Loading...
Item 5Case No. ZA19-0022 S T A F F R E P O R T Ma y 3, 2019 CASE NO: ZA19-0022 PROJECT: Plat Revision for Lots 38R1 and 38R2, Frances Throop No. 1511 Addition EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Kimball Lakes LLC is requesting approval of a Plat Revision for Lots 38R1 and 38R2, Francis Throop No. 1511 Addition on property described as Lot 38, Francis Throop No. 1511 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1200 N. Kimball Avenue, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: “B1” Business Service District. SPIN Neighborhood #4. DETAILS: This project is located on the northwest corner of E. Highland St. and N. Kimball Ave. The purpose of this request is to seek approval of a Plat Revision that subdivides an existing single lot office development into two lots. In December 2015, City Council approved a site plan for a single lot office development consisting of four (4) single story office buildings. Currently, two (2) of the buildings have been constructed along with the parking and fire lanes to support the two (2) buildings on the north half of the lot. The proposed plat revision does not affect the approved site plan and the resulting two (2) lots are to remain in conformance with all parameters of the site plan approval and the “B1” Business Service District zoning. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider approval of a Plat Revision ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated May 1, 2019 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses Presentation Plat Revision Exhibits STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072 Lorrie Fletcher (817) 748-8069 Case No. Attachment A ZA19-0022 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/ APPLICANT: Kimball Lakes LLC PROPERTY SITUATION: 1200 N. Kimball Ave. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 38, F. Throop No. 1511 Addition LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: “B1” – Business Service Park District HISTORY: March 6, 1984; City Council approved “LC” Light Commercial zoning on the property under Case ZA84-008; December 14, 1984; a Building Permit was issued for construction of an aircraft instrument repair shop; July 5, 1985; a Certificate of Occupancy was issued for an aircraft instrument repair shop; September 19, 1989; City Council approved "B-1" zoning on the property with approval of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and associated map; April 17, 2007; City Council approved a site plan for a new 12,675 sf building and parking area under Case ZA06-187 (never constructed); June 4, 2013; City Council approved a specific use permit for telecommunications towers, antennas and ancillary buildings to allow the construction of an unmanned telecommunications facility and the placement of six (6) panel antennas on an existing Oncor transmission tower under Case ZA12-080; August 14, 2013; a single-lot Plat Showing was filed for Lot 38, F. Throop No. 1511 Addition. May 29, 2014; a Demolition Permit was issued to remove all structures on the property with exception to the telecommunications facility. December 1, 2015; City Council approved a site plan for Kimball Highland Offices subject to Staff report dated November 23, 2015 and Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated November 23, 2015 and subject to the following: • Granting the variance request for relief from required fencing along northern boundary; • Noting Council’s approval of Option # 2 (as described in the TIA Study): Full opening drive at Tumbleweed/Kimball and a limited right in and right out at Cripple Creek Trail/Kimball subject to approval of the City Engineer; allowing an emergency access only on Highland with an emergency gate and grasscrete, recognizing that no variance Case No. Attachment A ZA19-0022 Page 2 to the driveway ordinance is needed as the access will only serve the Southlake Departments of Public Safety; • Noting the removal of five parking spaces on the southwest edge of the site taking the total number of parking spaces from 133 to 128 and noting that area will be replaced with landscaping consistent with the presentation at the City Council meeting; • Noting that all driveways and fire lanes will be completed with the initial Phase One construction; • Noting that the western boundary fencing will be wood and masonry consistent with the presentation at the City Council meeting; • Noting the applicant’s willingness to replace the proposed Bald Cypress trees with Live Oaks; • And, noting that any electrical or mechanical equipment that is visible from Kimball Avenue will be 100% screened with mature plantings (at time of planting) subject to City staff approval. SOUTHLAKE 2035 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The 2035 future land use designation for the site is Medium Density Residential. The purpose of the Medium Density Residential land use category is to promote a neighborhood setting primarily comprised of single family detached houses. The Medium Density Residential category is suitable for any single-family detached residential development. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space and Public/Semi-Public categories. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan The property is located on the northwest corner of Kimball Avenue and Highland Street. Kimball Avenue is designated as an 88’, 4-lane divided arterial roadway. Highland Street is designated as a 70’, 2-lane undivided collector roadway. Pathways / Sidewalk Plan There is an existing 8’ sidewalk along Kimball Avenue. The previously approved site plan shows a 5’ sidewalk along Highland Street; construction of that walkway will occur with the remaining buildings for this development. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions There are two existing access drives onto Kimball Avenue. There is also an existing grasscrete emergency access drive onto Highland Street. Traffic Impact A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required for the proposed subdivision. Case No. Attachment A ZA19-0022 Page 3 TREE PRESERVATION: All future development must comply with the previously approved Tree Preservation Plan under City Case ZA15-092. CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was not held for this project. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated May 1, 2019. Case No. Attachment B ZA19-0022 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA19-0022 Page 1 PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA19-0022 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 05/03/19 Project Name: Plat Revision – Lots 38R1 & 38R2, Francis Throop Survey No. 1511 Addition APPLICANT: Kimball Lakes LLC SURVEYOR: Burks Land Surveying John Dancer Tommy Burks 2001 Dancer Drive 223 County Road 1260 Arlington, TX 76013 Decatur, TX 76234 Phone: 817-992-5385 Phone: 817-228-5577 Email: advantageprime@gmail.com Email: blsurvey98@yahoo.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 04/22/19 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER. 1. Label the “Common Access” shown on the plat as a “Common Access Easement” and provide corrected hard copies prior to City Council meeting. * Any easements necessary to accommodate the future construction of phase two will require filing by separate instrument or an amended plat. * A Reciprocal Parking and Cross-Access – Easements, Covenants & Restrictions document has been submitted. Please provide a fully executed copy to the City following recordation. * Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, requires that proposed lot lines meet the requirement for perpendicular; staff has determined the proposed lot line meets the intent of this requirement. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: * The submitted Tree Conservation is consistent with the approved Case ZA15-092 Tree Conservation Plan. There is 4.9% of existing tree cover on the site and a minimum of 70% of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved. 70% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved. Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the Case No. Attachment C ZA19-0022 Page 2 property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% – 20% 70% 20.1 – 40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Kevin Ferrer, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8089 E-mail: kferrer@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The Environmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in: Case No. Attachment C ZA19-0022 Page 3 https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. * NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. * Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. * A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. * Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748- 8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us No comments base on the submitted information. GENERAL INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Although the proposed lot line is not perpendicular or radial, it appears to meet the intent of this requirement. * Through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The Case No. Attachment C ZA19-0022 Page 4 applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount. * We recommend this plat not be filed until the construction plans have been substantially approved. This will ensure adequate easements and finish floor elevations. * For Tarrant County filing, original signatures and seals will be required on one blackline mylar and one blackline paper copy prior to filing the plat. The mylar and paper copies will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat. * A Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication requirements and fees, off-site sewer extensions, off-site drainage and utility easements and impact fees. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * All development must comply with the B-1 zoning district. Case No. Attachment D ZA19-0022 Page 1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1. KIMBALL LAKES LLC B1 1200 N KIMBALL AVE 3.17 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: One (1) Responses Received within 200’and within platted subdivision: None (0)