Loading...
2007-09-10 Meeting Report (Kimball Lake Office Park)SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. ZA07 -106 PROJECT NAME: Kimball Lake Office Park SPIN DISTRICT: 6 MEETING DATE: September 10, 2007 6:30PM MEETING LOCATION: 1400 MAIN STREET, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS MEETING ROOMS 3A 313 TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Six (6) SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: None APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Curtis Young (Sage Group) and David Keener STAFF PRESENT: Planner Clayton Comstock STAFF CONTACT: Clayton Comstock, (817)748 -8269; ccomstocknci.soutwake.tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY yam Two residents attended the SPIN 6 meeting for the proposed Kimball Lake Office Park on the west side of N. Kimball Avenue between E. Highland Street and SH 114. The 3.5 -acre property is adjacent to the recently approved Gateway Church project on SH 114 and across Kimball from the recently approved Estancia residential subdivision. The S -P -1 zoning and site plan proposal is for six single story, Tuscan -style office buildings with a shared courtyard for each pair of buildings. None in attendance verbalized any major objections to the development. Since this SPIN meeting was held, the scope of this project has increased from a 3.5- acre S -P -1 zoning request for an office development to a 14.45 -acre S -P -2 zoning request with a mix of proposed uses. See full Staff Report for updated information. QUESTIONS DISCUSSION QUESTION: You mentioned this project will be built in phases; which buildings will be built first? RESPONSE: The southernmost two buildings and the southern building of the western pair will be built first. QUESTION: What uses are proposed? RESPONSE: Professional offices. QUESTION: Will the building style be similar to the professional offices on the west side of Carroll Ave between Southlake Blvd and SH 114? QUESTION: What is the timing of this development in relation to the widening of N. Kimball Avenue and the development of Estancia, Gateway Church, and public improvements related to those developments? SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes, rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council.