Item 7A HawkwoodCase No. Attachment A
ZA18-0033 Page 1
S T A F F R E P O R T
September 25, 2018
CASE NO: ZA18-0033
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Concept Plan fo r Hawkw ood (formerly Peytonville at
Boardwalk)
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Sage Group, on behalf of Hat Creek Development , is requesting approval at 1st
Reading of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan on property described as Lots 1R
and 2R, Block 1, Baker Estates Addition Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and
located at 610 and 620 S. Peytonville Avenue, Southlake, Texas. The current zoning
is “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District and “RE-5” Residential Estate District.
The requested zoning is “SF-20A” Single Family Residential District. SPIN
Neighborhood #10.
REQUEST: The subject property is located on the west side of S. Peytonville Avenue
approximately 525 feet south of the intersection of S. Peytonville Avenue and W.
Southlake Blvd.
The applicant is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan from
“SF-1A” Single Family Residential District and “RE-5” Residential Estate District to
“SF-20A” Single Family Residential District to allow construction of a 14 lot on 9.8
acres. The development is proposed to be served by a private street and be gated.
A variance to the City’s Subdivision Ordinance to allow a private street has been
requested. The lot sizes range from 20,493 sq. ft. to 37,008 sq. ft. with an average
lot size of 26,789 sq. ft. The gross density proposed is 1.43 du/acre. The
development will include a drainage easement for the existing creek and relocation
of the existing pond to the west in order to be located on the along the drainage
easement and provide retention capacity. A copy of the drainage plan is provided in
the packet and staff will present the proposed drainage plan as part of the
presentation. The concept plan includes a public access easement along the
proposed street to allow a 5-foot sidewalk within the development. Per the Planning
and Zoning Commission’s request the walls along S. Peytonville Avenue will have
pedestrian openings to allow the public to access the sidewalks within the
development. At the meeting, the applicant offered to extend the sidewalk to the
north along S. Peytonville Avenue (off-site) to the Stonebury subdivision. The
applicant has included a wroug ht iron fence along the north, west and south property
lines and will replace or repair the existing wrought iron fences along the property
lines.
VARIANCE: A variance to Section 5.04, of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, to
allow a private street with the initial development of the new residential subdivision.
Department of Planning & Development Services
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0033 Page 2
SITE DATA
SUMMARY:
Site Data Summary
Existing Zoning “AG” and “RE-5”
Proposed Zoning “SF-20A”
Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential
Gross/Net Acreage 9.8 acres
Dwelling Units/Residential Lots 14
Density 1.43 du/acre
At the September 20, 2018 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, several
residents expressed concerns with drainage issues on their properties adjacent to
the proposed development and within the proposed development, concerns with the
proposed development 14 lot density, concerns with the existing traffic on S.
Peytonville Avenue, concerns with the applicant’s proposal for wood fencing
adjacent to the existing residential, and concerns with access to the sidewalks within
the proposed development. In the report, please find copies of the public comment
cards turned in at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. At the meeting,
the applicant addressed comments from the citizens. The applicant agreed to
change the fencing type to wrought iron, allow pedestrian access into the
neighborhood, and build a sidewalk to the north. The applicant provided a detailed
presentation on the drainage.
Opposition to the zoning case with the 200 ft. notification bound ary is 30.78% at the
time of this report. If opposition is greater than 20% at the time of the 2 nd Reading, a
super majority vote (6 of 7 members) by City Council is required.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Consider Approval at 1st Reading
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated September 14, 2018
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(E) Surrounding Property Owners Responses
(F) Ordinance No. 480-752
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Link to Narrative
Link to Variance Request
Link to Plans:
Page 1 Concept Plan
Page 2 Tree Conservation Plan
Page 3 Landscape Master Plan
Pages 4-6 Preliminary Drainage and Utility Plans
Link to SPIN Report
Link to Corridor Planning Committee Report
Link to Resident’s Presentation at P&Z meeting on September 20, 2018
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Patty Moos (817) 748-8269
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0033 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Kosse Maykus, Hat Creek Development
PROPERTY SITUATION: 610 and 620 S. Peytonville Avenue
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1R and 2R, Block 1, Baker Estates Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential
CURRENT ZONING: “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District and “RE-5” Residential Estate
District
REQUESTED ZONING: “SF-20A” Single Family Residential District
HISTORY: The property given the “AG” Agricultural zoning designation with the adoption
of the City’s Zoning Ordinance in 1987.
January 4, 1994; City Council approved a zoning change of 4.08 acres of the
proposed Lot 2, Baker Estates from “AG” Agricultural District to “SF -1A”
Single Family Residential District. (ZA93-104)
January 20, 1994, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a Final
Plat for Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, Baker Estates. (ZA93 -129)
March 1994: a building permit was issued for the construction of a new
residence on the property.
July 15, 1997; City Council approved a plat revision for 2 lots for Baker
Estates. (ZA97-071)
August 5, 1997: City Council approved a zoning chan ge for Lot 2, Block 1,
Baker Estates from “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District to “RE-5”
Residential Estate District. (ZA97-080)
SOUTHLAKE 2035
PLAN: The underlying land use
designation is Medium
Density Residential.
The request to change
the zoning to “SF-20A”
Single Family
Residential District is
consistent with this land
use designation.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0033 Page 2
PATHWAYS
MASTER PLAN: The Pathway Master Plan
for this property requires a
5-foot sidewalk along the
west side of S. Peytonville
Avenue and an 8-foot
sidewalk on the east side
of S. Peytonville Avenue.
No sidewalks currently
exist on the west side of S.
Peytonville Avenue north
of Elks Lane (from W.
Continental Blvd. to Elks
Lane) to W. Southlake
Blvd. The 8-foot sidewalk
on the east side of S.
Peytonville Avenue has been constructed from Boardwalk Avenue north to
W. Southlake Blvd.
At the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the applicant indicated a
willingness to construct a sidewalk (off-site) on the west side of S. Peytonville
Avenue from the development north to the Stonebury/S. Peytonville
intersection.
WATER & SEWER: This site is currently serviced by an existing water force main along S.
Peytonville Avenue. There is an existing 8” sewer line located along the north
property line and a 6” sewer line located on the east side of S. Peytonville
Avenue.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS: Drainage is generally to the south on the western and north portion of the lot
and west at the southeast portion of the property. Also, water flows onto the
property from the east. An existing creek is located within the subdivision
draining to the south through the property. A preliminary drainage plan is
included in the packet.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The site will have one private access drive directly onto S. Peytonville
Avenue, a 2-lane undivided 70-foot collector. The proposed development is
located on S. Peytonville Avenue between W. Southlake Blvd. and W.
Continental Blvd.
S. Peytonville Avenue (51)
(between W. Continental Blvd. and Stonebury Drive)
24hr North Bound (2,214) South Bound (1,998)
AM Peak AM (387) 7:00 AM –8:00 AM Peak AM (202) 7:15 AM– 8:15 AM
PM Peak PM (227) 3:00 PM – 4:00 PM Peak PM (209) 1:00 PM – 2:00 PM
* Based on the 2017 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report
S. Peytonville Avenue (52a)
(between W. Southlake Blvd. and Stonebury Drive)
24hr North Bound (2,974) South Bound (2,700)
AM Peak AM (549) 7:00 AM –8:00 AM Peak AM (200) 7:15 AM– 8:15 AM
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0033 Page 3
PM Peak PM (292) 3:00 PM – 4:00 PM Peak PM (275) 1:00 PM– 2:00 PM
* Based on the 2017 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report
Traffic Impact
Use
Dwelling
Units Vtpd* AM-
IN
AM-
OUT PM-IN PM-
OUT
Single Family Detached
Housing (210) 14 134 3 8 9 5
The Public Works Department has indicated that the impact of the 14
additional homes would not be distinguishable from the normal daily variation
in traffic along S. Peytonville Avenue.
TREE PRESERVATION: The proposed tree preservation complies with the Existing Tree Cover
Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. There is
44.24% of existing tree cover on the site and a minimum of 50% of the tree
cover is required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve
51.96% of the existing tree cover.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held for this property on August 28, 2018. A link to
the report is provided. Link to the SPIN Report
A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on September 12,
2018. A link to the report is provided. Link to Corridor Planning Committee
Report
PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION: September 20, 2018; Approved (6-1) subject to the revised Staff Report
dated September 19, 2018 and the Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2
dated September 14, 2018; gra nting the variance requested, therein, for the
private street; noting the applicant’s willingness to consider bordering the
property with a wrought iron fence instead of a wood fence as initially
proposed; also noting the applicant’s willingness to enter into a development
agreement, with respect to the sidewalks, with the City to extend the
sidewalks (along the west side of S. Peytonville Avenue) to Stonebury Drive;
noting the applicant’s additional willingness to an agreement, held to task, to
present a preliminary landscape plan to City Council inclusive of trees along
S. Peytonville Avenue as well as interior street canopy trees ; also noting the
applicant’s willingness to make the internal sidewalks accessible to the
public; and also further noting the applicant’s willingness to impose and
require strict architectural required features including those noted in his
report and specifically that there will be absolutely no asphalt composite
shingles and that there will be a requirement for all wood windows; and
finally noting the applicant’s willingnes s to continue to discuss drainage
issues and in particular, discussing the drainage issues and presenting ideas
to City Council with respect to the property to the south.
Commissioner Dyche dissented due to his concern that the development is
taking up open greenspace for homes, his concern with the plan’s lack of
open space, the number of lots and lot sizes, and the trees coverage.
Requested the developer continue to work with neighbors regarding their
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0033 Page 4
concerns.
STAFF COMMENTS: The Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated September 14, 2018 is
located in Attachment ‘C’.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA18-0033 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0033 Page 1
CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA18-0033 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 9/14/18
Project Name: Zoning Change and Concept Plan – Hawkwood (formerly Peytonville at Boardwa lk)
APPLICANT: Hat Creek Development OWNER: Robert and Deany Cocanougher
Koss Maykus Robert Cocanougher
P.O. Box 92747 620 S. Peytonville Avenue
Southlake, TX 76092 Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: 817-329-3111 Phone: 817-266-2068
Email: Kosse@maykus.com Email: Robert@wiseadv.com
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 9/5//2018 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING
STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF
MEMBER.
Planning Review
Patty Moos
Planner I
Phone: (817) 748-8269
Email: pmoos@ci.southlake.tx.us
1. All residential lots must front on a public street meeting minimum City Standards. In Section 5.04 of
the Subdivision Ordinance, as amended, Conversion to Private Streets in Residential Subdivisions
(Amended Ord. No. 483-E): If the community desires gated streets, the applicant will need to request
a variance to Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 5.04, which does not permit
private streets in new subdivisions in which less than 75% of the lots contain homeowner occupied
structures to allow a gated community with private streets with the initial development. Variance
requested, to allow development of a gated private street.
2. All development must comply with the underlying zoning district regulations.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. Existing trees proposed to be preserved are located within util ity easements where a water line and
storm drains are proposed to be installed. Ensure that existing trees that are proposed to be
preserved are not altered by the utility construction. Trees shown to be protected will be required to be
mitigated if altered.
2. Existing trees in off-site utility easements will be required to be shown on all development civil
construction plans.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0033 Page 2
* The proposed existing tree cover preservation complies with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation
Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. There is 44.24% of existing tree cover on the site
and a minimum of 50% of the cover is required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to
preserve at least 51.96% of the existing tree cover with 19.90% designated as possibly (Marg inal) to
be removed.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requireme nts established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously
received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the
first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that m ust be
preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights -of-way as
approved by City Council.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City C ouncil approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as
approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements,
utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with
existing trees intended to be preserved.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
___________________________________________________________________________________
Public Works/Engineering Review
Kevin Ferrer, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8274
E-mail: kferrer@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
* This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
1. Label curb return radius for the proposed drive. Curb return radii for driveways shall be 30’ minimum.
EASEMENTS:
Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15’
minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line. A 20’ easement is required if
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0033 Page 3
both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. There’s currently a
proposed 14’ wide drainage easement.
Storm sewer lines proposed to run along the rear of the lots will require a private drainage easement
and will need to be privately maintained.
SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS:
1. Is there an alternative sanitary sewer route such as tie -in to sewer line by Peytonville Avenue?
Staff would like to preserve the existing trees if possible. Ple ase analyze if alternate options
are available.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. Limits of 1% floodplain boundaries shall be shown and contained within a dedicated drainage
easement at the time of submittal of the final plat and civil set.
2. Differences between pre- and post- development runoff shall be captured in detention
pond(s). Proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of the 1, 10 and 100 - year
storm events. Describe how increased runoff from site is being detained. Access easements
are needed for maintenance of detention ponds. If tract does not detain, development will
need to provide hydraulic and hydrology supporting documents up to the critical drainage
infrastructure at the time of the civil set showing that downstream properties are not negatively
affected.
3. Easements outside of right of way shall be required for proposed storm sewer. Storm sewer
must be installed outside the edge of pavement. Ordinance #605 defines easement
requirements for storm sewer:
30” RCP and under - 15’ easement
42” – 54” RCP - 20’ easement
60” – 66” RCP - 25’ easement
72” – 102” RCP - 30’ easement
Over 102” RCP – 3.5 times diameter
4. As the interpretation of “significant” may differ between city staff members and developer’s
staff, any revision of the concept/site/ development proposed pond(s) may require a re -
approval from Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council.
5. Provide a storm sewer junction box by lot 1 to provide a maintenance access point.
* Provide inlet at the end of pavement of proposed street to in tercept runoff before entering adjacent
property.
* Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #19 and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning
construction ($417.61/Acre).
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact o n upstream & downstream
properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the
Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The
plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes
which are located on the City’s website:
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0033 Page 4
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000. The
plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permi t. The Environmental
Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the review of the SWPPP
please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in:
https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP shall
be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans.
* NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
* A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report
shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748-8082
to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the
City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructu re. Construction plans for these
improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the
City Council agenda for consideration.
*=Denotes informational comment.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Public Works Traffic Division
Stephanie Taylor
Transportation Manager
Phone: 817-748-8216
Email: staylor@ci.southlake.tx.us
CONCEPT PLAN:
1. Show location of proposed stop sign at the intersection of the development exit and S
Peytonville Ave.
2. Proposed landscaping shall not obscure existing or proposed traffic signs. Follow
guidance of the latest edition of AASHTO’s “A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways
and Streets” regarding stopping sight distance for exiting motorists to see stop signs.
3. Proposed masonry wall shall not obscure intersection sight distance at the driveway.
Follow guidance of the latest edition of AASHTO’s “A Policy on Geometric Design of
Highways and Streets” regarding required intersection sight distance for motorists exiting
the site.
4. Proposed driveway storage length of 58.5’ is acceptable.
5. Follow guidance of Fire Marshal regarding pavement widths of the entrance and exit to the
site.
___________________________________________________________________________________
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8223
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0033 Page 5
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
FIRE LANE COMMENTS:
The entry appears to be designed to accommodate gated access, if requested and approved by city
council, the gate must be equipped with an Opticom or KS -2 switch for opening the gate
electronically, as well as a means for manual opening.
Fire apparatus access needs to be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire
apparatus (A minimum of 85,000 lbs. GVW). Fire access roads must be at least 31 ft. back of curb to
back of curb. (Standard street width) (Also, the median in front of Lot 1 an d 14 must be designed to
support the load of the fire apparatus due to being in an area that may be necessary for fire
department access)
_________________________________________________________________________________
General Informational Comments
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior
to construction of any signs.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and
building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include
but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and
Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. For this development, a Preliminary Plat, followed by a Plat
Revision or alternative to a Plat Revision, a Plat Vacation and Final Plat approved will be required.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA13-0033 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owners
610 and 620 S. Peytonville Avenue
SPO # Owner Zoning Address Acreage Response
1. ROGERS, DENNIS P SF20A 1420 PARK PL 0.48 NR
2. EADS, JIMMIE D SF20A 1417 PARK PL 0.47 NR
3. LIU, JIE SF20A 1419 PARK PL 0.47 NR
4. CONTARDI, LISA A SF20A 610 BOARDWALK AVE 0.46 O
5. ELAM, THOMAS E SF20A 612 BOARDWALK AVE 0.47 NR
6. RIVERA, JAY S SF20A 611 BOARDWALK AVE 0.67 NR
7. MCDERMOTT, KARL SF20A 607 STONEBURY DR 0.52 O
8. SWACKER, ROBERT N SF20A 605 STONEBURY DR 0.73 O
9. YOUNG, KEITH W SF20A 515 STONEBURY DR 0.48 NR
10. WOODS, SCOTT A SF20A 517 STONEBURY DR 0.70 NR
11. HARRY, GLEN SF20A 519 STONEBURY DR 0.68 O
12. CROWN, STACIE S SF20A 604 STONEBURY DR 0.55 NR
13. MURRAY, THOMAS J SF20A 516 STONEBURY DR 0.61 NR
14. RABELER, HILARY SF20A 602 STONEBURY DR 0.48 NR
15. CHAND, ELIZABETH SF20A 521 STONEBURY DR 0.50 O
16. HUBIK, JOSEPH P SF20A 603 STONEBURY DR 0.67 NR
17. SOUTHLAKE WOODS LP SF20A 2557 SW GRAPEVINE PKWY STE 100 0.20 NR
18. NYHOFF, DOUGLAS G SF1-A 670 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 2.56 NR
19. MCKELVEY, THOMAS R SF1-A 690 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 3.37 NR
20. KAHN, MAYIER SF20A 1801 NATIVE DANCER PL 0.96 NR
21. CARTER, W MICHAEL SF20A 1808 NATIVE DANCER PL 0.86 O
22. RAMAMURTHY, G SF20A 1800 NATIVE DANCER PL 0.96 O
O O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O = Opposed
Case No. Attachment D
ZA13-0033 Page 2
23. KHANANIA, ALISON SF20A 610 INDIAN PAINTBRUSH WAY 1.05 NR
24. LI, YUEH-HUA SF20A 1804 NATIVE DANCER PL 1.00 O
25. LIU, XIAODAN SF20A 608 INDIAN PAINTBRUSH WAY 1.00 NR
26. VINEYARD, BRYAN C SF20A 604 INDIAN PAINTBRUSH WAY 0.56 NR
27. FRITZ, MARK R SF20A 600 INDIAN PAINTBRUSH WAY 0.54 O
28. IVEY, BRIAN SF20A 524 INDIAN PAINTBRUSH WAY 0.50 NR
29. NAOMI JONES LIV TRUST SF1-A 655 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 1.00 F
30. NAOMI JONES LIV TRUST SF1-A 701 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 13.99 F
31. Supt. of Carroll ISD 2400 N Carroll Ave NR
32. Superintendent of
Grapevine Colleyville ISD 3051 Ira E Woods Ave NR
33. Supt. of Northwest ISD PO Box 77070 NR
34. Supt. of Keller ISD 350 Keller Pkwy NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Responses Received: In Favor: 1 Opposed: 9 Undecided: 0 No Comment 0 No Response: 23
Notices Sent: Thirty-three (33)
Responses Received within 200’: 10 (including P&Z meeting card responses)
Responses Received Outside 200’: 0
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0033 Page 1
Surrounding Property Owners Responses
Within 200 ft.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0033 Page 2
9-11-18 via email
Hi Patty,
I am writing with regards to the Public Hearing Notice that I received for ZA18-0033.
We live in 1800 Native Dancer Place in Southlake and our property is adjacent to the proposed zoning change at 610 and 620 S
Peytonville. The proposed zoning change from SA-1A (3+ Ac) and RE-5 (5+ Ac) to SF-20A would increase from one/two family
lots to a 14 lot subdivision with lot sizes around 20,000 to 37,000 s.f. We believe the zoning change will drastically impact negatively
on the neiborhood and our property.
Our property is in the path of storm drain flow. Our house often gets flooded during heavy rains.
We are constantly having to create pathways, remove debris along the path to ensure that the water
flows continuously. Despite this, at times the flow is so fast, the water rises to above slab level and
the house gets flooded.
Adding a subdivision only exacerbates the flooding situation due to the following reasons:
o Addition of roads, sidewalks, slabs, patios, driveways with concrete would increase the
flow of storm water.
o This is also a safety issue for our family. Our parents who are 87 and 80 live with us and it
would be difficult to evacuate them in a timely manner.
o I haven't seen any flood studies for the neighborhood.
o The developer nor the owner have talked to me about this proposed zoning change.
o The first time I came to know about this was yesterday when I received a notice in mail.
We have Carroll Senior High School on the S Peytonville Ave and is a few hundred feet from the
proposed subdivision. From 7-8.30 am and 3.30 to 4.30 pm during school time, S Peytonville is already
jammed that requires traffic police to direct the traffic. The traffic would get worse with the proposed 14
lot subdivision.
Traffic from this neighborhood also impacts Carroll Elementary School on Continental Blvd. Traffic on both
ways backs up to at least 500 yards in both directions.
The proposed subdivision doesn't address the storm drain issue. For that kind of development, one would
expect a detention pond of at least 2 acres with slow release.
Most of our neighbors have large lots with plenty of trees and greens. The smaller lots of the
proposed subdivision do not appear to fit into a large lot community and would most likely have less
trees and greens.
Based on the above, we strongly OPPOSE the zoning change. Thank You.
--
Sincerely,
Kishore Pondugula & Geethanjali Ramamurthy
1800 Native Dancer Pl
Southlake, TX 76092
(817) 301-3015
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0033 Page 3
9-11-18 via email
Hi Patty,
It was nice talking to you this morning about the rezoning subject.
We live in 1804 Native Dancer Place in Southlake and the property is right next to the Baker Estates
Addition on 610 and 620 S Peytonville that is proposing the zoning change. The proposed zoning
change from SA-1A to SF-20A would increase from one family units to a 14 lot subdivision with lot sizes
around 20,000 to 37,000 s.f. We believe the zoning change will drastically impact negatively on the
neiborhood and our property.
1. We have Carroll Senior High School on the S Peytonville Ave and is a few hundred feet from the
proposed subdivision. From 7-8.30 am and 3.30 to 4.30 pm during school time, S Peytonville is
already jammed that requires traffic police to direct the traffic. The traffic would get worse with the
proposed 14 lot subdivision.
2. Most of our neighbors have large lots with plenty of trees and greens. The smaller lots of the
proposed subdivision do not appear to fit into a large lot community and would most likely have
less trees and greens.
3. Our pool area is lower than our house foundation and the proposed new subdivision would be
right next to our pool area and might cause flooding in our property.
Based on the above, we strongly OPPOSE the zoning change.
Please let us know if there are any changes to this rezoning. Thank you very much.
Alan and Judy Li
1804 Native Dancer Place
Southlake, TX 96092
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0033 Page 4
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0033 Page 5
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0033 Page 6
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0033 Page 7
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0033 Page 8
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0033 Page 9
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0033 Page 10
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0033 Page 11
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Responses 9-20-18
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0033 Page 12
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0033 Page 13
Resident Presentation at 9-20-2018 P&Z meeting:
See Presentation Below
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0033 Page 14
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0033 Page 15
Case No. Attachment F
ZA18-0033 Page 1
ORDINANCE NO. 480-752
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED,
THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A
CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS 1R AND
2R, BLOCK 1, BAKER ESTATES ADDITION, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 9.80
ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN
EXHIBIT “A” FROM “SF-1A” SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT AND “RE-5” RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT TO “SF-
20A” SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON
THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND
INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE;
CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL
OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING
THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE
DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN
MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE
CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER;
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9
of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the lo cation and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to
amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “SF-1A” Single Family
Residential District and “RE-5” Residential Estate District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning
Case No. Attachment F
ZA18-0033 Page 2
Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person
or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the
facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise
producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on
established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs
to traffic control and adjacent property; street si ze and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably
expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood;
adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off -street parking facilities;
location of ingress and egress points for parking and off -street loading spaces, and protection of
public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad
the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the
concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and
other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public
necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly
requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of
Case No. Attachment F
ZA18-0033 Page 3
those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time
their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in
zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers,
promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over -
crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provis ion
of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a
necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determi ned that there has
been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or
tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and
therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are
needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of
Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby
amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and
amended as shown and described below:
Being described as Lots 1R and 2R, Block 1, Baker Estates Addition Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 9.80 acres, and more fully and
completely described in Exhibit “A” from “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District
and “RE-5” Residential Estate District to “SF-20A” Single Family Residential District
as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein
Case No. Attachment F
ZA18-0033 Page 4
as Exhibit “B”, and subject to the following conditions:
Council Motion:
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are
not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirm ed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been design ed, with respect to both present
conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen
congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to
avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation,
water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development
of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonab le
consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the
particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most
appropriate use of land throughout the community.
SECTION 5.
Case No. Attachment F
ZA18-0033 Page 5
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this
ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if
the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be
declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract
or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply
with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not
more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is
permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not,
under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until
final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
Case No. Attachment F
ZA18-0033 Page 6
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for
a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it
this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of
its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City
newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section
3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as
required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the ___ day of _________, 2018.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the ___ day of _________, 2018.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment F
ZA18-0033 Page 7
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment F
ZA18-0033 Page 7
EXHIBIT “A”
Reserved for metes and bounds description
Case No. Attachment F
ZA18-0033 Page 0
EXHIBIT “B”
Reserved for approved concept plan