Loading...
Item 7Case No. ZA19-0079 S T A F F R E P O R T January 17, 2020 CASE NO: ZA19-0079 PROJECT: Site Plan for The Hills Church Expansion EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Hills Church of Christ (aka Hills Church) is requesting approval of a Site Plan on property described as Lot 1R, Brock Addition (also shown as Lot 1R1), an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 2417 W. Southlake Blvd. (main building addressed as 2501 W. Southlake Blvd.), Southlake, Texas. SPIN Neighborhood #11. DETAILS: The project is generally located at the southwest corner of W. Southlake Blvd. and Brock Dr. The purpose of this request is to seek approval of a Site Plan for an approximately 16,760 square foot two-story expansion of The Hills Church. A limited access driveway with a gate is proposed onto Brock Dr. to use on Sundays during service times, Tuesdays and Thursdays for Mother’s Day Out, and for non-recurring special events. Case No. ZA19-0079 VARIANCES REQUESTED: 1) Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 33.19 requires a 5’ sidewalk along Brock Dr. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow no sidewalk to be constructed along Brock Dr. 2) Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 43.9.c.1.c requires all buildings to be designed such that no mechanical equipment (HVAC, etc.) or satellite dishes shall be visible from F.M. 1709 and any adjacent public right of way. Rooftop screening shall be accomplished either by roof design or by an architectural feature which is integral to the building’s design. The screening as shown on the elevations requires approval of a variance. A review comment has been added to revise the elevations to comply with the screening requirement or to add a variance request. 3) Zoning Ord. No. 480, as amended, Sections 43.9.c.2.b and Section 42.10, prohibit parking spaces to be located in bufferyard areas. A variance is requested to allow the existing and proposed parking to encroach into the bufferyard as shown on the plans. Note that a variance was approved with a previous Zoning Change and Concept Plan (ZA96-152) to allow the existing parking to be located in the bufferyard. 4) Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 39.6.a requires an 8’ solid fence to be constructed along all boundaries where a non-residential use abuts a residentially zoned lot or tract or a lot having an occupied residential dwelling. A variance was approved with the original Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA96- 152) to allow a plant screen with evergreen mix to meet this requirement. The applicant is requesting a continuation of the variance to allow the evergreen mix with a combination of existing and proposed plant materials. The applicant is also requesting a variance to Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 42 – Bufferyards, to allow the evergreen mix to satisfy the accent tree and shrub requirements in the south and west bufferyards. 5) Driveway Ord. 634, as amended, Section 5.2.d, requires a stacking depth for all driveways of 100’. A variance is requested to allow a stacking depth of approximately 85’ on the east driveway. A variance was approved with the original Zoning Change and Concept Plan (ZA96-152) to allow the existing spacing of approximately 220’ from the east driveway on W. Southlake Blvd. to the west right of way line for Brock Dr. 6) Driveway Ord. No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2.c prohibits commercial driveways on collector or local streets unless the tract or lot has no other public access. Brock Dr. is a local street. The applicant is requesting a limited access driveway with onto Brock Dr. Brock Dr. is proposed to be gated and intended for use during the following specified times: Sunday Morning 8:00 a.m. until 1:30 p.m. Use: Church Services Tuesday and Thursday from 8:30 a.m. until 9:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. until 2:30 p.m. Use: Mother’s Day Out Program Special occasions for non-recurring church-wide special events. During the times that access to Brock Dr. is allowed, the church proposes to have personnel at the connection with Brock Dr. to prevent vehicles from accessing Case No. ZA19-0079 Brock Dr. when there are three (3) northbound vehicles at the stop sign at the W. Southlake Blvd. intersection. 7) Landscape Ordinance No. 544-B requires parking lot islands to be a minimum 12’ wide. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow the existing islands to be less than 12’ wide and to contain the plant materials shown on the Landscape Plan. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing 2) Consider approval of a Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 17, 2020 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map & Responses Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only) Presentation Narrative and Variance Request Letter Plans 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Report SPIN Report Traffic Impact Analysis (pdf only) STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 Richard Schell (817) 748-8602 Case No. Attachment A ZA19-0079 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/ APPLICANT: Hills Church of Christ (aka Hills Church) PROPERTY SITUATION: 2417 W. Southlake Blvd. (main building addressed as 2501 W. Southlake Blvd.) generally located at the southwest corner of W. Southlake Blvd. and Brock Dr. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1R, Brock Addition (also shown as Lot 1R1) LAND USE CATEGORY: Public/Semi-Public CURRENT ZONING: “CS” Community Service District HISTORY: - The property was annexed into the City in 1956. - December 20, 1994; A Zoning Change and Concept Plan (ZA94-125) from “AG” Agricultural District and “CS” Community Service District to “CS” Community Service District was approved by City Council. - December 20, 1994; Specific Use Permit (ZA94-139) to allow a church child daycare center was approved. - February 18, 1997; A Zoning Change and Revised Concept Plan (ZA96- 152) from “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District (Lot 1, Brock Addition) and “CS” Community Service District (Lot 3R, Brock Addition) to “CS” Community Service District was approved by City Council. - May 6, 1997; A Zoning Change and Revised Concept Plan (ZA97-033) from “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District (Lot 2, Brock Addition) and “CS” Community Service District (Lot 3R, Brock Addition) to “CS” Community Service District was approved by City Council. - July 1, 1997; A Site Plan (ZA97-061) for Southlake Church of Christ was approved by City Council. - August 21, 1997; A Plat Revision (ZA97-094) for Lots 1R and 3R, Brock Addition was approved September 2, 1997 and filed November 21, 1997. - October 7, 1997; A Specific Use Permit (ZA97-122) for the relocation and phasing of the location of the church child care program was approved by City Council. November 20, 2007; A Revised Site Plan (ZA07-141) to add outdoor sports lighting was approved. September 27, 2012; A Revised Site Plan (ZA12-070) to allow a driveway onto Brock Dr. was withdrawn. A Specific Use Permit for Outdoor Sales or Services (ZA17-028) for Camp Gladiator to allow outdoor training in the parking lot was approved April 18, 2017. Case No. Attachment A ZA19-0079 Page 2 SOUTHLAKE 2035 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The 2035 future land use designation for the site is Public/Semi-Public which is defined in the Southlake 2035 plan as follows: Purpose and Definition: Public/Semi-Public areas are suitable for a wide range of public, civic, and religious uses, such as government offices and facilities, public and private schools, churches and related facilities (including parsonage and parochial schools), cemeteries, and Public Parks/Open Space uses in conjunction with these developments. Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan The Master Pathways Plan shows a future ≥ 8’ multi-use trail along W. Southlake Blvd. The multi-use trail and improvements to the retaining wall along W. Southlake Blvd. are proposed to be included in the project with City participation. A minimum 5’ sidewalk is required along Brock Dr. A variance is requested to not construct the sidewalk along Brock Dr. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions The property is currently accessed by four driveways onto W. Southlake Blvd., which are right-in/right-out only due to the median in W. Southlake Blvd. The church is proposing to close two of the four existing driveways. A limited access driveway connection to Brock Dr. with a gate is proposed to allow access to a full median opening on W. Southlake Blvd. for use only on Sundays during service times, Tuesdays and Thursdays for Mother’s Day Out, and for non-recurring special events. During the times that access to Brock Dr. is allowed, the church proposes to have personnel at the connection with Brock Dr. to prevent vehicles from accessing Brock Dr. when there are three (3) northbound vehicles at the stop sign at the W. Southlake Blvd. intersection. Traffic Impact A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared for this development (see attached separately). TREE PRESERVATION: The approval of the current Zoning and Concept Plan (Case ZA96-152) vested this property under the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. The applicant has the option to request that the development of the property be regulated by the current Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E and this option has been chosen. The proposed existing tree cover preservation conforms to the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E. There is 18.1% of existing tree cover on the property and a minimum of 70% is required to be preserved. 13.5% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be removed and 86.5% is proposed to be preserved. UTILITIES: The property is served by existing 12” water and 8” sewer lines that are in W. Southlake Blvd.. DRAINAGE: The majority of the site drains from a high point on the northwest portion Case No. Attachment A ZA19-0079 Page 3 of the site to the east and southeast to a borrow ditch along Brock Dr. Drainage along Brock Dr. is from north to south to a creek at the south end of the cul-de-sac. CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held on October 22, 2019. A meeting report is attached separately. A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on September 12, 2019. A meeting report is attached separately. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 17, 2020. General Development Standards Applies? Comments Overlay Regulations Yes Subject to requirements of Corridor Overlay – a variance to rooftop mechanical screening is required Building Articulation Yes Complies Masonry Standards Yes Complies Impervious Coverage Yes Complies Bufferyards Yes Variance requested to allow parking to encroach into north bufferyard and to allow an evergreen mix to satisfy the accent tree and shrub requirements on the west and south. Interior Landscape Yes Complies Tree Preservation Yes Tree Preservation Ord. No. 585-E Sidewalks Yes Variance requested to requirement for 5’ sidewalk on Brock Dr. The criteria for granting a variance to Zoning Ord. No. 480, Section 33.19, Sidewalk Requirements, are below: The City Council may grant a variance to this regulation where compliance would present extraordinary difficulties: i. in the use of the property or; ii. to construct due to characteristics of the development or surrounding properties. The criterial for granting a variance to Driveway Ord. No 634 are below: The City Council shall have the authority to grant a variance to this ordinance. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the regulations herein will create an unnecessary Case No. Attachment A ZA19-0079 Page 4 hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation creating unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The decision of the City Council shall be final. There are no specific variance criteria for Zoning Ord. No. 480, Section 42 – Bufferyards. Case No. Attachment B ZA19-0079 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA19-0079 Page 1 REVISED SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA19-0079 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 01/17/20 Project Name: Site Plan – The Hills Church Expansion APPLICANT: Craig Stone PROJECT MANAGER: Jill P. Styron-Smith Hills Church of Christ (aka Hills Church) 2501 W. Southlake Blvd. Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 281-0773 ext. 102 E-mail: craig.stone@thehils.org E-mail: jill.smith@basicarch.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 01/06/20 AND 01/16/20 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602. 1. Please make the following changes to the narrative and variance request letter: a. Add a variance request to allow the rooftop mechanical screening as shown if the elevations are not revised (see note #3 below). 2. Please revise the Site Plan to conform with the requirements of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 40. The following changes are needed to sheet C1.01: a. Use shading, symbols or hatching to show locations of all interior landscaping and landscaped parking islands on the site. 3. The following comments are regarding elevations: a. The metal panel RTU screening does not comply with Ord. No. 480, as amended, Section 43.9.c.1.c. Please revise the elevations to screen mechanical equipment with an architectural feature which is integral to the building’s design and ensures that such equipment is not visible from adjacent rights of way or submit a variance request letter to allow the screening as shown. Please also ensure that any ground mounted equipment is screened from view of rights of way as required. b. Please provide a sample board of all proposed exterior façade materials. * All driveways/points of ingress/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended: * Per Driveway Ord. 634, as amended, Section 5.2.d, the required stacking depth for all driveways is 100’. Approximately 85’ is shown for the east driveway on W. Southlake Blvd. A variance is requested. * The existing locations of the two driveways on W. Southlake Blvd. are not changing. * A variance was approved with the original Zoning Change and Concept Plan (ZA96-152) to allow the existing spacing of approximately 220’ from the east driveway on W. Southlake Blvd. to the west right of way line for Brock Dr. Case No. Attachment C ZA19-0079 Page 2 * Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 39.6.a requires an 8’ solid fence to be constructed along all boundaries where a non-residential use abuts a residentially zoned lot or tract or a lot having an occupied residential dwelling. A variance was approved with the original Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA96-152) to allow a plant screen with evergreen mix to meet this requirement. The applicant is requesting the same variance to allow the evergreen mix. The Zoning Change and Development Plan for Stony Brook (ZA17-064) showed a wood or ornamental metal fence on the boundaries abutting the church property. * Per Zoning Ord. No. 480, as amended, Section 43.9.c.2.b and Section 42.10, parking is not permitted in bufferyard areas. A variance is requested to allow the parking to encroach into the bufferyard as shown on the plans. Note that a variance was approved with a previous Zoning Change and Concept Plan (ZA96-152) to allow the existing parking to be located in the bufferyard. * Per Ord. No. 480, as amended, Section 33.19, a 5’ sidewalk is required along Brock Dr. A variance to the sidewalk requirement is requested. * Ensure that all sidewalks on the site comply with ADA requirements. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type of lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over. * Properties within Corridor Overlay Zone see Ord. No. 480, as amended, Section 43.9.c.1.e for design criteria if any walls or fences are proposed along W. Southlake Blvd. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: * The approval of the current zoning and concept plan under Case ZA96-152 vested this property under the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-B. The applicant has the option to request that the development of the property be regulated by the current Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E. The applicant has requested that the property be regulated by the current Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E. * The proposed existing tree cover preservation conforms to the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-E. There is 18.1% of existing tree cover on the property and a minimum of 70% is required to be preserved. 13.5% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be removed and 86.5% is proposed to be preserved. * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Case No. Attachment C ZA19-0079 Page 3 Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% – 20% 70% 20.1 – 40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. Fifty percent (50%) of the provided canopy trees must be at least four inch (4”) caliper. The remaining fifty percent (50%) may be a minimum of two inch (2”) caliper. * The floor area of the proposed new building is greater in size than 30% of the existing buildings, and greater than 5,000 square feet. The property is required to comply the regulations of the Landscape Ordinance 544-B, and the regulations of Section 42, Bufferyards, within the Zoning Ordinance. Please confirm that at least the minimum amount of interior landscape plant material is provided and all required bufferyards plant material is provided. The Landscape Ordinance and Bufferyards Regulations are proposed to be met with a combination of provided plant material and existing plant material. * Some of the existing parking is located within the north 20’ – O bufferyard but new parking is proposed to be constructed within the bufferyard. Parking may not be provided within a required bufferyard area. The applicant has requested a variance that the existing parking remain within the north bufferyard and that the proposed parking be within the north bufferyard as shown. USE OF BUFFERYARDS – A bufferyard may be used for passive recreation, such as pedestrian, bike or equestrian trails, provided that: (a) no plant material is eliminated; (b) the total width of the bufferyard is maintained; and (c) all other regulations of this ordinance are met. In no event shall the following uses be permitted in a bufferyard: playfields, stables, swimming pools, tennis courts or similar facilities, accessory buildings, parking facilities, or trash dumpsters. * The applicant is requesting a variance that the existing parking landscape islands remain the same width they currently are and be planted as shown. Parking lot islands shall have a minimum width of 12’ back-to-back if curbed or 13’ edge-to- edge if no curb is intended, and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall. A variance is requested. Case No. Attachment C ZA19-0079 Page 4 * Existing tree and landscape credits are proposed to be taken for some of the required interior and bufferyards landscaping. Existing tree and landscape credits shall only be granted if the tree/s and associated landscaping are in healthy condition and all requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, and Landscape Ordinance have been met as determined at the time of inspection for a Permanent Certificate of Occupancy. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Steve Anderson, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8101 E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. 3. Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. 4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. * Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. * Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. * Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. * Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 STORM DRAIN PLAN: 1. Clearly indicate private storm drain from public. WATER COMMENTS: * The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers Case No. Attachment C ZA19-0079 Page 5 allowed before the meter on the public side. A 1” inch meter must have a 1” tap, etc. * Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. * Fire lines shall be separate from service lines. SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS: 2. Add a note: Private sanitary sewer services need a plumbing permit and must be inspected by building inspections prior to burial. * Sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. * A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. * Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Stephanie Taylor, P.E., PTOE Transportation Manager Phone: (817) 748-8216 E-mail: staylor@ci.southlake.tx.us Transportation Manager Review Traffic Impact Analysis: 1. While the results of the additional requested analysis appear sound due to the conservative estimates that were used, the methodology is convoluted and includes traffic data from 2006. Please remove all references to the obsolete data; the driveway counts and church attendance Case No. Attachment C ZA19-0079 Page 6 numbers are sufficient. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: The addition to the existing building will require all of the existing building that is not currently protected with an automatic sprinkler system and the entire new addition to be fully protected with an automatic sprinkler system due to the total square footage. The addition to the building, with the increased occupant load, may require a fire alarm system that is capable of an emergency voice/alarm communication system depending on the total occupant load determined. General Informational Comments * A SPIN meeting for this project was held on October 22, 2019. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All mechanical equipment (rooftop and ground mounted) must be screened of view from right- of-ways in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Corridor Overlay Zone. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount. * A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA19-0079 Page 1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1. AISHWARYA PROPERTIES LLC SP2 100 RIVER OAKS DR 1.15 NR 2. KLOESEL, GREGORY B SP2 101 RIVER OAKS DR 0.92 NR 3. ANKINZ LLC SP2 2350 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 3.76 NR 4. NADO I LLC SP1 2530 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.92 NR 5. NADO I LLC SP1 2580 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.71 NR 6. BONOLA FAMILY LTD PRTNSHP SF1-A 2608 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.78 NR 7. CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD RPUD 2641 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.39 NR 8. CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD RPUD 2607 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.88 NR 9. CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD RPUD 2621 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 9.22 NR 10. CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD RPUD 410 BROCK DR 1.67 NR 11. CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD RPUD 2651 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 13.63 NR 12. SOUTHLAKE CHURCH OF CHRIST CS 2417 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 9.63 NR 13. CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD SF1-A 250 BROCK DR 1.39 NR 14. MCCALL, HAROLD L SF1-A 320 BROCK DR 1.20 NR 15. CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD RPUD 400 BROCK DR 4.73 NR 16. PAPILLARD, MARJORIE S SF1-A 329 BROCK DR 0.68 NR 17. PAPILLARD, MARJORIE S SF1-A 319 BROCK DR 0.61 NR 18. HOWARD, EMMA L SF1-A 303 BROCK DR 1.03 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA19-0079 Page 2 19. VARGAS, PERRY W SF1-A 209 BROCK DR 0.99 NR 20. QUINONES, MICHAEL C SF1-A 109 BROCK DR 0.53 NR 21. QUINONES, MICHAEL C SF1-A 105 BROCK DR 0.48 NR 22. TAK ENTERPRISES INC SP1 2419 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.00 NR 23. TAK ENTERPRISES INC SP1 2419 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.00 NR 24. KEEPING IT REAL ESTATE LLC SP1 2419 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.00 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Eighteen (18) Responses Received: None (0)