Loading...
Item 7A PresentationCITY VF SOUTHL,4 Item 7A ZA18-0032 Zoning Change and Development Plan Oxford Place ZA18-0032 .l RVEN 501 Ya 1749 +r.0 s M . RITEN 924 920s w 9161 O' 9 Z4 ic917 912.< _ "A a �r! d 501 Ya 1749 +r.0 s M . RITEN 924 920s w 9161 O' 9 Z4 ic917 912.< _ "A r - � •y Gateway Church CISD Property ` x CISD Oxford PI 0 f 4 4'0 - Gateway Church { E 7fighland Si r „� L HigF�9and St � 1St F. H4gh�a d `• Future Land Use 1749 E. Highland St. Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential 1f Pe181 Mixed Use f� Future Land Use Update - 2012 LU_TYPE --A ide i 100 -Year Flood Plain Corps of Engineers Property 1 Public ParklOpen Space Public/Semi-Public hfi di DR al Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Office Commercial Retail Commercial crri—c.—d i Mined Use - Town Center Regional Retail Industrial a axs 750 seer r i blic,'Serrti-Public 9t p{ lL}4 � 1 ❑ f"y t atmp Zonin�5hl-R -. Y gZumgg: SFI,� 11 Gross Acreage 12.64 ac. Net Acreage 11.20 ac. Low Density 0.87 du/ac. Re idential 0.98 du/ac. ■i �t �.�a _ m - i t4 — M.ixe Use�,,,', SH Low Density Residential - Single family detached dwellings at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. Mixed Use - The purpose of this land use category is "to provide an option for large-scale, master -planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses such as office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses." Dwelling Units (du) 11 Gross Acreage 12.64 ac. Net Acreage 11.20 ac. Gross Density 0.87 du/ac. Net Density 0.98 du/ac. Ord. No. 480-222A Zoning Parcel A - Permitted Uses 1749 E. Highland St. CS - Community Services District AG: Agricultural District 0-1- Office District 0 AG - C1 B-1— Business Service Park District ® RE - C2 0 SHA - C3 0 SF 1 B - C4 SF A ® SF2 - NR-PUD 0 SF30 - HC 0 SF20A 0 B1 0 SF20B 0 B2 B1 R-PUD =11 0 MH 0 12 0 MF2 0 SP1 MH 0 SP2 C S - DT AG0 0 01 F;71 T2D SP1 0 02 0 ECZ 480-590A ai SP1 480-714 Cs WsWq Luning: SFI-N I:'..�ihling fimi�p. SI 1.1, i:NP.J.=Ener-4?0'ip1p 3CSiU991iN1 I.'. �— HIGHLAND Ileal 14 4' E I _ 14 1 Legend Proposed 5' Concrete Sidewalk Proposed 6' Concrete Sidewalk Existing 6' Concrete Sidewalk R.Q.W. Dedication (E. Highland St.) Common Open Space Residential Lots Site Data Summary Existing Zoning "AG" Proposed Zoning 1 Land Use Designation j13 37,033 a.E \ \ 12.64 ac. Net Acreage 10.99 ac. Dwelling Units/Residential Lots 13 z , A �139,7NS �I', 1 I I � n i 11 3 i. gI -" - — -30,034 sl f } y 30,078 Y.f— p F L_ ` I J — — — h.x-yigZ.ft�AG _f R� 1 A-.10,002s:f.l u 1 L — —— ---J - a 1 30,02ft s. r � , ;u.nnn ..I. Legend Proposed 5' Concrete Sidewalk Proposed 6' Concrete Sidewalk Existing 6' Concrete Sidewalk R.Q.W. Dedication (E. Highland St.) Common Open Space Residential Lots Site Data Summary Existing Zoning "AG" Proposed Zoning "R -PUD" Land Use Designation Mixed Use and Low Density Residential Gross Acreage 12.64 ac. Net Acreage 10.99 ac. Dwelling Units/Residential Lots 13 The following revisions have been made to the plans since the November 6, 2018 City Council meeting: • The plans have been revised to show 11 minimum one acre residential lots that comply with the "SF -1A" Single Family Residential zoning district. • A public street is proposed, so the entry gates and private street designation have been removed. • The masonry wall along E. Highland St. has been shortened to a 26' wall with a sign face on each side of the entry street with a 6' iron fence with masonry columns on the remainder of the E. Highland frontage • The open space lots have been removed and a 15' Landscape Easement is now shown along the northern portion of the northernmost two lots. • The 8' board on board wood fence with masonry columns that was shown along the southern boundary has been revised to a board on board wood fence with no masonry columns and the board on board wood fence now extends along the entire eastern boundary. SOUTHLA,KE; F wmgZ.W.g: SFI-A 1 —1 g / ,nag. SF -A I Y11 W, I3xis ru LWa i,=tar-d•aWhlrainn�:Fsl �..- . nsi icW -.. ).-LPw L . d • •••- . ND ST M �. HGHLAt ]7 ST ----- ,,.-.� as E arras ,•-• m E HIGHLA— b -- 13 " 137,033+..f. 37,556 s.f 1+ - A L F.Wdae V Sb>. Shea Poinkm'tlel - - - - - LU R 1 -- -� Z - U Im 711 12 4 I z ®i 1443.,8'_ - 1 36,515 s.f 1 ;9,785 S.f. I 1 -- - L- - -- - ' --------�_�-------- --- - -� �, -- -- J ry 11 3�I 4 30,034 �, f.:130076sf- n� 9 3 ny+ L- _ - J aw i 41,5113 r -I' li.`li)5.1 LV 6.- __ __ z - IN6W eJ� a g j 10 .30:002 s.f.l !;0,034 sl I �' ' L- ------ - - - - - - -u F —_------I 1- _m J 143,565 K I s Ali'}y 02')8 ' S ao,uz6 s e� 30.00a s.e- -- �,. _ — —. ----- r r Fv �. 30,000 sX.. ; 30;527 0.. '4;.746..£ I 30.050 s.f. LO NS, ,ryy) .ti' � � ► I. i -,i f. a9 F11/6 City Council - 13 Lots 12/4 City Council — 11 Lots I The "R -PUD" zoning district follows the "SF -1A" Single Family Residential District zoning regulations with the following exception: R -PUD R -PUD Regulation SF -20A Regulation SF -1A Regulation 11/6/2018 12/4/2018 Lot Area 20,000 sq. ft. 30,000 sq. ft. 43,560 sq. ft. 43,560 sq. ft. Lot Width 100' 110' 100' 100' Lot Coverage 30% 35% 20% 20% Minimum Floor 1,800 sq. ft. 4,000 sq. ft. 2,000 sq. ft. 4,000 sq. ft. Area Maximum Accessory 600 sq. ft. 750 sq. ft. 3% of lot area or 4,000 sq. ft. 3% of lot area or 4,000 sq. ft. Structure Area Oxford Place Design Standards for Construction and Exterior Materials Create deed restrictions which manage the high level of construction expected, specifically: 1. Minimum Floor Space. All floor areas referenced below are for air- conditioned floor areas, exclusive of porches, garages, patios, terraces or breezeways attached to the main dwelling. Each dwelling constructed on any Lot shall contain a minimum of four thousand (4,000) square feet of heat and air conditioned floor space. 2. Drives and Walks. The standard finish for the lead walk and driveway will be salt deck or pavers, and not broom finish concrete. Any other finish must be approved in writing by the Architectural Control Committee. 3. Structure Materials: Exterior Items and Surfaces. Unless approved by the Committee, the dominant exterior vertical wall area of each structure, exclusive of doors and windows, shall be a minimum of 801/a masonry (brick, stone, or stucco over masonry base) or other material solely determined by the Committee. No more than 20% of the exterior vertical wall to be authentic lath and stucco application over wood framing. Dryvit systems or Styrofoam products are not acceptable. The exterior of chimney flues shall be of masonry material acceptable to the Committee. Installation of all types of exterior items and surfaces such as address numbers or external ornamentation, lights, mail chutes, mailboxes, roofing materials and exterior paint or stain, shall be subject to the approval of the Committee as to size, design, materials color, manufacturer and location. 4. Roofing Materials. The Architectural Control Committee will only approve roofing materials which are of the highest grade and quality and which are consistent with the external design, color and appearance of other improvements within the subdivision. Roofing materials which are metal, slate, slate like, clay, barrel tile, copper, minimum 50 year composition shingle, or concrete are the minimum standard of quality for roofing material to be used. The roof pitch of any structure shall be approved based on the roof type associated with architectural style of the home. Any deviation of roof pitch or roofing material must be approved in writing by the Architectural Control Committee. 5. Windows. Windows must be wood or fibrex composite clad, steel, or bronze and submitted for review of Committee approval. Window mullions that are appropriate for the selected architectural style are required and shall be approved by the Committee. G. iLiHLANll ST. "O o��o�s io.ev; ur P' s, 1 ]3 �� II37,033sF I 37,55fi s.f. t y \ --------- 1 '— ' 38,515 s.F. 30,785 "f I I I 3 10,034 a.f. I I 1 30,078 r.f. ]0 — 4 SO,(XUs.L c � � 130,034 s.f. I — I-------�+I I� v ESI L ---- — _---� _ F'_� 5 e:9 I . 30,018 s.f.l s' 130,000 s.f. I L ---- ��---- "-- —� L J r r---- ---7 4 I1 ;0'000 y.f. I = 36,6'17 of — 7 I � 3goso s_E_ � �d5 Lut9 9,373 s, F. ,3 zv�»usmm . VIP ELEVATIQN 8' Ht Board on Board Wood Fence with Pilaster Legend 6' Iron Fence 8' Board on Board w/ Cedar Cap 8' Board on Board w/ Cedar Cap and Masonry Pilasters - 40' o.c. +/- 6' Masonry Wall 6' Decorative Metal Fence am or ELEVATION 8' Ht Board on Board Wood Fence SECTION E. HIGHLAND ST. % % BQDARE (14 GA.) MCOrnE MN 81-0" O.C. / TOP ®BOTTOM rOr ACED AS SHOWN X`]' x 3' X }/ DECORATNE 1RON POST /! tWS,`PYRAMIDAL TOP" 3'-0" 2%T STAG%ED LEDS M COLMN W LW F3X111PP (TBD) - KLCHLER SOIRH HOPE R%TLAIE (MO 4M7W) SMDW'N DECOR —ENflN POSfS, 8'-0' O.C. MP.K, TYP., ELEVATION RMM)CT NL ASFoaEXP.CTLOCAT[OhS ELEVATION 314",WLl x(16 GAJ DFCORFM.MF LRON MCKETS AT4 D.C. (MEKSU AED FROM CENTER OF PMI 6' Iron Fence DUT, 6' Iron Fence with Masonry Columns Legend 6' Iron Fence 8' Board on Board w/ Cedar Cap 6' Iron Fence w/ Masonry Columns 6' Masonry Wall ELEVATION 8' Ht Board on Board Wood Fence SECTION 45,7} s.r� f 45,169 s.f. --------- 1' r --------- i I j ---------- r Ip ' I I r 2 �4{4zt s.l'.I 143,573 s.t. L -- - - I L ----------J 9 I 3 I 43,583 s.f. V f I 11 4j,564 s.0 ---� , 4 -- F---------,--------; $ I 4 43,565s.f. j I I 43,6009T i 1 Y� 5 Y -- `' 43,546 s.r. /// 9 v % % BQDARE (14 GA.) MCOrnE MN 81-0" O.C. / TOP ®BOTTOM rOr ACED AS SHOWN X`]' x 3' X }/ DECORATNE 1RON POST /! tWS,`PYRAMIDAL TOP" 3'-0" 2%T STAG%ED LEDS M COLMN W LW F3X111PP (TBD) - KLCHLER SOIRH HOPE R%TLAIE (MO 4M7W) SMDW'N DECOR —ENflN POSfS, 8'-0' O.C. MP.K, TYP., ELEVATION RMM)CT NL ASFoaEXP.CTLOCAT[OhS ELEVATION 314",WLl x(16 GAJ DFCORFM.MF LRON MCKETS AT4 D.C. (MEKSU AED FROM CENTER OF PMI 6' Iron Fence DUT, 6' Iron Fence with Masonry Columns Legend 6' Iron Fence 8' Board on Board w/ Cedar Cap 6' Iron Fence w/ Masonry Columns 6' Masonry Wall ELEVATION 8' Ht Board on Board Wood Fence SECTION ARI. Entry Exhibit at 11/6 City Council SAGE GROUP, INC. 51 ELEVATION OF THE SOUTH FENCE ,a. a,.«� J s � ✓ I I- 5TONE SGKEENING WALL SAGE .IW - EAST HIGHLAND 5TREET THE ENTRY PLAN CONCEPT OXF(-Jjjjj TJr.o.(, ?' ST ?I.w ® `+s Revised Entry Wall Exhibit MARBLE GLACIER BLACK LEDGE5TONE THREE RAIL ORNAMENTAL METAL FENCE FENCE - G' HIGH is IMPERIAL LEDGE STACK CLASSIC SPLIT - FACED LEDGESTONK STACKED LEDGESTONE COLUMN5 WITH LIGHT FIXTURE HARD S CAPE MATERIALS FOR SAGE GROUP, INC. f Master Planning01R Urban 0k ,gn MnhiltedUna 4 p 11 0 N. C-11 AA—Sb, 200 /� /� Sa Tex 72092 ` G TEL L: 9Si 1 7124 22 2 6 �/� V Loai,g! g: SFI A gL g SH -A L LeKIM; -AND ST 9 !d * 5 30,028 s f 130A* s.f. 5 I 30,000 s.f I 1 39;624 s.f. I � 30.059 s.f,�'Wll nA _ _ rFs� 3eber 11/6 City Council ' ; W f 4'.` P 5'f - - -' Y 43,582,11 43,577 g , c� % 43,7 r *' 48,022 5-f. i 43,748 �- x1 12/4 City Council Environmental Resource Protection 1749 E. Highland St. Map d-, G 1 _ Legend sde-S a E-Topo2lt a 4 r - Tree Preservation Areas Existing Tree Cover 100 Year 500 Year EHIHN ST Lake Grapevine & _ i Creeks i 0 YD 700 1,490 Feet 624 62, 5P' J 0 I IT[U (LAND ST. dl S.HIM1 n, - f�S Lii� SeAHtt i.f. - _ i 1113.71073 s.f. \ � 12 139.785 ar. ------ -� - r---- - 11 3 30,034 &r r 30,078 a.f. ffi -i a- -11 L ------ � J ----- — --- 2 j 10 - 4- i. J} 11 , 301002 �.p < 130.034 If., i ' L- --- -----� x y 1 s -- -34,428 "171 130; -f 4J p9� e r NEST SHb.bl' — — F.u,ngzm .S SPI Tree Canopy Coverage Total site area Total existing canopy 550,767 s.f. 35,586 s.f. --> 6.46% Preserved tree canopy (green) 24,981 s.f. --> 70.20% Possible preserved tree canopy (yellow) 6,974 s.f. --> 19.60% Removed tree canopy (red) 3,631 s.f. --> 10.20% 35,586 s,f, -> 100.00% Legend Preserved Tree Canopy Possible Preserved Tree Canopy Removed Tree Canopy ' Girring Zaving:$FI-eV SPI -A �m-L4xsaQlg Pos3dc9ti®I E. HIGHLAND ST � N 89'36'44" F�4i5.45' N A9 ifi'1i" ]a 71' 7 4i_16�➢ti_t: � ._ 43.582 s.f. j 43.573 s.f. ` I� 3 43,53 �f 43.569 if 4,600, e i I I — — i Y / 5 43.596 s E 48022 sf 43,798 v£ s s lVfSi X86 67' Exisli.g Z.—S: SPI h.D IL.W. D.=6u�Lli¢A&ami PWdin Tree Canopy Coverage Total site area Total existing canopy 550,767 s.f. 39,880 s.f. --> 7.24% Preserved tree canopy (green) 28,877 s.f. --> 72.41% Possible preserved tree canopy (yellow) 4,857 s.f. --> 12.18% Removed tree canopy (red) 6,146 s.f. 15.41% 39,880 s.f. 100.00% Legend Preserved Tree Canopy Possible Preserved Tree Canopy Removed Tree Canopy -it Existing Drainage Area Map I I R f J - r fM I'll -- 1 0-1 r \► f (0.2 2 11 -A I 1 A_x r �-._-I ♦ r � �� r — 1� ul wry 1— s. II ,Q � F1 .. r-_- :� I's r V.. I { I I� ♦ �, I I r 1 A2 I E-1 27 ' ---- tfaa--- ------ --- �------------ - - - ---- f� �fw« ----- #a ----tea. - - - - -- -- 1 02 �`. ♦ �0-3�' I , i� I �;� � sill I , '•� � , w ----- — -- ------ --- --- ----- ---- arm. — z — --- ----------waa �E II — m ------ I � 'd FlA Al JI'l I , ! II I I, II —+----------------------------------- L — ------------------------- ----------------------------------- 4- Site Photo �.� y� \ \ . ���v a w: . 6�� ,� «\ %,� .». � >�� f � . .. > % � � �, \ �. « . _ - .�� \ % � +\: �: . : � � � . �` ` � : .� � . � �.�.. _ .� }7 4 l � � r t.! � { Y-�' __ ' ,mow„ y wrwd r - .,..�, .�,t�o_ . Y P/; - .1 , ,F �r •. Y Site Photo - - -. Site Photo L "N �L:l=— Site Photo Site Photo Mom Site Photo October 4, 2018; Approved (4-1) referencing the staff report dated October 4, 2018 and Revised Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated October 4, 2018, • Noting the applicant's willingness to verify the drainage to be adequate to support the development with (Carroll) ISD, • On the landscaping, noting the applicant's willingness to provide the number of trees per lot that will be added and in the open space areas, and to specify a minimum 4" caliper size, two trees in the front and two in the back, and the tree types to be provided, such as oaks, etc., • Noting the applicant's willingness to provide pedestrian access to the internal sidewalks through a gate that is to be unlocked and accessible at all times and on the southern sidewalk through the school, to verify the location of the crosswalk with the ISD and the location of a gate from the southern property onto the school property, • Regarding the southern boundary fence that is shown as a board on board wood fence, the applicant has discussed coming up with a landscape plan for that or to come up with a fence design with masonry columns or a solid masonry fence for that area on the southern boundary; X x ,, X /N .,� v ] V) A' A I '�-. �,,. n. /\!`l X, h. • The applicant also expressed a willingness to develop design standards for the construction of the exterior materials, roofing materials etc. • The eastern fence is to be replaced with a new wood construction (board on board fence) and the HOA would maintain that afterwards, • Provide more detail on the landscape materials, particularly in the front. l�\�\CITY of --- - so UTHLAKE: City Council �� CITY OF SOUTHLAK