Loading...
Item 6Case No. ZA17-060 S T A F F R E P O R T October 13, 2017 CASE NO: ZA17-060 PROJECT: Zoning Change and Development Plan for Metairie at Southlake and Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Kirkwood Grove West EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of Southlake Dove Associates, LLC, D2 Investments, Inc. and DeOtte, Inc. are requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Metairie at Southlake and Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Kirkwood Grove West on property described as Tracts 1F and 1, James J. W est Survey, Abstract No. 1620, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 500 and 550 W. State Hwy. 114, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. Proposed Zoning: “TZD” Transitional Zoning District and "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #3. DETAILS: This project is located south of E. Dove Rd. between W. State Hwy. 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd. The purpose of this request is twofold. The first request is to seek approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan from “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District to “TZD” Transitional Zoning District for Metairie of Southlake, which includes 59 residential lots and four (4) open space lots on approximately 29.387 acres. The proposed gross density is 2.008 units per acre and the proposed net density is 2.83 units per acre. The percentage of open space proposed in the subdivision is approximately 17.3% of the gross area. The second request is to seek approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Kirkwood Grove West to revise the “S-P-2” zoning district boundary established in Ordinance No. 480-220 to only include a redefined boundary for the western tract, which was identified as “Tract A” in the ordinance. The existing zoning is “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District with Mixed Uses, to include limited uses in the following districts: "CS" Community Service District, "O-1" Office District, "O-2" Office District, "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, and "HC" Hotel District. All zoning requirements, conditions and vested rights from Ordinance No. 480-220, specifically Tract A, previously approved for this property are proposed to remain. The following chart summarizes the site data for the proposed Metairie at Southlake subdivision on the eastern portion of the property. Department of Planning & Development Services Case No. ZA17-060 Site Data Summary for “TZD” Zoning Existing Zoning “S-P-2” Proposed Zoning “TZD” Land Use Designation Mixed Use Gross/Net Acreage 29.387 / 25.409 Residential Lots 59 Gross Density 2.008 du/ac. Net Density 2.83 du.ac. Open Space % 17.3% Lot Area Range 10,014 s.f. to 19,325 s.f. Average Lot Area 11,672 s.f. A comparison of the proposed “TZD” regulations to the “SF-20A” Single Family Residential District is below: Regulation “SF-20A” “TZD” Regulations Max. Height 35’ and 2½ stories 35’ Front Yard 35’ 25’ Side Yard 15’ 5’ Rear Yard 40’ (35’ on cul-de-sac) 20’ Max. Lot Coverage 30% 50% (for principal dwelling) Min. Lot Area 20,000 s.f. 10,000 s.f. Min. Lot Width 100’ 75’ Min. Lot Depth 125’ 115’ Min. Floor Area 1,800 s.f. 2,500 s.f. (1-story) 2,750 s.f. (2-story) Max. Gross Density 2.18 du/ac. 2.008 du/ac. The following modifications to the “TZD” Zoning District requirements are proposed: A. Section 47.4.a: The requirement of having at least two of the district components. B. Section 47.4.d: The requirement for residential density to not exceed two (2) dwelling units per gross acre. C. Section 47.7.a.1 and 47.6 Table 47 -2: The requirement prohibiting dead end streets and cul-de-sacs and the block width and length requirement. D. Section 47.7.a.3: The human-scaled building requirement. E. Section 47.7.b: The building orientation requirement. F. Section 47.7.d: The building façade requirement. G. Section 47.7.e: The architectural design standards requirement. H. Section 47.7.f: The off-street parking requirement. Case No. ZA17-060 VARIANCE REQUESTED: Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.03.F includes minimum centerline radii for curvilinear streets and separation requirements for reverse circular curves. The alignment shown for Kirkwood Blvd. does not meet the requirements in the table. The applicant is requesting to allow the alignment shown. The Planning and Zoning Commission tabled this item at their October 5, 2017 meeting. The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed the following issues to be addressed for the October 19, 2017 meeting. P&Z Issues to be addressed by 10/19 meeting Applicant’s Response Relocate the kiosk from the median and provide more detail on the type of mailboxes to be used before Council. The applicant has removed the kiosk from the median and added several kiosks throughout the development. Provide elevations and materials for the wall and fence. Example photos of the proposed masonry wall and metal fence have been provided. Provide material samples or exhibits of the retaining wall material. Example photos of the retaining wall and a retaining wall exhibit have been provided. Provide an exhibit with showing the entrance lined up with Brentwood Circle. An exhibit has been provided. Add regulations to ensure custom home builders and discourage production builders. Regulations have been added under Section H – Building Standards. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider Approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan and a Zoning Change and Concept Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Development Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated October 13, 2017 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (E) Ordinance Nos. 480-729 and 480-220a Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only ) Link to PowerPoint Presentation Link to Narrative Link to TZD Regulations Link to Plans Page 1 - Development Plan (East) Page 2 - Landscape Plan Pages 3-4 Tree Conservation Plan and Tree Chart Page 5 - Pedestrian Access Plan Pages 6-7 - Street Sections Page 8 - Entry Exhibit Page 9 - Concept Plan (West) Pages 10-12 Civil Plans Link to Additional Exhibits provided since the 10/5 P&Z meeting Link to Corridor Planning Committee Report Link to SPIN meeting Report dated April 11, 2017 Link to SPIN meeting Report dated August 22, 2017 Case No. ZA17-060 STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 Richard Schell (817) 748-8602 Case No. Attachment A ZA17-060 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Southlake Dove Associates, LLC APPLICANT: D2 Investments, Inc. and DeOtte, Inc. PROPERTY SITUATION: 500 and 550 W. State Hwy. 114, located south of E. Dove Rd. between W. State Hwy. 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Tracts 1F and 1, James J. West Survey, Abstract No. 1620 LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CURRENT ZONING: “S-P-2” – Generalized Site Plan District with Mixed Uses, to include limited uses in the following districts: "CS" Community Service District, "O -1" Office District, "O-2" Office District, "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, and "HC" Hotel District. PROPOSED ZONING: “TZD” Transitional Zoning District and “S-P-2” – Generalized Site Plan District with Mixed Uses, to include limited uses in the following districts: "CS" Community Service District, "O-1" Office District, "O-2" Office District, "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C -2" Local Retail Commercial District, "C-3" General Commercial District and "HC" Hotel District. HISTORY: -A Zoning Change was approved by City Council Ma y 6, 1997, changing the zoning on the property from “AG” Agricultural District to “S -P-2” Generalized Site Plan District to include “CS” Community Service, “O-1” Office District, “C-1” Neighborhood Commercial District, “C-2” Local Retail Commercial District, “C-3” General Commercial District, “B-1” Business Service Park District and “HC” Hotel District uses (Case No. ZA96-130 and Ord. No. 480-220). - A Zoning Change and Site Plan for Southlake Center (ZA13-096) from “S- P-2” Generalized Site Plan District to “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District with “C-3” General Commercial District uses to also allow a fuel station and outdoor sales areas as shown on the site plan was tabled at the November 21, 2013 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting to the January 9, 2014 meeting. The requested site plan proposed approximately 443,000 square feet of development with an approximately 113,531 square foot grocery store with a drive-through pharmacy and an approximately 96,000 square foot department store as the main anchor stores in the development. This case and the associated Preliminary Plat for Southlake Center (ZA13 -097) were withdrawn January 9, 2014. - A Site Plan for Town and Country (ZA14-099) for the development of six retail and restaurant buildings totaling approximately 165,320 square feet and the associated Preliminary Plat (ZA14 -100) were withdrawn on April 13, 2015. The subject lot currently remains vacant and unplatted. Case No. Attachment A ZA17-060 Page 2 SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The 2030 future land use designation for the site is “Mixed Use”. The purpose of the Mixed Use category is to provide an option for large - scale, master-planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses such as office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses. Definition: The range of activities permitted, the diverse natural features, and the varying proximity to thoroughfares of areas in the Mixed Use category necessitates comprehensively planned and coordinated development. New development must be compatible with and not intrusive to existing development. Further, special attention should be placed on the design and transition between different uses. Typically, the Mixed Use designation is intended for medium- to higher-intensity office buildings, hotels, commercial activities, retail centers, and residential uses. Nuisance- free, wholly enclosed light manufacturing and assembly uses that have no outdoor storage are permitted if designed to be compatible with adjacent uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Retail Commercial, and Office Commercial categories. Single-family Residential Uses:  Residential uses are to be located between the proposed office or retail uses and existing residential neighborhoods. These uses are intended to provide a lower intensity transition between existing neighborhoods and commercial uses.  Residential uses should be well integrated with proposed open space and other civic uses to create a sense of place.  They should also be integrated with proposed commercial uses in a manner that provides internal automobile and pedestrian access to convenience commercial uses.  Single-family residential uses are recommended to be to the density and scale that is appropriate based on the context and character of the proposed overall development. Open Space:  Consider environmental elements as “features,” rather than constraints.  Emphasis shall be placed on preservation of existing wooded areas and stream corridors.  Avoid channeling or piping of streams.  Streams or creeks should become a f ocal point rather than the rear of the development.  Provide natural walking paths along stream and creek corridors.  Well designed and integrated open spaces are critical to the creation of successful mixed use neighborhoods.  Open spaces should be designed to add value to proposed development and not as an “after-thought”. To that end, open spaces should maximize frontage along residential and office uses. Open spaces shall occupy a prominent place in the development of a neighborhood and form the center pieces of a community. Case No. Attachment A ZA17-060 Page 3  Open spaces are intended to be the “front-yards” and invite passive recreational activities. Open spaces may be in the form of pocket parks, children’s play areas, squares, linear greens, and conservation areas.  Use the topography as an advantage, do not flatten the site.  Preserve views. Civic Uses:  Civic uses such as day-cares, post office, police substation, local government offices, churches, etc. are encouraged. Ideally, civic uses should be located centrally in the develop ment and provide convenient access to all other uses and activities in the development.  Civic uses are to be designed to the scale and context of the neighborhood. Uses are encouraged to be appropriately scaled to the proposed development and generally limited to a maximum of 10,000 square feet of built area. Overall Character and Design:  Buildings are to be designed to be pedestrian friendly.  Buildings shall have shallow setbacks and sidewalks that are a minimum of 10’.  Buildings are to be oriented towards other buildings (across the street) or towards open spaces.  Minimize the impact of surface parking.  Mix up land uses to maximize shared parking. S.H. 114 Corridor Plan. Street Design Standards:  Internal streets to be designed to accommodate both automobiles and pedestrians.  Streets to be designed with curb and gutter.  Interconnected street network.  Regular blocks and streets.  Block widths between 400’ and 600’.  Design speed < 25 mph. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan The subject property is bounded by W. State Hwy. 114 to the west, W. Dove Rd. to the north and N. White Chapel Blvd. to the east. The future alignment of Kirkwood Blvd. intersects the property, with the proposed “TZD” zoning district to the east side of Kirkwood Blvd. and the redefined boundary of the existing “S-P-2” zoning district to the west side. The Master Thoroughfare Plan shows Kirkwood. Blvd. to be a four -lane divided arterial with 100’ of right of way. The Preliminary Plat will show the full 100’ of right of way for Kirkwood Blvd. The Developer is responsible for dedicating 100’ of right of way (on a Final Plat) and constructing one-half (1/2) of the required street section according to City standards with the proposed Metairie at Southlake subdivision. N. White Chapel Blvd. is shown as a Case No. Attachment A ZA17-060 Page 4 four-lane arterial with 88’ of right of way and W. Dove Rd. is shown as a two lane undivided arterial with 88’ of right of way adjacent to the site. Adequate right of way is shown to be dedicated on the Development Plan, Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat. Coordination with Public Works staff will be required for the intersection of Kirkwood Blvd. and Dove Rd. Construction for the intersection improvements at this location has begun. The developer is required to install a mast arm for northbound traffic at the intersection. Construction of the traffic signal should be completed by December of 2017. Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan The Pathways Plan shows a less than 8’ sidewalk along the south side of Dove Road and a 6’ sidewalk is shown on the Development Plan. The Pathways Plan shows an 8’ or greater multi -use trail on east side of Kirkwood Boulevard and on west side of N. White Chapel Blvd. and 8’ multi-use trails are shown on the Development Plan connecting to an existing segment of 6’ sidewalk on N. White Chapel Blvd. south of the intersection with W. Dove Rd. 2035 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan The subject site is located within the 2035 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan area that was adopted June 20, 2017 under Ordinance No. 1171. Link to 2035 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan The following site specific recommendations are included for the subject property:  Retain the existing underlying Mixed Use land use designation and apply the Campus Office Overlay district.  Future development on these properties should be approved in a manner that is sensitive to potential impacts on adjacent residential areas, particularly as related to noise, traffic, building heights, lighting and views.  Provide a corner enhancement feature at SH 114 and W. Dove Rd in conjunction with development on the west half of the Fidelis tract.  Development of the Shivers property should be integrated with the Carillon commercial to the east.  For areas immediately along and east of the planned Kirkwood Blvd. extension, low-impact development such as residential with a similar design and pattern to the existing neighborhoods across White Chapel may be considered as a transition to the neighboring single family residential properties. Also a low-scale or garden office component may be considered if development is planned in a comprehensive manner which maximizes tree preservation.  Buffer any residential uses from non -residential uses on this property.  Traffic signals at major street intersections should be anticipated and addressed with development.  As development is proposed, traffic impacts on Dove St. and White Chapel Blvd (including the traffic circle) should be assessed.  Development should be sensitive to the existing tree cover and attempts should be made during the planning pro cess to maximize tree cover along with natural features and topography. Case No. Attachment A ZA17-060 Page 5  Any development should be walkable and pedestrian friendly.  Family history of Shivers tract should be preserved or recognized possibly through use of open space.  As development occurs drive access to Kirkwood Blvd. should be encouraged with limited drive access onto White Chapel Blvd. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions The proposed “TZD” zoning request for Metairie at Southlake has one main entrance onto N. White Chapel Blvd. A secondary connection is provided onto the proposed Kirkwood Blvd. to the west, which will connect to W. Dove Rd. and N. White Chapel Blvd. An emergency only access gate is also proposed onto Kirkwood. Blvd. Traffic Counts N. White Chapel Blvd. (60) (Between Kirkwood Blvd and Dove Rd) 24hr North Bound (2816) South Bound (2508) AM Peak AM (229) 7:30 – 8:30AM Peak AM (290) 7:30 – 8:30AM PM Peak PM (374) 5:15 – 6:15PM Peak PM (231) 3:00 – 4:00PM W. Dove Rd. (38) (Between N White Chapel Blvd and SH114) 24hr West Bound (2430) East Bound (2103) AM Peak AM (384) 7:30 – 8:30AM Peak AM (280) 7:15 – 8:15AM PM Peak PM (290) 5:15 – 6:15PM Peak PM (255) 5:00 – 6:00PM * Based on the (2014-2015) City of Southlake Traffic Count Report Traffic Impact A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was not required for this development. Use Units Vtpd* AM- IN AM- OUT PM- IN PM- OUT ITE Code (210) 59 565 12 34 39 22 * Vehicle Trips Per Day * AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour generators on a weekday * Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition The City Engineer has provided the following comments: N. White Chapel north of SH 114 is classified as a 4 -lane divided arterial. The subdivision ordinance recommends that arterials only be intersected by other arterials or collector streets. Minor collectors are permitted to intersect arterials upon specific approval of the Director of Public Works however median breaks should not be permitted at such locations. Furthermore median breaks should only be permitted at a minimum 600’ spacing. Though the proposed main entrance location for the Kirkwood Grove subdivision meets the requirements for minimum offset of centerline spacing from existing streets, Brentwood and Keystone, on the east side of the street, alignment with Brentwood would be the preference from mobility and safety perspectives. Case No. Attachment A ZA17-060 Page 6 Though the design for the future expansion of N. White Chapel has not commenced, there will likely be one median break between Kirkwood and Dove with the ideal location being approximately 900 ’ north of Kirkwood. This dimension lands closest to the proposed main entrance of Kirkwood Grove, with the next best location being at Brentwood. The preference would be to align the proposed main entrance of Kirkwood Grove with Brentwood, roughly 150’ south, allowing the most people access to the median opening and the ability to proceed north or south on N. White Chapel. Keystone would not be considered for a median break due to its proximity (<400’) to the roundabout at Dove Road which is planned for expansion in the future. Should the proposed main entrance to Kirkwood Grove be located north of Brentwood, as proposed, it would probably be the most likely location of a median break to serve the larger number of residences within Kirkwood Grove rather than the 9 residences in Brentwood. This would prevent the southbound movements onto N. White Chapel from Brentwood once the median is constructed. TREE PRESERVATION: The site is subject to the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585 -D since the property is being rezoned. There is approximately 25.4% existing tree cover on the site, of which, approximately 61.3% is proposed to be preserved. A standard zoning district would require that a minimum 60% of existing tree cover be preserved. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P- 2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. Case No. Attachment A ZA17-060 Page 7 UTILITIES: The property is served by an existing 18” water line in W. Dove Rd. and an existing 12” water line in N. White Chapel Blvd. The property is served by an existing 8” sanitary sewer line at the intersection of N. White Chapel Blvd. and Brentwood Circle. DRAINAGE: Drainage on the property is generally west to east to N. White Chapel Blvd. CITIZEN INPUT: The following meetings were held to discuss the development: SPIN meetings were held for this project on April 11, 2017 and August 22, 2017. Links to the reports are provided below. Link to April 11, 2017 SPIN Report Link to August 22, 2017 SPIN Report A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on January 10, 2017. A link to the report is provided. Link to Corridor Planning Committee Report STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Development Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated October 13, 2017. A review summary was not prepared for the Kirkwood Grove West Concept Plan since the purpose of the plan is only to redefine the “S -P-2” Generalized Site Plan District zoning boundary. Case No. Attachment B ZA17-060 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA17-060 Page 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA17-060 Review No.: Four Date of Review: 10/13/17 Project Name: Zoning Change and Development Plan – Metairie at Southlake APPLICANT: David Davis OWNER: Rich Coe D2 Investments, Inc. Southlake Dove Associates, LLC P.O. Box 793725 5207 McKinney Ave. #22 Dallas, TX 75379 Dallas, TX 75205 Phone: (214) 532-5720 Phone: (469) 289-4300 E-mail: david@d2dev.com E-mail: rcoe@frplcd.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REF ERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 09/18/17 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARI FICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748 -8602. 1. Change the name of the development on the plans to “Metairie at Southlake”. 2. Please move the request modify the requirement that the residential density not exceed two dwelling units per gross acre to the variance section and rename the variance section “Modifications”. 3. Please clarify the maintenance responsibilities for the medians. The medians should be maintained by the HOA. 4. Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.03.F includes minimum cen terline radii and separation requirements for reverse circular curves. The alignment shown for Kirkwood Blvd. does not meet the requirements in the table. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow the alignment shown. 5. Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.01.E - Half-streets shall be prohibited except where essential to the reasonable development of the subdivision in conformance with other requirements of this ordinance, and where the Council finds it will be practicable to obtain dedication when the adjoining land is platted. 6. Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, Section 5.02.D - The owner shall be required to dedicate right-of- way as shown in the Thoroughfare Plan, or as required in this section for all streets, or parts thereof, within or at the perimeter of the subdivision as a prerequisite for plat approval unless specifically stated otherwise. In the event that a major state or county thoroughfare lies within or directly adjacent to a development, the development shall only be required to dedicate such right- of-way as reasonably relates to the need created by and the benefit received by that development. In no event shall a development be required to dedicate a right -of-way greater than one hundred and twenty (120) feet in width. * A mailbox kiosk is required by the United State Postal Service for all new subdivisions. * A preliminary plat must be processed and approved and a final plat must be processed, approved and recorded prior to the conveyance of lots and issuance of building per mits. Both plats must conform to the underlying zoning district(s). Case No. Attachment C ZA17-060 Page 2 Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS: 1. There is a 36” Storm Drain and sidewalk proposed to be parallel to the right -of-way of N. White Chapel. The construction of the storm drain, grading, and sidewalk will cause the alteration and/or removal of the existing trees along the right-of-way. Identify which of the existing trees within the right-of-way would need to be altered or removed for the construction of the storm sewer, grading, and sidewalk along N. White Chapel. * The Kirkwood Grove development is proposed to be a Transitional Zoning District (TDZ) designated zoning. The amount of existing canopy cover on the property is 25.4% and 61.3% of the canopy cover is proposed to be preserved. If the development was proposed with traditional zoning 60% of the existing canopy cover is required to be preserved. Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% – 20% 70% 20.1 – 40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; Case No. Attachment C ZA17-060 Page 3 ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buf fer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man -made drainage creek; v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, grading, and any other structure proposed to be construct ed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE AND BUFFERYARDS COMMENTS: 2. Per table 47-2 – Streetscape Standards, a p lanting strip between the curb and the sidewalk and within the right-of-way shall be a minimum of 6’ within the interior portion of the residential neighborhood. Street tree plantings are required but their placement is flexible. Please add a regulation to allow the sidewalk against the curb with no planting strip and with the street trees planted on the house side of the sidewalk. * The “TZD” zoning district is not subject to the requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 42 - Bufferyards. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Alex Ayala, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8274 E-mail: aayala@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. Future Kirkwood Blvd. is categorized as a 4 Lane Divided Arterial roadway on the Thoroughfare Master Plan with 100’ Right of Way. Developer shall be responsible for dedicating 100’ of right of way and constructing one-half (1/2) of the required street section according to City standards. Case No. Attachment C ZA17-060 Page 4 3. Coordination with Public Works staff will be required for the intersection of Kirkwood Blvd. and Dove Rd. Construction for the intersection improvements is currently underway. Developer s hall be required to install mast arm for northbound traffic at the intersection. 4. Staff recommends placing entrance on White Chapel across from Brentwood Drive. Future widening of White Chapel will require the construction of a 4 lane divided street sec tion. Median cuts along White Chapel will most likely be placed across from Brentwood due to the proximity of the Dove round-a-bout. The placement across from Brentwood will also improve mobility and simplify the design of a signalized intersection if warranted in the future. 5. Future grading of high point to meet sight distance requirements along future Kirkwood Blvd. may impact elevations of final grade of all lots adjacent to the right of way. Future roadway profile cut may be considerable which may also impact cul-d-sac at Street E and intersection of Street A. * Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. * Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. * Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. * Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 EASEMENTS: 1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15’ minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line. A 20’ easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. Public Works Department will not allow the installation benches, decorative gates, community mailboxes, dovecotes, monument signs, and/or any other private amenity within public right of way. * Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. WATER COMMENTS: 2. Fire hydrants at cul-de-sacs should align with common property lines. * Water lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. * The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A 1” inch meter must have a 1” tap, etc. * Fire lines shall be separate from service lines. * Water lines constructed in public right of way shall conform to City standards. SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS: 1. Northernmost sanitary sewer line shall be extended to future Kirkwood Blvd. Provide manhole for future extension. Case No. Attachment C ZA17-060 Page 5 * Sanitary sewer lines constructed in public right of way shall conform to City standards. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 3. Differences between pre - and post- development runoff shall be captured in detention pond. Proposed detention pond shall control the discharge of the 2, 10 and 100 - year storm events. Detention may be required with any new proposed building construction. Describe how increased runoff from site is being detained. Access easements are needed for maintenance of detention ponds. 4. Verify size, shape, and/or location of the detention pond (as depicted on the concept plan). Any changes to size, shape, and/or location of the proposed pond may require a revision to th e concept plan and may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. 5. Swales shall be required between lots. Lot to lot drainage will not be allowed. 6. Easements outside of right of way shall be required for proposed storm sewer. Storm sewer must be installed outside the edge of pavement. Ordinance #605 defines easement requirements for storm sewer: 30” RCP and under – 15’ easement 42” – 54” RCP – 20’ easement * Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse i mpact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp 1. * New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. T he Environmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in: https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. 2. * NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. 3. 4. * Retaining walls greater than 4 -feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to constru ction. * Geotechnical report shall be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. * Right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Dep artment (817) 748- Case No. Attachment C ZA17-060 Page 6 8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system. * Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construct ion plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. * Denotes informational comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: Street names need to be approved by the city prior to final plat. Submit proposed nam e and alternate name as soon as possible. Developments of single family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads spaced as required. (Kirkwood Boulevard access must be completed prior to allowing occupancy for any of these residences). The required emergency access gate on Kirkwood must be equipped with an Opticom or KS-2 switch for opening the gate electronically, as well as a means for manual opening in the event of a power failure. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire apparatus access needs to be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus (A minimum of 85,000 lbs GVW). Fire access roads must be at least 31 ft . back of curb to back of curb with a 24’ wide clear conveyance with 30’ minimum inside turn radii. Community Service/Parks Department Review Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requ esting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748 -8607 for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every forty (40) dwelling units. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the amount of $6250 per dwelling unit x 59 dwelling units = $368,750.00. Case No. Attachment C ZA17-060 Page 7 General Informational Comments * SPIN meetings were held for this project on April 11, 2017 and August 22, 2017. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * In addition to the City of Southlake impact fees, please be aware that through the wholesale water customer contract with the City of Fort Worth, all new water connections are required to pay the City of Fort Worth impact fee. The City of Fort Worth impact fee assessment is based on the final plat recordation date and building permit issuance. The applicant is encouraged to review the City of Fort Worth's assessment and collection of Impact Fees Guide to determine the fee amount. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA17-060 Page 1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1 KIRKWOOD HOLLOW HO ASSOC RPUD 425 STOCKTON DR 0.32 NR 2 BRADFORD, JOSEPH RPUD 409 STOCKTON DR 0.46 O 3 OWENS, ANDREW W RPUD 401 STOCKTON DR 0.47 NR 4 SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF CS 2300 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.88 NR 5 KUSHWAHA, ALOK P RPUD 405 STOCKTON DR 0.59 NR 6 CHOKSHI, RUPESH RPUD 403 STOCKTON DR 0.49 NR 7 BOLLINI, SASHIDHAR RPUD 2304 IDLEWILD CT 0.37 NR 8 RAUF, KHALIQ A RPUD 2305 IDLEWILD CT 0.38 NR 9 SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF SF1-A 2235 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.65 NR 10 MORALES, MICHAEL D RPUD 2300 IDLEWILD CT 0.38 NR 11 EADY, LINDA L RPUD 2301 IDLEWILD CT 0.47 NR 12 SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF RPUD 150 W DOVE RD 0.44 NR 13 SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF RPUD 2280 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.54 NR 14 MULLIKIN, TIMOTHY D SF1-A 2225 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.15 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA17-060 Page 2 15 BRENTWOOD RESIDENTIAL ASSOC SF30 2055 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.02 NR 16 THRASHER, WESLEY A AG 1975 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.18 NR 17 GOTTIMUKKULA, SOHINI RPUD 109 KEYSTONE DR 0.46 NR 18 REPICE, JOSEPH RPUD 105 KEYSTONE DR 0.38 NR 19 VERIZON WIRELESS TEXAS LLC NRPUD 500 W DOVE RD 24.86 NR 20 SIMPSON, CHARLES SF30 104 BRENTWOOD CIR 0.68 NR 21 XIONG, KEVIN SF30 100 BRENTWOOD CIR 0.74 NR 22 PATEL, PRABHUDAS K TR SF30 101 BRENTWOOD CIR 0.74 NR 23 CURRIE, JOHN L SF30 105 BRENTWOOD CIR 0.87 NR 24 RODRIGUEZ, JOE RPUD 113 KEYSTONE DR 0.49 O 25 BROWN, KENNETH R SF1-A 2005 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.71 F 26 THRASHER, WESLEY AG 1965 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 1.85 NR 27 ESTES PARK HOA INC RPUD 101 KEYSTONE DR 0.30 NR 28 ESTES PARK HOA INC RPUD 100 KEYSTONE DR 0.58 NR 29 SOUTHLAKE DOVE ASSOCIATES LLC SP2 500 W SH 114 29.49 NR 30 SHIVERS FAMILY PTNRSHIP LTD AG 1900 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 39.54 NR 31 SOUTHLAKE DOVE ASSOCIATES LLC SP2 500 W SH 114 24.95 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Twenty-nine (29) Responses Received: Three (3) Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 1 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 2 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 3 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 4 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-729 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS PORTIONS OF TRACTS 1F AND 1, JAMES J. WEST SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1620, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 29.387 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM “S-P-2” GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT TO “TZD” TRANSITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 5 WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazar ds and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off -street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; e ffect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 6 at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 198 9, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as portions of Tracts 1F and 1, James J. West Survey, Abstract No. 1620, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas being approximately 29.387 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District to “TZD” Transitional Zoning District as depicted on the approved Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”, and subject to the following conditions: Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 7 1. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; a nd to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 8 SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 9 ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading o f this ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the _____ day of _____, 2016. _________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: _________________________________ CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the _____ day of _______, 2016. ________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: ________________________________ CITY SECRETARY Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 10 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: _________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY DATE:___________________________ ADOPTED:_______________________ EFFECTIVE:______________________ Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 11 EXHIBIT “A” Being described as Tracts 1F and 1, James J. West Survey, Abstract No. 1620 , City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 29.387 acres, and particularly described as follows: Metes and Bounds Description Reserved for metes and bounds description Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 12 EXHIBIT “B” Reserved for approved Development Plan Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 13 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 480-220a AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS PORTIONS OF TRACTS 1F AND 1, JAMES J. WEST SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 1620, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY 25.914 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT “A” FROM "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH MIXED USES, TO INCLUDE LIMITED USES IN THE FOLLOWING DISTRICTS: "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT, "O-1" OFFICE DISTRICT, "O-2" OFFICE DISTRICT, "C-1" NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "B-1" BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT, AND "HC" HOTEL DISTRICT, TO "S-P-2" GENERALIZED SITE PLAN DISTRICT WITH MIXED USES, TO INCLUDE LIMITED USES IN THE FOLLOWING DISTRICTS: "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT, "O-1" OFFICE DISTRICT, "O- 2" OFFICE DISTRICT, "C-1" NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "C-2" LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, "C-3" GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND "HC" HOTEL DISTRICT, AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 14 WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off -street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health ad the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 15 other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas , does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secu re safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 16 SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amend ed, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Being described as portions of Tracts 1F and 1, James J. West Survey, Abstract No. 1620, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas being approximately 25.914 acres, and more fully and completely described in Exhibit “A” from "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with Mixed Uses, to include limited uses in the following districts: "CS" Community Service District, "O-1" Office District, "O-2" Office District, "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, "C-3" General Commercial District, "B-1" Business Service Park District, and "HC" Hotel District, to "S-P-2" Generalized Site Plan District with Mixed Uses, to include limited uses in the following districts: "CS" Community Service District, "O-1" Office District, "O-2" Office District, "C-1" Neighborhood Commercial District, "C-2" Local Retail Commercial District, "C-3" General Commercial District and "HC" Hotel District, as depicted on the approved Concept Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “B”, and subject to the following conditions: 1. SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Off icial Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in s aid Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 17 accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 18 violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the _____ day of _____, 2017. _________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 19 _________________________________ CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the _____ day of _______, 2017. ________________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: ________________________________ CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: _________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY DATE:___________________________ ADOPTED:_______________________ EFFECTIVE:______________________ Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 20 EXHIBIT “A” Being described as portions of Tracts 1F and 1, James J. West Survey, Abstract No. 1620, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, being approximately 25.914 acres, and particularly described as follows: Metes and Bounds Description Reserved for metes and bounds description Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 21 EXHIBIT “B” Concept Plan and Uses approved with Ord. No. 480 -220 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 22 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 23 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 24 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 25 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 26 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 27 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 28 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 29 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 30 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 31 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 32 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 33 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 34 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 35 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 36 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 37 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 38 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 39 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-060 Page 40 Reserved for approved Concept Plan for 480-220a