Loading...
2017-04-11 Meeting Report (The Grove at White Chapel) JUSOUTHLAKE SPIN MEETING REPORT SPIN Item Number: SPIN17-09 City Case Numbers: TBD Project Name: The Grove at White Chapel SPIN Neighborhoods: SPIN #3 Meeting Date: April 11, 2017 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: 27 Host: Aaron Camele, Community Engagement Committee Applicants Presenting: David Davis, D2 Development, LP, email: davidp_D2dve.com; phone: 214-532-5720; Rich DeOtte, DeOtte Engineering, phone: 817-946-6088; Tom Matthews, Four Peaks Development City Staff Present: Patty Moos, Planner and Jerod Potts, Assistant to the Director Presentation begins: 6:03 pm Presentation ends: 7:10 pm Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.com and clicking on "I Want to" and "View" "Video on Demand"—forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY: Property Situation: 25 acres at the southwest corner of N. White Chapel Blvd. and W. Dove Road. Development Details: The applicant is proposing a 25 acre single family residential subdivision in the southwest corner of N. White Chapel Blvd. and W. Dove Road. The property will be rezoned from "AG' Agricultural District to "TZD" Transitional Zoning District to develop an approximately sixty (60) lot residential subdivision on approximately 25 acres. PRESENTATION: The applicant presented that the property has two tracts zoned "SP-2" with commercial uses. Tract A and Tract B were presented on a slide with permitted uses for each tract. The tract will be separated by the future Kirkwood Blvd. extension. The existing trees on the tracts are under the Tree Preservation Ordinance No. 585-B for preservation. The applicant presented a possible commercial use development plan on Tract B, but would prefer to develop Tract B as a residential development. The applicant presented two options for possible layouts for the property for the subdivision including a 4.6 acre park. The proposed approximate lot size is 11,000 square feet. Y pF�,Jii 4,. a f Y l I a' / Y y' 'Y Y I uN� � a Cl4 i , +IITIZONECY 7,e ,P-2 !! II ACdIMIrpACM ars • {r@irFCOPRAd."[4'M +` wNXIM6Y'SN'M°R0,0N4 MEAT r 6 q!.MMIN N4AM ttlMM r�fNN'li4:M'.S IMMARKU5 • C1Y;MrY51R POIAPMANIS LAN Y e� � IAIIIVMTMS rM9"NSIIrMA' AAMAOMCrv'SMTTN.MUS, RAMOAMMUNIG&TflEVl9fA DrxqrAwHasprrAis MNAM.NAtlN ojr P M,STIuYa R 5 M7tl6NPASTP)ms ''aAMIMA IS MAN HIALTd15il FAMrFMES ll RE4OMPAMES + MPMATPRO MRMMfWIYYCFS„ RAVU OURKAUS DMSERWIS / w DEPAIGPt!AE.4NT".a1014ft Ullr lUTV FFKr'S HARMAN PAMBdP"EOM 1%lhNBMIX9,WA.IG'lSCIl OW usil,TMdfraflos MCMAM DAwiWl,tM AEE SU MIS � FORMAI HOMES a naw avuwM�-rME&ROUIP NrrKAC"INI4; THEE ORDI AN dE 585-8 `(Ire r^ TIN, 9 ) SECTIC+N,S �, '"l "a rfon rdsldantlal development,all rote kel rd atkF �mLa tli�altered toInstalli utility lines , 41thln ipub]Ic A,O, fir Pu6(k utility or Drainage easements as howrn on an appr'0'44PlmitPlat,orto Install lNma lanes, required parklrij,a as atr l BINdInB pa d sites as shown an an i iroved Slte PISA; 'be`xehn rt from tree protecdon and ' ?t o#,f4 piatement iq:Ailr rtrtits f z i NDN R,t NT jNNNNNJ3 ST �C',TNCINNS LAN CtlSESCATC bRIIRSw CS,01,8 1 M SOC'TRACT ,O9,EA,iPZONE: BUILDINGS,,'11 Bi,� � �R LANCY LM�EJ AaT!E CiRNIESr S,01,Q2,C1,C2,C3,HC LANI"15CAI> RCNF E ., O,ALONG WHITECHAPEL ALONG RESIUENTlAL ;2'S"C1THER xlr~ UM 6 p irwrPERVIauS COVER f y COl' MERCII L STATISTICS t * TOTAL BVUING AREA, 3417,500$F' TOTAL PARXIINCr SPACES., 1,210 ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: 5,000 TO 8,000 VEHICLETRNPS PER TRAY TREES TO BE REMOVED.. B,A ACRE$ (I1 of EXISTING) Ipw9PERWOUSAREk 1S,EACRESjl2%OFS'r7T) r REZ NNINN N A T RTS► IL,LO d' R SIID IN'tl!A, ,'USES: H LES TRAFFICIMPACT * BETTER PRIVACY LES NEIGHBORHOOD DISRUPTION BETTER TRANSITION TO CCrIAANICRCIAL TRACTA FEWER TREE$REMOVED ED ISI II I.r�Tl f� '0,5TtIcs EXISTING ONJ G PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL NUMBER OF LOM 61 AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 1 ,000SF S�WDING AREA i -350 OV '244,0W5K ESTiMATEDTRAFFIC. 60QVERIIELE 'OHAI PARING 1210SPUS p 'SWENIAL TRIPS PER DAY TREES.TOBEREky9N3V'MI 35 ACRES(46%OF,EXIST11") , ����rAxr�rrRv����� IMPERVIOUS AREA. 9.2 ACRES(36%OF SITE� + T#VLfl OVAI. 6AMAIMI85%OfEXISIINO 3,5 ACRES06%OF UISUW,p ' PUBLIC OPEN SPACE:, 4.6 ACRES Vi�af w111,QKNSP CE NIA _ate AFS ,.: q'��EA I5r6AIU!C'S 162"FnOF Silt) W2k'MS('A6%OF"SITII r?. �d I �S i QUESTIONS /CONCERNS: 1. What is planned for Tract A? The developer doesn't own the property and it is zoned commercial. 2. What are the lot sizes and house sizes? The lots are 11,000 square feet and the houses are approximately 3,800 square feet. 3. Concern about the number of density and lot sizes as previously presented at the Corridor Committee meeting. Would like more information on the development number of lots and density to be able to determine support. 4. Describe the density and transition vs. what was presented to Corridor Committee. There will be a berm along N. White Chapel Blvd. with a wall and trees. The density is denser that Estes Park- comparison of commercial vs. residential. 5. Concerned about the density of the lots. 6. Concern about the tree buffer along W. Dove Road for the residential development vs. a commercial development. 7. What is the zoning request? "TZD" Transitional Zoning District 8. What are the proposed setbacks? The setbacks are not finalized, but may be 25- 30 feet on the front, 20-25 feet in the rear, and 10-15 feet on the sides. 9. Is commercial development an option for Tract B/ Tract B may be commercial, but proposing residential. Tract A is zoned commercial. 10.Concern regarding the development of tract B as commercial. Developer prefers to develop it as residential. 11.When is the proposed date for the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting? The applicant has not submitted the application for consideration. 12.Comment that resident wasn't the property to be commercial and not houses upon houses 13.Comment that one resident wants residential and not commercial. 14.Comments regarding that the development may be similar to Carillon, but Carillon offers more to compensate for the smaller lots; doesn't like the grid layout for the streets- likes meandering streets; will lose trees on the north lots with the current layout; wants the street redesign; and realigned away from the trees; and wants custom builders, not production builders. Concern about the school capacity. Cannot support the residential until the density, layout and regulations are complete. Applicant stated that they need the lots (more density) to make the subdivision work and can look at modifying the alignment. The development regulations will control the house construction standards and development. 15.What percentage of profit will the developer make on this development? Not known at this point what the profit margin will be. 16.Concern to preserve the essence of Southlake. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Call Summary: M , u. I;r�Y� �q� cr4,a"h�,� a;uin!wrr� asr"wrllmur,„ w�onawa� ;wwrrpk „a•n�,�"w 1,1,1­1 SPAN Tovnn Ha11 Porunm-APv!11,2417Detalled ! nafysis Stp � tion PIN TownHarr" U Forum April 1.1,2017. ' O8t&115 M©Rlrtiury Ilm 10 FG"TiY l rY725 140AatIGWYlpn Iendmull s ... r . f.. W"tlaie �fl i-94-k9 �I(1 4U� "� r.Yii'r'neJ Sannq Timve IiCY1 Iq CUT IVVI IIAA54iH4 AIT1111JI1111 1,11111111 Nol Gwntllrmatirw i4o �y,91a yn,I )�1 CRu�,:pll'�4e+( Rrquan4wsM �G IR.Gl^nil CICOIer Calll TNrnm�4ng Vey. ❑urada+r n r ran�.rt Vi ! II 4r Crniv r preeAerw CA R.u'txlPer l7n46wnr}+P'adP:}, Tatlm1 "m al Takud b II!w®r'V b d �r i.n4 1e1nuM1 P^dw o m"'rry m h a i V"ni IyWX4S fJa U erl Niue: iliu rp UF: 524 uro y:v,� „:a 1 r rtsn;iil flra4'- f si.. 5 f+nmaey[nln4i NI I I rtl-No/NtT"fOP J"titi'f �Uf!Y"fi 9.I"III rNII}I'4atv19 ,.. Frnn:'rn ❑14"ere,n ute�l II res;. e selnndle�y 1lumme r u:nl l'!lane 1"N f G..[ip [loop lJR /22 Ik%YRs. j 13uainesr I�+Ivun2 V,III IY)::ev�ca Nxfl raf Canal i I ti':>.x 1t1"!t 11-x Mr,f11 .d 131ockl IF .4 imlxv I IIU1"2 Mn f ai lo,�PW�*M1trumMr 41l ply"h Nvi I rr r�J.llrx�Ituuy Y'2& U�rFr" Na u d r "Fl0.4 GYvy:•_Intl.�I,aw.l L O.fI Y'N q61, `my "'"a Airnm+@t.TImrs DO....fthad A—,,m I AI,­pt t' Attwp d Amwrspx 4 At9rtslpt 5 Attsm pi 0 AnwN 7 Attempt$ Attempt t! Tpt41s 201101 11)13Ol'A 4 y'.!V!..r Y2H4 fl 0 0 tMk A:y J495 f �2ll U It li E C P I iC0. n 4i,pao 7'Q 411 „t 1 fl ✓1 q tl rtg4 nrynnPhmm 7,504 14 It 1) I I I It I'll 1111 11 11 1 :1 D rl (I fa I""I 121W Iw, 1121, "'U ID" Q Il I Q INU 1 'o I '410152 111'1,�"YVIS 'A It f3 If Il 0 ll 11 11 1 1 2 It 12 Mt G o 2 U 2 'Al 11VII 11 1 51-4., Il Q 1, 0 It I� I'-'l 0 0 1)D Q 0 (1 t)))))) It 11 1 11 tll Q Q '2 0 fl I1 It Q U I It 0 1) o (I fl U 2011111 10 11 lb II 116I,ILA 11 11 It 1 11 11 0 J rl 11 11 t, J U It .......... ..........Yelabite U 0 11 11 0 1 11 11 11 0 1 11 U Q 1 U p Q I It 11 1, 11 QI TT,`i IM Dt,,,, U G o Q 11 1) Q U o 0 G2V;F—Wd�j.'jjj,,