Item 7BCase No.
ZA17-015
S T A F F R E P O R T
March 15, 2017
CASE NO: ZA17-015
PROJECT: Zoning Change and Site Plan for Southlake Commons EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY: Tres Burros, LLC is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan for
Southlake Commons on property described as Lots 21-23, H. Granberry
Addition No. 581, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas
(previously described as a portion of Tract 3C, Hiram Granberry Survey,
Abstract No. 581 and Tract 1A, Littleberry G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686)
and addressed as 171, 201, and 211 W. Southlake Blvd. (previously addressed
as 130 S. White Chapel Blvd.), Southlake, Texas. SPIN Neighborhood #10.
DETAILS: The project is generally located near the SW corner of W Southlake Blvd and S
White Chapel Blvd. The purpose of this item is to receive zoning and site plan
approval to rezone an approximately 4.1 acre property from “O-1” Office District
to “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to allow construction of three single-story
retail commercial buildings totaling 21,997 square feet.
Site Data Summary
Department of Planning & Development Services
Case No.
ZA17-015
The three proposed retail commercial buildings are single-story and clad in
stucco, brick and stone veneer which meets the Residential and Corridor
Overlay standards. Each façade contains a minimum 80% masonry which
meets the Masonry Ordinance (the lowest percentage of masonry on any
façade is 87%). Building 3 utilizes a drive-thru window on the east façade facing
toward First Financial Bank.
S-P-1 regulations for Southlake Commons are as follows:
Development Regulations
This property shall be subject to the development regulations for the “C-2”,
Local Retail Commercial District, and all other applicable regulations with the
following exceptions:
1) The following C-2 uses shall not be allowed:
a. Antique Shops;
b. Business Colleges or Private Schools;
c. Cigar or Tobacco Stores;
d. Dancing Schools;
e. Day Nurseries;
f. Dog and Cat Hospitals or Small Animal Hospitals;
g. Dry Goods or Notion Stores;
h. Duplicating Services for Printing and Lithographing;
i. Frozen Food Lockers for Individual or Family Use;
j. Grocery Stores and/or Meat Markets;
k. Radio and Television Sales and Servicing;
l. Shoe Repair Services;
m. Gun Sales and Repair Stores;
n. Tires, Batteries and Automotive Accessory Sales;
o. Variety Stores;
2) A drive-thru facility shall be allowed, on Lot 23 (Building 3) as
indicated on the Site Plan, and shall service a Coffee/Beverage type
establishment, or – with SUP approval – a “Fast Casual” type
restaurant. By way of example but not limited to this list, the
following restaurant brands are considered “Fast Casual”: Corner
Bakery, Panera Bread, Jason’s Deli, Chipotle Mexican Grill, La
Madeleine, and Red Robin. No “Fast Food” establishments shall be
allowed. By way of example, but not limited to this list, the following
restaurant brands are considered fast food: McDonald’s, Wendy’s,
Burger King, Whataburger, KFC & Taco Bell.
3) Minimum Front Building Setbacks
a. Along Southlake Blvd. shall be forty-five (45’) feet.
4) Minimum Side Building Setbacks shall be fifteen (15’) feet, except
that setbacks along internal property lines shall not be required.
5) Minimum Rear Buildings Setbacks shall be fifteen (15’) feet, except
that setbacks along internal property lines shall not be required.
Case No.
ZA17-015
6) Buffer Yards along internal lot lines shall not be required.
7) The maximum impervious coverage for the overall “SP-1” boundary
shall be 70%; however, the maximum impervious coverage
requirement shall not apply to individual lots within the boundary.
8) A shared parking, cross-access easement and shared maintenance
agreement shall be required. Required parking for all built uses shall
be provided within the “SP-1” boundary; parking requirements for
individual lots shall not apply.
9) Parking Space Requirements:
All Uses: One (1) space for each one-hundred five (105) square feet
of Net Leasable area.
10) Dumpster Enclosure Location:
Dumpster enclosures shall be permitted as shown on the Site Plan.
11) Patio Shade Structures: Outdoor Shade Structures (e.g. Pergola or
Trellis) on the patio areas adjacent to buildings on Lots 21 & 22, as
indicated on Site Plan, shall be allowed to overlap the internal lot
boundary.
VARIANCES
REQUESTED:
Current Regulation Request
Driveway Ordinance No. 634, Section 5.2.d,
A driveway shall require a minimum 100’ of
stacking distance if the average number of
parking spaces per driveway falls within 50
and 199 parking spaces and the total amount
of parking exceeds 200.
Variance to Driveway Ordinance No. 634,
as amended, Section 5.2(d) regarding
stacking depth, to a minimum 77’, for the
entrance from FM-1709/Southlake Blvd.,
and to allow the site to be served by the
existing drives to and from the adjacent
properties.
Case No.
ZA17-015
ACTION NEEDED: Consider 1st Reading Approval of Zoning Change and Site Plan
ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information
(B) Vicinity Map
(C) Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated March 3, 2017
(D) Surrounding Property Owners Map
Link to Property Owner’s Responses
(E) Ordinance No. 480-724
Full Size Plans (for Commission and Council members only)
Link to PowerPoint Presentation
Link to Narrative and “S-P-1” Regulations
Link to Plans
Page 1 - Site Plan
Pages 2-6 - Building Elevations and Renderings
Page 7 - Landscape Plan
Page 8 - Tree Conservation Plan
Link to Traffic Impact Analysis
Link to Noise Assessment
Link to SPIN meeting report
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Baker (817) 748-8067
David Jones (817) 748-8070
Case No. Attachment A
ZA17-015 Page 1
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
OWNER: Gloria Lechler Trust, et al
APPLICANT: Tres Burros, LLC
PROPERTY SITUATION: Located near the SW corner of W. Southlake Blvd. and S. White Chapel
Blvd. and addressed as 171, 201 and 211 W. Southlake Blvd.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 20-23, H. Granberry Addition No. 581, an addition to the City of
Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas (also described as a portion of Tract
3C, Hiram Granberry Survey, Abstract No. 581 and Tract 1A, Littleberry
G. Hall Survey, Abstract No. 686) approx 4.09 acres
LAND USE CATEGORY: Office Commercial (Retail Commercial proposed)
CURRENT ZONING: “O-1” Office District
PROPOSED ZONING: “S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District with limited “C-2” uses
HISTORY: - The property was annexed into the Town of Southlake in 1956 as “AG”
(Ord. No. 041).
- The "O-1" Office District zoning was placed on the property with
approval of Zoning Ordinance No. 480 on September 19, 1989.
- A Plat Showing for Lot 4, H. Granberry No. 581 Addition for Southlake
Baptist Church adjacent to this property was approved in February 1994
(ZA93-87).
- A Preliminary Plat which included this lot under the name Medical
Villas at Taylor Creek was approved by City Council October 2007
(ZA07-057).
- A Final Plat for Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Medical Villas at Tuscan Creek
adjacent to this property was approved by the Planning and Zoning
Commission February 2009 (ZA07-155).
- A Final Plat of Tract 3C01 in the Hiram Granbury Survey for Lot 1,
Block 1, First Financial Bank adjacent to this property was approved by
City Council October 2010 (ZA10-038).
- A Zoning Change and Site Plan to rezone Tract 3C, Hiram Granberry
Survey, Abstract No. 581 and Tract 1A, Littleberry G. Hall Survey,
Abstract No. 686, approximately 7.5 acres, from “O-1” Office District to
“S-P-1” Detailed Site Plan District to allow construction of three single-
story retail commercial buildings and five single-story office buildings
totaling 51,638 square feet was withdrawn at first reading of City Council
on November 1, 2016 (ZA16-057).
- A Site Plan for four to five single-story office buildings totaling between
27,562 and 27,725 square feet on approximately 3.3 acres was
approved by City Council January 17, 2017 (ZA16-107).
Case No. Attachment A
ZA17-015 Page 2
- A Plat Showing for lots 20-23, H. Granberry No. 581 Addition was
approved by City Council January 17, 2017 (ZA16-106).
SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Future Land Use Plan
The 2030 future land use designation for
the site is Office Commercial which is
defined in the Southlake 2030 plan as
follows:
OFFICE COMMERCIAL Purpose
and Definition: “The Office
Commercial category is a
commercial category designed and
intended for the exclusive use of
office and limited office-related activities. It is established for and
will be allocated to those districts best suited for supporting
commercial activity of an office character. It has been established to
encourage and permit general professional and business offices of
high quality and appearance, in attractive landscaped surroundings
with the types of uses and design exterior appearance so controlled
as to be generally compatible with existing and future adjacent and
surrounding residential development. Properties with this
designation may serve as a transition between established
residential neighborhoods, major roadways, and retail development.
Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public
Parks/Open Space and Public/Semi-Public categories”.
The applicant is proposing a change to
Retail Commercial for retail commercial
portion of the property (Lots 1, 2 & 3).
Retail Commercial is defined in the
Southlake 2030 plan as follows:
RETAIL COMMERCIAL Purpose and
Definition: “The Retail Commercial
category is a lower- to medium-
intensity commercial category
providing for neighborhood-type retail shopping facilities and
general commercial support activities. It is intended to provide
limited local retail and/or office uses which serve neighborhoods in
close proximity. It is intended that all uses in this category will be
compatible with adjacent single family uses, thereby maintaining
the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods. This category
is intended to encourage comprehensively planned developments.
In areas where the Retail Commercial designation is adjacent to
residentially zoned properties or areas with a residential
designation on the Land Use Plan, lower intensity activities such as
office or office-related uses should be planned adjacent to the
residential uses. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the
Public Parks/Open Space, Public/Semi-Public, and Office
Commercial categories previously discussed.”
Retail
Commercial
Case No. Attachment A
ZA17-015 Page 3
Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan
The Master Pathways Plan shows an existing multi-use trail along W
Southlake Blvd adjacent to the site.
TRANSPORTATION
ASSESSMENT: Area Road Network and Conditions
The site has direct access to W Southlake Blvd, an A6D arterial with a
minimum 130’ to 140’ of right of way and indirect access to S White
Chapel Blvd, an A2U arterial with a minimum 88’ of right of way. No right
of way is proposed to be dedicated with this development.
F.M. 1709/Southlake Blvd (17)
(Between White Chapel and Shady Oaks)
24hr West Bound (25,385) East Bound (27,182)
AM Peak AM (1456)11:45AM–12:45PM Peak AM (2887) 7:00-8:00 AM
PM Peak PM (2638) 4:45-5:45PM Peak PM (1825)1:00-2:00PM
White Chapel Blvd (57)
(Between F.M. 1709 and Continental)
24hr North Bound (4,724) South Bound (4,857)
AM Peak AM (561)7:30AM–8:30PM Peak AM (315) 7:30-8:30AM
PM Peak PM (354) 5:00–6:00PM Peak PM (484)4:15–5:15PM
* Based on the 2015 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report
Traffic Impact
A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was submitted for this project. The
analysis substantially matches a Traffic Impact Analysis submitted in
October 2016 for this property. Public Works staff reviewed the changes
and found that they were not substantial enough to warrant formal
review by the traffic consultant. A response by the traffic consultant
referencing the 2016 report is attached via the link below.
Link to TIA
Link to TIA Review
TREE PRESERVATION: There is approximately 5.88% existing tree cover on Lots 20-23. A Tree
Conservation Plan was approved with the Plat Showing which showed
preservation of 73.45% of the existing tree cover with an additional
6.46% shown as marginal. Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-D requires
that 70% of the existing canopy be preserved. The proposed Site Plan
conforms to the approved Tree Conservation Plan.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a
planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-
2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit
Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council
shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in
conjunction with the corresponding development application.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and
Case No. Attachment A
ZA17-015 Page 4
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the
application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the
Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets,
and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of
environmental features of the property including mature tree
stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas
indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the
potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and
visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a
natural or man-made drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along
rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in
the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree
replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance.
UTILITIES: Water
There is an existing 12” water line along Southlake Blvd that will serve
this property.
Sewer
There is an existing 8” sanitary sewer line along the south property line
that will serve this property via an 8” extension approved with ZA16-107.
DRAINAGE: Drainage will generally sheet flow south and west to storm inlets
proposed on the property and from there be piped to the existing facility
on the Villas of Tuscan Creek property.
CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held on February 28, 2017 (SPIN2017-03)
Link to SPIN Report
PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION ACTION: March 9, 2017; The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6-0 to
recommend approval of this item as presented subject to Staff Report
dated March 3, 2017 and Site Plan Review Summary #2 dated March 3,
2017, specifically noting approval of the variance requested with respect
to the driveway ordinance.
STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 2, dated March 3, 2017.
Variance Approval Criteria for Driveway Ordinance No. 634, Article 8.2:
Variances – The City Council shall have the authority to grant a
variance to this ordinance. In granting any variance, the City
Council shall determine that a literal enforcement of the
regulations herein will create an unnecessary hardship or practical
difficulty on the applicant, that the situation causing unnecessary
hardship or practical difficulty is unique to the affected property
Case No. Attachment A
ZA17-015 Page 5
and is not self-imposed, that the variance will not injure and will be
wholly compatible with the use and permitted development of
adjacent properties, and that the granting of the variance will be in
harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. The
decision of the City Council shall be final.
General
Development
Standards
Applies? Comments
Overlay Regulations Yes Subject to requirements of Residential Adjacency Overlay
Building Articulation Yes Subject to requirements of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Sec. 43
Requirement Met
Masonry Standards Yes Subject to requirements of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Sec. 43
Requirement Met
Impervious Coverage Yes Not to exceed 70% of total lot area per proposed “S-P-1”
regulations Requirement Met
Bufferyards Yes
Subject to requirements of Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Sec. 42
Requirement Met along perimeter boundaries. Not required
on internal lot boundaries per proposed S-P-1 Regulations
Interior Landscape Yes Subject to requirements of Landscape Ordinance No. 544-B
(Section 3.3) Requirement Met
Tree Preservation Yes Subject to requirements of Tree Preservation Ordinance No.
585-D Requirement Met
Sidewalks Yes Required per Pathways Master Plan
Existing >8’ sidewalk along Southlake Blvd.
Case No. Attachment B
ZA17-015 Page 1
171, 201 and 211 W. Southlake Blvd.
Case No. Attachment C
ZA17-015 Page 1
SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY
Case No.: ZA17-015 Review No.: Two Date of Review: 03/03/17
Project Name: Zoning Change and Site Plan – Southlake Commons
APPLICANT: James C. Shindler OWNER: John Stephen (Steve) Church
Tres Burros, LLC Gloria Lechler Trust, et al
260 Miron Dr, Ste 108 4116 H.C. Meacham Blvd
Southlake, Texas 76092 Fort Worth, Texas 76135-9574
Phone: 817-552-7778; Fax: 817-552-7788 Phone: 817-707-6855; Fax: 888-702-6844
Email: Jim@ConiferRE.com Email: stvfwt@aeiwireless.net
CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 02/20/17 AND WE
OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN
APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED
FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER.
Planning Review
David Jones, AICP
Principal Planner
Phone: (817) 748-8070
Email: djones@ci.southlake.tx.us
1. Due to the shared nature of the existing drives, the sum of all the parking spaces within
Southlake Commons and the adjacent developments are divided by the total number of drives
to determine the minimum stacking depth for each drive (approx. 533 spaces / 4 drives = 134
spaces per drive) which results in a 100’ required stacking depth on all drives. A variance is
required from Ord. No. 680 to allow the site to be served by the existing drives. VARIANCE
REQUESTED
2. A 50’ setback line along Southlake Blvd. is shown on the approved plat for White Chapel
Office Park and is required per Section 3.02 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Section
43.9.c.2.a. of the Zoning Ordinance No. 480. Building 2 also appears to encroach the existing
15’ Drainage Easement along Southlake Blvd. If the S-P-1 zoning is approved with the building
layout as shown, an amended plat will need to be filed correcting the building line to match the
plan and amending the drainage easement.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Tree Conservation/Landscape Review
E-mail: kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us
Keith Martin
Landscape Administrator
Phone: (817) 748-8229
TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS:
* The proposed existing tree conservation complies with the existing tree cover preservation
requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. There is 5.88% of existing tree cover on the
Case No. Attachment C
ZA17-015 Page 2
site and 70% of that tree cover is required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to
preserve 73.45% of the existing tree cover.
* Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree
Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing
tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the
property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of
existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the
minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section.
Table 2.0 – Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements
Percentage of existing tree cover on
the entire site
Minimum percentage of the
existing tree cover to be
preserved*
0% – 20% 70%
20.1 – 40% 60%
40.1% - 60% 50%
60.1% - 80% 40%
80.1% - 100% 30%
*The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in
public rights-of-way as approved by City Council.
For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development
zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation,
Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall
consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the
corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and
Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City
Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the
Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the:
i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so
as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including
mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades;
ii. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the
Environmental Resource Protection Map;
iii. maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer
residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses;
iv. maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made
drainage creek;
v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other
streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and
vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to
this Ordinance.
* Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved
Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction
Case No. Attachment C
ZA17-015 Page 3
of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved
on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and
the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all
structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be
constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved.
LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
1. There is a note on the Landscape Plan that says “**Required plant material has been reduced
by 20% for an increase in bufferyard width.” As none of the bufferyard widths have been
increased so, please remove this comment from the Bufferyards Summary Chart.
* Indicates informational comment.
# Indicates required items comment.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Public Works/Engineering Review
Om Chhetri, P.E.
Civil Engineer
Phone: (817) 748-8089
E-mail: ochhetri@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil
construction plans.
2. Shared driveway access agreement with adjoining properties shall be in place.
* Construction within FM 1709 right of way shall require a permit from TxDOT.
* Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards.
* Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials.
* Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan.
* Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be
found in the City of Southlake website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/index.aspx?NID=266
WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1. The proposed dumpsters encroaches the drainage/sewer/water easements. An encroachment
agreement shall be in place before the final acceptance of the project. Any permanent
structure within easement will require an agreement.
* Based on review and research, it was found that the report prepared by Aqua Terra for
Medical Villas at Taylor Creek analyzed the fully developed condition of the watershed and
sized the downstream facilities to accept and convey the fully developed flows. Therefore, the
Case No. Attachment C
ZA17-015 Page 4
requirement of detention is waived.
* The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers
allowed before the meter on the public side. A 1” inch meter must have a 1” tap, etc.
* Fire lines shall be separate from service lines.
* All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be
constructed to City standards. Cement treated sand (CTS) backfill above the public utilities
and underneath the proposed pavement applies.
* Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City
standards.
* Property drains into a Critical Drainage Structure and requires a fee to be paid prior to
beginning construction.
* Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties
and meet the provisions of Ordinance No. 605.
INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS:
* Submit 22”x34” civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to
the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for
review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard
details and general notes which are located on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsouthlake.com/PublicWorks/engineeringdesign.asp
* Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines
pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures.
* Improvements within TxDOT Right of way requires TxDOT approval.
* A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817)
748-8082 to connect to the City’s sewer, water or storm sewer system.
* A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved
by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure.
* Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No. 836.
*=Denotes informational comment.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Community Services Review
Peter Kao
Construction Manager
Phone: (817) 748-8607
E-mail: pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us
Case No. Attachment C
ZA17-015 Page 5
Park Board comments or recommendations:
All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issu es if
requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817)
748-8607 for further details.
Land/park dedication requirements:
Non-residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1)
acre of park land for every fifty (50) non-residential gross acres of development.
If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, non-residential park dedication
fees in the amount of $8000 per gross acre x 7.501 acres= $60,008.00 will be required. Fees will be
collected with the approved developer’s agreement and prior to any permit being issued.
Pathway Comments:
Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide
pedestrian access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings.
Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with
Article V Street and Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas
accessibility requirements.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Fire Department Review
Kelly Clements
Fire Marshall
Phone: (817) 748-8233
E-mail: kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us
GENERAL COMMENTS:
The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the
riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along t he length of the pipe. If
the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a vault. Riser
rooms shall be a minimum of 5’X5’ if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of
6’X6’ if it is on the riser. (Riser room locations not indicated on plans, if FDC on building 3 is at the
riser room location, it will be further than 100 feet from the main and require a vault)
_________________________________________________________________________________
General Informational Comments:
* No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is
required prior to construction of any signs.
* This development must comply with Corridor Overlay Regulations and Residential Adjacency
Overlay Regulations, Section 43.
* All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended.
* All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and
Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended.
Case No. Attachment D
ZA17-015 Page 1
SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES
SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response
1. 321 SOUTHLAKE BLVD REAL ESTATE O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.128 NR
2. ATCC INVESTMENTS LLC O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.272 NR
3. BICENTENNIAL FIN CENTER LP SP2 250 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.166 NR
4. FIRST AMERICAN SAVINGS BANC SP2 222 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.168 NR
5. FIRST FINANCIAL BANK O1 151 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.619 F
6. HOFFMAN, HOLLY L SF20A 100 LONDONBERRY TER 0.909 O
7. IMAN, ASHER S O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.160 O
8. KESTER, PAIGE A SF20A 116 LONDONBERRY TER 0.482 O
9. LECHLER, GLORIA ETAL O1 130 S WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 7.345 F
10. LECHLER, GLORIA ETAL O1 0 S WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.223 F
11. LUTHY, ROBERT E SF20A 104 LONDONBERRY TER 0.460 O
12. MAHALO INVESTMENTS LLC O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.343 NR
13. MAHALO INVESTMENTS LLC O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 1.628 NR
14. MURPHY, TYLER C SF20A 108 LONDONBERRY TER 0.478 O
15. NMEM LTD SP1 190 S WHITE CHAPEL BLVD 0.950 F
16. O'DONNELL, PETER SF20A 120 LONDONBERRY TER 0.472 O
17. PARKHILL & WRIGHT LLC O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.136 NR
18. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF CS 300 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 10.292 NR
19. STEDKE REVOCABLE TRUST* SF20A 112 LONDONBERRY TER 0.493 O
Case No. Attachment D
ZA17-015 Page 2
(DRAKE, KURT L & JILL D)
20. SUNTREE STATION LLC SP2 110 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.903 NR
21. SUNTREE STATION LLC SP2 100 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 7.735 NR
22. TY SHAFER DDS PA O1 301 W SOUTHLAKE BLVD 0.259 F
23. Superintendent of Carroll ISD NR
24. Superintendent of Grapevine
Colleyville ISD NR
25. Superintendent of Northwest ISD NR
26. Superintendent of Keller ISD NR
*owner per adopted 2016 tax roll
Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response
Notices Sent: Twenty-Two (22)
Responses Received: Seven (7) Opposed; Four (4) In Favor
Link to Surrounding Property Owner Responses
Case No. Ord. No. 480-724
ZA17-015 Page 1
CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS
ORDINANCE NO. 480-724
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS
AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING
CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND
WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY
DESCRIBED AS LOTS 21-23, H. GRANBERRY NO. 581
ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE,
TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, APPROXIMATELY 4.094 ACRES
FROM “O-1” OFFICE DISTRICT TO “S-P-1” DETAILED SITE
PLAN DISTRICT WITH “C-2” LOCAL RETAIL COMMERCIAL
DISTRCT USES AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED SITE
PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS
EXHIBIT “B”, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER
PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING
THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL
WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND
AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS
ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES;
PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE
OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter
adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and
Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the
authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and
use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other
purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public
health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as “O-1” Office
District under the City’s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and
Case No. Ord. No. 480-724
ZA17-015 Page 2
WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property wa s requested by a
person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called
by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determinatio n as to whether
these changes should be granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians
using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and
damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and
effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types
of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and
adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use
around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by
requirements of this ordinance for off -street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress
points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing
on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health a nd the general welfare;
effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of
population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public
facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered
among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular
uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most
appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a
public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public
interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably
Case No. Ord. No. 480-724
ZA17-015 Page 3
invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the
classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the
changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, p anic,
and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and
air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and
facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and
other public requirements; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that
there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined
that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close
proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a change since the tract or tracts of land
were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning
classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best
interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote
the general health, safety and welfare of the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS:
SECTION 1.
That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and
amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas
be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below:
Case No. Ord. No. 480-724
ZA17-015 Page 4
Case No. Ord. No. 480-724
ZA17-015 Page 5
SECTION 2.
That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City
of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning.
SECTION 3.
That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described
shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all
other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing
sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning
Case No. Ord. No. 480-724
ZA17-015 Page 6
Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and
affirmed.
SECTION 4.
That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in
accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety,
morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, wi th respect to
both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable
future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent over -
crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of po pulation; and to facilitate the adequate
provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other
commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and
complete hearing with reasonable con sideration among other things of the character of the
district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the
value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the
community.
SECTION 5.
That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake,
Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except
in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conf lict with the
provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION 6.
That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and
that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described
herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of
Case No. Ord. No. 480-724
ZA17-015 Page 7
the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein.
SECTION 7.
Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to
comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be
fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a
violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 8.
All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all
violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances
affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and,
as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether
pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance
but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts.
SECTION 9.
The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed
ordinance or its caption and penalty together with a notice setting out the time and place for a
public hearing thereon at least fifteen (15) days before the second readi ng of this ordinance,
and if this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any
violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this
ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this
ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake.
SECTION 10.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and
publication as required by law, and it is so ordained.
Case No. Ord. No. 480-724
ZA17-015 Page 8
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st reading the ___day of _________ 2017.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2nd reading the ___day of _________ 2017.
________________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________________
CITY SECRETARY
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
_________________________________
CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:___________________________
ADOPTED:_______________________
EFFECTIVE:______________________
Case No. Ord. No. 480-724
ZA17-015 Page 9
EXHIBIT “A”
Case No. Ord. No. 480-724
ZA17-015 Page 10
EXHIBIT “B”
Reserved for City Council approved plans