Loading...
Item 7A PresentationITY OF SOUTHLP Zoning Change and Development Plan Crescent Heights ZA1 7=01 6 Applicant: Hat Creek Development Request: Approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Crescent Heights from "AG" Agricultural District and "SF -1A" Single Family Residential District to "R -PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development to develop 57 residential lots and 11 open space lots on approximately 57.95 acres. Location: Generally located north of W. Southlake Blvd. and west of Shady Oaks Dr. Future Land Use Crescent Heights Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential Future Land Use Update - 2012 W TYPE 1DD-Year Flood Plain Corps of Engineers Property ` -- Public Perld0pen Space Public/Senm Public Low Densis Resitleneal McQwm Density Resaennal �-- — once Commercial -- Retail Commercial Mirstl Use enziry aea.n.l - Town Center Regional Redil Industrial o ra Low Density Residential Purpose: The purpose of the Low Density Residential land use category is to provide for and to protect low intensity detached single-family residential development that promotes the openness and rural character of Southlake. Definition: The Low Density Residential category is for detached single-family residential development at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. Net density is the number of dwelling units per net acre, which excludes acreage in all public rights-of-way. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi -Public categories. The Low Density Residential category encourages the openness and rural character of the City of Southlake. Open Space: • Open spaces should be designed to add value to the development and may include parks, playgrounds, greenbelts, ponds and lakes, gardens, and conservation areas. • Provide natural walking paths along stream and creek corridors. • Preserve existing wooded areas and stream corridors when feasible. • Emphasize environmental elements as "features" rather than constraints. Zoning Crescent Heights ••nc•• ngncow,oral uis,rio, ••SF -,N•• Single Family ResiOenEal Uis4icr o� Mc, ®FE -C2 O SF,A M M o�,e M� ® sF2 M NRPUD o sF30 M NC 0 sF2DA 0 e, SF 0 0 s 20 ® az R-ai0 0 n oMF, -2 0 MF2 =SP, S - MH 0 SP2 0 cs M DT JSF1 0 0, M TZD rR 0 02 0 ECZ 11 A �0 J w� r � Y I, 3 I A, Aerial View N ��t V•P �V,...+° I "�II 1 �`� �Fi�IF Pe Al q'J�"'' � ,� .e !r� �. � r itlrak - P&Z/City Council Issues/Conditions Applicant's Response Measure the silt levels in the adjoining pond/creek areas before The applicant agreed to this stipulation at the P&Z the project commences and then at various intervals after the Commission meeting on May 4th. No changes have been project commences. made to the plans or regulations. A detailed entry plan has been submitted. Revised Bring updated pictorials of the gate to City Council. elevations of the gates will be presented at the May 16th City Council meeting. Remove the chain link fence on the southeast corner in the Sheet 2 of the Development Plan/Pedestrian Access Plan presentation presented to Council. has been revised. Put fountains in all the ponds and light the fountains on the A note has been added to sheet 2 of the Development ponds that border Southlake Blvd. Plan/Pedestrian Access Plan. Mr. Stacy's home will be refurbished to bring it up to customary Clarification is needed at City Council. iconic standards and how that's going to be envisioned. The regulation regarding minimum house sizes has been Explore the possibility of deed restrictions on the remaining revised to require new homes constructed on Lots16-19, Stacy properties. Block A and Lot 1, Block B to meet the minimum 4,000 SF floor area, but this requirement only applies to subsequent owners and not to current owners of those lots. Site Data Existing Zoning "AG and "SF -1A" Proposed Zoning "R -PUD Land Use Designation Low Density Residential Gross/Net Acreage (Private Streets) 57.95 Dwelling Units/Residential Lots 57 Gross Density 0.98 du/acre Net Density (Private Streets) 0.98 du/acre Open Space % 19.67% Lot Area Range 22,023 SF to 89,727 SF Average Lot Area 29,834 SF R -PUD Regulations�'a • Private street with one gated entrance • Sidewalks as shown • Rear setbacks and side setbacks adjacent to a street as shown • Side and rear lot lines as shown "'0 it T� n j q I.`u�iY/ - - _ f The Marq drive X,,�,i "` � � � 1 '• -! Gate location +. L k� - --- __ - S0UT11LAfCE $L — — - 1 F + Y Site Data Existing Zoning "AG" and "SF -1A" Proposed Zoning "R -PUD Land Use Designation Low Density Residential Gross/Net Acreage (Private Streets) 57.95 Dwelling Units/Residential Lots 57 Gross Density 0.98 du/acre Net Density (Private Streets) 0.98 du/acre Open Space % 20.53% Lot Area Range 22,023 SF to 65,458 SF Average Lot Area 29,834 SF R -PUD Regulations Private street with one gated entrance Sidewalks as shown Rear setbacks and side setbacks adjacent to a street as shown Side and rear lot lines as shown CIu - -�---- r --r G 7- - 4-- L— I --LTJ-- �/— - The Marq drive Gate location IMM Lot 1, Block B reconfigured to provide more open space - 1� , s f 1 cars GRDIIR, INC. TEXTURED PATTERNEI COLORED �. PAVEMENT PLANT SCREENING HBDGES IN FRONT OF PIPE RATI. FENCING - TYP THE ENTRY PLAN I J k I �MONUMtl N'1' / SIGN O 2 LOW STONE WALLS py �MONUbIEN7' CRESCENT —HEIGHTS— R -PUD zoning follows SF -20A district with the following exceptions: Regulation SF -20A Proposed R -PUD Front Yard Setback 35' 35' 15' 15' Side Yard Setback (15' for side yard adjacent to ( 5' for side yard adjacent to street on reverse frontage lots) street on reverse frontage lots 40' Rear Yard Setback 40 (35' for lots fronting (35' for lots fronting on a cul-de-sac) on a cul-de-sac and as shown Maximum Lot 30% 45% Coverage Minimum Lot Area 20,000 SF 22,000 SF Lot Width 100' 100' Lot Depth 125' 125' Maximum Height 35' and 2'/2 stories 35' and 2'/2 stories Minimum Floor Area 1,800 SF 4,000 SF Maximum Density 2.18 du/acre 0.98 du/acre 5L NCO STURLING xSR_ csleanNgqm^scc "' Tree Canopy Coverage Total site area 2,524,414 s.f. Totaexisting canopy 621,648 s.f. 24.63% u _, Wiz, --�� -- 9 Preserved tree canopy (green) 404,085 s.f. --> 65.00°k i Possible preserved tree canopy (yellow) 79,912 s.f. --> 12.86% q Removed tree canopy (red) 137,651 s.f. > 22.14°/n 621,648 s.f. > 100.00% - 14 --7 a 5©UTHLAKE BL~V-H. LIIT% WAY o� uawoce uc gLAN CO CIB. r STERLING CIR. Tree Canopy Coverage Total site area 2,524,414 s.f. taexisting canopy 621,648 s.f. 3Too 9- _ 7 -7 -7 - Preserved _Preserved tree canopy (green) 404,085 s.f. 65.00% -p a" Possible preserved tree canopy (yellow) 79,912 s.f. --> 12.86% j Removed tree canopy (red) 137,651 s.f. > 22.149/b .p 621,648 s.f. > 100.00% -_ - 16 LCT X 4 v\ I —jI 41 42 T�7- nop ion - - - - Lot 1, Block B reconfigured to provide more open space — - - i7-iTM—A-K E BLVD. UNITY WAY CRESCENT HEIGHTS 5NOKT TERM PARALLEL PAKMNG sx��` J _ PkTro .� ArL-mAF^}mS' � r,J� exrsnwG rKees ro 004, -WAIL RgMAIN PKOTECT€o t uxoaMac€o rm. _ i 1� OPEN5PACF T sr�e saaun, me { MAIL KIOSK IN OPEN SPACE ZA 17-016 Mail Kiosk Exhibit 191 Legend -� 5'OrnamentalIron 1 . .. �- 5' Masonry Wall f ,F 8' Wood Fence Retain Existing Fence _- %�-- �, _ } y, o 37 f { 1 Iii B" ; f 1 '- —. SOUTHLAKE BLVD. 23 Legend � 5 Ornamental Iron bFb M , 6' Masonry Wall 8' Wood Fence Retain Existing Fence i , . I Ornamental Iron fence removed s o u T x L A x Fence to r 4 .\ Amf ATETT! Northern Shady Oaks Offices Fence i,lr, , a , •� _ s x - - _ •.� � .;may .!t v s � a • - < ?moi''' - .., .' � - � � � P'r x _ __ j� - f�, �' 1 -_ - � �'7 ;� �?`.^.ks x.�� �i' ,qp'✓es* , --y�fi_���yF�� p � Western Shady Oaks Offices Fence A tF _� 5^ y ' S lk or Western Shady Oaks Offices rero.e CRESCENT GREENS c�#ot'C�n STOKI! cA n11a=�' SAGE GROUP, INC. u— D.ye� 11 s��� TYPICAL STONE SCREEN WALL S rEu 81 -424- 76°92 ZA17 - 01 b "fEL' 817-024-2fi2fi r�r�r�rr�rr�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r�r� Ornamental Metal Fence Exhibit 1-Ij<° v 1-1�4' W¢WfMIALN WLS C[YPNEPSPMrtE¢ED GG¢ wo Slm011l. WWUPIttM =sorovics-is ®N1 n"M OPPOSITE NANO FOR ENTRY GATES EXIT LANE GATES E`,TRf �SLVQ Revised elevation to be presented at 5/16 Council meeting ENTRY LANE GATES rtNp5TSIO- P) SPIFRO BEPWN�A EELECIE� v1/a' Wcw[artmox Ruts P R AOTi0M7 ON G4IE. MIM NERS MRfRm, 6RWIRl SFYiOTI r PoINi®RYAIX51dW FINISX 9Q. RAt -e N.— ENTR N.— N F� t ,� � � } �, '� ti � ,� � ,, X �� �� ��':; ., ' '��, .�r �k�- ,, �_ v. �` ti �� A� ``,�, f ` �3, �l 5. l �,� �', ���I� �'3�.s ., �• �6 • Ji�� r � w - I �r �y�tl 7� 1 .�,ll�-�--.� �'Il 4C� gj y a Ohl AA& 17 ks. j Ohl AA& 37 3x �`y' u' " 'F��t ..a• :'., S �'�'k ,�' ,y'f.r'' `'y_ .i sl�i� ' `� EE rr 77 �a• -� s:" �-a� � ! �,� v�'� _ � .�'• fit. :+i' al �� -rse -�� ,. "" �� � _R. __ =a Tic '_i • Y - � . g_'. ns £ k - 1 .. „ t ''' ` 6 On XF t _ r � `tIo 1' Yp r~' - ♦ fi, j� y. J^s: `I . " t ;fix a ° . n� +-._y.�'f-, d-'✓. } "�` ✓ �. t t + � I ._ Iv " Vii. ft f' 47 _ f n i Y % SLPMG@ G1R./ N STERL@ME CI R. u � f SEpQtp OS 051 DRAJNAGE AREa _ � DRMNAGE DIVIDE FLOW DIRECT IDN ARROW >ww 31 BL- t�/ i6 WAY 17.Y V -B . POST DEVELOF`® SIfE DRMVAE pATA axw�.rw..mxmm�w �,�m^n rruixn�rvmmnwvx e i>xvs�nrsa�na�v}.suprsaa•m • Shady Oaks Drive & Unity Way - Acceptable Level of Service • Shady Oaks Drive & Driveway 1 - Acceptable Level of Service • Shady Oaks Drive & Southlake Boulevard - Acceptable Level of Service P&Z Action May 4, 2017; Approved (4-0) subject to the staff report dated April 28, 2017 and Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 27, 2017 noting the applicant's willingness to measure the silt levels in the adjoining pond/creek areas before the project commences and then at various intervals after the project commences, further noting the applicant's willingness to bring updated pictorials of the gate and how they will look when they go to City Council, noting the applicant's willingness to remove the chain link fence on the southeast corner in the presentation that they present to Council, also noting the applicant's willingness to put fountains in all the ponds, to light the fountains on the ponds that border Southlake Blvd. and that Mr. Stacy's home will be refurbished to bring it up to customary iconic standards and how that's going to be envisioned and also exploring the possibility of deed restrictions on the remaining Stacy properties. CITY OF SOUTH AKE