2035 Corridor Committee Meeting Report - Mtg. 3 - 114 Blessed Way Office and Independent Living
Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Meeting Report
Meeting 3 – March 21, 2016
MEETING
LOCATION:
Southlake Town Hall – Training Rooms 3A & B
1400 Main Street
Southlake, Texas, 76092
IN
ATTENDANCE:
• City Council Member: Gary Fawks
• Planning & Zoning Commission Member: Chris Greer, Michael
Springer
• Park Board Member: Frances Scharli
• City Staff: Ken Baker, Dennis Killough, Rob Cohen, Alison Ortowski,
Shannon Hamons, David Jones, Richard Schell, Jerod Potts
AGENDA
ITEMS:
1. Call to Order
2. Review and make recommendations on a proposed office, independent
living, and assisted living project on 20.50 acres located at the northeast
intersection of SH 114 frontage road and Blessed Way.
3. Review and make recommendations on a proposed retail and office
project on approximately 7.5 acres at the southwest corner of FM1709 and
White Chapel Blvd.
4. Adjournment.
MEETING
OVERVIEW:
On March 21, 2016 the Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee
held their third meeting. In advance of the meeting, a meeting agenda
was posted and the meeting time was advertised on the City’s website
and was open to the public. The following meeting report focuses on
discussion points made during the meeting by members of the
Committee, public and City staff. This report is neither verbatim nor does
it represent official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and
appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions
raised by the Committee, City staff, and any attendees of the meeting.
Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow development cases
through the process. Please visit CityofSouthlake.com/Planning for more
information.
Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Office and Sr. Living on Blessed Way
Meeting #3 – March 21, 2016 Page 1
ITEM #2 DISCUSSION – OFFICE, INDEPENDENT LIVING AND ASSISTED LIVING
PROJECT (proposed multi-use development with two multi-story office buildings,
a multi-story independent living building and a multi-story assisted living building
on 20.5 acres of property at the northeast corner of SH 114 and Blessed Way):
o Staff made a brief presentation to the Committee
Applicant Presentation
o There is a demand for office space along SH 114 so an office component was
included at the front of the site along the highway. Designers went through 18
different designs before settling on the one shown tonight.
o There are some environmental constraints on the site with water flow, which
drove the splitting and arraigning of the buildings. There was a desire to make
the development internally walkable for residents and workers.
o Similar to Watermere in concept with combination of assisted
living/independent living/acute care/condos. Noted the condos in Watermere
hadn’t sold as well as projected which led to a later zoning change to allow
apartments.
o Noted this would be the first new independent living in NE Tarrant County in
the last 9 years. The average age of independent living residents in the area
is 81.5 years old.
o There would be approximately 115-120 dwelling units in the west IL building
with 1,300 sq ft a typical size. Structured parking would be included, and we
want to have an overflow agreement in place with Gateway Church. The
residential would be built in one phase while the office would be multi-phase.
Targeted average age for Independent Living is 79; targeted age for assisted
living is 86. Assisted living units would be mostly 2 bedrooms. We want to
make these units walkable to Gateway Church.
o Understand signage is discouraged on the upper floors but want to explore
options for signage.
o The residential buildings will be 4 stories while the parking garage will be 3.5
stories. The existing streams drove the location of the parking garage along
with the need to screen it from the SH 114 corridor.
RESPONSE BY COMMITTEE: Okay with structured parking here if it is not
visible from the highway and is surrounded by buildings like in Town Square.
Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Office and Sr. Living on Blessed Way
Meeting #3 – March 21, 2016 Page 2
Would also like to see bollard lighting on the top deck of the garage rather
than pole lighting.
RESPONSE BY APPLICANT: We’re not primarily office developers. Want to
do 60% medical office and there’s no other way to park it if not in a garage.
We can skin the sides of the garage to make it more appealing from 114 and
places where it is visible. Will be a small portion that is visible. We will also
have a natural tree buffer from the corner of 114 and Blessed Way that will
screen the garage.
Q BY COMMITTEE: Will you do “S-P-1” zoning?
A BY APPLICANT: We intend to come with S-P-2 zoning. But want to be as
transparent and decisive as possible and can do S-P-1.
Q: Can the garage be narrowed and elongated or deepened to go back into
the site and the offices pushed back? Might obtain more greenspace if the
building is moved back from 114.
A: The footprint shown is financially optimal for developing the site, and we
also didn’t want to imperil any specimen trees or wetlands which exist on the
site. The office building location has to provide easy access to the garage and
the two cannot be too far apart. Also want to create usable greenspace for the
office workers that is central to the site, which won’t be the case if it’s
between the building and 114.
Q: Can the surface parking be moved behind the building from 114?
A: Could be doable, will revisit prior iterations to see if we had looked at that
previously. Would amount to an extra 50 feet to walk from garage.
Q: Can there be public access for pedestrians from 114?
A: Maybe the trail along 114 could arc through the site instead of along the
frontage road.
Q: Can you do both?
A: We’re already showing multiple paths, but have to engineer to allow for
surface drainage so not finalized.
Q: Will waterways stay natural?
A: We will have a well for irrigation, a detention/retention pond with trails
around it and throughout the site. The lakes will stay wet, river rock will
prevent erosion and keep it pristine. My office will be there so I’ll have to look
Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Office and Sr. Living on Blessed Way
Meeting #3 – March 21, 2016 Page 3
at it every day. People in their eighties are mostly limited to walking and water
exercise.
Q: Will the trails be concrete?
A: Mixture of crushed granite and concrete.
RESPONSE BY COMMITTEE: Those site and architectural details will need
to be provided with the Zoning and Concept Plan beyond simply showing
artist renderings. It does look very nice with the way the land and water are
being used on the site. Other issues: The airport noise cone may be
problematic for residential. Watermere turned out well and similar
developments have been approved but not built in other places, but high
density may be a problem here. This section of 114 is good for office
campuses; would encourage residential to go elsewhere. We’ve already
approved Assisted Living that’s not started construction yet. We don’t want to
put residential up against 114 and have denied it in the past.
RESPONSE BY APPLICANT: Not sure there’s a piece of property in
Southlake that we could find consensus on.
Q: You’re talking about rental units. What are the age restrictions?
A: 62 and up. Can’t restrict any differently than that.
RESPONSE BY COMMITTEE: Basically putting senior apartments on 114,
which would be a first.
RESPONSE BY APPLICANT: Senior apartments different than independent
living, which is an entirely different level of service and amenity.
Q: Are there kitchens in the residences?
A: Yes. But residents can also get prepared meals, housekeeping,
indoor/outdoor pool, lifestyle director to help residents use current technology.
RESPONSE BY COMMITTEE: We need to make sure we have the right mix
of IL/AL and not cause too much competition with existing AL.
RESPONSE BY APPLICANT: We are at 75% IL with this plan because there
are much more people in their late seventies and early eighties than late
eighties. We hung in during a difficult economy and stuck through with
Watermere and will do the same with this project. We’re focusing on
Independent Living because of the demographics and the equity we can
obtain in the project. We feel this location is as good as any.
Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Office and Sr. Living on Blessed Way
Meeting #3 – March 21, 2016 Page 4
RESPONSE BY COMMITTEE: We recognize what you did with Watermere
and it’s a good project. This is 114 and a different product.
RESPONSE BY APPLICANT: Think this is a good property with good
synergy next to the church and Town Square. Is an extra 100 feet off of 114 a
material change?
RESPONSE BY COMMITTEE: It could be. This is a type of product we
haven’t approved yet at this location. At public meeting phase you’ll need to
be prepared to explain why IL/AL is the best use for this site. There may be
too much in the pipeline already in Southlake.
RESPONSE BY APPLICANT: Project in Mansfield had 58 residents move
from IL to AL so we can support the AL almost entirely with our own
residents.
There were no further questions or comments on Item 2.
Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Office and Sr. Living on Blessed Way
Meeting #3 – March 21, 2016 Page 5
STAFF PRESENTATION SHOWN TO COMMITTEE:
Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Office and Sr. Living on Blessed Way
Meeting #3 – March 21, 2016 Page 6
Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Office and Sr. Living on Blessed Way
Meeting #3 – March 21, 2016 Page 7
Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Office and Sr. Living on Blessed Way
Meeting #3 – March 21, 2016 Page 8
Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Office and Sr. Living on Blessed Way
Meeting #3 – March 21, 2016 Page 9
Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Office and Sr. Living on Blessed Way
Meeting #3 – March 21, 2016 Page 10
Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Office and Sr. Living on Blessed Way
Meeting #3 – March 21, 2016 Page 11