Net Roadway (Access Easement) / Area above 572 Ac -Net Roadway Easement Only Gross Ac Ac -Net Roadway (Access Easement) / Area above 572 Ac -Net Roadway Easement Only Gross Ac 1 48,651 48,990 50,696 48,286 48,616 50,696 47,016 47,349 50,696 2 50,497 95,692 100,359 50,237 87,763 92,845 50,237 87,763 92,845 3 45,028 55,671 57,862 45,391 58,949 61,023 45,391 58,949 61,023 4 44,282 64,380 67,006 43,621 76,766 82,397 43,621 76,766 82,397 5 49,040 84,198 88,998 43,584 66,925 68,977 43,584 66,925 68,977 6 51,898 51,898 54,524 58,530 58,530 61,355 58,530 58,530 61,355 7 57,753 58,431 70,711 60,526 61,480 72,953 60,526 61,480 72,953 10 (Harbor Oaks)66,519 66,519 80,255 66,500 66,500 80,255 64,286 64,286 80,255 Average Ac 51,708.50 65,722.38 71,301.38 52,084.38 65,691.13 71,312.63 51,648.88 65,256.00 71,312.63 Total Dev Ac 9.50 12.07 13.09 9.57 12.06 13.10 9.49 11.98 13.10 Average Lot 1.19 1.51 1.64 1.20 1.51 1.64 1.19 1.50 1.64 Total Ac 413,668.00 525,779.00 570,411.00 416,675.00 525,529.00 570,501.00 413,191.00 522,048.00 570,501.00 Du/Ac 0.842 0.663 0.611 0.836 0.663 0.611 0.843 0.668 0.611 Proposed Development Regulations The Conservation to follow SF-1A, with the following exceptions: Changes from 1st Reading Option “B” Only (cul-de-sac 1,008 feet) Open Space Management Plan Changes from 1st Reading Street View Images Looking SW towards the Housmans Lot Looking N towards the Housmans Lot Looking SW towards the Housmans Lot Proposed Master Plan –Option A Proposed Master Plan –Option B USACE Exhibit Yellow line = 572’ Existing Drainage Plan Option A Option B Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan Option A Option B Preliminary Utility Plan Option A Option B Applicant Provided Headlights Exhibit at 1st Reading Previous Zoning Case –Bella Lago ZA05-127 & ZA05-128) (9 Proposed Lots –8 new, 1 existing) Previous Zoning Case –Lake Forest ZA07-133 & ZA07-134 (5 Proposed Lots) ZA08-017 & ZA08-019 (3 Existing Lots) ZA08-018 (1 Existing Lot) •October 20, 2020; Approved (6-0)Subject to staff report dated October 13, 2020, and site plan review summary number 3, dated October 13, 2020 , –noting that the proposed development is for eight (8) residential lots on approximately 13.1 acres –that the access easement and street are proposed to be non-gated, open to public traffic, but privately maintained by the homeowner’s association –that no streetlights have been presented or will be allowed as part of this approval –the applicant’s willingness to present a drawing with moving the cul-de-sac to the west so that lots six (6) and seven (7) could be larger –also moving that cul-de-sac away from the existing home by the entrance that would be sided by street on three sides –the applicant’s willingness to present at second reading slides depicting the bar ditch versus a curb and gutter option –noting for second reading the applicant’s willingness to provide an entrance road further to the north on the Housmans’ lot –noting the applicant’s willingness for second reading to have the drainage engineer present to answer questions City Council 1st Reading Motion Questions?