Loading...
Item 6A Presentation Zoning Change and Site Plan Ajlouni Office Complex ZA17-074 Owner: Raed and Khaldoun Ajlouni Applicant: Blake Architects Request: Approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan for Ajlouni Office Complex to develop three (3) 8,400 square foot single-story medical office buildings on approximately 2.89 acres Location: 210 and 240 S. Peytonville Ave. ZA17-074 Aerial View •Cross access (north –south) between properties is provided. •Limit the number of drives onto Peytonville Ave. to a maximum of 2 by sharing driveway access. •Internal cross access from Players Circle to Peytonville Ave. as the properties are developed •Development sensitive to adjacent residential properties in the Southlake Woods neighborhood •Building location on the properties should be located near the front building line (front on Peytonville Ave.) with parking or the majority of parking behind the buildings Previous Concept Plan (2002) North Concept Plan (2008) Site Plan ±8,400 s.f. buildings 137 parking spaces Site Data Summary Site Data Summary 1/26/2018 CC 4/3/2018 CC Existing Zoning “S-P-1” and “S-P-2” “S-P-1” and “S-P-2” Proposed Zoning “S-P-1” “S-P-1” Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential Gross/Net Acreage 2.89/2.87 2.89/2.87 Total Building Floor Area (Gross) 100% Medical Office 27,000 s.f. 25,200 s.f. Building Height 35’ allowed 31’ 7” shown 35’ allowed 31’ 7” shown Number of Stories 2 ½ stories allowed 1 story shown 2 ½ stories allowed 1 story shown Open Space % 31% 30% Impervious Coverage % 69% 70% Total Parking Required (Zoning Ordinance at 8 spaces per 1st 1,000 s.f. and 1 per 150 s.f after that) 182 170 Total Parking Required (S-P-1 Regulation) 112 (1 space per 243 s.f.) 135 (1 space per 187 s.f.) Total Parking Spaces Provided 120 137 Permitted Uses: All permitted uses listed in the “O-1” Office District of the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance Development Regulations: a.Parking ratio shall be 1 space per 187 square feet of Medical Office. b.Rear yard setback shall be 25 feet. c.Maximum impervious coverage shall be 70%. . S-P-1 Regulations “O-1” and “S-P-1” Comparison Regulation “O-1” Office District “S-P-1” Regulation (1/16/18) “S-P-1” Regulation (4/3/18) Rear Yard Setback 10’ 25’ 25’ Maximum Impervious Coverage 65% 69% 70% Parking 8 spaces for 1st 1,000 SF and 1 space per 150 SF (170 spaces) 1 Space per 243 SF (112 spaces required and 120 spaces provided) 1 Space per 187 SF (135 spaces required and 137 spaces provided) Parking Comparison Medical Office Parking Ratio Baylor Scott & White Southlake Family Medicine (Building 1) 8 spaces per 1st 1,000 s.f. then for remaining floor area 1 space per 150 s.f. of doctor’s offices, and 1 space per 300 s.f. of all other uses including lab, pharmacy, medical imaging and ambulatory surgical services. Total net floor area = 41,293 s.f. with 245 spaces provided. Ratio provided on net floor area = 1 space per 169 s.f. Total gross floor area = 46,735 s.f. with 245 spaces provided. Ratio provided on gross floor area = 1 space per 191 s.f. Dr. Mendez Offices 8 spaces per 1st 1,000 s.f. then 1 space per 150 s.f. floor area with 10% reduction on each building. Total floor area = 32,726 s.f. with 210 spaces provided. Ratio provided on gross floor area = 1 space per 156 s.f. Watermere Medical 1 space per 177 s.f. Total floor area = 25,764 s.f. City of Southlake 8 spaces per 1st 1,000 s.f then 1 space per 150 s.f. floor area City of Keller 1 space per 200 s.f. gross floor area City of Grapevine 5 spaces + 1 space per 150 s.f. gross floor area City of Colleyville 1 space per 200 s.f. of gross floor area City of North Richland Hills 1 space per 200 s.f. floor area Rendering Elevations January 16, 2018 April 3, 2018 Elevations January 16, 2018 April 3, 2018 Elevations January 16, 2018 April 3, 2018 Elevations January 16, 2018 April 3, 2018 Elevations January 16, 2018 April 3, 2018 Revised Landscape Plan Tree Conservation Plan 1) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.1 requires a minimum stacking depth of 75’. The applicant is proposing a stacking depth of approximately 50’. 2) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.1, requires a minimum centerline driveway spacing of 250’ along an arterial. The applicant is proposing a centerline spacing of approximately 199’ between the proposed driveway on the property and the future driveway to the north shown on the Site Plan and on the previously approved Concept Plan. Variances Requested Variance Exhibit ± 50’ driveway stacking (75’ required) ± 199’ driveway spacing (250’ required) January 4, 2018; Approved (6-0) subject to the staff report dated December 29, 2017 and Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated December 29, 2017, specifically granting the requested variances related to stacking depth and centerline driveway spacing and further noting the applicant’s willingness for City Council to provide refined landscaping plans, renderings and elevations. P&Z Commission January 16, 2018; a motion to table the item at 1st reading was approved (7-0). February 6, 2018; the item was tabled at 1st reading on consent to the February 20, 2018 meeting (6-0). February 20, 2018; the item was tabled at 1st reading on consent to the March 6, 2018 meeting (7-0). March 6, 2018; the item was tabled at 1st reading on consent to the March 20, 2018 meeting (6-0). March 20, 2018; the item was tabled at 1st reading on consent to the April 3, 2018 meeting (7-0). City Council April 3, 2018; Approved at 1st reading (7-0) subject to the staff report dated March 27, 2018 and Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated March 26, 2018 and granting the following variances: 1.Variance Driveway Ordinance No 634, as amended, Section 5.1, which requires a minimum stacking depth of 75’. The applicant is proposing a stacking depth of approximately 50’. 2.Variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.1, which requires a minimum centerline driveway spacing of 250’ along an arterial. The applicant is proposing a centerline spacing of approximately 199’ between the proposed driveway on the property and the future driveway to the north shown on the Site Plan and on the previously approved Concept Plan. City Council Questions?