Item 4K TIATRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR
CRESCENT GREEN
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
DeShazo Project No. 17042
Prepared for:
Hat Creek Development
P.O Box 92747
Southlake, TX 76092
Prepared by:
DeShazo Group, Inc.
Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-3199
400 South Houston Street, Suite 330
Dallas, Texas 75202
214.748.6740
i�P�E. OF TFC\\(I
...:.....................:..
/ J. MARK MATHIS
/ ............ ..........
May 3, 2017 /�� ssoos ;��,;
—7%; DeShazo Group
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
Traffic Impact Analysis for
Crescent Green
DeShazo Project No. 17042 -
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVESUMMARY......................................................................................................................... i
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN ....................................................................................................................
111
INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................1
Purpose.............................................................................................................................................................1
ProjectDescription...........................................................................................................................................
2
StudyParameters.............................................................................................................................................2
StudyArea.........................................................................................................................................................
2
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS................................................................................................................
3
Approach...........................................................................................................................................................
3
Background Traffic Volume Data....................................................................................................................3
ExistingVolumes............................................................................................................................................3
Projected Background Traffic Volumes..........................................................................................................4
Site -Related Traffic...........................................................................................................................................4
TripGeneration..............................................................................................................................................4
Trip Distribution and Assignment...................................................................................................................5
Site -Generated Traffic Volumes.....................................................................................................................5
Traffic Operational Analysis —Roadway Intersections...............................................................................
5
Description.....................................................................................................................................................5
AnalysisTraffic Volumes................................................................................................................................6
Summaryof Results.......................................................................................................................................7
Traffic Operational Analysis —Roadway Links............................................................................................
9
Description.....................................................................................................................................................9
Summaryof Results.....................................................................................................................................10
SITE ACCESS REVIEW.......................................................................................................................10
DrivewaySpacing...........................................................................................................................................10
Deceleration Lane Analysis...........................................................................................................................11
IntersectionSight Distance...........................................................................................................................11
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.....................................................................11
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Table of Contents
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
LIST OF TABLES:
Table 1. Development Program Summary
Table 2. Historical Daily Traffic Volume Growth Trend
Table 3. Projected Trip Generation Summary
Table 4. Preliminary Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Results Summary
Table 5. Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis Results Summary (Signalized Intersections)
Table 6. Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis Results Summary (Unsignalized Intersections)
Table 7. Roadway Link Capacity Analysis Results Summary
Table 8. Median Spacing Summary
Table 9. Driveway Spacing Summary
I IST OF FXHIRITS-
Exhibit 1. Site Location and Study Area Map
Exhibit 2. Existing Roadway Geometry and Traffic Control
Exhibit 3. Sight Distance Analysis
LIST OF APPENDICES:
Appendix A. Traffic Volume Exhibits
Appendix B. Detailed Traffic Volume Data
Appendix C. Site -Generated Traffic Supplement
Appendix D. Detailed Intersection Capacity Analysis Results
Appendix E. Site Access Review Supplement
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Table of Contents
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The services of DeShazo Group, Inc. (DeShazo) were retained by Hat Creek Development to
conduct a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed Crescent Green residential development
("the Project") located at northwest corner of Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Shady Oak
Drive in Southlake, Texas. The Project will consist of 57 single-family lots. Buildout of the Project
is estimated to occur in 2020. A TIA is required by the City of Southlake for zoning and site plan
as part of the Project's approval process.
The purpose of this report is to summarize the traffic operational characteristics of the
background conditions within a specific study area and to measure the projected incremental
impact related to the Project as determined by standardized engineering analyses. The study
parameters used in this TIA are based upon the requirements of the City of Southlake and the
Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and are consistent with the standard industry
practices used in similar studies.
The following findings and recommendations are based upon buildout of the subject property in
accordance with the development scenario outlined in the Project Description section of this
report.
FINDING 1: The signalized intersection of Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Shady Oak Drive is
currently operating at an acceptable LOS during the analyzed peak hours. It is expected to
continue to operate at an acceptable LOS under both Site Plan A and Site Plan B buildout
conditions.
FINDING 2: The unsignalized intersection of Shady Oaks Drive and Unity Way is currently
operating at acceptable LOS during the analyzed peak hours. It is expected to continue to operate
at an acceptable LOS under Site Plan A and Site Plan B buildout conditions.
FINDING 3: The unsignalized intersection of Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Timber Lake
Place is currently operating at LOS F due to the difficulty northbound left -turning vehicles
encounter on Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) during the AM and PM peak hours. When Driveway
2 is added to the intersection at Site Plan A buildout, the southbound left -turn vehicles are
expected to have difficulty finding adequate gaps to turn left into Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709)
during the peak hours due to heavy traffic. Therefore, traffic wanting to go eastbound on
Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) out of Driveway 2 during the peak hours are expected to use
Driveway 1 on Shady Oak Drive.
❖ RECOMMENDATION: A traffic signal warrant analysis maybe performed to determine if the
installation of a traffic signal is warranted at this location for Site Plan A.
FINDING 4: The unsignalized intersection of Driveway 1 and Shady Oak Drive is currently
operating at an acceptable LOS during the analyzed peak hours. It is expected to continue to
operate at an acceptable LOS under Site Plan A and Site Plan B buildout conditions.
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
FINDING 5: Based upon the auxiliary lane thresholds for the City of Southlake and TxDOT, no right -
turn lanes are warranted for Driveway 1 on Shady Oak Drive at Site Plan A and Site Plan B buildout
conditions and for Driveway 2 on Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) Site Plan A buildout conditions.
END
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Table of Contents
Site Data Summary Chan _ ,s •r' , r,,T �+" „f.,e�di- �1'' i f - '
Hgoenum eL 66 4Mti 7B 99 dc.
open Space 14.7296 11.43x. j�a
H.O.W. 13.86% 8-03 ac. +f +:9f'i���,
f•ra65. Arae lOQ.D09a 57.93 ac. �' - f •.l �,� - ,,., _ 1•, _ `. ,�
• a4. ^V T
uxs 57
Duty_A
L
i ,�� •` =. � 1 �, ,%� -"'- rte, ai .'st ' � _..
Nv
' v- •,
Engineer.
8241 Hamlllm 0^, PC-
'd.
ncrcaas-d'xlao
Hath WcManH, h, T%.76182
Tel 817-266-04D8 'r w
y
Cmtact. Kei[h Flafltillt 1 �,o
• - - k�i
t�THS i � -
Applicant.- _, sr �-�.t�`ir— . .1.. - LITH -4A
o� 66x92747
m
sa�rtnwM n F s 'P, 11f '--
_r _'�.wr
meow
tonp324-31e1 6€-V ELD F N E N i- "s'.°�''�-�� ^''° ^
Planner: SaGEGROlW INCCase No. ZA17-
m0+�dsgs SSii
��yy� bCnxnxr
!i 119S0.fsmlM:e. Ae kV
19 ]AN 17'"'e t"or17l0®!
1• • 50' Ta eu4aFnac
D lar 208' Site Plan Pedestrian Access Plan - A Stacyperty
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas
U
,'\
Ell
Engineer:
HarnhamINd G p.Y -.. y`-
t r
MAeft- z
Rath attchland Why T%.76182 „ — � fir' _�.� �—
Tel817-m 6908
concoct: Wtn Hanft n _ _ j • `E ,_ - ',
r ■
Applicant: w
raac [eek ue dupme r11 r F r
P.Q.
.O 94x92747-1-,
southWx• Tx 75092 Y.I }',•. ,
n
aaMI 3111 s DEVELOPMENT V �"� :T rr T �� ld w->! o i
Planner. Skar�W,INC 1" r' `,
+,mM oa9,
.ase No. Zt417-
19 AN 17 ANhde. torr 740®7 Stacy
1w 200' Site Plan Pedestrian Access Plan - n4opertv
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas
Sake Data Summary Chart
nerid Area
owq-p
88x5
1335% 17.74
Ulm
�
13394E 7.74
Ga Ari
1W.00% 51.93 K.
ae 1ar
57
{• I
L
Dana4y
.9$Iac
U
,'\
Ell
Engineer:
HarnhamINd G p.Y -.. y`-
t r
MAeft- z
Rath attchland Why T%.76182 „ — � fir' _�.� �—
Tel817-m 6908
concoct: Wtn Hanft n _ _ j • `E ,_ - ',
r ■
Applicant: w
raac [eek ue dupme r11 r F r
P.Q.
.O 94x92747-1-,
southWx• Tx 75092 Y.I }',•. ,
n
aaMI 3111 s DEVELOPMENT V �"� :T rr T �� ld w->! o i
Planner. Skar�W,INC 1" r' `,
+,mM oa9,
.ase No. Zt417-
19 AN 17 ANhde. torr 740®7 Stacy
1w 200' Site Plan Pedestrian Access Plan - n4opertv
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
Technical Memorandum
To: Mr. Kosse Maykus —Hat Creek Development
From: Mark Mathis, P.E.—DeShazo Group, Inc.
Date: April 4, 2017
Re: Traffic Impact Analysis for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas
DeShazo Project Number 17042
INTRODUCTION
The services of DeShazo Group, Inc. (DeShazo) were retained by Hat Creek Development to
conduct a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed Crescent Creek residential development
("the Project") located at northwest corner of Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Shady Oak
Drive in Southlake, Texas. A site location map is provided for reference in Exhibit 1.
Hat Creek Development is seeking a zoning and site plan approval from the City of Southlake to
facilitate development of the Project. Submittal of a TIA, prepared by a registered professional
engineer experienced and skilled in the field of traffic/transportation engineering, is one of the
requirements of the City of Southlake as part of the Project's approval process. This TIA was
prepared in accordance with industry and local standards by registered professional engineers
employed by DeShazo. DeShazo is a licensed engineering firm based in Dallas, Texas, that
provides professional services in traffic engineering, transportation planning, and related fields.
Purpose
The purpose of a TIA is to determine if any improvements to the adjacent transportation system
are needed to maintain a satisfactory level of service, an acceptable level of safety, and
appropriate access for a proposed development. A TIA is site specific investigation of traffic
conditions in a localized area and is not a substitute for area -wide or regional transportation
planning, which are responsibilities of the local and regional government agencies.
To achieve this objective, this report summarizes the traffic operational characteristics of the
background conditions within a designated study area and the projected incremental impact of
the Project as determined through standardized engineering analyses. Based upon the results of
this analysis, DeShazo may recommend measures to mitigate traffic impacts that excessively or
unduly effect safety or operational efficiency. Some mitigation may be attributable, in part or in
whole, to the proposed development. It is intended that the findings and recommendations
presented in this study provide information to the public and the governing agency regarding
potential transportation improvements that may be warranted. But, also, this study is intended
to provide a credible basis upon which the governing agency may determine whether some
actions may be required as a condition of the Project's approval.
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 1
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
Project Description
The Project will consist of 57 single-family residential lots and will be built in one phase. Buildout
of the Project is estimated to occur in 2020. There are two site plan options for the proposed
development: Plan A and Plan B. Site Plan A will have two access connections: one across from
Timber Lake Place off Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and one off Shady Oak Drive. Site Plan B
will have only one public access connection off Shady Oak Drive. An emergency vehicle only
driveway is also provided off Southlake Boulevard. A summary of the proposed development
program, by phase, is provided in Table 1. Preliminary site plans for both options for the Project
as prepared by Sage Group, Inc. are attached following the Executive Summary.
Table 1. Development Program Summary
NOTE: The development program provided above is based upon the most current and
complete information available at the time of this study publication.
Study Parameters
The study parameters used in this TIA are based upon the requirements of the City of Southlake
and TxDOT and are consistent with the standard industry practices used in similar studies.
This TIA analyzed the day-to-day traffic operations at time periods that were considered
representative of the overall most critical conditions on the public roadway system with some
effect from the proposed Project. Based upon the prevailing background traffic conditions and
the trip generation characteristics of the proposed development, the following periods were
analyzed:
Typical weekday AM and PM peak hours and Saturday (special event) of adjacent street traffic at:
• 2017 Existing Conditions
• 2020 Background Conditions (Without site -generated traffic)
• 2020 Project Buildout Conditions (Background plus site -generated traffic)
• 2025 Horizon Year Project Buildout Conditions
The following technical assumption was also made in this analysis:
At the request of the City Engineer for the City of Southlake, a peak hour between 7 PM and 9 PM
on Saturday during a typical event at The Marq Southlake was included in this analysis.
Study Area
The study area for a TIA is typically defined to allow an assessment of the most relevant traffic
impacts to the local area. The extent of the study area is discretionary but is generally
commensurate with the scale of the proposed development. Special localized factors may also
be considered. The specific locations included in the study area of this TIA are listed below and
depicted in Exhibit 1.
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 2
210
Single Family Detached Housing
57 DU
NOTE: The development program provided above is based upon the most current and
complete information available at the time of this study publication.
Study Parameters
The study parameters used in this TIA are based upon the requirements of the City of Southlake
and TxDOT and are consistent with the standard industry practices used in similar studies.
This TIA analyzed the day-to-day traffic operations at time periods that were considered
representative of the overall most critical conditions on the public roadway system with some
effect from the proposed Project. Based upon the prevailing background traffic conditions and
the trip generation characteristics of the proposed development, the following periods were
analyzed:
Typical weekday AM and PM peak hours and Saturday (special event) of adjacent street traffic at:
• 2017 Existing Conditions
• 2020 Background Conditions (Without site -generated traffic)
• 2020 Project Buildout Conditions (Background plus site -generated traffic)
• 2025 Horizon Year Project Buildout Conditions
The following technical assumption was also made in this analysis:
At the request of the City Engineer for the City of Southlake, a peak hour between 7 PM and 9 PM
on Saturday during a typical event at The Marq Southlake was included in this analysis.
Study Area
The study area for a TIA is typically defined to allow an assessment of the most relevant traffic
impacts to the local area. The extent of the study area is discretionary but is generally
commensurate with the scale of the proposed development. Special localized factors may also
be considered. The specific locations included in the study area of this TIA are listed below and
depicted in Exhibit 1.
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 2
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
Intersections:
(a) Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Shady Oak Drive: Traffic -signal controlled
(b) Timber Lake Place and Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709): STOP -controlled on minorstreet
(c) Shady Oak Drive and Unity Way: STOP -controlled on minorstreet
(d) Shady Oak Drive and Driveway 1: Stop -controlled on Driveway 1
(e) Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Driveway 2: STOP -controlled on Driveway 2
Roadway Links:
(A) Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) east of Timber Lake Place
❑ Functional Classification: Principal Arterial
❑ Existing operation and cross-section: six lanes, two-way operation, median -
divided
❑ Existing Posted Speed Limit: 45 mph
❑ Current Daily Traffic Volume: 52,319 (03/23/2017)
(B) Shady Oak Drive north of Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709)
❑ Functional Classification: Major Collector
❑ Existing operation and cross-section: two lanes, two-way operation, undivided
❑ Existing Posted Speed Limit: 30 mph
❑ Current Daily Traffic Volume: 4, 276 (03/23/2017)
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Submittal of a Traffic Impact Analysis to the City of Southlake is required as part of the application
process for the Project. The study is provided to the Staff for technical review. Approval of any
recommendations made in this study are also subject to approval of the respective governing
agency.
Approach
The TIA presented in this report analyzed the operational conditions for the peak hours and study
area as defined above using standardized analytical methodologies where applicable. Current (or
recent) traffic volume data were collected on a typical day throughout the study area to represent
existing traffic conditions. Where applicable, growth factors were applied to the existing volumes
to project future background traffic at the site buildout year conditions. Then, traffic generated
by the proposed development was projected using the standard three-step approach: Trip
Generation, Trip Distribution, and Traffic Assignment. By adding the site -generated traffic to the
background traffic, the resulting site -plus -background traffic impact to operational conditions
may be assessed from which approach mitigation measures may be recommended, if needed.
Background Traffic Volume Data
Existing Volumes
Current traffic volumes were collected during the analysis periods at the study area intersections
on Saturday, March 25, 2017 and Thursday, March 23, 2017. Traffic volumes are graphically
summarized in Appendix A; detailed data sheets are provided in Appendix B.
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 3
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
Protected Background Traffic Volumes
Background traffic growth is defined as the normal growth of traffic that is not directly related to
the subject development of this study. A review of historical traffic volume data can provide an
indication of the local traffic growth patterns. Table 2 provides a comparison of recent traffic
volumes with prior traffic volumes in the vicinity of the subject site, from which DeShazo
calculated an annual growth rate.
Table 2. Historical Daily Traffic Volume Growth Trend
Roadway Segment
Year
Volume
Annual
Growth
Rate
Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) between
White Chapel Blvd and Byron Nelson Pkwy
2015
43776
6.64%
2014
41051
-1.21%
2013
41554
1.35%
2012
41000
5.13%
2011
39000
-4.88%
2010
41000
-
Data Source: A =TxDOT Traffic Count Database System Average Growth Rate: 1.41%
Based upon the historical traffic volumes in the vicinity and the resulting annual growth rates,
DeShazo applied an annual growth rate of two percent (2%) to determine background traffic
growth.
By applying the assumed growth rate(s) described previously, future background traffic volumes
at the Project buildout year (2020) were calculated for the study area intersections. These
volumes are graphically summarized in Appendix A.
Site -Related Traffic
Trip Generation
Trip generation is calculated in terms of "trip ends" — a trip end is a one-way vehicular trip entering
or exiting a site driveway (i.e., a single vehicle entering and exiting a site represents two trip ends).
Trip generation for this Project was calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)
Trip Generation manual (9t" Edition). ITE Trip Generation is a compilation of actual, vehicular
traffic volume generation data and statistics by land use as collected over several decades by
creditable sources across the country. Using the ITE equations and rates is an accepted
methodology to calculate the projected site -generated traffic volumes for many land uses (though
engineering judgment is strongly advised).
Table 3 provides a summary of the calculated net increase in trip ends generated by the project.
Supplemental information used in the trip generation calculations is provided in Appendix C.
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 4
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
Table 3. Projected Trip Generation Summary
Trip Distribution and Assignment
The distribution and assignment of site -generated trip ends to the surrounding roadway system
is determined by proportionally estimating the orientation of travel via various travel routes. A
global trip distribution was calculated based on the traffic volumes on TxDOT's Traffic Count
Database. This is a subjective exercise based upon professional judgment considering such factors
as directional characteristics of existing local traffic; trip attributes (e.g., trip purpose, trip length,
travel time, etc.), roadway features (e.g., capacity, operational conditions, character of
environment), regional demographics, etc.
Traffic for the proposed development was distributed and assigned to the study area roadway
network based upon consideration of the factors listed above. Separate traffic assignments were
generated for each site plan option. Detailed trip distribution and traffic assignment calculations
and results are summarized in Appendix C.
Site -Generated Traffic Volumes
Site -generated traffic is calculated by multiplying the trip generation value (from Table 3) by the
corresponding traffic assignments (from Appendix C). The resulting cumulative (for all uses) peak
period site -generated traffic volumes at buildout of the Project are graphically summarized in
Appendix A.
Traffic Operational Analysis —Roadway Intersections
Description
The level of performance of civil infrastructure can often be measured through an analysis of
volume and capacity that considers various physical and operational characteristics of the system.
For vehicular traffic an operational analysis of roadway intersection capacity is the most detailed
type of analysis. An industry -standardized methodology for this type of analysis was developed
by the Transportation Research Board and is presented in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM).
HCM uses the term "Level of Service" (or, LOS) to qualitatively describe the efficiency using a letter
grade of A through F. Generally, LOS can be described as follows:
LOS A = free, unobstructed flow
LOS e = reasonably free flow
LOS C= stable flow
LOS D = approaching unstable flow
LOS E = unstable flow, operating at design capacity
LOS F = operating over design capacity
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 5
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
Traffic operational analysis is typically measured in one-hour periods during day-to-day peak
conditions. In most urban settings, LOS C, or better, is desirable, although LOS D is considered to
be acceptable. Nevertheless, periods of LOS Eor Fconditions are not uncommon for brief periods
of time at major transportation facilities. In some cases measures to add more capacity, either
through operational changes and/or physical improvements, can be identified to increase
efficiency and sometimes raise Level of Service.
For traffic -signal -controlled ("signalized") intersections and STOP -controlled ("unsignalized")
intersections, LOS is determined based upon the calculated average seconds of delay per vehicle.
For signalized intersections the average delay per vehicle can be effectively calculated for the
entire intersection; however, for unsignalized intersections the average delay per vehicle is
calculated only by approach or by individual traffic maneuvers that must stop or yield right-of-
way. For unsignalized intersections of a minor street or driveway and a major roadway, the
analysis methodology often breaks down and yields low Levels of Service (often, LOS F) than
cannot be mitigated unless a traffic signal is installed. However, for a traffic signal to be installed,
the responsible agency that governs the right-of-way must issue their approval subject to very
specific warrant criteria being met and several other operational considerations being satisfied.
Neither Level -of -Service nor delay is considered a criterion for traffic signal installation.
The following table summarizes the LOS criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections as
defined in the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual.
Table 4. HCM Level -of -Service Criteria
L"OS
Signalized Intersection
Unsignalized Intersection
(Average Delay per Vehicle)
(Average Delay per vehicle)
•
< 10
• •
>10
:•
:•
>50
Analysis Traffic Volumes
Determination of the traffic impact associated with the Project is measured by comparing the
incremental change in operational conditions during peak periods with and without site -related
traffic. Appendix A provides exhibits summarizing the following:
• Existing traffic volumes during study peak hours
• Projected Background traffic volumes at the Site Buildout Year during study peak hours
• Projected Site -Generated traffic volumes during study peak hours
• Projected Background -plus -Site -Generated traffic volumes at the Site Buildout Year
during study peak hours
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 6
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
• Projected Horizon Year 2025 traffic volumes, including Site -Generated traffic during study
peak hours
A summary of the existing intersection/roadway geometry and traffic control devices is shown in
Exhibit 2.
Summary of Results
Intersection capacity analyses presented in this study were performed using the Synchro software
package. Table 5 and Table 6 provide a summary of the peak period intersection operational
conditions under the analysis conditions presented previously. Detailed software output is
provided in Appendix D.
NOTE: Traffic signal operational parameters used in this analysis were based upon actual, existing
traffic signal operational characteristics observed in the field at the time of traffic data collection.
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 7
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
Table 5. Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis Results for Signalized Intersections
Signalized Existin¢ 2020 Background
SITE PLAN A
2020 Buildout 2025 Horizon Year
SITE PLAN
2020 Buildout
2025 Horizon Year
Intersections AM PM Sat AM PM Sat
AM PM Sat AM PM Sat
AM PM Sat
AM PM Sat
Southlake Boulevard at
e
2025 Horizon Year
-.11e,
2020 Buildout
2025 Horizon Year
Shady Oak Drive B (10.5) B (15.4) A (6.4)
B (12.9) B (17.1) A (7.0)
B (13.2) B (17.5) A (7.3) B (17.5) C (24.0) A (76)
B (13.2) B (17.9) A (7.3)
B (176) C (24.3) A (Z6)
Table 6. Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis Results for Unsignalized Intersections
Unsignalized
Traffic
Existing
2020 Background
2020 Buildout
e
2025 Horizon Year
-.11e,
2020 Buildout
2025 Horizon Year
Intersections
Movement
AM
PM
Sat
AM
PM
Sat
AM
PM
Sat
AM PM
Sat
AM
PM
Sat
AM PM
Sat
Southlake Boulevard at
Timber Lake Place/Driveway 2
EBL
A (0.0)
A (0.0)
A (0.0)
A (0.0)
A (0.0)
A (0.0)
C (18.2)
F (164.5)
C (22.9)
C (20.4) F (171.3)
D (26.7)
A (0.0)
A (0.0)
A (0.0)
A (0.0) A (0.0)
4(0.0)
WBL
F (>100)
E (43.3)
C (15.9)
F (>100)
F (55.0)
C (170)
F (>I00)
F (55.0)
C (170)
F (>100) F (94.0)
C (19.1)
F (>100) F (56.3)
C (17.2)
F (>100) F (97.5)
C (19.3)
NEIL
F (>I00)
F (>100)
E (37.1)
F(>100)
F (>100)
E (42.4)
F (>100)
F (>100)
F (63.8)
F (>100) F (>I00)
F (88.1)
F(>100) F(>100)
F (60.2)
F (>100) F (>100)
F (81.1)
NBR
F (>100)
C (23.1)
B (14.4)
F (>100)
D (25.2)
B (14.9)
- -
- -
- -
- - - -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- - - -
- -
NBTR
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
F (>100)
D (25.3)
B (14.9)
F (>100) D (29.5)
C (15,9)
F (>100) D (25.5)
B (15.0)
F (>100) D (29.7)
C (16.0)
SBLTR
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
C (15.6)
F (50.1)
C (17.7)
C (16.7) F (65.2)
C (19.3)
- -
- -
- -
- - - -
- -
Shady Oak Drive at
Unity Way
WBL
B (13.3)
B (11.8)
A (9.3)
B (13.7)
B (12.1)
A (9.3)
B (13.9)
B (12.2)
A (9.4)
B (14.8) B (12.8)
A (9.5)
C (15.1)
B (12.9)
A (9.6)
C (16.3) B (13.7)
A (9.7)
WBR
B (10.7)
A (9.4)
A (8.7)
B (10.9)
A (9.5)
A (8.7)
B (11.0)
A (9.6)
A (8.8)
B (11.4) A (9.7)
A (8.8)
B (11.0)
A (9.6)
A (8.8)
B (11.4) A (9.7)
A (8.8)
SBL
A (8.2)
A (7.7)
A (74)
A (8.2)
A (7.7)
A (7.4)
A (8.3)
A (77)
A (7.4)
A (8.4) A (78)
A (74)
A (8.3)
A (77)
A (7.4)
A (8.4) A (78)
A(7-4)
Shady Oak Drive at
Driveway 1
EBLR
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
B (10.6)
B (10.2)
A (9.0)
B (10.5) B (10.4)
A (74)
B (10.3)
B (10.3)
A (9.1)
B (10.6) B (10.6)
A(9.2)
NEIL
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
A (7.6)
A (7.7)
A (Z4)
A (7.6) A (7.8)
A (9.1)
A (7.6)
A (78)
A (7.4)
A (7.6) A (7.8)
A (Z4)
KEY:
A, B, C, D, E, F = Level -of -Service far each intersection approach
NB, SB, EB, WB = North-, South-, East-, Westbound approach
L, T, R = Left Through, Right Approach turning movement
AM = AM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street
PM = PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street
Sat = Saturday Peak Hour of Adjacent Street
NOTE: Signalized intersection operational parameters and operational results were obtained directly from the optimized software output
and may differ slightly from actual traffic signal operations.
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 8
Deshazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
See specific recommendations in the Summary of Findings and Recommendations section of this
report.
Traffic Operational Analysis —Roadway Links
Description
A roadway link is a segment of roadway between two intersections. Roadway link capacity
analysis is a comparison of actual or forecasted traffic volumes to the available roadway capacity.
The capacity of the roadway link is predominantly a function of the roadway's cross-section (i.e.,
number of lanes, lane widths, type of center divider, etc.). Generally, roadway link capacity is less
critical than intersection capacity; however, it can provide a gage of the utilization of given
roadway.
A specific industry standard for roadway link capacity does not exist, but the typical concept is
derived from a base saturation flow rate (i.e., the maximum theoretical rate of continuous flow
under ideal, unobstructed conditions -- in the traffic engineering industry, this value is generally
considered to range between 1,900-2,100 vehicles per lane per hour). A series of adjustment
factors are then applied to the saturation flow rate to reflect the characteristics of a given
location.
The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) — the metropolitan planning agency
for the Dallas -Fort Worth region — has derived internal "hourly service volume" guidelines used
for transportation modelling purposes. The NCTCOG values were based upon the principals
presented in the Highway Capacity Manual with "regional calibration" factors applied. Though
these per -lane capacities, or "Service Volumes" (summarized in the table below), are intended for
modelling purposes, they do provide a reasonable estimate of the roadway capacity.
To determine the utilization of a roadway, the volume -to -capacity ratio v/c can be calculated — a
v/c ratio of less than 1.0 indicates that the roadway is operating under capacity. NCTCOG's Level
of Service denominations are as follows:
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 9
Deshazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
e ®. v
Conditions
I Hourly Volume Functional Classification
PLANA PLAN B
<_ 45%
A/B
> 45%:5 65%
C
>65%<_80%
D
> 80%:5 100%
E
> 100%
F
Summary of Results
For roadways adjacent to or in the vicinity of the subject site, the volume/capacity ratio was
calculated for existing and site buildout conditions. A summary of the link capacity analysis is
provided in Table 7. See specific recommendations in the Recommendations section of this
report.
Table 7. Roadway Link Capacity Analysis Results Summary
Roadway
I-
Conditions
I Hourly Volume Functional Classification
PLANA PLAN B
Capacity
V/C
PLAN A PLAN 8
LOS
PLAN A
PLAN B
Principal Arterial
Southlake Blvd
Existing
4,601 4,601
6 -Lanes - Divided Two Way)
5,550
0.83 0.83
E
E
Principal Arterial
between Timber Lake
Buildout
4,896 4,656
5,550
0.88 0.84
E
F
PI and Shady Oak
6 -Lanes - Divided Two Way)
Drive
Horizon
Principal Arterial
Year
5,368 5,128
6 -Lanes -Divided Two Way)
5,550
0.97 0.92
E
E
Existing
462 462 Major Collector
1050
0.44 0.44
A/B
A/B
Shady Oak Dr
I 2 -Lane - Undivided two way)
between Southlake
Buildout
541 490 Major Collector
1050
0.52 0.47
C
C
2 -Lane - Undivided two way)
Blvd and Unity Way
Horizon
Major Collector
Year
552 552
2 -Lane - Undivided two wa
1050
0.53 0.53
C
D
'The hourly volume represents the highest peak hour volume during a 24-hour period.
Based upon the link analysis results above, Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) is expected to operate at an
acceptable LOS even though the roadway capacity is projected to be near roadway capacity during
the weekday and Saturday peak hours. Shady Oak Drive is expected to operate below roadway
capacity and at an acceptable LOS during the weekday and Saturday peak hours.
SITE ACCESS REVIEW
The site access review portion of this study examined spacing requirements for proposed
driveways, the need for auxiliary lanes, and sight distance from proposed driveways along the
existing roadways.
Driveway Spacing
TxDOT controls access connection on Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and the City of Southlake
controls access connection on Shady Oak Drive. The TxDOTAccess Management Manual provides
guidelines for new driveways along State Highways based upon the posted speed limit. For a
posted speed limit of 45 mph, the minimum distance between access connections is 360 feet
(refer to TxDOT Table 2-2 in Appendix E). TxDOT considers the spacing between access points as
inside -edge -(of driveway pavement) -to -inside -edge.
The City of Southlake's Driveway Ordinance 634 Section 5.1 Design Standards (Table One) require
a minimum centerline spacing of 150 feet for access connections on collector roads such as Shady
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 10
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
Oak Drive. Exhibit 3 depicts the approximate location for each proposed access connection on
Southlake Boulevard and Shady Oak Drive. Table 8 summarizes the driveway spacing analysis.
Table 8. Drivewav Spacing Summary
Note: Site Plans A and B have Driveway 1 in the same location on Shady Oak Drive.
Based upon the driveway spacing summary above, proposed Driveway 1 (Site Plans A and B) on
Shady Oak Drive meets the City of Southlake's minimum centerline driveway spacing
requirements. Proposed Driveway 2 (Site Plan A) also meets TxDOT's meets the minimum
connection spacing requirement along Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709).
Deceleration Lane Analysis
The TxDOT criteria for providing right -turn deceleration auxiliary lanes are outlined in Table 2-3
(Appendix E) of the Access Management Manual. The threshold for roadways with a posted
speed limit less than or equal to 45 MPH is greater than 60 vehicles per hour.
Since the existing posted speed limit is 45 mph on Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and the right -
turn volumes into Driveway 2 (Site Plan A) do not exceed 60 vehicles during the AM, PM, and
Saturday peak hours, a right -turn lane is not warranted.
Since an exclusive eastbound left -turn lane into the proposed Driveway 2 already exists on
Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709), ingress left -turn volumes do not need to be evaluated for an
additional left -turn lane.
The City of Southlake's Ordinance 634 Section 5.4 Auxiliary Lanes requires that turn lanes be
provided for any driveway located on an arterial street if the ingress volume exceeds 50 vehicles
in the peak hour. If the existing speed limit on the street facility exceeds 40 mph, a deceleration
lane may be required if 40 right -turn ingress vehicles occur in the peak hour.
Since the existing posted speed limit is less than 40 mph (30 mph) on Shady Oak Drive and the
right -turn ingress volumes into Driveway 1 (Site Plan A and B) do not exceed 40 vehicles during
the AM, PM, and Saturday peak hours, a right -turn lane is not warranted.
Intersection Sight Distance
Sight Distance is the metric used to describe the ability of a motorist to physically see, via a direct
line of sight, objects and/or other vehicles to a degree sufficient to allow safe and efficient use a
roadway in the intended manner. Standardized intersection sight distance criteria are outlined in
the current edition of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
(AASHTO) A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (a.k.a., the "Green Book"). An
assessment of the proposed site Driveways 1 and 2 on Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Shady
Oak Drive shows unobstructed sight distance beyond the minimum required visibility.
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 11
Required
Available (ft)
• e
moit�14
Driveway 1 and Residential Driveway to the south
150
280
YES
Driveway 1 and Love Henry Ct
150
1700
YES
Driveway 2 and Residential Driveway to the east
360
660
YES
Driveway 2 and Ginger Ct
360
1420
YES
Note: Site Plans A and B have Driveway 1 in the same location on Shady Oak Drive.
Based upon the driveway spacing summary above, proposed Driveway 1 (Site Plans A and B) on
Shady Oak Drive meets the City of Southlake's minimum centerline driveway spacing
requirements. Proposed Driveway 2 (Site Plan A) also meets TxDOT's meets the minimum
connection spacing requirement along Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709).
Deceleration Lane Analysis
The TxDOT criteria for providing right -turn deceleration auxiliary lanes are outlined in Table 2-3
(Appendix E) of the Access Management Manual. The threshold for roadways with a posted
speed limit less than or equal to 45 MPH is greater than 60 vehicles per hour.
Since the existing posted speed limit is 45 mph on Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and the right -
turn volumes into Driveway 2 (Site Plan A) do not exceed 60 vehicles during the AM, PM, and
Saturday peak hours, a right -turn lane is not warranted.
Since an exclusive eastbound left -turn lane into the proposed Driveway 2 already exists on
Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709), ingress left -turn volumes do not need to be evaluated for an
additional left -turn lane.
The City of Southlake's Ordinance 634 Section 5.4 Auxiliary Lanes requires that turn lanes be
provided for any driveway located on an arterial street if the ingress volume exceeds 50 vehicles
in the peak hour. If the existing speed limit on the street facility exceeds 40 mph, a deceleration
lane may be required if 40 right -turn ingress vehicles occur in the peak hour.
Since the existing posted speed limit is less than 40 mph (30 mph) on Shady Oak Drive and the
right -turn ingress volumes into Driveway 1 (Site Plan A and B) do not exceed 40 vehicles during
the AM, PM, and Saturday peak hours, a right -turn lane is not warranted.
Intersection Sight Distance
Sight Distance is the metric used to describe the ability of a motorist to physically see, via a direct
line of sight, objects and/or other vehicles to a degree sufficient to allow safe and efficient use a
roadway in the intended manner. Standardized intersection sight distance criteria are outlined in
the current edition of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
(AASHTO) A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (a.k.a., the "Green Book"). An
assessment of the proposed site Driveways 1 and 2 on Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Shady
Oak Drive shows unobstructed sight distance beyond the minimum required visibility.
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 11
Deshazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
Consideration of clear sight triangles is recommended in the design phase of the proposed
driveway.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
SITE PLAN A
FINDING 1: The signalized intersection of Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Shady Oak Drive is
currently operating at an acceptable LOS during the analyzed peak hours. It is expected to
continue to operate at an acceptable LOS at Site Plan A buildout conditions.
FINDING 2: The unsignalized intersection of Shady Oaks Drive and Unity Way is currently
operating at acceptable LOS during the analyzed peak hours. It is expected to continue to operate
at an acceptable LOS at Site Plan A buildout conditions.
FINDING 3: The unsignalized intersection of Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Timber Lake
Place is currently operating at LOS F due to the difficulty northbound left -turning vehicles
encounter on Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) during the AM and PM peak hours. When Driveway
2 is added to the intersection, the southbound left -turn vehicles are expected to be extremely
difficult during the peak hours due to the heavy traffic on Southlake Boulevard (FM 179).
Therefore, Driveway 2 is expected to operate at low LOS during the peak hours.
❖ RECOMMENDATION: A traffic signal warrant analysis may be performed to determine if
the installation of a traffic signal is warranted at this location.
FINDING 4: The unsignalized intersection of Driveway 1 and Shady Oak Drive is currently operating
at an acceptable LOS during the analyzed peak hours. It is expected to continue to operate at an
acceptable LOS at Site Plan A buildout conditions.
FINDING 5: Based upon the auxiliary lane thresholds for the City of Southlake and TxDOT, no right -
turn lanes are warranted for Driveway 1 on Shady Oak Drive and Driveway 2 on Southlake
Boulevard (FM 1709).
C.ITF PI AN R
FINDING 1: The signalized intersection of Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Shady Oak Drive is
currently operating at an acceptable LOS during the analyzed peak hours. It is expected to
continue to operate at an acceptable LOS at Site Plan B buildout conditions.
FINDING 2: The unsignalized intersection of Shady Oaks Drive and Unity Way is currently
operating at acceptable LOS during the analyzed peak hours. It is expected to continue to operate
at an acceptable LOS at Site Plan B buildout conditions.
FINDING 3: The unsignalized intersection of Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) and Timber Lake
Place is currently operating at LOS F due to the difficulty northbound left -turning vehicles
encounter on Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) during the AM and PM peak hours.
FINDING 4: The unsignalized intersection of Driveway 1 and Shady Oak Drive is currently operating
at an acceptable LOS during the analyzed peak hours. It is expected to continue to operate at an
acceptable LOS at Site Plan B buildout conditions.
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 12
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
FINDING 5: Based upon the auxiliary lane thresholds for the City of Southlake, no right -turn lane
is warranted for Driveway 1 on Shady Oak Drive.
END OF MEMO
Crescent Green
Traffic Impact Analysis
Page 13
Exhibits
DeShazo Group, Inc.
Shopping Center
Traffic Impact Analysis
Exhibits
w •�����' � s N.T
` I V
4 _ -
J 'tYwaY �. �_ - - LEGEND:
l am d� E `-'P ; + �' ` • STUDY INTERSECTIONS
„ 24-HOUR ROAD TUBE COUNTS
Southlake-—�: • EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL
PROJECT SITE LOCATION j
=N000%Mm Group
3
i
IR
� e
r
I
. r
RESIDENTIP
I 9W
660'
Driveway Spacing for Site Plan A
TIA for Crescent Green in South lake,Texas.
m
0
a bin4
E 1
J
14
Lw�.g
.RIF
6A, L.
i
'
1 EF'r B J 4
EXHIBIT
PROJECT #17042 3 A
0;QDeShazo Group
Driveway Spacing for Site Plan B
TIA for Crescent Green in South lake,Texas.
PROJECT #17042
EXHIBIT
3B
Appendix A. Traffic Volume Exhibits
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
Crescent Green Traffic
Impact Analysis
Appendix A
Al. Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
MI
A2. Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
MO
A3. Existing Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
MI
A4. Background AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
MI
AS. Background PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
milli
A6. Background Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
MI
A7. Site Generated AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan A ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
M-Ul
A8. Site Generated PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan A ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
M -D
A9. Site Generated Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan A ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
M-Ul
A10. 2020 Background Plus Site Generated AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan A ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
41YL1
All. 2020 Background Plus Site Generated PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan A ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
41YL1
Al2. 2020 Background Plus Site Generated Saturday Peak Hour Volumes - Plan A ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
M -D
A13. 2025 Horizon Plus Site Generated AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan A ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
4iD
A14. 2025 Horizon Plus Site Generated PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan A ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
Mul
A15. 2025 Horizon Plus Site Generated Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan A ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
41YL1
A16. Site Generated AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan B ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
4.10
A17. Site Generated PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan B ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
MO
A18. Site Generated Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan B ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
MALI
A19. 2020 Background Plus Site Generated AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan B ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
41YL1
A20. 2020 Background Plus Site Generated PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan B ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
41YL1
A21. 2020 Background Plus Site Generated Saturday Peak Hour Volumes - Plan B ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
M-Ul
A22. 2025 Horizon Plus Site Generated AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan B ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
M-0
A23. 2025 Horizon Plus Site Generated PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan B ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
M -D
A24. 2025 Horizon Plus Site Generated Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Plan B ^ North
Not to Scale
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, Texas Deshazo Group
41YL1
Appendix B. Detailed Traffic Volume Data
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
Crescent Green Traffic
Impact Analysis
Appendix 8
Page I of 3
Intersection Traffic Movements
4:15 PM
0
1
0
14
DeShazo Group, Inc.
Location: Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) at Timber Lake Place
0
0
0
0
City/State: Southlake, Texas
5
0
Data Collector(s): Camera
0
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
Day/Date: Thursday, March 23, 2017
2
0
Weather Conditions:
Mild/Normal Conditions
0
Project -ID #: 17042
0
0
Traffic
Control: Unsignalized
3
0
12 638
Data Source: CJ-Hensch
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
Description: Minor -Street STOP
Controlled
0
Time of Northbound on Southbound on Eastbound on Westbound on
Count Timber Lake Place
Timber Lake Place
Southlake Boulevard
Southlake Boulevard
Begin End
U L T R
U
L
T R
U L T
R
U L T
R
7:00 AM 7:15 AM
0 2 0 11
0
0
0 0
0 0 788
0
0 1 147
0
7:15 AM 7.30 AM
0 5 0 21
0
0
0 0
0 0 815
4
0 9 236
0
7:30 AM 7.45 AM
0 3 0 34
0
0
0 0
0 0 826
3
0 2 305
0
7:45 AM 8:00 AM
0 2 0 21
0
0
0 0
0 0 732
12
0 7 299
0
8:00 AM 8:15 AM
0 1 0 21
0
0
0 0
0 0 718
3
0 15 315
0
8:15 AM 8:30 AM
0 1 0 19
0
0
0 0
0 0 635
6
0 2 235
0
8:30 AM 8:45 AM
0 1 0 23
0
0
0 0
0 0 605
4
0 4 208
0
8:45 AM 9:00 AM
0 2 0 10
0
0
0 0
0 0 615
4
0 5 211
0
Intersection PHV:
0 11 0 97
0
0
0 0
0 0 3,091
22
0 33 1,155
0
PHF:
0.00 0.55 0.00 0.71
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.94
0.46
0.00 0.55 0.92
0.00
Intersection
Peak Hour 7.• 15 AM - 8:15 AM
0
0
1,660
29
0
Intersection PHF.-
0.94
Study Area PHV:
0 11 0 97
0
0
00
0 0 3,091
22
0 33 1,155
0
PHF:
0.00 0.55 0.00 0.71
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.94
0.46
0.00 0.55 0.92
0.00
F --Study Peak Hour: 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM
Peak Hour 5:00 PM
- 6:00 PM
Study Area PHF: 0.94
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
0
1
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
317
5
0
18 667
0
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
0
2
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
436
3
0
12 638
0
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0
3
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
391
6
0
8 638
0
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
0
1
0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
404
3
0
17 653
0
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
0
2
0
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
374
9
0
18 738
0
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
435
4
0
20 675
0
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0
2
0
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
446
5
0
19 724
0
5:45 PM
6:00 PM
0
1
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
405
11
0
14 683
0
Intersection PHV:
0
5
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,660
29
0
71 2,820
0
PHF:
0.00
0.63
0.00
0.78
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.93
0.66
0.00
0.89 0.96
0.00
Intersection
Peak Hour 5:00 PM
- 6:00 PM
Intersection PHF.-
0.96
Study Area PHV:
0
5
0
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,660
29
0
71 2,820
0
PHF:
0.00
0.63
0.00
0.78
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.93
0.66
0.00
0.89 0.96
0.00
r --Study
Peak Hour: 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM
Study
Area PHF: 0.96
Observations:
File: C2X3HRS - 4L&12Mv Peds.XLS
Page 2 o f 3
Intersection Traffic Movements
4:15 PM
0
2
1
9
0
24
DeShazo Group, Inc.
Location: Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) at Shady Oak Drive
0
17
300
2
16
3 634
City/State: Southlake, Texas
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
0
Data Collector(s):
Camera
3
0
22
0
Day/Date: Thursday, March 23,
2017
17
406
Weather conditions:
Mild/Normal Conditions
0 633
19
Project -ID #: 17042
4:45 PM
0
3
Traffic
Control:
Signalized
15
1
27
0
Data Source: CJ-Hensch
400
1
9
2 638
16
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
0
6
3
Time of Northbound on Southbound on Eastbound on Westbound on
Count Driveway
12
Shady Oak Drive
42
Southlake Blvd
30
378
Southlake Blvd
12
Begin End
U L T
R
U
L
T R
U
L T
R
U
L T
R
7:00 AM 7:15 AM
0 1 0
2
0
3
0 7
0
19 774
1
3
2 137
5
7:15 AM 7.30 AM
0 0 0
0
0
11
2 10
0
36 760
0
1
1 237
12
7:30 AM 7.45 AM
0 2 0
0
0
17
0 19
0
62 794
8
5
3 276
14
7:45 AM 8:00 AM
0 1 0
1
0
20
1 21
0
79 655
3
5
3 292
36
8:00 AM 8:15 AM
0 1 0
0
0
25
1 24
0
68 690
1
8
2 312
26
8:15 AM 8:30 AM
0 1 0
1
0
11
0 16
0
49 657
6
3
1 218
20
8:30 AM 8:45 AM
0 0 0
2
0
14
1 20
0
28 555
6
3
3 202
19
8:45 AM 9:00 AM
0 1 0
5
0
18
1 11
0
16 607
5
4
8 204
11
Intersection PHV:
0 4 0
1
0
73
4 74
0
245 2,899
12
19
9 1,117
88
PHF:
0.00 0.50 0.00
0.25
0.00
0.73
0.50 0.77
0.00
0.78 0.91
0.38
0.59
0.75 0.90
0.61
Intersection
Peak Hour 7:15 AM -
8:15 AM
0.00
0.44
0.50
0.56
0.00
0.79
0.25
Intersection PHF.- 0.95
Study Area PHV:0
4 0
1
0
73
4 74
0
245 2,899
12
19
9 1,117
88
PHF:
0.00 0.50 0.00
0.25
0.00
0.73
0.50 0.77
0.00
0.78 0.91
0.38
L 0.59
0.75 0.90
0.61
Study Peak Hour: 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM
Study Area PHF: 0.95
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
0
2
1
9
0
24
1
53
0
17
300
2
16
3 634
19
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
0
3
0
3
0
22
0
29
0
17
406
0
7
0 633
19
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0
3
2
2
0
15
1
27
0
14
400
1
9
2 638
16
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
0
6
3
5
0
12
1
42
0
30
378
0
12
0 637
24
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
0
4
1
4
0
27
0
32
0
15
378
0
10
2 736
18
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
0
1
1
3
0
22
0
37
0
25
419
0
10
1 650
28
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0
1
0
1
0
14
1
32
0
36
416
1
7
0 725
26
5:45 PM
6:00 PM
0
1
2
1
0
22
0
29
0
17
396
0
9
1 668
14
Intersection PHV:
0
7
4
9
0
85
1
130
0
93
1,609
1
36
4 2,779
86
PHF:
0.00
0.44
0.50
0.56
0.00
0.79
0.25
0.88
0.00
0.65
0.96
0.25
0.90
0.50 0.94
0.77
Intersection
Peak Hour 5:00 PM
- 6:00 PM
Intersection PHF.-
0.96
Study Area PHV:
0
7
4
9
0
85
1
1300
93
1,609
1
36
4 2,779
86
PHF:
0.00
0.44
0.50
0.56
0.00
0.79
0.25
0.88
0.00
0.65
0.96
0.25
0.90
0.50 0.94
0.77
Study
Peak Hour: 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM
Study
Area PHF: 0.96
Observations:
File: C2X3HRS - 4L&12Mv Peds.XLS
Page 3 o f 3
Intersection Traffic Movements
4:15 PM
0
0
33
2
DeShazo Group, Inc.
Location: Shady Oak Drive at Unity Way
66
0
0
0
0
0
0
City/State: Southlake, Texas
8
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
Data Collector(s): Camera
0
34
2
0
Day/Date: Thursday, March 23, 2017
42
0
Weather
conditions: Mild/Normal Conditions
0
0
Project -ID #: 17042
1 0
4
4:30 PM
Traffic Control: Unsignalized
0
0
23
3
Data Source: CJ-Hensch
12
43
0
Description: Minor -Street STOP
Controlled
0
Time of Northbound on Southbound on Eastbound on Westbound on
Count Shady Oak Drive
Shady Oak Drive Unity Way
4
4:45 PM
Unity Way
0
Begin End
U L T R
U
L
T
R
U L T
R
U
L T
R
7:00 AM 7:15 AM
0 0 19 2
0
2
13
0
0 0 0
0
0
0 0
0
7:15 AM 7:30 AM
0 0 41 2
0
2
21
0
0 0 0
0
0
0 0
4
7:30 AM 7.45 AM
0 0 60 11
0
5
36
0
0 0 0
0
0
0 0
13
7:45 AM 8:00 AM
0 0 91 10
0
10
45
0
0 0 0
0
0
1 0
9
8:00 AM 8:15 AM
0 0 80 12
0
7
50
0
0 0 0
0
0
2 0
12
8:15 AM 8:30 AM
0 0 50 5
0
4
30
0
0 0 0
0
0
1 0
5
8:30 AM 8:45 AM
0 0 28 2
0
5
41
0
0 0 0
0
0
2 0
4
8:45 AM 9:00 AM
0 0 10 7
0
4
30
0
0 0 0
0
0
0 0
2
Intersection PHV:
0 0 281 38
0
26
161
0
0 0 0
0
0
4 0
39
PHF:
0.00 0.00 0.77 0.79
0.00
0.65
0.81
0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50 0.00
0.75
Intersection
Peak Hour 7.•30 AM - 8:30 AM
Intersection PHF:
0.92
Study Area PHV:
Intersection PHF.-
0.83
Study Area PHV:
0 0 272 35
0
24
152
0
0 0 0
0
0
3 0
38
PHF:
0.00 0.00 0.75 0.73
0.00
0.60
0.76
0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.38 0.00
0.73
F --Study Peak Hour: 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Study Area PHF: 0.79
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
0
0
33
2
0
5
66
0
0
0
0
0
0
3 0
8
4:15 PM
4:30 PM
0
0
34
2
0
7
42
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
4
4:30 PM
4:45 PM
0
0
23
3
0
12
43
0
0
0
0
0
0
4 0
4
4:45 PM
5:00 PM
0
0
42
10
0
9
41
0
0
0
0
0
0
7 0
7
5:00 PM
5:15 PM
0
0
33
4
0
3
43
0
0
0
0
0
0
5 0
8
5:15 PM
5:30 PM
0
0
46
3
0
7
52
0
0
0
0
0
0
5 0
4
5:30 PM
5:45 PM
0
0
58
11
0
4
31
0
0
0
0
0
0
5 0
14
5:45 PM
6:00 PM
0
0
23
7
0
9
41
0
0
0
0
0
0
12 0
4
Intersection PHV:
0
0
179
28
0
23
167
0
0
0
0
0
0
22 0
33
PHF:
0.00
0.00
0.77
0.64
0.00
0.64
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.79 0.00
0.59
Intersection
Peak Hour 4:45 PM
- 5:45 PM
Intersection PHF:
0.92
Study Area PHV:
0
0
160
25
0
23
167
0
0
0
0
00
27 0
30
PHF:
0.00
0.00
0.69
0.57
0.00
0.64
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.56 0.00
0.54
Study
Peak Hour: 5:00 PM - 6:00 PM
Study
Area PHF: 0.88
Observations:
File: C2X3HRS - 4L&12Mv Peds.XLS
Page l qf3
Intersection Traffic Movements
DeShazo Group, Inc.
Location:
Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) at Timber Lake Place
City/State:
Southlake, Texas
Data Collector(s):
Camera
Day/Date:
Saturday, March 25, 2017
Weather Conditions:
Mild/Normal Conditions
Project -ID #:
17042-01
Traffic
Control:
UnSignalized
Data Source:
CJ-Hensch
Description:
Minor -Street STOP Controlled
Time of Northbound on Southbound on Eastbound on Westbound on
Count
Timber Lake Place
Timber Lake Place
Southlake Blvd
Southlake Blvd
Begin End
L T R
L
T
R
L
T R
L T R
7:00 PM- 7:15 PM
2 0 12
0
0
0
0
214 1
6 325 0
7:15 PM- 7:30 PM
1 0 6
0
0
0
0
282 2
10 349 0
7:30 PM- 7:45 PM
2 0 8
0
0
0
0
199 0
9 264 0
7:45 PM- 8:00 PM
2 0 7
0
0
0
0
250 1
6 352 0
8:00 PM- 8:15 PM
0 0 4
0
0
0
0
160 2
10 265 0
8:15 PM- 8:30 PM
1 0 3
0
0
0
0
150 2
9 284 0
8:30 PM- 8:45 PM
1 0 2
0
0
0
0
157 2
5 297 0
8:45 PM- 9:00 PM
2 0 2
0
0
0
0
144 0
9 248 0
Intersection PHV
7 0 33
0
0
0
0
945 4
31 1,290 0
FO
PHF:
0.88 0.00 0.69
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.84 0.50
.78 0.92 0.00
Intersection Peak Hour.' 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM
Intersection PHF. 0.89
Study Area PHV: 7 0 33 0 0 0 0 945 4 31 1,290 0
PHF: 0.88 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.000-00 11 0.00 0.84 0.50 0.78 0.92 0.00
Studv Peak Hour: 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM Studv Area PHF: 0.89
Observations:
File: C1X5HRS - 4L&12Mv.
Page 2 qf3
Intersection Traffic Movements
DeShazo Group, Inc.
Location:
Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709) at Shady Oak Drive
City/State:
Southlake, Texas
Data Collector(s):
Camera
Day/Date:
Saturday, March 25, 2017
Weather Conditions:
Mild/Normal Conditions
Project -ID #:
17042-02
Traffic Control:
Signalized
Data Source:
CJ-Hensch
Time of Northbound on Southbound on Eastbound on Westbound on
Count
Driveway
Shady Oak
Drive Southlake Blvd
Southlake Blvd
Begin End
L T R
L
T
R
L
T R
L T R
7:00 PM- 7:15 PM
0 0 3
12
0
9
7
225 0
1 329 8
7:15 PM- 7:30 PM
0 0 1
10
0
12
4
266 0
1 348 8
7:30 PM- 7:45 PM
0 0 1
10
0
1
3
216 0
1 273 12
7:45 PM- 8:00 PM
0 0 0
6
0
5
5
253 0
0 356 9
8:00 PM- 8:15 PM
0 0 0
7
0
10
4
160 0
0 265 9
8:15 PM- 8:30 PM
0 0 0
5
0
3
3
154 0
0 296 13
8:30 PM- 8:45 PM
0 0 0
10
0
6
4
154 0
0 303 10
8:45 PM- 9:00 PM
0 0 0
2
0
8
7
132 0
0 256 8
Intersection PHV:
0 0 5
38
0
27
19
9600
3 1,306 37
PHF:
0.00 0.00 0.42
0.79
0.00
0.56
0.68
0.90 0.00
0.75 0.92 0.77
Intersection Peak Hour.' 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM
Intersection PHF. 0.92
Study Area PHV: 0 0 5 38 0 27 19 960 0 3 1,306 37
PHF: 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.79 0.00 0.56 j 0.68 0.90 0.00 0.75 0.92 0.77
Studv Peak Hour: 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM Studv Area PHF: 0.92
Observations:
File: C1X5HRS - 4L&12Mv.
Page 3 qf3
Intersection Traffic Movements
DeShazo Group, Inc.
Location:
Shady Oak Drive at Unity Way
City/State:
Southlake, Texas
Data Collector(s):
Camera
Day/Date:
Saturday, March 25, 2017
Weather Conditions:
Mild/Normal Conditions
Project -ID #:
17042-03
Traffic
Control:
UnsignaliZed
Data Source:
CJ-Hensch
Description:
Minor -Street STOP Controlled
Time of Northbound on Southbound on Eastbound on Westbound on
Count
Shady Oak Drive
Shady Oak
Drive
Driveway
Unity Way
Begin End
L T R
L
T
R
L
T R
L T R
7:00 PM- 7:15 PM
0 13 0
2
10
0
0
0 0
5 0 5
7:15 PM- 7:30 PM
0 10 2
1
15
0
0
0 0
8 0 5
7:30 PM- 7:45 PM
0 18 2
0
10
0
0
0 0
1 0 5
7:45 PM- 8:00 PM
0 12 0
0
8
0
0
0 0
2 0 1
8:00 PM- 8:15 PM
0 14 1
0
13
0
0
0 0
0 0 2
8:15 PM- 8:30 PM
0 15 1
0
5
0
0
0 0
0 0 2
8:30 PM- 8:45 PM
0 16 0
0
8
0
0
0 0
4 0 0
8:45 PM- 9:00 PM
0 11 2
0
6
0
0
0 0
1 0 3
Intersection PHV.-
0 53 4
3
43
0
0
0 0
0 1PHF:
FO'5
0.00 0.74 0.50
0.38
0.72
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.80
Intersection Peak Hour.' 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM
Intersection PHF. 0.82
Study Area PHV: 0 53 4 3 43 0 0 0 0 16 0 16
PHF: 0.00 0.74 0.50 0.38 0.72 0.00 j 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.80
Studv Peak Hour: 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM Studv Area PHF: 0.82
Observations:
File: C1X5HRS - 4L&12Mv.
Date Began:
3/23/2017
3500
3000
2500
2000
w
2
D
J
>1500
1000
500
0
EB Southlake Boulevard East of Timber Lake Place
TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL
0:00
16
10
14
10
50
1:00
6
4
8
6
24
2:00
4
11
8
10
33
3:00
3
17
17
20
57
4:00
31
46
58
90
225
5:00
96
144
184
241
665
6:00
319
458
550
660
1987
7:00
787
812
844
768
3211
8:00
734
613
674
610
2631
9:00
527
496
478
460
1961
10:00
372
325
370
411
1478
11:00
344
392
396
379
1511
12:00
358
362
362
396
1478
13:00
480
435
384
378
1677
14:00
388
374
367
336
1465
15:00
337
389
417
361
1504
16:00
320
438
406
412
1576
17:00
379
437
448
410
1674
18:00
373
366
316
352
1407
19:00
276
252
231
239
998
20:00
178
159
162
148
647
21:00
114
112
101
72
399
22:00
60
52
54
56
222
23:00
36
54
56
22
168
TOTAL: 27048
The A.M. peak hour from 7:00 to 8:00 is 3211
The P.M. peak hour from 16:45 to 17:45 is 1676
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0) 00 00 (p Q0 00 0) 00 00
0.
TIME
Date Began:
3/23/2017
3500
3000
2500
2000
w
2
D
J
>1500
1000
500
0
WB Southlake Boulevard East of Timber Lake Place
TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL
0:00
36
29
15
21
101
1:00
24
12
10
4
50
2:00
7
10
7
4
28
3:00
7
8
16
6
37
4:00
5
12
10
18
45
5:00
13
32
50
45
140
6:00
50
94
98
113
355
7:00
144
243
299
300
986
8:00
321
226
210
211
968
9:00
253
258
293
220
1024
10:00
251
252
300
280
1083
11:00
292
331
312
301
1236
12:00
358
347
359
328
1392
13:00
386
378
416
502
1682
14:00
444
410
423
428
1705
15:00
451
492
464
530
1937
16:00
663
632
640
654
2589
17:00
786
679
727
678
2870
18:00
624
580
541
518
2263
19:00
454
426
391
349
1620
20:00
394
368
284
286
1332
21:00
258
275
268
176
977
22:00
167
140
129
104
540
23:00
102
82
71
56
311
TOTAL: 25271
The A.M. peak hour from 7:15 to 8:15 is 1163
The P.M. peak hour from 17:00 to 18:00 is 2870
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 000. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
TIME
Date Began:
3/23/2017
300
250
200
w
150
J
O
100
50
0
NB Shady Oak Drive South of Unity Way
TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL
0:00
1
0
0
0
1
1:00
0
0
1
0
1
2:00
0
0
0
0
0
3:00
0
0
0
2
2
4:00
0
0
2
0
2
5:00
1
0
1
3
5
6:00
3
6
20
20
49
7:00
20
44
74
107
245
8:00
92
57
36
22
207
9:00
32
30
24
35
121
10:00
26
30
40
42
138
11:00
30
30
27
29
116
12:00
23
21
39
29
112
13:00
44
46
29
24
143
14:00
41
24
25
22
112
15:00
47
65
52
34
198
16:00
38
36
27
60
161
17:00
34
53
63
34
184
18:00
34
28
44
38
144
19:00
27
31
24
29
111
20:00
22
13
12
15
62
21:00
20
8
8
2
38
22:00
3
3
5
3
14
23:00
3
2
2
3
10
TOTAL: 2176
The A.M. peak hour from 7:30 to 8:30 is 330
The P.M. peak hour from 16:45 to 17:45 is 210
00 00 00 00 00 Q0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0) 00 00 00 Q0 00 0) 00 00
TIME
Date Began:
3/23/2017
250
200
150
w
2
D
J
0
100
50
0
SB Shady Oak Drive South of Unity Way
TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL
TOTAL: 2100
The A.M. peak hour from 7:45 to 8:45 is 176
The P.M. peak hour from 15:30 to 16:30 is 258
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
TIME
Appendix C. Site -Generated Traffic Supplement
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
Crescent Green Traffic
Impact Analysis
Appendix C
=N000%Mw Group
I— I-- —
31 L
17
Of
e
�CD CDRIVEW AY
iMi 1 K E _ r souTHi AKE BLVD (— oe
�-: q �L Y .
Global Traffic Distribution
TIA for Crescent Green in South lake,Texas.
YI b�E1�6eF�d—G�1f
PROJECT #17042
t
Y@
4)
EXHIBIT
C
Appendix D. Detailed Intersection Capacity Analysis Results
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
Crescent Green Traffic
Impact Analysis
Appendix D
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) Existing
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
-,,, , -,* F t T l
Lane Grout'
nL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
S9
SBR
Lane Configurations
►j
ttT+
)
ttt
?I
Vi
f+
i
%
Traffic Volume (vph)
245
2899
12
9
1117
88
4
0
1
73
0
74
Future Volume (vph)
245
2899
12
9
1117
88
4
0
1
73
0
74
Peak Hour Factor
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Adj. Flow (vph)
258
3052
13
9
1176
93
4
0
1
77
0
78
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
258
3065
0
9
1176
93
4
1
0
77
78
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
110.5
15.0
110.5
110.5
24.5
24.5
24.5
24.5
Total Split (%)
10.0%
73.7%
10.0%
73.7%
73.7%
16.3%
16.3%
16.3%
16.3%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
121.0
118.9
112.3
106.7
106.7
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.81
0.79
0.75
0.71
0.71
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
v/c Ratio
0.66
0.76
0.08
0.33
0.08
0.02
0.00
0.41
0.20
Control Delay
11.7
10.2
4.6
8.5
1.4
57.2
0.0
66.9
1.1
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
11.7
10.2
4.6
8.5
1.4
57.2
0.0
66.9
1.1
LOS
B
B
A
A
A
E
A
E
A
Approach Delay
10.4
7.9
45.8
33.8
Approach LOS
B
A
D
C
Queue Length 50th (ft)
48
452
1
147
0
3
0
70
0
Queue Length 95th (ft)
69
710
5
170
17
16
0
126
0
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
398
4027
172
3615
1152
163
298
188
391
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.65
0.76
0.05
0.33
0.08
0.02
0.00
0.41
0.20
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 150
Actuated Cycle Length: 150
Offset: 50.2 (33%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) Existing
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Intersection Signal Delay: 10.5 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.4% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min)15
iplits and Phases: 2: Sha
dy Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
t02 --04
24.5s 170.5
F
1 06 Oa
4.Ss
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) Existing
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Int Delay, s/veh 3.9
Movement
EBLI
-EB1�BR
WBL WBT
NBL
NBR
Lane Configurations
A
ftT+
I ?TT
I
F
Traffic Vol, veh/h
0
3091 22
33 1155
11
97
Future Vol, veh/h
0
3091 22
33 1155
11
97
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
Sign Control
Free
Free Free
Free Free
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
-
None
- None
-
None
Storage Length
380
Platoon blocked, %
340 -
130
0
Veh in Median Storage, # -
0
- 0
0
-
Grade, %
-
0
- 0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
94 94
94 94
94
94
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2 2
2 2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
0
3288 23
35 1229
12
103
Major/Minor Map
Major2
Minorl
Capacity (veh/h)
Conflicting Flow All
0 0 3312 0
3862
1656
Stage 1
- - - -
3300
-
Stage 2
-
562
-
Critical Hdwy 5.64
5.34
5.74
7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
6.64
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 -
-
6.04
-
Follow-up Hdwy 2.32
3.12
3.82
3.92
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver -
-26
-8
-74
Stage 1
-
-8
-
Stage 2
-
487
-
Platoon blocked, %
0
0
0
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
-26
0
-74
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
0
Free
Stage 1
-
-8
Stage 2
766
0
Storage Length
Approach EB
WB
NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0
14.5
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
HCM LOS
0
0 1.1
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBLnt NBLn2 EBU EBT
EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)
74
-26
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
1.394
1.35
HCM Control Delay (s)
-$338.4 0
-$522.8
HCM Lane LOS
F A
F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
8.3
4.2
Notes'
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined ': All major volume in platoon
4: Shady Oak Dr & Unity Way Existing
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Intersection
Minorl
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
619
366
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Stage 1
366
-
- - - -
Stage 2
253
Movement
ISL
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Lane Configurations
►j
-
j.
5.42
-
rj
Traffic Vol, veh/h
3
38
272
35
24
152
Future Vol, veh/h
3
38
272
35
24
152
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
766
None
Storage Length
0
0
Approach
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0 1.1
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
79
79
79
79
79
79
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
4
48
344
44
30
192
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
619
366
0 0 389 0
Stage 1
366
-
- - - -
Stage 2
253
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
452
679
1170
Stage 1
702
-
-
Stage 2
789
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
439
679
1170
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
439
-
-
Stage 1
702
Stage 2
766
Approach
WB
NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s
10.9
0 1.1
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 439 679 1170
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 0.071 0.026
HCM Control Delay (s) 13.3 10.7 8.2 0
HCM Lane LOS B B A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.2 0.1 -
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) Existing
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
-,,, , -,* F t T l
Lane Grouo-'EBL
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (HM 1709)
EBT
EBR WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
16 s 99 s
Lane Configurations
►j
t}'p
)
ttt
?I
Vi
f+
f+
Traffic Volume (vph)
93
1609
1 4
2779
86
7
4
9
85
1
130
Future Volume (vph)
93
1609
1 4
2779
86
7
4
9
85
1
130
Peak Hour Factor
0.96
0.96
0.96 0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
Adj. Flow (vph)
97
1676
1 4
2895
90
7
4
9
89
1
135
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
97
1677
0 4
2895
90
7
13
0
89
136
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
99.0
15.0
99.0
99.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
Total Split (%)
10.7%
70.7%
10.7%
70.7%
70.7%
18.6%
18.6%
18.6%
18.6%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
109.5
107.5
102.1
96.6
96.6
21.5
21.5
21.5
21.5
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.78
0.77
0.73
0.69
0.69
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
v/c Ratio
0.61
0.43
0.02
0.83
0.08
0.05
0.05
0.42
0.40
Control Delay
38.8
6.3
3.8
18.6
4.1
51.7
30.8
60.3
17.5
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
38.8
6.3
3.8
18.6
4.1
51.7
30.8
60.3
17.5
LOS
D
A
A
B
A
D
C
E
B
Approach Delay
8.1
18.1
38.1
34.4
Approach LOS
A
B
D
C
Queue Length 50th (ft)
34
156
1
639
11
6
3
74
19
Queue Length 95th (ft)
95
249
3
742
31
21
24
132
83
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
185
3903
293
3507
1106
145
263
214
338
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.52
0.43
0.01
0.83
0.08
0.05
0.05
0.42
0.40
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) Existing
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Intersection Signal Delay: 15.4 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.5% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min)15
Splits and Phases:
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (HM 1709)
t02
'(1`1013 X04
26s
15 s. 99s
06
F
07 08 rrrl
26
16 s 99 s
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) Existing
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Int Delay, s/veh 1.4
Movement
EBU
-EB1�BR
WBL WBT
NBL
NBR'
Lane Configurations
A
Tt'p
I ?TT
I
F
Traffic Vol, veh/h
0
1660 29
71 2820
5
50
Future Vol, veh/h
0
1660 29
71 2820
5
50
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
Sign Control
Free
Free Free
Free Free
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
30
None
- None
-
None
Storage Length
380
0
340 -
130
0
Veh in Median Storage, # -
0
- 0
0
-
Grade, %
-
0
- 0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
96 96
96 96
96
96
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2 2
2 2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
0
1729 30
74 2938
5
52
Major/Minor Majc
Major2
Minorl
Conflicting Flow All
0 0 1759 0
3067 880
Stage 1
- - - -
1744 -
Stage 2
-
1323 -
Critical Hdwy 5.64
5.34
5.74 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
6.64 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 -
-
6.04 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.32
3.12
3.82 3.92
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver -
165
24 249
Stage 1
-
83 -
Stage 2
160
191
Platoon blocked, %
4: Shady Oak Dr Existing
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Intersection
Minorl
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
438 196
0 0 210 0
Stage 1
Int Delay, s/veh 1.8
- - - -
Stage 2
242 -
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42 6.22
Movement
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Configurations
I
if
S3
576 845
1361
+
Traffic Vol, veh/h
27
30
160
25
23
167
Future Vol, veh/h
27
30
160
25
23
167
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
88
88
88
88
88
88
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
31
34
182
28
26
190
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
438 196
0 0 210 0
Stage 1
196 -
- - - -
Stage 2
242 -
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42 6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42 -
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42 -
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518 3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
576 845
1361
Stage 1
837 -
-
Stage 2
798
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
165 13 249
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
564 845 1361
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
- 13
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
564 - -
Stage 1
83
Stage 1
837
Stage 2
105
Stage 2
781
Approach EB
WB
Approach
WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0
1.1 58.2
HCM Control Delay, s
10.5 0 0.9
HCM LOS
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnl NBLn2 EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 13 249 165
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.401 0.209 0.448
HCM Control Delay (s) $ 408.1 23.2 0 43.4
HCM Lane LOS F C A E
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0.8 - 2.1
HCM LOS
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 564 845 1361
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.054 0.04 0.019
HCM Control Delay (s) 11.8 9.4 7.7 0
HCM Lane LOS B A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.1 0.1 -
MS Synchro 9 Report MS
Page 1
Synchro 9 Report
Page 2
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Background
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Lane Grout'
nL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
S9
SBR
Lane Configurations
V1
ttT+
)
ttt
?I
V1
f+
i
%
Traffic Volume (vph)
260
3076
13
10
1185
93
4
0
1
77
0
79
Future Volume (vph)
260
3076
13
10
1185
93
4
0
1
77
0
79
Peak Hour Factor
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Adj. Flow (vph)
274
3238
14
11
1247
98
4
0
1
81
0
83
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
274
3252
0
11
1247
98
4
1
0
81
83
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
110.5
15.0
110.5
110.5
24.5
24.5
24.5
24.5
Total Split (%)
10.0%
73.7%
10.0%
73.7%
73.7%
16.3%
16.3%
16.3%
16.3%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
121.0
116.8
112.2
106.5
106.5
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.81
0.78
0.75
0.71
0.71
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
v/c Ratio
0.74
0.82
0.09
0.35
0.09
0.03
0.00
0.43
0.22
Control Delay
17.5
13.4
4.9
8.7
1.3
57.2
0.0
67.7
1.3
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
17.5
13.4
4.9
8.7
1.3
57.2
0.0
67.7
1.3
LOS
B
B
A
A
A
E
A
E
A
Approach Delay
13.7
8.1
45.8
34.1
Approach LOS
B
A
D
C
Queue Length 50th (ft)
52
529
2
159
0
3
0
74
0
Queue Length 95th (ft)
96
832
6
182
17
16
0
133
0
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
376
3957
174
3610
1152
158
297
188
379
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.73
0.82
0.06
0.35
0.09
0.03
0.00
0.43
0.22
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 150
Actuated Cycle Length: 150
Offset: 50.2 (33%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 100
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.82
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Background
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Intersection Signal Delay: 12.9 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.1% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min)15
iplits and Phases: 2: Sha
dy Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
t02 --04
24.5s 170.5
F
1 06 Oa
4.Ss
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Background
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Int Delay, s/veh 6.1
Movement
EBLI
-EB1�BR
WBL WBT
NBL
NBR'
Lane Configurations
A
ftT+
I ?TT
I
F
Traffic Vol, veh/h
0
3280 22
35 1226
11
97
Future Vol, veh/h
0
3280 22
35 1226
11
97
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
Sign Control
Free
Free Free
Free Free
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
-
None
- None
-
None
Storage Length
380
Platoon blocked, %
340 -
130
0
Veh in Median Storage, # -
0
- 0
0
-
Grade, %
-
0
- 0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
94 94
94 94
94
94
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2 2
2 2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
0
3489 23
37 1304
12
103
Major/Minor Major1
Major2
Minorl
Capacity (veh/h)
Conflicting Flow All
0 0 3513 0
4097
1756
Stage 1
- - - -
3501
-
Stage 2
-
596
-
Critical Hdwy 5.64
5.34
5.74
7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
6.64
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 -
-
6.04
-
Follow-up Hdwy 2.32
3.12
3.82
3.92
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver -
-20
-6
-63
Stage 1
-
-6
-
Stage 2
-
468
-
Platoon blocked, %
0
0
0
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
-20
0
-63
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
0
Free
Stage 1
-
-6
Stage 2
754
0
Storage Length
Approach EB
WB
HCM Control Delay, s 0
22.6
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
HCM LOS
0
0 1.1
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBLnt NBLn2 EBU
EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)
63
-20
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
1.638
1.862
HCM Control Delay (s)
-$456.1 0
-$812.9
HCM Lane LOS
F A
F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
9.2
5
Notes'
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined ': All major volume in platoon
4: Shady Oak Dr & Unity Way 2020 Background
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Intersection
Minorl
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
656
389
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Stage 1
389
-
- - - -
Stage 2
267
Movement
ISL
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Lane Configurations
►j
-
j.
5.42
-
rj
Traffic Vol, veh/h
3
40
289
37
25
161
Future Vol, veh/h
3
40
289
37
25
161
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
754
None
Storage Length
0
0
Approach
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0 1.1
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
79
79
79
79
79
79
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
4
51
366
47
32
204
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
656
389
0 0 413 0
Stage 1
389
-
- - - -
Stage 2
267
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
430
659
1146
Stage 1
685
-
-
Stage 2
778
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
417
659
1146
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
417
-
-
Stage 1
685
Stage 2
754
Approach
WB
NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s
11.1
0 1.1
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 417 659 1146
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 0.077 0.028
HCM Control Delay (s) 13.7 10.9 8.2 0
HCM Lane LOS B B A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.2 0.1 -
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Background
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Lane Grouo-'EBL
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (HM 1709)
EBT
EBR WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
16 s 99 s
Lane Configurations
V1
t}'p
)
ttt
?I
V1
f+
Vi
f+
Traffic Volume (vph)
99
1707
1 4
2949
91
7
4
9
90
1
138
Future Volume (vph)
99
1707
1 4
2949
91
7
4
9
90
1
138
Peak Hour Factor
0.96
0.96
0.96 0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
Adj. Flow (vph)
103
1778
1 4
3072
95
7
4
9
94
1
144
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
103
1779
0 4
3072
95
7
13
0
94
145
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
99.0
15.0
99.0
99.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
Total Split (%)
10.7%
70.7%
10.7%
70.7%
70.7%
18.6%
18.6%
18.6%
18.6%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
109.5
107.5
102.0
96.4
96.4
21.5
21.5
21.5
21.5
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.78
0.77
0.73
0.69
0.69
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
v/c Ratio
0.64
0.46
0.02
0.88
0.09
0.05
0.05
0.44
0.43
Control Delay
42.1
6.5
3.8
21.3
4.2
51.9
30.8
61.1
19.7
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
42.1
6.5
3.8
21.3
4.2
51.9
30.8
61.1
19.7
LOS
D
A
A
C
A
D
C
E
B
Approach Delay
8.5
20.8
38.2
36.0
Approach LOS
A
C
D
D
Queue Length 50th (ft)
39
170
1
749
13
6
3
79
27
Queue Length 95th (ft)
103
272
3
854
33
21
24
139
94
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
185
3903
274
3502
1105
138
263
214
337
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.56
0.46
0.01
0.88
0.09
0.05
0.05
0.44
0.43
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140 .11119�
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Background
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Intersection Signal Delay: 17.2 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.4% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min)15
Splits and Phases:
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (HM 1709)
t02
'(1`1013 X04
26s
15 s. 99s
06
F
07 08 rrrl
26
16 s 99 s
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Background
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Movement
EBIJ
-EB1�BR
WBL WBT
NBL
NBR'
Lane Configurations
A
Tt'p
I ?TT
I
F
Traffic Vol, veh/h
0
1762 29
75 2993
5
50
Future Vol, veh/h
0
1762 29
75 2993
5
50
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
Sign Control
Free
Free Free
Free Free
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
32
None
- None
-
None
Storage Length
380
0
340 -
130
0
Veh in Median Storage, # -
0
- 0
0
-
Grade, %
-
0
- 0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
96 96
96 96
96
96
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2 2
2 2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
0
1835 30
78 3118
5
52
Major/Minor Map
Major2
Minorl
Conflicting Flow All
0 0 1866 0
3254 933
Stage 1
- - - -
1851 -
Stage 2
-
1403 -
Critical Hdwy 5.64
5.34
5.74 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
6.64
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 -
-
6.04 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.32
3.12
3.82 3.92
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver -
146
19 230
Stage 1
-
71 -
Stage 2
170
172
Platoon blocked, %
4: Shady Oak Dr & Unity Way 2020 Background
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Intersection
Minorl
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
465 209
0 0 224 0
Stage 1
Int Delay, s/veh 1.9
- - - -
Stage 2
256 -
-
Critical Hdwy
7.12 6.22
Movement
WBL
6.12 -
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
6.12 -
-
Lane Configurations
►j
2.218
j.
508 831
1345
rj
Traffic Vol, veh/h
29
32
170
27
24
177
Future Vol, veh/h
29
32
170
27
24
177
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
88
88
88
88
88
88
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
33
36
193
31
27
201
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
465 209
0 0 224 0
Stage 1
209 -
- - - -
Stage 2
256 -
-
Critical Hdwy
7.12 6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
6.12 -
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
6.12 -
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518 3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
508 831
1345
Stage 1
793 -
-
Stage 2
749
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
146 9 230
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
499 831 1345
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
- 9
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
499 - -
Stage 1
71
Stage 1
793
Stage 2
80
Stage 2
732
Approach EB
WB
Approach
- WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0
1.3 81.7
HCM Control Delay, s
11 0 0.9
HCM LOS
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnl NBLn2 EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 9 230 146
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.579 0.226 0.535
HCM Control Delay (s) $ 646.6 25.2 0 55
HCM Lane LOS F D A F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 0.8 - 2.6
HCM LOS
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) 499 831 1345
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.066 0.044 0.02
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.7 9.5 7.7 0
HCM Lane LOS B A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.1 0.1 -
MS Synchro 9 Report MS
Page 1
Synchro 9 Report
Page 2
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Lane Grouo-'EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
V1
ttT+
)
ttt
?I
V1
f+
T+
Traffic Volume (vph)
261
3076
13
10
1189
96
4
0
1
94
0
82
Future Volume (vph)
261
3076
13
10
1189
96
4
0
1
94
0
82
Peak Hour Factor
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Adj. Flow (vph)
275
3238
14
11
1252
101
4
0
1
99
0
86
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
275
3252
0
11
1252
101
4
1
0
99
86
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
110.5
15.0
110.5
110.5
24.5
24.5
24.5
24.5
Total Split (%)
10.0%
73.7%
10.0%
73.7%
73.7%
16.3%
16.3%
16.3%
16.3%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
121.0
116.8
112.2
106.5
106.5
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.81
0.78
0.75
0.71
0.71
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
v/c Ratio
0.74
0.82
0.09
0.35
0.09
0.03
0.00
0.53
0.23
Control Delay
17.9
13.4
4.9
8.7
1.3
57.2
0.0
71.6
1.4
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
17.9
13.4
4.9
8.7
1.3
57.2
0.0
71.6
1.4
LOS
B
B
A
A
A
E
A
E
A
Approach Delay
13.7
8.1
45.8
39.0
Approach LOS
B
A
D
D
Queue Length 50th (ft)
52
529
2
160
0
3
0
92
0
Queue Length 95th (ft)
101
832
6
183
17
16
0
157
0
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
375
3957
174
3609
1153
156
297
188
378
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.73
0.82
0.06
0.35
0.09
0.03
0.00
0.53
0.23
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 150
Actuated Cycle Length: 150
Offset: 50.2 (33%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 100
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.82
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Intersection Signal Delay: 13.2 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.0% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min)15
iplits and Phases: 2: Sha
dy Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
t02 --04
24.5s 170.5
F
1 06 Oa
4.Ss
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI/Driveway 2 & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Intersection
Majorl
Major2
Minorl
Minor2
63
Major/Minor
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
350
Majorl Major2
Int Delay, s/veh 6.1
1311 0 0
3514 0 0
4106 4894 1757
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
Movement
EBL EBT
EBR
WBL WBT WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
I TT1+
353
I T?T+
I
1+
7
I
k
353
Traffic Vol, veh/h
3 3281
22
35 1229 3
11
0
97
0
0
9
Future Vol, veh/h
3 3281
22
35 1229 3
11
0
97
0
0
9
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0 0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Free Free
Free
Free Free Free
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
-
None
- None
-
92
None
-
92
None
Storage Length
380
2
340
130
2
2
100
Mvmt Flow
8
Veh in Median Storage, #
- 0
384
- 0
-
0
Stage 2
-
0
-
Grade, %
- 0
- 0
-
0
Platoon blocked, %
-
0
Peak Hour Factor
94 94
94
94 94 94
94
94
94
94
94
94
Heavy Vehicles,%
2 2
2
2 2 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
3 3490
23
37 1307 3
12
0
103
0
0
10
3: Shady Oak Dr & Driveway 1 2020 Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Intersection
Majorl
Major2
Minorl
Minor2
63
Major/Minor
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
350
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1311 0 0
3514 0 0
4106 4894 1757
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
Y
3509 3509 -
1384 1384
t
T+
180
Traffic Vol, veh/h
7
20
4
353
164
3
Future Vol, veh/h
7
20
4
353
164
3
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
-
-
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
3.12
3.82 4.02 3.92
0
0
Follow-up Hdwy
Grade, %
0
-
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
0
0
-3 1 -63
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
8
22
4
384
178
3
Major/Minor
Majorl
Major2
Minorl
Minor2
63
Major/Minor
Minot
350
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1311 0 0
3514 0 0
4106 4894 1757
2787 4904
655
Conflicting Flow All
572
180
182 0 0
Stage 1
- -
- - -
3509 3509 -
1384 1384
-
Stage 1
180
-
- - -
Stage 2
-
-
597 1385 -
1403 3520
-
Stage 2
392
-
-
Critical Hdwy
5.34
5.34
6.44 6.54 7.14
6.44 6.54
7.14
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
7.34 5.54 -
7.34 5.54
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
-
6.74 5.54 -
6.74 5.54
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.12
3.12
3.82 4.02 3.92
3.82 4.02
3.92
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
276
-20
-3 1 -63
20 1
350
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
482
863
1393
Stage 1
-
-
-3 16 -
107 209
-
Stage 1
851
-
-
Stage 2
-
416 209 -
131 16
-
Stage 2
683
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
276
-20
- 0 -63
- 0
350
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
480
863
1393
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
- 0 -
- 0
-
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
480
-
-
Stage 1
-3 16
106 0
Stage 1
851
Stage 2
- 0
- 16
Stage 2
680
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
Approach
EB
NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s
0
22.5
15.6
HCM Control Delay, s
10.3
0.1 0
HCM LOS
C
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBLnt NBLn2
EBL EBT
EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnt SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h)
63
276
-20
350
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
1.638
0.012
1.862
0.027
HCM Control Delay (s)
-$456.1
18.2
-$812.9
0 15.6
HCM Lane LOS
F
C
F
A C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
9.2
0
5
0.1
Notes'10
-: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined ': All major volume in platoon
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBL
NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
1393
715
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.003
0.041
HCM Control Delay (s)
7.6
10.3
HCM Lane LOS
A
B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0
0.1
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
4: Shady Oak Dr & Unity Way
2020 Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in
Southlake, TX
Timing Plan: AM
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement
WBL
WBR
Lane Configurations
I
if
S•
rj
Traffic Vol, vehlh
3
40
296
37
25
164
Future Vol, veh/h
3
40
296
37
25
164
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
79
79
79
79
79
79
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
4
51
375
47
32
208
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majort
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
669
398
0
0
422
0
Stage 1
398
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
271
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
423
652
1137
Stage 1
678
-
-
Stage 2
775
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
409
652
1137
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
409
-
Stage 1
678
Stage 2
750
Approach
WB
NB
HCM Control Delay, s
11.2
0
1.1
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBT
NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL
SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
409 652 1137
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.009 0.078 0.028
HCM Control Delay (s)
13.9 11 8.3
0
HCM Lane LOS
B B A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0 0.3 0.1
-
MS
Synchro 9 Report
Page 3
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Lane Grouo-'EBL
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (HM 1709)
EBT
EBR WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
16 s 99 s
Lane Configurations
V1
t}'p
)
ttt
?I
V1
f+
f+
Traffic Volume (vph)
103
1707
1 4
2959
99
7
4
9
101
1
140
Future Volume (vph)
103
1707
1 4
2959
99
7
4
9
101
1
140
Peak Hour Factor
0.96
0.96
0.96 0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
Adj. Flow (vph)
107
1778
1 4
3082
103
7
4
9
105
1
146
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
107
1779
0 4
3082
103
7
13
0
105
147
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
99.0
15.0
99.0
99.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
Total Split (%)
10.7%
70.7%
10.7%
70.7%
70.7%
18.6%
18.6%
18.6%
18.6%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
109.5
107.5
101.9
96.3
96.3
21.5
21.5
21.5
21.5
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.78
0.77
0.73
0.69
0.69
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
v/c Ratio
0.66
0.46
0.02
0.88
0.09
0.05
0.05
0.49
0.44
Control Delay
44.4
6.5
3.8
21.6
4.4
51.9
30.8
63.0
20.2
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
44.4
6.5
3.8
21.6
4.4
51.9
30.8
63.0
20.2
LOS
D
A
A
C
A
D
C
E
C
Approach Delay
8.7
21.0
38.2
38.0
Approach LOS
A
C
D
D
Queue Length 50th (ft)
43
170
1
761
15
6
3
89
29
Queue Length 95th (ft)
108
272
3
862
36
21
24
152
96
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
185
3903
274
3499
1104
136
263
214
337
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.58
0.46
0.01
0.88
0.09
0.05
0.05
0.49
0.44
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Intersection Signal Delay: 17.5 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.4% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min)15
Splits and Phases:
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (HM 1709)
T02
'("0 3 X04
26s
15 sI 99s
06
F
07 08 rrrl
26
16 s 99 s
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI/Driveway 2 & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Intersection
Majorl
Major2
Minorl
4 229 32
Minor2
86
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Minot
0.535
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Conflicting Flow All
3130 0 0
1870 0 0
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
Movement
EBL EBT
EBR
WBL WBT WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
I Tt'p
190
vj T?T+
vj
1+
5
13
4+
190
Traffic Vol, veh/h
10 1766
29
75 2995 10
5
0
50
0
0
6
Future Vol, veh/h
10 1766
29
75 2995 10
5
0
50
0
0
6
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0 0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Free Free
Free
Free Free Free
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
-
None
- None
-
92
None
92
92
None
Storage Length
380
2
340
130
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
5
Veh in Median Storage, #
- 0
207
- 0
-
0
Stage 1
810
0
-
Grade, %
- 0
-
- 0
-
0
-
Stage 2
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
96 96
96
96 96 96
96
96
96
96
96
96
Heavy Vehicles,%
2 2
2
2 2 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
10 1840
30
78 3120 10
5
0
52
0
0
6
3: Shady Oak Dr & Driveway 1 2020 Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Intersection
Majorl
Major2
Minorl
4 229 32
Minor2
86
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Minot
0.535
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
3130 0 0
1870 0 0
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
Y
- -
- - -
+T
T+
3281 3281
Traffic Vol, veh/h
5
13
12
190
206
8
Future Vol, veh/h
5
13
12
190
206
8
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
-
None
-
None
Storage Length
0
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
-
-
6.74 5.54
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
0
0
-
Grade, %
0
-
3.82 4.02
0
0
3.92
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
5
14
13
207
224
9
Major/Minor
Majorl
Major2
Minorl
4 229 32
Minor2
86
Major/Minor
Minot
0.535
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
3130 0 0
1870 0 0
3280 5162
935
4038 5172
1565
Conflicting Flow All
461
228
233 0 0
Stage 1
- -
- - -
1876 1876
-
3281 3281
-
Stage 1
228
-
- - -
Stage 2
-
-
1404 3286
-
757 1891
-
Stage 2
233
-
-
Critical Hdwy
5.34
5.34
6.44 6.54
7.14
6.44 6.54
7.14
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
-
7.34 5.54
-
7.34 5.54
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
-
6.74 5.54
-
6.74 5.54
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.12
3.12
3.82 4.02
3.92
3.82 4.02
3.92
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
32
146
10 0
229
3 0
86
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
559
811
1335
Stage 1
-
-
47 119
-
4 22
-
Stage 1
810
-
-
Stage 2
-
131 21
-
332 117
-
Stage 2
806
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
32
146
-4 0
229
1 0
86
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
553
811
1335
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
-4 0
1 0
-
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
553
-
-
Stage 1
32 82
3 10
Stage 1
810
Stage 2
57 10
176 80
Stage 2
797
Approach
EB
WB
NB
SB
Approach
EB
NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s
0.9
1.3
177.8
50.1
HCM Control Delay, s
10.2
0.5 0
HCM LOS
F
F
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBLnl NBLn2 EBL EBT
EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnt
Capacity (veh/h)
4 229 32
146
86
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
1.302 0.227 0.326
0.535
0.073
HCM Control Delay (s)
$1702.3 25.3 164.5
55
50.1
HCM Lane LOS
F D F
F
F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
1.5 0.8 1
2.6
0.2
Notes
IM
-: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined ': All major volume in platoon
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBL
NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
1335
718
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.01
0.027
HCM Control Delay (s)
7.7
0 10.2
HCM Lane LOS
A
A B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0
- 0.1
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
4: Shady Oak Dr & Unity Way
2020 Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in
Southlake, TX
Timing Plan: PM
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.8
Movement SIL
WBR
Lane Configurations
►j
if
S•
rj
Traffic Vol, vehlh
29
32
174
27
24
185
Future Vol, veh/h
29
32
174
27
24
185
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
88
88
88
88
88
88
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
33
36
198
31
27
210
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majort
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
478
213
0
0
228
0
Stage 1
213
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
265
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
546
827
1340
Stage 1
823
-
-
Stage 2
779
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
533
827
1340
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
533
-
Stage 1
823
Stage 2
761
Approach
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
10.8
0
0.9
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBT
NBRWBLn1WBLn2
SBL
SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
533 827 1340
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.062 0.044
0.02
HCM Control Delay (s)
12.2 9.6
7.7
0
HCM Lane LOS
B A
A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.2 0.1
0.1
-
MS
Synchro 9 Report
Page 3
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: Saturday
Lane Grouo-'EBL
2: Shady Oak Dr 8 Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
Lane Configurations
V1
ttT+
)
ttt
?I
V1
A
A
Traffic Volume (vph)
23
1019
0
3
1394
46
0
0
5
53
0
31
Future Volume (vph)
23
1019
0
3
1394
46
0
0
5
53
0
31
Peak Hour Factor
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
Adj. Flow (vph)
25
1108
0
3
1515
50
0
0
5
58
0
34
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
25
1108
0
3
1515
50
0
5
0
58
34
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
82.0
15.0
82.0
82.0
23.0
23.0
23.0
23.0
Total Split (%)
12.5%
68.3%
12.5%
68.3%
68.3%
19.2%
19.2%
19.2%
19.2%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
91.7
90.5
89.5
86.1
86.1
18.5
18.5
18.5
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.76
0.75
0.75
0.72
0.72
0.15
0.15
0.15
v/c Ratio
0.09
0.29
0.01
0.42
0.04
0.01
0.27
0.09
Control Delay
4.0
5.2
3.3
7.7
1.6
0.0
48.6
0.5
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
4.0
5.2
3.3
7.7
1.6
0.0
48.6
0.5
LOS
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
A
Approach Delay
5.1
7.5
30.8
Approach LOS
A
A
C
Queue Length 50th (ft)
4
77
1
174
0
0
40
0
Queue Length 95th (ft)
10
136
3
206
11
0
82
0
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
325
3833
457
3650
1151
437
216
388
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.08
0.29
0.01
0.42
0.04
0.01
0.27
0.09
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.42
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: Saturday
Intersection Signal Delay: 7.3 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.0% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
Splits and Phases:
2: Shady Oak Dr 8 Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
t02
1 ■ 433 x0,
L's
15s I 82s
06
F
07 438 rR1
82s
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI/Driveway 2 & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: Saturday
Intersection
Majorl
Major2
Minorl
337
292
Minor2
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Major/Minor
Minot
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1551 0 0
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
Movement
EBL EBT
EBR
WBL WBT WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
I Tt'p
59
vj T?T+
vj
1+
6
15
rj►
59
Traffic Vol, veh/h
8 1006
4
33 1372 8
7
0
33
0
0
7
Future Vol, veh/h
8 1006
4
33 1372 8
7
0
33
0
0
7
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0 0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Free Free
Free
Free Free Free
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
-
None
- None
-
82
None
82
82
None
Storage Length
380
2
340
130
-
2
2
Mvmt Flow
7
Veh in Median Storage, #
- 0
72
- 0
-
0
980
1513
0
-
Grade, %
- 0
271
- 0
-
0
Stage 1
943
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
89 89
89
89 89 89
89
89
89
89
89
89
Heavy Vehicles,%
2 2
2
2 2 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
9 1130
4
37 1542 9
8
0
37
0
0
8
3: Shady Oak Dr & Driveway 1 2020 Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: Saturday
Intersection
Majorl
Major2
Minorl
337
292
Minor2
Int Delay, s/veh 1.7
Major/Minor
Minot
0.11
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1551 0 0
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
Y
84 0 0
Stage 1
t
'y
1151
Traffic Vol, veh/h
6
15
10
59
63
6
Future Vol, veh/h
6
15
10
59
63
6
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
4.12
None
None
Storage Length
0
-
7.34 5.54
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
-
0
0
5.54
Grade, %
0
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
82
82
82
82
82
82
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
7
18
12
72
77
7
Major/Minor
Majorl
Major2
Minorl
337
292
Minor2
0.114
Major/Minor
Minot
0.11
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1551 0 0
1135 0 0
1842
2776
567
2090 2773
775
Conflicting Flow All
176
80
84 0 0
Stage 1
- - -
- - -
1151
1151
-
1620 1620
-
Stage 1
80
-
- - -
Stage 2
-
-
691
1625
-
470 1153
-
Stage 2
96
-
-
Critical Hdwy
5.34
5.34
6.44
6.54
7.14
6.44 6.54
7.14
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
7.34
5.54
-
7.34 5.54
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
-
-
6.74
5.54
-
6.74 5.54
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.12
3.12
3.82
4.02
3.92
3.82 4.02
3.92
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
210
337
80
19
400
56 19
292
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
814
980
1513
Stage 1
-
-
156
271
-
73 160
-
Stage 1
943
-
-
Stage 2
-
-
365
159
-
496 270
-
Stage 2
928
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
210
337
69
16
400
45 16
292
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
807
980
1513
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
69
16
-
45 16
-
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
807
-
-
Stage 1
149
259
70 142
Stage 1
943
Stage 2
316
142
431 258
Stage 2
921
Approach
EB
WB
NB
Approach
EB
NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s
0.2
0.4
23.5
17.7
HCM Control Delay, s
9
1.1 0
HCM LOS
C
C
HCM LOS
A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnl NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnt
Capacity (veh/h)
69
400
210
337
292
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.114
0.093
0.043
0.11
0.027
HCM Control Delay (s)
63.8
14.9
22.9
17
17.7
HCM Lane LOS
F
B
C
C
C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.1
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBL
NBT EBLnI SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
1513
923
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.008
0.028
HCM Control Delay (s)
7.4
9
HCM Lane LOS
A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0
0.1
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
4: Shady Oak Dr & Unity Way
2020 Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in
Southlake, TX
Timing Plan: Saturday
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.1
Movement
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Configurations
I
r
S•
rj
Traffic Vol, vehlh
17
17
62
4
3
52
Future Vol, veh/h
17
17
62
4
3
52
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
79
79
79
79
79
79
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
22
22
78
5
4
66
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majort
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
154
81
0
0
84
0
Stage 1
81
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
73
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
838
979
1513
Stage 1
942
-
-
Stage 2
950
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
835
979
1513
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
835
-
Stage 1
942
Stage 2
947
-
Approach
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
9.1
0
0.4
HCM LOS
A
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBT
NBRWBLn1WBLn2
SBL
SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
835 979 1513
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.026 0.022 0.003
HCM Control Delay (s)
9.4 8.8
7.4
0
HCM Lane LOS
A A
A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.1 0.1
0
-
MS
Synchro 9 Report
Page 3
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
LaneGrouo-'EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
V1
ttT+
)
ttt
r
V1
T+
T+
Traffic Volume (vph)
288
3397
14
11
1312
106
4
0
1
102
0
90
Future Volume (vph)
288
3397
14
11
1312
106
4
0
1
102
0
90
Peak Hour Factor
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Adj. Flow (vph)
303
3576
15
12
1381
112
4
0
1
107
0
95
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
303
3591
0
12
1381
112
4
1
0
107
95
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
110.5
15.0
110.5
110.5
24.5
24.5
24.5
24.5
Total Split (%)
10.0%
73.7%
10.0%
73.7%
73.7%
16.3%
16.3%
16.3%
16.3%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
121.0
116.8
111.7
106.0
106.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.81
0.78
0.74
0.71
0.71
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
v/c Ratio
0.90
0.91
0.10
0.38
0.10
0.03
0.00
0.57
0.26
Control Delay
41.0
17.9
5.0
9.2
1.3
57.2
0.0
73.8
1.8
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
41.0
17.9
5.0
9.2
1.3
57.2
0.0
73.8
1.8
LOS
D
B
A
A
A
E
A
E
A
Approach Delay
19.7
8.6
45.8
39.9
Approach LOS
B
A
D
D
Queue Length 50th (ft)
71
718
2
183
0
3
0
100
0
Queue Length 95th (ft)
#149
1124
6
208
18
16
0
168
0
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
336
3957
174
3593
1151
149
296
188
360
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.90
0.91
0.07
0.38
0.10
0.03
0.00
0.57
0.26
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 150
Actuated Cycle Length: 150
Offset: 50.2 (33%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 120
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Intersection Signal Delay: 17.5 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.7% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min)15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
iplits and Phases: 2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
T02 ■ ha433 --0424.Ss 15s 1105
■ F
■ 06 f 07 08
Z4 s IS s
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI/Driveway 2 & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709;025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Intersection
1447 0 0
3878 0 0
Stage 1
- -
- - -
Stage 2
-
-
Critical Hdwy
5.34
5.34
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
HCM Control Delay (s)
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Int Delay, s/veh 11.9
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.12
3.12
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
237
-13
Stage 1
-
Movement
EBL EBT
EBR
WBL WBT WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
I TT1+
-
I T?T+
I
1+
Stage 2
I
k
0
Traffic Vol, veh/h
3 3623
22
39 1357 3
11
0
97
0
0
9
Future Vol, veh/h
3 3623
22
39 1357 3
11
0
97
0
0
9
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0 0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Free Free
Free
Free Free Free
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
-
None
- None
-
Heavy Vehicles,%
None
-
2
None
Storage Length
380
Mvmt Flow
340
130
4
424
100
3
Veh in Median Storage, #
- 0
- 0
-
0
-
0
Grade, %
- 0
- 0
-
0
-
0
Peak Hour Factor
94 94
94
94 94 94
94
94
94
94
94
94
Heavy Vehicles,%
2 2
2
2 2 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
3 3854
23
41 1444 3
12
0
103
0
0
10
Conflicting Flow All
1447 0 0
3878 0 0
Stage 1
- -
- - -
Stage 2
-
-
Critical Hdwy
5.34
5.34
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
HCM Control Delay (s)
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
20.4
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.12
3.12
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
237
-13
Stage 1
-
-
Stage 2
0.1
-
Platoon blocked, %
4
390
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
237
-13
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
20
-
Stage 1
182
3
Stage 2
0
0
Minorl
4532 5402 1939
3872 3872 -
660 1530 -
6.44 6.54 7.14
7.34 5.54 -
6.74 5.54 -
3.82 4.02 3.92
-1 0 -47
-1 10 -
381 177 -
Minorl
3076 5412 723
1528 1528 -
1548 3884 -
6.44 6.54 7.14
7.34 5.54 -
6.74 5.54 -
3.82 4.02 3.92
13 0 316
84 178 -
106 10 -
0 -47 0 316
0 0
-1 10 83 0
- 0 - 10
Approach EB WB NB SB f
HCM Control Delay, s 0 43.9 16.7
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBLnt NBLn2
EBL EBT
EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnt SBLn2
Capacity (veh/h)
47
237
- 13
316
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
2.196
0.013
3.191
0.03
HCM Control Delay (s)
-$735.4
20.4
$1575.5
0 16.7
HCM Lane LOS
F
C
- F
A C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
10.7
0
6.1
0.1
Notes'10
20
4
390
182
-: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined ': All major volume in platoon
3: Shady Oak Dr & Driveway 1 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Intersection
Minot
NBT EBLnI SBT SBR
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
632
199
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Stage 1
199
-
- - -
Stage 2
433
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
Y
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
t
T+
-
Traffic Vol, veh/h
7
20
4
390
182
3
Future Vol, veh/h
7
20
4
390
182
3
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
651
None
Storage Length
0
-
-
EB
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
HCM Control Delay, s
10.5
0
0
HCM LOS
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
8
22
4
424
198
3
Major/Minor
Minot
NBT EBLnI SBT SBR
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
632
199
201 0 0
Stage 1
199
-
- - -
Stage 2
433
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
444
842
1371
Stage 1
835
-
-
Stage 2
654
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
442
842
1371
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
442
-
-
Stage 1
835
Stage 2
651
Approach
EB
NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s
10.5
0.1 0
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBL
NBT EBLnI SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
1371
682
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.003
0.043
HCM Control Delay (s)
7.6
10.5
HCM Lane LOS
A
B
HCM 95th %file Q(veh)
0
0.1
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
4: Shady Oak Dr & Unity Way
2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in
Southlake, TX
Timing Plan: AM
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
Lane Configurations
I
if
j.
rj
Traffic Vol, vehlh
4
45
326
41
28
181
Future Vol, veh/h
4
45
326
41
28
181
Conflicting Peds, Whir
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
79
79
79
79
79
79
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
5
57
413
52
35
229
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majort
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
739
439
0
0
465
0
Stage 1
439
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
300
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
385
618
1096
Stage 1
650
-
-
Stage 2
752
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
371
618
1096
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
371
-
-
Stage 1
650
Stage 2
724
Approach
WB
NS
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
11.7
0
1.1
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/Major MI
NBT
NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL
SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
371 618 1096
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.014 0.092 0.032
HCM Control Delay (s)
14.8 11.4 8.4
0
HCM Lane LOS
B B A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0 0.3 0.1
-
MS
Synchro 9 Report
Page 3
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Lane Grouo-'EBL
EBT
EBR WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
Lane Configurations
V1
ttT+
)
ttt
?I
V1
f+
f+
Traffic Volume (vph)
113
1885
1 5
3266
109
7
4
9
110
1
155
Future Volume (vph)
113
1885
1 5
3266
109
7
4
9
110
1
155
Peak Hour Factor
0.96
0.96
0.96 0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
Adj. Flow (vph)
118
1964
1 5
3402
114
7
4
9
115
1
161
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
118
1965
0 5
3402
114
7
13
0
115
162
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
99.0
15.0
99.0
99.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
Total Split (%)
10.7%
70.7%
10.7%
70.7%
70.7%
18.6%
18.6%
18.6%
18.6%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
109.5
107.4
101.5
95.9
95.9
21.5
21.5
21.5
21.5
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.78
0.77
0.72
0.68
0.68
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
v/c Ratio
0.70
0.50
0.03
0.98
0.10
0.06
0.05
0.54
0.48
Control Delay
50.2
7.0
4.0
32.1
4.7
52.1
30.8
64.9
24.2
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
50.2
7.0
4.0
32.1
4.7
52.1
30.8
64.9
24.2
LOS
D
A
A
C
A
D
C
E
C
Approach Delay
9.5
31.2
38.3
41.1
Approach LOS
A
C
D
D
Queue Length 50th (ft)
53
200
1
1026
19
6
3
98
42
Queue Length 95th (ft)
#125
317
4
#1234
40
21
24
166
115
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
185
3902
242
3484
1099
124
263
214
336
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.64
0.50
0.02
0.98
0.10
0.06
0.05
0.54
0.48
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 110
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.98
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Intersection Signal Delay: 24.0 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.4% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min)15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
iplits and Phases: 2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
t02 '("0j07
�3ifR
26 s 99 s
F
35 08
76! 99 s
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI/Driveway 2 & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709;025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Intersection
Major2
Minorl
Capacity (veh/h)
Minor2
117
3454 0 0
2060 0 0
3616 5693
1030
4455 5703
1727
- - -
- - -
2066 2066
-
Int Delay, s/veh 9.3
F
-
-
1550 3627
-
833 2081
Notes'10
5.34
5.34
Movement
EBL EBT
EBR
WBL WBT WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
I Tt'p
6.74 5.54
vj T?T+
vj
1+
3.12
3.12
+j+
3.92
Traffic Vol, veh/h
10 1949
29
83 3306 10
5
0
50
0
0
6
Future Vol, veh/h
10 1949
29
83 3306 10
5
0
50
0
0
6
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0 0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Free Free
Free
Free Free Free
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
-
None
- None
-
Heavy Vehicles,%
None
2
2
None
Storage Length
380
Mvmt Flow
340
130
13
228
247
9
Veh in Median Storage, #
- 0
- 0
-
0
0
Grade, %
- 0
- 0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
96 96
96
96 96 96
96
96
96
96
96
96
Heavy Vehicles,%
2 2
2
2 2 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
10 2030
30
86 3444 10
5
0
52
0
0
6
Conflicting Flow All
Stage 1
Stage 2
Critical Hdwy
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
Follow-up Hdwy
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
Stage 1
Stage 2
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
Stage 1
Stage 2
ajorl
Major2
Minorl
Capacity (veh/h)
Minor2
117
3454 0 0
2060 0 0
3616 5693
1030
4455 5703
1727
- - -
- - -
2066 2066
-
3622 3622
F
-
-
1550 3627
-
833 2081
Notes'10
5.34
5.34
6.44 6.54
7.14
6.44 6.54
7.14
13
-
7.34 5.54
-
7.34 5.54
-
-
-
6.74 5.54
-
6.74 5.54
-
3.12
3.12
3.82 4.02
3.92
3.82 4.02
3.92
22
117
6 0
198
2 0
66
-
-
34 95
-
2 14
-
-
-
105 14
-
298 94
-
22
117
- 1 0
198
0 0
66
HCM Control Delay, s
10.4
-1 0
0
0 0
Grade, %
0
-
19 52
0
1 4
Peak Hour Factor
92
25 4
92
120 51
92
Approach EB WB NB S$
HCM Control Delay, s 1.4 2.3 $ 718.4 65.2
HCM LOS F F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBLnt NBLn2 EBL EBT
EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h)
1 198 22
117
66
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
5.208 0.263 0.473
0.739
0.095
HCM Control Delay (s)
$ 7607 29.5 271.3
94
65.2
HCM Lane LOS
F D F
F
F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
1.7 1 1.4
4.1
0.3
Notes'10
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
+T
T+
-: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined ': All major volume in platoon
3: Shady Oak Dr & Driveway 1 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Intersection
Minot
NBT EBLnI SBT SBR
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
505
251
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Stage 1
251
-
- - -
Stage 2
254
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
Y
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
+T
T+
-
Traffic Vol, veh/h
5
13
12
210
227
8
Future Vol, veh/h
5
13
12
210
227
8
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
779
None
Storage Length
0
-
-
EB
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
HCM Control Delay, s
10.4
0
0
HCM LOS
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
5
14
13
228
247
9
Major/Minor
Minot
NBT EBLnI SBT SBR
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
505
251
255 0 0
Stage 1
251
-
- - -
Stage 2
254
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
527
788
1310
Stage 1
791
-
-
Stage 2
788
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
521
788
1310
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
521
-
-
Stage 1
791
Stage 2
779
Approach
EB
NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s
10.4
0.4 0
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBL
NBT EBLnI SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
1310
690
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.01
0.028
HCM Control Delay (s)
7.8
0 10.4
HCM Lane LOS
A
A B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0
- 0.1
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
4: Shady Oak Dr & Unity Way
2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in
Southlake, TX
Timing Plan: PM
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.8
Movement SIL
WBR
Lane Configurations
►j
if
j.
rj
Traffic Vol, vehlh
32
35
192
29
27
204
Future Vol, veh/h
32
35
192
29
27
204
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
88
88
88
88
88
88
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
36
40
218
33
31
232
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majort
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
528
235
0
0
251
0
Stage 1
235
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
293
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
511
804
1314
Stage 1
804
-
-
Stage 2
757
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
497
804
1314
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
497
-
-
Stage 1
804
Stage 2
737
-
Approach
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
11.2
0
0.9
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBT
NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL
SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
497 804 1314
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.073 0.049 0.023
HCM Control Delay (s)
12.8 9.7 7.8
0
HCM Lane LOS
B A A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.2 0.2 0.1
-
MS
Synchro 9 Report
Page 3
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: Saturday
Lane Grouo-'EBL
2: Shady Oak Dr 8 Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
N@T
82s
Lane Configurations
V1
ttT+
)
ttt
?I
V1
f+
A
Traffic Volume (vph)
25
1125
0
4
1538
50
0
0
5
57
0
34
Future Volume (vph)
25
1125
0
4
1538
50
0
0
5
57
0
34
Peak Hour Factor
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
Adj. Flow (vph)
27
1223
0
4
1672
54
0
0
5
62
0
37
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
27
1223
0
4
1672
54
0
5
0
62
37
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
82.0
15.0
82.0
82.0
23.0
23.0
23.0
23.0
Total Split (%)
12.5%
68.3%
12.5%
68.3%
68.3%
19.2%
19.2%
19.2%
19.2%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
91.8
90.5
89.5
86.1
86.1
18.5
18.5
18.5
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.76
0.75
0.75
0.72
0.72
0.15
0.15
0.15
v/c Ratio
0.12
0.32
0.01
0.46
0.05
0.01
0.29
0.10
Control Delay
4.3
5.3
3.2
8.1
1.7
0.0
49.0
0.5
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
4.3
5.3
3.2
8.1
1.7
0.0
49.0
0.5
LOS
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
A
Approach Delay
5.3
7.9
30.9
Approach LOS
A
A
C
Queue Length 50th (ft)
4
88
1
202
0
0
43
0
Queue Length 95th (ft)
10
153
3
238
12
0
87
0
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
293
3833
418
3648
1151
419
216
378
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.09
0.32
0.01
0.46
0.05
0.01
0.29
0.10
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.46
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: Saturday
Intersection Signal Delay: 7.6 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.0% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
Splits and Phases:
2: Shady Oak Dr 8 Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
t02
1 ■ 433 ".74
L's
15s I 82s
06
F
07 438 rR1
82s
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI/Driveway 2 & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709;025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: Saturday
Intersection
Majorl
Major2
Minorl
295
Minor2
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Minot
0.051
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Conflicting Flow All
1710 0 0
1252 0 0
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
Movement
EBL EBT
EBR
WBL WBT WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
I Tt'p
66
vj T?T+
vj
1+
6
15
rj►
66
Traffic Vol, veh/h
8 1110
4
36 1514 8
7
0
33
0
0
7
Future Vol, veh/h
8 1110
4
36 1514 8
7
0
33
0
0
7
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0 0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Free Free
Free
Free Free Free
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
-
None
- None
-
82
None
82
82
None
Storage Length
380
2
340
130
-
2
2
Mvmt Flow
7
Veh in Median Storage, #
- 0
80
- 0
-
0
Stage 1
935
0
-
Grade, %
- 0
-
- 0
-
0
-
Stage 2
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
89 89
89
89 89 89
89
89
89
89
89
89
Heavy Vehicles,%
2 2
2
2 2 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
9 1247
4
40 1701 9
8
0
37
0
0
8
3: Shady Oak Dr & Driveway 1 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: Saturday
Intersection
Majorl
Major2
Minorl
295
Minor2
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Minot
0.051
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1710 0 0
1252 0 0
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
Y
- - -
- - -
t
'y
1787 1787
Traffic Vol, veh/h
6
15
10
66
69
6
Future Vol, veh/h
6
15
10
66
69
6
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
-
None
-
None
Storage Length
0
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
-
-
6.74 5.54
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
0
0
-
Grade, %
0
-
3.82 4.02
0
0
3.92
Peak Hour Factor
82
82
82
82
82
82
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
7
18
12
80
84
7
Major/Minor
Majorl
Major2
Minorl
295
Minor2
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
Major/Minor
Minot
0.051
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
1710 0 0
1252 0 0
2028 3058
626
2304 3057
855
Conflicting Flow All
193
88
91 0 0
Stage 1
- - -
- - -
1267 1267
-
1787 1787
-
Stage 1
88
-
- - -
Stage 2
-
-
761 1791
-
517 1270
-
Stage 2
105
-
-
Critical Hdwy
5.34
5.34
6.44 6.54
7.14
6.44 6.54
7.14
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
7.34 5.54
-
7.34 5.54
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
-
-
6.74 5.54
-
6.74 5.54
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.12
3.12
3.82 4.02
3.92
3.82 4.02
3.92
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
175
295
61 12
366
41 12
259
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
796
970
1504
Stage 1
-
-
129 238
-
55 132
-
Stage 1
935
-
-
Stage 2
-
-
330 132
-
465 237
-
Stage 2
919
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
175
295
51 10
366
32 10
259
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
790
970
1504
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
51 10
32 10
-
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
790
-
-
Stage 1
122 226
52 114
Stage 1
935
Stage 2
277 114
396 225
Stage 2
912
Approach
EB
WB
NB
Approach
EB
NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s
0.2
0.4
28.5
19.3
HCM Control Delay, s
9.1
1 0
HCM LOS
D
C
HCM LOS
A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnt NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLnt
Capacity (veh/h)
51
366
175
295
259
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.154
0.101
0.051
0.137
0.03
HCM Control Delay (s)
88.1
15.9
26.7
19.1
19.3
HCM Lane LOS
F
C
D
C
C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.1
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBL
NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
1504
911
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.008
0.028
HCM Control Delay (s)
7.4
9.1
HCM Lane LOS
A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0
0.1
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
4: Shady Oak Dr & Unity Way
2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan A)
TIA for Crescent Green in
Southlake, TX
Timing Plan: Saturday
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
Lane Configurations
I
r
j.
rj
Traffic Vol, vehlh
19
19
68
5
4
57
Future Vol, veh/h
19
19
68
5
4
57
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
79
79
79
79
79
79
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
24
24
86
6
5
72
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majort
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
171
89
0
0
92
0
Stage 1
89
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
82
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
819
969
1503
Stage 1
934
-
-
Stage 2
941
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
817
969
1503
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
817
-
-
Stage 1
934
Stage 2
938
Approach
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
9.2
0
0.5
HCM LOS
A
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBT
NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL
SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
817 969 1503
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.029 0.025 0.003
HCM Control Delay (s)
9.5 8.8 7.4
0
HCM Lane LOS
A A A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.1 0.1 0
-
MS
Synchro 9 Report
Page 3
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Lane Grouo-'EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
V1
ttT+
)
ttt
?I
V1
f+
T+
Traffic Volume (vph)
265
3076
13
10
1185
99
4
0
1
94
0
91
Future Volume (vph)
265
3076
13
10
1185
99
4
0
1
94
0
91
Peak Hour Factor
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Adj. Flow (vph)
279
3238
14
11
1247
104
4
0
1
99
0
96
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
279
3252
0
11
1247
104
4
1
0
99
96
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
110.5
15.0
110.5
110.5
24.5
24.5
24.5
24.5
Total Split (%)
10.0%
73.7%
10.0%
73.7%
73.7%
16.3%
16.3%
16.3%
16.3%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
121.0
116.8
112.1
106.4
106.4
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.81
0.78
0.75
0.71
0.71
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
v/c Ratio
0.75
0.82
0.09
0.35
0.09
0.03
0.00
0.53
0.25
Control Delay
18.3
13.4
4.9
8.7
1.3
57.2
0.0
71.6
1.6
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
18.3
13.4
4.9
8.7
1.3
57.2
0.0
71.6
1.6
LOS
B
B
A
A
A
E
A
E
A
Approach Delay
13.8
8.1
45.8
37.2
Approach LOS
B
A
D
D
Queue Length 50th (ft)
53
529
2
159
0
3
0
92
0
Queue Length 95th (ft)
105
832
6
182
17
16
0
157
0
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
376
3957
174
3607
1153
148
297
188
379
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.74
0.82
0.06
0.35
0.09
0.03
0.00
0.53
0.25
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 150
Actuated Cycle Length: 150
Offset: 50.2 (33%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 100
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.82
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Intersection Signal Delay: 13.2 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.0% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min)15
iplits and Phases: 2: Sha
dy Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
t02 --04
24.5s 170.5
F
1 06 Oa
4.Ss
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh
Movement
6.1
EBU
-EB1�BR
WBL WBT
NBL
NBR
Lane Configurations
A
ftT+
I ?TT
I
r
Traffic Vol, veh/h
0
3285 22
35 1239
11
97
Future Vol, veh/h
0
3285 22
35 1239
11
97
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
Sign Control
Free
Free Free
Free Free
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
-
None
- None
-
None
Storage Length
380
Platoon blocked, %
340 -
130
0
Veh in Median Storage, # -
0
- 0
0
-
Grade, %
-
0
- 0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
94 94
94 94
94
94
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2 2
2 2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
0
3495 23
37 1318
12
103
Major/Minor Map
Major2
Minorl
Capacity (veh/h)
Conflicting Flow All
0 0 3518 0
4108
1759
Stage 1
- - - -
3506
-
Stage 2
-
602
-
Critical Hdwy 5.64
5.34
5.74
7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
6.64
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 -
-
6.04
-
Follow-up Hdwy 2.32
3.12
3.82
3.92
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver -
-20
-6
-63
Stage 1
-
-6
-
Stage 2
-
464
-
Platoon blocked, %
None
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
-20
0
-63
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
0
-
Stage 1
0
-6
Stage 2
0
0
Grade, %
Approach EB
WB
NB
0
HCM Control Delay, s 0
22.3
Peak Hour Factor
92
HCM LOS
92
92
92
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBLnt NBLn2 EBU
EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)
63
-20
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
1.638
1.862
HCM Control Delay (s)
-$456.1 0
-$812.9
HCM Lane LOS
F A
F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
9.2
5
Notes'
164
3
-: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined ': All major volume in platoon
3: Shady Oak Dr & Driveway 1 2020 Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
Y
180
-
t
T+
405
Traffic Vol, veh/h
7
30
10
353
164
3
Future Vol, veh/h
7
30
10
353
164
3
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
1393
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
-
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
EB
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
8
33
11
384
178
3
Major/Minor
Minot
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
585
180
182 0 0
Stage 1
180
-
- - -
Stage 2
405
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
473
863
1393
Stage 1
851
-
-
Stage 2
673
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
468
863
1393
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
468
-
-
Stage 1
851
Stage 2
666
Approach
EB
NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s
10.1
0.2 0
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBL NBTEBLnl SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1393 744
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.008 0.054
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 10.1
HCM Lane LOS A B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.2
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
4: Shady Oak Dr & Unity Way
2020 Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in
Southlake, TX
Timing Plan: AM
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement
WBL
WBR
Lane Configurations
I
if
S•
rj
Traffic Vol, vehlh
3
40
296
37
25
164
Future Vol, veh/h
3
40
296
37
25
164
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
79
79
79
79
79
79
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
4
51
375
47
32
208
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majort
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
669
398
0
0
422
0
Stage 1
398
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
271
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
423
652
1137
Stage 1
678
-
-
Stage 2
775
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
409
652
1137
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
409
-
Stage 1
678
Stage 2
750
Approach
WB
NB
HCM Control Delay, s
11.2
0
1.1
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBT
NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL
SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
409 652 1137
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.009 0.078 0.028
HCM Control Delay (s)
13.9 11 8.3
0
HCM Lane LOS
B B A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0 0.3 0.1
-
MS
Synchro 9 Report
Page 3
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Lane Grouo-'EBL
EBT
EBR WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
Lane Configurations
V1
ttT+
)
ttt
?I
V1
f+
f+
Traffic Volume (vph)
113
1707
1 4
2949
109
7
4
9
101
1
146
Future Volume (vph)
113
1707
1 4
2949
109
7
4
9
101
1
146
Peak Hour Factor
0.96
0.96
0.96 0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
Adj. Flow (vph)
118
1778
1 4
3072
114
7
4
9
105
1
152
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
118
1779
0 4
3072
114
7
13
0
105
153
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
99.0
15.0
99.0
99.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
Total Split (%)
10.7%
70.7%
10.7%
70.7%
70.7%
18.6%
18.6%
18.6%
18.6%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
109.5
107.5
101.5
95.9
95.9
21.5
21.5
21.5
21.5
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.78
0.77
0.72
0.68
0.68
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
v/c Ratio
0.70
0.46
0.02
0.88
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.49
0.45
Control Delay
50.2
6.5
3.8
21.8
4.5
52.0
30.8
63.0
21.7
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
50.2
6.5
3.8
21.8
4.5
52.0
30.8
63.0
21.7
LOS
D
A
A
C
A
D
C
E
C
Approach Delay
9.3
21.2
38.2
38.5
Approach LOS
A
C
D
D
Queue Length 50th (ft)
53
170
1
774
17
6
3
89
34
Queue Length 95th (ft)
#125
272
3
854
39
21
24
152
103
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
185
3903
273
3484
1101
131
263
214
337
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.64
0.46
0.01
0.88
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.49
0.45
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Intersection Signal Delay: 17.9 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.8% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min)15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
iplits and Phases: 2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
t02 '("0j07
�3ifR
26 s 99 s
F
35 08
76! 99 s
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Int Delay, s/veh 1.9
Movement
EBU
-EB1�BR
WBL WBT
NBL
NBR
Lane Configurations
A
Tt'p
I ?TT
I
F
Traffic Vol, veh/h
0
1776 29
75 3001
5
50
Future Vol, veh/h
0
1776 29
75 3001
5
50
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
Sign Control
Free
Free Free
Free Free
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
18
None
- None
-
None
Storage Length
380
0
340 -
130
0
Veh in Median Storage, # -
0
- 0
0
-
Grade, %
-
0
- 0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
96 96
96 96
96
96
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2 2
2 2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
0
1850 30
78 3126
5
52
Major/Minor Major1
Major2
Minorl
Conflicting Flow All
0 0 1880 0
3272 940
Stage 1
- - - -
1865 -
Stage 2
-
1407 -
Critical Hdwy 5.64
5.34
5.74 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
6.64 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 -
-
6.04 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.32
3.12
3.82 3.92
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver -
144
18 227
Stage 1
-
69 -
Stage 2
32
171
Platoon blocked, %
3: Shady Oak Dr & Driveway 1 2020 Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Intersection
Minot
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
504
228 233 0 0
Stage 1
Int Delay, s/veh 1
- - - -
Stage 2
276
- -
Critical Hdwy
6.42
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
Y
3.318 2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
t
'y
Stage 1
Traffic Vol, veh/h
5
18
32
190
206
8
Future Vol, veh/h
5
18
32
190
206
8
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
-
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
5
20
35
207
224
9
Major/Minor
Minot
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
504
228 233 0 0
Stage 1
228
- - - -
Stage 2
276
- -
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22 4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
- -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
- -
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318 2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
528
811 1335
Stage 1
810
- -
Stage 2
771
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
144 8 227
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
512 811 1335
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
- 8 -
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
512 - -
Stage 1
69
Stage 1
810
Stage 2
78
Stage 2
748
Approach EB
WB [v1B
Approach
EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0
1.4 91.2
HCM Control Delay, s
10.2 1.1 0
HCM LOS
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnl NBLn2 EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h) 8 227 144
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.651 0.229 0.543
HCM Control Delay (s) $ 748 25.5 0 56.3
HCM Lane LOS F D A F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 0.9 - 2.7
HCM LOS
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBL NBTEBLnl SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1335 720
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.026 0.035
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 10.2
HCM Lane LOS A B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1
MS Synchro 9 Report MS
Page 1
Synchro 9 Report
Page 2
4: Shady Oak Dr & Unity Way
2020 Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in
Southlake, TX
Timing Plan: PM
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.8
Movement SIL
WBR
Lane Configurations
►j
if
S•
rj
Traffic Vol, vehlh
29
32
174
27
24
185
Future Vol, veh/h
29
32
174
27
24
185
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
88
88
88
88
88
88
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
33
36
198
31
27
210
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majort
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
478
213
0
0
228
0
Stage 1
213
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
265
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
546
827
1340
Stage 1
823
-
-
Stage 2
779
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
533
827
1340
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
533
-
Stage 1
823
Stage 2
761
Approach
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
10.8
0
0.9
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBT
NBRWBLn1WBLn2
SBL
SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
533 827 1340
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.062 0.044
0.02
HCM Control Delay (s)
12.2 9.6
7.7
0
HCM Lane LOS
B A
A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.2 0.1
0.1
-
MS
Synchro 9 Report
Page 3
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: Saturday
LaneGrouo-'EBL
2: Shady Oak Dr 8 Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
-1M-S
T --M
Lane Configurations
V1
ttT+
)
ttt
?I
V1
A
A
Traffic Volume (vph)
31
1019
0
3
1386
54
0
0
5
53
0
38
Future Volume (vph)
31
1019
0
3
1386
54
0
0
5
53
0
38
Peak Hour Factor
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
Adj. Flow (vph)
34
1108
0
3
1507
59
0
0
5
58
0
41
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
34
1108
0
3
1507
59
0
5
0
58
41
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
82.0
15.0
82.0
82.0
23.0
23.0
23.0
23.0
Total Split (%)
12.5%
68.3%
12.5%
68.3%
68.3%
19.2%
19.2%
19.2%
19.2%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
91.8
90.5
89.4
86.0
86.0
18.5
18.5
18.5
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.76
0.75
0.74
0.72
0.72
0.15
0.15
0.15
v/c Ratio
0.13
0.29
0.01
0.41
0.05
0.01
0.27
0.11
Control Delay
4.3
5.2
3.3
7.7
1.7
0.0
48.6
0.6
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
4.3
5.2
3.3
7.7
1.7
0.0
48.6
0.6
LOS
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
A
Approach Delay
5.1
7.5
28.7
Approach LOS
A
A
C
Queue Length 50th (ft)
5
77
1
174
0
0
40
0
Queue Length 95th (ft)
12
136
3
207
13
0
82
0
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
326
3833
456
3644
1151
437
216
389
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.10
0.29
0.01
0.41
0.05
0.01
0.27
0.11
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.41
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: Saturday
Intersection Signal Delay: 7.3 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.9% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
Splits and Phases:
2: Shady Oak Dr 8 Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
t02
1 ■ 433 x0,
L's
15s I 82s
06
F
07 438 rR1
82s
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2020 Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: Saturday
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement
EBU
-EB1�BR
WBL WBT
NBL
NBR
Lane Configurations
A
Tt'p
vj ?TT
vj
F
Traffic Vol, veh/h
0
1014 4
33 1379
7
33
Future Vol, veh/h
0
1014 4
33 1379
7
33
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
Sign Control
Free
Free Free
Free Free
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
Stop
None
- None
-
None
Storage Length
380
None
340 -
130
0
Veh in Median Storage, # -
0
- 0
0
-
Grade, %
-
0
- 0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
89 89
89 89
89
89
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2 2
2 2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
0
1139 4
37 1549
8
37
3: Shady Oak Dr & Driveway 1 2020 Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Pian: Saturday
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
Y
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
t
'y
1836
Traffic Vol, veh/h
6
22
26
59
63
6
Future Vol, veh/h
6
22
26
59
63
6
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
6.42
None
Storage Length
0
-
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
0
0
-
Grade, %
0
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
82
82
82
82
82
82
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
7
27
32
72
77
7
Major/Minor
Majorl
Major2
Minorl
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.077 0.093
Major/Minor
Minot
43.2
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
HCM Lane LOS
0 0 1144 0
1836
572
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
Conflicting Flow All
215
80
84 0 0
Stage 1
- - - -
1142
-
Stage 1
80
-
- - -
Stage 2
-
694
-
Stage 2
135
-
-
Critical Hdwy
5.64
5.34
5.74
7.14
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
6.64
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
-
-
6.04
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
2.32
3.12
3.82
3.92
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
-
333
115
397
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
773
980
1513
Stage 1
-
198
-
Stage 1
943
-
-
Stage 2
-
416
-
Stage 2
891
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
333
102
397
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
756
980
1513
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
102
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
756
-
-
Stage 1
198
Stage 1
943
Stage 2
370
Stage 2
871
Approach
EB
WB
Approach
EB
NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s
0
0.4
19.9
HCM Control Delay, s
9.1
2.3 0
HCM LOS
C
HCM LOS
A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnt NBLn2 EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)
102
397
333
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.077 0.093
0.111
HCM Control Delay (s)
43.2
15 0
17.2
HCM Lane LOS
E
C A
C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.2
0.3 -
0.4
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBL
NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
1513
921
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.021
0.037
HCM Control Delay (s)
7.4
9.1
HCM Lane LOS
A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.1
0.1
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
4: Shady Oak Dr & Unity Way
2020 Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in
Southlake, TX
Timing Plan: Saturday
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.1
Movement
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
Lane Configurations
I
r
S•
rj
Traffic Vol, vehlh
17
17
62
4
3
52
Future Vol, veh/h
17
17
62
4
3
52
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
79
79
79
79
79
79
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
22
22
78
5
4
66
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majort
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
154
81
0
0
84
0
Stage 1
81
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
73
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
838
979
1513
Stage 1
942
-
-
Stage 2
950
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
835
979
1513
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
835
-
Stage 1
942
Stage 2
947
-
Approach
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
9.1
0
0.4
HCM LOS
A
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBT
NBRWBLn1WBLn2
SBL
SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
835 979 1513
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.026 0.022 0.003
HCM Control Delay (s)
9.4 8.8
7.4
0
HCM Lane LOS
A A
A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.1 0.1
0
-
MS
Synchro 9 Report
Page 3
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
LaneGrouo-'EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
V1
ttT+
)
ttt
r
V1
T+
T+
Traffic Volume (vph)
292
3397
14
11
1309
109
4
0
1
102
0
100
Future Volume (vph)
292
3397
14
11
1309
109
4
0
1
102
0
100
Peak Hour Factor
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Adj. Flow (vph)
307
3576
15
12
1378
115
4
0
1
107
0
105
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
307
3591
0
12
1378
115
4
1
0
107
105
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
110.5
15.0
110.5
110.5
24.5
24.5
24.5
24.5
Total Split (%)
10.0%
73.7%
10.0%
73.7%
73.7%
16.3%
16.3%
16.3%
16.3%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
121.0
116.8
111.7
106.0
106.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.81
0.78
0.74
0.71
0.71
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
v/c Ratio
0.91
0.91
0.10
0.38
0.10
0.03
0.00
0.57
0.29
Control Delay
42.1
17.9
5.0
9.2
1.3
57.5
0.0
73.8
2.0
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
42.1
17.9
5.0
9.2
1.3
57.5
0.0
73.8
2.0
LOS
D
B
A
A
A
E
A
E
A
Approach Delay
19.8
8.6
46.0
38.3
Approach LOS
B
A
D
D
Queue Length 50th (ft)
74
718
2
182
0
3
0
100
0
Queue Length 95th (ft)
#153
1124
6
207
18
16
0
168
0
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
338
3957
174
3593
1152
140
296
188
360
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.91
0.91
0.07
0.38
0.10
0.03
0.00
0.57
0.29
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 150
Actuated Cycle Length: 150
Offset: 50.2 (33%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 120
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.91
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Intersection Signal Delay: 17.5 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.7% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min)15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
iplits and Phases: 2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
T02 ■ ha433 --0424.Ss 15s 1105
■ F
■ 05 f 07 08
Z4 s IS s
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Int Delay, s/veh 11.9
Movement
EBU
-EB1�BR
WBL WBT
NBL
0 0 3881 0
Lane Configurations
A
ftT+
I ?TT
I
if
Traffic Vol, veh/h
0
3626 22
39 1366
11
97
Future Vol, veh/h
0
3626 22
39 1366
11
97
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
Sign Control
Free
Free Free
Free Free
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
-
None
- None
-
None
Storage Length
380
Platoon blocked, %
340 -
130
0
Veh in Median Storage, # -
0
- 0
0
-
Grade, %
-
0
- 0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
94 94
94 94
94
94
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2 2
2 2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
0
3857 23
41 1453
12
103
Major/Minor Map
Major2
Minorl
Capacity (veh/h)
Conflicting Flow All
0 0 3881 0
4533
1940
Stage 1
- - - -
3869
-
Stage 2
-
664
-
Critical Hdwy 5.64
5.34
5.74
7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
6.64
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 -
-
6.04
-
Follow-up Hdwy 2.32
3.12
3.82
3.92
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver -
-13
-3
-47
Stage 1
-
-3
-
Stage 2
-
431
-
Platoon blocked, %
None
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
-13
0
-47
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
0
-
Stage 1
0
-3
Stage 2
0
0
Grade, %
Approach EB
WB
N8
0
HCM Control Delay, s 0
43.7
Peak Hour Factor
92
HCM LOS
92
-
92
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBLnt NBLn2 EBU EBT
EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)
47
- 13
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
2.196
3.191
HCM Control Delay (s)
-$735.4 0
$1575.5
HCM Lane LOS
F A
- F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
10.7
6.1
Notes'
182
3
-: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined ': All major volume in platoon
3: Shady Oak Dr & Driveway 1 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: AM
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
Y
199
-
t
T+
446
Traffic Vol, veh/h
7
30
10
390
182
3
Future Vol, veh/h
7
30
10
390
182
3
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
1371
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
-
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
EB
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
8
33
11
424
198
3
Major/Minor
Minot
NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
645
199
201 0 0
Stage 1
199
-
- - -
Stage 2
446
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
437
842
1371
Stage 1
835
-
-
Stage 2
645
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
433
842
1371
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
433
-
-
Stage 1
835
Stage 2
639
Approach
EB
NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s
10.3
0.2 0
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBL
NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
1371
714
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.008
0.056
HCM Control Delay (s)
7.6
10.3
HCM Lane LOS
A
B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0
0.2
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
4: Shady Oak Dr & Unity Way
2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in
Southlake, TX
Timing Plan: AM
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
Lane Configurations
I
if
j.
rj
Traffic Vol, vehlh
4
45
326
41
28
181
Future Vol, veh/h
4
45
326
41
28
181
Conflicting Peds, Whir
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
79
79
79
79
79
79
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
5
57
413
52
35
229
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majort
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
739
439
0
0
465
0
Stage 1
439
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
300
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
385
618
1096
Stage 1
650
-
-
Stage 2
752
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
371
618
1096
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
371
-
-
Stage 1
650
Stage 2
724
Approach
WB
NS
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
11.7
0
1.1
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/Major MI
NBT
NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL
SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
371 618 1096
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.014 0.092 0.032
HCM Control Delay (s)
14.8 11.4 8.4
0
HCM Lane LOS
B B A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0 0.3 0.1
-
MS
Synchro 9 Report
Page 3
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Lane Grouo-'EBL
EBT
EBR WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
Lane Configurations
V1
ttT+
)
ttt
?I
V1
f+
f+
Traffic Volume (vph)
123
1885
1 5
3256
119
7
4
9
110
1
160
Future Volume (vph)
123
1885
1 5
3256
119
7
4
9
110
1
160
Peak Hour Factor
0.96
0.96
0.96 0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
0.96
Adj. Flow (vph)
128
1964
1 5
3392
124
7
4
9
115
1
167
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
128
1965
0 5
3392
124
7
13
0
115
168
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
99.0
15.0
99.0
99.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
26.0
Total Split (%)
10.7%
70.7%
10.7%
70.7%
70.7%
18.6%
18.6%
18.6%
18.6%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
109.5
107.4
101.2
95.6
95.6
21.5
21.5
21.5
21.5
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.78
0.77
0.72
0.68
0.68
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
v/c Ratio
0.74
0.50
0.03
0.98
0.11
0.06
0.05
0.54
0.50
Control Delay
55.6
7.0
4.0
32.4
4.8
52.3
30.8
64.9
25.5
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
55.6
7.0
4.0
32.4
4.8
52.3
30.8
64.9
25.5
LOS
E
A
A
C
A
D
C
E
C
Approach Delay
10.0
31.4
38.3
41.5
Approach LOS
A
C
D
D
Queue Length 50th (ft)
63
200
1
1024
21
6
3
98
47
Queue Length 95th (ft)
#151
317
4
#1227
43
21
24
166
122
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
185
3902
243
3471
1097
119
263
214
336
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.69
0.50
0.02
0.98
0.11
0.06
0.05
0.54
0.50
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 140
Actuated Cycle Length: 140
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 110
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.98
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Intersection Signal Delay: 24.3 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.7% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min)15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
iplits and Phases: 2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
t02 '("0j07
�3ifR
26 s 99 s
F
35 08
76s 99s
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Int Delay, s/veh 3.9
Movement
EBU
-EB1�BR
WBL WBT
NBL
3609 1035
Lane Configurations
A
ftT+
I ?TT
I
if
Traffic Vol, veh/h
0
1959 29
83 3312
5
50
Future Vol, veh/h
0
1959 29
83 3312
5
50
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
Sign Control
Free
Free Free
Free Free
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
18
None
- None
-
None
Storage Length
380
0
340 -
130
0
Veh in Median Storage, # -
0
- 0
0
-
Grade, %
-
0
- 0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
96 96
96 96
96
96
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2 2
2 2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
0
2041 30
86 3450
5
52
Major/Minor Map
Major2
Minorl
Conflicting Flow All
0 0 2071 0
3609 1035
Stage 1
- - - -
2056 -
Stage 2
-
1553 -
Critical Hdwy 5.64
5.34
5.74 7.14
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
6.64 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 -
-
6.04 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.32
3.12
3.82 3.92
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver -
115
12 197
Stage 1
-
52 -
Stage 2
32
142
Platoon blocked, %
3: Shady Oak Dr & Driveway 1 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: PM
Intersection
Minot
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
549
251 255 0 0
Stage 1
Int Delay, s/veh 1
- - - -
Stage 2
298
- -
Critical Hdwy
6.42
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
Y
3.318 2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
t
T+
Stage 1
Traffic Vol, veh/h
5
18
32
210
227
8
Future Vol, veh/h
5
18
32
210
227
8
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
-
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
92
92
92
92
92
92
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
5
20
35
228
247
9
Major/Minor
Minot
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
549
251 255 0 0
Stage 1
251
- - - -
Stage 2
298
- -
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22 4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
- -
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318 2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
497
788 1310
Stage 1
791
- -
Stage 2
753
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
115 -3 197
EBR WBL WBT
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
482 788 1310
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
- -3
1.736 0.264
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
482 - -
Stage 1
52
HCM Lane LOS
Stage 1
791
Stage 2
36
4.2
Stage 2
730
Approach EB
WB NB
Approach
EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0
2.4 240.9
HCM Control Delay, s
10.4 1 0
HCM LOS
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt
NBLn1 NBLn2 EBU EBT
EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)
3 197
115
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
1.736 0.264
0.752
HCM Control Delay (s)
$ 2352.9 29.7 0
97.5
HCM Lane LOS
F D A
F
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
1.5 1
4.2
Notes'
-: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined ': All major volume in platoon
HCM LOS
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBL NBTEBLnl SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1310 692
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 0.036
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 10.4
HCM Lane LOS A B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
4: Shady Oak Dr & Unity Way
2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in
Southlake, TX
Timing Plan: PM
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.8
Movement SIL
WBR
Lane Configurations
►j
if
j.
rj
Traffic Vol, vehlh
32
35
192
29
27
204
Future Vol, veh/h
32
35
192
29
27
204
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
88
88
88
88
88
88
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
36
40
218
33
31
232
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majort
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
528
235
0
0
251
0
Stage 1
235
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
293
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
511
804
1314
Stage 1
804
-
-
Stage 2
757
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
497
804
1314
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
497
-
-
Stage 1
804
Stage 2
737
-
Approach
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
11.2
0
0.9
HCM LOS
B
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBT
NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL
SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
497 804 1314
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.073 0.049 0.023
HCM Control Delay (s)
12.8 9.7 7.8
0
HCM Lane LOS
B A A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.2 0.2 0.1
-
MS
Synchro 9 Report
Page 3
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: Saturday
LaneGrouo--------ESL
2: Shady Oak Dr 8 Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBL
NBT
NBR
SBL
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
V1
ttT+
)
ttt
?I
V1
T+
T+
Traffic Volume (vph)
33
1125
0
4
1530
58
0
0
5
57
0
41
Future Volume (vph)
33
1125
0
4
1530
58
0
0
5
57
0
41
Peak Hour Factor
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
Adj. Flow (vph)
36
1223
0
4
1663
63
0
0
5
62
0
45
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
36
1223
0
4
1663
63
0
5
0
62
45
0
Turn Type
pm+pt
NA
pm+pt
NA
Perm
Perm
NA
Perm
NA
Protected Phases
7
4
3
8
2
6
Permitted Phases
4
8
8
2
6
Detector Phase
7
4
3
8
8
2
2
6
6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s)
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
Minimum Split (s)
9.5
22.5
9.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
Total Split (s)
15.0
82.0
15.0
82.0
82.0
23.0
23.0
23.0
23.0
Total Split (%)
12.5%
68.3%
12.5%
68.3%
68.3%
19.2%
19.2%
19.2%
19.2%
Yellow Time (s)
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
All -Red Time (s)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Lost Time (s)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Lead/Lag
Lead
Lag
Lead
Lag
Lag
Lead -Lag Optimize?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Recall Mode
None
C -Max
None
C -Max
C -Max
Max
Max
Max
Max
Act Effct Green (s)
91.8
90.5
89.4
86.0
86.0
18.5
18.5
18.5
Actuated g/C Ratio
0.76
0.75
0.74
0.72
0.72
0.15
0.15
0.15
v/c Ratio
0.15
0.32
0.01
0.46
0.05
0.01
0.29
0.12
Control Delay
4.7
5.3
3.2
8.1
2.0
0.0
49.0
0.6
Queue Delay
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total Delay
4.7
5.3
3.2
8.1
2.0
0.0
49.0
0.6
LOS
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
A
Approach Delay
5.3
7.9
28.7
Approach LOS
A
A
C
Queue Length 50th (ft)
6
88
1
201
1
0
43
0
Queue Length 95th (ft)
13
153
3
237
15
0
87
0
Internal Link Dist (ft)
954
695
219
264
Turn Bay Length (ft)
350
320
140
100
Base Capacity (vph)
294
3833
418
3644
1151
419
216
379
Starvation Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Spillback Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storage Cap Reductn
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Reduced v/c Ratio
0.12
0.32
0.01
0.46
0.05
0.01
0.29
0.12
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBTL and 8:WBTL, Start of Green
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.46
2: Shady Oak Dr & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: Saturday
Intersection Signal Delay: 7.6 Intersection LOS: A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.9% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
Splits and Phases:
2: Shady Oak Dr 8 Southlake Blvd (FM 1709)
t02
1 ■ 433 x0,
L's
15s I 82s
06
F
07 438 rR1
82s
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
1: Timber Lake PI & Southlake Blvd (FM 1709) 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: Saturday
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement
EBU
-EB1�BR
WBL WBT
NBL
SBT
Lane Configurations
A
Tt'p
vj ?TT
vj
if
Traffic Vol, veh/h
0
1118 4
36 1521
7
33
Future Vol, veh/h
0
1118 4
36 1521
7
33
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
Sign Control
Free
Free Free
Free Free
Stop
Stop
RT Channelized
Stop
None
- None
-
None
Storage Length
380
None
340 -
130
0
Veh in Median Storage, # -
0
- 0
0
-
Grade, %
-
0
- 0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
92
89 89
89 89
89
89
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2 2
2 2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
0
1256 4
40 1709
8
37
3: Shady Oak Dr & Driveway 1 2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in Southlake, TX Timing Plan: Saturday
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.3
Movement
EBL
EBR
NBL
NBT
SBT
SBR
Lane Configurations
Y
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
t
'y
2022
Traffic Vol, veh/h
6
22
26
66
69
6
Future Vol, veh/h
6
22
26
66
69
6
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
-
None
None
6.42
None
Storage Length
0
-
-
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
-
Grade, %
0
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
0
0
-
Peak Hour Factor
82
82
82
82
82
82
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
7
27
32
80
84
7
Major/Minor
Majorl
Major2
Minorl
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.1 0.102
Major/Minor
Minot
55.5
Majorl Major2
Conflicting Flow All
HCM Lane LOS
0 0 1261 0
2022
630
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
Conflicting Flow All
232
88
91 0 0
Stage 1
- - - -
1258
-
Stage 1
88
-
- - -
Stage 2
-
764
-
Stage 2
144
-
-
Critical Hdwy
5.64
5.34
5.74
7.14
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
-
6.64
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
-
-
6.04
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
2.32
3.12
3.82
3.92
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
-
292
91
364
Pot Cap -1 Maneuver
756
970
1504
Stage 1
-
168
-
Stage 1
935
-
-
Stage 2
-
382
-
Stage 2
883
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
292
79
364
Mov Cap -1 Maneuver
739
970
1504
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
-
79
Mov Cap -2 Maneuver
739
-
-
Stage 1
168
Stage 1
935
Stage 2
330
Stage 2
864
Approach
EB
WB
Approach
EB
NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s
0
0.4
22.9
HCM Control Delay, s
9.1
2.1 0
HCM LOS
C
HCM LOS
A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLnt NBLn2 EBU EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)
79
364
292
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.1 0.102
0.139
HCM Control Delay (s)
55.5
16 0
19.3
HCM Lane LOS
F
C A
C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.3
0.3 -
0.5
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBL
NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)
1504
909
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.021
0.038
HCM Control Delay (s)
7.4
9.1
HCM Lane LOS
A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.1
0.1
MS Synchro 9 Report MS Synchro 9 Report
Page 1 Page 2
4: Shady Oak Dr & Unity Way
2025 Horizon + Buildout (Site Plan B)
TIA for Crescent Green in
Southlake, TX
Timing Plan: Saturday
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.2
Movement
WBL
WBR
NBT
NBR
Lane Configurations
I
r
j.
rj
Traffic Vol, vehlh
19
19
68
5
4
57
Future Vol, veh/h
19
19
68
5
4
57
Conflicting Peds, #Ihr
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sign Control
Stop
Stop
Free
Free
Free
Free
RT Channelized
None
None
None
Storage Length
0
0
-
Veh in Median Storage, #
0
-
0
0
Grade, %
0
-
0
0
Peak Hour Factor
79
79
79
79
79
79
Heavy Vehicles,%
2
2
2
2
2
2
Mvmt Flow
24
24
86
6
5
72
Major/Minor
Minorl
Majort
Major2
Conflicting Flow All
171
89
0
0
92
0
Stage 1
89
-
-
-
-
-
Stage 2
82
-
-
Critical Hdwy
6.42
6.22
4.12
Critical Hdwy Stg 1
5.42
-
Critical Hdwy Stg 2
5.42
-
-
Follow-up Hdwy
3.518
3.318
2.218
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver
819
969
1503
Stage 1
934
-
-
Stage 2
941
-
-
Platoon blocked, %
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver
817
969
1503
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver
817
-
-
Stage 1
934
Stage 2
938
Approach
WB
NB
SB
HCM Control Delay, s
9.2
0
0.5
HCM LOS
A
Minor Lane/MajorMvmt
NBT
NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL
SBT
Capacity (veh/h)
817 969 1503
HCM Lane V/C Ratio
0.029 0.025 0.003
HCM Control Delay (s)
9.5 8.8 7.4
0
HCM Lane LOS
A A A
A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
0.1 0.1 0
-
MS
Synchro 9 Report
Page 3
DeShazo Group, Inc.
April 4, 2017
Appendix E. Excerpts from the City of Southlake and TOOT Access Management Manual
Crescent Green Traffic
Impact Analysis
Appendix E
If
TABLE ONE
- 8 -
(including notes
on the following
page)
Criteria
Street
Classification
Residential
Driveway
Commercial &
Multi -Family
Service Driveway
Driveway
Driveway Throat
Width*
S.H. 114 & frontage roads
12-20 ft
2440 ft.
3048 ft
F.M. 1938, F.M. 1709, S.N. 26
12-20 ft
2440 ft.
3048 ft.
Arterial
12-20 ft.
2440 ft.
3048 ft.
Collector
12-20 ft.
2440 ft.*
30-48 ft.*
Local Street
12-20 ft.
2440 ft.*
24-36 ft.e
Driveway Curb
Radius*
S.H. 114 & frontage roads
20-25 ft
20-30 ft.
25-40 ft
F.M. 1938, F.M. 1709, S.H. 26
20-25 ft.
20-30 ft.
25-40 ft.
Arterial
20-25 ft.
20-30 ft.
25-30 ft.
Collector
15-20 ft.
10-20 ft.*
10-20 ft.*
Local Street
5-I0 ft.
10-20 ftw
10-20 ft.*
'num Distance to
section Along
S.H. 114 & frontage roads
150 ft.
200 ft.
200 ft
Roadway$
F.M. 1938, F.M. 1709, S.H. 26
150 ft.
500 ft.
200 ft.
Arterial
150 ft.
200 ft.
200 ft.
Collector
50 ft.
150 ft.*
150 ft.*
Minimum Centerline
D
Driveway Spacing
Local Street
S.H. 114 & frontage roads
30 ft.
80 ft.
100 ft.0
500 ft.�
100 ft.0
500 ft�
Along Roadwayt
F.M. 1938, F.M. 1709, S.H. 26
80 ft
500 ft.<
250 ft*
Arterial
100 ft.
250 ft.
250 R.*
Collector
40 ft.
150 ft•
I50 ft.e
Local Street
20 ft
100 ft•
100 ft.�
- 8 -
TABLE ONE NOTES:
* The requirements for Driveway Throat Width and Driveway Curb Radius are for standard undivided two-way
operation and may be varied by the Director if traffic volumes, truck usage, common driveways, and other
factors warrant such.
t The minimum centerline spacing does not implicitly determine the number of driveways allowed. Driveways
served by deceleration lanes may be spaced at closer intervals if approved by the Director. See Section 5.2(b)
for additional restrictions on driveway locations along S.H. 114 frontage roads.
$ Distance measured from the intersecting R.O.W. line to the centerline of the driveway. See Section 5.2(b) for
additional restrictions on driveway locations along S.H. 114 frontage roads.
* Service driveway centerline spacing may be reduced to 150' if the ingress/egress volume is less than 50 vehicles
per day and if the service driveway is a secondary driveway ancillary to a commercial driveway within the
same development.
♦ The minimum centerline spacing may be reduced to 250' provided that the driveway is connecting directly to a
frontage road and provided that it meets the criteria in Section 5.2(b).
• Refer to Section 5.2(c). Commercial, multi -family and service driveways may not be permitted on collector or
local streets.
p The minimum centerline spacing maybe reduced to 250' for right-in/right-out driveways. Refer to Section
5.2(a).
5.2 GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA
a. DRIVEWAYS ON F.M. 1709, F.M. 1938 & INTERSECTING ARTERIALS:
The minimum centerline spacing for full -access driveways on F.M. 1709 & F.M.
1938 is 500 feet as per Table One; however, the minimum centerline spacing may
be reduced to 250 feet for right-in/right-out driveways in accordance with
Appendix 1. Driveways constructed within 250 feet of an intersection of F.M.
1709 or F.M. 1938 and an arterial shall be right-in/right-out only. All right-
in/right-out drives shall be designed in accordance with Appendix 5 and shall
have signs placed at the Applicants expense indicating right tum in only facing
the street and right turn out only facing the property.
b. DRIVEWAYS ON S.H. 114: Driveways along S.H. 114 (and its future frontage
roads) shall be designed in accordance with Texas Department of Transportation
(TxDOT) access control guidelines as applicable to the conceptual design and
alignments of the proposed reconstruction of S.H. 114. Driveways will be not be
allowed within areas indicated as "access denied" as per Appendices 2 & 3.
c. DRIVEWAYS PROHIBITED: Commercial, multi -family and service driveways
shall not be permitted on collector or local streets unless the tract or lot has no
other public access. In the event there is no other public access, commercial,
9_
driveway sight distance may be insufficient, the Applicant will be required to
submit vertical and horizontal information prepared by a registered Professional
Engineer to the City Engineer that verifies adequate sight distance is available for
the proposed driveway location.
1. SITE PLAN REQUIRED: A site plan showing all existing right-of-way,
easements, curbs, storm drain inlets, flumes, underground and overhead utilities,
trees and sidewalks shall be required for each non-residential driveway permit
application. The proposed driveway grades shall also be shown for a minimum
distance of fifteen (15') feet past the right-of-way line. All driveways and median
openings within 150 feet of the subject property on both sides of each abutting
street shall be shown on the site plan. If an adjacent street contains a wised
median, showing driveway(s) on the opposite side of the street shall not be
required unless a median opening is present or proposed.
5.3 RESIDENTIAL STANDARDS
a. CIRCULAR DRIVES: Circular drives are allowed on residential lots not fronting
on arterial or collector thoroughfares. There shall be 25' minimum distance
between the two interior portions of the drives at the R.O.W. line. The minimum
lot frontage required to construct a circular drive is 70 feet.
b. COMMON DRIVE WIDTH: A residential driveway shared by two or more
properties shall have a minimum throat width of twelve (12') feet. A common
access easement shall also be required as described in Section 3.5. Shared
residential driveways may be required for adjoining residential lots on major
street facilities to reduce the number of access points on those roadways.
c. ACCESS TO MAJOR STREET FACILITY: Driveway access to a residential lot
from any major street facility shall not be permitted unless that lot has no other
public access. If such a driveway is approved on a major street facility, an off-
street maneuvering area approved by the Director shall be provided to ensure that
vehicles will not back into the public street. Driveway access to a residential lot
from a collector street may be denied if either (a) the lot has access to a local
street or (b) the proposed access would create a traffic flow or safety problem
unless there is no other access.
5.4 AUXILIARY LANES
a. WHEN REQUIRED: As a condition of a Driveway Permit, the Applicant shall
provide a deceleration lane for any driveway located on an arterial street if the
right turn ingress volume exceeds 50 vehicles in the design hour (150 vehicles if
the design hour occurs on a Sunday). If the existing or future speed limit on the
street facility exceeds 40 MPH, a deceleration lane may be required if 40 right
1Z-
tum ingress vehicles occur in the design hour (100 vehicles if the design hour
occurs on a Sunday).
b. DRIVEWAYS PROHIBITED: No driveway shall be permitted within the
transition area of any separate right turn or deceleration lane.
c. EXTENSION OF RIGHT TURN LANE: When a driveway is approved within
the separate right turn lane of a public street intersection, the lane shall be
extended a minimum of fifty (50') feet in advance of the driveway.
d. CONTINUOUS DECELERATION LANE: A continuous deceleration lane may
be required as a condition of a driveway permit when two or more deceleration
lanes are planned and their proximity necessitates that they be combingd for
proper traffic flow and safety. The transition taper for a continuous deceleration
lane shall not extend into or beyond a public street intersection.
e. LEFT TURN LANES ON UNDIVIDED ROADS: On undivided arterial
roadways, a left tum lane and taper may be required as a condition of the
driveway permit when the product of the projected left turn ingress volume (50
minimum) and the opposing volume per lane exceeds 25,000 in any design hour
In such cases, a Traffic Impact Analysis shall be provided by the Applicant to
analyze the present and future traffic volumes to verify that the left tum lane is
necessary to maintain minimum levels of traffic flow and safety.
f. LEFT TURN LANES ON DIVIDED ROADS: On divided arterial roadways, the
Applicant shall, as a condition of the permit, construct a left tum lane at an
existing public street median opening when the proposed driveway will be served
by such median opening and no left tum lane exists in the median.
g. TEMPORARY AUXILIARY LANE: The Director may require a temporary
auxiliary lane to be constructed on existing arterial roadways that are planned for
future improvement.
h. DECELERATION LANE EXTENSION: In the event the Applicant is allowed to
locate a driveway connecting to a deceleration lane within one hundred (100') feet
of an arterial intersection, the Applicant shall be required to extend the
deceleration lane to such intersection. The one hundred (100') feet shall be
measured from the nearest edge of the driveway throat to the nearest R.O.W. line
of the intersecting arterial.
i. CONSTRUCTION COSTS: The Applicant shall be responsible for the design,
right-of-way adjustment of utilities, and construction costs of any auxiliary lane
and street widening required as a condition of the driveway permit. If for any
reason an auxiliary lane required under this Ordinance cannot be constructed in
conjunction with the driveway by the Applicant, the Applicant may be required to
place all necessary funds in escrow with the City.
-13-
Chapter 2 —Access Management Standards
Section 3 —Number, Location, and Spacing ofAccess
Connections
Table 2-2: Other State Highways Connection Spacing Criteria
Other State Highways Minimum Connection Spacing (1)(2)(3)
Posted Speed (mph)
Distance (ft)
< 30
200
35
250
40
305
45
360
> 50
425
(1) Distances are for passenger cars on level grade. These distances may be
adjusted for downgrades and/or significant truck traffic. Where present or
projected traffic operations indicate specific needs, consideration may be
given to intersection sight distance and operational gap acceptance measure-
ment adjustments.
(2) When these values are not attainable, refer to the variance process as
described in Chapter 2, Section 5.
(3) Access spacing values shown in this table do not apply to rural highways
outside of metropolitan planning organization boundaries where there is little,
if any, potential for development with current ADT levels below 2000.
Access connection spacing below the values shown in this table may be
approved based on safety and operational considerations as determined by
TxDOT.
Corner clearance refers to the separation of access connections from roadway intersections. Table
2-2 provides minimum corner clearance criteria.
Where adequate access connection spacing cannot be achieved, the permitting authority may allow
for a lesser spacing when shared access is established with an abutting property. Where no other
alternatives exist, construction of an access connection may be allowed along the property line far-
thest from the intersection. To provide reasonable access under these conditions but also provide
the safest operation, consideration should be given to designing the driveway connection to allow
only the right -in turning movement or only the right-in/right out turning movements if feasible.
Auxiliary Lanes
This subsection describes the basic use and functional criteria associated with auxiliary lanes. Aux-
iliary lanes consist of left -turn and right -turn movements, deceleration, acceleration, and their
associated transitions and storage requirements. Left -turn movements may pose challenges at
driveways and street intersections. They may increase conflicts, delays, and crashes and often com-
plicate traffic signal timing. These problems are especially acute at major highway intersections
Access Management Manual 2-13 RDOT 07/2011
Chapter 2 —Access Management Standards
Section 3 —Number, Location, and Spacing ofAccess
Connections
where heavy left -turn movements take place, but also occur where left -turn movements enter or
leave driveways serving adjacent land development. As with left -turn movements, right -turn move-
ments pose problems at both driveways and street intersections. Right -turn movements increase
conflicts, delays, and crashes, particularly where a speed differential of 10 mph or more exists
between the speed of through traffic and the vehicles that are turning right.
Table 2-3 presents thresholds for auxiliary lanes. These thresholds represent examples of where left
turn and right turn lanes should be considered. Refer to the TxDOT Roadway Design Manual,
Chapter 3, for proper acceleration and deceleration lengths.
Table 2-3: Auxiliary Lane Thresholds
Access Management Manual 2-14 TxDOT 07/2011
Right Turn to or from Property (5)
Median Type
Left Turn to or from Property
Acceleration
Deceleration
Acceleration
Deceleration
Non -Traversable
(2)
All
Right turn egress >
♦ > 45 mph where right
(Raised Median)
200 vph (4)
turn volume is > 50
vph (3)
♦ <_ 45 where right turn
volume is > 60 vph (3)
Traversable (Undi-
(2)
(1)
Same as above
Same as Above
vided Road)
(1) Refer to Table 3-11, TxDOT Roadway Design Manual, for alternative left -turn -bay operational considerations.
(2) A left -turn acceleration lane may be required if it would provide a benefit to the safety and operation of the road-
way. A left -turn acceleration lane would interfere with the left -turn ingress movements to any other access
connection.
(3) Additional right -turn considerations:
♦ Conditions for providing an exclusive right -turn lane when the right -turn traffic volume projections are less than
indicated in Table 2-3:
• High crash experience
• Heavier than normal peak flow movements on the main roadway
• Large volume of truck traffic
• Highways where sight distance is limited
♦ Conditions for NOT requiring a right -turn lane where right -turn volumes are more than indicated in Table 2-3:
• Dense or built -out corridor where space is limited
• Where queues of stopped vehicles would block the access to the right turn lane
• Where sufficient length of property width is not available for the appropriate design
(4) The acceleration lane should not interfere with any downstream access connection.
♦ The distance from the end of the acceleration lane taper to the next unsignalized downstream access connection
should be equal to or greater than the distances found in Table 2-2.
♦ Additionally, if the next access connection is signalized, the distance from the end of the acceleration lane taper to
the back of the 90th percentile queue should be greater than or equal to the distances found Table 2-2.
(5) Continuous right -turn lanes can provide mobility benefits both for through movements and for the turning vehi-
cles.' Access connections within a continuous right turn lane should meet the spacing requirements found in Table 2-
2. However, when combined with crossing left in movements, a continuous right -turn lane can introduce additional
operational conflicts.
Access Management Manual 2-14 TxDOT 07/2011