Item 7ACase No.
ZA18-0058
S T A F F R E P O R T
January 8, 2019
CASE NO: ZA18-0058
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Site Plan for CISD Senior High School Music Building
Addition
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: On behalf of Carroll Independent School District, Huckabee Associates, Inc. is
requesting 1st reading approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan for Carroll ISD
Senior High School Athletics Music Building to include a variance to the Masonry
Ordinance No. 557, as amended, on property described as Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll
Senior High School Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County,
Texas and located at 1501 W. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: “S-
P-1” Detailed Site Plan District. Proposed Zoning: “S -P-1” Detailed Site Plan District.
SPIN Neighborhood # 10.
DETAILS: Carroll ISD Senior High School is located at the southeast corner of W. Southlake
Blvd. and S. Peytonville Ave.
The purpose of this request is to seek 1st reading approval of a Zoning Change and
Site Plan from “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
to allow improvements to the CISD Senior High School to include an approximately
60,000 square foot music building addition, renovation of 12,000 square feet of
existing interior space and associated site improvements. A variance to Masonry
Ordinance No. 557, as amended, is requested to allow the use of a the composite and
metal panels on the facades of the music building.
Site Data Summary
Existing Proposed Total
Zoning “S-P-1” “S-P-1” “S-P-1”
Gross/Net Area (ac.) 55.03 55.03 55.03
Building Area (s.f.) 285,923 59,347 345,270
Floor Area (s.f.) 357,979 71,711 429,690
Area of Impervious
Coverage (ac.) 37.86 2.31 (added) 40.17
Percentage of
Impervious Coverage 68.79% 4.21% (added) 73.0%
Department of Planning & Development Services
Case No.
ZA18-0058
The following “S-P-1” regulations are proposed for the new improvements only. No
other changes to the previously approved “S -P-1” zoning regulations or conditions
of approval are proposed.
Regulation “CS” Community Service District
(Base “S-P-1” zoning) S-P-1 Regulation
Articulation and
Masonry Façade
Materials
This site is subject to the Residential
Adjacency and Corridor Overlay District
regulations, which includes specific
requirements for masonry façade materials
and vertical and horizontal articulation on
buildings within 400’ of residential property
and on all facades visible from FM 1709
and S. Peytonville Ave.
Allow horizontal and vertical
articulation, non-masonry façade
materials and concrete columns
as shown on the site plan and
building elevations.
Maximum Height 35’ or 2 ½ stories ± 58’
Maximum Impervious
Coverage 65% 73%
Bufferyards
New construction that increases the
building square footage by 30% or that
exceeds 5,000 square feet requires
bufferyards to meet current requirements
for the entire site.
Existing bufferyards are to
remain as they exist.
The applicant will provide additional details on the traffic flow at or before the City
Council meeting on January 15, 2019 per the Planning and Zoning Commission
motion for approval.
VARIANCES
REQUESTED:
1. Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended, requires all buildings to have
exterior walls constructed using a masonry material covering at least eighty
percent (80%) of said walls, exclusive of all windows, doors, roofs, glass
construction materials, or sidewalk and walkway covers. The applicant is
requesting a variance to allow composite and metal panes as façade materials
on the music building.
2. Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2.d requires a minimum
stacking depth of 150’. The applicant is requesting a stacking depth of
approximately 27’ on the northern S. Peytonville Ave. driveway.
3. Landscape Ordinance 544 -B requires interior landscaping to comply with the
current ordinances for new construction greater in size t han 30% of the
existing building or greater than 5,000 square feet. The applicant is requesting
a variance to the Landscape Ordinance to request relief from the interior
landscaping requirements to allow the landscaping as shown on the proposed
landscape plan.
Case No.
ZA18-0058
ACTION NEEDED: Consider 1st reading approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 8, 2019
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(E) Ordinance No. 480-338G
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only )
Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Link to Narrative
Link to Regulations and Variance Requests
Link to Plans
Link to SPIN meeting Report
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0058 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Carroll Independent School District
APPLICANT: Huckabee Associates, Inc.
PROPERTY SITUATION: 1501 W. Southlake Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll Senior High School Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Public/Semi-Public, Medium Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
REQUESTED ZONING: “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District
HISTORY: - A zoning change (ZA90-058) from “AG” Agricultural District to “S-P-1”
Detailed Site Plan District for Carroll High School was approved by City
Council on December 4, 1990.
- A preliminary plat (ZA90-059) and a final plat (ZA90-060) for Carroll High
School were approved by City Council on November 20, 1990.
- A revised site plan (ZA97-108) for additions and renovations to Carroll High
School was approved by City Council on October 7, 1997.
- A zoning change and site plan (ZA99 -078) from “AG” Agricultural and “S-P-1”
Detailed Site Plan to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan with Community Service uses
to allow the construction of a Natatorium, classroom additions and storage
buildings was approved by City Council on June 20, 2000.
- A plat revision (ZA00-006) was approved by City Council on June 6, 2000.
- A zoning change and site plan (ZA08-116) was approved by City Council on
April 7, 2009 to allow the reconfiguration of the driveway and parking area
south of the Aquatics Center.
- A zoning change and site plan (ZA10 -019) was approved by City Council on
May 18, 2010 to allow the addition of an art building, a gym expansion, an
aquatics center expansion, a locker building at the tennis courts, a locker
building near the baseball and softball fields, and eighteen (18) parking
spaces.
- A plat revision for Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll Senior High School Addition was
filed on September 30, 2010.
- A zoning change and site plan (ZA11-007) to add parking and to reconfigure
the service yard was approved by City Council on June 7, 2011.
- A zoning change and site plan (ZA12-035) for an approximately 3,000 square
foot expansion to the field house was approved by City Council on May 15,
2012.
- A Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA13 -093) from “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan
District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to allow the installation of two
irrigation tanks at Carroll ISD Senior High School was approved by City
Council on November 5, 2013.
- A Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA18-030) from “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan
District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to allow improvements to the CISD
Senior High School athletic facilities to include the addition of a new indoor
and outdoor batting cage facility with concessions building, new girls softball
locker room, baseball dugouts, storage buildings, additional baseball
bleachers, bleacher canopies and associated site work. was approved by City
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0058 Page 2
Council on May 15, 2018.
SOUTHLAKE 2030/2035
PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2030/2035 future land use designation for the site is Public/Sem i-Public.
Purpose and Definition: Public/Semi-Public areas are suitable for a wide
range of public, civic, and religious uses, such as government offices and
facilities, public and private schools, churches and related facilities (including
parsonage and parochial schools), cemeteries, and Public Parks/Open Space
uses in conjunction with these developments.
TREE PRESERVATION: The proposed tree removal as shown on the submitted Tree Conservation
Plan includes the area of the proposed music center con struction and the
drainage area behind the large baseball field and parallel to the east property
line. There is more existing tree cover on the site than indicated on the Tree
Conservation Plan. A storm sewer is proposed to be constructed within the
drainage area but is outside of the platted drainage easement. A total of ten
(10) trees are proposed to be removed, with three (3) of the trees being dead
and one (1) lying on the ground. If the request was for a straight zoning
change, the proposed tree cover preservation would comply with the Existing
Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance.
The existing tree cover on the site is approximately 10%. A Minimum of 70% of
the existing tree cover would be required to be preserved. O nly .05% of the
tree cover is proposed to be removed and 99.9% to be preserved.
UTILITIES: Water and sanitary sewer services for the music building will be extended from
existing 8” water and sewer lines internal to the site.
DRAINAGE: Documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary will be
required prior to approval of construction plans.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held for this project on December 11, 2018. Link to SPIN
Report
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: January 3, 2019; Approved (7 -0) subject to the staff report dated January 3,
2019, granting the variances requested therein, also subject to Site Plan
Review Summary No. 2, dated December 21, 2018 and noting the applicant’s
willingness to provide more detail on any processes, procedures and protocols
of how the traffic flow is going to be addressed.
STAFF COMMENTS: Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated January 8, 2019 is attached.
The criteria for the City Council to grant a variance to Masonry Ordinance 557,
as amended, are below:
The City Council, upon application duly filed by the applicant and after a public
hearing, may grant a variance from the terms of this ordinance and the
requirements set forth herein upon an affirmative vote of a majori ty of the City
council members present and voting on such variance. The application for a
variance shall set forth in specific language the grounds or reasons upon
which such variance request is being made.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0058 Page 3
In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine:
that a literal enforcement of the regulations will create an unnecessary
hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant,
that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical
difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed,
that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the
use and permitted development of adjacent properties,
and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit
and purpose of this ordinance.
The terms and conditions of the variance, if granted, shall be noted by minute
order. In the event that a variance application is denied by the City Council, no
other variance of like kind shall be considered or acted upon by the City
Council upon the same building or proposed building for a period of six (6)
months subsequent to said denial.
The criteria for the City Council to grant a variance to Landscape Ordinance
No. 544-B are below:
Landscape Ordinance No. 544-B:
12.2 VARIANCES AND APPEALS: Any applicant who desires a variance or
elimination of the requirements herein, or who desires to appeal a decision by
the Landscape Administrator, shall file a written appeal with the City Manager
for consideration by the City Council. Such appeal shall be accom panied by
adequate graphic reproductions, a written summary of the request, and
justification for such request. The City Council shall have the authority to grant
an interpretation or variance to the requirements of this ordinance. In granting
any variance, the City Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the
regulations herein will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty
on the applicant, that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or
practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed,
that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and
permitted development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the
variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The
decision of the City Council shall be final.
APPLICABLE
REGULATIONS:
General Development
Standards Applies Comments
Overlay Regulations Y Corridor/Residential Adjacency
Building Articulation Y “S-P-1” regulation added
Masonry Standards Y Variance Requested
Impervious Coverage Y “S-P-1” regulation added
Bufferyards Y “S-P-1” regulation added
Interior Landscape Y Variance Requested
Tree Preservation Y Complies
Sidewalks Y Complies
Case No. Attachment B
ZA18-0058 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0058 Page 1
REVISED SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA18-0058 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 01/08/19
Project Name: Site Plan – Carroll ISD Sr. High School Music Building
APPLICANT: Jesse Sherr/Crystal Vasquez OWNER: Dr. David Faltys
Huckabee Carroll ISD
801 Cherry St., Suite 500 2400 N. Carroll Ave.
Fort Worth, Tx 76102 Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (817) 946-0047 Phone: (817) 949-8222
E-mail: cvasquez@huckabee-inc.com
jesse.sherr@huckabee-inc.com
E-mail: david.faltys@southlakecarroll.edu
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFE RENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
12/17/18 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIF ICATION, PLEASE CONTACT
RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748 -8602.
1. In the “S-P-1” regulations, please revise the sentence in the second paragraph to state “Except as
noted below, there are no changes to the previously approved “S -P-1” zoning regulations and all
previous conditions of approval remain in effect.
2. Please make the following changes to the Overall Site Plan (Sheet SP -1):
a. Show all buildings, structures, sidewalks, paving, irrigation storage tanks and other
improvements as currently existing and/or approved in addition to the proposed
improvements.
b. Please remove the impervious coverage shown to the north of the baseball field.
c. Show and label all existing and proposed easements on the site.
d. Show and label the correct type and height of all existing and proposed fencing on the site.
e. Ensure that the data in the Site Data Summary cha rt accurately reflects all approved and
proposed buildings, structures, sidewalks, paving, irrigation storage tanks and other
improvements as currently approved in addition to the proposed improvements.
f. Add rows for number of students and number of teachin g stations to the Site Data Summary
and recalculate the required parking if necessary.
g. Show the Zoning and Land Use Designation (LUD =) on the properties to the east in Stone
Lakes. The LUD = Medium Density Residential and the zoning is “R -PUD”.
3. All driveways/points of ingess/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as
amended). The following changes are needed:
a. Dimension and label the stacking depth measured from the right of way/property line to the
nearest parking stall or intersecting drive lane pavement edge. The 35’ dimension shown is
incorrect. The north driveway on S. Peytonville Ave. does not meet the minimum required
stacking depth of 150’. Approximately 27’ of stacking depth is provided. A variance to
Driveway Ord. No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2(d) to allow the 27’ stacking depth on
the northern S. Peytonville Ave. driveway is requested.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0058 Page 2
4. The property is within the Corridor Overlay Zone. No improvements shown are within the Residential
Adjacency Overlay Zone. Masonry constructio n meeting the requirements of Ord. 557 and Ord. 480,
Section 43.9.c.1.a is required on proposed buildings. The green composite phenolic panels are a non-
masonry material. A variance is requested to Ord. No. 557, as amended, to allow the percentage
of masonry as shown on the elevations to be less than 80%. The north and west elevations do
not meet the horizontal articulation requirements of Ord. 480, Section 43.9.c.1.d. Please revise the
“S-P-1” regulation regarding articulation to also allow the façade mat erials as shown on the
elevations for the music building (see below).
Building Articulation and Materials – Vertical and horizontal articulation and the non-masonry
façade materials are allowed as shown on the elevations.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
* The proposed tree removal as shown on the submitted Tree Conservation Plan includes the area of
the proposed music center co nstruction and the drainage area behind the large baseball field and
parallel to the east property line. There is more existing tree cover on the site than indicated on the
Tree Conservation Plan. A storm sewer is proposed to be constructed within the drai nage area but is
outside of the platted drainage easement. A total of ten (10) trees are proposed to be removed, with
three (3) of the trees being dead and one (1) lying on the ground.
If the request was for a straight zoning change, the proposed tree co ver preservation would comply
with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The
existing tree cover on the site is approximately 10%. A Minimum of 70% of the existing tree cover
would be required to be preserved . Only .05% of the tree cover is proposed to be removed and 99.9%
to be preserved.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously
received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the
first such permit was issued s hall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be
preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public
rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0058 Page 3
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning
district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit
Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for
a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as
established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve
the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to
maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental
Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas
from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage
creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets
as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed t ree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as
approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements,
utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with
existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
* A variance is requested for the Landscape Ordinance requirem ents and the Bufferyards regulations.
The interior landscaping is proposed to be provided as shown and no changes are proposed to be
made to the existing bufferyards.
New construction greater in size than 30% of the existing building or greater than 5,00 0 square feet
shall require compliance with the Landscape Ordinance as it applies to the entire square footage of
the existing building and proposed addition. New Construction which increases the square footage of
the existing building by thirty percent (30%) or greater or which exceeds 5,000 square feet shall be
required to meet the requirements of the Bufferyards regulations for the entire property. Any request
for changes in zoning also requires compliance with the Bufferyards regulations.
* Existing tree credits are proposed to be taken for required interior landscaping. Existing tree credits
shall only be granted if the tree/s are in healthy condition and all requirements of the Tree
Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined at the time of ins pection for a Permanent
Certificate of Occupancy.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0058 Page 4
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Kevin Ferrer, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8089
E-mail: kferrer@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
* Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
* Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
EASEMENTS:
1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15’
minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line. A 20’ easement is required if
both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement.
* Verify if easement of water/sanitary sewer/storm sewer crossing the site is in an easement.
* Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of
way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be
constructed to City standards.
WATER COMMENTS:
2. Remove Proposed Tees with plugs and replace them with two 45 degree bend fittings.
* Water lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way.
* The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers
allowed before the meter on the public side. A 1” inch meter must have a 1” tap, etc.
* Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way.
* Fire lines shall be separate from service lines.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. Double check utilized runoff coefficient for X-1, X-3, and X-4 as they appear a little high.
2. Also make sure all drainage sub basins are being reflected on the table, i.e. X -1 and X-2 are missing.
3. Clearly label all private and public storm lines.
4. Differences between pre- and post- development runoff shall be captured in detention pond(s).
Proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of the 1, 10 and 100 - year storm events.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0058 Page 5
Detention may be required with any new proposed building construction. Describe how increased
runoff from site is being detained. Access easements are needed for maintenance of deten tion
ponds.
5. Easements outside of right of way shall be required for proposed storm sewer. Storm sewer must be
installed outside the edge of pavement. Ordinance #605 defines easement requirements for storm
sewer:
30” RCP and under - 15’ easement
42” – 54” RCP - 20’ easement
60” – 66” RCP - 25’ easement
72” – 102” RCP - 30’ easement
Over 102” RCP – 3.5 times diameter
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on upstream and
downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinanc e No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details
and general notes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000. The
plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The Environmental
Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the review of the SWPPP
please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in:
https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP shall
be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
* NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
* Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a
registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building
Inspections Department prior to construction.
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report
shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114.
Permit approval is required before beginn ing construction. Submit application and plans directly
to TxDOT for review.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748 -
8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by
the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Develo per’s Agreement on
the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0058 Page 6
*=Denotes informational comment.
Transportation Manager Review
Stephanie Taylor, P.E., PTOE
Transportation Manager
Phone: (817) 748-8216
E-mail: staylor@ci.southlake.tx.us
PROJECT NARRATIVE:
1. The traffic section needs to be updated to reflect the most recent discussion. The
southernmost entrance is not currently proposed to be entrance only.
SITE PLAN:
2. The Traffic Flow sheet should show traffic exiting at the southernmost entrance where the
SRO is currently stationed. Several athletes are dropped off in this area and parents will
not travel on the loop toward the other curb cut.
3. All previous comments from 12-10-2018 have been addressed.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler systems can be located on the
riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length of the pipe. If
the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a vault. Riser
rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is located in a vault, or a minimum of 6’X6’ if it
is located on the riser. (Label riser room location)
Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and
within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes on the property. (FDC location not indicated on the
plans) Add FDC location, wall mount or remote connection to meet the distance requirements.
Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting was held on Dec. 11, 2018.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior
to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right -of-ways and residential properties in
accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0058 Page 7
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay
Zones.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully correct ed site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and
building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include
but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and
Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water
customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the City
of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final plat
recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort
Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0058 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owners
Carroll Senior High School
SPO # Owner Zoning Property Address Acres Response
1 MYERS MEADOW HOMEOWNERS
ASSN RPUD 1713 WILD ROSE WAY 4.90 NR
2 REALTY INCOME TX PRO 1 LLC C3 1400 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.97 NR
3 SOUTHLAKE SAFECO LTD C3 1500 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.31 NR
4 SEJ ASSET MGT & INVESTMENT CO C3 1600 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.99 NR
5 EECU C3 1460 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.81 NR
6 MOHAREB, PIERRE RPUD 1308 NORMANDY DR 0.49 NR
7 RIACH INVESTMENTS LLC C2 1701 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 2.18 NR
8 NUESE, DAVID V RPUD 102 WATERFORD DR 0.35 NR
9 BHATARA, VISHAL RPUD 105 WATERFORD DR 0.39 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0058 Page 2
10 RABBANI, MAHMOOD RPUD 104 WATERFORD DR 0.44 NR
11 CRABTREE, BAOCHAU RPUD 107 WATERFORD DR 0.34 NR
12 IVY, KRISTY RPUD 106 WATERFORD DR 0.39 NR
13 VARSITY PROFESSIONAL PARK LLC O1 190 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 1.28 NR
14 DAMES, JOHN D RPUD 109 WATERFORD DR 0.34 NR
15 THATCHER, STEVEN B RPUD 108 WATERFORD DR 0.39 NR
16 REBECCA LYNN REYNOLDS LIVING T RPUD 111 WATERFORD DR 0.31 NR
17 DAVIS, DONALD G O1 200 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 1.01 NR
18 WHITACRE, CHARLES M RPUD 110 WATERFORD DR 0.38 NR
19 JAIN, BHANU RPUD 1400 MAYFAIR PL 0.38 NR
20 BLANCHARD, JEFFERY E RPUD 1404 MAYFAIR PL 0.36 NR
21 GORMAN, JOHN RPUD 1406 MAYFAIR PL 0.53 NR
22 CUEVAS, ALLYSON RPUD 1402 MAYFAIR PL 0.35 NR
23 AL AJLOUNI, KHALDOUN SP1 210 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 1.01 NR
24 LOREDO, LUCIO RPUD 1409 MAYFAIR PL 0.57 NR
25 STELLING, RICHARD RPUD 1407 MAYFAIR PL 0.40 NR
26 CHAFFEE, MELVIN L RPUD 1405 MAYFAIR PL 0.33 NR
27 CHUJOY RUSSMANN FAMILY
REVOCAB RPUD 1404 WEDGEWOOD CT 0.33 NR
28 DYER, ADRIAN K RPUD 1406 WEDGEWOOD CT 0.44 NR
29 SHUGA, PAUL T RPUD 1408 WEDGEWOOD CT 0.54 NR
30 SCHRAMM, ALLEN RPUD 1403 WEDGEWOOD CT 0.38 NR
31 WILLIAMS, RICHARD A RPUD 1405 WEDGEWOOD CT 0.43 NR
32 NAUGHTON, JAMES S RPUD 1402 RICHMOND CT 0.31 NR
33 PRINCE, HARRY T RPUD 1404 RICHMOND CT 0.52 NR
34 HILL, ROY RPUD 1406 RICHMOND CT 0.55 F
35 CLAFFEY, CHARLES E RPUD 1403 RICHMOND CT 0.38 NR
36 ROBERTS, SEAN F RPUD 1405 RICHMOND CT 0.56 NR
37 ARMSTRONG LIVING TRUST RPUD 1402 CAMBRIDGE CROSSING 0.73 NR
38 STARKS, SHELLEY HEDGECOCK RPUD 1400 CAMBRIDGE CROSSING 0.36 NR
39 DUPREY, FELIX RPUD 1404 CAMBRIDGE CROSSING 0.42 NR
40 SEITZ, KERRY A SF20A 1400 PARK PL 0.56 NR
41 SEMADENI, RETO B SF20A 1402 PARK PL 0.46 NR
42 TYLER, DAVID C SF20A 1404 PARK PL 0.46 NR
43 PARENTE, DAVID SF20A 1406 PARK PL 0.46 NR
44 JENSE, RACHELLE SF20A 1408 PARK PL 0.46 NR
45 WILLIAMS, JAY L SF20A 1410 PARK PL 0.46 NR
46 COUCH, JASON L SF20A 1412 PARK PL 0.46 NR
47 VANYO, CAROLE L SF20A 1414 PARK PL 0.46 NR
48 ROBINSON, KENNETH M SF20A 1416 PARK PL 0.46 NR
49 MATTHEWS, PAUL M SF20A 1418 PARK PL 0.46 NR
50 ROGERS, DENNIS P SF20A 1420 PARK PL 0.48 NR
51 NAIDU, RAHUL RPUD 1406 CAMBRIDGE CROSSING 0.33 NR
52 JAEGER, ERIC RPUD 1408 CAMBRIDGE CROSSING 0.30 NR
53 NOVACK, RICHARD C SF20A 1401 PARK PL 0.57 NR
54 HENRY, DANIEL R SF20A 1403 PARK PL 0.47 NR
55 MAHAPATRA, RADHA SF20A 1405 PARK PL 0.46 NR
56 LAMBETH, RONALD SF20A 1407 PARK PL 0.46 NR
57 OHARA, MICHAEL J SF20A 600 PARK PLACE CT 0.47 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0058 Page 3
58 NUHU, ESTHER C SF20A 601 BOARDWALK AVE 0.61 NR
59 FERRI, RAYMOND SF20A 1415 PARK PL 0.45 NR
60 EADS, JIMMIE D SF20A 1417 PARK PL 0.47 NR
61 LIU, JIE SF20A 1419 PARK PL 0.47 NR
62 LEWANDOWSKI, MARK SF20A 405 INDIAN PAINTBRUSH WAY 0.71 NR
63 MAY, CLENTIS L O1 280 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 1.04 NR
64 AKARD, LARRY W O1 260 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 0.99 NR
65 SCIPIONE, JEFFREY SF20A 403 INDIAN PAINTBRUSH WAY 0.49 NR
66 KRISHNAN, HEMANTH SF20A 401 INDIAN PAINTBRUSH WAY 0.48 NR
67 SOUTHLAKE WOODS LP SF20A 611 STONEBURY CT 0.21 NR
68 AJRO, VEZIR SF20A 609 STONEBURY DR 0.47 NR
69 MCDERMOTT, KARL SF20A 607 STONEBURY DR 0.52 NR
70 SWACKER, ROBERT N SF20A 605 STONEBURY DR 0.73 NR
71 AL-AJLOUNI, KHALDOUN SP1 240 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 1.91 NR
72 SOUTHRIDGE LAKES HMOWNER
ASSN C3 1300 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 3.44 NR
73 BOLOGNA, ANTHONY RPUD 100 WATERFORD DR 0.58 NR
74 CARROLL, ISD SP1 1501 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 56.04 NR
75 SOUTHLAKE BLVD PRESBYTERIAN
CH CS 1452 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 6.01
NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSES
Notices Sent: Seventy-five (75)
Responses Received: One (1) - Attached
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 0
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-338G
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1,
BLOCK 1, CARROLL SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION, AN
ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 55.03 ACRES, AND MORE
FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “S-
P-1” DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH “CS” COMMUNITY
SERVICE DISTRICT USES TO “S-P-1” DETAILED SITE PLAN
DISTRICT WITH “CS” COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT USES AS
DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO
AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL
OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING
THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE
DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN
MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9
of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “S-P-1” Detailed Site
Plan District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 2
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person
or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off -street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and
other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreaso nably invade the rights of
those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time
their original investment was made; and,
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 3
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes i n
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a
necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has
been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or
tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and
therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are
needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of
Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the ge neral health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Being legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll Sen ior High School Addition, an
addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat filed as
Instrument # D210240592, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately
55.03 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from “S-P-1”
Detailed Site Plan District with “CS” Community Service District Uses to “S -P-1”
Detailed Site Plan District with “CS” Community Service District Uses as depicted on
the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B,” and
subject to the following conditions:
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 4
“S-P-1” REGULATIONS AS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO 480-338
(NATATORIUM ADDITION)
Proposed Regulations Comments
1. Permitted Uses Same as CS with the following
exceptions – allowing for joint use with
the City of Southlake
2. Accessory Uses Same as CS and adding natatorium,
lighted tennis courts, baseball fields
with bleachers and concession sales,
running tracks, practice fields and
indoor training facility.
3. Specific Use Permits Same as CS
4. Development Regulations
4.1 Height Same as CS
4.2 Front Yard Same as CS
4.3 Side Yard Same as CS, except no zero lot line
development
4.4 Rear Yard Same as CS
4.5 Maximum Lot Coverage Same as CS
4.6 Maximum Impervious
Coverage
Same as CS
4.7 Additional Development
Regulations for building uses
lying within 400’ of single
family residential zoning
Same as CS, except the existing high
school educational building and
additions attached thereto shall emulate
existing construction materials, surfaces
and architectural style. The proposed
natatorium shall be exempt from
vertical and horizontal articulation
requirements and the 4:1 height setback
from existing residential zoning.
Existing trees being saved
along residential property
lines will partially shield the
building from view and
mandatory fire and safety
external lighting will be
directed away from
residential property.
5. Concept Plan No Concept Plan shall be required. Site developed as S-P-1
requiring a site plan to be
submitted for additional
developments.
6. Effect of Concept Plan No Concept Plan required.
7. Site Plan Same as CS
8. Special Exception Uses Same as CS
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 5
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH ORD. NO. 338
(NATATORIUM ADDITION)
Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
May 18, 2000
Motion was made to approve ZA99-078 subject to Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 4,
dated May 12, 2000, and subject to the following:
Regarding Item #1 (interior landscaping and bufferyards) referencing Landscape
Comments Review No. 4, dated May 11, 2000: removing the berms listed as the second
#3; regarding #4, not requiring there to be all Mondell Pines and instructing the applicant
to work with the Landscape Administrator to determine what canopy trees and accent
trees would be the most appropriate for the south and east areas; regarding #5, the
applicant is to mitigate as required the 2,250 inches and with respect to the placement,
diameter, and number of trees defer to the decisions made by the Joint Utilization
Committee; regarding #6 (previous Site Plan approval) (the 1st bulleted item) with respect
to the trees to be placed along Peytonville Avenue the applicant is to install the
remaining trees and shrubs that have not been installed and replace those that are
demolished or dead; (the 2nd bulleted item) referring back to the item regarding Mondell
Pines; (the 3rd bulleted item) requiring the applicant to do as the Landscape Administrator
suggests and place all the plantings on the west side of the channel; removing the 4 th
bulleted item (berm); (the 5th bulleted item) applicant should note at the time at the time
of final inspection for Certificate of Occupancy all required plant materials will be required
to be installed as was approved; (the 6th bulleted item) applicant should meet the
requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance; regarding item #7 (high school site
landscaping) requiring the applicant to provide an Interior Landscape and Bufferyards
Summary Chart as required by the Zoning Ordinance and Landscape Ordinance and
shall comply with the Interior Landscape and Bufferyard Summary Chart that is attached
to the Landscape Comments; and regarding Item #8 (Natatorium Site Landscaping)
requiring the applicant to remove the undesirable trees and replant quality trees in their
place noting that the undesirable trees consist of Chinaberry and Mulberry;
Allowing no variance on Item #2 and keeping the height of the building at 35’;
Regarding Iem #3 (screening device) if the residential properties on the east and south
sides already have fencing, the school district shall maintain those fences and if there is
no fencing, the school district shall complete the fencing at 6’ or 8’ in height, whichever
the resident wants; This requirement was revised with the approval of Ordinance No.
480-338a to require the applicant to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board on
board fence along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and south, specifically along
the western property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lo ts 9
and 10, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition, Ordinance No. 480-338c to require installation of
a new fence on the eastern boundary adjacent to the western property lines of Lots 10 -
11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34-35, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) f oot cedar
with the friendly side facing the neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity and Ordinance
No. 480-338d to remove the School District’s responsibility to construct and maintain the
fence along the southern property boundary adjacent to the Park Pla ce neighborhood
only.
Deleting item #4.a (articulation);
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 6
Allowing no variance on Item #4.b (4:1 slope) and instructing the applicant to move the
building as far west as possible, a minimum of 20’, and requiring the applicant to explain
to City Council what they absolutely cannot move it any farther west;
Regarding Item #5 (lighting) requiring the lighting on the east and south sides of the
Natatorium building to be nothing but sconces with the lights pointed to the ground and
allowing one sconce on either side of each door with a total of six on the east side and
two on the south side;
Allowing frosted glass on the windows on the side of the Natatorium;
Regarding the accessory buildings, requiring the buildings along the south property line
to be moved as far north as possible and buildings along the east property line to be
moved as far west as possible and asking the applicant to completely reassess what it is
they need regarding accessory buildings and come back with the absolute minimum (if
four are not needed, then do not put in four); approving 30’ x 60’ and moving each of
them a minimum of 50’; requiring that any lighting on the accessory buildings to be
sconces with the lights pointed downward and to the interior of the site;
Requiring the applicant to include all used on any future Site Plans;
Approving the hammerhead turnaround shown on the exhibit tonight and putting the
emergency access gate 170’ from the east residential properties;
Asking the applicant to consider moving the Natatorium to the parking area shown in
Phase 5 and to explain to City Council why that is not a better site and why it would not
work;
And requiring compliance with the Lighting Ordinance.
Motion: Peebles
Second: Muller
Ayes: Muller, Horne, Boutte, Peebles, Sandlin
Nays: King
Approved: 5-1
Motion carried.
(Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 05 -18-00, tape 2, section #0623)
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 7
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
JUNE 6, 2000 MINUTES
Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-338, 1st Reading (ZA99-078), as submitted;
with changes; subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated June 2, 2000, subject to the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommendations with the following exceptions: on Item 2,
allowing the building height as shown, Item 4b, allowing the 4:1 slope resulting from the
relocation of the natatorium 16’ to the west and acknowledging the school district’s commitment
to make the following changes discussed this evening:
Addressing concerns raised by the property owners to the south (Park Place Addition)
1. Reduced the number of accessory buildings from 4 to 1, (4,000 s.f. in size and
located south of the multi-purpose building. This location will require additional
tree removal, but it was determined that these trees should not be mitigated.
2. Screening on the south would be accomplished by a) staggered, double row of
mitigated trees shown as shaded on the plan and b) additional low canopy trees to
screen the shot put area along the fence.
3. School to build fence for property owner at the southeast corner where there is
currently no fence and will reconstruct the property Owner’s fence at the
southwest corner to be level with his neighbor’s fence on the east all the way to
Peytonville Avenue (resulting in a fence height of 6’ t o 10’). This requirement was
revised with the approval of Ordinance No. 480-338a to require the applicant to
construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board on board fence along the Stone
Lakes subdivision to the east and south, specifically along the weste rn property
lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lots 9 and 10, Block 7,
Stone Lakes Addition, Ordinance No. 480-338c to require installation of a new
fence on the eastern boundary adjacent to the western property lines of Lots 10 -
11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34-35, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot
cedar with the friendly side facing the neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity
and Ordinance No. 480-338d to remove the School District’s responsibility to
construct and maintain the fence along the southern property boundary adjacent
to the Park Place neighborhood only.
4. Drainage problem on the south caused by curb construction in the area will be
completed with ongoing construction.
5. Scoreboard and foul posts to be screened with staggered, double row of mitigated
trees along the east and south of the ball field area and a berm should be
constructed around the scoreboard with shrubs planted on top to prevent persons
being able to look over the fences into neighboring propertie s. All mitigated trees
shall be on a 4-inch caliper rather that a 3-inch caliper.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 8
Addressing concerns raised by the property owners to the east (Stone Lakes Addition)
1. Relocated the natatorium 16’ to the west and lowered the building eave 2’,
resulting in reduction of the 4:1 slope line encroachment (from 10’ to 4’).
2. Relocated the storm sewer and relocated the parking spaces on the west to the
south of the natatorium while meeting ADA accessibility standards.
3. Relocated shrubs from adjacent to the natatorium to along hammerhead to block
headlights from shining into eastern properties.
4. Parking lot lighting accomplished by 6 to 8 bollards (3 ½ to 4 -feet tall) with a
hammerhead area being chained off at the neck of the hammerhead and being
accessible only to service and fire vehicles.
5. Screening accomplished by staggered, double row of mitigated trees shown as
shaded area on the plan, existing trees to remain and other trees planted in the
bufferyard.
6. School to maintain fencing along the east side as well with the fence on the end
being leveled. This requirement was revised with the approval of Ordinance No.
480-338a to require the applicant to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board
on board fence along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and so uth,
specifically along the western property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern
property lines of Lots 9 and 10, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition, Ordinance No.
480-338c to require installation of a new fence on the eastern boundary adjacent
to the western property lines of Lots 10-11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34-35, Block 7,
Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly side facing the
neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity and Ordinance No. 480 -338d to remove
the School District’s responsibility to construct and maintain the fence along the
southern property boundary adjacent to the Park Place neighborhood only.
7. Outdoor lighting on east side (by the two entrances) shall be down lighting only as
provided by sconces mounted at height of 7’.
Staff to work with TPM and School District on the following prior to 2 nd reading:
1. Landscaping Plan and Tree Mitigation Plan for the site with a liberal interpretation
of tree preservation ordinance requirements in the ball field area and requiring
replacement of only trees that can be reasonably be placed on this site.
2. Evaluation of parking to accommodate joint use of the facility.
Motion: Potter
Second: Shankland
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 9
Ayes: Potter, Shankland, Standerfer, Fawks, Kendall, Stacy
Nays: None
Approved: 6-0 vote
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 10
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
JUNE 6, 2000 MINUTES
Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-338, 2nd Reading, (ZA99-078), the Rezoning
and Revised Site Plan for Carroll Senior High School subject to the Site Plan Review Summary
No. 5, dated June 2, 2000, making the following changes:
That CISD is to plant the 750 mitigation trees from Carroll Senior High School in the
following manner: 1) at the Carroll Senior High School site, plant the maximum numb er
of trees possible with the commonly accepted horticultural and arboricultural standards
as approved by the Landscape Administrator; 2) the remaining trees are to be planted at
the remaining CISD school sites possible, and with the commonly accepted hort icultural
and arboricultural standards as approved by the Landscape Administrator; 3) if any
additional tree planting is required for mitigation from this site or any of the Kimball Rd.
sites, the Landscape Administrator is directed to work with the CISD i n establishing an
exchange plan to permit the credit of those trees to go toward maximizing the
landscaping at all school sites, including allowing tree credit toward interior landscape
and bufferyard requirements; 4) CISD is to provide a detailed plan no later than March 1,
2001 to reflect a phased plan over a five -year period to achieve the planting
requirements with a minimum of 1/5 of the plantings take place each year and be
maintained in perpetuity;
Subject to two hooded lights, ten (10) feet high, shielded to protect neighbors to the east
and south plus the four-foot bollards appropriately timed to operating hours as approved
by the Chief of Building Services;
That the fence on the southwest corner of the school site shall be repaired and replaced
in perpetuity; This requirement was revised with the approval of Ordinance No. 480 -338a
to require the applicant to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board on board fence
along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and south, specifically along the western
property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lots 9 and 10, Block
7, Stone Lakes Addition, Ordinance No. 480-338c to require installation of a new fence
on the eastern boundary adjacent to the west property lines of Lots 10 -11, 20-22, 27-29R
and 34-35, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly side
facing the neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity and Ordinance No. 480 -338d to
remove the School District’s responsibility to construct and maintain the fence along the
southern property boundary adjacent to the Park Place neighborhood only.
Incorporating the City Council action from the first reading.
Motion: Standerfer
Second: Potter
Ayes: Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, Kendall, Shankland, DuPre , and Stacy
Nays: None
Approved: 7-0 vote
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 11
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH ORD. NO. 338a
(ADDITION OF PARKING AND DRIVEWAY BY NATATORIUM)
No Changes to the S-P-1 Regulations approved with Ord. No. 338
1. Granting the requested variance to allow deferral of the required eight (8) foot multi-
use trail along the east side of South Peytonville Ave. until the Phase V parking is
added.
2. Subject to the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission:
a. Noting the applicant’s willingness to add the eleven live oaks and a row of
shrubs to the east and south of the added parking area as shown on the
landscape plan.
b. Noting the applicant’s willingness to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot
board on board fence along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and
south, specifically along the west property lines of Lots 1 -6, Block 7 and the
northern property lines of Lots 9 and 10, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition.
This requirement was not revised with the approval of Ordinance No. 480 -
338c to require installation of a new fence on the eastern boundary
adjacent to the western property lines of Lots 10 -11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34-
35, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly
side facing the neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity and Ordin ance No.
480-338d to remove the School District’s responsibility to construct and
maintain the fence along the southern property boundary adjacent to the
Park Place neighborhood only.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 12
CHANGES TO S-P-1 REGULATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338b
(ADDITION OF ART BUILDING, GYM EXPANSION, NATATORIUM EXPANSION, FIELD
HOUSE EXPANSION, TENNIS COURT AND BASEBALL FIELD LOCKER BUILDINGS)
S-P-1 Site Plan District Regulations using “CS” Community Service District zoning as our basis.
This site shall be subject to all previous conditions of approval unless specifically approved
otherwise by the City Council. Regulatory modifications to the CS development regulations
include the following:
a) Allow for joint use facilities with the City of Southlake.
b) Accessory uses to allow a natatorium, lighted tennis courts, baseball fields with
bleachers and concession sales, field houses, running tracks, practice fields, and an
indoor training facility.
c) Vertical and horizontal articulation will be allowed as shown on the elevations.
d) The natatorium is exempt from the height requirements for residential adjacency.
e) A 6’ tall screening device will be allowed on the southern eastern and the southern
boundaries adjacent to residential properties. This requirement was revised with the
approval of Ordinance No. 480-338c to require installation of a new fence on the eastern
boundary adjacent to the western property lines of Lots 10 -11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34-35,
Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly side facin g the
neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity and Ordinance No. 480 -338d to remove the
School District’s responsibility to construct and maintain the fence along the southern
property boundary adjacent to the Park Place neighborhood only. The requirement with
approval of Ordinance No. 480-338a to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board on
board fence along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and south, specifically along
the western property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lots 9
and 10, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition remains unchanged by subsequent ordinance
revisions.
f) A green painted concrete facade is allowed on the north side of the art building.
g) Plantings provided in the east and south bufferyards will be what ex ists.
h) Due to the existing conditions, no bufferyards are to be provided along South Peytonville
Road and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709).
Variance requests will include the following:
a) Section 5.06.C of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that sidewalks be located no closer
than two feet (2’) to the curb or grade line. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow
sidewalks to meander to the curb line.
b) Section 5.06.B.3.a of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that sidewalks shall be either 5’
in width or the width as specified in the city’s Pathways Master Plan. The Pathways
Master Plan shows an 8’ multi-use trail along the east side of Peytonville Ave. The
applicant is requesting a variance to allow a trail of approximately five feet (5’) in width
adjacent to an existing gas meter only.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 13
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH ORD. NO. 338b
(ADDITION OF ART BUILDING, GYM EXPANSION, NATATORIUM EXPANSION, FIELD
HOUSE EXPANSION, TENNIS COURT AND BASEBALL FIELD LOCKER BUILDINGS)
1. Including the plan presented, Plan Diagram Section A-AA (attached);
2. Noting the applicant’s willingness to not remove any of the trees on the banks of the
drainage channel;
3. Noting the applicant’s willingness to work with the CISD Senior High Art Department to
screen the water meter;
4. Noting the applicant’s willingness to replace and maintain the eight (8) foot fence along
the property line; This requirement was revised with the approval of Ordinance No. 480 -
338c to require installation of a new fence on the eastern boundary adjacent to the
western property lines of Lots 10-11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34-35, Block 7, Stone Lakes
Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly side facing the neighbors to be
maintained in perpetuity and Ordinance No. 480-338d to remove the School District’s
responsibility to construct and maintain the fence along the southern property boundary
adjacent to the Park Place neighborhood only. The requirement with approval of
Ordinance No. 480-338a to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board on board
fence along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and south, specifically along the
western property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lots 9 and
10, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition remains unchanged by subsequent ordinance
revisions.
5. Granting the requested variances for the sidewalks;
6. Subject to Review Summary No. 3, dated April 27, 2010;
a. Please revise the renderings for the art building to match the elevations and
landscape plan.
b. Please ensure that all parking lot landscape islands are at least 12’ in width at the
widest point, from back of curb to back of curb.
c. Show any intended lighting. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance
No. 693, as amended, with regard to type of lighting, intensity, glare and spill -over.
d. Please label the façade materials to be used on the field house.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 14
CHANGES TO S-P-1 REGULATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338c
(ADDED PARKING SPACES WEST OF THE NATATORIUM, SOUTHWEST OF
THE NEW ART BUILDING AND EAST OF THE SERVICE YARD)
The project will comply with all previous conditions approved under the zoning and site plan with
the following proposed changes:
Provide additional parking north of the existing building and west of the Aquatics Center.
Provide additional parking west of the Art Building.
Provide for the development of a new service yard area that can be enclosed near the
existing cooling tower.
Provide for additional parking east of the new service yard area.
Revise the landscape plan to accommodate the new parking.
Variance request will include the f ollowing:
A variance to the required 8’ multi-use trail is requested to allow a minimum width of 4.5’
adjacent to an existing fire hydrant, telephone box, fence, and culvert.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH ORD. NO. 338c
Council conditions of approval June 7, 2011:
1. specifically approving the eight (8) foot trail variance along Peytonville to
allow a minimum width of 4.5’ adjacent to an existing fire hydrant,
telephone box, fence and culvert (see attached exhibit);
2. noting the applicant’s installation of a n ew fence on the eastern boundary
adjacent to the western property lines of Lots 10 -11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34-
35, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly
side facing the neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity. The require ment
with approval of Ordinance No. 480-338a to construct and maintain an
eight (8) foot board on board fence along the Stone Lakes subdivision to
the east and south, specifically along the western property lines of Lots 1 -6,
Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lots 9 and 10, Block 7, Stone
Lakes Addition remains unchanged by subsequent ordinance revisions.
The requirement for the CISD to construct and maintain the fence along the
southern property boundary adjacent to the Park Place neighborhood onl y
was removed with approval of Ordinance No. 480 -338d;
3. noting the applicant is in the process of installing tennis court lights and
they will comply with the existing lighting ordinance on that matter;
4. noting that the applicant will address the pond and st agnant water issue at
the southeast corner of the property;
5. noting that the new trees and landscaping will have bubbler irrigation
installed,
6. noting that there will be thirty-four (34) inches of tree mitigation at the
northwest corner of the property;
7. pursuant to the staff report dated June 7, 2011 and Revised Site Plan
Review Summary No. 2 dated June 7, 2011:
a. Please ensure that all parking lot landscape islands are at least 12’ in width at
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 15
the widest point, from back of curb –to- back of curb.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 16
CHANGES TO S-P-1 REGULATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338d
(FIELD HOUSE EXPANSION)
No changes to S-P-1 Regulations
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH ORD. NO. 338d
1. Removing the fence requirement from previous site plan approval along the southern
property line adjacent to the Park Place subdivision only. The requirement with approval of
Ordinance No. 480-338a to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board on board fence
along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and south, specifically along the western
property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lots 9 and 10, Block 7,
Stone Lakes Addition and the requirement to install a new fence on the eastern boundary
adjacent to the western property lines of Lots 10-11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34-35, Block 7,
Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly side facing the neighbors to
be maintained in perpetuity remain unchanged by subsequent ordinance revisions.
2. Pursuant to site plan review summary No. 2, dated May 8, 2012.
a. Please specify the type and size of the plant materials shown on the Landscape Plan.
Twenty-two (22) shrubs are required and twenty-one (21) are shown on the plan.
Three (3) accent trees are required and four (4) are shown on the plan. The
Landscape Administrator has approved the extra accent tree provided in place of the
shrub that is short.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 17
CHANGES TO S-P-1 REGULATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338e
(Irrigation Tanks)
No changes to S-P-1 Regulations
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH ORD. NO. 338e
1. City Council motion at 1st reading: October 15,, 2013; Approved on consent at
1st reading (7-0).
2. City Council Motion at 2nd reading: November 5, 2013; Approved as presented
(7-0).
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 18
CHANGES TO S-P-1 REGULATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338f
Athletic Improvements Phase 2
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 19
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 20
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH ORD. NO. 338F
1. City Council motion at 2nd reading on May 15, 2018:
May 15, 2018; Approved at 2nd reading (7-0) subject to the Staff Report dated May 8,
2018, and the Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 23, 2018, and gr anting
the following variances:
- Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended, requires all buildings to have exterior
walls constructed using a masonry material covering at least eighty percent (80%)
of said walls. The variance is to allow corrugated metal to be used as a façade
material on the existing activity center, and on the baseball and softball press
boxes.
- Landscape Ordinance 544-B, a variance to the Landscape Ordinance with relief
from the interior landscaping requirements to allow interior lands caping to remain
as it currently exists on the site.
- Also noting that unless noted in the staff report or indicated on the site plan and
elevations or as part of the motion, all previous zoning regulations for the Senior
High site will remain.
- Also noting, during tonight’s discussion, the applicant did state willingness to
address the water drainage and vegetation growth issues as it relates to this
application.
Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 23, 2018:
5. Provide a written narrative summarizing the proposed changes.
6. Please make the following changes to the impervious coverage
calculations:
a. In the Phase Three calculations, the “Proposed Practice Fields
Coverage” is incorrectly shown as 3.521 ac. instead of 3.251 ac.
7. The property is in the Corridor Overlay District and the Residential
Adjacency Overlay District, Section 43 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as
amended, so all plans must comply with the requirements of both sections.
a. The following comments relate to the elevations:
i. Masonry construction meeting the requirements of Ord. No. 557, as
amended, is required on all facades of all buildings. The Masonry
Ordinance requires that all buildings on the property be constructed
with a masonry material covering at least 80% of each façade n ot
counting windows, doors, roofs, glass construction materials or
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 21
sidewalk and walkway covers. A variance to Masonry Ordinance No.
557, as amended to allow the corrugated metal on the activity center
and press boxes has been submitted.
ii. Articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. No. 480, as amended,
Sections 43.9.c.1.d and 43.13.a.4 is required on all buildings. An “S-P-
1” regulation to allow the articulation as shown on the activity center,
the concessions and batting cage building, the football and so ftball
storage buildings and the softball clubhouse has been submitted.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. Provide the existing tree cover preservation percentages on the Tree
Conservation Plan.
* Existing landscape trees along the west sides of the softball and baseball
fields are proposed to be removed for the proposed additions. The proposed
canopy removal is approximately 1,513 square feet. The proposed existing
trees cover preservation complies with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation
Regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The existing tree cover is
10% and the proposed removal is .05%. 99.99% of the existing tree cover is
proposed to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. The proposed building addition exceeds 5,000 square feet which requires the
site to meet the Landscape Ordinance and Bufferyard Regulations
requirements. An “S-P-1” regulation has been added to allow existing
bufferyards as they exist for the current site. A separate variance request is
required for the Landscape Ordinance. Please move the variance to the
Landscape Ordinance to allow the existing landscaping to qualify for the
existing buildings and to provide additional interior landscaping based on the
new construction square footage only to the variance section of the “S-P-1”
and variance request letter below the request for a variance to the Masonry
Ordinance.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
GENERAL COMMENTS:
3. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the
review of civil construction plans.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 22
4. New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per
TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F
of the permit. The City of Southlake especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1)
(g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution
(especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly
recommended the project manager p rovide a series of maps for complex
projects, including one map showing controls during mass grading and
infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one
map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the
landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for
installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be submitted by second
review of the civil construction plans.
5. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall
Layout sheet.
6. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural
plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls
shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Departme nt prior to
construction.
EASEMENTS:
7. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage.
Easements shall be 15’ minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the
property line. A 20’ easement is required if both storm sewer and s anitary
sewer will be located within the easement.
8. Detention ponds shall be dedicated by plat as drainage easements. The
following note shall be added to the plat: Compliance with the provisions of
the city’s Storm Drainage Policy does not relieve a person of the responsibility
of complying with all other applicable laws, including, but not limited to,
Section 11.086, Texas Water Code.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
6. Submit preliminary drainage plan with drainage arrows and preliminary
calculations.
7. Provide grading plan containing 2’ contours. Contours may be obtained from
the City of Southlake.
8. Clearly label all private and public storm lines.
9. Differences between pre- and post- development runoff shall be captured in
detention pond(s). Proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of
the 1, 10 and 100- year storm events. Detention may be required with any
new proposed building construction. Describe how increased runoff from site
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 23
is being detained. Access easements are needed for maintenance of
detention ponds.
10. Documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary
will be required prior to approval of construction plans.
11. Impervious coverage exceeds allowable. An “S -P-1” regulation has
been added.
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on
downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan
Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review.
Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the
most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes
which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention
Plan which outlines pre-construction, construction and post-construction
erosion control measures.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may
need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public
infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be
acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on
the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance
No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Ensure that the concrete emergency access to the new restroom, practice field
house and softball dressing room is able to support 85,000 lbs. GVW, since
this area will be required for the fire apparatus to reach the buildings with
proper hose lay distance.
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system
can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main,
measured linearly along the length of the pipe. If the riser is further than 100
feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a vault. Riser rooms
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 24
shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is not located on the riser, or a
minimum of 6’X6’ if it is on the riser. (Riser location not indicated on plans)
Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system for the practice field house
must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department
fire lane access. (FDC location not indicated on plans) (Remote FDC may be
installed to meet these requirements)
General Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting for this project was held on March 27, 2018.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate
building permit is required prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and
residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as
amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the
Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No.
480, Section 43, Overlay Zones.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issu ance of a building permit a Plat
must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site
plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted
for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be
limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer
Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through
the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new
water connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The
City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation
date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the
City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to
determine the fee amount.
* Denotes Informational Comment
CHANGES TO S-P-1 REGULATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338g
Music Building Addition
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 25
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH ORD. NO. 338G
1.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are
not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present
conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen
congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to
avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 26
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be
declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract
or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 27
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not,
under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until
final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for
a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it
this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfei ture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section
3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the ______ day of _______, 2019.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 28
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the ________ day of _______, 2019.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 29
EXHIBIT “A”
Being legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll Senior High School Addition, an addition to the
City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat filed as Instrument # D210240592,
Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 55.03 acres .
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0058 Page 30
EXHIBIT “B”
Reserved for approved plans