Loading...
Item 14 - MemoCase No. ZA18 -0006 S T A F F R E P O R T May 11, 2018 CASE NO: ZA18-0006 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Development Plan for Carillon Parc EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: HCCP Development & Construction is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Carillon Parc (Plaza District) on property described as Tracts 1, 1D, 1E, 1F, 1G, 3A, 3A01, 3A03, 3A04, 3A04A, 3A05, and 3A01B, Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1775, 1781 and 1801 N. White Chapel Blvd., 1840 Riviera Ln., 201 E. Kirkwood Blvd., and 100 through 300 E. State HWY 114. Southlake, Texas. SPIN Neighborhood #3. DETAILS: The purpose of this item is to seek approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for the Plaza District portion (approximately 42.51 acres) of the Carillon Development for the purposes of amending the existing district regulations and approved development plan for this portion of Carillon. Site Data Summary Existing Zoning “ECZ” Employment Center Zoning District Land Use Designation Mixed Use Gross Acreage 42.51 Ac. +/- Approx. ROW Dedication 5.95 Ac. +/- Approx. Park Dedication 8.90 Ac. +/- Net Acreage 27.65 Ac. +/- Percentage of Open Space Minimum 15% Percentage of Impervious Coverage Maximum 90% Required Parking TBD with Site Plan Provided Parking Max. 22% reduction Percentage of Outside Storage 0% This application represents a development plan. If this application is approved (ZA18-0006) and receives zoning entitlement from City Council, the applicant will be required to submit site plan applications for all residential lofts and non-residential buildings (excluding kiosks). Department of Planning & Development Services Case No. ZA18 -0006 VARIANCES REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting four (4) variances to Driveway Ordinance No. 634 Each variance is in regard to the required internal stacking / minimum throat length for a commercial site with 200+ parking spaces (Section 5.2.d). 1) Driveway 1 (entrance to site from E. Kirkwood Blvd.) Variance Requested: Allow 143’ of stacking as opposed to the required 150’. 2) Driveway 2 (northern entrance to site along N. White Chapel Blvd.) Variance Requested: Allow 122’ of stacking as opposed to the required 150’. 3) Driveway 3 (southern entrance to site along N. White Chapel Blvd.) Variance Requested: Allow 122’ of stacking as opposed to the required 150’. 4) Driveway 4 (entrance to site from SH 114 westbound feeder road) Variance Requested: Allow 42’ of stacking as opposed to the required 150’. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider recommending approval of the proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated March 11, 2018 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map (E) Surrounding Property Owners Responses Full Size Plans / Carillon Zoning Booklet (for P&Z Commissioners only) Link to PowerPoint Presentation Plans / Other Exhibits: Development Plan Zoning Document Comment Response Letter Driveway Exhibit TIA Vol. 1 TIA Vol. 2 Consultant Review of TIA STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 Jerod Potts (817) 748-8195 Case No. Attachment A ZA18 -0006 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: HCCP Property Partners, LLC / The Southlake Salons of Voltera, LLC APPLICANT: HCCP Development & Construction PROPERTY SITUATION: Generally located east of N. White Chapel Blvd., south of E. Kirkwood Blvd., west of Riviera Ln., and north of E. State HWY 114. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 1, 1D, 1E, 1F, 1G, 3A, 3A01, 3A03, 3A04, 3A04A, 3A05, and 3A01B, Larkin H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 300, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1775, 1781 and 1801 N. White Chapel Blvd., 1840 Riviera Ln., 201 E. Kirkwood Blvd., and 100 through 300 E. State HWY 114. LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CURRENT ZONING: “ECZ” Employment Center Zoning District HISTORY: May 20, 1997; City Council approved a zoning change and concept plan to “NR-PUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit Development. December 18, 2001; City Council approved a zoning change and concept plan requiring a 300 ft. setback on N. Carroll Avenue, subject to City Council discretion. The purpose of the zoning change and concept plan was to incorporate newly acquired tracts of land into the existing “NR-PUD”, revise parcel boundaries and permitted uses within the district. On November 18, 2008 the City Council approved a Zoning Change and Development Plan from ‘NR-PUD’ Non-Residential Planned Unit Development and ‘C-2’ Local Retail Commercial District to ‘ECZ’ Employment Center Zoning District for Carillon under Planning Case ZA08- 031 (Ordinance No. 480-564). September 4, 2012; City Council approved the request to amend miscellaneous development regulations in the Carillon Zoning Booklet under Planning Case ZA12-066 (Ordinance No. 480-564a). November 6, 2014; Jacobs Engineering, Inc. on behalf of Hines Interest, LP requested at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting on November 6, 2014 to table indefinitely two applications: a Site Plan application for One Carillon Court (ZA18-085) and a Zoning Change and Development Plan application for the Carillon Corporate District (ZA14-102). April 21, 2015; City Council voted to deny a 1st Reading request for a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Carillon under Planning Case ZA15-002 (Ordinance No. 564b). The purpose of this request was to amend the current Carillon Zoning Book to add a roofing material permitted in the EC Neighborhood - Chateaux District. The proposal intended to add language that would have allowed metal as a permitted roof material to Chateaux District. April 18, 2017; Jacobs Engineering, Inc. on behalf of Hines Interest, LP Case No. Attachment A ZA18 -0006 Page 2 requested to withdrawal the following Planning Cases at the April 18, 2017 City Council meeting: • ZA16-029 (Ordinance. No. 480-564B) – Zoning Change and Development Plan for Carillon Corporate District • ZA16-030 – Site Plan for Hotel Indigo Carillon • ZA16-031 – Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Carillon – Hotel Indigo • Also at the April 18, 2017 City Council meeting, The City of Southlake withdrew Planning Case ZA17-071 (Ordinance No. 480- 564C), which was a proposed Zoning Change and Development Plan for Carillon Plaza District. The following Planning Cases related to the Carillon Plaza District were withdrawn by staff due to inactivity; the applicant did not ever make a formal submittal: • ZA16-081 – Site Plan for Carillon Salons of Volterra • ZA16-082 – Site Plan for Carillon Wellness Center and Spa • ZA16-083 – Preliminary Plat for the Carillon Plaza District SOUTHLAKE 2030/2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: A detailed Comprehensive Plan Analysis has been prepared for this development. Link to Comprehensive Plan Analysis TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions Access to the project will be provided by two access driveways onto W. Kirkwood Blvd., which is a four-lane divided arterial with 100’ of right of way. One access driveway is proposed onto a future SH 114 frontage road. The timing of the SH 114 frontage road construction is unknown at this time. Traffic Impact A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared for this development. A link to the report follows: Link to Volume 1 – Traffic Impact Analysis Link to Volume 2 - Appendix Link to Consultant’s Review of TIA TREE PRESERVATION: CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN Town Hall Forum was held for this project on July 15, 2017. Link to SPIN Report A Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on January 10, 2017. Link to Corridor Planning Committee Meeting Report STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated February 1, 2018. Case No. Attachment C ZA18 -0006 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA18 -0006 Page 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA18-0006 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 5/11/18 Project Name: Zoning Change and Development Plan – Carillon Parc APPLICANT: OWNER: HCCP Development & Construction HCCP Property Partners, LLC / The Southlake Salons of Voltera, LLC Laird Fairchild Laird Fairchild 161 Summit Ave. Ste. 200. Southlake, TX 161 Summit Ave. Ste. 200. Southlake, TX Phone: (817) 455-9635 Phone: (817) 455-9635 Email: lfairchild@hccp.com Email: lfairchild@hccp.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEW ED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/2/18 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT JEROD POTTS AT (817) 748-8195. Planning Review Jerod Potts Policy & Strategic Initiative Principal Planner Phone: (817) 748-8195 Email: jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us General Comments 1. On each exhibit, please label all streets and drives for clarity of reference with name, letter or number. Zoning Booklet General Zoning Booklet Comments 2. On page 7, include either “the” or “a” as the sentence currently states “Southlake Public Library will be focal point…” Also on page 7, please correct the exhibit as it appears text and boundaries shifted from the initial submittal. 3. On page 12 (Pathways) in the final sentence of the third paragraph it appears that “enhance” should be “enhanced.” 4. On page 14, please indicate when the Carillon towers are intended to be constructed in the phasing plan. Public Works/Engineering Review Steve Anderson, P.E. Deputy City Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8101 Fax: (817) 748-8077 E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us Case No. Attachment C ZA18 -0006 Page 3 GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. 3. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. 4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. SANITARY SEWER: 1. Be mindful of sanitary sewer manhole locations in the public gathering areas. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 Fax: (817) 481-5713 E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: Case No. Attachment C ZA18 -0006 Page 4 * The proposed development is consistent with the approved comprehensive Carillon Tree Conservation Analysis but if it was conventional zoning it would not comply with the Existing Tree Conservation Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. There is 38.4% of existing tree cover on the site and under conventional zoning 60% of the existing tree cover is required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve 33% of the existing tree cover. * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% – 20% 70% 20.1 – 40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Case No. Attachment C ZA18 -0006 Page 5 Ordinance. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE, PARKING, AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 1. In the Surface parking lot minimum interior landscaping portion of the Development Standards, it says that landscape islands shall be a minimum of 12’ in width on the ends of parking space groups and 10’ in width internal to the parking, and parking space groups shall be no more than 20 spaces long without a landscape island. There are numerous landscape islands that are slightly below 12’ in width and rows of parking which exceed 20 spaces long which are not broken by an internal landscape island. 2. The tree wells or continuous planters are proposed to be minimum 5’ x 5’. Please ensure when trees are provided within tree wells that the length and width of the tree wells is at least 6’ x 6’ or 8’ x 4’, or provide a planting strip consistent with the Streetscape Standards within Section 49, Table 49-2, of the Zoning Ordinance. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 Fax: (817) 748-8181 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler systems can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length of the pipe. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a vault. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6’X6’ if it is located on the riser. (Riser room locations not indicated on plans) FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Fire Department Connections for sprinkler systems must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department fire lane access. (Fire Department Connection locations not indicated on plans) Add FDC locations, which can be a wall mount FDC or a remote FDC connection, and ensure fire hydrants on the property are spaced as necessary to meet the requirements) Fire hydrants are required at a maximum spacing of 500 feet for commercial locations that contain fully Case No. Attachment C ZA18 -0006 Page 6 sprinkled buildings. (Fire hydrant locations not indicated on plans) FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire apparatus access, needs to be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, a minimum of 24 feet wide in access areas provided for low rise structures and a minimum of 26 feet wide in access areas provided for high rise structures, with 6 inch red striping that contains 4 inch white lettering that states “FIRE LANE NO PARKING” every 25 feet. The fire lane access areas must be able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (Minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW) (Both high rise structures in Carillon Parc are required to have the 26 feet wide fire lane access) (Also, the fire lane in the Piazza does not meet the 24 foot minimum requirements, and if the Piazza is the access for the Boutique Hotel the width must be 26 feet wide on the side fronting the hotel) Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius. (Per 2015 I.F.C. Sec. 503.2.4) Community Service / Parks Department Review Candice Edmonson Deputy Director Phone: (817) 748-8311 Fax: (817) 748-8027 Email: cedmonson@ci.southlake.tx.us Comments will be provided to the applicant at a later date. Informational Comments: * The residential Villas will be served by a private alley – the developer / applicant should reach out to Republic Waste Services to determine the needs for garbage / recycling access. The number for customer service is (817) 317-2424. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * Show any intended lighting. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type of lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * It appears that a portion of this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * Masonry materials shall mean and include brick, stucco, plaster, cement, concrete tilt wall, stone, rock or other masonry material of equal characteristics. Stucco and plaster shall only be considered a masonry material when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath Case No. Attachment C ZA18 -0006 Page 7 mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing comparable cement stucco finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. Synthetic products (e.g., EIFS –exterior insulation and finish systems, hardi plank, or other materials of similar characteristics) shall not be considered a masonry material. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21, Building Color Standards for Non-Residential Buildings. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * All driveways/points of ingress/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended). The applicant is requesting approval of all streets and driveways as represented on the development plan. * Staff recommends providing a materials sample board. * All development must comply with the underlying zoning district regulations. * With Site Plan and/or Plat submittal an open space management plan may be required. * Consider adding a note that states all square footage, building heights, stories, etc. illustrated on the plan are representative only. * Please ensure that all typographic errors and misspellings are corrected within the Carillon Zoning Booklet before the next submittal. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA18 -0006 Page 1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Carillon Parc – Plaza District SPO # Owner Zoning Property Address Acreage Response 1. ALEXANDER TRUST ECZ 1804 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.19945 158 NR 2. ALFORD, CARL S ECZ 1812 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.18305 543 NR 3. BANK OF THE OZARKS ECZ 105 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36645 567 NR 4. BENOIT, ROBERT ECZ 1813 RIVIERA LN 0.12002 864 NR 5. BERNHARD, ANTHONY ECZ 1625 RIVIERA LN 0.12025 610 NR 6. BIEKER, RON ECZ 1621 RIVIERA LN 0.12136 792 NR 7. BOISSEVAIN, DAVID ECZ 1609 RIVIERA LN 0.11872 522 NR 8. BRENSINGER, PATRICK ECZ 300 ORLEANS DR 0.48284 587 F 9. BRYCE, DANIEL L ECZ 1825 RIVIERA LN 0.12128 616 NR 10. BURCH, MIKE J ECZ 1633 RIVIERA LN 0.16446 477 NR 11. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 1750 LE MANS LN 0.47625 315 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA18 -0006 Page 2 SPO # Owner Zoning Property Address Acreage Response 12. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 1650 LE MANS LN 0.35808 190 NR 13. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 300 CARILLON CT 0.15378 321 NR 14. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 350 ORLEANS DR 0.83220 465 NR 15. CARILLON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATI ECZ 401 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 0.66753 260 NR 16. CHAPEL OWNER LP SP2 101 W SH 114 6.16280 419 NR 17. CLARK, JAMES C ECZ 1805 RIVIERA LN 0.13046 004 NR 18. CLARK, ROBERT K ECZ 1701 RIVIERA LN 0.16632 808 NR 19. DAVENPORT, DANIEL F ECZ 104 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36088 599 NR 20. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES SP2 101 E SH 114 0.40400 000 NR 21. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES SP2 201 E SH 114 0.07800 000 NR 22. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES SP2 301 E SH 114 2.69787 560 NR 23. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES SP2 319 E SH 114 2.85980 238 NR 24. DOMINION SOUTHLAKE PROPERTIES SP2 1350 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 6.33041 384 NR 25. EAMSHERANGKOON, KRIDDANAT ECZ 401 MONTE CARLO DR 0.18936 396 NR 26. ELBORAI, EMILY ECZ 1717 RIVIERA LN 0.14925 475 NR 27. ELIESON, JOHN C ECZ 1808 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.17904 708 NR 28. ELVING, CARL ECZ 1709 RIVIERA LN 0.12305 784 NR 29. FLURY, JANE ECZ 1809 RIVIERA LN 0.12660 996 NR 30. GOLLA, HEMANTHA ECZ 101 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36601 488 NR 31. GUTHRIE, JACQUELINE ECZ 1833 RIVIERA LN 0.12142 453 NR 32. HCCP PROPERTY PARTNERS LLC ECZ 1840 RIVIERA LN 2.33098 844 NR 33. HINES SOUTHLAKE LAND LP ECZ 360 E SH 114 9.02049 048 NR 34. HOPKINS DALLAS PROPERTIES LTD C2 140 W SH 114 0.84700 000 NR 35. HUSAIN, ASIF ECZ 1801 RIVIERA LN 0.14272 695 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA18 -0006 Page 3 SPO # Owner Zoning Property Address Acreage Response 36. KELLY, LAURA ECZ 1601 RIVIERA LN 0.20868 408 NR 37. LEE, ERVING ECZ 1821 RIVIERA LN 0.12104 266 NR 38. LEE, SANG ECZ 1705 RIVIERA LN 0.11939 082 NR 39. LY, LIEM ECZ 1841 RIVIERA LN 0.11960 453 NR 40. MARINELLI, RODNEY ECZ 301 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36061 990 NR 41. MARTIN, MARGARET ECZ 1820 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.25555 319 NR 42. MATOUSEK, TIMOTHY P ECZ 1713 RIVIERA LN 0.12173 280 NR 43. MAY, MARTHA L ECZ 1837 RIVIERA LN 0.12048 323 NR 44. MCCAW, NEIL ECZ 1617 RIVIERA LN 0.12024 092 NR 45. MEAD, MICHAEL E ECZ 1829 RIVIERA LN 0.12123 364 NR 46. MEISNER, JEFFREY ECZ 401 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.15747 883 NR 47. MICHELSEN, ROBIN M ECZ 1800 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.19666 672 NR 48. ORTIZ, LOUIS M ECZ 400 PALLADIAN BLVD 0.15394 665 NR 49. PATEL, PARESH ECZ 1816 ST. PHILIP AVE 0.18175 905 NR 50. PATEL, TEJAL ECZ 304 MONTPELIER DR 0.14853 104 NR 51. PERRY, RICHARD B ECZ 308 MONTPELIER DR 0.12745 968 F 52. PLIMPTON, THOMAS E ECZ 1817 RIVIERA LN 0.11925 504 NR 53. PREMO, DAVID ECZ 1605 RIVIERA LN 0.12249 017 NR 54. ROSS, FREDRICK J ECZ 1629 RIVIERA LN 0.12054 022 NR 55. RUCCI, COREY ECZ 1613 RIVIERA LN 0.12119 434 NR 56. SATANI, DHAVAL D ECZ 209 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36229 041 NR 57. SAULS, MARIA ECZ 400 MONTPELIER DR 0.35649 091 NR 58. SHARON R. BELL LIVING TRUST ECZ 306 MONTPELIER DR 0.12574 742 NR 59. SHIVERS FAMILY PTNRSHIP LTD AG 1900 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 39.5380 0000 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA18 -0006 Page 4 SPO # Owner Zoning Property Address Acreage Response 60. SHIVERS, FRANCES BIRD EST AG 1800 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.19700 000 NR 61. SOLEIL DEVELOPMENT LLC ECZ 1845 RIVIERA LN 0.13577 306 NR 62. SOUTHLAKE LAND HOLDINGS LP SP2 335 E SH 114 15.0880 7843 NR 63. SOUTHLAKE SALONS OF VOLTERRA L ECZ 201 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 1.68742 609 NR 64. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF ECZ 100 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 0.63163 791 NR 65. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF ECZ 400 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 4.91215 960 NR 66. STEWART, KRISTOPHER ECZ 100 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.38562 905 NR 67. SUMMIT QI PROPERTIES LLC ECZ 250 E SH 114 3.62391 723 NR 68. SUMMIT QI PROPERTIES LLC ECZ 1700 N CARROLL AVE 8.01443 171 NR 69. SUMMIT QI PROPERTIES LLC ECZ 300 E SH 114 3.93653 770 NR 70. SUMMIT QI PROPERTIES LLC ECZ 1801 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 10.5042 2183 NR 71. SUMMIT QI PROPERTIES LLC ECZ 1781 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 3.07031 526 NR 72. SUMMIT QI PROPERTIES LLC ECZ 1775 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.32161 557 NR 73. SUMMIT QI PROPERTIES LLC ECZ 100 E SH 114 4.60200 383 NR 74. SUMMIT QI PROPERTIES LLC ECZ 190 E SH 114 1.29411 695 NR 75. SUMMIT QI PROPERTIES LLC ECZ 200 E SH 114 1.04816 289 NR 76. SUMMIT QI PROPERTIES LLC ECZ 240 E SH 114 0.75731 557 NR 77. Superintendent of Carroll ISD NR 78. Superintendent of Grapevine Colleyville ISD NR 79. Superintendent of Keller ISD NR 80. Superintendent of Northwest ISD NR 81. THRASHER, WESLEY AG 1965 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.85499 578 NR 82. THRASHER, WESLEY A AG 1975 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.17954 781 NR 83. VISSERS, EMILY ECZ 310 MONTPELIER DR 0.17258 057 NR 84. WALKER, ANDREW T ECZ 213 ST. TROPEZ DR 0.36128 293 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA18 -0006 Page 5 SPO # Owner Zoning Property Address Acreage Response 85. WEISS, SCOTT ECZ 300 MONTPELIER DR 0.24349 511 NR 86. ZVONECEK, BRIAN C2 1700 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.63600 000 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Sixty-Seven (67) Responses Received 200’: Two (2) In Favor: Two (2) Opposed: NR Undecided: NR No Response: Sixty-Five (65) Case No. Attachment E ZA18 -0006 Page 1 Case No. Attachment E ZA18 -0006 Page 2