Loading...
Item 9A PresentationPlat Showing Lots 57 and 58, F. Throop No. 1511 Addition Item 9A ZA19-0040 ZA19-0040 OWNER:Farhat Osman APPLICANT:Eagle Surveying REQUEST:Approval of a Plat Showing for Lots 57 and 58,F.Throop No.1511 Addition to reconfigure the boundaries of two existing tracts totaling approximately 3.95 acres into two residential lots LOCATION:2117 and 2150 E.Dove Rd. Aerial View Future Land Use Current Zoning Kingdom Place Preliminary Plat Net Density 9 lots/10.36 AC = 0.869 8 lots/8.6 AC = 0.930 (without Lot 5) Net Acreage: 11.44 AC (Gross) 1.08 AC (ROW) 10.36 AC (NET) Approved Nov. 17, 2015 Plat Showing and Site Plan Variance Requests ±85’ i.Driveway Ord.No.634,as amended,requires a 100’centerline spacing for residential driveways on arterials.A variance is requested to allow a spacing of approximately 85’between the proposed driveways on Lots 57 and 58. ii.Driveway Ord.No.634,as amended,requires a 250’centerline spacing to commercial driveways on arterials.A variance is requested to allow a spacing of approximately 100’between the proposed driveways on Lots 57 and 58 and the existing commercial driveway to the east. iii.Subdivision Ord.No.483,as amended,Section 8.01.D requires all side lot lines to be perpendicular to the right of way lines or radial in the case of a cul-de-sac or curvilinear design.A variance is requested to allow the side lot lines as shown. iv.Subdivision Ord.No.483,as amended,Section 8.01.K prohibits panhandle lots,also known as flag lots.The proposed western lot is configured as a panhandle lot. ±100’ Variance for Panhandle Lots Variance Approval Criteria for Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 –Panhandle Lots: Subdivision Ord. No. 483, as amended, Section 8.01.K prohibits panhandle lots, also known as flag lots. However, the approving the approving authority may waive this requirement if it finds that one or more of the following condi tions are satisfied and the requirements of subsection 2 are met: a. Topographical, environmental preservation or other severe physical constraints prevent conventional subdivision and the pa nhandle lot appears to be the best solution to subdivision of lands; b. The panhandle lot arrangement is a temporary one in which the panhandle will disappear and the ultimate access will be pro vided by conventional means; and/or c. The proposed lot(s) will not have an adverse affect upon surrounding properties. Additionally, the approving authority shall not consider a waiver of this requirement unless the following conditions must be met: a. The area and width of the buildable area of the lot must comply with the underlying zoning regulations. The panhandle port ion of the lot is not to be included as part of the required minimum lot area; b. The length and width of the panhandle section of the lot must provide for or exceed the minimum emergency access and fire protection standards of the adopted City codes; and c. The location of the panhandle lot conforms to the City’s Driveway Ordinance, No. 634, as amended. Tree Conservation Plan Tree Survey and Grading Plan Street View Street View (East on Dove Rd.) P&Z Commission August 8,2019;Approved (6-1)(Kubiak)subject to the staff report dated August 2,2019 and Plat Review Summary No.2,dated August 1,2019,granting the variances requested therein and noting two things: 1.The applicant’s willingness to consider proposing a layout or scenario with one driveway versus two driveways; 2.Suggesting that the City look at removing the current designation of Retail Commercial and changing it to the appropriate residential land use for the Land Use Plan with an amendment. P&Z Commission Conditions P&Z Commission Issues Applicant’s Response Noting the applicant’s willingness to consider proposing a layout or scenario with one driveway versus two driveways. The applicant is willing to consider a scenario with one driveway. Suggesting that the City look at removing the current designation of Retail Commercial and changing it to the appropriate residential land use for the Land Use Plan with an amendment. The applicant has no objections to the City changing the Land Use designation to a single family residential use. Questions?