Loading...
Item 6Flblb CASE NO: ZA18-0057 SOUTHLAKE PLANNING Se DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT February 12, 2019 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Site Plan for District 114 at Kimball Park EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of Medici Development Partners and Bruce and Michelle Fusselman, BOKA Powell, LLC is requesting 2nd reading approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for District 114 at Kimball Park on property described as Lots 1- 6, Kimball Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lot A, Block A, Briarwood Estates, Phase I (also known as Lot Al, Block A, Briarwood Estates, Phase 1) an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, located at 2100-2116 E. State Hwy. 114, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "S -P- 2" Generalized Site Plan District and "C-3" General Commercial District. Proposed Zoning: "S -P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #4. DETAILS: This project is located at the northeast corner of E. State Hwy. 114 and Cherry Ln., approximately 600 feet west of the intersection of E. State Hwy. 114 and N. Kimball Ave. The purpose of this request is to seek 2nd reading approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan to develop a three- and four-story, approximately 94,650 square foot mixed use building on approximately 3.301 acres. The property includes the existing Lot 2 of Kimball Park, which was originally approved for an approximately 10,000 square foot restaurant in the "S -P-2" zoning district and the existing Lot A, Block A, Briarwood Estates, Phase I, which currently contains the Lake Cities Animal Clinic in an approximately 1,306 square foot building at 2100 E. S.H. 114. The Lake Cities Animal Clinic lot is currently zoned "C-3" General Commercial District. The two lots are proposed to be combined into one lot that will be part of the Kimball Park "S -P-2" zoning district. The proposed zoning on the lot is "S -P-2" with "C-2" uses and regulations. The eastern portion of the mixed use building is proposed to be four (4) stories and the western portion of the building is proposed to be three (3) stories. The proposed uses will include general and medical office predominantly on the upper floors with retail, restaurant and office uses on the first floor. A four -level parking garage with 300 spaces is shown to be connected to the rear of the building with direct access into the building. Multi-level parking garages typically require approval of a Specific Use Permit, so the applicant has added the garage as a permitted use in the proposed "S -P-2" regulations. Driveway access to the garage is proposed off of Cherry Ln. Access to 48 surface parking spaces will be from the main driveway into Kimball Park off of S.H. 114 and from a driveway on Cherry Ln. The Land Use Designation on the lot at 2100 E. S.H. 114 is Office Commercial. An amendment to the Land Use Map in the 2035 Comprehensive Plan from Office Commercial to Mixed Use is requested for that lot (See Case No. CP 18-0005). Case No. ZA18-0057 The "S -P-2" zoning for the proposed Lot 2R will follow the "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District regulations with the following exceptions: Regulation "C-2" Site Data Summary Lot 2R Existing Zoning "S -P-2" and "C-3" Proposed Zoning "S -P-2" Land Use Designation Mixed Use and Office Commercial Proposed Land Use Designation Mixed Use Gross/Net Acreage 3.301 ac. Total Building Floor Area (sq.ft.) Lobby Retail Restaurant Medical Office General Office 94,650 7,769 7,966 16,265 29,000 33,650 Building Height/Number of Stories 75' 4 stories Open Space % 22.11% Impervious Coverage % 77.89% Total Parking Required(S-P-2) 348 Total Parking Spaces Provided 348 The "S -P-2" zoning for the proposed Lot 2R will follow the "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District regulations with the following exceptions: Regulation "C-2" "S -P-2" Max. Impervious 70% 70% for Kimball Park as a Coverage whole Maximum Height, 35' 2 /2 stories 75' 4 stories Front Yard 30' on Cherry Ln. 20' on Cherry Ln. Setback (±25' shown) 10' Type `E' along S.H. 114 Bufferyards 25' Type 'J' along S.H. 114 'C' and 10' Type `C' along Cherry 10' Type along Cherry Ln. Ln. w/ reduced bufferyard plantings as shown 348 spaces Off Street Parking 521 spaces (Kimball Park parked as a whole per S -P-2 VARIANCES REQUESTED: 1) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, requires a minimum stacking depth of 150' if the average number of parking spaces per driveway is 200 or more spaces and the total number of spaces is 200 or more spaces. The applicant is proposing stacking depths of approximately 54' on the southern Cherry Ln. driveway and approximately 30' on the existing S.H. 114 driveway. A variance was approved with the original "S -P-2" zoning to allow the stacking depth as shown on the S.H. 114 driveway. The parking garage does not have direct driveway access to the rest of the site, so the required stacking depth on the two garage driveways is 1 00'(more than 200 spaces total and between 50 and 199 spaces per driveway). The applicant is proposing approximately 71' of stacking depth for the southern garage driveway and approximately 32' for the northern driveway. Case No. ZA18-0057 2) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, requires a minimum 100' centerline spacing between the garage driveways on Cherry Ln. A variance is requested to allow the 60' centerline spacing shown. 3) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, requires the minimum driveway spacing from an intersection on Cherry Ln. to be 100'. The applicant is request a variance to allow a spacing of approximately 40' measured from the right of way line/property line to the centerline of the driveway. 4) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2.c, prohibits commercial driveways on collector or local streets unless the lot has no other access. A variance is requested to allow the three driveways on Cherry Ln. 5) A variance to Landscape Ord. No 544, as amended, is request to allow the interior landscape area and materials as shown on the plan. 6) Avg-rcvan�"r"arnGe-tov asenrrny QFdiRarrGe 55was- amended, �re-quested to aI�--slew the peFGentage of masenry materials shown 4R the materials Gharts en the elevatlen. The request for a variance to the Masonry Ordinance has been withdrawn. The metal panels previously shown have been revised to an elastomeric coating that meets the requirements of the Masonry Ordinance. The City Council approved the item at 1 St reading on February 5, 2019 with the following condition: City Council Condition at 1st Reading Applicant's Response Noting the applicant's willingness to The applicant will discuss the explore screening options that may be screening for the west facing garage possible for the west facing garage. at the meeting on February 19, 2019. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing 2) Consider 2nd Reading approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated February 11, 2019 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (E) Ordinance No. 480-657C Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only) Link to PowerPoint Presentation Link to Narrative Variance Request Letter Link to "S -P-2" Regulations Link to Trip Generation Memo Link to Parking Analysis Link to Plans Link to Exhibits to Address P&Z Commission Conditions of Approva Link to Comprehensive Plan Analysis Link to SPIN Report Link to Corridor Planning Committee Report STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 Case No. ZA18-0057 Richard Schell (817) 748-8602 Case No. ZA18-0057 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Medici Development Partners and Bruce and Michelle Fusselman APPLICANT: BOKA Powell, LLC PROPERTY SITUATION: This project is located at the northeast corner of E. State Hwy. 114 and Cherry Ln., approximately 600 feet west of the intersection of E. State Hwy. 114 and N. Kimball Ave. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1-6, Kimball Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lot A, Block A, Briarwood Estates, Phase I (also known as Lot Al, Block A, Briarwood Estates, Phase I LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use and Office Commercial PROPOSED LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CURRENT ZONING: "S -P-2" Generalized Site Plan District and "C-3" General Commercial District. PROPOSED ZONING: "S -P-2" Generalized Site Plan District HISTORY: - A Zoning Change from "O-1" Office District to "C-3" General Commercial District for Lot A, Block A, Briarwood Estates, Phase I was approved in 1991 for Lake Cities Animal Clinic. - A Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan (ZA12-067) from "I-1" Light Industrial District to "S -P-2" Generalized Site Plan District for Victory Lane was approved by City Council on September 4, 2012. - A Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan (ZA13-135) from ""S -P-2" Generalized Site Plan District to "S -P-2" Generalized Site Plan District for Kimball Park was approved by City Council on March 4, 2014. - A Preliminary Plat (ZA13-136) for Kimball Park was approved by City Council on March 4, 2014. - A Final Plat for Kimball Park was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on May 8, 2014. - A Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA15-032) from ""S -P-2" Generalized Site Plan District to "S -P-2" Generalized Site Plan District for revisions to the Cambria Hotel Site Plan and Elevations was approved June 2, 2015. - A Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA15-142) from "S -P-2" Generalized Site Plan District to "S -P-2" Generalized Site Plan District for The Offices at Kimball Park to revise the previously approved S -P-2 Zoning and Concept Plan for Kimball Park and to seek approval of a Site Plan for an approximately 116,484 square foot four-story office building and a one -level parking garage was approved March 1, 2016. - A Site Plan (ZA17-002) for Kimball Park Lot 5 Retail/Restaurant, which includes an approximately 9,176 square foot, one-story building on approximately 1.27 acres was approved February 21, 2017. SOUTHLAKE 2030/2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: A detailed Comprehensive Plan Analysis has been prepared for this development. Link to Comprehensive Plan Analysis Case No. Attachment A ZA18-0057 Page 1 TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions The property has access to surface parking from the existing main entry driveway to Kimball Park on the S.H. 114 frontage road and from one driveway on Cherry Ln. Access to the proposed multi-level parking garage is from two driveways on Cherry Ln. There is no internal driveway access from the parking garage to the rest of the Kimball Park development. Traffic Counts * Based on the (2018) City of Southlake Traffic Count Report Traffic Impact A trip generation memo was prepared for this development. Link to Trip Generation Memo TREE PRESERVATION: The site is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-D since it is being rezoned. There is approximately 15% existing tree cover on the site, of which, 0% is proposed to be preserved. A standard zoning district would require that a minimum 70% of existing tree cover be preserved. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S -P-1 Site Plan, S -P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and Case No. Attachment A ZA18-0057 Page 2 vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. UTILITIES: A 12" water line and an 8" sewer line exist in S.H. 114 to serve the property. DRAINAGE: Drainage on the property is generally from west to east to the main Kimball Park driveway and then into the creek in the Kimball Park open space lot. CITIZEN INPUT: The following meetings were held to discuss the development: A SPIN meeting was held December 11, 2018. Link to SPIN Report A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on November 14, 2018. Link to Corridor Planning Committee Report PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION: January 17, 2019; Approved (5-0) subject to the staff report dated January 16, 2019 and Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 16, 2019 granting the variances requested in the staff report and noting the applicant's willingness to come up with a potential alternative plan with respect to the landscaping bordering S.H. 114 and also noting the applicant's willingness to work on the pedestrian connectivity to the north. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: February 5, 2019; Approved at 1st reading (6-0) subject to the staff report dated February 4, 2019 and Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated February 4, 2019 granting the following variances: 1) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, requires a minimum stacking depth of 150' if the average number of parking spaces per driveway is 200 or more spaces and the total number of spaces is 200 or more spaces. The applicant is proposing stacking depths of approximately 54' on the southern Cherry Ln. driveway and approximately 30' on the existing S.H. 114 driveway. Avariance was approved with the original "S -P-2" zoning to allow the stacking depth as shown on the S.H. 114 driveway. The parking garage does not have direct driveway access to the rest of the site, so the required stacking depth on the two garage driveways is 100' (more than 200 spaces total and between 50 and 199 spaces per driveway). The applicant is proposing approximately 71' of stacking depth for the southern garage driveway and approximately 32' for the northern driveway. 2) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, requires a minimum 100' centerline spacing between the garage driveways on Cherry Ln. A variance is requested to allow the 60' centerline spacing shown. 3) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, requires the minimum driveway spacing from an intersection on Cherry Ln. to be 100'. The applicant is request a variance to allow a spacing of approximately 40' measured from the right of way line/property line to the centerline of the driveway. Case No. Attachment A ZA18-0057 Page 3 4) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2.c, prohibits commercial driveways on collector or local streets unless the lot has no other access. A variance is requested to allow the three driveways on Cherry Ln. 5) A variance to Landscape Ord. No 544, as amended, is requested to allow the interior landscape area and materials as shown on the plan. Finally, noting the applicant's willingness to explore screening options that may be possible for the west facing garage. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated February 11, 2019. Variance Approval Criteria for Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended: Variances — The City Council shall have the authority to grant a variance to this ordinance. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the regulations herein will create an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The decision of the City Council shall be final. Variance Approval Criteria for Landscape Ordinance 544, as amended: VARIANCES AND APPEALS: Any applicant who desires a variance or elimination of the requirements herein, or who desires to appeal a decision by the Landscape Administrator, shall file a written appeal with the City Manager for consideration by the City Council. Such appeal shall be accompanied by adequate graphic reproductions, a written summary of the request, and justification for such request. The City Council shall have the authority to grant an interpretation or variance to the requirements of this ordinance. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the regulations herein will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The decision of the City Council shall be final. Case No. Attachment A ZA18-0057 Page 4 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: General Development Standards Applies Comments Overlay Regulations Y Corridor Overlay and Residential Adjacency Overlay Building Articulation Y "S -P-2" Regulation Masonry Standards Y "S -P-2" Regulations Impervious Coverage Y "S -P-2" Regulation Buffe ards Y "S -P-2" Regulation Interior Landscape Y Variance Requested Tree Preservation Y Approved with "S -P-2" zoning Sidewalks Y Complies Case No. Attachment A ZA18-0057 Page 5 Vicinity Neap 2100-2116 E. State Hwy. 114 ZA18-0057 Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan District 114 at Kimball Park l "y t 0 5UG 1 iiijO 2 1000 R' a Feet �1 s Case No. Attachment B ZA18-0057 Page 1 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA18-0057 Review No.: Five Date of Review: 02/11/19 Project Name: Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan — Kimball Park Phase IV APPLICANT: Dennis Gulseth Boka Powell, LLC 8070 Park Lane, Suite 300 OWNER: Jeff Medici Medici Development Partners 2106 E. SH 114, Ste. 103 Dallas, TX Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (972) 701-9000 Phone: (214) 784-1617 E-mail: dgulseth@bokapowell.com E-mail: jeff@medicidp.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 12/31/18, 01/11/2019, 01/16/2019 01/29/2019, 02/04/2019 AND 02/11/2019 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602. An appropriate plat must be processed, approved and recorded for the proposed Lot 2R. 2. Please make the following changes to the Concept Plan and Concept Data (Sheets S3.1 and S3.2): a. Revise the parking analysis by Halff and Associates. The total number of spaces provided is 1106 and not 1110. Please also show any spaces that maybe removed on Lot 1 fora pedestrian connection to and from Lot 2R, if any. If four spaces are removed on Lot 1 for the pedestrian crossing, the total number of spaces for the site is 1102. b. Add a separate row for Land Use Designation (Proposed) and change the one shown to (Land Use Designation (Existing). The proposed designation will be Mixed Use for all of Lot 2R. c. Show the footprint as one building using dashed lines across the covered walkway and label the portion of the footprint that is covered walkway on ground floor. 3. Please make the following changes to the S -P-2 regulations: a. On the first page of the S -P-2 regs, please add "...to also include:" after "C-2 Local Retail Commercial District' to match the wording for Lots 1 and 3. Add "Event space for civic groups" as a permitted use in Lot 2R and change "Special Use Permit' to "Specific Use Permit'. b. Per Section 43.9.c.1.e of the Corridor Overlay Section of the Zoning Ordinance, exposed structural support columns shall be constructed of, or clad in, the same masonry material as the principal structure. Please label all column materials on the elevations and add an S -P-2 regulation to address any columns that are proposed to be constructed of, or clad in, a nonconforming material. 4. Please make the following changes to the Site Plan (Sheet 3.0): Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0057 Page 1 a. The required parking cannot exceed the parking provided. Correct the required parking in the Site Data Summary Chart to 348, which is the required numbers of spaces per the S- P -2 regulations and not the required parking per Zoning Ord. No. 480. b. Add a separate row for Land Use Designation (Proposed) and change the one shown to (Land Use Designation (Existing). The proposed designation will be Mixed Use for all of Lot 2R. c. In the Site Data chart, please remove the rows labeled "Building 1" and "Building 2" in the Site Data chart and just show one row for the total proposed building footprint, the number of stories and the building height. Show the overall height of 75' only. Please add a row for the garage footprint area. d. Please dimension the stacking depth on the S.H. 114 driveway per the Driveway Ordinance. The correct dimension is from the edge of the driveway in front of the building to the S.H. 114 right of way/property line. Approximately 30' of stacking depth is shown on the E. S.H. 114 driveway. e. Please dimension the distance from the right of way line/property line to the centerline of the driveway for the distance to an intersection on Cherry Ln. The minimum required distance is 100'. A variance is requested. f. The fire lane in front of the building scales to 22' and not 24' with and engineer's scale. Please ensure that there is adequate distance for the fire lane and parking as shown and revise the plan so that all dimensions shown are to scale. Show the fire lane with a light gray shading to the correct width. g. Show the footprint as one building using dashed lines across the covered walkway and label the portion of the footprint that is covered walkway on ground floor. 5. The following comments pertain to the Variance Request Letter: a. The following variances are requested to the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended: The applicant is requesting variances to the stacking depths on all three driveways on Cherry Ln. in addition to the main driveway on S.H. 114. The correct dimensions for the garage driveways are 71' for the southern driveway and 32' for the northern driveway. The stacking on the southernmost driveway is 54'. Please dimension the stacking depth on the S.H. 114 driveway per the Driveway Ordinance. The correct dimension is from the edge of the driveway in front of the building to the S.H. 114 right of way/property line. Approximately 30' of stacking depth is shown on the E. S.H. 114 driveway. The required stacking depth is 150' on the southern Cherry Ln. driveway and the SH 114 driveway (more than 200 total spaces and more than 200 spaces per driveway on the three Kimball Park driveways). The parking garage does not have direct driveway access to the rest of the site, so the required stacking depth on the two garage driveways is 100' (more than 200 spaces total and between 50 and 199 spaces per driveway). ii. A variance to the minimum centerline spacing between driveways is requested. The required spacing on Cherry Lane is 100' and a variance is requested to allow the 60' spacing between the two northernmost driveways on Cherry Ln. iii. Please dimension the distance from the right of way line/property line to the centerline of the driveway for the distance to an intersection on Cherry Ln. The minimum required distance is 1 00'and the requested distance is approximately 40'. A variance is requested. Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0057 Page 2 iv. A variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2.c, which prohibits commercial driveways on collector or local streets unless the lot has no other access may be required to allow the three driveways on Cherry Ln. The Director of Public Works will make a determination on the need for a variance request. b. Both the minimum required interior landscape area and plant material are not provided. A variance is requested to allow the landscape area and materials as shown. 6. Please make the following changes to the elevations: a. Swap the labels on the east and west elevations. b. Stucco and plaster shall only be considered a masonry material when applied using a 3 - step process over diamond metal lath to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing a comparable cement stucco finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. An S -P-2 regulation has been added to allow the elastomeric coating. c. Based on the feedback from the Corridor Planning Committee, staff strongly recommends providing a rendering that includes the landscaping to be provided along S.H. 114. Please ensure that all landscaping shown on the renderings matches the materials shown on the landscape plan. Please see the Landscape Administrator's comment regarding plant materials in the utility easement along S.H. 114 that contains the overhead power lines and underground utilities. d. Staff strongly recommends providing a material sample board of all exterior materials prior to or at the City Council meeting. 7. Show the location, type, and height of all walls, fences, and screening devices, if any. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: The development is proposed to be "S -P-2" Zoning. If the development were proposed as straight zoning it would not comply with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. There is 15% of existing tree cover on the site and a minimum of 70% of the existing tree cover would be required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve 0% of the existing tree cover. Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0057 Page 3 Table 2.0 — Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 70% -0%-20% 20.1-40% 60% 50% -40.1%-60% 60.1%-80% 40% 80.1% -100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S -P-1 Site Plan, S -P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting in the S -P-2 regulations that the south and west bufferyards be allowed as shown on the plan. A 25' Type `J' bufferyard would typically be required adjacent to E. State Highway 114. and a 10'— E type bufferyard is shown on the plan. The applicant is proposing less Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0057 Page 4 than the required plant materials in the 10' Type `C' bufferyard on the west. A bufferyard may be used for passive recreation, such as pedestrian, bike, or equestrian trails, provided that: (a0 no plant material is eliminated; (b) the total width of the bufferyard is maintained; and (c) all other regulations of the bufferyards regulations and zoning ordinance are met. In no event shall the following uses be permitted in a bufferyard: playfields, stables, swimming pools, tennis courts, or similar facilities, accessory buildings, parking facilities, or trash dumpsters. 2. Both the minimum required interior landscape area and plant material are not provided. A variance is requested Provide the amount of interior landscape area actually being provided. In the Interior Landscape Requirements summary chart provided on the Landscape Plan the building footprint area, required interior landscape area, and "Required" plant material quantities are incorrect. Based on the data provided for the building foot print areas (53,996), the required interior landscape area is 26,998 square feet. 3. A 5% reduction in interior landscape area is being taken for water conservation credits based on Section 3.3e of the Landscape Ordinance 544-B. An Irrigation Plan must be submitted to determine if the Landscape Plan and associated do comply with Section 3.6 of the Landscape Ordinance 544-B 3.3e Water Conservation Credits: Where irrigation systems in accordance with Section 3.6 b herein are utilized in at least 75% of all shrub beds, the the required landscape area may be reduced by 5%. 3.6 IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS: All required landscape areas shall be irrigated by an automatic irrigation system designed by a Licensed Irrigator, Landscape Architect or other professional authorized by the State to design such systems. Natural meadows of wild flowers or other native habitat shall not be required to be irrigated. a. Minimum Standards for Irrigation Systems: All irrigation systems shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the landscape irrigation rules promulgated by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) or successor agency, as the same may be from time to time amended, and any applicable adopted City Plumbing Codes. Water Conservation: The City would like to promote the use of efficient irrigation methods and practices. Where possible in planting beds, flood irrigation, porous pipe or emitter/drip systems should be utilized. Where slopes do not allow flood systems, flat spray heads should be utilized undershrubs ratherthan upward spray heads on risers above shrubs. Lawn spray heads should have low precipitation rates, run for longer periods of time, and water infrequently to promote deep root growth for grasses. C. Tree Irrigation Requirements: Provisions shall be made in the design of the irrigation system to adequately provide water to the root zone of newly planted trees until they are established. This may be done through installation of a separate zone providing bubbler irrigation, low-pressure drip systems or similar heads directly adjacent to newly planted trees. Any lines providing heads near a tree shall be installed radially to the trunk of the tree rather than crossing through the root zone. The irrigation designer may propose other means of tree irrigation during establishment, subject to approval by the Landscape Administrator. d. Pressure Regulating Devices: All irrigation systems shall utilize pressure regulating spray heads and rotor bodies in order to reduce system misting and aid in proper Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0057 Page 5 water placement. All pressure regulating devices shall be installed per the manufacturer's directions. Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Kevin Ferrer, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8089 E-mail: kferrer@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. Construction within FM 1709/1938/SH 114 right of way shall require a permit from TxDOT. Copy of the approved TxDOT permit will be needed prior Pre -con request. Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.citVofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 EASEMENTS: Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15' minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. Detention ponds shall be dedicated by plat as drainage easements. The following note shall be added to the plat: Compliance with the provisions of the city's Storm Drainage Policy does not relieve a person of the responsibility of complying with all other applicable laws, including, but not limited to, Section 11.086, Texas Water Code. Verify if easement of water/sanitary sewer/storm sewer crossing the site is in an easement. Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. Permanent drainage or utility easement abandonment requires a council action. WATER COMMENTS: Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0057 Page 6 2. The new proposed water line alignment that is to replace the 12" shall have diameter of 12" up to the reconnection to 12"s The Structure's encroachment in the existing easement will need an Easement abandonment. Water lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A 1" inch meter must have a 1" tap, etc. Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. Fire lines shall be separate from service lines. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. Pre and development condition shall have common outfall. Summary table shall compare existing and development discharge location. All proposed outfall location shall be limited to pre-existing condition, or justification provided to allow any increased runoff. 2. Clearly label all private and public storm sewer lines. 3. Differences between pre- and post- development runoff shall be captured in detention pond(s). Proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of the 1, 10 and 100- year storm events. Detention may be required with any new proposed building construction. Describe how increased runoff from site is being detained. Access easements are needed for maintenance of detention ponds. Supporting documents for no detention may be submitted at the time of design phase, but please note that if it is determined that detention is needed the Site Plan may require to be re- approved. 4. Easements outside of right of way shall be required for proposed storm sewer. Storm sewer must be installed outside the edge of pavement. Ordinance #605 defines easement requirements for storm sewer: 30" RCP and under - 15' easement 42" — 54" RCP - 20' easement 60" — 66" RCP - 25' easement 72" — 102" RCP - 30' easement Over 102" RCP — 3.5 times diameter Calculations will be required to verify capacity of proposed curb inlets. Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards. Provide inlet at the end of pavement of proposed street to intercept runoff before entering adjacent property. Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on upstream and downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0057 Page 7 review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website: http://www.citVofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The Environmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in: https://www.citVofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. * NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. * Retaining walls greater than 4 -feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. * A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. * Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Transportation Manager Review Stephanie Taylor, P.E., PTOE Transportation Manager Phone: (817) 748-8216 E-mail: staylor@ci.southlake.tx.us TRIP GENERATION UPDATE: 1. The City has received the update to the trip generation originally presented in the 2012 TIS and agrees with the conclusion that the new mixed-use development will generate slightly fewer trips than the previously proposed restaurant use. PARKING ANALYSIS: 1. Staff agrees that a deficit of 99 spaces can be overcome through demand fluctuations and efficiencies gained through shared parking for the site overall; however, this may not be the Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0057 Page 8 case for Lot 2R specifically. This portion of the site is not as well connected to the rest of the development as the other lots, so visitors will not be able to easily access the surplus of parking available on the other lots or enjoy the same shared parking efficiencies. The current deficit of 173 spaces is significant and needs to be addressed through increased pedestrian connectivity from parking areas to Lot 2R, an increase in the parking garage capacity on Lot 2R, or an alternate solution. SITE PLAN: 1. Confirm that the east driveway for Lot 2R will be constructed in a manner that complies with ADA guidelines. A minimum 5' wide flat surface with a max cross slope of 2% should be provided across the driveway, similar to the proposed configuration for the Cherry Ln. driveways with sidewalks. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: Both buildings must be completely covered by an automatic fire sprinkler system due to the total square footage being in excess of 6,000 square feet. The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler systems can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length of the pipe. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a vault. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5'X5' if the double check is located in a vault, or a minimum of 6'X6' if it is located on the riser. (Label riser room locations) Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes on the property. (FDC location indicated for one building, but not for the other building and parking garage on the plans) Add FDC locations, wall mount or remote connection, and add/or relocate fire hydrants as necessary to meet the distance requirements. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius. (Per 2015 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4) General Informational Comments A SPIN meeting was held December 11, 2018. No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0057 Page 9 All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount. Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0057 Page 10 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES E kORMY ryM H�4�L1 R r 737 � 4, ae LN Nit N71 zuF VIE � a. } 414 .79 _ I r c SH 7a r SPO # � Owner Zoning Ph sical Address Acreage Response 1. KAUFMAN, JAMES C SF1-A 625 BRIARWOOD DR 1.35 NR 2. PARADIS, THOMAS MF1 450 CHERRY LN 0.94 NR 3. PATEL, HARSHADBHAI MF1 425 BRIARWOOD DR 1.03 NR 4. CLTH AND AR ASSOCIATES INC MF1 440 CHERRY LN 0.50 NR 5. CLTH AND AR ASSOCIATES INC MF1 430 CHERRY LN 0.50 NR 6. MC PROPERTIES INC SP1 1940 E SH 114 1.14 NR 7. LR SOUTHLAKE PARTNERS LP SPI 1980 E SH 114 1.53 NR 8. CARDARELLI, PAUL C2 2000 E SH 114 1.05 NR 9. BTH & RA ASSOCIATES INC MF1 400 BRIARWOOD DR 0.54 NR 10. MOSS, ANGELIA J SF1-A 550 CHERRY LN 1.09 NR 11. VAN TIL, ROBERT MF1 500 CHERRY LN 1.15 NR 12. PERKINSON, DOUGLAS ABLE SF1-A 575 BRIARWOOD DR 1.03 NR 13. TOWRY, JOHN EARL SF1-A 475 BRIARWOOD DR 1.13 NR 14. BROWN, RONNI SF1-A 600 BRIARWOOD DR 1.27 NR 15. TATE, JOHN T SP2 2120 E SH 114 0.92 NR 16. TEXAS PETRO CORP III SP2 2150 E SH 114 1.16 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA18-0057 Page 1 17. BRIARWOOD TOWNHOMES LP MF1 420 BRIARWOOD DR 0.57 NR 18. DRIGGERS, RANDALL D SF1-A 450 BRIARWOOD DR 1.06 NR 19. WAGNER, STEVEN R SF1-A 550 BRIARWOOD DR 1.05 NR 20. POKHREL, RAMESH K SF1-A 500 BRIARWOOD DR 1.07 NR 21. FIRST FINANCIAL TRUST & ASSET MF1 675 CHERRY LN 0.98 NR 22. COTY, ROB SF1-A 600 CHERRY LN 1.00 NR 23. LEE, K WAYNE SP2 566 N KIMBALL AVE 0.66 NR 24. KIMBALL LAKES PROPERTY OWNERS SP2 572 N KIMBALL AVE 0.39 NR 25. EKSTROM, DELTON E SF1-A 650 CHERRY CT 0.99 NR 26. SILVERADO SOUTHLAKE LLC SP1 2001 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 4.41 NR 27. HARRIS, KIMBERLY SUSAN SF1-A 700 CHERRY CT 0.95 NR 28. HALIM, EMIL A MF1 725 CHERRY CT 0.96 NR 29. 31. CHERRY LANE PARTNERS LP SAWNMC3 REYNAL, JOHN 01 MF1 485 CHERRY LN 575 CHERRY LN 1.95 1.10 NR NR 32. VAN TIL, JOHN J MF1 1625 CHERRY LN 1.00 NR 3. MDP KIMBALL PARK OFFICE LLC SP2 2108 E SH 114 5.17 F 35. S INVESTME INC FC SOUTHLAKE LLC SP2 RRY 2104 E SH 114 1.0 3.64 NR 36. KIMBALL ROAD LP 11 500 N KIMBALL AVE 1.60 NR 37. TDC MANAAGEMENT LLC SP2 560 N KIMBALL AVE 0.48 NR 38. 40. ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO LLC BELF, BRETT CS AG 550 N KIMBALL AVE KIMBALL AVE 501 N KIMBALL AVE 2.48 3.40 NR NR 41. ST LAURENCE EPISCOPAL CHURCH CS 517 N KIMBALL AVE 6.43 NR 42. KP SOUTHLAKE JV LLC SP2 2112 E SH 114 1.30 NR 43. BOWEN SL LTD 11 450 N KIMBALL AVE 0.37 NR 44. SANDCO HOLDINGS LP SPI 420 N KIMBALL AVE 0.53 NR 45. BARGER EQUITY GROUP LLC 11 440 N KIMBALL AVE 0.33 NR 6. MDP SOUTHLAKE LLC SP2 2116 E SH 114 0.92 F 47. MAYSE, RICHARD A SP1 2118 E SH 114 0.75 NR 48. MDP SOUTHLAKE LLC SP2 2114 E SH 114 2.97 F 49. MDP SOUTH LAKE LLC SP2 2102 E SH 114 1.56 F Responses: F: In Favor 0: Opposed U: Undecided Notices Sent: Forty-seven - (47) Responses Received: Five (5) - Attached NR: No Response Case No. Attachment D ZA18-0057 Page 2 NoUficati€ n Resporkse Form ZA I "087 Me&tIng Date: January 17, 2019 at 0:30 PM ALTS INVESTMENTS CROUP INC 489 CHERRY LN SOUTHLAKE TX 76052iUOO Dirract gwstiDns and rraad responses tip_ NoFr=,:,ffota Rnr 1400 Mair, . t: Ste.316 irrrt ti lk TX - 7609 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. ' tQ5,eing the owner(s) of the prop" so noted above, re �ter+ehy i n f�lvo:ro� opposed to u n deo about 017116y b -7 (circle or underline one. the proposed Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan referenced above, Space for comments regarding your position. r"'e'd !117 0 we AO a R qe Signature: Date; AdditionalSignature: Cate; Printed Name(s). _ Yp.1 MuFA tm prupedty rover(&) whorbe nanrwo(p are ponied al top. CSlherwim omwct the Planning Data nwit, Onia t rrr firer propariy. Phone Number (optionaly Z 1 # 2 -3 — Case No. Attachment D ZA18-0057 Page 3 Rn V gmgy!!!�-af d, I -qie"-T -rV7 gde R++ z7Vr,-' e - R qe Signature: Date; AdditionalSignature: Cate; Printed Name(s). _ Yp.1 MuFA tm prupedty rover(&) whorbe nanrwo(p are ponied al top. CSlherwim omwct the Planning Data nwit, Onia t rrr firer propariy. Phone Number (optionaly Z 1 # 2 -3 — Case No. Attachment D ZA18-0057 Page 3 Notification Response Form 18-0057 Moret ng Date- January 17, 2019 at &3D FM FUSSELMM. BRUCE 2100 C STATE 1HWY ii4 SOUTHLAKE TX 760 2-6512 Direct quesSorm and rmizil wrap es to. y Gf soustfkw" Notffieaian Fkwponee 1400 MaiR 1p 7X 7M2 1<�T48 Fac (81 7 p7484W" PLEASE I ROVIO COMPLETED FORMS VIA WIL , FAX OR HAN D DELIVERY BEFOREE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being thi t awner(a) 4of the property so noted Atmwe, ®re hereby in aver of opposed to undecsded about circle or underline ono) the proposed Zoning Change and ConceptWe Man referenced above. Space for comme+ regarding your posi6on. - - -- ` �ts _ .f T 1' fry c IM7 T6 -- Signature: Additional ignatdre: Lute: Date; Printed Narne(s)= bkuj V A ore prr.psety owner(s) wt I a r4 -9m€ ',$) 91E phr4ed at sup- Caterwise coMicl Me Plann.V 11WAMe I L Orrt fCrm w impeav Phone Number (oo ian a.l); Case No. Attachment D ZA18-0057 Page 4 Notification Response Form 7 -A18 -D057 Wetingl date- January 17, 2019 at 6;30 PM HAGAR, STEPHEN T 479 N KIMBALL AVE UTHLAKE TX 76D92-6642 Direct 4�jpstic-Mand P1 ail respoilbe�i to: Cdty e( Sou#hl:ake plan.r1ing & Deuelopmelit services 140 lairs :fit, Ste 310 'Ph' n (-l317)748-8621. 4 -0077 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE STAIN OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING, Being the ?+y± s of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of apposed to undedded about -- ^~(circle or underline one the proposed Zoning Change and Concep tI ite Flan referenced above, Space for comments regarding your position: Signature: _ ^Dale: AdditionalSignature: ,��, �° Date: F Printed Name(s), Muni he praperty avnrer(s) whmw- Phone Number (optional)- �2 � Y - w . Fn's 1'.,.1,, ar Case No. Attachment D ZA18-0057 Page 5 Notification Response Form ZA19-0057 Meeting Date: January 17, 20119 at 6:30 PM AARP KIMBALL PARK OFFICE LLC 2106 E STATE 114 HWY STE 103 SOUTHLAKE TX 76092 Gity ref a at!-hla4@ P!a n ning . �1 v i rri rrt crv.® 400 ItAai€S.Srt, ` tp :x'10 �rtF�lait Tp: 76DW Fay.,—, {13173`` 0 t1? i PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX DR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Be ng the owner(s) of the pFoperty so noted above, are hereby t f—a V 0 r p opposed to undecided about (cirnle OF underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: Baa"" Fqg OF aD&40j I I Signature: Date, - -� AdditionalSignature-, Date: Printed Name(s): ZkAvAm I? LvLAtc, Mint kfe property vmwRs) wh av nerw(s) are prlrpd at top- QfherWiwe wrrtact the FtanNr,g aepar,-mem.. Ores farm per property. Rhone Number (optional). Case No. Attachment D ZA18-0057 Page 6 Notification Response f=orm ZA 18 -0057 Meeting Date: January 17, 2a19 at 6:30 RM MOP SOUTH LAKE LLC 2106 E STATE 114 H'Y STE 103 OU` HLAKE 1rX 76092 JAN 16 201* 4. D,if ct:gU0§firjn--� 9 n d rnail r sperrisc!s to: ity Pf S0111111ake Filar-1ming-4, DeVel6wdent Survides • !�c�t�Fi.�f�e�ir 9�e�c�rt�€� 3-citl?[a. e, TX 6092', : . f ax;1.517174BL 7 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS IIIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby (in favor opposed to and oided about (circie or underline one) the proposed Zcnlng Change and ConceptJSite Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: 7rtALS m.- A r, 41% 4n�<LkkOAV Signature: AdditionalSignature: Date: t� Date: Printed Nnme(s); 71*k&1 >a Muss to prop" OW004tY whow narne(z) are pdMsd al fop. Qlroerwfte Corded the P4anrrng Depamant. 0"1P f0ml per property. Phone Number (optional), Case No. Attachment D ZA18-0057 Page 7 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-657C AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1-6, KIMBALL PARK, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOT A, BLOCK A, BRIARWOOD ESTATES, PHASE I (ALSO KNOWN AS LOT Al, BLOCK A, BRIARWOOD ESTATES, PHASE 1) AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 17.27 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" FROM "S -P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT TO "S -P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT AND SITE PLANS ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "B", SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article X1, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 1 WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as "S -P-2" Generalized Site Plan District under the City's Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 2 clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as Lots 1-6, Kimball Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lot A, Block A, Briarwood Estates, Phase I (also Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 3 known as Lot A1, Block A, Briarwood Estates, Phase 1) an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 17.27 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit "A" from "S -P-2" Generalized Site Plan District to "S -P-2" Generalized Site Plan District as depicted on the approved Concept and Site Plans attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", and subject to the following conditions: APPROVAL OF ORD. NO 480-657 S -P-2 Regulations for Ordinance No. 480-657 Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 4 tAdams M;irch t. -111 t Kimball Parr Proposed Permitted Uses azul Developntvot Rugulmions fur "4-V-2" Zoning 11trmrlIeel Use,: This property is, divided into :six lois. Lot 1. consisting of 3.59 aureb. shall include the pennitted uses & found in the "HC" Hotel District, List 3 shall inclu&! pennitted uses fuuttcl in the -0-2" t_Yffete District and l.,ats 2, -l. and 5 ,liall includr the permiucd me, as Found in 'C-2" I-AlCal R rt ril Cornrrwrcial District of7oning Ordinance No. 490, Wi ®meadeef_ With the fbltrau•ing excriatinn: Lot I: "HC" I'latel District tt,es to al -mi include: r Restaurant .and baf which are accessed from atx interiau lobby ■ Conference Center totaling 9.3W square i'ectof meeting a-nd;LrpprFrFrt spavc Lot 2,34 dt 5: "t::-2- Local Retail C(nimiercial District groes, limited to-, ■ Restriurant (lour is u larrmiued acre,sury use) * L or+ Qe Shalt Re-, lima i VX, IHdVs lobi klod) Lin Los 2. 4, & 5 with Lit ve-Iliru SeiA ice Alowedmi I. eat 4 only tprr L--+uneil rnrttieml w Retail • Health & Well Being busincsws (mzt5sagr therapy, f mcgsi, health related products) r spa Lett 3; `H0-2" Offier Diktric t u,e� to also inrlvde: lululd--,Wy 67tfiwe hrhilding5 ails to 4 above grade flmn with gmd.e level floor ruwd for l arking: r Allan fiat initial or tatture pxrk:ia� dett 10 ntert additional parking denamnds with a parking ratira L?(4 Slpacesp r IMHW 5F Lot 6: Open Spa oe lest with natural vegetation. + existing o.Teek ctiannei. new ptanlings and detend on atrea. Primary area will :sen -e as a dram mge easement. Dev lciprment Regulations! This property that€ ase suirj"t to the detelopenent regulations for the "HC' Howl Disiri4t fig° Lot I - the "C Local Retail Con>_nw(cryial Di trict A)r Lot 4 cit 5, and "D-2 Office Distrivi i4r Lot 3 and all other appli`a ale regulatians Stith the Following exceptir)[ts: • F arktttg agreenient-� will be ill lalace prior ur pennitting No saui Cy elle urombined parking rryuirerna-nts for the devrlupmrnt- Required parking will he as shm%n on plan. + TO fiacihtaEe R contigucnis developnient, buffvey'ards will not be requt vd along internal boundary Line's- 910S ine:;_ 910S K.miniD A%cave + Se,awEianhe. Tnn 75[193 rft�yc: Avg. NO. �'"�'ak7'; �ncryi�.��acus•c�ane^�r�.n,�,cxrm Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 5 RM r C,ix'en the long r1111w alUng p0nitan5 Ofthc faaafa lk. Jill uvrrimse of building arLwulutiuns will diwty".t from a Mum wtrt:am-line] architectural intent. Fvr thi'� rewjun, Urti ulatim will he as shown on the architectural site plan, conceptual floor plans, and exterior elevations. Articniation Nvill be dimensioned on the floor planus for clarity- * Delivery to the property will be €iehednled and hinited to occur bets;Keen the hours of 7 -00ani - 7:l1Upm daily and trash Biel: -up will be limited to occuf berween the hours of 7:00aan - 7:(Wjpin Monday - Satur aye (must cvnforrn to the Contrawt 6)r Rei dcritial aJnd Commerc-ital Refuse kind Ctrlkroitpa)' + The wcsicrn paroperty line acijatccni to the mtitlt-lhmily rtrsidcntial lots will be scrucncd with a vcg,zWccl wr ning fol cxiMing plant naaatcrial. rrcp1=d plantings within lbr t+aJf 4 and additionarl large shrubs and accent trees planled within the buffer yard_ Plantings consisting of both existing and new plant material will achieve a solid screening to 9' in height and 3t°ilI be shown on the landscope phtn. • Ltaadiatp .zones are positioned within each lot as shown on plan and in the .site data saunrnary chart- + As in iattettwlized development with a slturtd ctunntort accc�.�s easement and parking the building halt',% sk ill lre allowed as shown on plan. + Vary from each lot fronting a right-of-way to allow the lot configuration as shown on plan + Stacking dcp1h% at NO the Kimball and Hwy 114 catrance allmvcol bV approval of the altachcd Variance Rerluest letter. With the close proximity of the proposed buildings and cross parking Inyanii impervious calculatlaw. tc'ill vary to allow for anti t vetall inVervious area. of 70%, Ilse and operation The projoct ray°un,ictt' cntaails a hotel and uit3ice dc3°ck_Ta 1 nl wiih an out parccl fronling tint SH 114 and, two internal parcels that wdl be developed into a Mi Lure of uses to ijiClUde restauraalL retail, health 1 Nvell-being and cofTee shop with drive-thru. The following is a lot by lot breakdown with the primary empharsia on the Lw I Site Plan, Lot 1 (Hite Plan Apnikation) Site ,plan proposes a Cambria Suiles `all -suites' hotel with an upscale rating according to Smith Travel Research. Indtar,r LL&CS its aft{hide: + Rtstaurautl With lounge + filar %t n on -!Ac ,klc«hol ConStamption + 175 g Ue-'.t suites { able indicot'ing Imit mix a0d ,quare foiatgges is at the end of this norrative) • Balhr inn;xilhporiiiionsforJacaapaaciivLli764pcaip14 + Adrninistrpti a office slwace Retail sundry spa-ce + Cvrtfercncc Center containing 5.100 sCluure feel Of rticCting Slaaaec a 13tt+irk , c=enter + 1,495sf Fitness Crater Proposed outdoor services uses to include (it should be noted that all patios are interconnected): • Patio conlaining lCiLwrc area wiih Pool, + Patio c ontainir�g lire pit and dining + Roll-out bar service P'atiiti for Confera:arce Crnicr spill out 910 5 iLlLI5tKM Avewe a SutuhLeLe- Terry 76092 817.328.3200 a FAX 817-328.3294 TWE Reg. ku_F,10tlY: iraai,°.udumsr rr� rrvn ..cam Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 6 9 Shaui le sen -ice to points of interest Fswrior N -sign of the PvUm5wd C ambra:a Suites Haul Tltr: Pri3Pcrsc.d hnlcl is four 141 storic-s in height and tatuls approxiaatatcly 118.3 1 S square feet. The faxrtprinl Of the building is uPP+rOxiniatcly 3I. ­qtmm fact. and is 47`-5" to the urp of the primary parapet and 59'-3" to the top of the tower structure. The building de,. ign is contemlmrar�, and includes aft adenliliciaticrrl tcm er adjacent tin the hotel lrahlwt eratraame- This limrrideiniiic4 the hotel from all taccess PninLa to the Silr incltulinv_r Mien aplrrxraathin" the development from tate airport. Che Erase of the lower contains a die Ole height hotel lobby while the upper floors contain executive Suites. Arrival to the hotel is also signified by a cowentpor'ary Porte C oclaere whiA contain'..' M expressive a atuilevered srrucrut al systeiaa cirisaitit%8 of brick pigs and a metal clad =opy anchored in place by cabie stanchitnas. The cxtGrior Finish materials of the building include brick. %tru:ce, mctaal and glass• Brick: uill be u d primarily at the towcrs, along illc entire baric of than building, at pmjiwing wall frarnc elements, and in select locations to create additional articulation between bi il&ng volumes. At the upper floors. at infill tik alts within flm projecting frames, and on all non -street facing elevations (north and west). a srucco finish is propmed, Two eohjrs will he as inediurn ttitilir for the ler%%rr pcsrticrr 4 cs1 thr Walls and a 1 V+1 Sian fors the upper tJ kscrr- uununary of-uwgndj+�ratjons - Carrkbria taite -Hertel; The d4aveloper proposes to develop a Cambria Suites hotel. The proposed howl is prntiaanirned io have 175 guest suites- a 8,380 square flat Conference Center containing 5,100sf of meeting space, restaurant and bar, filncss center. and pool. The restmerant:' bar Operation WilI a nnsist of a 1.900sf Prin-Lang alining lounge space and utilize the outrlour courtyard on select occasions. I'lae restaurant and Imr will primarily service hotel guests and adjacent office building tenants. although it +% ill be open to the public as well. A U00sf kitchen is positioned int d w floor plana to cflicieauly NrT%icc the clirain,a, 13FeR M, %tell xis to tiert'icc the m"tiog rooms- In aaddititan tlat: ha,atel k:Durey and will ltc: Weil aarpoiniud Iter hotly a relaxing and b ilmint aatmozsphere with a lxlol, fi"luce anil PeriodiL: lire entenaimnew. Hotel hours of operation: Firod Seryice i Restaurant typically opens at 6:00am and cloves no earlier than I L(YiPrn; 7 days a week- - Bar Service typioally upewi at 10:40am and eloses aro later tha xi 2, M:taarn Mon -Sat,- typically opens at I I-[l0mm and cloves no fatcr than 2.00am on Sunday. Liyc Music a%, ill end no later than 12:00axrn, 7 days a w cek, Outdoor Speaker, - sound system will be shut off no later than 12:0 ann and any outdoor music: will be discontinued no later than 12 V) ata. 7 dams a week. The propm.,ecl writ ercure spaca is included in the f otp nt of the hcnrl ansa in pri g7pirn Lncd prkrnttrily to hent gvtup cv=Mj :such as corPclraatr nwctiugs rand u?ciaal evcntn. 1110 meeting space %till Irons: as PRnnincni second eniranc:e for acee&s fron-i the ad[acent office buildings. Theprcrpnsed ballroom is 4.326 squame feet, and has a p i:pam,innied capacity of 264. The balkwrn will have a lame conference patina that connects to the pistil area arttl lire flit. T e room is divisible iritis Urine break-out roorm of 1.440 square fret each. The lircgmm alwu includes as break-out meetutg room ctararairiing 469 square feet and has a capacity ol'32- The YI0 S. K: JLlxatl AlC11tlr • �nld4s. Te."% 76092 917 328.3.20n 9 rAA' 817.z?8,.?u" . 7'li f rE RCK.:Vel. i'-1 MJF?,' vi�mr.arf��uF-t�7�rnrr�rrn�.ca7m Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 7 RM prog in also includes a board rnoni. CMflai]tireg, ?g8 square feet and has a capacity, of 10. t )y,Crutte1efa11. the howl v' -ill be uble to ]fust all %iZC cpgH.Mr'ltr; C%'4TLt:1i A -ith q':1i%i1iCSL 1<iL kirc. bangvct-�, hra0L-0111 iraeetong"- dining and l+:wka ing. For a4m-C0Fj14rrJ1U 0C smaller r'S'etFU the tocileeees t5g11 be av'aikehle 1x� reservation to rent the ballroorn and meeting rooms. CanE reisce space hours of operation: Normal hours (corporate a -ents) - 9.00am-9:00prn Mon -Scali I l Alain-7:00pm Sun - Special event hours - 7 Xkkin-2,00ani 14 ou-fiat., 11:0aarn-11:fit}pin Sun Lot 2 Concept plan proposes an out -parcel lot for a restaurant_ W Concept plire i-� imtteil(W to shotiv scalc of whoa eon fit on the ow -parcel in jwetndanict with the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinancae and the SH 114 Corridor overlay. Site data for what is shown in the cw)necpt cans cis Of singir sklrr 10.0110srfoolprint and 03 parking spacers,. Alsip shown is an outdoor waiting, area with bar service. Ultimatr site Alin will enTtsiwtofwhat 6iE, %% Willi ehe guruttirt"s otiheC'eniVreltensivc Zoning Ordinance and the SIS 1 W Corridor +Uverlay but should generally conform to the concept plan. r Development will he a rte taurant, a Majorty ofparking ree:lrwirememts shall 13c provided on-site and the ra amining will be subject to a C01ntrinetl porking agrccmcnt vw'iih the* other Kits within the devclopmcni.. e Re-staaerani will have the ability to inchidc an outdoor 'wx-n ting arca wl.th Isar service and limited seating, 0 A 15 X 25 sip easement as shown on the site plan will run with the sale of the property, 0 The lire lane illustrated along the Lot 3 boundary line and access paint to the mainentry drive will rc-main as shown on the Site Phan, Lot 3 t=onatiept plan proposes the € evelopnaeiit of a three-story office develcpneeit that Could develop as a four- story structure with parking on the ground level or have a parking deck to fdecilita to hiture parkinv demands- 0 Concept plan is intcndcd to shout- sc ale of what can fat 4n the prop owd lot with. structure and parkhig in accorddace with t1Te Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Site data for what is shown in the concept -consists sof a three story office building with a 32,000 footprint far a total of 96, Wrif and 26 parking spaces. ID Ultimate site plan will consist of whn I tit, lvithin the parameters of the Cwlmprehcnsivc Zoning OTdinatace htat 4,h(3ulri gerteraally e:oTi tt4Tn1 tet the ecVlrepf Plrirt.. La Concept plan proposes the development of a restaurant coffee -shop with drive-thru. ■ Concept plan is ivteridt vd tai shm% wale of wvhot can tit on the prrrlxas d lot in m;ctrrs Tive with the Cw}mprehensive Zoning Ordinanec, Site data for what is shown in The concept consists of a single %W6- MON 0atptrini anal 521 parking spavcs. ,Abel shown i:k a dtdieatcd drive-thru l€inc< • Any restaurant use will exclude fast-food frannchises_ + Ultimate site plan will consist of what lits within the parameters of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance but should generally conform to the concepi plan. L2t 5 gift S KunImIJ hrenne 0 .Snentdakc. fnn4 7092 TBPE Rog. AV F-1fi1 Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 8 Concept platb proposes the development of a restaurant retail building. • Clnccpt plan is intendcd to sho%v scale of what can fit on the pmposM lot in accordance tvith the Comprehensive Zoning Cirdinnrtsc. Site data for what is shown in the concept consists of a single sttary "22%, foo print artd 54 parking paete8. Alho shown i& mmple space for outdoordining and plaza spare_ Dcvclopmcnt is conccptunll'se v proposed to bz a multi-tcnaant strU4lurc Nvith uses rclativc to restaurant, retail and or hcnith and well-being. Possible health and well-being uses could consist of rnstssage thztapy. ritnvss, spji and health related products and wrvice:s. • Ultimate site plan will consist of what tits within the panuneters of the Comprehensive Zoning Ctrdimmvc but shoU14 gcncrall'y ecin'di rn to the ronccpl pian ■ MajoritY ofparlktttg requirenxents shalt be pro,..gded on-site and the rentainine will be subject to a combined parking agreement tirith the other lotq within the &V lupment. Phasing Intent Phasint; Intent It is tate intent of the developer to move forward with construction documents for the hotel in anxediately upon :Site Plan approval from Council. The entirety of all cicmrnts shown on Lol l will be part of the c€tnstntction package and bidding as rxill the primal drive aisle loop from H;i,,,- 114 j+? Kinibttd M a and the POA lot which includes the drtcntion The fire lent that is split by. the UFL _ 13Q7u1jdAry:mJ T. in 3 boundary will be built as ivell. Lots 2-5 Will cOn11e an -line as each lot i5put tinder contract. It is w4mown at this time what the order of mkc-dovyn will bc. Lot I Parking Anale'sis (Hotel): Parking as shown on die plan includes 211 spares within Lot 1 and 495 spaces widlin Lot 1-5 for a total of 706 spaces. Required parking for Lot I per the CAY of Southlakc ordinancc Was calct;tlatcd as follows: - 17 5 room-: fi:i l per room =175 spaces - AdihtiomA provided for acce&sory uses = 36 spaces - Bar, RIOSsat>rartt Iacressorvuse to the hotel) r I.100sf X t9OCkf= 19 spaces (25110 if spaces required are :additional to the hotel use - s gates. The halanc cc 75%- i+: €cccsson- to the hotel and Flo additional spnccs to those allocated to gucstroorns are proposed) - Meeting space use tea the I-Poirll d l 3 "eats X :306 wary 3 10? tregtsaw spaces (assumes 15sf per person odl 5,400 sf): -13% of spaces required are additional to the Mattel use = 102 X .25 = 26 spxcen. The halancc 7511is accssspry to the hotel and no additional spa"c, to those allocated to guzstroonis are proposed) Total space: requ Irerl =1.75 + 5 + 26 = 206 Loi 1 Total = 211 provided spaces 9 10 S. tunibA Aveime • S.-�utle_ Texas 7609'- 637.328.3200. t-A�'x 817.329.32" FBPE kay.: 'r�. 1;4(J 2 ak�4rv.rr i a errgrrrcnrrrra�.d a�N Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 9 Variances approved with Ord. No. 480-657 ,3Adams Januaty 3, 2014 City of Soutltlake Department of Planning & Development Services 1400 Main Street, Suite 310 Southlake, TX 76CA2 Re: Request for Variances Kimball Park Additiom Lots i thru 6 ACE! Project No. 2012.156 This request for variances is to address lot frontage on a public or private street and the stacking distance at driveways into the property, The Southlake Ordiname No. 403, Section 8.01(A) requires that every lot front on a public or private suet. As a contiguous. development that eAeodS deep off of Hwy 114 and will have a mixture of uses on individual Cats It Is requested that a variance be granted to allover the lot configuration as shown on pian. Tlie Southlake Driveway Ordinance No. 634 "ulms a stack;ittg depth of 150 feet from the adjacent R.O.W. to tlye oearest parking stall cx inter5eciing drlve lane pavenvmt edge within the property. The ddJulaing p;irLuls flung Kimball Ave. am! Hwy 114 are cvrhtnc>'lllay the location of the crass acceS5 Interr�ect:lun and thus setting the Slacking distance, refer to the site plat) submitted LG lllustt'ate both driveways and common access points. The adjacent property alorig Hwy 111, Lot 7R, Block 1 Me sEu fklrtlt6r3r , virus approved Ly Lhe City of 5authlake zoning! case ZA96-ID9. The concept plan in this tuning carne includes a corTnrt on access drivewayfeasennent appaoximateh,, 34 feet autSide the HWY 114 R.O.W. The Kimball Park site plait allows for approximately 34 feet of starking dislance in the driveway from H Y 11:4 clue to this appruved common access driveway, The adjacent property along Kimball Ave Legit 1, Block 1 Mesco Addition, has twru existing drives parrailtling Kimball approximately 17 feet and 102 fce.t ouWde: the Kimball R.O.W The Kimball Park site plan allows connectlon to both of thm existing drams which forces a stacking distance gess that the requilm.0 150 fbf-t. We herein rcquest a lot Fronting on pulp; or private stmt variance and a driveway stacking distance variance for both K mtWl Park driveways. Thank your Far your time and canslderatioan regarding this I ue, PWase do not hesitate to contxt zi rr:garding any que;tians. Sincerely, - 31mmy Fechter, FILA Project Managff Adanns - Fnglneering inti r)wvelopment Consultarits 910 S. K mWl Avimue a Sr Ahlakv, Texas 7609," ll t 7.;28.32W • FAX 117.376.3 11l'i dreg. NaF-)002,innr.tw�ern�s�r��iere:e�°i�agrami Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 10 Council Motion at 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 480-657: March 4, 2014; Approved at 2nd reading (6-1) pursuant to the following: 1. Approving requested variances—driveway and minimum required stacking and Subdivision Ordinance 483, Section 8.01(A), as amended, which requires every lot to be on a public or private street and as requested to allow the lots to be configured as shown on the revised concept plan; 2. Also noting the requirements under this motion are pursuant to: a. the revised renderings that were presented to Council this evening; b. the Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions, and easements (CCR) as presented to Council in the application this evening; c. the revised landscape plan presented to Council (included in Attachment "B" of this Ordinance); d. the revised permitted uses, as presented from Adams Engineering in their letter dated March 4, 2014, noting that the drive-through service will only be allowed for Lot 4 (correction made in S -P-2 regulations); e. also noting the balance of the concept plan for the buildings that are not included in this site plan approval that it is Council's expectation there will be 100% masonry construction; f. the permitted uses represented from Adams Engineering that the food service hours of operations as noted in the application that "they will close no later than 11:00 p.m." that it is Council's intention to have wording that mentions that it will be "no earlier than 11:00 p.m. (correction made in S -P-2 regulations); g. the office building in the concept plan will be a four story construction and that additional parking will be presented on the first level underneath the building; h. pursuant to the revised concept/site plan as presented this evening and (included in Attachment "B" of this Ordinance); 3. Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated February 26, 2014: 8. Please make the following changes the Concept and/or Site Plans: a. Show, label and dimension the width of the R.O.W. adjacent to the site. b. One 10' x 50' loading space is required for the hotel and that space is provided on the west side of the building. Staff recommends adding a loading space on the east side of the building adjacent to the bar and restaurant or show how deliveries to the kitchen and bar area will be made. C. Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01(A), as amended, requires that every lot front on a public or a private street. Council approval of a variance will be required to allow the lot configuration as shown. A variance was granted by City Council. Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 11 9. Please move the S -P-2 regulation regarding building articulation to the section for Lot 1. The way the regulation is written, all future buildings would be allowed to not meet the articulation requirements before City Council has a chance to see the proposed elevations (corrected in the S- P -2 regulations). 10. Revise the parking provided for Lot 1 in the Site Data Summary Chart on the Concept Plan to 212 spaces. 11. Revise the office square footage in the first paragraph of Section 2.2 of the TIA (48,000 s.f. should be 96,000 s.f.). The square footage is correctly shown in Table 1 —Trip Generation Summary just below the paragraph. 12. Please make the following changes with regard to easements: a. Label the existing common access easement on Lots 6R and 7R, Block 1, Mesco Addition as shown on the plat recorded as Instrument No. D211037987, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. 13. All driveways/points of ingess/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended). The following changes are needed: a. The proposed driveway onto E. SH 114 does not meet the minimum 250 feet of spacing (60 feet shown) from an approved driveway and common access easement located on Lot 7R, Block 1, Mesco Addition (case ZA96-109). The driveway/common access easement on Lot 7R1, Block 1 is labeled to be abandoned. Prior to issuance of a permit for the proposed driveway on SH 114, a copy of the executed and recorded instrument(s) for the off-site and on-site common access easements and agreement to abandon the common access easement and driveway on the approved Lot 7R, Block 1, Mesco Addition (case ZA96-109) must be provided. 14. Revise the renderings and/or the Concept and Site Plans so that the landscaped and sidewalk areas adjacent to the hotel entrance match. The renderings are showing a landscaped area where a paved area is shown on the Concept and Site Plans. Tree Conservation Comments: The submitted Development Regulations propose that the western property line adjacent to the multi -family residential lots will be screened with a vegetated screening of: existing plant material, required plantings within the buffer and additional large shrubs and accent trees planted within the bufferyard. There are a significant amount of existing trees and associated vegetation along the west and north property lines. Identify these trees and designate if they will be preserved, removed, considered marginal, and show how the Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 12 proposed west bufferyard landscaping will be integrated with the existing vegetation. 2. The Preliminary Grading Plan shows that the McPherson Branch Creek on Lot 6 is proposed to be graded and improved. There is one large Post Oak tree on the back of Lot 7R, Block 1, Mesco Addition that might be on the Kimball Park, Lot 6 property. The proposed grading and south access drive look like they may alter the existing tree. Please locate and identify this tree on the submitted plans. Interior Landscape and Bufferyard Comments: 1. Some of the parking lot islands measure less than 12' in width from back -of -curb to back -of -curb. Parking lot islands shall have a minimum width of 12' back-to-back if curbed or 13' edge -to -edge if no curb is intended, and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall. 2. No bufferyard is proposed along the east property line of Lot 6 in the Summary Chart, but a bufferyard is shown on the concept plan. The east bufferyard along the east property line of Lot 6 is required to be a 5'— A, adjacent to the commercial and office properties, and a 10' — E along North Kimball Avenue. Include an S -P-2 regulation if a bufferyard will not be provided. 3. Some of the Bufferyards on the Concept Plan and the Bufferyard Summary Charts do not match. 1. Lot 3, west bufferyard is required to be a 10' — B, and is labeled 10'— C on the Concept Plan, and 5'— A in the Bufferyard Summary Chart. 4. The parking lot landscape islands are required to contain at least the minimum of the required canopy tree as shown along with shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses, seasonal color or a combination of these plant materials. Turf grass is not acceptable vegetation within the parking lot landscape islands. Public Works/Engineering Review General Comments: 1. Please provide an updated traffic impact analysis. Preliminary Utility Comments: 1. No 901 bends, use 2-450 bends. 2. All waterlines to be public and in easements. 3. 12" waterline not on the City's Master Water Plan, therefore no city participation in upsizing. 4. Any sanitary sewer lines crossing lot lines will need to be public and contained in easements. 5. Extend SS -1 west to property line. 6. Extend SS -4 to west property line. Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 13 APPROVAL OF ORD. NO 480-657a (Changes to Lot 1 - Cambria Hotel only) S -P-2 Regulations for Ordinance No. 480-657a 12,Adains A11rJt 15, 201 S Kimball Park Prolm-ve i Parmilled llsts iind Dve:lupnivnl Ite,;ula rimes for "S-17-2" Zoning ]?c-=ittcd U. s: l'llls pmperty Is divldcd info -six IncL.. Leat. I, LviiNmramg of 1.59 aumq, shall IFLCIudC IhC permined usCs as found in the 41 C: Motel DistricL. Lila J shall IRCINade permitted mel tbu.114 in the "0-2" Office Distrkt and 1.4us; , 4, and 5 shall includr the p -ermined uses as found hn "C-2" Coral Rcta iI Coanvner6ai Disirict of )-ring Ordinunce No. 490. as :anaeniletd, Lvilh the li)llowing exceptikins: Lral 1.. "FIC" ifaricl aislrict uses ta, alsD include: RxStaurant Lind bar Which am aca_rswd from an interior lobby • Conference Center totaling rL.y3x squmc fivt cif meeting and siippon spact: [BELL iLlrluaie the Isallrooni. b0ILnd rumn, meetinII Toon - pre-tunztsun arra and sIOM-yr. Last 2, 4 k S: -C-"_' Local Retail Comrrtemial Districl uses limited to: • Re-staumni (Bat is ;a permitted accessory ow) • Coffee Shame Rest wfant wilh Drive-Thm Scrw'ice Lpla lilt a only (excludes fast food) • Reiait • Hr3llh 4 Well tieing hustrwsus tmvmage the mpy, tilacss, health related prr>durt4i ■ ,Spa Lot 3: "0-2" Office DisfrICL uses tel 31w ipclude; • Nfulti-slur} office building,, up to 4 ta'I ovo grade fiuum with grade level Floor used firr ling. r Allow for iniaial or furore parking ilexk icy mel additional patking Lkrm ndt; with a 1xitiing ratio {If 4 %ptace%per Itl(II(osE. LA 6-. Open Splice lot %viih nittural vegetation. ex.iisting %;reek channel. new- pL-miingr and detention arca. PiiMMY areU Will 3erw'C as a drainage easement_ Dcvclvrnnent Rryulaliuns: Thi% pro1wrry shall be sttbjeCt tip the diwelupnseis[ regularions for die "HC" Hotel Istria fn Ltrt 1, the LIC -2" Local Rxtatrl Cottumti+rciail D sari€t for Im 2, 4 & 5_ and u0-2" t�li3ere Uistritt for Lot 3 and MI uth.e°r applicable regulations with the t+tllcAving exceMions: • Pwking agreemcnt will he in place prior to permitkng to satisfy, the combined parking requifement!i for the developineut. Ro4tiired parking will be as shown on plan, • To ftucilitate a wrnttiguous Oarvelopnaent,'Wftcr ynr45 will tint he requimd along inlern„al boundary 1 Lnes. 91+! S KuI21* l AN c,uar • S'OUA a ilkc. f'rxn" 70192 R 17 32I. 120D • FA_%8 L 7 32H.3291) MIT keg. NuF^102- relni.a firms-tihagirrrravg.rmm Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 14 • Uvtn the long rtrns slung portlow, oftht; fkaJe. an overu.wof Ouilding articulation& will dtstmct frm-n a more stream -lined architectural inieiin- For oils reason, articulation far Lot I will be as &hown kin the architectural ,kite plan, cs ceptual lloorplans, and exterior elevations- Articulation will be dimensioned an the floc r plans for clarity. + Delivery to the propk.Tty will be scheduled and lututed to ucmr between the hours of 7:00anr - 7:00pm daily and trash pick-up will be limited to occur between the hour% of 7:00am — 7:00pin Mondaav — Saturday ('must conform to the Comnuct for Rtsidential mind Commercial Refuse and ollect7ion ), + The western property litre adjacent to the anulti-family residential lots will he sereetaed twirls a vegctatcd screening of-, existing plant material- rQluired plantings within the bulbar and additional large sltinibs and accent trees planted within the buffer yard. Plantings consisting of both existing tend new rlaatt maatrrial will chie'a-c as +olid scrmnlnf� to Ii' in height and twill be shown on the landscape plan. + Loading zones are positioned within each lot as sl omm on plait and in flue site data surnmart+ chart. • As in internalized de%'cickpant:rrt is ith a shared uonranun access u:a"-ntcnt and parking the building litres will be allowed as AILI%t 11 oll plan. ■ Vary from cacti lut fronting ti rivht-ul'. ay w allow the Iot configuration as shot.%gin cm plan + �tacl:ing depths at beth the Kimball and Hivy 114 entrance allowed by approv°a6 of the arttacbed Variance Reque%L letter. With the cltx a Proximity Of' the proposed btoildings and cress parking laymil impervic}aa:., calculatrions will vm-y to allow for an overall ianpen ious area of 70%_ [Tyq ant& Operathou The project o err iety entail% a hmel and office development with an out parcel fronting tits Sly 114 and two internal parcels- that will be developed into a mixture Auses to include restaurant, retail. health swell -being and cotTee shop with drive-thru- The following is a lot by lot breakds wn with the primary ealphasis ins the Lot 1 Site Plat. LGt 1 1Site Plan APP lien tiani Site plan prcaposes a Cambria Suites 'all -suites' holtA with an ups"Att rating according to Smith travel Rcsaarch. Indcxir servicesr' ttscs it) include.- 0 nclude.* Restaurant with laui7ge ■ Bar with an -site alcohol consunapt on + 175 guest suites + Ballroom, with partitions for a capacity of approximately 07 people + Adininistrative of7'ice space + Rrtatil sundry space + x ,7'I 9 sf Conference Center fMet ca7aataoats 5,079 cf of meeting -,pace Business Center + 1.17{i I s ffitn ess Center Pruptosed;-utdoor se •ices"uses to inckide (it should he trued that all patios are interconnected), • Patio canwinarag leisure area with peal. + Patio containing lire pit and dining • knll-out bar service + Patio for Conference C'cntur spill cut Llt 0 S_ Kimbnit Avmur + SoutMa -e- Iex,is 7609 317 328.1-M 8 FAN 817.328 -INN T9PERdW_ iia. P-1002: ngrieering.e.uaa V GJG I\V. I'9LLGVIIIlI�i 11� V ZA18-0057 Page 15 f a Shuttle dceerw'1 a to rMitts of interest Lie ' or Q] Jn al' t r emya d gmahnia al The proposed ]hotel is four (4) stories in height and totals approxiniately I 1 1)%97 square feet_ The footprint of the building. is approximately 29.5 t4 square feet, and is 5 VAP" P" to the top of the primary parapet tuid 51)'-4" to the top of [lye lower structure_ The building design is contemporary and includes an identification tower adjacent to the hotel lobby entrance. This WAver identifies the hotel fnpm kill aacccs., Points to the site including twhcn appr sav in,g the d'cvclop ncnt turn the airport. The base of the tt wix contains a sinelc height hotel lobby while the upper flour^: ontain executive suites, Aris'al to The hotel is alsa� signified by a eonternporury Forte Cochere which cerntilins an expressive cuntilevered struclural system consisting t,t'brieL pirn, and u Ocur 1+. I I%tiJC41;n:i10 clad call43fl}' analtetred In place by cahlr sulalchio , The exterior finish materials. of the building include brick, stiwco, metal and glass. Brick will be used ;primarily at the towers.. along the entire base of tile building_ at projecting wall frame elements_ and in select locations to create additional articulation between buildurg volunies. At the upper floors, at infill walls within the projecting Preface, and on alI non -street Facingg elc�mtions (north aitd 3a st). a stucco finish is proposed, Two colors will be utilized: a medium taupe for the lower portion& of the wails and a light tan for the tipper fluor. 5umm€ cy of use anti. orations — gatnbia Suit" Iljj The devel-aper pra:rfrows to de-velop a Cambria Suite, hotel. The proposed hotel is prograntm,ed to have 175 guest suites, €a 8..1314 square f6otConference Center containing 3.(j7,j f off iaaeetiotp tifrace, > e�tauratlt uti L bar, #ititeess center, and pt-)ul_ The restaurant' bar operation will consist of approximately 1?011 primary dining r lounge space and utilize the outdoor courtyard on select occasions_ The restaurant and baa will primarily sen -ice hotel guests and adjacent office building tenants_ although it will be open to the public as well. A sl'_11 sf kitcherL is positioned in the tlo-or plan to efficiently service the dining area as well as to service the meeting rooms. In addition the howl c€Furl}aril will be Nyvll appointed For both a relaxing and �ibraul attrilosphcre with a pool. Fircphu and periodic live entertai unent. Hotel hour% of operaatitara; - FmA'Servive Restaurant typically cy"s at fxtlt.Iatrt and clasp o o titee thio l I.00pm. 7 d4,y%, a wEek._ Bar Semite typically opens at 10- 00atn and closes no later than 2-00ani Mott -Sat- typical ly opens at 11,00arn and chases oo later than 2-00ain o1i Sunday. Live Music will end no later than 1 :00an1, 7 days a week. Outdoor Speakers — sound s'ystern )vill be shut off no later than 12 --CIO am and any outdoor music will be discontinued no later than 1-:111.1 ata, 7 days a week. The proposed eonfcrence space is included in the foolp6nt of the hotel and is programmed primarily to host group stte:h as corporate Meetings and socia I twnts. The aneeting sprite wN ill bavr- a profilinent second entrance for access from the adjacent tether buildings. The prtslx4sed ballremtn is a. I I (F sicittare feet and has a progratiamed Nap€ city of .3117- The balltuotn will have a large crinference patio that entn7ect_s to The pool arra and fire pit. The room is di'v'isible into three bmak-fait rounns arl'a� 1Yr+.+: erre ugly' 1,350 square feet ea ell_ The program also includes a 'break-out meetioig room comaining. 454, square feet and has a 91 G S. Kwiball Aveme * SFsftt ibkc. Zeaas 76091- 91" 6091- 917..329.3'_lltl ■ FAX811 3'8.3' 99 T&PERvT. ,Va F-1GKi:; �6,e,e,a�ams rrn�,;r�wrr�n�,crF,a Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 16 cupadly of Z7. The prigs m also i-mbides a b(YjFd roorn containing ,�07,-qumrc fctt and has a capaviry (if 14- Opmtiunally the hatel will be able to host all size corporate events widi activities. leistire, banquet,,. break-aut meetings, dining and lodging. for non-voiporaw or smaller events the facititieswill be available by reservation to rent the ballroom and meeting rooms- Cranferrn" spa" hour, (irperation; Normal hours (corporatc cv.cnis) - 9:00arn-9;00prn Mon -Sal) I 1;00arn-7-.00pin Sun I..,JJeLJ4il event baurs - 1,00am-21,10aln NILM-Sat" I 1:00atn-1 I °(X)Pln Sun "t Concept plan proposes an out -parcel lot for a restaurant - Concept plan is intended to show scale of what can fit on the out -parcel in accordance with the Comprchcmive Zoning Ordinance and The SH 114 Corridor overlay. SAC data for tN.hal is shoNm in tht: concept consists of a singic story 10,0004 footprint and 63 parking spoccs. Also shown is an ouldklkn wailing titer with har service. Ultimate site plan will consist of what ft, within the parameters L)C the Canipreheji6iye Zoning Ordinance and the SH 114 Corridor Ch-erlay but should gtaerally QPnforr-ri to the concept plan. Duvviopmmi will N: a milatirwail. 0 MOjkIriN LI[parking rtquircinentii shall lac pvv%-i&-d ori-s-itc and the remaining will be Lwbjcct to a coinbincd parking uLrrcvrncnt vitb the Qtbm lot,within the &. vlopmCal, 9 restaurant will have the ability to include an outdoor waiting area with bar service and hinited seatilia- A 15 X 15 sign easement as shown on the site plan will run with the sale of the property. v a Tl w fire lant iIIWOMJ� Td AU K-1 IL�the 1.012 undOrY linus-si e alld accP44,11 to, the ]will entry drive W iM ll MOas 6 W11 O in hOTI OW Sire Plan, L03 Concept plan proposes, the developawrit of a threw -stagy office dt-valopmeni that could develop as a four- story structure with parking on the ground level or ha-ve a parldrin deck to facilitate future parking dtrnands - a Ccocept plata is intended to show male of ;% hat can Iii tin the propcmd 1 rit with structure ali d parking in accordance with the Comprehensive Zoning Of dinance. Site data for what is shown in the -concept consists of a dwee story office building with a 32.000 fciotprint for a total ol'96,000sf and 3 26 parking spaces. IF UlTiMNIC bitc plan %N ili consist of what fils within the pararnocrs, of the ComprOwnsivc Zoning Ordinanvc but sliould gcnurally to the canxcpt plan. L," Coriapt plait proposes the development of a restaurantJ coffee -shop with drive -thin. -9 Concept plan is intended to show scale of what can fiI on the propomd lot in accordance with [lie Comprehensive Zoning, Ordinance. Site data I -or what is shown in the vmvepi L!onsists, of m single story 4.500-si'llmilprint and 52 parking spa"s. Also shown is n dediwied drivc-ihru larit:. * Any resloiratit use will culi0c [asi -k)kid friandii-ics.i. * Ultimate site plan will consist of ),what fits within the parameters of the Comprehensive Zoning Of dinance but slicnild generally conform Io the concept plan - Lot 5 91U S. Kmbn H AkT[ILIC & SOWLIIRk-C, 'rCIKa- 76092 N ', r.ALX ti 1 7)gs 3299 TRPE Rog. ND, F-1002: Case No. Attachment E ZA1 8-0057 Page 17 EM Concept plan proposes The development of a restaurants retail building. Concept plan is intended to show settle of what can lit on [lie proposed lot in accordance with the C4irnlarehrrtyi 'e .iariin t7r+aina n e. Site rata for what V, Shawn in the r:L7nccpt emsiwt:s LA Story 9.222sf footprint and 54 parking spaces. Also shown is ample space for outdoor dining and plaza space. • De4c]—optntnt is comcpivallyr propow-J to be umalls-tenant structure with uses rclati%c Co. nestaurant retail and.,or health and well-being. 1'4 Bible health and well-being uses could consist of massage t1wrapy, fitness, spa and health related products and sen ices. i laltiMate. site Plan tv'ill 'what rt4 within thk:piintneten of lb'C'omprehonsivt /.slung Ordinance but shouttl 4enerally vonfonn to the concept plan, Majority of pai,king requirements shall be provided on-site and the rm ining will be subject to a ixi-nbintd panting ttgtrectncnt with the tether lots within the dtvclopmcni• Phasing Intent Pha4inx Intent It P. Ihk intent ofIht, &Vel«Irer CC [111A L� 1•L11'%%ar4 vVith epnutr wtity Jok uattants; rof the 17(}1el irritiiedietely upon Site Plan approval from Council- Tho entirety of all elements shown on Lot f will be part of the construction package and bidding as will the primary drive aisle loop from Hwy 114 to Kimball Ave and the POA lot 1,%•hi6includes the deten4iiM. The fire lane that is split key the LOI 2 bMndary and Lot d boundary will he built w well. LQ 2-5 Will c{;aW tin-li= W." each lot is pat Unkr sntract- It is unkna" n at this tilTne tt hat tlae Order of take-dc.?%vtt will he - Lot I Parking Analysis (Hotcb: Parki3ig as iluiwii "n the plant imludes 2I1 `~paces within Lot 1 and 495 spaces withsi, I i t 2-5 Iiir :i in,.;'d Of 706 %paces- Reyuifecl parkin -L, for l.ot 1 per the City of Southlake twilinaiwe waw LUILLAILL I U1.10110%%s: - 17t5 rooms 4 I 1"aiC [ rs>H)r4i 175 spas es .A dd1.tic-mals 1wovid.ed for acces ory uses 36 4paces Bar,' Restaurant (accessory use to the hotel) lir 1 100sf X approx 2,700sf= 21,4: spaces (25°io of spaces required are additional to the hotel use = 7 spaces. The balatrce 75% is accessory to the hotel and no additional spaces in Owse alloeat.ed to guestrooms are pnipowd) m Meeting sTace (accessory use to the luatel) {iz 1!3 seats X 3-41t seat% I lt; required spares from occrapant lead calcs-, 25% of spaces required are additional ict the hotel rase = 116 X.25 = 21) spaces, The balance 73% is accesscuy to I.hc howl and no additional spaces to than all€xated. to guestroollis are Proposed) = Tonal spaces required - 175 + 7 + 24 - 311 Lot 1 Tool = 211 provided spaces 9l ll 4. KmtbaIJ .Armee 0 SoutWake. 'Iexm 76092 $11.x218.�20U. r. xttt7 3DO 99 TRPE ReR. No. F-1002; artinr.cndurms-ani aa�er r�{$-reazs Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 18 City Council 2nd Reading Motion for Ordinance No. 480-657a: June 2, 2015; Approved at 2nd reading (6-0): 1. subject to Staff Report dated May 26, 2015 and Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated April 16, 2015; 2. noting that all regulations associated with the zoning case ZA13-135 shall remain in place; 3. revisions to case ZA13-135 are those exhibits presented and approved this evening and those changes indicated in the permitted uses and development regulations for S -P-2 zoning located on Attachment `D', Page 1 of the Staff Report dated May 26, 2015 (See attached in Exhibit B of this ordinance) 4. subject to the material boards presented this evening; 5. noting Council's approval of spandrel glass with no metal banding; 6. approving Option `1', four -post, polycarbonate roof porte cochere; approving Option `1', polycarbonate conference center awnings to match the porte cochere; and approving Option `1' polycarbonate in the swim/patio area to match the porte cochere and conference center awnings. Site Plan Review Summary No. 1 dated April 16, 2015 The proposed revisions are only to Lot 1 of the Kimball Park Development. All previously approved plans and conditions of approval remain in effect unless specifically revised as part of this request. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: The submitted Development Regulations propose that the western property line adjacent to the multi -family residential lots will be screened with a vegetated screening of: existing plant material, required plantings within the buffer and additional large shrubs and accent trees planted within the bufferyard. There are a significant amount of existing trees and associated vegetation along the west and north property lines. Identify these trees and designate if they will be preserved, removed, considered marginal, and show how the proposed west bufferyard landscaping will be integrated with the existing vegetation. Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE & BUFFERYARDS COMMENTS: The parking lot landscape islands are required to contain at least the minimum of the required canopy tree as shown along with shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses, seasonal color or a combination of these plant materials. Turf grass is not acceptable vegetation within the parking lot Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 19 landscape islands. Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review PRELIMINARY UTILITY COMMENTS: 7. No 901 bends, use 2-451 bends. 8. All waterlines to be public and in easements. 9. 12" waterline not on the City's Master Water Plan, therefore no city participation in upsizing. 10. Any sanitary sewer lines crossing lot lines will need to be public and contained in easements. 11. Extend SS -1 west to property line. 12. Extend SS -4 to west property line. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Submit 4 copies of the civil construction plans (22" X 34" full size sheets) and a completed Construction Plan Checklist as part of the first submittal for review directly to the Public Works Administration Department. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website. A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748- 8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. A Developer's Agreement will be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. A separate bond will be required for the Maintenance Bond and bound only unto the City of Southlake for a period of two years for all development projects. The Maintenance Bond cannot be tied to the Performance and Payment Bond in any way. Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated Ordinance No. 836. Fire Department Review GENERAL COMMENTS: An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for all commercial structures in excess of 6,000 square feet, with coverage extended into the attic if comprised of combustible construction. (per 2009 I.F.C. Sec. 903.3.1.3 as amended). Also, the restaurants classified as an A-2 occupancy will require an automatic sprinkler system with an occupant load in excess of 100. Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 20 All sprinkled buildings are required to be equipped with a fire alarm in compliance with NFPA 72, the 2009 International Fire Code, and the City of Southlake amendments. A complete set of plans for the underground fire protection line, fire sprinkler system, and fire alarm system shall be submitted to Reed Fire Protection for review and approval at 14135 Midway Road in Addison, Texas 75001. Business phone is 214-638-7599. A Knox Box Rapid Key entry system shall be installed on the buildings near access to the riser room. Keys must be provided to access the riser room. The Knox Box can be ordered on the Internet at www.knoxbox.com. A 5 inch Fire Department Connection shall be installed on each building, with a locking Knox cap attached to the FDC to prevent debris from entering the connection. An exterior audible/visual fire alarm device must be installed above the Fire Department Connection on each sprinkled building to indicate when a fire alarm condition is present in the building, or located as near as possible to the FDC, on the building, if the FDC is installed remotely. Approved suite numbers and/or building address shall be posted on all new buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. All numbers shall contrast with their background. Electrical, Mechanical, Roof Access, Fire Alarm Panel, Sprinkler Riser and all other pertinent rooms must be labeled with appropriate signage. The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5'X5' if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6'X6' if it is on the riser. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire lanes require minimum 30 ft. inside turn radius and minimum 54 ft. outside turn radius. FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Hydrants required at a maximum spacing of 300 feet for commercial locations that contain un -sprinkled buildings, and 600 feet for commercial locations that contain completely sprinkled buildings.(If all buildings in the complex are completely sprinkled, then hydrant locations are acceptable except for adding a hydrant at the South entrance into the complex off of the service road of State Highway 114)(If all building are not completely sprinkled, then hydrants will need to be added and relocated to meet requirements). A fire hydrant shall be within 100 feet of each Fire Department Connection, and the Fire Department Connection within 50 feet of fire lane access.(Fire Department Connection locations not indicated on plans). Conditions of approval of Ordinance No. 480-657b: City Council motion at 1 st Reading: February 2, 2016; Approved (6-0) pursuant to the staff report dated January 26, 2016, Concept/Site Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 21 Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 25, 2016, noting that we are granting the variances which were approved in the original Zoning Change and Concept Plan on March 4, 2014; the stacking depth of 17.6' on the N. Kimball Ave. driveway and 34.2' of stacking depth shown on the S.H. 114 driveway rather than the minimum depth of 150'and noting that the lot configuration does not meet the requirement that every lot front on a public or private street, noting that prior to the next hearing, the applicant will address the landscaping variances around the garage, and noting that the applicant will come forth mitigating the articulation variances noted on the building and the garage, noting some willingness to relax on the articulation on the north side of the garage, but there still needs to be some stone veneer or column treatments at a minimum throughout the garage elevations on the north, south east and west, noting that the elastomeric coating samples in buildings and to the extent to help Council understand the architectural and physical qualities of that building material will be brought forth to Council prior to the next hearing. Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 22 APPROVAL OF ORD. NO 480-657b (Changes to Lot 3 — Offices and Kimball Park only) S -P-2 Regulations for Ordinance No. 480-657b DAdams March i, 20116 Kitnhall Park Proposed Permitted lues and Development Regulaborts'few " r -P -r Zoning Ptnikitle!d US&g. - TbB property is d.tvided into six lots_ Lot 1 shall uaclaufe the permuted uses as found Ln the "tfC" Hotel District, Lot 3 shall include permitted uses Bund in the "0-2" office District and Lasts W, 4, mud 5 shall include the prrmilted uses as foitud in "C"-2" Local Detail-Cunimcniml D^istricl of zmniug a'dittanee No_ 4130, as ajnetkded. with flie t6llowing exceplions: Lot I: "HC" Hotel District uses to also include: * Rr-sra ttl--tit orid bit vwhicI are roams. d rmui an itttrrior lolft • C'vrtfcrcn.lx Ceder tolaling 8,738 sgi5aru feel of meeting and support space thal includes the hollrOEMI, bokint roorn. aleeling nkolu' Ine-filliction l Rea lied-.516rNge. Lit , 4 8r 5: "C-2 Local Detail Commercial District uses limited to. Reslatumt (Bar is it perrniltcd accessory use) Coftet� Shapr Restmmial with hove-Thru Serviee oa Lat 4 only (excludes fust ford) • Detail • 1le alth &- Well Feeing businesses (ruassage therapy, fitu,ess., hen.lth related prudtiCIIS) Spa Lot 3: "0-2" Office Distzi.ct uses to also include. 0 Multi -story office buildings up to 4 above grade floors_ Allow for a single level parlang deck. Lot G: {?pen Space lot with natural vegetation, existmg creek channel, new plantings and deteanau area_ Primary area wiJl serve as a drainage easement_ e P rli�osl Rt..�tie v TbiS prcapeM shall be subject to the development regulations for the "FIC" Flotel District for Lar L_ the "C -I" Lozol Detail Commerci.91 District for Lot ?- 4 & 5_ and -0-2" Office District for Lot 3 and all other applicaaloic regtllafiom. %viih laic following exceptions-. Parlane, agreements Will be in place prior to permitting to satisfy the combined parking re pircments for the deo"clopment. required parking will be as shovm on plan. To facilitate a conlippous development, buffer yards will not be required along, rnternal boundary tines_ Giver! the long t►tits afi'rasg potliniu of the fAgaf e, R13 Uvevw& Of Ituildntg articulations Will &"j Traao fiailt a nrorc alt arm ]itaerJ mrclait lair l infcrit, F(w Ihis moron, articulalion will be aas s-hown on the architectural site plan, conceptual floor plans, and exterior elevations. Articulalion will be dirrre nioned ou 1 be floor plass for claarily, This applies to thr Cambria How[ and ilii Fcitrr iciry office Wif ing 91Us. Kirnbalt.^lvWffit*SuikiIJ&c_'F -7609' 817.3..0 3 YIO ■ FAX 91 7.329.321W TEPE R'eg. No F-ID02, xrKi+_akwrs-cogroreerinScorri Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 23 9Adarns • Delivery to the property will be scheduled and limited to occur between the hours of 7_00am 7:Ot)pm daily and bash pick -fila will be limited to occur between the hours of 7:00ain - 7:O pm Nionriay - Saturday (tour-st conform to the Colrtract fOT Residential and Cotrrrrrercial Refuse aril Collection)- • The w"tern property litre adjacent to the irntlti-family residential bats will lie scre-ened with a vegetated screening of: existing plant material, required plantings within the buffer and additional large slaubs and accent trces planted within the buffer yard. Plantings consist Log of berth existing and mw plant material will achieve a solid screening to F in height and will N shown on the landscape plan- • Loading zones are positioned within each lot as sbo wn on plan and in. the site data surnmary Chan. • As in interraaliz-ed development with a shared Common access easement and puking The building limes will be allowed as shown on plan. • vary from each lot ficruting a right -of --way to allow the lot coufigivatioti as shown on plan • Stack-ing deptlis at both the Kimball and Hwy 114 entrance allowed by approval of the previously sularuitted Variance F.LgLiMt ldtef. • With the close proximity of the proposed biWdings and crass pukiag, layow hiller OUS calculations will vary to allow for an overall in4wrvious area of 700%- • Allow for a teller drive -up lane and window on the west elevation of the office building 4n LoT 3 to facilitate a banking tenant and also al low a reduction of 12 provided parking spaces in Iliac arca- Since the rcuruval of 1' spacc5 woWd drop the total parking to 435 spaces allow for the regnired parking of 436 spaces to retinae to 435 spaces, • Vary from the additional land watpe r equireritems for a parking ,garage as this development proposes a single deck constructed internal to the ,ground level parking perimeter - Use and Op-erution The project overview entails a holes and offices developin nt with an out parcel fronting on Sl -1 114 and two internal parcels that will be developed into a mixture of uses to include restaurant, retail- health & well-being :and coffee shop with drive-thru- The following is a lot by Iat break -dawn with the primary emphasis on the Lot 3 Site Plam Lott 3 f'llr-e Plan AorrllcAtiaa] site platy proposes the development of a four-story Class "A" office develcliment that includes a si igle level parking deck- • 1=ottr story uff-rc+u totalwg,11b,484,sf • leasable space 108.799sf • Single level parking; deck Exterior Design of PluMsed Office Building The office Wiidiug blertcls stone and sincoth plaster like piuicls with metal aecetits to ereatr: a nrodurit but contextual building. 'rhe garage complements the style of the office building. `nw office building and garage are part sof a larger development and respond to the style of the adjacent hotel awhile creating; their own identities The exterior f tMes will iiacllyde natural stone, cast stone, painted concrete, stucco, rttetal and glass- Stone will be primarily used at rice entire base of the building, at all 4 projecting comers and at tilt north and south entries. Stone. ruetal mid glass will be owd a1 tlrc two catries to+eiloasiizee the umiu entry points ro the building. The upper floor: will consist of painted tilt wall concrete panels with metal panct and some stucco at the South corners. 9951 Cypress Raters RhA. 15G • r]®tlas, Tis 75019 g 17339 31NO . F-A.X 8 t 7.32.8,3299 TRPE &P;t. Ms. F IW 9L9111`.r7e�fddk4 iPJN��f1PF77i1�. C!]Rf Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 24 Adams 'The parking structure will include precast concrete panels and stone cladding at the 4 corners. Lot 3 Parkiag AnaWis (OH e): Parka" as showu on the plan includes 447 spaces within Lot 3 and 380 spaces within Lits L. 2, 4 and 5 for a total. of 927 spaces_ Required parking for Lot 3 per the City of Southiak.e ordinance was calculated as follows: - 108,798sf of lease space @(- 4 spaces per 1000sf = 436 spam Breakdown of parking for Lot 3 - 351 at grade parte spaces, 96 parking deck spaces Lol 3 Total = 447 proOded spues Note: Should a drive thou baaL- teller lane be added - .4fluu-. far a teller &-Ive-a p lame and xvindaip oja the gest ele-wo n of the office budding an lot 3 to f "racxliaoao a bew.4 xag tenant and also adinv a reductlop: of 12 provldedluarktrag spaces in Mar area. Stares the reveovral of 12 spcaces would drop the total parking to 735 spaces chow f�r tdre required par-kmg of 436 spaces to reduce to 435 spaces. LO 1. Cambria Suites `all -suites' hotel with an upscale rating according to Smith Travel Research. indoor serviced irses to iuchAe; • Restaurant with lounge • Lias with ou�ite slcollol consittruptiou 175 guest suites dP Ballroom with partitions for a capacity of approximately 107 people • dLU1uistrstive office space • Retail sundry space • 8,738 sfC'onference Center that contams 5,079 sfof ting space • Business Center • 1,061sfFitrknm Center Proposed outdoor service&a uses to include fit should be noted that all patios are interconnected): • Patio ContainilLg leisitte area with Poo1., +� Patio containing fire pit and dingy • Roll-out bare service • Patio for Cont ecce Center spill oin • Shuttle serviceto points of interest. Exterior Desimn of the Pnxysed Cambria Suites Hotel The proposed hotel is four (4) stories in height and totals approximately 1111897 square feet_ The footprint of the building is appfoximWely 29,514 sgiwre feet, and is 51'-V to the top of the pritnary parapet and 59'4" to the torp of the tower structure_ M I C }' xto Watus $tvd. SIe, 150 • Dallas. Tem 73019 817°328 3200* FAx 817J283.V9 ,WE'Reg, M. F-100:; t,�,�,°,ddraNes-�n�tn r�.tacara Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 25 �Adains The baddrug design is conleulpurary and includes an identification tourer adjacent to the hotel lobby entrance. Tlas tower identifies Ik hotel from all access points to the site including wheu a}pVwaeh the development form the airport. The base of the lower contains a sitigle height hotel lobby while the upper foots contain executive suites. Arrival to the hotel is also signified by a contemporary forte Cochere which contains an expressive cantilevere-1 stnwrural s}^stem cousisting of brick piers and a clear polycarboa we claret canopy anchored in place by cable staac ons. The exterior finish rttatleriatls of the building include brick, stucco, foetal and glass, Brick will be used. primarily a1 the towers, along the entire base of the building, at pro ecting wall frum elements, and in select locations 9a create additional aniculation between Ixuilding volumes_ At the upper floors, at infill walls within the projecting frames, and on all non -street facing elevations (north and west), a stucco finish is proposed- Two colors will be utilized: a medium taupe for the lower portions or the walls and a light tan for the upper floor - 5 Lganary loor_ 5uuunary oflasc and operatious — Cambria Suites Hotel; The developer• proposes to develop a Cambria Suites hotel. The proposed hotel is programmed to have 175 guest fArites, a 5,738 square foot Conference Center containing 5,079 sf of meeting space, restaurant and bar, fitness center, aud pool. The rest^aurantJ bar operation will consist of approximately 2,700 pritnaty dining i lounge sparce and utilize the outdoor courtyard on select occasions, The restaurant and bar will prima6ly seiNice hotel guestas and adjacent office building tenants, althmigh 1t will be open to the public as well. A 920 sf kitchen is positioned an the floor plan to efficiently senrice the dining area as well as to service the meeting To . 1n addition the hotel cou and will be well appointed for both a relaxing, and vibrant atmosphere with a pool, fireplace and periodic live entertaiumeni_ Hotel hmm of operatiou> Food Senior i Restaurad typically opens at 6_OOa m and closes no later than 1 i:ODput., 7 dray's a. week_ - Bar Service typically opens at 10.00= and closes ao later than 2_tj1}arnl Mon -Sat; typically opals al l I Main and classes ao later that! 2:00arn on Simday. - hive Music will enol act Eater Than 12 ,00am 7 days a week. - Outdoor Speakers — sound system will be shat ori' no later dum 12:9]0 am and any outdoor nuasic will bediscontinued no later than I ?; 00 am, 7 days n week. The proposed conference space is included in the footprint of the hotel and is programmed primarily to host group events such as corporate meetings raid social events. The meeting space will have a prominent second entrance for access iTom the adj.acertt office buildings. The proposed ballroom is 4,116 square feet and has a prognunmed capacity of 3917. The ballroom will have a large conference patio that connects to the pool area and fire pit. The room is dilisible into three break-out rooms of approximately 1,350 square feet each_ The program also includes a break-out meeting room containing 456 square feet and has a capacity of 27_ The progumi also includes- e. board room cr.+utaining 507 square feet and has a eapacity of 14. Operationally the hotel will be able to host all size corporate events with activities, leisra , bMrlcl,tlets. break-out =clings. ditaing and !cadging. For non-=porate or stualler events the facilities will be available by reservation to rent the ballroom and meeting roorm. Conference space hotars of operation:. - Nonnal hours(colporwe events) - 9;00am--9;0Opm Mon -Sail 11;OOat11-7;00pal Stu, 4ptcial event hours 7:iltiartn-2 ktant C��on-�awu' l 1:Otlam-1 l:Otlpnti rat1 $951 Cy}nr,.s. Waters 131wL Ste. 150 • Dallas_ I e, 75 D 817.328L�2W ■ FAX 6 t 7.3 28.3399 TBPE keg° Nor_ F-10029or w mf m-engineering.c"r Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 26 9Adams Lot 1 Parki.irg Analysis (Hotel)_ Pafkiiirg as shown on tlk- plan i lttdcs 2 11 spaces within Lot 1 add 495 spay t s Vwillun Lot 2 liar a hotel of 70-6 spaces. Required parking for La.)l l per ti,e City of SoutWale ordinaiwe was calcuLited as follows. - 175 rooms @ l per room = 175 spacts - Additional provided for accessory mes = 36 spaces - Barf Restaurant (accessoryuac to the hotel) @ 1f]OUsf X approx-,70D.5f 28 spices (Z5% of spaces regiiised.are additional to the hotel is - 7 spaces. The balance 75% is accessory to the hotel acid no addir ortnl spaces to those allocated to gitewoorns are proposed) Meeting space (accessory use to the hotel) (r3 I l 3 seats X -14 g seats = 116 required spaces from occupant load calcs; 25% of spaces required are additional to the hotel use = 116 X _25 = 29 spaces. The balance 75% is accessory to the hotel and no additional spaces to those allocated to guestrooms are proposed) 'total spaces regmiriul =175 + 7 + 29 = 211 Lit 3 Concept plan proposes an out4mrcel lot for a restaurant. • Concept plan is intended to show scale of what can fit on the out -parcel in accordance with the C"ornprehensive Zoning Winance and the S14 114 Corridor overlay, Site data for what is sbowa in the concept consists of single store 10000sffootivinr mad fid parling spikes, All sbown is an outdoorwaiting area with barsenice- • Ultimate site plan will consist of what fits within the parameters of the C ompreheatsive Zoni ng Ordinance and the SH 114 Corridor Overlay but should generally cconfbrrn to the concept plan_ ■ Development will be a r tavranl. Majority of parting requirements shrill be provided ori -site and the retraining will be subject to a mbined parking agreement with the other lots within. the develotmaerit. f Restaurant will have the ability to include an outdoor waiting area with bar service and limited seating. ■ A 15 X 25 sign easement as shown on the site plan will run with the sane of the property. The fire lane illustrated a long the Lot 2 boundary line and access point to the train entry drive W I relnain as shown on the Site Plan. Ltrt 4 Concept plan proposes the development of a restaurant, coffee shop with drhv� tluu. Concept plan is intended to show sole of what can fit on the proposed lot in aixordance with the Campri:hmsive Zoning Ordivanc . Site data for what is shown in the of single story 4_50(isf footprint and 52 parking graces. Also s3town is a dedicated drive-thm .laue_ * Any restaurant use will exclude fast-food franchises. * Ultimate site plan will consist of what fits within the parameters of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance but should generally conform to the concept plan. Lau Coria:gpt plan pioposes the devetopuient of restaurant! retail bmld*. 8951 C}press Wotm Hh�d. Sit. 130 it Dolims Tcxas 750 t 9 817,3 8.,1200 a F&x 17.,128.3299 TBPE Reg_ No, F-1002'.ani F rrrir r rs�e�rgJ xrrlg.er�a� Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 27 �DAdams Concept plan is Wended to show scale of wbal can fl! on The proposed lot fti accordance with the Cm"rehemive Zoning Ordinance- Site data for what is Shown in the cmicept consists of a single story 9,.222sf footprint and 54 parEng spaces. Also shoe is ample space for outdoor dining and plaza space- • Dt-velopiucut is cuaccpIwAly proposcd to k, a an dti-lenant slructt= with uses relative to restaurant, retail andlor health aad well-being. Possible health and well-being uses ootild cousist of niasmge therapy, fltutss, spa and health related products and services. • Ultimate site plan will consist of what fits within the pontmews of tine Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance but should generally conform to the concept plan- • Majority of parking requitements shall be provided on-site and the remaining will be subject to a combined parking agreement with the other lots within the development- basingIntent Phasing Intent It is the intent of the developer 10 [Rove forward with vonstnicfioa documents for the office Jimaie&ately upou Site Plwi approvEil from Council. The cutirety of all clemnts shown on Lot 3 will be pall a r the construction package and bidding_ Lois 2, 4 and 5 will wine on-line as each lot is put under contract- 11 is kftik'LoWn' at this tune what the order of tak-e-dDwn will be. 8951 C}-pmm WRImm Rh -d. Mr. 150 iD ThktLas, T=as 75019 8 1 7.32U 200 n FAx 81'x.328.3299 TBPE Reg No. F-) 00.2; tvwir adamswnglinwAtIerg em Case No. Attachment E ZA1 8-0057 Page 28 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE REQUEST LETTER 3Adan-is January 3, 2014 City of soutfilake Department of Planning & Development Services 140€} Main Street, Suite 310 Southldke, TX 76092 Re: Request for Variances Kimball Park Addition Lots f thru 6 ACEI Project. No. 2012..156 This req uest for variances is to address lot frontage on a ,public or private street and tlx: slacking distance at driveways into the property.. The 5outhlake OrdinarKe No. 4133, 5eWon 8.0I(A) requires that every lot front on a public or private strtet, As a contiguous development that extends deep off of Hwy 114 and will have a mad ure of uses on Individual, trots It 7s requested that a variance be granted to allow the lot confrquratiara as shown on plan. The Southlake Dfiveway Ordinance No. 634 requires a stacking depth or 150 feet fnam the adjacent R.O.W. to the nearest parking stall or intersecting drive: lane pavement edge witiein the property. The adjoltiing pdree[5 dlDay Kimball Ave. and Hwy 114 are orontrollIng the location of theeross access Intersection and thus Bening the stacking distance. Refer to the site than submdtted to illustrate both driveways and ctarnrrmon access polnts. The adjacent property along Hwy 114, Lot 7R, Blork 1 Mexo,kddlllon, w&3 approved Ly the City of 5outhlake zoning case ZA96-1179, The wncept plan in this toning case Indudes e con rnon access drivewayfeaserient approxlmatel - M feet outside the HWYr 114 R;f1 W, The KirrrbdIl Park site pian allows for approximately 34 feet of stacking dislance In the driveway from H4VY 114 due to this approved cornmori access daveway. The adjacent property along Kimball Ave„ Wt 1, i3loick 1 Mesm Addition, has two existing drives paralleling Kimball approxImately 17 Feet and 102 feet outside the Kimball R.0,W, The Kimball Park site plan allows omnectlon to troth of these existing driver, which Forces a stacking dlstance less that the required 150 Feet, We herein request a lot fronting on public or private strut variance: and a driveway stacking distance varlarKe for both KirnbWl Park rdrlwewways, Thank you For your tine and consideration regard Ing this Issue, Please do not hesitate to contact .as regarding any questions. Siracaerely, 1 Jimmy Fechter, RIA Project Manager Arlan — Fnglueering and Development Consultants 91 [r S. Kimball Avenue a Suerrhtdea Texiu. 7609 8 r 7.328.32M M FAX it 17.326.1249 TIDE Reg., Foto- F-1032, �nnr.arluiars-rngirrrerireg.c m Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 29 Council Motion at 2nd Reading of Ordinance No. 480-657b: March 1, 2016; Approved (7-0) subject to the following: 1. Granting the following variances: a. The driveways do not meet the minimum required stacking depth of 150', approximately 17.6' of stacking depth is shown on the N. Kimball Ave. driveway and 34.2' of stacking depth is shown on the State Hwy. 114 driveway; b. Also granting a variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01(a), as amended, which requires that every lot front on a public or a private street, a variance is requested and approved to allow the lots to be configured as shown on the Concept Plan; 2. Noting that Council is accepting the revised Concept Plan and development regulations for the S -P-2 zoning dated February 23, 2016 and under Attachment "D" of the staff report; 3. Accepting the revised Site Plan, Tree Preservation Plan and Landscape Plan found under Attachment "D" of the staff report; 4. Accepting the revised office building and parking garage elevations; 5. Noting the required parking will reduce by one from what was presented and will now be at 435 (S -P-2 regulations in Attachment "B" have been revised); 6. The staff report dated February 23, 2016 (includes language that all previous plans and conditions of approval remain in effect unless specifically noted in this request.) and; 7. Concept/Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated February 23, 2016 (below). Concept/Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated February 23, 2016 1. Please make the following changes the Concept and/or Site Plans: a. Please make the following changes to the impervious coverage and open space areas and percentages in the table on the Concept Plan. i. The open space area plus the impervious area should add to the net area for each lot and for the total. The percentages of open space and impervious coverage should total 100% for each lot and for the total. Please change the percentage of impervious coverage for Lot 4 to 77% and change the percentage of open space for Lot 5 to 21 %. 2. Please make the following revisions to the elevations: Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 30 a. Please dimension and label the height of the building to the predominant parapet height on the elevations and not to the roof height. b. The scale is incorrect. Please add the correct written scale under a graphic scale. c. Please provide a material sample board of all exterior materials to be used. 3. The proposed office development is subject to the requirements in the Corridor and Residential Overlay Districts except as noted in the S -P-2 regulations. The following Overlay requirements have been modified in the S -P-2 regulations: a. A regulation has been added to allow the vertical and horizontal articulation on the office building as shown on the Site Plan. The north and south elevations do not meet the horizontal and vertical articulation requirements. b. Please include a regulation to allow the articulation on the parking garage as shown. None of the garage elevations meet the horizontal and vertical articulation requirements. c. A regulation has been added to allow painted concrete and metal as permitted fagade materials on the office building and precast concrete panels as a permitted fagade material on the garage. 4. Please revise the drive lanes, trash enclosure location and parking islands and spaces on the Boka Powell plans to match the Site Plan (S4.0). A bank teller zone is shown on the west side of the building on the Boka Powell Site Plan and an S -P-2 regulation has been added to allow a teller drive -up lane and window on the west elevation and the reduction of 12 provided parking spaces. Approval of a Site Plan by the City Council following a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission will be required to allow the addition of a drive-through and window. Ordnance No. 480, Section 36.6 requires 3 loading spaces for office buildings 100,000 — 199,999 square feet in size. A regulation has been added to allow 2 loading spaces as shown on the Concept and Site Plans. The Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Easements for Kimball Park was approved with the original Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Kimball Park and it remains in effect with this request unless otherwise noted. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: The submitted Tree Conservation Plan complies with the previously approved Tree Conservation Plan. Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 31 Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: Within the proposed Development Regulations the applicant is proposing to vary from the interior landscape area and plant material that is required to be provided for the footprint area of the parking garage. The interior landscape calculations indicate that enough landscape area is provided across the site but the required plant material is not provided. Parking garages shall be considered as building in accordance with Section 3.3 in the Landscape Ordinance 544-B. 2. Not all of the parking landscape islands are 12' width form back -of -curb to back -of -curb. Ensure that parking landscape islands are at least 12- wide form back -of -curb to back -or -curb. Parking lot islands shall have a minimum width of 12' back-to-back if curbed or 13' edge -to - edge if no curb is intended, and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall. 3. None of the required interior landscape or bufferyards shrubs are shown on the submitted Landscape Plan. Please show the shrubs to be provided on the landscape plan. 5. Put the quantities of each plant material in the plant material list. 6. In the plant material list, please use a different key for purple heart groundcover since the same key is used for Palatka holly. 7. The Development Regulations state that the western property line will be screened with a vegetated screening of: existing plant material, required plantings and additional large shrubs and accent trees that will achieve a solid screening of 8' in height and will be shown on the landscape plan. The plantings shown within the west bufferyard are only the minimal required plantings for the 5'— A type bufferyard and the shrubs are not shown. Most of the existing trees shown to be preserved are on the property line, within a utility easement, and are partially the proposed developments and the adjoining property owners. Based on the information that is provided, the proposed landscaping within the west bufferyard does not seem to comply with the proposed Development Regulations. 9. Each individual parking lot landscape island shall contain a minimum of one (1) canopy tree with the remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses, or seasonal color. Parking lot landscape islands which have light poles for lighting the parking areas may substitute two (2) understory/accent trees for the required canopy tree. All required landscape areas shall be evenly distributed throughout the entire required parking lot landscape areas. Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 32 GENERAL COMMENTS: 3. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 4. New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. 5. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. 6. Retaining walls greater than 4 -feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. 7. Traffic Impact Analysis on file for overall development. No update is required. Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: htto://www.citvofsouthlake.com/index.asox?NID=266 EASEMENTS: 8. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15' minimum and located on one lot — not centered on the property line. A 20' easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. WATER COMMENTS: 9. Minimum size for water lines is 8". 10. Commercial and industrial developments require fire hydrant spacing of 300' maximum for non - sprinkled buildings or 600' for sprinkled buildings. Water lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc. V water line on (street name) shall conform to the City's water concept plan. Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. Fire lines shall be separate from service lines. Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 33 SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS: 11. Minimum size for sanitary sewer is 8". Sanitary sewer service lines shall connect to public sanitary sewer system built to City standards. 12. Extend sanitary sewer to the eastern/western/northern/southern property line and provide sewer stub to adjacent property. 13. Add a note: Private sanitary sewer services need a plumbing permit and must be inspected by building inspections prior to burial. Sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #XX and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning construction ($0.00/Acre). Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22"x34" civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City's website: http://www.citVofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre -construction, construction and post -construction erosion control measures. * A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. * Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Fire Department Review Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 34 GENERAL COMMENTS: An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 square feet, and a dry standpipe for the two-story parking garage. (Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 903.2.11.9 as amended) Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection, 14135 Midway Road, Suite G260, Addison, Texas 75001. Phone 214-638-7599. The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5'X5' if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6'X6' if it is on the riser. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire apparatus access needs to be provided within 250 feet of all exterior portions of the perimeter of buildings on a "hose -lay" basis for sprinkled buildings and within 150 feet of all exterior portions of the perimeter of non -sprinkled buildings. Fire apparatus access shall be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, 24 feet wide and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (A minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW) (Label fire lanes throughout the property; appear to be missing around the parking garage) Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius. (Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4) FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Hydrants are required at a maximum spacing of 500 feet for commercial locations with completely sprinkled buildings. (Hydrant spacing does not meet the requirements; add hydrants as necessary around the parking garage) Fire Department Connections for sprinkler systems and standpipes must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes. (FDC locations not indicated on plans) Add FDC locations, wall mount or remote connection, and fire hydrants as necessary to meet requirements for the office building and parking garage. General Informational Comments A SPIN meeting for Kimball Park was held January 6, 2014. A preliminary plat for the entire property that conforms to the site plan must be approved and a final plat must be approved and filed prior to issuance of a building permit. No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 8.01(A), as amended, requires that every lot front on a public or a private street. City Council approved a variance with the first Zoning Change and Concept Plan application to allow the lots to be configured as shown. All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 35 All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type of lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over. All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones except where noted in the S -P-2 regulations. The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. Denotes Informational Comment APPROVAL OF ORD. NO 480-657C (Reserved for Council motion and approved S -P-2 Regulations) Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 36 SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 37 those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to post the proposed ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 38 of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1St reading the day of , 2019. " RITION ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Case No. ZA18-0057 day of , 2019. Attachment E Page 39 EXHIBIT "A" Being described as Lots 1-6, Kimball Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lot A, Block A, Briarwood Estates, Phase I (also known as Lot A1, Block A, Briarwood Estates, Phase 1) an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 17.27 acres. Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 40 EXHIBIT "B" Reserved for approved Concept/Site Plan Case No. Attachment E ZA18-0057 Page 41