Loading...
Item 6B .rr 618• 4/3/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mad-Fwd:Discuss Rezoning SOUTHLAKE David.ones<dlones@crsouthdake.tx.us> Fwd: Discuss Rezoning rNs���z Lori Payne<Ipayne@ci southlake.tx us> Sun.Apr 2.2017 at 7 29 PM To Laura Hill<mayor-ml@a.southlake tx us> Cc Ken Baker<KBaker@ci southlake.tx.us>.dlones@ci southlake tx.us.sserrano@ci southlake.tx us Lon Payne Begin forwarded message From:"'Paige Kester'via Mayor and City Council"< > Date:Apnl 2.2017 at 6 54'51 PM CDT Subject:Discuss Rezoning Reply-To.Paige Kester Mayor Hill and City Council, The residents of Stratfort Parc appreciate and have taken seriously our right to address the rezoning of the"Donkey Pasture". If you have the opportunity I would like to discuss with you all that has occurred and where our community is at this point. Please feel free to call my cell phone anytime or send me a time and number and I will call you. A face-to-face is always good too but I know the time is short. I can meet in person tonight,before or after work on Monday,or before work on Tuesday. 7:45 AM in the banks parking lot next to the Donkey's is a great option' Perhaps the biggest development was Confier RE asking me if a meeting would be worthwhile. I said"no"if a drive thru was a must-have for them and further it would not be necessary if their proposal wouldn't near 0-1 use intensity. Nine of the homeowners in Stratfort Parc just got out of that meeting. We told them that we felt strongly the 0-1 zoning was the right and just zoning but would agree to C-1 without restaurants if they would build a north wall similar to our HOA's east wall as a compromise to be done with the matter. They said they were not willing to go that route and would just go ahead and take their chance on the vote on Tuesday. I hope you have heard the citizens of Southlake this week. I was surprised of the passion on this topic. There was a concern about the residents next to this property and the message if the council were willing to change a 28 year zoning after all the surrounding property had been developed but the two big issues they had were first,anything that adds to traffic at this intersection is bad and second,this development is not consistent with the citizen's vision for Southlake? It was a very consistent theme to keep our home values high and maintain our beautiful home community by keeping new retail developments in the areas designated in the land standing and persistent Southlake long range plan-generally Town Center.the east and west ends and along 114. I have seen the 7,000+signers of the electronic petition against any rezoning and many of the near 1000 comments are spot on. I have attached many of them below. Yes,a few ask for the land to be left pasture and we in the HOA understand that that is not an option. We support the land owner to develop the land as zoned for 28 years,0-1! I have seen the overwhelming support of the current zoning on Mayor Hill's Facebook account also. And many of the emails to Council that I was copied on supported the current zoning. I would like to ask you a few questions before Tuesday night's vote. For example'Why vote for this rezoning? If you believe in a land owner's right supersede anything else,then why have zoning? Is there another compelling reason to depart from the city's 28 year plan that everyone has built around these 4 acres for'? I would like to ask again for you to deny this rezoning request. Thank you. Respectfully. Paige Kester 116 Londonberry Terrace Stratfort Parc HOA President - (home) (cell) Comments from the 7000+signers of. petition:Say'No'to Rezoning in Southlake! https//mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ut=2&ik=60e547089c&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b3137a08d8c60b&sim1=15b3137a08d8c60b 1/7 4/3/2017 Ci southlakelx.us Mail-Fwd Discuss Rezoning 'a-z,.niry m Squihidie Bivc!l Tie-xtege2 Corxav°atc drdquc Icudied hr-he,cuirs.ce a.SLB ;b8g0, I I Enough of the over development of Southlake'Not every inch of grass should be covered with pavement and buildings.It is okay to leave things as they are I have been' ere 9 years and Southlake has changed tremendously It has not changed for the better.No more dnve thrus no bank,no storage facility.enough We have empty buildings all over Southlake Boulevard There are also too many new buildings that are vacant on Kimbell.Stop the madness'The traffic is awful up and down Southlake 'Boulevard That intersection is just awful in the morning and in the afternoon.I oppose this plan. 4he owners of the properties that back up to the proposed rezoning site made their purchases with the understanding the property on Southlake Boulevard was zoned usiness The zoning should stay business In addition,the traffic on that section of Southlake Boulevard is already congested several times a day.I believe a change to etail zoning would increase u-turns.congestion and accidents Southlake does not need a dnve thru Starbucks at that location There are two Starbucks across the treet and a new dnve-thru Starbucks two miles away What really concerns me is that the city council members that I trust to make these decisions are putting development before the citizens Council needs to listen to 'these voices and hear that we are all fed up with the over crowded development in this town Town square traffic is such a nightmare it's not even appealing to our own residents to shop there All of this zoning change needs to end It appears we have developers running our city in a way that benefits them and not the citizens that pay taxes T (The intersection of 1709 and whites chapel is already a busy intersection.Added to that,dunng school hours,many teen dnvers are navigating these roads and this 'intersection,often rushing to pass between the two campuses.At times,especially dunng the morning commute,1709 backs up trying to turn north into whites chapel ue to school traffic I feel changing the zoning to allow fast food establishments with dnve thus will only increase the delays and contnbute to a less safe environment IAn average Starbucks serves 600-700 customers per day with over 1000 on a busy day There is already three Starbucks locations within a five mile radius just along Southlake Blvd.not including the ones inside Tom Thumb or in the Town Square Additionally,there is 104 registered restaurant-type establishments in the 76092 zip code.That is nearly 2x the ratio of restaurants to population in the City of Dallas Do we really need more dnve-through traffic and more restaurants" This location does not provide a safe way to exit and head west on 1709 which will promote u turns at intersection or increase traffic in whites chapel parking lot where nvers will find a place to turn around.Even worse scenano will be u turns in front of pine street to head back to 1709 I've already been rear ended at this intersection as overs heading north on whites chapel are not prepared for the abrupt stops caused by the traffic back up on this road first reason is the safety of the citizens That intersection is not designed for that amount of traffic The second reason is that the residents of Southlake should feel onfident that the city council has our best interest in mind when making decisions.Re zoning a property to a different designation-30 years after it was onginally zoned en it is near residential neighbors is not something in the best interest of the residents of Southlake Ever since Southlake Blvd added large,landscaped center medians requiring poor visibility u-turns to access businesses on the street the area has become dangerous toi dove.Adding retail,particularly fast food dnve through would make it worse Additionally,any retail or restaurant put in that location would be highly likely to fail due to the access issues,leaving another ugly empty space on Southlake Blvd Want less traffic which decreases noise.And i like our bedroom community to be left alone.Its nice to know that i can go to the town center to shop and come back to my neighborhood without all the retail jammed down my throat We've lived here since December of 1998.Bedroom community does not need drive thru fast food Put it at the ends of the town or centrally located in the center of town This intersection is already insanely busy and getting in and out of the development would be a nightmare Not to mention that this is obviously among the route between 1 the high school and senior high,which not only adds additional challenges for teenage dnvers but would increase travel time between campuses We have enough retail space and restaurants-and more than enough that stand empty I live near this intersection,across from the high school on whites chapel This whole intersection has become super congested and dangerous We hear sirens every ay,witness accidents and it's gotten to the point where we can't even get out of our neighborhood because it's so busy The restaurants in that stnp can't even stay in usiness so there's no need to rezone and add more. 11-hat intersection is already extremely busy and histoncally dangerous if not deadly A dnve-thru does not make sense in that location Our city needs to be taken back by the residents and we need to protect the city that we love Southlake is losing its charm Our small town is being given away to developers I agree.rezoning is ruining ur city-it needs to stop. I am within 200'and do not wish to see a change of zoning I purchase my residence expecting to be surrounded by professional office buildings not dnve through estaurants.I am also concerned for our traffic patterns and increased stress on the busy corner dunng peak times Increased Noise,smells and late night activity is not at I was expecting. IIt is very important to me because that intersection is already dangerous adding this would create more wrecks and more traffic congestion'I moved here because of the mall town feel 13 years ago 1709 has become a nightmare I avoid that road as much as possible as it is Something needs to be done about all the development It's small "out of hand" r — — - -- — — i Traffic on 1709 is too congested Additional entry's and exits to fast food restaurants will add to the problem With the proximity to Carroll Senior High and Carroll High School the potential is them for increased traffic Student dnvers rushing in and out of restaurants could result in accidents Please keep this zoned office building use Lease stop the madness of CRAMMING MORE onto 1709 when can our beautiful city and stop,look around and see we have ENOUGH.TIRED OF THE LONG UTE to my children's schools,events,shopping etc Dnving is dreadful,dangerous and there are new dnvers in that very area going to high school and church tly Please NO MORE PLEASE One of Southlake's greatest assets is Carroll ISO and the students who attend the schools This intersection is utilized by the busses traveling between the two high school campuses all day long There are also teenage drivers traveling to each school Adding more congestion only complicates the traffic pattern and endangers our 'students Noise,is one The increase in traffic will bring more people and only create congestion.People buy homes in Southlake because we want to escape the"city"and live in la relatively small community where homes are highly valued The added people and traffic are sure to lower my property value and create a congested highly traveled road — — Prefer to have developments that are more conducive to the community In addition,prefer for zoning to stay as it was onginally presented and approved Fellow Southlake homeowners living in that area,invested in being homeowners in our City based on what has already been approved.It is not fair to them for a bait and switch. In the mornings the traffic is severely congested turning left out of Londonbeny Terrace and this will only increase an already tough left turn in morning traffic.Soon we plan on walking our kids(twn 4yr olds)across the street to White's Chapel for preschool,but not if the traffic increases,which it certainly will. Dangerous intersection.Too much traffic and would put students and parents in danger going to and from High School for Pick up and drop off.Use the empty spaces we have now Southlake is starting to look like Fnsco and smell like it.Our small town is gone.Rezoning is ruining our city and we are no longer unique • https//mail.google.com/mall/u/0/7ul=2&Ik=60e547089c&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b3137a08d8c60b&slml=15b3137a08d8c60b 2/7 S 4/3/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd Discuss Rezoning !The intersection is already complicated,the Jr High is close by which means the intersection has non experienced teens dnving through There have been accidents on that intersection already.Including those new business there will!make it worse We live in this city because it is safe Please keep it on that way, We already have too much traffic in that area!Will cause trouble for teen dnvers going to and leaving both high school campuses.Southlake is becoming fust like every other city around because of such growth.Pretty soon,it will be nothing special and lose the small town feel.(And property values will go downs) i intersection is already the site of frequent accidents and is not designed for this volume of traffic.Really,Southlake City Council,how many more fast casual'and Starbucks do we need?There are dnve through Starbucks already a few miles down the road on both sides Just say no to more cheap development' L 1lAs a 9 year resident of Southlake I am concerned with the amount of over development in our city I am also concemed with the amount of traffic that this development attracts making our city more congested and prone to more auto accidents in an area that has not been designed to withstand the increased traffic. raffic safety,especially near our schools.We have so many folks outside of our city already using SLBLVD to commute.This proposal would lust increase congestion .nd safety concerns.Residents are not in need of more retail or dnve throughs.Seek another location if potential commerce is a concern.Thanks I would not like to see a fast food dnve though across the street from our beautiful church.It is not the correct development for this portion of SLB If the restaurant fails which is more probable than not),then we have an empty fast food shell in place of something that could really add value. 1 e moved here for the small town feel and now I'm living in an over developed"small"community.So disappointed in Southlake approving high density construction (which increases traffic Can't even find parking in SLTS for"community events"so dnving citizens away that moved here to support local The traffic in Southlake is already a nightmare'That intersection alone is already insane.Please,please,please put our community first and fust don't look at the potential$$that can be made by putting in more retail.We moved here because of all the green space Please don't take it all away, 4raffic at that intersection is already congested It's an intersection that is between both high schools and already a safety hazard to all of us including the high school "rivers going to/from and between both High school campuses I've witnessed several bad accidents in that section of 1709 he traffic close to 114 are getting worse for all main road.White chapel,dove.Kimball.We need city help for better traffic.We moved to our dream home with peaceful neighborhood,not for city life.Southlak has enough restaurants and business,buy where is peaceful land we had before. he traffic is already bad on 1709 and rezoning that area would lower home values and create more accidents There is already congestion at that intersection in the omings as the light is not sync correctly and lots of young drivers dnve that route as the high school is location nearby. !Too much traffic already-very congested.Property values will be decreased with any type of fast food or other dnve-thru establishment.Nightime traffic will be more (dangerous with necessary u-turn to get to this area as lighting on White Chapel is inadequate for u-turn at night. e live near this intersection and see car accidents weekly.Too much traffic in too many lanes at too fast speeds Adding a drive-through there is an insane ideal I can't !imagine more people pulling out of a dove through into SL Blvd plus making u-turns at Shady Oaks to access it! fThe proposed"turn around"area is near the entry to Stratfort Parc community which is already difficult to turn out onto White Chapel with current traffic Added fast food ! land business traffic will be a negative impact on our neighborhood,property values,and safety of community. II have two,soon to be three children who attend Southlake schools,and that intersection is already way too busy as it is,and near by schools,which mean lots of kids {walking,and also lots of cross country runners.This should not be re-zoned for the safety of our students. I already avoid that intersection whenever possible due to traffic concerns Adding more retail would only make things worse.Another Starbucks?i There's already TWO directly across the street(one is inside of Tom Thumb).3 in a one block radius seems a bit excessive,no?, Not The traffic in this location is so homfic as it stands now,As a parent of a new dnver attending Carroll High School I do not want anything else added at that intersection.The amount of traffic accidents at this location is terrifying Don't add to the problem. (Dangerous intersection as it is Traffic is already out of control There is a freaking Starbucks nght across the street Enough is enough We have plenty of empty !buildings in this town Quit filling every green space we have with buildings It's getting ndiculous !Jst adding more traffic and congestion to an already congested intersection Also why do we have to build on every inch of SLB You did a survey and one of the top !concerns was traffic and building along SLB It is fust exploding along that road Getting ndiculous !This intersection cannot handle the increased traffic that a Starbucks with dnve through would bnng.Especially in the morning when that intersection is already !challenging Drive times to school and work will increase with greater traffic that would result r — — That intersection is already very congested.This has not been proven to be a successful area for restaurants Leaving small parcels of land undeveloped,or in their natural state ie the Donkey Patch,is more inline with what many consider"suburban living". These intersections are busy enough!!„iiiii I do not want my child dnving(in the next 4 years)with even more confusion and traffic,This place is scary enough with all khe damn accidents and crazy drivers,Do not add more confusion to the chaos,ii, I live near this intersection and strongly oppose this rezoning It would greatly increase traffic in an already heavy traffic area We fust don't need or want dnve thru fast ood in this location.Please maintain the integnty of our beautiful City!!, ' live in the neighborhood directly behind the donkey patch and feel the increased noise and traffic inherent in a dnve-thru rezoning will endanger my children with undue need since there is already a Starbucks directly across the street currently here are so many empty retail sites in our town now.We need to focus on filling the empty spots,not building more retail space The traffic on 1709 is already hombie here.We do not need to add more congestion there.I agree,more donkeys, e relocated from Keller to Southlake 3 years ago for this very reason-TRAFFIC'We loved the fact that Southlake doesn't overcrowd the area with fast food and partments Please keep Southlake safe and do not allow unnecessary retail rezoning Unsafe to add additional stop and go and in and out traffic to an already over populated and crowded street The zoning should not be changed to allow anybretail/restaurants and especially not a busy Starbucks or other high traffic drive-thru Southlake does not need any more Junky fast food restaurants,'Southlake is over built and has become way to congested.1709 is becoming dangerous because of so uch growth and we have too many empty spaces as it is Please Stop Buildingi,i his is very near where I live and the traffic is already horrible here There are plenty of open locations blocks away for dnve thru and retail No more are needed here. here is also school traffic that does not need any further issues! raffic congestion is an issue at that location.Southlake does not need more fast food and/or dnve-thru restaurants that would add to increased traffic in that area.And,I =gree with all the previous comments opposing this development. 1709 is too congested,kids love the donkey patch and tired of seeing all these chains restaurants and dnve thrus everywhere in Southlake Please let's preserve the reens of Southlake. already it feels like a concrete Jungle' (Council members please represent the residents of Southlake and NOT the developers We count on you to represent our interests.We do not want to see fast diners, rive throughs and other highly congested businesses in this track. FMy kids are approaching dnving age and will be driving this area to ge to the high school and sr his school daily,It is already dangerous,as proven by the daily sirens https//m al 3/7 4/3/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd Discuss Rezoning hea6Lfrom the accidents that occur at that intersartroo_ we have empty buildings in the shopping center where Wal Mart use to be,we do not need to be building any fast food places.congesting 1709 The traffic is bad enough "already and the medians make U turns and access dangerous' !This has always been a very congested,dangerous intersection Students and parents going to and from High School and from the Senior High to High Scool.not ro "mention general traffic is more than enough congestion here Ilt seems a bit shortsighted and antiquated to equate development with progress.How does turning the beloved donkey patch into a strip mall improve our way of life?I !moved here because of the open space and farmland - -_ _----- - - "There's too many half-empty retail spaces on Southlake Blvd as it is We need to be much more careful to develop with long-term viability in mind rather than on short- tterm profits that don't stay in our community Every day life and driving in midtown Southlake is already Jammed and impacted from the retail increases made.We need to start holding our community members quality of life at a higher regard than our bottom line kilo more fast food/dnve through restaurants and the traffic at that intersection would be more dangerous for all,especially the teenaged dnvers going to a fro between the 'high school and senior high school. his area is already congested with traffic and new high school dnvers I don't feel that more high volume fast food restaurants are needed in this area,increasing traffic nd the likelihood of accidents Traffic near my home-southlake is already over developed and there is plenty of vacant retail space.Let see full the newly developed space that has been vacant for ver a year before building new - - — _- - This area is already such a hazard with the high school traffic-I don't think it can bear any increase-much less 900 more a day It's a BAD idea and sets a bad precedent I of development at any cost i We don't have the infrastructure to support such activity at this intersection,and I also find it hard to support in light of how very much vacant retail space is currently available in Southlake The proposed location does not have the proper infrastructure to support the additional traffic caused by a high volume dnve through What a tembly irresponsible idea for i the city to consider' i II live in the Stratfort Gardens subdivision I do not wish to have additional traffic and noise in my neighborhood We moved to this location specifically for the lack of raffic and noise That's already such a dangerous intersection any more business would be detnmental.There are already so many vacant spaces around town,why not fill those spaces before building new ones? I live close by,and frequent this area daily.Traffic is already horrendous in this area.and the last thing we need is another dumb restaurant in this town clogging up the traffic more. Too much traffic already It's dangerous for more traffic in this area between the 2 high schools when the students are trying to get between the two schools in a limited mount of time - - - - -i My 4th of 6 kids will be passing that already congested intersection every school day Followed by my last 2 kids over the next 6 years No thank you to another ,unnecessary restaurant,' _ I 'We need some open space along Southlake Blvd it is congested and now the city looks disheveled with all sorts of different buildings It is not that nice of a city to live lin anymore IVVe have restaurants closing down constantly.no more are needed It would be nice to keep a patch of green somewhere In addition I share concerns of high school (dnvers on that road hdnve this route at least twice a day It is dangerous with speeding cars people on cell phones etc Has way too much traffic as it is nght now Don't add to the chaos land danger 'definitely oppose-it would create a traffic flow nightmare.the current traffic pattems already have it congested at pnme times it would increase frustrations and safety issues We moved to southlake for its small town atmosphere and it's important that we do not make this place commercial and trash strewn drive throughs every where like every other suburb' I've lived there all my life and after watching it continue to grow in ways that are dangerous for traffic reasons,this is another development that should be put to a STOP now rli his intersection already has a great deal of traffic There are vacancies for fast food restaurants near Davis and 1709 which is more appropnate area for this type of usiness I travel EB to Goddard,it's very difficult to exit that dnveway and then u-tum at White Chapel,I could only imagine how difficult it would be closer to White Chapel and 1709 'Traffic concerns and congestion of turning traffic around with the median With the high school traffic several times a day in close proximity that corner is a nightmare already To protect student dnvers headed to/from CHS ALREADY a crazy busy intersection with people cutting through lots and doing illegal maneuvers to rush through this 'intersection- - -- - - - - -- ---- - !This is a congested corner in the morning and late afternoon Building more there is just inviting accidents.A traffic study needs to be done before any building is discussed here is so much congestion already along 1709- Failed restaurants already near there Slow down developing this town-the vacant lots make it great I oppose the - oning oo much traffic already and complicating a bad intersection near a school with young dnvers is a bad idea.No need for this We have enough restaurants and retail (ready. (Please no more retail/restaurants on Southlake Blvd We need to protect any green spots that are left There is enough abandoned retail space on 1709 that can be re- fused ; 'Because this intersection has enough accidents with young high school dnvers and now they will all pile in the car to go get fast foodiiir I can see the wrecks already' [As a Southlake resident and parent of teenagers the proposed change raises serious issues regarding increased congestion/traffic and safety concerns for teenage }Need}Need balance with the town growth some things way too much and losing its small quaint feel,Safety for the young dnvers,overall the traffic is suffocating as it is We do not need anymore businesses on that corner to create more traffic We already have a traffic problem getting to the High School and we do not need to add to it Living in Southlake i have seen so much accidents in that specific location and the turn signal light seems us-usually short Making a tum there is always a hassle https//mail.google.com/mad/u/0/?ur=2&ik=60e547089c&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b3137a08d8c60b&stmt=15b3137a08d8c60b 4/7 • 4/3/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd'Discuss Rezoning !Increased traffic/u-turns causing more safety at the already busy intersection I've personally witnessed directly or the after effects of 4 accidents here in 3 years —1jj `rhe traffic and nit importantly,the accidents in that area are astonishingly bad This will only worsen with more development,particularly at that intersection Southlake does not need anymore retail business!'It is so congested around our Oak Hill neighborhood and we've already considered moving before it gets worse!! Safety&enormous traffic!Mainly safety hazard w/so many HS kids starting to drive,etc'No need for Starbucks'A new one lust down the road by Hobby Lobbyn Traffic is a huge issue Mornings are like traveling Hwy 75 or downtown Dallas We are a small town and there is no more land fust parking lots and concrete- Southlake Blvd.too congested at that intersection already Lots of young dnvers going to the High School.Would like the zoning to remain office space The medians on Southlake Boulevard ruined that street,requinng dnvers to make dangerous LI-turns to get to the other side Please don't make it worse This intersection is already very busy and there are far too many really bad accidents that already happen there without adding a dnve-thru to the mix. We don't need additional traffic at this intersection and we certainly don't need another restaurant There are so many unoccupied buildings nght now. We do not need any more traffic along that area,is already dangerous intersection and is clogged in mornings and afternoons with high school traffic4. —+ This intersection already is extremely busy and will always have 15-18 year old dnvers going through it on a daily basis because of the CHS&CSHS. I travel through this area twice a day and it is already very congested.It would be dangerous to add dnve through restaurant traffic to the area. Please keep this section of Southlake blvd business and not retail or fast food Way to much traffic at this intersection and too many accidents City has approved waaaay too much new development without any regard to negative effects on traffic.Traffic is way out of hand all over city . It's important to me because we don't need a mom complicated intersection nor a new dnve thru in this location,it will only increase traffic 1709 does not need additional traffic.Property owners behind this location should not have to deal with this type of nose/congestion/traffic I don't agree with changing the zoning in this area.We do not need another fast food restaurant at this site Too much traffic in this area!! I Moved here two years ago and the traffic on SLB and White Chapel is so bad now.Fast casual restaurants with a dnve thru would make it worst I live in a subdivision near this property(SouthRdge Lakes)and this development will negatively impact our traffic and our property values (This area is already very crowded when it comes to traffic This would be very poor planning.SL Blvd is fust turning into a long parking lot I use Whites Chapel and Southlake blvd frequently and the traffic congestion is already bad.Now it's mor cars and u turns it will be unsafe I already avoid this area because of traffic,this will only make things worse and cause back-up in other areas More green space please This intersection is far too congested for additional businesses on this comer,especially for a fast food business with dnve through !I have a 13 year old son who will be learning to dnve soon.We have enough congestion and dangerous dnving situations close to the HS 1 Mie have too much traffic at this intersection already A dnve-thru establishment would create more traffic Please don't approve this' -� Too much congestion already around Southlake Blvd and this would add to it.Many young dnvers in this area between the high schools. ! The traffic at that intersection is alreadI. y heavy.Too many accidents occur at that intersection.This would create more congestion L0o much traffic and congestion already.More restaurants and office/retail not needed in Southlake,it is already over developed. f I agree that 1709 and White Chapel is already a very busy and dangerous intersection.Adding a dnve-thru would make things worse traffic on SL Blvd is way too busy now-and where it intersects with White Chapel will fust cause bigger traffic problems!! There is too much traffic in this area and this will further deteriorate the quality of life of folks living in Stratford Parc. Wedo riot want more traffic,noise,pollution.We do not want more restaurants nor stores Let's keep it green and beautiful. That is already a dangerous intersection particularly dunng the school year with much traffic to and from the High School. It's so crowded already and many many wrecks.We dont need to Increase traffic at this intersection nor near our schools' Too much traffic on 1709'Too many high schoolers traveling between the high school and senior high at that traffic light! We all paid a lot of money to live safely and quietly in Southlake Enough is enough How much more retail do we need'»? This intersection is already very busy,and having dnve thru restaurant would make it a traffic nightmare and unsafe Traffic is bad enough on 1709.This will make it worse.Please stop adding more development Leave the donkeys alone. Too much traffic in that congested area Southlake needs to start thinking of the safety of us citizens before money. That intersection is already too busy and it's very residential These types of businesses belong near the highway We have plenty restaurant/eating options already We don't need more and dodont need more traffic hazards on SIB' This area is way too congested to add drive through restaurants.Plus,it further ruins our small-town community. The proposed development is behind my home and I'm concerned about traffic,noise and smell from the restaurants.— Traffic is already horrendous-especially to and from school I cannot even exit my neighborhood in the morning Too much traffic and Southlake does not need anymore commercial or fast food establishments'#savethedonkeypatch Southlake Blvd is already too congested with traffic.Surely there's a better place for fast food restaurants. It is definitely going to affect my life in terms of traffic,property value,safety for kids etc etc etc There is already way too much traffic on 1709 and we don't need yet another business taking up precious land! Too many wrecks here already Slowing traffic for fast food will make this intersection even more dangerous Traffic on 1709 has become temble and congested,causing accidents Please leave the zoning the way it is I already have a hard enough time getting into my neighborhood without more congestion and traffic on 1709 The intersection is already too busy and many inexpenenced high school dnvers must use this intersection. Homeowners should not have to face the potential for home value decrease stemming from re-zoning attempts Avoid bad traffic,keep the integnty of the neighborhood community,avoid pollution,no home for donkeys. We need to clamp down on growth.Traffic is insane around Whites Chapel a,ready.This is not a mart move Too much congestion on 1709 and we have a 16 year old who dnves now,too many young dnvers in that area Please stop the traffic madness in Southlake It is bad as it is We need more safe zones in this suburb homble traffic already dangerous and this would not be in line with keeping it a small town atmosphere Traffic is already homble there in the morning and at night We don't need another restaurant there. White's Chapel&1709 is already a busy,unsafe intersection.This would increase traffic in that area. Do not want increased traffic and feel that the zoning for office space only 20 years ago makes sense I live in the area and believe that the negative impact of the rezoning greatly exceeds any benefits. no more needed'there is plenty of empty spaces to utilize it's already jammed and over built STOP! I have teenage dnvers that use that intersection daily for school It's already way too congested. Too much congestion and accidents in that area Many students travel through that particular area https//mail.google.com/mad/u/0/qui=2&ik=60e547089c&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b3137a08d8c60b&slml=15b3137a08d8c60b 5/7 V11111111111111 - . 4/3/2017 Ci.southlake.bc.us Mail-Fwd Discuss Rezoning The east bound traffic on SLB is already as bad as it can get Let's not add more to the problem! The traffic at that intersection is already horrendous It can't handle any more traffic safety Leave the donkey's .love the"old"Southlake Way overdeveloped and congested I'm that area. We already have an enouous traffic problem this will make it a lot worse homble idea Don't need it 1709 is too congested Will cause more traffic and accidents!Nonononon00000k Concerned about the traffic,congestion,and potential safety issues near this intersection! e don't need increased traffic congestion at the intersection of 1709&White's Chapel Bld bill cause traffic,more accidents and will add to how unsightly southlake blvd has become. ! To preserve a level of tolerable traffic and allow non franchise restaurants to flounsh. b/c of the increased traffic congestion near where my children will be dnving to school — — +, iToo much traffic already plus there is no need for more fast food chain type resturants !traffic is very bad here already and this will make it worse devaluation of the area !We don't need anymore accidents or traffic!!We have enough restaurants unts!No more The area requesting to be rezoned already has too much traffic and is too congested !Iwant development to ensure safety and not overuse certain zoning in our great city ;SLB is too busy already-adding a fast food restaurant would add to the congestion there is so much traffic and acoidents As a mother of 3 I worry about their safety jNo to traffic hazards and congestion Don't spoil the integnty of the neighborhood -- - I i4I his would cause even more congestion in the area which will lead to more accidents 4Southlake has too much traffic on 1709 We don't need any new restaurants or shops This change in zoning and use of land will have too many adverse effects to count i Traffic and more transit traffic in a highly residential area is not a good mix I Quit adding useless shopping and medical facilities We are overrun as it is now We do not need or want a fast food dnve thru restaurant at that intersection i It is to congested there already Safety for dnvers and especially our kids Enough already!!The charm and character of Southlake are quickly being lost !The intersection is way too busy as it is We do not need any more traffic i i !There is already too much congestion in that area,and many student dnvers !It's important to me because I have a teenage dnver and one mom next year i !Safety for our young little ones going to school and coming back every day I'oppose the rezoning along SLB It will create a bigger traffic problem !Further building of this area will be detnmental to Southlake.I vote no IIt is not set up for fast food restaurants The streets are busy enough !This is a bad idea and will create even more mayhem at the intersection! — — — —i I shop and visit the vet at that corner and it is already too congested i This is already a high traffic area We should not re-zone this parcel irte chapel is already unsafe,any added traffic is a senous concernj !No point in rezoning this space and adding to the traffic congestion!! !There is too much traffic on Southlake Blvd Please stop overbuilding. II am concerned about increased traffic in an already congested area The intersection is too congested.It will not support a dnve-thru II am concerned for traffic safety in our town Stop overdevelopment The proposed rezoning will make our city more congested and unsafe !Please!Help us keep Southlake the beautiful charming city we love! —I Southlake needs more parks less restsurants I live here,I care ! ,I live off WC&SLB&the am&pm tush hours are already homble ' !Enough is enough Southlake has been overcrowded and congested — — —_--- — — iSafety concerns,out of control congestion at that intersection , ,Traffic is alreadybad on 1709,especially pecialiy at this intersection. t re don't need additional traffic this close to the high school 'A very dangerous intersection,adding more traffic is so scary I Have you dnven down Southlake Blvd lately'?Enough is enough Too much traffic and too many accidents already in the area. !Safety for my young dnver going to and from the high school I have a teenage dnver and safety is of utmost importance Safety is the first concern and traffic issues a major 2nd — — i ffi There is already plenty of traffic at this intersection! !Increased traffic in an already dangerous traffic area. 11 It will bring more traffic to an already congested area — hat area is already too busy and crowded with traffic !ready too much traffic heading to both high schools i 1709 is congested enough Traffick is a huge concern! (Reducing traffic on 1709 and safety of our students — Too much congestion at that intersection already!!! i Too dangerous w kids trying to get to high school! I There many accidents in that intersection already. i Resident of Southlake and parent of young children Reduce traffic and increase safety and enjoyment -- — ——-- — —+— i Too much traffic and fast food junks up an area !1 https//mall.google.corn/mail/u/0/Pui=2&Ik=60e547089c&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b3137a08d8c60b&siml=15b3137a08d8c60b 6/7 4/3/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd Discuss Rezoning Already a horrible intersection-too dangerous! There is too much development of green space Traffic control and safety for teen dnvers. Too much traffic with retail and fast food — I live in Southlake very close to this area Traffic safety in an already congested area Way too much traffic in that area as it is --- — Dangerous intersection fur a dnve through. Too congested of an area for a restaurant. I live here.It's too much traffic already Safety of the public,especially children Traffic concerns so close to high school. Senous traffic issues many car accidents Traffic problems,too much retail in SL! — —_-- — _ — — Increased traffic congestion and safety Please keep traffic down in this areal — — — ——Prevent further congestion in our city Safety of neighborhood is in jeopardy Too much traffic unsafe intersections I agree it would be a traffic hazard Dangerous&too much traffic already! Too much traffic already in the area! -- — — —— — —Increased traffic congestion&safety Please don't make us leave Southlake Dont need more traffic near schools Traffic and safety of my children It will cause traffic problems Too much traffic on SL Blvdi! Traffic safety and congestion — -- — ----- — -- -- -- — Two words Traffic concerns' Traffic issues will increase Too much traffic on SL Blvd! I oppose the zoning change Traffic congestion on 1709 -- — -- — Supporting Neighbourhood Too much traffic already --------— ------------ ---------- ------ Traffic in that area ------------------------------- ---- +I!Traffic congestion (Traffic and safety! — — — — ---- https//mad.google.corn/mad/u/OPu!=2&i k=60e547089c&view=pt&search=i nbox&th=15b3137a08d8c60b&s!m 1=15b3137a08d8c60b 7/7 Notificati©n Response Form RE : ZA17-015 ' awe`; �, j, ,, ; '* �.' 'f�r J`4 'P"'s �Lt' `•fr.Y�,4.•q}o , Xf ,{X9' Meeting Date: April 4, 2017 at 7:60P cevea Your Name and Address: r" (+iyt•ica'zi'sn Re i xJ� ' �L � f ' Mainz St:SYe 31 �.) 44dti 4/11-4,944S uth ake,TX 7.6492 �J �E tions (81 ,748 16Z _ �i'eG n� .n � Fax. (817j 748;8077 Southlake, TX PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners(s) of the property noted above, are hereby _in favor of _opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) The proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for your comments regarding your position: • Signature: Date: 3 0)-m • Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): ` i Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. ■ • Notification Response Form RE :ZA17-015 I; „,+ n aj +{:o Meeting Date: April 4, 2017 at e':00PM (,7 ' !I4,t �' .1't4Y �'i r X � r F 7r E ; ✓ 0 4 Your Name and Address: y -eovip i y sf zq,�; *tifc: le °`max t30 rt4a1 <.' t: Ste 310 '(� tt�r TX76092 :.,,,1---)5 � � L';::;:l?,titnifrke,gone: {817)748-8621 % 4 tax: (817)748-8077V- q.Liz_ c._;'-- , 4_ ___ , _ : Southlake, TX —1 b O a PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners(s) of the •roperty noted above, are hereby __in favorer (i��pposed `') _undecided about (,.irc e or underline one) The proposed Zoning Change rind Site Plan referenced above. Space for your comments regarding your position: • Signature c...,_<e t Date: 3-Q6 --l7 Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name (s): �----'seneN_ Q Lr.:Ic% , b V-WO Ca Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printsed at top. )rh rwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Notification Response Form RE : ZA17-015 D ret.questions a n*+ait;'e4pb11�ses• =•,' �::, a t !iOilthfake ' ef ? Meeting Date: April 4, 2017 at 7:OOPM xJi" ietievei' rlint S vis Your Name and Address: No itication Response R nn1400 Main St;Ste 310 Q .- 3T-tT L C S Y So thiai�e, xf76092 C .- " \ Phone ( i.71-7:4-87862'121 :-,',-,:} �, h � IDI J' i I m to C Fal: (8171.748-8077 r K,° - Southlake, TX PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners(s) of the property noted above, are hereby _in favor of !a opposed t• _undecided about (circle or underline one) The proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for your comments regarding your position: U\k i l-e s C GgLp el. +- 170c) is mu_ 4 G2 2 (rn ai or 11-ers e .D-.,..s 11,-\ CIAD0I L r \ wobt,i4 c. im /1'L-fr -t-D aer^ O6Q2 I,""*'Jv{'� �Y1 z ,, 1 V l e UU(`(_ Gl f\e- 4P2( 2 'eix(5-i(-1 St-or to clic Gtt ,`S t n_ki"S c'c s), -CoW),\)( fnQ.e a +d ( P) Signature: ._>1v / i► Date: 31.?-7 // 1 Additional Signature: , 4/ 1„...„ Date:, 3/Z?/I Printed Name(s): AlIV-tq "tel CA s , j �rr- L0 �S Must be property owner(s)whose name(s) re printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Notification Response Form RE : ZA17-015 Meeting Date: April 4, 2017 at 7:00PM r { �, Your Name and Address: , i M lT bo e K(A-s hfd N I (`' Cr4itja t Southiake, TX PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners(s) of the property noted above, are hereby _in favor of )<opposed to undecided about cir erline one) The proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. • Space for your comments regarding your position: I -'s � Irendj +Do SL W , f-h oaPs Oki our seC+,o ( 1 0`F Sa ,,(+-hInKe Plod ( LA1Ce &est- deJe_ Iopmer)-F ) fho-F e J e h+ ,'S o-F+e N► d (f,'c uN- M AJC; k,1/41 +h e U -+urn)S !Jecess ArcJ, -E-0 9e+ aid +v ± he bo tIe L-JArd wesi-bou ,vd — or -f-o -i-' r i --o our d e /eIaprayeNt eAS+bourld - Are dou) ,N, r,jh+- d erQ1 c . Pi doo4 + Add -fa s co N3 Signature: je,er,-77 — Date: `.A2(9/1 Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): avoei ) (-( . S-(-or i(wP il- K ush IorJ Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - FW: Oppose ZA17-015 Page 1 of 1 CITY Or SOUTHLAKE Selena Serrano<sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us> FW: Oppose ZA17-015 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:25 PM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Ken Baker<kbaker@ci.southlake.tx us>, Selena Serrano <sserrano@ci southlake.tx.us> ---Original Message---- From: 'Leslie Guess'via Mayor and City Council [mailto:mayorandcitycouncil@ci southlake tx us] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 1:23 PM To: mayorandcitycouncil@ci southlake tx.us Subject Oppose ZA17-015 Hello, Mayor Laura Hill and City Council members I am not sure if I'll be able to attend the meeting Tuesday but wanted to note that I am opposed to changing the zoning on this property Thank you for listening to the concerns many citizens have about this Rezoning request. Best regards, Leslie Guess 411 Bryn Meadows South lake Sent from my iPhone https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=8947d4f5bc&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b... 3/30/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail -FW: Re: White Chapel/Southlake Boulevard rezoning Page 1 of 2 UM. CITY Of SOUTHLAKE Selena Serrano<sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us> FW: Re: White Chapel/Southlake Boulevard rezoning 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3'44 PM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc' Ken Baker<kbaker@ci south lake tx.us>, Selena Serrano <sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: GARY HARGETT[mailto. Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 3:44 PM To: mayor@ci.southlake tx.us Subject: Fw: Re: Mayor Hill,this was received by mail,however,it contained the mayor&council members email addresses, requesting expressing opposition. Ms. Reed's letter had her email address.Below is our correspondence.I did speak to Mr.O'Donnel, however,they haven't cleaned it up,hopefully,they won't dump again.Thanks for your assistance -I work very hard keeping our place looking nice&I get upset when someone disrespects by dumping.Sincerely, Gary Hargett From:Johanna Reed Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 4:17 PM To:GARY HARGETT Subject: Re: wish I was was here 10 years ago but I lived in New Jersey! I would probably have fought that too.We did fight and won when they tried to put up a cell phone tower there. My concern is that intersection cannot currently support 3 restaurants and a drive thru. It will increase wait times at the light,accidents due to U turns and the number of young drivers going to the high school,and cause bus delays between classes.Additionally,our request is to maintain the current zoning NOT to undermine construction.I understand that you do not support this and I do appreciate your response. Johanna Reed Sent from my iPhone https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=8947d4f5bc&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b... 3/30/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - FW: Re: White Chapel/Southlake Boulevard rezoning Page 2 of 2 On Mar 27,2017,at 3:53 PM,GARY HARGETT 4011111111W wrote: Ms. Reed,Your objections to the Church family's re-zoning are unbelievable.Where were you when I was protesting Southlake's approval of a Tavern or 10 plus years on continual both legal&illegal expansion at Feedstore BBQ?Feedstore BBQ is located at an S curve on S.White Chapel and customers continually stop in the street waiting for a close-up parking space -causing a traffic hassard.A liquor selling business in the middle of residential properties valued at several million dollars is all about"good ole boy"administration.Also, I found myself standing alone in opposition at City Council approval.Additionally,all of Southlake Blvd.has/is becoming a shopping mecca and denial of this proposal would be discriminatory. Sincerely, Gary Harget 1111 S.White Chapel Blvd Southlake,Texas (817) 329-2150 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=8947d4f5bc&view—pt&search=inbox&th=15 b... 3/30/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: Opposition to rezoning the "Donkey Pasture" Page 1 of 2 CrrY QF SOUTHLAKE Selena Serrano<sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: Opposition to rezoning the "Donkey Pasture" 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:11 PM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: Keith Davis Date: March 29, 2017 at 7:55:53 PM CDT To: mayor@ci southiake tx us Subject: Opposition to rezoning the"Donkey Pasture" Subject: Opposition to rezoning of Donkey Pasture Madam Mayor, City Council, Mr. Baker: My Name is Keith W. Davis. I live at 101 Londonberry Terrace within Stratfort Parc Subdivision of Southlake. I have been made aware of an application by a land developer requesting to rezone what is locally called the "Donkey Pasture" at the corner of Southlake Blvd. and White's Chapel Blvd. from Office Retail to Commercial Retail. I strongly oppose this request for many reasons including that it is inappropriate to rezone a property this close to a residential neighborhood for Retail Commercial when the current land use designation has been in place for 28 years and the negative effect the zoning change will have on this already heavy traffic intersection. When we decided to move to our current home in Southlake, my wife and I were taken by the lovely feel of the community. By that I refer to the tasteful mix of retail, office and subdivisions/homes. Many less attractive cities have succumbed to the temptation of"more tax revenue" through bringing in any and every new business with little to no consideration to how it was negatively affecting the lives of its citizens. Southlake has done a fine job so far of maintaining a good mix of its zoning which is attractive to all of its citizens. I'm sure you have driven through towns and cities where the main road has been overtaken with fast food joints, drive-thru coffee houses and low end businesses that left you feeling turned off. By changing the zoning of the subject land, you take us down the path of changing the basic feel of the Southlake its citizen's love. When that change reaches a certain tipping https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=8947d4f5bc&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b... 3/30/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: Opposition to rezoning the "Donkey Pasture" Page 2 of 2 point, property values will go down, high wage earning folks will leave and the city will go into decline. It won't happen overnight but it will happen. Please don't let this be the next step in going down the path to decline! Vote against the zoning change, please! Sincerely, Keith W. and Lisa A. Davis Keith W Davis Keith Davis Oil &Gas 101 Londonberry Terrace, Suite B Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: 817-988-2181 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=8947d4f5bc&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b... 3/30/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: ZAI7-015 Page 1 of 2 CrrY OF SOUTH LAKE Selena Serrano<sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: ZA17-015 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:12 PM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us, Ken Baker<kbaker@ci southlake.tx.us> Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: Anissa Weisberg Date: March 29, 2017 at 7:57:41 PM CDT To: "mayor@ci.southlake tx us" <mayor@ci southiake.tx.us> Subject: ZA17-015 Reply-To: Anissa Weisberg Dear Mayor Hill, Thank you for your service to our city. I know your job is not an easy one. You face the daily challenge of balancing the income requirements of the city with the safety and security of your citizens. This constant challenge does not go overlooked I am writing to express my opposition to Case Number ZA17-015, the proposed zoning change for Southlake Commons. I know many of my neighbors have already voiced their opposition to this zoning change as well as thousands of other Southlake residents who have signed a petition as such. I am particularly concerned about the prospect of a drive-thru facility being a part of the proposed building plan. The intersection of White's Chapel Boulevard and Southlake Boulevard is already a highly traveled one. I have seen countless accidents at this intersection without the addition of 500-900 cars the new drive-thru is expected to bring. These were not just bumper-tap type accidents, either. My family and I regularly take walks in and around our neighborhood. I have seen accidents where cars have managed to jump the curb in front of White's Chapel on the 1709 side This is disturbing to me not just as a motorist but as a pedestrian Every time I see this kind of accident I think to myself, "We could have been hit by that car" I have seen a car jump the curb on White's Chapel Boulevard just next to First Financial Bank and uproot a tree. If you drive along White's Chapel in this area you will notice a plant in the parkway that does not match the other trees Again, I take pause thinking we could have been hit if we were walking at the wrong time. I have been on my way home numerous times only to find a Southlake DPS Officer directing traffic through that intersection thanks to another accident. I can only imagine the kind of danger that will be created at that intersection as well as the adjacent area if we add hundreds of cars into the mix. These will obviously be drivers in a hurry to get a cup of coffee and be on their way. Why do I say that they are obviously in a hurry? Well, there are two Starbucks locations just across the street from the proposed construction https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=8947d4f5bc&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b... 3/30/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: ZA17-015 Page 2 of 2 site There is a freestanding location and another just steps away inside Tom Thumb If these drivers were not in a hurry they could simply stop at either of the two locations just across the way, get out of their cars, and buy a coffee Drive-thru businesses imply speed. Speed of service, speed of cars. I implore you to consider voting"no"to the proposed zoning change(ZA17-015) at the next city council meeting on April 4, 2017. Please consider the safety of our citizens first and foremost Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Anissa & Bryan Weisberg 309 Edinburgh Ct. Southlake, TX 76092 817-416-3849 • https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=8947d4f5bc&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b... 3/30/2017 1r■m■■r • Notification Response Form Direct questions and mad responses to: ZA17-015 A-Pre}L 3t City-oo:Southlake: • Meeting Date:' 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM Planning & Development Services ,; ; �- Notification'Response J�0 1 e-1\11- l� fd�-- 1400-Main St Ste 310 `� • Southiake,::TX 76092 .. S o 011-11-1:1-1C-E) b 01 2-- Phone.: (817)748-8621 Fax_.: (817)748-8077 • PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the pro•erty so noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed • undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: 1/ Gm()i-D iC Le of 17-A-orf rC Signature: Date: 2-2-1 Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): iAD R / Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. I Phone Number (optional): £ d e69:90Lt. 0£lPW Notification Response Form Direct and mail-responses to; ZA17-015 City of Southiake :- Meeting Date: telanylvg, 2017 at 6:30 PM PanningA_Devetopment.Services f✓ Notification;Response - 1400 Main St;-Ste;310. ,S C) )- , L -i. E ( ' -7,� c 7 Sou htalce; TX 8436 2 ' Piaon e' (8.'t 7j?48-$fi21 Fax_ (81 )748-8077. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor of (opposed tet undecided about (circle or underline one) the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for comments regarding your position: cfk_Avz„-I2) rte �'����-e.� rt-.-ek,-,./.� (-!•, �_ r; �-`4 -! `ybe.- Signature: ( tw Date: S h,c/ r� ' Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): � ' -C c/ Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property, Phone Number (optional): z Notification Response Form - Direct gOastions=and.mall responses to: ZA17 015 14c,g IL 11City of Meeting Date: 2017 at 5:30 PM Southialte!, n �.Rlanning& Development Services. -7! ? `� fl `'zsp a,, Notification Response 1400 Main:St,Ste 310 'Southlake,TX.76092 Phone:(817)748 362.1 Fax (817)748;4077.:: PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owner(s) of the property so noted above, are hereby in favor ofposed t undecided about (circle underline the proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. SSpac.eisx comments regarding your position: /off ; �� 4 - -- V 1 D ea_CA/. ' j,A ^ tip ( C) ' I F Signature: Date: 3.42 .1_. ? Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): 16'14_ I A W A) Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed atop. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Phone Number (optional). va 4/3/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd Opposing Rezoning SOUTHLAKE David Jones <dlonesraici.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: Opposing Rezoning Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 10.56 PM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, drones@ci.southlake.tx.us, sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us Lon Payne Begin forwarded message- From: Josh Bryant < Date: April 2, 2017 at 10:28:56 PM CDT To: ma, Ic'.southlake t .:s, placeli2�c� soutblake.tx us, place2`aci southlake tx us, _iace3ra;ci southlake.tx us, placea@ct southiake tx us, places@ci southlake.tx us, 1 l.� _. Subject: Opposing Rezoning To whom it may concern: My name is Josh Bryant. My wife, Jennifer, and our two sons moved to Southlake this past fall. We made a huge sacnfice moving to this community because we feel like this town puts the safety and well being of children and students first. We know this is a sought-after place to live because of the wonderful community and schools. With the rezoning and adding 3 "fast-casual" restaurants, we feel it would greatly affect us. Our son attends Whites Chapel Preschool and that intersection is already busy and congested. I've had a car accident on that road already. As our children are older and learn to drive, we don't want them having to navigate an even busier intersection due to the increased traffic. We moved from South Arlington and the more fast-casual restaurants that were in an area, the worse the neighborhood became. People wanted to leave the congested areas. Conversations I've had, it seems unanimous people oppose this. Please listen to your citizens. Josh Bryant, MS AuthL aithouse Strong www.JoshStrength.com nttp rrinstagram_com/tailhousestrong Iwbe L. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: this message is intended for the recipient only. https//mail.google.corn/mail/u/0/9w=2&k=60e547089c&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b31f50af076336&siml=15b31f50af076336 1/1 Notification Response Form RE . ZA17-015 Meeting Date: April 4, 2017 at 7:00PM � Your Name and Address: h �,� ` , (moo/y,7 A (-1-1'606 �; , ti w �; f. 93 .� w� y � :;''t"§i74--15`Z;s`' Southlake,TX PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners(s) of the property noted above, are hereby in favor of opposed to _undecided about (circle or under(a one) The proposed Zoning, Chung,-ail.': r fan rei�i 1 b,o a'%v= e. Space for your comments regarding your position: /ter/mss ,4 ,5 ,/,ney ' I,/,4ie 17/# fiv,/,e'e 46 fiv/,4„, 'dad , e hifh tee/ve/ n,ir 844/1 .�.ry /r 7:1 $ � , 7 Signature: � �,-7 *' r Date: 3 Zt Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed?t top. Ot^erwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. 4/4/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd oppose ZA17-015 SOUTH.AKE David Jones <djones@ct,southlake.tx.us> Fwd: oppose ZA17-015 Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon. Apr 3, 2017 at 6:21 PM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us>, mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us Cc- Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us, djones@ci.southlake.tx.us Lon Payne Begin forwarded message: From: MARY DOMINGUEZ Date: April 3, 2017 at 6:12:45 PM CDT To: " - " <vlayorandcitycouncil(dci.southlake tx us> Subject: oppose ZA17-015 Re: ZA17-015 Mayor and City Council Members, I respectfully ask the proposed rezoning of property at Southlake Blvd. and Whites Chapel to allow commercial development NOT be approved on April 4. 1. Property has been zoned office for many years. Area has been reviewed by past Southlake committees and intentionally left with office zoning as residential neighborhoods are to the south and west. Offices have less noise, less garbage, less "ins and outs" than commercial buildings and are a better use for the land, hence the current zoning. 2. Property exit on Whites Chapel is not designed for high commercial use and will have a significant impact on traffic and safety . Cars exiting onto Southlake Blvd will also add to the current congestion. This will negatively effect the residents of Stratfort Parc and Lake Crest as we try to enter/exit our neighborhoods safely. It will also impact anyone traveling on these roads including our young drivers going to Carroll High School. Please uphold the current zoning and deny ZA17-105. Thank you for your time and consideration. Mary and John Dominguez 209 Lake Crest Dr https//mail google.com/mail/u/0/2u=2&ik=60e547089c&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b361faae3285f6&siml=15b361faae3285f6 1/2 4/4/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd oppose ZA17-015 Southlake, TX 76092 https//mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=60e547089c&view=pt&search=Inbox&th=15b361faae3285f6&siml=15b361faae3285f6 222 -a: '7 Q3.5'io Freehlina Tree Service 817-421-1140 c 1 fotification Response Form RE: ZA17-015 � '" " Meeting Date:April 4, 2017 at 7:00PM � y Your Name and Address: ,: ;i ��1-4 -=� Henry and Sharon Freehling - "� ' ; 381 South White Chapel Boulevard ' ?:« sty YI Southiake, TX PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners(s) of the property noted above, are hereby in favor of pposed ta� _undecided about (circle or underline one) The proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for your comments regarding your position: Traffic during peak hours will be increased along Southlake Blvd and on White Chapel. Young drivers going to school will face increased risk due to in-and-out traffic from a drive-thru. Busses running between CHS and CSHS will face additional delays getting students to class. Accidents will increase due to the difficulty of making a U turn so close to the light. Area has been zoned as office since the late 80's and there are other retail locations vacant and more appropriate for these businesses. Signature: -- „me / j --.. - Date: March 30, 2017 Additional Signature: L.90 ron 4 • / It). Date: March 30, 2017 Printed Name(s): Henryand Sharon Freehling Must be property osvner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. • 4/3/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-FW.Opposition to rezoning of Donkey Pasture SOUTHLAKE David Jones <djones(@ci.southlake.tx.us> FW: Opposition to rezoning of Donkey Pasture Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:27 AM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Ken Baker<kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, David Jones <djones@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Selena Serrano <sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Hargreaves, Kevin J (N-BAE US) [mailto Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 11:26 AM To: - kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us Subject: Opposition to rezoning of Donkey Pasture Madam Mayor, City Council, Mr Baker. My Name is Kevin Hargreaves. I live at 1014 South Hollow Dr,Southlake. I have been made aware of an application by a land developer requesting to rezone what is affectionately called the Donkey Pasture at the corner of Southlake Blvd and White's Chapel Blvd from Office Retail to Commercial Retail. I oppose this request for many reasons including it is inappropriate to rezone a property this close to a residential neighborhood for Retail Commercial when the current land use designation has been in place for 28 years and the negative effect the zoning change will have on this intersection. Regards Kevin Hargreaves 1014 South Hollow Dr Southlake,TX 76092 I https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0Pu=2&i k=60e547089c&view=pt&search=i nbox&th=15b34a66a754b52f&si m 1=15b34a66a754b52f 1/1 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: donkey field Page 1 of 1 IN CITY OF SOUTHLAKE Selena Serrano<sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: donkey field 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5 59 PM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southiake.tx.us>, sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: Bobbie Heller 111.11.1.11.111. Date: April 1, 2017 at 1:34:11 PM CDT To: Laura Hill <mayor@ci southlake tx us> Subject: donkey field Hi Mayor, I would like to clarify a mistakenly worded post I put on Facebook in the donkey field comments. (which I've deleted rather than try to reword it there). I reversed the zoning ordinances in my comments when I meant to suggest that C-1 might be an alternative to the zoning change being asked for Neighborhood commercial would make more sense if a zoning change even needs to happen-in my opinion of course. If I were still living in Stratfort Parc I would be fighting right along with them to keep it office zoned though. Thanks for listening and for your passionate support of all things Southlake! Bobbie Heller 817-602-1652 https://mail.google.eom/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=8947d4f5bc&view=pt&cat=City%20Secretary... 4/1/701 7 Notification Response Form RE:ZA17-015 = Meeting Date:April 4, 2017 at 7:OOPM _ Your Name and Address: Charles M.&Phyllis A. Hiney 301 Canyon Lake Dr. • _ Southlake,TX 76092 =` (Lake Crest Addition) PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners(s)of the property noted above, are hereby in favor of _opposed to _undecided about (circle or underline one) The proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for your comments regarding your position: A zoning change from commercial office to allow"fast casual"restaurants in this area is a risky idea from a traffic safety and flow perspective. More U-turns in and around an already congested intersection,plus cut-through traffic through neighborhoods with young children,is a dangerous situation that should not be allowed to happen.We have a lot of vacant buildings up and down Southlake Blvd that should be filled first.A drive through Starbucks has been one business mentioned for this location which,with its excessive traffic volume,should not even be considered.There are two Starbucks directly across the street,two in the Town Center,one at Nolen,and the new one at Davis and Southlake Blvd.As I recall,this is FM(1709)for"Farm to Market",not SS(1709)for"Starbucks to Starbucks". Signature: as /�l ,Ll Y�/� Date.3: z ' �t / `1/�Dj Additional Signature: ;i Date: c7 dr 6/7 Charle .Hiney Phyllis A. Printed Name(s): Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. C3-APR-2017 11:19 From:1111 Page:1,1 Notification Response Form f,REy''.�ry TA...-e 57:r.��. irt k7r{$( ,.7 4 27 h� 1 : ZA17-015 • rApy 'T:K.': . 04e:(H )t;...fpbf, h lT Pi: ffR4,4 ? r1 ` : 7 ini.,,..w4F,t.? ,5� Hr '47r µ q } ys ° `Meeting Date:April 4, 2017 at 7:O0PM %f � ;* z; .. 4y d" mi 3 + ' Vi !'' } i. ... „4' Las..0.3w» -.312tiu "Your Name and Address: E.41r0•:. e ' i r M " �. nt, ,, o : }: ru li �r4.-, . Vis *-::5,go Arg,. V(��'\\ /\ oT - ( lte- hx3u - V2O S 1:3c: VVr F T . d. k10 :. .f"'�l,' b , Heft4• ii v !Iicizzt.0 : 5 Pr'ao,Af ee ?.23za,-;ryia4s{k r�,...t i .:44/,fi ' ,>Arvo*di 4 t* .4 :01, r! fi04,..g y k�icw...""r�k 5,9,,:w .N�iaJi W`` ,SiL..il.. ,,: .: H4C: !w,ktg Southiake, TX PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners(s) of the property noted above, are hereby _in favor of ,opposed to _undecided about (circle or underline one) The proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for your comments regarding your position: • ii Signature: ► ' / dill Date: his? 17-7_ Additional Signature: Date: Printed Name{s): t {\ r must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top.Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. i i I s • Notification Response Form RE : ZA17-015 Direct que$tions{and mail responses eta: ;. City,of Southlake Meeting Date: April 4, 2017 at 7:OOPM = ' ' n errtg 8kPeY.eli►pmef- .Servic ,, Your Name and Address: -:44,'','' `, ri it.,,..� r-;r� ' .0 S a C.,M 1L � '���Y`J ,.,, T7:: 3 ti ,i ',yr, 1:i: )17 _,:i L;,....:::,.., "„ y� .. tie .. Southlake, TX PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners(s) of the property noted above, are hereby _in favor of opposed to _undecided about (circle or underline one) The proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for your comments regarding your position: • 0i)*P ,../_,, , ��c1; �� �A ��-D15 - Signature: 1....50 ' i . "•. / Date: 3-2R-f li Additional Signature: lixi riktiDate: ., a, Printed Name(s): u9,�,1 �-�,�, �— E=r�,, ��.�- Z'..,, .„. � Must be property owner(s)whose names)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. 4/4/2017 Ci southlake.tx.us Mail-FW Proposed Development opposition SOUTHL.AKE David Jones <djones@ci.southlake.tx.us> FW: Proposed Development opposition 2 messages Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1.38 PM To' Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc. Ken Baker<kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, David Jones <djones@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Selena Serrano <sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Kathy Mast[mailto Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2017 1:33 PM To: Subject: Proposed Development I am wnting in regards to proposed development at Southlake Blvd and Whites Chapel. My issues are the big traffic problem that already exists, safety in traveling to and from our homes and overall aesthetics These concerns have been expressed by many people. However, a huge problem that is not being addressed is water retention and drainage. I talked with the property developer and he said the city is not requiring him to address drainage. With the addition of the buildings and concrete for parking, drainage through Lake Crest will be even worse than it is now. Even if the buildings and drainage are "in compliance," sometimes compliance misses big issues. We already have risks to safety, especially children, and our homes. Please do not approve the development, but do come alongside us to fix the drainage problems. Best regards, Kathy Mast 307 Canyon Lake Drive Southlake 1 ? 638-4498 David Jones <djones@ci.southlake.tx.us> Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1 42 PM To: Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc. Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx us>, Ken Baker<kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Selena Serrano <sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us> Thank your [Quoted text hidden] David P. Jones, AICP Principal Planner City of Southlake 1400 Main Street, Suite 310 Southlake, Texas 76092 817-748-8070 - djones@ci.southiake.tx.us www.crtyofsouthlake corn-Please take this short survey and rate our customer service https//mail.google.com/mail/u/OPui=2&ik=60e547089c&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b3a44dc0890400&siml=15b3a44dc0890400&siml=15b3a46a6786c4cd 1/1 orrMrErp 4/3/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-FW I oppose ZA17-015 0SOUTHLAKE David Jones <djones@ci.southlake.tx.us> FW: I oppose ZA17-015 • • es sag= Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 10:07 AM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Ken Baker<kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, David Jones <djones@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Selena Serrano <sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: 'Ln Day' via Mayor and City Council [mailto: ` ayorandcltycouncll@ci southlake tx.us] Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 10:09 AM To: ouncita ,outnlake.tx us Subject: I oppose ZA17-015 More retail at White Chapel and Southlake Blvd. will be unsightly and cause more traffic accidents in an area which already becomes overly congested. Sincerely, L. Nemeth Southlake resident https.//m ail.google.com/m ail/u/0/2u=2&i k=60e547089c&view=pt&search=I nbox&th=15b345d6ce754399&si m 1=15b345d6ce754399 1/1 4/3/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd Zoning change • SOUTHLAKE David Jones 4djones@ci.southlake,tx.us> Fwd: Zoning change .s age Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 7:29 PM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, djones@ci.southlake.tx.us, sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us Lon Payne Begin forwarded message: From: Sandy Ohmstede Date: April 2, 2017 at 6:51:38 PM CDT To: ,outhlak Subject: Zoning change Dear Mayor and council members, We are stnctly against rezoning the property on the corner of White Chapel Blvd. and Southlake Blvd. to anything other than commercial offices. Southlake is flooded with Starbucks and restaurants already and we do not need more traffic congesting 1709. We feel that our town of Southlake is now becoming another Piano with all the building of restaurants and coffee shops and that is not why we moved here. We are members of Whites Chapel United Methodist Church and attend 2 to 3 times a week, so this would mean more traffic for all of its members. Plus causing more congested traffic for our school buses and students attending the Carroll schools. Please consider your citizens and young people as you move forward on the ordinance ZA17-015. We have been residents of Southlake for 20 years. Roger and Sandy Ohmstede https//mail.google.com/mail/u/0/9ui=2&ik=60e547089c&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b31373f3958a68&siml=15b31373f3958a68 1/1 Notification Response Form RE : ZA17-015 Meeting Date: April 4, 2017 at 7:00PM ~}r *,>" _ TM Your Name and Address: Southlake, TX y PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners(s) of the property noted above, are hereby in favor of .— pp o osed to undecided about — 'circle or underline one) The proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Space for your comments regarding your position: • Signature: /�?�t.��'� ,{rte-� Date: `�7//7 Additional Signature: k 4-;-n4 a_Di,_ Po , � ��� Date: �\ Printed Name(s): //L -if-)* Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact the Planning Department. One form per property. Notification Response Form RE : ZA17-015 ,�M : - s k Meeting®ate:April 4, 2017 at 7 OOP : -_,;:" .,=,,:..: :,,-,11-.‘t;,:.,_,-7: =7 : ,l - E k ' .f ^ r a'�' Your Name and Address: 'r. , -' r � ;, r WiciiarYi-f Torik5re sem.=- ,._.;� i Southlake, TX PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners(s) of the property noted above, are hereby _in favor of opposed to undecided about - nderiine one) The propose* Zoning Change:,d Site Plan referenced above. Space for your comments regarding your position: (��� iso t n �C'���r �- n V _ c�i n�'ile, --ra--fit C, -f pr -4-h1 5 C�}Y-nQ—r, '1e,rEl i S �C (bud-) C Y`n C -m.4-a_ at`L -4V)i S Cbz'n Er- al r c.ody Wi}-1,-)---\ -3 t Ex s� n �''''J bus no- Ses , - p,n,-N 5A,1,1A, rte. b CS y)c - • Signature: DY t - \-1G nQA,S R ycr- Date: -a7. - I77 ` y -17 Additional Sig ature: bb�ll,ill s fv -- Wit( arn Sriyc�r- Date:e. - �4 - 1�- Printed Name(s): \;111 Girn Sr, r -1aneic N- h � c-2 Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at t;p. Otherwise contact the Planning Depa. ent. One form per property. Notification Response Form RE : ZA17-015 Direct questions and mail responses to: City of Southlake Meeting Date: April 4, 2017 at 7:00PM Planning&Development Services Your Name and Address: Notification Response 1400 Main St;Ste 310 :7-4(c_ ` ' ""1 y`"'' ,Y f. outhlake,TX 76042 ! (Q vi c] - � ` hone: {817)748-8621 s ax: 1817)748-8077 Southlake, TX PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners(s) of the property noted above, are hereby _in favor of ;-opposed to undecided about (circle or underline one) The proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. Spacx___. e for your comments regarding your position: FU t�,`r` ` 20 v _ Com{;v;�. .\.„..1c6„.„.A., (\ji3-z,c.LA_ Q _?2,40k CLLAAAA-1 , . ai (Sev"1 ` s,< t ,, c C , , ZS-' ---)A--k-Ni�G,t-A Cll�- • J • Signature: \ .,_6-,NA,-* ` ,,,C -mi. Date: -7_— ilif ”i�X Additional Signature: (,t_+- Date: 44: `Z- (1 Printed Name(s): r1Acl G v �(� e If C. � I .. , c<( Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)are printed at top. Otherwise contact/the Planning Department. One form per property Notification Response Form RE . ZA17-015 .n, ' - ';'.._.'i, -_.a,:; " °W- R- Meeting Date: April 4, 2017 at 7:0fi�°'9 , ' a 0,4 _ **4 a. , Your Name and Address ' � ` V �4�f lJ� v l�,.^^n ,,,, �' „,,le,. • d -Par + qF r `P . '17;1'. 2 It�� Y .. n .! 'e- sem} .f DS ).j hle`; f\ C -. -57,4= -:Y .# .r=�r A. Southlake, TX -76-&>1 f PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners(s) of the property noted above, are hereby _in favor of ,opposed to `undecided about (circle es Jr?deriine one) The proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above. . Space for your comments regarding your p.osstior;• 1 ,Su \O WICf.— -t) .� Zoe ,mss ��t-\ 6--(-_,,,--,c,,6-,.3 (& � z . 0 4, a-4- ,4114, a yr)le- 5c1,---,oerQ-.S) . ,ASD G(64., - ii'�G?'6,.- y'lit)i - .1 W "'e..)u 1 s4 f -e:,G l ) oQ /tL CLL- �.k-___�---6 rrN-L2— —S121/45-1' i2 c-urs Signature: ( ' (72-----_�._._. Date: 3 I) 11 Additional Signature: / - — _ _Date: Printed Name(s): 6G1Ait 'Pio fhp so,-, Must be property owner(s)whose name(s)e e P t One i ) � F�rrte z'::t.: i.1:�cr.:se ca c2,d the Pfarr,i�7�Ge;,:rtr,,e;t. Oformr ge property, 3/31/2017 Ci.southlake.tx us Mail-FW Opposition to rezoning the Donkey Pasture off Highway 1709 SOUTHLAKE David Jones <djones@ci.southiake.tx.us> FW: Opposition to rezoning the Donkey Pasture off Highway 1709 I message Lori Payne <Ipayne@cl.southlake.tx.us> Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:30 AM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Ken Baker<kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Selena Serrano <sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us>, David Jones <djones@ci.southlake.tx.us> From: Gary Traylor [mailto Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 10:29 AM To: ayorandcltycouncil@ci.southiake tx Cc: kbaker@cl southlake.tx-us Subject: Opposition to rezoning the Donkey Pasture off Highway 1709 Dear Mayor,Mrs Laura Hill, I've become aware of a proposal to rezone an area of land off Highway 1709, known as the Donkey Pasture.This land has been zoned appropriately for nearly 30 years to support businesses seeking office space. Business offices are a good fit for the land use, seeing as the land is so close to residential homes. My understanding is that the recent proposed change would allow the land to be used for restaurants and other businesses potentially involving significant vehicle traffic. I am opposed to such a change. This section of Hwy 1409 is far too congested already in both mornings and evenings,particularly regarding east-bound traffic. Restaurants,and especially drive-through restaurants,should be forced to locate on the other side(north side)of Hwy 1409 to prevent u-turns and additional traffic congestion.As well,any restaurant located on the south side of Hwy 1709 in that area will be positioned far too close to neighboring residential communities, presenting multiple health and safety risks to our citizens. Please side with our good community members to defeat this proposal. Gary Traylor 703 Timber Lake Circle Southlake TX 76092 https://m ai l.google.com/m ail/u/0/lu=2&ik=60e547089c&view=pt&search=i nbox&th=15b24ffd9b2c7e22&sim 1=15b24ffd9b2c7e22 1/1 3/30/2017 Ci southlake tx us Mail-Fwd FW Opposition to rezoning of"Donkey Pasture" SOUTHLAKE David Jones <djones@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: FW: Opposition to rezoning of "Donkey Pasture" Ken Baker <kbaker©ci.southlake tx us> Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8 47 AM To. Selena Serrano <sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us>, Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us>, David Jones <djones@ci.southlake.tx.us> Forwarded messag From. Stephen Van Noy < 11 Date. Wed, Mar 29. 2017 at 10:56 PM Subject- Re- Opposition to rezoning of"Donkey Pasture" To Randy Williamson <placea a zuuE K.:: :1 > Cc: s ce tx us Dear Randy, Thank you for reaching out. In addition to other factors that are disruptive to a community, long lines of idling transient traffic are counter to the expectations that a property will remain safe and not lose value over the years. It is difficult to predict how long these lines will grow over time along with their environmental and safety impact. Suggest that the City of Southlake should refrain from permitting high volume businesses to be in close proximity to previously established neighborhoods where they can undermine their environment, safety, and value. Greatly appreciate you reaching out. All the best, Steve Sent from my 'Phone On Mar 29, 2017, at 10:13 PM, Randy Williamson <oiace4,3ci southlake tx us> wrote: Stephen, Thank you for reaching out to share your opinion on this application. Please know that I am committed to heanng everyone's voice during this process. At 1st reading, I commented on the potential traffic impact as a key factor related to this application. Regards, Randy Williamson City Council, Place 4 Mayor Pro Tern Sent from my iPad On Mar 29. 2017.. at 9.18 AM, Steve Van Noy Dear Madam Mayor, City Council. Mr Baker: My Name is Stephen Van Noy and I live at 810 Aberdeen Way. Southlake, TX, 76092. I have been made aware of an application by a land developer requesting to rezone what is affectionately called the"Donkey Pasture" at the corner of Southlake Blvd and White's Chapel Blvd from Office Retail to Commercial Retail. I oppose this request for many reasons including it is inappropriate to rezone a property this close to a residential neighborhood for Retail Commercial when the current land use designation has been in place for 28 years and the negative effect the zoning change will have on this intersection. I understand that all of those residents affected are also in opposition to this action. Such facilities bring unintended crowding and associated hazards during critical commuting times which also needs to be considered Best Regards, https//mai i.google com/m ail/u/OPui=2&i k=60e547089c&view=pt&search=i nbox&msg=15b1 f7915da32928&sim l=15b1 f7915da32928 1/2 1 y _ yrommib -ry 3/30/2017 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail-Fwd FW Opposition to rezoning of"Donkey Pasture" • Stephen Van Noy Kenneth M. Baker, AICP Senior Director of Planning and Development Services City of Southlake 1400 Main Street-Suite 310 Southlake, TX 76092 817448-8067 https//mail google.com/mad/u/OPu=2&ik=60e547089c&view=pt&search=inbox&msg=15b1f7915da32928&siml=15b1f7915da32928 2/2 Ci.southlake.tx.us Mail - Fwd: Opposed to Ordinance ZA17-015 REZONING Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE Selena Serrano<sserrano@ci.southlake.tx.us> Fwd: Opposed to Ordinance ZA17-015 REZONING 1 message Lori Payne <Ipayne@ci.southlake.tx.us> Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 559 PM To: Laura Hill <mayor-int@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Ken Baker<KBaker@ci.southlake tx.us>, sserrano@ci southlake.tx us Lori Payne Begin forwarded message: From: MarciaHeadlynz Webster< Date:April 1, 2017 at 5:26 31 PM CDT To: "mayorandcitycouncil@ci.southlake.tx.us" <mayorandcitycouncil@ci southlake tx us>, "mayor@ci.southlake.tx us" <mayor@ci southlake tx us>, "placel@ci southlake tx us" <placel@ci southlake.tx us>, "place2@ci.southlake tx.us" <place2@ci.southlake tx us>, "place3@ci southlake.tx us"<place3@ci.southlake tx us>, "place4@ci southlake tx us" <place4@ci southlake.tx us>, "place5@ci southlake.tx us" <place5@ci southlake tx us>, "place6@ci southlake.tx.us" < lace6 cis uthlake tx us> Cc: Murphy Webster< Subject: Opposed to Ordinance ZA17-015 REZONING I am strongly opposed to this zoning change on the SW corner of White Chapel and Southlake Blvd. This is a highly congested corner already and dangerous. Having Starbucks drive through there will undoubtably be a big mistake for Southlake. Students, school buses, and parents use this intersection heavily and it's already very crowded Starbucks and other fast food restaurants at this corner will pose a huge traffic problem. There are other places more suitable than this spot. This corner cannot safely support the volume of traffic that will occur. Thank you for your consideration. Marcia Webster Sent from my iPad https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=8947d4f5bc&view=pt&cat=City%20Seeretary... 4/3/2017 Notification Response Form RE : 7-015 � ��s • = = :+; Meeting Date: April 4, 2017 at 7:00PM ft*614 % � Your Name and Address:a / 1 =- w• �� >�� .5-33 Southiake, TX PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED ED PUBG IC HEA NG. Being the owners(s) of the property noted above, are hereby in favor of Xopposed to undecided about (circ12 or under:ine one) The proposed Zci:ng Change and Site pian referenced above. dere is a brief list of why we are opposing the change: o Traffic during peak hours will be increased along Southlake Blvd and on White Chapel. Starbucks average 500- 900 visits per day at their drive-thru locations o Young drivers going to school will face increased risk due to in-and-out traffic from a drive-thru o Busses running between CHS and CSHS will face additional delays getting students to class o Several Southlake retail locations are vacant and more appropriate for these businesses • This area has been zoned as office since the late 80's -there is no need to change now o Accidents will increase due to the difficulty of making a U turn so dose to the light o Cut-through traffic will possibly effect YOUR R dev`lc,pment Signature: ! .. Date: - Additional Signature: Printed Name(s): _. . " . . - Must be property owners)whose name(s)are printed at zo. Otherwise contact the Planning'Deparzrm.nt Coe form per property J1?7988077 From: (None) 03/30/17 10:25 PM Page 1 of 1 "-_tification Response Form RE :UA17-015 Meeting Date:April 4,2017 at 7:00PM Your Name and Address: Arc .c /STY) 0504 Co' tau, c Southiake,TX PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED FORMS VIA MAIL, FAX OR HAND DELIVERY BEFORE THE START OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING. Being the owners(s)of theheproperty noted above,are hereby in favor of „�Ybpposed to „undecided about (circle or underline one) The proposed Zoning Change and Site Plan referenced above, Space for your comments regarding your position: 41.1-6 5�. r7rgiv ptx.( -7-4?-ti,Q i fee�as�{ �{ `1c 49,E rru a � 1'104-,•<<.k...A.. , ,t '11,, h c.Nf tteA 4 "t' c, f-e, oCt,s e w C'1w„V&A Cn. C hi Ca +v,f (,V CS Ctl + ( 4)thAt I tiU.,+-41., • L'tLA t.n.. "' ^-` ,441 PLc.-..-a.yr,4 P t4 14-, kt,rb-•s-.S 1.1441 L(. C-•trx..P �G�La„ <�, 6� � •- �:'�'�-��,�, rfat c-�G: 4-- ° l Signature: atAi, ;i Date: 1)115;/241-7 / J Additional Signature: Data: Printed Name(s): rr&' W.(`► 11 Mutt be property owner(s)wtsose names)are prime et tep. Qtretotete curaact the Planing Department. One team per e.epeny. 4/4/2017 Ci southlake.tx.us Mail-Bicycle Safety Committee Recommendations and Ordinance No.1075B OC%TY OF SOUTHLAKE Jerod Potts <jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us> Bicycle Safety Committee Recommendations and Ordinance No. 1075B 1 message Mitch Hill Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 3:33 PM To: Jerod Potts <jpotts ci.sout a e.tx.us>, Ken Baker<kbaker@ci.southlake.tx.us> Cc: Lori Palmer , chad patton , Ben Siebach To. Southlake City Council (via Ken Baker and Jerod Potts), I am out of town on a business trip today, and will be again on April 18th. I wanted to send a quick note to voice my support for your consideration of the subject items. http://weblink.cityofsouthlake.com/WebLink8/0/doc/1285437/Pagel.aspx I appreciate the support of City Council in the formation of the Bicycle Safety Committee last August. Although the committee is small we have been able to engage with the CEC, members of the community, city staff and even the managers of Bicycle's Inc. and Bicycle World. As far as I know these groups are in support of the recommendations and they are willing to assist with bicycle educational / safety efforts in the city on an ongoing basis. On behalf of all of these groups I would also like to recognize the expertise and efforts of Ken Baker and Jerod Potts to evaluate and make recommendations as to the proper way to implement various ideas of the committee and the CEC. Thanks, Mitch Hill City of Southlake Bicycle Safety Committee Member Parks and Recreation Board Member cell - 949-584-9994 https//mail.google.com/mail/u/0/7u=2&ik=c96eb0c1b4&view=pt&search=inbox&th=15b3aac105e12d70&siml=15b3aac105e12d70 1/1