Item 7B - PresentationZoning Change and Development Plan
Oxford Place
Item 7B ZA18-0032
ZA18-0032
Owner: Linda Behrends c/o Travis Franks
Applicant: Sage Group, Inc.
Request: Approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for
Oxford Place to develop 13 single family residential lots
with a private gated street on approximately 12.64 acres.
Location: 1749 E. Highland St.
Aerial View
Land Use Exhibit
Low Density
Residential Mixed Use Entire Site
Dwelling Units
(du) 4 9 13
Gross Acreage 4.88 ac. 7.76 ac. 12.64 ac.
Net Acreage 4.035 ac. 6.96 ac. 10.99 ac.
Gross Density 0.82 du/ac. 1.16 du/ac. 1.03 du/ac.
Net Density 0.99 du/ac. 1.29 du/ac. 1.18 du/ac.
Low Density
Residential
Mixed Use
Low Density Residential - Single family detached dwellings at
a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre.
Mixed Use - The purpose of this land use category is “to
provide an option for large-scale, master-planned, mixed
use developments that combine land uses such as office
facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses.”
Ord. No. 480-222A
Parcel A - Permitted Uses
CS - Community Services District
O-1 - Office District
B-1 – Business Service Park District
AG
Aerial View
Development Plan at 10/4 P&Z Commission
Site Data Summary
Existing Zoning “AG”
Proposed Zoning “R-PUD”
Land Use Designation Mixed Use and Low Density Residential
Gross Acreage 12.64 ac.
Net Acreage 10.99 ac.
Dwelling Units/Residential Lots 13
Gross Density 1.03 du/ac.
Net Density 1.18 du/ac.
Open Space % 10.4%
Lot Area Range 30,000 s.f. to 39,785 s.f.
Average Lot Area 32,595 s.f.
“R-PUD” Regulations
Regulation SF-20A
(Base Zoning) SF-30 SF-1A R-PUD Regulation
Lot Area 20,000 sq. ft. 30,000 sq. ft. 43,560 sq. ft. 30,000 sq. ft.
Lot Width 100’ 100’ 100’ 110’
Lot Coverage 30% 20% 20% 35%
Minimum Floor
Area 1,800 sq. ft. 1,800 sq. ft. 2,000 sq. ft. 4,000 sq. ft.
Maximum
Accessory
Structure Area
600 sq. ft. 750 sq. ft. 3% of lot area or
4,000 sq. ft. 750 sq. ft.
The “R-PUD” zoning district follows the “SF-20A” Single Family Residential District zoning regulations
with the following exceptions:
P&Z Commission Conditions of Approval
P&Z Conditions Applicant’s Response
Noting the applicant’s willingness to verify the drainage to be adequate to support the
development with (Carroll) ISD.
The applicant contacted the engineer for Carroll ISD and the
preliminary response is that their drainage is adequate to support the
proposed development.
Provide the number of trees per lot that will be added and in the open space areas,
and specify a minimum 4” caliper size, two trees in the front and two in the back, and
the tree types to be provided, such as oaks, etc.
A note has been added to the Master Landscape Plan requiring two
4” caliper trees in the front and back of each lot to be live oak, red
oak, cedar elm, and/or chinese pistache and a more detailed open
space landscape plan has been provided.
Provide pedestrian access to the internal sidewalks through a gate that is to be
unlocked and accessible at all times on the southern sidewalk through the school and
verify the location of the crosswalk with the ISD and the location of a gate from the
southern property onto the school property.
The applicant met with Carroll ISD and has stated that the school
district does not want a sidewalk connection. The sidewalk through
the southern open space lot has been removed on the plans.
Come up with a fence design with masonry columns or a solid masonry fence for that
area on the southern boundary.
The plans have been revised to show a board on board fence with
masonry columns on the southern boundary.
Develop design standards for the construction of the exterior materials, roofing
materials, etc. The applicant has provided Construction Material Design Standards.
The eastern fence is to be replaced with a new wood construction (board on board
fence) and the HOA would maintain that afterwards.
The applicant met with Carroll ISD and has stated that the school
district has agreed to the existing chain link fence being replaced by a
board on board wood fence. The plans show a board on board wood
fence along the eastern boundary.
Provide more detail on the landscape materials, particularly in the front. A more detailed landscape plan for the open space lots has been
provided.
Revised Development Plan
Site Data Summary
Existing Zoning “AG”
Proposed Zoning “R-PUD”
Land Use Designation Mixed Use and Low Density Residential
Gross Acreage 12.64 ac.
Net Acreage 10.99 ac.
Dwelling Units/Residential Lots 13
Gross Density 1.03 du/ac.
Net Density 1.18 du/ac.
Open Space % 10.4%
Lot Area Range 30,000 s.f. to 39,785 s.f.
Average Lot Area 32,595 s.f.
Wall maintenance easements added
Sidewalk connection removed
Fence Plan at 10/4 P&Z Commission
Revised Fence Plan
Existing chain link and wood
fence replaced by 8’ board on
board w/ cedar cap
8’ board on board w/ cedar
cap and masonry columns
Articulation added
South Fence Exhibit
Landscape Plan
10/4 P&Z Commission 11/6 City Council
Open Space Landscape Plan
Entry Exhibit at 10/4 P&Z Commission
Revised Entry Exhibit
Entry Plan at 10/4 P&Z Commission
Entry Wall Plan
Tree Conservation Plan
Existing Drainage Area Map
Preliminary Drainage Plan
Utility Plan
Site Photo
Site Photo
Site Photo
Site Photo
Site Photo
Site Photo
Site Photo
Site Photo
Site Photo
Site Photo
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 4, 2018; Approved (4-1) referencing the staff report dated October 4, 2018 and Revised Development Plan Review Summary No. 2,
dated October 4, 2018,
•Noting the applicant’s willingness to verify the drainage to be adequate to support the development with (Carroll) ISD,
•On the landscaping, noting the applicant’s willingness to provide the number of trees per lot that will be added and in the open space
areas, and to specify a minimum 4” caliper size, two trees in the front and two in the back, and the tree types to be provide d, such as
oaks, etc.,
•Noting the applicant’s willingness to provide pedestrian access to the internal sidewalks through a gate that is to be unlock ed and
accessible at all times and on the southern sidewalk through the school, to verify the location of the crosswalk with the ISD and the
location of a gate from the southern property onto the school property,
•Regarding the southern boundary fence that is shown as a board on board wood fence, the applicant has discussed coming up wit h a
landscape plan for that or to come up with a fence design with masonry columns or a solid masonry fence for that area on the southern
boundary;
•The applicant also expressed a willingness to develop design standards for the construction of the exterior materials, roofin g materials,
etc.
•The eastern fence is to be replaced with a new wood construction (board on board fence) and the HOA would maintain that afterwards,
•Provide more detail on the landscape materials, particularly in the front.
Questions?