Item 7Case No.
ZA20-0038
S T A F F R E P O R T
August 28, 2020
CASE NO: ZA20-0038
PROJECT: Site Plan for Carroll High School Addition
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: On behalf of Carroll ISD, Hart, Gaugler & Associates is requesting approval of a
Site Plan for Carroll High School Addition on property described as Lot 1, Block
1, Carroll ISD No. 2 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas, and located at 800 N. White Chapel Blvd., Southlake, Texas.
Current Zoning: “NR-PUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District.
SPIN Neighborhood #7.
DETAILS: The purpose of this request is to seek approval of a Site Plan for an
approximately 2,650 square foot one-story addition to Carroll High School.
VARIANCES
REQUESTED: Landscape Ord. No. 544, as amended, requires additional interior landscape
plantings based on the footprint of the addition. A variance is requested. The
variance to the bufferyard requirement in the variance request letter is not
required.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider approval of a Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated August 28, 2020
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
Presentation
Narrative
Variance Request Letter
Plans
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No. Attachment A
ZA20-0038 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Carroll ISD
APPLICANT: Hart, Gaugler & Associates
PROPERTY SITUATION: 800 N. White Chapel Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll ISD No. 2 Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Public/Semi-Public
CURRENT ZONING: “NR-PUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District.
HISTORY: -A zoning change and site plan (ZA97-002) from “AG” Agricultural to “N-
RPUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit Development was approved by
City Council April 15, 1997.
-A final plat for Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2, Carroll ISD No. 2
Addition was filed September 25, 1998.
-A revised site plan (ZA06-173) for an expansion was approved by City
Council January 2, 2007.
-A revised site plan (ZA10-032) for an expansion was approved by City
Council June 15, 2010.
SOUTHLAKE 2035 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2035 future land use designation for the site is “Public/Semi-Public.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Master Pathways Plan shows existing sidewalks along N. White
Chapel Blvd. and along the south property line.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: No changes to the existing traffic patterns are proposed.
TREE PRESERVATION: One tree is expected to be removed and five trees are shown as
marginal.
CITIZEN INPUT/
BOARD REVIEW: A SPIN meeting was held on August 25, 2020. A video of the meeting is
available on Video on Demand on the City’s website.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated August 28, 2020.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA20-0038 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0038 Page 1
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA20-0038 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 08/28/20
Project Name: Site Plan – Carroll High School Addition
APPLICANT: Hart, Gaugler and Associates OWNER: Carroll ISD
John D. Blacker John Haugen
12801 N. Central Expy, Suite 1400 2400 N. Carroll Ave.
Dallas, TX 75243 Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (972) 239-5111 Phone: (817) 949-8222
E-mail: jblacker@hartgaugler.com E-mail: john.haugen@southlakecarroll.edu
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY
ON 08/17/20 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE
HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,
PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
1. The variance to the bufferyard requirement in the variance request letter is not required.
* A variance to the interior landscape requirements of Landscape Ord. No. 544-B has been
requested.
* No approval of signs is intended with this Site Plan. All signs require approval of a separate
sign permit.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. Within the Tree Preservation Summary Chart provide the percentage of existing tree cover,
percentage of existing tree cover to be removed, and the percentage of existing tree cover to
remain.
* Only one (1) existing trees is shown to be removed and five (5) are designated marginal.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree
Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing
tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the
property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of
existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the
minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0038 Page 2
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall
consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and
Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City
Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the
Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so
as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including
mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer
residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to
this Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved
Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction
of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved
on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and
the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all
structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be
constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
* The applicant is requesting relief from the Landscape Ordinance 544-B interior landscape
requirements.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0038 Page 3
Existing buildings: Buildings in existence on the effective date of this ordinance shall be
considered legally nonconforming as it pertains to this ordinance. New construction greater in
size than 30% of the existing building or greater than 5,000 square feet shall require
compliance with this ordinance as it applies to the entire square footage of the existing building
and proposed addition. New construction intended to increase the square footage by less than
30% of the existing building or less than 5,000 square feet shall be required to meet the
requirements herein only as it pertains to the square footage of the new construction.
The proposed addition is less than 30% of the existing buildings footprint and less than 5,000
square feet. Landscape plant material is required to be provided for 30% of the proposed
building footprint area, 795 square feet.
2 – Canopy Trees
3 – Accent Trees
20 – Shrubs
119 sq.ft. – Ground Cover
16 sq.ft. – Seasonal Color
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Sandra Endy, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8033
E-mail: sendy@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. With the first submittal of Civil Construction Drawings, in addition to the proposed drainage
area map, please include an existing conditions drainage area map showing the entire school
property as well as existing drainage calculations.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard
details and general notes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000.
The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The
Environmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the
review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in:
https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP
shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0038 Page 4
report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
*= Denotes informational comments that will need to be addressed on the first submittal of the
Civil Construction Plans.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Since the building is equipped with an automatic fire protection system, proper sprinkler
system coverage must be continued into the new STEM addition.
Since the building is already equipped with audible and visual fire alarm devices, coverage
must be continued into the new STEM addition to maintain compliance with NFPA 72 and the
2018 International Fire Code, with the City of Southlake Amendments, throughout the building.
General Informational Comments
* A virtual SPIN meeting was held on August 25, 2020.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is
required prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site
plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and
all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park
Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale
water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to
pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based
on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to
review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine
the fee amount.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA20-0038 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1. YETMAN, BERT M AG 351 W HIGHLAND ST 0.72 NR
2. WILLIAMS, VAN V SF20A 125 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.49 NR
3. WELSCHMEYER, MARK SF20A 145 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.46 NR
4. WEAVER, RON SF20A 165 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.46 NR
5. FRENCH AND SONS, LLC SF20A 185 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.46 NR
6. HODAN, DANIEL SF20A 205 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.46 NR
7. MATTIACE, MICHAEL SF20A 225 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.46 NR
8. COMUNALE, LAWRENCE SF20A 245 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.47 NR
9. MEACHAM, JEREMY C SF20A 265 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.47 NR
10. CERONE, CHRISTOPHER SF20A 285 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.47 NR
11. STONE, DAVID P SF20A 305 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.47 F
12. EUBANKS, DANIEL SF20A 404 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.47 NR
13. ANDERSON, RYAN SF20A 408 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.46 NR
14. SPIETH, JOEL D SF20A 412 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.49 NR
15. LAVEROCK, HUGH SF20A 416 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.48 NR
16. MORGAN, BOB SF20A 420 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.49 NR
17. BONANNO, JAMES J SF20A 608 CHAPEL CT 1.32 NR
18. COSCIA, PAUL SF20A 401 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.47 NR
19. BOUBEKRI, NOURREDINE SF20A 700 BRIARRIDGE RD 0.46 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA20-0038 Page 2
20. TOURE, MOHAMED SF20A 705 BRIARRIDGE RD 0.56 NR
21. CELLUCCI, RACHEL SF20A 705 TRUELOVE TRL 0.46 NR
22. WALKER, DERALD W SF20A 700 TRUELOVE TRL 0.43 NR
23. CARROLL, ISD NRPUD 800 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 45.38 NR
24. HOWLE, JOHN A SF20A 325 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.47 NR
25. DICKEY, TRAVIS SF20A 400 W CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.47 NR
26. PATY, BARBARA ANN AG 1000 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 2.05 NR
27. CAMPBELL FAMILY TRUST AG 335 W HIGHLAND ST 0.71 NR
28. CARROLL, ISD NRPUD 900 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 2.79 NR
29. COLE, THOMAS C SF20A 103 ASCOT DR 0.47 NR
30. CHALLGREN, KIRK SF20A 101 ASCOT DR 0.54 NR
31. DORMAN, DIANNE LOUISE SF20A 100 ASCOT DR 0.48 NR
32. WALLACE, HEATHER D SF20A 102 ASCOT DR 0.45 NR
33. MOHIUDDIN, SYED SF20A 100 BELMONT PLACE CIR 0.50 NR
34. FLORY, CURT A SF20A 101 BELMONT PLACE CIR 0.53 NR
35. SENEVIRATNE, SUCHETHA N SF20A 102 BELMONT PLACE CIR 0.52 NR
36. LEDBETTER, BOB SF20A 100 CHURCHILL CIR 0.58 NR
37. EGEL, RAMON W SF20A 101 CHURCHILL CIR 0.57 NR
38. SMITH, DOUGLAS M SF20A 102 CHURCHILL CIR 0.54 NR
39. ZERBE, STEPHEN J SF20A 101 E CHAPEL DOWNS DR 0.47 F
40. KEENE, J RANDALL SF1-A 525 W HIGHLAND ST 4.95 NR
41. DUNN, NINA LOUISE AG 960 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.46 NR
42. DUNN, NINA LOUISE AG 950 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.06 NR
43. DORIN, PAUL SF1-A 1101 LINNEA LN 0.99 NR
44. CARROLL, ISD CS 801 SHADY OAKS DR 28.98 NR
45. MCCLELLAND, DAVID SF1-A 479 W HIGHLAND ST 4.88 NR
46. YETMAN, BERT M SF1-A 459 W HIGHLAND ST 4.84 NR
47. BISHOP, BRUCE SF1-A 1100 LINNEA LN 1.47 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Forty-Seven (47)
Responses received: Two (2)
Case No. Attachment D
ZA20-0038 Page 3
Case No. Attachment D
ZA20-0038 Page 4