Loading...
Item 2- Complete PZ Packet 5-04-2017 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 20, 2017 Page 1 of 6 REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 20, 2017 LOCATION: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, Texas Work Session - Executive Conference Room, Suite 268 of Town Hall or City Council Chambers of Town Hall Regular Session - City Council Chambers of Town Hall COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Michael Forman, Daniel Kubiak, Craig Rothmeier, Michael Smietana, Michael Springer and Chris Greer. STAFF PRESENT: Deputy Director of Planning & Development Services, Dennis Killough; Principal Planner, Richard Schell; Planner, Lorrie Fletcher; and Commission Secretary, Selena Serrano. WORK SESSION: 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. RECAP OF CITY COUNCIL’S ACTION AND DISCUSSION OF PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION / SIGN BOARD AGENDA ITEMS. 3. DISCUSSION OF ITEMS ON MEETING AGENDA 4. ADJOURNMENT REGULAR SESSION: 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Forman called the regular session to order at 6:30 p.m. 2. EXECUTIVE SESSION No Executive Session held. 3. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES A motion was made to approve the minutes from the April 6, 2017 meeting. Motion: Kubiak Second: Springer Ayes: Smietana, Forman, Kubiak, Springer, Rothmeier Nays: None Abstain: Greer Approved: 5-0-1 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 20, 2017 Page 2 of 6 4. ADMINISTRATIVE COMMENTS No administrative comments. Chairman announced that items will be taken out of order and will be starting with item No. 6 ZA17-019. 6. CONSIDER: ZA17-019, PLAT REVISION FOR LOTS 1R1, 1R2, 9R1 AND 9R2, BLOCK C, COMMERCE BUSINESS PARK BEING A REVISION OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 1 AND 9, BLOCK C, COMMERCE BUSINESS PARK, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS AND LOCATED AT 2805 MARKET LOOP AND 580 COMMERCE ST., SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS. CURRENT ZONING: “I-1” – LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. SPIN #8. PUBLIC HEARING A motion was made to table Item No. 6 at the request of the applicant. Motion: Kubiak Second: Greer Ayes: Smietana, Kubiak, Forman, Rothmeier, Greer, Springer Nays: None Abstain: None Approved: 6-0 REGULAR AGENDA: 8. CONSIDER: ZA17-030, PLAT REVISION FOR LOT 1R, BLOCK 17, SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE PHASE IV BEING A REVISION OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 17 AND A PORTION OF RESERVE STREET, SOUTHLAKE TOWN SQUARE PHASE IV, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS LOCATED AT 1420 DIVISION ST., SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS. CURRENT ZONING: “DT” – DOWNTOWN DISTRICT. SPIN #8. PUBLIC HEARING Principal Planner, Richard Schell, presented item No. 8 ZA17-030. Applicant Frank Bliss 621 Chandon Court, opened for questions. Staff discussed future developments with the applicant. Chairman Forman opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Chairman Forman closed the public hearing. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 20, 2017 Page 3 of 6 A motion was made to approve Item No. 8 ZA17-030 subject to the Staff Report dated April 13, 2017; further subject to the Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated April 13, 2017. Motion: Kubiak Second: Greer Ayes: Smietana, Kubiak, Forman, Rothmeier, Greer, Springer Nays: None Abstain: None Approved: 6-0 10. CONSIDER: ZA17-032, PLAT REVISION FOR LOTS 8R1 AND 8R2, BLOCK 1, MOSS FARMS BEING A REVISION OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOT 8R, BLOCK 1, MOSS FARMS, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS LOCATED AT 1505 MOSS LANE, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS. CURRENT ZONING: "SF-1A" SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. SPIN #4. PUBLIC HEARING Planner, Lorrie Fletcher, presented item No. 10 ZA17-032. Staff opened for questions. No questions asked. Applicant- Clayton Redinger with DeOtte Engineering- opened for questions. No questions asked. Chairman Forman opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Chairman Forman closed the public hearing. A motion was made to approve Item ZA17 -032 subject to the Staff Report dated April 14, 2017; and the Plat Review Summary No. 1 dated April 12, 2017. Motion: Kubiak Second: Greer Ayes: Smietana, Greer, Kubiak, Forman, Springer, Rothmeier, Nays: None Abstain: None Approved: 6-0 5. CONSIDER: ZA17-013, SITE PLAN FOR THE GLEN ALAN SALON ON PROPERTY BEING DESCRIBED AS LOT 2R2, BLOCK1, MIRON ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, LOCATED AT 205 MIRON DRIVE, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS. CURRENT ZONING: "B-1” BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 20, 2017 Page 4 of 6 SPIN #8 PUBLIC HEARING Planner, Lorrie Fletcher, presented item No. 5 ZA17-032. Staff opened for questions. Commission asked if the trees on the south side of the tract belong to the property. Staff confirmed that those trees do not belong to the property owner. Applicants- Nate Ferish 1021 Tennison Pkwy, Colleyville TX and Jerry Ferish 3109 Scenic View, Bedford TX opened for questions. Commission asked if there was an example model of what the building will look like. Applicant stated that he does not have a modeled structure of the future building. Commission suggests that the applicant add stucco to the north side of the building and possibly add more articulation to the façade. Chairman Forman opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Chairman Forman closed the public hearing. A motion was made to approve item No. 5 ZA17-013 subject to the Staff Report dated April 20, 2017; and further subject to the Site Plan Review Summary No. 3 dated April 13, 2017; specifically granting the variance related to the tree preservation ordinance; however, noting the applicant’s willingness, with respect to the variance, putting cost saving associated with that into cladding the entire exterior of the building with a 3-coat traditional stucco system. Motion: Kubiak Second: Greer Ayes: Smietana, Greer, Kubiak, Forman, Springer, Rothmeier, Nays: None Abstain: None Approved: 6-0 7. CONSIDER: ORDINANCE NO. 480-725, (ZA17-025), ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT PLAN FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT TO BE KNOWN AS LOT 14, L.B.G. HALL NO. 686 ADDITION ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS TRACT 2E, L.B.G. HALL SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 686 AND TRACT 9C, T.M. HOOD SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 706, IN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS LOCATED AT 583 SHADY OAKS DRIVE, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS. CURRENT ZONING: "AG" AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. PROPOSED ZONING: "SF-30" SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 20, 2017 Page 5 of 6 DISTRICT. SPIN #7. PUBLIC HEARING Principal Planner, Richard Schell, presented item No. 7 ZA17-025. Staff opened for questions. No questions were asked. Applicant Josh Wargo 2106 West Morphy Street, Fort Worth Texas- gave a brief presentation of the proposed Zoning Change and Concept Plan. Commission asked if the owner has contacted Todd Zavodnick who is opposed to the Zoning Change. Applicant stated that there has not been any contact with this person. Chairman Forman opened the public hearing. No one came forward. Chairman Forman closed the public hearing. A motion was made to approve item No. 7 ZA17-025 subject to the Staff Report dated April 13, 2017; and the Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2 dated April 13, 2017. Motion: Kubiak Second: Greer Ayes: Smietana, Greer, Kubiak, Forman, Springer, Rothmeier, Nays: None Abstain: None Approved: 6-0 9. CONSIDER: RESOLUTION NO. 17-022, (ZA17-031), SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS, ANTENNAS, OR ANCILLARY STRUCTURES ON PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CARROLL ISD NO. 3 ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS LOCATED AT 2400 N. CARROLL AVENUE, SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS. CURRENT ZONING: "CS" COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT. SPIN #2. PUBLIC HEARING Planner, Lorrie Fletcher, presented item No. 9 ZA17-031. Staff opened for questions. No questions were asked. Applicant- Peter Kavanaugh, 1620 Handley Drive, Dallas TX- opened for questions. Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 20, 2017 Page 6 of 6 Commission asked if there was another pole that could be used for this structure due to the opposed feedback. Applicant stated that he met with one resident and provided photos of an existing tower that was located at Carroll High School. Applicant stated that if they were to relocate the antenna tower to the opposite side, it would be difficult to access the equipment compound. Chairman Forman opened the public hearing. Syed Hussain, 2501 Oak Bend Court- Asked questions about additional landscape around the cell tower; asked if they are planning to add any additional landscape. Also stating his concerns with the view of the structure and being able to see the cell tower from his backyard. Chairman Forman closed the public hearing. A motion was made to approve ZA17-031 subject to the Staff Report dated April 13, 2017; and further subject to the Specific Use Permit Review Summary No. 1 dated April 11, 2017; specially granting the two variances requested for the landscape requirement and the co-location requirement. Motion: Kubiak Second: Greer Ayes: Smietana, Greer, Kubiak, Forman, Springer, Rothmeier, Nays: None Abstain: None Approved: 6-0 11. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 7:30 P.M. ______________________________ Michael Forman ATTEST: Chairman ________________________________ Selena Serrano Commission Secretary Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Meeting Report Meeting 6 – October 26, 2016 MEETING LOCATION: Southlake Town Hall – Executive Conference Room, Suite 268 1400 Main Street Southlake, Texas, 76092 IN ATTENDANCE: • City Council Members: Gary Fawks, Chad Patton • Planning & Zoning Commission Members: Michael Springer, Chris Greer • Park Board Member: Frances Scharli • City Staff: Ken Baker, Dennis Killough, Richard Schell, Kyle Hogue AGENDA ITEMS: 1. Call to Order. 2. Review and make recommendations on the proposed Stacy property residential development generally located north of W. Southlake Blvd., west of Shady Oaks Dr., south of the South Ridge Lakes Addition and east of the Ginger Creek Addition. 3. Adjournment. MEETING OVERVIEW: On October 26, 2016 the Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee held their sixth meeting. The Committee was sent a packet of materials prior to the meeting that were to be discussed during the session. A meeting agenda was posted and the meeting time was advertised on the City’s website. The following meeting report focuses on discussion points made during the meeting by members of the Committee, public and City staff. This report is neither verbatim nor does it represent official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by the Committee, City staff, and any attendees of the meeting. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow development cases through the process. Please visit CityofSouthlake.com/Planning for more information. Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Stacy Property Meeting #6 – October 26, 2016 Page 2 ITEM #2 DISCUSSION –STACY PROPERTY (Proposed 59-Lot, 58-Acre residential subdivision north of Southlake Blvd., and west of Shady Oaks Dr.): • Staff made presentation to the Committee • Kosse Maykus, representing the project, made a presentation to the Committee. The following includes comments by the presenter and other representatives of the project: o Looked at one-acre project initially  Could not get something they were comfortable with  Looked at intersections at FM 1709 and Shady Oaks o Wanted to align with the entrance to The Marq o Surveyed all the trees on the property. About 38 trees > 25 inches in diameter (Legacy Oaks) o Developer believes this proposal meets the intent of the Land Use Plan o Rick Stacy’s house on the property will stay o Circle area (oval park) in the center of the proposal contains all but about six of the identified Legacy Oak trees  This area will not require much site work o Would work with the City’s traffic consultant and staff to get a traffic signal at FM 1709  Developer will pay some part or half of cost for traffic signal installation o Proposing a gated subdivision with private streets o Intention is for this to be a custom-built subdivision o Rick Stacy owns most of the land. The west 10 acres owned by others o If traffic signal on FM 1709 not provided, the access onto FM 1709 will not be provided. Emergency access to FM 1709 will be provided on the western portion of the property o Buffer provided along FM 1709 – 40’ to 100’ in width, homes face the green o Tried to consider what the project would look like from 1709 o Both entrances lead to the central open space area – focal point • Questions for the Applicant(s) Q: In your proposal you were saying about an emergency exit – would that be sod with brick or real driveway? A: It would be real pavement. Most emergency access is 22’ fire lane – this would probably be a 24’ Q: Consider doing that but more natural? Doesn’t look like a driveway when you look at it. A: Tell us what to do and we’ll do it Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Stacy Property Meeting #6 – October 26, 2016 Page 3 Q: People across the street in Timberlake previously worried about ponds being silted in – they wanted money put in escrow if it had to be cleaned out A: Timberlake is 15-20 years. More regulation for siltation now – will be under much more intense regulatory environment. We will come in and grass the whole site Q: Would you be willing to have an escrow account to ensure that the Timberlake Pond is not impacted by construction? A: Do not have a problem – real key would be the language. What is it that will trigger doing that? RESPONSE BY COMMITTEE: Think you need to do something – establish a baseline COMMITTEE: Is the concern what will happen during construction or long term? COMMITTEE: Silt built up from previous stuff – felt it was unjustly dumped on them – didn’t want to have to pay again Q: What is your park dedication on this? A: Would be considered a private park Q: Is there no concern for the ponds on site that will go away? A: Ponds are not natural Q: Are the ponds on the site spring-fed ponds or well-fed ponds? A: Well-fed. Will commence delineation barring the government saying the ponds need to be saved – otherwise ponds will be filled in Q: Green space would be built with existing grade at 1709? A: Southlake Blvd. is pretty close to grade – no need to change existing grade for greenbelt Q: Retaining wall? A: No – can meet grade requirements Q: Wall and fence plan? A: Wrought iron fencing along trees in southwest corner. Would put in 8’ foot wood fence where we back up to residential RESPONSE BY COMMITTEE: Is there a buffer for neighbors? RESPONSE BY DEVELOPER: No just a normal building line – quite a few trees. Could put a landscape easement? Q: Taking some of these lots on your own? Have you identified other builders? A: Have about 5-8. Depends on what their capacity is. Have a preferred list Q: At any point in time did you look at ingress/egress further north on Shady Oaks? May be problematic if you cannot get a light at 1709 A: No Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Stacy Property Meeting #6 – October 26, 2016 Page 4 Q: Where would the gate be? A: Gate would be located to allow queuing – cue two or three cars Q: With the lot count – would you have to get a variance? A: Could do without a land use amendment if one lot were lost • Questions for Staff by Committee Q: What does the Ordinance say about gated communities? A: If the properties are already owned you must get 100% participation and petition the city, but you can bring in development as a private street and gated subdivision but this must be approved by City Council • Questions for Staff by Applicant Q: Private streets are allowed if approved by City Council? A: Would need a variance • Comments by the Committee o Drainage and silting problem is what I have heard the most complaints about o The street - people were worried about high-school kids making a left-hand turning out of there going to school RESPONSE BY DEVELOPER: Have talked to people. Do not know what their reaction will be – do not know what neighbors will think o Like the buffer in the front o Like the median in both of the proposed drives o Density may be problematic o Council has not shown interest in having a big lot with a bunch of small lots (adding the Stacy properties to bring the density down and have the same number of lots) o Not a fan of gated communities o Like the oval park in the middle, saving the trees o Show density calculation without including Stacy property or private streets in calculation Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Stacy Property Meeting #6 – October 26, 2016 Page 5 STAFF PRESENTATION SHOWN TO COMMITTEE: Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Stacy Property Meeting #6 – October 26, 2016 Page 6 Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Stacy Property Meeting #6 – October 26, 2016 Page 7 Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Stacy Property Meeting #6 – October 26, 2016 Page 8 Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Stacy Property Meeting #6 – October 26, 2016 Page 9 Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Stacy Property Meeting #6 – October 26, 2016 Page 10 Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Stacy Property Meeting #6 – October 26, 2016 Page 11 APPLICANT PRESENTATION SHOWN TO COMMITTEE: Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Stacy Property Meeting #6 – October 26, 2016 Page 12 Southlake 2035 Corridor Planning Committee Item #2 – Stacy Property Meeting #6 – October 26, 2016 Page 13 ...\040-062 Utility Plan.dgn 4/17/2017 10:01:09 AM ...\040-062 Pre DA Map.dgn 4/17/2017 9:50:41 AM ...\040-062 Post DA Map.dgn 4/17/2017 9:50:00 AM Zoning Change and Development Plan Crescent Heights ZA17-016 Applicant: Hat Creek Development Request: Approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Crescent Heights from “AG” Agricultural District and “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District to “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development to develop 57 residential lots and 11 open space lots on approximately 57.95 acres. Location: Generally located north of W. Southlake Blvd. and west of Shady Oaks Dr. ZA17-016 Aerial View View North Development Plan Site Data Summary Existing Zoning “AG” and “SF-1A” Proposed Zoning “R-PUD Land Use Designation Low Density Residential Gross/Net Acreage (Private Streets) 57.95 Dwelling Units/Residential Lots 57 Gross Density 0.98 du/acre Net Density (Private Streets) 0.98 du/acre Open Space % 19.67% Lot Area Range 22,023 SF to 89,727 SF Average Lot Area 29,834 SF R-PUD Regulations Regulation SF-20A Proposed R-PUD Front Yard Setback 35’ 35’ Side Yard Setback 15’ 15’ (25’ for side yard adjacent to street on reverse frontage lots) Rear Yard Setback 40’ (35’ for lots fronting on a cul-de-sac) 40’ (35’ for lots fronting on a cul-de-sac and as shown) Maximum Lot Coverage 30% 45% Minimum Lot Area 20,000 SF 22,000 SF Lot Width 100’ 100’ Lot Depth 125’ 125’ Maximum Height 35’ and 2 ½ stories 35’ and 2 ½ stories Minimum Floor Area 1,800 SF 4,000 SF Tree Conservation Analysis Mail Kiosk Plan Mail Kiosk Exhibit Fence and Wall Plan Masonry Wall Exhibit Ornamental Metal Fence Exhibit Entry/Exit Gate Detail Utility Plan Pre-Developed Drainage Area Map Post-Developed Drainage Area Map Questions? Residential Planned United Development District- Land Use and Development Regulations and Open Space Management Plan for the 57.95 acre development located at Southlake Blvd. at Shady Oaks Dr. known as Crescent Heights Southlake, Texas 28 April 2017 Case # ZA17-016 Sage Group, Inc. This Residential Planned Unit Development shall abide by the all conditions of the City of Southlake Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, as it pertains to: the “SF-1A” Single-Family Residential zoning district for Lots 16-19, Block A, and Lot 1, Block B; and the “SF-20A” Single-Family Residential zoning district for the remaining lots; and the City of Southlake Subdivision Ordinance No. 483, as amended, with the following exceptions for the “SF-20A” lots only: Lot Area: The minimum area of a lot shall not be less than twenty-two thousand (22,000) square feet. Lot Width: Lot widths shall be measured along the Front Yard setback line for each lot as indicated on the Zoning Development Plan. Lot Coverage: All buildings or structures shall have a maximum lot coverage not exceeding forty five percent (45%) of the lot area, except the sum total of accessory buildings shall not exceed 600 square feet. Minimum House Size: All new houses constructed shall be a minimum of 4,000 s.f. in floor area. A minimum 4’ wide concrete sidewalk shall be required along the internal street frontage of all Residential Lots. Sidewalks and Trails within the Open Space Lots shall be as shown on the Zoning Development Plan and Pedestrian Access Plan. Streets: A 31’ B-B pavement section with standard 6” curb & 50’ Private Street R.O.W. shall be provided along the frontage of all residential lots. The cul-de-sac shall be the standard 100’ B-B diameter paving, in a one hundred ten (110’) foot diameter Private Street ROW, or as shown where median open space is provided. No walls or fences shall be allowed within the flood plain, as it is ultimately determined. The sidewalk along Shady Oaks Drive is to be provided in the location shown on the Development Plan. Side and rear lot lines shall be configured as shown on the Development Plan. Rear setbacks, and side setbacks adjacent to a street are as labeled and shown on the Development Plan. This development shall have one primary, gated vehicular entry, with an additional emergency-only access point meeting the fire safety requirements (as shown on the Development Plan) and private streets, built to standard city specifications. Open Space Management Plan: Intended Usage: The common open space areas of the project are intended for the quiet enjoyment of the residents within the development. The project frontage along Southlake Blvd. (Open Space Lot 1, Block A) will buffer the homes from Southlake Blvd. and provide a nicely landscaped streetscape along this portion of Southlake Blvd. As primarily a visual amenity will act as a welcoming and well-maintained “front door” to the development. The portion of this open space along the creek/ drainage area at the southwest corner of the property will be maintained as natural as possible, in order the preserve the many existing trees within that area. Occasional trimming of the grounds and drainage-ways may be necessary from time to time, to keep a quality appearance. The internal open space preserve within the Private Street B oval loop, also called Open Space Lot 5, is the central open space focus area for the project. It will contain many preserved trees, and the area outside those tree preservation areas will be fully landscaped, irrigated and maintained on a regular basis, and shall serve as a visual amenity and the interior “central park” for the use of the residents. The open space lot and “endcaps,” located at the west end of the existing estate which will be incorporated into the project), as well as the various open space medians, will be developed as manicured landscaped areas. The HOA will maintain all open space areas. All sidewalks and trails are intended for recreational pedestrian traffic, shall be kept in good condition, and accessible to the residents. Any significant changes to the plan must be approved by the City Council. All Common Open Space shall be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association (HOA), to be established for the development. All other areas shall be the responsibility of the individual property owners, including the front yards and required streetscape trees of the residential lots. All property owners, except for the existing homes fronting on Shady Oaks, shall be required to be a member of the HOA. Dues assessments, required for the maintenance of the common areas and other HOA activities, shall be mandatory. The HOA, through a resident Board of Directors, shall be responsible for the maintenance and operation of the protected open space within the development , either directly or through a third-party management company. No full-time employees are contemplated to be necessary. The expenses required to maintain the common areas at a quality level shall be estimated annually by the HOA Board, and dues shall be determined and assessed on each property owner in an equitable fashion at such a rate as necessary to maintain such a level of quality. The annual expenses for such open space maintenance are initially estimated to be $50,000, or approximately $940 for each of the HOA homeowners. Authority to enforce these requirements, and to place a lien on the property if such dues are not paid, shall be in the form of written Deed Restrictions and Covenants, agreed to by all property owners in the HOA at purchase, and shall run with the land. Provisions shall be made, in the HOA bylaws and Deed Restrictions, that in the unlikely event the HOA fails to maintain all or a portion of the protected open space in reasonable order and condition, the City of Southlake may, but is not required to, assume responsibility for its maintenance and take corrective action, including the provision of extended maintenance. The costs of such maintenance may be charged to the HOA or individual property owners that make up the HOA, and may include administrative costs and penalties which shall become a lien on all property in the development. SPIN MEETING REPORT SPIN Item Number: SPIN17-04 Project Name: Crescent Green SPIN Neighborhood: SPIN #6 Meeting Date: February 28, 2017 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: Twenty-one (21) Host: David Alexander, Community Engagement Committee Applicant Presenting: Kosse Maykus City Staff Present: Jerod Potts, Assistant to the Director – Planning and Development Services Attached to the end of this report are the Blackboard Connect Delivery Results for the February 28, 2017 SPIN Town Hall Forum Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.com and clicking on “Learn More” under Video On Demand; forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY : Property Situation: • Located to the northwest of the Southlake Blvd. (FM 1709) and Shady Oaks Dr. intersection Development Details: • Under contract for various sites depicted (otherwise known as the Stacy property) • Various property owners • Attempting to comply with the land use plan and develop a high quality neighborhood • Near FM 1709 (Southlake Blvd.) and Shady Oaks • Four (4) Stacy lots included in plan along Shady Oaks – tied properties together • The Marq is across the street to the east • Existing Stacy home to remain - would be updated / refurbished • Four other Stacy homes will remain as one acre lots • Other structures will be demolished • A lot of new ponds installed for detention (some for aesthetics, people enjoy the visual) • Plan is to save as many trees as possible • Over twenty-five (25) 20" - 30" Oak Trees in the center oval park – plan is to save all trees in that center • Do not have a strong feeling either way regarding entrance aligning with Timber Lake across the street • Have different plan options for entry to the subdivision • Driveway (along Shady Oaks Dr.) lines up to future entrance of The Marq • Plan A shows an entrance onto FM 1709 with the attempt to get a signalized intersection o Cannot give assurances that curb cut can be secured there (for entrance) o Preference would be to not have access there if cannot get a light • Plan B removes that proposed signalized intersection o Use emergency only exit o Committed to the city that all homes would have fire suppression systems • Applicant mentioned that this plan is in compliance with the land use plan • 19% of development is open space – much of the common space would be maintained by an HOA • Would be a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning • Would also have additional fencing, setback requirements • Going to be a custom home development Exhibits presented at SPIN: QUESTIONS / CONCERNS: • What is your plan for dealing with drainage? o Ponds are basically the same in both plan options - same amount of water. Hydrology analysis showed that there needed to be more ponds to mitigate potential storm drain through this site. There will be no more water exiting this site after the development than there is today. Ended up with 7 different detention areas • Concerned about drainage due to curb cut near entrance at 1709 that carries quite a bit of water - water drains that way and the proposal shows paving on that area o There is a lot of thought on that from an engineering perspective • Four houses on the east side of the property; those are going to remain as one- acre tracts? o Yes • They look quite a bit larger o Those are one acre lots - use the open space to save trees, use of ponds. Those are true one acre lots • What is the range? o 23,000 square feet - one acre • Gated community? o Yes • Where are the trails going to be? How does the public access, do you have trails planned? o There is a whole system of sidewalks, will be trails in open space. There will be a gate for cars. Where we have had gated developments we encourage pedestrian access • Pedestrians will be allowed to access those trails? o Not private - encourage their use • Do you see it a problem for future homeowners that anyone can walk through? o No - not the first time it has been done this way • When Toll Brothers made their presentations, there were discussions about during construction dirt would be exposed - worried that the dirt will come towards Stone Lakes - there were conversations about dredging after the development when everything is built (putting money into escrow) want to see if we can talk about how to handle that - this will be Stone Lakes’ major concern o Get a measurement (contour of ponds) - get existing condition of pond and post condition of pond. Can assure that we are much more sensitized to the need to mitigate the silt • There is a trail on 1709, how would your trail work? o Stone perimeter wall - right now that trail runs by the curb of 1709 -- on this plan (B) intention would be to do a trail connection. Will give as many opportunities as possible for people to leave the neighborhood • On Shady Oaks there are partial trails on the west side – see that you are going into The Marq and you have that little bit of green space; are there plans to make a trail or would there be private property and would never be a trail there? o Bar ditches on the west side. Plan would not be to do anything. Would do something through green space. If there is a way to do something, certainly • Concerned about traffic coming in. About the light - you have commercial traffic over there o Get different viewpoints; hoping to sit down with people in Southridge Lakes, Ginger Creek. Have a traffic study in process SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Blackboard Connect Delivery Results for the February 28, 2017 SPIN Meeting Case No. ZA17-016 S T A F F R E P O R T April 28, 2017 CASE NO: ZA17-016 PROJECT: Zoning Change & Development Plan for Crescent Heights EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Hat Creek Development is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan for Crescent Heights to develop 57 residential lots on property described as Tracts 3H, 3H1, 3J, 3J1, 3J1A, 3J1B, 3J1C and 3J2, Little Berry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, Lots 1R1 and 2, Block 1, Owens Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas; and Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 720 through 1120 W. Southlake Blvd. and 250 through 330 Shady Oaks Dr., South lake, Texas. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District and "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. Requested Zoning; "R-PUD" Residential Planned Unit Development District". SPIN #6. REQUEST DETAILS: The property is generally located north of W. Southlake Blvd. and west of Shady Oaks Dr. and is bounded to the west by the Ginger Creek Addition , to the north by the Southridge Lakes, Phase II Addition and to the southeast by the Shady Oaks Offices. The applicant is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan from “AG” Agricultural District and “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District to “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development for Crescent Heights, a residential subdivision consisting of 57 residential lots and 11 open space lots on approximately 57.95 acres. This proposal complies with the Low Density Residential designation in the 2030 Land Use Plan, which requires a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. A gated community with private streets is proposed. If the private streets are not approved and right of way dedication is required, the net density would be approximately 1.13 dwelling units per acre and the development would not comply with the Low Density Residential land use designation. Approval of a Land Use P lan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential would be required before the “R - PUD” zoning could be approved with the current number of lots. The five homes on the properties currently addressed as 980 and 1000 W. Southlake Blvd. and 300 through 330 Shady Oaks Dr. will remain on one acre or large r lots with a base zoning of “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District. Department of Planning & Development Services Case No. ZA17-016 Site Data Summary Existing Zoning “AG” and “SF-1A” Proposed Zoning “R-PUD Land Use Designation Low Density Residential Gross/Net Acreage (Private Streets) 57.95 Dwelling Units/Residential Lots 57 Gross Density 0.98 du/acre Net Density (Private Streets) 0.98 du/acre Open Space % 19.67% Lot Area Range 22,023 SF to 89,727 SF Average Lot Area 29,834 SF The “R-PUD” district will follow the uses and regulations in the “SF-20A” Single Family Residential District (except for the five lots with existing homes that will follow the “SF- 1A” Single Family Residential District) as noted in the table below: Regulation SF-20A Proposed R-PUD Front Yard Setback 35’ 35’ Side Yard Setback 15’ 15’ (25’ for side yard adjacent to street on reverse frontage lots) Rear Yard Setback 40’ (35’ for lots fronting on a cul-de-sac) 40’ (35’ for lots fronting on a cul-de-sac and as shown) Maximum Lot Coverage 30% 45% Minimum Lot Area 20,000 SF 22,000 SF Lot Width 100’ 100’ Lot Depth 125’ 125’ Maximum Height 35’ and 2 ½ stories 35’ and 2 ½ stories Minimum Floor Area 1,800 SF 4,000 SF The Development Plan shows one street connection to Shady Oaks Dr. that will line up with the southern driveway for The Marq. An emergency access only driveway through an open space lot will connect to W. Southlake Blvd. The United States Postal Service now requires mail kiosks in new s ubdivisions, so exhibits of the proposed kiosk location and design have been provided. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing 2) Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Development Plan Case No. ZA17-016 ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 27, 2017 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (E) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) Link to PowerPoint Presentation Link to R-PUD Regulations Link to Plans Page 1 - Development Plan Pages 2 - 5 Fence and Wall Plan and Exhibits Pages 6 - 8 Mail Kiosk Exhibits Page 9 Tree Conservation Plan Pages 10 - 12 Civil Plans Link to Corridor Planning Committee Report Link to SPIN meeting Report STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817)748-8067 Richard Schell (817)748-8602 Case No. Attachment A ZA17-016 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPLICANT: Hat Creek Development OWNERS: James R. Stacy, Sr., et. al., Crestone Group, Ltd., Rhonda and Larry Highberger, Randall W. Stacy, Ronald and Barbara Stacy and R oy J. Stacy Est. PROPERTY LOCATION: Generally located north of W. Southlake Blvd. and west of Shady Oaks Dr . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Tracts 3H, 3H1, 3J, 3J1, 3J1A, 3J1B, 3J1C and 3J2, Little Berry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, Lots 1R1 and 2, Block 1, Owens Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, L.B.G. Hall No. 686 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas and located at 720 through 1120 W. Southlake Blvd. and 250 through 330 Shady Oaks Dr., Southlake, Texas. LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: “AG” Agricultural District and “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District REQUESTED ZONING: “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District HISTORY: - The property was annexed into the City in 1956 and given the “AG” Agricultural District zoning designation. - A preliminary plat (ZA93-020) for Lot 1, Block 1, Owens Addition was approved June 1, 1993. - A final plat (ZA93-021) for Lot 1, Block 1, Owens Addition was approved June 1, 1993. - A plat revision (ZA98-039) for Lots 1R and 2, Block 1, Owens Addition was approved May 19, 1998. - A Land Use Plan amendment, Zoning Change and Development Plan (ZA13- 092) for Glenmore that proposed sixty-one (61) residential lots and four (4) open space lots on approximately 39.512 acres were withdrawn at the August 7, 2014 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at the appl icant’s request. - A Zoning Change and Concept Plan (ZA14-111) for Glenmore from “AG” Agricultural District to “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District and a Preliminary Plat (ZA14-112) for Glenmore on Lot 1R1, Block 1, Owens Addition, consisting of 16 residential lots and 3 open space lot s on approximately 19.519 acres, were approved January 20, 2015. - A Land Use Plan amendment (CP15-002) and Zoning Change and Development Plan (ZA15-105) for Glenmore that proposed fifty four (54) residential lots and ten (10) open space lots on approximately 49.59 acres was denied by City Council at 1st reading (6-0) on February 2, 2016. Case No. Attachment A ZA17-016 Page 2 SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The site is designated “Low Density Residential”, which specifies single family detached dwellings at a net d ensity of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. The proposed residential development is consistent with this designation. In the event that City Council does not approve the private streets in lieu of right of way dedication, the development will not meet the maximum net density requirement of one or fewer dwelling units per acre in the Low Density Residential Land Use category and approval of a separate Land Use Plan amendment by City Council following a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission will be required prior to approval of the requested zoning change. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan The Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan shows W. Southlake Blvd. to be a Farm-to-Market road with 130’ of right of way and Shady Oaks Dr.to be a two lane undivided collector with 60’ of right of way. Adequate right of way is shown to be dedicated on the plans. Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan The Pathways Master Plan shows the existing 6’ sidewalk along the north side of Southlake Blvd. A <8’ sidewalk is shown on the Pathways Plan along Shady Oaks Dr. The required 4’ sidewalk is shown to extend only along the portion of the development where there is not a bar ditch along the street south of the four existing homes on Shady Oaks Dr. A regulation h as been added that sidewalks are to be provided as shown on the plans. Major Corridors Urban Design Plan The property is in the “Estate Residential” zone in the Major Corridors Urban Design Plan. The following recommendations pertain to the “Estate Residential” zone in the plan. Case No. Attachment A ZA17-016 Page 3 TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions The development shows one street access onto Shady Oaks Dr. Shady Oaks Dr. is currently a two lane undivided collector. The traffic counts for the portion of Shady Oaks adjacent to the proposed development are below: Shady Oaks Dr. (between F.M. 1709 and E. Highland St.) 24hr North Bound (2,104) South Bound (2,015) AM Peak AM (335) 7:30 – 8:30 AM Peak AM (196) 7:45 – 8:45 AM PM Peak PM (202) 3:00 – 4:00 PM Peak PM (266) 3:45 – 4:45 PM * Based on the 2015 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report Traffic Impact Use Lots Vtpd* AM- IN AM- OUT PM- IN PM- OUT Single Family Residential (210) Added 52 498 10 30 34 19 Existing 5 48 1 3 3 2 Total 57 546 11 33 37 21 * Vehicle Trips Per Day * AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour of generator on a weekday * Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition WATER & SEWER: The property will be served by an existing 20” water line in W. Southlake Blvd. and an existing 12” water line in Shady Oaks Dr. Sanitary sewer for the development is proposed to connect to an existing 8” sewer line that runs north and south along the western property line. DRAINAGE: Drainage on the property is generally to the s outhwest portion of the property to an existing culvert that runs under F.M. 1709. TREE PRESERVATION: The Tree Preservation Plan shows that there is approximately 24.63% existing tree cover on the site. If the case was a request for a straight zoning change, Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585 -D would require that a minimum of 60% of the existing canopy be preserved. For property sought to be zoned R-PUD, the City Council shall consider the application for a Tree Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development Case No. Attachment A ZA17-016 Page 4 application. The applicant is proposing to preserve approximately 65% of the existing tree cover. CITIZEN INPUT: The following meetings were held to discuss the development: A SPIN meeting for this project was held by the applicant on February 28, 2017. A link to the report is provided. Link to SPIN Report A 2035 Corridor Planning Committee meeting was held on October 26, 2016. A link to the report is provided. Link to Corridor Planning Committee Report STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Revised Development Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 27, 2017. Case No. Attachment B ZA17-016 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA17-016 Page 1 Development Plan Review Summary Case No.: ZA17-016 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 04/27/17 Project Name: Development Plan – Crescent Green APPLICANT: Kosse Maykus ENGINEER: Keith Hamilton Hat Creek Development Hamilton Duffy, P.C. P.O. Box 92747 8241 Mid-Cities Blvd. #100 Southlake, TX 76092 North Richland Hills, TX 76182 Phone: (817) 991-8182 (817) 268-0408 E-mail: kosse@maykus.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 04/17/17 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELL AT (817) 748 -8602. 1. A Preliminary Plat that conforms to the R-PUD district zoning must be processed and approved and then a Final Plat (or Plat Revision) processed and record ed prior to the conveyance of any lots or the issuance of any building permits. Portions of the property are already platted as Lots 1R1 and 2, Block 1, Owens Addition, so a Plat Revision or a Plat Vacation must be processed and recorded prior to approval and recording of a Final Plat. 2. Please be aware that all plans and exhibits submitted with an application for an “R-PUD” Residential Planned Unit Development District zoning are approved as part of the “R -PUD” zoning ordinance and that changes to the plan s after Council approval will require re-approval of an “R- PUD” Zoning Change and Development Plan. 3. The area of the private roads is approximately 7.6 acres. In the event that City Council does not approve the private road in lieu of right of way dedication, the development will not meet the maximum net density requirement of one or fewer dwelling units per acre in the Low Density Residential Land Use category in the 2030 Land Use Plan and approval of a separate Land Use Plan amendment by City Council following a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission will be required prior to approval of the requested zoning change. The net density if right of way dedication is required is approximately 1.13 dwelling units per acre. 4. Staff strongly recommends relocating residential lot lines out of the creek area and placing the entirety of the creek in the adjacent open space lot so that the HOA will be responsible for maintaining the creek area instead of individual property owners. The applicant is proposi ng to fill the area of floodplain shown crossing the lot boundaries subject to the results of a flood study. 5. Provide fence elevations for the wood fence along the north property line showing materials, height and spacing of posts or columns. Specify the procedure for constructing the wood fence along the northern property line and tying into existing fencing since there are 11 different property owners. 6. Please dimension the height of the gates and columns on the exhibit of the entrance/exit gates. 7. A <8’ sidewalk is shown on the Pathways Plan along Shady Oaks Dr. The required 4’ sidewalk is shown to extend only along the portion of the development where there is not a bar ditch along the street south of the four existing homes on Shady Oaks Dr. A regulat ion has been added that Case No. Attachment C ZA17-016 Page 2 sidewalks are to be provided as shown on the plans.. A 6’ existing sidewalk is shown on the Pathways Plan along Southlake Blvd. The sidewalk is shown on the plans. 8. Please provide an exhibit of the cluster mail boxes. 9. Add language to the Open Space Management Plan regarding maintenance of the private streets and gated areas stating that the HOA is responsible for maintaining the streets and gated areas in addition to all other open space areas and also add language in the HOA bylaws and deed restrictions regarding maintenance of the streets and gated areas in addition to all other open space areas. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. A detailed Tree Conservation Plan which complies with the approved development Tree Conservation Analysis will be required to be submitted with the submittal of a Preliminary Plat and/or Final Plat. * Tree Conservation Analysis complies with the Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The development has 24.63% of existing tree cover and if it was proposed to be straight zoning 60% of the existing tree cover would be required to be pre served. 65% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved. * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree c over in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% – 20% 70% 20.1 – 40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and Case No. Attachment C ZA17-016 Page 3 make a recommendation to the City Council re garding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: * Existing tree credits are proposed to be taken for canopy trees required to be planted within the south bufferyard adjacent to W. Southlake Blvd. Existing tree credits shall only be granted if the tree/s are in healthy condition and all requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined at the time of inspection for a Permanent Certificate of Occupancy. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Alejandra (Alex) Ayala, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8274 E-mail: aayala@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. Due to public feedback concerning traffic within the City, staff recommends that a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) be submitted to the Public Works staff for review prior to placing this Case No. Attachment C ZA17-016 Page 4 item on the agenda. Consider including traffic projections contributing to Shady Oaks Drive and the following elements: A. A combined analysis with the fully developed site of Bicentennial P ark and impacts to Shady Oaks during park peak times as well as Saturday nights. The Marc is a facility which can accommodate banquets on the weekends. B. Analysis for determining if a left turn lane on Shady Oaks is needed due to the proximity of Private Street A and Bicentennial Park driveway. * Construction within FM 1709 right of way shall require a permit from TxDOT. Submit permit application prior to site plan approval. * Refer to Driveway Ordinance No. 634 for design criteria. * Proposed private streets must be constructed to conform to City street standards. * Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. * Refer to Driveway Ordinance No. 634 for design criteria. * Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. * Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. * Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. A drainage study of stream BB-8 must accompany the submittal of Civil Construction Plans. The study shall include:  Hydrologic and hydraulic models for the determination of the 100-year water surface elevation and include the FM 1709 box culverts.  Model shall include upper reaches of stream BB-8 near Lots 37, 38 and 39.  Model shall include tailwater impacts to the downstream pond system.  Changes to watershed timing due to development.  Detention pond calculations and routing.  Recommendations for mitigation of changes to the watershed. NOTE: The North Central Texas Council of Governments through Halff Associates, Inc. has completed a drainage study of stream BB-8 which extends the limits of detailed study to a point north of FM 1709. 2. Finish floor elevations of Lots 37, 38 and 39 shall be 2’ above the 100 -year water surface elevation of stream BB-8. 3. Development plans shows lot lines and fences within boundaries of 100- year floodplain. Fences will not be allowed in the floodplain. Any changes to the site plan after a detailed drainage study has been completed may require a revision to the development plan and may need to be approve d by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. Case No. Attachment C ZA17-016 Page 5 4. Western drainage easement of Lot 48 on Blanco Circle currently contains a storm drain line which discharges onto Crescent Heights. Civil construction plans shall include capacity calculations of existing drainage swale and runoff from upstream watershed. 5. Drainage area map shall include contours from upstream watershed. 6. Provide grading plan containing 2’ contours. Contours may be obtained from the City of Southlake. 7. Differences between pre- and post- development runoff shall be captured in detention pond(s). Proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of the 1, 5 and 100 - year storm events. Access easements are needed for maintenance of detention ponds. 8. Verify size, shape, and/or location of the detention ponds (as depicted on the development plan). Any changes to size, shape, and/or location of the proposed pond(s) may require a revision to the development plan and may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission a nd the City Council. * Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards. The proposed flume will not be allowed. * Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #20 and requires a fee to be paid pr ior to beginning construction ($214.29/Acre). * Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. EASEMENTS: 1. Detention ponds shall be dedicated by plat as drainage ea sements. The following note shall be added to the plat: Compliance with the provisions of the city’s Storm Drainage Policy does not relieve a person of the responsibility of complying with all other applicable laws, including, but not limited to, Section 11.086, Texas Water Code. 2. A minimum 15’ Drainage Easement is required between Lots 31 and 32 to convey runoff from Blanco Circle Drive. Easement must be contained within one lot. * Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in a n easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. WATER AND SEWER COMMENTS: 3. Minimum size for water and sewer lines is 8”. (Utility plan is difficult to read.) 4. Extend sewer to northernmost property line of Crescent Heights subdivision for future connection to Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19, Block A. 5. Single family residential developments require fire hydrant spacing of 400’ maximum for non-sprinkled residences or 600’ for sprinkled residences. 6. Water lines and sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards. * All water line stubs must have 2 joints past the valve with a 2” blow -off per the City’s details. * Water and sewer lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. Case No. Attachment C ZA17-016 Page 6 * The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A 1” inch meter must have a 1” tap, et c. * Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. * Fire lines shall be separate from service lines. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist dir ectly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The Environmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in: https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. * NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. * A geotechnical report will be required for all private roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. * Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operation s Department (817) 748- 8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Co nstruction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Fire Marshal Review Kelly Clements Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: The gated entry, if approved, must be equipped with an Opticom or KS-2 switch for opening the Case No. Attachment C ZA17-016 Page 7 gate electronically, as well as a means for manual opening of the gate. Ensure that the emergency access only entrance off of Southlake Boulevard is designed for all - weather conditions and able to support 85,000 lbs. GVW. FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Hydrants maximum spacing for R-3 Occupancies is 400 feet for subdivisions that contain any un - sprinkled homes. (Hydrants shown on plan are not sufficient) Hydrants are required at intersecting streets and at intermediate locations between as prescribed above, measured as the hose would be laid. (Hydrants required at both entrances into the subdivision and every 400 feet between). Community Service/Parks Department Review Peter Kao Construction Manager 817-748-8607 pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748 -8607 for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every forty (40) dwelling units. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the amount of $6250 per dwelling unit x 52 dwelling units. Pathway Comments: Should provide pathways con sistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings. Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consis tent with Article V Street and Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements. Other informational comments? General Informational Comments * A SPIN meeting was held February 28, 2017. * The common open space within a R -PUD development must comprise not less than 10% of the gross area within the R-PUD development. The areas in retention and detention ponds of drainage easements in excess of 25% of the required open space area cannot be counted toward the open space requirement. Case No. Attachment C ZA17-016 Page 8 * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view from right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected development plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * A permit from TxDOT must be obtained prior to any curb cut along F.M. 1709. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment D ZA17-016 Page 1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Crescent Heights SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1. BLOCH, JAY D SF20A 301 STERLING CT 0.52 NR 2. DAVIDSON, GLENN SF20A 303 STERLING CT 0.52 NR 3. ZIA, SAIYED SF20A 305 STERLING CT 0.54 NR 4. GILLEN, CARL B SF20A 304 BLANCO CIR 0.48 NR 5. RONCK, KEITH P SF20A 307 STERLING CT 0.50 NR 6. SIMONS, CHRISTOPHER J SF20A 306 BLANCO CIR 0.46 NR 7. LEMEIN, GREGG D SF20A 1200 BRAZOS DR 0.52 NR 8. ROOSMA, JOHN SF20A 314 BLANCO CIR 0.46 NR 9. MIRITELLO FAMILY REVOCABLE LIV SF20A 312 BLANCO CIR 0.47 NR 10. FLYNN, LARRY D SF20A 304 STERLING CT 0.47 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA17-016 Page 2 11. DYER, JOHN P SF1-A 550 GINGER CT 1.05 NR 12. DHANANI, ASIF M SF1-A 450 GINGER CT 1.01 NR 13. STACY, JAMES R SF1-A 1000 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.13 NR 14. SCHINER, CHRISTOPHER SF1-A 350 GINGER CT 1.08 NR 15. HESS, PAUL J SF1-A 250 GINGER CT 1.17 NR 16. SCHNEIDER, STEVE SF1-A 150 GINGER CT 1.29 NR 17. WM REAL ESTATE LTD RPUD 1001 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.39 NR 18. HYDE, JOHN RPUD 100 REGENT CT 0.42 NR 19. BIGLEY, ROBERT W RPUD 101 REGENT CT 0.34 NR 20. STONE LAKES SUBDIV HOMEOWNERS RPUD 1100 STRATFORD DR 0.31 NR 21. SMITH, JOE V AG 803 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.98 NR 22. STONE LAKES SUBDIV HOMEOWNERS RPUD 1000 STRATFORD DR 0.83 NR 23. JEON, JUNHA RPUD 101 WOODGLEN CT 0.60 NR 24. HALL, MARK A RPUD 103 WOODGLEN CT 0.36 NR 25. SMITH, STEPHEN E RPUD 105 WOODGLEN CT 0.35 NR 26. GMAC MORTGAGE CORP LLC RPUD 107 WOODGLEN CT 0.54 NR 27. HALE, COAVERT T RPUD 102 SPRINGBROOK CT 0.50 NR 28. BADGETT, BRANDI RPUD 100 SPRINGBROOK CT 0.49 NR 29. ALLMOND FAMILY TRUST RPUD 109 WOODGLEN CT 0.44 NR 30. BRIAND, JOHN RPUD 103 REGENT CT 0.42 NR 31. NICK, JEFFREY A RPUD 100 WOODGLEN CT 0.54 NR 32. THOMPSON, HUGH A SF20A 313 BLANCO CIR 0.46 NR 33. HAMILTON, JAY SCOTT SF20A 315 BLANCO CIR 0.47 NR 34. BRETT, KEVIN SF20A 307 BLANCO CIR 0.53 NR 35. POLITO, JONATHAN A SF20A 309 BLANCO CIR 0.48 NR 36. BAKER, JOSEPH R SF20A 311 BLANCO CIR 0.46 NR 37. HAHN, CHARLES SF20A 317 BLANCO CIR 0.59 NR 38. SALES FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING SF20A 319 BLANCO CIR 0.50 NR 39. NORMAN, KYLE B SF20A 320 BLANCO CIR 0.56 NR 40. JAMES, RHONDA SF1-A 430 SHADY OAKS DR 3.22 NR 41. HIGHBERGER, RHONDA SF1-A 310 SHADY OAKS DR 1.10 NR 42. STACY, RANDALL W SF1-A 300 SHADY OAKS DR 0.98 NR 43. STACY, RONALD T SF1-A 330 SHADY OAKS DR 1.04 NR 44. STACY, ROY J EST SF1-A 320 SHADY OAKS DR 5.61 NR 45. SOUTHLAKE OAKS LLC C2 500 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 2.53 NR 46. BANK OF THE OZARKS SP1 600 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.05 NR 47. CRESTSTONE GROUP LTD AG 1110 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 2.48 NR 48. CRESTSTONE GROUP LTD AG 1100 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 3.44 NR 49. CRESTSTONE GROUP LTD AG 1110 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.45 NR 50. CRESTSTONE GROUP LTD AG 1110 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.26 NR 51. CRESTSTONE GROUP LTD AG 1100 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.69 NR 52. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF CS 379 SHADY OAKS DR 1.35 NR 53. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF CS 315 SHADY OAKS DR 5.15 NR 54. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF CS 285 SHADY OAKS DR 7.14 NR 55. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF CS 275 SHADY OAKS DR 3.88 NR 56. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF CS 379 SHADY OAKS DR 2.88 NR 57. WAYLAND, MARCUS D AG 817 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.90 NR 58. TIMBER LAKE RES ASSOC INC RPUD 100 TIMBER LAKE PL 2.82 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA17-016 Page 3 59. LOWE, TOMMY ROY SF1-A 750 GINGER CT 1.33 NR 60. CUNNIGHAM, CHARLES S SF1-A 650 GINGER CT 1.30 NR 61. CHIU, HUI-TANG SF20A 300 STERLING CT 0.56 NR 62. MEEKS, SCOTT J SF20A 308 BLANCO CIR 0.63 NR 63. WEST, GUNNAR SF20A 306 STERLING CT 0.58 NR 64. FRENCH, JAMES SF20A 302 STERLING CT 0.47 NR 65. SECORD, ALAN SF1-A 950 GINGER CT 1.31 NR 66. MASSEY, NICHOLAS J SF1-A 850 GINGER CT 1.41 NR 67. CRESTSTONE GROUP LTD AG 1120 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 2.37 NR 68. DONG, XIAOYI SF20A 316 BLANCO CIR 0.46 NR 69. STENGLE, ERIC J SF20A 318 BLANCO CIR 0.46 NR 70. PYRAMIDS HOSPITALITY INV LP SP1 620 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.99 NR 71. PYRAMIDS HOSPITALITY INV LP SP1 640 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.14 NR 72. ENERGY VAULT A47 LLC SP1 660 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.86 NR 73. STIEFEL, RICHARD M SF20A 310 BLANCO CIR 0.48 NR 74. STACY, JAMES R AG 980 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 9.24 NR 75. STACY, JAMES R SF1-A 800 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 19.71 NR 76. STACY, J R AG 250 SHADY OAKS DR 10.22 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Sixty-seven (67) Responses Received Within 200’: None (0) Case No. ZA17-026 S T A F F R E P O R T April 28, 2017 CASE NO: ZA17-026 PROJECT: Zoning Change & Concept Plan for Lots 17, 18 and 19, J.J. Freshour No. 521 Addition EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Fred R. Joyce Construction is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Lots 17, 18 and 19, J.J. Freshour No. 521 Addition to develop three residential lots on property described as Tracts 9B1 and 9C1A, J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and located at 550 Randol Mill Ave. and 2300 Hillside Ct., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "SF -1A" Single Family Residential District. SPIN #11. REQUEST DETAILS: The property is located north of Hillside Ct. and west of Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938) approximately 0.6 miles north of the intersection of W . Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938). The applicant is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District to develop three residential lots on approximately 3.176 acres. This proposal complies with the Low Density Residential designation in the 2030 Land Use Plan , which requires a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. Site Data Summary Existing Zoning “AG” Proposed Zoning “SF-1A” Land Use Designation Low Density Residential Gross/Net Acreage 3.176 acres Dwelling Units/Residential Lots 3 Gross Density 0.945 du/acre Net Density 0.945 du/acre Lot Area Range 1.05 ac. to 1.07 ac. Average Lot Area 1.06 ac. ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct a public hearing 2) Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan Department of Planning & Development Services Case No. ZA17-026 ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated April 28, 2017 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (E) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) Link to PowerPoint Presentation Link to Plans Page 1 - Concept Plan Page 2 Tree Conservation Plan Page 3 Grading and Utility Plan Page 4 Drainage Analysis Link to SPIN meeting Report STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817)748-8067 Richard Schell (817)748-8602 Case No. Attachment A ZA17-026 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPLICANT: Fred R. Joyce Construction OWNERS: Shirley E. Free PROPERTY LOCATION: North of Hillside Ct. and west of Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938) and currently addressed as 550 Randol Mill Ave. and 2300 Hillside Ct. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Tracts 9B1 and 9C1A, J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521 LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: “AG” Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District HISTORY: - The existing home at 550 Randol Mill Ave. was constructed in 1963 (Source: Tarrant Appraisal District). There has been no development on the remainder of the property. - The property was annexed into the City in 1988 and given the “AG” Agricultural District zoning designation. SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The site is designated “Low Density Residential”, which specifies single family detached dwellings at a net density of one or fewer dwelling units per acre. The proposed development complies with this designation. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan The Mobility and Master Tho roughfare Plan shows Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938) to be a four-lane divided arterial with 140’ of right of way. Hillside Ct. is a local residential street with 50’ of right of way. Adequate right of way is shown on the plans. Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan The Pathways Master Plan shows a <8’ sidewalk along the west side of Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938). The sidewalk was constructed wih the Davis Blvd. (F.M. 1938) roadway improvements. A 4’ sidewalk is required along Hillside Ct. and the sidewalk is shown on the Concept Plan. Construction of the sidewalk will be required at the time of home construction on the proposed Lots 18 and 19. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions The development shows two new driveways onto Hillside Ct. to serve the proposed Lots 18 and 19. The proposed Lot 17 will have access to and from F.M. 1938 from the existing driveway to that property. Case No. Attachment A ZA17-026 Page 2 Traffic Impact Use Lots Vtpd* AM- IN AM- OUT PM- IN PM- OUT Single Family Residential (210) Added 2 19 0 1 1 1 Existing 1 10 0 1 1 0 Total 3 29 0 2 2 1 * Vehicle Trips Per Day * AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour of generator on a weekday * Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition WATER & SEWER: The proposed Lots 18 and 19 will be served by an existing 6” water line in Hillside Ct. and the proposed Lot 17 is served by an existing 12” water line in Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938). Sanitary sewer for the proposed Lots 18 and 19 is shown to connect to an existing 8” sewer line in Hillside Ct. An existing 8” sewer line in Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938) to the north of the proposed Lot 17 serves that lot. DRAINAGE: Drainage on the property is generally sheet flow from northwest to southeast across the property. The proposed drainage f or Lots 18 and 19 is south to Hillside Ct. and east to Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938). The proposed drainage for Lot 17 is east to Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938). TREE PRESERVATION: The existing tree cover preservation is provided for a per lot bases instead of for all three (3) of the lots being zoned and platted. The existing tree cover preservation for each lot and all three (3) lots together complies with the Existing Tree Cover Regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The existing trees cover on the three (3) lots is 6.15% and 70% of the existing tree is required to be preserved. The Tree Conservation Plan shows that 94% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved. CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting for this project was held by the applicant on March 28, 2017. A link to the report is provided. Link to SPIN Report STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Concept Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated April 28, 2017. Case No. Attachment B ZA17-026 Page 1 Case No. Attachment C ZA17-026 Page 1 Concept Plan Review Summary Case No.: ZA17-026 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 04/28/17 Project Name: Concept Plan – Lots 17, 18 and 19, J.J Freshour No. 521 Addition APPLICANT: Fred Joyce SURVEYOR: Tommy Q. Burks Fred Joyce Construction Burks Land Surveying 210 W. College 223 County Rd. 1260 Grapevine, TX Decatur , TX 76234 Phone: 817-475-1812 Phone: (817) 228-5577 E-mail: fjmment@aol.com E-mail: blsurvey98@yahoo.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 04/18/17 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HER EBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT RICHARD SCHELLAT (817) 748-8602. 1. Confirm that any existing structures are adequately off -set per zoning district setback regulations from the proposed lot lines. A note has been added to the Concept Plan stating that all existing structures are to be removed. * Please be aware that any fence along F.M. 1938 will have to meet the requirements of S ection 43 - Corridor Overlay Zone 43.9.c.1.f regarding architectural fencing, which requires masonry matching the building, wrought iron or living plant material. It shall not run in a straight line without being off -set by a minimum of 6 feet every 60 feet and it shall be located no closer to the right of way than one -half the width of the required bufferyard. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: * The existing tree cover preservation is provided for a per lot bases instead of for all three (3) of the lots being zoned and platted. The existing tree cover preservation for each lot and all three (3) lots together complies with the Existing Tree Cover Regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The existing trees cover on the three (3) lots is 6.15% and 70% of the existing tree is required to be preserved. The Tree Conservation Plan shows that 94% of the existing tree cover is prop osed to be preserved. * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirem ents established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Case No. Attachment C ZA17-026 Page 2 Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% – 20% 70% 20.1 – 40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation o f the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. BUFFERYARD COMMENTS: 1. The 15’ – Q Bufferyard has been provided along the east property boundary of Lots 17 and 19. Please provide the following Bufferyard Summary Chart on the Concept Plan. SUMMARY CHART – BUFFERYARDS Location/ Length of Base Line Required / Provided Length Bufferyard Width/Type Canopy Trees Accent Trees Shrubs Fence/Screenin g Height & Material East - Required 424.79’ 15’ - Q 9 13 43 Provided 425.79’ 15’ - Q 9 13 43 * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Case No. Attachment C ZA17-026 Page 3 Public Works/Engineering Review Alejandra (Alex) Ayala, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8274 E-mail: aayala@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional req uirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. Construction within FM 1938 right of way shall require a permit from TxDOT. Submit permit application prior to site plan approval. * Street intersections and sidewalks shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. * Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. * Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. * Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possibl e. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 EASEMENTS: 1. The sidewalk along Hillside Court shall be in a pedestrian easement if not located in the right of way. * Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. WATER AND SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS: * The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A 1” inch meter must have a 1” tap, etc. * Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. * Water and sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. Documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary will be required prior to approval of construction plans. * Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #18 and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning construction ($212.61/Acre). * Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: Case No. Attachment C ZA17-026 Page 4 * Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The Envi ronmental Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in: https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. * Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1938. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748 - 8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us No comments based on submitted information. Community Service/Parks Department Review Peter Kao Construction Manager 817-748-8607 pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748 -8607 for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Case No. Attachment C ZA17-026 Page 5 Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every forty (40) dwelling units. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the amount of $6250 per dwelling unit x 2 additional dwelling unit= $12,500. ============= The following should be informational comments only ==================== * A SPIN meeting for this project was held March 28, 2017. * Sidewalks shall be required to be constructed with each dwelling. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separa te sign permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denoted informational comment. Case No. Attachment D ZA17-026 Page 1 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS 550 Randol Mill Ave. and 2300 Hillside Ct. SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response 1. RANDALL, MATTHEW D AG 2391 FLORENCE RD 2.00 NR 2. WINZEN, RONDALD J SF1-A 2351 FLORENCE RD 1.92 NR 3. FREE, CHARLES W AG 115 COUNTY ROAD 930 2.17 NR 4. MALLORY, TERRELL G SF1-A 2304 HILLSIDE CT 1.05 NR 5. KAISER, MIKE F SF1-A 2306 HILLSIDE CT 1.11 NR 6. FREE, CHARLES W AG 115 COUNTY ROAD 930 2.26 NR 7. GARRETT, ROSS W SF1-A 2303 HILLSIDE CT 1.00 NR 8. TEXAS, STATE OF RPUD 2501 SW 820 LOOP 0.39 NR 9. FRED JOYCE-MARY MYERS ENT INC RPUD 600 W NASH ST 1.09 NR 10. SCOTT, DAVID A AG 2301 FLORENCE RD 1.04 NR 11. WILSON, MARY L AG 1328 DUBLIN ST 2.13 NR 12. SCOTT, DAVID A AG 2301 FLORENCE RD 1.04 NR 13. GALLAGHER, JOHN SF1-A 2307 HILLSIDE CT 1.05 NR 14. SYKES, CHRISTOPHER A SF1-A 2305 HILLSIDE CT 1.10 NR 15. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF RPUD 1400 MAIN ST 5.92 NR 16. CAMDEN SL HOA INC RPUD 500 S NOLEN DR STE 100 0.40 NR 17. JOHNSON, TIMOTHY AG 545 RANDOL MILL AVE 1.84 NR 18. DOMBROSKI, MICHAEL RPUD 465 RANDOL MILL AVE 1.08 NR Case No. Attachment D ZA17-026 Page 2 19. CAMDEN SL HOA INC RPUD 500 S NOLEN DR STE 100 0.25 NR 20. FIROZ, MUSTAFA AG 565 RANDOL MILL AVE 0.97 NR 21. HAVERKAMP, ROGER C2 2407 FLORENCE RD 0.92 NR Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Twenty-one (21) Responses Received Within 200’: One (1) - Attached Case No. Attachment D ZA17-026 Page 3 Zoning Change and Concept Plan Plat Showing Lots 17, 18 and 19, J.J. Freshour No. 521 Addition ZA17-026 & ZA17-027 Applicant: Fred R. Joyce Construction Request: 1) Approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan from “AG” Agricultural District to “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District to develop three residential lots on approximately 3.176 acres 2) Approval of a Plat Showing for the three residential lots Location: 550 Randol Mill Ave. and 2300 Hillside Ct. ZA17-026 and ZA17-027 Aerial View View North Concept Plan (ZA17-026) Tree Conservation Analysis Grading and Utility Plan Drainage Analysis Plat Showing (ZA17-027) Questions? SPIN MEETING REPORT SPIN Item Number: SPIN17-05 City Case Numbers: ZA17-026 and 027 Project Name: 550 Randol Mill & 2300 Hillside Ct. – J. Freshour Addition SPIN Neighborhood: SPIN #11 Meeting Date: March 28, 2017 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: Twenty-nine (29) Host: David Alexander, Community Engagement Committee Applicant Presenting: Fred Joyce City Staff Present: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner; David Jones, Principal Planner; Jerod Potts, Assistant to the Director; Ken Baker, Senior Director; Steve Anderson, Deputy City Engineer; and, Jill Lind, Senior Marketing Manager Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.com and clicking on “I Want to” and “View” “Video on Demand” – forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY: Property Situation:  Located on the northwest corner of Hillside Court and Randol Mill Avenue Development Details:  Currently two unplatted tracts with an AG – Agricultural District zoning designation  Applications submitted for zoning change & concept plan and Plat Showing  Proposing three residential lots with SF-1A (minimum 1 acre) zoning Exhibits presented at SPIN: Concept Plan - Grading & Utility Plan – Plat Showing – QUESTIONS / CONCERNS: There were no questions or concerns SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. NO T E S : 1. B E A R I N G S A R E B A S E D O N T H E F I N A L P L A T O F H I L L S I D E E S T A T E S , A N A D D I T I O N T O T H E C I T Y O F S O U T H L A K E A S R E C O R D E D I N V O L U M E 3 8 8 - 1 8 1 , P A G E 5 O F T H E P L A T R E C O R D S O F T A R R A N T C O U N T Y , T E X A S . 2. T H I S P R O P E R T Y L I E S I N Z O N E " X " A S D E T E R M I N E D B Y FE M A F L O O D I N S U R A N C E R A T E M A P N o . 4 8 4 3 9 C 0 0 8 5 K , D A T E D S E P T E MB E R 2 5 , 2 0 0 9 , A N D I S N O T L O C A T E D I N A S P E C I A L F L O O D H A Z A R D A R EA . 3. S E L L I N G A P O R T I O N O F A N Y L O T W I T H I N T H I S A D D I T I O N B Y M E T E S A N D B O U N D S I S A V I O L A T I O N O F S T A T E L A W A N D C I T Y O R D I N A N C E A N D I S S U B J E C T TO F I N E S A N D W I T H H O L D I N G O F U T I L I T I E S A N D B U I L D I N G P E R M I T S . 4. T H E C I T Y O F S O U T H L A K E R E S E R V E S T H E R I G H T T O R E Q U IR E M I N I M I M F I N I S H F L O O R E L E V A T I O N S O N A N Y L O T C O N T A I N E D W I T H I N T H I S A D D I T I O N . T H E MI N I M U M E L E V E A T I O N S S H O W N A R E B A S E D O N T H E M O S T C U R R E N T I N F O R M A T I O N A V A I L A B L E A T T H E T I M E T H E P L A T I S F I L E D A N D M A Y B E S U B J E C T T O C H A N G E . A D D I T I O N A L L O T S , O T H E R T H A N TH O S E S H O W N , M A Y A L S O S U B J E C T T O M I N I M U M F I N I S H F L O O R C R I T E R I A . 5. C O M P L I A N C E W I T H T H E P R O V I S I O N S O F T H E C I T Y ' S S T O RM D R A I N A G E P O L I C Y D O E S N O T R E L I E V E A P E R S O N O F T H E R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y O F C O M P L Y I N G W I T H A L L O T H E R A P P L I C A B L E L A W S , I N C L U D I N G , B U T N O T L I M I T E D T O , S E C T I O N 1 1 . 0 8 6 , T E X A S W A T E R C O D E . 6. G R O S S P R O P E R T Y : 3 . 1 7 6 A C R E S T O T A L D E D I C A T I O N : 0 . 0 0 0 A C R E S N E T P R O P E R T Y : 3 . 1 7 6 A C R E S 7. A L L S T R U C T U R E S A R E T O B E R E M O V E D . 8. T H E O W N E R S O F A L L C O R N E R L O T S S H A L L M A I N T A I N S I G HT T R I A N G L E S I N A C C O R D A N C E W I T H T H E C I T Y S U B D I V I S I O N O R D I N A N C E . 9. L O T 1 9 S H A L L N O T B E A L L O W E D D R I V E W A Y A C C E S S O N T O F . M . 1 9 3 8 17021 PLAT SHOWING LOTS 17, 18 & 19 JJ FRESHOUR SURVEY NO. 521 ADDITION AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE JJ FRESHOUR SURVEY, ABSTRACT No. 521 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS MAY 2017 BEING 3.176 ACRES IN THE SITUATED IN THE S U R V E Y O R S C E R T I F I C A T E TH I S S U R V E Y I S C E R T I F I E D T O R T C , A L L I A N T A N D K I M B A L L L A K E S , L L C . T H I S i s t o c e r t i f y t h a t I , T o m m y Q . B u r k s , a Re g i s t e r e d P r o f e s s i o n a l L a n d S u r v e y o r o f t h e St a t e o f T e x a s , h a v i n g p l a t t e d t h e a b o v e s u b d i v i s i o n f r o m a n a c t u a l s u r v e y o n t h e g r o u n d ; a n d t h a t al l l o t c o r n e r s , a n d a n g l e p o i n t s , a n d p o i n t s o f c u rv e s h a l l b e p r o p e r l y m a r k e d o n t h e g r o u n d , a n d th a t t h i s p l a t c o r r e c t l y r e p r e s e n t s t h a t s u r v e y m a d e b y m e o r u n d e r m y d i r e c t i o n a n d s u p e r v i s i o n . To m m y Q . B u r k s Re g i s t e r e d P r o f e s s i o n a l L a n d S u r v e y o r N o . 5 5 0 9 FO R R E V I E W O N L Y Burks Land Surveying Decatur, Tx 76234 817/228-5577 E-Mail: blsurvey98@yahoo.com 223 County Road 1260 JO H N S O N R D W S O U T H L A K E B L V D SU B J E C T PR O P E R T Y HI L L S I D E C T FL O R E N C E R D R A N D O L M I L L A V E VI C I N I T Y M A P Approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission Date: ______________________________ Chairman: __________________________ P&Z Secretary: _______________________ Approved by the City Council Date: ______________________________ Mayor: _____________________________ City Secretary: _______________________ FILED AS INSTRUMENT # __________________, DATE ______________ OWNED BY: FRED JOYCE PHONE: (817) 481-3516 GRAPEVINE, TEXAS 76051 600 W NASH ST NOW, THEREFORE, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT, I FRED JOYCE, being the sole owner does h ereby adopt this plat designating the hereinabove described property as Lots 17, 18 & 19 JJ F reshour No. 521 Addition, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and we do hereby dedicate the rights of way and easements shown thereon to the public's use unless otherwise no ted. It is agreed that this release shall be binding upon the Owner, their heirs and assigns, and successors in the interest with the regard to said prope rty located in or in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, running with the land, and shall be recorded in the Deed Records of Tarrant County or Denton County, as appropriate, Texas. *There are no liens against this property* Executed this ______ day of _________________ , A.D., 2017. __________________________ Fred Joyce STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this da y personally appeared Fred Joyce, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the above and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed the same for the purposes and consideration expressed and in the capacity therein stated. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE on this the ______ day of ______________ , 2017. ___________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC N 0 0 ° 4 3 ' 4 2 ' ' W 4 1 8 . 9 2 ' N 8 9 °1 9 '5 4 ''E 3 2 8 .6 0 ' S 0 1 ° 1 3 ' 2 5 ' ' E 4 0 4 . 9 9 ' S 4 3 ° 4 4 ' 2 8 ' ' W 1 9 . 8 0 ' S 8 9 °2 2 '0 1 ''W 3 1 8 .2 3 ' X LO T 1 7 (1 . 0 6 A C R E S ) LO T 1 8 (1 . 0 5 A C R E S ) LO T 1 9 (1 . 0 7 A C R E S ) 2 6 4 . 9 8 ' 1 4 0 . 0 1 ' 1 4 0 . 0 0 ' 2 7 8 . 9 2 ' S 0 0 ° 4 3 ' 4 2 " E 2 7 9 . 0 2 ' 1 6 4 .0 0 ' 1 6 5 .7 5 ' 1 6 4 .0 0 ' 1 5 4 .2 3 ' 50 2 5 0 25 50 3 0 . 0 ' 3 0 . 0 ' 7 5 .0 '7 5 .0 ' 5 0 ' B . L . 1 0 ' U .E . $ S .W .E . 4 0 ' B .L . 1 0 ' U .E . & S .W .E . 4 0 ' B .L . 1 0 ' U . E . MA R Y L O U W I L S O N IN S T D 2 0 5 3 6 9 9 8 1 D. R . T . C . T . CH A R L E S W F R E E & SH I R L E Y E F R E E V. 5 4 3 5 , P . 9 5 4 D . R . T . C . T . LO T 1 5 HI L L S I D E E S T A T E S V. 3 8 8 - 1 8 1 , P . 6 P. R . T . C . T . LO T 1 3 JJ F R E S H O U R N O . 5 2 1 A D D I T I O N CA B . A , S L I D E 8 3 2 3 P. R . T . C . T . HI L L S I D E C T (6 0 ' R . O . W . ) LO T 2 HI L L S I D E E S T A T E S V. 3 8 8 - 1 8 1 , P . 6 P. R . T . C . T . LO T 1 HI L L S I D E E S T A T E S V. 3 8 8 - 1 8 1 , P . 6 P. R . T . C . T . R A N D O L M I L L A V E ( F . M . 1 9 3 8 ) ( R . O . W . v a r i e s ) ( U n d e r C o n s t r u c t i o n ) OWNERS CERTIFICATE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF TARRANT WHEREAS, Fred Joyce, and being the sole owner of a 3.176 acre tract of land in the JJ Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, Tarrant County, Texas and being a portion of that same tract of land as described in deed to Charles W. Free and wife, Shirley E. Free as recorded in Volume 5435, Page 954 and being more particularly d escribed as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron rod set with a "TQ Burks #5509" cap in the north line of Hillside Court (60' R.O.W.) and also being by plat call the southe ast corner of that certain tract of land known as Lot 15 Hillside Estates, an addition to the City of Southlake as recorded in Volume 388-181, Page 6 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas ; THENCE N 00° 43' 42" W along the east line of said Lot 15 and passing at 349.32 feet a 5/8" iron rod found at the northeast corner of said Lot 15 an d also being by plat call the southeast corner of that certain tract of land being Lot 13 JJ Freshour No. 521 Addition as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide 8323 P.R.T.C.T. and continuing in all a distance of 418.92 to a 5/8" iron rod found and said point being by deed call the southwest corner of that cer tain tract of land as described in deed to May Lou Wilson as recorded in Instrument #D205369981 D.R.T.C.T.; THENCE N 89° 19' 54" E along the south line of said Wilson tract a distance of 328.60 to a 1/2" iron rod set with a "TQ Burks #5509" cap in the west rig ht-of-way line of Randol Mill Road (FM 1938) (R.O.W. Varies); THENCE S 01° 13' 25" E along said west right-of-way a distance of 404.99 feet to a 1/2" iron rod set with a "TQ Burks #5509" cap; THENCE S 43° 44' 28" W along said right-of-way a di stance of 19.80 feet to a 1/2" iron rod set with a "TQ Burks #5509" cap in the north right-of-way li ne of said Hillside Court; THENCE S 89° 22' 01" W along said north right-of-wa y a distance of 318.23 feet to the Point of Beginni ng and containing in all 138350 square feet or 3.176 a cres of land. 1/ 2 " I R F 1/ 2 " I R S C 5/ 8 " I R F 1/ 2 " I R S C 1/ 2 " I R S C 5/ 8 " I R F 1/ 2 " I R F PO B ZA17-027 VE R PP IR F IR S C WV GT E UT I L I T Y L E G E N D SA N I T A R Y S E W E R GA S M E T E R WA T E R M E T E R WA T E R V A L V E VE R I Z O N V A U L T GT E M A N H O L E PO W E R P O L E FI R E H Y D R A N T IR O N R O D S E T W I T H "T Q B U R K S # 5 5 0 9 " C A P IR O N R O D F O U N D AI R C O N D I T I O N E R CL E A N O U T ASWFH CG N 40' B.L. 5' U.E. 20' B.L. 5' U.E. S 8 9 °1 9 '5 4 " W 3 2 9 .8 1 ' 20' B.L. 5' U.E. 2 0 ' B . L . 5 ' U . E . 2 0 ' B .L . 5 ' U .E . 4 0 ' B .L . 5 ' U .E . 4 0 ' B .L . 5 ' U .E . 5 0 ' B . L . 1 0 ' U . E . 2 0 ' B .L . 5 ' U .E . SC A L E : 1 " = 5 0 ' 1 5 ' T Y P E Q L A N D S C A P E B U F F E R 1 5 ' T Y P E Q L A N D S C A P E B U F F E R 1 5 ' D .&U .E . 15' U.E. 5 ' D .&U .E . 7.5' D.&U.E. Case No. ZA17-027 S T A F F R E P O R T April 28, 2017 CASE NO: ZA17-027 PROJECT: Plat Showing for Lots 17, 18 and 19, J.J. Freshour No. 521 Addition EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Fred R. Joyce Construction is requesting approval of a Plat Showing for Lots 17, 18 and 19, J.J. Freshour No. 521 Addition to develop three residential lots on property described as Tracts 9B1 and 9C1A, J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521, City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, and located at 550 Randol Mill Ave. and 2300 Hillside Ct., Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: "AG" Agricultural District. Requested Zoning: "SF-1A" Single Family Residential District. SPIN #11. REQUEST DETAILS: The property is located north of Hillside Ct. and west of Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938) approximately 0.6 miles north of the intersection of W . Southlake Blvd. (F.M. 1709) and Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938). The applicant is requesting approval of a Plat Showing for three residential lots on approximately 3.176 acres in association with Zoning Case No. Z A17-026 – Zoning Change and Concept Plan for Lots 17, 18 and 19, J.J. Freshour No. 521 Addition. ACTION NEEDED: Consider approval of a Plat Showing ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated April 28, 2017 (D) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (E) Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council Members Only) Link to PowerPoint Presentation Link to Plat Showing Link to SPIN meeting Report STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817)748-8067 Richard Schell (817)748-8602 Department of Planning & Development Services Case No. Attachment A ZA17-027 Page 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION APPLICANT: Fred R. Joyce Construction OWNERS: Shirley E. Free PROPERTY LOCATION: North of Hillside Ct. and west of Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938) and currently addressed as 550 Randol Mill Ave. and 2300 Hillside Ct. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Tracts 9B1 and 9C1A, J.J. Freshour Survey, Abstract No. 521 LAND USE CATEGORY: Low Density Residential CURRENT ZONING: “AG” Agricultural District REQUESTED ZONING: “SF-1A” Single Family Residential District HISTORY: - The existing home at 550 Randol Mill Ave. was constructed in 1963 (Source: Tarrant Appraisal District). There has been no development on the remainder of the property. - The property was annexed into the City in 1988 and given the “AG” Agricultural District zoning designation. WATER & SEWER: The proposed Lots 18 and 19 will be served by an existing 6” water line in Hillside Ct. and the proposed Lot 17 is served by an existing 12” water line in Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938). Sanitary sewer for the proposed Lots 18 and 19 is shown to connect to an existing 8” sewer line in Hillside Ct. An existing 8” sewer line in Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938) to the north of the proposed Lot 17 serves that lot. DRAINAGE: Drainage on the property is generally sheet flow from northwest to southeast across the property. The proposed drainage for Lots 18 and 19 is south to Hillside Ct. and east to Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938). The proposed drainage for Lot 17 is east to Randol Mill Ave. (F.M. 1938). TREE PRESERVATION: The existing tree cover preservation is provided for a per lot bases instead of for all three (3) of the lots being zoned and platted. The existing tree cover preservation for each lot and all three (3) lots together complies with the Existing Tree Cover Regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The existing trees cover on the three (3) lots is 6.15% and 70% of the existing tree is required to be preserved. The Tree Conservation Plan shows that 94% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved. CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting for this project was held by the applicant on March 28, 2017. A link to the report is provided. Link to SPIN Report STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Plat Review Summary No. 3, dated April 28, 2017. Case No. Attachment B ZA17-027 Page 1 ZA17-027 Plat Showing Case No. ZA17-027 Page 3 Plat Review Summary Case No.: ZA17-027 Review No.: Three Date of Review: 04/28/17 Project Name: Plat Showing – Lots 17, 18 and 19, J.J Freshour No. 521 Addition APPLICANT: Fred Joyce SURVEYOR: Tommy Q. Burks Fred Joyce Construction Burks Land Surveying 210 W. College 223 County Rd. 1260 Grapevine, TX Decatur , TX 76234 Phone: 817-475-1812 Phone: (817) 228-5577 E-mail: fjmment@aol.com E-mail: blsurvey98@yahoo.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 04/18/17 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT DENNIS KILLOUGH AT (817) 748-8072. 1. Revise the title block as follows: a. Remove “Survey” in the title of the plat to read Lots 17, 18 and 19, J.J. Freshour No. 521 Addition. 2. The following changes are needed in the “owner’s” dedication: a. Revise the owner’s dedication and notary to conform to the standard format as shown in Appendix 1 (Individuals). See attached.  Change the format and wording of the owner’s dedication to match the wording in Appendix 1 (attached) and also remove the language regarding the release being binding. 3. Show and label all survey lines. 4. Confirm that any existing structures are adequately off -set per zoning district setback regulations from the proposed lot lines. A note has been added to the associated Concept Plan with Case No. ZA17 - 026 stating that all existing structures are to be removed. 5. Remove the bufferyard designation from the Plat Showing. 6. Sidewalks shall be required to b e constructed with each dwelling on Lots 18 and 19 . 7. The following changes are needed with regard to easements: a. Provide easements for water, sewer and/or drainage in compliance with approved construction plans. Case No. Attachment C ZA17-027 Page 1 Tree Conservation/Landscape Review E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) 748-8229 TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: * The existing tree cover preservation is provided for a per lot bases instead of for all three (3) of the lots being zoned and platted. The existing tree cover preservation for each lot and all three (3) lots together complies with the Existing Tree Cover Regulations of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The existing trees cover on the three (3) lots is 6.15% and 70% of the existing tree is required to be preserved. The Tree Conservation Plan shows that 94% of the existing tree cover is proposed to be preserved. * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% – 20% 70% 20.1 – 40% 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Coun cil approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. BUFFERYARD COMMENTS: 1. The 15’ – Q Bufferyard has been provided along the east property boundary of Lots 17 and 19. Please provide the following Bufferyard Summary Chart on the Concept Plan. Case No. Attachment C ZA17-027 Page 2 SUMMARY CHART – BUFFERYARDS Location/ Length of Base Line Required / Provided Length Bufferyard Width/Type Canopy Trees Accent Trees Shrubs Fence/Screenin g Height & Material East - Required 424.79’ 15’ - Q 9 13 43 Provided 425.79’ 15’ - Q 9 13 43 * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Public Works/Engineering Review Alejandra (Alex) Ayala, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) 748-8274 E-mail: aayala@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requiremen ts may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. Construction within FM 1938 right of way shall require a permit from TxDOT. Submit permit application prior to site plan approval. * Street intersections and sidewalks shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. * Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. * Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. * Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Mon ument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266 EASEMENTS: 1. The sidewalk along Hillside Court shall be in a pedestrian easement if not located in the right of way. * Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. WATER AND SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS: * The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A 1” inch meter must have a 1” tap, etc. * Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. Case No. Attachment C ZA17-027 Page 3 * Water and sanitary sewer in easements or right of way shall be constructed to City standards. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. Documentation supporting and certifying that detention is not necessary will be require d prior to approval of construction plans. * Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure #18 and requires a fee to be paid prior to beginning construction ($212.61/Acre). * Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downst ream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City’s website: http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp * New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) per TXR150000. The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The Environment al Coordinator will review the SWPPP. For instructions on how to complete the review of the SWPPP please refer to the Stormwater Management for Construction Sites in: https://www.cityofsouthlake.com/2237/Stormwater-Management-for-Construction-S. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. * Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1938. Permit approva l is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) 748 - 8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer’s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836. *=Denotes informational comment. Case No. Attachment C ZA17-027 Page 4 Fire Department Review Kelly Clements Deputy Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Phone: (817) 748-8233 E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us No comments based on submitted information. Community Service/Parks Department Review Peter Kao Construction Manager 817-748-8607 pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) 748 -8607 for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every forty (40) dwelling units. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the amount of $6250 per dwelling unit x 2 additional dwelling unit= $12,500. ============= The following should be informational comments only ==================== * A SPIN meeting for this project was held on March 28, 2017. * All plats filed must have an original signed and stamped Tax Certificate submitted with it from each taxing unit with jurisdiction of the real property, indicating that no delinquent taxes are owed and that taxes for the current year have been paid. After September 1st, a certificate showing that the taxes for that year are paid, but that the taxes for the upcoming year have yet to be calculat ed is required. (House Bills 1563 & 3101). A copy of this information may be obtained from the Tarrant County Tax Assessor/Collector’s Office located at 100 E. Weatherford St. in Ft. Worth (across from the old red courthouse). There is a service charge of $10 per account for this certificate. For more information contact the Assessor/Collector’s office at 817-212-6847. * Please submit a revised pdf "check print" prior to submitting the blackline mylar and paper copy with original signatures. * For Tarrant County filing, original signatures and seals will be required on one blackline mylar and one blackline paper copy prior to filing the plat. The mylar and paper copies will not be accepted if any erasures or original ink, other than signatures or seals, appear on the plat. * A Developers Agreement is required prior to construction of any public infrastructure , if any. The Developer's Agreement for this addition should consider streets, drainage, park dedication Case No. Attachment C ZA17-027 Page 5 requirements and fees, off-site sewer extensions, off-site drainage and utility easements and impact fees. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * Denotes Informational Comment Case No. Attachment C ZA17-027 Page 6