Loading...
2035 Corridor Committee Meeting Report - Mtg. 9 - SH 114 & N. White Chapel Office Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Meeting Report Meeting 9 – March 22, 2017 MEETING LOCATION: Southlake Town Hall – Training Rooms 3B, 3C & 3D 1400 Main Street Southlake, Texas, 76092 IN ATTENDANCE:  City Council Members: Chad Patton, Gary Fawks  Planning & Zoning Commission Members: Michael Springer, Chris Greer  Park Board Member: Frances Scharli  Community Enhancement Development Corporation: Brandon Bledsoe  City Staff: Ken Baker, Dennis Killough, Daniel Cortez, David Jones, Richard Schell, Jerod Potts, Kyle Hogue AGENDA ITEMS: 1. Call to Order. 2. Opening Comments. 3. Review, discuss and make recommendations on a proposed office development on property located at the northwest corner of N. White Chapel Blvd. and W. State Highway 114 and addressed as 140 and 190 W. State Highway 114 and 1700 N. White Chapel Blvd. 4. Review, discuss and make recommendations on a proposed Kroger fuel station on property located at the southwest corner of E. State Highway 114 and Village Center Dr. and addressed as 300 Village Center Dr. 5. Southlake 2035 Land Use Plan – Development of the State Highway 114 Sector Plan. 6. Adjournment. Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #3 – SH 114 & N. White Chapel Office Meeting #9 – March 22, 2017 Page 2 MEETING OVERVIEW: On March 22, 2017 the Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee held their ninth meeting. The Committee was sent a packet of materials prior to the meeting that were to be discussed during the session. A meeting agenda was posted and the meeting time was advertised on the City’s website. The following meeting report focuses on discussion points made during the meeting by members of the Committee, public and City staff. This report is neither verbatim nor does it represent official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by the Committee, City staff, and any attendees of the meeting. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow development cases through the process. Please visit CityofSouthlake.com/Planning for more information. Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #3 – SH 114 & N. White Chapel Office Meeting #9 – March 22, 2017 Page 3 ITEM #3 DISCUSSION – SH 114 & N. White Chapel Office:  Staff made presentation to the Committee  Questions for Staff by the Committee Q: Is the hard corner C-2 (zoning)? A: The whole corner is C-2  Skip Blake, representing the project, made a presentation to the Committee. The following includes comments by the presenter and other representatives of the project: o Would be creating a legitimate drive rather than a temporary drive o Partners interested in developing the project would take 20,000 feet, already leased out this space o As part of landscape percentage would like to create detention pond with active fountain o Rendering is a style of a building, not the final look of the building o Will create more of a hierarchy on the corner  Questions for the Applicant by the Committee Q: Tilt up? A: Have heard some concerns about tilt ups along 114 - want more direction about construction materials. Will not try to force Q: Envision a facade so you don't see the parking lot under? A: Would look like it was the first floor of the building Q: What drives decision with first floor parking or not? A: Parking does get expensive for underneath parking spaces RESPONSE BY COMMITTEE: Will need to make this decision before City Council Q: Have you looked at how this will fit into Tree Preservation Ordinance? A: Not yet in detail Q: What is the topography? (for the retention pond) A: About a six-foot drop Q: Coming in as an S-P-1? A: Yes, can adjust parking ratios, height - still discussing planting northwest pieces off so they can be sold later; this is being discussed as part of the project Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #3 – SH 114 & N. White Chapel Office Meeting #9 – March 22, 2017 Page 4 Q: Share parking with animal hospital? A: No - Once we get sewer he wants to build larger building Q: Dumpster on the northwest? To service the whole lot? A: Yes RESPONSE BY COMMITTEE: Tend to be sensitive to pushing dumpsters to someone else's property  Comments by the Committee o Too much parking - does not seem like much green space RESPONSE BY APPLICANT: Will see when colored in o Doesn't look like trees on edge will survive o Cross-access easement needs to be added RESPONSE BY APPLICANT: No opposition to that o The more you can hide parking the better we feel about it o Concern about look of the building, surface parking o Quality of building materials, façade RESPONSE BY APPLICANT: Want it to be class A office RESPONSE BY COMMITTEE: Hopefully the bar has been raised - this helps everybody o Save as many trees as you can save Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #3 – SH 114 & N. White Chapel Office Meeting #9 – March 22, 2017 Page 5 STAFF PRESENTATION SHOWN TO COMMITTEE: Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #3 – SH 114 & N. White Chapel Office Meeting #9 – March 22, 2017 Page 6 Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #3 – SH 114 & N. White Chapel Office Meeting #9 – March 22, 2017 Page 7 Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #3 – SH 114 & N. White Chapel Office Meeting #9 – March 22, 2017 Page 8