Item 9A PresentationPlat Showing
Lots 57 and 58, F. Throop No. 1511 Addition
Item 9A ZA19-0040
ZA19-0040
OWNER:Farhat Osman
APPLICANT:Eagle Surveying
REQUEST:Approval of a Plat Showing for Lots 57 and 58,F.Throop
No.1511 Addition to reconfigure the boundaries of two
existing tracts totaling approximately 3.95 acres into two
residential lots
LOCATION:2117 and 2150 E.Dove Rd.
Aerial View
Future Land Use
Current Zoning
Kingdom Place Preliminary Plat
Net Density
9 lots/10.36 AC = 0.869
8 lots/8.6 AC = 0.930
(without Lot 5)
Net Acreage:
11.44 AC (Gross)
1.08 AC (ROW)
10.36 AC (NET)
Approved Nov. 17, 2015
Plat Showing and Site Plan
Variance Requests
±85’
i.Driveway Ord.No.634,as amended,requires a 100’centerline
spacing for residential driveways on arterials.A variance is
requested to allow a spacing of approximately 85’between the
proposed driveways on Lots 57 and 58.
ii.Driveway Ord.No.634,as amended,requires a 250’centerline
spacing to commercial driveways on arterials.A variance is
requested to allow a spacing of approximately 100’between the
proposed driveways on Lots 57 and 58 and the existing
commercial driveway to the east.
iii.Subdivision Ord.No.483,as amended,Section 8.01.D requires
all side lot lines to be perpendicular to the right of way lines or
radial in the case of a cul-de-sac or curvilinear design.A variance
is requested to allow the side lot lines as shown.
iv.Subdivision Ord.No.483,as amended,Section 8.01.K prohibits
panhandle lots,also known as flag lots.The proposed western
lot is configured as a panhandle lot.
±100’
Variance for Panhandle Lots
Variance Approval Criteria for Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 –Panhandle Lots:
Subdivision Ord. No. 483, as amended, Section 8.01.K prohibits panhandle lots, also known as flag lots.
However, the approving the approving authority may waive this requirement if it finds that one or more of the following condi tions are satisfied and
the requirements of subsection 2 are met:
a. Topographical, environmental preservation or other severe physical constraints prevent conventional subdivision and the pa nhandle lot
appears to be the best solution to subdivision of lands;
b. The panhandle lot arrangement is a temporary one in which the panhandle will disappear and the ultimate access will be pro vided by
conventional means; and/or
c. The proposed lot(s) will not have an adverse affect upon surrounding properties.
Additionally, the approving authority shall not consider a waiver of this requirement unless the following conditions must be met:
a. The area and width of the buildable area of the lot must comply with the underlying zoning regulations. The panhandle port ion of the lot is
not to be included as part of the required minimum lot area;
b. The length and width of the panhandle section of the lot must provide for or exceed the minimum emergency access and fire protection
standards of the adopted City codes; and
c. The location of the panhandle lot conforms to the City’s Driveway Ordinance, No. 634, as amended.
Tree Conservation Plan
Tree Survey and Grading Plan
Street View
Street View (East on Dove Rd.)
P&Z Commission
August 8,2019;Approved (6-1)(Kubiak)subject to the staff report dated August 2,2019 and
Plat Review Summary No.2,dated August 1,2019,granting the variances requested therein
and noting two things:
1.The applicant’s willingness to consider proposing a layout or scenario with one
driveway versus two driveways;
2.Suggesting that the City look at removing the current designation of Retail Commercial
and changing it to the appropriate residential land use for the Land Use Plan with an
amendment.
P&Z Commission Conditions
P&Z Commission Issues Applicant’s Response
Noting the applicant’s willingness to consider
proposing a layout or scenario with one driveway
versus two driveways.
The applicant is willing to consider a scenario
with one driveway.
Suggesting that the City look at removing the
current designation of Retail Commercial and
changing it to the appropriate residential land
use for the Land Use Plan with an amendment.
The applicant has no objections to the City
changing the Land Use designation to a single
family residential use.
Questions?