Item 7CCase No.
ZA18-0004
S T A F F R E P O R T
May 8, 2018
CASE NO: ZA18-0004
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Site Plan for Southlake Commons EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Sage Group, Inc. is requesting 1st reading approval of a Zoning Change and
Site Plan for Southlake Commons on property described as Lots 20-23, H.
Granberry No. 581 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant
County, Texas and located at 171 - 211 W. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, Texas.
Current Zoning: “O-1” Office District, Proposed Zoning: “S-P-1” Detailed Site
Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood # 10.
DETAILS: The project is generally located south of W. Southlake Blvd. and west of S.
White Chapel Blvd. adjacent to First Financial Bank.
The purpose of this item is to seek 1st reading approval of a Zoning Change and
Site Plan from “O-1” Office District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to allow
construction of ten (10) single-story general and medical office buildings totaling
approximately 64,676 square feet on approximately 7.5 acres. The five (5)
southernmost buildings shown on Lot 20 are consistent with the Site Plan
Option A that was approved for Lot 20 on January 17, 2017 (Case No. ZA16-
107).
The project proposes connections to existing driveways that access onto W.
Southlake Blvd. and S. White Chapel Blvd.
Site Data Summary
Lot 20 Lot 21 Lot 22 Lot 23 Total
Existing Zoning “O-1” “O-1” “O-1” “O-1” “O-1”
Proposed Zoning “S-P-1” “S-P-1” “S-P-1” “S-P-1” “S-P-1”
Gross/Net Acreage 3.41 ac. 1.48 ac. 1.39 ac. 1.22 ac. 7.5 ac.
Open Space Area 1.36 ac. 0.38 ac. 0.37 ac. 0.39 ac. 2.50 ac.
Open Space % 39.88% 25.68% 26.62% 31.97% 33.33%
Imp. Coverage Area 2.05 ac. 1.10 ac. 1.02 ac. 0.83 ac. 5.00 ac.
Imp. Coverage % 60.12% 74.32% 73.38% 68.03% 66.67%
Total Bldg. Area 27,854 sf 13,314 sf 12,670 sf 10,838 sf 64,676 sf
Leasable Area 25,643 sf 13,315 sf 12,667 sf 10,838 sf 62,463 sf
Parking required for
entire site per S-P-1
1 space/185 sf
- - - - 338
Parking Provided 148 69 67 55 339
Department of Planning & Development Services
Case No.
ZA18-0004
The regulations will follow the “O-1” Office District regulations and all other regulations in Zoning Ord.
No. 480, as amended, with the following exceptions:
Regulation “O-1” District “S-P-1” Regulation
Side Yard Setback 15’ No setbacks required along
internal lot lines.
Max. Impervious
Coverage 65% 67%
Off-street parking
1 space per 1st 1,000 sf and
then 1/150 for medical office
and 1/300 for general office
1space/185 sf for the site as
a whole
Bufferyards 5’ Type ‘A’ along internal lot
lines
No bufferyards required
along internal lot lines
Dumpster Location To the side or rear of the
principal building
Dumpster enclosure
permitted in the locations
shown on the Site Plan.
VARIANCE
REQUESTED: Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, requires a minimum stacking depth
of 100’ if the average number of parking spaces per driveway falls within 50 and
199 spaces and the total number of spaces exceeds 200. The applicant is
proposing stacking depths of approximately 70’ on the W. Southlake Blvd.
driveway, 74’ on the north S. White Chapel Blvd. driveway and 18’ on the south
S. White Chapel Blvd. driveway to allow the development to be served by the
existing driveways to and from the adjacent properties.
ACTION NEEDED: Consider 1st reading approval of Zoning Change and Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated April 26, 2017
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map
(E) Ordinance No. 480-744
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Link to Narrative and “S-P-1” Regulations
Link to Plans
Link to Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)
Link to TIA Review
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0004 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Gloria Lechler Trust, et al
APPLICANT: Sage Group, Inc.
PROPERTY SITUATION: Generally located south of W. Southlake Blvd. and west of S. White
Chapel Blvd. at 171 - 211 W. Southlake Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 20-23, H. Granberry Addition No. 581 Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial
CURRENT ZONING: “O-1” Office District
PROPOSED ZONING: “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District with “O-1” uses.
HISTORY: - The property was annexed into the City in 1956 and given the “AG”
Agricultural District zoning designation. (Ord. No. 041).
- The "O-1" Office District zoning was placed on the property with
approval of Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and the Official Zoning Map on
September 19, 1989.
- A Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA16-057) from “O-1” Office District
to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to allow construction of three
single-story retail commercial buildings and five single-story office
buildings totaling 51,638 square feet approximately on approximately
7.5 acres was withdrawn at first reading of City Council on November 1,
2016.
- A Site Plan (ZA16-107) for four to five single-story office buildings
totaling approximately 27,562 to 27,725 square feet on approximately
3.3 acres was approved by City Council January 17, 2017.
- A Plat Showing (ZA16-106) for Lots 20-23, H. Granberry No. 581
Addition was approved by City Council January 17, 2017.
- A Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA17-015) to rezone Lots 20-23, H.
Granberry No. 581 Addition, an approximately 4.1 acre property, from
“O-1” Office District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to allow
construction of three single-story retail commercial buildings totaling
approximately 21,997 square feet was withdrawn on April 4, 2017.
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2030 future land use designation for the site is Office Commercial
which is defined in the Southlake 2030 plan as follows:
OFFICE COMMERCIAL Purpose and Definition: “The Office
Commercial category is a commercial category designed and intended
for the exclusive use of office and limited office-related activities. It is
established for and will be allocated to those districts best suited for
supporting commercial activity of an office character. It has been
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0004 Page 2
established to encourage and permit general professional and business
offices of high quality and appearance, in attractive landscaped
surroundings with the types of uses and design exterior appearance so
controlled as to be generally compatible with existing and future
adjacent and surrounding residential development. Properties with this
designation may serve as a transition between established residential
neighborhoods, major roadways, and retail development. Other suitable
activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space and
Public/Semi-Public categories”.
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Master Pathways Plan shows an existing 8’ multi-use trail along W.
Southlake Blvd. and future <8’ sidewalk along S. White Chapel Blvd. A
5’ sidewalk is required along S. White Chapel Blvd. A review comment
has been added to remove “existing” from the label since no sidewalk
currently exists. The 5’sidewalk is required to be constructed with the
proposed development.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The site has direct access to W Southlake Blvd, a six-lane divided
arterial with a minimum 130’ to 140’ of right of way and indirect access
to S. White Chapel Blvd, which is shown on the Master Thoroughfare
Plan as an undivided two-lane arterial with a minimum 88’ of right of
way. S. White Chapel Blvd. is constructed a four-lane divided arterial
with center turn lanes adjacent to the subject property. Adequate right of
way appears to exist for this project pending the TIA review.
Traffic Impact
An update of a previous Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was submitted for
this project. Link to TIA The response from the City’s Consultant is also
attached. Link to TIA review
TREE PRESERVATION: If the development was proposed to be traditional zoning, the existing
tree cover preservation would comply with the Existing Tree Cover
Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The
existing tree cover is 6.30% and 70% of the existing tree cover would be
required to be preserved. 72.04% of the existing tree cover is proposed
to be preserved.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a
planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-
2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit
Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council
shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in
conjunction with the corresponding development application.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the
application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the
Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0004 Page 3
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets,
and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of
environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas
indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the
potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and
visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a
natural or man-made drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along
rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in
the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree
replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance.
UTILITIES: Water
There is an existing 12” water line along Southlake Blvd that will serve
this property.
Sewer
There is an existing 8” sanitary sewer line along the west property line
that will serve this property.
DRAINAGE: Drainage will generally sheet flow from east to west to storm inlets
proposed on the property and from there be piped to the existing
facilities on the Villas of Tuscan Creek property.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting for this project is scheduled for May 8, 2018.
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: May 3, 2018; A motion to deny the item carried by a vote of (3-1).
Commissioners Panahy, Smietana and Rothmeier voted to deny the
item.
Commissioner Panahy has concerns about the safety of traffic exiting
onto Southlake Blvd. that wants to go westbound having to cross four
lanes of traffic to get into the left turn lane at the intersection with White
Chapel Blvd. to make a U-turn and the stacking of traffic in the left turn
lane. Additional concerns are the stacking depth issues caused by traffic
waiting to exit onto Southlake Blvd. or waiting to make a left turn onto
White Chapel Blvd. at the southern White Chapel driveway.
Commissioner Smietana also has concerns about the safety of traffic
exiting onto Southlake Blvd. that wants to go westbound having to cross
four lanes of traffic to get into the left turn lane at the intersection with
White Chapel Blvd. and he would like to see more green space area
and less building and parking area.
Commissioner Rothmeier did not intend to vote to deny the project and
he e-mailed an explanation of his vote to City Council. Link to e-mail
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-0004 Page 4
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated April 26, 2018.
Variance Approval Criteria for Driveway Ordinance No. 634, Article 8.2:
Variances – The City Council shall have the authority to grant a
variance to this ordinance. In granting any variance, the City
Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the
regulations herein will create an unnecessary hardship or practical
difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing unnecessary
hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property
and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be
wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of
adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in
harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The
decision of the City Council shall be final.
General
Development
Standards
Applies? Comments
Overlay Regulations Yes Subject to requirements of Corridor Overlay and Residential
Adjacency Overlay
Building Articulation Yes Complies
Masonry Standards Yes Complies
Impervious Coverage Yes “S-P-1” regulation added to allow impervious coverage of 67%
Bufferyards Yes “S-P-1” regulation added to not require bufferyards on internal
lot boundaries
Interior Landscape Yes Complies subject to review comments being addressed
Tree Preservation Yes Tree Conservation Plan approved with zoning request- complies
with ordinance requirements
Sidewalks Yes
Complies subject to removing the “existing” label from the
sidewalk shown along S. White Chapel Blvd. and constructing
the sidewalk with the development.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA18-0004 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0004 Page 1
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA18-0004 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 04/26/18
Project Name: Site Plan – Southlake Commons
APPLICANT: Curtis Young OWNER: John Stephen (Steve) Church
Sage Group, Inc. Gloria Lechler Trust, et al
1130 N Carroll Avenue 4116 H.C. Meacham Blvd
Southlake, Texas 76092 Fort Worth, Texas 76135-9574
Phone: 817-424-2626; Fax: 817-424-2890 Phone: 817-707-6855; Fax: 888-702-6844
Email: cyoung@sage-dfw.com Email: stvfwt@aeiwireless.net
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY
ON 04/17/18 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE
HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION,
PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602.
1. Please make the following change to the Site Plan.
a. Show and label the required 30’ front building along S. White Chapel Blvd. and remove
the 15’ building line shown.
b. The sidewalk along S. White Chapel Blvd. is not existing, so please remove “existing”
from the label. Construction of the sidewalk will be required with the development.
c. In the Site Data Summary chart, please change the existing zoning to “O -1” only as
there is no “S-P-1” zoning on any of the property.
2. Please make the following changes regarding the elevations:
a. Label the fascia material on sheets PZ-6C and PZ-7C.
b. Staff strongly recommends providing a material sample board with all exterior materials
for the P&Z Commission and City Council meetings.
3. Provide a copy of an executed and recorded cross access, reciprocal parking and
maintenance agreement prior to the issuance of any building permits.
4. Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, requires a minimum stacking depth of 100’ if the
average number of parking spaces per driveway falls within 50 and 199 spaces and the total
number of spaces exceeds 200. The applicant is proposing stacking depths of approximately
70’ on the W. Southlake Blvd. driveway, 74’ on the north S. White Chapel Blvd. driveway and
18’ on the south S. White Chapel Blvd. driveway to allow the development to be served by the
existing driveways to and from the adjacent properties.
* Provide easements for utilities and drainage per the approved construction plans.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0004 Page 2
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
* If the development was proposed to be traditional zoning, the existing tree cover preservation
would comply with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree
Preservation Ordinance. The existing tree cover is 6.30% and 70% of the existing tree cover
would be required to be preserved. 72.04% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be
preserved.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree
Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing
tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the
property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of
existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the
minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall
consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and
Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City
Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the
Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so
as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including
mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0004 Page 3
residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to
this Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved
Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction
of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved
on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and
the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all
structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be
constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. Eastern Red Cedar is being utilized as a Canopy Tree. The Landscape Ordinance lists
Eastern Red Cedar as an Accent Tree.
2. There is a note in the Bufferyard Summary Chart that says "A canopy tree planted on the site
must be a minimum of 4" in caliper." All of the canopy trees are specified to be 3" caliper. The
Landscape Ordinance requires a minimum of 50% of the canopy trees to be 4” and 50% to be
2”.
3. Existing tree credits shall only be granted if the tree/s are in healthy condition and all
requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined at the time of
inspection for a Permanent Certificate of Occupancy.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
Steve Anderson, P.E., CFM
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8101
E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
2. New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan
must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0004 Page 4
especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan
to prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly
recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including
one map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls
during vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always
equitable to the landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for
installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the
civil construction plans.
3. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet.
4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared
by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the
Building Inspections Department prior to construction.
TIA:
1. A revised TIA with the traffic counts based on the all office use has been submitted and it is
under review by the City’s consultant.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard
details and general notes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines
pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshall
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
No comments based on submitted information.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-0004 Page 5
General Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting is scheduled for May 8, 2018.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is
required prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must
be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street
Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale
water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to
pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based
on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to
review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine
the fee amount.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0004 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1. SUNTREE STATION LLC SP2 110 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.90 NR
2. LAW, TIFFANY SF20A 105 LONDONBERRY TER 0.47 NR
3. RAI, ROHIT SF20A 300 SIR JOHNS CT 0.46 NR
4. DAVIS, KEITH SF20A 101 LONDONBERRY TER 0.51 NR
5. SIMON, ANDREA H SF20A 109 LONDONBERRY TER 0.55 NR
6. MURPHY, TYLER C SF20A 108 LONDONBERRY TER 0.48 NR
7.
LUTHY, ROBERT E (Response
received from current owners
Jonathan and Josephine Hyman)
SF20A 104 LONDONBERRY TER 0.46 U
8. PARKHILL & WRIGHT LLC O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.14 NR
9. IMAN, ASHER S O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.16 NR
10. 321 SOUTHLAKE BLVD REAL ESTATE O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.13 NR
11. TY SHAFER DDS PA O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.26 NR
12. ATCC INVESTMENTS LLC O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.27 NR
13. NMEM LTD SP1 190 S WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.95 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0004 Page 2
14. HOFFMAN, HOLLY L SF20A 100 LONDONBERRY TER 0.91 NR
15. DRAKE, KURT SF20A 112 LONDONBERRY TER 0.49 U
16. KESTER, PAIGE A SF20A 116 LONDONBERRY TER 0.48 U
17. GHIA, JAYESH SF20A 124 LONDONBERRY TER 0.51 NR
18. MAHALO INVESTMENTS LLC O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.34 NR
19. O'DONNELL, PETER SF20A 120 LONDONBERRY TER 0.47 O
20. FIRST FINANCIAL BANK O1 151 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.62 NR
21. MAHALO INVESTMENTS LLC O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.63 NR
22. LECHLER, GLORIA ETAL O1 171 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.23 NR
23. WHITE'S CHAPEL CEMETERY CS 121 S WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.72 NR
24. WHITE'S CHAPEL METH CH CS 185 S WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 23.84 NR
25. SUNTREE STATION LLC SP2 100 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 7.75 NR
26. FIRST AMERICAN SAVINGS BANC SP2 222 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.97 NR
27. BICENTENNIAL FIN CENTER LP SP2 250 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.00 NR
28. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF CS 300 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 9.92 NR
29. LECHLER, GLORIA ETAL O1 201 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.35 NR
30. LECHLER, GLORIA ETAL O1 185 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 3.42 NR
31. LECHLER, GLORIA ETAL O1 211 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.53 NR
*owner per adopted 2016 tax roll
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Twenty-six (26)
Responses Received: Four (4) – Attached – 3 undecided and 1 opposed
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0004 Page 3
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0004 Page 4
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0004 Page 5
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-0004 Page 6
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0004 Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-744
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND
WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS LOTS 20-23, H. GRANBERRY NO. 581
ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED AT 171 - 211 W.
SOUTHLAKE BLVD., SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, BEING
APPROXIMATELY 7.501 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND
COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “O-1”
OFFICE DISTRICT TO “S-P-1” DETAILED SITE PLAN
DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN
ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS
EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER
PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING
THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL
WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS
ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE
OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and
Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and
use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other
purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public
health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and,
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “O-1” Office
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0004 Page 2
District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a publ ic hearing called
by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether
these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians
using the facilities in the area immediately surro unding the sites; safety from fire hazards and
damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and
effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types
of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and
adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use
around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by
requirements of this ordinance for off -street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress
points for parking and off -street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing
on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the gen eral welfare;
effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of
population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public
facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered
among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular
uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most
appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0004 Page 3
interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning chan ges do not unreasonably
invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the
classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the
changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic,
and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and
air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concent ration of population, and
facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and
other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that
there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined
that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close
proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land
were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning
classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best
interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and he lps promote
the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and
amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas
be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below:
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0004 Page 4
Being described as Lots 20-23, H. Granberry No. 581 Addition, an addition to
the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and being approximately 7.501
acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from “O-1” Office
District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District as depicted on the approved Site
Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”, and subject to the
following conditions:
1.
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City
of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described
shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all
other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing
sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning
Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and
affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, wi th respect to
both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable
future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -
crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of po pulation; and to facilitate the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other
commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and
complete hearing with reasonable con sideration among other things of the character of the
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0004 Page 5
district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the
value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the
community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except
in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the
provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and
that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described
herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of
the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to
comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances
affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and,
as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether
pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0004 Page 6
but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and
place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this
ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for
any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this
ordinance in the official City newspaper on e time within ten (10) days after passage of this
ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law, and it is so ordained.
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the _____ day of _____, 2018.
_________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0004 Page 7
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the _____ day of _______, 2018.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0004 Page 8
EXHIBIT “A”
Being described as Lots 20-23, H. Granberry No. 581 Addition, an addition to the City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded as Instrument No.
D217045213, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas and being approximately 7.501 acres.
Case No. Attachment E
ZA18-0004 Page 9
EXHIBIT “B”
Reserved for approved Development Plan