Loading...
Item 7B - PresentationZoning Change and Development Plan Oxford Place Item 7B ZA18-0032 ZA18-0032 Owner: Linda Behrends c/o Travis Franks Applicant: Sage Group, Inc. Request: Approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Oxford Place to develop 13 single family residential lots with a private gated street on approximately 12.64 acres. Location: 1749 E. Highland St. Aerial View Land Use Exhibit Low Density Residential Mixed Use Entire Site Dwelling Units (du) 4 9 13 Gross Acreage 4.88 ac. 7.76 ac. 12.64 ac. Net Acreage 4.035 ac. 6.96 ac. 10.99 ac. Gross Density 0.82 du/ac. 1.16 du/ac. 1.03 du/ac. Net Density 0.99 du/ac. 1.29 du/ac. 1.18 du/ac. Low Density Residential Mixed Use Low Density Residential - Single family detached dwellings at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. Mixed Use - The purpose of this land use category is “to provide an option for large-scale, master-planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses such as office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses.” Ord. No. 480-222A Parcel A - Permitted Uses CS - Community Services District O-1 - Office District B-1 – Business Service Park District AG Aerial View Development Plan at 10/4 P&Z Commission Site Data Summary Existing Zoning “AG” Proposed Zoning “R-PUD” Land Use Designation Mixed Use and Low Density Residential Gross Acreage 12.64 ac. Net Acreage 10.99 ac. Dwelling Units/Residential Lots 13 Gross Density 1.03 du/ac. Net Density 1.18 du/ac. Open Space % 10.4% Lot Area Range 30,000 s.f. to 39,785 s.f. Average Lot Area 32,595 s.f. “R-PUD” Regulations Regulation SF-20A (Base Zoning) SF-30 SF-1A R-PUD Regulation Lot Area 20,000 sq. ft. 30,000 sq. ft. 43,560 sq. ft. 30,000 sq. ft. Lot Width 100’ 100’ 100’ 110’ Lot Coverage 30% 20% 20% 35% Minimum Floor Area 1,800 sq. ft. 1,800 sq. ft. 2,000 sq. ft. 4,000 sq. ft. Maximum Accessory Structure Area 600 sq. ft. 750 sq. ft. 3% of lot area or 4,000 sq. ft. 750 sq. ft. The “R-PUD” zoning district follows the “SF-20A” Single Family Residential District zoning regulations with the following exceptions: P&Z Commission Conditions of Approval P&Z Conditions Applicant’s Response Noting the applicant’s willingness to verify the drainage to be adequate to support the development with (Carroll) ISD. The applicant contacted the engineer for Carroll ISD and the preliminary response is that their drainage is adequate to support the proposed development. Provide the number of trees per lot that will be added and in the open space areas, and specify a minimum 4” caliper size, two trees in the front and two in the back, and the tree types to be provided, such as oaks, etc. A note has been added to the Master Landscape Plan requiring two 4” caliper trees in the front and back of each lot to be live oak, red oak, cedar elm, and/or chinese pistache and a more detailed open space landscape plan has been provided. Provide pedestrian access to the internal sidewalks through a gate that is to be unlocked and accessible at all times on the southern sidewalk through the school and verify the location of the crosswalk with the ISD and the location of a gate from the southern property onto the school property. The applicant met with Carroll ISD and has stated that the school district does not want a sidewalk connection. The sidewalk through the southern open space lot has been removed on the plans. Come up with a fence design with masonry columns or a solid masonry fence for that area on the southern boundary. The plans have been revised to show a board on board fence with masonry columns on the southern boundary. Develop design standards for the construction of the exterior materials, roofing materials, etc. The applicant has provided Construction Material Design Standards. The eastern fence is to be replaced with a new wood construction (board on board fence) and the HOA would maintain that afterwards. The applicant met with Carroll ISD and has stated that the school district has agreed to the existing chain link fence being replaced by a board on board wood fence. The plans show a board on board wood fence along the eastern boundary. Provide more detail on the landscape materials, particularly in the front. A more detailed landscape plan for the open space lots has been provided. Revised Development Plan Site Data Summary Existing Zoning “AG” Proposed Zoning “R-PUD” Land Use Designation Mixed Use and Low Density Residential Gross Acreage 12.64 ac. Net Acreage 10.99 ac. Dwelling Units/Residential Lots 13 Gross Density 1.03 du/ac. Net Density 1.18 du/ac. Open Space % 10.4% Lot Area Range 30,000 s.f. to 39,785 s.f. Average Lot Area 32,595 s.f. Wall maintenance easements added Sidewalk connection removed Fence Plan at 10/4 P&Z Commission Revised Fence Plan Existing chain link and wood fence replaced by 8’ board on board w/ cedar cap 8’ board on board w/ cedar cap and masonry columns Articulation added South Fence Exhibit Landscape Plan 10/4 P&Z Commission 11/6 City Council Open Space Landscape Plan Entry Exhibit at 10/4 P&Z Commission Revised Entry Exhibit Entry Plan at 10/4 P&Z Commission Entry Wall Plan Tree Conservation Plan Existing Drainage Area Map Preliminary Drainage Plan Utility Plan Site Photo Site Photo Site Photo Site Photo Site Photo Site Photo Site Photo Site Photo Site Photo Site Photo Planning and Zoning Commission October 4, 2018; Approved (4-1) referencing the staff report dated October 4, 2018 and Revised Development Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated October 4, 2018, •Noting the applicant’s willingness to verify the drainage to be adequate to support the development with (Carroll) ISD, •On the landscaping, noting the applicant’s willingness to provide the number of trees per lot that will be added and in the open space areas, and to specify a minimum 4” caliper size, two trees in the front and two in the back, and the tree types to be provide d, such as oaks, etc., •Noting the applicant’s willingness to provide pedestrian access to the internal sidewalks through a gate that is to be unlock ed and accessible at all times and on the southern sidewalk through the school, to verify the location of the crosswalk with the ISD and the location of a gate from the southern property onto the school property, •Regarding the southern boundary fence that is shown as a board on board wood fence, the applicant has discussed coming up wit h a landscape plan for that or to come up with a fence design with masonry columns or a solid masonry fence for that area on the southern boundary; •The applicant also expressed a willingness to develop design standards for the construction of the exterior materials, roofin g materials, etc. •The eastern fence is to be replaced with a new wood construction (board on board fence) and the HOA would maintain that afterwards, •Provide more detail on the landscape materials, particularly in the front. Questions?