Item 8Case No.
ZA20-0005
S T A F F R E P O R T
January 31, 2020
CASE NO: ZA20-0005
PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for The Wheelhouse
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: On behalf of Mark W. and Melva G. Stanfield, Wyndham Properties is
requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for Lots 1-7, Block 1, Wheelhouse
Addition on property described as Tracts 6C01A, 6C02, 6C and 6C03, Jesse G.
Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and
located at 880 – 950 Davis Blvd. (F.M. 1938), Southlake, Texas. Current
Zoning: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District and "I-1" Light Industrial District.
SPIN Neighborhood #11.
DETAILS: The proposed development is located on the west side of Davis Blvd. (F.M.
1938) approximately 600 feet north of the intersection with Union Church Rd.
The purpose of this item is to seek approval of a Preliminary Plat in
conformance with the Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for The
Wheelhouse (ZA19-0033) that was approved by City Council on September 3,
2019.
On September 3, 2019, City Council approved a Zoning Change and Site Plan
for the Wheelhouse to develop two single-story buildings along Davis Blvd.
totaling approximately 19,461 square feet with limited “I-1” Light Industrial
District uses to also include office showroom with retail sales and automobile
and motorcycle sales and/or service uses and three single-story buildings
behind totaling approximately 47,629 square feet with garage, maintenance of
personal vehicles, storage uses and hobby shop for personal use only on
approximately 6.235 acres. New facades were approved for the two existing
industrial buildings on the property totaling approximately 18,745 square feet
with uses also limited to garage, maintenance of personal vehicles, storage and
hobby shop for personal use only. The “S-P-1” boundary includes Lot 6 as an
open space lot and Lot 7 retains the “I-1” Light Industrial District zoning.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider approval of a Preliminary Plat
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated January 30, 2020
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
Presentation
Plans
Case No.
ZA20-0005
2035 Corridor Planning Committee report dated January 24, 2019
SPIN report dated August 13, 2019
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No. Attachment A
ZA20-0005 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Mark W. and Melva G. Stanfield
APPLICANT: Wyndham Properties
PROPERTY SITUATION: 880 – 950 Davis Blvd. (F.M. 1938)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 6C01A, 6C02, 6C and 6C03, Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No.
18
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use, 100-Year Floodplain and Medium Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: "S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District and "I-1" Light Industrial District
HISTORY: - The existing home at 950 Davis Blvd. was built in 1972 (Source: TAD).
- The property was annexed into the City in 1987 and given the “AG”
Agricultural zoning designation.
- A Zoning Change (ZA93-007) from “AG” Agricultural District to “I-1”
Light Industrial District was approved April 20, 1993 for the existing
tracts at 880 Davis Blvd.
- A previous home at 900 Davis Blvd. was removed around 2014.
- A Zoning Change and Site Plan for The Wheelhouse (ZA19-0033)
from "I-1" Light Industrial District and “AG” Agricultural District to "S-P-1"
Detailed Site Plan District and "I-1" Light Industrial District was approved
by City Council on September 3, 2019.
SOUTHLAKE 2035 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2035 future land use designations for the site are primarily “Mixed
Use” and “100-Year Floodplain” with a small portion of one of the
proposed open space lots designated as “Medium Density Residential”.
Purpose and Definition (Mixed Use): The purpose of the Mixed Use
land use category is to provide an option for large-scale, master-
planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses such as
office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses. The range
of activities permitted, the diverse natural features, and the varying
proximity to thoroughfares of areas in the Mixed Use category
necessitates comprehensively planned and coordinated development.
New development must be compatible with and not intrusive to existing
development. Further, special attention should be placed on the design
and transition between different uses.
Typically, the Mixed Use designation is intended for medium- to higher-
intensity office buildings, hotels, commercial activities, retail centers, and
residential uses. Nuisance-free, wholly enclosed light manufacturing and
assembly uses that have no outdoor storage are permitted if designed
to be compatible with adjacent uses. Other suitable activities are those
permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, Low
Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Retail Commercial,
and Office Commercial categories previously discussed.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA20-0005 Page 2
Purpose and Definition (100-Year Floodplain): The Floodplain
category illustrates areas designated by the August 1995 Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps as being in the 100-
year floodplain. The “floodplain” is an expanse of natural vegetation and
wildlife and should be preserved as natural open area. Within the
floodplain is “floodway” that must be kept free of encroachment in order
that the 100-year flood may be carried without harmful increases in the
height of flood waters. Although it is not to be encouraged, the portion of
the floodplain not in the floodway may be reclaimed for development
under certain circumstances if in accordance with FEMA regulations.
The designated land use for areas of reclaimed floodplain is that of the
immediately adjacent land use category. This designation may also
include environmentally sensitive areas, habitats, or wetlands that may
not be in FEMA identified floodplains.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Master Thoroughfare Plan shows Davis Blvd. to be a six-lane
divided arterial with 130’ to 140’ of right of way.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Master Pathways Plan shows a <8’ sidewalk along Davis Blvd. and
the required 5’ sidewalk is shown on the plans. The Master Pathways
Plan shows an 8’ or greater multi-use trail running north/south through
the floodplain. City Council granted a variance with the Zoning Change
and Development Plan to not require construction of an 8’ multi-use trail
running north/south through the flood plain in Lot 6, but to dedicate an
easement for the trail.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The Wheelhouse development was approved with one access drive on
Davis Blvd. and a driveway connection to the church property to the
south. There are currently two driveways to the office and industrial
buildings at 880 Davis Blvd. and one driveway to the existing single-
family residence at 950 Davis Blvd.
TREE PRESERVATION: The Tree Conservation Plan substantially conforms with the plan that
was approved with the Zoning Change and Site Plan for the
Wheelhouse (ZA19-0033). There is approximately 37.62% existing tree
cover on the site, of which, approximately 44.63% was proposed to be
preserved on the plan approved with the Zoning Change and Site Plan.
The plan submitted with the Preliminary Plat show approximately 46.6%
of existing canopy to be preserved.
UTILITIES: A 6” water line exists in Davis Blvd. to serve the property.
A 15” sewer line exists along the west property line to serve the
property.
DRAINAGE: Existing and proposed drainage on the property is to the 100-Year
Case No. Attachment A
ZA20-0005 Page 3
Floodplain that runs through the property.
CITIZEN INPUT/
BOARD REVIEW: A 2035 Corridor Planning meeting for this project was held on January
24, 2019. Please see the Corridor Planning Committee report attached
separately.
A SPIN meeting was held on August 13, 2019. Please see the SPIN
report attached separately.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 1, dated January 30, 2020.
The City Council motion for approval of the Zoning Change and Site
Plan (ZA19-0033) is below for reference:
September 3, 2019; Approved at 2nd Reading (6-0) subject to the staff
report dated August 27, 2019 and Site Plan Review Summary No. 4,
dated August 26, 2019 granting the following variance requests:
• Variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended,
Section 8.01.A, regarding lots abutting a street, to allow the lots
as shown on the Site Plan.
• Variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended,
Section 8.01.D, regarding side lot lines, to allow the lots as
shown on the Concept/Site Plan.
• Variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, and
the Master Pathways Plan, to not require construction of an 8’
multi-use trail running north/south through the flood plain in Lot
6, but to dedicate an easement for the trail.
• Variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section
5.2(d) requiring a stacking depth of 75’ to allow a minimum 33’
stacking depth for the entrance from Davis Boulevard.
• Variance to the Driveway Ord. No. 634, as amended, Section
5.1, which requires a minimum 500' driveway spacing for
commercial driveways along F.M. 1938, to allow the spacings of
154' and 423' to the north and south as shown.
• Variance to the Masonry Ord, No. 557, as amended, to allow the
use of a sprayed insulated cork barrier type coating, such as
“Duro-Pro Cork Barrier” or a similar Elastomeric Stucco finish
material on all buildings and the metal screening on the north
elevations of Buildings 6 and 7 as shown.
And also noting:
Noting that the Lot 7 is being removed from the zoning application.
Noting that Lot 6 will be zoned S-P-1 with passive open space.
Approval of the updated S-P-1 regulations and site plans as indicated
in the staff report and as presented.
Noting that any hobby shop is for personal use only no retail sales.
Noting the applicant has added a dedicated pedestrian access
easement.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA20-0005 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0005 Page 1
PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA20-0005 Review No.: One Date of Review: 01/30/20
Project Name: Zoning Change and Site Plan – The Wheelhouse
APPLICANT: Terry Wilkinson OWNER: Melva Stanfield
Wyndham Properties Mel-Man Properties, Inc.
640 W. Southlake Blvd. 318 Pebblebrook Dr.
Southlake, TX 76092 Grapevine, TX 76051
Phone: (817) 307-3600 Phone: (817) 988-8404
E-mail: terry@wyndhamproperties.com E-mail: melvastanfield@aol.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY
ON 01/08/20 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE
HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT/SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY
AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER
CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
1. Split lot zoning is not permitted. A Preliminary Plat that complies with the underlying zoning
must be processed and approved and a Final Plat that complies with the underlying zoning
and the Preliminary Plat must be processed, approved and recorded with the County prior to
the conveyance of any portion of the property or the issuance of any building permits. A Final
Plat must be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to the execution of a
Developer’s Agreement.
2. Show the current owner and deed reference in the legal description.
3. Remove the owner’s dedication language.
4. Revise the land use chart to show the existing zoning as “S-P-1” and “I-1”. Remove the
proposed zoning column. Remove the open space area column.
5. Remove note #4.
6. Label existing zoning and Land Use Designation (LUD = ) on all adjacent properties.
7. The following variances were approved with the Zoning Change and Development Plan for
The Wheelhouse (ZA19-0033).
i. Variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 8.01.A, regarding
lots abutting a street, to allow the lots as shown on the Site Plan.
ii. Variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 8.01.D, regarding
side lot lines, to allow the lots as shown on the Concept/Site Plan.
iii. Variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, and the Master Pathways
Plan, to not require construction of an 8’ multi-use trail running north/south through the
flood plain in Lot 6, but to dedicate an easement for the trail.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0005 Page 2
iv. Variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2(d) requiring a
stacking depth of 75’ to allow a minimum 33’ stacking depth for the entrance from
Davis Blvd.
v. Variance to the Driveway Ord. No. 634, as amended, Section 5.1, which requires a
minimum 500' driveway spacing for commercial driveways along F.M. 1938, to allow
the spacings of 154' and 423' to the north and south as shown.
vi. Variance to the Masonry Ord, No. 557, as amended, to allow the use of a sprayed
insulated cork barrier type coating, such as “Duro-Pro Cork Barrier” or a similar
Elastomeric Stucco finish material on all buildings and the metal screening on the north
elevations of Buildings 6 and 7 as shown.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. There is a Storm Sewer proposed within the critical root zone area of the trees proposed to be
preserved in the southeast corner of the development. Please relocate the storm sewer
outside the critical root zone area of the trees to avoid altering them.
ALTER; ALTERS; ALTERATION: Any act which causes or may reasonably be expected to
cause a tree to die, including but not limited to, any of the following: uprooting any portion of
the tree’s root system; severing the main trunk of the tree; inflicting damage upon the tree’s
root system by machinery, storage of materials, or the compaction of soil above the root
system of a tree; changing the natural grade of the critical root zone of a tree or uphill from the
critical root zone of the tree so as to divert the flow of water to or away from the critical root
zone; applying herbicidal or other lethal chemicals to the tree or any portion of the critical root
zone of the tree; placement of impermeable material over any portion of the critical root
system of a tree; and trenching within the critical root zone. A protected tree shall be
considered to be altered if one or more of the following occurs: more than twenty -five percent
(25%) of the critical root zone is adversely affected, more than twenty-five percent (25%) of its
canopy is removed, or the tree is disfigured to the extent a reasonable person would conclude
the tree will not survive.
2. Provide on the Tree Conservation Plan the note from the approved Tree Conservation Plan
“Lot 7 will be required to meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance in effect at
the time of lot development.”
* The submitted Tree Conservation Plan substantially conforms to the plan that was approved
with the Zoning Change and Site Plan for The Wheelhouse (ZA19-0033). The previously
approved Tree Conservation Plan showed 37.62% of existing tree cover and 44.63% of the
existing tree cover was proposed to be preserved. On the revised Tree Conservation Plan,
46.6% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree
Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0005 Page 3
tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the
property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of
existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the
minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall
consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and
Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City
Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the
Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so
as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including
mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer
residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to
this Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved
Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction
of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved
on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and
the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all
structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0005 Page 4
constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Kevin Ferrer, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8089
E-mail: kferrer@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
* Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
* Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
* Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan.
* Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be
found in the City of Southlake website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266
EASEMENTS:
1. Detention ponds shall be dedicated by plat as drainage easements. The following note shall
be added to the plat: Compliance with the provisions of the city’s Storm Drainage Policy does
not relieve a person of the responsibility of complying with all other applicable laws, including,
but not limited to, Section 11.086, Texas Water Code.
* Verify if easement of water/sanitary sewer/storm sewer crossing the site is in an easement and
Provide (Volume/Page) of the Existing easements.
WATER COMMENTS:
* The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers
allowed before the meter on the public side. A 1” inch meter must have a 1” tap, etc.
* Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way.
* Fire lines shall be separate from service lines.
SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS:
* Sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0005 Page 5
1. Proposed Drainage map’s drainage basin A2 should utilize runoff coefficient of .95 as
specified in iswm for drives, walks and roofs. If a lower runoff coefficient is utilized for drainage
basin A-2 provide justification.
2. Are there no compensatory storage proposed for the proposed fill in the 1% storm event’s
boundary? A Development permit will be required. Provide H&H study with software data on
DVD with civil plan submittal.
3. FEMA boundaries are approximate location. The FIS’s profile (Flood Insurance Study) and
onsite survey contour information shall be utilized to determine the floodplain boundaries.
4. Differences between pre- and post- development runoff shall be captured in detention pond(s).
Proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of the 1, 10 and 100- year storm events.
Detention may be required with any new proposed building construction. Downstream
assessment utilizing 10% may be utilized to justify no that detention is not needed. Analysis’
software data shall be provided on DVD at the time of the Civil Plans.
5. Tributary is part of the Big Bear Watershed. Zone of Influence/10% should be based
* Fire lane will need to be located above the 1% storm event’s BFE
* Floodplain will need to be in a drainage easement.
* Documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary will be required prior
to approval of construction plans.
* Reclamation or fill within any portion of the effective floodplain will require hydraulic modeling
and a LOMR. LOMR shall be obtained prior to acceptance of the subdivision and placing
homes near floodplain.
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on upstream and
downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard
details and general notes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000.
The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The
Environmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the
review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in:
https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP
shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
* NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
* Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared
by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the
Building Inspections Department prior to construction.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0005 Page 6
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical
report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH
114. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans
directly to TxDOT for review.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817)
748-8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
* The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler systems can be located
on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length
of the pipe. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be
in a vault. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is located in a vault, or
a minimum of 6’X6’ if it is located on the riser. (Label riser room locations for all buildings that
are equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system).
* The gated entry and exit must be equipped with an Opticom or KS-2 switch for opening the
gate electronically, as well as a means for manual opening of the gate.
* Fire Department Connections for the sprinkler systems must be within 100 feet of a fire
hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes on the property. (FDC for Building 5 is
not located within 100 feet of a fire hydrant).
Transportation Review
Stephanie Taylor
Transportation Manager
Phone : 817-748-8216
E-mail : staylor@ci.southlake.tx.us
No comments.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0005 Page 7
General Informational Comments
* A Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The
Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication
requirements and fees, off-site sewer extensions, off-site drainage and utility easements and
impact fees.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must
be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street
Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale
water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to
pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based
on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to
review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine
the fee amount.
* The City Council motion for approval of the Wheelhouse Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA19-
0033) are included below for reference.
September 3, 2019; Approved at 2nd Reading (6-0) subject to the staff report dated August 27,
2019 and Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated August 26, 2019 granting the following
variance requests:
• Variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 8.01.A, regarding
lots abutting a street, to allow the lots as shown on the Site Plan.
• Variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 8.01.D, regarding
side lot lines, to allow the lots as shown on the Concept/Site Plan.
• Variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, and the Master Pathways
Plan, to not require construction of an 8’ multi-use trail running north/south through
the flood plain in Lot 6, but to dedicate an easement for the trail.
• Variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2(d) requiring a
stacking depth of 75’ to allow a minimum 33’ stacking depth for the entrance from
Davis Boulevard.
• Variance to the Driveway Ord. No. 634, as amended, Section 5.1, which requires a
minimum 500' driveway spacing for commercial driveways along F.M. 1938, to allow
the spacings of 154' and 423' to the north and south as shown.
• Variance to the Masonry Ord, No. 557, as amended, to allow the use of a sprayed
insulated cork barrier type coating, such as “Duro-Pro Cork Barrier” or a similar
Elastomeric Stucco finish material on all buildings and the metal screening on the
north elevations of Buildings 6 and 7 as shown.
And also noting:
Noting that the Lot 7 is being removed from the zoning application.
Noting that Lot 6 will be zoned S-P-1 with passive open space.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA20-0005 Page 8
Approval of the updated S-P-1 regulations and site plans as indicated in the staff report and as
presented.
Noting that any hobby shop is for personal use only no retail sales.
Noting the applicant has added a dedicated pedestrian access easement.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA20-0005 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1. JOSEPH PENNINGTON INC AG 864 DAVIS BLVD 0.55 NR
2. STANFIELD, MARK W SP1 880 DAVIS BLVD 0.47 NR
3. SAFFE PROPERTY & CASUALTY LP I1 2113 GREENBRIAR DR 0.61 NR
4. STANFIELD, MARK W SP1 950 DAVIS BLVD 0.87 NR
5. PRIMSLAKE II LLC SP1 1100 DAVIS BLVD 1.58 NR
6. SCF RC FUNDING III LLC SP1 945 DAVIS BLVD 0.68 NR
7. KJ MANAGEMENT LLC C2 1025 DAVIS BLVD 0.54 NR
8. RIG PROPERTIES LLC SP1 1125 DAVIS BLVD 1.19 NR
9. ZVONECEK, BRIAN AG 855 DAVIS BLVD 0.58 NR
10. HALL, MICHAEL C AG 911 DAVIS BLVD 1.12 NR
11. TRAN WEALTH PORTFOLIO
GROUP LL C3 955 DAVIS BLVD 2.07 NR
12. NORTHEAST BAPTIST CHURCH CS 1000 DAVIS BLVD 3.35 NR
13. K & B PROPERTIES LP AG 2365 MICHAEL DR 0.54 NR
14. JOSEPH PENNINGTON INC AG 860 DAVIS BLVD 1.15 NR
15. SIENA/SOUTHLAKE RES ASSOC
INC SF20A 929 SIENA DR 0.31 NR
16. COURTNEY, JAMES SF20A 1001 SIENA DR 0.44 NR
17. SUICH, KAREN SF20A 1005 SIENA DR 0.47 NR
18. LOCKHART, LAURA SF20A 1009 SIENA DR 0.47 NR
19. SIENA/SOUTHLAKE RES ASSOC
INC SF20A 929 SIENA DR 0.57 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA20-0005 Page 2
20. MEEK, ROBERT A SF20A 925 SIENA DR 0.45 NR
21. COLLIER, CLYDE SF20A 918 SIENA DR 0.50 NR
22. GARITA, MARIO SF20A 1000 SIENA DR 0.48 NR
23. QUINN, WILLIAM AG 2435 MICHAEL DR 0.55 NR
24. DONNELL, NICHOLE SF20A 913 SIENA DR 0.68 NR
25. BAHRY, JEFFREY G SF20A 921 SIENA DR 0.53 NR
26. C&T LAWNS LLC AG 2425 MICHAEL DR 1.11 NR
27. PHINNEY, BRENT SF20A 917 SIENA DR 0.71 NR
28. STANFIELD, MARK W SP1 900 DAVIS BLVD 3.84 NR
29. RBJH REAL ESTATE LLC AG 2395 MICHAEL DR 1.04 NR
30. STANFIELD, MARK W SP1 880 DAVIS BLVD 1.97 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Twenty-nine (29)
Responses received: None (0)