Item 6A Presentation
Zoning Change and Site Plan
Ajlouni Office Complex
ZA17-074
Owner: Raed and Khaldoun Ajlouni
Applicant: Blake Architects
Request: Approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan for
Ajlouni Office Complex to develop three (3)
8,400 square foot single-story medical office
buildings on approximately 2.89 acres
Location: 210 and 240 S. Peytonville Ave.
ZA17-074
Aerial View
•Cross access (north –south) between properties is
provided.
•Limit the number of drives onto Peytonville Ave. to a
maximum of 2 by sharing driveway access.
•Internal cross access from Players Circle to
Peytonville Ave. as the properties are developed
•Development sensitive to adjacent residential
properties in the Southlake Woods neighborhood
•Building location on the properties should be located
near the front building line (front on Peytonville Ave.)
with parking or the majority of parking behind the
buildings
Previous Concept Plan (2002)
North
Concept Plan (2008)
Site Plan
±8,400 s.f. buildings
137 parking spaces
Site Data Summary
Site Data Summary
1/26/2018 CC 4/3/2018 CC
Existing Zoning “S-P-1” and “S-P-2” “S-P-1” and “S-P-2”
Proposed Zoning “S-P-1” “S-P-1”
Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential
Gross/Net Acreage 2.89/2.87 2.89/2.87
Total Building Floor Area (Gross)
100% Medical Office 27,000 s.f. 25,200 s.f.
Building Height
35’ allowed
31’ 7” shown
35’ allowed
31’ 7” shown
Number of Stories 2 ½ stories allowed
1 story shown
2 ½ stories allowed
1 story shown
Open Space % 31% 30%
Impervious Coverage % 69% 70%
Total Parking Required
(Zoning Ordinance at 8 spaces per 1st 1,000 s.f. and 1
per 150 s.f after that)
182 170
Total Parking Required
(S-P-1 Regulation)
112
(1 space per 243 s.f.)
135
(1 space per 187 s.f.)
Total Parking Spaces Provided 120 137
Permitted Uses:
All permitted uses listed in the “O-1” Office District of the City of
Southlake Zoning Ordinance
Development Regulations:
a.Parking ratio shall be 1 space per 187 square feet of
Medical Office.
b.Rear yard setback shall be 25 feet.
c.Maximum impervious coverage shall be 70%.
.
S-P-1 Regulations
“O-1” and “S-P-1” Comparison
Regulation “O-1” Office District “S-P-1” Regulation (1/16/18) “S-P-1” Regulation (4/3/18)
Rear Yard
Setback 10’ 25’ 25’
Maximum
Impervious
Coverage
65% 69% 70%
Parking
8 spaces for 1st 1,000
SF and
1 space per 150 SF
(170 spaces)
1 Space per 243 SF
(112 spaces required and
120 spaces provided)
1 Space per 187 SF
(135 spaces required and
137 spaces provided)
Parking Comparison
Medical Office Parking Ratio
Baylor Scott & White Southlake
Family Medicine
(Building 1)
8 spaces per 1st 1,000 s.f. then for remaining floor area 1 space per 150 s.f. of doctor’s offices,
and 1 space per 300 s.f. of all other uses including lab, pharmacy, medical imaging and
ambulatory surgical services.
Total net floor area = 41,293 s.f. with 245 spaces provided.
Ratio provided on net floor area = 1 space per 169 s.f.
Total gross floor area = 46,735 s.f. with 245 spaces provided.
Ratio provided on gross floor area = 1 space per 191 s.f.
Dr. Mendez Offices
8 spaces per 1st 1,000 s.f. then 1 space per 150 s.f. floor area with 10% reduction on each
building.
Total floor area = 32,726 s.f. with 210 spaces provided.
Ratio provided on gross floor area = 1 space per 156 s.f.
Watermere Medical 1 space per 177 s.f.
Total floor area = 25,764 s.f.
City of Southlake 8 spaces per 1st 1,000 s.f then 1 space per 150 s.f. floor area
City of Keller 1 space per 200 s.f. gross floor area
City of Grapevine 5 spaces + 1 space per 150 s.f. gross floor area
City of Colleyville 1 space per 200 s.f. of gross floor area
City of North Richland Hills 1 space per 200 s.f. floor area
Rendering
Elevations
January 16, 2018 April 3, 2018
Elevations
January 16, 2018 April 3, 2018
Elevations
January 16, 2018
April 3, 2018
Elevations
January 16, 2018
April 3, 2018
Elevations
January 16, 2018
April 3, 2018
Revised Landscape Plan
Tree Conservation Plan
1) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.1 requires a
minimum stacking depth of 75’. The applicant is proposing a stacking
depth of approximately 50’.
2) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.1, requires a
minimum centerline driveway spacing of 250’ along an arterial. The
applicant is proposing a centerline spacing of approximately 199’
between the proposed driveway on the property and the future
driveway to the north shown on the Site Plan and on the previously
approved Concept Plan.
Variances Requested
Variance Exhibit
± 50’ driveway stacking (75’ required)
± 199’ driveway spacing (250’ required)
January 4, 2018; Approved (6-0) subject to the staff report dated
December 29, 2017 and Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated
December 29, 2017, specifically granting the requested variances
related to stacking depth and centerline driveway spacing and
further noting the applicant’s willingness for City Council to
provide refined landscaping plans, renderings and elevations.
P&Z Commission
January 16, 2018; a motion to table the item at 1st reading was approved
(7-0).
February 6, 2018; the item was tabled at 1st reading on consent to the
February 20, 2018 meeting (6-0).
February 20, 2018; the item was tabled at 1st reading on consent to the
March 6, 2018 meeting (7-0).
March 6, 2018; the item was tabled at 1st reading on consent to the March
20, 2018 meeting (6-0).
March 20, 2018; the item was tabled at 1st reading on consent to the April
3, 2018 meeting (7-0).
City Council
April 3, 2018; Approved at 1st reading (7-0) subject to the staff report dated
March 27, 2018 and Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated March 26, 2018
and granting the following variances:
1.Variance Driveway Ordinance No 634, as amended, Section 5.1, which
requires a minimum stacking depth of 75’. The applicant is proposing a
stacking depth of approximately 50’.
2.Variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.1, which
requires a minimum centerline driveway spacing of 250’ along an arterial.
The applicant is proposing a centerline spacing of approximately 199’
between the proposed driveway on the property and the future driveway to
the north shown on the Site Plan and on the previously approved Concept
Plan.
City Council
Questions?