Item 5 - ZA18-006Case No.
ZA18-006
S T A F F R E P O R T
April 13, 2018
CASE NO: ZA18-006
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Southwest Meadows
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Wilks Southlake Development is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and
Concept/Site Plan for Southwest Meadows on property described as Lot 1R1R2,
Block 1, Sabre Group Campus Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake,
Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1901 W. Kirkwood Blvd., Southlake, Texas.
Current Zoning: “NR-PUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District.
Proposed Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #1.
DETAILS: This project is located at the southeast corner of W. State Hwy. 114 and W
Kirkwood Blvd.
The applicant is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan to
"S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District for Southwest Meadows to develop a five-
story full service hotel with 134 rooms (Concept and Site Plan) and three outparcel
lots with a total of approximately 17,868 square feet of retail, restaurant, office,
bank and/or health and well being uses (Concept Plan) on approximately 6.004
acres. The full service hotel, which is proposed as Phase 1 of the development on
approximately 2.422 acres, includes approximately 1,969 square feet of dining and
lounge space, approximately 1,568 square feet of meeting space and an
approximately 850-950 square foot fitness center. Future development of the three
outparcel lots will require approval of a Site Plan by City Council following a
recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
The Site Data Summary chart below from the proposed Concept Plan includes the
data for the hotel site in the Lot 1 column and also the data for the three outparcel
lots in the columns for Lots 2-4.
Department of Planning & Development Services
Case No.
ZA18-006
VARIANCES
REQUESTED: 1) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.1 requires a minimum
stacking depth of 75’. The applicant is prop osing a stacking depth of
approximately 50’.
2) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.1, requires a minimum
centerline driveway spacing of 250’ along an arterial. The applicant is proposing
a centerline spacing of approximately 199’ between the proposed driveway on
the property and the future driveway to the north shown on the Site Plan and on
the previously approved Concept Plan.
3) Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.4 requires a deceleration
lane for any driveway located on an arterial street if the right turn ingress volume
exceeds 50 vehicles in the design hour. If the street facility exceeds 40 MPH, a
deceleration lane may be required if 40turn ingress vehicles occur in the design
hour. The applicant is requesting a variance to not construct deceleration lanes
on the two Kirkwood Blvd. driveways.
ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing
2) Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
Case No.
ZA18-006
(C) Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated March 29, 2018
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Link to Comprehensive Plan Analysis
Link to “S-P-2” Regulations
Link to Plans
Link to Civil Plans
Link to Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)
Link to Consultant’s Review of TIA
Link to Parking Analysis
Link to SPIN meeting Report
Link to 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Report
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
Richard Schell (817) 748-8602
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-006 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER/APPLICANT: Wilks Southlake Development
PROPERTY SITUATION: 1901 W. Kirkwood Blvd., generally located at the southeast corner of W.
State Hwy. 114 and W Kirkwood Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1R1R2, Block 1, Sabre Group Campus Addition
LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use
CURRENT ZONING: “NR-PUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District.
PROPOSED ZONING: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District.
HISTORY: November 19, 1985 - The site was zoned "H"- Heavy Commercial with
the annexation the property under Ordinance No. 319.
August 4, 1987 - Approximately 342 acres, bounde d by T.W. King Road,
W. S.H. 114, W. Dove Road and N. White Chapel Blvd. was zoned from
"H" Heavy Commercial to "PUD" Planned Unit Development allowing "R-1"
and "R-2" Retail, "O-1" and "O-2" office and "CS" Community Service
district development under case ZA87-015 (Ordinance 334-012).
September 19, 1989 - The above described 342 acres was given "PUD"
Planned Unit Development zoning allowing "C -3" General Commercial,
"CS" Community Service development with the adoption of the Zoning
Ordinance No. 480 and the official zoning map.
October 17, 1995 - A Zoning Change and Concept Plan for NR-PUD
allowing "C-3" General Commercial, "O-2" Office, "HC" Hotel and "CS"
Community Service development under Case ZA95 -074 (Ordinance 480-
180) was approved for an approximately 127 acre portion of the previously
described 342 acres, west of the alignment of the approximate alignment of
Kirkwood Boulevard; "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development
allowing detached single family residential development was approved
under Case ZA95-073 (Ordinance 480-179) for approximately 199 acre
portion of the previously described 342 acres, east of the approximate
alignment of Kirkwood Boulevard.
July 20, 1999 - A Zoning Change and Concept Plan for NR-PUD allowing
a variety of non-residential uses and development to include "High-Tech"
uses, "O-2 Office", "Parking Structures", "Hotel", "Restaurant" was
approved for approximately 155 acre under Case ZA99-056 (Ordinance
480-313). The area included portions of the above described "NR -PUD"
west of the alignment of Kirkwood Boulevard and a northern portion of the
"R-PUD" area east of the alignment of Kirkwood Boulevard.
October 19, 1999 - A Preliminary Plat for Lots 1-4, Block 1, Sabre Group
Campus was approved under Case ZA99 -080.
November 18, 1999 - A Final Plat for Lots 1-4, Block 1, Sabre Group
Campus was approved under case ZA99 -096.
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-006 Page 2
January 18, 2000 - A Development Plan for Sabre Group Campus was
approved under Case ZA99-090.
March 20, 2007 - A Plat Revision for Lots 1R1, 1R2, 2R, 4R1, 4R2 and
4R3, Block 1, Sabre Group Campus was approved under case ZA07 -025.
September 15, 2015 - A Plat Revision for Lots 1R1R1 and 1R1R2, Block 1,
Sabre Group Campus was approved under case ZA15 -085.
SOUTHLAKE 2030/2035
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: A detailed Comprehensive Plan Analysis has been prepared for this
development. Link to Comprehensive Plan Analysis
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
Access to the project will be provided by two access driveways onto W.
Kirkwood Blvd., which is a four-lane divided arterial with 100’ of right of way.
One access driveway is proposed onto a fut ure SH 114 frontage road. T he
timing of the SH 114 frontage road construction is unknown at this time.
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared for this development. A link to
the report follows – Link to TIA and Link to Consultant’s Review of TIA
TREE PRESERVATION: The site is subject to the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-D
because the request is for a Zoning Change and Site Plan.
There is approximately 38% existing tree cover on the site, of which 0% is
proposed to be preserved. A standard zoning district requires that a
minimum 60% of existing tree cover be preserved.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-
2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider
the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application.
The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds
that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets,
and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of
environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas
indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the
potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and
visual effects of nonresidential uses;
Case No. Attachment A
ZA18-006 Page 3
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a
natural or man-made drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along
rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in
the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree
replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance.
CITIZEN INPUT: The following meetings were held to discuss the development:
A SPIN meeting was held for this project on December 12, 2017. A link to
the report is provided. Link to SPIN Report
A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on October 4,
2017. A link to the report is provided. Link to Corridor Planning Committee
Report
P&Z ACTION: April 5, 2018; Approved (7-0) to table until the next scheduled Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting (April 19, 2018).
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept/Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated March 29,
2018.
The criteria for granting a variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634 are
below:
In granting any variance, the City Council shall dete rmine that a literal
enforcement of the regulations herein will create and unnecessary hardship
or practical difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing
unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected
property and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be
wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent
properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the
spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The decis ion of the City Council shall
be final.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA18-006 Page 1
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-006 Page 1
CONCEPT/SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA18-006 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 03/29/18
Project Name: Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan – Southlake Meadows
APPLICANT: Josh Wilks Engineer: Jimmy Fechter
Wilks Southlake Development Adams-Engineering
17018 I-20 8951 Cypress Waters Blvd. Suite 150
Cisco, TX 76437 Dallas, TX 75019
Phone: (817) 850-3600 Phone: (817) 328-3215
E-mail: josh.wilks@wilksdevelopment.com E-mail:
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON
03/19/18 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY
MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE
CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748 -8602.
1. The S-P-2 zoning is a site specific zoning district. Any changes to Concept Plan, regulations,
design guidelines or deviations from example renderings or materials approved with the zoning will
require approval of a zoning change by City Council following a recommendation by the Planning
and Zoning Commission.
2. A parking analysis by DeShazo has been provided. Provide a parking analysis for each lot
based on the floor area shown on the Concept Plan and propose modified parking ratios with
justifications if the uses shown do not meet the minimum requirements in the City’s zoning
ordinance. Revise the parking analysis for Lot 1 and add the parking analyses for Lots 2 -4 to
the S-P-2 regulations.
3. The following variances to the Driveway Ordinance No. 634 are requested:
a. Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.1 requires a minimum centerline
spacing between driveways of 250’. A variance is requested to allow the spacing o f
approximately 231’ between the driveways on Kirkwood Blvd. as shown.
b. Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.2(d) requires a minimum driveway
stacking depth of 100’. A variance is requested to allow the approximately 75’ stacking
depth provided on the SH 114 driveway and the approximately 47’ stacking depths on the
two Kirkwood Blvd. driveways.
c. Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended, Section 5.4 requires a deceleration lane for any
driveway located on an arterial street if the right turn ingress volume exceeds 50 vehicles in
the design hour. If the street facility exceeds 40 MPH, a deceleration lane may be required
if 40 turn ingress vehicles occur in the design hour. The applicant is requesting a variance
to not construct deceleration lanes on the two Kirkwood Blvd. driveways.
4. Please make the following changes to the “S -P-2” Regulations:
a. The stucco proposed must be applied using the 3 -step process as stated in Zoning
Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 43.9.c.1.a. Add a request for a varia nce to the
Masonry Ordinance in the variance section and a regulation allowing the materials shown
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-006 Page 2
in the Development Regulations if at least 80% of any façade is not covered by a permitted
masonry material.
5. Please make the following changes to the Conce pt Plan:
a. Please correct the Site Data Summary Chart as follows:
i. Please revise the number of parking spaces required (per S-P-2 regulations) to match
the parking spaces required per the DeShazo parking analysis.
b. The lane to the trash receptacle enclosur e requires a truck to back up approximately 130’
adjacent to parking spaces. Please consider revising the dumpster location to reduce the
length of the access lane. Verify with Republic Services that the access lane length meets
their requirements.
6. Please make the following changes to the Site Plan:
a. Please correct the Site Data Summary Chart as follows:
i. Please revise the number of parking spaces required (per S-P-2 regulations) to match
the parking spaces required per the DeShazo parking analysis.
7. The following comments are in regard to the elevations:
a. The stucco proposed must be applied using the 3 -step process as stated in Zoning
Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 43.9.c.1.a. Add a request for a variance to the
Masonry Ordinance in the variance section and a regulation allowing the materials shown
in the Development Regulations if at least 80% of any façade is not covered by a permitted
masonry material.
b. Staff recommends providing a material sample board of each material shown on the
elevations including the PTAC vents, wood powder coating and prefinished metal canopy.
8. Staff recommends specifying tree types on the landscape plan.
9. Staff strongly recommends providing the following plans and exhibits:
a. Color renderings, design guidelines and mate rial samples for outparcel lots.
b. Example color rendering and material sample of the retaining walls.
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
1. On the Tree Conservation Plan provide the tree tags number for each tree surveyed.
* The applicant is proposing that the tree removal be as shown on the plan.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-006 Page 3
If the development were proposed as straight zoning it would not comply with the Ex isting Tree
Cover Regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. There is approximately 38% of existing
tree cover on the site and a minimum of 60% of the tree cover would be required to be preserved.
0% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preser ved.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation
Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in
accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has
previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at
the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover
that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning
district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit
Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application
for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application
(as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application
and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall
approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as
to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including m ature
tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential
areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man -made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this
Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-006 Page 4
Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the
development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the
approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning
as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures,
easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not
conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE AND BUFFERYARDS COMMENTS:
1. On the overall color landscape plan ensure that each lot has the required amount of interior and
bufferyard landscaping provided.
2. In the west parking of Lot 1 one of the parking landscape islands is less than 12’ in width and is
proposed to contain an accent tree instead of the required canopy tree.
Parking lot islands shall have a minimum width of 12’ back-to-back if curbed or 13’ edge-to-
edge if no curb is intended, and shall be equal to the length of the parking stall.
All parking planter islands in parking areas shall contain a minimum of one (1) canopy tree with the
remaining area in shrubs, ground cover, ornamenta l grasses or seasonal color. Planter islands
which have light poles for lighting the parking areas may substitute two (2) understory/accent trees
for the required canopy tree.
3. Ensure that all electrical transformers and mechanical equipment are suffic iently screened for
visibility from the right-of-way.
* The applicant is proposing that the Lot 1 east bufferyard be variable width and contain portions of
a patio and parking, and the Lot 4 west bufferyard be allowed to have a small edge of the west
facing parking located within it.
Proposed patios, parking and a trash dumpster are proposed with the required 10’ – B bufferyard
along the east property line of Lots 1, and the northwest edge of the parking spaces facing State
HWY 114 is proposed within the required west 25’ – J bufferyard on Lot 3.
USE OF BUFFERYARDS – A bufferyard may be used for passive recreation, such as pedestrian,
bike or equestrian trails, provided that: (a) no plant material is eliminated; (b) the total width of the
bufferyard is maintained; and (c) all other regulations of this ordinance are met. In no event shall
the following uses be permitted in a bufferyard: playfields, stables, swimming pools, tennis courts
or similar facilities, accessory buildings, parking facilities, or t rash dumpsters.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
Public Works/Engineering Review
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
WATER COMMENTS:
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-006 Page 5
1. For Lots 2, 3, and 4 the domestic services and fire services will need to be separate taps off the
water main.
DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. The existing run-off is about 17 cfs and the proposed run -off is 42 cfs. Please provide detention
or show that the increased run-off has no adverse impacts downstream.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allo w 15 business days for
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard
details and general notes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines
pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures.
* Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on SH 114. Permit approval is
required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for
review.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works O perations Department (817)
748-8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for
these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s
Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
Fire Department Review
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler systems can be located on
the risers if the risers are within 100 feet of the water main, measured linea rly along the length of
the pipe. If the risers are further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valves shall be in
vaults. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is located in a vault, or a
minimum of 6’X6’ if it is located on the riser. (Fire line to Lot 1 and Lot 3 are in excess of 100 feet
from the water main)
Indicate locations of riser rooms.
FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS:
Fire Department Connections for sprinkler systems must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant,
and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes on the property. (FDC on Lot 2 does not meet
requirement) (Also, locations of various retaining walls could affect measurement distances
Case No. Attachment C
ZA18-006 Page 6
from FDC to fire hydrants, measurements could be required to be taken arou nd the retaining
walls depending on finished height).
General Informational Comments
* A SPIN meeting for this project was held on December 12, 2017.
* Future development of the outparcel lots will require approval of a Site Plan by City Council
following a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
* An application for a Plat Revision must be processed and approved by the City and a Plat
Revision recorded with the County to subdivide the lots as shown on the Concept Plan.
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is
required prior to construction of any signs.
* All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential
properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordin ance No. 480, as amended.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment
Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
* It appears that a portion of this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay
Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible
Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479.
* Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,
Overlay Zones.
* The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be
processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan,
irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be
paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street
Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees.
* In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water
customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the
City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final
plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City
of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount.
* Denotes Informational Comment
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-006 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1. U S A AG 3295 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 5.47 NR
2. NGUYEN, HIEU VAN RPUD 557 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.88 NR
3. CANTELE, JOHN W RPUD 565 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.60 NR
4. XU, LIYU RPUD 560 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.69 NR
5. MILHIZER, ERIC RPUD 569 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.49 NR
6. ROTHENBACH, THOMAS A RPUD 570 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.67 NR
7. DUCANES, A CHRISTOPHER RPUD 573 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.51 NR
8. FRAGA, MARK RPUD 526 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.62 NR
9. ALTIMONT, DAVID RPUD 520 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.56 NR
10. ZEALLOS, JUAN RPUD 516 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.73 NR
11. CURTISS, THOMAS L RPUD 509 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.61 NR
12. DICKSTEIN, MICHAEL RPUD 505 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.57 NR
13. SALESKI, MARK RPUD 2816 TYLER ST 0.56 NR
14. FISCHER, DIRK T RPUD 2815 TYLER ST 0.68 NR
15. KIRKWOOD HOLLOW HO ASSOC RPUD 2819 TYLER ST 1.17 NR
16. PARKER, THANE D RPUD 2813 TYLER ST 0.65 NR
17. SABRE HEADQUARTERS LLC NRPUD 3150 SABRE DR 25.45 NR
18. KIRKWOOD HOLLOW HO ASSOC RPUD 2818 TYLER ST 0.10 NR
19. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 1001 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 11.26 NR
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-006 Page 2
20. DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W STATE HWY 114 19.99 NR
21. DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W STATE HWY 114 0.24 NR
22. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 3410 T W KING RD 0.41 NR
23. THOMPSON, KENNETH L RPUD 3521 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.48 NR
24. BENNETT, MICHAEL RPUD 3517 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.47 NR
25. BRAZOS ELECTRIC POWER CORP NRPUD 3411 T W KING RD 3.71 NR
26. U S A AG 3050 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 94.78 NR
27. HALL, PATRICK S RPUD 617 RANCHO LAREDO TRL 0.46 NR
28. JONI L WOMACK LIVING TRUST RPUD 613 RANCHO LAREDO TRL 0.44 NR
29. ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO LLC NRPUD 3401 T W KING RD 2.23 NR
30. MCCRAY, KENNETH RPUD 3520 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.46 NR
31. PAULSEN, DEREK J RPUD 3500 SUNRISE RANCH RD 0.48 NR
32. U S A AG 3600 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 19.84 NR
33. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF RPUD 3728 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 10.39 NR
34. TRINITY RIVER AUTHORITY OF TX SP1 3200 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.27 NR
35. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF RPUD 3000 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 5.10 NR
36. BROWN, MICHAEL RPUD 561 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.94 NR
37. ALLAM, SRIDHAR RPUD 577 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.61 NR
38. DELEMOS, JAMES A RPUD 581 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.87 NR
39. BAKSHI, UTPAL RPUD 524 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.60 NR
40. ROOP, THOMAS RPUD 512 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.70 NR
41. DANG, VI RPUD 508 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.62 NR
42. BARDEN, VIC RPUD 3513 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.66 NR
43. BEN-MEIR, NAPHTALI RPUD 3505 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.47 NR
44. SHUTE, SCOTT RPUD 3509 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.48 NR
45. HENDERSON, JOSEPH WILLIAM RPUD 3501 MATADOR RANCH RD 0.47 NR
46. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 1400 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 13.77 NR
47. DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W STATE HWY 114 4.38 NR
48. DALLAS MTA LP NRPUD 747 W SH 114 0.08 NR
49. SOUTHLAKE CITY NRPUD 1050 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 4.39 NR
50. SINNOTT, ROBERT A RPUD 504 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.69 NR
51. BADYLAK, JOHN RPUD 500 ROUND HOLLOW LN 0.58 NR
52. TD AMERITRADE SERVICES
COMPANY NRPUD 1051 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 78.39 NR
53. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 1901 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 5.98 NR
54. U S A AG 3400 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 16.97 NR
55. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 3415 T W KING RD 4.29 NR
56. WILKS SOUTH LAKE DEVELOPMENT NRPUD 1750 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 2.95 NR
57. SABRE HEADQUARTERS LLC NRPUD 1600 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 9.15 NR
58. REDUS TEXAS LAND LLC NRPUD 3400 E T W KING RD 2.31 NR
59. BRE SOLANA LLC NRPUD 1900 W KIRKWOOD BLVD 19.99 NR
60. MAGUIRE PTNRS-SOLANA LTD RPUD 812 W SH 114 0.05 NR
61. MAGUIRE PTNRS-SOLANA LTD RPUD 812 W STATE HWY 114 1.32 NR
62. TOLL DALLAS TX LLC RPUD 2509 AMELIA ISLAND PATH 0.48 NR
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Ten
Responses Received within 200’: Two (2) – Attached
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-006 Page 3
Case No. Attachment D
ZA18-006 Page 4