Item 6ICase No.
ZA18-0003
S T A F F R E P O R T
August 28, 2018
CASE NO: ZA18-0003
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Site Plan for White Chapel Office Complex
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: On behalf of Brian Zvonecek, Blake Architects is requesting 2nd Reading approval
of a Zoning Change and Site Plan for White Chapel Office Complex on property
described as Tract 6C, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Parkway Office
Center Addition (also described as Lot 3A, Block 1, Parkway Office Center
Addition), an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located
at 1700 N. White Chapel Boulevard and 190 W. State Hwy. 114, Southlake,
Texas. Current Zoning: "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District. Proposed Zoning:
"S-P-1" Detailed Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #3.
DETAILS: This project is located on the north side of W. State Hwy. 114 and on the west side
of N. White Chapel Blvd.
The purpose of this request is to seek 2nd Reading approval of a Zoning Change
and Site Plan to develop a four-story, approximately 43,861 square foot (previously
45,657 square foot) general office building on approximately 2.220 acres. The
existing property located at 190 W. State Hwy. 114 is also included in the Zoning
Change and Site Plan request to allow the existing property line between the two
properties to be shifted to the west to align with the proposed shared driveway. The
proposed area for the western lot is approximately 0.697 acres. No changes are
proposed to the two existing buildings on the western property. The proposed
zoning for both lots is “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District with “O-1” Office District
uses limited to general office uses only. The current “C-2” Local Retail Commercial
District zoning allows for low to medium intensity neighborhood type retail shopping
facilities and general commercial activities.
Site Data Summary
Lot 3R2 Lot 3R1 Total
Existing Zoning C-2 C-2 C-2
Proposed Zoning S-P-1 S-P-1 S-P-1
Land Use Designation Mixed Use Mixed Use Mixed Use
Gross/Net Acreage 2.220 ac. 0.697 ac. 2.917 ac.
Total Building Floor Area (gross) 43,861 sf 6,623 sf 50,484 sf
Building Height/Number of Stories 64’ 5”
4 stories
27’6”
1 story
64’ 5”
4 stories
Open Space % 30% 37% 32%
Impervious Coverage % 70% 63% 68%
Total Parking Required (S-P-1) - - 161
Total Parking Spaces Provided 137 24 161
Department of Planning & Development Services
Case No.
ZA18-0003
The S-P-1 zoning district will follow the “O-1” Office District regulations with the
following exceptions:
Regulation “O-1” “S-P-1”
Lot 3R1
“S-P-1”
Lot 3R2
“S-P-1”
Lots 3R1 and 3R2
Max.
Impervious
Coverage
65% 65% 70% -
Maximum
Height
35’
2 ½ stories
35’
2 ½ stories
64’ 5”
4 stories -
Side Yard
Setback 15’ 10’ 15’ -
Bufferyards Bufferyards on all
boundaries
No bufferyard along
shared driveway and
existing landscaping
to satisfy other
bufferyards
No bufferyard
along shared
driveway
-
Off Street
Parking
8 spaces for first
1,000 sf and 1
space per 300 sf
after that
(168 spaces)
- -
1 space per 314 sf
for site as a whole
(161 spaces)
Mechanical
Screening
Equipment to be
screened from view
from adjacent rights
of way
-
Rooftop
equipment
screened with
stucco panels
as shown on
the elevations
-
VARIANCE
REQUESTED: Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, requires a minimum stacking depth of
75’ if the average number of parking spaces per driveway falls within 50 and 199
spaces and the total number of spaces is between 50 and 199 spaces. The
applicant is proposing stacking depths of approximately 23’ and 48’ on the two S.H.
114 driveways, which are the existing stacking depths, and a stacking depth of
approximately 51’ on the N. White Chapel Blvd. driveway.
The City Council approved the item at 1 st reading on June 19, 2018 with the
following stipulations:
City Council Stipulations Applicant’s Response
Look at potential modifications to the materials
utilized in the rendering, specifically as it relates to
the metal banding around the building as well as
looking at creative ideas as it relates to the tower
feature.
The applicant has revised the elevations. The
previously requested variance to the Masonry
Ordinance has been withdrawn.
Remove the existing dumpster and build two (2)
enclosed dumpsters on site.
The applicant agreed that the existing dumpster
would be removed and two (2) new trash
enclosures are shown on the plans.
Case No.
ZA18-0003
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider 2nd Reading approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Site Plan Review Summary No. 7, dated August 27, 2018
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
(E) Ordinance No. 480-747
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only )
Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Link to Narrative and Regulations
Link to Plans
Page 1 - Site Plan
Pages 2-9 - Renderings and Elevations
Page 10 - Landscape Plan
Page 11 - Tree Conservation Plan
Pages 12-13 - Civil Plans
Link to Comprehensive Plan Analysis
Link to SPIN Report
Link to Corridor Planning Committee Report
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0003 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Brian Zvonecek
APPLICANT: Blake Architects
PROPERTY SITUATION: This project is located on the north side of W. State Hwy. 114 and on the
west side of N. White Chapel Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 6C, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, and a portion of Lot
3, Block 1, Parkway Office Center Addition (also described as Lot 3A, Block
1, Parkway Office Center Addition)
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING: “C-2” – Local Retail Commercial District
PROPOSED ZONING: “S-P-1” – Detailed Site Plan District with “O-1” Office District uses limited to
General Office uses.
HISTORY: - “HC” Heavy Commercial and “LC” Light Commercial Zoning District
was placed on the property at some point prior to April 11, 1985.
- A Plat Showing for Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Parkway Office Center
Addition was approved April 2, 1985 and filed April 11, 1985.
- “R1” Retail 1 Zoning District was approved with the adoption of the
Zoning Ordinance No. 334 and the official Zoning Map in 1986.
- “C-2” Local Retail Commercial Zoning District was approved with the
adoption of the Zoning Ordinance No 480 and the official Zoning Map on
September 19, 1989.
SOUTHLAKE 2030/2035
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: A detailed Comprehensive Plan Analysis has been prepared for this
development. Link to Comprehensive Plan Analysis
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The property will access the S.H. 114 frontage road by way of two existing
driveways and one additional driveway connection will provide access to N.
White Blvd. The driveway connection onto N. White Chapel will be right-in
right-out only due to a median that is to be installed in White Chapel Blvd.
An additional driveway connection has been added to the property to the
north. The Carillon Parc development to the east of White Chapel that is
currently in the approval process shows a driveway connection to N. White
Chapel Blvd. that is north of the White Chapel driveway connection shown
on the subject property. A full median opening on N. White Chapel is more
likely to line up with the Carillon Parc driveway, so the driveway connection
to the north could provide access to the full median opening with future
development of that site and the Carillon site.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0003 Page 2
Traffic Counts
SH 114 Frontage Rd (10W)
(Between White Chapel Blvd and Dove Rd)
24hr West Bound (3,473) East Bound
AM 256 (no hour stated) N/A
PM 829 (no hour stated) N/A
N White Chapel Blvd (60a)
(Between SH 114 and Dove Rd)
24hr North Bound (4,442) South Bound (3,508 )
AM Peak AM (308) 7:15 – 8:15AM Peak AM (303) 7:15 - 8:15AM
PM Peak PM (803) 5:00 – 6:00PM Peak PM (304) 3:00 – 4:00PM
* Based on the (2017) City of Southlake Traffic Count Report
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required for this development.
Use Area/Units Vtpd* AM-
IN
AM-
OUT
PM-
IN
PM-
OUT
ITE Code (710)
Existing 6,623 73 9 1 2 8
Proposed 43,861 482 60 8 11 54
Total 52,484 555 69 9 13 62
* Vehicle Trips Per Day
* AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour generators on a weekday
* Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7 th Edition
TREE PRESERVATION: The site is subject to the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-D
since it is being rezoned.
There is approximately 14.4% existing tree cover on the site, of which,
approximately 72% is proposed to be preserved. A standard zoning district
would require that a minimum 70% of existing tree cover be preserved.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a
planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2
Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or
Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the
application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application.
The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds
that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets,
and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of
environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas
indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map;
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0003 Page 3
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the
potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and
visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a
natural or man-made drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural
roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the
Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement
procedures pursuant to this Ordinance.
UTILITIES: A 12” water line exists in the S.H. 114 right of way to serve the property.
Sanitary sewer is not currently provided to the site, so an 8” sewer line will
be constructed to connect to the existing 8” sewer line in Kirkwood Blvd. at
St. Tropez.
DRAINAGE: Drainage on the majority of the property is carried to a detention pond
adjacent to S.H. 114 and then to a TxDOT inlet in the right of way. The
southeast portion of the property drains to a TxDOT inlet at the intersection
of S.H. 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd.
CITIZEN INPUT: The following meetings were held to discuss the development:
A SPIN meeting was held June 12, 2018. A link to the report is provided.
SPIN Report
A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on March 22, 2017.
A link to the report is provided. Link to Corridor Planning Committee Report
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: June 7, 2018; Approved (6-0) subject to the staff report dated June 7, 2018
and Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated May 31, 2018, granting the
two variances requested in the staff report and further noting the applicant’s
willingness to modify or adjust the garage door opening to something better
than how it currently looks.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: June 19, 2018; Approved at 1 st reading (6-0) subject to the Staff Report
dated June 12, 2018, and Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated June
12, 2018, and granting one variance:
- Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, requires a minimum stacking
depth of 75’ if the average number of parking spaces per driveway falls
within 50 and 199 spaces and the total number of spaces is between 50
and 199 spaces. The applicant is proposing stacking depths of
approximately 23’ and 48’ on the two SH 114 driveways, which are the
existing stacking depths, and a stacking depth of approximately 51’ on
the North White Chapel Blvd driveway.
- Also noting the applicant has agreed between the 1 st and 2 nd readings to
look at potential modifications to the materials utilized in the rendering,
specifically as it relates to the metal banding around the building, as well
as looking at creative ideas as it relates to the tower feature.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0003 Page 4
- Also noting the applicant’s willingness to remove the existing dumpster
and build two (2) enclosed dumpsters on site.
August 7, 2018; Tabled to the August 7, 2018 meeting.
August 21, 2018; Tabled to the August 21, 2018 meeting.
STAFF COMMENTS : Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 7, dated August 27, 2018.
Variance Approval Criteria for Driveway Ordinance No. 634:
Variances – The City Council shall have the authority to grant a variance to
this ordinance. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine
that a literal enforcement of the regulations herein will create an
unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty on the applicant, that the
situation causing unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to
the affected property and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not
injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted
development of adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance
will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The
decision of the City Council shall be final.
APPLICABLE
REGULATIONS:
General Development Standards Applies Comments
Overlay Regulations Y Corridor Overlay
Building Articulation Y Complies
Masonry Standards Y Complies – Previous variance request withdrawn
Impervious Coverage Y “S-P-1” Regulation
Bufferyards Y “S-P-1” Regulation
Interior Landscape Y Complies
Tree Preservation Y Approved with “S-P-1” zoning
Sidewalks Y Complies
Case No. Attachment B
ZA18-0003 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0003 Page 1
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA18-0003 Review No.: Seven Date of Review: 08/27/18
Project Name: Zoning Change and Site Plan – White Chapel Office Complex
APPLICANT: Skip Blake OWNER: Brian Zvonecek
Blake Architects
1202 S. White Chapel Blvd. 190 W. State Hwy 114, Ste. A
Southlake, TX 76092 Southlake, TX 76092
Phone: (817) 488-9397 Phone: (817) 991-5236
E-mail: blakearch@verizon.net
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
08/24/18 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE
CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
1. A Plat Revision that complies with the underlying zoning districts must be processed and recorded
with the County prior to the issuance of any building permits. Please designate the two proposed
lots as Lots 3R1 and 3R2, Block 1, Parkway Office Center Addition. Lot 3R1 will be the remainder
of Lot 3.
2. A copy of an executed cross access and maintenance agreement must be submitted prior to the
issuance of building permits.
3. Show, label and dimension the width of any easements on or adjacent to the site, if any. Label the
cross access easement for the existing drive that connects to N. White Chapel Blvd. (if one exists).
If a cross easement exists for the existing driveway to White Chapel, it must be abandoned prior to
the Plat Revision for Lots 3R1 and 3R2, Block 1, Parkway Office Center Addition being recorded.
4. Dedicate cross access easements on all drives by plat.
5. All driveways/points of ingress/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as
amended). The following changes are needed:
a. The stacking depth is measured from the right of way to the nearest parking stall or
intersecting drive lane pavement edge. Please add the stacking depth of the westernmost
existing driveway on the S.H. 114 frontage road to the first turning movement. The required
stacking depth is 75’ for all driveways including the spaces shown for the future building.
The applicant is requesting a variance to allow stacking depths of approximately 23’ and
48’ on the two S.H. 114 driveways, which are the existing stacking depths, and a stacking
depth of approximately 51’ on the N. White Chapel Blvd. driveway.
6. Please consider providing a retention pond instead of a detention pond.
7. No more than 50% of any façade may be reflective glass. For the purposes of this ordinance,
reflective glass shall be defined as glass having a reflectance of greater than 10%.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0003 Page 2
8. Staff strongly recommends providing a material sample board with all exterior materials and color
renderings and color elevations of the proposed building with perspective views from SH 114 and
N. White Chapel Blvd.
* All buildings must be designed such that no mechanical equipment (HVAC, etc.) or satellite dishes
shall be visible from adjacent rights of way. Screening shall be accomplished by either the
construction of a parapet roof or an architectural feature which is integral to the building’s design.
An “S-P-1” regulation has been added to allow the screening with stucco panels as shown on the
elevations.
* The building as shown meets horizontal and vertical articulation requirements on all facades.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. If the development was proposed to be traditional zoning the existing tree cover preservation
would comply with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation
Ordinance except there are utilities proposed to cut directly through existing trees proposed to be
preserved, which would cause the alteration of the protected trees. The existing tree cover is
14.4% and 70% of the existing tree cover would be required to be preserved. 72% of the existing
tree cover is proposed to be preserved.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has
previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at
the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover
that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning
district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit
Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application
for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application
(as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0003 Page 3
and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall
approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as
to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature
tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential
areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning
as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not
conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. Please make the following change with regard to bufferyards:
a. The Bur Oaks proposed to be planted within the East Bufferyard adjacent to N. White
Chapel Blvd. are shown to be planted directly underneath aerial utilities. Please move them
back west a bit so that they are not directly underneath the aerial utilities. To avoid conflict
with utilities the required bufferyard plant material does not need to be directly with in the
required bufferyard area but can be planted with in a close vicinity if there is appropriate
area provided.
* Existing trees that are proposed to be preserved are being used towards existing tree credits for
some of the required bufferyards canopy and accent trees. Existing tree credits shall only be
granted if the tree/s are in healthy condition and all requirements of the Tree Preservation
Ordinance have been met as determined at the time of inspection for a Permanent Certificate of
Occupancy.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0003 Page 4
Public Works/Engineering Review
Steve Anderson, P.E. , CFM
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8101
E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us
No comments.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
Depending upon the total portion of the parking garage that is considered to be enclosed
versus open air, other code requirements may apply.
Since the building is equipped with an automatic fire protection system, proper sprinkler system
coverage must be continued throughout the entire building. (Due to the presence of a parking
garage under the occupied space in the building, the automatic fire suppression (sprinkler
system) shall be extended into the parking garage)
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on
the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of a looped water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet
from the main, the double check valve shall be in a vault. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’
if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6’X6’ if it is on the riser. (Sprinkler
riser location is in excess of 100 feet from the city main, so a vault shall be installed)
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0003 Page 5
General Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting was held on June 12, 2018.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required
prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties
in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* The Master Pathways Plan shows 8’ multi-use trails along W. SH 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd.
The required 8’ multi-use trails are shown on the Site Plan.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* No more than 50% of any façade may be reflective glass. For the purposes of this ordinance,
reflective glass shall be defined as glass having a reflectance of greater than 10%.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay
Zones.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed
and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan,
and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may
include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer
Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water
customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the
City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final
plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City
of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0003 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1. SHIVERS, FRANCES BIRD EST AG 1800 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.20 NR
2. ZVONECEK, BRIAN C2 1700 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.64 NR
3. ZVONECEK, BRIAN C2 190 W SH 114 1.50 NR
4. CLONINGER & MOORE LP C2 204 W SH 114 0.58 NR
5. CLONINGER C2 210 W SH 114 0.39 NR
6. CLONINGER & MOORE LP C2 200 W SH 114 0.27 NR
7. HOPKINS DALLAS PROPERTIES LTD C2 140 W SH 114 0.85 NR
8. SHIVERS FAMILY PTNRSHIP LTD AG 1900 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 39.54 NR
9. SUMMIT QI PROPERTIES LLC ECZ 1801 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 10.50 F
10. SUMMIT QI PROPERTIES LLC ECZ 1781 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 3.07 F
11. SUMMIT QI PROPERTIES LLC ECZ 1775 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.32 F
12. SUMMIT QI PROPERTIES LLC ECZ 100 E SH 114 4.60 F
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Seven – (7)
Responses Received within 200’: Four (4) – Attached – In Favor
Responses Received outside 200’: Six (6) – Attached – In Favor
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0003 Page 2
Responses Received within 200’
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0003 Page 3
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0003 Page 4
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0003 Page 5
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0003 Page 6
Responses Received outside 200’
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0003 Page 7
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0003 Page 8
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0003 Page 9
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0003 Page 10
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0003 Page 11
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0003 Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-747
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS TRACT 6C, THOMAS M. HOOD SURVEY,
ABSTRACT NO. 706, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY,
TEXAS AND A PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, PARKWAY
OFFICE CENTER ADDITION (ALSO DESCRIBED AS LOT 3A,
BLOCK 1, PARKWAY OFFICE CENTER ADDITION) BEING
APPROXIMATELY 2.917 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “C-2” LOCAL
RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO “S-P-1” DETAILED SITE
PLAN DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN
ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS
EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE
ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC
INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE
ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE;
PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE
OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF;
PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter
9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of
buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and
to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals
and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “C-2” Local Retail
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0003 Page 2
Commercial District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by
the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these
changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using
the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and
damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of
such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs
and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width
for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the
immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance
for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street
loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust;
effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the
over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation,
water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among
other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the
view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land
throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest
clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0003 Page 3
rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed
at the time their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes
in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other
dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents
the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is
a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there
has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the
tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally
classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or
tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the
citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare
of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake,
Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is
hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered,
changed and amended as shown and described below:
Being described as Tract 6C, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Parkway Office
Center Addition (also described as Lot 3A, Block 1, Parkway Office Center
Addition) being approximately 2.917 acres, and more fully and completely
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0003 Page 4
described in Exhibit “A” from “C-2” Local Retail Commercial District to “S-P-1”
Detailed Site Plan District as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto
and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”, and subject to the following conditions:
1. List any conditions
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of
Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall
be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections,
subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance
are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals
and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both
present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to
lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of
land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of
transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs
and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing
with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar
suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and
encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0003 Page 5
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in
those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of
this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that
if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein
shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance
of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to
comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting
zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such
accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or
not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted
until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0003 Page 6
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place
for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance,
and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation
of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the
official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required
by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication
as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1 st reading the 19 th day of June, 2018.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2 nd reading the _____ day of _______, 2018.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0003 Page 7
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0003 Page 8
EXHIBIT “A”
Being described as Tract 6C, Thomas M. Hood Survey, Abstract No. 706, City of Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas and a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Parkway Office Center Addition (also
described as Lot 3A, Block 1, Parkway Office Center Addition), being approximately 2.917
acres and being more particularly and completely described as follows:
Metes and Bounds Description
Reserved for metes and bounds description
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0003 Page 9
EXHIBIT “B”
Reserved for approved Site Plan