Loading...
Item 7A and 7B - Letters, e-mails and survey responsesJan. 27, 2020 Re: High Density Living in Southlake Dear: Mayor Hill, and City Council members: Ronell Smith (Place 4) Shahid Shafi (Place 1) Sean McKaskill (Place 2) Huffman (Place 5), Christopher Archer (Place 6) and Chad Patton (Place 3) Planning and Zoning Chairman Kubiak, Vice Chair, Greer and Planning and Zoning Members: Torres-Lepp, Springer Rothmeier Dyche, and Phalen I would like to thank you for your continued volunteerism as public officials for the City of Southlake. Having considered running as a City Council member in the past, I recognize that you all have a special and unique role to play in the development and preservation of our beautiful city. I know it takes countless hours of unpaid time away from your family and friends and a selfless dedication to make our city what it is today. I am grateful to you for your public service and for all you do for Southlake. I have seen both the presentation from Cooper and Co. during the town forum and the facebook live session from councilmen Huffman and McCaskill regarding the proposed "Lake District" project and wanted to take a moment and write about my concerns about rezoning of the land. We have been residents of Southlake for nearly 16 years. We lived here before most of Town Square was developed, when Central Market, Park Place Village, Estes Park and Carrillon were grassy fields filled with wildlife and when there were acres and acres of undeveloped land all over the city. And although the city footprint has drastically changed and many new buildings and subdivisions have been built, we are still proud of the choice we made all those years ago to buy a house and live in Southlake. We, like many of our neighbors invested in this community over ones in Ft. Worth (where my husband commutes to everyday) Colleyville, Keller, Flower Mound and N. Richland Hills for two primary reasons 1. The sense of family and community Southlake has because of its small town, country -like feel and 2. The exemplary and intimate 1 -mascot school district where everyone in every school here is a Carroll Dragon from day 1. I have not found another city anywhere in the country that has these two special and unique features. It has been a wonderful place for us to put down roots, start our family and raise our children. In my opinion, the thought of allowing high-density multi -family apartments per the newest proposal by Copper and Co. to be built in this unique, family -centered city would destroy the community people are moving here to enjoy. There is no value in adding high-density residential housing to any of us who currently live here. I don't believe the city master plan included multi -family high-density dwellings to be built in the proposed area and zoning should not be changed to allow them to be built there now. I don't believe we should allow high-density residential dwellings for two primary reasons (and please note they are the same reasons my family chose to move here to enjoy). First, we cannot support the increase in number of students who attend CISD. During my time as a volunteer within CISD, I saw studies done within our district that calculated the number of children per household based on the assessed value of the house(s). For example, in my neighborhood, each home is expected to bring in an average of 3 elementary/intermediate school -aged kids to CISD. I believe that this study also took into account that CISD has one of the largest student -per - roof numbers in the entire country but if it didn't, then that number should be even higher. A significant majority of the buyers in Southlake are families and they move here primarily because of the schools. If the apartments (which when all 15% of the discussed high-density units are complete could reach nearly 1K), were to follow those same metrics, our schools will be unable to provide infrastructure for all of the kids the Lake District would bring. Mind you, if those calculations are modest and there is no legal oversight to the number of people allowed to live in each room within the apartments, we could be adding 3+ kids per apartment and a plethora of cars with not enough "assigned" places to park. We could be inviting 3,000+ new students from the proposed "Lake District" into CISD without the infrastructure to support them. The developers projected number of only adding a maximum of 35- 53 new students to the highly sought after and exemplary CISD district is laughable! Our schools are already overcrowded, underfunded and landlocked. We are still trying to place all the new-to-Southake residents that have moved here in the last 20 years because the school district was unprepared (but knew they were coming per our city master plan) to accommodate them. So, we continue to push city and school bonds to try and catch up with the development (newly completed and in progress) and all our new residents. I realize we have no way to pre -determine who will move into these proposed apartments. However, we as long time residents can make highly educated guesses based on who is and who has been moving in and out of Southlake on a regular basis for years --families. With that said, what happens to the open enrollment Southlake students and staff/faculty kids who are only allowed to attend CISD schools if there is space in the schools for them? What about the grandparent clause? Will they get pushed out to accommodate any new students who move in to these or any other high-density dwellings who have priority into the district they are zoned to? Will re -zoning become an issue again? Will CISD be forced to build more schools (including a true 2nd rival high school that no doubt will NOT be the Carroll Dragons) to accommodate the new students? Will the school district be forced to add more busses to get these new students to and from school (including the shuttle that goes back and forth between the high school and senior high every period) to our already overcrowded streets? I'm not asking you to know the answers to any of these questions because they will be determined by our school board but these questions will need to be answered if we allow high-density residential into Southlake and add thousands more students into our district. I as a parent of 2 CISD students, a homeowner and tax payer want to know how this development and others like this will shape what Southlake schools and our city infrastructure will be forced to deal with if we add high density housing to our city. That brings me to my second concern for adding high-density apartments to Southlake--losing precious green -space, our country -like feel and dealing with limited infrastructure, city resources and topography challenges. The traffic on all of our main city streets (1709, Peytonville/Davis, Carroll, White Chapel, Kimball, Continental and so on) during commute/school hours and even in the middle of the day is horrendous making kids (even on busses) late to school and the city infrastructure (roads, water, gas, electric, other city services, etc.) would simply not be able to support this excessive and unavoidable population growth. Once we open the door to apartments for rent and developer variance changes, you are setting the precedence that our city encourages variance changes and high-density living. We will invite more builders to find creative ways to build more dwellings like that and the charm and sense of community and intimacy that makes Southlake unique will disappear. If our current population is 32,269 residents (per Community Impact Magazine -Jan. 2020) and our expected build out is 30,000-34,000 but we keep adding more residential housing to our city than we planned for how are we going to support them, their students, their water, sewer, gas, electric, and transportation needs? The proposed Lake District would add between 1,000-4,000 residents alone and there is still more undeveloped land in Southlake. I urge you deny the "Lake District" zoning changes because they will bring irreparable and long-term consequences for our city. Cooper and Co. as a company, invested in building Town Square because they saw it as a business investment and I have no doubt they believe it will be a great asset to our city despite the majority of Southlake residents that do not believe it will. Just because they have a new vision and an opportunity for a larger return on investment for the land i.e. by adding apartments, does not mean we owe them a variance. The proposed development would add absolutely nothing of value to our city and is not worth the sacrifice. I certainly don't want Southlake, our home, to turn into another Grapevine, Coppell, Allen, Plano, Frisco, Colleyville, Keller, Trophy Club, or N. Richland Hills. For these reasons and more, I ask you NOT to allow them to change the zoning from C-3 to allow apartments/multi-family rentals and instead encourage them to finish building out Town Square as per their original, approved design. If we only have space to add another 2,000-4,000 residents to our city to finish the build out, then we should carefully consider using the remaining land to its highest and best use. In closing, I thank you again for your public service as city leaders and respectfully ask that you continue spending your remaining time on counsel doing your best to continue protecting the Southlake we love. Please continue to preserve our sense of community and all of our Dragons by NOT approving any high-density living in Southlake. Thank you! Jessica Heintz 1433 Sandstone Court Southlake, TX 76092 1/27/2020 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: Apartments in Southlake IDS©UTHLAKE Richard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: Apartments in Southlake 1 message Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.south Iake.tx.us> Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 8:08 AM To: Richard Schell <rscheII@ci.south lake.tx.us>, Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.south Iake.tx.us> ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Date: a, an at Subject: Apartments in Southlake To: <jpotts@ci.south lake.tx.us> NO!!! Please, please, please! No apartments in Southlake. Especially in an area where traffic and parking is already overloaded. Jerry Costin Southlake, TX 214.418.4549 (c) Sent from my iPad Pro 10 Jerod Potts Policy & Strategic Initiative Principal Planner City of Southlake I Planning and Development Services P: (817) 748-8195 1 F: (817) 748-8077 1 E: jpotts@ci.south lake.tx.us Please take a moment to complete our customer service survey: Link https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=178f934086&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3Al656890692992114655%7Cmsg-f%3Al6568906929921... 1/1 1/27/2020 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: SUPPORT for Downtown Residences, SPIN2020-02 IDSOUTHLAKE Richard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: SUPPORT for Downtown Residences, SPIN2020-02 1 message Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.south Iake.tx.us> Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 8:10 AM To: Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Richard Schell <rschelI@ci.south Iake.tx.us> ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Joanne Viola Date: Fri, Jan 24, 20 at Subject: SUPPORT for Downtown Residences, SPIN2020-02 To: <jpotts@ci.south lake.tx.us>, <mayor@ci.south Iake.tx.us>, <place1 @ci.southlake.tx.us>, <place2@ci.southlake.tx.us>, <place3@ci.south Iake.tx.us>, <place4@ci.south lake.tx.us>, <pIace5@ci.south lake.tx.us>, <place6@ci.southlake.tx.us>, <frank.bliss@cooper.company>, <denise.carino@cooper.company> To: Southlake City Council & Cooper & Company 1/24/2020 From: Robert Dellamura & Joanne Viola 350 Central Avenue #201 Southlake, Texas 76092 817-880-3431 817-454-4098 Reference: SPIN2020-02 SPIN Town Hall Forum Tuesday, January 28, 2020 The Community Engagement Committee will be hosting a SPIN (Southlake Program for the Involvement of Neighborhoods) Town Hall Forum. 1. SPIN2020-02 — An applicant is proposing to develop 350 downtown residences on approximately 7.3 acres located on the east side of N. Carroll Ave. between Division St. and Federal Way (addressed as 401 N. Carroll Ave. per Tarrant Appraisal District) in Southlake Town Square within SPIN Neighborhood #8. Dear Southlake City SPIN Board, Mayor & Councilmembers, During the past 3 years we have had the opportunity to purchase and be part of the development of the Parkview Residences in the Southlake Town Square. We have purchased unit #201 and are looking forward to the project's completion. First, we would like to thank the City of Southlake for continuing to develop the Town Square utilizing high standards. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=l 78f934086&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1656890857822246660%7Cmsg-f%3A16568908578222... 1/2 1/27/2020 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: SUPPORT for Downtown Residences, SPIN2020-02 Several of the reasons we choose to have a residence in Southlake is: The City's past reputation for quality retail & housing standards. 2. The proximity to the DFW Airport, 121, 114 & the 635 business corridors. 3. The town's high standard ISD 4. We enjoy White's Chapel UMC As retail continues to transition with online shopping and home delivery and as the town's population ages and life expectancy increase, Southlake should considered developing a long term plan that addresses the need for high quality mature alternative and urban living options within 76092. Joanne and I have five grown children and are empty nesters. We are in the top 1 -to -10 percent income bracket. Maintaining large older homes and properties seems increasingly less attractive to us as time moves on. We are currently in our late 50s. Our condo at Parkview, in a vibrant upper scale town center is a logical next step. Our primary homes are located in Fort Worth, 76109, near TCU and the town center at The Shops at Clearfork, developed along the Trinity River (https://www.edwardsranchl848.com/). This modern, ultra-high end retail, professional, residential and high density development seems to fit the nickname "A One Percenter's Town Center". https://www.simon.com/mall/the-shops-at-clearfork So the three points we would like you to consider, as you review the request to develop the 350 ultra-high end Southlake Downtown Residences, are: 1. Will this new development align with the needs of those within 76092, as the population ages and would like to maintain a 76092 presence? We think `Yes'. 2. Will this new development align with the needs of higher income and younger professionals looking to transition to 76092? We think that it could. 3. Will this new development be purveyed into an opportunity to inspire future generations rather than a detractor? We think this is an opportunity to demonstrate inclusiveness. Realizing that if communities don't grow and understand future needs, they risk becoming irrelevant and less desirable. It is our hope that Southlake's vision for excellence inspires all involved to embrace what the future may hold. May openness, inclusiveness and vision prevail! We support Cooper & Company's Downtown Residence proposal and we hope that you will too! Sincerely, Bob Dellamura & Joanne Viola Jerod Potts Policy & Strategic Initiative Principal Planner City of Southlake Planning and Development Services P: (817) 748-8195 F: (817) 748-8077 1 E: jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us Please take a moment to complete our customer service survey: Link https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=l 78f934086&view=pt&search=al I&permthid=thread-f%3A1656890857822246660%7Cmsg-f%3A16568908578222... 2/2 1/29/2020 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: southlake citizens opposed to high density 19S©UTHLAKE Richard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: southlake citizens opposed to high density 1 message Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.south Iake.tx.us> Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:28 AM To: Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Richard Schell <rschelI@ci.south Iake.tx.us>, Selena Serrano <sserrano@ci.south lake.tx. us> ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Date: ue, an a Subject: southlake citizens opposed to high density To: jpotts@ci.south lake.tx.us <jpotts@ci.south lake.tx.us> Please accept this email as vote against apartments. Kristi Sosa 2009 Woodbury Ct Southlake TX 76092 972-352-0921 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Jerod Potts Policy & Strategic Initiative Principal Planner City of Southlake I Planning and Development Services P: (817) 748-8195 1 F: (817) 748-8077 1 E: jpotts@ci.south lake.tx.us Please take a moment to complete our customer service survey: Link https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=l 78f934086&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1657080739156084090%7Cmsg-f%3A16570807391560... 1/1 1/28/2020 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Re: SPIN mtg. IUSOUTHLAKE Richard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us> Re: SPIN mtg. 1 message MICHAEL SPINOZZI Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 8:26 PM To: Jerod Potts <jpotts ci.sout a ce.tx.us> Cc: Richard Schell <rschelI@ci.south Iake.tx.us>, Selena Serrano <sserrano@ci.south lake.tx.us> Thanks Jerod! Richard and Selena, Below are my comments regarding the proposal for the downtown residences. I would appreciate you including these in any packets and also sending along as appropriate the planning and zoning commission and city council. I return to town on 2/11/20 and hope to attend the planning and zoning commission and city council meetings. I am strongly opposed to this proposal for the following reasons: First, the population density that this proposal creates would have a negative impact on Southlake. This is not only the number of additional households this project adds but also the high level of expected turnover that is expected in a rental community (typically 50% annual turnover). This significant increase in density and activity would over burden city infrastructure and resources. Second, I am strongly opposed to any rental units in the city of Southlake. We have a strong sense of community in Southlake and residents who are willing to be engaged and intervene in city problems and issues. This sense of community is largely due to the demographics of Southlake and the fact that residents are homeowners and vested in the community. These city strengths can be negatively impacted by adding a highly transit, renter segment to the population. This project will bring a temporary, transient presence that does not have a long term interest in the city and presents far more risk than benefit to the city. Third, I believe the statistics suggest that as renter presence increases - so does the risk of crime and other negative activity. We should not expose the city of Southlake to this risk. We should not burden city services and resources pr expose citizens to this risk . Fourth, I fail to see the benefit of this proposal. I am not aware of a strong, unmet need for rental property in the city of Southlake. If there is a need for additional residential housing in this area then I would recommend premium condo ownership options. Southlake is a unique city with a strong sense of community and an excellent quality of life. It was built over time and benefitted from good vision and decision making by it's council and leadership. This proposal represents a huge step in the wrong direction and sets a dangerous precedent. I would encourage all city decision makers to reject this project and protect the quality of life that many have worked to establish and that your citizens enjoy. As an active member of the community and resident of the city for 14 years I am confident that my views are help by the great majority of Southlake citizens. Please vote to protect that citizen base and reject this proposal. Thank you. Sincerely, Michael Spinozzi 915A Emerald blvd., Southlake On Jan 27, 2020, at 10:17 AM, Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.south lake.tx.us> Michael, Thank you for reaching out. SPIN is one of the very first steps in the development process. SPIN is an informal meeting intended for community members to have a conversation with a developer on a project proposal, in a Q&A format. No https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=178f934086&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3Al656895038806059189%7Cmsg-f%3Al 6569371190251... 1/2 1/28/2020 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Re: SPIN mtg. votes will be taken at SPIN. What I would recommend doing if you are unable to attend this meeting but want to make sure your comments are represented, would be to send an email to the Planning & Zoning Commission and/or Southlake City Council. You may do so by sending an email. The links below contain email address information where you may reach out to these elected and appointed officials. I have also copied the case planner for this proposal, Richard Schell, as well as the Secretary for the Planning & Zoning Commission, Selena Serrano to this response. If you send your comments to one of those staff members, they will also be included in a meeting packet and forwarded to the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council. Here is a link to the City Council webpage: https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/246/City-Council Here is a link to the Planning & Zoning Commission webpage: https://www.cityofsou thlake.com/258/Planning-Zoning-Commission You may stream the SPIN meeting using the City's Video on Demand (VOD) application. A link to that resource is below. If you are unable to stream live through VOD but would like to watch later, the video from these meetings are typically available with 24-48 hours of a meeting. https://www.cityofsouthIake.com/332/0n-Demand-Video The proposal for the Downtown Residences is scheduled for a Public Hearing at the next Planning & Zoning Commission meeting, which will be held on Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 6:30 PM in the Southlake Town Hall Council Chambers. You may visit the webpage that has been set up to provide more information about this proposal. That link is below. The item is currently on schedule to be presented before the City Council on February 18, 2020 (first reading) and on March 3, 2020 (second reading). https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2768/Town-Square-Residential-Development Please let me know if there is anything else I can help you with, or if you have any further questions. Respectfully, On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 7:11 PM MICHAEL SPINOZZI wrote: Hi Jerrod, I am writing in regard to the SPIN meeting scheduled for 1/28 that discusses the residential apartment proposal for the town square area. I will be out of town and unable to attend the meeting. I have very strong views about this project and would like them represented at this meeting. How am I able to communicate my position to those in attendance? I am a 14 year resident of Southlake and would like to participate in this process. Thank you Mike Spinozzi Jerod Potts Policy & Strategic Initiative Principal Planner City of Southlake I Planning and Development Services P: (817) 748-8195 1 F: (817) 748-8077 1 E: jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us Please take a moment to complete our customer service survey: Link https://mai l.google.com/mail/u/0?i k=178f934086&view=pt&search=al I&permthid=thread-f%3Al 656895038806059189%7Cmsg-f%3Al 6569371190251... 2/2 1/29/2020 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: Fw: SPIN2020-02 Meeting 1/28/20 - IDS©UTHLAKE Richard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: Fw: SPIN2020-02 Meeting 1/28/20 - 1 message Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.south Iake.tx.us> Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:28 AM To: Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Richard Schell <rschelI@ci.south Iake.tx.us>, Selena Serrano <sserrano@ci.south lake.tx. us> ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Date: Wed, Jan 29, 2U20 a Subject: Fw: SPIN2020-02 Meeting 1/28/20 - To: <Ipotts(a)ci.south lake.tx.us> Cc: Sent from my BlackBerry - the most secure mobile device From: Sent: anuary To: 'pottts(abci.southlake.tx.us; mayor@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc: frank.bliss@cooper.company Subjec : - 2 Meeting 1/28/20 - Hello, In reference to Tuesday's SPIN2020-02 meeting, related to the proposed SL Downtown Residences, though the developer is a long term and trusted partner for the SL town square the majority of residence seemed to voice a similar tone against the project. NIMBY syndrome seems to be alive a well, which could be a good or bad thing. Time will tell. As the SL town square ages, retail turns more online and casual dining lags... the SL town square may slowly transition to just another wayward post retail destination. Cities that don't continue grow and develop, aligning for future needs, risk becoming irrelevant. There was also lot of talk about the CISD. The CISD is a good one, but the well off can generally send their children to equally highly rated and prestigious private schools by choice. CISD 'protection' sounded like 'segregation' by legislation. So time will tell if all the NIMBYs are acting with clarity and vision. Do they really represent the majority? I am for the SL Downtown Residences, as future housings needs transition to a more manageable scope and scale. We know that with Southlake's talent and resources at the ready additional high end, high value, four -five star housing/life style options are possible! Villas, The Brownstones, Parkview Residences and now The Downtown Residences. Way to Go Southlake! Best Regards, Robert Dellamura https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=178f934086&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3Al657080704255579458%7Cmsg-f%3Al 6570807042555... 1/2 1/29/2020 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: Fw: SPIN2020-02 Meeting 1/28/20 - 350 Central Avenue #201 Southlake, TX 76092 817-880-3431 Sent from my BlackBerry - the most secure mobile device Jerod Potts Policy & Strategic Initiative Principal Planner City of Southlake Planning and Development Services P: (817) 748-8195 F: (817) 748-8077 1 E: jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us Please take a moment to complete our customer service survey: Link https://mai l.google.com/mail/u/0?i k=178f934086&view=pt&search=al I&permthid=thread-f%3Al 657080704255579458%7Cmsg-f%3Al 6570807042555... 2/2 1/27/2020 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: "Downtown Residences now that is SPIN ... IDS©UTHLAKE Richard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: "Downtown Residences ....... now that is SPIN ... 1 message Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.south Iake.tx.us> Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 8:09 AM To: Richard Schell <rscheII@ci.south lake.tx.us>, Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.south Iake.tx.us> ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Date: at, .an -_, __-- at ::.. AM Subject: "Downtown Residences now that is SPIN To: <jpotts@ci.south lake.tx.us> Jerod Potts Policy & Strategic Initiative Principal Planner City of Southlake Planning and Development Services P: (817) 748-8195 F: (817) 748-8077 1 E: jpotts@ci.south lake.tx.us Please take a moment to complete our customer service survey: Link https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=l 78f934086&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1656890751511745902%7Cmsg-f%3A16568907515117... 1/1 1/29/2020 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: New comment on your survey: City of Southlake Survey IDS©UTHLAKE Richard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: New comment on your survey: City of Southlake Survey 1 message Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.south Iake.tx.us> Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:28 AM To: Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Richard Schell <rschelI@ci.south Iake.tx.us>, Selena Serrano <sserrano@ci.south lake.tx. us> ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Pilar Schank <pschank@ci.southlake.tx.us> Date: Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 8:31 PM Subject: Fwd: New comment on your survey: City of Southlake Survey To: Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.south Iake.tx.us>, Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.south Iake.tx.us> Cc: Jessica McBride <jmcbride@ci.south lake.tx.us> FYI Thank you, Pilar Schank City of Southlake Begin forwarded message: From: Date: January 28, 2020 at 8:30:31 PM CST To: pschank@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: New comment on your survey: City of Southlake Survey Reply -To: New comment(s) on your survey: City of Southlake Survey How are we doing? 28-01-2020 20:29:39 Southlake Program for the Involvement of Neighborhoods (SPIN) Southlake, TX - Official Website https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/825/SPIN The city was originally built on low density Housing with no hotels and P; no apartments. What is happening? Why are we even having a SPIN meeting about 350 residents on 7.2 acres this should just be tossed right out as even an acceptable option. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=l 78f934086&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1657080721641402516%7Cmsg-f%3A16570807216414... 1/2 1/29/2020 Ci. south lake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: New comment on your survey: City of Southlake Survey Jerod Potts Policy & Strategic Initiative Principal Planner City of Southlake Planning and Development Services P: (817) 748-8195 F: (817) 748-8077 1 E: jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us Please take a moment to complete our customer service survey: Link https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=l 78f934086&view=pt&search=al I&permthid=thread-f%3A1657080721641402516%7Cmsg-f%3A16570807216414... 2/2 1/29/2020 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: New comment on your survey: City of Southlake Survey IDS©UTHLAKE Richard Schell <rschell@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: New comment on your survey: City of Southlake Survey 1 message Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.south Iake.tx.us> Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:29 AM To: Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Richard Schell <rschelI@ci.south Iake.tx.us>, Selena Serrano <sserrano@ci.south lake.tx. us> ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Pilar Schank <pschank@ci.southlake.tx.us> Date: Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 8:21 PM Subject: Fwd: New comment on your survey: City of Southlake Survey To: Ken Baker <kbaker@ci.south Iake.tx.us>, Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.south Iake.tx.us> Cc: Jessica McBride <jmcbride@ci.south lake.tx.us> Ken and Jerod, FYI Thank you, Pilar Schank City of Southlake Begin forwarded message: From: Date: January 28, 2020 at8:17:33 PM CST To: pschank@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: New comment on your survey: City of Southlake Survey Reply -To: New comment(s) on your survey: City of Southlake Survey How are we doing? 28-01-2020 20:17:06 Southlake, TX - Official Website I Official Website https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/ I don't want any more condos or high to medium density housing. It will add too much traffic and I find it ridiculous that the city attempted to prevent large acreage from not being able to subdivide under 2 to 3 acres but would even consider 350 homes on 7.2 acres. Jerod Potts https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=l 78f934086&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1657080759190562470%7Cmsg-f%3A16570807591905... 1/2 1/29/2020 Ci. south lake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: New comment on your survey: City of Southlake Survey Policy & Strategic Initiative Principal Planner City of Southlake Planning and Development Services P: (817) 748-8195 F: (817) 748-8077 1 E: jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us Please take a moment to complete our customer service survey: Link https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O?ik=l 78f934086&view=pt&search=al I&permthid=thread-f%3A1657080759190562470%7Cmsg-f%3A16570807591905... 2/2