Loading...
Item 2- Complete PZ Packet Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – May 4, 2017 Page 1 of 5 REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MAY 4, 2017 LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, Texas Work Session - Executive Conference Room, Suite 268 of Town Hall or City Council Chambers of Town Hall Regular Session - City Council Chambers of Town Hall COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Michael Forman, Craig Rothmeier, Michael Springer and Chris Greer. STAFF PRESENT: Deputy Director of Planning & Development Services, Dennis Killough; Principal Planner, Richard Schell; Planner, Lorrie Fletcher; Civil Engineer; Alex Ayala and Commission Secretary, Selena Serrano. WORK SESSION: 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. RECAP OF CITY COUNCIL’S ACTION AND DISCUSSION OF PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION / SIGN BOARD AGENDA ITEMS. 3. DISCUSSION OF ITEMS ON MEETING AGENDA 4. ADJOURNMENT REGULAR SESSION: 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Forman called the regular session to order at 6:30 p.m. 2. EXECUTIVE SESSION No Executive Session held. 3. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES A motion was made to approve the minutes from the April 20, 2017 meeting. Motion: Greer Second: Springer Ayes: Greer, Forman, Springer, Rothmeier Nays: None Abstain: None Approved: 4-0 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – May 4, 2017 Page 2 of 5 4. ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS No administrative comments. Chairman announced that item No. 5 would be presented first. REGULAR AGENDA: 5. CONSIDER: ZA17-016, ZONING CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CRESCENT HEIGHTS ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 3H, 3H1, 3J, 3J1, 3J1A, 3J1B, 3J1C AND 3J2, LITTLE BERRY G. HALL SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 686, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, LOTS 1R1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, OWENS ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS; AND LOTS 5, 6, 7 AND 8, L.B.G. HALL NO. 686 ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED AT 720 THROUGH 1120 W. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. AND 250 THROUGH 330 SHADY OAKS DR., SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. REQUESTED ZONING; "R-PUD" RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT". SPIN #6. PUBLIC HEARING Principal Planner, Richard Schell, gave a brief presentation of the proposed land use for Crescent Heights. Applicant, Koss Maykus with Maykus Custom Homes - presented an overview of the proposed Crescent Heights Development. Commissioner asked what the drainage plans are. Applicant- proposed that if drainage concerns did occur he would have an en gineer take measurements to fix any drainage issues. Commission asked if the entry gate is on a sliding tract. Applicant stated that it is not a sliding gate. Commission suggested that the applicant look further into the entry gate and its design. Commission asked what the lighting plans are. Applicant stated that he does not have any plans yet, but did state that there will not be any pole lighting and also stated that he may add tree lighting. Applicant continued to answer additional questions. Chairman Forman opened the public hearing. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – May 4, 2017 Page 3 of 5 Eric Stengle, 318 Blanco Circle, Southlake, Texas spoke in opposition. John Roosma, 314 Blanco Circle, Southlake, Texas spoke in opposition. Lynda West, 306 Sterling Court, Southlake, Texas spoke in opposition. Cindy L. Roosma, 314 Blanco Circle, Southlake, Texas spoke in opposition. Rick Stacy, 1000 West Southlake Blvd., Southlake, Texas spoke in support. Diane Stacy, 1000 West Southlake Blvd., Southlake, Texas spoke in support. Becky Stienfel, 310 Blanco Circle, Southlake, Texas did not speak but submitted a comment card in opposition. John Miritello, 312 Blanco Circle, Southlake, Texas did not speak but submitted a comment card in opposition. Gunnar West, 306 Sterling Court, Southlake, Texas did not speak but submitted a comment card in opposition. James A. Taylor, 250 Shady Oaks, Southlake, Texas did not speak but submitted a comment card in support. Austin Stacy, 330 Shady Oaks, Southlake, Texas did not speak but submitted a comment card in support. Randy Stacy, 300 Shady Oaks, Southlake, Texas did not speak but submitted a comment card in support. Larry Highberger, 310 Shady Oaks, Southlake, Texas did not speak but su bmitted a comment card in support. Cathy Stacy, 300 Shady Oaks, Southlake, Texas did not speak but submitted a comment card in support. Rhonda Highberger, 310 Shady Oaks, Southlake, Texas did not speak but submitted a comment card in support. Chairman Forman closed the public hearing. Applicant returned to the podium to answer additional questions. Commission continued to discuss the future development with the applicant. A motion was made to approve Item No. 5 subject to the Staff Report dated April 28, 2017 and Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 27, 2017 noting the Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – May 4, 2017 Page 4 of 5 applicant’s willingness to measure the silt levels in the adjoining pond/creek areas before the project commences and then at various intervals after the project commences, further noting the applicant’s willingness to bring updated pictorials of the gate and how they will look when they go to City Council, noting the applicant’s willingness to remove the chain link fence on the southeast corner in the pres entation that they present to Council, also noting the applicant’s willingness to put fountains in all the ponds, to light the fountains on the ponds that border Southlake Blvd. and that Mr. Stacy’s home will be refurbished to bring it up to customary icon ic standards and how that’s going to be envisioned and also exploring the possibility of deed restrictions on the remaining Stacy properties. Motion: Greer Second: Springer Ayes: Greer, Forman, Springer, Rothmeier Nays: None Abstain: None Approved: 4-0 Chairman Forman announced that items 6 and 7 will be presented together. 6. CONSIDER: ZA17-026, ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR LOTS 17, 18 AND 19, J.J. FRESHOUR NO. 521 ADDITION ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 9B1 AND 9C1A, J.J. FRESHOUR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 521, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND LOCATED AT 550 RANDOL MILL AVE. AND 2300 HILLSIDE CT., SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. SPIN #11. PUBLIC HEARING 7. CONSIDER: ZA17-027, PLAT SHOWING FOR LOTS 17, 18 AND 19, J.J. FRESHOUR NO. 521 ADDITION ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS TRACTS 9B1 AND 9C1A, J.J. FRESHOUR SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 521, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND LOCATED AT 550 RANDOL MILL AVE. AND 2300 HILLSIDE CT., SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. REQUESTED ZONING: "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. SPIN #11. Principal Planner, Richard Schell, presented item 6 and 7 together. Staff opened for questions. No questions asked. Applicant, Ed Kelly with Kelly Engineering, gave a brief presentation of the proposed Zoning Change. Applicant opened for questions. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – May 4, 2017 Page 5 of 5 There were no questions asked. Chairman Forman opened the public hearing. No one came forward speak. Chairman Forman closed the public hearing. A motion was made to approve item No. 6 ZA17 -026 subject to the Staff Report dated April 28, 2017 further subject to the Concept Plan and Review Summary dated April 20, 2017. Motion: Greer Second: Rothmeier Ayes: Greer, Forman, Springer, Rothmeier Nays: None Abstain: None Approved: 4-0 A motion was made to approve item No. 7 ZA17 -027 subject to the Staff Report dated April 28, 2017 further subject to the Plat Review Summary No.3 dated April 28, 2017. Motion: Greer Second: Rothmeier Ayes: Greer, Forman, Springer, Rothmeier Nays: None Abstain: None Approved: 4-0 8. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:43 P.M. ______________________________ Michael Forman ATTEST: Chairman ________________________________ Selena Serrano Commission Secretary Final Plat for Matthews Court Item 5 APPLICANT: Landlock, LLC REQUEST: Approval of a Final Plat for Matthews Court, a 8 lot single-family residential gated subdivision with a private street. LOCATION: Generally located south of Zena Rucker Road approximately 1,000 feet east of Byron Nelson Parkway and addressed as 851 and 841 E Southlake Blvd. and 650 S. Carroll Ave. ZA17-035 Approved Matthews Court Medium Density Residential APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSED FINAL PLAT Questions? Case No. ZA17-035 S T A F F R E P O R T May 12, 2017 CASE NO: ZA17-035 PROJECT: Final Plat for Matthews Court EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Landlock LLC is requesting approval of a Final Plat for Matthews Court on property described as portions of Tracts 3D, 3D2 and 3, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, generally located south of Zena Rucker Road approximately 1,000 feet east of Byron Nelson Parkway and addressed as 851 and 841 E Southlake Blvd. and 650 S. Carroll Ave., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District. SPIN #9 DETAILS: This is the Final Plat for a 5.8 acre gated subdivision with a private street containing eight (8) single-family residential lots and four (4) open space lots. The Final Plat is consistent with the “RPUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District zoning and the Preliminary Plat approved under Case No. ZA16-045 and ZA16-046 respectively. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Consider approval ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Approved Plans and Supporting Documents (D) SPIN Meeting Report (E) Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated April 25, 2017 (F) Half Size Plans (for the Commission Only) Link to PowerPoint Presentation Link to Final Plat STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072 Department of Planning & Development Services Case No. Attachment A ZA1 7-035 Page 1 BAC KGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: Landlock, LLC PROPERTY SITUATION: Generally located south of Zena Rucker Road approximately 1,000 feet east of Byron Nelson Parkway and addressed as 851 and 841 E Southlake Blvd. and 650 S. Carroll Ave., Southlake, Texas. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portions of Tracts 3D, 3D2 and 3, Obediah W. Knight Survey, Abstract No. 899 LAND USE CATEGORY: Medium Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District HISTORY: October 6, 2015 – City Council approved a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court (ZA15-070, Ord. No. 480-701). October 6, 2015 – City Council approved a Preliminary Plat for Matthews Court (ZA15-071). August 2, 2016 – City Council approved a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Matthews Court to allow a gated subdivision with a private street. (ZA16-045, Ord. No. 480-701a). August 2, 2016 – City Council approved a Preliminary Plat for Matthews Court to allow a gated subdivision with a private street. (ZA16-046) CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN Town Hall Forum was held for the original project (ZA15-070) on June 23, 2015 at Southlake Town Hall. A SPIN Town Hall Forum has not been held for the revised project (ZA16-045). A SPIN Meeting Report from the June 23, 2015 SPIN Town Hall Forum is included as Attachment “D” of this report. SOUTHLAKE 2030: Consolidated Future Land Use The Southlake 2030 Future Land Use Plan designates this property as Medium Density Residential. As proposed, this development is consistent with the Future Land Use Plan. The image to the right illustrates the Future Land Use for the proposed location. Master Thoroughfare Plan Zena Rucker Road currently does not connect between Byron Nelson Parkway and Carroll Avenue. Access to this proposed subdivision is contingent upon the construction of Zena Rucker Road, which according to the Southlake Master Thoroughfare Plan is designated as a 2- lane collector (C2U) with a minimum 60’ R.O.W. required. A minimum radius of 400’ and minimum tangent length of 50’ between curves is required per Case No. Attachment A ZA1 7-035 Page 2 Subdivision Ordinance No. 483. This development as proposed is dependent upon acquisition of offsite R.O.W. and construction of a portion of Zena Rucker Road. Note, the applicant is not proposing to finish the connection of Zena Rucker Road between Byron Nelson Parkway and Carroll Avenue; the street is proposed to stub approximately leaving 600’ to the nearest cross street to the east. Mobility Master Plan The Mobility Master Plan recommends the extension of Zena Rucker Road east to S. Carroll Avenue. Below is the recommendation as written within the Mobility Master Plan. The proposal for Matthews Court states that in conjunction with the installation of culverts immediately west of the neighborhood by the City, Zena Rucker Road will be extended across these culverts and along the frontage of the neighborhood by the developer, which will bring Zena Rucker Road closer to its ultimate connection at Tower Boulevard which will then complete the alternative connection between S. Carroll Avenue and Byron Nelson Parkway. Thoroughfare Plan Recommendations Ref. No. Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VNT Link VGO Tie Priority Tier Responsible Department MT 12 As Rucker and Prade properties develop, traffic volumes are expected to increase along FM 1709. Extend Rucker Road east to S Carroll Ave. Roadways are anticipated to be constructed as development occurs with city participation in bridging the floodplain. Assist in bridging the floodplain to enable the completion of the Rucker extension project. Mobility, Infrastructure, C1, C2 Efficient Mobility Options 3.1, 3.3, 3.5, 3.9 3 PW Pathways / Sidewalk Plan The Official Pathways Map, adopted by City Council on January 7, 2014 designates that the north side of Zena Rucker Road is designated as having a future sidewalk that is less than 8 feet wide and the south side of Zena Rucker Road is designated as having a future multiuse trail that is greater than or equal to 8 feet wide. The pedestrian access plan for Matthews Court shows a continuation of the existing 8 foot wide hike & bike trail on the south side of Zena Rucker Road, which was designed to connect with the future trail to the east and the west. Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan The Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan was approved by City Council on September 20, 2011. The following recommendations are relevant to the medium density cluster residential area designated on the Illustrative Recommendations Map (below chart). Ref. No. Issue Recommendation Case No. Attachment A ZA1 7-035 Page 3 Ref. No. Issue Recommendation LU3 1. Land use designation Medium Density Residential 2. Considerable amount of area dedicated to floodplain and other water features Retain the Medium Density Residential designation for the area south of Zena Rucker Road Encourage “cluster” residential development Preserve heavily wooded areas, especially within drainage areas and floodplain E2 1. Environmental stewardship and innovation in green building 2. Reserved open space/landscape areas require heavy irrigation 3. On‐site drainage detention facilities Encourage water reuse for irrigation Encourage green building design practices Preserve and enhance existing ponds Reflect the desired preservation on the Carroll/1709 Small Area Illustrative Map on the Environmental Resource Protection map M1 1. Desire to decrease dependence on the automobile for everyday needs 2. Two schools, shopping and offices all within close proximity of the site Development should be pedestrian oriented, emphasizing pedestrian connectivity in any residential areas. Provide passive trails through preserved natural areas which also provide connectivity to the sidewalk system M2 1. Round‐a‐bout approved at intersection of “Plaza Drive” and Zena Rucker Road Consider a roundabout at the intersection of Rucker and the north‐south connector M3 1. Create a vibrant and appealing streetscape along the area’s local streets Provide curvilinear streets Provide street trees between the sidewalk and the street curb M4 1. A landscaped parkway concept with minimal pavement is desired for Zena Rucker Road 2. Landscaped medians preferred 3. No on‐street, parallel parking is desired Consider the creation of a new 60’ ROW 2‐ lane divided collector (C2D) with medians and left‐turn/stacking lanes at intersections in the Mobility Plan to apply to Zena Rucker Road “Urban” cross section which includes curb, gutters, medians, street trees and sidewalks. Speed limit not to exceed 30 m.p.h. Design as a local slow movement roadway. U2 1. Appropriately buffer and screen residential south of Zena Rucker Road from any non‐residential uses to the north side of Zena Rucker Road Recommend a parkway buffer and street trees adjacent to Rucker Road. Carroll/1709 Small Area Plan Illustrative Recommendations Map. Case No. Attachment A ZA1 7-035 Page 4 TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions Portions of Zena Rucker Road have been constructed from Byron Nelson Parkway and from S. Carroll Avenue. The proposal for Matthews Court states that in conjunction with the installation of culverts immediately west of the neighborhood by the City, Zena Rucker Road will be extended across these culverts and along the frontage of the neighborhood by the developer, which will bring Zena Rucker Road closer to its ultimate connection at Tower Boulevard which will then complete the alternative connection between S. Carroll Avenue and Byron Nelson Parkway. Traffic Impact Use Units Vtpd* AM- IN AM- OUT PM- IN PM- OUT Single-Family Detached Housing (210) 8 76 2 4 5 3 * Vehicle Trips Per Day * AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour generators on a weekday * Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition UTILITIES: Water The applicant is proposing a connection to an existing eight inch (8”) water line running north of the existing portion of Zena Rucker Road. The Preliminary Water & Sanitary Sewer Layout for Matthews Court shows that the proposed eight inch (8”) water line and valve will stub out with at nearly the same place as the end of the proposed extension of Zena Rucker Road (at the end of the Matthews Court Subdivision). The applicant is proposing an 8 inch (8”) water line and valve to run along the east side of proposed Matthews Court road in order to service the subdivision. Sewer The applicant will be extending 8 inch (8”) sewer from a sewer manhole located between Rockenbaugh Elementary and Lot 4, Block 1 Pecan Creek. The applicant is proposing an 8 inch (8”) sanitary sewer main to run along the west side of proposed Matthews Court road in order to service the subdivision. Case No. Attachment A ZA1 7-035 Page 5 The Preliminary Water & Sanitary Sewer Layout for Matthews Court shows sanitary sewer being extended to the northeast corner of the Matthews Court subdivision south of Zena Rucker Road. TREE PRESERVATION: There is approximately 39.8% tree canopy coverage, and the applicant is proposing to preserve as much as 53.7% of that tree cover. There is approximately 8.4% of that cover that is marginal and could potentially be removed. The proposed Tree Conservation Plan is attached. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No.1 dated April 25, 2017 N:\Community Development\MEMO\2016 Cases\046 - PP - Matthews Court\Staff Report\Final Memo.doc Case No. Attachment B ZA1 7-035 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA1 7-035 Page 1 Approved Plans & Support Documents Development Plan Case No. Attachment C ZA1 7-035 Page 2 Preliminary Plat Case No. Attachment C ZA1 7-035 Page 3 Preliminary Storm Sewer Layout Case No. Attachment C ZA1 7-035 Page 4 Preliminary Water & Sanitary Sewer Layout Case No. Attachment C ZA1 7-035 Page 5 Pedestrian Access Plan Case No. Attachment C ZA1 7-035 Page 6 Preliminary Paving Plan Case No. Attachment C ZA1 7-035 Page 7 Existing Structure Exhibit Case No. Attachment D ZA1 7-035 Page 1 Case No. Attachment D ZA1 7-035 Page 2 Case No. Attachment D ZA1 7-035 Page 3 Case No. Attachment D ZA1 7-035 Page 4 Case No. Attachment D ZA1 7-035 Page 5 Case No. Attachment D ZA1 7-035 Page 6 Case No. Attachment D ZA1 7-035 Page 7 Case No. Attachment D ZA1 7-035 Page 8 Case No. Attachment D ZA1 7-035 Page 9 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-035 Page 1 PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA17-035 Review No.: One Date of Review: 4/25/17 Project Name: Final Plat – Matthews Court APPLICANT: Four Peaks Development, LLC OWNER: Landlock LLC, c/o Warren Clark Development Tom Matthews Dale Clark 2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 120-323 16390 Addison Rd. Southlake, Texas, 76092 Addison, Texas, 75001 Phone: 214-676-3434 Phone: 972-931-8971 Fax: 817-481-4074 Fax: 972-931-8975 Email: tmatthews@fourpeaksdev.com Email: dc@wcdevelopment.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 4/10/17 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072. Planning Review Dennis Killough Phone: (817) 748-8072 E-mail: dkillough@ci.southlake.tx.us 1. The following changes are needed with regard to easements: a. Show and label the type, size and deed record of all existing easements on the property. b. Provide easements for water, sewer and/or drainage in compliance with approved construction plans. c. Show via dotted lines any easements previously abandoned and label with deed record of abandonment. d. Provide the width and centerline of the PAE. Properly tie the centerline to the lot boundary corner and each endpoint. e. Provide an easement for the existing electric distribution line crossing Lot 9X and Lot 8, Block A. Otherwise confirm that line is to be relocated in another easement. f. All newly installed utility services must be must be under ground and all above ground equipment screened of public view in a manner that it cannot be seen from a public ROW. 2. The following changes are needed regarding the proposed lotting: a. Please provide dimensions (bearings, distances, curve data) for the common boundary of the public and private street (north boundary of Lot 1X, Block B. Also provide the area of the Lot 1X. 3. Remove the Land Use Summary from the final. This is only required on a Preliminary Plat. 4. In addition to the other referenced calls, the P.O.B. needs to be tied to the Survey Corner or a platted subdivision corner with reference to the name, lot, block and recording information. 5. Note 7 needs to be revised to follow after note 8 to allow only improvements that were represented with the approved zoning and development plan. An HOA must be properly established to insure perpetual maintenance of the Common Areas, Private Street and other common elements of the subdivision. Case No. Attachment E ZA17-035 Page 2 6. Note 13 needs to be updated to reflect the current zoning (ZA16-045, Ord. No. 480-701a) 7. Correct the owner and notary acknowledgement to match. Also, Owner is shown in the preamble to be Landlock, LLC. The executing authority’s name and title or authority under the ownership should be printed below the signature line. 8. Place the Case No. ZA17-035 in the lower right hand corner of the plat. Public Works/Engineering Review Alex Ayala, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8274 Fax: (817) 748-8077 E-mail: aayala@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. * Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. * Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. * Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. * Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 EASEMENTS: 1. Easements shall be 15’ minimum and located on one lot – not centered on the property line. Revise location of 15’ water easement in between Lots 4 and 5. A 20’ easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. 2. Provide 15’ minimum width easements for Drainage Easement and Sanitary Sewer Easement between Lots 1 and 2. 3. Provide a utility easement for future relocation of power line. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 Fax: (817) 481-5713 E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Case No. Attachment E ZA17-035 Page 3 1. A Tree Conservation Plan which conforms with the Tree Conservation Plan submitted with the approved Preliminary Plat is required to be submitted with the Final Plat. Please submit the required Tree Conservation Plan. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 Fax: (817) 748-8181 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: No comments based on submitted information. Community Service/Parks Department Review Peter Kao Construction Manager Phone: (817) 748-8607 Fax: (817) 748-8027 Email: pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee credits and/or acceptance of land dedication. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748-8607 for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every forty (40) dwelling units. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the amount of $6250 per dwelling unit x 8 dwelling units= $50,000.00. (Resolution 16-026). Per Section 7.02 of Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended: Section 7.02 Applicability: A. Unplatted Property: This section, as amended, applies to all property for which a final plat has not been formally submitted to the City for approval, unless otherwise noted herein. B. Exempt Property: Any tract or lot occupied by an existing residential dwelling unit at the time of adoption of this ordinance shall be exempt from the dedication requirements of this section herein if the residential dwelling remains on the lot. This exemption pertains only to the tract or lot with the existing residential dwelling. Any additional lots created by further subdivision of the property shall be subject to the requirements Case No. Attachment E ZA17-035 Page 4 herein. C. Date of Assessment: All requirements contained in this section shall be assessed at the time of approval of the final plat of any applicable property. Pathway Comments: Review termination of east pathway along Zena Rucker. Should terminate in R.O.W so that adjacent property can connect. Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings. Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements. The following should be informational comments only * Although there are a few lot lines which are not perpendicular or radial, they appear to meet the intent of this requirement. * This development as proposed is dependent upon acquisition of offsite R.O.W. and construction of a portion of Zena Rucker Road. * Park Fees and Road/Bridge Improvements credits or reimbursements are matters subject to approval of a Developer’s Agreement by City Council. * A Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication requirements and fees, off-site sewer extensions, off-site drainage and utility easements and impact fees. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * Although the Subdivision Ordinance requires that utility easements be provided along the perimeter of the property staff recommends that utility easements be provided only where needed to ensure adequate extension of franchise and public utilities and to provide maximum tree preservation. * When a Final Plat is filed it will be required to tie down the Pedestrian Access Easement by metes and bounds. * Please be aware that sidewalk design standards need to meet those in Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 Section 5.06. * This subdivision is subject to the conditions and requirements of approval for Cases ZA16-045 Zoning and Development Plan for Matthews Court (Ord. 480-701a) and Case ZA16-046 Preliminary Plat for Matthews Court. * Denotes Informational Comment Bob Jones Nature Center – Site Plan request to replace tent with permanent pavilion structure 30x50 Hip structure pavilion with stone columns and standing seam metal roof to match main building The Bob Jones Nature Center has 758 acres of natural fun. It provides a unique opportunity for the community to explore nature and discover the Cross Timbers ecosystem. It is a hidden natural treasure located in the heart of the DFW metroplex. The normal operating hours of the Nature Center are Monday thru Saturday 9am-5pm. Additional information can be found on the website at www.bjnc.org. The City of Southlake Community Services Department intends to install a permanent shade structure to replace the tent currently located on the back patio of the Bob Jones Nature Center. The proposed shade structure will be 30ftx50ft and have 8ft clearance underneath. The ridge height of structure will be approximately 13ft tall. The 4-12 roof pitch will be same as existing building and utilize similar metal roofing material. Stone veneer will be attached to columns. See photos included of a similar existing shade structure located at the Nature Center. The shade structure will create a permanent covered space where the city can provide outdoor education, family event rentals, and a respite after a long hike on the beautiful nature trails. Construction is expected to begin late 2017 with an early 2018 completion date. Bob Jones Nature Center Site Plan ZA17-029 Applicant: City of Southlake Request: Approval for the construction of a 1,500 square foot shade pavilion with stone columns and a standing seam metal roof. The proposed structure will replace an existing tent in the same location and provide a permanent covered space for the Bob Jones Nature Center facility. Location: 355 East Bob Jones Road ZA17-029 Aerial View Enlarged Aerial View Approved Site Plan (ZA06-163) Proposed Site Plan Bob Jones Nature Center – Site Plan request to replace tent with permanent pavilion structure Existing Tent Structure Proposed Pavilion Variance Request Per Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 43.13.a(2) – Roof Design Standards: Standing seam metal roofs shall be constructed of a factory-treated, non-metallic, matte finish. The applicant is requesting to use a metallic “Galvalume” color standing seam metal roof to match the roof material used for the main building. Questions? Case No. ZA17-029 S T A F F R E P O R T May 12, 2017 CASE NO: ZA17-029 PROJECT: Site Plan for Bob Jones Nature Center EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City of Southlake is requesting approval of a Site Plan for Bob Jones Nature Center on property being described as Tracts 3, 4, 5 & 5A, R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1003A and Tracts 1 & 2, M. Mahaffey Survey, Abstract No. 916A, City of Southlake, Denton County, Texas; and Tract 5A, R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas. The property is located at 355 E. Bob Jones Road, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: “AG” Agricultural District. SPIN #1. DETAILS: Bob Jones Nature Center (BJNC) is generally located on the northeast boundary of Bob Jones Park, off of Tucker Drive. The purpose of this item is to gain site plan approval for the construction of a 1,500 square foot shade pavilion with stone columns and a standing seam metal roof. The proposed structure will replace an existing tent in the same location and provide a permanent covered space for outdoor education, family event rentals, and a respite after a long hike on the nature trails. No other changes to the site are proposed. A site plan approval by City Council following a recommendation from the Planning & Zoning Commission is needed because the non-residential use is within 400 feet of residential properties resulting in the application of Residential Adjacency Overlay Standards. VARIANCE REQUEST: Per Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Section 43.13.a(2) – Roof Design Standards: Standing seam metal roofs shall be constructed of a factory-treated, non-metallic, matte finish. The applicant is requesting to use a metallic “Galvalume” color standing seam metal roof to match the roof material used for the main BJNC building. This roof material was approved by City Council in 2006 with a variance request associated with a Revised Site Plan application for Bob Jones Park (ZA06-163). Although the roof initially has reflective metallic properties, it soon weathers to a non-reflective gray color. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider Approval of a Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map Department of Planning & Development Services Case No. ZA17-029 (C) Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated April 11, 2017 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (E) Hard Copy Exhibit Packet Link to PowerPoint Presentation Link to Narrative Link to Exhibits STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8072 Lorrie Fletcher (817) 748-8069 Case No. Attachment A ZA17-029 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: City of Southlake APPLICANT: City of Southlake PROPERTY SITUATION: 355 E Bob Jones Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 3, 4, 5 & 5A, R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1003A and Tracts 1 & 2, M. Mahaffey Survey, Abstract No. 916A, City of Southlake, Denton County, Texas; and Tract 5A, R.D. Price Survey, Abstract No. 1207, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas. LAND USE CATEGORY: Public Park/OpenSpace CURRENT ZONING: AG - Agricultural District HISTORY: May 8, 2006; Parks Board reviewed and recommended approval of the Bob Jones Nature Center conceptual plans. June 20, 2006; SPDC and City Council approved the Bob Jones Nature Center Conceptual Plans. November 21, 2006; City Council approved a revised site plan to add the Bob Jones Nature Center at Bob Jones Park. (ZA06-163) SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The Southlake 2030 Consolidated Future Land Use Plan designates the subject property as Public Parks/Open Space. The Future Land Use Plan defines Public Parks/Open Spaces as public areas designated for active and passive recreation, such as parks and athletic complexes, and public open space for the preservation of the scenic vistas and natural vegetation of the City. This Land Use Plan depicts only existing Public Parks/ Open Space facilities; potential Public Parks/ Open Space sites are illustrated in the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan. Parks, Recreation & Open Space The proposed site plan for the pavilion is consistent with the Parks, Recreation & Open Space / Community Facilities Master Plan component of the Southlake 2030 Plan for Bob Jones Nature Center. “Outdoor Classrooms” were adopted as a Tier 2 priority project at this location. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions The BJNC has direct access onto Tucker Drive, a two lane park Case No. Attachment A ZA17-029 Page 2 entrance drive. TREE PRESERVATION: No existing trees will be altered due to the proposed pavilion. CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was not held for this project. SPDC: An SPDC meeting is scheduled for May 16, 2017 regarding funding for this project. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 1, dated April 11, 2017. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: General Development Standards Applies Comments Overlay Regulations Y Residential Adjacency Roof Material Y Variance Requested Masonry Standards Y Complies – columns will be clad with brick Impervious Coverage N/A Bufferyards N/A Tree Preservation Y No trees are proposed to be removed or altered Sidewalks Y Sidewalk construction cost is not roughly proportional to project 40.4 REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SITE PLAN In granting or denying an application for a development plan or a site plan approval, the City Staff, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, as appropriate, shall take into consideration the following factors: 1. Safety of the motoring public and of pedestrians using the facility and the area immediately surrounding the site. 2. Safety from fire hazards, and measures of fire control. 3. Protection of adjacent property from flood or water damage. 4. The impact of noise, glare from vehicular or stationary lights, or any other applicable performance standards on adjacent properties, as determined by any reports or studies which may be reasonably required to determine compliance with these applicable performance standards. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-KK.) 5. Location, lighting and type of signs; relation of signs to traffic control and the adverse effect on adjacent properties. 6. Street size and adequacy of pavement width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood. 7. Adequacy of parking, as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress/egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces; and protection of public health by all weather surfacing on all parking areas to control dust. 8. Such other measures as will secure and protect public health, safety, morals and general welfare. 43.9 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS b. Variances - At the time of review of any required Concept Plan or Site Plan, the City Council may grant variances to the development regulations set forth in this Section and to Section 35.6, “Number of Off-Street Parking Spaces Required.” A parking space variance can only be at the request of the Owner/Applicant and cannot be required by the City Council as a part of their approval of any Concept Case No. Attachment A ZA17-029 Page 3 Plan, Site Plan, Developer’s Agreement or by any other means. The City Council shall be limited to granting a variance to no more than fifteen percent (15%) of the required number of off -street parking spaces. (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-OOO) 1. To receive a variance, the applicant must demonstrate one of the following: a. A variance will reduce the impact of the project on surrounding residential properties; or b. Compliance with this ordinance would impair the architectural design or creativity of the project; or c. A variance is necessary to assure compatibility with surrounding developed properties; or d. The proposed construction is an addition to an existing project that does not meet the requirements of this ordinance. 2. The City Council may grant a variance by an affirmative vote of a majority of the City Council members present and voting on the matter. In order to grant a variance, the City Council must determine that a literal enforcement of the regulations will create an unnecessary hardship or a practical difficulty for the applicant; that the situation causing the unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property and is not self imposed; that the variance will not injure and will be wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of adjacent properties; and that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. 2. If a variance application is denied by the City Council, no other variance of like kind relating to the same project or proposed project shall be considered or acted upon by the City Council for a period of six (6) months subsequent to the denial. Case No. Attachment B ZA17-029 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA17-029 Page 1 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA17-029 Review No.: One Date of Review: 04/11/17 Project Name: Site Plan – Bob Jones Nature Center Pavilion APPLICANT: City of Southlake ARCHITECT: Peter Kao Phone: x8607 Phone: Fax: Fax: City staff has reviewed the above referenced project received by the city on 03/27/17 and we offer the following stipulations. These stipulations are hereby made conditions of site plan approval unless specifically amended by the City Council. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please contact Lorrie Fletcher at (817) 748-8069 or lfletcher@ci.southlake.tx.us . Planning Comments: 1. Place the City case number “ZA17-029" in the lower right corner of all submitted exhibits for ease of reference. 2. Provide recommendation(s) from Park Board, if a meeting is scheduled. 3. Provide roof material sample. A variance request was approved with the revised site plan for the main building under ZA06-163 allowing metallic galvalume color standing seam metal roof. A variance has been requested. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 No Comments Public Works/Engineering Review Steve Anderson, P.E., CFM Deputy City Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8101 E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us No Comments Case No. Attachment C ZA17-029 Page 2 Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us No comments based on submitted information. General Informational Comments * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * All development must comply with the underlying zoning district. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA17-029 Page 1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES Owner Zoning Address Acreage Response 1. CHARLTON FAMILY TRUST SF1-A 4357 HOMESTEAD DR 1.01 NR 2. JANSEN, ORVILLE H SF1-A 4323 HOMESTEAD DR 1.12 NR 3. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 4.35 NR 4. CUMMINS, MOLLIE A AG 0.39 NR 5. TIERNEY, RICHARD L SF1-A 415 E BOB JONES RD 0.99 NR 6. WALKER, C A & DONNA SF1-A 400 BROOKS CT 1.04 NR 7. STARK, SEAN & CHRISTINA SF1-A 455 BROOKS CT 1.02 NR 8. WALTHER, CORBETT M & MORGAN J SF1-A 415 BROOKS CT 0.99 NR 9. NOEL, JEFFREY M & JULIE SF1-A 465 BROOKS CT 1.48 NR 10. BURTCHAELL. JOHN C & LAMPARD, PAMELA A SF1-A 420 BROOKS CT 1.05 NR 11. MCCREARY, JON P & REAGANN R SF1-A 470 BROOKS CT 1.12 NR 12. NOLAN, MICHAEL E AG 632 WALNUT GROVE 0.25 NR 13. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 1.64 NR 14. NOLAN, MICHAEL E AG 628 WALNUT GROVE 0.89 NR 15. FREDERICK, OLA F ETAL AG 624 WALNUT GROVE 1.06 NR 16. BLAKE, TIMOTHY W SF1-A 525 BROOKS CT 1.09 NR 17. BARRETT, ANTHONY SF1-A 515 BROOKS CT 1.22 NR 18. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 395 E BOB JONES RD 11.67 NR 19. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 375 E BOB JONES RD 3.80 NR 20. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 385 E BOB JONES RD 1.91 NR 21. LANDESBERG, PETER & JULIE SF1-A 305 E BOB JONES RD 5.61 NR 22. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 345 E BOB JONES RD 16.83 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA17-029 Page 2 23. BERGEE, MARK SF1-A 405 E BOB JONES RD 1.05 NR 24. HENK, TAMARA & DAVID SF1-A 4300 WALNUT DR 1.11 NR 25. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 335 E BOB JONES RD 2.29 NR 26. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 355 E BOB JONES RD 28.04 NR 27. CUMMINS, MOLLIE A AG 620 WALNUT GROVE 0.52 NR 28. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 1.64 NR 29. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 2.23 NR 30. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 0.90 NR 31. U S A AG 94.78 NR 32. MOORE, DAWNE A SF1-A 325 E BOB JONES RD 4.66 NR 33. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 341 E BOB JONES RD 0.75 NR 34. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 3901 N WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 79.26 NR 35. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF AG 365 E BOB JONES RD 5.53 NR 36. SF1-A 500 BROOKS CT 1.13 NR 37. AG 6.44 NR 38. AG 369.43 NR 39. AG 24.87 NR 40. U S A AG 106.75 NR 41. Superintendent of Carroll ISD SF1-A NR 42. Superintendent of Grapevine Colleyville ISD SF1-A NR 43. Superintendent of Northwest ISD AG NR 44. Superintendent of Keller ISD AG NR Notices Sent: Twenty-four (24) Responses Received within 200’: In Favor: 0 Opposed: 0 Undecided: 0 No Response: 24 No Responses to Date Narrative The City of Southlake is partnering with TXU and ChargePoint to install one Level 2 dual head EV charging station in the Town Square East Parking Garage between two parking spaces (see photo in Plans and Support Information). Additionally, a second charging station that is an exact replica and adjacent to the proposed location have also been planned for the future. When the need arise, the second charging station will be installed. This initiative aligns with Southlake’s 2030 Mobility Master Plan as a Tier 1 project. This project includes the installation of facility infrastructure, signage and dual head charger that will allow two electric vehicles to charge simultaneously. The charging station is a CT4000 Level 2 commercial charging station. No additional lighting is proposed. Four spaces in the first floor parking garage is well below the 10% allowable. Bollards or wheel stops will be provided to protect the charging station. In summary, two charging stations in 4 spaces are requested with this application. It is proposed that the two stations are installed in two different phases. The timeline for the second station installation is unknown at this time. P l a n s 1 Plans 2 Plans 3 Plans 4 Plans 5 Plans 6 East Parking Garage View North Plans 7 Electric Vehicle Charging Spaces Southlake Town Square East Parking Garage Specific Use Permit Item 7 ZA17-033 ZA17-033 Applicant: City of Southlake Request: Approval of a Specific Use Permit for Electric Vehicle Charging Spaces in the Southlake Town Square East Parking Garage Location: 1451 Federal Way Aerial View EV Location Hilton Hotel Town Hall Harkins Theater East Parking Garage West Parking Garage East Parking Garage Site Plan Fe d e r a l W a y Proposed Concept Dual Bollard Station Details 6 f t . Proposed Signage Pavement Marking Pole Signs Site Photographs View north to four proposed EV spaces in the east parking garage Site Photographs View northwest to four proposed EV spaces in the east parking garage Questions? 45.20 SPECIFIC REGULATIONS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING SPACES Electric vehicle charging equipment may only be installed when accessory to the primary permitted use. No more than 10% of the total number of required parking spaces may be designated as electric vehicle charging spaces. Each charging space shall be posted with signage indicating the space is only for electric vehicle charging purposes. Days and hours of operations shall be included if time limits or tow away provisions are to be enforced by the owner. Information identifying voltage and amperage levels or safety information must be posted. Design should be appropriate to the location and use. Facilities should be able to be readily identified by electric vehicle drivers but blend into the surrounding landscape/architecture for compatibility with the character and use of the site. Equipment shall be located so as not to impede pedestrian travel, create trip hazards on sidewalks, or interfere with accessibility requirements. Regulations for the electric vehicle charging equipment and spaces shall be established in the specific use permit. These regulations may include but are not limited to location; size of equipment; signage, including directional signage (if any); and lighting (if any). Additionally, in granting or denying an application for a specific use permit, the City Council shall take into consideration the following factors: a. Safety of the motoring public and of pedestrians using the facility and the area immediately surrounding the site. b. Safety from fire hazard, and measures for fire control. c. Protection of adjacent property from flood or water damage. d. Noise producing elements; and glare of vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood. e. Location, lighting and type of signs; and relation of signs to traffic control and adverse effect on adjacent properties. f. Street size and adequacy of pavement width for traffic and reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood. g. Adequacy of parking, as determined by requirements of this chapter for off-street parking facilities for similar uses; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces; and protection of the public health by all-weather surfacing on all parking areas to control dust. h. Such other measures as will secure and protect the public health, safety, morals and general welfare. i. City Council may grant variances to specific regulations associated with a specific use set forth in Sections 45. To receive a variance, the applicant must demonstrate one of the following (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-MMMM): (a) A variance will reduce the impact of the project on surrounding residential properties; or (b) Compliance with this ordinance would impair the architectural design or creativity of the project; or (c) A variance is necessary to assure compatibility with surrounding developed properties; or (d) The proposed construction is an addition to an existing project that does not meet the requirements of this ordinance. Section 45.20 Specific Use Permit Case No. ZA17-033 S T A F F R E P O R T May 12, 2017 CASE NO: ZA17-033 PROJECT: Specific Use Permit for Electric Vehicle Charging Spaces EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City of Southlake is requesting approval of a Specific Use Permit for electric vehicle charging spaces on property described as Lot 5, Block 4R1, Southlake Town Square Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 1451 Federal Way, Southlake, Texas on approximately 1.39 acres. Current Zoning: “DT” Downtown District. SPIN Neighborhood #8. DETAILS: The City of Southlake is requesting approval of a Specific Use Permit for electric vehicle charging spaces consisting of two (2) electric vehicle charging stations with dual charging ports to be installed to serve 4 dedicated parking spaces. One of the electric vehicle dual port charging stations and two parking spaces are to be installed immediately. The second electric vehicle dual port charging station and two parking spaces will be installed in the future with no expiration of the specific use permit. The electric vehicle charging spaces will be located at the north end of the first level of the Southlake Town Square east parking garage near an electric power source. There are 170 parking spaces on the first floor and total of 747 parking spaces in the garage structure. The electric vehicle charging spaces are allowed with an approved Specific Use Permit and limited to a maximum utilization of 10% of required parking spaces. The City of Southlake currently has two electric vehicle charging spaces located on the first floor of the Southlake Town Square west parking garage. The charging station will be utilized as public electric vehicle charging spaces. The proposed charging stations have designated and signed parking spaces for electric vehicles only. The applicant has provided additional information for the electric vehicle charging spaces specific use permit regulations in the Narrative. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider Specific Use Permit Request for Electric Vehicle Charging Spaces Department of Planning & Development Services Case No. ZA17-033 ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Specific Use Permit Staff Review Summary #2, dated May 12, 2017 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map (E) Surrounding Property Owners Responses Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members only) Link to PowerPoint Presentation Link to Narrative Link to Plans Page 1 Site Plan Page 2 - 6 Electric Vehicle Charging Station Details Page 7 Site Photographs Link to SPIN Report STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) 748-8070 Patty Moos (817) 748-8269 Case No. Attachment A ZA17-033 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPLICANT/OWNER: City of Southlake PROPERTY SITUATION: 1451 Federal Way LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5, Block 4R1, Southlake Town Square Addition LAND USE CATEGORY: Town Center CURRENT ZONING: “DT” Downtown District TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: This request does not affect traffic on or around the property. SOUTHLAKE 2030: This initiative aligns with Southlake’s 2030 Mobility Master Plan as a Tier 1 recommendation. HISTORY: September 20, 2016; City Council approved a Specific Use Permit for two electric vehicle charging spaces with a dual charging station for the Southlake Town Square West Parking Garage , subject to Staff Report dated September 13, 2016 and noting the following: • Approving the location of two parking spaces as indicated on the site plan and located in the West Town Square parking garage as electric vehicle charging parking spaces. • Also approving the location of the electric charging station, pavement markings, signage and parking control devices (bollards, curb stops) as presented. (ZA16-064) SPIN: A SPIN meeting was held on Tuesday, May 9, 2017. The SPIN report is available in Attachments of this Staff Report. STAFF COMMENTS: The Specific Use Permit Review Summary No. 2 is located in Attachment C of this Staff Report. Note: A specific use permit shall automatically expire if a building permit is not issued and construction begun within six (6) months of the granting of the specific use permit or if the use shall cease for a period of six (6) months. 45.20 SPECIFIC REGULATIONS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING SPACES 1) Electric vehicle charging equipment may only be installed when accessory to the primary permitted use. 2) No more than 10% of the total number of required parking spaces may be designated as electric vehicle charging spaces. 3) Each charging space shall be posted with signage indicating the space is only for electric vehicle charging purposes. Days and hours of operations shall be included if time limits or tow away provisions are to be enforced by the owner. Information identifying voltage and amperage levels or safety information must be posted. Case No. Attachment A ZA17-033 Page 2 4) Design should be appropriate to the location and use. Facilities should be able to be readily identified by electric vehicle drivers but blend into the surrounding landscape/architecture for compatibility with the character and use of the site. 5) Equipment shall be located so as not to impede pedestrian travel, create trip hazards on sidewalks, or interfere with accessibility requirements. 6) Regulations for the electric vehicle charging equipment and spaces shall be established in the specific use permit. These regulations may includ e but are not limited to location; size of equipment; signage, including directional signage (if any); and lighting (if any). 45.5 FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED - In granting or denying an application for a specific use permit, the City Council shall take into consideration the following factors: a. Safety of the motoring public and of pedestrians using the facility and the area immediately surrounding the site. b. Safety from fire hazard, and measures for fire control. c. Protection of adjacent property from flood or water damage. d. Noise producing elements; and glare of vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood. e. Location, lighting and type of signs; and relation of signs to traffic control and adverse effect on adjacent properties. f. Street size and adequacy of pavement width for traffic and reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood. g. Adequacy of parking, as determined by requirements of this chapter for off-street parking facilities for similar uses; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces; and protection of the public health by all-weather surfacing on all parking areas to control dust. h. Such other measures as will secure and protect the public health, safety, morals and general welfare. i.City Council may grant variances to specific regulations associated with a specific use set forth in Sections 45. To receive a variance, the applic ant must demonstrate one of the following (As amended by Ordinance No. 480-MMMM): (a) A variance will reduce the impact of the project on surrounding residential properties; or (b) Compliance with this ordinance would impair the architectural design or creat ivity of the project; or (c) A variance is necessary to assure compatibility with surrounding developed properties; or (d) The proposed construction is an addition to an existing project that does not meet the requirements of this ordinance. Case No. Attachment A ZA17-033 Page 1 APPLICABLE REGULATIONS: General Development Standards Applies Comments Overlay Regulations NA DT Regulations and Guidelines not applicable to request Building Articulation NA DT Regulations and Guidelines not applicable to request Masonry Standards NA DT Regulations and Guidelines not applicable to request Impervious Coverage NA DT Regulations and Guidelines not applicable to request Bufferyards NA DT Regulations and Guidelines not applicable to request Interior Landscape NA DT Regulations and Guidelines not applicable to request Tree Preservation NA DT Regulations and Guidelines not applicable to request Sidewalks NA DT Regulations and Guidelines not applicable to request \\SLKSV1057\THLocal\Community Development\MEMO\2017 Cases\033-SUP-Electric Charging Station Case No. Attachment B ZA17-033 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA17-033 Page 1 SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA17-033 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 05/12/17 Project Name: Specific Use Permit – Electrical Charging Stations APPLICANT: City of Southlake OWNER: City of Southlake 1400 Main Street 1400 Main Street Southlake, Texas 76092 Southlake, Texas 76092 Contact: Om Chhetri, P.E. Phone: 817-748- 8089 Email: ochhertri@ci.southlake.tx.us__________ City staff has reviewed the above referenced project received by the city on 05/1/17 and we offer the following stipulations. These stipulations are hereby made conditions of Specific Use Permit approval unless specifically amended by the City Council. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please contact the appropriate staff member. Planning Review Patty Moos Planner I Phone: (817) 748-8269 Email:pmoos@ci.southlake.tx.us Note: A specific use permit shall automatically expire if a building permit is not issued and construction begun within six (6) months of the granting of the specific use permit or if the use shall cease for a period of six (6) months. 45.20 SPECIFIC REGULATIONS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING SPACES 1) Electric vehicle charging equipment may only be installed when accessory to the primary permitted use. 2) No more than 10% of the total number of required parking spaces may be designated as electric vehicle charging spaces. 3) Each charging space shall be posted with signage indicat ing the space is only for electric vehicle charging purposes. Days and hours of operations shall be included if time limits or tow away provisions are to be enforced by the owner. Information identifying voltage and amperage levels or safety information must be posted. 4) Design should be appropriate to the location and use. Facilities should be able to be readily identified by electric vehicle drivers but blend into the surrounding landscape/architecture for compatibility with the character and use of the site. 5) Equipment shall be located so as not to impede pedestrian travel, create trip hazards on sidewalks, or interfere with accessibility requirements. 6) Regulations for the electric vehicle charging equipment and spaces shall be established in the specific use permit. These regulations may include but are not limited to location; size of equipment; signage, including directional signage (if any); and lighting (if any). Fire Review Case No. Attachment C ZA17-033 Page 2 Kelly Clements Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 Email:kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: Provide vehicle impact protection for all charging station locations. (Bollards) Informational Comments: * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA17-033 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owners Electric Charging Spaces at the Southlake Town Square East Parking Garage SPO # Owner Zoning Address Acreage Response 1. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 1420 DIVISION ST 2.90 NR 2. H & C SOUTHLAKE HILTON LLC DT 1400 PLAZA PL 3.72 NR 3. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 1430 DIVISION ST 2.55 NR 4. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 1410 DIVISION ST 0.24 NR 5. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 1420 PLAZA PL 0.40 NR 6. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 1430 DIVISION ST 0.75 NR 7. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 1440 PLAZA PL 0.51 NR 8. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 400 GRAND AVE W 0.26 NR 9. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 1452 DIVISION ST 0.22 NR 10. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 1450 PLAZA PL 2.96 NR 11. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 400 GRAND AVE W 0.19 NR 12. SLTS GRAND AVENUE II LP DT 371 STATE ST 1.86 NR 13. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP SP1 1200 PROSPECT ST 2.66 NR 14. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE SP1 300 STATE ST 2.97 NR 15. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 1431 PLAZA PL 0.23 NR 16. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 400 GRAND AVE W 0.22 NR 17. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF DT 351 STATE ST 1.97 NR 18. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 1440 PLAZA PL 0.42 NR 19. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF DT 399 GRAND AVE W 0.34 NR 20. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 1452 PLAZA PL 0.20 NR 21. SLTS GRAND AVENUE II LP DT 1361 FEDERAL WAY 1.42 NR 22. SLTS GRAND AVENUE II LP DT 250 GRAND AVE W 0.40 NR 23. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 316 GRAND AVE E 0.25 NR 24. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 327 GRAND AVE E 0.43 NR 25. SLTS GRAND AVENUE II LP DT 300 GRAND AVE 0.48 NR 26. SLTS GRAND AVENUE II LP DT 200 GRAND AVE W 0.56 NR 27. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 1401 FEDERAL WAY 2.44 NR 28. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF DT 1451 FEDERAL WAY 1.37 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA17-033 Page 2 29. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 291 GRAND AVE 0.60 NR 30. SLTS GRAND AVENUE LP DT 1471 FEDERAL WAY 0.58 NR 31. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 1240 MAIN ST 4.08 NR 32. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 1400 CIVIC PL 0.75 NR 33. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 1422 MAIN ST 0.67 NR 34. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 1256 MAIN ST 0.67 NR 35. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 1200 MAIN ST 0.58 NR 36. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF DT 1400 MAIN ST 0.69 NR 37. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 1460 MAIN ST 0.48 NR 38. DURANT, TOM DT 1500 MAIN ST 0.13 NR 39. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 1230 MAIN ST 0.28 NR 40. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 1431 MAIN ST 0.33 NR 41. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 141 GRAND AVE 3.62 NR 42. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 1431 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.39 NR 43. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF DT 151 STATE ST 0.81 NR 44. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 180 STATE ST 0.42 NR 45. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 1235 MAIN ST 0.34 NR 46. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 115 GRAND AVE 0.38 NR 47. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 112 STATE ST 0.38 NR 48. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF DT 101 STATE ST 0.94 NR 49. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 1430 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.27 NR 50. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 140 STATE ST 3.28 NR 51. TOWN SQUARE VENTURES LP DT 1200 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.01 NR 52. BROWNSTONE AT TOWN SQUARE LP DT 1501 MEETING ST 0.16 NR 53. BROWNSTONES AT TOWN SQUARE OWN DT 190 SUMMIT AVE 0.15 NR 54. BROWNSTONE AT TOWN SQUARE LP DT 351 CENTRAL AVE 2.16 NR 55. BROWNSTONE AT TOWN SQUARE LP DT 301 CENTRAL AVE 0.57 NR 56. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF DT 1297 FEDERAL WAY 1.72 NR 57. SLTS LAND LP DT 401 N CARROLL AVE 2.33 NR 58. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF DT 1299 FEDERAL WAY 1.68 NR 59. SLTS LAND LP DT 401 N CARROLL AVE 8.09 NR 60. SLTS LAND LP DT 401 N CARROLL AVE 0.37 NR 61. SLTS LAND LP DT 401 N CARROLL AVE 0.28 NR 62. SLTS LAND LP DT 401 N CARROLL AVE 2.62 NR 63. Superintendent of Carroll ISD NR 64. Superintendent of Grapevine Colleyville ISD NR 65. Superintendent of Northwest ISD NR 66. Superintendent of Keller ISD NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Thirteen (13) Responses Received: In Favor:0 Opposed: 0 No Response:13 Undecided:0 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-033 Page 3 Surrounding Property Owners Responses Within 200 ft.: No Responses to Date Outside 200 ft: On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Diana Wagner <kerrpatchrn@gmail.com> wrote: Ms Fletcher, Good afternoon, I attended last night's SPIN Town Hall Forum and had specific questions regarding the proposed electric vehicle charging stations in the Southlake Town Square East Parking Garage that the presenter did not have answers. Since, the meeting, I have additional questions. 1) What is the type of electric charger that will be installed? Please provide detail of the manufacturer and type of Electric Vehicle Charger. 2) What is the anticipated project cost? What will be the annual cost to operate the charging stations? 3) What is the cost share between the City of Southlake and the electric provider? 4) Has the City of Southlake obtained bids from or vetted other electric providers for this project? 5) The presenter stated that there would be an initial period whereby electricity used by consumers would be "free" while the City does a study to ascertain what the usage will be and what needs to be charged. Has the City of Southlake obtained financial impact studies from other cities or businesses that have installed these charging stations? 6) Why as a taxpayer who does not have an electric car support the City of Southlake providing free electric vehicle charging at taxpayers expense? 7) Why has the City of Southlake not obtain a cost analysis to ascertain the cost of the electricity to ascertain what to charge consumers? 8) Will the City of Southlake obtain a cost analysis BEFORE the implementation of the proposed project to ascertain the costs associated and to ascertain what to charge consumers? 9) Is this project expected to be a revenue generating project for the City of Southlake? 10) What City of Southlake agency will be responsible for overseeing Electric Vehicle Charging stations? 11) What expertise does the City of Southlake agency have in Electric Vehicle Charging stations? 12) What is the estimated return on investment for these Electric Vehicle Charging stations? 13) What is the estimated annual revenue the City of Southlake expects to generate from these Electric Vehicle Charging stations? 14) What is the estimated annual maintenance costs associated with these Electric Vehicle Charging stations? 15) Electric Vehicle Charging stations have an inherent risk of shock hazards due to vandalism, copper theft, chaffed cables, collisions, standing water, or accidents involving the charging devices. What experience does the City of Southlake have in safety inspections, safety training, installation, maintenance of these devices to ensure public safety and mitigate claims and Case No. Attachment E ZA17-033 Page 4 litigation against the City of Southlake from damages, injury or death that may occur? 16) Has the City of Southlake Fire Department Fire Marshall completed a safety feasibility study to ascertain if the placement in the parking garage is safe and if Fire Department staff is trained to provide appropriate fire suppression or rescue involving these Electric Vehicle Chargers? 17) What will be the proposed safety maintenance inspection schedule and who will be responsible to complete this task? What is the expertise of the personnel assigned to this role and responsibility? 18) Will there be ADA accessible Electric Vehicle Charging stations? The photos did not provide for handicap accessible stations. 19) The citizens of the City of Southlake are not services by a municipal owned power company or cooperative. Regulatory authority falls to the Public Utility Commission of Texas for these proposed charging stations. How will the City of Southlake navigate and meet the requirements of the PUC in charging consumers for usage? 20) Why does the City of Southlake wish to engage in the business of electric vehicle charging stations? 21) Companies such as Green Mountain Energy, a subsidiary of NRG, offers EV drivers a special rate on 100% wind power to charge their cars. What will be the electricity source from the proposed electrical provider? Will the electrical provider provide 100% renewable source? 22) What is the rationale for the proposed location of the project and not at another location within the City of Southlake? These are just a few questions and would appreciate your information and feedback. Thank you, Diana Wagner SPIN MEETING REPORT SPIN Item Number: SPIN2017-11 City Case Number: ZA17-033 Project Name: Electric Vehicle Charging Spaces SPIN Neighborhood: SPIN #8 Meeting Date: May 9, 2017 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: Six (6) Host: Sherry Berman, Community Engagement Committee Applicant Presenting: Om Gharty Chhetri, City of Southlake Civil Engineer City Staff Present: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner; David Jones, Principal Planner; Om Gharty Chhetri, Civil Engineer Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.com and clicking on “I Want to” and “View” “Video on Demand” – forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY: Property Situation:  The two (2) proposed electric vehicle charging stations are to be located in the Southlake Town Square east parking garage – 1451 Federal Way. Development Details:  City of Southlake is requesting City Council approval of a Specific Use Permit for two (2) electric vehicle charging stations with duel charging ports to be installed to serve four (4) dedicated parking spaces.  One to be installed upon approval and the second one at an undetermined time in the future.  First level at the north end of east parking garage.  EVC’s are a Tier 1 recommendation of the Southlake 2030 Mobility Master Plan.  There are currently two (2) EVC’s approved for the west parking garage. One (1) has been installed.  City of Southlake in partnership with TXU. Exhibits presented at SPIN: QUESTIONS / CONCERNS:  Does it cost to use? o It will not cost anything to use it right away, however, a fee will be set and implemented in the future. o By credit card? o Yes  What cost does City incur and what cost is TXU? o The unit will be provided to the city by TXU at no charge. The City provides the infrastructure to operate the unit.  How much do they cost? o Approximately 15-20 thousand  Who maintains the units? o The City will provide the maintenance o The City will collect usage data to determine fee which will be set by City Council  A statement of concern was made regarding the fairness of free electric “fill-ups” when others who use gasoline have to pay… SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Call Summary Report: Case No. ZA17-034 S T A F F R E P O R T May 12, 2017 CASE NO: ZA17-034 PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Highland Chase of Southlake EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On behalf of L&B SHC Series 1 Southlake, LLC and The Highland Group Joint Venture, LLC, Pacheco Koch is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Highland Chase of Southlake on property described as Tracts 4F2 and 4F4, Absolom H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 299, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and generally located on the north side of E. Highland St. approximately 300 feet east of E. State Hwy. 114, addressed as 930 E. Highland St. (also addressed as 1000 N. Carroll Ave.) and 1320 N. Carroll Ave., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "C- 3" General Commercial District. SPIN #3. DETAILS: The property is generally located on the north side of E. Highland St. approximately 300 feet east of E. State Hwy. 114. The purpose of the request is to seek approval of a Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Highland Chase of Southlake to convey the property west of the E. Kirkwood Blvd. alignment to the owner of the Harborchase of Southlake property to the west and to dedicate right of way for E. Kirkwood Blvd. and E. Highland St. The proposed Lot 1, Block 1, will remain as open space and there are no plans to develop the proposed Lot 2, Block 1 at this time. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider Approval of a Preliminary Plat ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated May 12, 2017 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only) Link to PowerPoint Presentation Link to Plans and Support Information STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067 Richard Schell (817) 748-8602 Department of Planning & Development Services Case No. Attachment A ZA17-034 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: L&B SHC Series 1 Southlake, LLC and The Highland Group Joint Venture, LLC APPLICANT: Pacheco Koch PROPERTY SITUATION: Generally located on the north side of E. Highland St. appr oximately 300 feet east of E. State Hwy. 114, addressed as 930 E. Highland St. (also addressed as 1000 N. Carroll Ave.) and 1320 N. Carroll Ave., LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tracts 4F2 and 4F4, Absolom H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 299 LAND USE CATEGORY: Mixed Use CURRENT ZONING: “C-3” – General Commercial District HISTORY: The property was annexed into the City in 1957 and giving the “AG” Agricultural District zoning designation. - Tract 4F2 was given the “H” Heavy Commercial District zoning designation and Tract 4F4 was given the “L” Light Commercial District zoning designation with the adoption of Ordinance No. 261 and the official Zoning Map in 1981. - Tract 4F2 was given the “R2” Retail Two District zoning designation and Tract 4F4 was given the “R1” Retail One District zoning designation with the adoption of Ordinance No. 334 and the official Zoning Map in 1986. - The “C-3” Zoning District designation was approved with the adoption of the Zoning Ordinance No. 480 and the official Zoning Map on September 19, 1989. SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The 2030 future land use designation for the site is “Mixed Use”. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan The 2030 Master Thoroughfare Plan shows E. Kirkwood Blvd. to be a four- lane divided arterial with 100;’ of right of way north of the intersection with E. Highland St. transitioning to a four-lane divided arterial with 88’ of right of way at the current alignment of E. Highland St. and E. Highland St. to be a two-lane undivided collector with 70’ of right of way west of the intersection with E. Kirkwood Blvd. Adequate right of way dedication for E. Kirkwood Blvd. and E. Highland St. is shown on the plat. Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan Sidewalks shall be required along both sides of all public streets. The 2030 Pathways Master Plan shows future sidewalks <8’ to the west of E. Kirkwood Blvd. and along both sides of E. Highland St. (including the portion that will be E. Kirkwood Blvd.) and a future multi-use trail ≥ 8’ on the east side of E. Kirkwood Blvd. extending south to the intersection with the current E. Highland St. TREE PRESERVATION: The site is subject to the City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585 -D because there has been no previous development on the site. The purpose of the submittal is for platting purposes only. A Tree Conservation Plan Case No. Attachment A ZA17-034 Page 2 complying with the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585 -D will be required with the submittal of a Site Plan, Development Plan, or any other plans which propose development of the properties. CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was not held for this plat. No development is proposed at this time. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Review Summary No. 2, dated May 12, 2017. Case No. Attachment B ZA17-034 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA17-034 Page 1 PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA17-034 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 05/12/17 Project Name: Preliminary Plat –Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Highland Chase APPLICANT: Javier Jaramillo OWNER: Thomas Dwyer Pacheco Koch Silverstone Healthcare Company, LLC 7557 Rambler Rd. Suite 1400 3710 RawlinsSt. #800 Dallas, TX 75231 Dallas, TX 75219 Phone: (972) 235-3031 Phone: (214) 561-2830 E-mail: jjaramillo@pkce.com E-mail: tdwyer@silverstonehc.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 05/01/17 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748-8602. 1. The following changes are needed with regard to the legal description: a. In the third call after the beginning call, the central angle in the legal description (89º28’36” doesn’t match the central angle on the plat (88º29’36”). 2. The following changes are needed with regard to adjacent properties within 200' to include properties across any adjacent R.O.W.: a. Label the Land Use Designation on the property to the west as LUD = Mixed Use and Flood Plain. 3. Change the Existing Land Use in the quantitative land use schedule to Mixed Use and Flood Plain. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The purpose of the submittal is for platting purposes only. A Tree Conservation Plan complying with the regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance 585 -D will be required with the submittal of a Site Plan, Development Plan, or any other plans which propose development of the pro perties. Case No. Attachment C ZA17-034 Page 2 Public Works/Engineering Review Steve Anderson, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8101 E-mail: sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us No comments. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us No comments. ============= The following should be informational comments only ==================== * A Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure. The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication requirements and fees, off-site sewer extensions, off-site drainage and utility easements and impact fees. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Eros ion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Case No. Attachment D ZA17-034 Page 1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Highland Chase Preliminary Plat SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1. VARKLAN LLC SP1 850 E SH 114 1.63 NR 2. ABIDING GRACE LUTHERN CHURCH CS 1000 E HIGHLAND ST 3.38 NR 3. QUINN, WILLIAM W AG 1330 N CARROLL AVE 1.07 NR 4. VARKLAN LLC SP1 950 E SH 114 5.36 NR 5. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF ECZ 970 E KIRKWOOD BLVD 22.77 NR 6. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF ECZ 480 E SH 114 7.51 NR 7. CEDAR RIDGE OFFICE PARK OWNERS SP1 800 E SH 114 0.50 NR 8. OSCAR WOLFE FAMILY CEMETERY CS 950 E HIGHLAND ST 0.15 NR 9. BURGESS, DERRELL AG 1360 N CARROLL AVE 7.32 NR 10. HIGHLAND GROUP JV C3 1320 N CARROLL AVE 1.47 NR 11. 1280 NORTH CARROLL LLC CS 1280 N CARROLL AVE 4.66 NR 12. HIGHLAND GROUP JV C3 930 E HIGHLAND ST 11.94 NR 13. L&B SHC SERIES I SOUTHLAKE LLC SP1 700 E SH 114 12.54 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA17-034 Page 2 Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Nine (9) Responses Received Within 200’: None (0) Preliminary Plat Lots 1and 2, Block 1 Highland Chase of Southlake ZA17-034 Owner: L&B SHC Series 1 Southlake, LLC and The Highland Group Joint Venture, LLC Applicant: Pacheco Koch Request: Approval of a Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Highland Chase of Southlake to convey the property west of the E. Kirkwood Blvd. alignment to the owner of the Harborchase of Southlake property to the west and to dedicate right of way for E. Kirkwood Blvd. and E. Highland St. Location: Generally located on the north side of E. Highland St. approximately 300 feet east of E. State Hwy. 114 and addressed as 930 E. Highland St and 1320 N. Carroll Ave. ZA17-034 Aerial View Preliminary Plat Questions? Case No. ZA17-038 S T A F F R E P O R T May 12, 2017 CASE NO: ZA17-038 PROJECT: Site Plan for Miron Grove Business Park EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Conifer Real Estate, Inc., on behalf of the owner Southlake Miron Office, LLC, is requesting approval of a Site Plan on property described as Lot 4R, Block 1, Miron Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, located at 240 Miron Drive, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN #8 REQUEST DETAILS: The applicant is requesting approval of the site plan for Miron Grove Business Park to install an electric generator and generator enclosure adjacent to Building #4 for a medical office. The generator enclosure will be installed on the north side of the building in two parking spaces and a portion of the landscape island. The development provides 211 parking spaces (207 spaces required) on the site to accommodate the elimination of two parking spaces for the proposed generator enclosure. One trash enclosure was eliminated (two trash enclosures remain) to add three parking spaces to the development. Further explanation may be found in the Narrative. The generator enclosure will be constructed with the same masonry building materials used for the office building. With this site plan, the medical office building elevation will be modified to remove one door on the east elevation to accommodate the operation of the tenant. The window design will be modified on the east and west elevations and the masonry details will enhance the windows. The proposed elevation enhancements will be compatible and consistent with the other building in the development. Site Data Summary Miron Grove Business Park Existing Zoning S-P-2 Land Use Designation Office Commercial Gross/Net Acreage 2.16 acre/.2.16cre Total Building Floor Area (Gross) 5,900 sf Building Height/Number of Stories 1 Area of Open Space 79,812 sf Percentage of Open Space 38% Area of Impervious Coverage 130,190 sf Percentage of Impervious Coverage 62% Total Parking Required (1/150sf 45% and 1/300 sf 55%sf) 207 spaces Total Parking Spaces Provided 211 spaces Department of Planning & Development Services Case No. ZA17-038 ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a Public Hearing 2) Consider Approval of the Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: ((A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated May 12, 2017 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (E) Surrounding Property Owners Responses Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only ) Link to PowerPoint Presentation Link Narrative Link Plans Page 1 - Site Plan Page 2 - Enlarged Site Plan Pages 3 - 4 Proposed Elevations Page 5 - Generator Enclosure Page 6 - Revised Landscape Plan STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817)748-8072 Patty Moos (817)748-8269 Case No. Attachment A ZA17-038 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNERS: Southlake Miron Office, LLC APPLICANT: Conifer Real Estate PROPERTY SITUATION: 240 Miron Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4R, Block 1, Miron Subdivision LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial CURRENT ZONING: “S-P-2” Generalized Site Plan District HISTORY: May 5, 1992; A change of zoning to “S-P-2” was approved by City Council. June 3, 1997; City Council approved a plat revision for Miron Addition. October 3, 2006; (ZA06-088) A change of zoning to "S-P-2" with "O-1" uses was approved by City Council on the second reading (6-0) subject to Concept Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated September 27, 2006 and subject to the applicant’s presentation and the handout presented at the meeting; approving the proposed development regulation that the required number of parking spaces shall be 207 spaces, or equal to a 5% reduction in the required number of parking spaces; noting that the articulation on site plan page A3 is the correct articulation; subject to the number of carports to be reduced from 41 to 25 (Carports are approved and permitted in Phase I only) and will be made of a trellis design with no plywood decking , the roof design shall be a low pitch shed roof, and the maximum number of parking spaces under a carport shall be 10 spaces; and specifying that approval does not include approval of any signage. October 3, 2006; A site plan (ZA06-089) for phase 1 was also approved by City Council. February 20, 2007; A revised site plan (ZA07-014) was approved by City Council to change the building elevations on Phase 1. April 20, 2010; A zoning change and site plan (ZA10-008) to allow “ambulatory surgical center/clinic (no overnight stay)” as a permitted use as well as to allow an additional short-term covered parking space (or “carport”) and screening wall to screen new generators and HVAC units was approved by City Council. December 4, 2012; Approved a zoning change and site plan (ZA12-081) for the construction of an approximately 528 square foot addition to Building 6 to be used for storage space and to expand the mechanical yard by approximately 75 square feet at second reading (7-0), subject to Site Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated October 31, 2012. No other changes to the S-P- 2 regulations. September 1, 2015; Approved (6 -0) a site plan (ZA15-078) subject to the Staff Report dated August 25, 2015 and the Site Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated August 25, 2015 and noting the applicant will maintain all existing uses and regulations as noted in the Staff Report. Case No. Attachment A ZA17-038 Page 2 SOUTHLAKE 2030 Pathways Master Plan: A 6’ sidewalk currently exists along E. Southlake Boulevard. There are no recommended trails or sidewalks in the Mobility Plan along Miron Drive. TREE PRESERVATION: There is an existing stand of trees located along the east side of the property which will remain and protected per City of Southlake Ordinance 585 -C as recommended in the ZA06-088 Zoning and Concept Plan for the Miron Grove Business Park. The site plan shows the preservation of this stand of trees. UTILITIES: Water An 8” water line exists along the east side of Miron Drive. Existing public water lines are located within Phase 1 of the development. Sewer A 6” sanitary sewer line exists along the west side of Miron Drive. Existing private sewer lines are located within Phase 1 of the development. SPIN MEETING: The SPIN meeting is scheduled for May 23, 2017. STAFF COMMENTS: Site Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated May 12, 2017 is attached. The Miron Grove Business Park will maintain the uses and regulations under the existing “S-P-2” zoning in Phase I and II as follows:  “O-1” Office District uses and development regulations  Parking – The required number of parking spaces shall be 207 spaces, or equal to a 5% reduction in the required number of parking spaces  Carports – Carports shall be a permitted accessory use as shown on the concept plan. The following modifications are proposed to the development regulations specific to carports: o The roof design shall be a low pitch shed roof o The maximum number of parking spaces under a carport shall be 10 spaces o A total number of 25 parking spaces within the carport structures shall be permitted (Currently, all permitted carports are shown on the approved Site Plan. There are no carports are currently proposed with Phase 2). There are no variances requested. Case No. Attachment B ZA17-038 Page 1 Case No. Attachment E ZA17-038 Page 1 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY Case No.: ZA17-038 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 5/12/2017 Project Name: Site Plan for Miron Grove Business Park APPLICANT: Conifier Real Estate OWNER: Southlake Miron, LLC Martin Schelling Jim Shindler 260 Miron Drive, Suite 108 260 Miron, Suite 108 Southlake, TX 76092 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 475-3335 Phone: 817-552-7789 Email: martin@confierre.com Email: jim@confierre.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/9//2017 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER. Planning Review Patty Moos Planner I Phone: (817) 748-8269 Email: pmoos@ci.southlake.tx.us Tree Conservation/Landscape Review Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us No comments. Public Works/Engineering Review Om Chhetri, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8089 E-mail: ochhetri@ci.southlake.tx.us 1. Verify the location of all utilities prior to construction. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us Case No. Attachment E ZA17-038 Page 2 No Comments. General Informational Comments * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building p ermit, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment F ZA17-038 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owners Miron Grove Business Park SPO # Owner Zoning Address Acreage Response 1. PKY GROUP LLC SP1 1621 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.10 NR 2. BRUTON, PAUL R SP2 1615 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.02 NR 3. JEFFLYN PROPERTIES VI LTD SP1 1575 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.44 NR 4. MALIK, NALIA B1 175 MIRON DR 0.63 NR 5. WETRICH REALTY LP B1 325 MIRON DR 0.70 NR 6. ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS LLC SP1 345 MIRON DR 1.00 NR 7. MARCH INVESTMENTS LP B1 365 MIRON DR 0.74 NR 8. STALETS, SCOTT W SF20B 1316 WESTMONT CT 0.48 NR 9. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF CS 320 MIRON DR 1.57 NR 10. HEALTH CARE REIT INC SP2 1565 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 4.29 NR 11. DALLAS SMSA TOWER HOLDINGS LP B1 340 MIRON DR 0.98 NR 12. TESORIERO HOLDINGS LLC SP2 300 MIRON DR # 1 0.08 NR 13. D2S2M LLC SP2 300 MIRON DR # 2 0.08 NR 14. BEARFOOT INVESTMENTS LLC SP2 300 MIRON DR # 3 0.08 NR 15. HERITAGE PARTNERS III LLC SP2 300 MIRON DR # 4 0.13 NR 16. THORN PROPERTIES LLC SP2 300 MIRON DR # 5 0.11 NR 17. ARIANNA SHABAHANG LLC C2 1695 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.54 NR 18. WOODS, GLEN A B1 205 MIRON DR 0.52 NR 19. CANDY BEARA LLC B1 305 MIRON DR 0.77 NR 20. CAMBRIDGE 114 INC SP2 1545 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD 5.08 NR 21. CAMBRIDGE 114 INC SP2 1555 E SOUTHLAKE 3.06 NR Case No. Attachment F ZA17-038 Page 1 BLVD 22. SOUTHLAKE MIRON LLC SP2 300 MIRON DR #6 0.11 NR 23. SOUTHLAKE MIRON LLC SP2 300 MIRON DR #7 0.14 NR 24. SOUTHLAKE MIRON LLC SP2 300 MIRON DR #8 0.07 NR 25. SOUTHLAKE MIRON LLC SP2 300 MIRON DR #9 0.07 NR 26. SOUTHLAKE MIRON LLC SP2 300 MIRON DR #10 0.08 NR 27. SOUTHLAKE MIRON LLC SP2 300 MIRON DR #11 0.08 NR 28. Superintendent of Carroll ISD 2400 N Carroll Ave NR 29. Superintendent of Grapevine Colleyville ISD 3051 Ira E Woods Ave NR 30. Superintendent of Northwest ISD PO Box 77070 NR 31. Superintendent of Keller ISD 350 Keller Pkwy NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Twenty-four (24) Responses: None Case No. Attachment G ZA17-038 Page 1 Surrounding Property Owners Responses No Responses NARRATIVE FOR MIRON GROVE SITE PLAN REVISION Southlake Miron, LLC is requesting a site plan revision to accommodate a plastic surgery center for Vennemeyer Plastic Surgery. Vennemeyer Plastic Surgery specializes in elective outpatient cosmetic plastic surgery, most under general anesthesia provided by an anesthesiologist. Most of the procedures will be breast augmentation and other relatively short procedures. Patients are generally discharged approximately 90 minutes after the procedure. This new office will be their primary location to see new patients for consolations, procedures and follow up visits. This will also be their main office with the all of their administrative staff and general offices. The application is required to amend the site to accommodate an electrical generator and enclosure. The generator is a safety measure to ensure that in the event of power loss, there are no interruptions during procedures and the recovery period. The original Miron Grove site plan included three dumpsters to service eleven buildings. We determined that three dumpsters were not required to accommodate the development. One dumpster was eliminated which added three additional parking spaces. The generator location will take two parking spaces and we relocated one accessible route which eliminated one parking space. The parking spaces provided on this revised site plan are the equal the number of parking spaces shown on the original site plan. Additionally, Vennemeyer desires to enhance the elevation of the previously approved building elevation. The enclosed elevation includes enhancements to the windows and eliminates one door on the east elevation. Since this building be occupied 100% by Vennemeyer Plastic Surgery only one door is required on the east side and will be the main entry to the building. The proposed elevation enhancements are be compatible and consistent with the other buildings in the Miron Grove development. Z A 1 7 - 0 3 8 PLANS 1 Z A 1 7 - 0 3 8 PLANS 2 PL A N S 3 PL A N S 4 PL A N S 5 PLANS 6 Item 9 ZA17-038 Miron Grove Business Park Site Plan APPLICANT: Conifer Real Estate, Inc. OWNER: Southlake Miron Office, LLC REQUEST: Approval of a Site Plan for Miron Grove Business Park to add an electric generator and generator enclosure adjacent to Building #4 for a medical office. LOCATION: 240 Miron Drive ZA17-038 APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN (ZA06-088) Phase 1: 5 Office buildings with 20,300 square feet Phase 2 Phase 1 Carports are approved and permitted in Phase I and are limited to 25 spaces. The carports will be made of a trellis design with no plywood decking, the roof design shall be a low pitch shed roof, and the maximum number of parking spaces under a carport shall be 10 spaces. Currently, carports not approved in Phase 2. APPROVED SITE PLAN (ZA06-089) Phase 1: 5 Office buildings with 20,300 square feet Phase 2 Phase 1 Carports are approved and permitted in Phase I and are limited to 25 spaces. APPROVED BUILDING ELEVATIONS (TYP.) (ZA07-014) PHASE 2 APPROVED SITE PLAN (ZA15-078) Bldg. 8 Bldg. 3 Bldg. 2 Bldg. 1 Bldg. 7 Bldg. 4 Phase 2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN (ZA17-038) Bldg. #4 Proposed Generator BUILDING #4 (ZA17-038) Building #4 Proposed Generator Enclosure BUILDING #4 ELEVATIONS (ZA17-038) Approved Building Elevations #4 (ZA15-078) Proposed Building Elevations #4 (ZA17-038) BUILDING #4 ELEVATIONS WITH PROPOSED GENERATOR ENCLOSURE (ZA17-038) Building Elevations #4 Proposed Generator APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN (ZA15-078) Bldg. 4 REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN (ZA17-038) Proposed canopy tree, shrubs and groundcover modified locations Generator enclosure View east to generator location SITE PHOTOGRAPHS View south to generator location View southwest to generator enclosure SITE PHOTOGRAPHS View north to generator enclosure Questions? Approved S-P-2 Regulations (ZA06-088) The Miron Grove Business Park will maintain the uses and regulations under the existing “S-P-2” zoning as follows: “O-1” Office District uses and development regulations Parking – The required number of parking spaces shall be 207 spaces, or equal to a 5% reduction in the required number of parking spaces Carports – Carports shall be a permitted accessory use as shown on the concept plan. The following modifications are proposed to the development regulations specific to carports: •The roof design shall be a low pitch shed roof •The maximum number of parking spaces under a carport shall be 10 spaces •A total number of 25 parking spaces within the carport structures shall be permitted (Currently, all permitted carports are shown on the approved Site Plan. No carports are currently proposed with Phase 2). TREE CONSERVATION PLAN Tree Conservation Area (ZA06-088) ZA06-088 Vision, Goals & Objectives 1 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX ORDINANCE NO. 1173 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE VISION, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES OF THE SOUTHLAKE 2035 PLAN, THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE. WHEREAS, a Home Rule Charter of the City of Southlake, Texas, was approved by the voters in a duly called Charter election on April 4, 1987; and, WHEREAS, the Home Rule Charter, Chapter XI requires an update to the City’s comprehensive plan elements every four years, WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that a vision statement is a blueprint for the community’s future and the goals and objectives clarify that vision, WHEREAS, the City Council desires the Vision, Goals, & Objectives to provide the guiding principles for all the elements of the Comprehensive Plan, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide direction to the Planning & Zoning Commission in formulating the elements of the Southlake 2030 Plan update, WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed that the Vision, Goals, and Objectives have been formulated with adequate public input, WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed that the Vision, Goals, and Objectives herein reflect the community’s desires for the future, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of the findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City Council hereby incorporates said findings into the body of this ordinance as if copied in its entirety. Section 2. The statements in ‘Exhibit 1’ are hereby adopted as the Vision, Goals, & Objectives of the Southlake 2035 Plan. Section 3. The different elements of the Comprehensive Master Plan, as adopted and amended by the City Council from time to time, shall be kept on file in the office of the City Secretary of the City of Southlake, along with a copy of the ordinance and minute order of the Council so adopting or approving the same. Any existing element of the Comprehensive Master Plan which has been heretofore adopted by the City Council shall remain in full force until amended by the City Council as provided herein. Vision, Goals & Objectives 2 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX Section 4. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. Section 5. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. Section 6. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby authorized to publish this ordinance in book or pamphlet form for general distribution among the public, and the operative provisions of this ordinance as so published shall be admissible in evidence in all courts without further proof than the production thereof. Section 7. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance or its caption and penalty in the official City newspaper one time within ten days after final passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 8. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and af ter its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 6th day of June, 2017. __________________________ Laura Hill, MAYOR Vision, Goals & Objectives 3 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX ATTEST: __________________________ Lori Payne, CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 20th day of June, 2017. _________________________ Laura Hill, MAYOR ATTEST: __________________________ Lori Payne, CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: _________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY DATE:___________________________ ADOPTED:_______________________ EFFECTIVE:______________________ Vision, Goals & Objectives 4 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX Exhibit 1 Vision, Goals & Objectives Adopted by City Council on xxxx 2017 Ordinance No. 1173 Vision, Goals & Objectives 5 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX SOUTHLAKE 2035 VISION STATEMENT Southlake will continue to enhance its status as a desirable, attractive, safe, healthy and fiscally-sound community with quality neighborhoods, while maintaining a high standard of living, learning, shopping, working, recreation, and open spaces. Southlake will continue to be a vibrant community that epitomizes both economic and environmental sustainability. SOUTHLAKE 2035 GOALS & OBJECTIVES Goal 1: Quality Development Promote quality development that is consistent with the Urban Design Plan and existing development patterns, well- maintained, attractive, pedestrian-friendly, safe, contributes to an overall sense of place and meet the needs of a vibrant and diverse community. Objective 1.1 Encourage the maintenance and enhancement of existing neighborhoods, features and amenities in order to preserve property values and a unique sense of place. Objective 1.2 Create and preserve attractive pedestrian-friendly streets and pathways to encourage transportation alternatives to the automobile. Objective 1.3 Encourage appropriately-scaled neighborhood design that compliments existing development patterns while creating unique places, recognizing that quality residential neighborhoods are the cornerstone of our community. Objective 1.4 Emphasize creativity and ensure environmental stewardship in the design of all development and public infrastructure, maximizing the preservation of desirable natural features such as trees, topography, streams, wildlife corridors and habitat. Objective 1.5 Promote unique community character through a cohesive theme by emphasizing urban design detail and performance standards for structures, streets, street lighting, landscaping, entry features, wayfinding signs, open spaces, amenities, pedestrian/automobile orientation and transition to adjacent uses. Vision, Goals & Objectives 6 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX Objective 1.6 Consider high-quality single-family residential uses as part of a planned mixed-use development at appropriate transitional locations. Objective 1.7 Explore and encourage opportunities for redevelopment when appropriate. Objective 1.8 Ensure high-quality design and a heightened sensitivity towards the integration of new development with the existing development and urban design pattern. Objective 1.9 Strengthen street and landscape design standards to enhance the visual quality along major corridors. Objective 1.10 Continue to promote a strong working relationship with the Texas Department of Transportation to improve the appearance of roadways, bridges, embankments and entryways into the City. Objective 1.11 Ensure that city- and developer-provided infrastructure is functional, aesthetically well-designed, and integrated with the natural environment. Objective 1.12 Continue to strengthen the City’s regulations to encourage effective signage that is appropriately designed and scaled to minimize adverse impacts on community aesthetics. Goal 2: Balance Maintain a balanced approach to growth and development in order to preserve the City’s assets (schools, public safety, and competitive edge in the region) and fiscal health. Objective 2.1 Encourage a balance of uses, including retail, office, medical, hospitality, entertainment, institutional, industrial and residential that is both responsive to and sustainable within changing market conditions and sustains growth in property values for the future. Objective 2.2 Support appropriate public-private financial partnerships that will help retain and enhance the City’s economic base. Objective 2.3 Ensure the City’s built environment fosters a positive relationship between the taxable value of real property and the corresponding cost of municipal services. Goal 3: Mobility Vision, Goals & Objectives 7 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX Develop an innovative mobility system that provides for the safe, convenient, efficient movement of people and goods, reduces traffic congestion, promotes energy and transportation efficiency and promotes expanded opportunities for citizens to meet some routine needs by walking or bicycling. Objective 3.1 Provide a safe and efficient streets and pathways network that allows travel to shopping areas, schools, parks and places of employment, reducing the need to travel on the City’s major arterials (FM 1709, FM 1938, or SH 114) and minimizes cut-through traffic in residential neighborhoods. Objective 3.2 Implement and promote a mobility system that addresses safety, design, comfort and aesthetic elements such as landscaping, crosswalks, railing, lighting, traffic-calming and signage in order to provide distinct character and functionality for the City. Objective 3.3 In accordance with a need identified by the Citizen Survey, provide and promote a continuous pedestrian pathways system that is user- friendly, efficient, safe, economical, and connect parks, shopping, schools, work and residential areas. Objective 3.4 Pursue opportunities to link Southlake’s pathways to systems in adjacent cities and trails on the Corps of Engineers property. Objective 3.5 Identify and prioritize the funding and construction of mobility system capital improvements projects according to the impacts on safety, system efficiency, costs, and improving levels of service for roadways. Objective 3.6 Increase safe bicycle mobility when reasonably possible. Objective 3.7 Continue to promote a strong working relationship with the Texas Department of Transportation to identify, design and implement projects that prevent or relieve congestion in the area. Objective 3.8 Continue to evaluate and improve upon the existing mobility system within the City, maintaining existing infrastructure, making required improvements and evaluating innovative ways to integrate transportation and land use. Objective 3.9 Obtain adequate right-of-way for future roadway corridors and improvements. Goal 4: Parks, Recreation and Open Space Vision, Goals & Objectives 8 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX Support a comprehensive integrated parks, recreation and open space system for all ages that creates value and preserves natural assets of the City. Objective 4.1 Ensure that new development incorporates usable open space. Objective 4.2 Ensure that parkland and open spaces include an integrated mix of developed and natural areas with consideration of protecting the City’s ecosystem and wildlife corridors. Objective 4.3 Promote water conservation and reuse in the design of parks and open spaces. Objective 4.4 Utilize partnerships to create open space and recreation facilities. Objective 4.5 Ensure an even geographic distribution of park facilities and recreation activities—both active and passive—for citizens of all ages. Objective 4.6 Provide a full range of park facilities and linear linkages that will accommodate the current and future needs of the City’s residents and visitors. Objective 4.7 Integrate passive recreational opportunities into preserved natural and drainage areas. Objective 4.8 Incorporate feedback received from the Parks and Recreation Citizen Survey into recreation activities and park facilities. Objective 4.9 Acknowledge the City’s rich natural history, heritage and historical landmarks. Objective 4.10 Determine parkland desirable for dedication as part of the development process based on classification, location and maintenance cost. Objective 4.11 Prioritize investments in existing and established parks understanding that there will be strategic opportunities for land acquisition. Objective 4.12 Incorporate educational and learning opportunities within parks and related facilities. Objective 4.13 Pursue recreational and educational opportunities on Corps of Engineers property compatible with the goal of protecting and preserving the existing ecosystem for future generations. Goal 5: Public Safety Vision, Goals & Objectives 9 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX Establish and maintain protective measures and policies that reduce danger, risk or injury to property and individuals who live, work or visit the City. Objective 5.1 Maintain a level of police, fire and ambulance services commensurate with population and business needs. Objective 5.2 Provide effective and efficient professional public safety services in partnership with the citizens we serve, encouraging mutual respect and innovative problem-solving, thereby improving the quality of life in our community. Objective 5.3 Ensure compliance with the stated standard of response coverage and industry guidelines through the provision of facilities, equipment, personnel and roadways. Objective 5.4 Ensure that all buildings and public facilities are constructed in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local safety regulations and standards. Objective 5.5 Maintain the continued compliance with national standard of excellence through the accreditation process. Objective 5.6 Enhance and promote public safety through public-private partnerships and utilization and training of volunteers. Objective 5.7 Maintain a high level of community readiness through training and communications among neighborhood and volunteer groups and city, county, state, and federal entities. Objective 5.8 Develop and implement safety education programs that enhance the quality of life and safety in the community. Objective 5.9 Promote security of public buildings and infrastructure. Objective 5.10 Ensure safe and healthy working conditions for city staff, volunteers and officials by providing security, facility, vehicular and equipment maintenance, information, education and training. Goal 6: Economic Development Create a diversified, vibrant and sustainable economy through the attraction and support of business enterprises and tourism meeting the vision and standards desired by City leaders. Objective 6.1 Promote the City both nationally and regionally as a great place to live, work, visit, shop and recreate. Vision, Goals & Objectives 10 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX Objective 6.2 Provide necessary, desirable and diverse goods and services for residents of the City. Objective 6.3 Foster an environment that retains and supports existing businesses to ensure the sustainability of our existing tax base. Objective 6.4 Attract desired businesses to ensure economic growth as well as continued employment and services for residents of the City. Objective 6.5 Enhance the quality of life for residents and the sustainability of City business through the promotion of the tourism, convention and hotel industry in the City. Objective 6.6 Develop a clear and understandable incentive policy that accomplishes the business attraction and retention goals of the City and is based on factors such as job creation, investment, quality of business, return on investment and overall value to the community. Objective 6.7 Foster communication between the public and private sectors. Goal 7: Sustainability Encourage the conservation, protection, enhancement and proper management of the natural and built environment. Objective 7.1 Maintain and implement policies to reduce the use of nonrenewable resources, such as energy in the heating, cooling, and operation and maintenance of city facilities. Objective 7.2 Promote public awareness and education on such sustainability issues as public health, energy and water conservation and overall environmental stewardship. Objective 7.3 Promote sustainable public and private development practices and patterns, building design, water-use reduction and waste reduction while maintaining the existing character of the city. Objective 7.4 Protect surface, storm, and groundwater quality from septic discharge, impervious surface runoff, improper waste disposal and other potential contaminant sources. Objective 7.5 Conserve, restore and promote tree and plant cover that is native or adaptive to the City and region while also protecting existing significant vegetation and maintaining the existing character of the City. Vision, Goals & Objectives 11 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX Objective 7.6 Protect and enhance air quality in coordination with federal, regional and local agencies. Objective 7.7 Recognize the importance of and protect the biological diversity for the ecological and aesthetic benefits to the community. Objective 7.8 Define, protect, and celebrate the local Cross Timbers Ecosystem as a community asset for future generations. Objective 7.9 Assess and minimize the ecological impact of any new trails provided on Corps of Engineers property. Goal 8: Community Facilities Plan and provide quality community facilities and services that effectively meet the service needs of Southlake’s residents and businesses. Objective 8.1 Provide a level of community facilities that meet the needs of both the existing and projected population. Objective 8.2 Encourage cooperation with the school districts in planning for and financing community facilities to encourage the cost-effective provision of resources. Objective 8.3 Systematically evaluate City-owned buildings in terms of their quality of service delivery and prioritize maintenance and renovation accordingly. Objective 8.4 Incorporate new computer and telecommunications technologies into public buildings and designated areas in order to improve time and cost efficiency of service delivery and to meet increasing demands of information access and sharing. Goal 9: Partnerships Fully utilize and coordinate with the City’s many partners to address issues facing the area, provide services and facilities, promote volunteerism, support events and programs and encourage economic growth. Objective 9.1 Partner with other government entities, non-governmental organizations and the North Central Texas Council of Governments to address regional and local issues. Objective 9.2 Continue mutually beneficial partnerships between the City and local school districts to explore the provision of facilities, services, Vision, Goals & Objectives 12 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX technology, and other opportunities through open communication and close coordination. Objective 9.3 Continue active partnerships with non-profit organizations, civic groups and local businesses to create opportunities that benefit the community. Objective 9.4 Partner with local school districts to educate Southlake’s youth in their municipality and seek youth input when planning the future of our community. Goal 10: Infrastructure Through sound management and strategic investment, develop, maintain, improve and operate public infrastructure that promotes health, safety and an enhanced quality of life for all members of the community. Objective 10.1 Ensure equitably-distributed and adequate services and facilities. Objective 10.2 Plan and program land acquisition and the installation of all essential public facilities to reasonably coincide with the need for such facilities. Objective 10.3 Identify and implement programs where costs may be shared by multiple agencies and/or developers. Objective 10.4 Provide for adequate public water and sewer services in appropriate areas of the City. Objective 10.5 Provide and maintain an effective stormwater management system throughout the City. Objective 10.6 Maintain and enhance existing infrastructure and levels of service through the provision of timely maintenance, repair and replacement as needed. Objective 10.7 Provide and maintain effective solid waste collection and recycling programs for residents. Objective 10.8 Provide a streetlight system for adequate illumination and a wayfinding signage system for pedestrian and driver safety where appropriate. Goal 11: Tourism Vision, Goals & Objectives 13 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX Enhance the quality of life for residents and the sustainability of City businesses through the use and promotion of the tourism, convention and hotel industry as a tool for the local economy in the City. Objective 11.1 Promote a destination image for the City and continuously evolve it to adapt to changing economic conditions. Objective 11.2 Support programs enriching experiences for residents and visitors. Objective 11.3 Increase awareness and utilization of the hotel accommodations and meeting facilities in the City. Objective 11.4 Promote and implement programs that increase the patronage of businesses in the City. Objective 11.5 Support events held in the City that promote the City’s tourism goal and objectives. Objective 11.6 Support partnerships with other businesses and organizations that are mutually beneficial. Goal 12: Community Engagement Promote and prioritize initiatives that involve and empower residents and businesses to collaborate with the City of Southlake in achieving community objectives Objective 12.1 Use technology to engage the community on topics of interest that informs and facilitates the exchange of information. Objective 12.2 Provide opportunities for the community’s youth to advise and participate in policy and decision making, while investing in future generations. Objective 12.3 Implement effective engagement strategies, such as Town Hall Forums, that solicit input from the community. Objective 12.4 Engage with community groups to identify opportunities to enhance transparency and encourage participation in local government. Vision, Goals & Objectives 1 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX SOUTHLAKE 20350 VISION STATEMENT Southlake will continue to enhance its status as a desirable, attractive, safe, healthy and fiscally-sound community with quality neighborhoods, while maintaining a high standard of living, learning, shopping, working, recreation, and open spaces. Southlake will continue to be a vibrant community that epitomizes both economic and environmental sustainability. SOUTHLAKE 20350 GOALS & OBJECTIVES Goal 1: Quality Development Promote quality development that is consistent with the Urban Design Plan and existing development patterns, well- maintained, attractive, pedestrian-friendly, safe, contributes to an overall sense of place and meet the needs of a vibrant and diverse community. Objective 1.1 Encourage the maintenance and enhancement of existing neighborhoods, features and amenities in order to preserve property values and a unique sense of place. Objective 1.2 Create and preserve attractive pedestrian-friendly streets and pathways to encourage transportation alternatives to the automobile. Objective 1.3 Encourage appropriately-scaled neighborhood design that compliments existing development patterns while creating unique places, recognizing that quality residential neighborhoods are the cornerstone of our community. Objective 1.4 Emphasize creativity and ensure environmental stewardship in the design of all development and public infrastructure, maximizing the preservation of desirable natural features such as trees, topography, streams, wildlife corridors and habitat. Objective 1.5 Promote unique community character through a cohesive theme by emphasizing urban design detail and performance standards for structures, streets, street lighting, landscaping, entry features, wayfinding signs, open spaces, amenities, pedestrian/automobile orientation and transition to adjacent uses. Objective 1.6 Consider high-quality single-family residential uses as part of a planned mixed-use development at appropriate transitional locations. Objective 1.7 Explore and encourage opportunities for redevelopment when appropriate. Vision, Goals & Objectives 2 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX Objective 1.8 Ensure high-quality design and a heightened sensitivity towards the integration of new development with the existing development and urban design pattern. Objective 1.9 Strengthen street and landscape design standards to enhance the visual quality along major corridors. Objective 1.10 Continue to promote a strong working relationship with the Texas Department of Transportation to improve the appearance of roadways, bridges, embankments and entryways into the City. Objective 1.11 Ensure that city- and developer-provided infrastructure is functional, aesthetically well-designed, and integrated with the natural environment. Objective 1.12 Continue to strengthen the City’s regulations to encourage effective signage that is appropriately designed and scaled to minimize adverse impacts on community aesthetics. Objective 1.13 Explore creating participation programs with home owner associations and subdivision groups to enhance the long-term viability of neighborhood features and amenities. Goal 2: Balance Maintain a balanced approach to growth and development in order to preserve the City’s assets (schools, public safety, and competitive edge in the region) and fiscal health. Objective 2.1 Encourage a balance of uses, including retail, office, medical, hospitality, entertainment, institutional, industrial and residential that is both responsive to and sustainable within changing market conditions and sustains growth in property values for the future. Objective 2.2 Support appropriate public-private financial partnerships that will help retain and enhance the City’s economic base. Objective 2.3 Ensure the City’s built environment fosters a positive relationship between the taxable value of real property and the corresponding cost of municipal services. Goal 3: Mobility Develop an innovative mobility system that provides for the safe, convenient, efficient movement of people and goods, reduces traffic congestion, promotes energy Vision, Goals & Objectives 3 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX and transportation efficiency and promotes expanded opportunities for citizens to meet some routine needs by walking or bicycling. Objective 3.1 Provide a safe and efficient streets and pathways network that allows travel to shopping areas, schools, parks and places of employment, reducing the need to travel on the City’s major arterials (FM 1709, FM 1938, or SH 114) and minimizes cut-through traffic in residential neighborhoods. Objective 3.2 Implement and promote a mobility system that addresses safety, design, comfort and aesthetic elements such as landscaping, crosswalks, railing, lighting, traffic-calming and signage in order to provide distinct character and functionality for the City. Objective 3.3 In accordance with a need identified by the Citizen Survey, provide and promote a continuous pedestrian pathways system that is user- friendly, efficient, safe, economical, and connect parks, shopping, schools, work and residential areas. Objective 3.4 Pursue opportunities to link Southlake’s pathways to systems in adjacent cities and trails on the Corps of Engineers property. Objective 3.5 Develop a program to encourage the dedication of easements for pathway construction in accordance with the sidewalk priority plan and Capital Improvements Plan. Objective 3.56 Identify and prioritize the funding and construction of mobility system capital improvements projects according to the impacts on safety, system efficiency, costs, and maintaining acceptable improving levels of service for roadways.. Objective 3.67 Increase safe bicycle mobility when reasonably possible. Objective 3.78 Continue to promote a strong working relationship with the Texas Department of Transportation to identify, design and implement projects that prevent or relieve congestion in the area. Objective 3.89 Continue to evaluate and improve upon the existing mobility system within the City, maintaining existing infrastructure, making required improvements and evaluating innovative ways to integrate transportation and land use. Objective 3.910 Obtain adequate right-of-way for future roadway corridors and improvements. Goal 4: Parks, Recreation and Open Space Vision, Goals & Objectives 4 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX Support a comprehensive integrated parks, recreation and open space system for all ages that creates value and preserves natural assets of the City. Objective 4.1 Ensure that new development incorporates usable open space. Objective 4.2 Ensure that parkland and open spaces include an integrated mix of developed and natural areas with consideration of protecting the City’s ecosystem and wildlife corridors. Objective 4.3 Promote water conservation and reuse in the design of parks and open spaces. Objective 4.4 Utilize partnerships to create open space and recreation facilities. Objective 4.5 Ensure an even geographic distribution of park facilities and recreation activities—both active and passive—for citizens of all ages. Objective 4.6 Provide a full range of park facilities and linear linkages that will accommodate the current and future needs of the City’s residents and visitors. Objective 4.7 Integrate passive recreational opportunities into preserved natural and drainage areas. Objective 4.8 Incorporate feedback received from the Parks and Recreation Citizen Survey into recreation activities and park facilities. Objective 4.9 Acknowledge the City’s rich natural history, heritage and historical landmarks. Objective 4.10 Determine parkland desirable for dedication as part of the development process based on classification, location and maintenance cost. Objective 4.11 Prioritize investments in existing and established parks understanding that there will be strategic opportunities for land acquisition. Objective 4.12 Incorporate educational and learning opportunities within parks and related facilities. Objective 4.13 Pursue recreational and educational opportunities on Corps of Engineers property compatible with the goal of protecting and preserving the existing ecosystem for future generations. Goal 5: Public Safety Vision, Goals & Objectives 5 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX Establish and maintain protective measures and policies that reduce danger, risk or injury to property and individuals who live, work or visit the City. Objective 5.1 Maintain a level of police, fire and ambulance services commensurate with population and business needs. Objective 5.2 Provide effective and efficient professional public safety services in partnership with the citizens we serve, encouraging mutual respect and innovative problem-solving, thereby improving the quality of life in our community. Objective 5.3 Ensure compliance with the stated standard of response coverage and industry guidelines through the provision of facilities, equipment, personnel and roadways. Objective 5.4 Ensure that all buildings and public facilities are constructed in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local safety regulations and standards. Objective 5.5 Maintain the continued compliance with national standard of excellence through the accreditation process. Objective 5.6 Enhance and promote public safety through public-private partnerships and utilization and training of volunteers. Objective 5.7 Maintain a high level of community readiness through training and communications among neighborhood and volunteer groups and city, county, state, and federal entities. Objective 5.8 Develop and implement safety education programs that enhance the quality of life and safety in the community. Objective 5.9 Promote security of public buildings and infrastructure. Objective 5.10 Ensure safe and healthy working conditions for city staff, volunteers and officials by providing security, facility, vehicular and equipment maintenance, information, education and training. Goal 6: Economic Development Create a diversified, vibrant and sustainable economy through the attraction and support of business enterprises and tourism meeting the vision and standards desired by City leaders. Objective 6.1 Promote the City both nationally and regionally as a great place to live, work, visit, shop and recreate. Vision, Goals & Objectives 6 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX Objective 6.2 Provide necessary, desirable and diverse goods and services for residents of the City. Objective 6.3 Foster an environment that retains and supports existing businesses to ensure the sustainability of our existing tax base. Objective 6.4 Attract desired businesses to ensure economic growth as well as continued employment and services for residents of the City. Objective 6.5 Enhance the quality of life for residents and the sustainability of City business through the promotion of the tourism, convention and hotel industry in the City. Objective 6.6 Develop a clear and understandable incentive policy that accomplishes the business attraction and retention goals of the City and is based on factors such as job creation, investment, quality of business, return on investment and overall value to the community. Objective 6.7 Foster communication between the public and private sectors. Goal 7: Sustainability Encourage the conservation, protection, enhancement and proper management of the natural and built environment. Objective 7.1 Maintain and implement policies to reduce the use of nonrenewable resources, such as energy in the heating, cooling, and operation and maintenance of city facilities. Objective 7.2 Promote public awareness and education on such sustainability issues as public health, energy and water conservation and overall environmental stewardship. Objective 7.3 Promote sustainable public and private development practices and patterns, building design, water-use reduction and waste reduction while maintaining the existing character of the city. Objective 7.4 Protect surface, storm, and groundwater quality from septic discharge, impervious surface runoff, improper waste disposal and other potential contaminant sources. Objective 7.5 Conserve, restore and promote tree and plant cover that is native or adaptive to the City and region while also protecting existing significant vegetation and maintaining the existing character of the City. Vision, Goals & Objectives 7 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX Objective 7.6 Protect and enhance air quality in coordination with federal, regional and local agencies. Objective 7.7 Recognize the importance of and protect the biological diversity for the ecological and aesthetic benefits to the community. Objective 7.8 Define, protect, and celebrate the local Cross Timbers Ecosystem as a community asset for future generations. Objective 7.9 Assess and minimize the ecological impact of any new trails provided on Corps of Engineers property. Goal 8: Community Facilities Plan and provide quality community facilities and services that effectively meet the service needs of Southlake’s residents and businesses. Objective 8.1 Provide a level of community facilities that meet the needs of both the existing and projected population. Objective 8.2 Encourage cooperation with the school districts in planning for and financing community facilities to encourage the cost-effective provision of resources. Objective 8.3 Systematically evaluate City-owned buildings in terms of their quality of service delivery and prioritize maintenance and renovation accordingly. Objective 8.4 Incorporate new computer and telecommunications technologies into public buildings and designated areas in order to improve time and cost efficiency of service delivery and to meet increasing demands of information access and sharing. Goal 9: Partnerships Fully utilize and coordinate with the City’s many partners to address issues facing the area, provide services and facilities, promote volunteerism, support events and programs and encourage economic growth. Objective 9.1 Partner with other government entities, non-governmental organizations and the North Central Texas Council of Governments to address regional and local issues. Objective 9.2 Continue mutually beneficial partnerships between the City and local school districts to explore the provision of facilities, services, Vision, Goals & Objectives 8 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX technology, and other opportunities through open communication and close coordination. Objective 9.3 Continue active partnerships with non-profit organizations, civic groups and local businesses to create opportunities that benefit the community. Objective 9.4 Partner with local school districts to educate Southlake’s youth in their municipality and seek youth input when planning the future of our community. Goal 10: Infrastructure Through sound management and strategic investment, develop, maintain, improve and operate public infrastructure that promotes health, safety and an enhanced quality of life for all members of the community. Objective 10.1 Ensure equitably-distributed and adequate services and facilities. Objective 10.2 Plan and program land acquisition and the installation of all essential public facilities to reasonably coincide with the need for such facilities. Objective 10.3 Identify and implement programs where costs may be shared by multiple agencies and/or developers. Objective 10.4 Provide for adequate public water and sewer services in appropriate areas of the City. Objective 10.5 Provide and maintain an effective stormwater management system throughout the City. Objective 10.6 Maintain and enhance existing infrastructure and levels of service through the provision of timely maintenance, repair and replacement as needed. Objective 10.7 Provide and maintain effective solid waste collection and recycling programs for residents. Objective 10.8 Provide a streetlight system for adequate illumination and a wayfinding signage system for pedestrian and driver safety where appropriate. Goal 11: Tourism Vision, Goals & Objectives 9 Adopted: XXXXXXXXXX Enhance the quality of life for residents and the sustainability of City businesses through the use and promotion of the tourism, convention and hotel industry as a tool for the local economy in the City. Objective 11.1 Promote a destination image for the City and continuously evolve it to adapt to changing economic conditions. Objective 11.2 Support programs enriching experiences for residents and visitors. Objective 11.3 Increase awareness and utilization of the hotel accommodations and meeting facilities in the City. Objective 11.4 Promote and implement programs that increase the patronage of businesses in the City. Objective 11.5 Support events held in the City that promote the City’s tourism goal and objectives. Objective 11.6 Support partnerships with other businesses and organizations that are mutually beneficial. Goal 12: Community Engagement Promote and prioritize initiatives that involve and empower residents and businesses to collaborate with the City of Southlake in achieving community objectives Objective 12.1 Use technology to engage the community on topics of interest that informs and facilitates the exchange of information. Objective 12.2 Provide opportunities for the community’s youth to advise and participate in policy and decision making, while investing in future generations. Objective 12.3 Implement effective engagement strategies, such as Town Hall Forums, that solicit input from the community. Objective 12.4 Engage with community groups to identify opportunities to enhance transparency and encourage participation in local government. M E M O R A N D U M May 12, 2017 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Ken Baker, AICP – Sr. Director of Planning & Development Services Subject: Southlake 2035 Plan Proposed Vision, Goals and Objectives Action Requested: Discuss and recommend approval for the proposed Vision, Goals and Objectives of the Southlake 2035 Plan. Background Information: The vision, goals and objectives developed as part of the Southlake 2035 Comprehensive Plan define the values of the community and set both the framework and the tone for the rest of the plan elements. The proposed vision, goals and objectives were developed using the Southlake 2030 Plan Vision, Goals and Objectives as a foundation. Goals and objectives were added and modified to reflect changes in the community over the last eight years and to address new plan elements that are included in the scope of the Southlake 203 5 Plan. Additions are indicated in the attached document with red text. Deletions are indicated with a strikethrough. Financial Considerations: None. Strategic Link: The Vision, Goals and Objectives relate to all focus areas of the strategy map. Citizen Input/ Board Review: All meetings of the Corridor Planning Committee are open to the public. The Committee reviewed the proposed updates at its meeting on January 10, 2017. In addition, a SPIN citywide meeting was held on May 9, 2017 (see the SPIN report in Attachment A). A public hearing is scheduled for this item at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting on May 18, 2017. A public hearing will also be scheduled at a City Council meeting pending Planning & Zoning Commission approval. Legal Review: None. Alternatives: Recommend modifications to the proposed vision, goals and objectives or move forward with the vision, goals and objectives as presented. 2 Attachments: (A) SPIN Meeting Report (B) Southlake 2030 Plan Vision, Goals and Objectives (C) Ordinance No. 1173 SPIN MEETING REPORT SPIN Item Number: SPIN2017-13 Project Name: Southlake 2035 Vision, Goals, and Objectives SPIN Neighborhoods: City-Wide Meeting Date: May 9, 2017 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: Six (6) Host: Sherry Berman, Community Engagement Committee Applicant Presenting: David Jones, AICP, City of Southlake Principal Planner City Staff Present: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner; David Jones, Principal Planner and Om Chhetri, Civil Engineer Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.com and clicking on “I Want to” and “View” “Video on Demand” – forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY: The vision, goals and objectives developed as part of the Southlake 2035 Comprehensive Plan define the values of the community and set both the framework and the tone for the rest of the plan elements. The proposed vision, goals and objectives were developed using the Southlake 2030 Plan Vision, Goals and Objectives as a foundation. Goals and objectives were added and modified to reflect changes in the community over the last eight years and to address new plan elements that are included in the scope of the Southlake 2035 Plan. Exhibits presented at SPIN: RECOMMENDED CHANGES: QUESTIONS/CONCERNS: There were no questions or concerns raised. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Call Summary Report: M E M O R A N D U M May 12, 2017 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Ken Baker, AICP – Director of Planning & Development Services Subject: Ordinance 1171: Southlake 2035 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan Action Requested: Discuss and recommend approval of the proposed Southlake 2035 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan. Background Information: The City of Southlake approaches land use planning through sector planning, a method which divides the City into sectors to identify development issues and to develop recommendations for each individual area. This approach recognizes that planning issues are numerous and complex, and may vary from area to area or even site to site. In short, the purpose of a sector plan is to:  Establish a detailed background for the planning area,  Identify current development constraints and issues,  Identify features, resources and areas to be protected or improved,  Explore development opportunities and  List recommendations for the future development and conservation of the area. The 114 Corridor Plan is the first of six sector plans being considered during the Southlake 2035 Land Use Plan update. Financial Considerations: None. Strategic Link: The S.H. 114 Corridor Plan relates to all focus areas of the strategy map. Citizen Input/ Board Review: Development of the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan was overseen by the Corridor Planning Committee. All Committee meetings are open to the public. The committee met on January 10th, February 15th, March 22nd, and April 19th of 2017 to discuss the S.H. 114 Corridor. In addition, a SPIN meeting was held on May 9, 2017 (see the SPIN report in Attachment A). A public hearing is scheduled for this item at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting on May 18, 2017. A public hearing will also be scheduled at a City Council meeting pending Planning & Zoning Commission approval. Planning & Zoning Commission: The meeting is scheduled for May 18, 2017. Legal Review: None. Alternatives: Recommend modifications to the proposed S.H. 114 Corridor Plan or move forward with the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan as presented. Attachments: (A) SPIN Meeting Report (B) Southlake 2035 Draft S.H. 114 Corridor Plan (C) Proposed Future Land Use Map (D) Proposed Optional Land Use Map ORDINANCE NO. 1171 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE S.H. 114 CORRIDOR PLAN AS AN ELEMENT OF THE SOUTHLAKE 2035 PLAN, THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE. WHEREAS, a Home Rule Charter of the City of Southlake, Texas, was approved by the voters in a duly called Charter election on April 4, 1987; and, WHEREAS, the Home Rule Charter, Chapter XI requires an update to the City’s comprehensive plan elements every four years, WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan is an element of the Southlake 2035 Plan, the City’s Comprehensive Master Plan, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan complies with the Southlake 2035 Vision, Goals, & Objectives, WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan provides the guiding principles for all the elements of the Comprehensive Plan, including the Land Use and Master Thoroughfare Plans, for the S.H. 114 Corridor, WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed that the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan has been formulated with adequate public input, WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed that the recommendations in the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan herein reflect the community’s desires for the future development of the S.H. 114 Corridor, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. All of the findings in the preamble are found to be true and correct and the City Council hereby incorporates said findings into the body of this ordinance as if copied in its entirety. Section 2. The statements in ‘Exhibit 1’ are hereby adopted as the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan of the Southlake 2035 Plan. Section 3. The different elements of the Comprehensive Master Plan, as adopted and amended by the City Council from time to time, shall be kept on file in the office of the City Secretary of the City of Southlake, along with a copy of the ordinance and minute order of the Council so adopting or approving the same. Any existing element of the Comprehensive Master Plan which has been heretofore adopted by the City Council shall remain in full force until amended by the City Council as provided herein. Section 4. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 conflict with the provisions of such ordinances, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances are hereby repealed. Section 5. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. Section 6. The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to post the proposed ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. Section 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the 6th day of June, 2017. __________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: __________________________ CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the 20th day of June, 2017. _________________________ MAYOR ATTEST: __________________________ CITY SECRETARY DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: _________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY DATE:___________________________ ADOPTED:_______________________ EFFECTIVE: ______________________ DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan Ordinance No. 1171 Adopted by City Council on xxxx, 2017 DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page i Abstract The S.H. 114 Corridor Plan is the first of six sector plans adopted during the Southlake 2035 process. The plan encompasses approximately 1,878 acres that are adjacent to S.H. 114. The most prominent land uses include commercial activities and residential uses; although a significant portion of the plan area is classified as vacant or underdeveloped. As such, the primary objectives for planning in the S.H. 114 corridor are maintaining high development and urban design standards, buffering residential uses from the roadway corridor and commercial uses, and ensuring continued quality growth. The Plan further addresses the unique characteristics and challenges of the S.H. 114 corridor and provides specific planning recommendations in regard to land use, mobility, environmental resources, as well as parks, recreation and open space. Sector Planning and Land Use Planning Introduction The City of Southlake’s Land Use Plan serves as the community’s vision for future development by allocating the appropriate location, concentration and intensity of future development by land use categories. The plan serves as a guide to all decision making as it pertains to the City’s future development. The City of Southlake approaches land use planning through sector planning, a method which divides the City into sectors to identify development issues and to develop recommendations for each individual area. This approach recognizes that planning issues are numerous and complex, and may vary from area to area or even site to site. In short, the purpose of a sector plan is to:  Establish a detailed background for the planning area,  Identify current development constraints and issues,  Identify features, resources and areas to be protected or improved,  Explore development opportunities and  List recommendations for the future development and conservation of the area. Sector planning was first implemented in Southlake during the development of the Southlake 2025 Plan in 2004. For the Southlake 2030 Plan, eight sector plans were created: DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page ii MAP 1: SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLANNING SECTORS This strategy is continued in the Southlake 2035 Plan with four sector plans (West, North, Central, Southeast) and two corridor plans. The 1709 corridor and 1938 corridor will be combined into one plan called the F.M. 1709 and F.M. 1938 Corridor Plan (also known as the F.M. Corridor Plan). Due to its visibility, as well as its unique challenges and opportunities, the 114 Corridor will continue to be evaluated as a distinct planning area from the other sectors. Although recommendations may vary from area to area, all sector plans are intended to work together to support a desired direction for growth as outlined in the adopted Vision, Goals and Objectives of the Southlake 2035 Plan (Ordinance No. xxxx). As such, the land use recommendations from the sector plans are consolidated to create one cohesive document for the City as a whole and the result is the City’s Land Use Plan. Recommendations developed in the sector plans will also be incorporated into other plan elements, such as the Master Thoroughfare Plan and Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan, as appropriate. In addition, the sector plans will be utilized in setting priorities in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) planning process, updating current development ordinances and creating new planning related ordinances or programs as needed. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page iii Relationship to Southlake’s Strategic Management System Strategic planning is an ongoing process where resources, critical concerns, community priorities and citizen needs are combined to produce both a plan for the future and a measure for results. More specifically, Southlake’s Strategic Management System links the city’s day-to-day activities to a comprehensive long term strategy for public policy and management decisions. The Strategic Management System identifies Strategic Focus Areas and Objectives to guide effective and efficient resource allocation and provides benchmarks to assess performance. The Strategic Focus Areas and Objectives are driven by the City’s Citizen Survey and are outlined in the City’s Strategy Map (please see Appendix B). The Strategic Management System guided the development of the Southlake 2035 Plan Vision, Goals and Objectives (VGO), which define a desired direction for growth for the City. As such, all recommendations in the Southlake 2035 Plan are tied to at least one Strategic Focus Area from the Strategic Management System and at least one Objective from the Adopted Vision, Goals and Objectives. Relationship to Vision North Texas Vision North Texas is a public, private, non-profit and academic partnership headed by the North Central Texas Council of Governments, the Urban Land Institute, and the University of Texas at Arlington. The partnership was created to serve as a forum for discussion, research, and action on issues related to the growth and development of North Central Texas. In addition, the partnership strives to increase public awareness about important regional land use issues and to build support for initiatives that create a successful and sustainable future for North Texas. Over the last few years, Vision North Texas has invited stakeholders from across the region to participate in a series of workshops to develop a vision for the region’s future as well as an action plan DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page iv to achieve that vision. The result of these workshops is North Texas 2050, which describes the preferred future envisioned by Vision North Texas participants. The document also provides guiding principles to help decision-makers achieve the regional vision. The City of Southlake recognizes the importance of the regional vision and has worked to align the Southlake 2035 Plan with North Texas 2050. All Southlake 2035 recommendations are linked to at least one of the guiding principles (please see Appendix C). Additional information on North Texas 2050 and Vision North Texas is available at www.visionnorthtexas.org. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page v Table of Contents Abstract i Land Use Planning and Sector Planning Introduction i Relationship to Southlake’s Strategic Management System iii Relationship to Vision North Texas iii 1.0 Introduction to the S.H. 114 Corridor 1 1.1 Character of the Corridor 2 1.2 Preliminary Analysis 2 1.2.1 Existing Land Use Distribution 3 1.2.2 Existing Zoning 4 1.2.3 Recent Development Changes 5 2.0 Planning Challenges and Issues 7 3.0 Land Use Recommendations 8 3.1 Existing Land Use Categories and Definitions 8 3.2 Optional Land Use Categories and Map 22 3.3 Recommendations 29 4.0 Mobility Recommendations 40 4.1 Corridor Roadways 41 4.2 Corridor Pathways 45 4.3 Recommendations 47 5.0 Environmental Resource Recommendations 53 5.1 Recommendations 55 6.0 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Recommendations 58 Appendix A: Adopted Southlake 2035 Plan Vision, Goals and Objectives Appendix B: City of Southlake Strategy Map Appendix C: Vision North Texas Guiding Principles DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 1 1.0 Introduction to the S.H. 114 Corridor The S.H. 114 Corridor generally includes all properties adjacent to S.H. 114 from the western city limit to the eastern city limit. The S.H. 114 Corridor includes some of the City’s larger developments including Southlake Town Square, Gateway Plaza, the campuses of Sabre and TD Ameritrade and the master planned development of Carillon. This plan is focusing on the entire length of S.H. 114 that crosses the city from the northwest to the southeast but also includes Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709) from North Carroll Avenue to the eastern City limit. The western portion of Southlake Boulevard (F.M. 1709), west of North Carroll Avenue, is not included in the S.H. 114 Corridor because it is within the boundaries of the F.M. 1709 Corridor Plan and is addressed therein. The boundaries of the plan area are shown in the following map. MAP 2: S.H. 114 CORRIDOR BOUNDARIES DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 2 1.1 Character of the Corridor The S.H. 114 Corridor is generally characterized by office, retail, medical and residential uses along with some larger tracts of vacant land. Office and Medical uses are generally found along the frontage road of S.H. 114 and most of the retail is located between S.H. 114 and Southlake Boulevard. The largest concentration of retail and restaurant uses is found at Southlake Town Square, The Shops at Southlake, Village Center and Gateway Plaza. More recent developments in the corridor that are built or under way for construction along the corridor include TD Ameritrade, Kimball Park, and the Granite Office Building. Granite Office Building TD Ameritrade Kimball Park 1.2 Preliminary Analysis To fully understand the development issues facing S.H. 114 corridor, an analysis of existing conditions is critical. The following section offers an assessment of the existing land uses and zoning as well as a description of recent development changes in the corridors. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 3 1.2.1 Existing Land Use Distribution An evaluation of existing land use in the S.H. 114 corridor shows that approximately 35.0% is classified as “Vacant”, which is down from 47% in 2012. Significant properties with this classification are the “NR- PUD” Non-Residential Planned Unit Development, “ECZ” Employment Center zoning and “AG” Agriculture zoning districts. With the development of TD Ameritrade on approximately 80 acres near the Sabre campus, the most significant pieces of undeveloped land along the corridor are the 125 acre Milner tract west of N. Carroll Ave., the 55 acre and 40 acre tracts near the intersection of Dove Rd. and White Chapel Blvd., and the approximately 50 acres of land remaining in Carillon. Other significant tracts are the former flea market at the southeast corner of S.H. 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd. and the 21 acre tract at the corner of S.H. 114 and Blessed Way. “Household Activities” and “Unbuilt Residential” comprises the next most common land use category with 16.2% of the land area or 304.7 acres. “Shopping and Dining” comprise approximately 275.4 acres, or 14.7% of the land area in the corridor. “Social, Cultural or Religious” land use consists of approximately 79 acres or 4.5% of the total land area in the sector, although this is down about 50% from the Southlake 2030 analysis due to Gateway Church selling portions of its property for development. Medical and Healthcare also comprises a growing portion of the 114 Corridor with 2.9% of the land area or 55.2 acres. This growth is due largely to the development of the Methodist Southlake Health Center but also due to growing demand for and construction of medical office space along the corridor and within the city. TABLE 1: S.H. 114 EXISTING LAND USES *Exclusive of public right-of-ways The map below illustrates existing conditions of the corridors. The classifications indicated on the map are based on the Land Based Classification Standards (LBCS) model developed by the American Planning Association. This model extends the notion of classifying land uses by refining traditional categories into multiple dimensions, such as activities, functions, building types, site development character, and ownership constraints. Each dimension has its own set of categories and subcategories. These multiple dimensions allow users to have precise control over land-use classifications. Existing Land Use Acres* Percentage Vacant / Developable 657.0 35.0% Residential 304.7 16.2% Shopping/Dining 275.4 14.7% Parks, Recreation & Open Space 84.3 4.5% Public / Civic / Religious 79.0 4.2% Medical and Healthcare 55.2 2.9% DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 4 MAP 3: S.H. 114 CORRIDOR EXISTING LAND USES 1.2.2 Existing Zoning The existing zoning in the S.H. 114 Corridor is primarily a mix of Site Plan District (S-P-1 and S-P-2), General Commercial District (C-3), Downtown District (DT), Non-Residential Planned Unit Development District (NR-PUD) and Employment Center Zoning District (ECZ) designations. There is also a large portion of land area with the Agricultural Zoning District (AG) and limited Single-Family Residential and Two Family Residential Zoning District designations (SF-1A, SF-2, SF-20A, SF-20B, SF-30, MF1). DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 5 MAP 4: S.H. 114 CORRIDOR ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS 1.2.3 Recent Development Changes Since the adoption of the Southlake 2030 Plan, there have been several new developments in the S.H. 114 Corridor. The development includes residential, office, retail, restaurant and civic park as shown in the following map: DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 6 MAP 5: RECENT (5 YEAR) DEVELOPMENT SINCE SOUTHLAKE 2030 ADOPTION 4 9 DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 7 2.0 Planning Challenges and Issues Along with the adopted Vision, Goals and Objectives of the Southlake 2035 Plan, these challenges and issues serve as the basis for many of the recommendations outlined in the following chapters. Development along the S.H. 114 Corridor According to traffic counts conducted by the City in 2015, an average of 58,202 vehicles traverse the 114 corridor each day. With the City’s proximity to both DFW Airport and Alliance Airport in Ft. Worth and the overall health of the northeast Tarrant County market, the vacant land along S.H. 114 has become extremely desirable for development. Providing a diverse and attractive range of land uses along the corridor will be necessary to attract the type of development the City would like to see along the corridor. Since much of this land consists of large tracts, there are opportunities to master plan many of these areas to ensure good vehicle/pedestrian connectivity, land use mixes and public services. In addition, as development occurs, this will provide for opportunities to implement the City’s Urban Design Plan. S.H. 114 also presents visual opportunities and challenges. It is the public face and dominant impression of the community for thousands of freeway commuters and travelers daily. The City’s 2008 Urban Design Plan set a number of goals for the Corridor, many of which have been achieved with the quality design of bridge structures and landscaping improvements. This plan and the 2035 Urban Design Plan seek to build upon these improvements and set new goals for design and aesthetics in both the public and private realms. The growing corporate corridor along W. Kirkwood also holds great potential for creation of a cohesive urban design theme directly off of S.H. 114. The critical challenge along the S.H. 114 corridor is to establish private development standards that can create a sense of place along this highway corridor. Essentially, the scale and character of any future development along the highway corridor will be able to better define the corridor due to the expanse of the highway right-of-way. Pedestrian Mobility and Safety As with any highway, pedestrian mobility and safety will be a challenge on a high volume roadway such as S.H. 114. The implementation of strategies to reduce cut-through traffic will also help protect residential neighborhoods and enhance pedestrian safety around schools, churches, community centers and parks. Of particular concern are the safety hazards posed by vehicles to school-aged children and other residents during the peak drop-off and pick-up hours. The City will continue to work with local school districts to identify safe routes to all schools, establish safe drop-off and pick-up zones and encourage walking or bicycling as safe alternatives to driving children to school. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 8 3.0 Land Use Recommendations In the context of comprehensive planning, “land use” typically refers to future land use designations as shown on the Future Land Use Map. The Future Land Use Map illustrates the desired location and distribution of land uses throughout the City, as opposed to the Existing Land Use Map (discussed in Section 1.2.1) which shows how land is currently being utilized. As such, the Future Land Use Map is an important visual tool used by city decision-makers, city staff, developers, and citizens to understand the community’s desired development pattern. RELATIONSHIP TO ZONING A comprehensive plan and its land use plan component are policy instruments; therefore, they are advisory and general in nature. Zoning, in the form of a zoning ordinance, is the primary mechanism used by a municipality to implement its land use plan portion of the comprehensive plan. Texas Local Government Code, Section 211.004, Compliance with Comprehensive Plan, differentiates zoning ordinances from land use (or comprehensive) plans. The generally accepted interpretation of Section 211.004 is that an adopted land use plan (or comprehensive plan) forms a legal basis for zoning and, therefore, zoning should be in accordance with the land use plan. The zoning ordinance interprets the general pattern and categories of land uses in the land use plan into districts of permissible activities within specific district boundaries. LAND USE CATEGORIES AND DEFINITIONS The following sections describe the twelve underlying land use categories. Additional information such as the recommended land use mix, scale and context criteria, and overall character and design characteristics are provided for land use categories that include a mix of uses and require further clarification. FLOODPLAIN Purpose and Definition: The Floodplain category illustrates areas designated by the August 1995 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps as being in the 100-year floodplain. The “floodplain” is an expanse of natural vegetation and wildlife, and should be preserved as natural open area. Within the floodplain is “floodway” that must be kept free of encroachment in order that the 100-year flood may be carried without harmful increases in the height of flood waters. Although it is not to be encouraged, the portion of the floodplain not in the floodway may be reclaimed for development under certain circumstances if in accordance with FEMA regulations. The designated land use for areas of reclaimed DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 9 floodplain is that of the immediately adjacent land use category. This designation may also include environmentally sensitive areas, habitats, or wetlands that may not be in FEMA identified floodplains. CORPS OF ENGINEERS Purpose and Definition: The Corps of Engineers category includes all property adjacent to Grapevine Lake owned by the federal government and managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). The primary purpose of this property is the temporary reservoir storage of flood waters. Within the COE ownership (and, in some instances, on adjacent private land), there is a regulatory flowage easement at an elevation of 572 feet above sea level. Through lease agreements with the COE, property within the Corps of Engineers category may be utilized as parks, recreation, and open space. Ancillary commercial and retail activities associated with these uses are permitted, but no habitable structures may be developed within the flowage easement. PUBLIC PARKS / OPEN SPACE Purpose and Definition: Public Parks/Open Space are public areas designated for active and passive recreation, such as parks and athletic complexes, and public open space for the preservation of the scenic vistas and natural vegetation of the City. This Land Use Plan depicts only existing Public Parks/Open Space facilities; potential Public Parks/Open Space sites are illustrated in the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan. PUBLIC / SEMI-PUBLIC Purpose and Definition: Public/Semi-Public areas are suitable for a wide range of public, civic, and religious uses, such as government offices and facilities, public and private schools, churches and related facilities (including parsonage and parochial schools), cemeteries, and Public Parks/Open Space uses in conjunction with these developments. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Purpose: The purpose of the Low Density Residential land use category is to provide for and to protect low intensity detached single-family residential development that promotes the openness and rural character of Southlake. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 10 Definition: The Low Density Residential category is for detached single-family residential development at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. Net density is the number of dwelling units per net acre, which excludes acreage in all public rights-of-way. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi-Public categories described previously. The Low Density Residential category encourages the openness and rural character of the City of Southlake. Land Use Mix*: The percentages below for the land use mix in the Low Density Residential category are intended only to be guidelines, and greater flexibility may be appropriate under site specific conditions. Land Use Percentage of Acreage Flexibility Allowed Single-family Residential 85% ±15% Open space** 10% ±10% Civic use 5% ±5% Total 100% *These percentages are not regulatory and should only be used as a guide. **Park dedication fees may be appropriate in lieu of open space. Small subdivisions (less than 4 lots) may be designed without open space. Scale and Context Criteria: Scale and context criteria describe intensity, location, and compatibility criteria for the mix of land uses proposed. Residential Uses:  Single family detached dwellings at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. Open Space:  Open spaces should be designed to add value to the development and may include parks, playgrounds, greenbelts, ponds and lakes, gardens, and conservation areas.  Provide natural walking paths along stream and creek corridors.  Preserve existing wooded areas and stream corridors when feasible.  Emphasize environmental elements as “features” rather than constraints. Civic Uses: DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 11  Small scale government offices and facilities, schools, churches and related facilities. Overall Character and Design: This land use category is primarily characterized by single family detached dwellings with rural cross-section roadways. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Purpose: The purpose of the Medium Density Residential land use category is to promote a neighborhood setting primarily comprised of single family detached houses. Definition: The Medium Density Residential category is suitable for any single-family detached residential development. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space and Public/Semi-Public categories previously discussed. Land Use Mix*: The percentages below for the land use mix in the Medium Density Residential category are intended only to be guidelines, and greater flexibility may be appropriate under site specific conditions. Land Use Percentage of Acreage Flexibility Allowed Single-family Residential 85% +15% Open space 10% ±10% Civic use 5% ±5% Total 100% *These percentages are not regulatory and should only be used as a guide. Scale and Context Criteria: DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 12 Residential Uses:  Single family detached dwellings. Open Space:  Open spaces should be designed to add value to the development and may include parks, playgrounds, greenbelts, ponds and lakes, gardens, and conservation areas.  Provide natural walking paths along stream and creek corridors.  Preserve existing wooded areas and stream corridors when feasible.  Emphasize environmental elements as “features” rather than constraints. Civic Uses:  Small scale government offices and facilities, schools, churches and related facilities. Overall Character and Design Images: Medium Density Residential Uses OFFICE COMMERCIAL Purpose and Definition: The Office Commercial category is a commercial category designed and intended for the exclusive use of office and limited office-related activities. It is established for and will be allocated to those districts best suited for supporting commercial activity of an office character. It has been established to encourage and permit general professional and business offices of high quality and appearance, in attractive landscaped surroundings with the types of uses and design exterior appearance so controlled as to be generally compatible with existing and future adjacent and surrounding residential development. Properties with this designation may serve as a transition between established residential neighborhoods, major roadways, and retail development. Other DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 13 suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space and Public/Semi-Public categories previously discussed. Land Use Mix*: The percentages below for the land use mix in the Office Commercial category are intended only to be guidelines, and greater flexibility may be appropriate under site specific conditions. Land Use Percentage of Acreage Flexibility Allowed Office 85% ±15% Open space 10% ±10% Civic use 5% ±5% Total 100% *These percentages are not regulatory and should only be used as a guide. Examples: Typical Office Commercial Uses RETAIL COMMERCIAL DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 14 Purpose and Definition: The Retail Commercial category is a lower- to medium-intensity commercial category providing for neighborhood-type retail shopping facilities and general commercial support activities. It is intended to provide limited local retail and/or office uses which serve neighborhoods in close proximity. It is intended that all uses in this category will be compatible with adjacent single family uses, thereby maintaining the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods. This category is intended to encourage comprehensively planned developments. In areas where the Retail Commercial designation is adjacent to residentially zoned properties or areas with a residential designation on the Land Use Plan, lower intensity activities such as office or office-related uses should be planned adjacent to the residential uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, and Office Commercial categories previously discussed. Land Use Mix*: The percentages below for the land use mix in the Retail Commercial category are intended only to be guidelines, and greater flexibility may be appropriate under site specific conditions. Land Use Percentage of Acreage Flexibility Allowed Retail 65% +35% Office 20% ±20% Open space 10% ±10% Civic use 5% ±5% Total 100% *These percentages are not regulatory and should only be used as a guide. REGIONAL RETAIL Purpose: To preserve and promote quality, high-intensity retail centers along the S.H. 114 corridor that provide convenient shopping for Southlake residents and to attract residents of neighboring communities. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 15 Definition: The Regional Retail land use category is a higher-intensity commercial category providing for regional retail shopping facilities that generally draw customers from a very large market area (5 mile radius or greater). Development within this land use may consist of a single large anchor store (> 100,000 sq. ft.) or have multiple anchor tenants (department, supermarket, drug, home improvement, sporting, variety, or specialty) along with pad sites developed on the fringe of the area. Other permitted secondary uses include fast food, restaurants, banks and service stations; however, these uses must be integrated into the larger primary use. Regional Retail designated areas should have direct access to State Highway 114. Also, development within the Regional Retail land use category must adhere to specific design guidelines (see appendix). Land Use Mix*: The percentages below for the land use mix in the Regional Retail category are intended only to be guidelines, and greater flexibility may be appropriate under site specific conditions. Land Use Percentage of Acreage Flexibility Allowed Retail 90% ±10% Office 5% ±5% Open space 5% ±5% Total 100% *These percentages are not regulatory and should only be used as a guide. MIXED USE Purpose: To provide an option for large-scale, master-planned, mixed use developments that combine land uses such as office facilities, shopping, dining, parks, and residential uses. Definition: The range of activities permitted, the diverse natural features, and the varying proximity to thoroughfares of areas in the Mixed Use category necessitates comprehensively planned and coordinated development. New development must be compatible with and not intrusive to existing development. Further, special attention should be placed on the design and transition between different uses. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 16 Typically, the Mixed Use designation is intended for medium- to higher-intensity office buildings, hotels, commercial activities, retail centers, and residential uses. Nuisance-free, wholly enclosed light manufacturing and assembly uses that have no outdoor storage are permitted if designed to be compatible with adjacent uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Retail Commercial, and Office Commercial categories previously discussed. Land Use Mix*: The percentages below for the land use mix in the Mixed Use category are intended only to be guidelines, and greater flexibility may be appropriate under site specific conditions. Land Use Percentage of Acreage Flexibility Allowed Retail 30% ±20% Office 35% ±30% Residential 15% ±15% Open space 15% ±15% Civic use 5% ±5% Total 100% *These percentages are not regulatory and should only be used as a guide. Scale and Context Criteria: General:  Buildings and their pedestrian entrances are to be oriented towards internal streets.  Larger-format retail uses (with footprints larger than 40,000 s.f.) shall be located adjacent to the arterial or highway with pedestrian entrances from internal streets. Retail and Office Uses:  Pedestrian-oriented or automobile-oriented. Hotel Uses: DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 17  Hotel uses should be full-service hotels at market-driven locations, primarily in the S.H. 114 Corridor. Full-service, for the purposes of this plan, shall be hotels that include a table- service restaurant within or directly attached to the hotel. Other services or amenities typically included would be bell service and room service, as well as available meeting space.  The desire is to approve hotels adequate to support market-driven commerce in the City, paying attention to the product mix such that the hospitality services in the area are complementary to one another. Single-family Residential Uses:  Residential uses are to be located between the proposed office or retail uses and existing residential neighborhoods. These uses are intended to provide a lower intensity transition between existing neighborhoods and commercial uses.  Residential uses should be well integrated with proposed open space and other civic uses to create a sense of place.  They should also be integrated with proposed commercial uses in a manner that provides internal automobile and pedestrian access to convenience commercial uses.  Single-family residential uses are recommended to be to the density and scale that is appropriate based on the context and character of the proposed overall development. Open Space:  Consider environmental elements as “features,” rather than constraints.  Emphasis shall be placed on preservation of existing wooded areas and stream corridors.  Avoid channeling or piping of streams.  Streams or creeks should become a focal point rather than the rear of the development.  Provide natural walking paths along stream and creek corridors.  Well designed and integrated open spaces are critical to the creation of successful mixed- use neighborhoods.  Open spaces should be designed to add value to proposed development and not as an “after-thought”. To that end, open spaces should maximize frontage along residential and office uses. Open spaces shall occupy a prominent place in the development of a neighborhood and form the center pieces of a community.  Open spaces are intended to be the “front-yards” and invite passive recreational activities. Open spaces may be in the form of pocket parks, children’s play areas, squares, linear greens, and conservation areas.  Use the topography as an advantage, do not flatten the site.  Preserve views. Civic Uses:  Civic uses such as day-cares, post office, police substation, local government offices, churches, etc. are encouraged. Ideally, civic uses should be located centrally in the development and provide convenient access to all other uses and activities in the development. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 18  Civic uses are to be designed to the scale and context of the neighborhood. Uses are encouraged to be appropriately scaled to the proposed development and generally limited to a maximum of 10,000 square feet of built area. Overall Character and Design:  Buildings are to be designed to be pedestrian friendly.  Buildings shall have shallow setbacks and sidewalks that are a minimum of 10’.  Buildings are to be oriented towards other buildings (across the street) or towards open spaces.  Minimize the impact of surface parking.  Mix up land uses to maximize shared parking. Street Design Standards:  Internal streets to be designed to accommodate both automobiles and pedestrians.  Streets to be designed with curb and gutter.  Interconnected street network.  Regular blocks and streets.  Block widths between 400’ and 600’.  Design speed <25 mph. Representative Images: Residential Uses Neighborhood Scale Retail Integrated Open Space DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 19 Natural Open Space Professional Office Use Civic Use TOWN CENTER Purpose: The purpose of the Town Center land use district is to encourage the creation of a pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use urban environment that serves as Southlake’s downtown and center of community life. Definition: The Town Center land use designation is intended to enhance and promote the development of the community’s downtown. The goal is to create an attractive, pedestrian-oriented environment that becomes the center of community life in Southlake. It may include compatibly designed retail, office, cultural, civic, recreational, hotel and residential uses. All uses shall be developed with a great attention to design detail and will be integrated into one cohesive district or into distinct sub-districts, each with its own unique characteristics. A mix of different uses is encouraged to create a vibrant, lively, and unique environment. Land Use Mix*: The percentages below for the land use mix in the Town Center category are intended only to be guidelines, and greater flexibility may be appropriate under site specific conditions. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 20 Land Use Percentage of Acreage Flexibility Allowed Retail 35% ±25% Office 25% ±10% Residential 15% ±15% Open space 15% +10% Civic use 10% ±5% Total 100% *These percentages are not regulatory and should only be used as a guide. Scale and Context Criteria: Retail Uses:  Pedestrian-oriented retail and service uses. Office Uses:  Pedestrian-oriented office uses. Residential Uses:  Residential uses are to be located between the proposed office or retail uses and existing residential neighborhoods. These uses are intended to provide a lower intensity transition between existing neighborhoods and commercial uses.  Residential uses should be well integrated with proposed open space and other civic uses to create a sense of place.  They should also be integrated with proposed commercial uses in a manner that provides internal automobile and pedestrian access to convenience commercial uses.  Residential uses are recommended to be to the density and scale that is appropriate based on the context and character of the proposed overall development. Open Space:  Consider environmental elements as “features,” rather than constraints.  Emphasis shall be placed on preservation of existing wooded areas and stream corridors.  Avoid channeling or piping of streams.  Streams or creeks should become a focal point rather than the rear of the development. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 21  Provide natural walking paths along stream and creek corridors.  Well designed and integrated open spaces are critical to the creation of successful mixed- use neighborhoods.  Open spaces should be designed to add value to proposed development and not as an “after-thought”. To that end, open spaces should maximize frontage along residential and office uses. Open spaces shall occupy a prominent place in the development of a neighborhood and form the center pieces of a community.  Open spaces are intended to be the “front-yards” and invite passive recreational activities. Open spaces may be in the form of pocket parks, children’s play areas, squares, linear greens, and conservation areas.  Use the topography as an advantage, do not flatten the site.  Preserve views.  Located to add value, to create a sense of place, and to invite passive recreational activities.  Public squares, plazas, and parks integrated with the surrounding development. Civic Uses:  Government offices and facilities, schools, churches and related facilities. Overall Character and Design Images: Retail Uses Integrated Open Space Representative Mixed Uses DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 22 INDUSTRIAL Purpose and Definition: Industrial and business service development that is relatively free of unwanted side effects, such as unsightliness, noise, odor, glare, vibrations, etc., is permitted in the Industrial category. If meeting the qualification of relatively free of unwanted side effects, suitable types of development in the Industrial category can be characterized by the manufacturing, processing, packaging, assembly, storage, warehousing and/or distribution of products. Ancillary commercial and retail activities associated with these uses are permitted. Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi- Public activities as described above may be permitted if surrounding industrial uses do not pose hazards and are sufficiently buffered. OPTIONAL LAND USE CATEGORIES AND DEFINITIONS The following Optional Land Use Categories, or Overlays, were developed using the Southlake 2035 Plan Vision, Goals and Objectives as a guide, as well as the recommendations of the Economic Development Master Plan, which was the first Southlake 2035 element to be adopted. Using market studies commissioned by City Council, the Economic Development Master Plan assessed the areas in which the Southlake marketplace is oversaturated, such as retail, and recommends a focus on target growth industries to build and sustain both the daytime and resident population of Southlake. The target industries, which include corporate offices, information technology, biotechnology, high- value services firms, research and development, restaurants and restaurant clusters, and medical, health and wellness, have been developed as Land Use overlay recommendations for the 114 Corridor. While existing land use designations were largely retained, three new overlay districts were created and applied based on the recommendations of the Southlake 2035 Economic Development Master Plan. CORPORATE OFFICE OVERLAY Purpose and Definition: The Corporate Office Cluster category is a commercial overlay category designed and intended for the use of high-quality, medium to large-scale office buildings or campuses and their ancillary uses and structures. This district is inherently suited for the development of office developments 50,000 square feet or larger for the use of corporate or regional headquarters, professional services firms, financial firms, information technology and media companies, biomedical companies, and other users which drive demand for medium to large-scale office buildings or campuses. Ideally, such developments will be located in areas adjacent to and contiguous with existing users of the same type and scale to create a critical mass of daytime population within the city. These uses will be DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 23 well-connected to the existing highway and arterial street network, with the buildings themselves typically presenting one or more significant façades along the 114 Corridor. The Corporate Office Cluster generally consists of three typologies of office development, Campus Office, Multi-Tenant Office and Multi-Story Office. These definitions are not regulatory and are intended only to be guidelines. Greater flexibility may be appropriate under site specific conditions. CAMPUS OFFICE BUILDINGS Campus Office The Campus Office overlay category is a commercial overlay category designed and intended for the use of high-quality, medium to large-scale office buildings or campuses and their ancillary uses and structures. This district is inherently suited for the development of built-to-suit office developments 100,000 square feet or larger for the use of corporate or regional headquarters, professional services firms, financial firms, information technology and media companies, biomedical companies, and other users which drive demand for medium to large-scale office buildings or campuses. Generally characterized by 2-4 story buildings that have a Floor-to-area ratio (FAR) under 1, with highly integrated green space as a key feature of the design, parking structures or underground parking DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 24 dispersed and/or separated from the main building, horizontally-integrated floor plans, more subdued low-impact building design, and the presence of multiple buildings or building wings if accomplished in an environmentally sensitive manner. Amenities such as walking trails, open space, plazas, water features, special roadway and sidewalk treatments, and unique landscaping should be incorporated into the development. In most cases campus office type development is envisioned to occur near or adjacent to established neighborhoods. While it is understood that developments of this scale and size will change the development characteristics in the area, special attention must be paid to designing the development in a manner that addresses neighborhood adjacency concerns. This may be accomplished by preserving natural buffers or establishing new buffers, installing low-level lighting, locating buildings and parking structures in a manner which will create the least impact, including locating parking structures underground, and designing traffic circulation to disperse traffic or focus it on higher-capacity roads which create the least impact on residential properties. MULTI-TENANT BUILDINGS Multi-Tenant Office Overlay DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 25 The Multi-Tenant Office category is a commercial overlay category designed and intended for the use of high-quality, medium to large-scale office buildings of 2-4 stories that may be build-to-suit or speculative (“spec”) built. These office developments are envisioned to be 50,000 square feet or larger in either a standalone or office park configuration, and are for the use of corporate offices, professional services firms, financial firms, information technology and media companies, biomedical companies, research and development, medical office, and other users which drive demand for medium to large-scale office buildings. These buildings are less prominent than high-rise office with floor layouts that are designed for maximum user flexibility. HIGH RISE BUILDINGS High-Rise Office Generally characterized by 5+ story buildings having a FAR of 1-5, smaller floor plates, below-ground or concentrated parking areas or structures integrated with the building, highly visible or iconic building design features, and more concentrated or delineated open spaces. Greater building heights may be considered if open space and tree preservation are increased on the site and signature design features or amenities are provided. Some ancillary retail may be allowed in this district if it is intended to support or be supported by the primary office users. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 26 Land Use Percentage of Acreage Flexibility Allowed Office (including parking) 75% ±25% Supporting Retail 5% ±5% Open Space 20% ±20% Total 100% MEDICAL AND WELLNESS DISTRICT OVERLAY The Medical Cluster category is an overlay category designed and intended for the concentration of local to regional healthcare and related facilities, including Medical/Wellness, specialty surgical centers, pediatric care, geriatric care of an outpatient nature, research and development facilities including those operated in partnership with a hospital, university, or other similar institutions, and health, beauty and wellness clinics and facilities. Retail and office should be strictly limited to uses which support the primary medical facilities. By its nature, the Medical Cluster is intended to foster collaboration and multiplication of benefits by locating medical services and disciplines in close proximity to each other, thereby benefitting both the institutions and the patients they serve. The Medical Cluster is envisioned to provide the greatest benefits when used in close proximity to existing medical facilities such as those clustered around the 114 Corridor between N. Carroll Avenue and N. White Chapel Avenue. Land Use Percentage of Acreage Flexibility Allowed Medical, Health and Wellness 75% ±25% Supporting Office 5% ±5% Supporting Retail 5% ±5% Open Space (plazas & squares) 15% ±15% Total 100% RESTAURANT AND SPECIALTY RETAIL OVERLAY The Restaurant and Culinary Cluster category is a commercial overlay category designed and intended for the concentration of unique dining options not otherwise found in Southlake’s established retail and restaurant centers. The purpose of this category is to foster the development of a dynamic, destination restaurant district. This district should feature mostly independent, local restaurants offering diverse and healthy cuisine in a sit-down format, which may also include aspects of culinary tourism or DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 27 educational components up to and including schools offering training in culinary arts. The cluster may provide for incubation of new businesses and concepts which might otherwise struggle to operate in more traditional retail commercial spaces. Physical aspects of this district may include proximity to Community Services uses, proximity to niche retail, frontage onto shared space for dining or gathering rather than streets, and shared parking. In areas of the district which are located east of N. Carroll Ave., up to 30% of the land area may be suitable for retail operations that are boutique or specialized in character, such as specialty grocers or home goods stores. Boutique hotels may also be considered, particularly if they can be integrated into and serve areas hosting a concentration of tourists or visitors, such as a restaurant cluster or medical cluster. Land Use Percentage of Acreage Flexibility Allowed Restaurant/Dining 65% ±25% Specialty Retail (including boutique hotel) 10% ±10% Open Space or shared use areas 15% ±15% Civic 10% ±10% Total 100% DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 28 MAP 6A The following map highlights the areas with a recommended land use designation change or site specific recommendation. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 29 MAP 6B The land use recommendations are outlined in the following table. The numbers in the first column of the table are references to the numbers in the preceding two maps. The second column provides a brief description of the issues specific to the site and the third column provides recommendations to address the issues. The implementation metric in the fourth column is a quantifiable goal with a specified deadline for achievement. The “Strategic Link” and “VGO Tie” relate the issues, recommendations and implementation metrics to Strategic Focus Areas from the City’s Strategy Map and to specific objectives from the adopted Southlake 2035 Vision, Goals and Objectives. The “VNT Link” column relates the issues and recommendations to the guiding principles of the Vision North Texas document, North Texas 2050. The final column provides the abbreviation for the department(s) that will take the lead on the implementation of the recommendations. This format is followed for all the recommendation tables in this plan. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 30 TABLE 3: S.H. 114 CORRIDOR PLAN LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS Ref. No. Issue Recommendation Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO VNT Link Responsible LU1 Fidelis and Shivers tracts  Land Use designation is Mixed Use.  Zoning is S-P-2 with O- 1, O-2, HC, C-1, C-2, C- 3, and B-1 uses on Fidelis tract and  Land is currently vacant and numerous attempts at site plan approval have been unsuccessful  Eastern portion of the property lies adjacent to established single- family residential neighborhoods  Planned extension of Kirkwood Boulevard run through these tracts  Access onto White Chapel should be limited Retain Mixed Use and add Campus Office Overlay SITE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION:  Campus office is recommended on both properties with a corner enhancement at 114 and W. Dove Rd and integration to Carillon to the east  For areas immediately along the planned Kirkwood Blvd. extension, low-impact development such as residential with a similar design and pattern to the existing neighborhoods across White Chapel may be considered as a transition to neighboring single-family residential properties.  Low-scale or garden office component may also be considered if development is planned in a comprehensive manner which maximizes tree preservation. Buffer any residential uses from non- residential uses on this property.  Traffic signals at major street intersections should be anticipated and addressed with development. Development should be sensitive to the existing tree cover and attempts should be made during the planning process to maximize tree cover along with natural features and topography. Family history of Shivers tract should be preserved or recognized through use of open space.  Drive access to Kirkwood Blvd. should be encouraged with limited drive access onto White Chapel. Amend Land Use Map in FY 2018 to add Campus Office Overlay and Culinary- Specialty Retail Overlay CBO3 Quality Development, B1 1.3, 1.4, 1.8 Development Diversity, Efficient Growth, Quality Places PDS DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 31 Ref. No. Issue Recommendation Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO VNT Link Responsible LU2 Carillon  Land Use designation is Mixed Use  Zoning is ECZ  Undeveloped commercial areas along S.H. 114 frontage or near hard corner of S.H. 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd.  Current Master Plan contains a high concentration of retail and a recommendation for a performance arts facility which the City has determined is economically unfeasible to build and operate. Retain Mixed Use designation and add Office, Medical and Wellness, and Culinary – Specialty Retail Overlays. SITE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION:  In the non-residential portion of Carillon immediately east of White Chapel between S.H. 114 and Kirkwood, develop a unique “customer experience” and “sense of place” that is pedestrian rather than automobile focused. Desired uses are chef-driven restaurant cluster, incubator, and possibly a culinary school component, along with specialty retail and health and wellness uses consistent with target industries as identified in the Economic Development Master Plan.  Design process for the non-residential portion of Carillon should focus on preserving natural tree stands and utilizing existing trees to create inviting open spaces. Restaurant cluster is envisioned with common use outdoor eating and gathering space utilizing natural and manmade features. In all overlays, a central park or greenspace may include public facilities not already discussed which offer a variety of cultural experiences.  Provide a combination of structured and surface parking. Surface parking should be dispersed into lots of minimal size which are adequately screened from adjacent rights of way and residential areas. Amend Land Use Map in FY 2018 to add Office, Medical and Wellness, and Culinary – Specialty Retail Overlays. CBO3 Quality Development, B1 1.7, 1.8, 2.1 Efficient Growth, Activity Centers, Quality Places, Healthy Communities PDS DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 32 Ref. No. Issue Recommendation Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO VNT Link Responsible LU3 3 acres property north of Countryside Bible Church and Chapel Crossing along S.H. 114.  City-owned property  This property is part of a larger area of nearly contiguous tree coverage along S.H. 114 between Kirkwood Blvd. and White Chapel Blvd. Encourage preservation of trees along S.H. 114 frontage to preserve continual tree-line along both sides of the corridor and provide a “city in a forest” aesthetic on the western side of the city. SITE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION: Maintain this land as passive permanent open space and encourage development of adjacent properties in such a manner that a contiguous natural tree line is maintained between S.H. 114 and developed sites when practical. As properties in this area develop, prioritize the contiguous preservation of trees along the S.H. 114 corridor CBO3 Quality Development, B1 1.1, 1.8, 1.9, 7.5, 7.8 Environmental Stewardship, Quality Places PDS LU4 SE corner of S.H. 114 and N. White Chapel Blvd.  Land Use designation is Mixed Use  Zoning is S-P-2 Retain Mixed Use designation and add Medical and Wellness and Office Overlays. SITE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION: Medical, health and wellness uses encouraged in accordance with Economic Development Master Plan recommendations. Multi- story Corporate or office uses with signature corner feature, parking structure, and below grade parking are encouraged. Amend Land Use Map in FY 2018 to include Medical and Wellness and Office Overlays CBO3 Quality Development, B1 1.7, 1.8, 2.1 Efficient Growth, Activity Centers, Quality Places, Healthy Communities PDS DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 33 Ref. No. Issue Recommendation Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO VNT Link Responsible LU5 Hospital Site  Includes approximately 30.7 acre hospital property, of which half is developed as either buildings or parking.  Additional approximately 6.6 acres at NE corner of N. White Chapel and E. Highland zoned for low density single- family residential.  Land Use designation is Mixed Use and a small portion of Flood Plain  Zoning is S-P-2 and SF- 1A Retain Mixed Use designation and add Medical and Wellness and Office Overlays. SITE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION:  The future development of the site should occur in a manner consistent with the initial hospital development.  Vehicular and pedestrian connectivity to the existing hospital is encouraged.  Parking structures and below grade parking are encouraged.  Development along Highland St. and White Chapel Blvd. should occur in a manner that is compatible with the adjacent residential development.  Acceptable types of development may also include garden office which is complementary to the uses on the west side of White Chapel. Amend Land Use Map in FY 2018 to include Medical and Wellness and Office Overlays CBO3 Quality Development, B1 1.7, 1.8, 2.1 Efficient Growth, Activity Centers, Quality Places, Healthy Communities PDS DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 34 Ref. No. Issue Recommendation Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO VNT Link Responsible LU6 124 acre Milner property  Land Use designation is Mixed Use, Flood plain, and Medium Density Residential  Zoning is AG  Surrounded by areas of Low-Density Residential and Medium-Density Residential Retain Medium-Density Residential and Mixed Use designations and add Campus Office and Medical and Wellness Overlays to current Mixed Use portion SITE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION:  Office development should be limited to building size and scale which is compatible with adjacent single- family residential and preserves the maximum amount of green space on the site. Buffer should be established between existing and future residential uses and planned office uses. Any commercial component should be developed holistically with neighboring commercial properties to the east, including the considerations shared parking and the alignment of access drives along S.H. 114 to improve parking and access to the site at the corner of 114 and Carroll.  Culinary – Specialty Retail may be appropriate on the eastern side of the property provided it is designed in a manner that is respectful to existing site features and the adjacent residential neighborhood.  Development of the Medium Density Residential portion of the property should evaluate connectivity to Lakewood Acres to allow this neighborhood direct access to the S.H. 114 frontage road.  Embrace and leverage topography and natural features to create a signature development on this site. Avoid mass grading of site or alteration of existing stream. Amend Land Use Map in FY 2018 to add Campus Office and Health and Wellness Overlays CBO3 Quality Development, B1 1.3, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.1, 4.1, 7.5 Development Diversity, Environmental Stewardship, Quality Places PDS DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 35 Ref. No. Issue Recommendation Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO VNT Link Responsible LU7 Gateway Church in NR- PUD #5 and S-P-1 (480- 714) and Chesapeake property  Land Use designation is Mixed Use and Public/Semi- Public  Zoning is NR-PUD and AG  Contains Gateway Church campus and multiple undeveloped parcels  Gateway Church has in the last several years sold portions of its land for development  Existing wetlands on Chesapeake site. Drains water from Town Square to the 100 year flood plain east of N. Kimball Ave. Retain existing Mixed Use and Public/Semi-Public Land Use designations and add Multi-Tenant Office Overlay on the undeveloped portion along S.H. 114. SITE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS:  Office development should consist of moderately-scaled buildings with a high degree of design quality with amenities at major corners and features such as underground parking. Buildings should lessen in height closer to Kirkwood Blvd. corridor.  Area is also appropriate for medical development consistent with overlay description, and educational facilities as recommended in the Economic Development Master Plan.  Future development should incorporate existing wetlands and creek. Evaluate water intake from Town Square and reduce impact on downstream flood plain. Amend Land Use Map in FY 2018 to add High-Rise Office Overlay Make any needed adjustments to Flood Plain Land Use layer and address impacts in 2035 Water, Waste Water and Storm Water Master Plan CBO3 Quality Development, B1 1.4, 1.8, 2.1, 7.4 Efficient Growth, Environmental Stewardship, Quality Places PDS DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 36 Ref. No. Issue Recommendation Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO VNT Link Responsible LU8 Cherry Ln  Land Use designation is Office Commercial and Mixed Use.  Zoning is O-1, C-2, C-3, S-P-1, MF-1, SF-1A  Contains a variety of uses and development intensities close to the 114 corridor, including garden office, duplex, retail, and an animal clinic.  65 LDN airport overlay. Retain underlying Mixed Use and Office Commercial Future Land Use designations and Medical and Wellness Overlay along S.H. 114. SITE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION: Medical and Wellness uses as described in the Overlay are encouraged along S.H. 114. Also. Culinary-Specialty Retail may be considered in along S.H. 114 if traffic impacts can be addressed. Redevelopment of residential properties to the north as garden office may be considered if development is proposed in a comprehensive manner with emphasis on connectivity to adjacent commercial properties. Amend Land Use Map in FY 2018 to add Medical and Wellness Overlay CBO3 Quality Development, B1 1.7, 1.8, 2.1 Efficient Growth, Quality Places PDS DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 37 Ref. No. Issue Recommendation Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO VNT Link Responsible LU9 Commercial areas near Shady Lane  Land Use designation is Retail Commercial and Office Commercial  Zoning is C-3 and S-P-1  Between 114 frontage and existing low- density neighborhood Amend Future Land Use to Mixed Use and add Medical and Wellness Overlay and Restaurant – Specialty Retail Overlay. SITE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATION: Medical should consist of lower intensity destination uses such as health and wellness designed around specific user. Retail establishments consistent with target industries identified Economic Development Master Plan may be considered if potential traffic impacts are adequately addressed. Cross access between properties should be provided. Natural tree buffers should be preserved along residential boundaries. Amend Land Use Map in FY 2018 to Mixed Use and include Medical and Wellness Overlay and Restaurant – Specialty Retail Overlay CBO3 Quality Development, B1 1.7, 1.8, 2.1 Efficient Growth, Activity Centers, Quality Places, Healthy Communities PDS LU10 North side of 114 corridor between W. Kirkwood Blvd. and N. White Chapel Blvd. is a growing area for office/corporate campus type development Create an overlay or optional Future Land Use to allow for the development of large-scale office developments on the north side of 114. Amend Land Use Map in FY 2018 to include Campus Office CBO3 Quality Development, CBO4 Attract High-Quality Businesses, B1, C4 1.8 Quality Places PDS DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 38 Ref. No. Issue Recommendation Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO VNT Link Responsible LU10 North side of 114 corridor between W. Kirkwood Blvd. and N. White Chapel Blvd. is a growing area for office/corporate campus type development Create an overlay or optional Future Land Use to allow for the development of large-scale office developments on the north side of 114. Amend Land Use Map in FY 2018 to include Campus Office CBO3 Quality Development, CBO4 Attract High-Quality Businesses, B1, C4 1.8 Quality Places PDS LU11 The area containing Children’s Medical Center, Methodist Southlake Hospital, and Harborchase has the potential to aid in attracting health care uses and facilities to Southlake Create an overlay or optional Future Land Use to foster development of health services facilities in the area along S.H. 114 between N. White Chapel and N. Carroll while also allowing market flexibility for these sites to develop as offices. Amend Land Use Map in FY 2018 to include Medical and Wellness and Office Overlays CBO3 Quality Development, CBO4 Attract High-Quality Businesses, B1 1.8, 6.4, 9.3? Educational Opportunity, Healthy Communities PDS LU12 The city desires a variety of office typologies, scale and bulk along the 114 corridor, with future development consisting primarily of a mixture of campus and multi-story offices. New office development should conform to areas and formats addressed in overlay districts. Amend Land Use Map in FY 2018 to include Office Overlays CBO3 Quality Development, B1 1.5, 1.8 Quality Places PDS LU13 Based on the findings of the MXD Retail Saturation study, Southlake is over- retailed and future retail should be highly targeted and specialized. New retail is encouraged to be limited to areas identified in the 114 Corridor Overlay districts and consistent with the recommendations of the Economic Development Master Plan. Amend Land Use Map in FY 2018 to include overlay districts CBO3 Quality Development, CBO4 Attract High-Quality Businesses, B1 1.8, 2.1, 6.2, 6.4 Development Diversity PDS DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 39 Ref. No. Issue Recommendation Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO VNT Link Responsible LU14 Parking along 114 Corridor presents a high visual impact if not properly designed and screened. Surface parking on S.H. 114 is discouraged unless adequately screened and buffered. Underground parking is preferred when development scale allows. Address in 2035 Urban Design Plan and consider possible zoning ordinance amendment specific to parking along 114 CBO3 Quality Development, B1 1.5, 1.8 Quality Places PDS LU15 Projects with large footprints exacerbate the urban heat island effect. Modify the Zoning Ordinance to allow for incentives on projects that reduce their development footprint such as but not limited to allowing for a greater height or number of stories permitted in conjunction with a massing study, if a greater degree of landscaping or open space is provided or with features such as underground parking. Modify the Zoning Ordinance. Quality Development & Performance Management and Service Delivery; B5 1.4, 1.5, 1.8, 7.3 Environmental Stewardship, Resource Efficiency, Quality Places PDS DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 40 4.0 Mobility Recommendations “Mobility” refers to the City’s transportation network and includes automotive, pedestrian, bicycle and other alternative modes of transportation. Over the past several decades, the physical, social and economic success Southlake has experienced can be attributed in part to the City's transportation network. The highways, streets, paths, railway and proximity to the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport that provide mobility within the City and access to points beyond have caused Southlake to transition from a relatively isolated community at its incorporation to a premier City in the DFW Metroplex and beyond. However, the same transportation network has also created adverse side effects: traffic congestion due to regional travel patterns, increased pollutant emissions and high stress levels due to commuting. 4.1 Roadways in the F.M. Corridors As previously discussed, S.H. 114 is a major roadway corridor in the City of Southlake and in the region of Northeast Tarrant County. According to the Master Thoroughfare Plan, S.H. 114 is classified as a highway with 300 to 500 feet of right of way. There are also many other important arterials in the City that cross this plan area and also S.H. 114 such as Carroll Avenue, Kimball Avenue and White Chapel Boulevard. The thoroughfare designations for these major roadways as well as other streets in the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan Area are illustrated in the following map. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 41 MAP 7: EXISTING MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN FOR THE S.H. 114 CORRIDOR 4.1.1 Major Corridors Urban Design Plan A key component of the Southlake 2035 Comprehensive Plan is the Urban Design Master Plan. This plan will be an update to the 2008 Urban Design Plan which contained several recommendations for the 114 Corridor. Because the 2035 Land Use Plan runs ahead of the new Urban Design Master Plan, urban design recommendations for the 114 Corridor are introduced here and will be carried forward to the new Urban Design Plan as scheduled. 4.1.2 Major Corridors Urban Design Plan: S.H. 114 Enhancements Although many of the recommendations of the 2008 Urban Design Plan were implemented, there are still numerous opportunities to enhance the primary roadway through the city. This will be best realized with a combination of public and private enhancements which could take the form of landscaping, bridge design, and corner features identifying developments at major intersections. During the development of the 114 Corridor plan, several recommendations were discussed which are noted in the following section. These recommendations will be built upon and expanded with the development of the Southlake 2035 Urban Design Plan. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 42 Specific to Highway 114, there are still opportunities for landscaping and design enhancements at key intersections such as F.M. 1709, Dove Rd., and Kirkwood Blvd. Recent highway projects in the DFW area such as the George Bush Turnkpike and the Chisolm Trail Parkway in southern Tarrant and northern Johnson counties provide examples of high-quality freeway design and landscaping. Chisolm Trail Parkway Other than Highway 114 itself, one of the areas in the corridor with the greatest potential for enhancement is the Kirkwood Boulevard corridor. Although not complete, this roadway will eventually link Solana to the north with the Kimball Ave. corridor to the south. In between, the roadway winds through a growing cluster of corporate and regional headquarters and office buildings, including One Kirkwood, Sabre, and TD Ameritrade. These developments all linked by a single roadway create an opportunity for creative branding of the Kirkwood Corridor through signage, lighting, and landscaping. Examples of professional district branding are found in the following images. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 43 DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 44 DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 45 4.2 Pathways in the S.H. 114 Corridor The City of Southlake places a high priority on sidewalks and trails for both mobility and recreation. Currently the City has an approved Sidewalk Pathways Plan which indicates the location of future sidewalk facilities in the City and priorities these facilities for construction. Also, the City of Southlake ensures construction of sidewalks by the following actions: 1) allocates approximately $400,000 annually for the construction of trails and sidewalks in the CIP (Capital Improvements Program); 2) seeks grants for funding; 3) requires new development to construct sidewalks along public streets adjacent to the site; 4) implemented the sidewalk matching program (a 50% cost sharing program for the design and construction of sidewalks within neighborhoods); and 5) implemented the Sidewalk Partnership program (promotes the dedication of easements by citizens and business for the construction of sidewalks). The map below shows the existing Pathways Plan for the S.H. 114 Corridor. MAP 8: EXISTING PATHWAYS PLAN As shown in the map above, the primary east-west route for pedestrian mobility is found along S.H. 114 and also the future Kirkwood Boulevard. However, the sidewalks adjacent to S.H. 114 have several missing segments and will be built as development occurs along the highway. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 46 4.3 Mobility Recommendations In coordination with the Vision, Goals & Objectives, adopted by City Council in xxxx, the following table lists the recommendations for the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan Area regarding mobility. For a description of each column heading, please refer to the legend following the table. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 47 TABLE 4: S.H. 114 CORRIDOR MOBILITY RECOMMENDATIONS Ref. No. Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO Tie Responsible Department VNT LINK M1 The S.H. 114 bridge at Dove Street and the associated concrete embankments serve as a less than aesthetically pleasing portal into the City’s major corporate campus district.  Design and implement a portal plan at S.H. 114 and Dove Street which enhances the bridge structure and redesigns the bridge embankments.  Fund improvements through the CIP.  Explore public private partnerships to improve the entry portal as development occurs. Address in 2035 Mobility Plan and/or Urban Design Plan CBO3 Quality Development, B1, C3, F2 1.1, 1.5, 1.9, 1.10, 10.3 PDS, PW, CS Quality Places M2 Significant portions of S.H. 114 lack landscaping or beautification, most visibly on the eastern side of the city  Coordinate with TXDoT and the City of Grapevine to make landscape improvements along this section of the corridor using recent regional projects such as the Chisolm Trail Parkway as a design example.  Develop a S.H. 114 Urban Design Plan. Develop Design Plan. Address in 2035 Mobility Plan and/or 2035 Urban Design Plan CBO3 Quality Development, B1, F2 1.1, 1.5, 1.9, 1.10, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 10.3, 10.5 PW, CS, PDS Quality Places DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 48 Ref. No. Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO Tie Responsible Department VNT LINK M3 Existing and future high- value corporate Campus Office developments along W. Kirkwood present an opportunity for branding the corridor with public space improvements  Design and implement a plan to create a cohesive and unique urban design environment along the Kirkwood Blvd. Campus Office corridor development and also buffers the impact to adjacent residential properties  Design should include the landscaping of medians, installation of sidewalks, street lighting and wayfinding signage Create and implement design plan. Amend the Urban Design Plan to include the design. Fund project through the CIP. CBO3 Quality Development, B1, C3, F2 1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.5, 1.8, 1.9, 2.2, 2.3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.8, 6.3, 6.4, 10.3, 10.5, 10.8 PDS, PW, CS Quality Places M4 Traffic demands at the intersection of 114 and Kirkwood Blvd. and 114 and Dove Street will necessitate mobility improvements to the area in order to ensure easy access to the City’s Corporate Campus district.  Construct 114 frontage road from Dove Street to Kirkwood Blvd.  Explore the possibility of a Texas turnaround in one or both directions.  Assist in the funding through CIP.  Ensure future development in this area includes primary access to and from S.H. 114 frontage road. Develop and Approve Construction Plans Mobility, Infrastructure, C1, C2, B2, F2 3.1, 3.4, 3.7, 3.8 PW Efficient Mobility Options DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 49 Ref. No. Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO Tie Responsible Department VNT LINK M5 Pedestrian connectivity between Southlake Town Square, Shops of Southlake, and Park Village is cut off by arterial roads. Work with TXDOT to enhance safety of pedestrian crossings at the F.M. 1709 and Carroll Ave. intersection. Address in 2035 Mobility Plan Mobility, Infrastructure, C1, C2 1.2, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 11.1? PW, PDS Pedestrian Design, Activity Centers, Quality Places, Efficient Mobility Options, Healthy Communities M6 There are portions of Kirkwood Blvd which have not been completed or fully improved. Kirkwood Blvd. is a critical east/west arterial that allows citizens vehicular access to work, shopping, dining, schools and places of worship without the need to travel on S.H. 114.  Work with developers to have roughly proportional sections of Kirkwood constructed in conjunction with development.  Fund construction of critical sections such as the bridge crossing at Carillon and the intersection at Carroll Ave. through the CIP. Address in 2035 Mobility Plan Mobility, Infrastructure, C1, C2 3.1, 3.3, 3.5, 3.8 PW Efficient Mobility Options DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 50 Ref. No. Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO Tie Responsible Department VNT LINK M7 The City desires to create an alternative transportation system such as a trolley that will create a unique experience for visitors to the community, promote and attract business, alleviate traffic along 114 created by short vehicle trips from one local destination to another, and connect key destinations such as shopping areas to corporate offices, Gateway Church, and hotels. Conduct an Alternative Transportation Feasibility Study which will allow the City to examine the feasibility of a variety of alternative transportation methods that will assist in promoting economic development and tourism consistent with the goals of the Economic Development and Tourism Master Plans. Implement study recommendations through annual work plans. If needed, address in 2035 Mobility Plan Mobility, Quality Development, Business Attraction, C1, C2, C4, B2, B4 1.8, 2.2, 3.2, 6.3, 6.4, 10.3, 11.1, 11.3 ED, PDS Efficient Mobility Options M8 Traffic volumes along N White Chapel between S.H. 114 and Dove are anticipated to increase as Carillon builds out and the property between N. White Chapel Blvd. and S.H. 114 develops. Coordinate through a Developer’s Agreement and the CIP the widening of this section of N. White Chapel to 4 lanes divided facility. Complete construction of the N. White Chapel improvements from S.H. 114 to Dove Mobility, Infrastructure, C1, C2 3.1, 3.3, 3.6, 3.8 PW Efficient Mobility Options M9 The level of service is expected to decrease as Carillon and other properties adjacent to N. Carroll Avenue develop. Consider the widening of N. Carroll Ave. from SH 114 to Dove Rd as traffic counts and level of service warrant. Complete the widening and improvements of N. Carroll Avenue. This may occur in phases. Mobility, Infrastructure, C1, C2 3.1, 3.3, 3.6, 3.8 PW Efficient Mobility Options DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 51 Ref. No. Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO Tie Responsible Department VNT LINK M10 Traffic calming measures and fire access goals are out of alignment in certain aspects Create a road design criteria, informed by studies of roadway design, pedestrian safety, and best practices, which achieves the goals of traffic calming and urban design while also providing for adequate fire emergency access If needed, address in 2035 Mobility Plan Mobility, Quality Development, C1, C2, B1, B5 1.5, 3.2, 5.1, 5.9, 5.10 PW, PDS, DPS Pedestrian Design, Quality Places, Efficient Mobility Options M11 As the city experiences greater levels of tourism and visitor activity during festivals and events in Town Square, a more thorough approach to pedestrian safety may be required. Consider options and establish guidelines for improving pedestrian safety during festivals and special events in Town Square. Create SOP to enhance pedestrian safety during Town Square events. Safety and Security, Mobility, C1, C2 3.1 PW, PDS, ED M12 A TEX Rail station in Southlake or a second station in Grapevine is not easily accessible from residential and business areas in Southlake Consider proposals (perhaps in the form of a 3P) for a bus, shuttle, or trolley system to take riders to and from the station to the center of Southlake Address in South Sector Plan and 2035 Mobility Plan Mobility, Quality Development, C1, C2, B2 1.7, 2.2, 3.6, 3.8 PDS, CS Efficient Mobility Options, Healthy Communities M13 The Cotton Belt trail will run along the boundary of Southlake, but current bike facilities do not provide an adequate connection to this amenity Specify trail connections between this regional route and local bicycle routes Address in South Sector Plan and 2035 Mobility Plan Mobility, Infrastructure, C1, C2 1.2, 3.6, 3.8 PW, PDS, CS Efficient Mobility Options, Healthy Communities DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 52 Ref. No. Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO Tie Responsible Department VNT LINK M14 Bike-pedestrian connectivity to neighboring cities is lacking or non-existent Consider regional sidewalk strategy and sidewalk connections with adjacent city pathways in Trophy Club and Westlake Address in 2035 Mobility Plan Mobility, Infrastructure, C1, C2 1.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.6, 3.8 PW, PDS, CS Efficient Mobility Options, Healthy Communities Recommendations Table Legend Ref. No. = Reference number. Issues = A brief description of the issue requiring action. Recommendations = Recommendations to address the issues. Implementation Metric = A quantifiable goal, often with a deadline for achievement. Strategic Link = The Strategic Focus Area(s) from the City’s Strategy Map that relate to the issue and recommendations. VNT Link = The guiding principle(s) from Vision North Texas that relate to the issue and recommendations. VGO Tie = Specific objective(s) from the adopted Southlake 2030 Vision, Goals and Objectives that relate to the issue and recommendations. Responsible Department = The department(s) that will take the lead on implementing the recommendation. PDS = Planning & Development Services; PW = Public Works; CS = Community Services; ED = Economic Development; DPS = Department of Public Safety Gray Shading = Citywide goals (not unique to the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan Area). DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 53 5.0 Environmental Resource Recommendations Environmental sustainability is vital to the current and long term financial health of the City and the physical and emotional health of area residents. As such, the City of Southlake places a high priority on the protection and conservation of the community’s natural assets. “Environmental resources” in this section primarily refers to natural amenities, such as trees, water, soil, air, and wildlife. A more detailed discussion on sustainability, including topics such as energy use, waste reduction, and recycling, may be found in the Sustainability Plan. The primary environmental resource issues in the S.H. 114 corridor are protection of the floodplain and preservation and enhancement of the existing tree canopy. Several creeks drain into Grapevine Lake with a significant area in the 100 year flood plain running near S.H. 114 and East Highland Street and adjacent to the mixed use development, Carillon, presenting unique opportunities and challenges. Many of the trees are found adjacent to the floodplain, as shown in the map below. Most of these trees are characteristic of the Cross Timbers ecosystem, including Post Oaks, Blackjack Oaks, Cedar Elms, American Elms, Hackberries, Pecans, and Cottonwoods. In addition, significant grade changes in the S.H. 114 Corridor present challenges. Specifically, along S.H. 114 itself, a steep grade separates the highway from the adjacent properties particularly towards the western half of S.H. 114 within the City limits. This grade change will require special consideration for any proposed development. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 54 MAP 9: EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE PROTECTION PLAN MAP DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 55 5.1 Environmental Resource Recommendations Based on the Southlake 2035 Vision, Goals, and Objectives, the following general environmental resource recommendations are proposed. For a description of each column heading, please refer to the legend following the table. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 56 TABLE 5: S.H. 114 CORRIDOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE RECOMMENDATIONS Ref. No. Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO Tie Responsible Department VNT Link E1 Development of the Milner property has the potential to result in a significant loss of open space adjacent to S.H. 114 and developed residential property Consider purchasing right of first refusal in the event that the Milner property goes up for sale (still researching) Include in City’s FY 2018 work plan Quality Development, C3 4.2, 7.5, 10.2 CS Efficient Growth, Environmen tal Stewardship E2 Significant trees at key intersections such as 114 and White Chapel are threatened for removal when properties are developed Consider stronger tree protection requirements or incentives for protecting trees at key intersections or view corridors Address in 2035 Sustainability Plan Quality Development, C3 7.5 PDS Quality Places, Environmen tal Stewardship E3 The community desires a higher level of urban forest maintenance, management and protection. Evaluate Options for improving tree protection. Consider: - Software programs or other tools for managing and assessment of existing tree cover. - Conducting tree survey Include in City’s FY 2018 work plan Quality Development, C3, F2 7.5 PDS Quality Places, Environmen tal Stewardship E4 The tree cover map is out of date in many places where development has removed pre-existing trees Update the tree cover map semi- annually to reflect development or other changes in tree coverage Complete as part of the 2035 Sustainability Plan Performance Management and Service Delivery, B4 7.3, 7.5, 7.7 PDS Environmen tal Stewardship Recommendations Table Legend Ref. No. = Reference number. Issues = A brief description of the issue requiring action. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 57 Recommendations = Recommendations to address the issues. Implementation Metric = A quantifiable goal, often with a deadline for achievement. Strategic Link = The Strategic Focus Area(s) from the City’s Strategy Map that relate to the issue and recommendations. VNT Link = The guiding principle(s) from Vision North Texas that relate to the issue and recommendations. VGO Tie = Specific objective(s) from the adopted Southlake 2030 Vision, Goals and Objectives that relate to the issue and recommendations. Responsible Department = The department(s) that will take the lead on implementing the recommendation. PDS = Planning & Development Services; PW = Public Works; CS = Community Services; ED = Economic Development; DPS = Department of Public Safety Gray Shading = Citywide goals (not unique to the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan Area). DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan June 20, 2017 Page 58 6.0 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space The S.H. 114 Corridor Plan Area includes several small public parks particularly within Southlake Town Square such as Summit Park, Rustin Park, Frank Cornish Park, Central Park and other open spaces. The S.H. 114 Corridor Plan area also includes some open space and future parks within the Carillon master planned mixed use community that will be built as the development is built out. A complete discussion on these facilities will be undertaken with the 2035 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan. MAP 10: PARKS IN S.H. 114 CORRIDOR PLAN AREA Based on the Southlake 2035 Vision, Goals, and Objectives, the following parks, recreation and open space recommendations are proposed. For a description of each column heading, please refer to the legend that following the table. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan xxxx, 2017 Page 59 TABLE 6: S.H. 114 CORRIDOR PLAN AREA PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE RECOMMENDATIONS Ref. No. Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VGO Tie Responsible Department VNT Link P1 The Parks Master Plan and Pathways Map are currently separate documents Consider creation of an integrated Parks and Pathways Map to better address the issues of bike- ped connectivity to park space Address in 2035 Parks, Open Space, and Community Facilities Plan Mobility, C1, C2, C3, B1 3.3, 3.8, 4.6 PDS, CS Pedestrian Design, Healthy Communities Recommendations Table Legend Ref. No. = Reference number. Issues = A brief description of the issue requiring action. Recommendations = Recommendations to address the issues. Implementation Metric = A quantifiable goal, often with a deadline for achievement. Strategic Link = The Strategic Focus Area(s) from the City’s Strategy Map that relate to the issue and recommendations. VNT Link = The guiding principle(s) from Vision North Texas that relate to the issue and recommendations. VGO Tie = Specific objective(s) from the adopted Southlake 2030 Vision, Goals and Objectives that relate to the issue and recommendations. Responsible Department = The department(s) that will take the lead on implementing the recommendation. PDS = Planning & Development Services; PW = Public Works; CS = Community Services; ED = Economic Development; DPS = Department of Public Safety Gray Shading = Citywide goals (not unique to the S.H. 114 Corridor Plan Area). DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 Corridor Plan Appendix A Appendix A Vision, Goals & Objectives Adopted by City Council on XXXX, 2017 Ordinance No. xxxx DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 Vision, Goals & Objectives 1 November 17, 2009 SOUTHLAKE 2030 VISION STATEMENT Southlake will continue to enhance its status as a desirable, attractive, safe, healthy and fiscally-sound community with quality neighborhoods, while maintaining a high standard of living, learning, shopping, working, recreation, and open spaces. Southlake will continue to be a vibrant community that epitomizes both economic and environmental sustainability. SOUTHLAKE 2030 GOALS & OBJECTIVES Goal 1: Quality Development Promote quality development that is consistent with the Urban Design Plan, well- maintained, attractive, pedestrian-friendly, safe, contributes to an overall sense of place and meet the needs of a vibrant and diverse community. Objective 1.1 Encourage the maintenance of existing neighborhoods, features and amenities in order to preserve property values and a unique sense of place. Objective 1.2 Create and preserve attractive pedestrian-friendly streets and pathways to encourage transportation alternatives to the automobile. Objective 1.3 Encourage appropriately-scaled neighborhood design that compliments existing development patterns while creating unique places, recognizing that quality residential neighborhoods are the cornerstone of our community. Objective 1.4 Emphasize creativity and ensure environmental stewardship in the design of all development and public infrastructure, maximizing the preservation of desirable natural features such as trees, topography, streams, wildlife corridors and habitat. Objective 1.5 Promote unique community character through a cohesive theme by emphasizing urban design detail and performance standards for structures, streets, street lighting, landscaping, entry features, wayfinding signs, open spaces, amenities, pedestrian/automobile orientation and transition to adjacent uses. Objective 1.6 Consider high-quality single-family residential uses as part of a planned mixed-use development at appropriate transitional locations. Objective 1.7 Explore and encourage opportunities for redevelopment when appropriate. Objective 1.8 Ensure high-quality design and a heightened sensitivity towards the integration of new development with the existing development and urban design pattern. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 Vision, Goals & Objectives 2 November 17, 2009 Objective 1.9 Strengthen street and landscape design standards to enhance the visual quality along major corridors. Objective 1.10 Continue to promote a strong working relationship with the Texas Department of Transportation to improve the appearance of bridges, embankments and entryways into the City. Objective 1.11 Ensure that city- and developer-provided infrastructure is functional, aesthetically well-designed, and integrated with the natural environment. Objective 1.12 Continue to strengthen the City’s regulations to encourage effective signage that is appropriately designed and scaled to minimize adverse impacts on community aesthetics. Objective 1.13 Explore creating participation programs with home owner associations and subdivision groups to enhance the long-term viability of neighborhood features and amenities. Goal 2: Balance Maintain a balanced approach to growth and development in order to preserve the City’s assets (schools, public safety, and competitive edge in the region) and fiscal health. Objective 2.1 Encourage a balance of uses, including retail, office, medical, hospitality, entertainment, institutional, industrial and residential that is both responsive to and sustainable within changing market conditions and sustains growth in property values for the future. Objective 2.2 Support appropriate public-private financial partnerships that will help retain and enhance the City’s economic base. Objective 2.3 Ensure the City’s built environment fosters a positive relationship between the taxable value of real property and the corresponding cost of municipal services. Goal 3: Mobility Develop an innovative mobility system that provides for the safe, convenient, efficient movement of people and goods, reduces traffic congestion, promotes energy and transportation efficiency and promotes expanded opportunities for citizens to meet some routine needs by walking or bicycling. Objective 3.1 Provide a safe and efficient streets and pathways network that allows travel to shopping areas, schools, parks and places of employment, reducing the DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 Vision, Goals & Objectives 3 November 17, 2009 need to travel on the City’s major arterials (FM 1709, FM 1938, or SH 114) and minimizes cut-through traffic in residential neighborhoods. Objective 3.2 Implement and promote a mobility system that addresses safety, design, comfort and aesthetic elements such as landscaping, crosswalks, railing, lighting, traffic-calming and signage in order to provide distinct character and functionality for the City. Objective 3.3 In accordance with a need identified by the Citizen Survey, provide and promote a continuous pedestrian pathways system that is user-friendly, efficient, safe, economical, and connect parks, shopping, schools, work and residential areas. Objective 3.4 Pursue opportunities to link Southlake’s pathways to systems in adjacent cities and trails on the Corps of Engineers property. Objective 3.5 Develop a program to encourage the dedication of easements for pathway construction in accordance with the sidewalk priority plan and Capital Improvements Plan. Objective 3.6 Identify and prioritize the funding and construction of mobility system capital improvements projects according to the impacts on safety, system efficiency, costs, and maintaining acceptable levels of service. Objective 3.7 Increase safe bicycle mobility when reasonably possible. Objective 3.8 Continue to promote a strong working relationship with the Texas Department of Transportation to identify, design and implement projects that prevent or relieve congestion in the area. Objective 3.9 Continue to evaluate and improve upon the existing mobility system within the City, maintaining existing infrastructure, making required improvements and evaluating innovative ways to integrate transportation and land use. Objective 3.10 Obtain adequate right-of-way for future roadway corridors and improvements. Goal 4: Parks, Recreation and Open Space Support a comprehensive integrated parks, recreation and open space system for all ages that creates value and preserves natural assets of the City. Objective 4.1 Ensure that new development incorporates usable open space. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 Vision, Goals & Objectives 4 November 17, 2009 Objective 4.2 Ensure that parkland and open spaces include an integrated mix of developed and natural areas with consideration of protecting the City’s ecosystem and wildlife corridors. Objective 4.3 Promote water conservation and reuse in the design of parks and open spaces. Objective 4.4 Utilize partnerships to create open space and recreation facilities. Objective 4.5 Ensure an even geographic distribution of park facilities and recreation activities—both active and passive—for citizens of all ages. Objective 4.6 Provide a full range of park facilities and linear linkages that will accommodate the current and future needs of the City’s residents and visitors. Objective 4.7 Integrate passive recreational opportunities into preserved natural and drainage areas. Objective 4.8 Incorporate feedback received from the Parks and Recreation Citizen Survey into recreation activities and park facilities. Objective 4.9 Acknowledge the City’s rich natural history, heritage and historical landmarks. Objective 4.10 Determine parkland desirable for dedication as part of the development process based on classification, location and maintenance cost. Objective 4.11 Prioritize investments in existing and established parks understanding that there will be strategic opportunities for land acquisition. Objective 4.12 Incorporate educational and learning opportunities within parks and related facilities. Objective 4.13 Pursue recreational and educational opportunities on Corps of Engineers property compatible with the goal of protecting and preserving the existing ecosystem for future generations. Goal 5: Public Safety Establish and maintain protective measures and policies that reduce danger, risk or injury to property and individuals who live, work or visit the City. Objective 5.1 Maintain a level of police, fire and ambulance services commensurate with population and business needs. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 Vision, Goals & Objectives 5 November 17, 2009 Objective 5.2 Provide effective and efficient professional public safety services in partnership with the citizens we serve, encouraging mutual respect and innovative problem-solving, thereby improving the quality of life in our community. Objective 5.3 Ensure compliance with the stated standard of response coverage and industry guidelines through the provision of facilities, equipment, personnel and roadways. Objective 5.4 Ensure that all buildings and public facilities are constructed in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local safety regulations and standards. Objective 5.5 Maintain the continued compliance with national standard of excellence through the accreditation process. Objective 5.6 Enhance and promote public safety through public-private partnerships and utilization and training of volunteers. Objective 5.7 Maintain a high level of community readiness through training and communications among neighborhood and volunteer groups and city, county, state, and federal entities. Objective 5.8 Develop and implement safety education programs that enhance the quality of life and safety in the community. Objective 5.9 Promote security of public buildings and infrastructure. Objective 5.10 Ensure safe and healthy working conditions for city staff, volunteers and officials by providing security, facility, vehicular and equipment maintenance, information, education and training. Goal 6: Economic Development Create a diversified, vibrant and sustainable economy through the attraction and support of business enterprises and tourism meeting the vision and standards desired by City leaders. Objective 6.1 Promote the City both nationally and regionally as a great place to live, work, visit, shop and recreate. Objective 6.2 Provide necessary, desirable and diverse goods and services for residents of the City. Objective 6.3 Foster an environment that retains and supports existing businesses to ensure the sustainability of our existing tax base. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 Vision, Goals & Objectives 6 November 17, 2009 Objective 6.4 Attract desired businesses to ensure economic growth as well as continued employment and services for residents of the City. Objective 6.5 Enhance the quality of life for residents and the sustainability of City business through the promotion of the tourism, convention and hotel industry in the City. Objective 6.6 Develop a clear and understandable incentive policy that accomplishes the business attraction and retention goals of the City and is based on factors such as job creation, investment, quality of business, return on investment and overall value to the community. Objective 6.7 Foster communication between the public and private sectors. Goal 7: Sustainability Encourage the conservation, protection, enhancement and proper management of the natural and built environment. Objective 7.1 Maintain and implement policies to reduce the use of nonrenewable resources, such as energy in the heating, cooling, and operation and maintenance of city facilities. Objective 7.2 Promote public awareness and education on such sustainability issues as public health, energy and water conservation and overall environmental stewardship. Objective 7.3 Promote sustainable public and private development practices and patterns, building design, water-use reduction and waste reduction while maintaining the existing character of the city. Objective 7.4 Protect surface, storm, and groundwater quality from septic discharge, impervious surface runoff, improper waste disposal and other potential contaminant sources. Objective 7.5 Conserve, restore and promote tree and plant cover that is native or adaptive to the City and region while also protecting existing significant vegetation and maintaining the existing character of the City. Objective 7.6 Protect and enhance air quality in coordination with federal, regional and local agencies. Objective 7.7 Recognize the importance of and protect the biological diversity for the ecological and aesthetic benefits to the community. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 Vision, Goals & Objectives 7 November 17, 2009 Objective 7.8 Define, protect, and celebrate the local Cross Timbers Ecosystem as a community asset for future generations. Objective 7.9 Assess and minimize the ecological impact of any new trails provided on Corps of Engineers property. Goal 8: Community Facilities Plan and provide quality community facilities and services that effectively meet the service needs of Southlake’s residents and businesses. Objective 8.1 Provide a level of community facilities that meet the needs of both the existing and projected population. Objective 8.2 Encourage cooperation with the school districts in planning for and financing community facilities to encourage the cost-effective provision of resources. Objective 8.3 Systematically evaluate City-owned buildings in terms of their quality of service delivery and prioritize maintenance and renovation accordingly. Objective 8.4 Incorporate new computer and telecommunications technologies into public buildings and designated areas in order to improve time and cost efficiency of service delivery and to meet increasing demands of information access and sharing. Goal 9: Partnerships Fully utilize and coordinate with the City’s many partners to address issues facing the area, provide services and facilities, promote volunteerism, support events and programs and encourage economic growth. Objective 9.1 Partner with other government entities, non-governmental organizations and the North Central Texas Council of Governments to address regional and local issues. Objective 9.2 Continue mutually beneficial partnerships between the City and local school districts to explore the provision of facilities, services, technology, and other opportunities through open communication and close coordination. Objective 9.3 Continue active partnerships with non-profit organizations, civic groups and local businesses to create opportunities that benefit the community. Objective 9.4 Partner with local school districts to educate Southlake’s youth in their municipality and seek youth input when planning the future of our community. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 Vision, Goals & Objectives 8 November 17, 2009 Goal 10: Infrastructure Through sound management and strategic investment, develop, maintain, improve and operate public infrastructure that promotes health, safety and an enhanced quality of life for all members of the community. Objective 10.1 Ensure equitably-distributed and adequate services and facilities. Objective 10.2 Plan and program land acquisition and the installation of all essential public facilities to reasonably coincide with the need for such facilities. Objective 10.3 Identify and implement programs where costs may be shared by multiple agencies and/or developers. Objective 10.4 Provide for adequate public water and sewer services in appropriate areas of the City. Objective 10.5 Provide and maintain an effective stormwater management system throughout the City. Objective 10.6 Maintain and enhance existing infrastructure and levels of service through the provision of timely maintenance, repair and replacement as needed. Objective 10.7 Provide and maintain effective solid waste collection and recycling programs for residents. Objective 10.8 Provide a streetlight system for adequate illumination and a wayfinding signage system for pedestrian and driver safety where appropriate. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 Appendix B Appendix C DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 North Texas 2050 Guiding Principles Excerpted from North Texas 2050 www.visionnorthtexas.org 1. Development Diversity – Meet the needs of changing markets by providing a mix of development options and land use types in communities throughout the region. 2. Efficient Growth – Promote reinvestment and redevelopment in areas with existing infrastructure, ensure that new infrastructure supports orderly and sustainable growth, and provide coordinated regional systems of natural and built infrastructure. 3. Pedestrian Design – Create and connect pedestrian- (and bicyclist) oriented neighborhoods, centers and places throughout the region. 4. Housing Choice – Sustain and facilitate a range of housing opportunities and choices that meet the needs of residents of all economic levels and at all stages of life. 5. Activity Centers – Create mixed use developments that are centers of neighborhoods and community activities and serve as hubs of non-automobile transportation systems. 6. Environmental Stewardship – Protect, retain or enhance the region’s important natural assets (including its air, water, land and forests) and integrate these natural features and systems into the character of the region’s communities and the experiences of its residents. 7. Quality Places – Strengthen the identities of the region’s diverse communities through preservation of significant historic structures and natural assets, creation of new landmarks and gathering spaces, use of compatible architectural and landscape design, and support for the activities and institutions that make each community unique. 8. Efficient Mobility Options – Invest in transportation systems, facilities and operations that provide multi-modal choices for the efficient and sustainable movement of people, goods, and services. 9. Resource Efficiency – Design buildings, sites, communities and regional systems to use water, energy, and renewable resources responsibly, effectively and efficiently, and to retain non-renewable resources for the use of future generations. 10. Educational Opportunity – Provide opportunities for all North Texans to have access to the schools, people and technology they need for success in learning throughout their lives. 11. Healthy Communities – Identify and support functional, sustainable infrastructure and institutions that offer North Texans access to affordable, nutritious foods, opportunities for physical activity, and access to wellness and primary care services. 12. Implementation – Achieve the region’s vision by adoption of compatible comprehensive plans and ordinances for cities and consistent investment plans for regional systems; involve citizens and stakeholders in all aspects of these planning processes. DR A F T 4/1 9 / 1 7 S.H. 114 S . H . 1 1 4 S H A D Y O A K S D R E S OU T H L A K E B LV D N K I M B A L L A V E E DOVE RD W DOVE RD N P E Y T O N V I L L E A V E W SOUTHLAKE BLVD N C A R R O L L A V E N W H I T E C H A P E L B L V D W H IG H L A N D S T E HIGHLAND ST E K I R K W O O D B L V D N W HIT E C H A P E L B L V D E DOVE RD E HIGHLAND ST Legend Hospital2 114 Corridor LU_TYPE 100-Year Flood Plain Corps of Engineers Property Public Park/Open Space Public/Semi-Public Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Office Commercial Retail Commercial Mixed Use Town Center Regional Retail Industrial / SH 114 CorridorLand Use Plan Changes and Recommendations Land Use Change Site Recommendation Note: A comprehensive plan shall notconstitute zoning regulations orestablish zoning district boundaries. Please refer to Southlake 2035Plan and all its componentelements for additional information. 1 inch = 1,042 feet Department of Planningand Development ServicesGeographic Information Systems DISCLAIMER: This data has been compiled for The City of Southlake and is for informational purposes. Various official and unofficial sources were used to gather this data, and it does not represent an on-the-ground survey. Any propertyboundaries shown are approximate only. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of the data, but it was not prepared for and may not be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. As such, no guarantee is given or implied as to the accuracy of this data. LU1 LU2 LU3 LU4 LU5 LU6 LU7 LU8 DRAFT Not for Release LU9 S.H. 114 S . H . 1 1 4 S H A D Y O A K S D R N K I M B A L L A V E E DOVE RD E SO UTHL AKE BLVD N P E Y T O N V I L L E A V E W DOVE RD N C A R R O L L A V E N W H I T E C H A P E L B L V D W HIGHLA ND S T E HIGHLAND ST E K I R K W O O D B L V D E HIGHLAND ST E DOVE RD / 1 inch = 1,132 feet Department of Pla nningand De velopment ServicesGeographic Information Systems 114 Corridor Medical and Wellness Overlay Restaurant andSpecialty RetailOverlay Campus Office Overlay Multi-Tenant OfficeOverlayHigh-Rise OfficeOverlay Mixed Medical and OfficeOverlay SH 114 Corridor Optional Land UseRecommendations LU1 LU2 LU3 LU4 LU5 LU6 LU7 LU8 Site Recommendation Land Use Change Note: A comprehensive plan shall notconstitute zoning regulations orestablish zoning district boundaries. Please refer to Southlake 2035Plan and all its componentelements for additional information. DISCLAIMER: This data has been compiled for The City of Southlake and is for informational purposes. Variou s official and unofficial sources were use d to g ather this data, and it does not rep re sen t an on-the-ground survey. Any propertyboundaries shown are approximate only. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of the data, but it was not prepared for and may not be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. As such, no guarantee is given or implied as to the accuracy of this data. DRAFT Not for Release LU9 SPIN MEETING REPORT SPIN Item Number: SPIN2017-12 City Case Number: CP17-004 Project Name: Southlake 2035 State Highway 114 Corridor Plan SPIN Neighborhoods: City-Wide Meeting Date: May 9, 2017 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: Six (6) Host: Sherry Berman, Community Engagement Committee Applicant Presenting: David Jones, AICP, City of Southlake Principal Planner City Staff Present: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner; David Jones, Principal Planner and Om Chhetri, Civil Engineer Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.com and clicking on “I Want to” and “View” “Video on Demand” – forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY: The S.H. 114 Corridor Plan is the first of six sector plans adopted during the Southlake 2035 process. The plan encompasses approximately 1,878 acres that are adjacent to S.H. 114. The most prominent land uses include commercial activities and residential uses; although a significant portion of the plan area is classified as vacant or underdeveloped. As such, the primary objectives for planning in the S.H. 114 corridor are maintaining high development and urban design standards, buffering residential uses from the roadway corridor and commercial uses, and ensuring continued quality growth. The Plan further addresses the unique characteristics and challenges of the S.H. 114 corridor and provides specific planning recommendations in regard to land use, mobility, environmental resources, as well as parks, recreation and open space. For the Southlake 2035 Future Land Use plan, three optional land use categories were developed to align the plan with the Economic Development Plan adopted in 2016 and the Tourism Plan adopted in 2017. The three optional land use categories are the Medical and Wellness Overlay, the Restaurant and Specialty Retail Overlay, and the Office Overlay, which is further broken out into Campus Office, Multi-Tenant Office, and High-Rise Office. These overlays would not have an effect on the existing property zoning. Exhibits presented at SPIN: FUTURE LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS: In all, nine (9) site-specific recommendations are being proposed with the 114 Corridor Plan, with other general recommendations for land use, mobility, and environmental conservation. OPTIONAL LAND USE RECOMMENDATIONS: MOBILITY RECOMMENDATIONS: QUESTIONS/CONCERNS: There were no questions or concerns raised. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Call Summary Report: