Item 4K13 CITY OF
S0UTHLA1<...E-
Department of Planning & Development Services
STAFF REPORT
November 27, 2018
CASE NO: ZA18-0043
PROJECT: Plat Revision for Stony Brook
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Creekside Land Company, Ltd. Is requesting approval of a Plat Revision for Stony
Brook on property described as Tracts 5A, 5C1, 5B, 5A3, and 5A2, Jesse G. Allen
Survey, Abstract No. 18, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and Lots 5B and
5A (5A and 5B being portions of Lot 5), Brock Addition, an addition to the City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 2607, 2621, 2631, 2641, and
2651 W. Southlake Blvd. and 400 and 410 Brock Dr., Southlake, Texas. Current
Zoning: "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District. SPIN
Neighborhood #11.
DETAILS: This project is located south of W. Southlake Blvd. and south and west of Brock Dr.
Lakeside Presbyterian Church is to the west and the Siena subdivision is to the
south.
The applicant is requesting approval of a Plat Revision for Stony Brook to develop
47 residential lots and 9 open space lots on approximately 34.73 acres. A Plat
Revision is required in place of a Final Plat for this case because a portion of the
property was previously platted as part of the Brock Addition. The proposed Plat
Revision conforms to the approved Zoning Change and Development Plan (ZA17-
064) and Preliminary Plat (ZA17-066) for Stony Brook that were approved by City
Council on March 6, 2018, which include 47 residential lots and 8 open space lots.
The subdivision was approved as a gated community with private streets. One
additional open space lot is shown on the Plat Revision due to the area of the
private streets is now being designated as an open space lot. The gross density
and net density on the approved Development Plan and the proposed Plat
Revision is 1.35 units per acre and the percentage of open space (not counting the
private streets) is approximately 27.2% of the gross area.
ACTION NEEDED: Consider approval of a Plat Revision
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated November 26, 2018
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Link to Plans
Link to Corridor Planning Committee Report
Link to SPIN meeting Report
Case No.
ZA18-0043
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No.
ZA18-0043
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/APPLICANT: Creekside Land Company, Ltd.
PROPERTY SITUATION: 2607, 2621, 2631, 2641, and 2651 W. Southlake Blvd. and 400 and 410
Brock Dr.
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Tracts 5A, 5C1, 5B, 5A3, and 5A2, Jesse G. Allen Survey, Abstract No. 18
and Lots 5B and 5A (5A and 5B being portions of Lot 5), Brock Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential, 100 -Year Floodplain
CURRENT ZONING: "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District.
HISTORY: - The property was annexed into the City in 1956.
- A Plat Showing for Brock Addition was filed November 8, 1967.
- The "SF -1A" Single Family Residential District zoning was placed on the
Brock Addition property with the adoption of Ordinance No. 480 and the
Official Zoning Map in September of 1989.
- A Plat Revision for Lots 1 R and 3R, Brock Addition was approved
September 2, 1997 and filed November 21, 1997.
- A Zoning Change and Development Plan (ZA15-125) for Stone Trail
Estates from "AG" Agricultural District and "SF -1A" Single Family
Residential District to "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development for
Stone Trail Estates to develop 61 residential lots and 12 open space lots on
approximately 36.03 acres and the associated Preliminary Plat (ZA15-153)
were denied by City Council on August 2, 2016.
- A Zoning Change and Development Plan (ZA17-064) from "AG"
Agricultural District and "SF -1A" Single Family Residential District to "R -
PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development for Stony Brook to develop 47
residential lots and 8 open space lots on approximately 34.73 acres and the
associated Preliminary Plat (ZA17-066) were approved by City Council on
March 6, 2018.
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The majority of the site is designated "Medium Density Residential", which
is suitable for any single-family detached residential development.
Approximately 6.79 acres of the proposed development that is currently in
the Brock Addition has a Low Density Residential designation in the 2030
Land Use Plan. The six (6) lots shown in that portion of the proposed
subdivision comply with the Low Density Residential designation, which
requires a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre.
Medium Density Residential:
The purpose of the Medium Density Residential land use category is to
promote a neighborhood setting primarily comprised of single family
detached houses.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0043 Page 1
Definition: The Medium Density Residential category is suitable for any
single-family detached residential development. Other suitable activities are
those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space and Public/Semi-Public
categories previously discussed.
Low Density Residenital:
The purpose of the Low Density Residential land use category is to provide
for and to protect low intensity detached single-family residential
development that promotes the openness and rural character of Southlake.
Definition: The Low Density Residential category is for detached single-
family residential development at a net density of one or fewer dwelling
units per acre. Net density is the number of dwelling units per net acre,
which excludes acreage in all rights-of-way, easement, and lots designated
for public or private streets. Other suitable activities are those permitted in
the Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi -Public categories. The
Low Density Residential category encourages the openness and rural
character of the City of Southlake.
Floodplain
The Floodplain category illustrates areas designated by the August 1995
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps as being in the
100 -year floodplain. The "floodplain" is an expanse of natural vegetation
and wildlife, and should be preserved as natural open area. Within the
floodplain is "floodway" that must be kept free of encroachment in order that
the 100 -year flood may be carried without harmful increases in the height of
flood waters. Although it is not to be encouraged, the portion of the
floodplain not in the floodway may be reclaimed for development under
certain circumstances if in accordance with FEMA regulations. The
designated land use for areas of reclaimed floodplain is that of the
immediately adjacent land use category. This designation may also include
environmentally sensitive areas, habitats, or wetlands that may not be in
FEMA identified floodplains.
Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan
The Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan shows W. Southlake Blvd. to
be a Farm -to -Market road with 130' of right of way. Adequate right of way is
shown to be dedicated on the plans.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Pathways Master Plan shows the existing 8' multi -use trail along the
south side of Southlake Blvd. and a future >_8' multi -use trail extending from
W. Southlake Blvd. to Union church Rd. through the floodplain.
Maior Corridors Urban Design Plan
The property is in the "Estate Residential" zone in the Major Corridors
Urban Design Plan. The following recommendations pertain to the "Estate
Residential" zone in the plan.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0043 Page 2
■
Reinforce aid enhance the distinct "Estate
Residential zone" ch atter b -v
reconu-ltud4 the glaiitiiig �f 6 e 8 foot
high shrubs Acing iesident al Mites that
require fregnetit tilo-liniteaance aloe; the
corridor. "leis Mould not only screen
ctilsting re5ideY nal uses from the busy
roach; ay, but also crate green edges along
the roadw;; -,
New residential neighborhood fencing
should be lin trd to aalasvniry, stone avid
wrought -iron style fencing rrmter als, with
tree qnd slil'iil bery 02x1ting in a ltat vs&T e
I1 duller Oil the% Vr ly stele of the telice.
. tr��less�
rd3 �OWN.
•raw N -P
r Presrrvc and rrinfome- thr r�,istlug
character of the estate residential with
psskway phnungs and trail arl -emrries as
rece mmCiACd in t1 -3e plRiti.
Easter planning of larger resideiitial or
cnmsiicrci:tl tsC�CtS, ur rnitltiplr tr�rts„ is
encouraged over piece -Lineal developinent.
In addition, the iia-5trr Alin applications
shbeld a tludr all the elements of list lariat
esivironniern€ shell as biulcliug dens, site
de, -w;iytiet&ig and htulding siviage,
Lwadsrnpiig, tregtnicitt of liatUTAI features,
Bridges, streets, street 1i81it ig, etc, Every
effort should be made to mcwporate
reebin xievded U&aln design Arun lits alto
the prcpect desigii.
wjww �.,! k i �' 4•.-rs ,eel +
(br KmAwW Frhah ow itwig iter
�4nnlr+�. and ,atwr e&nMraceo�ir�r Ar
� iiWR�7Ad.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The proposed "R -PUD" zoning request has one main entrance onto W.
Southlake Blvd. An emergency only access gate is proposed at the Naples
Dr. connection to the south.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0043 Page 3
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required for this development.
* Vehicle Trips Per Day
* AM -In, AM -Out, PM -In and PM -Out are peak hour generators on a weekday
* Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7`h Edition
The City Engineer provided the following comments during the approval
process of the associated Zoning Change and Development Plan and
Preliminary Plat:
From a mobility perspective, it would be preferred to have a second, full
access point into this subdivision. The current proposal to force all 57 lots
to a right-in/right-out drive on FM 1709 is less than ideal and will only result
in more congestion. We do not believe that TxDOT is likely to permit a
hooded left median opening on FM 1709, which will certainly result in u -turn
movements at the existing openings creating a safety concern. The
preferred connection would be to Naples Drive, which was stubbed out
from the Siena subdivision and planned for future extension. This
connection would give the residents access to traffic signals at Davis,
Watermere, or Pearson for a much safer scenario to head west on FM
1709 if desired. The next best option would be to extend access and
connect to Brock Drive. While this would not provide access to a signal, it
would give full access to FM 1709 to go east or west as well as allow for
safe entrance for westbound traffic. The final option would be a plan for
future connection directly to Davis Boulevard. This connection should be
planned to line up with a future median opening on Davis, preferably line up
with Sunset Way, allowing full access for north and south movements. This
is also the least likely since this extension would require the crossing of the
flood plain which will likely be cost prohibitive and is not currently planned
as a capital improvement project.
TREE PRESERVATION: The site is subject to the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-D
since the property was recently rezoned.
There is approximately 40.1% existing tree cover on the site, of which,
approximately 66.4% is proposed to be preserved. A standard zoning
district would require that a minimum 50% of existing tree cover be
preserved.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a
planned development zoning district, including an S -P-1 Site Plan, S -P-
2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development,
or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider
the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with
the corresponding development application.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0043 Page 4
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the
application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the
Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets,
and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of
environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas
indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the
potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and
visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a
natural or man-made drainage creek;
V. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along
rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in
the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree
replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance.
UTILITIES: The property proposes to connect to an existing 12" water line in W.
Southlake Blvd. to the north and to an existing 8" water line in Naples Dr. to
the south. Sanitary sewer for the development is proposed to connect to an
existing 8" sewer line in Naples Dr to the south.
DRAINAGE: Drainage on the property is generally north to south and east to the creek
that runs through the southeast portion of the property.
CITIZEN INPUT: The following meetings were held to discuss the development:
A SPIN meeting was held for this project on September 12, 2017.
Link to SPIN Report
A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on August 7, 2017.
Link to Corridor Planning Committee Report
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: November 8, 2018; Approved (4-0) noting the staff report dated November
7, 2018 and Revised Plat Review Summary No. 2 dated November 7, 2018.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated November 26, 2018.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0043 Page 5
Case No. Attachment B
ZA18-0043 Page 1
Case No.: ZA18-0043
PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY
Review No.: Three
Project Name: Plat Revision — Stony Brook
APPLICANT: Terry Holmes
Creekside Land Company, Ltd.
225 E. State Hwy. 121, Suite 120
Coppell, TX 75019
Phone: (214) 488-5200
E-mail: terry@theholmesbuilders.com
Date of Review: 11/26/18
Engineer: Dennis Lang
Adams Engineering
8951 Cvaress Waters Blvd. Suite 150
Dallas, TX 75019
Phone: (817) 328-3200
E-mail: dennis.lang@adams-engineering.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
11/26/18 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE
CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
The driveway for Lot 4, Brock Addition (Harold McCall property) is located in Lot 5B, Brock
Addition, which is part of the property being developed. The approved Development Plan shows
that the existing driveway is to be replaced by a 24' wide emergency access driveway with a gate
in a 24' emergency access easement. A maintenance agreement stating that the HOA is
responsible for maintaining the entirety of the emergency access driveway is required. Please
submit a copy of the recorded agreement.
A Plat Revision or Final Plat that conforms to the R -PUD district zoning and the approved
Preliminary Plat must be processed, approved and recorded prior to the conveyance of any lots or
the issuance of any building permits. Portions of the property are already platted in the Brock
Addition, so a Plat Revision has been submitted to be processed and recorded in place of a Final
Plat.
Approval of a modification to the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.04 to allow private
streets in a new subdivision was approved by City Council.
Dead-end streets are permitted only where future connection is to be made (Subdivision
Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.03.K). City Council approved a modification to this Subdivision
Ordinance section to allow no connection to the Siena subdivision to the south.
A maximum of 20 dwelling units is generally allowed on a cul-de-sac street, which is defined as
that street or part of a street having one common entry and exit and no other entry and/or exit
(Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.03.1) City Council approved an R -PUD regulation to
allow one entry/exit.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0043 Page 1
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
There are a few areas on the Tree Conservation Plan that are inconsistent with the previously
approved Tree Preservation Analysis, however, the percentage of canopy shown to be preserved
has increased from 57.9% to 66.4°/x. There is approximately 40.1 % existing tree cover on the site,
of which, approximately 66.4% is proposed to be preserved. A standard zoning district would
require that a minimum 50% of existing tree cover be preserved.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S -P-1 Site Plan, S -P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider
the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding
development application.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation
to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or
Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so
as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including
mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential
areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant
to this Ordinance.
Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning
as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not
conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0043 Page 2
Public Works/Engineering Review
Kevin Ferrer, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8089
E-mail: kferrer@ci.southIake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Sidewalks shall be required to be constructed with each dwelling.
Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan.
Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be
found in the City of Southlake website:
http://www.citVofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=26r--
EASEMENTS:
All the cross lot drainage, and grate inlets shall be in a private drainage easement. The grate inlet
areas proposed along the rear lots abutting open space area 4x of block 2 needs to be in a private
drainage easement as these only serve subject lots.
SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS:
2. No comments.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
The Finish floor elevation specified on the Final plat needs to correspond with the finish pad
elevation specified on the grading plan of the civil set.
Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on upstream and
downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
https://www.citvofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP shall
be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
Retaining walls greater than 4 -feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a
registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building
Inspections Department prior to construction.
A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical
report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0043 Page 3
* Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH
114. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans
directly to TxDOT for review.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817)
748-8082 to connect to the City's sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer's
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
* Please give me a call or email any questions regarding the comment with the contact
information above.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
No comments based on submitted information.
The following should be informational comments only
Park Board comments or recommendations:
All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if
requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at
(817) 748-8607 for further details.
Land/park dedication requirements:
Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1)
acre of park land for every forty (40) dwelling units.
If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication
fees in the amount of $6250 per dwelling unit x 47 dwelling units = $293,750.00.
A SPIN meeting was held for this project on September 12, 2017.
All plats filed must have an original signed and stamped Tax Certificate submitted with it from each
taxing unit with jurisdiction of the real property, indicating that no delinquent taxes are owed and
that taxes for the current year have been paid. After September 1 st, a certificate showing that the
taxes for that year are paid, but that the taxes for the upcoming year have yet to be calculated is
required. (House Bills 1563 & 3101). A copy of this information may be obtained from the Tarrant
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0043 Page 4
County Tax Assessor/Collector's Office located at 100 E. Weatherford St. in Ft. Worth (across
from the old red courthouse). There is a service charge of $10 per account for this certificate. For
more information contact the Assessor/Collector's office at 817-212-6847.
We recommend this plat not be filed until the construction plans have been substantially approved.
This will ensure adequate easements and finish floor elevations. Minimum finish floor elevations
may be required pending review of construction plans.
Please submit a revised pdf "check print" prior to submitting the blackline mylar and paper copy
with original signatures.
In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water
customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the
City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final
plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City
of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount.
For Tarrant County filing, original signatures and seals will be required on one blackline mylar and
one blackline paper copy prior to filing the plat. The mylar and paper copies will not be accepted if
any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat.
A Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The
Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication
requirements and fees, off-site sewer extensions, off-site drainage and utility easements and
impact fees.
All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0043 Page 5
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
SPO #
Owner
Zoning
Physical Address
Acreage
Response
1
PURI, MUKTA
SF1—A
102 JELLICO CIR
1.24
NR
2
FRANKS, NINA
AG
700 VENICE AVE
0.47
NR
3
BEENE, LORI DAMRON
AG
719 PORTOFINO PL
0.46
NR
4
FAZEN, MARK A
SF1—A
720 PORTOFINO PL
0.46
NR
5
HARIDAS, RAGHAVEN
SF20A
701 VENICE AVE
0.46
NR
6
QUINN, WILLIAM
SF20A
2435 MICHAEL DR
0.55
NR
7
C&T LAWNS LLC
SF20A
2440 MICHAEL DR
1.13
NR
8
C&T LAWNS LLC
SF20A
2425 MICHAEL DR
1.11
NR
9
SMYTH, HENRY C
SF20A
301 WATERMERE DR
6.37
NR
10
MULLENIX, DAVID W
AG
701 PORTOFINO PL
0.59
NR
11
JOHNSON, GEORGE
AG
2390 MICHAEL DR
1.13
NR
12
GLENDA WIESMAN TRUST
AG
2631 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
3.50
NR
13
BYLER, JOHN R
SP2
705 PORTOFINO PL
0.46
NR
14
COMER, JACK
SF20A
707 PORTOFINO PL
0.47
NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0043 Page 1
15
YOUNG, MICHAEL
SP2
715 PORTOFINO PL
0.52
NR
16
QUINN, WILLIAM
AG
2445 MICHAEL DR
0.57
NR
17
MURWAY, DEBBIE
AG
829 SIENA DR
2.37
NR
18
NADO I LLC
AG
2530 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
1.92
NR
19
NADO I LLC
SF20A
2580 W SOUTH LAKE BLVD
1.71
NR
20
BONOLA FAMILY LTD PRTNSHP
SF20A
2608 W SOUTH LAKE BLVD
1.78
NR
21
KUELBS, GREGORY G
SF20A
500 DAVIS BLVD
5.57
NR
22
KUELBS, GREGORY G
AG
504 DAVIS BLVD
2.10
NR
23
KUELBS, GREGORY G
SF2
684 DAVIS BLVD
5.09
NR
24
CT PLUS 4 LLC
CS
2420 MICHAEL DR
1.13
NR
25
GLENDA WIESMAN TRUST
SF1-A
2641 W SOUTH LAKE BLVD
0.39
NR
26
WIESMAN, GLENDA
AG
2607 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
0.88
NR
27
GLENDA WIESMAN TRUST
CS
2621 W SOUTH LAKE BLVD
9.22
NR
28
LOWMAN, MIKE
SP1
711 PORTOFINO PL
0.47
NR
29
CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD
SP1
410 BROCK DR
1.67
NR
30
LAKESIDE PRESBYTERAN CHURCH
SF1-A
2701 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
7.03
NR
31
SMYTH, HENRY C
SP1
301 WATERMERE DR
8.86
NR
32
GLENDA WIESMAN TRUST
SF1-A
2651 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
13.63
NR
33
SOUTHLAKE CHURCH OF CHRIST
SF1-A
2417 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD
9.63
NR
34
GLENDA WIESMAN TRUST
SF1-A
250 BROCK DR
1.39
NR
35
MCCALL, HAROLD L
SF1-A
320 BROCK DR
1.20
NR
36
CREEKSIDE LAND COMPANY LTD
SF1-A
400 BROCK DR
4.73
NR
ARD, MARJORIE A
---RPP'
329 BROCK DR
0.68
Not Oppose
38
PAPILLARD, MARJORIE S
RES
319 BROCK DR
0.61
Not Opposed.
39
HOWARD, EMMA L
SF1-A
303 BROCK DR
1.03
NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Thirty-two (32)
Responses Received
within the notification boundary: One (1)
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0043 Page 2
NoUficabon Response Form
ZAI "04
Mustin g Date; Nov mbar 8, 2010 .at 0:3;0 NM
PAPILLARD. MARJORIE A
319 BROCK DR
SOUTHLAKE TX 76097-92051
PLEASE PRf]VIDF-COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY
BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING.
Being the owner(s) a� (tie property so noted above, are hereby
in fervor of opposed to undecided about
(6-rda or undefline one)
the prowsed Mat Revision referenced above.
Space for cornmentt regarding your Position:
_
Signature:
• { _
I f11tM1F ti
Y 6..
Additional ignature: Date-
PrintedName(s): r 11 r
I&W (m prEpperij c*-rimr(a) who5i- I FAAr�jjjk3'PjjjtW8' t®p 01herwl 6�r tad ire PlAnuYU 0epoftn)-t. Cera "n Par vrwerw
Phone Number (optional): ? i T Y 3 / -//
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0043 Page 3