No preview available
 /
     
Item 6A and 6B PresentationStony Brook Zoning Change and Development Plan - ZA17-064 Preliminary Plat – ZA17-066 Items 6A and 6B Owners: Margaret J. Haney and Estate of E.I. & Glenda Wiesman Applicant: Dolce Investments, LLC Requests: 1) Approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan to develop 47 residential lots and 8 open space lots on approximately 34.730 acres (ZA17-064) 2) Approval of a Preliminary Plat for Stony Brook (ZA17-066) Location: Generally located south of W. Southlake Blvd. and south and west of Brock Dr. ZA17-064 and ZA17-066 Aerial View Development Plan – Corridor Planning Committee 8-7-17 Development Plan (1/16/2018) 59 Lots (12/5/2017) 53 Lots (1/16/2018) Development Plan (1/16/2018) 59 Lots (12/5/2017) 53 Lots (1/16/2018) Removed Alley Removed Vehicular Access Pedestrian Access Provided Emergency Access To Brock Entrance shifted east Development Plan (2/06/2018) 53 Lots (1/16/2018) 48 Lots (2/06/2018) Development Plan (2/06/2018) 53 Lots (1/16/2018) 48 Lots (2/06/2018) Removed cul-de-sac and lots fronting on it Increased central open space area from ±1.51 ac. to ±4.04 ac. Relocated some open space into central area Development Plan (2/20/2018) 48 Lots (2/06/2018) 47 Lots (2/20/2018) Development Plan (2/20/2018) 48 Lots (2/06/2018) 47 Lots (2/20/2018) Open space area enlarged from ±13,600 sq.ft. to ±20,119 sq.ft. Functional stacking depth increased to ±232’ Open space decreased from ±19,985 sq.ft. to ± 16,246 sq.ft. Revised Development Plan 47 Lots (2/20/2018) 47 Lots (3/06/2018) 47 Lots (2/20/2018) 47 Lots (3/06/2018) Revised Development Plan Lots sizes and dimensions adjusted slightly Entrance gate moved adjacent to the open space lot and functional stacking depth reduced from ±232’ to ±198’. •Entrance gate moved adjacent to the open space lot instead of in front of a residential lot and the functional stacking depth reduced from ±232’ to ±198’. (Exit gate unchanged) •The lot sizes and dimensions on both sides of the entrance have been adjusted slightly. Summary of Changes Site Data Summary for “R-PUD” Zoning CC 12/5/2017 CC 01/16/2018 CC 02/06/2018 CC 02/20/2018 CC 03/06/2018 Existing Zoning “AG” and “SF-1A” “AG” and “SF-1A” “AG” and “SF-1A” “AG” and “SF-1A” “AG” and “SF-1A” Proposed Zoning “R-PUD” “R-PUD” “R-PUD” “R-PUD” “R-PUD” Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Floodplain Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Floodplain Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Floodplain Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Floodplain Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Floodplain Gross/Net Acreage 34.628 34.730 34.730 34.730 34.730 Residential Lots 59 53 48 47 47 Gross/Net Density 1.70 du/ac. 1.53 du/ac. 1.38 du/ac. 1.35 du/ac. 1.35 du/ac. Open Space % (Acres) 26.0% (9.02 ac.) 21.9% (7.59 ac.) 26.7% (9.27 ac.) 27.2% (9.46 ac.) 27.2% (9.45 ac.) Lot Area Range 8,556 sf to 31,634 sf 15,063 sf to 35,301 sf 15,016 sf to 31,086 sf 15,294 sf to 34,825 sf 15,294 sf to 34,825 sf Average Lot Area 15,058 sf 18,738 sf 19,794 sf 20,067 sf 20,087 sf Site Data Summary Revised Development Plan Site Data Summary for “R-PUD” Zoning Existing Zoning “AG” and “SF-1A” Proposed Zoning “R-PUD” Land Use Designation Medium Density Residential Low Density Residential Floodplain Gross/Net Acreage 34.730 Residential Lots 47 Gross/Net Density 1.35 du/ac. Open Space % 27.2% (9.45 ac.) Lot Area Range 15,294 s.f. to 34,825 s.f. Average Lot Area 20,087 s.f. Emergency access driveway Central Open Space Exhibit Proposed R-PUD Regulations Comparison Chart Regulation “SF-20A” “R-PUD” Regulations 12/5/2017 “R-PUD” Regulations 01/16/2018 “R-PUD” Regulations 02/06/2018 “R-PUD” Regulations 02/20/2018 “R-PUD” Regulations 03/06/2018 Max. Height 35’ and 2½ stories 35’ and 2½ stories 35’ and 2½ stories 35’ and 2½ stories 35’ and 2½ stories 35’ and 2½ stories Front Yard 35’ 20’ and 25’ 30’ 30’ 30’ 30’ Side Yard 15’ 1’ and 9’ (villa lots) 7’ 10’ 10’ 10’ 10’ Rear Yard 40’ (35’ on cul-de- sac) 15’ or 30’ 10’ adj. to alley 20’ or 30’ 20’ or 30’ 20’ or 30’ 20’ or 30’ Max. Lot Coverage 30% 40% and 50% 40% 40% 40% 40% Min. Lot Area 20,000 s.f. 8,300 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Min. Lot Width 100’ 52.9’ 85’ 85’ 85’ 85’ Min. Lot Depth 125’ 100’ 125’ 125’ 125’ 125’ Min. Floor Area 1,800 s.f. 2,600 s.f. 1,800 s.f. 1,800 s.f. 1,800 s.f. 1,800 s.f. Max. Gross Density 2.18 du/ac. 1.70 du/ac. 1.53 du/ac. 1.38 du/ac. 1.35 du/ac. 1.35 du/ac. Tree Conservation Analysis Revised Fence Plan •Pedestrian access easement included to connect to Siena Wall and Fence Exhibit Pedestrian Access Plan •Pedestrian access easement included to connect to Siena Pedestrian access gates Pedestrian access gate Mail Kiosk Plan Mailbox Kiosk Exhibit Requested Modifications to Subdivision Ord. 1)Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 5.04 does not permit private streets in new subdivisions in which less than 75% of the lots contain homeowner occupied structures. The applicant is requesting a gated community with private streets with the initial development. 2) Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 5.03.I - Generally, a maximum number of twenty (20) dwelling units should be permitted on a cul-de-sac street permanently designed as such. Additionally, the length of the Cul-de-Sac should not exceed 1,000 feet or be less than 150 feet in length. However, density of development, topography, lot sizes and other significant factors will be weighed in determining the length of a cul-de-sac street. 3) Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 5.03.K states that dead end streets shall be permitted only where a future extension or connection is to be made. The applicant has removed the connection to the street stub from the Siena subdivision to the south. October 5, 2017; Tabled to the October 19, 2017 meeting (6-0). October 19, 2017; Approved (4-2) subject to the Staff Report dated October 19, 2017; further subject to the Development Plan Review Summary No. 4 dated October 19, 2017; •Granting the variance No. 1 related to a gated community on the northern end and variance No. 2 on the length of the cul-de-sac street; specifically not granting variance No. 3 related to gated emergency access only on the southern side of the site. •Noting the applicant’s willingness to also include in their application with respect to alleyways an alternative that does not include alleyways in the Site Plan. •Noting the applicant’s willingness to provide alternative Site Plans relative to access to the site for Council’s consideration. P & Z Commission (ZA17-064) December 5, 2017; A motion to table the item was approved (7-0). January 16, 2018; A motion to table the item was approved (4-3). February 6, 2018; A motion to table the item was approved (6-0). City Council (ZA17-064) (Continued on next slide) February 20, 2018; Approved at 1st reading (5-2) subject to the staff report dated February 13, 2018 and Development Plan Review Summary No. 8, dated February 13, 2018 noting the following approvals of the modifications to Subdivision Ord. No. 483 as requested: 1) Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 5.04 does not permit private streets in new subdivisions in which less than 75% of the lots contain homeowner occupied structures. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a gated community with private streets with the initial development of the subdivision. 2) Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 5.03.I - Generally, a maximum number of twenty (20) dwelling units should be permitted on a cul-de-sac street permanently designed as such. Additionally, the length of the Cul-de-Sac should not exceed 1,000 feet or be less than 150 feet in length. This proposed plan does not meet the intent of the regulation, however, noting that a secondary emergency only access to the subdivision has been provided. 3) Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, Section 5.03.K states that dead end streets shall be permitted only where a future extension or connection is to be made. The applicant has removed the connection to the street stub to the Siena subdivision to the south, Also noting the applicant’s willingness to address the stacking distance issues on egress and ingress as it relates to where the gate is positioned and will come to 2nd reading with an option or options for City Council to consider, And then noting that Council would be directing staff that in order for the applicant to obtain a first lot certificate of occupancy, they’ll be required to have completed the open space and water features prior to that issuance of a CO. City Council (ZA17-064) Preliminary Plat (ZA17-066) October 5, 2017; A motion to table the item to the October 19, 2017 meeting was approved (6-0). October 19, 2017; Approved (4-2) subject to the Staff Report dated October 19, 2017; further subject to the Plat Review Summary No. 4 dated October 19, 2017; further subject to the conditions all which are attached to previous Item No. 8 that were voted, and approved. P & Z Commission (ZA17-066) Questions?