Loading...
Item 6C PresentationZoning Change and Development Plan Oxford Place Item 6C ZA18-0032 ZA18-0032 Owner: Linda Behrends c/o Travis Franks Applicant: Sage Group, Inc. Request: Approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Oxford Place to develop 11 residential lots (Option ‘A’) or 12 residential lots and 3 open space lots (Option ‘B’) on approximately 12.64 acres. Location: 1749 E. Highland St. Aerial View Aerial View Oxford Place Gateway Church CISD CISD Property Oxford Place Gateway Church Oxford Place Oxford Place CISD Gateway Church Option ‘A’ Land Use Exhibit Dwelling Units (du) 11 Gross Acreage 12.64 ac. Net Acreage 11.20 ac. Gross Density 0.87 du/ac. Net Density 0.98 du/ac. Low Density Residential Mixed Use Low Density Residential - Single family detached dwellings at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. Mixed Use - The purpose of this land use category is “to provide an option for large-scale, master-planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses such as office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses.” Option ‘B’ Land Use Exhibit Dwelling Units (du) 12 Gross Acreage 12.64 ac. Net Acreage 11.06 ac. Gross Density 0.95 du/ac. Net Density 1.09 du/ac.* Low Density Residential Mixed Use Low Density Residential - Single family detached dwellings at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. Mixed Use - The purpose of this land use category is “to provide an option for large-scale, master-planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses such as office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses.” *Council finding required for approval Development Plan at 11/6 City Council Site Data Summary Existing Zoning “AG” Proposed Zoning “R-PUD” Land Use Designation Mixed Use and Low Density Residential Gross Acreage 12.64 ac. Net Acreage 10.99 ac. Dwelling Units/Residential Lots 13 Gross Density 1.03 du/ac. Net Density 1.18 du/ac. Open Space % 10.4% Lot Area Range 30,000 s.f. to 39,785 s.f. Average Lot Area 32,595 s.f. Option ‘A’ Development Plan Site Data Summary Existing Zoning “AG” Proposed Zoning “R-PUD” Land Use Designation Mixed Use and Low Density Residential Gross Acreage 12.64 ac. Net Acreage 11.20 ac. Dwelling Units/Residential Lots 11 Gross Density 0.87 du/ac. Net Density 0.98 du/ac. Open Space % 0.0%* Lot Area Range 43,565 s.f. to 48,022 s.f. Average Lot Area 44,349 s.f. *Variance Requested 12/4/2018 and 1/15/2019 Option ‘B’ Development Plan Site Data Summary Existing Zoning “AG” Proposed Zoning “R-PUD” Land Use Designation Mixed Use and Low Density Residential Gross Acreage 12.64 ac. Net Acreage 11.06 ac. Dwelling Units/Residential Lots 12 Gross Density 0.95 du/ac. Net Density 1.09 du/ac. Open Space % 3.66%* Lot Area Range 38,410 s.f. to 48,02238,712 s.f. Average Lot Area 38,543 s.f. *Variance Requested 1/15/2019 Development Plan Comparison Option ‘A’ – 11 Lots Option ‘B’ – 12 Lots “R-PUD” Regulations Regulation SF-20A R-PUD Regulation 11/6/2018 R-PUD Regulation Option ‘B’ 01/15/2019 SF-1A R-PUD Regulation 12/04/18 & Option ‘A’ 01/15/2019 Lot Area 20,000 sq. ft. 30,000 sq. ft. 38,400 sq. ft. 43,560 sq. ft. 43,560 sq. ft. Lot Width 100’ 110’ 100’ 100’ 100’ Lot Coverage 30% 35% 30% 20% 20% Minimum Floor Area 1,800 sq. ft. 4,000 sq. ft. 4,000 sq. ft. 2,000 sq. ft. 4,000 sq. ft. Maximum Accessory Structure Area 600 sq. ft. 750 sq. ft. 600 sq. ft. 3% of lot area or 4,000 sq. ft. 3% of lot area or 4,000 sq. ft. The “R-PUD” zoning district follows the “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District (Option ‘A’) and the “SF-20A” Single Family Residential District (Option ‘B’) zoning regulations with the following exceptions: Fence Plan at 11/6 City Council Fence Plan at 12/4/18 City Council Fence Plan Option ‘A’ Fence Plan Option ‘B’ Entry Exhibit Entry Wall Exhibit Wall and Fence Material Exhibit Landscape Plan Option ‘A’ Landscape Plan Option ‘B’ Tree Conservation Analysis (11/6/2018) Tree Conservation Analysis (Option ‘A’) Tree Conservation Analysis (Option ‘B’) Existing Drainage Area Map Preliminary Drainage Plan Utility Plan Planning and Zoning Commission October 4, 2018; Approved (4-1) referencing the staff report dated October 4, 2018 and Revised Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated October 4, 2018, •Noting the applicant’s willingness to verify the drainage to be adequate to support the development with (Carroll) ISD, •On the landscaping, noting the applicant’s willingness to provide the number of trees per lot that will be added and in the open space areas, and to specify a minimum 4” caliper size, two trees in the front and two in the back, and the tree types to be provide d, such as oaks, etc., •Noting the applicant’s willingness to provide pedestrian access to the internal sidewalks through a gate that is to be unlock ed and accessible at all times and on the southern sidewalk through the school, to verify the location of the crosswalk with the ISD and the location of a gate from the southern property onto the school property, •Regarding the southern boundary fence that is shown as a board on board wood fence, the applicant has discussed coming up wit h a landscape plan for that or to come up with a fence design with masonry columns or a solid masonry fence for that area on the southern boundary; •The applicant also expressed a willingness to develop design standards for the construction of the exterior materials, roofin g materials, etc. •The eastern fence is to be replaced with a new wood construction (board on board fence) and the HOA would maintain that afterwards, •Provide more detail on the landscape materials, particularly in the front. City Council November 6, 2018; A motion to table the item to the December 4, 2018 meeting was approved (6-1). December 4, 2018; Approved at 1st Reading (7-0) subject to the staff report dated November 27, 2018 and Development Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated November 26, 2018; •Granting the following variance as it relates to Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 30.11, which requires common open space to comprise not less than 10% of the gross site area within a Residential Planned Unit Development District and approving 0% open space; •Noting the applicant’s willingness to, between 1st and 2nd reading, to explore and present alternative green space options that were discussed and suggested tonight, specifically related to the green space opportunities within the islands and the roadways and; •Also noting the applicant’s willingness to revisit the issue of stone columns with forty (40) foot centers on the southern boundary. Questions?