Loading...
2017-10-10 Meeting Report (FM 1709 - FM1938 Corrifor Plan) SPIN MEETING REPORT SPIN Item Number: SPIN2017-32 Project Name: FM 1709 –FM 1938 Corridor Plan SPIN Neighborhood: Citywide Meeting Date: October 10, 2017 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: One (1) Host: Sandra Harrison, Community Engagement Committee ApplicantPresenting: Ken Baker, Sr. Director of Planning and Development Services City Staff Present: Jerod Potts –Policy & Strategic Initiative Principal Planner Attached to the end of this report are the Southlake Connect Results for the October 10, 2017SPIN Town Hall Forum Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.comand clicking on “Learn More” under Video On Demand; forums are listed under SPINby meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY: Development Details: FM 1709 –FM 1938 Corridor Plan is the Second of six (6) sector land use plans Comprehensive Plan is a reflection of the values and desires of the citizens, guides growth and development in the City, sets the City’s expectations for quality of life, determines level of services, and prioritizescapital improvement projects All recommendations in the comprehensive plans are aligned with the City’s strategy map. Also, we make sure the recommendations are formatted in a way that is measurable. Assign metrics (Key Accountability Indicators) to the recommendations Comprehensive planning began in Southlake in 1969 FM 1709 -FM 1938 Corridor study area consists of 850 acres The Land Use Plan focuses on the type of land use designation on properties This planalsoprovides specific recommendations for certain study areas Comprehensive planning is not zoning. This process does not remove the existing zoning designation on a piece of property Land Use Plan indicates a couple of areas thatgarden type or low leveloffice may be appropriate in medium density residential areasas a transition area Land Use Recommendationsby study area: LU1 –approximately 28 acres along Davis Blvd. (FM 1938) south of FM 1709 Currently there are a number of ranch-style, large lot homes o Creek area that runs along western boundary o There is an entitlement for a4,000 SF retail development south of the existing o Sonicon the west side of FM 1938 Some recommendations include: o Properties should be master planned or developed in a coordinated matter, if possible Any development should explore a creek crossings from Davis to residential to the west Shared driveway access to minimize the number of drives that should alignwith future median openings on FM 1938 Passive trail along creek area Preserve, highlight, incorporate creek area into future development Scale of development needs to be consistent with the surrounding area Per an economic development study there are retail, restaurant target uses that are identified; those type of uses are encouraged Buildings should be located near the property line and parking should be behind buildings and screened fromFM 1938where possible LU2 –approximately33 acres There are two church properties to the north and west of this property o Some recommendations include: o Evaluatecreek crossing back to FM 1938 Properties should be master planned or developed in a coordinated manner, if possible Any development that occurs should preserve or highlight the creek area in terms of green space, walking areas Significant tree cover on these properties –development should try to preserve this tree cover There are two large tree areas adjacent to the church propertiesand any development that occurs should attempt to preserve that tree area, to serve as a buffer between the residential development and the church properties Subdivision should be walkable withsidewalks,connections tothe open space, as well as connections to theFM 1709 sidewalk system LU3 –approximately14 acres A number of non-conforminguses and structuresarelocated on this property o Medium density designation to the west, flood plain through the center o Private drive along Michael Dr. served off one single meteron Davis o Some recommendations: o Maintainmedium density residential west of the creek, do allow or consider garden office type uses, if the property is redeveloped Redevelopment of properties should highlight, preserve floodplain corridor Future redevelopment to the western portion should be sensitive to the Siena neighborhood, as it relates to noise, traffic, building heights, lighting and views Work with property owners todedicateautility easement along Michael Dr.so lots can be metered individually As any development occurs, use these recommendations as a guideline to evaluate any development coming forward LU4 –approximately22 acres East of Davis, south of Continental o Bear Creekisto the south; creek is Southlake’s southern boundary o Some recommendations: o Change office commercial designation to mixed useand note that the development to the west close to the Country Walk development, either residential or garden-office use is recommended as a transitional use between the subdivision and any future development on FM 1938 Change Land Use designation from retail commercial designation to mixed use; mixed use is more of a variety and can respond to some of the market conditions better than the retail commercial land use designation Non-residential development that does occur should be to the scale of the area, in terms of being low-profile. Target industries defined in the Economic Development Master Plan such as low profile office or health and medical uses, target retail, restaurant uses are encouraged Any development that occurs should be towards the street with parking to the back, with parking screened Creek area to the south should be highlighted as an amenity if development occurs Any development should be walkable and there should be open space and pathway connections, as well as to the future FM 1938 sidewalk system as well as any internal pathway systems LU5 North of Sprouts o Currently low-densityresidentialarea o Some recommendations: o Keep low densitydesignation on the propertybut note that office development at a low scale may be consideredthrough the rezoning process Any development that occurs should use existingcommercialopening on Randol Mill / FM 1938 so there is cross connectivity Consider office commercial Building should be along FM 1938 with parking in the back and the tree area should be preserved to the greatest extent possible LU6 Southlake Marketplace;C-3 zoning on the property o There is approximately 202,000 SF of retail o Approximately 1,000 parking spaces in the development o Some recommendations: o Look at some new driveway configurations to makeaccess into and out of the center easier; includes constructing driveway and signal across from DPS West station(public-private partnership) Consider rezoning the property or portions of the property to allow more flexible parking requirements for possible uses compatible with the shopping area and the adjacent residential neighborhood (Southlake Woods)when possible If the property is rezoned, include improvement to the large parking field, providing open and greenspace, landscaping, lighting, replacing non- conforming signs LU7 Includes Peytonville o Retail commercial and medium density land use designation o Some recommendations: o Extend office commercial land use designation to reflect the use of the orthopedics building instead of the retail designation As the tree farm is developed the types of uses that may be appropriate should be aligned with target industries Undeveloped office properties along Peytonville as they are developed, cross access should be provided to limit the number of drives onto Peytonville Provide internal cross access from Players Circleto Peytonville so a vehicle does not have to get back on FM 1709 to get from Players Circle to Peytonville Encourage development consistent with the medium density land use category on the southern portion of the tree farm (scale should be appropriate for that area) Any development that occurs should be compatible with the Southlake Woods property LU8 Cities property, about 13 acres. Where the old senior center is located at the end o of the cul-de-sac Some recommendations: o City should retain this property as a passive recreation use, such as walking, jogging, exercising Retain the tree areas Clean up the pond area and make it a property amenity Consider retaining the old senior center building to allow for meeting / event space Provide appropriate park amenities (benches, trash cans, etc.) LU9 Property to the west of Carroll Ave. o Primarily undeveloped o When the Southlake 2030 plan was written, a small area plan was developed for o the area from Carroll back to Timarron. A number of recommendations in this plan is what you see in the built environment in terms of Park Village, Winding Creek Committee felt there were a number of recommendation still applicable to the o Rucker property and wanted to keep those in place Some recommendations: o Anything north of Zena Rucker Rd. would be the office-type development. The backs of the buildings should look like fronts of buildings as this will be a major traffic thoroughfare through here. Wooded areas / drainage areas are recommended to be preserved on the Rucker property Encourage water reuse for irrigation Any green building design Preserve and enhance existing creeks LU10 North of FM 1709 and west of Carroll o Mendez / Strunk properties o Not recommending placing additional drives on Carroll o Some recommendations: o Extend medium density land use to the south Properties along Carroll could bedeveloped asgarden officeif planned in a comprehensive manner Any office development along Carroll Ave. should have cross access back to the traffic signal at FM 1709 / Tower Plaza A new drive cut at Carroll Ave. and Main St. is not recommended Mobility Recommendations M1(FM 1709 / FM 1938 Mobility) o Some recommendations: Recommendation toimplement Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Examples includeadaptive signal controls, advanced signal systems, variable speed limits,dynamic messaging signs,in- vehicle systems,road geometry warnings, pedestrian safety warnings, bicycle warnings MT2 (1938 Medians) o Some recommendations: Encourage TXDOT to provide medians along FM 1938 consistent with the City’s median plan Explore the addition of a traffic signal at Sunset MT3 (1938 Intersection Enhancement) o Some recommendations: Improve aestheticsof the FM 1709 -FM 1938 intersection in a manner consistent with urban design themes MT4 (1709 sidewalks) o There are a couple of gaps in the sidewalk system Some recommendations Provide a continuous sidewalk system along FM 1709 MT5 (Hills Church Retaining Wall / Sidewalk) o Some recommendations: As the sidewalk project comes in, look to design or retrofit hardscapeconsistent with the City’s Urban Design Plan MT6 (Pedestrian Crossings by Town Square) o Some recommendations: Enhance the pedestrian crossings at the intersections of FM 1709 and Carroll Ave. and Central to make a more walkable environment Consider utilization of an alternative form of transportation such as a trolley to move people between Town Square, Shops of Southlake, and Park Village Pedestrian Bridge MT7 (1938 Sidewalks) o Some recommendations: Explore grants for sidewalk along FM 1938 south of FM 1709 Parks Recommendations Central Park o Some Recommendations: Explore options to activate the park and attract users Former Safety Town Property o Under 1 acre in size located near DPS West facility Some Recommendations: The City should retain this property as undeveloped open space along FM 1938 Exhibits presented at SPIN: QUESTIONS / CONCERNS: None SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made.Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant.Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. SouthlakeConnect Results for the October 10, 2017SPIN Town Hall Forum