Loading...
Item 11Case No. ZA18-0059 S T A F F R E P O R T January 11, 2019 CASE NO: ZA18-0059 PROJECT: Site Plan for Darr Warehouse Complex EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Frontier Equity, LLC is requesting approval of a Site Plan for Darr Warehouse Complex on property described as a p ortion of Lot 1 (also described as Lots 1A and 1B) and Lot 2, Block A and Lot 8, Block B, Southlake Bank Place, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lot 5, Block A, Commerce Business Park, an addition to the City of Southlake, Ta rrant County, Texas, and located at 400, 401, 413, and 451 Bank St. and 525 Commerce St., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "I-1" Light Industrial District. SPIN Neighborhood #8. DETAILS: This project is located at the south end of Bank St. and it includ es the existing lot at 525 Commerce St. The purpose of this request is to seek approval of a Site Plan to develop three office/warehouse buildings totaling approximately 182,129 square feet on approximately 12.645 acres. The two lots to the north of the proposed development on Bank St. (proposed Lot 2R, Block A and Lot 8R, Block B) are included in the Site Plan to reconfigure the lot lines to allow a private driveway connection from Bank St. to Commerce St. and to meet the impervious coverage requirements on the proposed Lot 1R. The driveways and parking spaces on the proposed Lot 5R, Block A, Commerce Business Park are being reconfigured to accommodate the 30’ driveway connection to Commerce St. and parking spaces are being provided on the proposed Lot 8R with a parking agreement to offset the spaces that are being removed on Lot 5R for the driveway. No changes to the existing buildings are proposed on Lot 2R, Block A and Lot 8R, Block B, Southlake Bank Place and Lot 5R, Block A, Commerce Business Park. A P lat Revision (ZA18-0060) is being processed to relocate the lot lines and to dedicate the easements as shown. Site Data Summary (Lot 1R, Block A) Existing Zoning “I-1” Land Use Designation Industrial Gross/Net Acreage 12.645 ac. Total Building Floor Area (sq.ft.) Building 1 Building 2 Building 3 182,129 39,812 39,182 103,135 Building Height/Number of Stories 33’ and 1 story Open Space % 33% Impervious Coverage % 67% Total Parking Required 242 Total Parking Spaces Provided 245 Department of Planning & Development Services Case No. ZA18-0059 VARIANCES REQUESTED: 1) Driveway Ord. No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2.d requires a minimum stacking depth of 100’. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a stacking depth of approximately 86’ on Lot 1R, Block A. 2) Driveway Ord. No. 634, as amended, Sec tion 5.1 requires a minimum driveway centerline spacing of 100’ on a local street. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow approximately 54’ of spacing to the driveway to the north and approximately 67’ of spacing to the south on Commerce St. 3) A variance is requested to the Tree Preservation Ordinance to allow the tree canopy preserved as shown. 4) Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 8.01.D requires side lot lines to be perpendicular or radial to the street. The applicant is reque sting a variance to allow the lot lines as shown between Lot 1R, Block A and Lot 8R, Block B, Southlake Bank Place. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing 2) Consider approval of Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 11, 2019 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only ) PowerPoint Presentation Narrative Variance Request Letter Traffic Impact Analysis Plans SPIN Report Corridor Planning Committee Report STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 Richard Schell (817) 748-8602 Case No. Attachment A ZA18-0059 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER/ APPLICANT: Frontier Equity, LLC PROPERTY SITUATION: This project is located at the south end of Bank St . and it includes the existing lot at 525 Commerce St. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A portion of Lot 1 (also described as Lots 1A and 1B) and Lot 2, Block A and Lot 8, Block B, Southlake Bank Place, and Lot 5, Block A, Commerce Business Park LAND USE CATEGORY: Industrial CURRENT ZONING: "I-1" Light Industrial District. HISTORY: - The property was annexed into the City in 1957. - A Zoning Change from “Agricultural” to “Light Industrial” was approved in 1981. - A plat for Southlake Bank Place was filed in 1984. - The I-1” Light Industrial District zoning was placed on the property with the adoption of Zoning Ord. No. 334 and the Official Zoning Map in 1986. - The I-1” Light Industrial District zoning was continued on the property with the adoption of Zoning Ord. No. 480 and the Official Zoning Map in 1989. SOUTHLAKE 2030/2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The 2035 land Use designation on the property is Industrial. Industrial: Purpose and Definition: Industrial and business service development that is relatively free of unwanted side effects, such as unsightliness, noise, odor, glare, vibrations, etc., is permitted in the Industrial category. If meeting the qualification of relatively free of unwanted side effects, suitable types of development in the Industrial category can be characterized by the manufacturing, processing, packaging, assembly, storage, warehousing and/or distribution of products. Ancillary commercial and retail activities associated with these uses are permitted. Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi-Public activities as described above may be permitted if surrounding industrial uses do not pose hazards and are sufficiently buffered. 2035 Southeast Sector Recommendation: Explore options for increasing accessibility to Bank Street in the 2035 Mobility Plan, such as a roadway connector parallel to F.M. 1709 or a roadway connection to the south. 2030 Mobility Plan Recommendation: MT19 -Bank Street Connector: This project includes the design and construction of a roadway connector parallel to FM 1709. The roadway connector will allow Bank Street to tie Case No. Attachment A ZA18-0059 Page 2 into Commerce Street which has an existing traffic signal at FM 1709. This project is necessary because the DFW Connector will prevent westbound FM 1709 access from Bank Street. Commuters would have to turn right, heading eastbound and then turn around in Grapevine to head west into Southlake. This project is critical for business retention as it will prevent existing businesses on Bank Street from relocating due to inaccessibility. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions The project has frontage on Bank Street, a local commercial/industrial street, having approximately 60 ft. of R.O.W. with a 37 ft. wide street. A 30’ wide private driveway is proposed that connects to Commerce St. through Lot 5, Block A, Commerce Business Park. To prevent traffic other than the traffic coming or going to the proposed development from using the driveway connection to Commerce St., the applicant is not proposing to dedicate a Common Access Easement on the driveway. Traffic Impact A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared for this development. Please see separate TIA. TREE PRESERVATION: The site is subject to the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-E since it is a new development. The Tree Conservation Plan does not meet the preservation requirements of the ordinance. A variance is requested. UTILITIES: A 12’ water line in Commerce St. and a 6” water line in Bank St. exist to serve the property. Sanitary sewer will connect at the City’s lift station to the south of the site. DRAINAGE: Drainage on the property is collected in grate inlets and carried to two detention ponds at the southern portion of the property. CITIZEN INPUT: The following meetings were held to discuss the development: A SPIN meeting was held January 8, 2019. Please see separate SPIN Report. A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on November 14, 2018. Please see separate Corridor Planning Committee report. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated January 11, 2019. Variance Approval Criteria for Drivewa y Ordinance No. 634, as amended: Variances – The City Council shall have the authority to grant a variance to this ordinance. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the regulations herein will create an unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self -imposed, that the variance will not Case No. Attachment A ZA18-0059 Page 3 injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The decision of the City Council shall be final. Variance Approval Criteria for Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-E: VARIANCES: The City Council may authorize a variance to any provision of this Ordinance following a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. A request for a variance to any provision in this Ordinance shall be accompanied by a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan as outlined in Article 6, or other documentation requested by the Administrative Official, and the following factors shall be considered in evaluating the variance request: i. Whether a literal enforcement of the Ordinance will create an undue hardship or an unreasonable practical difficulty on the applicant; ii. Whether the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self - imposed; iii. Whether a reasonable accommodation or alternative solution can be made to accomplish the desired activity without the alteration of the tree; iv. Whether the variance will injure or be wholly compatible with the use and future or existing development of adjacent properties; v. Whether the increased development costs caused by preserving the tree create an undue hardship on the development of the site; vi. W hether there is any identified adverse effect of the alteration or preservation on erosion, soil moisture retention, flow of surface water, and drainage systems; vii. Whether there is any substantial impact to the buffering of residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of non - residential uses; viii. The costs versus the benefits of relocating required utility service infrastructure and easements based on preservation or alteration of protected trees; ix. Whether the proposed tree replacement procedures adequately mitigate the alteration of the tree; Ordinance 585-D 26 Adopted November 20, 2007 Southlake Tree Preservation Ordinance & Technical Manual x. Whether the alteration adversely affects the public health, safety or welfare; and xi. Whether the granting of the variance will be in harm Case No. Attachment A ZA18-0059 Page 4 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: General Development Standards Applies Comments Overlay Regulations Y Non-Residential Development Overlay - Not subject to General Development Standards Building Articulation N Not Required Masonry Standards Y Complies Impervious Coverage Y Complies Bufferyards Y Complies subject to Site Data Review Summary changes Interior Landscape Y Complies subject to Site Data Review Summary changes Tree Preservation Y Variance Requested Sidewalks Y Complies Case No. Attachment B ZA18-0059 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0059 Page 1 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA18-0059 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 01/11/19 Project Name: Site Plan – Darr Warehouse Complex APPLICANT: Todd Marchesani ENGINEER: Ryan Koch Frontier Equity, LLC Pacheco Koch 5950 Berkshire Lane, Suite 900 7557 Rambler Rd, Suite 1400 Dallas, TX Dallas, TX 75231 Phone: (972) 235-9544 Phone: (972) 235-9544 E-mail: tmarchesani@frontierequity.com E-mail: rkoch@pkce.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 12/31/18 and 01/10/19 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748 -8602. * A Plat Revision that complies with the proposed Site Plan and underlying zoning must be processed, approved and recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits. 1. Please make the following changes to the Site Plan: a. The area of open space plus the area of impervious coverage must equal the total lot area. Add the area of pre- and post- impervious coverage to the Site Data Summary Charts for Lot 8R, Block B and Lot 2R, Block A., Southlake Bank Place. P lease revise the area of the impervious coverage and/or open space on Lot 1R to so that the sum is equal to the lot area shown on the plat (550,820 s.f.) The impervious coverage and open space currently sum to 550,816 s.f. b. Clearly designate the location and dimensions of all off-street loading spaces. c. Label the trash receptacle enclosures with the height and type of materials to be used for walls and gates. A minimum 6’ screen fence (or plantings) with metal doors is required. 2. All driveways/points of ingess/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended). The following changes are needed: a. The driveway does not meet the minimum required stacking depth of 100’. Approximately 86’ of stacking depth is shown. The stacking depth is measur ed from the property/right of way line to the first parking space or the first turning movement. Please revise the plan to dimension the stacking depth correctly. Either provide the required stacking depth or submit a variance request letter requesting a v ariance to Driveway Ord. No/ 634, as amended, Section 5.2.d requiring a minimum stacking depth of 100’ to allow a stacking depth of approximately 86’. b. Dimension the correct centerline to centerline distance between the proposed 30’ wide driveway on Lot 5R, Block A, Commerce Business Park and the adjacent driveway on Commerce St. to the south. The dimension arrow does not extend to the centerline of the Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0059 Page 2 driveway, so it appears that the centerline spacing is slightly greater than the 67’ indicated on the plan. Driveway Ord. No. 634, as amended, requires a minimum driveway spacing of 100’ on a local street. A variance is requested to allow approximately 54’ of spacing to the driveway to the north and approximately 67’ (?) of spacing to the south. 3. Please make the following changes to the variance request letter: a. The applicant is requesting a variance to the Tree Preservation Ordinance requirements. See the Landscape Administrator’s comments below regarding adding the percentage of existing canopy on the site and the percentage of existing canopy to be preserved to the plan. Include the percentage of existing canopy that is required to be preserved per the ordinance in the variance letter along with the percentage of canopy that is proposed to be preserved. b. Add the Section of the Subdivision Ord. requiring all side lot lines to be perpendicular or radial to the street (Section 8.01.D). 4. Staff recommends providing a cross access easement on the 30’ driveway connecting Bank St. to Commerce St. 5. Please provide a cross access easement to the City’s lift station to the south of the property on the associated Plat Revision and show the easement on the Site Plan. 6. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type of lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over. 7. Show the location, type, and height of all walls, fences, and screening devices, if any. Note whether existing or proposed. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. Grading is proposed within the critical root zone area of existing trees proposed to be preserved and taken bufferyard landscaping existing tree credits for within the west and east pro perty lines. Ensure that the grading does not alter the existing trees proposed to be preserved and complies with the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585 -E. 2. The existing tree cover calculations are unclear and the percentage of existing tree cover to remain is not provided. It appears that a variance to the Tree Preservation Ordinance is required. Provide the three (3) following calculations for the existing tree cover on the site. - Amount of existing tree cover - % - Minimum amount of existing tree cover to be preserved - % - Amount of existing tree cover to remain - % * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will pre serve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0059 Page 3 previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% – 20% 70% 20.1 – 40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to b e preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE AND BUFFERYARDS COMMENTS: 1. The labeled bufferyard designations on the Site Plan are incorrect and do not match the bufferyards within the Bufferyards Summary Chart. The west bufferyard is required to be a 5’ – A, and the bufferyards around the City of Southlake property in the south portion of the property are required to be a 10’ – B. Bufferyards are not required adjacent to the properties within the City of Grapevine. The entire 10’ width of the required 10’ – B bufferyard around the City of Southlake property is not provided. 2. Clearly delineate which trees are providing existing tree credits for required interior landscape canopy trees. There are no trees within the interior landscape area that are proposed to be preserved. 3. The plant material provided within the landscape design does not match the quantities of the provided plant material quantities within the Interior Landscape and Bufferyards Summary Charts. * Existing tree credits shall only be granted if the tree/s are in healthy condition and all requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined at the time of inspection for a Permanent Certificate of Occupancy. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Steve Anderson, P.E. , CFM Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8101 Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0059 Page 4 E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of S outhlake especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please in clude timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. 3. Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. 4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. * Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. * Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. * Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. * Use the City of Southlake GPS monumen ts whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 EASEMENTS: 1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15’ minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line. A 20’ easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. 2. The following note shall be added to the plat: Compliance with the provisions of the city’s Storm Drainage Policy does not relieve a person of the responsibility of complying with all other applicable laws, including, but not limited to, Section 11.086, Texas Water Code. 3. A drainage easement shall be required for the detention pond/s. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Site Plan 1. Show offsite topo to validate off-site drainage areas. 2. Show flow direction arrows. 3. Provide land use/zoning information to justify C values. Use of c = 0.8 seems too low for EX-4 and too high for EX-1. 4. Show/label the point to which each drainage area drains. (Several drainage areas say that they Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0059 Page 5 drain to an existing curb inlet, but I can’t see the inlets or the existing storm drain lines.) 5. So there’s a north/south swale for the entire length of the east side of drainage area EX 4? Where does it go? 6. C2.2 7. All offsite areas should be shown on proposed drainage area map. EX 4 from the existing drainage area map is omitted. 8. Show flow direction arrows. 9. OS 1 thru OS 10 are show and labeled in the plan view, but only OS 1 thru OS 4 are shown in the drainage area table. 10. Do all OS drainage areas sheet flow into proposed site? Difficult to tell how this is accounted for in some areas. 11. It is unclear where DA 8 and DA 9 drain and how they are accounted for in storm drain design. 12. Should show and label detention areas in proposed drainage area map. 13. It’s unclear where and how detention ponds discharge. Please clarify. C2.5 1. Please clarify what is meant by “truck detention.” If this is intended to be above-ground parking-lot detention, confirm with City engineering staff that this is allowable. 2. Provide detention calculations for the 1-, 10-, and 100-year events. 3. Detention calculations should account for offsite areas and bypass areas. 4. Provide a pond routing summary that includes the target flow, peak inflow, peak outflow, peak stage, and peak discharge for each return event for each pond. 5. Provide outlet structure rating tables/curves. C3.2 1. There are a couple of proposed 6” sewer lines shown at 0.2% and 0.23% slope. These are too flat. 2. There appear to be several existing utilities crossing through the site, particularly along the existing sewer pipeline easement that dissects the tract. Please more clearly label the lines. It is difficult to tell what is what. 3. Are the existing 6” sewer and 6” water within the sewer pipeline easement to remain? Please clarify. If they are to remain, it seems that the proposed storm drain may conflict in some areas. 4. Is the City of Southlake parcel at the south end of the project a sewer lift station site? Or some other facility? Please clearly show and label. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. * A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0059 Page 6 * Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (81 7) 748-8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Transportation Manager Review Stephanie Taylor, P.E., PTOE Transportation Manager Phone: (817) 748-8216 E-mail: staylor@ci.southlake.tx.us TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS: 1. The City has received the traffic study dated November 17, 2018, and concurs wi th the conclusion that this development’s impacts will not require mitigation in order for the surrounding area to handle the anticipated traffic. SITE PLAN: 1. Show street names. 2. Show other driveways along Commerce St so the distance between them and the proposed site driveway can be seen on the plan. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler systems can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length of the pipe. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a vault. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is located in a vault, or a minimum of 6’X6’ if it is located on the riser. (Label riser room locations) Fire Department Connections for the sprinkler systems must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes on the property. (FDC locations not indicated on the plans) Add FDC locations, wall mount or remote connection to meet the Case No. Attachment C ZA18-0059 Page 7 distance requirements. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire apparatus access, needs to be a n all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, 24 feet wide and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (Minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW) (Fire lanes not indicated, fire lanes must intersect with existing dedicated streets or fire lanes on neighboring properties and continue throughout the entire property) Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius. (Per 2015 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4) General Informational Comments * A SPIN meeting for this development was held on January 8, 2019. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 and 75 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval a nd all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA18-0059 Page 1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1. HOLBROOK, THOMAS M SP1 2925 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.75 NR 2. ANDERSON, STEPHEN P I1 2915 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.65 NR 3. QUIKTRIP CORP SP1 2905 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 2.55 NR 4. 275 COMERCE LTD SP1 275 COMMERCE ST 2.00 NR 5. MUGHAL REAL ESTATE HOLDING LLC C3 3311 E SH 114 2.25 NR 6. SOUTHLAKE CAMPUS INC C3 301 BANK ST 4.99 NR 7. 280 SPORT LLC SP1 280 COMMERCE ST 4.05 NR 8. HARTD LTD I1 250 BANK ST 1.59 NR 9. P & P MANAGEMENT SP1 325 COMMERCE ST 2.17 NR 10. DARR EQUIPMENT LP I1 300 BANK ST 1.57 NR 11. CADDIS PROPERTIES LTD I1 351 BANK ST 0.59 NR 12. PERAZZI PROPERTIES LLC I1 2890 MARKET LOOP 0.93 NR 13. DARR EQUIPMENT OPERATING CO I1 401 BANK ST 1.24 NR 14. AKP MANAGEMENT LLC I1 2850 MARKET LOOP 1.44 NR 15. TAYLOR, HENRY A I1 2865 MARKET LOOP 0.91 NR 16. PACK, LEON TR I1 2875 MARKET LOOP 0.95 NR 17. FOUR STAR INVESTMENTS I1 2895 MARKET LOOP 1.00 NR 18. MANFREDINI, VINCENT I1 525 COMMERCE ST 1.22 NR 19. DARR EQUIPMENT OPERATING CO I1 413 BANK ST 6.00 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA18-0059 Page 2 20. DARR EQUIPMENT OPERATING CO I1 451 BANK ST 6.51 NR 21. TRI DAL REAL ESTATE LTD SP1 540 COMMERCE ST 6.67 NR 22. MARKET LOOP PARNTERS I1 2830 MARKET LOOP 1.66 NR 23. NORTH AMERICAN WESTERN DATA SY I1 545 COMMERCE ST 1.30 NR 24. WANG, JEFF CHAUR-TARNG I1 2820 MARKET LOOP 0.77 NR 25. COMMERCE BUSINESS PARK JV I1 585 COMMERCE ST 3.95 NR 26. JJK MANAGEMENT LLC I1 2810 MARKET LOOP 0.81 NR 27. SOUTHLAKE FLEX PROPERTIES LLC I1 580 COMMERCE ST 1.63 NR 28. SOUTHLAKE FLEX PROPERTIES LLC I1 2805 MARKET LOOP 1.63 NR 29. MARKET LOOP LTD I1 2800 MARKET LOOP 0.68 NR 30. SOUTHLAKE FLEX PROPERTIES LLC I1 2835 EXCHANGE BLVD 0.65 NR 31. SOUTHLAKE FLEX PROPERTIES LLC I1 2845 EXCHANGE BLVD 0.74 NR 32. PIMA PROPERTIES INC I1 726 COMMERCE ST 0.71 NR 33. SOUTHLAKE FLEX PROPERTIES LLC I1 2875 EXCHANGE BLVD 0.72 NR 34. SOUTHLAKE FLEX PROPERTIES LLC I1 2865 EXCHANGE BLVD 0.73 NR 35. SOUTHLAKE FLEX PROPERTIES LLC I1 2855 EXCHANGE BLVD 0.72 NR 36. DOTTY CORP I1 427 BANK ST 0.46 NR 37. DARR EQUIPMENT OPERATING CO I1 400 BANK ST 4.12 NR 38. MANNHART PROPERTIES LLC SER A SP1 375 COMMERCE ST 1.74 NR 39. DARR EQUIPMENT OPERATING CO I1 350 BANK ST 1.45 NR 40. RAM INTERESTS LP I1 170 BANK ST 0.75 NR 41. PACK, RANDY I1 200 BANK ST 3.25 NR 42. CHU, ROBERT C3 3105 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.61 NR 43. KCP RE LLC C3 3115 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.00 NR 44. VINCENT, CHARLES VICTOR C3 275 BANK ST 1.45 O 45. MANCHESTER PROPERTIES LLC C3 3205 E SH 114 1.85 NR 46. DAR PROPERTIES SEVEN LLC C3 3305 E SH 114 2.08 NR 47. HIEN QC LLC C3 3317 E SH 114 1.54 NR 48. BBJ & E LTD I1 2860 MARKET LOOP 1.99 NR 49. RAM INTERESTS LP I1 2870 MARKET LOOP 1.04 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Thirty-nine – (39) Responses Received: One (1) - Attached Case No. Attachment D ZA18-0059 Page 3