Loading...
Item 9 - ZA18-030Case No. ZA18-030 S T A F F R E P O R T April 13, 2018 CASE NO: ZA18-030 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Site Plan for CISD Senior High School Athletics Phase 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of Carroll Independent School District, LPA, Inc. is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan for Carroll ISD Senior High School Athletics Phase 2 to include a variance to the Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended, on property described as Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll Senior High School Addition, an addition to th e City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1501 W. Southlake Blvd., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: “S -P-1” Detailed Site Plan District. Proposed Zoning: “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood # 10. DETAILS: Carroll ISD Senior High School is located at the southeast corner of W. Southlake Blvd. and S. Peytonville Ave. The purpose of this request is to seek approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan from “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to allow improvements to the CISD Senior High School athletic facilities to include the addition of a new indoor and outdoor batting cage facility with concessions building, new girls softball locker room, baseball dugouts, storage buildings, additional baseball bleachers, bleacher canopies and associated site work. A variance to Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended, is requested to allow the use of a corrugated metal exterior on the existing activity building to solve problems with leaking and maintenance and on the existing press boxes. No changes to the existing field lighting are proposed. Site Data Summary Existing Zoning “S-P-1” Proposed Zoning “S-P-1” Existing Building Area Removed 8,263 sf Proposed Building Area Added 18,636 sf Net Building Area Added 10,373 sf Percentage of Impervious Coverage (including field turf on practice fields) 68.76% Department of Planning & Development Services Case No. ZA18-030 The following existing buildings totaling approximately 8,263 square feet are proposed to be removed (Sheet A1.00):  Concessions and restrooms (2 buildings)  Baseball dugouts (home and visitors)  Covered batting cages (2 buildings) The following buildings totaling approximately 1 8,636 square feet are proposed to be added (Sheet A1.01):  Concessions and indoor and outdoor batting cages (14,418 SF)  Softball field clubhouse (705 SF)  Home dugout and storage (833 SF)  Visitors dugout (445 SF)  Softball field storage building (645 SF)  Football storage building (1,590 SF) In addition to adding new buildings, the applicant is also proposing the following improvements:  Add bleacher seating for 434 persons and metal bleacher canopies to the baseball stadium  Add metal bleacher canopies to the softball stadium  Add terraced seating at the baseball stadium  Add a corrugated metal façade to the activity building (Masonry variance)  Add corrugated metal and brick veneer facades to the existing baseball and softball field press boxes (Masonry variance)  Add field turf to the practice fields, which requires a modification to the maximum impervious coverage percentage allowed The following “S-P-1” regulations are proposed for the new improvements only. No other changes to the previously approved “S -P-1” zoning regulations or conditions of approval are proposed. Regulation “CS” Community Service District (Base “S-P-1” zoning) S-P-1 Regulation Articulation This site is subject to the Residential Adjacency and Corridor Overlay District regulations, which requires vertical and horizontal articulation on buildings within 400’ of residential property and on all facades visible from FM 1709 and S. Peytonville Ave. Allow horizontal and vertical articulation as shown on the site plan and building elevations for the new buildings. Maximum Impervious Coverage 65% 70% Landscaping and Bufferyards New construction that increases the building square footage by 30% or that exceeds 5,000 square feet requires bufferyards and landscaping to meet current requirements for the entire site. Existing landscaping and bufferyards for existing square footage will be what exists. Additional landscaping provided based on new square footage only. Case No. ZA18-030 VARIANCE REQUESTED: Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended, requires all buildings to have exterior walls constructed using a masonry material covering at least eighty percent (80%) of said walls, exclusive of all windows, doors, roofs, glass construction materials, or sidewalk and walkway covers. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow corrugated metal to be used as a façade material on the existing activity center and on the baseball and softball press boxes. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing 2) Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated April 13, 2018 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (E) Ordinance No. 480-338F Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only ) Link to PowerPoint Presentation Link to Regulations and Variance Request Link Plans Page 5 - Site Plan Pages 8 - Landscape Plan Page 9 - Demo Plan Page 10 - Proposed Improvement Plan Pages 12-19 - Elevations and Renderings Link to SPIN meeting Report STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 Richard Schell (817) 748-8602 Case No. Attachment A ZA18-030 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Carroll Independent School District APPLICANT: LPA Inc. PROPERTY SITUATION: 1501 W. Southlake Blvd. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll Senior High School Addition LAND USE CATEGORY: Public/Semi-Public, Medium Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District REQUESTED ZONING: “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District HISTORY: - A zoning change (ZA90-058) from “AG” Agricultural District to “S -P-1” Detailed Site Plan District for Carroll High School was approved by City Council on December 4, 1990. - A preliminary plat (ZA90-059) and a final plat (ZA90-060) for Carroll High School were approved by City Council on November 20, 1990. - A revised site plan (ZA97-108) for additions and renovations to Carroll High School was approved by City Council on October 7, 1997. - A zoning change and site plan (ZA99 -078) from “AG” Agricultural and “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan with Community Service uses to allow the construction of a Natatorium, classroom additions and storage buildings was approved by City Council on June 20, 2000. - A plat revision (ZA00-006) was approved by City Council on June 6, 2000. - A zoning change and site plan (ZA08-116) was approved by City Council on April 7, 2009 to allow the reconfiguration of the driveway and parking area south of the Aquatics Center. - A zoning change and site plan (ZA10 -019) was approved by City Council on May 18, 2010 to allow the addition of an art building, a gym expansion, an aquatics center expansion, a locker building at the tennis courts, a locker building near the baseball and softball fields , and eighteen (18) parking spaces. - A plat revision for Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll Senior High School Addition was filed on September 30, 2010. - A zoning change and site plan (ZA11-007) to add parking and to reconfigure the service yard was approved by City Council on June 7, 2011. - A zoning change and site plan (ZA12-035) for an approximately 3,000 square foot expansion to the field house was ap proved by City Council on May 15, 2012. - A Zoning Change and Site Plan (ZA13 -093) from “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to allow the installation of two irrigation tanks at Carroll ISD Senior High School was appro ved by City Council on November 5, 2013. SOUTHLAKE 2030/2035 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The 2030/2035 future land use designation for the site is Public/Semi-Public. Case No. Attachment A ZA18-030 Page 2 Purpose and Definition: Public/Semi-Public areas are suitable for a wide range of public, civic, and religious uses, such as government offices and facilities, public and private schools, churches and related facilities (including parsonage and parochial schools), cemeteries, and Public Parks/Open Space uses in conjunction with these developments. TREE PRESERVATION: Existing landscape trees along the west sides of the softball and baseball fields are proposed to be removed for the proposed additions. The proposed canopy removal is approximately 1,513 square feet. The p roposed existing tree cover preservation complies with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The existing tree cover is 10%. The proposed removal is .05% and 99.95% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved. UTILITIES: No changes to the existing public utilities are proposed. DRAINAGE: Documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary will be required prior to approval of construction plans. CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held for this project on March 27, 2018. A link to the report is provided. Link to SPIN Report STAFF COMMENTS: Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated April 13, 2018 is attached. The criteria for the City Council to grant a variance to Masonry Ordinance 557, as amended, are below: The City Council, upon application duly filed by the applicant and after a public hearing, may grant a variance from the terms of this ordinance and the requirements set forth herein upon an affirmative vote of a majority of the City council members present and voting on such variance. The application for a variance shall set forth in specific language the grounds or reasons upon which such variance request is being made. In granting any variance, the City Council shall determine:  that a literal enforcement of the regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty on the applicant,  that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self-imposed,  that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties,  and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The terms and conditions of the variance, if granted, shall be noted by minute order. In the event that a variance application is denied by the City Council, no other variance of like kind shall be considered or acted upon by the City Council upon the same building or proposed building for a period of six (6) months subsequent to said denial. Case No. Attachment A ZA18-030 Page 3 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: General Development Standards Applies Comments Overlay Regulations Y Corridor/Residential Adjacency Building Articulation Y “S-P-1” regulation added Masonry Standards Y Variance Requested Impervious Coverage Y “S-P-1” regulation added Bufferyards Y “S-P-1” regulation added Interior Landscape Y “S-P-1” regulation added Tree Preservation Y Complies Sidewalks Y Complies Case No. Attachment B ZA18-030 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA18-030 Page 1 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA18-030 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 04/13/18 Project Name: Zoning Change and Site Plan – Carroll Senior High Athletics Phase 2 APPLICANT: Lelia Goehring LPA, Inc. 1920 McKinney Ave. Dallas, TX 75201 Phone: (469) 899-5111 E-mail: lgoehring@lpainc.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 04/05/18 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072. 1. Provide a written narrative summarizing the proposed changes. 2. Please correct exhibits as necessary so that all the building areas are consistent across the plans. The areas on the impervious coverage calculations sheets do not match the Site Plan. Also, the new building area in the “Proposed Changes to the Site Summary Table” (17,750 s.f.) on sheet C01.00 does not match the sum of the areas shown on sheet A1.01 (18,636 s.f.). The new building area in the Interior Landscape Chart on sheet (16,020 s.f.) area must also be revised to match the sum of the new building areas and then the required landscaping to be added must be recalculated. 3. Please make the following changes to the impervious coverage calculation sheets C0.1 and C0.2: a. The 3,000 square foot field house expansion was not included in the previous site data summary chart. Please add the 3,000 s quare foot expansion to the existing impervious coverage area and percentage and recalculate the impervious coverage for each phase also including the 645 square foot softball field storage building and the 1,590 square foot football storage building. The impervious coverage on the impervious coverage calculations sheets must match the impervious coverage shown in the Site Data chart on the Site Plan (68.76%). b. Remove the existing Site Data Summary Chart and the Section 8.5 Development Regulations from sheet C0.1. c. In the Phase One impervious calculations, the Proposed Impervious Coverage percentage under the New Total Impervious Coverage should be 57.06% (to be recalculated) instead of 49.70%. d. In the Phase Two impervious calculations, the Proposed Impervious Coverage percentage under the New Total Impervious Coverage should be 60.75% (to be recalculated) instead of 57.06%. e. There are too many “proposed” rows under the calculations for Phase Two and Phase Three. To simplify the calculations, please remove the repeated Phase One Baseball/Softball calculations from the Phase Two section and just replace the “Existing Case No. Attachment C ZA18-030 Page 2 Impervious Coverage” with “Existing + Phase One Impervious Coverage” followed by two rows showing the impervious acres and percentage as follow s: Existing + Phase One Impervious Coverage Impervious Coverage - 31.398 acres (1,367,697 Square Feet) (to be recalculated) Impervious Coverage – 57.06% (to be recalculated) Then remove the repeated Phase One and Phase Two calculations in the Phase Three calculations and just provide the “Existing + Phase One + Phase Two Impervious Coverage” as follows: Existing + Phase One + Phase Two Impervious Coverage Impervious Coverage - 33.433 acres (1,456,324 Square Feet) (to be recalculated) Impervious Coverage – 60.75% (to be recalculated) f. In the Phase Three calculations, the “Proposed Practice Fields Coverage” is incorrectly shown as 3.521 ac. instead of 3.251 ac. 4. The property is in the Corridor Overlay District and the Residential Adjacency Overlay Distric t, Section 43 of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, so all plans must comply with the requirements of both sections. a. The following comments relate to the elevations: i. Masonry construction meeting the requirements of Ord. No. 557, as amended, is required on all facades of all buildings. The Masonry Ordinance requires that all buildings on the property be constructed with a masonry material covering at least 80% of each façade not counting windows, doors, roofs, glass construction materials or sidewalk and walkway covers. A variance to Masonry Ordinance No. 557, as amended to allow the corrugate d metal on the activity center and press boxes has been submitted. ii. Articulation meeting the requirements of Ord. No. 480, as amended, Sections 43.9.c.1.d and 43.13.a.4 is required on all buildings. An “S-P-1” regulation to allow the articulation as shown on the activity center, the concessions and batting cage building, the football and softball storage build ings and the softball clubhouse has been submitted. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. Provide the existing tree cover preservation percentages on the Tree Conservation Plan. * Existing landscape trees along the west sides of the softball and baseball fields are proposed to be removed for the proposed additions. The proposed canopy removal is approximately 1,513 square feet. The proposed existing trees cover preservation complies with the Existing Tree Cover Case No. Attachment C ZA18-030 Page 3 Preservation Regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The existing tree cover is 10% and the proposed removal is .05%. 99.99% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. The proposed building addition exceeds 5,000 square feet which requires the site to meet the Landscape Ordinance and Bufferyard Regulations requirements. An “S-P-1” regulation has been added to allow existing landscaping and bufferyards as they exist for the current site and for additional landscaping to be provided for the new building square footage only. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Steve Anderson, P.E. , CFM Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8101 E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construc tion plans. 3. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. 4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaini ng walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. EASEMENTS: 1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15’ minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line. A 20’ easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. 2. Detention ponds shall be dedicated by plat as drainage easements. The following note shall be added to the plat: Compliance with the provisions of the city’s Storm Drainage Policy does not relieve a person of the responsibility of complying with all other applicable laws, including, but not limited to, Section 11.086, Texas Water Code. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: Case No. Attachment C ZA18-030 Page 4 1. Submit preliminary drainage plan with drainage arrows and preliminary calculations. 2. Provide grading plan containing 2’ contours. Contours may be obtained from the City of Southlake. 3. Clearly label all private and public storm lines. 4. Differences between pre- and post- development runoff shall be captured in detention pond(s). Proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of the 1, 10 and 100 - year storm events. Detention may be required with any new proposed building construction. Describe how increased runoff from site is being detained. Access easements are needed for maintenance of detention ponds. 5. Documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary will be required prior to approval of construction plans. 6. Impervious coverage exceeds allowable. * Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre - construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: Ensure that the concrete emergency access to the new restroom, practice field house and softball dressing room is able to support 85,000 lbs. GVW, since this area will be required for the fire apparatus to reach the buildings with proper hose lay distance. The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the Case No. Attachment C ZA18-030 Page 5 riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length of the pipe. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a vault. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double ch eck is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6’X6’ if it is on the riser. (Riser location not indicated on plans) Fire Department Connection for the sprinkler system for the practice field house must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department fire lane access. (FDC location not indicated on plans) (Remote FDC may be installed to meet these requirements) General Informational Comments * A SPIN meeting for this project was held on March 27, 2018. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA18-030 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owners Carroll Senior High School SPO # Owner Zoning Property Address Acres Response 1 MYERS MEADOW HOMEOWNERS ASSN RPUD 1713 WILD ROSE WAY 4.90 NR 2 REALTY INCOME TX PRO 1 LLC C3 1400 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.97 NR 3 SOUTHLAKE SAFECO LTD C3 1500 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.31 NR 4 SEJ ASSET MGT & INVESTMENT CO C3 1600 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.99 NR 5 EECU C3 1460 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.81 NR 6 ZARROUG, ALI M RPUD 1308 NORMANDY DR 0.49 NR 7 CALVERT LLC C2 1701 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 2.18 NR 8 NUESE, DAVID V RPUD 102 WATERFORD DR 0.35 NR 9 BHATARA, VISHAL RPUD 105 WATERFORD DR 0.39 NR 10 RABBANI, MAHMOOD RPUD 104 WATERFORD DR 0.44 NR 11 LAPKA, DAVID G RPUD 107 WATERFORD DR 0.34 O 12 IVY, KRISTY RPUD 106 WATERFORD DR 0.39 NR 13 VARSITY PROFESSIONAL PARK LLC O1 190 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 1.28 NR 14 DAMES, JOHN D RPUD 109 WATERFORD DR 0.34 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA18-030 Page 2 15 THATCHER, STEVEN B RPUD 108 WATERFORD DR 0.39 NR 16 REYNOLDS, REBECCA LYNN RPUD 111 WATERFORD DR 0.31 NR 17 DAVIS, DONALD G O1 200 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 1.01 NR 18 WHITACRE, CHARLES M RPUD 110 WATERFORD DR 0.38 NR 19 JAIN, BHANU RPUD 1400 MAYFAIR PL 0.38 NR 20 BLANCHARD, JEFFERY E RPUD 1404 MAYFAIR PL 0.36 NR 21 GORMAN, JOHN RPUD 1406 MAYFAIR PL 0.53 NR 22 CUEVAS, ALLYSON RPUD 1402 MAYFAIR PL 0.35 NR 23 AL AJLOUNI, KHALDOUN SP2 210 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 1.01 NR 24 LOREDO, LUCIO RPUD 1409 MAYFAIR PL 0.57 NR 25 STELLING, RICHARD RPUD 1407 MAYFAIR PL 0.40 NR 26 CHAFFEE, MELVIN L RPUD 1405 MAYFAIR PL 0.33 NR 27 CHUJOY, CESAR RPUD 1404 WEDGEWOOD CT 0.33 NR 28 DYER, ADRIAN K RPUD 1406 WEDGEWOOD CT 0.44 NR 29 SHUGA, PAUL T RPUD 1408 WEDGEWOOD CT 0.54 NR 30 SCHRAMM, ALLEN RPUD 1403 WEDGEWOOD CT 0.38 NR 31 WILLIAMS, RICHARD A RPUD 1405 WEDGEWOOD CT 0.43 NR 32 NAUGHTON, JAMES S RPUD 1402 RICHMOND CT 0.31 NR 33 PRINCE, HARRY T RPUD 1404 RICHMOND CT 0.52 NR 34 GAUCH, BARRY RPUD 1406 RICHMOND CT 0.55 NR 35 CLAFFEY, CHARLES E RPUD 1403 RICHMOND CT 0.38 NR 36 ROBERTS, SEAN F RPUD 1405 RICHMOND CT 0.56 NR 37 ARMSTRONG, EDWARD RPUD 1402 CAMBRIDGE CROSSING 0.73 NR 38 SCHAFER, DEBORAH RPUD 1400 CAMBRIDGE CROSSING 0.36 NR 39 DUPREY, FELIX RPUD 1404 CAMBRIDGE CROSSING 0.42 NR 40 SEITZ, KERRY A SF20A 1400 PARK PL 0.56 NR 41 SEMADENI, RETO B SF20A 1402 PARK PL 0.46 NR 42 TYLER, DAVID C SF20A 1404 PARK PL 0.46 NR 43 PARENTE, DAVID SF20A 1406 PARK PL 0.46 NR 44 HOWELL, GLENNA JINX SF20A 1408 PARK PL 0.46 NR 45 WILLIAMS, JAY L SF20A 1410 PARK PL 0.46 O 46 COUCH, JASON L SF20A 1412 PARK PL 0.46 NR 47 VANYO, CAROLE L SF20A 1414 PARK PL 0.46 NR 48 ROBINSON, KENNETH M SF20A 1416 PARK PL 0.46 NR 49 MATTHEWS, PAUL M SF20A 1418 PARK PL 0.46 NR 50 ROGERS, DENNIS P SF20A 1420 PARK PL 0.48 NR 51 NAIDU, RAHUL RPUD 1406 CAMBRIDGE CROSSING 0.33 NR 52 JAEGER, ERIC RPUD 1408 CAMBRIDGE CROSSING 0.30 NR 53 JOHNSON, SCOTT ALLEN SF20A 1401 PARK PL 0.57 NR 54 HENRY, DANIEL R SF20A 1403 PARK PL 0.47 NR 55 MAHAPATRA, RADHA SF20A 1405 PARK PL 0.46 NR 56 LAMBETH, RONALD SF20A 1407 PARK PL 0.46 NR 57 OHARA, MICHAEL J SF20A 600 PARK PLACE CT 0.47 NR 58 NUHU, ESTHER C SF20A 601 BOARDWALK AVE 0.61 NR 59 FERRI, RAYMOND SF20A 1415 PARK PL 0.45 NR 60 EADS, JIMMIE D SF20A 1417 PARK PL 0.47 NR 61 LIU, JIE SF20A 1419 PARK PL 0.47 NR 62 LEWANDOWSKI, MARK SF20A 405 INDIAN PAINTBRUSH WAY 0.71 NR 63 MAY, CLENTIS L O1 280 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 1.04 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA18-030 Page 3 64 AKARD, LARRY W O1 260 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 0.99 NR 65 MARLER, RICHARD SF20A 403 INDIAN PAINTBRUSH WAY 0.49 NR 66 KRISHAN, HEMANTH SF20A 401 INDIAN PAINTBRUSH WAY 0.48 NR 67 SOUTHLAKE WOODS LP SF20A 611 STONEBURY CT 0.21 NR 68 AJRO, VEZIR SF20A 609 STONEBURY DR 0.47 NR 69 MCDERMOTT, KARL SF20A 607 STONEBURY DR 0.52 NR 70 SWACKER, ROBERT N SF20A 605 STONEBURY DR 0.73 F 71 AL-AJLOUNI, KHALDOUN SP1 240 S PEYTONVILLE AVE 1.91 NR 72 SOUTHLAKE BLVD PRESBYTERIAN CH CS 1452 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 6.01 NR 73 SOUTHRIDGE LAKES HMOWNER ASSN C3 1300 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 3.44 NR 74 BOLOGNA, ANTHONY RPUD 100 WATERFORD DR 0.58 NR 75 CARROLL, ISD SP1 1501 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 56.04 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNER RESPONSES Notices Sent: Seventy-five (75) Responses Received: Three (3) - Attached Case No. Attachment D ZA18-030 Page 4 Case No. Attachment D ZA18-030 Page 5 Case No. Attachment D ZA18-030 Page 6 Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 1 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-338f AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CARROLL SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING APPROXIMATELY 55.03 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “S- P-1” DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH “CS” COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT USES TO “S-P-1” DETAILED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH “CS” COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT USES AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinan ce and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 2 WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off -street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over -crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 3 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secu re safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over - crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amende d, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll Senior High School Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat filed as Instrument # D210240592, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 55.03 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District with “CS” Community Service District Uses to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District with “CS” Community Service District Uses as depicted on the approved Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B,” and subject to the following conditions: Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 4 “S-P-1” REGULATIONS AS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO 480-338 (NATATORIUM ADDITION) Proposed Regulations Comments 1. Permitted Uses Same as CS with the following exceptions – allowing for joint use with the City of Southlake 2. Accessory Uses Same as CS and adding natatorium, lighted tennis courts, baseball fields with bleachers and concession sales, running tracks, practice fields and indoor training facility. 3. Specific Use Permits Same as CS 4. Development Regulations 4.1 Height Same as CS 4.2 Front Yard Same as CS 4.3 Side Yard Same as CS, except no zero lot line development 4.4 Rear Yard Same as CS 4.5 Maximum Lot Coverage Same as CS 4.6 Maximum Impervious Coverage Same as CS 4.7 Additional Development Regulations for building uses lying within 400’ of single family residential zoning Same as CS, except the existing high school educational building and additions attached thereto shall emulate existing construction materials, surfaces and architectural style. The proposed natatorium shall be exempt from vertical and horizontal articulation requirements and the 4:1 height setback from existing residential zoning. Existing trees being saved along residential property lines will partially shield the building from view and mandatory fire and safety external lighting will be directed away from residential property. 5. Concept Plan No Concept Plan shall be required. Site developed as S-P-1 requiring a site plan to be submitted for additional developments. 6. Effect of Concept Plan No Concept Plan required. 7. Site Plan Same as CS 8. Special Exception Uses Same as CS Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 5 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH ORD. NO. 338 (NATATORIUM ADDITION) Regular Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting May 18, 2000 Motion was made to approve ZA99-078 subject to Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated May 12, 2000, and subject to the following:  Regarding Item #1 (interior landscaping and bufferyards) referencing Landscape Comments Review No. 4, dated May 11, 2000 : removing the berms listed as the second #3; regarding #4, not requiring there to be all Mondell Pines and instructing the applicant to work with the Landscape Administrator to determine what canopy trees and accent trees would be the most appropriate for the south and east areas; regarding #5, t he applicant is to mitigate as required the 2,250 inches and with respect to the placement, diameter, and number of trees defer to the decisions made by the Joint Utilization Committee; regarding #6 (previous Site Plan approval) (the 1st bulleted item) with respect to the trees to be placed along Peytonville Avenue the applicant is to install the remaining trees and shrubs that have not been installed and replace those that are demolished or dead; (the 2nd bulleted item) referring back to the item regarding Mondell Pines; (the 3rd bulleted item) requiring the applicant to do as the Landscape Administrator suggests and place all the plantings on the west side of the channel; removing the 4 th bulleted item (berm); (the 5th bulleted item) applicant should note at the time at the time of final inspection for Certificate of Occupancy all required plant materials will be required to be installed as was approved; (the 6th bulleted item) applicant should meet the requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance; regarding item #7 (high school site landscaping) requiring the applicant to provide an Interior Landscape and Bufferyards Summary Chart as required by the Zoning Ordinance and Landscape Ordinance and shall comply with the Interior Landscape and Bufferyard Summ ary Chart that is attached to the Landscape Comments; and regarding Item #8 (Natatorium Site Landscaping) requiring the applicant to remove the undesirable trees and replant quality trees in their place noting that the undesirable trees consist of Chinaberry and Mulberry;  Allowing no variance on Item #2 and keeping the height of the building at 35’;  Regarding Iem #3 (screening device) if the residential properties on the east and south sides already have fencing, the school district shall maintain those fen ces and if there is no fencing, the school district shall complete the fencing at 6’ or 8’ in height, whichever the resident wants; This requirement was revised with the approval of Ordinance No. 480-338a to require the applicant to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board on board fence along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and south, specifically along the western property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lots 9 and 10, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition, Ordinance No. 480-338c to require installation of a new fence on the eastern boundary adjacent to the western property lines of Lots 10- 11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34-35, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly side facing the neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity and Ordinance No. 480-338d to remove the School District’s responsibility to construct and maintain the fence along the southern property boundary adjacent to the Park Place neighborhood only.  Deleting item #4.a (articulation); Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 6  Allowing no variance on Item #4.b (4:1 slope) and instructing the applicant to move the building as far west as possible, a minimum of 20’, and requiring the applicant to explain to City Council what they absolutely cannot move it any farther west;  Regarding Item #5 (lighting) requiring the lighting on the east and south sides of the Natatorium building to be nothing but sconces with the lights pointed to the ground and allowing one sconce on either side of each door with a total of six on the east side an d two on the south side;  Allowing frosted glass on the windows on the side of the Natatorium;  Regarding the accessory buildings, requiring the buildings along the south property line to be moved as far north as possible and buildings along the east propert y line to be moved as far west as possible and asking the applicant to completely reassess what it is they need regarding accessory buildings and come back with the absolute minimum (if four are not needed, then do not put in four); approving 30’ x 60’ and moving each of them a minimum of 50’; requiring that any lighting on the accessory buildings to be sconces with the lights pointed downward and to the interior of the site;  Requiring the applicant to include all used on any future Site Plans;  Approving the hammerhead turnaround shown on the exhibit tonight and putting the emergency access gate 170’ from the east residential properties;  Asking the applicant to consider moving the Natatorium to the parking area shown in Phase 5 and to explain to City Council why that is not a better site and why it would not work;  And requiring compliance with the Lighting Ordinance. Motion: Peebles Second: Muller Ayes: Muller, Horne, Boutte, Peebles, Sandlin Nays: King Approved: 5-1 Motion carried. (Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, 05-18-00, tape 2, section #0623) Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 7 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS JUNE 6, 2000 MINUTES Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-338, 1st Reading (ZA99-078), as submitted; with changes; subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated June 2, 2000, subject to the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendations with the following exceptions: on Item 2, allowing the building height as shown, Item 4b, allowing the 4:1 slope resulting from the relocation of the natatorium 16’ to the west and acknowledging the school district’s commitment to make the following changes discussed this evening: Addressing concerns raised by the property owners to the south (Park Place Addition) 1. Reduced the number of accessory buildings from 4 to 1, (4,000 s.f. in size and located south of the multi-purpose building. This location will require additional tree removal, but it was determined that these trees should not be mitigated. 2. Screening on the south would be accomplished by a) staggered, double row of mitigated trees shown as shaded on the plan and b) additional low canopy trees to screen the shot put area along the fence. 3. School to build fence for property owner at the southeast corner where there is currently no fence and will reconstruct the property Owner’s fence at the southwest corner to be level with his neighbor’s fence on the east all the way to Peytonville Avenue (resulting in a fence height of 6’ to 10’). This requirement was revised with the approval of Ordinance No. 480-338a to require the applicant to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board on board fence along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and south, specifically along the west ern property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lots 9 and 10, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition, Ordinance No. 480-338c to require installation of a new fence on the eastern boundary adjacent to the western property lines of Lots 10- 11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34-35, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly side facing the neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity and Ordinance No. 480-338d to remove the School District’s responsibility to construct and maintain the fence along the southern property boundary adja cent to the Park Place neighborhood only. 4. Drainage problem on the south caused by curb construction in the area will be completed with ongoing construction. 5. Scoreboard and foul posts to be screened with staggered, double row of mitigated trees along the east and south of the ball field area and a berm should be constructed around the scoreboard with shrubs planted on top to prevent persons being able to look over the fences into neighboring properties. All mitigated trees shall be on a 4-inch caliper rather that a 3-inch caliper. Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 8 Addressing concerns raised by the property owners to the east (Stone Lakes Addition) 1. Relocated the natatorium 16’ to the west and lowered the building eave 2’, resulting in reduction of the 4:1 slope line encroachment (from 10’ to 4’). 2. Relocated the storm sewer and relocated the parking spaces on the west to the south of the natatorium while meeting ADA accessibility standards. 3. Relocated shrubs from adjacent to the natatorium to along hammerhead to block headlights from shining into eastern properties. 4. Parking lot lighting accomplished by 6 to 8 bollards (3 ½ to 4 -feet tall) with a hammerhead area being chained off at the neck of the hammerhead and being accessible only to service and fire vehicles. 5. Screening accomplished by staggered, double row of mitigated trees shown as shaded area on the plan, existing trees to remain and other trees planted in the bufferyard. 6. School to maintain fencing along the east side as well with the fence on the end being leveled. This requirement was revised with the approval of Ordinance No. 480-338a to require the applicant to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board on board fence along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and south, specifically along the western property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lots 9 and 10, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition, Ordinance No. 480-338c to require installation of a new fence on the eastern boundary adjacent to the western property lines of Lots 10-11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34-35, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly side facing the neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity and Ordinance No. 480 -338d to remove the School District’s responsibility to construct and maintain the fence along th e southern property boundary adjacent to the Park Place neighborhood only. 7. Outdoor lighting on east side (by the two entrances) shall be down lighting only as provided by sconces mounted at height of 7’. Staff to work with TPM and School District on the following prior to 2nd reading: 1. Landscaping Plan and Tree Mitigation Plan for the site with a liberal interpretation of tree preservation ordinance requirements in the ball field area and requiring replacement of only trees that can be reasonably be placed on this site. 2. Evaluation of parking to accommodate joint use of the facility. Motion: Potter Second: Shankland Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 9 Ayes: Potter, Shankland, Standerfer, Fawks, Kendall, Stacy Nays: None Approved: 6-0 vote Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 10 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING 667 NORTH CARROLL AVENUE SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS JUNE 6, 2000 MINUTES Motion was made to approve Ordinance No. 480-338, 2nd Reading, (ZA99-078), the Rezoning and Revised Site Plan for Carroll Senior High School subject to the Site Plan Review Summary No. 5, dated June 2, 2000, making the following changes:  That CISD is to plant the 750 mitigation trees from Carroll Senior High School in the following manner: 1) at the Carroll Senior High School site, plant the maximum number of trees possible with the commonly accepted horticultural and arboricultural standards as approved by the Landscape Administrator; 2) the remaining trees are to be planted at the remaining CISD school sites possible, and with the commonly accepted horticultural and arboricultural standards as approved by the Landscape Administrator; 3) if any additional tree planting is required for mitigation from this site or any of the Kimball Rd. sites, the Landscape Administrator is directed to work with the CISD in establishing an exchange plan to permit the credit of those trees to go toward maximizing the landscaping at all school sites, including allowing tree credit toward interior landscape and bufferyard requirements; 4) CISD is to provide a detailed plan no later than March 1, 2001 to reflect a phased plan over a five-year period to achieve the planting requirements with a minimum of 1/5 of the plantings take place each year and be maintained in perpetuity;  Subject to two hooded lights, ten (10) feet high, shielded to protect neighbors to the east and south plus the four-foot bollards appropriately timed to operating hours as approved by the Chief of Building Services;  That the fence on the southwest corner of the school site shall be repaired and replaced in perpetuity; This requirement was revised with the approval of Ordinance No. 480-338a to require the applicant to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board on board fence along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and south, specifically along the west ern property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lots 9 and 10, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition, Ordinance No. 480-338c to require installation of a new fence on the eastern boundary adjacent to the west property lines of Lots 10-11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34-35, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly side facing the neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity and Ordinance No. 480 -338d to remove the School District’s responsibility to construct and maintain the fence along the southern property boundary adjacent to the Park Place neighborhood only.  Incorporating the City Council action from the first reading. Motion: Standerfer Second: Potter Ayes: Standerfer, Potter, Fawks, Kendall, Shankland, DuPre, and Stacy Nays: None Approved: 7-0 vote Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 11 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH ORD. NO. 338a (ADDITION OF PARKING AND DRIVEWAY BY NATATORIUM) No Changes to the S-P-1 Regulations approved with Ord. No. 338 1. Granting the requested variance to allow deferral of the required eight (8) foot multi - use trail along the east side of South Peytonville Ave. until the Phase V parking is added. 2. Subject to the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission: a. Noting the applicant’s willingness to add the eleven live oaks and a row of shrubs to the east and south of the a dded parking area as shown on the landscape plan. b. Noting the applicant’s willingness to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board on board fence along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and south, specifically along the west property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lots 9 and 10, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition . This requirement was not revised with the approval of Ordinance No. 480- 338c to require installation of a new fence on the eastern boundary adjacent to the western property lines of Lots 10-11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34- 35, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly side facing the neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity and Ordinance No. 480-338d to remove the School District’s respon sibility to construct and maintain the fence along the southern property boundary adjacent to the Park Place neighborhood only. Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 12 CHANGES TO S-P-1 REGULATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338b (ADDITION OF ART BUILDING, GYM EXPANSION, NATATORIUM EXPANSION, FIELD HOUSE EXPANSION, TENNIS COURT AND BASEBALL FIELD LOCKER BUILDINGS) S-P-1 Site Plan District Regulations using “CS” Community Service District zoning as our basis. This site shall be subject to all previous conditions of approval unless specifically a pproved otherwise by the City Council. Regulatory modifications to the CS development regulations include the following: a) Allow for joint use facilities with the City of Southlake. b) Accessory uses to allow a natatorium, lighted tennis courts, baseball field s with bleachers and concession sales, field houses, running tracks, practice fields, and an indoor training facility. c) Vertical and horizontal articulation will be allowed as shown on the elevations. d) The natatorium is exempt from the height requirements fo r residential adjacency. e) A 6’ tall screening device will be allowed on the southern eastern and the southern boundaries adjacent to residential properties. This requirement was revised with the approval of Ordinance No. 480-338c to require installation of a new fence on the eastern boundary adjacent to the western property lines of Lots 10-11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34-35, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly side facing the neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity and Ordinance No. 480-338d to remove the School District’s responsibility to construct and maintain the fence along the southern property boundary adjacent to the Park Place neighborhood only. The requirement with approval of Ordinance No. 480-338a to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board on board fence along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and south, specifically along the western property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lots 9 and 10, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition rem ains unchanged by subsequent ordinance revisions. f) A green painted concrete facade is allowed on the north side of the art building. g) Plantings provided in the east and south bufferyards will be what exists. h) Due to the existing conditions, no bufferyards are to be provided along South Peytonville Road and West Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709). Variance requests will include the following: a) Section 5.06.C of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that sidewalks be located no closer than two feet (2’) to the curb or grade line. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow sidewalks to meander to the curb line. b) Section 5.06.B.3.a of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that sidewalks shall be either 5’ in width or the width as specified in the city’s Pathways Master Plan. The Pathways Master Plan shows an 8’ multi-use trail along the east side of Peytonville Ave. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a trail of approximately five feet (5’) in width adjacent to an existing gas meter only. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH ORD. NO. 338b (ADDITION OF ART BUILDING, GYM EXPANSION, NATATORIUM EXPANSION, FIELD HOUSE EXPANSION, TENNIS COURT AND BASEBALL FIELD LOCKER BUILDINGS) Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 13 1. Including the plan presented, Plan Diagram Section A-AA (attached); 2. Noting the applicant’s willingness to not remove any of the trees on the banks of the drainage channel; 3. Noting the applicant’s willingness to work with the CISD Senior High Art Department to screen the water meter; 4. Noting the applicant’s willingness to replace and maintain the eight (8) foot fence along the property line; This requirement was revised with the approval of Ordinance No. 480 - 338c to require installation of a new fence on the eastern boundary adjacent to the western property lines of Lots 10-11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34-35, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly side facing the neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity and Ordinance No. 480-338d to remove the School District’s responsibility to construct and maintain the fence along the so uthern property boundary adjacent to the Park Place neighborhood only. The requirement with approval of Ordinance No. 480-338a to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board on board fence along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and south, specifi cally along the western property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lots 9 and 10, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition remains unchanged by subsequent ordinance revisions. 5. Granting the requested variances for the sidewalks; 6. Subject to Review Summary No. 3, dated April 27, 2010; a. Please revise the renderings for the art building to match the elevations and landscape plan. b. Please ensure that all parking lot landscape islands are at least 12’ in width at the widest point, from back of curb to back of curb. c. Show any intended lighting. All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended, with regard to type of lighting, intensity, glare and spill -over. d. Please label the façade materials to be used on the field house. Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 14 CHANGES TO S-P-1 REGULATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338c (ADDED PARKING SPACES WEST OF THE NATATORIUM, SOUTHWEST OF THE NEW ART BUILDING AND EAST OF THE SERVICE YARD) The project will comply with all previous conditions approved under the zoning and site p lan with the following proposed changes:  Provide additional parking north of the existing building and west of the Aquatics Center.  Provide additional parking west of the Art Building.  Provide for the development of a new service yard area that can be enc losed near the existing cooling tower.  Provide for additional parking east of the new service yard area.  Revise the landscape plan to accommodate the new parking. Variance request will include the following:  A variance to the required 8’ multi-use trail is requested to allow a minimum width of 4.5’ adjacent to an existing fire hydrant, telephone box, fence, and culvert. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH ORD. NO. 338c Council conditions of approval June 7, 2011: 1. specifically approving the eight (8) foot trail variance along Peytonville to allow a minimum width of 4.5’ adjacent to an existing fire hydrant, telephone box, fence and culvert (see attached exhibit); 2. noting the applicant’s installation of a new fence on the eastern boundary adjacent to the western property lines of Lots 10-11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34- 35, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly side facing the neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity. The requirement with approval of Ordinance No. 480-338a to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board on board fence along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and south, specifically along the west ern property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lots 9 and 10, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition remains unchanged by subsequent ordinance revisions. The requirement for the CISD to construct and maintain the fence along the southern property boundary adjacent to the Park Place neighborhood only was removed with approval of Ordinance No. 480 -338d; 3. noting the applicant is in the process of installing tennis court lights and they will comply with the existing lighting ordinance on that matter; 4. noting that the applicant will address the pond and stagnant water issue at the southeast corner of the property; 5. noting that the new trees and landscaping will have bubbler irrigation installed, 6. noting that there will be thirty-four (34) inches of tree mitigation at the northwest corner of the property; 7. pursuant to the staff report dated June 7, 2011 and Revised Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated June 7, 2011: a. Please ensure that all parking lot landscape islands are at least 12’ in width at Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 15 the widest point, from back of curb –to- back of curb. Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 16 CHANGES TO S-P-1 REGULATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338d (FIELD HOUSE EXPANSION) No changes to S-P-1 Regulations CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH ORD. NO. 338d 1. Removing the fence requirement from previous site plan approval along the southern property line adjacent to the Park Place subdivision only. The requirement with approval of Ordinance No. 480-338a to construct and maintain an eight (8) foot board on board fence along the Stone Lakes subdivision to the east and south, specifically along the western property lines of Lots 1-6, Block 7 and the northern property lines of Lots 9 and 10, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition and the requirement to install a new fence on the eastern boundary adjacent to the western property lines of Lots 10-11, 20-22, 27-29R and 34-35, Block 7, Stone Lakes Addition to be eight (8) foot cedar with the friendly side facing the neighbors to be maintained in perpetuity remain unchanged by subsequent ordinance revisions. 2. Pursuant to site plan review summary No. 2, dated May 8, 2012. a. Please specify the type and size of the plant materials shown on the Landscape Plan. Twenty-two (22) shrubs are required and twenty-one (21) are shown on the plan. Three (3) accent trees are required and four (4) are shown on the plan. The Landscape Administrator has approved the extra accent tree provided in place of the shrub that is short. Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 17 CHANGES TO S-P-1 REGULATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338e (Irrigation Tanks) No changes to S-P-1 Regulations CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH ORD. NO. 338e 1. City Council motion at 1st reading: October 15,, 2013; Approved on consent at 1st reading (7-0). 2. City Council Motion at 2nd reading: November 5, 2013; Approved as presented (7-0). CHANGES TO S-P-1 REGULATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338e Athletic Improvements Phase 2 Reserved for S-P-1 regulations CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH ORD. NO. 338F 1. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land her ein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 18 conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable futur e; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dolla rs ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 19 SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or no t, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the ____ day of _______, 2018. _________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: ________________________________ CITY SECRETARY Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 20 PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the ______ day of ______, 2018. ________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: ________________________________ CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: _________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY DATE:___________________________ ADOPTED:_______________________ EFFECTIVE:______________________ Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 21 EXHIBIT “A” Being legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Carroll Senior High School Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat filed as Instrument # D210240592, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being approximately 55.03 acres . Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 22 EXHIBIT “B” LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338a Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 23 SITE PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338b Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 24 TREE CONSERVATION PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338b Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 25 LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338b Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 26 LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338b Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 27 LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338b Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 28 ELEVATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338b Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 29 ELEVATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338b Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 30 ELEVATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338b Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 31 ELEVATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338b Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 32 DRAINAGE SWALE PLAN A-AA APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338b Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 33 SITE PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338c (SUBMITTED JUNE 6, 2011) Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 34 TREE CONSERVATION PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338c (SUBMITTED JUNE 1, 2011) Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 35 LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338c (SUBMITTED JUNE 6, 2011) Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 36 LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338c (SUBMITTED JUNE 6, 2011) Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 37 LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338c (SUBMITTED JUNE 6, 2011) Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 38 LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338c (SUBMITTED JUNE 6, 2011) Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 39 SITE PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338d Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 40 ELEVATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338d Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 41 LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338d Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 42 FLOOR PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338d Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 43 SITE PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338e Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 44 SITE PLAN APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338e Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 45 ELEVATIONS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338e Case No. Attachment E ZA18-030 Page 46 PLANS APPROVED WITH ORD. NO. 338F Reserved for approved plans