Loading...
Item 6E - SPIN Report SPIN MEETING REPORT SPIN Item Number: SPIN17-07 City Case Number: CP17-002 / Ordinance No. 1075B Project Name: City of Southlake Mobility Master Plan SPIN Neighborhood: Citywide Meeting Date: March 28, 2017 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: Twelve (12) Host: David Alexander, Community Engagement Committee Applicant Presenting: David Jones City Staff Present: Lorrie Fletcher, Planner; Jerod Potts, Assistant to the Director; Ken Baker, Senior Director; Steve Anderson, Deputy City Engineer; David Jones, Principal Planner and Jill Lind, Senior Marketing Manager Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting http://www.cityofsouthlake.com and clicking on “I Want to” and “View” “Video on Demand” – forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY : Proposal Details: • Amendment to the Southlake 2030 Mobility Master Plan • Recommendations addressing bicycle mobility and intersection capacity improvements • Amend Active Transportation Recommendations to include items AT14 – AT24 and associated priority tiers • Amend the Bicycle Facility Master Plan Map and Bicycle Facility Master Plan Recommendations as follows: o Remove the existing Tier 2 sharrow route from Kirkwood Blvd.; o Reprioritize the existing Tier 1 signed route along Kirkwood Blvd. to a Tier 3 signed route noting that the completion of this recommendation is contingent upon private development of Kirkwood Blvd per the Mobility Master Plan; o Revise the existing Tier 1 signed route currently shown along N. Kimball Ave. between Kirkwood and Dove to extend from N. Kimball Ave. between Dove and 1709; o Remove the Tier 1 signed route between Continental Blvd. and S.H. 26 on S. Kimball Ave.; o Add a Tier 1 signed + sharrow route between 1709 and S.H. 26 on S. Kimball Ave.; and o Change the existing recommendation on Dove Rd. between Westlake city limits and Grapevine city limits from a Tier 1 signed route to a Tier 1 signed + sharrow route. • Remove the Priority Intersections list (pages 83-84 in the Southlake 2030 Mobility Master Plan, Ord. 1075) as well as the Priority Crosswalk Intersection Reference Map (Page 85) • Amend the Mobility Master Plan to include the 87 proposed Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations and associated priority tiers • Reprioritize the priority tier for existing recommendation MT3 from Tier 2 to a Tier 3 The following slides were presented at SPIN: Existing Active Transportation Recommendations Possible Active Transportation Recommendations Recommendation Priority Tier Department Responsible Strategic Link VGO AT14 Continue participating in the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee through the NCTCOG 1 PDS, CS, PW Partnerships & Volunteerism; C5 9.1 AT15 As the City designs, constructs or provides maintenance on City roads, consider opportunities to incorporate bicycle signage in a manner that provides linkages to bicycle facilities in neighboring cities 1 PW Quality Development, Mobility, Infrastructure; C2, C3 1.2, 3.7 AT16 Consider citywide participation in Bike (Safety) Month (May)1 PDS, CS, ED, DPS Mobility, Safety & Security, Partnerships & Volunteerism; C1, C3, C5, C6, 3.7, 5.8, 9.1 AT17 Host a Bicycle Safety Forum 1 PDS, PW, DPS Mobility, Safety & Security, Partnerships & Volunteerism; C1, C5, C6, B2 3.7, 5.8, 9.1 AT18 Develop bicycle-related Story Maps 1 PDS, PW, ED Mobility, Partnerships & Volunteerism, Performance Management & Service Delivery; C2, B2, B6 3.7, 9.3 AT19 Pursue grant funding opportunities for projects related to bicycle safety 1 PDS, DPS, PW Mobility, Safety & Security, Performance Management & Service Delivery; C1, B4, F1 3.7, 5.8 Possible Active Transportation Recommendations, Continued Recommendation Priority Tier Department Responsible Strategic Link VGO AT20 Consider holding annual collaboration meetings between surrounding municipalities and NCTCOG to discuss bicycle/pedestrian safety issues and promote regional planning for active transportation 2 PDS, CS, ED, DPS Mobility, Safety & Security, Partnerships & Volunteerism, Quality Development; C1, C2, C5, B2 3.7, 5.8, 9.1 AT21 Promote the linkage from Southlake to the Cotton Belt Trail 1*PDS, PW Mobility, Safety & Security, Performance Management & Service Delivery; C2, C3, B6 3.4 AT22 Consider designing, installing and/or constructing any future bike facilities according to AASHTO / NACTO guidelines 3 PW Quality Development, Mobility, Infrastructure; C1, B1, F2 1.2, 3.7, 10.6 AT23 Explore opportunities to implement new technology and improvements that promote bicycle and pedestrian safety 1*PW, PDS Quality Development, Mobility, Infrastructure, Safety & Security; C1, C2, B6, F2 1.2, 3.2, 10.6 AT24 Research and consider pursuing Bicycle Friendly Community status through the League of American Bicyclists 3 PDS, CS Quality Development; B1 1.2 *AT21 & AT23 proposed change from Priority Tier III to Tier I by the Bicycle Safety Committee Existing Bicycle Facilities Master Plan Recommendations Adopted Bicycle Facility Map Proposed Map with Revisions –Bicycle Safety Committee* *Staff not recommending shared lane markings on future Kirkwood Blvd. or Kimball Ave. Figure 9C-9. Shared Lane Marking -MUTCD, 2009 Edition, published by FHWA Dove Rd. 30 MPH N. Kimball 40 MPH S. Kimball 35 MPH Future Kirkwood Blvd. ≥ 35 MPH Speed Limit Exhibit Staff Recommended Proposed Bicycle Facilities Map *Staff not recommending shared lane markings on future Kirkwood Blvd. or Kimball Ave. Proposed Map with Revisions –Bicycle Safety Committee*Staff proposed revisions RECOMMENDATIONS –INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS Signal Re- timing Improve Crosswalks Better Signage Modify Intersection Landscaping Add Roundabouts Additional Turn Lanes Recommendations Overview Tier No.of Recs.Rec. ID Tier 1 71 IC1 –IC71 Tier 2 2 IC72 –IC73 Tier 3 14 IC74 –IC87 Total 87 Recs.IC1 –IC87 Intersections Studied 1 2 3 2 4 3 5 6 3 7 8 3 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 -way Stop Controlled) 18 4 19 5 20 21 22 23 -way Stop Controlled) 24 25 5 26 27 5 28 29 REPRIORITIZATION OF EXISTING RECOMMENDATION MT3 MT3 Continental Blvd and S Peytonville Ave Roundabout This project involves the design and construction of a roundabout at the Continental Boulevard and S Peytonville Avenue intersection. The funding request includes drainage improvements. Funding does not include burying of the utilities. The funding request also includes landscaping, irrigation, electrical work, and art for the roundabout. REPRIORITIZATION OF EXISTING RECOMMENDATION MT3 Ref. No.Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VNT Link VGO Tie Priority Tier Responsible Department MT3 Traffic increases in the vicinity of Continental and S Peytonville during peak times, school pick up/drop off times, and during heavy use of Koalaty Park. Construct a roundabout at the intersection of W Continental and S Peytonville. Complete construction of the W Continental/S Peytonville roundabout. Mobility, Infrastructure, C1, C2 Efficient Mobility Options 3.1, 3.3, 3.5, 3.9 2 PW Ref. No.Issues Recommendations Implementation Metric Strategic Link VNT Link VGO Tie Priority Tier Responsible Department MT3 Traffic increases in the vicinity of Continental and S Peytonville during peak times, school pick up/drop off times, and during heavy use of Koalaty Park. Construct a roundabout at the intersection of W Continental and S Peytonville. Complete construction of the W Continental/S Peytonville roundabout. Mobility, Infrastructure, C1, C2 Efficient Mobility Options 3.1, 3.3, 3.5, 3.9 3 PW Existing prioritization (Tier 2) Proposed prioritization (Tier 3) SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations •Remove existing Priority Intersection List and Reference Map from Mobility Master Plan •Include the 87 proposed Intersection Capacity Improvement Recommendations (IC1 -IC87) •Reprioritize existing recommendation MT3 Bicycle Safety Recommendations •Include 11 Active Transportation Recommendations (AT14 -AT24) •Amend Bicycle Facilities Map and Recommendations QUESTIONS / CONCERNS: There were no questions or concerns. SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Call Summary: