Item 7 - ZSP Pinnacle Point Phase 2Case No.
ZA18-0014
S T A F F R E P O R T
January 11, 2019
CASE NO: ZA18-0014
PROJECT: Zoning Change & Site Plan for Pinnacle Point
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: On behalf of SP Southlake-Kimball, LLC, Claymoore Engineering is requesting
approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan for Pinnacle Point on property
described as Lots 1-3, Block A, Meadow Oaks Addition, an addition to the City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 455 S. Kimball Ave., Southlake,
Texas. Current Zoning: S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District. Proposed Zoning: S-
P-2 Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood # 8.
DETAILS: The property is located along the east side of South Kimball Avenue, directly
across the street from Cleburne Eubanks Intermediate and George Dawson
Middle school. The purpose of this request is to obtain approval of a zoning
change and site plan that will accommodate the second phase of office
development for Pinnacle Point; specifically for Lot 3, Pinnacle Point Addition. The
zoning change and site plan proposes three single-story buildings on three
separate lots for general office use on approximately 7.29 acres.
In April 2016, City Council approved a S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District zoning
change for the entire property, however, the site plan and building elevations were
only approved for Lots 1 & 2 (ZA15-115). A site plan and rezoning approval by City
Council is required for the remaining lot(s) in order to construct any additional
buildings. City Council also noted that if South Village Center Drive from Kimball to
Nolen is not completed prior to the submission of any site plan and zoning
application(s) for the remaining lot(s) that an updated traffic impact analysis (TIA)
would be required. The applicant has provided staff with an updated TIA and staff
Transportation Manager has determined there are no issues.
The S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District zoning is proposed to allow any use
permitted in the O-1 Office District with exception to medical/dental associated
uses as listed in the submitted S-P-2 zoning document which is consistent with the
original 2015 zoning request.
Department of Planning & Development Services
Case No.
ZA18-0014
Site Data Summary
Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3R1 Lot 3R2 Lot 3R3 Total
Existing Zoning S-P-2 S-P-2 S-P-2 S-P-2 S-P-2
Proposed Zoning S-P-2 S-P-2 S-P-2 S-P-2 S-P-2
Lot Area SF 115,243 70,537 104,280 110,982 97,418 498,460
Bldg Area SF 21,500 15,500 26,493 27,695 27,071 118,259
Open Space Area % 45.34% 27.74% 28% 25.71% 16.62% 29.24%
Impervious Coverage % 58.7% 61% 72% 74.29% 83.37% 70.1%
Parking required under
O-1 General Office use 77 57 93 97 95 419
Parking provided 92 72 112 130 119 525
Regulation Standard O-1 District S-P-1 Regulation
Impervious Coverage Maximum 65% Maximum 70.1% for the site
as a whole
Parking
General Office Parking is calculated
as 1 space per 300 square feet.
All professional office use is required
to start calculation at 8 spaces for the
first 1,000 square feet. The required
parking for this project equates to
419 spaces for the site as a whole.
525 Spaces for the site as a
whole.
Tree Preservation Minimum 60% Minimum 32.75%
VARIANCE
REQUEST: The following variance is requested:
1) The Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, requires that all lots
be fronted on a public or private street. The applicant is requesting
approval of the lot configuration as shown on the proposed site plan,
with lots fronting on common access easement / 24’ fire lanes.
Approval of a plat revision will be required.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated January 8, 2019
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(E) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only)
Presentation
Case No.
ZA18-0014
Narrative
S-P-2 Regulation Document
Plans
SPIN Report
Traffic Impact Analysis
Corridor Committee Meeting Report
Comprehensive Plan Review
STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072
Lorrie Fletcher (817) 748-8069
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0014 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: SP Southlake-Kimball LLC
APPLICANT: Claymoore Engineering
PROPERTY SITUATION: 455 S. Kimball Ave.
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION: Lots 1-3, Pinnacle Point Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING: S-P-2 – Generalized Site Plan District with limited O-1 – Office District uses
REQUESTED ZONING: S-P-2 – Generalized Site Plan District with limited O-1 – Office District uses
HISTORY: - The Meadow Oaks subdivision was zoned A-3 Single Family District and
a Final Plat filed in 1979.
- The SF-1 Single Family District zoning designation was placed on the
property with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance No. 334 in 1986.
- The SF-1A Single Family Residential District zoning designation was
placed on the property with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance No. 480 in
1989.
- A zoning change and site plan for Avanti at Southlake was denied by City
Council May 20, 2014 under Planning Case ZA14-031.
- A zoning change and concept/site plan was approved for S-P-2
Generalized Site Plan District for Lots 1-3, however, the concept plan was
denied and the site plan was only approved for Lots 1 and 2; April 5, 2016
under Planning Case ZA15-115.
- A plat revision for Lots 1-3, Block A, Pinnacle Point was approved
December 6, 2016 under Planning Case ZA16-097.
SOUTHLAKE 2035 PLAN: Future Land Use Plan
The site is designated “Mixed
Use”.
Purpose and Definition: To
provide an option for large-scale,
master-planned, mixed use
developments that combine land
uses such as office facilities,
shopping, dining, parks, and
residential uses. The range of
activities permitted, the diverse
natural features, and the varying proximity to thoroughfares of areas in the
Mixed Use category necessitates comprehensively planned and
coordinated development. New development must be compatible with and
not intrusive to existing development. Further, special attention should be
placed on the design and transition between different uses. Typically, the
Mixed Use designation is intended for medium- to higher-intensity office
buildings, hotels, commercial activities, retail centers, and residential uses.
Nuisance-free, wholly enclosed light manufacturing and assembly uses that
Phase I
Phase II
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0014 Page 2
have no outdoor storage are permitted if designed to be compatible with
adjacent uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public
Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, Low Density Residential, Medium
Density Residential, Retail Commercial, and Office Commercial categories.
Crooked/Kimball Small Area Plan
The property is also included in the
Crooked/Kimball Small Area Plan. The
Future Land Use designation was changed
from Low Density Residential to Mixed Use
in 2012 as a result of the recommendations
in that plan.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan shows S. Kimball Ave. to be a
4-lane divided arterial with 88’ of right of way. The future Village Center
Drive location will be north of the Phase I property and connect to S. Nolen
Drive; it is planned as a 2-lane undivided collector with 60’ of right of way.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
There is an existing 6’ sidewalk along the west side of S. Kimball Avenue.
The proposed site plan indicates a 6’ sidewalk to be built on the east side
of S. Kimball Avenue along the west boundary of the subject property.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed development has access onto S. Kimball Avenue from the
Phase I development to the north as well as one future access point onto
Village Center Drive once that roadway is constructed. The proposed site
plan also shows two future access points to the property to the south.
S. Kimball Ave.
(between Crooked Ln. & E. Southlake Blvd.)
24hr North Bound (5,605) South Bound (5,039)
AM Peak AM (505) 7:45 AM –8:45 AM Peak AM (557) 7:45 – 8:45 AM
PM Peak PM (580) 4:30 – 5:30 PM Peak PM (460) 3:15 – 4:15 PM
* Based on the 2018 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was submitted for the proposed
development. Staff Transportation Manager has reviewed the report and
reported no issues. A link to the TIA has been provided on page 2 of this
report.
Use Area Vtpd
*
AM-
IN
AM-
OUT
PM-
IN
PM-
OUT
General Office – Lots 1 & 2 37,000 s.f. 407 51 7 10 48
General Office – Lots 3R1,
3R2 and 3R3 81,259 s.f. 896 111 16 22 105
* Vehicle Trips Per Day
* AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour generators on a weekday
* Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0014 Page 3
TREE PRESERVATION: There is 25.10% of existing tree cover. The applicant is proposing to
preserve 32.75% of the existing tree cover. The plan is in conformance with
the previously approved Tree Conservation Plan.
CITIZEN INPUT/
BOARD REVIEW: A SPIN Forum for this project was held May 8, 2018. A 2035 Corridor
Committee Meeting was held May 31, 2018. Links to the summary reports
for those meetings can be found on page 2 of this report.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated January 8, 2019.
Variance Criteria:
Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 9.01 Modifications and Variations:
A. Compliance: Where the Council finds that compliance with these
regulations would cause unusual hardship or extraordinary difficulties
because of exceptional and unique conditions of access, location, shape,
size, drainage, or other physical features of the site, the requirements may
be modified to mitigate the hardship, provided that the public interest is
protected and the development is in keeping with the general spirit and
intent of this ordinance.
1) This section shall not be interpreted to permit the development of
land which is inherently unsuitable for the use proposed.
2) Any modification will not have the effect of preventing the orderly
subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the
provisions of this ordinance.
APPLICABLE
REGULATIONS:
General Development Standards Applies Comments
Overlay Regulations Y Corridor and Residential Adjacency
Building Articulation Y Complies
Masonry Standards Y Complies
Impervious Coverage Y S-P-2 regulation written allowing a maximum 70.10%
Bufferyards Y S-P-2 regulation written to relieve lot-to-lot bufferyard
requirements. All exterior bufferyards comply.
Interior Landscape Y complies
Tree Preservation Y S-P-2 regulation written allowing a minimum 32.75%
Sidewalks Y Complies
Case No. Attachment B
ZA18-0014 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0014 Page 1
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA18-0014 Review No.: Five Date of Review: 1/8/19
Project Name: Zoning Change and Site Plan – Pinnacle Point Southlake Phase 2
APPLICANT: Claymoore Engineering OWNER: SP Southlake-Kimball LLC
Clay Cristy David Karr
1903 Central Drive, Ste 406 800 E 96th Street, #175
Bedford, TX 76021 Indianapolis, IN 46240
Phone: 817-281-0572 Phone: 214-506-3205
Email: clay@claymooreeng.com Email: david@browndfw.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 12/31/18 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER.
Planning Review
Lorrie Fletcher
Planner
Phone: (817) 748-8069
Email:lfletcher@ci.southlake.tx.us
1. The Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, requires that all lots front on a public or private
street. A Variance has been requested to allow lot configuration as proposed, fronting on a
common access easement (CAE) and 24’ fire lane.
2. Show, label and provide (with plat revision or deed instrument) common access easements over
proposed external driveways and fire lanes with stubs into adjacent lots to south and east.
3. Please confirm and provide corrections as necessary to site data summary charts regarding number
of parking spaces required and provided for each lot. Data summary needs to be provided by lot and
in total, inclusive of Lots 1 & 2 in Phase I.
* The Master Pathways Plan indicates a minimum 5’ sidewalk (<8’) is required along Kimball Avenue
along the west boundary. A 6’ sidewalk was approved with the Site Plan for Lots 1 & 2; installation is
currently pending.
* The proposed development is located less than 400 feet from the nearest single family residential
property. Residential adjacency standards shall apply. These standards are in addition to the
development regulations applicable to the underlying zoning district.
* Approval of a plat revision will be required to be recorded with the County prior to issuance of a
building permit.
* Please be aware when submitting for a building permit, any variation from an approved site plan or
approved elevations and renderings will require a zoning change.
* Please note there are lingering corrections to be made regarding parking lot landscape islands and
the interior landscape summary chart. See below comments by the Landscape Administrator.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0014 Page 2
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
The following are recommendations and observations by staff where your application may
benefit and does not represent a requirement.
Staff recommends a colored illustrative site plan be provided that includes landscaping, pavement
treatments, sidewalks and buildings. Please see the examples at the end of this review. Staff
believes this will add much value to the application.
Staff recommends providing a materials sample board.
All development must comply with the underlying zoning district regulations.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. There is 25.10% of existing tree cover. The applicant is proposing to preserve 32.75% of the
existing tree cover. The plan is in conformance with the previously approved Tree Conservation
Plan.
* (Section 7.2.b. Ord. 585, as amended) For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning
district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan,
Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district,
the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction
with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and
Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council
regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds
that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as
to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature
tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential
areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0014 Page 3
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the
zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do
not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
* If the site was being developed under a standard zoning district, preservation would be required
in accordance with Table 2.0 below. For this site, 60% of the existing tree cover would need to be
preserved. For properties developed under a standard zoning district, except as provided by
subsection 7.2.b. (noted above) of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has
previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at
the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree
cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. The parking landscape islands in the south and east rows of parking spaces are less than 12’ in
width. Parking lot islands shall have a minimum width of 12’ back-to-back if curbed or 13’ edge-to-
edge if no curb is intended, and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall.
2. The interior landscape interior landscape design does not match the “Provided” quantities of plant
material within the Interior Landscape Summary Chart.
- The Interior Landscaper Summary Chart plant material calculations show that 79 Canopy Trees
are provided, while there are only 43 interior landscape Canopy Trees provided within the
design and no indications of existing tree credits being taken.
- The Interior Landscaper Summary Chart plant material calculations show that 155 Accent Trees
are provided, while there are only 90 interior landscape Accent Trees provided within the design
and no indications of existing tree credits being taken.
- Only 48 Accent Trees are provided within the south bufferyard instead of 50 as shown to be
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0014 Page 4
provided.
- Ensure that the total shrubs count matches the “Required” and “Provided plant material
requirements.
- The existing landscape trees planted during the first phase of the development were planted to
meet tree removal mitigation and required landscaping. They cannot be used as credits towards
for required landscaping.
* Within the Pinnacle Point Phase I development the east bufferyard is a 5’ – A type bufferyard.
The applicant is proposing an east 10’ – B bufferyard.
* A Water Conservation Credit to reduce the interior landscape area by 5% is proposed to be
taken. The submitted Irrigation Plan is designed in accordance with Section 3.6 of the Landscape
Ordinance 544-B.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Brent Anderson, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8274
E-mail: baanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
2. Any required common access drive stub-outs must be paved all the way to property line.
3. Proposed sidewalk near southwest corner of development stops short of connecting to proposed
sidewalk along Kimball. Extend this east-west walk to connect to new north-south walk along
Kimball.
4. See City of Southlake website for current engineering design standards and update your general
notes and construction details to conform prior to submitting final sealed construction plans to
Public Works department.
a. https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/152/Engineering-Design-Standards
EASEMENTS:
1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15’
minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line. A 20’ easement is required if
both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement.
* Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of
way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be
constructed to City standards.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0014 Page 5
WATER COMMENTS:
2. All water line stubs must have 2 joints past the valve with a 2” blow-off per the City’s details.
SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS:
3. Minimum size manhole for drop manholes is 5.0’ diameter.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. Storm should be labeled as private.
2. Final sealed construction plans should include phase 1 detention design sheets for informational
purposes and verify/note that proposed phase 2 drainage design is consistent with the design
assumptions that were utilized to size the regional pond constructed with phase 1. Any changes
to size, shape, and/or location of the proposed pond(s) may require a revision to the
concept/site/development plan and may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the City Council.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details
and general notes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000.
The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The
Environmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the
review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in:
https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP
shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
* NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
* Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by
a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the
Building Inspections Department prior to construction.
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report
shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114.
Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly
to TxDOT for review.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-
8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by
the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on
the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0014 Page 6
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on
the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length of the
pipe. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a vault.
Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is located in a vault, or a minimum of
6’X6’ if it is located on the riser. (Label riser room location)
Fire Department Connections for the sprinkler systems must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant,
and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes on the property. (FDC location not indicated on
plans, show location) Add FDC location, wall mount or remote connection, and verify that the fire
hydrants are installed as necessary to meet the distance requirements.
Traffic
Stephanie Taylor
Transportation Manager
Phone: (817) 748-8216
E-mail: staylor@ci.southlake.tx.us
* Comments have been addressed
General Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting was held for this project May 8, 2018.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21,
Building Color Standards for Non-Residential Buildings.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0014 Page 7
* Through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water
connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact
fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The
applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact
Fees Guide to determine the fee amount.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit the following may be
required: a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan and building plans must be
submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to
the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and
related Permit Fees.
* It appears that portions of this property lie within either the 65 and 75 LDN D/FW Regional Airport
Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport
Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0014 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS
Pinnacle Point
Owner Zoning Address Acreage Response
1. DOWNEY ENTERPRISES LLC C2 2545 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.92 NR
2. DREAM 7 EQUITIES LLC C2 2445 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.68 NR
3. PEARSON, CAREY SF1-A 695 S KIMBALL AVE 2.08 NR
4. PEARSON, CAREY SF1-A 2300 CROOKED LN 2.22 NR
5. FOX, TODD SF1-A 605 S KIMBALL AVE 2.41 NR
6. MARX, RODERICK SF1-A 2350 CROOKED LN 2.30 NR
7. MULLER, RICHARD J SF1-A 2400 CROOKED LN 2.16 NR
8. TRI DAL REAL ESTATE LTD SF1-A 505 S KIMBALL AVE 4.03 NR
9. CHURCH OF CHRIST OUR KING SP1 595 S KIMBALL AVE 3.96 NR
10. CARROLL, ISD CS 400 S KIMBALL AVE 35.39 NR
11. ZADA M WHITE ESTATE TRUST SF1-A 2450 CROOKED LN 3.20 NR
12. SOUTH NOLAN MEDICAL INVESTMENT AG 2627 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 3.88 NR
13. CESANDER, LAURENCE P O1 2485 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.34 NR
14. CARR, HOWARD E SF1-A 285 S KIMBALL AVE 2.72 NR
15. 495 KIMBALL LLC SF1-A 495 S KIMBALL AVE 3.96 NR
16. PINNACLE POINT BUILDING LLC SP2 405 S KIMBALL AVE 2.66 NR
17. SP SOUTHLAKE-KIMBALL II LLC SP2 455 S KIMBALL AVE 7.30 NR
18. ZADA M WHITE ESTATE TRUST AG 2450 CROOKED LN 12.94 NR
19. CARR, HOWARD E AG 311 S KIMBALL AVE 5.66 NR
20. SP SOUTHLAKE-KIMBALL I LLC SP2 415 S KIMBALL AVE 1.64 NR
21. WILLIAMS, ROGER GLENN ETAL AG 320 S NOLEN DR 1.54 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent Within 200’: Twenty-one (21)
Responses Received: None