Loading...
Item 12 - ZA12-088-Savannah Estates Department of Planning & Development Services S T A F F R E P O R T October 12, 2012 CASE NO: ZA12-088 PROJECT: Zoning Change & Development Plan for Savannah Estates EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: G&A Consultants, LLC on behalf of Maguire Partners- Solana Land, L.P. is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan from “NR-PUD” Non Residential Planned Unit Development, “AG” Agricultural District and “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District for Savannah Estates on property described as, Tracts 1B, 1B2, 1B2A, 1B2A1, 1B2A2, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3, 4A, 4A1, 4A2, 4A3, 4B, 4B1, 4B2, 5A, 5A1, 5A1A, 5B, 5C, 6A, 6A1, 6A1A, 6A2, 6A2A, and 6B, R.P. Estes Subdivision and Tracts 1B, 1B1, 1B1A, 1B1A1, 1B1B, 1B1B1, 1B1C, 1B1D, and 1B2, T. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas; and generally located at the northwest corner of W. Dove Rd. SPIN Neighborhood #5 and SH 114, Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas. REQUEST DETAILS: The proposed zoning change and development plan allows for the development of a residential subdivision consisting of one hundred and six (106) residential lots and five (5) open space/common area lots on approximately 77.05 acres giving the development a density of 1.38 units/acre. The proposed development will be consistent with the following Site Data Summary Chart and the exhibits attached in section “C” of this report. Case No. ZA12-088 The proposed “R-PUD” regulations for the development of the request are outlined below in attachment “C” of this report. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing 2) Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information (Link to PowerPoint) (D) SPIN Meeting Report (E) Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated October 12, 2012 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map (G) Surrounding Property Owner Responses for Commission and Council Members Only (H) Full Size Plans () STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817)748-8072 Matt Jones (817)748-8269 Case No. ZA12-088 BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPLICANT: G&A Consultants, LLC OWNER: Maguire Partners- Solana Land, L.P. PROPERTY LOCATION: The northwest corner of W. Dove Rd. and SH 114 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Tracts 1B, 1B2, 1B2A, 1B2A1, 1B2A2, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3, 4A, 4A1, 4A2, 4A3, 4B, 4B1, 4B2, 5A, 5A1, 5A1A, 5B, 5C, 6A, 6A1, 6A1A, 6A2, 6A2A, and 6B, R.P. Estes Subdivision and Tracts 1B, 1B1, 1B1A, 1B1A1, 1B1B, 1B1B1, 1B1C, 1B1D, and 1B2, T. Martin Survey, Abstract No. 1134 LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use and Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: “NR-PUD” Non Residential Planned Unit Development, “AG” Agricultural District and “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District REQUESTED ZONING: “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District HISTORY: A portion of the property was annexed into the City of Southlake in 1985 and another portion of the property was annexed in 1987; A plat for RP Estes Subdivision was filed with Tarrant County prior to annexation; A portion of the property was zoned “NR-PUD” with the adoption of Ordinances 334 and 480; A Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA09-062) from “AG” – Agricultural District to “S-P-1” – Detailed Site Plan District with limited O-1 and limited I-1 uses was approved by the City Council for one of the subject properties (2411 Sam School Road) on May 10, 2011. SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan / S.H. 114 Corridor Plan The northern and eastern portions of the property have an underlying land use designation of “Mixed Use” and an optional land use designation of “Employment Center.” The southwest portion of the site is designated “Low Density Residential.” The proposed residential development is consistent with the “Mixed Use” designation, but is not consistent with the recommended scope of uses under the “Low Density Residential” land use designation for the southwest corner of the property. Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan The Pathways Master Plan and Sidewalk Plan shows an 8’ Multi-Use Trail along SH 114 and the south side of W. Dove Rd. and On-Street Bikeway along both W. Dove Rd. and Sams School Rd. Major Corridors Urban Design Plan The intersection of W. Dove Rd. and S.H. 114 is recommended as an appropriate location for bridge and embankment enhancements. Case No. Attachment A ZA12-088 Page 1 Environmental Resource Protection The north-central portion of the site is designated as a Tree Preservation Area. Tree cover/open space should be preserved where appropriate.The eastern portion of the property is within the 500-year and 100-year flood plains. WATER & SEWER: There is currently a 12” water line along W. Dove Rd. and a 2” water line along Sam School Rd., as well as a 12” sewer line along SH 114. TREE PRESERVATION: The applicant has provided a Tree Conservation Plan as part of the “R-PUD” included in Attachment “C” of this report and is subject to the approval of City Council. The proposed tree coverage is consistent with the following chart: CITIZEN INPUT/ BOARD REVIEW: A SPIN meeting for this project was held by the applicant on October 8, 2012. A SPIN Report is included as Attachment D of this Staff Report. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated October 12, 2012. Case No. Attachment A ZA12-088 Page 2 Case No. Attachment B ZA12-088 Page 1 Proposed R-PUD Regulations Case No. Attachment C ZA12-088 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA12-088 Page 2 Case No. Attachment C ZA12-088 Page 3 Case No. Attachment C ZA12-088 Page 4 DEVELOPMENT PLAN Case No. Attachment C ZA12-088 Page 5 SPIN MEETING REPORT CASE NO. ZA12-088 PROJECT NAME: Savannah Estates SPIN DISTRICT: SPIN # 5 MEETING DATE: October 8, 2012; 8:00 PM MEETING LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX Training Rooms 3A – 3B TOTAL ATTENDANCE: Thirteen (13)  SPIN REPRESENTATIVE(S) PRESENT: David Alexander # 2; Rob Baker # 1; Ron Evans # 10  APPLICANT(S) PRESENTING: Randi Rivera, G&A Consultants, LLC, et al (4)  STAFF PRESENT: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner I STAFF CONTACT: Matt Jones, Planner I: (817)748-8269 or mjones@ci.southlake.tx.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Situation  The property is located on the northwest corner of West Dove Road and State Highway 114; and is approximately 77 acres. Development Details  Zoning Change and Development Plan proposed for approximately 105 single family residential lots.  Current zoning districts are AG – Agricultural District, NRPUD – Non-Residential Planned Unit Development, and S-P-1 – Detailed Site Plan District.  Proposed zoning district is RPUD – Residential Planned Unit Development with regulations that are consistent with a SF-20A – Single Family Residential District. The plan presented at SPIN: Case No. Attachment D ZA12-088 Page 1 QUESTIONS / CONCERNS  Where is the gas well in Westlake located? Over 600 feet to the north o  What about the 1000 foot setback that has been established in Southlake? It may not apply since the well was here first and homeowners will have full disclosure prior to o moving here; and it’s in Westlake.  Don’t you think approving a residential subdivision less than 1000 feet away from a gas well will set a precedent that it’s OK to have that setback in Southlake?  What is the minimum lot size? 15,000 square feet; about 1.4 dwelling units per acre o  Will there be a clubhouse? No o  What is the developer’s experience? Centurion American has over ninety (90) residential developments o  Who will build? Toll Brothers will likely be the builder o  Will these homes be in keeping with the surrounding properties? Yes, we are considering what is surrounding o  What is the estimated price point? $750K to 1.5 million o  Didn’t you develop Terra in Colleyville? No. Terra Plantation was built around 1975 o  I would like to see a more timeless design. We have seen so much of this “castle” theme. Southlake has enough of this... would like to see “hill country” or “Mediterranean.” Case No. Attachment D ZA12-088 Page 2  What kind of fencing will be between the lots? Wood… board-on-board. All of the open space will have wrought-iron. o  How many trees are you taking out? We do not have a tree survey yet; this is just zoning at this point o  The homes look very large for such small lot size. This is typical Toll Brothers.  We would like to see larger lots; we are concerned about school capacity; we are also concerned about the existing gas well. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Case No. Attachment D ZA12-088 Page 3 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY ZA12-088Two10/12/12 Case No.: Review No.: Date of Review: ZDP– Savannah Estates Project Name: APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: G&A Consultants, LLC Maguire Partners- Solana Land L.P. 611 Dallas Dr. Ste. 114 1221 N-1-35E, Ste. 200 Roanoke, TX 76262 Carrollton, TX 75006 Phone: (682) 831-9712 Phone: (469) 892-7200 Fax: (817) 890-4043 Fax: (469) 892-7202 CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 09/10/12 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT MATT JONES AT (817) 748-8269. Informational Comments: * The proposed round-a-bout (at W. Dove Rd., Sam School Rd., and N. Peytonville Rd.) is subject to the acquisition of adequate off-site ROW dedication. In the event that ROW dedication cannot be acquired, staff recommends that an alternative plan be provided showing a standard intersection. Case No. Attachment E ZA12-088 Page 1 Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Case No Review No.Dated: Number of Pages: . ZA12-088 One September 19, 2012 1 Project Name: Savannah Estates (Zoning Change-Development Plan) ContactPhone:Fax: : Keith Martin (817) 748-8229 (817) 481-5713 =========================================================================== The following comments are based on the review of plans received on September 10, 2012 . Comments designated with a number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant’s responsibility to contact the . department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment =========================================================================== TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1.Provide a Tree Conservation Plan clearly identifying areas to be preserved, areas to be removed, and areas of marginal removal. The plan should also include estimated percent of existing tree coverage, percentage of tree coverage to be conserved, percentage to be removed, and percentage that is marginal. 2.When applicant is seeking a R-PUD zoned development they may seek approval of a Tree Preservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan alternate from the minimum required Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements but it looks like the proposed subdivision design may not comply with the existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements as it applies across the development if a Single Family Zoning was requested. 3.Staff recommends basing the proposed Tree Cove Conservation Plan on the following requirements: Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the Minimum percentage of the entire site existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% – 20% 70% 20.1 – 40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. b. For property sought to be zoned for Planned Unit Development, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: Case No. Attachment E ZA12-088 Page 2 i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. 4. The Open Space Lot 17X, Block G contains a riparian zone with many existing American Elm trees that seem to have succumbed to Dutch Elm Disease. Please state the applicant’s intentions to manage this property. BUFFERYARDS: 1. A 25’-G type bufferyard and associated plant material are required to be provided adjacent to the right- of-way of Highway 114. 2. A 10’-B type bufferyard and associated plant material are required to be provided adjacent to the right- of-way of West Dove Road. Case No. Attachment E ZA12-088 Page 3 Public Works/Engineering Review Case No. Review No. Date: 9/24/12 Number of Pages: ZA12-088 1 3 Project Name: Savannah Estates Development Plan Contact: Alex Ayala – Civil Engineer Email: aayala@ci.southlake.tx.us Phone: (817) 748-8274 Fax: (817)748-8077 The following comments are based on the review of plans received on:9/10/2012 It is the applicant’s responsibility to contact the department representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment. GENERAL COMMENTS: This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of 1. construction plans. Comments with * are information and/or will be required to be addressed in the Civil Construction Plans. 2. A ROW permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department for connections with the City’s sewer, water or storm drain inlets. Contact Public Works Operations at (817) 748-8082. 3. A Traffic Impact Analysis will be needed for this development. Left turn storage at the easternmost driveway will be needed in order to not disrupt eastbound vehicular travel. 4. A detailed layout of the round-a-bout will be required prior to submitting construction plans to insure necessary right-of-way is being allocated. 5. Sam School Rd. needs to intersect the round-a-bout perpendicular to the circle. 6. Label the proposed right-of-way for the proposed streets. 7. Width of proposed sidewalks should be in accordance with Master Pathways Plan. 8. Show the curb return radii for all proposed drives. All fire lane radii must be 30’ minimum. 9. Label the distances to the nearest drives or street intersections in either direction from the propose drives on Dove Rd. * Street intersections must comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. * Sight distances will be required to conform to AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. * Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. EASEMENTS: 1. Show all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage on plat and utility plans. Easements shall be 15’ minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line. A 20’ easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. 2. A drainage easement will be required for the amenity ponds of this development. The drainage easement must contain access points for maintenance. The plat must have language included that the amenity ponds will be maintained by the Home Owner’s Association. Case No. Attachment E ZA12-088 Page 4 3. Water and sewer lines cannot cross property lines without being in a public easement or in the ROW. All waterlines in easements or ROW must be constructed to City standards. WATER AND SEWER COMMENTS: 1. Verify sizes for water and sewer. Minimum sizes are 8-inch diameter for water and sewer. 2. Water on Sam School Rd. shall be looped back to Palmetto Way. 3. Fire hydrants and water meters must be located in an easement or right-of-way. 4. Fire lines will need to be separate from irrigation and service lines. 5. All water and sewer lines need to be in easements or right-of-way and must be constructed to City standards. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. The difference between pre and post development runoff shall be captured in the detention ponds. The proposed detention ponds shall control the discharges of the 2, 10 and 100 year storm events. 2. Verify that the size, shape, and/or location of the detention ponds as depicted on the development plan. Any changes to the size, shape, and/or location of the proposed ponds may require a revision to the development plan and may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. 3. Base flood elevations (BFE) need to be shown on drainage plans. Finish floor elevations of dwellings along a flood plain will need to be set 2-feet above the BFE and accurate floodplain limits shown on the plat. 4. Submit a preliminary drainage plan with preliminary calculations for amenity ponds showing the 2, 10 and 100 year runoff calculations. 5. Submit a preliminary grading plan which includes drainage arrows and 2’ contours. Contours may be obtained from the City of Southlake. * Provide preliminary hydraulic calculations for the proposed storm drain systems. * Lot-to-lot drainage will not be allowed and grading plan should clearly depict how runoff will discharge onto street. * All storm sewers collecting runoff from the public street shall be RCP. * This eastern portion of the property drains into Critical Drainage Structure #3 and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning construction ($186.15/Acre). * The discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance # 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 4 copies of the civil construction plans (22” x 34” full size sheets) and a completed Construction Plan Checklist as part of the first submittal for review directly to the Public Works Administration Department. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website. http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp Case No. Attachment E ZA12-088 Page 5 * A Developer’s Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * A separate bond will be required for the Maintenance Bond and bound only unto the City of Southlake for a period of two years for all development projects. The Maintenance Bond cannot be tied to the Performance and Payment Bond in any way. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated, Ordinance No. 836. Case No. Attachment E ZA12-088 Page 6 Fire Department Review Case NoReview No.DatedNumber of Pages . ZA12-088 1 : 09-19-2012 : 1 Project Name: Savannah Estates ContactPhone Fax : Kelly Clements, Assistant Fire Marshal : 817-748-8233 : 817-748-8181 =========================================================================== The following comments are based on the review of plans received on 09-10-2012. Comments designated with a number may be incorporated into the formal review to be considered by either the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Other items will not be addressed by either the P&Z or City Council. It is the applicant’s responsibility to contact the department . representative shown above and make modifications as required by the comment =========================================================================== GENERAL COMMENTS: Subdivision street names to be approved by city prior to final plat. Submit proposed names and alternate names as soon as possible. Automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for residences over 6,000 square feet (per 2009 I.F.C. Sec. 903.3.1.3 as amended) Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection, 14135 Midway Road, Suite G260 Addison, Texas 75001 Phone 214-638-7599. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire apparatus access needs to be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus (minimum of 80,000 lbs GVW). Fire access roads must be at least 31 ft. back of curb to back of curb. (Standard street width) Fire lanes require minimum 30 ft. inside turn radius and minimum 54 ft. outside turn radius. Cul-de-Sacs must have 30 ft. inside turn radius and 100 ft. total diameter for approved turnaround. FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Hydrants to have Hydra-Storz connections with butterfly vanes (or equivalent) on pumper outlet for five inch diameter hose. Hydrants required at maximum spacing for R-3 and U Occupancies is 400 feet for subdivisions with un-sprinkled homes and 600 feet for subdivisions that are completely sprinkled. Hydrants are required at intersecting streets and at intermediate locations between as prescribed above, measured as the hose would be laid. Relocate and add hydrants as noted on plans. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Case No. Attachment E ZA12-088 Page 7 All construction plans to be submitted for a building permit must conform to the edition of the International Fire Code currently amended and adopted. Case No. Attachment E ZA12-088 Page 8 Informational Comments: * A SPIN meeting for this request was held on October 8, 2012. * Staff recommends providing more information in regards to the type and what the features look like to be provided as part of the amenities. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment Attached: Invoice, Bufferyard Calculation Chart Case No. Attachment E ZA12-088 Page 9 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Savannah Estates SPO Owner Zoning Land Use Acreage Response # 1. Lewis, Jerry W & Shelly R SF1-A Low Density Residential 0.95 NR Mixed Use, Low Density 2. AG 5.02 NR Barber, Phil M Residential Mixed Use, Low Density NR 3. SF1-A 4.86 940 West Dove Rd Llc Residential Case No. Attachment F ZA12-088 Page 1 4. Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Low Density Residential 2.01 NR 5. Wise, Philip W Etux Anne AG Low Density Residential 1.04 NR 6. Webster, Philip W Etux Delores AG Low Density Residential 1.17 NR Mixed Use, Low Density NR 7. SP1 1.02 Jw Partners Ltd Residential 8. Crawford, James Anderson AG Low Density Residential 1.00 NR 9. Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Low Density Residential 2.24 NR 10.Strange, Kim AG Low Density Residential 0.54 NR 11.Smith, David J AG Low Density Residential 0.49 NR Mixed Use, Low Density NR 12.AG 1.03 Crawford, Lois May Residential Mixed Use, Low Density NR 13.AG 10.07 Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd Residential 14.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 0.06 NR 15.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 5.85 NR 16.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 0.47 NR 17.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 0.49 NR 18.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 0.49 NR 19.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 0.54 NR 20.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 3.08 NR 21.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 0.92 NR 22.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 1.04 NR 23.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 3.25 NR 24.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 1.13 NR 25.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 0.57 NR 26.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 0.34 NR 27.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 0.18 NR 28.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 0.45 NR 29.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 0.57 NR 30.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 0.42 NR 31.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 2.52 NR 32.Neill, Rosemma & Kay V Gunn SF1-A Low Density Residential 1.50 NR 33.Wise Asset No 9 Ltd SF1-A Low Density Residential 2.11 NR 34.Wayland, Cheryl Renee SF1-A Low Density Residential 3.05 NR 35.Sells, Ralph B Iv & Jennifer P SF1-A Low Density Residential 6.58 NR 36.Duggins, James L Etux Joy SF1-A Low Density Residential 6.61 NR 37.Elliott, Bryan Etux Tracy SF1-A Low Density Residential 7.27 NR 38.Goza, Timothy D SF1-A Low Density Residential 4.86 NR 39.Paxton, John F Etux Deborah K SF1-A Low Density Residential 5.06 O 40.Avary, John Etux Dawn SF1-A Low Density Residential 3.98 NR 41.Redus Texas Land Llc NRPUD Mixed Use 84.04 NR 42.Verizon Wireless Texas Llc NRPUD Mixed Use 24.86 NR Mixed Use, Low Density NR 43.AG 4.42 Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd Residential 44.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 0.69 NR 45.Allen National Property Llc AG Low Density Residential 1.12 NR 46.Allen National Property Llc AG Low Density Residential 2.09 NR 47.Allen National Property Llc AG Low Density Residential 1.05 NR 48.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 5.25 NR 49.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 12.57 NR Case No. Attachment F ZA12-088 Page 2 50.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd NRPUD Mixed Use 4.19 NR 51.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd NRPUD Mixed Use 0.91 NR 52.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd NRPUD Mixed Use 0.90 NR 53.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd NRPUD Mixed Use 3.65 NR 54.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd NRPUD Mixed Use 0.26 NR 55.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd NRPUD Mixed Use 1.14 NR 56.Maguire Ptnrs-Solana Ltd AG Mixed Use 2.28 NR 57.Maguire Prtnrs Solana Holdings NRPUD Mixed Use 19.99 NR 58.Maguire Prtnrs Solana Holdings NRPUD Mixed Use 4.38 NR 59.Maguire Prtnrs Solana Holdings NRPUD 100-Year Flood Plain 0.08 NR 60.Glosser, T W AG Low Density Residential 1.08 NR 61.French, Mannie B AG Low Density Residential 0.27 NR Mixed Use, Low Density NR 62.AG 0.58 Miller, Luke D Est Etal Residential 63.Glosser, T W AG Low Density Residential 0.35 NR 64.Glosser, T W AG Low Density Residential 0.35 NR 65.Pearson, Roy L Etux Jean AG Low Density Residential 0.52 NR 66.Glosser, T W Etux Debra AG Low Density Residential 0.51 NR 67.Fiserv Iss & Co AG Low Density Residential 0.75 NR 68.Glosser, T W & Debra AG Low Density Residential 0.40 NR NR 69.AG Low Density Residential 0.92 Glosser, T W 70.Glosser, T W AG Low Density Residential 0.63 NR 71.Town of Westlake NR 72.Mesenbrink, Daniel S Etux M L RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.67 NR 73.Favero, James R Etux Taryn D RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.58 NR 74.Ott, Timothy Etux Deborah D RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.56 NR 75.Cary, Carmen S & Kenneth C RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.69 NR 76.McElroy, Kathleen Brewer RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.57 NR 77.Rayner, Fred RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.54 NR 78.Excel Management Corporation RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.60 NR 79.Burtnett, Michael & S Rogers RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.66 NR 80.Parker, Thane D Etux Vera E RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.65 NR 81.Fischer, Dirk T Etux Elaine RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.68 NR Medium Density Residential, NR 82.RPUD 1.17 Kirkwood Hollow Homeowners,Asn Mixed Use 83.Kirkwood Hollow Ho Assoc RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.10 NR 84.Kirkwood Hollow Homeowners,Asn RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.70 NR Medium Density Residential, NR 85.RPUD 0.09 Kirkwood Hollow Homeowners,Asn Mixed Use 86.Litwin, Mark S RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.51 NR 87.Arison, Joan C Etvir Alan S RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.44 NR 88.Green, Kayle C Etux Tina A RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.40 NR 89.Agualimpia, Juan & M Issacs RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.38 NR Medium Density Residential, NR 90.RPUD 0.74 Kirkwood Hollow Ho Assoc Mixed Use 91.Zhou, Jun Etux Na Li RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.38 NR 92.Bollini, Sashidhar Etux Sesha RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.37 NR 93.Mansoor, Shadan RPUD Medium Density Residential 0.40 NR 94.Kirkwood Hollow Ho Assoc RPUD Medium Density Residential, 0.32 NR Case No. Attachment F ZA12-088 Page 3 Mixed Use Public/Semi-Public, Medium NR 95.RPUD 0.44 Southlake, City Of Density Residential Public/Semi-Public, Medium NR 96.RPUD 0.46 Kirkwood Hollow Ho Assoc Density Residential Medium Density Residential, NR 97.RPUD 0.14 Kirkwood Hollow Home Own Ass Mixed Use Medium Density Residential, NR 98.NRPUD 11.25 Redus Texas Land Llc Mixed Use Mixed Use, Medium Density NR 99.NRPUD 4.39 Southlake City Residential 100.Maguire Prtnrs Solana Holdings NRPUD Mixed Use 0.24 NR 101.Dove 114 Infinity Llc SP2 Mixed Use, Mixed Use 54.44 NR 102.T Zero Partners Lp AG Office Commercial 5.64 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Fifty six (56) Responses Received: One (1) Case No. Attachment F ZA12-088 Page 4 PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSES Case No. Attachment G ZA12-088 Page 1